Author Topic: Cyclone Zoe vs Cyclone Monica  (Read 6448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carlos E

  • Elephant Trunk F2
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Gender: Male
Cyclone Zoe vs Cyclone Monica
« on: 02 November 2007, 11:21:20 AM »
Ok, I have another question (not really a question, but one asking for opinion I guess).

2002's Cyclone Zoe is regarded as one of the strongest storms ever in the Southern Hemisphere. I believe it's peak pressure (correct me if I'm wrong) was in the 890's. 2006's Cyclone Monica, which struck the Northern Territory was at an estimated pressure of 905hPa at its peak power.

Which one was actually stronger in your opinion? I'm doing some research on the two, and thus far I've found that Monica remained incredibly powerful up until its landfall, and Zoe (which was actually predicted to reach winds of 170 1-min knots at one point!, although it didn't) eventually dissipated in the South Pacific.

Any responses appreciated!

Offline Michael Bath

  • storm chaser
  • Administrator
  • Wedge tornado F5
  • *
  • Posts: 1,602
  • Gender: Male
    • Australian Severe Weather
Location: Mcleans Ridges, NSW Northern Rivers
Australian Severe Weather:   http://australiasevereweather.com/
Lightning Photography:   http://www.lightningphotography.com/
Early Warning Network: http://www.ewn.com.au
Contact: Michael Bath

Offline Carlos E

  • Elephant Trunk F2
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cyclone Zoe vs Cyclone Monica
« Reply #2 on: 02 November 2007, 05:40:37 PM »
I can't believe the unofficial report estimates Monica was more intense than Tip...

It's almost surreal that it happened so close to Darwin.

Offline Carlos E

  • Elephant Trunk F2
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cyclone Zoe vs Cyclone Monica
« Reply #3 on: 03 November 2007, 11:43:39 AM »
I see, thanks for the pictures.

Monica is the closest I've even seen to "perfect" in terms of Cyclones.