http://australiasevereweather.com/ From: "Shane Williams" To: Subject: aus-wx: Cyclone Season Starts Nov 1- April 30 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 00:08:44 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All, My Name is Shane. May I just say that this is the best list I've subscribed to. Today marks the beginning of cyclone season. With all signs pointing to an El Nino event it maybe another slow year for northern Australia. I hope to see interesting events take place these next 6 months and maybe a few close encounters too. Regards Shane. Gold Coast Queensland +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 01:12:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Phil and all, hasn't been water upto the road in 6 or 7 years, went past in August and could see it off in the distance, went past last weekend couldn't see it at all this time, but it doesn't take much to fill it really, at its deapest (when full) point its only like 10m (i think). Cheers --------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra, ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------- Proud member of the Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > "Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > of water in the far distance. > I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Smith > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > wow! > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > would see > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > Matt Smith > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > weather did > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > localised dust > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in very > > sharp > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > Looked quite > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > drought > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > ). This > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > sudden > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k with the very latest Virus definition files. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 17/10/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 01:47:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Come across this just now, http://www.webone.com.au/~dougsden/lg/lg.htm Some nice pics fron OCT 2002 here. And these http://www.nexus.edu.au/ozprojects/wetlands/lake_george.htm And this might be of interest to some. http://www.abc.net.au/quantum/stories/s118097.htm http://image.ce.adfa.edu.au/research/LakeGeorge/web_html.htm Cheers --------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra, ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------- Proud member of the Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Yole" To: Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 11:10 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix off > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > PaulY > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > Thompson > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a young > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > could not see how even then. > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. Like > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > wonder where the water went. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Liam Domanski" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > > >of water in the far distance. > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > >Phil > > ><>< > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Matthew Smith > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > wow! > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > > > would see > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > weather did > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > localised dust > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in > very > > > > sharp > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > > Looked quite > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > > drought > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > > > ). This > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > > > sudden > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > + > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > - > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k with the very latest Virus definition files. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 17/10/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "macdonald" To: Subject: aus-wx: Deforestation & Effects on Climate Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:58:30 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello All,
I have been reading a text and email that i received from the chief of the CSIRO Atmospheric Research devision.
 
I have been interested in the effects of deforestation upon the regional climate. The New England is a perfect example, only have to look at the high basalt plateau around the Guyra- Ben Lomond area. I have seen photos of mother of ducks lagoon at Guyra in the early 1900s. It was thick with timber, and the lagoon was deep enough for a paddlesteamer. New England suffered from my dieback in the early 80s and late 70's, due to infestation of Christmas beetle larve... probably due to the high nutrient levels from the super phosphate.
 
The Guyra observer, Jeff, once said that he thinks that the winters in Guyra are not as cold as they used to be. It is hard know whether the climate is warming. I personaly believe that the climate goes through cycles.
 
"If forests are removed and replaced by pasture, the reflectivity may rise by 10 % or more, depending on soil types ( dark soils would absorb more reflective light), vegetation that replaces the forest. Energy input to the region that is deforested is decreased, hence changing the regional climate.
 
Forests on the earth's surface, cause areodynamic drag that slows the movement of air masses over the earth's surface.  Removal of the forests and the replacement of them by pastures, leads to a signifcant change in drag and this influences the climate systems."
 
Cheers
Sam
 
 
From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:23:51 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I thought it was 'supposed' to be connected to a lake somewhere in New Zealand :-) (Actually, these legends may really be a manifestation of the fact that rainfall in this region is strongly related to ENSO, so it wouldn't be a surprise if Lake George tended to be low in periods when a lake somewhere in the world that gets more rain during El Nino events is high, and vice versa). Lake George also tends to respond to rainfall anomalies on the multi-year timescale. It was very high during the wet periods of the mid-70s and late 80s/early 90s. Prior to the last year or so, 1982 was the only time since the 60s that it had been completely dry (and then only briefly), but I believe it was dry or mostly dry for about 15 years in the 20s/30s. (It's also very sensitive to evaporation; during the last Ice Age it was much deeper (20-30 metres) than it is now, despite lower rainfall). In 1982 the ACT Cross Country Club ran a race across it. I'm not sure if they have any plans for a repeat performance this year. Blair > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix off > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > PaulY > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > Thompson > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a young > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > could not see how even then. > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. Like > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > wonder where the water went. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Liam Domanski" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > > >of water in the far distance. > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > >Phil > > ><>< > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Matthew Smith > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > wow! > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > > > would see > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > weather did > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > localised dust > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in > very > > > > sharp > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > > Looked quite > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > > drought > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > > > ). This > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > > > sudden > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > + > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > - > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 13:10:13 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Blair, Thanks for that tremendous insight even if it did destroy some tales. Jimmy Deguara At 12:23 PM 1/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >I thought it was 'supposed' to be connected to a lake somewhere in >New Zealand :-) (Actually, these legends may really be a manifestation >of the fact that rainfall in this region is strongly related to >ENSO, so it wouldn't be a surprise if Lake George tended to be low >in periods when a lake somewhere in the world that gets more rain >during El Nino events is high, and vice versa). > >Lake George also tends to respond to rainfall anomalies on the >multi-year timescale. It was very high during the wet periods of >the mid-70s and late 80s/early 90s. Prior to the last year or so, >1982 was the only time since the 60s that it had been completely >dry (and then only briefly), but I believe it was dry or mostly >dry for about 15 years in the 20s/30s. > >(It's also very sensitive to evaporation; during the last Ice Age it >was much deeper (20-30 metres) than it is now, despite lower >rainfall). > >In 1982 the ACT Cross Country Club ran a race across it. I'm not >sure if they have any plans for a repeat performance this year. > >Blair > > > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix off > > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > > Thompson > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a young > > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > > could not see how even then. > > > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. Like > > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > > wonder where the water went. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Liam Domanski" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around > > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, > > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > > > >of water in the far distance. > > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > > > >Phil > > > ><>< > > > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Matthew Smith > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > wow! > > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not > something you > > > > > would see > > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > > weather did > > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > > localised dust > > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in > > very > > > > > sharp > > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > > > Looked quite > > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > > > drought > > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > > > > ). This > > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra > trip, a > > > > > sudden > > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of > > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > + > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 14:23:01 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I remember going on a fieldtrip to Lake George in either 1st or 2nd year Uni - we were taking soil cores from the northwestern shore of the Lake (which during 1975/76 was very close to the road, with the ground being generally sodden if I remember correctly - footrot was rife in the area) - I remember the sleet that day, oddly far better than I remember the soil cores . I'll dig out my history books and see what I can glean from the locah historians of the region as there are a number of mentions of Lake George and its disappearing act over the last ~100 years. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- > I thought it was 'supposed' to be connected to a lake somewhere in > New Zealand :-) (Actually, these legends may really be a manifestation > of the fact that rainfall in this region is strongly related to > ENSO, so it wouldn't be a surprise if Lake George tended to be low > in periods when a lake somewhere in the world that gets more rain > during El Nino events is high, and vice versa). > > Lake George also tends to respond to rainfall anomalies on the > multi-year timescale. It was very high during the wet periods of > the mid-70s and late 80s/early 90s. Prior to the last year or so, > 1982 was the only time since the 60s that it had been completely > dry (and then only briefly), but I believe it was dry or mostly > dry for about 15 years in the 20s/30s. > > (It's also very sensitive to evaporation; during the last Ice Age it > was much deeper (20-30 metres) than it is now, despite lower > rainfall). > > In 1982 the ACT Cross Country Club ran a race across it. I'm not > sure if they have any plans for a repeat performance this year. > > Blair > > > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix off > > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > > Thompson > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a young > > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > > could not see how even then. > > > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. Like > > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > > wonder where the water went. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Liam Domanski" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around > > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, > > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > > > >of water in the far distance. > > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > > > >Phil > > > ><>< > > > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Matthew Smith > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > wow! > > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > > > > would see > > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > > weather did > > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > > localised dust > > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in > > very > > > > > sharp > > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > > > Looked quite > > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > > > drought > > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > > > > ). This > > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > > > > sudden > > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > + > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > - > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 18:18:08 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com We got Jeff kennet > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix off > South Australia...LOL Similar story except my father said it was > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. Looks like that Jeff Kennet is still up to his old tricks... Now he's pinching whole *Cities* from South Australia!!! :( :) LOL Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Yole" To: Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:40 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix off > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > PaulY > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > Thompson > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a young > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > could not see how even then. > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. Like > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > wonder where the water went. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 19:54:13 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, a little light reading about the Lake and the landscape in which it is set, taken from the wonderful book "The Face of Australia" Charles F Laseron 1957 (3 scanned pages) http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Archives/lakeg1a.jpg http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Archives/lakeg2a.jpg http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Archives/lakeg3a.jpg Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Thompson" To: Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:53 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a young > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > could not see how even then. > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. Like > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > wonder where the water went. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Liam Domanski" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > > >of water in the far distance. > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > >Phil > > ><>< > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Matthew Smith > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > wow! > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > > > would see > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > weather did > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > localised dust > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in > very > > > > sharp > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > > Looked quite > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > > drought > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > > > ). This > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > > > sudden > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- - > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > + > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au--------------------------- -- > > > > - > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- - > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- - > > > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: supercells... how to recognize them...? Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 20:57:27 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Some more interesting and thought provoking discussion borrowed from the wx-chase list based in the USA for those of you who aren't involved...seems that everyone's interested in the 'definition'........ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:49:18 -0500 From: "Dickson, Dan" Subject: Re: supercells... how to recognize them...? This might be is a stupid question, but I'm curious: when stormchasing, is there any way to visually know you are looking at a supercell, as opposed to just a regular cell w/anvil etc.? I remember reading in a chase report that the chaser (i don't remember who or where this was) could "see that the cell was supercellular". Isn't the technical definition just that the updraft is of a certain strength? Are there any indicators out in the field that a cell is a supercell? What about when looking at a radar image? -=dan, so many dumb questions, so little time... ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:05:54 -0600 From: Lon Curtis Subject: supercells... how to recognize them...? "Dickson, Dan" wrote: > This might be is a stupid question, but I'm curious: when stormchasing, is > there any way to visually know you are looking at a supercell, as opposed to > just a regular cell w/anvil etc.? I remember reading in a chase report that > the chaser (i don't remember who or where this was) could "see that the cell > was supercellular". Isn't the technical definition just that the updraft is > of a certain strength? Are there any indicators out in the field that a > cell is a supercell? What about when looking at a radar image? = Let me answer the last question first ... The general definition of a supercell is a thunderstorm that has a persistent mesocyclone. A mesocyclone can be detected by doppler radar utilizing either algorithms that search the volume scan for velocity data satisfying a predetermined structure, or by human interpretation of velocity products, in particular, velocity products adjusted for storm-relative motion. The presence of a mesocyclone can also be inferred from radar imagery (not restricted to doppler data) showing the presence of a persistent BWER (bounded weak echo region), which is generally interpreted to depict the very intense updraft which causes hydrometeors (rain, graupel, hail) to remain well aloft above the updraft. A pendant or hook echo is often seen in association with supercell storms. The hook echo is now thought to be caused by a thin curtain of hydrometors (usually rain) wrapping around the "back" side of the mesocyclone. I'll let everyone 'chew' on those thoughts while I work on the first question. Lon Curtis ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:14:40 -0600 From: Lon Curtis Subject: supercells... how to recognize them...? "Dickson, Dan" wrote: > This might be is a stupid question, but I'm curious: when stormchasing, is > there any way to visually know you are looking at a supercell, as opposed to > just a regular cell w/anvil etc.? I remember reading in a chase report that > the chaser (i don't remember who or where this was) could "see that the cell > was supercellular". Isn't the technical definition just that the updraft is > of a certain strength? Are there any indicators out in the field that a > cell is a supercell? What about when looking at a radar image? = Answering the initial question ... Probably the most useful visual clue that a storm is a supercell is the presence of a PERSISTENT ROTATING wall cloud. I emphasize that the wall cloud must be both persistent and rotating. The wall cloud is thought to be the lower extension of the "rotating" updraft that is detected by radar as a mesocyclone, so in one sense, you could say that rotating wall cloud equals mesocyclone, and therefore, confirms a the storm is a supercell. However, there are many supercells that do not have a visible wall cloud, and some produce tornadoes without a visible wall cloud. Other visual features that can HELP in identifying a supercell are: overshooting top above intense convective tower, the presence of a back-sheared anvil, often with knuckles protruding toward the upwind side of the storm, inflow bands that appear to spiral into the storm core, and striations of the main cloud tower that suggest rotation. There are probably others, and perhaps we will hear from others on the list with their thoughts on this question. Lon Curtis ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:23:43 -0800 From: Michael Cohen Subject: Re: supercells... how to recognize them...? Dan, One major updraft is a good visual clue.Banding around the storm showing rotation. Overshooting top with a smooth sharp anvil and knuckles on the back side of the storm.How about a rainfree base with a rotating wall cloud. Beaver tail with midlevel inflow jets. This is a good start. Michael Cohen ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:47:12 +0000 From: Shane Adams Subject: Re: supercells... how to recognize them...? The main distinguising factor in my opinion, like Michael said, is ONE updraft. You can have a severe multi-cell cluster happening with numerous, vigorous updrafts.....but in various stages of development; intensifying, mature, decaying, and everything in between. A supercell updraft is dominant, rogue, and extremely volatile. Also, sometimes you can discern a rotational characteristic in the updraft, which is referred to loosely as a "barber pole", and sometimes you can actually see the physical "lean" of this feature; the mid-upper level winds blowing the top portion of the updraft further downwind than the bottom, letting precip fall free of the updraft's heart, allowing warm moist air to continously pour in (which is what keeps them humming along for hours at a time). It's a truly beautiful and amazing process. As far as supercell types, they all have the dominant updraft. Here are some distinguishing factors found with each variety: Classic: To me, one of the most tell-tale signs of a classic is the presence of a distinct flanking line. Also, the rain/hail core will be next to the updraft area, with a (possible) inflow feeder coming in from the opposite side as the flanking line. Low-precipitation: Where classics often have flanking lines, LPs often have a "cut-off", or tiered edge. The inflow cascades up the the back side into the updraft, creating a beautiful, sculpted edge. High-precipitation: These are just big nasty blobs of rotating love. Often times they'll have two precip areas, associated with both their RFD and FFD. They don't like to follow the classic supercell pattern of rain/heavy rain/hail/giant/hail/tornado. These guys can put down a love tube on their front flank or their RFD, and they don't always give you warning signs like hail before the tornado. Ask anyone who was driving down I-40 near Lela, TX on June 11, 1997. These are just a few observations that I've noted from personal experience; I'm sure some of the veteran guys could greatly expound on this. Looking foward to seeing some of those posts. Shane Adams http://www.passiontwist.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:10:47 -0600 From: Lon Curtis Subject: Re: supercells... how to recognize them...? Shane Adams wrote: > The main distinguising factor in my opinion, like Michael said, is ONE > updraft. You can have a severe multi-cell cluster happening with numerous, > vigorous updrafts.....but in various stages of development; intensifying, > mature, decaying, and everything in between. A supercell updraft is > dominant, rogue, and extremely volatile. = I beg to differ on this "one" updraft concept. The question was about visual and radar clues for identifying a supercell and I don't think it helps anyone to suggest that you can discern how many updrafts a storm has visually, although sometimes a very talented radar operator may be able to do so using the many tools associated with doppler radar. Updrafts are mostly composed of air containing water vapor and neither the human eye nor radar (in reflectivity mode) detect water vapor. In fact, the flanking line cited by Shane is composed of cloud features that contain water vapor that has been condensed (into fine particles of water, what we call "clouds"). Within these features, there are distinct updrafts that may be carrying water vapor high into the atmosphere (and at very high velocities), but the human eye sees only the condensed water in the form of clouds. I would subscribe to the notion that the supercell represents a storm that has single "dominant" updraft. But keep in mind that in some instances, the flanking line may feed replacement updrafts into the supercell storm, with each succeeding updraft becoming the "dominant" updraft. Lon Curtis ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:07:07 -0600 From: Sam Barricklow Subject: VLF Lightning Sounds and supercell appearance Since chasing is slow, here is something for chasers who are also lightning buffs. Listen to the audio files at: http://www.spaceweathersounds.com/sndbites.htm And, go to the following URL to see a supercell from start to finish: http://www.k5kj.net/010601.htm and http://www.k5kj.net/990503.htm Note the hard edge to the anvil and the inflow band extending to the left: http://www.k5kj.net/99053101.jpg The hard anvil edge is apparent on several images at: http://www.k5kj.net/990516.htm And, for rotating updrafts, check this one out: http://www.k5kj.net/lamesa06.jpg Here's a supercell at night. This one was producing a 1/2 mile wide tornado at the time. http://www.k5kj.net/920615cx.jpg more are at http://www.k5kj.net/920615.htm Sam ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 18:15:09 -0800 From: Bill Combes Subject: Re: supercells... how to recognize them...? Definition from the NWS in Norman: *Supercell - A thunderstorm with a persistent rotating updraft. Supercells are rare, but are responsible for a remarkably high percentage of severe weather events - especially tornadoes, extremely large hail and damaging straight-line winds. They frequently travel to the right of the main environmental winds (i.e., they are right movers). Radar characteristics often (but not always) include a hook or pendant, bounded weak echo region (BWER), V-notch, mesocyclone, and sometimes a TVS. Visual characteristics often include a rain-free base (with or without a wall cloud), tail cloud, flanking line, overshooting top, and back-sheared anvil, all of which normally are observed in or near the right rear or southwest part of the storm (Fig. 7). Storms exhibiting these characteristics often are called classic supercells; however HP storms (Fig. 3) and LP storms (Fig. 5) also are supercell varieties #### I want to comment on the use of the term supercell without getting flamed. In my opinion, the term is used more often than it should be. I've seen small storms with a rain free base described as a supercell just because it had a rain free base. I use a combination of techniques in my analysis of whether or not a storm is exhibiting supercellular characteristics. Satellite really helps in my opinion. Radar, storm motion, and visuals combined are a great way to make a determination. Anyhow, there are a few great papers by Doswell on this topic. Great discussion for the off season. - Bill Combes www.f5tornadosafaris.com www.anythingweather.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 02:22:22 +0000 From: Shane Adams Subject: Re: supercells... how to recognize them...? <<>> That's what I was referring to. Perhaps I should've made myself more clear. I used the multicell updraft comparison to show that supercells have one dominant updraft VS the multiple updrafts in a multicell. <<>> You don't think describing how to identify dominant supercell updrafts is helpful as a visual clue? It's very possible to discern a dominant supercell updraft visually, otherwise there wouldn't be a lot of successful chasers. And if someone can show a new chaser how to identify a dominant updraft in the field, then I'd say that person has been helped along pretty well. Shane Adams http://www.passiontwist.net ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:56:17 -0500 From: Ed Verkaik Subject: Re: supercells... how to recognize them...? From: "Bill Combes" > I want to comment on the use of the term supercell > without getting flamed. In my opinion, the term is > used more often than it should be. Both "supercell" and "wall cloud" are regularly overused, even by some veteran chasetrs. It's only human nature for a chaser to want a storm or lowering to be this way. Exaggeration is part of the story, even when we're talking to ourselves! Up close under a supercell, most of the proof depends on the wall cloud or other evidence of rotation. Most other features can occur with intense multicell or even pulse storms. Factors like longevity, size, and motion (deviant) are fairly convincing but features like overshoot, knuckles, etc. are often brief and associated with one particularly strong phase in a storm. Persistence is key. From a distance, the clues are tougher. The anvil's smoothness (no "flakes"), sharpness and density (dark near edge) and uniformity are good clues. Supercells also have very persistent static, with lots of shorter crackles, and uniform activity over time. If you can see the updraft region, towers rising in the main updraft are often very close together, i.e. they are steeply "staircased." A short flanking line is also a good indicator, especially for LP supercells. A sharp backsheared anvil is good as long as you know winds aloft are strong, since anvils will spread upwind easily in lighter flow (like summer). I would add that supercells tend to be fairly "tidy" and concentrated in appearance. All visible elements line up, belong together, seem to be operating as one system. Strong storms have subsidence around them that cause smaller cumulus to evaporate. A sudden decrease in smaller clouds near a storm may indicate the onset of a severe phase. If all else fails, you can wait for Weatheradio tornado warnings. :-) EdV ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:49:04 -0600 From: Chris Novy Subject: Re: supercells... how to recognize them...? Ed Verkaik writes... >Both "supercell" and "wall cloud" are regularly overused, even by some >veteran chasetrs. It's only human nature for a chaser to want a storm or >lowering to be this way. Exaggeration is part of the story, even when >we're talking to ourselves! Ed makes an excellent point and it's one I plan on addressing more in my SKYWARN talks next year --assuming the next ice age hasn't arrived. I've seen a tendency for spotters and chasers to automatically label any big storm which is not a squall line as being a supercell. In term of spotting this isn't directly a problem since NWS does not issue supercell warnings. Where I've seen trouble, however, is when spotters assume they are looking at a supercell and then try to fit what they are actually seeing with the conceptual model of supercell. Here, a roll cloud (outflow-related) is perceived as a beavers tail (inflow-related) and isolated lowerings become wall clouds. A patch of lighter sky becomes a clear slot. Once a spotter is convinced that his/her storm is something special it's my belief that they are more likely to interpret other features such as dust and low hanging clouds as signs of tornado development. When training spotters I'm always careful to stress that they watch things for a while and that they don't jump to conclusions based on a single observation. For instance, while power flashes can be associated with tornadoes striking power lines they can also be caused by lightning-related power surges, wind-blown trees with overgrown branches making contact with the lines, and even drunk drivers striking phone poles. Low clouds with rotation may or may not be a wall cloud and even if they *are* a wall cloud the rotation may not be significant in and of itself. Since most of the storms I get to see are HP in nature and have little if any visible structure, I tend to rely a lot of radar to get an idea what's going on. Products like SWIFT, StormLab, and WeatherTap can really be helpful in determining what exactly you are looking at ad positioning yourself in the right part of the storm to see a tornado and avoid being slammed by hail. For me, I chase to see interesting clouds. Tornadoes are incidental --andb rare. I'm less interested in what kind of storm I'm looking at and more interested in being in a position to get good stable video of it and keep up with it. ..Chris.. -------------------------------- -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 22:33:20 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It used to actually support a fishery ! Now where those fish hole up during the dry times has me wondering. If it were 20 to 30 metres deeper it probably would start overflowing into Mulwaree Ponds or some other river near Goulburn. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Blair Trewin" To: Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 12:23 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > I thought it was 'supposed' to be connected to a lake somewhere in > New Zealand :-) (Actually, these legends may really be a manifestation > of the fact that rainfall in this region is strongly related to > ENSO, so it wouldn't be a surprise if Lake George tended to be low > in periods when a lake somewhere in the world that gets more rain > during El Nino events is high, and vice versa). > > Lake George also tends to respond to rainfall anomalies on the > multi-year timescale. It was very high during the wet periods of > the mid-70s and late 80s/early 90s. Prior to the last year or so, > 1982 was the only time since the 60s that it had been completely > dry (and then only briefly), but I believe it was dry or mostly > dry for about 15 years in the 20s/30s. > > (It's also very sensitive to evaporation; during the last Ice Age it > was much deeper (20-30 metres) than it is now, despite lower > rainfall). > > In 1982 the ACT Cross Country Club ran a race across it. I'm not > sure if they have any plans for a repeat performance this year. > > Blair > > > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix off > > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > > Thompson > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a young > > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > > could not see how even then. > > > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. Like > > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > > wonder where the water went. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Liam Domanski" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around > > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, > > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > > > >of water in the far distance. > > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > > > >Phil > > > ><>< > > > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Matthew Smith > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > wow! > > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > > > > would see > > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > > weather did > > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > > localised dust > > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in > > very > > > > > sharp > > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > > > Looked quite > > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > > > drought > > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > > > > ). This > > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > > > > sudden > > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > + > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > - > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 22:34:20 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks for those Links ! Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 1:47 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > Come across this just now, > http://www.webone.com.au/~dougsden/lg/lg.htm > Some nice pics fron OCT 2002 here. > And these > http://www.nexus.edu.au/ozprojects/wetlands/lake_george.htm > > And this might be of interest to some. > http://www.abc.net.au/quantum/stories/s118097.htm > http://image.ce.adfa.edu.au/research/LakeGeorge/web_html.htm > > Cheers > --------------------------------- > Simon Angell > Canberra, ACT > www.canberra-wx.com > --------------------------------------------- > Proud member of the > Australian Severe Weather Association. > www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Yole" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 11:10 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix > off > > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > > Thompson > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a > young > > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > > could not see how even then. > > > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. > Like > > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > > wonder where the water went. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Liam Domanski" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going > around > > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach > Ness, > > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > > > >of water in the far distance. > > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust > is > > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > > > >Phil > > > ><>< > > > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Matthew Smith > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > wow! > > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something > you > > > > > would see > > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > > weather did > > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > > localised dust > > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in > > very > > > > > sharp > > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > > > Looked quite > > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > > > drought > > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in > comparison > > > > > ). This > > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, > a > > > > > sudden > > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > + > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k > with the very latest Virus definition files. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 17/10/2002 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 22:42:04 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Jane, that sounds like one interesting book !! Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 7:54 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > Evening all, > > a little light reading about the Lake and the landscape in which it is > set, taken from the wonderful book "The Face of Australia" Charles F > Laseron 1957 (3 scanned pages) > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Archives/lakeg1a.jpg > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Archives/lakeg2a.jpg > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Archives/lakeg3a.jpg > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Thompson" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:53 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a > young > > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector > and > > could not see how even then. > > > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. > Like > > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > > wonder where the water went. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Liam Domanski" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going > around > > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach > Ness, > > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and > the > > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as > a > > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a > puddle > > > >of water in the far distance. > > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the > dust is > > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > > > >Phil > > > ><>< > > > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Matthew Smith > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > wow! > > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not > something you > > > > > would see > > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > > weather did > > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > > localised dust > > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted > in > > very > > > > > sharp > > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at > highest. > > > > > Looked quite > > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown > and > > > > > drought > > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in > comparison > > > > > ). This > > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra > trip, a > > > > > sudden > > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: > 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of > > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > + > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of > > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au--------------------------- > -- > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > -- > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tornadoes in Perth Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 00:50:19 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Channel 10 late news had some damage footage from weak Tornadoes (coldies) associated with last nights vigorous frontal passage through Perth. Significant structural damage occurred in Mt. Pleasant and Thornlie (again) in narrow strips. I called up my folks who live in Thornlie.., said it started to rain, then there was a awesome roaring noise like a line of gravel trucks going past and a humungous wind that bent all the trees double in different directions. Lasted only a few minutes then it just rained with normal gusty wind, total 22mm. Some lightning and distant thunder. "Never seen anything like it" said Mum who was looking out the window to see what all the noise was about. Congratulations to Channel 10 for describing the events as tornadoes and even managing to completely avoid the "mini" prefix! (Personally I still prefer "Cock-eyed bobs", LOL) John. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 04:18:50 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: aus-wx: SA STORMS To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I have to say I have nice timing. I'm currently spending a week working in Adelaide, and have timed it well to encounter one of the best storm set-ups in Adelaide for probably a couple of years. No sleep so far for many of us and the sun will be soon getting up... The first line of storms hit Adelaide at approx. 2.30am or so - mainly in southern and coastal suburbs. Quickly afterwards another lot of storms developed in less than 20 minutes to the north of the city to my delight. In just 2 radar frames the inital cell went from nothing to red just to my north. I recieved small hail and severe wind gusts plus numerous close Cgs. I hope the photos turn out... Currently (4.45am) a very nice looking squall line stretches from Kangaroo Island to Port Augusta and should hit Adelaide within about an hour. Will update later on... plus I'm sure others will as well. Regards, Tim Eckert. (currently at Elizabeth, Adelaide) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 04:26:15 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: aus-wx: SA STORMS To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Also, an interesting point of note is Adelaide's minimum temperature. So far it hasnt gone below 24.8C and is currently back up to 27.1 at 4.50am which I think is almost unheard of... Would be interesting to see what the minimum ends up being and how far off the November record it is?? From memory I think the all time record is about 29 or 30C but no idea what November's is? +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 07:20:52 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: SA STORMS Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Time Adelaide does have hot nights quite often. It had a min of 29.0 on 2 November 1987; its November record is 30.2 in 1922 all time record 33.5 in Jan 1982. Don White Tim Eckert wrote: > > Also, an interesting point of note is Adelaide's > minimum temperature. So far it hasnt gone below > 24.8C and is currently back up to 27.1 at 4.50am > which I think is almost unheard of... Would be > interesting to see what the minimum ends up being > and how far off the November record it is?? From > memory I think the all time record is about 29 or 30C > but no idea what November's is? > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 07:06:27 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: SA STORMS To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Don for that... The squall line has moved through Adelaide now with some great Cg crawlers, mostly dry storms again so i hope it doesnt start to many fires. Tim. ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 07:20:52 +1100 >From: Don White >Subject: Re: aus-wx: SA STORMS >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Time >Adelaide does have hot nights quite often. >It had a min of 29.0 on 2 November 1987; its November record is 30.2 in >1922 all time record 33.5 in Jan 1982. >Don White > >Tim Eckert wrote: >> >> Also, an interesting point of note is Adelaide's >> minimum temperature. So far it hasnt gone below >> 24.8C and is currently back up to 27.1 at 4.50am >> which I think is almost unheard of... Would be >> interesting to see what the minimum ends up being >> and how far off the November record it is?? From >> memory I think the all time record is about 29 or 30C >> but no idea what November's is? >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------- ----------------- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: OCT 2002 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 17:54:17 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Greetings from the Natural State:
Heres the weather for Mena, Arkansas for October, 2002:
 
Avg. High: 66.5F(19.1C)
Avg. Low: 50.0F(10.0C)
        High: 87F(30.5C), Oct. 2
        Low: 36F(2.2C), Oct. 15
Rain for Month: 8.00IN(203.2mm)
                     (+2.90IN/+73.6mm)
Rain for year: 54.20IN(1,376.6mm)
                     (+6.90IN/+175.2mm)
We've seen very little sunshine from Oct. 19-31+, an unusually long cloudy period, due to an active Subtropical Jet Stream (which is actually keeping the very cold air to our north). The fall foliage here is starting to look very good. Wish ya'll were here.
Wishing everyone a Safe and Happy November.
Yours   (trying to do a Sun dance) David Powell
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 08:46:02 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: Subject: aus-wx: preparation for storm chasing ... X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com When chasing it is essential to keep track of the time so that you can accurately write up your reports later. It is also essential to bring your laptop with a satellite Internet connection to keep up with the latest weather developments. Now you can save the weight of carrying both a laptop and a wristwatch... After years of work, computer science graduate students at the University of Poland have finally finished their Internet-based digital clock: http://www.yugop.com/ver3/stuff/03/fla.html Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.109.174.138] From: "John Roenfeldt" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tornadoes in Perth Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 08:49:27 +0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2002 00:50:18.0789 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0B8E550:01C28209] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Channel 7 did a good report here in Perth as well. They even had some animated graphics illustrating theyre commentary. 24 houses were damaged. John Roenfeldt ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:50 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tornadoes in Perth > Hi all, > > Channel 10 late news had some damage footage from weak Tornadoes (coldies) > associated with last nights vigorous frontal passage through Perth. > Significant structural damage occurred in Mt. Pleasant and Thornlie (again) > in narrow strips. > > I called up my folks who live in Thornlie.., said it started to rain, then > there was a awesome roaring noise like a line of gravel trucks going past > and a humungous wind that bent all the trees double in different directions. > Lasted only a few minutes then it just rained with normal gusty wind, total > 22mm. Some lightning and distant thunder. "Never seen anything like it" > said Mum who was looking out the window to see what all the noise was about. > > Congratulations to Channel 10 for describing the events as tornadoes and > even managing to completely avoid the "mini" prefix! (Personally I still > prefer "Cock-eyed bobs", LOL) > > John. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 12:13:55 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: preparation for storm chasing ... Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 08:46 AM 2/11/2002 +0800, you wrote: >When chasing it is essential to keep track of the time so that you can >accurately write up your reports later. >It is also essential to bring your laptop with a satellite Internet >connection to keep up with the latest weather developments. Well, I'm working on a way to put some obs (especially storm locations) onto the airwaves, so instead of a satellite connection, all you will need is a scanning receiver to team up with the laptop, and a bit of free software. No ongoing charges, and being receive only, no licence required. >Now you can save the weight of carrying both a laptop and a wristwatch... >After years of work, computer science graduate students at the >University of Poland have finally finished their Internet-based >digital clock: LOL, I like it! :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 12:05:06 +1030 From: Richard Albury X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: SA STORMS Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tim Eckert wrote: > I have to say I have nice timing. I'm currently > spending a week working in Adelaide, and have timed > it well to encounter one of the best storm set-ups in > Adelaide for probably a couple of years. > No sleep so far for many of us and the sun will be > soon getting up... > The first line of storms hit Adelaide at approx. 2.30am > or so - mainly in southern and coastal suburbs. > Quickly afterwards another lot of storms developed in > less than 20 minutes to the north of the city to my > delight. In just 2 radar frames the inital cell went from > nothing to red just to my north. I recieved small hail > and severe wind gusts plus numerous close Cgs. I > hope the photos turn out... > Currently (4.45am) a very nice looking squall line > stretches from Kangaroo Island to Port Augusta and > should hit Adelaide within about an hour. > Will update later on... plus I'm sure others will as well. > Regards, > Tim Eckert. > (currently at Elizabeth, Adelaide) > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Hi :) Had two massive thunderstorms pass over me at Kurralta Park early this morning (02;25) and (03,15 am). The first storm lightning followed by the claps of thunder shook my house to the foundations and I lost power for 10 minutes. The storm passed directly overhead heading SE towards Strathalbyn. The second cell passed NE of me over Pt. Adelaide heading over Para Hills and points east. I recorded only a trace of rain. Richard Kurralta Park. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "twc" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: preparation for storm chasing ... Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:28:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tony, are you thinking of using Packet? Cheers, Paul -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Tony Langdon (VK3JED) Sent: Saturday, 2 November 2002 12:14 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: preparation for storm chasing ... At 08:46 AM 2/11/2002 +0800, you wrote: >When chasing it is essential to keep track of the time so that you can >accurately write up your reports later. It is also essential to bring >your laptop with a satellite Internet connection to keep up with the >latest weather developments. Well, I'm working on a way to put some obs (especially storm locations) onto the airwaves, so instead of a satellite connection, all you will need is a scanning receiver to team up with the laptop, and a bit of free software. No ongoing charges, and being receive only, no licence required. >Now you can save the weight of carrying both a laptop and a >wristwatch... After years of work, computer science graduate students >at the University of Poland have finally finished their Internet-based >digital clock: LOL, I like it! :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:27:01 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > It used to actually support a fishery ! > > Now where those fish hole up during the dry times has me wondering. > > If it were 20 to 30 metres deeper it probably would start overflowing into > Mulwaree Ponds or some other river near Goulburn. > > Michael > Actually into the Yass catchment at Geary's Gap (SW side), IIRC. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 15:17:19 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: RE: aus-wx: preparation for storm chasing ... Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 01:28 PM 2/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Hi Tony, are you thinking of using Packet? Yeah, more specifically, APRS. Have to get the TNC hooked up to the radio and it'll fire up nicely. :) APRS is unconnected "broadcast" mode, so it can be monitored easily. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: mbath at mail.ozemail.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 15:55:13 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Michael Bath Subject: Re: aus-wx: OCT 2002 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com How many rain days did the rain fall on Dave ? At my location on the NSW North Coast, I recorded 39.0mm on 6 days for Oct, almost all of which fell during Sunday 27th. YTD 827.0mm on 102 days. Normal for this part of the world from 1 Jan to 31 Oct is about 1600mm, so we're only around 50 per cent. The main storage dam is now at 33 % of capacity. It's never been anywhere near this low before. cheers, Michael At 05:54 PM 1/11/2002 -0600, you wrote: >Greetings from the Natural State: >Heres the weather for Mena, Arkansas for October, 2002: > >Avg. High: 66.5F(19.1C) >Avg. Low: 50.0F(10.0C) > High: 87F(30.5C), Oct. 2 > Low: 36F(2.2C), Oct. 15 >Rain for Month: 8.00IN(203.2mm) > (+2.90IN/+73.6mm) >Rain for year: 54.20IN(1,376.6mm) > (+6.90IN/+175.2mm) >We've seen very little sunshine from Oct. 19-31+, an unusually long cloudy >period, due to an active Subtropical Jet Stream (which is actually keeping >the very cold air to our north). The fall foliage here is starting to look >very good. Wish ya'll were here. >Wishing everyone a Safe and Happy November. >Yours (trying to do a Sun dance) David Powell =================================================================== Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ =================================================================== From: "David James Powell" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OCT 2002 X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.00 X-IPAddress: 208.189.4.110 Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 23:32:27 -0600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'Day Michael: The rain fell on 12 days in October. We only need less than a half-inch more to assure another year of above normal rainfall. (I'll try to do a Raindance for you). Best(Wet)Wishes David Powell > > How many rain days did the rain fall on Dave ? > > At my location on the NSW North Coast, I recorded 39.0mm on 6 days for Oct, > almost all of which fell during Sunday 27th. YTD 827.0mm on 102 days. > Normal for this part of the world from 1 Jan to 31 Oct is about 1600mm, so > we're only around 50 per cent. The main storage dam is now at 33 % of > capacity. It's never been anywhere near this low before. > > cheers, Michael > > > At 05:54 PM 1/11/2002 -0600, you wrote: > > >Greetings from the Natural State: > >Heres the weather for Mena, Arkansas for October, 2002: > > > >Avg. High: 66.5F(19.1C) > >Avg. Low: 50.0F(10.0C) > > High: 87F(30.5C), Oct. 2 > > Low: 36F(2.2C), Oct. 15 > >Rain for Month: 8.00IN(203.2mm) > > (+2.90IN/+73.6mm) > >Rain for year: 54.20IN(1,376.6mm) > > (+6.90IN/+175.2mm) > >We've seen very little sunshine from Oct. 19- 31+, an unusually long cloudy > >period, due to an active Subtropical Jet Stream (which is actually keeping > >the very cold air to our north). The fall foliage here is starting to look > >very good. Wish ya'll were here. > >Wishing everyone a Safe and Happy November. > >Yours (trying to do a Sun dance) David Powell > > > ================================================== ================= > Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au > McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ > North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ > Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ > ================================================== ================= > > -- Sent using Voltage Net Webmail http://www.voltage.net/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: OCT 2002 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:32:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I can't recall a decent rain here this month, only the muddy rain a couple weeks back. i suspect that we didn't recieve the average rain this month, but we are now into novemeber and interestingly enough in the last 3 years November is the only month to have above Average rainfall in all 3 years, hopefully it will continue into a Fourth. Some intersting rainfall stats happening this year, for YTD (to end September) we 17.9mm Above average (due to Febuarary's 211mm) But for March to september we are 104mm Down on average with only 2 months recording Above average rainfall (1.1mm in June and 5.5mm in Septmeber). I suspect that October's deficit will all but wipe out any benifit with YTD. Interesting the Bom Commented on Evaporation earlier this week, we lost over double the daily expected Evap on 2 consecutive days, with over 12mm evap'd daily instead of the average 6mm daily.., Just another testimate to El-Nino and how dry the airmass has been recently. Today on the other hand although still dry, the Easterly seabreeze came in Yesterday day evening driving the Dp from -6.5 to 9.0 in 1 hour, bringin Stratus Cover wind has tended to hang around all day limit max temp below 25C (forecast was 30C) and Dp has remained relativly steady around 9C, there is a slight Possibiltiy of Some precip and Thunder tonight/Sun Morning but im not getting my hope up too much. Cheers --------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra, ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------- Proud member of the Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Bath" To: Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: OCT 2002 > How many rain days did the rain fall on Dave ? > > At my location on the NSW North Coast, I recorded 39.0mm on 6 days for Oct, > almost all of which fell during Sunday 27th. YTD 827.0mm on 102 days. > Normal for this part of the world from 1 Jan to 31 Oct is about 1600mm, so > we're only around 50 per cent. The main storage dam is now at 33 % of > capacity. It's never been anywhere near this low before. > > cheers, Michael > > > At 05:54 PM 1/11/2002 -0600, you wrote: > > >Greetings from the Natural State: > >Heres the weather for Mena, Arkansas for October, 2002: > > > >Avg. High: 66.5F(19.1C) > >Avg. Low: 50.0F(10.0C) > > High: 87F(30.5C), Oct. 2 > > Low: 36F(2.2C), Oct. 15 > >Rain for Month: 8.00IN(203.2mm) > > (+2.90IN/+73.6mm) > >Rain for year: 54.20IN(1,376.6mm) > > (+6.90IN/+175.2mm) > >We've seen very little sunshine from Oct. 19-31+, an unusually long cloudy > >period, due to an active Subtropical Jet Stream (which is actually keeping > >the very cold air to our north). The fall foliage here is starting to look > >very good. Wish ya'll were here. > >Wishing everyone a Safe and Happy November. > >Yours (trying to do a Sun dance) David Powell > > > =================================================================== > Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au > McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ > North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ > Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ > =================================================================== > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k with the very latest Virus definition files. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 16/10/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 15:57:33 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aus-wx Subject: aus-wx: No Fire Danger in Sydney Tomorrow??? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi everyone, I'm a little puzzled at the Sydney forecast. I was writing up scripts for TV when I came across the forecast with no fire dangers. Checking the Illawarra forecast (very high to extreme fire danger), and the Hunter forecast (extreme fire danger), and sighting that the forecast was for tops up to 38C in the west with 20-30 knot NW winds, I phoned up the Sydney BoM to see if there was a mistake. I was informed by one of the forecasters that there was no fire danger for Sydney tomorrow, but they'll review it later this evening??? Yet for tonight (temps in the low 20s) they have a very high fire danger, but not for tomorrow? BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE Issued at 3:34pm on Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 For Sunday Very warm to hot north to northwest winds ahead of cooler late southerly change. Slight risk of an afternoon thunderstorm. Precis For Sunday Min Max Sydney: Very warm ahead of late S change 17 30 Liverpool: Hot ahead of S change 15 37 Richmond: Hot ahead of S change 14 38 UV Index: 2 [Extreme], decreasing to 8 [High] under cloud I don't understand... AC +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 16:02:24 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aus-wx Subject: aus-wx: More on "No Sydney Fire Danger" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Now this frustrates me again...after talking to a forecast explicitly asking if there were a fire danger and being told "no" (I even asked him twice!) This just got issued a couple of minutes ago...now was the forecaster I spoke to "out of the loop" and didn't know that there were 38C and 20-30knot NW winds forecast for tomorrow, or is this bad management? This frustrates people...(it's frustrated me) IDN22000 NSW FIRE WEATHER WARNING BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE Issued at 1652 on Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 for Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 Hot, dry and windy conditions are expected to cause VERY HIGH TO EXTREME FIRE DANGER in the following weather forecast districts today: North West Slopes and Plains,Central West Slopes, Hunter, Metropolitan, Illawarra, South Coast, Central Tablelands, Southern Tablelands. TOTAL FIRE BAN The Commissioner, NSW Rural Fire Service has TOTALLY BANNED THE LIGHTING OF FIRES until midnight tonight [Saturday 2nd November 2002] in the following weather forecast districts: North West Slopes and Plains, Central West Slopes, Hunter, Metropolitan, Illawarra, South Coast, Central Tablelands, Southern Tablelenads. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: OCT 2002 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:07:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Just thought I would fix a few errors in my last post
> Today on the other hand although still dry, the Easterly seabreeze came in
> Yesterday day evening driving the Dp from -6.5 to 9.0 in 1 hour, bringin
> Stratus Cover wind has tended to hang around all day
 
That Should have said...
Today on the other hand although still dry, the Easterly seabreeze came in
Yesterday day evening driving the Dp from -6.5 to 9.0 in 1 hour, bringing
Stratus Cover which has tended to hang around all day
 

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
 
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 16/10/2002
From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: More on "No Sydney Fire Danger" Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:21:09 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com So the forecast office say no Fire danger? yet the FWW and TFB cover the Metro distric and all surrounding districts. Somebody needs to go over the fire danger meter again.... Cheers --------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra, ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------- Proud member of the Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Cornelius" To: "Aus-wx" Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 5:02 PM Subject: aus-wx: More on "No Sydney Fire Danger" > Now this frustrates me again...after talking to a forecast explicitly > asking if there were a fire danger and being told "no" (I even asked him > twice!) This just got issued a couple of minutes ago...now was the > forecaster I spoke to "out of the loop" and didn't know that there were > 38C and 20-30knot NW winds forecast for tomorrow, or is this bad > management? > > This frustrates people...(it's frustrated me) > > IDN22000 > NSW FIRE WEATHER WARNING > BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY > NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE > Issued at 1652 on Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 > for Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 > > Hot, dry and windy conditions are expected to cause VERY HIGH TO > EXTREME FIRE DANGER in the following weather forecast districts > today: > > North West Slopes and Plains,Central West Slopes, Hunter, > Metropolitan, Illawarra, > South Coast, Central Tablelands, Southern Tablelands. > > TOTAL FIRE BAN > > The Commissioner, NSW Rural Fire Service has TOTALLY BANNED THE > LIGHTING OF FIRES until midnight tonight [Saturday 2nd November 2002] > in the following weather forecast districts: > > North West Slopes and Plains, > Central West Slopes, > Hunter, > Metropolitan, > Illawarra, > South Coast, > Central Tablelands, > Southern Tablelenads. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k with the very latest Virus definition files. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 16/10/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: No Fire Danger in Sydney Tomorrow??? Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 20:21:28 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Anthony Cornelius wrote > I don't understand... > BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY > NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE > Issued at 3:34pm on Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 > For Sunday > Very warm to hot north to northwest winds ahead of cooler late > southerly change. Slight risk of an afternoon thunderstorm. also, from ABC, today's forecast reads > A band of cloud extends from the Kimberley across southeast Australia to the Bight along a trough, bringing > scattered showers and thunderstorms to SA, VIC and NSW. Cloud increasing for TAS with thundery rain >developing. Readers may remember my prediction for potential for rain in NSW on or about 2nd/3rd. I have no wish to open up dead debate, but perhaps now it will be understood what I was advocating. Whether or not it actually rains does not detract from the potential, which is what I was trying to demonstrate my forecasting method can throw up. The fact that the BoM itself has also now picked up on this potential indicates some agreement, only I clearly knew about it well before they did and without the use of fancy equipment, unless you call a ruler, a pen and an ephemeris high tech.. The dedicated and desperate efforts to prove me wrong have been misplaced because the successful prediction of potential cannot be measured. If I am wrong about the next couple of days then the BoM is too, so (phew)I am at last in good company. cheers Ken +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David James Powell" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OCT 2002 X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.00 X-IPAddress: 208.189.4.63 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 01:52:21 -0600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Michael, to answer your question more fully: We've had 74 Raindays in 2002. While I was away on vacation(holiday-June 25 to July 6) Mena had 2.30IN(58.4mm)rain; I do not know how many days were involved in this case. But, if you take that total rain away, I can say of a certainty that 51.90IN(1,318.2mm) fell on 74 days (including the snowfall on Feb. 5&6). If the rainstorm carries over past midnight into the next day, I count both days as raindays--emptying my raingauge at 12:01 A.M. I wish I could send ya'll some of our surplus rain! Mabye if a bunch of ya'll would wash their cars, plan a cookout/yard sale etc, that you could cause it to rain! (It works here). > G'Day Michael: The rain fell on 12 days in > October. We only need less than a half-inch more > to assure another year of above normal rainfall. > (I'll try to do a Raindance for you). > Best(Wet)Wishes David Powell > > > > > How many rain days did the rain fall on Dave ? > > > > At my location on the NSW North Coast, I > recorded 39.0mm on 6 days for Oct, > > almost all of which fell during Sunday 27th. > YTD 827.0mm on 102 days. > > Normal for this part of the world from 1 Jan to > 31 Oct is about 1600mm, so > > we're only around 50 per cent. The main > storage dam is now at 33 % of > > capacity. It's never been anywhere near this > low before. > > > > cheers, Michael > > > > > > At 05:54 PM 1/11/2002 -0600, you wrote: > > > > >Greetings from the Natural State: > > >Heres the weather for Mena, Arkansas for > October, 2002: > > > > > >Avg. High: 66.5F(19.1C) > > >Avg. Low: 50.0F(10.0C) > > > High: 87F(30.5C), Oct. 2 > > > Low: 36F(2.2C), Oct. 15 > > >Rain for Month: 8.00IN(203.2mm) > > > (+2.90IN/+73.6mm) > > >Rain for year: 54.20IN(1,376.6mm) > > > (+6.90IN/+175.2mm) > > >We've seen very little sunshine from Oct. 19- > 31+, an unusually long cloudy > > >period, due to an active Subtropical Jet > Stream (which is actually keeping > > >the very cold air to our north). The fall > foliage here is starting to look > > >very good. Wish ya'll were here. > > >Wishing everyone a Safe and Happy November. > > >Yours (trying to do a Sun dance) David Powell > > > > > > > ================================================== > ================= > > Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au > > McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: > http://australiasevereweather.com/ > > North Coast NSW webmaster: > http://lightningphotography.com/ > > Australia ASWA president: > http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ > > > ================================================== > ================= > > > > > > -- > Sent using Voltage Net Webmail > http://www.voltage.net/ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ ------------------------ > > -- Sent using Voltage Net Webmail http://www.voltage.net/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "twc" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: No Fire Danger in Sydney Tomorrow??? Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:56:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com There is a potential for rain every day. Matt Pearce ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 6:21 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: No Fire Danger in Sydney Tomorrow??? > Anthony Cornelius wrote > > I don't understand... > > BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY > > NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE > > Issued at 3:34pm on Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 > > For Sunday > > Very warm to hot north to northwest winds ahead of cooler late > > southerly change. Slight risk of an afternoon thunderstorm. > > also, from ABC, today's forecast reads > > A band of cloud extends from the Kimberley across southeast Australia to > the Bight along a trough, bringing > > scattered showers and thunderstorms to SA, VIC and NSW. Cloud increasing > for TAS with thundery rain >developing. > > Readers may remember my prediction for potential for rain in NSW on or about > 2nd/3rd. > I have no wish to open up dead debate, but perhaps now it will be understood > what I was advocating. Whether or not it actually rains does not detract > from the potential, which is what I was trying to demonstrate my forecasting > method can throw up. The fact that the BoM itself has also now picked up on > this potential indicates some agreement, only I clearly knew about it well > before they did and without the use of fancy equipment, unless you call a > ruler, a pen and an ephemeris high tech.. > The dedicated and desperate efforts to prove me wrong have been misplaced > because the successful prediction of potential cannot be measured. If I am > wrong about the next couple of days then the BoM is too, so (phew)I am at > last in good company. > cheers > Ken > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: No Fire Danger in Sydney Tomorrow??? Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:59:00 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I suspect it's for the same reason you see simultaneous severe thunderstorm warnings for the Hunter, Illawarra and central tablelands but not Sydney. I don't know what the reason is, but there's a curious coincidence of policy operating here? Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Cornelius" To: "Aus-wx" Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 4:57 PM Subject: aus-wx: No Fire Danger in Sydney Tomorrow??? > Hi everyone, > > I'm a little puzzled at the Sydney forecast. I was writing up scripts > for TV when I came across the forecast with no fire dangers. Checking > the Illawarra forecast (very high to extreme fire danger), and the > Hunter forecast (extreme fire danger), and sighting that the forecast > was for tops up to 38C in the west with 20-30 knot NW winds, I phoned up > the Sydney BoM to see if there was a mistake. I was informed by one of > the forecasters that there was no fire danger for Sydney tomorrow, but > they'll review it later this evening??? Yet for tonight (temps in the > low 20s) they have a very high fire danger, but not for tomorrow? > > BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY > NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE > Issued at 3:34pm on Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 > > For Sunday > > Very warm to hot north to northwest winds ahead of cooler late > southerly change. Slight risk of an afternoon thunderstorm. > > > Precis For Sunday Min Max > > Sydney: Very warm ahead of late S change 17 30 > Liverpool: Hot ahead of S change 15 37 > Richmond: Hot ahead of S change 14 38 > > UV Index: 2 [Extreme], decreasing to 8 [High] under cloud > > I don't understand... > > AC > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.132.18.241] From: "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Vic storms Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 19:09:19 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2002 08:09:20.0067 (UTC) FILETIME=[2558F130:01C28247] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It's going OFF here in VIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The NW is COVERED by strikes on the tracker. Some isolated cells now firing just to the NW of Melb. Could be a great night!!!!!! Liam _________________________________________________________________ Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Western Vic storms 11/02 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 03:10:37 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey All, Well, this afternoon turned out to be a disappointment. Nothing worth chasing really. I ended up in the Grampians for the day to do some nature photography with a mate before we left Halls Gap to head back to Horsham. Approximately 15km South of Horsham, we seen the first CG strike from a line that was developing to the West. Anyway, to cut a short story even shorter, a few strobing CG's were witnessed West of Green Lake, caught them on video, and then drove home while some CG's dropped behind and to the side of us. Here at the moment, we've just had a storm to the South with a few flangs, but nothing interesting really. Mind you, as I type, I just got another rumble to the West. All up, nothing worth chasing IMO. PaulY +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Andrews" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Vic storms Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 19:22:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm just heading out to the bay to see if we can see anything roll in. Then perhaps back up to Mt Dandenong depending what happens with the storm..... Hopefully will get to add some images to my lonely 2 lightning shots.... Cheers, Michael www.michaelsphotography.net -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Liam Domanski Sent: Saturday, 2 November 2002 7:09 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Vic storms It's going OFF here in VIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The NW is COVERED by strikes on the tracker. Some isolated cells now firing just to the NW of Melb. Could be a great night!!!!!! Liam _________________________________________________________________ Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Western Vic storms 11/02 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 20:05:32 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com easy, Go here www.canberra-wx.com/chat/ Cheers --------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra, ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------- Proud member of the Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "April Charles" To: Sent: Thursday, January 01, 1998 1:17 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Western Vic storms 11/02 > HI, how do I get into the weather chat in MIRC.... I had a reformat and lost > all onfo > > Thanks > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Paul Yole > Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 7:11 PM > To: Aussie Weather > Subject: aus-wx: Western Vic storms 11/02 > > > Hey All, > > Well, this afternoon turned out to be a disappointment. Nothing worth > chasing really. I ended up in the Grampians for the day to do some nature > photography with a mate before we left Halls Gap to head back to Horsham. > Approximately 15km South of Horsham, we seen the first CG strike from a line > that was developing to the West. > > Anyway, to cut a short story even shorter, a few strobing CG's were > witnessed West of Green Lake, caught them on video, and then drove home > while some CG's dropped behind and to the side of us. > > Here at the moment, we've just had a storm to the South with a few flangs, > but nothing interesting really. Mind you, as I type, I just got another > rumble to the West. All up, nothing worth chasing IMO. > > PaulY > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k with the very latest Virus definition files. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 16/10/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.50.30.20] From: "Ben Jerrems" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 20:13:06 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2002 09:13:06.0970 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E5BFFA0:01C28250] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Hey all, looks like doncaster westfield will be good place to see oncoming storms, i know i'll b there when they break!

Ben Jerrems
http://groups.msn.com/melbournelightning

beanzvision at hotmail.com

BEANZVISION Photographics.



Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: No Fire Danger in Sydney Tomorrow??? Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 00:03:48 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > There is a potential for rain every day. Matt, I'm sure the farmers would LOVE to hear that. But if there's potential for rain in a district most forecasters, me included, generally say so, and not if there's not. That's what a forecast is. Ken www.predictweather.com > Matt Pearce > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 6:21 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: No Fire Danger in Sydney Tomorrow??? > > > > Anthony Cornelius wrote > > > I don't understand... > > > BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY > > > NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE > > > Issued at 3:34pm on Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 > > > For Sunday > > > Very warm to hot north to northwest winds ahead of cooler late > > > southerly change. Slight risk of an afternoon thunderstorm. > > > > also, from ABC, today's forecast reads > > > A band of cloud extends from the Kimberley across southeast Australia to > > the Bight along a trough, bringing > > > scattered showers and thunderstorms to SA, VIC and NSW. Cloud increasing > > for TAS with thundery rain >developing. > > > > Readers may remember my prediction for potential for rain in NSW on or > about > > 2nd/3rd. > > I have no wish to open up dead debate, but perhaps now it will be > understood > > what I was advocating. Whether or not it actually rains does not detract > > from the potential, which is what I was trying to demonstrate my > forecasting > > method can throw up. The fact that the BoM itself has also now picked up > on > > this potential indicates some agreement, only I clearly knew about it well > > before they did and without the use of fancy equipment, unless you call a > > ruler, a pen and an ephemeris high tech.. > > The dedicated and desperate efforts to prove me wrong have been misplaced > > because the successful prediction of potential cannot be measured. If I am > > wrong about the next couple of days then the BoM is too, so (phew)I am at > > last in good company. > > cheers > > Ken > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: More on "No Sydney Fire Danger" Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 23:16:16 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com We have had bans on and off here for a whilst now. But we didn't get news either way on the pagers this afternoon. One incredibly huge factor in calling a fire ban is the humidity forecast. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Anthony Cornelius Sent: Saturday, 2 November 2002 5:02 PM To: Aus-wx Subject: aus-wx: More on "No Sydney Fire Danger" Now this frustrates me again...after talking to a forecast explicitly asking if there were a fire danger and being told "no" (I even asked him twice!) This just got issued a couple of minutes ago...now was the forecaster I spoke to "out of the loop" and didn't know that there were 38C and 20-30knot NW winds forecast for tomorrow, or is this bad management? This frustrates people...(it's frustrated me) IDN22000 NSW FIRE WEATHER WARNING BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE Issued at 1652 on Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 for Saturday the 2nd of November 2002 Hot, dry and windy conditions are expected to cause VERY HIGH TO EXTREME FIRE DANGER in the following weather forecast districts today: North West Slopes and Plains,Central West Slopes, Hunter, Metropolitan, Illawarra, South Coast, Central Tablelands, Southern Tablelands. TOTAL FIRE BAN The Commissioner, NSW Rural Fire Service has TOTALLY BANNED THE LIGHTING OF FIRES until midnight tonight [Saturday 2nd November 2002] in the following weather forecast districts: North West Slopes and Plains, Central West Slopes, Hunter, Metropolitan, Illawarra, South Coast, Central Tablelands, Southern Tablelenads. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 23:52:21 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic storms Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 07:09 PM 2/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >It's going OFF here in VIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > >The NW is COVERED by strikes on the tracker. Some isolated cells now >firing just to the NW of Melb. Could be a great night!!!!!! Umm, where. I am on the NW side of Melb, and NOTHING!!! (except for some lightning from a cell passing over the heads, 80km away). 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 00:26:14 +1100 (EST) From: Robert Goler Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic storms X-X-Sender: robert at tornado.maths.monash.edu.au To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all From Clayton I could see a lot of lightning activity to the south, and I managed to catch some of it on video....some captures are here: http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/Weather/2002_11_02/today.html It pretty much died after 8:10pm, and I tried to find some more lightning further to the southeast, but I came up empty. Cheers -- Robert A. Goler School of Mathematical Sciences PO Box 28M Monash University Clayton, Vic 3800 Australia ph. +61 3 9905 4424 email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Potential Sydney Rain 2/3 Nov. Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 10:06:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Dear All,
 
Firstly how much rain does it take to be called rain.
 
Last night Saturday 2nd Nov. we had rain drops, heavy enough for us to hear them on the awning outside between 8pm and 8.30pm  -  though not enough to wet the concrete at all.  A friend also reported similar at Narrabeen and Adam found the same at work at Warriewood.
 
So at risk of myself being called stupid is this trace of rain worth reporting.  Also does the Northern Beaches qualify as rain in Sydney.  We consider that we live in Sydney.
 
Judy Mayo
From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Re:aus-wx Vic storms Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 10:15:55 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Robert,
 
Do you know if Ballarat got any rain last night.
Thanks
Judy Mayo
X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 10:17:29 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Potential Sydney Rain 2/3 Nov. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Judy,

Well observed and nice ot be on the go. Definitely qualifies as rain but not much - perhaps a trace.

Jimmy Deguara

At 10:06 AM 3/11/2002 +1100, you wrote:
Dear All,
 
Firstly how much rain does it take to be called rain.
 
Last night Saturday 2nd Nov. we had rain drops, heavy enough for us to hear them on the awning outside between 8pm and 8.30pm  -  though not enough to wet the concrete at all.  A friend also reported similar at Narrabeen and Adam found the same at work at Warriewood.
 
So at risk of myself being called stupid is this trace of rain worth reporting.  Also does the Northern Beaches qualify as rain in Sydney.  We consider that we live in Sydney.
 
Judy Mayo
From: "Michael Andrews" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Vic storms Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 11:25:16 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Nice video caps Robert, I headed up to Mt Dandenong for a bit of a look at what was coming. On the radar and lightning tracker before I left home there looked to be a small cell crossing Geelong and the bay, while the huge storm front with heaps of lightning was still over Ballarat way. Originally I wanted to go to Brighton but there was not enough time - as it turns out, if I had left earlier and made it to the bay there would have been one hell of a lightshow. I managed to see it from Mt Dandenong - not as close as I would like to be for photos, but I managed to zoom in a little and take half a roll of slide film, there were some pretty impressive CG's. I just hope they turn out from that distance. That activity continued out of view to the east, and other than a couple of very close CG's down around Kilsyth / Bayswater there was nothing else coming. It started to rain pretty heavy, and the carpark was closing in around half an hour so decided to pop back home and check the radar, then head over to Doncaster to see the larger storm approach. On checking the radar there appeared to be a fair bit of steady rain all over melb except for the eastern suburbs - and the lightning storm out west seemed to be fading. We still headed to Doncaster, sat on the roof for an hour, got rained on but no lightning activity - not even on the AM radio. We drove around the city for another couple of hours taking some nightime shots to use up the slide film and see if any storms rolled in - but nothing. On coming home and checking the lightning tracker, the storm just fizzed out before it even got to us. So im pretty glad we got to see the storm over the bay, fingers crossed the shots will come out. It's been 9 months since I got my first two lightning shots ever and have been dying to add to the collection. Will let you all know if they turn out and post them on my site. Cheers, Michael. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Robert Goler Sent: Sunday, 3 November 2002 12:26 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic storms Hi all From Clayton I could see a lot of lightning activity to the south, and I managed to catch some of it on video....some captures are here: http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/Weather/2002_11_02/today.html It pretty much died after 8:10pm, and I tried to find some more lightning further to the southeast, but I came up empty. Cheers -- Robert A. Goler School of Mathematical Sciences PO Box 28M Monash University Clayton, Vic 3800 Australia ph. +61 3 9905 4424 email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: aus-wx: SSC | Tornado Events Archive Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:04:05 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
It has taken quite some time, but the Tornado event archive for Eastern Australia is back up on SSC. We are still in the process of fixing up links to some tornado reports that have been moved.
Any reports, as always,  is much appreciated.
 
 
Thanks
 
dann
 
 
 
 
 
From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: In Search of Supercells 2002 - the video Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 14:18:03 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Australian Sky & Weather are proud to announce an almost 4 hour masterpiece of storm video by Roger Hill. For those of you who don't know Roger's history, he has been voted as the 'Most Desired Accessory for a Chase Vehicle' in the USA - where Roger goes, severe weather follows....... If you are interested in obtaining a copy (NTSC & PAL formats will be available) have a look here for further details http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm Format - NTSC $70AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in Australia) and I've been able to negotiate a better price for the PAL version which will now be Format - PAL $75AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in Australia) Pre Christmas orders will be finalised no later than 5pm Tuesday November 19 to have this video to you for Christmas. If you would like to reserve your copy please send a cheque or money order made out to 'Australian Sky & Weather' for $70 NTSC / $75 PAL, to Australian Sky & Weather 227 / 16 Cotham Road KEW Victoria 3101 specifying the version you prefer including your email address and full postal address. Australian Sky & Weather will be on the lookout for further worthwhile videos in the future. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 15:23:39 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: Incredible dew point differences Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello all, It amazes me that the temps and dew points are vastly different in eastern and western parts of Sydney. Some suburbs are in moist sea breeze air and we are sweltering near 40C temps and very low dew points. Good stuff. Very hazy due to bush fires. Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Incredible dew point differences Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 15:52:59 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Dewpoint here (Seven Hills) a short time ago was 5 degrees at 37.9 and RH about 11%. Max has been 38.5. Pretty common for November on my calcs, even this early in the month (1 yr in 3). Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 3:23 PM Subject: aus-wx: Incredible dew point differences > Hello all, > > It amazes me that the temps and dew points are vastly different in eastern > and western parts of Sydney. Some suburbs are in moist sea breeze air and > we are sweltering near 40C temps and very low dew points. > > Good stuff. Very hazy due to bush fires. > > Jimmy Deguara > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > from > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Max" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Incredible dew point differences Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 15:53:07 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tell me about it Jimmy! Stinkin hot here at Wenty! Last check had it just over 38. Oh well, thank goodness for a/c :) Max ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 3:23 PM Subject: aus-wx: Incredible dew point differences > Hello all, > > It amazes me that the temps and dew points are vastly different in eastern > and western parts of Sydney. Some suburbs are in moist sea breeze air and > we are sweltering near 40C temps and very low dew points. > > Good stuff. Very hazy due to bush fires. > > Jimmy Deguara > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > from > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Incredible dew point differences Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 16:58:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Max & all, I used to like living on top of the ridge in Harris Park / Rosehill - open every door and window and the sea breeze would pass on through (but not down the other side of the ridge, as it was deflected upwards)......the eastern side of the unit could be 28C in the seabreeze and just down the street on the western side of the ridge it would be 34C and rising every step you took, till right down the bottom of the western side of the ridge at the shops it could be as high as 42C!! Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max" To: Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 3:53 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Incredible dew point differences > Tell me about it Jimmy! > Stinkin hot here at Wenty! > Last check had it just over 38. > Oh well, thank goodness for a/c :) > > Max > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jimmy Deguara" > To: > Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 3:23 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Incredible dew point differences > > > > Hello all, > > > > It amazes me that the temps and dew points are vastly different in eastern > > and western parts of Sydney. Some suburbs are in moist sea breeze air and > > we are sweltering near 40C temps and very low dew points. > > > > Good stuff. Very hazy due to bush fires. > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Please note the change to my new e-mail > > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > > ----------------------------------------- > > Jimmy Deguara > > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > > > from > > Schofields, Sydney > > NSW Australia > > > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- - > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 22:41:00 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aus-wx Subject: aus-wx: November QLD ASWA Meeting Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com !!!Guests more than welcome to attend!!! The next QLD ASWA meeting will be held on Saturday the 16th of November, commencing at 10am. This will probably be the last official meeting of the year, given people tend to go away over Christmas. Because of this I hope that you can join us do the following: - Watch video footage from past storm events (including the October 9 supercell: http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/09_10_02ac.html and October 26 and 27 storm events throughout SE QLD, NE NSW and Wide Bay and Burnett: http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/27_10_02-01ac.html ) - Join in other assorted footage over the past few months and future footage over the next few weeks to come! - Join in discussion of current, past and future weather events - End it with some pizza and more storm videos! In brief the details are: Date: Saturday, 16th of November 2002 Time: 10am-2pm Place: "Pixel Components" Unit 9/14 Argon St. Sumner (Brisbane) What to bring? Photos, videos and $4 for pizza and drinks. If you can definately attend, please drop me a quick email at cyclone at bigpond.net.au If you're unsure, you can still drop in anyway even if you don't email! Look forward to seeing you there, -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: simon at fearby.com To: Subject: aus-wx: People in NZ on this list.... Cc: Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:49:40 Pacific Standard Time X-Originating-Ip: [210.86.76.209] X-Mailer: NOCC v0.9.5 X-AntiSpam: Checked for restricted content by Gordano's AntiSpam Software Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Kiwi's I am an Aussie from Tamworth NSW Australia and I love reading this list. I am travelling in NZ at the moment and I find your weather patterns amazing. I have lots of photos to add links to when i get back. I have travelled from Christchurch to Dunedin then to Milford then Doubtful and now in Queenstown. The weather has been great along the way but I would likle some snow or heavy rain... If you are a Kiwi I would love to hear where you are from in NZ and what your weather is like (a forcast for the next few days would also be great).. p.s. NZ is heaven on earth. Tamworth Australia is a dust bowl compared to over here in NZ.. Thanks Simon Fearby simon at fearby.com simon.fearby at tafensw.edu.au ICQ: 8010808 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 16:19:39 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: BoM new building Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Looks like the BoM in melbourne are getting a new building, media release here : http://www.bom.gov.au/announcements/media_releases/ho/20021104.shtml This paragraph is the best, i hope the VIC BoM people like riding bikes... Dr Stone said that in keeping with the Bureau’s strong environmental focus, bicycle storage would be provided to encourage employees to power their way to work on the bike, ahead of in the car. I can easily see Jane in August powering down the road on a bike with her 2 frozen dogs being dragged along to visit the BoM! hehehe Matt Smith http://www.sydneystormchasers.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: BoM new building To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:10:48 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Looks like the BoM in melbourne are getting a new building, media > release here : > > http://www.bom.gov.au/announcements/media_releases/ho/20021104.shtml > > This paragraph is the best, i hope the VIC BoM people like riding > bikes... > > Dr Stone said that in keeping with the Bureau’s strong environmental > focus, bicycle storage would be provided > to encourage employees to power their way to work on the bike, ahead of > in the car. > > I can easily see Jane in August powering down the road on a bike with > her 2 frozen dogs being dragged along to visit the BoM! hehehe > > Matt Smith > http://www.sydneystormchasers.com > A fairly significant proportion of Bureau staff ride to work; probably close to 10% at times (myself among them). One of the earliest uses to which I put the radar after arriving here was to time when to ride home on showery days :-) Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: October Averages Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:32:08 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
October Averages for my backyard in Sydney's Northern Suburbs between Chatswood West & North Ryde on the Lane Cove River:
 
Average Maximum: 27.4
Average Minimum: 11.0
Rainfall:        12mm
Highest Maximum: 34.8 on the 30th
Lowest Minimum:  5.1 on the 1st
 
 
 
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 20:20:06 +1300 From: Gregg Ward User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: People in NZ on this list.... Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Simon, I'm Gregg Ward from Palmerston North, on the western side of the lower half of the North Island of NZ. The forecast for Palmerston North, for the next few days, is as follows: Tuesday: Cloudy periods at first with the odd shower. A period of widespread rain from late Tuesday morning along with brief heavy falls. Occasional showers follow the rain. Max 19 Min 10 Wednesday: Occasional showers. Max 15 Min 11 Thursday: Occasional showers. Chance of a few thundery falls possible especially about the ranges. Max 16 Min 7 Glad to see you are enjoying yourself in NZ. Gregg simon at fearby.com wrote: >Hello Kiwi's > >I am an Aussie from Tamworth NSW Australia and I love reading this list. I am travelling in NZ at the moment and I find your weather patterns amazing. I have lots of photos to add links to when i get back. > >I have travelled from Christchurch to Dunedin then to Milford then Doubtful and now in Queenstown. The weather has been great along the way but I would likle some snow or heavy rain... > >If you are a Kiwi I would love to hear where you are from in NZ and what your weather is like (a forcast for the next few days would also be great).. > >p.s. NZ is heaven on earth. Tamworth Australia is a dust bowl compared to over here in NZ.. > >Thanks > >Simon Fearby >simon at fearby.com >simon.fearby at tafensw.edu.au >ICQ: 8010808 > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "ASNWmsc" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: BoM new building Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:55:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > I can easily see Jane in August powering down the road on a bike with > her 2 frozen dogs being dragged along to visit the BoM! hehehe Matty, Matty, Matty.............. me? on a bike? you? walking? Jane btw, the view from the new building won't be nearly as stunning....... :( -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.178] From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 20:05:42 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2002 09:05:42.0531 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A477D30:01C283E1] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Blair and all, I have been watching Lake George since I came to Canberra in 1981 and have seen it off and on since 1968. I read a report on the Lake in the 1980's by the BMR which concluded that the Lake is very sensitive to rainfall\evaporation in its basin. Hence full in the mid 50's, 70's and generally low or dry for most of the period. I last saw duststorms on the Lake in the big Dty in the 1990-92 drought and they were awesome! caused by very strong winds blowing off the Lake George escarpment onto the lake surface some 2 to 3 km out on the lake bed The dust rose up to 200 metres above the bed as a huge wall . Canberra has had some good falls late winter but they missed the lake hence a brown area east of the Lake. I know Goulburn missed all that rain we had last winter. Gavin SSWW Canberra >From: Blair Trewin >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George >Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:23:51 +1100 > >I thought it was 'supposed' to be connected to a lake somewhere in >New Zealand :-) (Actually, these legends may really be a manifestation >of the fact that rainfall in this region is strongly related to >ENSO, so it wouldn't be a surprise if Lake George tended to be low >in periods when a lake somewhere in the world that gets more rain >during El Nino events is high, and vice versa). > >Lake George also tends to respond to rainfall anomalies on the >multi-year timescale. It was very high during the wet periods of >the mid-70s and late 80s/early 90s. Prior to the last year or so, >1982 was the only time since the 60s that it had been completely >dry (and then only briefly), but I believe it was dry or mostly >dry for about 15 years in the 20s/30s. > >(It's also very sensitive to evaporation; during the last Ice Age it >was much deeper (20-30 metres) than it is now, despite lower >rainfall). > >In 1982 the ACT Cross Country Club ran a race across it. I'm not >sure if they have any plans for a repeat performance this year. > >Blair > > > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix >off > > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > > Thompson > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a >young > > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > > could not see how even then. > > > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. >Like > > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > > wonder where the water went. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Liam Domanski" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going >around > > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach >Ness, > > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and >the > > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a >puddle > > > >of water in the far distance. > > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust >is > > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > > > >Phil > > > ><>< > > > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Matthew Smith > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > wow! > > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something >you > > > > > would see > > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > > weather did > > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > > localised dust > > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in > > very > > > > > sharp > > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > > > Looked quite > > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown >and > > > > > drought > > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in >comparison > > > > > ). This > > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra >trip, a > > > > > sudden > > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the >body of > > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > + > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body >of > > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > - > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 06:09:17 EST Subject: aus-wx: keep it up To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jane I have always received great feed back from those on othere lists that have asked a weather ? and I have recomended (with permission  ) they send you an email .Keep up the good work . 


Regards

Dennis Cottle
From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 06:50:48 EST Subject: Re: aus-wx: preparation for storm chasing ... To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Is there any chance we might see some storm chase results on amaeture  \ comunity TV ?

Regards

Dennis Cottle
X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 23:48:22 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: preparation for storm chasing ... Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 06:50 AM 4/11/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Is there any chance we might see some storm chase results on amaeture \ >comunity TV ? Well, I was hoping to put some live action onto amateur TV, but the transmitter isn't finished yet. I might look at videotaping some of my chases and getting them put to air at a later stage. :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "ASNWmsc" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: ASWA 2004 Calendar Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:49:16 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) is looking into having their very own calendar published for 2004. At present we are gathering quotes from various printing sources but most quotes are based on the quantity of calendars that would be needed. ASWA would like to know if you would be interested in purchasing 1 or more 2004 calendars for $15-$20 each plus postage and handling, so they know roughly how many they would need when it comes time to have them produced. The calendar will be a 12mth calendar with photos of weather taken by ASWA members from around the country. All members will have an opportunity in the New Year to submit weather photos and try their luck at making it into the calendar. Please email astrolady99 at netscape.net if you would be interested in purchasing the ASWA Calendar. Also if there is anyone that is in the printing industry or knows of someone in the printing industry that you think could be of service to ASWA please let us know at the above email address. Kind Regards Kathryn Wall State Rep - SA +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steven Williams" To: Cc: , "Steven Williams" Subject: Re: aus-wx: People in NZ on this list.... Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:57:55 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Simon Steven Williams from Auckland. You won't have to wait long for rain but you are a bit late for snow. However could be down to 1000m Thursday the Otago Alpine area. Forecast here(in AK) is for a few showers, heavy and thundery Thursday, clearing Friday, rain returning late Saturday. Wet. Enjoy the rest of your holiday. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Cc: Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:49 AM Subject: aus-wx: People in NZ on this list.... > Hello Kiwi's > > I am an Aussie from Tamworth NSW Australia and I love reading this list. I am travelling in NZ at the moment and I find your weather patterns amazing. I have lots of photos to add links to when i get back. > > I have travelled from Christchurch to Dunedin then to Milford then Doubtful and now in Queenstown. The weather has been great along the way but I would likle some snow or heavy rain... > > If you are a Kiwi I would love to hear where you are from in NZ and what your weather is like (a forcast for the next few days would also be great).. > > p.s. NZ is heaven on earth. Tamworth Australia is a dust bowl compared to over here in NZ.. > > Thanks > > Simon Fearby > simon at fearby.com > simon.fearby at tafensw.edu.au > ICQ: 8010808 > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.139.221.28] From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Deforestation & Effects on Climate Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 20:55:21 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2002 09:55:21.0772 (UTC) FILETIME=[9EDF16C0:01C2857A] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Sam, your comments are very interesting. I spent quite some time at UNE Armidale in the mid 70's to early 80's I was very interested in the "die back" issue. It was thought to be a soil bug or fungus that attacks the tree's roots . As in what you said , super phosphate was thought to be the cause although clearance of forest\woodlands to scatted tree lots over the century since settlement must also stress the small groups of trees left.Die back also occurs between Collector and Goulburn on similar country. . Your analysis on climate change is interesting .I think it would be at micro-climate level but with regional impacts. The Lagoon is most likely the victim of deforestation and increased soil erosion leading to silting of the Lagoon. I have seen a similar effect with the Rose Lagoon near Collector .In the 60's it was a lagoon now it is a reed infested wetland badly silted up. I have not been over to Lake Bathurst near Tarago since 1982 but I will go over to see if it is also being silted up too. Gavin SSWW Canberra >From: "macdonald" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Deforestation & Effects on Climate >Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:58:30 +1100 > >Hello All, >I have been reading a text and email that i received from the chief of the >CSIRO Atmospheric Research devision. > >I have been interested in the effects of deforestation upon the regional >climate. The New England is a perfect example, only have to look at the >high basalt plateau around the Guyra- Ben Lomond area. I have seen photos >of mother of ducks lagoon at Guyra in the early 1900s. It was thick with >timber, and the lagoon was deep enough for a paddlesteamer. New England >suffered from my dieback in the early 80s and late 70's, due to infestation >of Christmas beetle larve... probably due to the high nutrient levels from >the super phosphate. > >The Guyra observer, Jeff, once said that he thinks that the winters in >Guyra are not as cold as they used to be. It is hard know whether the >climate is warming. I personaly believe that the climate goes through >cycles. > >"If forests are removed and replaced by pasture, the reflectivity may rise >by 10 % or more, depending on soil types ( dark soils would absorb more >reflective light), vegetation that replaces the forest. Energy input to the >region that is deforested is decreased, hence changing the regional >climate. > >Forests on the earth's surface, cause areodynamic drag that slows the >movement of air masses over the earth's surface. Removal of the forests >and the replacement of them by pastures, leads to a signifcant change in >drag and this influences the climate systems." > >Cheers >Sam > _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: AWN hourly charts now show station names Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 11:14:41 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I've added location names to most station plots on the Australian Weather News high-scale charts. To cut down on clutter, only four letters of the station name is shown, and I've refrained from trying to add them to the all-Australia charts. These are usually the first four letters of the name, but there are some variations. If you're desparate to check the full station name, I've added a link to a full station code/name listing. If you're wondering why some plots show names and others don't, it's because DA doesn't currently allow station codes (other than the rather eclectic WMO station number) to be plotted, so I have developed a work-around that works with the most common stations. To make way for the station names, rainfall is now plotted to the left of the weather symbol (or between the temperature and dew point figures for automatic weather stations), and cloud base (preceded by the letter "L") is now plotted beneath the dew point. The changes also seem to improve the legibility of the plots, making rainfall in particular easier to pick out. All we need now is some rain... Cheers Laurier Williams Australian Weather News http://www.australianweathernews.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 22:47:40 +1100 (EST) From: Robert Goler Subject: aus-wx: Some images from GLEX X-X-Sender: robert at tornado.maths.monash.edu.au To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey all Here are some images I took while on the Gulf Line EXperiment (GLEX). http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/Weather/Glex/glex_pt1.html As I mentioned earlier I only saw 2 morning glories during my 1 week stay in Karumba - 1 of which was without cloud. During my 2 weeks in Weipa it seemed as though the best morning glories were occurring down in Karumba. I will try to make more photos from these events available - there's something like 2Gb of photos lying around on a friend's laptop, and that's not to mention all the films yet to be developed! While in Weipa, all the flights went okay, and there was only 1 decent cloud line that we flew through, the images of which are on the above URL. The drive home to Melbourne from Karumba was pretty good. We drove inland through to Cloncurry and then headed west to Mt Isa to investigate the dryline which the boys in Karumba noticed from the Qld obs (separates dry air from really dry air!). There seemed to be a marked drop in dew point from Cloncurry to Mt Isa, by in some cases, up to 20 degs!! When we drove through the area we noted that from Cloncurry to a distance of 20km to the west the dew point went from -7 to -12. This stayed at -12 all the way to Mt Isa. This changed seemed to coincide with the landscape becoming more hilly and the road increasing in elevation???? Any thoughts anyone?? The next day of driving from Mt Isa to Emerald was done entirely within the dust storm (Oct 23), which was interesting, if not a little featureless. Then it was on to Maroochydore for a day of rest, pass through Brisbane to stay the night in Coffs Harbour (_just_ found a place to stay!), through to Sydney to stay the night in Gundagai, and then finally onto Melbourne - just over 4500km in 7 days. Cheers -- Robert A. Goler School of Mathematical Sciences PO Box 28M Monash University Clayton, Vic 3800 Australia ph. +61 3 9905 4424 email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Some images from GLEX Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 00:17:33 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Excellent Photographs! That fire seemed damn close too. We once drove from Darwin to Mt. Isa (about 2400km) in 26hrs - 4 people in the car- two asleep 2 awake driving. I recall hitting a humidity wall, where we literally felt the humidity vanish. Happened somewhere between 3 ways and Mt. Isa, was quite extraordinary- 35 C and humid was so much worse than 45 and dry!!! James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Robert Goler Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2002 10:48 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Some images from GLEX Hey all Here are some images I took while on the Gulf Line EXperiment (GLEX). http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/Weather/Glex/glex_pt1.html As I mentioned earlier I only saw 2 morning glories during my 1 week stay in Karumba - 1 of which was without cloud. During my 2 weeks in Weipa it seemed as though the best morning glories were occurring down in Karumba. I will try to make more photos from these events available - there's something like 2Gb of photos lying around on a friend's laptop, and that's not to mention all the films yet to be developed! While in Weipa, all the flights went okay, and there was only 1 decent cloud line that we flew through, the images of which are on the above URL. The drive home to Melbourne from Karumba was pretty good. We drove inland through to Cloncurry and then headed west to Mt Isa to investigate the dryline which the boys in Karumba noticed from the Qld obs (separates dry air from really dry air!). There seemed to be a marked drop in dew point from Cloncurry to Mt Isa, by in some cases, up to 20 degs!! When we drove through the area we noted that from Cloncurry to a distance of 20km to the west the dew point went from -7 to -12. This stayed at -12 all the way to Mt Isa. This changed seemed to coincide with the landscape becoming more hilly and the road increasing in elevation???? Any thoughts anyone?? The next day of driving from Mt Isa to Emerald was done entirely within the dust storm (Oct 23), which was interesting, if not a little featureless. Then it was on to Maroochydore for a day of rest, pass through Brisbane to stay the night in Coffs Harbour (_just_ found a place to stay!), through to Sydney to stay the night in Gundagai, and then finally onto Melbourne - just over 4500km in 7 days. Cheers -- Robert A. Goler School of Mathematical Sciences PO Box 28M Monash University Clayton, Vic 3800 Australia ph. +61 3 9905 4424 email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 11:01:28 +1000 From: Lisa Collett X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en To: "\\"Aussie-Weather" " at theworld.com Subject: aus-wx: October 23rd duststorm X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2002 01:01:34.0437 (UTC) FILETIME=[37815950:01C285F9] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi, I'm chasing a time sequence of images of the Oct 23rd duststorm. I've got a fair sequence together of the progression of the dust front during the late morning and afternoon but I'm interested in getting some very early morning or even night time images from the day before (around 10 pm on the 22nd to 2AM on the 23rd). I've seen the great images on www.stormchasers.au.com/dust1002.htm but does anyone know where I could obtain some early images? I'm particularly interested in the formation of the front. Cheers and thanks, Lisa -- --------------------------------------------- Lisa Collett Remote Sensing (Fire) Queensland Centre for Climate Applications Climate Impacts & Natural Resource Systems Department of Natural Resources & Mines Ph: (07) 3896 9529 Fax: (07) 3896 9843 http://www.LongPaddock.qld.gov.au ************************************************************************ The information in this e-mail together with any attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any form of review, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this e-mail message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete this message and any copies of this message from your computer and/or your computer system network. ************************************************************************ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: im back Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 19:01:22 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
HI All,
 
Been away for awhile.. tore achillies tendon.  Off work for 5 weeks, slowly healing back. Sick and tired of walking on crutches.. plaster off next Wed.
 
Where is all this rain.!!  come on !!!!  Bring it on.!!
 
Hope everyone is going well.
 
Dave
Bathurst
 
 
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 19:00:54 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: im back Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
jeeze dave, sorry to hear about that, hope you get back into the swing of things soon, rain?, um, whats that? 
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Thursday, 7 November 2002 6:40:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: im back
 
HI All,
 
Been away for awhile.. tore achillies tendon.  Off work for 5 weeks, slowly healing back. Sick and tired of walking on crutches.. plaster off next Wed.
 
Where is all this rain.!!  come on !!!!  Bring it on.!!
 
Hope everyone is going well.
 
Dave
Bathurst
 
 
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: sg-0.gif: 00000001,17d6c14d,00000000,00000000 Embedded Content: IMSTP2.gif: 00000001,2cc0da2c,00000000,00000000 From: "Max" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: im back Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:49:55 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Ouch!!!
 
How did you manage that Dave?
 
Incidentally, when you get some of that rain, will you shunt some down my way?
 
Max
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:01 PM
Subject: aus-wx: im back

HI All,
 
Been away for awhile.. tore achillies tendon.  Off work for 5 weeks, slowly healing back. Sick and tired of walking on crutches.. plaster off next Wed.
 
Where is all this rain.!!  come on !!!!  Bring it on.!!
 
Hope everyone is going well.
 
Dave
Bathurst
 
 
From: "David Carroll" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: im back Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 22:08:54 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
HI,
 
Well i did was i went to sprint off my left ankle. pop.. down i went.  I had been a sprinter for many years and never did anything like this.
 
I shall try to send the rain down when we get some.. 
 
Mind you when we do get rain, will turn into a flood..!!  Remember 1998 Aug??
 
Dave
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Max
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: im back

Ouch!!!
 
How did you manage that Dave?
 
Incidentally, when you get some of that rain, will you shunt some down my way?
 
Max
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:01 PM
Subject: aus-wx: im back

HI All,
 
Been away for awhile.. tore achillies tendon.  Off work for 5 weeks, slowly healing back. Sick and tired of walking on crutches.. plaster off next Wed.
 
Where is all this rain.!!  come on !!!!  Bring it on.!!
 
Hope everyone is going well.
 
Dave
Bathurst
 
 
From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Cc: "~Roger Badham" , "~Don White" Subject: aus-wx: New capital city current weather maps Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:37:44 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I've set up weather charts for capital cities and immediate surrounds. These update hourly, and cover : Sydney/Wollongong/Newcastle/Blue Mountains Melbourne and 100km around Brisbane and 100km around Adelaide and 50km east and 150km west Perth and SW WA Hobart and the rest of Tasmania ;) There are two charts for each location. The first simply shows temperature, dew point, wind, pressure and rain in the past hour for as many AWS's as I could fit in, plotted in their correct locations (with location names!) The second shows the same plots, but is overlaid with isotherms in red, equal relative humidity isopleths in green (anyone remember what they're called?), and wind streamlines in black. The result is a bit messy until you adjust your eyes to it, but it is worthwhile doing so because, even in the few hours I've had it running experimentally, it's fascinating the amount of small-scale activity you can see happening. The wind streamlines really pick up seabreeze fronts and katabatics well, and should pick up thunderstorm outflows and local convergence lines nicely if we ever get any. At the moment, only current hour charts are available; I'll add a 24-hour archive if there's a demand. To get to them, go to http://australianweathernews.com and click on Hourly Charts in the Quick Weather bit at the top of the page. As always, any suggestions for improvement are most welcome. Cheers Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: New capital city current weather maps Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 00:58:42 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Excellent Laurier! -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Laurier Williams Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:38 PM To: Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com Cc: ~Roger Badham; ~Don White Subject: aus-wx: New capital city current weather maps I've set up weather charts for capital cities and immediate surrounds. These update hourly, and cover : Sydney/Wollongong/Newcastle/Blue Mountains Melbourne and 100km around Brisbane and 100km around Adelaide and 50km east and 150km west Perth and SW WA Hobart and the rest of Tasmania ;) There are two charts for each location. The first simply shows temperature, dew point, wind, pressure and rain in the past hour for as many AWS's as I could fit in, plotted in their correct locations (with location names!) The second shows the same plots, but is overlaid with isotherms in red, equal relative humidity isopleths in green (anyone remember what they're called?), and wind streamlines in black. The result is a bit messy until you adjust your eyes to it, but it is worthwhile doing so because, even in the few hours I've had it running experimentally, it's fascinating the amount of small-scale activity you can see happening. The wind streamlines really pick up seabreeze fronts and katabatics well, and should pick up thunderstorm outflows and local convergence lines nicely if we ever get any. At the moment, only current hour charts are available; I'll add a 24-hour archive if there's a demand. To get to them, go to http://australianweathernews.com and click on Hourly Charts in the Quick Weather bit at the top of the page. As always, any suggestions for improvement are most welcome. Cheers Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Cool News Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:26:23 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello Folks:
        Well, I see ya'll are having some very warm/hot temperatures. In my effort to cool ya'll off a bit, heres this chilly news: Mena had the first frost of Autumn this morning (Thur. Nov. 7) as the morning low dipped to 31F(-0.5C). The highs are expected to be in the 60sF.
          I have a question: Mena saw very , very little sunshine from Oct. 19 through Nov. 5--a very unusual prolonged cloudy stretch. Do places in Australia experience cloudy stretches like this? (The sunshine really looks good!!!)
           I hope this news cooled everyone off a bit.
           Have an Awesome November (& stay cool)
           Yours     David (soaking up the sun) Powell
X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 06:13:28 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cool News Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com  "Do places in Australia experience cloudy stretches like this? (The sunshine really looks good!!!)"

Wollongong and Victoria :)

Jimmy Deguara

At 12:26 PM 7/11/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Hello Folks:
        Well, I see ya'll are having some very warm/hot temperatures. In my effort to cool ya'll off a bit, heres this chilly news: Mena had the first frost of Autumn this morning (Thur. Nov. 7) as the morning low dipped to 31F(-0.5C). The highs are expected to be in the 60sF.
          I have a question: Mena saw very , very little sunshine from Oct. 19 through Nov. 5--a very unusual prolonged cloudy stretch. Do places in Australia experience cloudy stretches like this? (The sunshine really looks good!!!)
           I hope this news cooled everyone off a bit.
           Have an Awesome November (& stay cool)
           Yours     David (soaking up the sun) Powell
From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: ASWA Victoria barbeque Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:03:32 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Afternoon all, We've organised a nice (well, as far as barbeques go anyway.....) day for tomorrow's Victorian ASWA barbeque - 11am start. If you're coming from the Eastern Freeway, turn off at Chandler Highway, turn into Yarra Boulevard at the Guide Dogs, go across the Freeway and keep an eye out for Bellbird Picnic area..... http://www.stormchasers.au.com/barbeque.htm We'd love to see members, friends & family. See you all there tomorrow!! Cheers, the "Victorian Barbeque Squad" -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: Hot days, cool nights Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:13:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Message
In my backyard in Sydney's Northern Suburbs between Chatswood West & North Ryde I have been recording night temperatures below 10 degrees this week:
 
7.7 degrees
on the night of the seventh
7 degrees
on the night of the sixth
6.9
on the night of the fifth
 
At the moment the temperature here is 37.6
 
 
You can view all my daily statistics at:
 
My WX-918 weather station site is at:
 
 
 
 
XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Hot days, cool nights Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:10:07 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Message
= Dry air.
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Damian
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:14 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Hot days, cool nights

In my backyard in Sydney's Northern Suburbs between Chatswood West & North Ryde I have been recording night temperatures below 10 degrees this week:
 
7.7 degrees
on the night of the seventh
7 degrees
on the night of the sixth
6.9
on the night of the fifth
 
At the moment the temperature here is 37.6
 
 
You can view all my daily statistics at:
 
My WX-918 weather station site is at:
 
 
 
 
From: "David James Powell" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cool News X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.00 X-IPAddress: 208.189.4.95 Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 22:46:54 -0600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks for that. Wouldn't the prolonged cloudiness in Wollongong and Victoria be due to the marine influence? Mena has little direct marine influence; this episode of cloudiness was due to an active Subtropical Jet Stream (plus an Upper-level Low and 3 weak Canadian Cold fronts). > > "Do places in Australia experience cloudy stretches like this? (The > sunshine really looks good!!!)" > > Wollongong and Victoria :) > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 12:26 PM 7/11/2002 -0600, you wrote: > >Hello Folks: > > Well, I see ya'll are having some very warm/hot temperatures. In > > my effort to cool ya'll off a bit, heres this chilly news: Mena had the > > first frost of Autumn this morning (Thur. Nov. 7) as the morning low > > dipped to 31F(-0.5C). The highs are expected to be in the 60sF. > > I have a question: Mena saw very , very little sunshine from > > Oct. 19 through Nov. 5--a very unusual prolonged cloudy stretch. Do > > places in Australia experience cloudy stretches like this? (The sunshine > > really looks good!!!) > > I hope this news cooled everyone off a bit. > > Have an Awesome November (& stay cool) > > Yours David (soaking up the sun) Powell > > -- Sent using Voltage Net Webmail http://www.voltage.net/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 17:02:20 +1100 From: Greg Browning X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: ASWA Victoria barbeque Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jane, I think I'll have to give tomorrow a miss due to study - have last exam on Thu. Sorry for the late notice but I wouldn't have needed any meat, anyway! Have fun and say Hi to the guys for me, Regards Greg Browning Jane ONeill wrote: > Afternoon all, > > We've organised a nice (well, as far as barbeques go anyway.....) day for > tomorrow's Victorian ASWA barbeque - 11am start. If you're coming from the > Eastern Freeway, turn off at Chandler Highway, turn into Yarra Boulevard at > the Guide Dogs, go across the Freeway and keep an eye out for Bellbird > Picnic area..... > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/barbeque.htm > > We'd love to see members, friends & family. > > See you all there tomorrow!! > > Cheers, > > the "Victorian Barbeque Squad" > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky and Weather > www.stormchasers.au.com > > ASWA - Victoria > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cool News Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:58:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Wollongong - not of late, but in certain years it can compared to Sydney's west be extremely cloudy.
 
Three Bushfires this afternoon in Wollongong, the largest which had potential to threaten homes was waterbombed by the big sky crane.
 
Hit 38C today.  Seabreeze front went back and forward a few times but established better around 4pm.
 
Michael
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cool News

 "Do places in Australia experience cloudy stretches like this? (The sunshine really looks good!!!)"

Wollongong and Victoria :)

Jimmy Deguara

At 12:26 PM 7/11/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Hello Folks:
        Well, I see ya'll are having some very warm/hot temperatures. In my effort to cool ya'll off a bit, heres this chilly news: Mena had the first frost of Autumn this morning (Thur. Nov. 7) as the morning low dipped to 31F(-0.5C). The highs are expected to be in the 60sF.
          I have a question: Mena saw very , very little sunshine from Oct. 19 through Nov. 5--a very unusual prolonged cloudy stretch. Do places in Australia experience cloudy stretches like this? (The sunshine really looks good!!!)
           I hope this news cooled everyone off a bit.
           Have an Awesome November (& stay cool)
           Yours     David (soaking up the sun) Powell
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02
X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 01:00:54 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: ASWA Victoria barbeque Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 12:03 PM 8/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Afternoon all, > >We've organised a nice (well, as far as barbeques go anyway.....) day for >tomorrow's Victorian ASWA barbeque - 11am start. If you're coming from the >Eastern Freeway, turn off at Chandler Highway, turn into Yarra Boulevard at >the Guide Dogs, go across the Freeway and keep an eye out for Bellbird >Picnic area..... >http://www.stormchasers.au.com/barbeque.htm Well, it's a bit late, I know, but I will see you there. A late night resulted in the BBQ winning the contest of the double booking here... :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Patrick Tobin" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:36:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Have been overseas (to places where snow and ice are settling in for the northern winter). I flew back into Sydney on Monday of this week and got the following pictures of blowing dust over the SE corner of Lake George from the strong westerly winds blowing down from the range on the western side. It reminded me of some of the satellite photos I have seen of huge dust storms in the lee of the Rocky Mtns as a foehn effect accentuates the turbulence from the mountains and accelerates the descending air into the desert valleys. (No foehn effect here though - just normal turbulence in the lee of the hills). The shots are taken looking east and the second shot shows some some low based cumulus on the eastern horizon from a moister southerly flow moving up the coast and penetrating just to the eastern edge of the tablelands (but no further inland). http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/LakeGeorge/DSCF0185.JPG http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/LakeGeorge/DSCF0186.JPG http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/LakeGeorge/DSCF0187.JPG Cheers, Patrick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > Blair and all, > I have been watching Lake George > since I came to Canberra in 1981 and have seen it off and on since 1968. I > read a report on the Lake in the 1980's by the BMR which concluded that the > Lake is very sensitive to rainfall\evaporation in its basin. Hence full in > the mid 50's, 70's and generally low or dry for most of the period. I last > saw duststorms on the Lake in the big Dty in the 1990-92 drought and they > were awesome! caused by very strong winds blowing off the Lake George > escarpment onto the lake surface some 2 to 3 km out on the lake bed The dust > rose up to 200 metres above the bed as a huge wall . > Canberra has had some good falls late winter but they missed the lake hence > a brown area east of the Lake. I know Goulburn missed all that rain we had > last winter. > Gavin SSWW Canberra > > > > > > >From: Blair Trewin > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > >Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:23:51 +1100 > > > >I thought it was 'supposed' to be connected to a lake somewhere in > >New Zealand :-) (Actually, these legends may really be a manifestation > >of the fact that rainfall in this region is strongly related to > >ENSO, so it wouldn't be a surprise if Lake George tended to be low > >in periods when a lake somewhere in the world that gets more rain > >during El Nino events is high, and vice versa). > > > >Lake George also tends to respond to rainfall anomalies on the > >multi-year timescale. It was very high during the wet periods of > >the mid-70s and late 80s/early 90s. Prior to the last year or so, > >1982 was the only time since the 60s that it had been completely > >dry (and then only briefly), but I believe it was dry or mostly > >dry for about 15 years in the 20s/30s. > > > >(It's also very sensitive to evaporation; during the last Ice Age it > >was much deeper (20-30 metres) than it is now, despite lower > >rainfall). > > > >In 1982 the ACT Cross Country Club ran a race across it. I'm not > >sure if they have any plans for a repeat performance this year. > > > >Blair > > > > > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > > > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix > >off > > > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > > > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > > > > > PaulY > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > > > Thompson > > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a > >young > > > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > > > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > > > > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and > > > could not see how even then. > > > > > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. > >Like > > > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > > > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > > > wonder where the water went. > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Liam Domanski" > > > To: > > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going > >around > > > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach > >Ness, > > > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and > >the > > > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > > > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a > >puddle > > > > >of water in the far distance. > > > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust > >is > > > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > > > > > >Phil > > > > ><>< > > > > > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > > >From: Matthew Smith > > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > > > wow! > > > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something > >you > > > > > > would see > > > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > > > weather did > > > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > > > localised dust > > > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in > > > very > > > > > > sharp > > > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > > > > Looked quite > > > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown > >and > > > > > > drought > > > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in > >comparison > > > > > > ). This > > > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra > >trip, a > > > > > > sudden > > > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > >body of > > > > > > your > > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > > + > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > >of > > > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > > message. > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steven Williams" To: Cc: "Steven Williams" Subject: aus-wx: Contrasting weather Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 20:20:56 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
The hot dry weather being experienced by SE Australia is in contrast to cool, wetter conditions in NZ.
Much of the rain in NZ however is in the west. NZ Met Service is predicting snow to 500m over the South island
on Monday and 700m over the North island Tuesday. And medium range charts suggest another equally cold
outbreak end of the week.
Cheers
Steven Williams(NZ)
From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 22:50:06 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Welcome back Patrick, that is pretty similar to what I saw. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Tobin" To: Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 11:36 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > Hi all, > > Have been overseas (to places where snow and ice are settling in for the > northern winter). > > I flew back into Sydney on Monday of this week and got the following > pictures of blowing dust over the SE corner of Lake George from the strong > westerly winds blowing down from the range on the western side. It reminded > me of some of the satellite photos I have seen of huge dust storms in the > lee of the Rocky Mtns as a foehn effect accentuates the turbulence from the > mountains and accelerates the descending air into the desert valleys. (No > foehn effect here though - just normal turbulence in the lee of the hills). > > The shots are taken looking east and the second shot shows some some low > based cumulus on the eastern horizon from a moister southerly flow moving up > the coast and penetrating just to the eastern edge of the tablelands (but no > further inland). > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/LakeGeorge/DSCF0185.JPG > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/LakeGeorge/DSCF0186.JPG > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/LakeGeorge/DSCF0187.JPG > > > Cheers, > > Patrick > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gavin O'Brien" > To: > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 8:05 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > Blair and all, > > I have been watching Lake George > > since I came to Canberra in 1981 and have seen it off and on since 1968. > I > > read a report on the Lake in the 1980's by the BMR which concluded that > the > > Lake is very sensitive to rainfall\evaporation in its basin. Hence full in > > the mid 50's, 70's and generally low or dry for most of the period. I last > > saw duststorms on the Lake in the big Dty in the 1990-92 drought and they > > were awesome! caused by very strong winds blowing off the Lake George > > escarpment onto the lake surface some 2 to 3 km out on the lake bed The > dust > > rose up to 200 metres above the bed as a huge wall . > > Canberra has had some good falls late winter but they missed the lake > hence > > a brown area east of the Lake. I know Goulburn missed all that rain we had > > last winter. > > Gavin SSWW Canberra > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Blair Trewin > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > >Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:23:51 +1100 > > > > > >I thought it was 'supposed' to be connected to a lake somewhere in > > >New Zealand :-) (Actually, these legends may really be a manifestation > > >of the fact that rainfall in this region is strongly related to > > >ENSO, so it wouldn't be a surprise if Lake George tended to be low > > >in periods when a lake somewhere in the world that gets more rain > > >during El Nino events is high, and vice versa). > > > > > >Lake George also tends to respond to rainfall anomalies on the > > >multi-year timescale. It was very high during the wet periods of > > >the mid-70s and late 80s/early 90s. Prior to the last year or so, > > >1982 was the only time since the 60s that it had been completely > > >dry (and then only briefly), but I believe it was dry or mostly > > >dry for about 15 years in the 20s/30s. > > > > > >(It's also very sensitive to evaporation; during the last Ice Age it > > >was much deeper (20-30 metres) than it is now, despite lower > > >rainfall). > > > > > >In 1982 the ACT Cross Country Club ran a race across it. I'm not > > >sure if they have any plans for a repeat performance this year. > > > > > >Blair > > > > > > > It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet > > > > working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand > Prix > > >off > > > > South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they > > > > are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) > > > > > > > > PaulY > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael > > > > Thompson > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM > > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > > > > It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a > > >young > > > > lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was > > > > connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. > > > > > > > > Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector > and > > > > could not see how even then. > > > > > > > > I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. > > >Like > > > > Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, > > > > perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and > > > > wonder where the water went. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Liam Domanski" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > > > > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going > > >around > > > > > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach > > >Ness, > > > > > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Liam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > > > > > > > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and > > >the > > > > > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as > a > > > > > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a > > >puddle > > > > > >of water in the far distance. > > > > > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the > dust > > >is > > > > > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > > > > > > > > > >Phil > > > > > ><>< > > > > > > > > > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > > > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > > > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > > > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > > > >From: Matthew Smith > > > > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > > > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > > > > > > > > > wow! > > > > > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not > something > > >you > > > > > > > would see > > > > > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > > > > > weather did > > > > > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > > > > > localised dust > > > > > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted > in > > > > very > > > > > > > sharp > > > > > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at > highest. > > > > > > > Looked quite > > > > > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown > > >and > > > > > > > drought > > > > > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in > > >comparison > > > > > > > ). This > > > > > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra > > >trip, a > > > > > > > sudden > > > > > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: > 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > > >body of > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body > > >of > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > > > > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > > > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > >your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > >your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > >your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online > > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 07:22:48 EST Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cool News To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi David
from my 48 years experience a high temp of 41C to a low of say 16C in a 24 Hr. Period is not that unusual in Melbourne's'  summer . Others on the list can no doubt give more accurate info. .

Regards

Dennis Cottle
From: "Stargazer" To: "Aussie-Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Lightning Trackers Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 23:22:33 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all,
 
I was wondering how lightning trackers sense the lightning strikes. Are there different systems/ways to gather this info? How is this tracker  http://data.theweather.com.au/access/imageserver.jsp?image=lightning/Aus_Lightning.jpg  different to this one http://ritz.otago.ac.nz/~sferix/L_plot_special_map.jpg ? There seems to be only three (3) sensors in Australia for the second site. And how come some strike are recorded on one & not the other?
 
Is there a better one?
 
 
From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 08:50:45 EST Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lightning Trackers To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Paul

Jane ONeill is great at answering those type of questions .
Watch the list and I'm sure she will give the answer .

Regards

Dennis Cottle
From: "Steven Williams" To: Subject: aus-wx: Wintry forecast Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 11:28:50 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

For Otago and Southland
A cold outbreak developing overnight with westerlies becoming severe gale force. On Monday, showery with thunderstorms, hail and snow lowering to 400 metres.

 

Is that a wintry forecast or what!

Steven W (NZ)

 

From: "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Contrasting weather Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 09:46:02 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Using my little met knowledge, this explanation could partially explain why this is so. I am sure others may have a better theory.

 

Basically, at ~50s, the circumference of the Earth is ~28k km. If we have a basic 4 long wave pattern set up, each wave would be ~7k km long. Given the distance between Western Aus, SE Aus and NZ, it is not surprising to find that a lot of the time, Western Aus would have a similar long wave set up with NZ (i.e. Long wave trough or ridge), but both may have opposite set up to SE Aus.

 

I did a quick check on the latest LW analysis chart (9/11/02) and noted a slight ridging though SE Aus and slight troughing over NZ and off WAus coast. If you go forward to tonight and tomorrow (+24HR & +48HR), the ridging and troughing in the areas mentioned are more pronounced. This large scale set up is not the 4 classical wave pattern that I mentioned (5 at low lat and 4/5 at high lat) but I hope you get my gist.

 

Keep in mind my explanation is for large scale only and totally ignores all regional and local effects.

 

tuan (Melb)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Steven Williams
Sent: Saturday, 9 November 2002 18:21
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Cc: Steven Williams
Subject: aus-wx: Contrasting weather

The hot dry weather being experienced by SE Australia is in contrast to cool, wetter conditions in NZ.
Much of the rain in NZ however is in the west. NZ Met Service is predicting snow to 500m over the South island
on Monday and 700m over the North island Tuesday. And medium range charts suggest another equally cold
outbreak end of the week.
Cheers
Steven Williams(NZ)
From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Victorian ASWA barbeque Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 11:45:12 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com On a day perfect for a barbeque (but not a stormchase) with a serious cap restricting the lifting process.....Victorians gathered down by the Yarra River for the inaugural ASWA November barbeque. http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Nov02/1109aswa1.jpg Credit goes to Macca for a perfectly cooked lunch (and for doing the washing up single handedly ) http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Nov02/1109aswa2.jpg ... have you noticed that Pepsi have used ASWA colours to market their drink successfully? Robert Goler is seen here demonstrating..... http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Nov02/1109aswa3.jpg A game of indoor cricket began after lunch http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Nov02/1109aswa4.jpg - Tony Middleton showed amazing skill in steering the ball around the pavilion without any damage (except to my sunglasses!!) ........ A great day was had by all!!!!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Wintry forecast Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 10:56:50 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Sounds wonderful.  37C here yesterday with local fires, and 35C already at 10:30am this morning, I sure wouldn't mind a bit of wintry weather.  Please send to SEQ ASAP.
 
John.
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Steven Williams
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 8:29 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Wintry forecast

For Otago and Southland
A cold outbreak developing overnight with westerlies becoming severe gale force. On Monday, showery with thunderstorms, hail and snow lowering to 400 metres.

 

Is that a wintry forecast or what!

Steven W (NZ)

 

X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:18:46 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian ASWA barbeque Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 11:45 AM 10/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >A great day was had by all!!!!! It was a good day, even if the cricket pitch was a bit overgrown and the field had a slope... (that was after we moved the game out of the pavilion ;) ). 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:21:44 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Wintry forecast Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 10:56 AM 10/11/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Sounds wonderful. 37C here yesterday with local fires, and 35C already at >10:30am this morning, I sure wouldn't mind a bit of wintry >weather. Please send to SEQ ASAP. Nah, I'm still over winter.... but any donations of rain would be much appreciated. :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Observations--Seven Hills Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:09:37 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
For anyone that might be interested these are the latest readings for my observiing site:
 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Wintry forecast Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:11:51 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
here here
 
thank God for air conditioning !!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: aus-wx: Wintry forecast

Sounds wonderful.  37C here yesterday with local fires, and 35C already at 10:30am this morning, I sure wouldn't mind a bit of wintry weather.  Please send to SEQ ASAP.
 
John.
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Steven Williams
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 8:29 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Wintry forecast

For Otago and Southland
A cold outbreak developing overnight with westerlies becoming severe gale force. On Monday, showery with thunderstorms, hail and snow lowering to 400 metres.

 

Is that a wintry forecast or what!

Steven W (NZ)

 

From: "Steven Williams" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Wintry forecast Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:13:26 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I agree with Tony. In November the last thing you want is more winter. Winter is OUT. But the rain is nice. I hate drought though. Drought should be banned...if only we could control the weather! Cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 3:21 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Wintry forecast > At 10:56 AM 10/11/2002 +1000, you wrote: > > >Sounds wonderful. 37C here yesterday with local fires, and 35C already at > >10:30am this morning, I sure wouldn't mind a bit of wintry > >weather. Please send to SEQ ASAP. > > Nah, I'm still over winter.... but any donations of rain would be much > appreciated. :) > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Graham" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: nsw sta....woohoo!!! Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 20:55:30 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Let's hope there's more rain than hail...... John in Ballina TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST NSW Severe Thunderstorm Advice BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE Issued at 2040 on Sunday the 10th of November 2002 The Bureau of Meteorology in Sydney has issued a Severe Thunderstorm Advice for people in the following weather forecast district: Northern Rivers This advice is valid until 10pm and it should not be used after this time. Thunderstorms are forecast within the advice area this evening. Some of these are expected to be severe bringing damaging winds and large hailstones. ____________________________________________________________ John Graham gorzzz at d2.net.au or gorzzz at yahoo.com Icq 25440353 Member of The Australian Severe Weather Assoc. ASWA Homepage http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ Snail Mail: P.O. Box 1072 Ballina 2478 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Wintry forecast Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 23:42:47 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Topped out at 39.7C here (Mt. Crosby) today, that's five 37+C days in SEQ since Oct 1, and 33 days over 30C since Sep 1, and "summer" is still 3 weeks away... Darn well feels like we have had summer already. Rain would be sooooo nice. John. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Steven Williams Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 2:13 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Wintry forecast I agree with Tony. In November the last thing you want is more winter. Winter is OUT. But the rain is nice. I hate drought though. Drought should be banned...if only we could control the weather! Cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 3:21 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Wintry forecast > At 10:56 AM 10/11/2002 +1000, you wrote: > > >Sounds wonderful. 37C here yesterday with local fires, and 35C already at > >10:30am this morning, I sure wouldn't mind a bit of wintry > >weather. Please send to SEQ ASAP. > > Nah, I'm still over winter.... but any donations of rain would be much > appreciated. :) > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Cool News Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 09:29:37 +1100 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Message
I would say the places in Australia most prone to extended periods of widespread cloud are the SW slopes of NSW and SW WA, of course particularly in Winter and early Spring. It would be extremely uncommon for either of these places to experience cloudy conditions over a period of weeks though.
 
Andrew.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Michael Thompson
Sent: Friday, 8 November 2002 8:59 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cool News

Wollongong - not of late, but in certain years it can compared to Sydney's west be extremely cloudy.
 
Three Bushfires this afternoon in Wollongong, the largest which had potential to threaten homes was waterbombed by the big sky crane.
 
Hit 38C today.  Seabreeze front went back and forward a few times but established better around 4pm.
 
Michael
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cool News

 "Do places in Australia experience cloudy stretches like this? (The sunshine really looks good!!!)"

Wollongong and Victoria :)

Jimmy Deguara

At 12:26 PM 7/11/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Hello Folks:
        Well, I see ya'll are having some very warm/hot temperatures. In my effort to cool ya'll off a bit, heres this chilly news: Mena had the first frost of Autumn this morning (Thur. Nov. 7) as the morning low dipped to 31F(-0.5C). The highs are expected to be in the 60sF.
          I have a question: Mena saw very , very little sunshine from Oct. 19 through Nov. 5--a very unusual prolonged cloudy stretch. Do places in Australia experience cloudy stretches like this? (The sunshine really looks good!!!)
           I hope this news cooled everyone off a bit.
           Have an Awesome November (& stay cool)
           Yours     David (soaking up the sun) Powell
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02
From: "Steven Williams" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Wintry forecast Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:00:19 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Christchurch airport reports a temp of 6C with rain. There have been TS/GR in the vicinity of Ch this afternoon. Wellington, the sunshine capital of the southern hemisphere is reporting temp 9, s25kts TS/GR (thunderstorm/hail) What happened to summer???????. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:42 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Wintry forecast > Topped out at 39.7C here (Mt. Crosby) today, that's five 37+C days in SEQ > since Oct 1, and 33 days over 30C since Sep 1, and "summer" is still 3 weeks > away... Darn well feels like we have had summer already. Rain would be > sooooo nice. > > John. > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Steven > Williams > Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 2:13 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Wintry forecast > > > I agree with Tony. In November the last thing you want is more winter. > Winter is OUT. But the rain is nice. > I hate drought though. Drought should be banned...if only we could control > the weather! > Cheers > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > To: > Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 3:21 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Wintry forecast > > > > At 10:56 AM 10/11/2002 +1000, you wrote: > > > > >Sounds wonderful. 37C here yesterday with local fires, and 35C already > at > > >10:30am this morning, I sure wouldn't mind a bit of wintry > > >weather. Please send to SEQ ASAP. > > > > Nah, I'm still over winter.... but any donations of rain would be much > > appreciated. :) > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 06:16:29 EST Subject: Re: aus-wx: Wintry forecast To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com John
I will crank up my secret weather machine and send some temp. to my east if you crank up yours and send some rain to your west .
Why did summer come so early ????????

Regards

Dennis Cottle

Melbourne
From: "John Graham" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: nsw sta....woohoo!!! Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:48:34 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com [snip] had only 0.8mm last night.....very frustrating.....bloody politician weather (promises you everything under the sun, & gives you s.f.a in return) John in Ballina > > Delurking to say I was in Grafton all weekend visiting family. On the > trip back to Coffs airport I noticed that there looked some storm > action. Very frustrating. > > Grafton hit 40 on Saturday and close to it on Sunday. The weather on > arrival back in Sydney was a tad cooler. > > Shaun > -- > But the helmet had gold decoration, and the bespoke armourers had made a > new gleaming, > breastplate with useless gold ornamentation on it. Sam Vimes felt like a > class > traitor every time he wore it. He hated being thought of as one of those > people > that wore stupid ornamental armour. It was gilt by association. > - Terry Pratchet "Night Watch" > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 23:11:28 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: nsw sta....woohoo!!! Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Monday, 11 November 2002 10:10:10 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: nsw sta....woohoo!!!
 
On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 23:55, John Graham wrote:
> Let's hope there's more rain than hail......
>
> John in Ballina
>
> TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST
>
> NSW Severe Thunderstorm Advice
> BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY
> NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE
> Issued at 2040 on Sunday the 10th of November 2002
>
> The Bureau of Meteorology in Sydney has issued a Severe Thunderstorm Advice
> for people in the following weather forecast district:
>
> Northern Rivers

Delurking to say I was in Grafton all weekend visiting family. On the
trip back to Coffs airport I noticed that there looked some storm
action. Very frustrating.

Grafton hit 40 on Saturday and close to it on Sunday. The weather on
arrival back in Sydney was a tad cooler.

Shaun
--
But the helmet had gold decoration, and the bespoke armourers had made a
new gleaming,
breastplate with useless gold ornamentation on it. Sam Vimes felt like a
class
traitor every time he wore it. He hated being thought of as one of those
people
that wore stupid ornamental armour. It was gilt by association.
- Terry Pratchet "Night Watch"
what,s this ^^^
 
regards
richard

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP.gif: 00000001,582db83c,00000000,00000000 From: "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: US Tornado Outbreak. Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 00:56:13 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all,
Well with our storm season underway, this time of year its a little quite in the US, However in the previous ~24 hours over 250 Svr WX warnings have been issued and over 180 Tornado watches were issued.
 
So far 55 Tornado's have been Confirmed, with 9 also on the previous day, there will be more added to this for sure. I have read reports of 32 deaths due to the fact that alot of this Occured during the late afternoon into the night and early hours of the morning. Millions of $$$ damage and lots more people injured.
 
This has been the biggest tornadic outbreak this year in the US, and its not even the actual storm season, but what US Chasers call "Secondary season" which occurs for a few weeks in Autumn, before the winter months take hold.
 
Im also wondering if the Early Snowfalls that fell over many Northan and Eastern states a week or two back aided in anyway to the outbreak, would be interesting to see, if the same mechanism that brought the snowfalls also had a play in the outbreak.
 
Hopefully I will get some links orgained (or somebody else who has been following it) but for now check this out. http://mgweather.com/

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 1/11/2002
From: "Third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: nsw sta....woohoo!!! Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 06:07:56 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com approx 0.5mm in Petrie (just N of Brisbane) last night. won't even water the lawn !! ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Graham" To: Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:48 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: nsw sta....woohoo!!! > [snip] > > had only 0.8mm last night.....very frustrating.....bloody politician weather > (promises you everything under the sun, & gives you s.f.a in return) > > John in Ballina > > > > > Delurking to say I was in Grafton all weekend visiting family. On the > > trip back to Coffs airport I noticed that there looked some storm > > action. Very frustrating. > > > > Grafton hit 40 on Saturday and close to it on Sunday. The weather on > > arrival back in Sydney was a tad cooler. > > > > Shaun > > -- > > But the helmet had gold decoration, and the bespoke armourers had made a > > new gleaming, > > breastplate with useless gold ornamentation on it. Sam Vimes felt like a > > class > > traitor every time he wore it. He hated being thought of as one of those > > people > > that wore stupid ornamental armour. It was gilt by association. > > - Terry Pratchet "Night Watch" > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:36:02 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: Re: aus-wx: Wintry forecast Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 06:16 11/11/02 EST, you wrote: >John > I will crank up my secret weather machine and send some temp. to my east >if you crank up yours and send some rain to your west . > Why did summer come so early ???????? > > Regards > > Dennis Cottle > > Melbourne Dunno JohnGaul NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Subject: Re: aus-wx: nsw sta....woohoo!!! From: Shaun Cronin To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 11 Nov 2002 21:33:00 -1000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 23:55, John Graham wrote: > Let's hope there's more rain than hail...... > > John in Ballina > > TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST > > NSW Severe Thunderstorm Advice > BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY > NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE > Issued at 2040 on Sunday the 10th of November 2002 > > The Bureau of Meteorology in Sydney has issued a Severe Thunderstorm Advice > for people in the following weather forecast district: > > Northern Rivers Delurking to say I was in Grafton all weekend visiting family. On the trip back to Coffs airport I noticed that there looked some storm action. Very frustrating. Grafton hit 40 on Saturday and close to it on Sunday. The weather on arrival back in Sydney was a tad cooler. Shaun -- But the helmet had gold decoration, and the bespoke armourers had made a new gleaming, breastplate with useless gold ornamentation on it. Sam Vimes felt like a class traitor every time he wore it. He hated being thought of as one of those people that wore stupid ornamental armour. It was gilt by association. - Terry Pratchet "Night Watch" +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: It's here Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:46:12 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Temperature plummeting now the change has hit with a 46.7kmh gust from the west and heaps and heaps of red dust. As if we needed more of that. I only got to 34.1 here today but it was one of those days that felt and looked like it might do something.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: It's here Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:48:05 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Temperature plummeting now the change has hit with a 46.7kmh gust from the west and heaps and heaps of red dust. As if we needed more of that. I only got to 34.1 here today but it was one of those days that felt and looked like it might do something. Make that a 51kmh gust and twice as much dust
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Sorry Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:39:34 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Very sorry about the three exact posts on my return. Something went astray and I didn't think the message was being sent. Hence the "click again"
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:58:34 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sorry To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com no worries Bussie... I've been having problems for the last couple of days with the list and was wondering if anyone else is? I've tried sending e-mails but they have all bounced so this is more or less a test to see if it gets through... Tim. ---- Original message ---- >Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:39:34 +1100 >From: "Bussy" >Subject: aus-wx: Sorry >To: "aussie-weather" > >Very sorry about the three exact posts on my return. Something went astray and I didn't think the message was being sent. Hence the "click again" > >Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:46:50 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sorry Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
no probs my end tim, yours are coming through ok.
 
regards
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Tuesday, 12 November 2002 8:40:51 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sorry
 
no worries Bussie... I've been having problems for the
last couple of days with the list and was wondering if
anyone else is? I've tried sending e-mails but they
have all bounced so this is more or less a test to see
if it gets through...

Tim.


---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:39:34 +1100
>From: "Bussy" <bussie at netc.net.au>
>Subject: aus-wx: Sorry
>To: "aussie-weather" <aussie-
weather at world.std.com>
>
>Very sorry about the three exact posts on my return.
Something went astray and I didn't think the message
was being sent. Hence the "click again"
>
>Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP3.gif: 00000001,2ebd0629,00000000,00000000 From: "Jason Beer" To: Subject: aus-wx: cold in Sweden Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:49:58 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, A bit of snow in Stockholm in the last 2 days also down to -10c last night and max temp today about -5c or so. To those that have records: In Sweden there has hardly been any precipitation since last March / April. The odd storm in summer. Can anyone find records if Sweden suffered a similar dry spell at the same time OZ did in 82/83 ? I would call it a drought here. But there are so many lakes and water here water restrictions would be unimaginable! I´ll drill a hole and send some down to you. cheers Jas +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:54:42 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aussie Weather Subject: aus-wx: Real time Data in Sydney's North Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The Rural Fire Service has put up weather data from its Terrey Hills site, offering the best available real time data in Sydney's north - an area neglected by the BoM as far as AWS's are concerned. They are apparently still devdloping the site at http://www.beaconhillrfb.org.au/weather/ shows some Graphs and is automatically updated every minute automatically (no need to hit refresh) http://www.beaconhillrfb.org.au/weather/eoc.htm gives some links to more details Thanks to Supt Craig Geddes and his men. Don White +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: It's here Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:20:55 +1100 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Message
It will be interesting to see what sort of a charge, if any, the dust makes across southern NSW tonight.
 
Both Hay and Hillston in the Riverina reported dust storms in the 2100EDT synop. Hay reported wind speeds (not gusts) of 45 kts, but I'm unsure of whether the reporter has an actual anemometer or not. Wagga Wagga was 34G40 at 2200. Also, Deniliquin 38G50 at 2040.
 
Andrew.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Bussy
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2002 7:46 PM
To: aussie-weather
Subject: aus-wx: It's here

Temperature plummeting now the change has hit with a 46.7kmh gust from the west and heaps and heaps of red dust. As if we needed more of that. I only got to 34.1 here today but it was one of those days that felt and looked like it might do something.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:40:35 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sorry X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Haven't posted lately because weather hasn't happened here but I'll try out a test just to see what happens. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Richard Modistach" To: Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:46:50 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sorry > no probs my end tim, yours are coming through ok. > > regards > richard > > -------Original Message------- > > From: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Tuesday, 12 November 2002 8:40:51 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sorry > > no worries Bussie... I've been having problems for the > last couple of days with the list and was wondering if > anyone else is? I've tried sending e-mails but they > have all bounced so this is more or less a test to see > if it gets through... > > Tim. > > > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:39:34 +1100 > >From: "Bussy" > >Subject: aus-wx: Sorry > >To: "aussie-weather" weather at world.std.com> > > > >Very sorry about the three exact posts on my return. > Something went astray and I didn't think the message > was being sent. Hence the "click again" > > > >Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > . +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Bathurst weather Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 01:57:00 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
HI All.
 
Shocked to hear thunder about 5 min ago.. Wind speed has picked up.. Loaded up radar real quick and can see some rain heading to Bathurst soon. Its about time, although i doubt will last long. Anything wld be good.
 
Might be time to shut down computers. 
 
Sounding rather like gales outside. 
 
Dave
Bathurst
 
 
From: "Dave Ellem" To: Subject: aus-wx: Electrical Storm in Northern Rivers - 10th November Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:15:30 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Afternoon!
I have written up a report on Sunday nights electrical storms near Lismore and Ballina along with some photos I took. It can be seen here:
Looks like more storms developing here now!!
 
Enjoy!
 
Dave Ellem,
Wollongbar,
Northern Rivers,
NE NSW
From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: Darwin & the Top End added to hourly charts Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 07:55:26 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I've added Darwin and the NT Top End to the regional charts at http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml (sorry for the wait, Paul ). As would be expected, the wind streamlines show off areas of convergence very nicely! Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steven Williams" To: Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:59:19 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea levels dropped by 0.5m.
Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ.  Story here if anybody is interested.
 
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Negative storm surges Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:15:15 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>from that article:

>The scientists, who noticed it on their remote-controlled sea level recorders, had never seen or heard of >anything like it before. .two weeks after it first happened, it happened again..Scientists are struggling to >explain data from July.. Niwa has also noticed that the sea level around the country tends to drop during El >Nino years..Conversely, the sea level rises in La Nina years...typical sea level variation in El Nino or La Nina >years was only around 4cm, compared with 50cm in the July events.

Just to put a perspective on this story, they have no more idea than anyone else as to what's going on and by their own admission don't fully understand ocean physics.  All the more reason for them to stop telling everyone that the oceans are rising. One of them, on the radio today, even tried to blame global warming(yawn). These "negative storm surges" are a grand tidal phenomenon, lunar and on a 20 year cycle.

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges

South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea levels dropped by 0.5m.
Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ.  Story here if anybody is interested.
 
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: aus-wx: More sea science Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:29:50 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

"..Sand from Waitemata Harbour is being considered to restore a North Shore beach because local Maori object to sand from the Coromandel. A Ngati Whatua representative said the Coromandel sand was unacceptable because it included elements of blood and bone from another tribe's area.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004042&thesection=news&thesubsection=general

So in this country, tribe's blood doesn't get dissolved in water and some can tell sand and tiny bits of bone one beach from another only 50 miles away. Incredible. But then, some can also detect a sealevel rise of 1mm per year, which is what NIWA scientists did in 1999 at Lyttleton, a study well publicised at the time. On a constantly undulating sea, coming in and out each day, 1mm is amazing.  It just shows you how clever NZers are.

 

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges

South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea levels dropped by 0.5m.
Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ.  Story here if anybody is interested.
 
From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: More sea science Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:28:38 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Must bite tounge . . . must . . . . noooooooo LOL- keep fishing ken J

 

James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

ph. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring
Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 8:30 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: More sea science

 

"..Sand from Waitemata Harbour is being considered to restore a North Shore beach because local Maori object to sand from the Coromandel. A Ngati Whatua representative said the Coromandel sand was unacceptable because it included elements of blood and bone from another tribe's area.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004042&thesection=news&thesubsection=general

So in this country, tribe's blood doesn't get dissolved in water and some can tell sand and tiny bits of bone one beach from another only 50 miles away. Incredible. But then, some can also detect a sealevel rise of 1mm per year, which is what NIWA scientists did in 1999 at Lyttleton, a study well publicised at the time. On a constantly undulating sea, coming in and out each day, 1mm is amazing.  It just shows you how clever NZers are.

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 PM

Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges

 

South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea levels dropped by 0.5m.

Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ.  Story here if anybody is interested.

 

X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.70] From: "Catherine Elliott" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:32:45 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2002 12:32:45.0855 (UTC) FILETIME=[C4E00AF0:01C28B10] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Today was amazing yet very unnerving and way too close to home. I thought I might share the day with you. I called a friend of mine (who helps out in emergencies) at about 2.30 and found out there was a fire at The Pines Flora & Fauna Reserve (he was there), I have other friends who live there on Pecan, now if you know of frankston Nth you'll know that at the end of Excelsior is Honeysuckle (that is near where the fires stopped) just 60m or so back there is Rowan Ct off Marlock, this is where my friends grandmother lives, (my friends were sitting on their garrage watching it) At about 2.45 my sister and her flatmate went down there and the smoke was very thick and really dark. There were CFA & police there and they followed for a few seconds an SES vehicle but had to stop, couldn't go any further. they pulled into a ct and there were choppers up, 2 police and 1 fire we thought + the water chopper (? not too sure though) one of them was right above the car by about 10m. They left there and went to their house, great view of the plume of smoke, every now and then the smoke would start billowing up and was very dark red brown. I found out later on that the conservationists were very upset with the backburning that was started to stop the fire spreading down the side of the reserve, they didnt want it to be done and were arguing with people. & I have just found out that the fire is still burning but under control so that there is less risk during summer & that my first friend who i called was actually in the fire and was hit by water from the tanker. he went in with a CFA strike team and said it was hot. apparently the gumtrees shake when burning. Anyway that was all (mainly courtesy of my friends but yeah) very interesting day. yours Catherine _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:18:49 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: aus-wx: uh-oh! Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
here we go again, still, aus-wx has been a bit quiet latley.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 11:11:51 PM
Subject: RE: aus-wx: More sea science
 

Must bite tounge . . . must . . . . noooooooo LOL- keep fishing ken J

 

James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

ph. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring
Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 8:30 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: More sea science

 

"..Sand from Waitemata Harbour is being considered to restore a North Shore beach because local Maori object to sand from the Coromandel. A Ngati Whatua representative said the Coromandel sand was unacceptable because it included elements of blood and bone from another tribe's area.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004042&thesection=news&thesubsection=general

So in this country, tribe's blood doesn't get dissolved in water and some can tell sand and tiny bits of bone one beach from another only 50 miles away. Incredible. But then, some can also detect a sealevel rise of 1mm per year, which is what NIWA scientists did in 1999 at Lyttleton, a study well publicised at the time. On a constantly undulating sea, coming in and out each day, 1mm is amazing.  It just shows you how clever NZers are.

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 PM

Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges

 

South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea levels dropped by 0.5m.

Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ.  Story here if anybody is interested.

 

 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP4.gif: 00000001,07efc6a0,00000000,00000000 From: simon at fearby.com To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Hunter Chase - 13 Nov Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:23:19 Pacific Standard Time X-Originating-Ip: [203.98.50.151] X-Mailer: NOCC v0.9.5 X-AntiSpam: Checked for restricted content by Gordano's AntiSpam Software Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I have photos (still in Film) of the Storm fronts over NZ that threw a Tornado through Christchurch from 17,000 feet three weeks ago. Huge waves of Cumulonimbus Incus clouds etc.. Simon Craig Arthur wrote : > I was flying back into Sydney yesterday > evening and grabbed a couple of photos of storms along the trough. Once I get > the film processed, I'll throw them up. Looked quite nice surrounded by Sc and > then these towers all nicely lined up... >   > Craig > > -----Original Message-----From: > aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of James > HarrisSent: Thursday, 14 November 2002 08:48To: > aussie-weather at world.std.comSubject: aus-wx: Hunter Chase - 13 > Nov >   > Myself and Matt Smith got home late last night after chasing > the Hunter succesfully yesterday. A Full report will b eon www.sydneystormchasers.com > soon. >   > Storms fired near Muswellbrook and Scone around 5pm with one > particular storm we followed from Scone east to Timor dropping Hail around 2 - > 3 cms in places. Scone had some fantastic rain although for some reason it has > 0.0mm in the rainfall summary (The storm literally started precipitating right > on Scone so I suspect the rain gauge is held somewhere west of Scone > ) >   > Around Timor there were storms in every direction most with > great structure , the odd hail shaft and some very heavy rain (Whatever the > valley is east from Scone had some great rain totals in areas). Around 7pm we > followed a cell N / NE of Murrundi that soon became a big complex of storms. > Some fantastic lightning (about every second) with Matt and I taking as many > photos as we could . Should get them developed today and have them online soon > ! >   Last one to the pub is a MCSE professional! -- My 3D FishTank Simulator / Screen Saver ----------------- ( DirectX 8.1 ) ----- Main: http://www.fearby.com/products/3dfishtank/default.shtml Screenshots: http://www.fearby.com/products/3dfishtank/screenshots.shtml Download: http://www.fearby.com/products/3dfishtank/evaluation.shtml ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.29.139] From: "James Harris" To: Subject: aus-wx: Hunter Chase - 13 Nov Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:48:13 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2002 21:48:20.0288 (UTC) FILETIME=[61BEDC00:01C28B5E] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
 
Myself and Matt Smith got home late last night after chasing the Hunter succesfully yesterday. A Full report will b eon www.sydneystormchasers.com soon.
 
Storms fired near Muswellbrook and Scone around 5pm with one particular storm we followed from Scone east to Timor dropping Hail around 2 - 3 cms in places. Scone had some fantastic rain although for some reason it has 0.0mm in the rainfall summary (The storm literally started precipitating right on Scone so I suspect the rain gauge is held somewhere west of Scone )
 
Around Timor there were storms in every direction most with great structure , the odd hail shaft and some very heavy rain (Whatever the valley is east from Scone had some great rain totals in areas). Around 7pm we followed a cell N / NE of Murrundi that soon became a big complex of storms. Some fantastic lightning (about every second) with Matt and I taking as many photos as we could . Should get them developed today and have them online soon !
 
From: "Craig Arthur" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Hunter Chase - 13 Nov Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:09:55 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I was flying back into Sydney yesterday evening and grabbed a couple of photos of storms along the trough. Once I get the film processed, I'll throw them up. Looked quite nice surrounded by Sc and then these towers all nicely lined up...
 
Craig
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of James Harris
Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2002 08:48
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Hunter Chase - 13 Nov

 
Myself and Matt Smith got home late last night after chasing the Hunter succesfully yesterday. A Full report will b eon www.sydneystormchasers.com soon.
 
Storms fired near Muswellbrook and Scone around 5pm with one particular storm we followed from Scone east to Timor dropping Hail around 2 - 3 cms in places. Scone had some fantastic rain although for some reason it has 0.0mm in the rainfall summary (The storm literally started precipitating right on Scone so I suspect the rain gauge is held somewhere west of Scone )
 
Around Timor there were storms in every direction most with great structure , the odd hail shaft and some very heavy rain (Whatever the valley is east from Scone had some great rain totals in areas). Around 7pm we followed a cell N / NE of Murrundi that soon became a big complex of storms. Some fantastic lightning (about every second) with Matt and I taking as many photos as we could . Should get them developed today and have them online soon !
 
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:58:05 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From my website .."Sydney sees rain.... between 16th-21st..." One would have to say, with my give or take 24 hrs, that this is now looking likely. Ken 14/11/02 "ABC News A cloudband crosses northern and eastern Australia ahead of a trough, causing isolated showers and storms in the NT, QLD and NSW New South Wales Sydney Late shower". ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Modistach To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:48 AM Subject: aus-wx: uh-oh! here we go again, still, aus-wx has been a bit quiet latley. richard -------Original Message------- From: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 11:11:51 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: More sea science Must bite tounge . . . must . . . . noooooooo LOL- keep fishing ken J James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 8:30 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: More sea science "..Sand from Waitemata Harbour is being considered to restore a North Shore beach because local Maori object to sand from the Coromandel. A Ngati Whatua representative said the Coromandel sand was unacceptable because it included elements of blood and bone from another tribe's area. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004042&thesection=news&t hesubsection=general So in this country, tribe's blood doesn't get dissolved in water and some can tell sand and tiny bits of bone one beach from another only 50 miles away. Incredible. But then, some can also detect a sealevel rise of 1mm per year, which is what NIWA scientists did in 1999 at Lyttleton, a study well publicised at the time. On a constantly undulating sea, coming in and out ea ch day, 1mm is amazing. It just shows you how clever NZers are. ----- Original Message ----- From: Steven Williams To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 PM Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea levels dropped by 0.5m. Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ. Story here if anybody is interested. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004050&thesection=news&t hesubsection=general ____________________________________________________ IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Food for thought--El Nino Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:19:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:52:57 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com If I remember rightly there was some rain forecast for Sydney by you earlier this month ? To be fair that first rain forecast came close, but surface conditions did not marry up with unstable upper air - the result nothing. Since July to present in Shellharbour we have had just over 20mm of rain. This month has had several 0.2mm falls, but hardly a 1mm on total yet. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:58 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? > >From my website > .."Sydney sees rain.... between 16th-21st..." > One would have to say, with my give or take 24 hrs, that this is now looking > likely. > Ken > > 14/11/02 "ABC News > A cloudband crosses northern and eastern Australia ahead of a trough, > causing isolated showers and storms in the NT, QLD and NSW > New South Wales > Sydney > Late shower". > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Richard Modistach > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:48 AM > Subject: aus-wx: uh-oh! > > > here we go again, still, aus-wx has been a bit quiet latley. > > richard > > -------Original Message------- > > From: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 11:11:51 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: RE: aus-wx: More sea science > > Must bite tounge . . . must . . . . noooooooo LOL- keep fishing ken J > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 8:30 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: More sea science > > "..Sand from Waitemata Harbour is being considered to restore a North Shore > beach because local Maori object to sand from the Coromandel. A Ngati Whatua > representative said the Coromandel sand was unacceptable because it included > elements of blood and bone from another tribe's area. > http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004042&thesection=news&t > hesubsection=general > So in this country, tribe's blood doesn't get dissolved in water and some > can tell sand and tiny bits of bone one beach from another only 50 miles > away. Incredible. But then, some can also detect a sealevel rise of 1mm per > year, which is what NIWA scientists did in 1999 at Lyttleton, a study well > publicised at the time. On a constantly undulating sea, coming in and out ea > ch day, 1mm is amazing. It just shows you how clever NZers are. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Steven Williams > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges > > South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea > levels dropped by 0.5m. > Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ. Story here > if anybody is interested. > > http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004050&thesection=news&t > hesubsection=general > > > > ____________________________________________________ > IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:04:05 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Hunter Chase - 13 Nov X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Now this comment brought some images to mind! When I was a kid growing up in Australia, to "Throw (anything) up" meant to vomit it out through your mouth! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Craig Arthur" To: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:09:55 +1100 Subject: RE: aus-wx: Hunter Chase - 13 Nov > I was flying back into Sydney yesterday evening and grabbed a couple of > photos of storms along the trough. Once I get the film processed, I'll > throw > them up. Looked quite nice surrounded by Sc and then these towers all > nicely > lined up... > > Craig [snip] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Food for thought--El Nino Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:09:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I am a bit worried about the correlations of reduced sediment to higher organic growth.
 
I am no scientist, but have spent hours in my younger days paddling through Lake Illawarra after green weed for bait and know the opposite is correct.
 
Weed and organic growth in the Lake peaks 1 to 2 months after a decent fresh. This I have seen time and time again. Last weekend I was struggling to find enough green weed for a some fishing.  Lake Illawarra is at its lowest level that I can ever remember and salt levels a very high.
 
It is the same text book / no practice science that spent millions of dollars to come up with a sea wall that would keep Lake Illawarra open. I even wrote a letter to the local paper suggesting that the design was flawed and would simply allow Windang Beach to fill the channel dredged. The main flaws were that they only built one breakwater, and secondly it bent the wrong way, its design actually promoted the build up of sand. It would have been best if they left it alone, the Lake blocking is not unnatural, in fact it would in pre white history blocked for months or even into years at a time. Unfortunately a few misguided people have stolen the debate and would have you believe that Lake Illawarra once had an entrance that you could sail the Queen Mary up. 
 
Michael
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Food for thought--El Nino

Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02
From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:33:32 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi All,
 
Yesterday we were at Robertson at the Lavendar Farm and the owner told us a story about someone in that area who had pulled up old lino and found a paper from 1940.  On it was list of predictions by Indigo Jones.  It could have been a story in the local paper from this week or last week.
 
If Don White or anyone else who reads this, has heard of him perhaps further comments would be interesting.
 
The old newspaper had a list of predictions, many of which evidently have come true.  Including a forecast of drought for 2002 and 2003 with rain on 27th November this year.
 
Anyway just thought that it could be interesting to everyone out of curiosities sake, to see what happens. 
 
Judy Mayo
From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:38:27 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Anyone else see this photo? http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/DroughtS.jpg Looks eerily like Melbourne's Dust Storm! James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:00:57 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hmmm, the recent dust storm in brissy certainly did not present like this... Just a gardual orangey darkening covering the sky from the South West, followed by gradual reduction in visibility eventually down to about 250m. But there was little wind with it, so I presume that it was very much into a decaying phase by then, and dust was more or less just dropping out of the mid levels. John. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of James Holbeach Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:38 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith Anyone else see this photo? http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/DroughtS.jpg Looks eerily like Melbourne's Dust Storm! James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David Carroll" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:02:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com WOW.. what a photo.. Did you take this photo James? Dave Bathurst ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith > Anyone else see this photo? > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/DroughtS.jpg > > Looks eerily like Melbourne's Dust Storm! > > James > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:36:36 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com LOL no- it was in the newspaper today James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of David Carroll Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2002 12:03 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith WOW.. what a photo.. Did you take this photo James? Dave Bathurst ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith > Anyone else see this photo? > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/DroughtS.jpg > > Looks eerily like Melbourne's Dust Storm! > > James > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:25:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Those conservationists should be thrown in the bloody fire so they themselves can find out just how hot they get after around 20years of no fire in the area. Then they might sit down, shutup and cooperate. I will also attach a copy of an email I received from the NSWRFS which is VERY good news in these matters. Glen O'Riley NSWRFS Member ----- Positive Approach to Hazard Reduction Thursday, 14 November 2002 - Members of the public are being encouraged to voice their concerns about hazard reduction directly to the NSW Rural Fire Service. As a result of amendments to the Rural Fires Act on 1 August 2002, the public now has an avenue of complaint when a landholder has failed to do necessary hazard reduction. Since the new legislation took effect, 72 complaints have been received by the RFS. While 22 are still under investigation a range of solutions has been achieved in other cases including directing the manual removal of the bushfire hazards, prescribed burning of the area being programmed as a priority following the end of the bushfire season or recognition that no significant hazard exists. All land owners and managers will be accountable to manage the fire risk on their properties and, more particularly, to carry out any hazard reduction that is needed to achieve this, said NSW Rural Fire Service Commissioner Phil Koperberg. If nothing is done after a concern has been properly identified, we can direct the landholder to carry-out the hazard reduction or arrange for it to be done and charge the landholder for costs incurred. A complaint can be made to the RFS after a member of the public has discussed the problem with the owner of the land and nothing has been done. The RFS will investigate the complaint, identify the extent and authenticity of any hazard, as well as review what hazard reduction has previously taken place and what may currently be planned in that vicinity. A letter detailing these activities will be sent to the concerned person and an RFS officer will discuss hazard reduction options and property protection strategies with them. Commissioner Koperberg said that, whilst much hazard reduction had been carried out since the recent Christmas/New Year Fires, there was room for improvement. Recently introduced legislation will ensure there is a more pragmatic approach to the problem and private land owners will find it easier to carry out hazard reduction on their own land in the future. The ongoing audit process will help identify particular bushfire hazards and have them dealt with by land managers, both public and private, said Commissioner Koperberg. __________________________________________________________ Thursday, 14 November 2002 - Total Fire Ban The Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service has declared a Total Fire Ban in the following Weather Forecast Districts: North West Plains and Central Western Plains. The weather forecast for these areas is very high temperature, low humidity and moderate to strong winds. These conditions are conducive to fire activity and the community is urged to take particular care. Fire danger in this area will be extreme or approaching extreme. The Total Fire Ban will become effective for the 24 hours from MIDNIGHT TONIGHT, Wednesday, November 13, 2002 for 24 hours until MIDNIGHT Thursday, 14 November 2002. During a Total Fire Ban no fire of any kind may be lit in the open. This includes incinerators and barbecues, which burn solid fuel, e.g. wood or charcoal. You may use a gas or electric barbecue, but only if ? It is on residential property within 20m of the house or dwelling; ? It is under the direct control of a responsible adult; ? The ground around the barbecue is cleared for 3m of all material which could burn; ? You have a continuous supply of running water. A map identifying the boundaries of weather districts can be found on the Bureau of Meteorology web site at http://www.bom.gov.au/weather/nsw/dist_map.shtml. Members of the public can phone 1 800 654 443 or their local NSW Rural Fire Service Fire Control Centre for more information. __________________________________________________________ Wednesday, 13 November 2002 No threat to Bundanoon The Touga fire in the Shoalhaven area poses no immediate threat to the villages of Penrose, Wingello and Bundanoon, the NSW Rural Fire Service (RFS) said today. The RFS wants to quell any fears residents may have about the current risk to these villages. ``There is no immediate threat to Penrose, Wingello and Bundanoon, the fire is still on the southern side of the Shoalhaven gorge and is in no way threatening those areas, Superintendent David Phillips said. ``Even if the fire were to approach those areas over the next 24 to 36 hours it would pose minimal threat. Residents of these villages have been handed fire preparation advice notices to encourage them to prepare properties and advise them of appropriate contact details as a precautionary measure, however, the fire remains a considerable distance from villages. ``These notices are purely precautionary and are an excellent way to encourage home owners to prepare their land and homes and give them advice and assistance, Supt Phillips said. Dust in the atmosphere around the Southern Highlands may be contributing to concerns about fire threat. ``Dust from a storm in Mildura has rolled into the area this morning and could be confused for smoke, however, this is not the case, Supt Phillips said. Residents can call the Wingecarribee Emergency Operations Centre on 1800 033 088 for further advice. __________________________________________________________ Wednesday 13 November 2002 STATEWIDE FIRE UPDATE More than 1500 firefighters are working on 87 fires that have burnt more than 475,000 hectares across NSW. Firefighters from the NSW Rural Fire Service (RFS), National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS), State Forests (SF), NSW Fire Brigades (NSWFB) and interstate agencies including Country Fire Authority (CFA) and the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE) from Victoria, the Tasmania Fire Service (TFS) and the Tasmania National Parks (TNPWS). Weather conditions today are expected to deteriorate across the State. A total fire ban has been declared for the North West Slopes, North West Plains, Hunter, Central West Slopes and Central West Plains districts. Mittagong  Wingecarribee Complex of fires The Wingecarribee Complex of fires that destroyed fives houses and has burned approximately 2,500 hectares in the Mittagong area on Sunday is being controlled. Mild weather conditions yesterday assisted firefighters in establishing containment lines. More than 80 personnel will be working to mop up and black out containment lines with machinery and aerial waterbombing operations to slow the progress of the fire east of the Nattai River and north of Mittagong to protect rural properties and the townships of Welby, Mittagong and Colo Vale. Upper Hawkesbury - Bala Range  Putty Road remains closed To date the Bala Range fire has burned in excess of 69,630 hectares mainly in National Park and at its widest extends for 35 kilometres and is 25 kilometres in length. The Bala Range fire is being contained in the northeastern division. Ground crews and dozers will be working on strengthening the northern cutoff of the fire Garland 2001 and Mt Yengo 2001 fires. Crews will continue to mop up and patrol the southwestern division of the fire along the Putty Road to Bunjin Hill. Due to backburning operations, the Putty Road remains closed to through traffic and only residents will be allowed to travel between Wheelbarrow Ridge Road, Colo Heights and the Garland Valley Halfway House until further notice. Cessnock/ Singleton District - Property protection remains the priority The Mt View fire 10km southwest of Cessnock is being controlled. Helicopter waterbombing is being done on the northeast edges to enable crews to construct a dozer line. Crews will be waterbombing and mopping up the active fire east of Stringybark Ridge. Crews working on the Fal Brook fire are focussing on property protection along the Cassell Road and water bombing the northern and eastern edges. The St Clair fire is being patrolled and crews today will be working on property protection and containing the fire west of the Dungog Shire boundary using dozer lines. The Gunnadoo fire west of the Brokenback Range is going and crews will be working today on dozer lines and backburns. No property is currently under threat and residents have been allowed to return to the Coolawine Estate. Great Lakes District  Euther Fire - environmental threat The Euther Fire burning on NPWS estate remains a threat to environmental assets and has the potential to impact on telecommunications infrastructure at Cabbage Tree Tower. Crews will be working on dozer lines and a backurn is being put in place along the Cabbage Tree Trail. Gloucester District fires The Cravens Peak fire is contained and crews will be working today to strengthen containment lines and waterbomb hotspots to prevent it from encroaching on the north side of Cravens Peak. The Beean Beean fire is being controlled and crews will be working to mop up and patrol the backburn put in between the Barrington and Kerript Rivers. Broader containment lines are being established. Northern Tablelands fires A total of 50 fires have been listed within the Section 44 covering the Inverell, Severn, Guyra and Tenterfield Council area since 28 September. The Spirabo Complex of fires is still active in places, burning in remote mountainous areas east of Glenn Innes. A 20km backburn is progressing on the northern edge of the fire. The Stop a bit fire on the eastern edge of the Northern Tablelands is being contained, down to the Sara River near the Guy Fawkes River valley. Crews are working to deepen containment lines and carry out backburns. Crews are patrolling the perimeters of the Strathmore and Buchanan fires and mopping up areas that are still smouldering. The Torrington/ Bobs Swamp fire is being contained and crews will be working today to contain the fire within established control lines. Scone district  backburning for containment The Glen Range 2 fire is being controlled and is burning within established containment lines. Crews will be working today on backburning operations along the eastern and western boundaries. The Tubrabucca complex of fires has burned more than 4,700 hectares into the Barrington Tops National Park and State Forest areas. Today, crews will work to protect properties to the west and north of the fire. Backburning has contained the spread of the fires to the north, east and south and crews will be focussed on establishing a western containment line today. The Gog Top complex of fires is burning along the Gog Top Range and Gulf Mountain plateau into remote country. Crews will be working consolidate containment lines today. Shoalhaven  Roads and National Park areas closed The Touga fire west of Nowra is on the floor of the Ettrema Gorge and is continuing to progress through inaccessible terrain. Crews will be working today to contain an outbreak on the southwestern corner along the Tolwong Road, blacking out the western flank and aircraft waterbombing the northern flank below the Shoalhaven River. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Catherine Elliott Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 11:33 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston Hi all, Today was amazing yet very unnerving and way too close to home. I thought I might share the day with you. I called a friend of mine (who helps out in emergencies) at about 2.30 and found out there was a fire at The Pines Flora & Fauna Reserve (he was there), I have other friends who live there on Pecan, now if you know of frankston Nth you'll know that at the end of Excelsior is Honeysuckle (that is near where the fires stopped) just 60m or so back there is Rowan Ct off Marlock, this is where my friends grandmother lives, (my friends were sitting on their garrage watching it) At about 2.45 my sister and her flatmate went down there and the smoke was very thick and really dark. There were CFA & police there and they followed for a few seconds an SES vehicle but had to stop, couldn't go any further. they pulled into a ct and there were choppers up, 2 police and 1 fire we thought + the water chopper (? not too sure though) one of them was right above the car by about 10m. They left there and went to their house, great view of the plume of smoke, every now and then the smoke would start billowing up and was very dark red brown. I found out later on that the conservationists were very upset with the backburning that was started to stop the fire spreading down the side of the reserve, they didnt want it to be done and were arguing with people. & I have just found out that the fire is still burning but under control so that there is less risk during summer & that my first friend who i called was actually in the fire and was hit by water from the tanker. he went in with a CFA strike team and said it was hot. apparently the gumtrees shake when burning. Anyway that was all (mainly courtesy of my friends but yeah) very interesting day. yours Catherine _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 03:06:35 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Ah, the joys of pulling up old lino!
 
Of equal interest, of course, would be the predictions that didn't come true. If I make 100 predictions, the law of averages says that a proportion will come true. The more general my predictions, and/or the greater the frequency of such an event anyway, the better the chance of success. "It will rain somewhere in Queensland in December 2075" has a pretty good chance of coming true. "There will more than 25mm of rain at Observatory Hill, Sydney, on 27 March 2075" is a bit less likely to be successful.
 
Laurier
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Adam Mayo
Sent: Thursday, 14 November, 2002 00:34
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands

Hi All,
 
Yesterday we were at Robertson at the Lavendar Farm and the owner told us a story about someone in that area who had pulled up old lino and found a paper from 1940.  On it was list of predictions by Indigo Jones.  It could have been a story in the local paper from this week or last week.
 
If Don White or anyone else who reads this, has heard of him perhaps further comments would be interesting.
 
The old newspaper had a list of predictions, many of which evidently have come true.  Including a forecast of drought for 2002 and 2003 with rain on 27th November this year.
 
Anyway just thought that it could be interesting to everyone out of curiosities sake, to see what happens. 
 
Judy Mayo
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:15:16 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Inigo Jones' predictions used to be in the "Weekly Times" when I was a kid and everyone in the bush used to follow them when planning what they would do on the farm. Later, Lennox Walker took over from him. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Adam Mayo" To: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:33:32 +1100 Subject: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands > Hi All, > > Yesterday we were at Robertson at the Lavendar Farm and the owner told > us a story about someone in that area who had pulled up old lino and > found a paper from 1940. On it was list of predictions by Indigo > Jones. It could have been a story in the local paper from this week or > last week. > > If Don White or anyone else who reads this, has heard of him perhaps > further comments would be interesting. > > The old newspaper had a list of predictions, many of which evidently > have come true. Including a forecast of drought for 2002 and 2003 with > rain on 27th November this year. > > Anyway just thought that it could be interesting to everyone out of > curiosities sake, to see what happens. > > Judy Mayo > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 03:26:12 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com John, the photo shows a true dust storm. What you experienced in Brisbane (and we have had here in Blackheath twice in the past month) was not a dust storm, but widespread dust in the atmosphere. The proper meteorological definition is: Duststorm (or sandstorm): "A storm in which dust or sand is raised by turbulent winds to great heights and surface visibility is reduced to less than 1km (for the purpose of a synoptic report). The necessary conditions for a duststorm, whose arrival is marked by a 'wall of dust', are a supply of fine dust, the sudden onset of relatively strong winds and a steep lapse rate of temperature." (from the UKMO Meteorological Glossary) In WMO parlance, "widespread dust in suspension in the air, not raised by wind at or near the station at the time of observation" is not a duststorm. In weather reporting (see http://www.australianweathernews.com/images/wxcode1.gif), there's one code (06) for the latter, but 8 (07, 09, 30 to 35) for the real thing. Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of John > Woodbridge > Sent: Thursday, 14 November, 2002 01:01 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith > > > Hmmm, the recent dust storm in brissy certainly did not present > like this... > Just a gardual orangey darkening covering the sky from the South West, > followed by gradual reduction in visibility eventually down to about 250m. > But there was little wind with it, so I presume that it was very > much into a > decaying phase by then, and dust was more or less just dropping out of the > mid levels. > > John. > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of James > Holbeach > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:38 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith > > > Anyone else see this photo? > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/DroughtS.jpg > > Looks eerily like Melbourne's Dust Storm! > > James > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:51:51 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com He also forecast the heavy rains of June 1967 back in 1934 or thereabouts. Lennox Walker (see other emails) used to be published every Sunday in the Sun Herald, I think it was. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 2:15 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands > Inigo Jones' predictions used to be in the "Weekly Times" when I was a > kid and everyone in the bush used to follow them when planning what they > would do on the farm. > Later, Lennox Walker took over from him. > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Adam Mayo" > To: > Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:33:32 +1100 > Subject: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands > > > Hi All, > > > > Yesterday we were at Robertson at the Lavendar Farm and the owner told > > us a story about someone in that area who had pulled up old lino and > > found a paper from 1940. On it was list of predictions by Indigo > > Jones. It could have been a story in the local paper from this week or > > last week. > > > > If Don White or anyone else who reads this, has heard of him perhaps > > further comments would be interesting. > > > > The old newspaper had a list of predictions, many of which evidently > > have come true. Including a forecast of drought for 2002 and 2003 with > > rain on 27th November this year. > > > > Anyway just thought that it could be interesting to everyone out of > > curiosities sake, to see what happens. > > > > Judy Mayo > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:53:19 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Judy... I referred to this is my column in the Daily Telegraph last week... no noe can find the paper... so I think it may be an urban myth. Don White > Adam Mayo wrote: > > Hi All, > > Yesterday we were at Robertson at the Lavendar Farm and the owner told > us a story about someone in that area who had pulled up old lino and > found a paper from 1940. On it was list of predictions by Indigo > Jones. It could have been a story in the local paper from this week > or last week. > > If Don White or anyone else who reads this, has heard of him perhaps > further comments would be interesting. > > The old newspaper had a list of predictions, many of which evidently > have come true. Including a forecast of drought for 2002 and 2003 > with rain on 27th November this year. > > Anyway just thought that it could be interesting to everyone out of > curiosities sake, to see what happens. > > Judy Mayo +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: mbath at mail.ozemail.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:13:58 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Michael Bath Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It's also done the rounds up here on the North Coast about 2 weeks ago. ABC tracked it down to someone in Kyogle, who reckoned they had made it up, but who knows :) At 04:53 PM 14/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Judy... >I referred to this is my column in the Daily Telegraph last week... no >noe can find the paper... so I think it may be an urban myth. > >Don White > > > Adam Mayo wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > Yesterday we were at Robertson at the Lavendar Farm and the owner told > > us a story about someone in that area who had pulled up old lino and > > found a paper from 1940. On it was list of predictions by Indigo > > Jones. It could have been a story in the local paper from this week > > or last week. > > > > If Don White or anyone else who reads this, has heard of him perhaps > > further comments would be interesting. > > > > The old newspaper had a list of predictions, many of which evidently > > have come true. Including a forecast of drought for 2002 and 2003 > > with rain on 27th November this year. > > > > Anyway just thought that it could be interesting to everyone out of > > curiosities sake, to see what happens. > > > > Judy Mayo > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ =================================================================== Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ =================================================================== From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:47:38 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Yay..go Ingo!!   I've already said the 27th will certainly be a rain date for both Aussie and NZ locations. From my website
 
1. "rain for Auckland and Bay of Plenty comes between ..27th-30th". 
2. A cold front moves onto NZ (27th - 28th)bringing widespread rain, apart from in the E of both islands. Rain is likely to
continue in most areas until the 29th. 
3. Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around  ..and 27th.
4. Darwin can expect ..falling between the 20th-28th.
5. Brisbane can expect ..rain ..25th-27th.
6. Canberra ..rain likely .. 26th-29th.

7. Melbourne’s rain..26th-29th. 
 
Inigo Jones knew what he was talking about, as many old timers will attest. He used astrology/astronomy as did Sir isaac Newton, as did astrometeorologists about 12000 years ago and still do today.
Ken 

 
----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Mayo
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:33 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands

Hi All,
 
Yesterday we were at Robertson at the Lavendar Farm and the owner told us a story about someone in that area who had pulled up old lino and found a paper from 1940.  On it was list of predictions by Indigo Jones.  It could have been a story in the local paper from this week or last week.
 
If Don White or anyone else who reads this, has heard of him perhaps further comments would be interesting.
 
The old newspaper had a list of predictions, many of which evidently have come true.  Including a forecast of drought for 2002 and 2003 with rain on 27th November this year.
 
Anyway just thought that it could be interesting to everyone out of curiosities sake, to see what happens. 
 
Judy Mayo
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 20:05:21 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > ABC > tracked it down to someone in Kyogle, who reckoned they had made it up, but > who knows :) >... no > >noe can find the paper... so I think it may be an urban myth. > > How absolutely unfortunate for a guy like Jones to have his life's work called an urban myth that someone made up. The Crohamhurst Observatory was set up in 1935. Lennox joined in 1953, an observatory that was world famous in its time. Get the book "Only An Australian" by Lennox Walker. ISBN 0 646 829855 0 "Long-range Forecasting Australian farmers have always had an insatiable appetite for long-range weather forecasts and, for many years, the late Inigo Jones, who had worked under Clement Wragge in Brisbane, provided seasonal forecasts from his privately operated Crohamhurst Observatory in southeast Queensland. Despite two Ministerially commissioned investigations which concluded that his forecasting methods had no scientific basis, the demand for his forecasts remained and after his death the service continued under Lennox Walker..." http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/fam/1604.html +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:06:23 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yes Glen, I'll say "Amen!" to your suggestion. I have seen backburning effectively contain so many fires over the years, that they are crazy to oppose it. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:25:18 +1100 Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston > Those conservationists should be thrown in the bloody fire so they > themselves can find out just how hot they get after around 20years of > no > fire in the area. Then they might sit down, shutup and cooperate. [snip] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Mark Hardy" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:26:43 +1100 Organization: The Weather Company X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Backburning and hazard reduction are not the same thing. Hazard reduction is used to reduce fuel loads and in many cases will reduce the intensity of a fire should one break out. However, it should be noted that in extreme conditions, areas that have been hazard reduced can still burn very intensiely should be fire get into the forest crown. Backburning is used to form a firebreak around an uncontrolled fire. Mark Hardy The Weather Company Pty. Ltd. http://www.theweather.com.au -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Phil Smith Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2002 6:06 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston Yes Glen, I'll say "Amen!" to your suggestion. I have seen backburning effectively contain so many fires over the years, that they are crazy to oppose it. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:25:18 +1100 Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston > Those conservationists should be thrown in the bloody fire so they > themselves can find out just how hot they get after around 20years of > no fire in the area. Then they might sit down, shutup and cooperate. [snip] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Liz Kennedy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:54:38 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Judy,
 
Funny you should mention Indigo Jones. My flat mate is not much into weather, but knows I am, and came home with the words "Indigo Jones" written on a piece of paper. She is the manager of a Service Station and a regular customer came in telling her about this Indigo fellow, mentioning that he predicted this drought being severe. The only irregularity I have with your comments is that she was told drought breaking rain would occur on the 20th November. She too, mentioned that an old paper was pulled up from under lino.
 
Let's hope he might of known what he was on about.
 
Cheers,
Liz Kennedy,
Tamworth
----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Mayo
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands

Hi All,
 
Yesterday we were at Robertson at the Lavendar Farm and the owner told us a story about someone in that area who had pulled up old lino and found a paper from 1940.  On it was list of predictions by Indigo Jones.  It could have been a story in the local paper from this week or last week.
 
If Don White or anyone else who reads this, has heard of him perhaps further comments would be interesting.
 
The old newspaper had a list of predictions, many of which evidently have come true.  Including a forecast of drought for 2002 and 2003 with rain on 27th November this year.
 
Anyway just thought that it could be interesting to everyone out of curiosities sake, to see what happens. 
 
Judy Mayo
XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:06:34 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Indeed, And let us not mark the number of 'controlled burns' which have got out of control and which in many cases have caused damage to property and have even led to loss of life. Fire is such a problem because 98% of fires are started by humans, regrettably many of them deliberately by juveniles. They are a thus a fact of life in the Australian bush, and no amount of hazard reduction will ever make the problem disappear. My observation is that repeated annual or bi-annual burning yields degraded weed infested bushland with significantly reduced levels of wildlife and greater propensity for next dry period 'grass fires'. The answer to property destruction is to create building codes and council regulation that improve fire proofing of 'close to bush' buildings and prevent construction where wildfire presents risk, i.e, adequate fire breaks and buffer zones must exist and be maintained. People who build timber and timber framed houses either in or right next to bushland or on the edge of escarpments overlooking bush, must expect that one day they will lose the property to fire, ipso facto. John. p.s. Speaking as someone who has owned several properties right on the edge of bushland in Hornsby (on Waitara Ck) and Asquith (on Berowra bushland reserve), and who presently lives on well bushed acreage in SE QLD. One day there WILL be a fire and you had better be prepared for it! >snip -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Mark Hardy Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 5:27 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston Backburning and hazard reduction are not the same thing. Hazard reduction is used to reduce fuel loads and in many cases will reduce the intensity of a fire should one break out. However, it should be noted that in extreme conditions, areas that have been hazard reduced can still burn very intensiely should be fire get into the forest crown. Backburning is used to form a firebreak around an uncontrolled fire. Mark Hardy The Weather Company Pty. Ltd. http://www.theweather.com.au -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Phil Smith Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2002 6:06 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston Yes Glen, I'll say "Amen!" to your suggestion. I have seen backburning effectively contain so many fires over the years, that they are crazy to oppose it. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:25:18 +1100 Subject: RE: aus-wx: Bushfire/brushfire in North Frankston > Those conservationists should be thrown in the bloody fire so they > themselves can find out just how hot they get after around 20years of > no fire in the area. Then they might sit down, shutup and cooperate. [snip] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Chambers" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:37:41 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi John, all It was a little different down here just south of Brisbane. We had periods of gusty winds (with blowing dust/leaves, followed by light/calm winds. Visibility was reduced to about 500m for about an hour at it's worst. The most memorable part was the actual smell and feel of it - a very strange feeling! I took a couple of pics as the dust moved in close to sunset: http://www.bsch.au.com/seqstorms/photos/2002/231102b.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/seqstorms/photos/2002/231102c.jpg The thicker dust just under the sun completely covered it about 1-2mins later. A bit of a wall of dust, but not really :) Regards James Brisbane Storms http://members.ozemail.com.au/~jamestorm/bristorm.html > Hmmm, the recent dust storm in brissy certainly did not present like this... > Just a gardual orangey darkening covering the sky from the South West, > followed by gradual reduction in visibility eventually down to about 250m. > But there was little wind with it, so I presume that it was very much into a > decaying phase by then, and dust was more or less just dropping out of the > mid levels. > > John. > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of James > Holbeach > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:38 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith > > > Anyone else see this photo? > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/DroughtS.jpg > > Looks eerily like Melbourne's Dust Storm! > > James > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:45:41 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: "weather mailing list" Subject: Fw: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
yeah, not the same but a similar one in the adelaide advertiser today.
 
looks a bit like ayres rock, ba a mongeral to climb.
 
regards
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Thursday, 14 November 2002 11:24:32 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Dust Storm in Griffith
 
Anyone else see this photo?
http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/DroughtS.jpg

Looks eerily like Melbourne's Dust Storm!

James

James Holbeach
--------------------------------
Trapdoor Ski Club
Mt. Hotham, Australia
ph. 0417 553 757
http://www.trapdoor.com.au
--------------------------------

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP5.gif: 00000001,504bf6e2,00000000,00000000 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:47:40 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken.. I am perfectly aware of Jones, his son-in-law, Lennox Walker and his son, Haydon who still shares a column space with me in The Land newspaper. At least they based their assessment on sunspot activity - probably having a little more input into the variation of energy in the atmosphere than the moon. No - no one said or even inferred their work was an urban myth. Read it again if you must. Your response is typical of either your ignorance or your inability to understand English... perhaps it is the latter given your track record on the days it was supposed to rain in Sydney so far this month and hasn't... but given your logic, we'll just ignore all those false assessments - bound to get one right eventually. But please read what is written before making stupid comments. Don White Ken Ring wrote: > > > ABC > > tracked it down to someone in Kyogle, who reckoned they had made it up, > but > > who knows :) > >... no > > >noe can find the paper... so I think it may be an urban myth. > > > > How absolutely unfortunate for a guy like Jones to have his life's work > called an urban myth that someone made up. The Crohamhurst Observatory was > set up in 1935. Lennox joined in 1953, an observatory that was world famous > in its time. Get the book "Only An Australian" by Lennox Walker. ISBN 0 646 > 829855 0 > > "Long-range Forecasting > Australian farmers have always had an insatiable appetite for long-range > weather forecasts and, for many years, the late Inigo Jones, who had worked > under Clement Wragge in Brisbane, provided seasonal forecasts from his > privately operated Crohamhurst Observatory in southeast Queensland. Despite > two Ministerially commissioned investigations which concluded that his > forecasting methods had no scientific basis, the demand for his forecasts > remained and after his death the service continued under Lennox Walker..." > http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/fam/1604.html > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steve Baynham" To: Subject: aus-wx: Great photos Dave! - Electrical Storm in Northern Rivers - 10th November Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:22:40 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
hey Dave!
some awesome lightning there, man!
Really appreciate the effort you and other chasers put in to sharing your pics and reports so quickly.
It helps us storm deprived think we're not fully missing out on the action:)
 
keep 'em coming everyone!!
 
 
Steve Baynham
icq : 26863574
 
Brisbane Storm Chasers
http://www.bsch.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Association
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Ellem
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 2:15 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Electrical Storm in Northern Rivers - 10th November

Afternoon!
I have written up a report on Sunday nights electrical storms near Lismore and Ballina along with some photos I took. It can be seen here:
Looks like more storms developing here now!!
 
Enjoy!
 
Dave Ellem,
Wollongbar,
Northern Rivers,
NE NSW
From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:16:40 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The following from NOAA should interest all that remember what having hourly satpix was like! Laurier ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- Subject: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan: Effective for March 31, 2003: Issued Topic: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan Message Issued: October 31, 2002, 1322 UTC Satellites Impacted: GMS-5 and GOES-9 Products Impacted: Current GMS-5 imagery Date/Time of Initial Impact: March 31, 2003 ----------------------------------------- Details: ***GOES-9 is scheduled to replace GMS-5 located over the west Pacific at 155E on March 31, 2003*** GMS-5, the Japanese Meteorological Agency's (JMA) meteorological satellite located at 140E, launched in 1995 and providing meteorological data over Japan, the West Pacific Ocean, Australia, and Asia, is scheduled to be temporarily replaced with NOAA's GOES-9 satellite on March 31, 2003, with its final location at 155E. For more information on GMS-5 and MTSAT (JMA's next meteorological satellite), visit http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/ and http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/new/index.htm . In order to support the operation of GOES-9 from 155E, a command and control ground station is currently being built in Fairbanks, Alaska. Below are some of the tentative dates and plans for the operation of GOES-9. (1) GOES-9 Out of storage December 11, 2002 Note: Some preliminary GOES-9 GVAR data will be available from approx December 12, 2002 through approx January 11, 2003 using the Wallops, VA CDA. (2) GOES-9 North/South maneuver December 16, 2002 (3) GOES-9 to drift west at .8 degrees/day starting December 19, 2002 (4) GOES-9 imaging suspended approx January 11, 2003 to transfer CDA control from Wallops to Fairbanks (5) GOES-9 imagery resumes approx March 1, 2003 using Fairbanks CDA **(6) Operations using GOES-9 start March 31, 2003, at which time GOES-9 will be at 170E (a) At this point, it is planned for GMS-5 to stop disseminating high resolution data, and to transmit GOES-9 WEFAX via the GMS-5 satellite. (b) Users currently obtaining GMS-5 WEFAX from GMS-5 should not need to make any changes to receive GOES-9 WEFAX via GMS-5 (c) GOES-9 data will _not_ be converted to VISSR and relayed through GMS-5 (d) GOES-9 WEFAX products should be made available via GOES-10 as a one to one replacement of the current GMS-5 WEFAX products that are made available via GOES-10 (see http://noaasis.noaa.gov/NOAASIS/ml/wefax_sked.html for this current schedule) (e) Imagery will be available both via GVAR for direct readout, and from DOMSAT for CONUS users. More details when further information is available. (7) Approx April 18, GOES-9 arrives on station at 155E. Scanning Strategies: Imager: While not finalized, the GOES-9 imager schedule will roughly reflect the current GMS-5 scanning schedule. Hourly full disk images from pole to pole will begin at HH:34, ending at HH:00. Every 6 hours, an abbreviated full disk (exact location to be determined, but roughly +/- 49 N/S) will begin at HH:08 and end at HH:26 where HH=5, 11, 17, 23. For the other 20 hours of the day between HH:08 and HH:26, it has yet to be determined what the scanning scenario will be, but will likely consist of several shorter sectors in the northern hemisphere. Sounder: While also not finalized, the GOES-9 sounder instrument will be on during this time providing 50 minute scans every hour, and will be scanning parts of the northern hemisphere 16 times a day, parts of the equatorial region 4 times a day, and parts of the southern hemisphere 4 times a day. More information on the transition from GMS-5 to GOES-9 will be provided as it becomes available. Once schedules and sectors are finalized, information will be posted via email and our home page. ------------------------------------------ Contact Information: Tom Renkevens Satellite Services Division NOAA/NESDIS/OSDPD 301-763-8081 x109 thomas.renkevens at noaa.gov See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/SATS/messages.html for this and other satellite related messages. See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov for full GOES scanning schedules. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 03:38:18 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don White" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:47 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands > Ken.. > I am perfectly aware of Jones, his son-in-law, Lennox Walker and his > son, Haydon who still shares a column space with me in The Land > newspaper. No - no one said or even inferred their work was an urban myth. Read it > again if you must. Your response is typical of either your ignorance or > your inability to understand English. Here we go, slanging again. Well, you were ambiguous when you said "I referred to this is my column in the Daily Telegraph last week... no noe can find the paper... so I think it may be an urban myth.." Hard to tell if the writer meant the report was the myth or Jones. I'd have thought a journo would have a better grasp of the craft. > At least they based their assessment on sunspot activity - probably > having a little more input into the variation of energy in the > atmosphere than the moon. Not necessarily. Walker admits in his book (p245)that in drought years there is often a dearth of sunspot activity. I have in my possession a very ancient tattered booklet by Inigo Jones, probably a collectors item, called My Meteorological Career. He does not dismiss the moon, the only reference being "Mr Tippenhauer, of Haiti, had a theory almost identical with my own, even to the electro-magnetic principle involved, but he included the moon, which I have never done." > given > your track record on the days it was supposed to rain in Sydney so far > this month and hasn't... Oh? I was as right as the BoM at the time, check back and see. That's all I ever try to be. But I did it months before. It sounds like a pathetic case of envy on your part. I've said (on 24th July).." but November, aha, I think you'll see around 40-50mm. Most of that will be from 16th-24th November." Let's wait and see. Only a couple of days to go. So far, the BoM appears on track with me again. It's clouding over right now.."Cloud builds in a trough over eastern Australia, causing potentially severe thunderstorms and showers across NSW and QLD.." That's tonight's posting on ABC. I'm MORE than happy with that. There's nothing wrong with putting up forecasts way ahead. That's what real forecasters are meant to do, Don. But for all your condemning of me, I don't see your forecasts anywhere. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:41:19 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken... Regrettasbly you are also dishonest. You stated on 24 July: My prediction for Sydney: Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, and 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. So far 2-3rd - no rain - you were wrong 7-10th - no rain - you were wrong. Any fool would relaise that there is a fair chance of rain between 15-22 nd (you want 1 day either side) or 25-29th.... so what. In 25 or the last 26 years it has rained in Sydney on at least one of those dates so you are hardly giving any useful guide. So, it does rain sometime in the 2nd half of November - the best you can claim is 50% accuracy although you will probably manipulate your rubbish. Even on 50% accuracy - in Australia you would be out of business if you tried to charge for such rubbish. Forget the envy. I just feel sorry for all the poor fools you are misleading with this rubbish. Or maybe there are enough gullible people here as well. Until this industry gets rid of people like you, the repsect for weather forecasting will be hald back Don White Ken Ring wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don White" > To: > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:47 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands > > > Ken.. > > I am perfectly aware of Jones, his son-in-law, Lennox Walker and his > > son, Haydon who still shares a column space with me in The Land > > newspaper. No - no one said or even inferred their work was an urban myth. > Read it > > again if you must. Your response is typical of either your ignorance or > > your inability to understand English. > Here we go, slanging again. Well, you were ambiguous when you said "I > referred to this is my column in the Daily Telegraph last week... no noe can > find the paper... so I think it may be an urban myth.." Hard to tell if the > writer meant the report was the myth or Jones. I'd have thought a journo > would have a better grasp of the craft. > > > At least they based their assessment on sunspot activity - probably > > having a little more input into the variation of energy in the > > atmosphere than the moon. > Not necessarily. Walker admits in his book (p245)that in drought years there > is often a dearth of sunspot activity. I have in my possession a very > ancient tattered booklet by Inigo Jones, probably a collectors item, called > My Meteorological Career. He does not dismiss the moon, the only reference > being "Mr Tippenhauer, of Haiti, had a theory almost identical with my own, > even to the electro-magnetic principle involved, but he included the moon, > which I have never done." > > > given > > your track record on the days it was supposed to rain in Sydney so far > > this month and hasn't... > Oh? I was as right as the BoM at the time, check back and see. That's all I > ever try to be. But I did it months before. It sounds like a pathetic case > of envy on your part. I've said (on 24th July).." but November, aha, I think > you'll see around 40-50mm. Most of that will be from 16th-24th November." > Let's wait and see. Only a couple of days to go. So far, the BoM appears on > track with me again. It's clouding over right now.."Cloud builds in a trough > over eastern Australia, causing potentially severe thunderstorms and showers > across NSW and QLD.." That's tonight's posting on ABC. I'm MORE than happy > with that. There's nothing wrong with putting up forecasts way ahead. That's > what real forecasters are meant to do, Don. But for all your condemning of > me, I don't see your forecasts anywhere. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:50:26 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I beg to differ. From ABC News "3rd: A band of cloud extends from the Kimberley across southeast Australia to the Bight along a trough, bringing scattered showers and thunderstorms to SA, VIC and NSW.." 7th-10th no rain, true. When you get through slanging, spitting and generally choking on my forecasts, how about a forecast of your own - if you have any time left..? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don White" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:41 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands > Ken... > Regrettasbly you are also dishonest. > You stated on 24 July: > My prediction for Sydney: > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, > and > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > > So far 2-3rd - no rain - you were wrong > 7-10th - no rain - you were wrong. > Any fool would relaise that there is a fair chance of rain between > 15-22 nd (you want 1 day either side) or 25-29th.... so what. In 25 or > the last 26 years it has rained in Sydney on at least one of those dates > so you are hardly giving any useful guide. > So, it does rain sometime in the 2nd half of November - the best you can > claim is 50% accuracy although you will probably manipulate your > rubbish. Even on 50% accuracy - in Australia you would be out of > business if you tried to charge for such rubbish. > Forget the envy. I just feel sorry for all the poor fools you are > misleading with this rubbish. Or maybe there are enough gullible people > here as well. Until this industry gets rid of people like you, the > repsect for weather forecasting will be hald back > > Don White > > Ken Ring wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Don White" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:47 AM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands > > > > > Ken.. > > > I am perfectly aware of Jones, his son-in-law, Lennox Walker and his > > > son, Haydon who still shares a column space with me in The Land > > > newspaper. No - no one said or even inferred their work was an urban myth. > > Read it > > > again if you must. Your response is typical of either your ignorance or > > > your inability to understand English. > > Here we go, slanging again. Well, you were ambiguous when you said "I > > referred to this is my column in the Daily Telegraph last week... no noe can > > find the paper... so I think it may be an urban myth.." Hard to tell if the > > writer meant the report was the myth or Jones. I'd have thought a journo > > would have a better grasp of the craft. > > > > > At least they based their assessment on sunspot activity - probably > > > having a little more input into the variation of energy in the > > > atmosphere than the moon. > > Not necessarily. Walker admits in his book (p245)that in drought years there > > is often a dearth of sunspot activity. I have in my possession a very > > ancient tattered booklet by Inigo Jones, probably a collectors item, called > > My Meteorological Career. He does not dismiss the moon, the only reference > > being "Mr Tippenhauer, of Haiti, had a theory almost identical with my own, > > even to the electro-magnetic principle involved, but he included the moon, > > which I have never done." > > > > > given > > > your track record on the days it was supposed to rain in Sydney so far > > > this month and hasn't... > > Oh? I was as right as the BoM at the time, check back and see. That's all I > > ever try to be. But I did it months before. It sounds like a pathetic case > > of envy on your part. I've said (on 24th July).." but November, aha, I think > > you'll see around 40-50mm. Most of that will be from 16th-24th November." > > Let's wait and see. Only a couple of days to go. So far, the BoM appears on > > track with me again. It's clouding over right now.."Cloud builds in a trough > > over eastern Australia, causing potentially severe thunderstorms and showers > > across NSW and QLD.." That's tonight's posting on ABC. I'm MORE than happy > > with that. There's nothing wrong with putting up forecasts way ahead. That's > > what real forecasters are meant to do, Don. But for all your condemning of > > me, I don't see your forecasts anywhere. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: Indigo Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:00:14 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Hi All, > > Yesterday we were at Robertson at the Lavendar Farm and the owner told us >a story about someone in that area who had pulled up old lino and found a >paper from 1940. On it was list of predictions by Indigo Jones. It could >have been a story in the local paper from this week or last week. > > The old newspaper had a list of predictions, many of which evidently have >come true. Including a forecast of drought for 2002 and 2003 with rain on >27th November this year. Judy, I have a good friend who has looked into Indigo's forecast. His summary is below. Cheers, David Did Inigo Jones predict the 2002 Australian drought? There are rumours throughout inland eastern Australia that the legendary Inigo Jones (1872-1954) forecast the drought of 2002 many years ago. Jones believed that the alignments of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus caused variations in the sunspot numbers, which then affected rainfall in eastern Australia. So he could make very long-range forecasts of eastern Australian droughts, by knowing the future planetary alignments. Jones published a table of his predicted droughts for the period 1949-2008 in the National Motorist in January 1950. This table provides a unique opportunity to verify his long-range forecasts over many years. His table appears to refer to Queensland droughts, or to eastern Australian droughts. I have examined how his drought forecasts match observed seasonal rainfall averaged across Queensland. Jones did forecast a "Dry Summer, Autumn and Winter" in 2001 and 2002. Rainfall was low in Queensland in each of these three seasons, but has continued to be low into spring 2002. Jones failed to predict the severe 1965, 1982 and 1994 droughts (the three driest years of the second half of the 20th century). He predicted a "Minor Drought in Summer" in 1998-1999. This did not occur. He also predicted a "Dry Winter, Spring and Summer" for 1995 and 1996. Winter and spring 1995 were wet, although summer 1995/96 was dry as predicted. Jones correctly predicted a "Dry Summer " for 1977/78 and a "Dry Spell" for 1979/80. He predicted a "Moderately Severe Drought" for 1957-1960. The first and last of these years were drier than normal, but 1958 and 1959 were slightly wetter than normal. He failed to predict drought for 1961, the driest year in the 1957-1961 sequence. Perhaps the most intriguing of Jones's predictions was for a "Severe Prolonged Drought" with "Social National Crises" for the period 1983 to 1992. There were only two years of drought (1986 and 1992) during this period. The mean 1983-1992 rainfall was below the long-term mean rainfall, but substantially higher than the rainfall in the 1963-1972 period. Jones did not identify the 1963-1972 period as a prolonged drought. Even the terms he used for the years in which he did predict droughts during the 1960s and early 1970s ("Rains Slightly Below Normal", "Dry Spell", "Minor Drought", "Moderate Drought") do not suggest a severe prolonged drought. In summary, Inigo Jones did predict the 2001-2002 drought, but this was one of only a few occasions when his long-range predictions of drought have been correct. In particular he failed to predict the most severe (1965, 1982 and 1994) droughts and the extended dry period of the 1960s and early 1970s. Dr David Jones Head Climate Analysis Section National Climate Centre Bureau of Meteorology Fax : (+61 3) 9669 4678 GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne Ph (work): (+61 3) 9669 4085 Victoria 3001, Australia Ph (home): (+61 3) 9755 1923 email : D.Jones at bom.gov.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: rain in SE? Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:05:04 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com OK, I don't want to get everyone's hopes too high but the progs are starting to show some interesting developments for early next week for the SE. The front due on Sunday looks like it will largely stall over Victoria for about three days, while an amplifying upper trough build through the bight. With lots of juicy moisture across Western Australia there is the very real possibility of us seeing isolated-to-widespread showers and storm activity for about a 3 day period in the SE. Keep those fingers crossed as we really really need some rain in Victoria. Hopefully this system doesn't die 100km west of Melbourne like the front on Tuesday.... See http://152.80.49.205/CGI/PUBLIC/wxmap_all.cgi?type=prod&area=ngp_ausnz&prod= prp for further info. Regards, David Dr David Jones Head Climate Analysis Section National Climate Centre Bureau of Meteorology Fax : (+61 3) 9669 4678 GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne Ph (work): (+61 3) 9669 4085 Victoria 3001, Australia Ph (home): (+61 3) 9755 1923 email : D.Jones at bom.gov.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: aus-wx: Ouch Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:11:21 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Until this industry gets rid of people like you, the > > repsect for weather forecasting will be hald back > > Don White This is very disturbing comment. It has shades of Klu Klux Klan and Hitler's Germany. I suggest it is too strong for this forum and Don needs to be reminded that this is a free society. And to claim that I am responsible for respect for forecasting being low is too ridiculous to pass comment. It's hardly as if I have a national voice. The forecasters who do only have themselves to blame if people go elsewhere. Don's nastiness can only mean one thing - it must be raining. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:42:13 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yawn... John. >snip -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Don White Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 6:41 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Ken... Regrettasbly you are also dishonest. You stated on 24 July: My prediction for Sydney: Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, and 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. So far 2-3rd - no rain - you were wrong 7-10th - no rain - you were wrong. Any fool would relaise that there is a fair chance of rain between 15-22 nd (you want 1 day either side) or 25-29th.... so what. In 25 or the last 26 years it has rained in Sydney on at least one of those dates so you are hardly giving any useful guide. So, it does rain sometime in the 2nd half of November - the best you can claim is 50% accuracy although you will probably manipulate your rubbish. Even on 50% accuracy - in Australia you would be out of business if you tried to charge for such rubbish. Forget the envy. I just feel sorry for all the poor fools you are misleading with this rubbish. Or maybe there are enough gullible people here as well. Until this industry gets rid of people like you, the repsect for weather forecasting will be hald back Don White +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: hitler? Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:03:58 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:11:21 +1300 >From: "Ken Ring" >Subject: aus-wx: Ouch > >> Until this industry gets rid of people like you, the >> > repsect for weather forecasting will be hald back >> > Don White > >This is very disturbing comment. It has shades of Klu Klux Klan and >Hitler'sGermany. Ken how can you possibly claim that calling for accountability in an industry is like Hitler's Germany? Just as in a modern society we require engineers to be trained and demonstrate their skills, doctors to be trained and demonstrate their skills, etc etc., so too it should be with professional meteorologist - this is not censoring - it is what makes a modern society. Until such time as you can unambiguously demonstrate skill in your forecasts you should not be allowed to practice. Further you should not be able to practice unless you demonstrate professional competency. Can you do both? Quite frankly, it is not for me to judge.... Regards, David +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:08:32 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts of Australia on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April 2001. I've only had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my assessment. It is based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements (forecasts) made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In addition, I've noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation of any individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with evidence. For October we have: "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain than last month. " 1. True, the dry spell continued. 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the overall metro area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the only stations for which totals were received each day in both months. There will be a fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the meantime these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. " Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to eliminate dew. Figures are date/mm Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 Richmond: 11/1.0 So 3rd False 10th True 15th False 17th False Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the previous month, but (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which being significantly less than "about half" scores a False. 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so False "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, 14th-15th, 21st and 27th." The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW slopes, eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain (either amounts or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th (about two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) So, 1st to 6th False 14th-15th True 21st False 27th False 24th missed So Ken's score for October: True 3 False 8 Neither True nor False 1 Missed events 3 For November, the jury's still out, but a few early observations: "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with most possibly between 16th-21st." Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not intermittently every few days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are 3.0mm at Chatswood and Turramurra. "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine hours. " 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm to date. "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and 25th. " The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. Further update on November after month's end. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: aus-wx: Jones and sunspots Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:44:28 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Very interesting analysis, David. Inigo said some strange things, too, like.."(I have solved) what has been an insoluble puzzle, namely, the essential difference between spring and autumn. This is now seen to be due to the fact that in spring the southern sunspots are turned more away from us in the Earth's southern atmosphere, and are more directed towards us in the autumn. From this again can be seen the great importance of the sunspots to our weather control.." Surely the difference between spring and autumn is caused by the proximity of Earth to the Sun and tilt of the Earth. You'd think he would have known that. He was onto it, somewhat, with the planets, but not quite. He referred to the forward movement of the Sun through space in the direction he referred to as "north" which was towards the star Vega. When the planet Jupiter or Saturn or both are on the Vega side of the Sun, he said they act as a shield to the Sun from the magnetic field through which the solar system moves, and he believed this was the time when there was no sunspots visible on the Sun. He also stated that this was the time for droughts in Australia at least, and when the planets were following behind the Sun towards "north" then this was the time for sunspots and with heavy rain or floods. However, he overlooked that these two planets would be together on the "north" or "south" side of the Sun only rarely, but he made use of each or both planets individually or together for his long range weather forecasts. It seems hard to imagine that ONLY Australia would be affected in this manner by droughts. Surely other countries would be receiving normal rain or even floods while Australia was in the grip of a drought, or viceversa. If this was the position world-wide, how can just those planets be used to say what the weather will be in any given country? Saturn, on its closest approach to Earth will be about 1271 million km(790 million miles) away, and Jupiter 670 million km(390 million miles). As they stay more or less stationary - Jupiter moves 30deg per year and Saturn 13 deg per year - it seems doubtful to me that they could, with the moon taken out the picture, significantly affect our daily weather. Jones placed great reliance on Jupiter and Saturn, the only two planets large enough to affect any change on the Sun as they orbit. It takes 11.86 years for Jupiter to orbit the Sun, the same purported time for the sunspot cycle. But so far neither astronomers nor climatologists have brought forward a map of the solar system which shows just where Jupiter was situated on its orbit around the sun when the sunspots appear. So the question is; does the sunspot cycle precess or advance on the orbit of Jupiter? It's not enough just to relate sunspots to the planet Jupiter and let it go at that. Saturn takes 29.45 years to orbit the Sun, which means that Jupiter orbits the Sun near enough to 2.5 times to one orbit of Saturn. In the one orbit of Jupiter, Saturn will have advanced about 158 deg on its own orbit. To overtake the 158 degrees that Saturn has moved forward, will take Jupiter, in its next orbit, about another six years or so. The total time it will take Jupiter to catch up to Saturn, assuming each was in the same starting position in relation to one another at first, will be in the vicinity of 18 years which is MORE than the time taken for one orbit by Jupiter. So this, of course, will not be the same original starting position on the orbit of Saturn. This 18 years is too long a period to equate with the sunspot cycle, but half of that period of nine years is closer. These figures could be closer to the time taken by Jupiter for one orbit and also the accepted period for the sunspot cycle. BUT..the sunspot cycle is said to be approx 11 years(even Inigo said it varies from 9-16 years), and even today many meteorologists stick to simplistic sunspot thinking. They know there is much repeatability in 18 years but again they seem intent on overlooking the moon's 18 year orbit, and it could well be that the mimicking of the combined sunspot cycle periodicity and cycle of Jupiter is about 35 years, disguising what could be really a lunar influence. I can accept that because the cycle rises to a peak before reducing to a minimum, the half orbit between Jupiter and Saturn, when they are together on the same side and when they are 180deg apart, could be the catalyst to commence a sunspot cycle. In other words, the sunspot cycle could commence at 9, a very lunar compatible number. 4.5 is the accepted El Nino figure and it starts to get hard to separate what might be Sun and what might be Moon influences when the cycles coincide. Could be both, but Inigo limited himself by sticking just to Jupiter and Saturn. Ken Ring www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jones" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:00 AM Subject: aus-wx: Indigo > Did Inigo Jones predict the 2002 Australian drought? > > There are rumours throughout inland eastern Australia that the legendary > Inigo Jones (1872-1954) forecast the drought of 2002 many years ago. Jones > believed that the alignments of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus caused variations > in the sunspot numbers, which then affected rainfall in eastern Australia. > So he could make very long-range forecasts of eastern Australian droughts, > by knowing the future planetary alignments. Jones published a table of his > predicted droughts for the period 1949-2008 in the National Motorist in > January 1950. This table provides a unique opportunity to verify his > long-range forecasts over many years. His table appears to refer to > Queensland droughts, or to eastern Australian droughts. I have examined how > his drought forecasts match observed seasonal rainfall averaged across > Queensland. > > Jones did forecast a "Dry Summer, Autumn and Winter" in 2001 and 2002. > Rainfall was low in Queensland in each of these three seasons, but has > continued to be low into spring 2002. > > Jones failed to predict the severe 1965, 1982 and 1994 droughts (the three > driest years of the second half of the 20th century). He predicted a "Minor > Drought in Summer" in 1998-1999. This did not occur. He also predicted a > "Dry Winter, Spring and Summer" for 1995 and 1996. Winter and spring 1995 > were wet, although summer 1995/96 was dry as predicted. Jones correctly > predicted a "Dry Summer " for 1977/78 and a "Dry Spell" for 1979/80. He > predicted a "Moderately Severe Drought" for 1957-1960. The first and last of > these years were drier than normal, but 1958 and 1959 were slightly wetter > than normal. He failed to predict drought for 1961, the driest year in the > 1957-1961 sequence. > > Perhaps the most intriguing of Jones's predictions was for a "Severe > Prolonged Drought" with "Social National Crises" for the period 1983 to > 1992. There were only two years of drought (1986 and 1992) during this > period. The mean 1983-1992 rainfall was below the long-term mean rainfall, > but substantially higher than the rainfall in the 1963-1972 period. Jones > did not identify the 1963-1972 period as a prolonged drought. Even the terms > he used for the years in which he did predict droughts during the 1960s and > early 1970s ("Rains Slightly Below Normal", "Dry Spell", "Minor Drought", > "Moderate Drought") do not suggest a severe prolonged drought. > > In summary, Inigo Jones did predict the 2001-2002 drought, but this was one > of only a few occasions when his long-range predictions of drought have been > correct. In particular he failed to predict the most severe (1965, 1982 and > 1994) droughts and the extended dry period of the 1960s and early 1970s. > > Dr David Jones > > Head Climate Analysis Section > National Climate Centre > Bureau of Meteorology Fax : (+61 3) 9669 4678 > GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne Ph (work): (+61 3) 9669 4085 > Victoria 3001, Australia Ph (home): (+61 3) 9755 1923 > email : D.Jones at bom.gov.au > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:27:56 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Pissing down now in Brisbane.. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:22:33 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Nice assesment Laurier... very interesting reading! Thanks for going to all the effort. Matt Smith Laurier Williams wrote: > Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts of Australia > on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April 2001. I've only > had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my assessment. It is > based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements (forecasts) > made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In addition, I've > noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. > > I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation of any > individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with evidence. > > For October we have: > > "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain than last > month. " > 1. True, the dry spell continued. > 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the overall metro > area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the only stations > for which totals were received each day in both months. There will be a > fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the meantime > these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. > Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP > Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) > Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN > Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN > Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN > Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN > Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP > Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME > Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP > Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP > Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP > Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP > Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN > Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN > Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN > Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP > Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) > > UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 > > "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. " > Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to eliminate dew. > Figures are date/mm > Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 > Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 > Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 > Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 > Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 > Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 > Richmond: 11/1.0 > > So > 3rd False > 10th True > 15th False > 17th False > Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed > > "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the previous month, but > (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." > 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which being > significantly less than "about half" scores a False. > 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so False > > "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, 14th-15th, 21st and > 27th." > The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW slopes, > eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain (either amounts > or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th (about > two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) > So, 1st to 6th False > 14th-15th True > 21st False > 27th False > 24th missed > > So Ken's score for October: > True 3 > False 8 > Neither True nor False 1 > Missed events 3 > > For November, the jury's still out, but a few early observations: > > "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with most possibly > between 16th-21st." > Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not intermittently every few > days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are 3.0mm at > Chatswood and Turramurra. > > "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine hours. " > 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm to date. > > "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and 25th. " > The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. > > Further update on November after month's end. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steven Williams" To: Cc: "Steven Williams" Subject: aus-wx: Summer has finally arrived in NZ Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:31:11 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Special Weather Advisory

SPECIAL WEATHER ADVISORY FOR SOUTHLAND OTAGO CANTERBURY MARLBOROUGH
WELLINGTON WAIRARAPA HAWKES BAY GISBORNE TAIHAPE WAIKATO WAITOMO
AUCKLAND NORTHLAND 
ISSUED BY METSERVICE AT 11:10am Friday 15-Nov-2002

YET ANOTHER COLD SNAP FOR THE WEEKEND

MetService forecasters are expecting another in the series of
unseasonable cold spells to hit much of the country over the weekend.
Cold, showery  southerly winds should spread into Southland overnight
and onto Otago and Canterbury by late Saturday morning and farther
north into the southern part of the North Island by midnight Saturday,
bringing some thunderstorms, hail and a dusting of snow to about 500
metres in the southern hills. The cold southerlies with falling
temperatures and a spell of thundery showers and hail, should spread
over most of the remainder of the North Island on Sunday.

Farmers are advised that wind chills below zero in exposed southern
and eastern parts of both islands are likely to place stress on
vulnerable stock, and hail may affect some horticultural areas.
Drivers using high country roads in the South Island tomorrow, and
the Desert Road early Sunday should keep up to date with current
conditions.

Forecast  : 
In Southland, Otago and Canterbury: Cold southerlies pushing
northwards Saturday morning with showery weather bringing thunder and
hail at times. A few centimetres of snow are likely down to about 400
to 500 metres in Southland and Otago and 500-600 metres in the
Canterbury high country. Later on Saturday, showers should become
lighter and fewer and mostly above 600 metres, but will continue on
into Sunday, especially about southern and eastern coasts.

In Eastern Marlborough, Wellington, Wairarapa: The onset of cold
southerlies on Saturday afternoon or evening should bring some
thunderstorms and hail.

Over the remainder of the North Island falling temperatures and heavy
thundery showers, with some hail at times, should spread to many 
areas from Sunday morning.

The next Special Weather Advisory will be issued by 10:15 Saturday
16-Nov-2002
From: "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:48:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That will be great Laurier. I oft walk outside on a warm evening, slingshot in hand, hoping to catch a glimpse of GMS-5 to take aim at it, trying to blow it out of the sky. To this date i have been unsucessful.....maybe i can now turn my time to more important things (darts anyone?) ;) Thanks for keeping us informed Laurier. dann ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:16 AM Subject: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 > The following from NOAA should interest all that remember what having hourly > satpix was like! > > Laurier > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ----------- > > Subject: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan: Effective for March 31, 2003: > Issued > Topic: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan > Message Issued: October 31, 2002, 1322 UTC > Satellites Impacted: GMS-5 and GOES-9 > Products Impacted: Current GMS-5 imagery > Date/Time of Initial Impact: March 31, 2003 > > ----------------------------------------- > > Details: > > ***GOES-9 is scheduled to replace GMS-5 located over the west Pacific at > 155E on March 31, 2003*** > > GMS-5, the Japanese Meteorological Agency's (JMA) meteorological > satellite located at 140E, launched in 1995 and providing meteorological > data over Japan, the West Pacific Ocean, Australia, and Asia, is > scheduled to be temporarily replaced with NOAA's GOES-9 satellite on > March 31, 2003, with its final location at 155E. For more information > on GMS-5 and MTSAT (JMA's next meteorological satellite), visit > http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/ and > http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/new/index.htm . > > In order to support the operation of GOES-9 from 155E, a command and > control ground station is currently being built in Fairbanks, Alaska. > Below are some of the tentative dates and plans for the operation of > GOES-9. > > (1) GOES-9 Out of storage December 11, 2002 > Note: Some preliminary GOES-9 GVAR data will be available from approx > December 12, 2002 through approx January 11, 2003 using the Wallops, VA > CDA. > (2) GOES-9 North/South maneuver December 16, 2002 > (3) GOES-9 to drift west at .8 degrees/day starting December 19, 2002 > (4) GOES-9 imaging suspended approx January 11, 2003 to transfer CDA > control from Wallops to Fairbanks > (5) GOES-9 imagery resumes approx March 1, 2003 using Fairbanks CDA > > **(6) Operations using GOES-9 start March 31, 2003, at which time GOES-9 > will be at 170E > (a) At this point, it is planned for GMS-5 to stop disseminating high > resolution data, and to transmit GOES-9 WEFAX via the GMS-5 satellite. > (b) Users currently obtaining GMS-5 WEFAX from GMS-5 should not need to > make any changes to receive GOES-9 WEFAX via GMS-5 > (c) GOES-9 data will _not_ be converted to VISSR and relayed through > GMS-5 > (d) GOES-9 WEFAX products should be made available via GOES-10 as a one > to one replacement of the current GMS-5 WEFAX products that are made > available via GOES-10 (see > http://noaasis.noaa.gov/NOAASIS/ml/wefax_sked.html for this current > schedule) > (e) Imagery will be available both via GVAR for direct readout, and from > DOMSAT for CONUS users. More details when further information is > available. > > (7) Approx April 18, GOES-9 arrives on station at 155E. > > Scanning Strategies: > Imager: > While not finalized, the GOES-9 imager schedule will roughly reflect the > current GMS-5 scanning schedule. Hourly full disk images from pole to > pole will begin at HH:34, ending at HH:00. Every 6 hours, an abbreviated > full disk (exact location to be determined, but roughly +/- 49 N/S) will > begin at HH:08 and end at HH:26 where HH=5, 11, 17, 23. For the other > 20 hours of the day between HH:08 and HH:26, it has yet to be determined > what the scanning scenario will be, but will likely consist of several > shorter sectors in the northern hemisphere. > Sounder: > While also not finalized, the GOES-9 sounder instrument will be on > during this time providing 50 minute scans every hour, and will be > scanning parts of the northern hemisphere 16 times a day, parts of the > equatorial region 4 times a day, and parts of the southern hemisphere 4 > times a day. > > More information on the transition from GMS-5 to GOES-9 will be provided > as it becomes available. Once schedules and sectors are finalized, > information will be posted via email and our home page. > > ------------------------------------------ > > Contact Information: > Tom Renkevens > Satellite Services Division > NOAA/NESDIS/OSDPD > 301-763-8081 x109 > thomas.renkevens at noaa.gov > > See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/SATS/messages.html for this and other > satellite related messages. > See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov for full GOES scanning schedules. > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:06:47 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: Re: aus-wx: US Tornado Outbreak. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 00:56 12/11/02 +1100, you wrote: > Hi all, Well with our storm season underway, this time of year its a >little quite in the US, However in the previous ~24 hours over 250 Svr WX >warnings have been issued and over 180 Tornado watches were issued. >Tornado's have been Confirmed, with 9 also on the previous day, there will >be more added to this for sure. I have read reports of 32 deaths due to >the fact that alot of this Occured during the late afternoon into the >night and early hours of the morning. Millions of $$$ damage and lots more >people injured. This has been the biggest tornadic outbreak this year in >the US, and its not even the actual storm season, but what US Chasers call >"Secondary season" which occurs for a few weeks in Autumn, before the >winter months take hold. Im also wondering if the Early Snowfalls that >fell over many Northan and Eastern states a week or two back aided in >anyway to the outbreak, would be interesting to see, if the same mechanism >that brought the snowfalls also had a play in the outbreak. Hopefully I >will get some links orgained (or somebody else who has been following it) >but for now check this out. http://mgweather.com/ >Cheers Yes, I have just seen the tornado's on TV here in NZ. As posted before, we have already had our first tornado of the season here in Canterbury NZ (Oct 27th) even though it was only F0. As the Fujuta TIS rates the power of it's scale by damage, this funnel only passed over rural areas. If it had passed over built up areas of Christchurch like a similar tornado did on the 20th of January 1983, it would of been graded further. As tornadoes here are of a rare event I don't think we'll have any more for a while. Maybe 20 years time??? Just put up with the occasional boring thunderstorm ?????????? If we get them !!!!!!!! JohnGaul NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:09:53 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 15:27 15/11/02 +1000, you wrote: >Pissing down now in Brisbane.. Yeah, the latest JMS sattelite pic looks good over Queensland. Skies were reddish here in ChCh the other day with cirro-stratus possibly with smoke embedded haze aloft. JohnGaul NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:16:05 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Laurier, Thanks for this post. This is excellent news as I think it is important to have satellite pictures in now casting. I wonder if we will enjoy the high resolution data and frequency the US public/chasers are used to. Just a thought. Nevertheless, the important thing is that this is good news and at least hourly satellite imagery become available again. Jimmy Deguara At 02:16 PM 14/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: >The following from NOAA should interest all that remember what having hourly >satpix was like! > >Laurier > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >----------- > >Subject: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan: Effective for March 31, 2003: >Issued >Topic: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan >Message Issued: October 31, 2002, 1322 UTC >Satellites Impacted: GMS-5 and GOES-9 >Products Impacted: Current GMS-5 imagery >Date/Time of Initial Impact: March 31, 2003 > >----------------------------------------- > >Details: > >***GOES-9 is scheduled to replace GMS-5 located over the west Pacific at >155E on March 31, 2003*** > >GMS-5, the Japanese Meteorological Agency's (JMA) meteorological >satellite located at 140E, launched in 1995 and providing meteorological >data over Japan, the West Pacific Ocean, Australia, and Asia, is >scheduled to be temporarily replaced with NOAA's GOES-9 satellite on >March 31, 2003, with its final location at 155E. For more information >on GMS-5 and MTSAT (JMA's next meteorological satellite), visit >http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/ and >http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/new/index.htm . > >In order to support the operation of GOES-9 from 155E, a command and >control ground station is currently being built in Fairbanks, Alaska. >Below are some of the tentative dates and plans for the operation of >GOES-9. > >(1) GOES-9 Out of storage December 11, 2002 >Note: Some preliminary GOES-9 GVAR data will be available from approx >December 12, 2002 through approx January 11, 2003 using the Wallops, VA >CDA. >(2) GOES-9 North/South maneuver December 16, 2002 >(3) GOES-9 to drift west at .8 degrees/day starting December 19, 2002 >(4) GOES-9 imaging suspended approx January 11, 2003 to transfer CDA >control from Wallops to Fairbanks >(5) GOES-9 imagery resumes approx March 1, 2003 using Fairbanks CDA > >**(6) Operations using GOES-9 start March 31, 2003, at which time GOES-9 >will be at 170E >(a) At this point, it is planned for GMS-5 to stop disseminating high >resolution data, and to transmit GOES-9 WEFAX via the GMS-5 satellite. >(b) Users currently obtaining GMS-5 WEFAX from GMS-5 should not need to >make any changes to receive GOES-9 WEFAX via GMS-5 >(c) GOES-9 data will _not_ be converted to VISSR and relayed through >GMS-5 >(d) GOES-9 WEFAX products should be made available via GOES-10 as a one >to one replacement of the current GMS-5 WEFAX products that are made >available via GOES-10 (see >http://noaasis.noaa.gov/NOAASIS/ml/wefax_sked.html for this current >schedule) >(e) Imagery will be available both via GVAR for direct readout, and from >DOMSAT for CONUS users. More details when further information is >available. > >(7) Approx April 18, GOES-9 arrives on station at 155E. > >Scanning Strategies: >Imager: >While not finalized, the GOES-9 imager schedule will roughly reflect the >current GMS-5 scanning schedule. Hourly full disk images from pole to >pole will begin at HH:34, ending at HH:00. Every 6 hours, an abbreviated >full disk (exact location to be determined, but roughly +/- 49 N/S) will >begin at HH:08 and end at HH:26 where HH=5, 11, 17, 23. For the other >20 hours of the day between HH:08 and HH:26, it has yet to be determined >what the scanning scenario will be, but will likely consist of several >shorter sectors in the northern hemisphere. >Sounder: >While also not finalized, the GOES-9 sounder instrument will be on >during this time providing 50 minute scans every hour, and will be >scanning parts of the northern hemisphere 16 times a day, parts of the >equatorial region 4 times a day, and parts of the southern hemisphere 4 >times a day. > >More information on the transition from GMS-5 to GOES-9 will be provided >as it becomes available. Once schedules and sectors are finalized, >information will be posted via email and our home page. > >------------------------------------------ > >Contact Information: >Tom Renkevens >Satellite Services Division >NOAA/NESDIS/OSDPD >301-763-8081 x109 >thomas.renkevens at noaa.gov > >See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/SATS/messages.html for this and other >satellite related messages. >See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov for full GOES scanning schedules. > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:23:33 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com So that is why I have all these rocks landing on the roof late at night! :P Dont get rid of GMS5 just yet... we need it till the changeover!!! Matt Smith dann weatherhead wrote: > That will be great Laurier. > > I oft walk outside on a warm evening, slingshot in hand, hoping to catch a > glimpse of GMS-5 to take aim at it, trying to blow it out of the sky. > > To this date i have been unsucessful.....maybe i can now turn my time to > more important things (darts anyone?) > ;) > > Thanks for keeping us informed Laurier. > > dann > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laurier Williams" > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:16 AM > Subject: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 > > > The following from NOAA should interest all that remember what having > hourly > > satpix was like! > > > > Laurier > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > ----------- > > > > Subject: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan: Effective for March 31, 2003: > > Issued > > Topic: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan > > Message Issued: October 31, 2002, 1322 UTC > > Satellites Impacted: GMS-5 and GOES-9 > > Products Impacted: Current GMS-5 imagery > > Date/Time of Initial Impact: March 31, 2003 > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > Details: > > > > ***GOES-9 is scheduled to replace GMS-5 located over the west Pacific at > > 155E on March 31, 2003*** > > > > GMS-5, the Japanese Meteorological Agency's (JMA) meteorological > > satellite located at 140E, launched in 1995 and providing meteorological > > data over Japan, the West Pacific Ocean, Australia, and Asia, is > > scheduled to be temporarily replaced with NOAA's GOES-9 satellite on > > March 31, 2003, with its final location at 155E. For more information > > on GMS-5 and MTSAT (JMA's next meteorological satellite), visit > > http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/ and > > http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/new/index.htm . > > > > In order to support the operation of GOES-9 from 155E, a command and > > control ground station is currently being built in Fairbanks, Alaska. > > Below are some of the tentative dates and plans for the operation of > > GOES-9. > > > > (1) GOES-9 Out of storage December 11, 2002 > > Note: Some preliminary GOES-9 GVAR data will be available from approx > > December 12, 2002 through approx January 11, 2003 using the Wallops, VA > > CDA. > > (2) GOES-9 North/South maneuver December 16, 2002 > > (3) GOES-9 to drift west at .8 degrees/day starting December 19, 2002 > > (4) GOES-9 imaging suspended approx January 11, 2003 to transfer CDA > > control from Wallops to Fairbanks > > (5) GOES-9 imagery resumes approx March 1, 2003 using Fairbanks CDA > > > > **(6) Operations using GOES-9 start March 31, 2003, at which time GOES-9 > > will be at 170E > > (a) At this point, it is planned for GMS-5 to stop disseminating high > > resolution data, and to transmit GOES-9 WEFAX via the GMS-5 satellite. > > (b) Users currently obtaining GMS-5 WEFAX from GMS-5 should not need to > > make any changes to receive GOES-9 WEFAX via GMS-5 > > (c) GOES-9 data will _not_ be converted to VISSR and relayed through > > GMS-5 > > (d) GOES-9 WEFAX products should be made available via GOES-10 as a one > > to one replacement of the current GMS-5 WEFAX products that are made > > available via GOES-10 (see > > http://noaasis.noaa.gov/NOAASIS/ml/wefax_sked.html for this current > > schedule) > > (e) Imagery will be available both via GVAR for direct readout, and from > > DOMSAT for CONUS users. More details when further information is > > available. > > > > (7) Approx April 18, GOES-9 arrives on station at 155E. > > > > Scanning Strategies: > > Imager: > > While not finalized, the GOES-9 imager schedule will roughly reflect the > > current GMS-5 scanning schedule. Hourly full disk images from pole to > > pole will begin at HH:34, ending at HH:00. Every 6 hours, an abbreviated > > full disk (exact location to be determined, but roughly +/- 49 N/S) will > > begin at HH:08 and end at HH:26 where HH=5, 11, 17, 23. For the other > > 20 hours of the day between HH:08 and HH:26, it has yet to be determined > > what the scanning scenario will be, but will likely consist of several > > shorter sectors in the northern hemisphere. > > Sounder: > > While also not finalized, the GOES-9 sounder instrument will be on > > during this time providing 50 minute scans every hour, and will be > > scanning parts of the northern hemisphere 16 times a day, parts of the > > equatorial region 4 times a day, and parts of the southern hemisphere 4 > > times a day. > > > > More information on the transition from GMS-5 to GOES-9 will be provided > > as it becomes available. Once schedules and sectors are finalized, > > information will be posted via email and our home page. > > > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > Contact Information: > > Tom Renkevens > > Satellite Services Division > > NOAA/NESDIS/OSDPD > > 301-763-8081 x109 > > thomas.renkevens at noaa.gov > > > > See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/SATS/messages.html for this and other > > satellite related messages. > > See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov for full GOES scanning schedules. > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Duncan & Mandy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:02:05 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'day all, I might join in the Ken Ring bashing session as well. Dunno about Ken's accuracy for Central Australia. From the 9th until the 13th of November the region had a period of humidity and Storms. While Alice Springs recorded only around 5mm, New Crown station on the western edge of the Simpson Desert recorded around 27mm. For them, this is a significant rain event. Many areas around Alice Springs had good falls of rain, but these aren't recorded due to the remoteness of the country. Ken did not mention even the possibilty of rain. He predicts rain for around November 22nd. We shall see - maybe my faith will be restored... Cheers, Duncan Alice Springs, N.T. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 11:38 am Subject: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts of Australia > on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April 2001. I've only > had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my assessment. It is > based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements (forecasts) > made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In addition, I've > noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. > > I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation of any > individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with evidence. > > For October we have: > > "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain than last > month. " > 1. True, the dry spell continued. > 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the overall metro > area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the only stations > for which totals were received each day in both months. There will be a > fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the meantime > these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. > Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP > Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) > Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN > Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN > Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN > Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN > Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP > Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME > Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP > Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP > Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP > Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP > Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN > Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN > Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN > Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP > Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) > > UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 > > "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. " > Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to eliminate dew. > Figures are date/mm > Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 > Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 > Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 > Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 > Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 > Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 > Richmond: 11/1.0 > > So > 3rd False > 10th True > 15th False > 17th False > Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed > > "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the previous month, but > (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." > 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which being > significantly less than "about half" scores a False. > 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so False > > "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, 14th-15th, 21st and > 27th." > The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW slopes, > eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain (either amounts > or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th (about > two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) > So, 1st to 6th False > 14th-15th True > 21st False > 27th False > 24th missed > > So Ken's score for October: > True 3 > False 8 > Neither True nor False 1 > Missed events 3 > > For November, the jury's still out, but a few early observations: > > "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with most possibly > between 16th-21st." > Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not intermittently every few > days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are 3.0mm at > Chatswood and Turramurra. > > "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine hours. " > 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm to date. > > "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and 25th. " > The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. > > Further update on November after month's end. > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:24:08 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I can concur with that - 23mm and counting in Petrie (N of Brisbane). I actually have a significant theory on Brisbane rainfall - It rains when I get on my pushbike - hmmmm - maybe I should go for a ride out west. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:27 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > Pissing down now in Brisbane.. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:39:36 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com LOL James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Smith Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 6:24 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 So that is why I have all these rocks landing on the roof late at night! :P Dont get rid of GMS5 just yet... we need it till the changeover!!! Matt Smith dann weatherhead wrote: > That will be great Laurier. > > I oft walk outside on a warm evening, slingshot in hand, hoping to catch a > glimpse of GMS-5 to take aim at it, trying to blow it out of the sky. > > To this date i have been unsucessful.....maybe i can now turn my time to > more important things (darts anyone?) > ;) > > Thanks for keeping us informed Laurier. > > dann > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laurier Williams" > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:16 AM > Subject: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 > > > The following from NOAA should interest all that remember what having > hourly > > satpix was like! > > > > Laurier > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > -- > > ----------- > > > > Subject: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan: Effective for March 31, 2003: > > Issued > > Topic: GMS-5 to GOES-9 Transition Plan > > Message Issued: October 31, 2002, 1322 UTC > > Satellites Impacted: GMS-5 and GOES-9 > > Products Impacted: Current GMS-5 imagery > > Date/Time of Initial Impact: March 31, 2003 > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > Details: > > > > ***GOES-9 is scheduled to replace GMS-5 located over the west Pacific at > > 155E on March 31, 2003*** > > > > GMS-5, the Japanese Meteorological Agency's (JMA) meteorological > > satellite located at 140E, launched in 1995 and providing meteorological > > data over Japan, the West Pacific Ocean, Australia, and Asia, is > > scheduled to be temporarily replaced with NOAA's GOES-9 satellite on > > March 31, 2003, with its final location at 155E. For more information > > on GMS-5 and MTSAT (JMA's next meteorological satellite), visit > > http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/ and > > http://mscweb.kishou.go.jp/new/index.htm . > > > > In order to support the operation of GOES-9 from 155E, a command and > > control ground station is currently being built in Fairbanks, Alaska. > > Below are some of the tentative dates and plans for the operation of > > GOES-9. > > > > (1) GOES-9 Out of storage December 11, 2002 > > Note: Some preliminary GOES-9 GVAR data will be available from approx > > December 12, 2002 through approx January 11, 2003 using the Wallops, VA > > CDA. > > (2) GOES-9 North/South maneuver December 16, 2002 > > (3) GOES-9 to drift west at .8 degrees/day starting December 19, 2002 > > (4) GOES-9 imaging suspended approx January 11, 2003 to transfer CDA > > control from Wallops to Fairbanks > > (5) GOES-9 imagery resumes approx March 1, 2003 using Fairbanks CDA > > > > **(6) Operations using GOES-9 start March 31, 2003, at which time GOES-9 > > will be at 170E > > (a) At this point, it is planned for GMS-5 to stop disseminating high > > resolution data, and to transmit GOES-9 WEFAX via the GMS-5 satellite. > > (b) Users currently obtaining GMS-5 WEFAX from GMS-5 should not need to > > make any changes to receive GOES-9 WEFAX via GMS-5 > > (c) GOES-9 data will _not_ be converted to VISSR and relayed through > > GMS-5 > > (d) GOES-9 WEFAX products should be made available via GOES-10 as a one > > to one replacement of the current GMS-5 WEFAX products that are made > > available via GOES-10 (see > > http://noaasis.noaa.gov/NOAASIS/ml/wefax_sked.html for this current > > schedule) > > (e) Imagery will be available both via GVAR for direct readout, and from > > DOMSAT for CONUS users. More details when further information is > > available. > > > > (7) Approx April 18, GOES-9 arrives on station at 155E. > > > > Scanning Strategies: > > Imager: > > While not finalized, the GOES-9 imager schedule will roughly reflect the > > current GMS-5 scanning schedule. Hourly full disk images from pole to > > pole will begin at HH:34, ending at HH:00. Every 6 hours, an abbreviated > > full disk (exact location to be determined, but roughly +/- 49 N/S) will > > begin at HH:08 and end at HH:26 where HH=5, 11, 17, 23. For the other > > 20 hours of the day between HH:08 and HH:26, it has yet to be determined > > what the scanning scenario will be, but will likely consist of several > > shorter sectors in the northern hemisphere. > > Sounder: > > While also not finalized, the GOES-9 sounder instrument will be on > > during this time providing 50 minute scans every hour, and will be > > scanning parts of the northern hemisphere 16 times a day, parts of the > > equatorial region 4 times a day, and parts of the southern hemisphere 4 > > times a day. > > > > More information on the transition from GMS-5 to GOES-9 will be provided > > as it becomes available. Once schedules and sectors are finalized, > > information will be posted via email and our home page. > > > > ------------------------------------------ > > > > Contact Information: > > Tom Renkevens > > Satellite Services Division > > NOAA/NESDIS/OSDPD > > 301-763-8081 x109 > > thomas.renkevens at noaa.gov > > > > See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/SATS/messages.html for this and other > > satellite related messages. > > See http://www.ssd.noaa.gov for full GOES scanning schedules. > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:06:27 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Maybe you should hire yourself out to drought-stricken cockies to pedal around their properties! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Third" To: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:24:08 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > I can concur with that - 23mm and counting in Petrie (N of Brisbane). > > I actually have a significant theory on Brisbane rainfall - It rains > when I > get on my pushbike - hmmmm - maybe I should go for a ride out west. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Woodbridge" > To: > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:27 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > Pissing down now in Brisbane.. > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:11:15 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From over here, it appears the level of Ken-bashing is inversely proportional to the amount of interesting weather that is happening in Oz. So let some decent storms come rolling through so Ken can quietly go back to what he loves doing - having a go at predicting the weather - while the rest of us read some exciting chase reports etc. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Duncan & Mandy" To: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:02:05 +1030 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > G'day all, > I might join in the Ken Ring bashing session as well. > Dunno about Ken's accuracy for Central Australia. From the 9th until > the > 13th of November the region had a period of humidity and Storms. While > Alice > Springs recorded only around 5mm, New Crown station on the western edge > of > the Simpson Desert recorded around 27mm. For them, this is a > significant > rain event. Many areas around Alice Springs had good falls of rain, but > these aren't recorded due to the remoteness of the country. Ken did not > mention even the possibilty of rain. > He predicts rain for around November 22nd. We shall see - maybe my > faith > will be restored... > Cheers, > Duncan > Alice Springs, N.T. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laurier Williams" > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 11:38 am > Subject: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts of > Australia > > on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April 2001. > I've > only > > had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my assessment. > It > is > > based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements > (forecasts) > > made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In > addition, > I've > > noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. > > > > I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation of > any > > individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with evidence. > > > > For October we have: > > > > "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain than > last > > month. " > > 1. True, the dry spell continued. > > 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the overall > metro > > area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the only > stations > > for which totals were received each day in both months. There will be > a > > fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the > meantime > > these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. > > Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP > > Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) > > Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN > > Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN > > Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN > > Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN > > Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP > > Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME > > Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP > > Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP > > Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP > > Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP > > Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN > > Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN > > Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN > > Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP > > Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) > > > > UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 > > > > "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. " > > Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to eliminate > dew. > > Figures are date/mm > > Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 > > Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 > > Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 > > Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 > > Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 > > Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 > > Richmond: 11/1.0 > > > > So > > 3rd False > > 10th True > > 15th False > > 17th False > > Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed > > > > "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the previous > month, > but > > (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." > > 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which being > > significantly less than "about half" scores a False. > > 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so False > > > > "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, 14th-15th, > 21st > and > > 27th." > > The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW slopes, > > eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain (either > amounts > > or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th (about > > two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) > > So, 1st to 6th False > > 14th-15th True > > 21st False > > 27th False > > 24th missed > > > > So Ken's score for October: > > True 3 > > False 8 > > Neither True nor False 1 > > Missed events 3 > > > > For November, the jury's still out, but a few early observations: > > > > "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with most > possibly > > between 16th-21st." > > Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not intermittently > every > few > > days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are 3.0mm > at > > Chatswood and Turramurra. > > > > "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine hours. > " > > 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm to > date. > > > > "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and 25th. > " > > The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. > > > > Further update on November after month's end. > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:27:43 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: Re: aus-wx: GOES-9 to replace GMS-5 from April 2002 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 17:48 15/11/02 +1100, you wrote: >That will be great Laurier. > >I oft walk outside on a warm evening, slingshot in hand, hoping to catch a >glimpse of GMS-5 to take aim at it, trying to blow it out of the sky. > >To this date i have been unsucessful.....maybe i can now turn my time to >more important things (darts anyone?) >;) > >Thanks for keeping us informed Laurier. > >dann Now Dann don't do that for the next 6 months. I can't wait for GO 9 G05 shows phuct satellite pictures on NZ television. Mind you they do a good makeshift. Looks as though the GO9 launch was succesfull ?? JohnGaul NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: aus-wx: Michael's forecast accuracy. Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:20:28 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2002 11:17:58.0176 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6D61200:01C28C98] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Looking into the crystal ball I see...................................... Melbourne ....next August a day either side of the 15th to 17th you will have strato cumulus. Wollongong..............next November, a day either side of the 29th to 30th, a trough will stall just 200km north and provide severe weather to the NE third of NSW, whilst Wollongong will miss out. .................................wait there is more............................... I see storms in Darwin this December....................strong winds in Tasmania sometime in the next six weeks. Michael --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 23:04:15 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Phil I am not into "Ken bashing" but it annoys me when a fraud like Ken professes to be a weather predictor when all the evidence shows clearly that his so called predictions are no better than chance - in fact, a random assesment of recent weather in sydney, would be more accuarate. Sure, eventually he has to be right but he is so dishonest that he changes his parameters at will. His theories have been shown to be wrong... time and again his limited forecasts that have been available to us have been shown to be total rubbish, but he persists in trying to justify his forecasts by changing his interpreations eg his stupid comments today about early November stating showers... storms in SE Australia... 500 kms away from Sydney and then tries to use that to justify his forecast of rain in Sydney. On 26 October Ken posted on this list the following: Hi all I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in November, as I posted on 24/7/02. My prediction for Sydney: Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, and 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. My prediction for Brisbane: Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly dry again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 Ken It rained in Sydney today - 15 Novewmber - for the first time this month. surely that aloe shows the futility of trying to do something of which he is incapable! I enjoy an intellectual disvcussion - we have gone past that poitn with Ken's rubbsish. It cannot be justified because it is plainly wrong. All other professions (eg medicine, law engineering etc) have professional bodies for a reasom. Imagine the science of medicine putting up with such ignorant utterences... but we have to tolerate it because we are yet at that level. If Ken wants to put forward his theories --- fine. If he can't accept the fact that his forecasts are useless, then we can't just ignore them because they "bring down" the whole credibility of meteorology. No one is saying that this science is perfect... but if I cannot forecast with 80-85% accuracy then there is little point .. after all, a forecast for a city such as Sydeny based on presistence alone would be 75% accurate... and all that is saying is that tomorrow will be the same as today. Ken has been wrong every day in November that he has forecast rain for Sysdney. Eventually, he will be right, but so what? Eventually it will rain - probably this week! As a science and as a fledging industry we must reject such utterances made on the pretext for forecasting the weather otherwise we will all be eventually judged by the lowest common demoninator.That is why I believe we cannot allow Ken to go unchallenged. The trouble with Ken is that he is either unwilling or too stupid to admit he is wrong. I will not give a day by day forecast beyond 5-7 days because I do not beleive that the science of meteorology is sophisticated enough to make such outlooks commercially viable. I will prepare climatic assessments a season ahead based on variation to normal. To try to do more is not and has never been justified.. Ken's attempts have shown that to be true even if he doesnt want to face reality. Don White s Phil Smith wrote: > > >From over here, it appears the level of Ken-bashing is inversely > proportional to the amount of interesting weather that is happening in > Oz. > So let some decent storms come rolling through so Ken can quietly go back > to what he loves doing - having a go at predicting the weather - while > the rest of us read some exciting chase reports etc. > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Duncan & Mandy" > To: > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:02:05 +1030 > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > G'day all, > > I might join in the Ken Ring bashing session as well. > > Dunno about Ken's accuracy for Central Australia. From the 9th until > > the > > 13th of November the region had a period of humidity and Storms. While > > Alice > > Springs recorded only around 5mm, New Crown station on the western edge > > of > > the Simpson Desert recorded around 27mm. For them, this is a > > significant > > rain event. Many areas around Alice Springs had good falls of rain, but > > these aren't recorded due to the remoteness of the country. Ken did not > > mention even the possibilty of rain. > > He predicts rain for around November 22nd. We shall see - maybe my > > faith > > will be restored... > > Cheers, > > Duncan > > Alice Springs, N.T. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Laurier Williams" > > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > > Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 11:38 am > > Subject: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts of > > Australia > > > on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April 2001. > > I've > > only > > > had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my assessment. > > It > > is > > > based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements > > (forecasts) > > > made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In > > addition, > > I've > > > noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. > > > > > > I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation of > > any > > > individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with evidence. > > > > > > For October we have: > > > > > > "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain than > > last > > > month. " > > > 1. True, the dry spell continued. > > > 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the overall > > metro > > > area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the only > > stations > > > for which totals were received each day in both months. There will be > > a > > > fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the > > meantime > > > these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. > > > Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP > > > Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) > > > Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN > > > Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN > > > Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN > > > Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN > > > Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP > > > Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME > > > Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP > > > Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP > > > Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP > > > Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP > > > Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN > > > Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN > > > Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN > > > Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP > > > Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) > > > > > > UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 > > > > > > "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. " > > > Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to eliminate > > dew. > > > Figures are date/mm > > > Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 > > > Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 > > > Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 > > > Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 > > > Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 > > > Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 > > > Richmond: 11/1.0 > > > > > > So > > > 3rd False > > > 10th True > > > 15th False > > > 17th False > > > Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the previous > > month, > > but > > > (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." > > > 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which being > > > significantly less than "about half" scores a False. > > > 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so False > > > > > > "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, 14th-15th, > > 21st > > and > > > 27th." > > > The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW slopes, > > > eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain (either > > amounts > > > or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th (about > > > two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) > > > So, 1st to 6th False > > > 14th-15th True > > > 21st False > > > 27th False > > > 24th missed > > > > > > So Ken's score for October: > > > True 3 > > > False 8 > > > Neither True nor False 1 > > > Missed events 3 > > > > > > For November, the jury's still out, but a few early observations: > > > > > > "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with most > > possibly > > > between 16th-21st." > > > Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not intermittently > > every > > few > > > days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are 3.0mm > > at > > > Chatswood and Turramurra. > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine hours. > > " > > > 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm to > > date. > > > > > > "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and 25th. > > " > > > The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. > > > > > > Further update on November after month's end. > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Mossman" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:14:13 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Don ..... While it seems interetsing that you should wish to defend the profession, the finger pointing aint going to advance an argument very far. The BOM constantly get it wrong, yet we are all ready to back them with "models wrong"..."difficult set-up..." etc etc. Just sit back and enjoy it - labelling, accusing etc will only see you in Court. Let his work speak the loudest.... Rgds, Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don White" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:34 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > Phil > I am not into "Ken bashing" but it annoys me when a fraud like Ken > professes to be a weather predictor when all the evidence shows clearly > that his so called predictions are no better than chance - in fact, a > random assesment of recent weather in sydney, would be more accuarate. > Sure, eventually he has to be right but he is so dishonest that he > changes his parameters at will. > His theories have been shown to be wrong... time and again his limited > forecasts that have been available to us have been shown to be total > rubbish, but he persists in trying to justify his forecasts by changing > his interpreations eg his stupid comments today about early November > stating showers... storms in SE Australia... 500 kms away from Sydney > and then tries to use that to justify his forecast of rain in Sydney. > On 26 October Ken posted on this list the following: > Hi all > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > My prediction for Sydney: > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, > and > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > My prediction for Brisbane: > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly > dry > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > Ken > It rained in Sydney today - 15 Novewmber - for the first time this > month. > surely that aloe shows the futility of trying to do something of which > he is incapable! I enjoy an intellectual disvcussion - we have gone past > that poitn with Ken's rubbsish. It cannot be justified because it is > plainly wrong. > All other professions (eg medicine, law engineering etc) have > professional bodies for a reasom. Imagine the science of medicine > putting up with such ignorant utterences... but we have to tolerate it > because we are yet at that level. > If Ken wants to put forward his theories --- fine. If he can't accept > the fact that his forecasts are useless, then we can't just ignore them > because they "bring down" the whole credibility of meteorology. No one > is saying that this science is perfect... but if I cannot forecast with > 80-85% accuracy then there is little point .. after all, a forecast for > a city such as Sydeny based on presistence alone would be 75% > accurate... and all that is saying is that tomorrow will be the same as > today. > > Ken has been wrong every day in November that he has forecast rain for > Sysdney. Eventually, he will be right, but so what? Eventually it will > rain - probably this week! > As a science and as a fledging industry we must reject such utterances > made on the pretext for forecasting the weather otherwise we will all be > eventually judged by the lowest common demoninator.That is why I believe > we cannot allow Ken to go unchallenged. > The trouble with Ken is that he is either unwilling or too stupid to > admit he is wrong. > I will not give a day by day forecast beyond 5-7 days because I do not > beleive that the science of meteorology is sophisticated enough to make > such outlooks commercially viable. I will prepare climatic assessments a > season ahead based on variation to normal. To try to do more is not and > has never been justified.. Ken's attempts have shown that to be true > even if he doesnt want to face reality. > > Don White > s > Phil Smith wrote: > > > > >From over here, it appears the level of Ken-bashing is inversely > > proportional to the amount of interesting weather that is happening in > > Oz. > > So let some decent storms come rolling through so Ken can quietly go back > > to what he loves doing - having a go at predicting the weather - while > > the rest of us read some exciting chase reports etc. > > > > Phil > > <>< > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Duncan & Mandy" > > To: > > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:02:05 +1030 > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > G'day all, > > > I might join in the Ken Ring bashing session as well. > > > Dunno about Ken's accuracy for Central Australia. From the 9th until > > > the > > > 13th of November the region had a period of humidity and Storms. While > > > Alice > > > Springs recorded only around 5mm, New Crown station on the western edge > > > of > > > the Simpson Desert recorded around 27mm. For them, this is a > > > significant > > > rain event. Many areas around Alice Springs had good falls of rain, but > > > these aren't recorded due to the remoteness of the country. Ken did not > > > mention even the possibilty of rain. > > > He predicts rain for around November 22nd. We shall see - maybe my > > > faith > > > will be restored... > > > Cheers, > > > Duncan > > > Alice Springs, N.T. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Laurier Williams" > > > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > > > Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 11:38 am > > > Subject: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > > > > Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts of > > > Australia > > > > on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April 2001. > > > I've > > > only > > > > had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my assessment. > > > It > > > is > > > > based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements > > > (forecasts) > > > > made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In > > > addition, > > > I've > > > > noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. > > > > > > > > I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation of > > > any > > > > individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with evidence. > > > > > > > > For October we have: > > > > > > > > "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain than > > > last > > > > month. " > > > > 1. True, the dry spell continued. > > > > 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the overall > > > metro > > > > area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the only > > > stations > > > > for which totals were received each day in both months. There will be > > > a > > > > fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the > > > meantime > > > > these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. > > > > Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP > > > > Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) > > > > Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN > > > > Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN > > > > Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN > > > > Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN > > > > Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP > > > > Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME > > > > Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP > > > > Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP > > > > Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP > > > > Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP > > > > Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN > > > > Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN > > > > Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN > > > > Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP > > > > Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) > > > > > > > > UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 > > > > > > > > "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. " > > > > Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to eliminate > > > dew. > > > > Figures are date/mm > > > > Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 > > > > Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 > > > > Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 > > > > Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 > > > > Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 > > > > Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 > > > > Richmond: 11/1.0 > > > > > > > > So > > > > 3rd False > > > > 10th True > > > > 15th False > > > > 17th False > > > > Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the previous > > > month, > > > but > > > > (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." > > > > 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which being > > > > significantly less than "about half" scores a False. > > > > 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so False > > > > > > > > "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, 14th-15th, > > > 21st > > > and > > > > 27th." > > > > The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW slopes, > > > > eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain (either > > > amounts > > > > or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th (about > > > > two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) > > > > So, 1st to 6th False > > > > 14th-15th True > > > > 21st False > > > > 27th False > > > > 24th missed > > > > > > > > So Ken's score for October: > > > > True 3 > > > > False 8 > > > > Neither True nor False 1 > > > > Missed events 3 > > > > > > > > For November, the jury's still out, but a few early observations: > > > > > > > > "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with most > > > possibly > > > > between 16th-21st." > > > > Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not intermittently > > > every > > > few > > > > days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are 3.0mm > > > at > > > > Chatswood and Turramurra. > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine hours. > > > " > > > > 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm to > > > date. > > > > > > > > "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and 25th. > > > " > > > > The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. > > > > > > > > Further update on November after month's end. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > + > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > - > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: Heavy storm falls around Brisbane Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:51:35 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm a bit surprised there's been no mention on the list of the 73.4mm that fell in 2 hours to 6pm at Nambour this afternoon. Also, the flood rain network has reported a few large totals since 9am (up to 10pm) -- 91mm at Wamuran, 95 at Round Mt Reservoir, and a whopping 170 at North Pine Dam, 153 of which fell in the hour to 4pm. I think North Pine Dam is somewhere between Sandgate and Burpengary. Can anyone confirm such heavy rain? Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain in SE? Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 00:01:25 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2002 13:01:26.0253 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B2371D0:01C28CA7] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi David, Thanks for your thoughts, I enjoy reading them. Keep us posted if anything catches your eye, I will certainly be waiting for any further updates Cheers, Karl :) >From: David Jones >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" > >Subject: aus-wx: rain in SE? >Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:05:04 +1100 > >OK, I don't want to get everyone's hopes too high but the progs are >starting >to show some interesting developments for early next week for the SE. > >The front due on Sunday looks like it will largely stall over Victoria for >about three days, while an amplifying upper trough build through the bight. >With lots of juicy moisture across Western Australia there is the very real >possibility of us seeing isolated-to-widespread showers and storm activity >for about a 3 day period in the SE. > >Keep those fingers crossed as we really really need some rain in Victoria. >Hopefully this system doesn't die 100km west of Melbourne like the front on >Tuesday.... > >See >http://152.80.49.205/CGI/PUBLIC/wxmap_all.cgi?type=prod&area=ngp_ausnz&prod= >prp for further info. > >Regards, > >David > >Dr David Jones > >Head Climate Analysis Section >National Climate Centre >Bureau of Meteorology Fax : (+61 3) 9669 4678 >GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne Ph (work): (+61 3) 9669 4085 >Victoria 3001, Australia Ph (home): (+61 3) 9755 1923 >email : D.Jones at bom.gov.au > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:15:33 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Paul, I still think Ken's just pulling our legs. He's certainly making the bells ring. I agree with you that his work speaks the loudest, and that certainly has advanced the argument over the past month or two. I note there's been no response to my post that started this thread. Ken, are you conceding that your forecasts were in error? Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:37:14 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Is anyone ready to try some BoM-bashing instead? For ammo check out http://www.weather.org.hk/discus/messages/1/3967.html? FridayNovember1520021032pm for a graph of the BoM's performance on Melbourne's maximum temperatures for the last seven days. But in all fairness, this is not an exact science. More often than not the forecast maximum will be "in error". It just happens that this week the errors have all been in the same direction. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Paul Mossman" To: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:14:13 +0930 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > Don ..... > > While it seems interetsing that you should wish to defend the > profession, > the finger pointing aint going to advance an argument very far. > > The BOM constantly get it wrong, yet we are all ready to back them with > "models wrong"..."difficult set-up..." etc etc. > > Just sit back and enjoy it - labelling, accusing etc will only see you > in > Court. Let his work speak the loudest.... > > Rgds, > Paul > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don White" > To: > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:34 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > Phil > > I am not into "Ken bashing" but it annoys me when a fraud like Ken > > professes to be a weather predictor when all the evidence shows > clearly > > that his so called predictions are no better than chance - in fact, a > > random assesment of recent weather in sydney, would be more > accuarate. > > Sure, eventually he has to be right but he is so dishonest that he > > changes his parameters at will. > > His theories have been shown to be wrong... time and again his > limited > > forecasts that have been available to us have been shown to be total > > rubbish, but he persists in trying to justify his forecasts by > changing > > his interpreations eg his stupid comments today about early November > > stating showers... storms in SE Australia... 500 kms away from Sydney > > and then tries to use that to justify his forecast of rain in Sydney. > > On 26 October Ken posted on this list the following: > > Hi all > > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), > in > > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > > My prediction for Sydney: > > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, > 16th-21st, > > and > > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > > My prediction for Brisbane: > > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, > heaviest > > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, > mostly > > dry > > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around > 150mm > > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > > Ken > > It rained in Sydney today - 15 Novewmber - for the first time this > > month. > > surely that aloe shows the futility of trying to do something of > which > > he is incapable! I enjoy an intellectual disvcussion - we have gone > past > > that poitn with Ken's rubbsish. It cannot be justified because it is > > plainly wrong. > > All other professions (eg medicine, law engineering etc) have > > professional bodies for a reasom. Imagine the science of medicine > > putting up with such ignorant utterences... but we have to tolerate > it > > because we are yet at that level. > > If Ken wants to put forward his theories --- fine. If he can't > accept > > the fact that his forecasts are useless, then we can't just ignore > them > > because they "bring down" the whole credibility of meteorology. No > one > > is saying that this science is perfect... but if I cannot forecast > with > > 80-85% accuracy then there is little point .. after all, a forecast > for > > a city such as Sydeny based on presistence alone would be 75% > > accurate... and all that is saying is that tomorrow will be the same > as > > today. > > > > Ken has been wrong every day in November that he has forecast rain > for > > Sysdney. Eventually, he will be right, but so what? Eventually it > will > > rain - probably this week! > > As a science and as a fledging industry we must reject such > utterances > > made on the pretext for forecasting the weather otherwise we will all > be > > eventually judged by the lowest common demoninator.That is why I > believe > > we cannot allow Ken to go unchallenged. > > The trouble with Ken is that he is either unwilling or too stupid to > > admit he is wrong. > > I will not give a day by day forecast beyond 5-7 days because I do > not > > beleive that the science of meteorology is sophisticated enough to > make > > such outlooks commercially viable. I will prepare climatic > assessments a > > season ahead based on variation to normal. To try to do more is not > and > > has never been justified.. Ken's attempts have shown that to be true > > even if he doesnt want to face reality. > > > > Don White > > s > > Phil Smith wrote: > > > > > > >From over here, it appears the level of Ken-bashing is inversely > > > proportional to the amount of interesting weather that is happening > in > > > Oz. > > > So let some decent storms come rolling through so Ken can quietly > go > back > > > to what he loves doing - having a go at predicting the weather - > while > > > the rest of us read some exciting chase reports etc. > > > > > > Phil > > > <>< > > > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: "Duncan & Mandy" > > > To: > > > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:02:05 +1030 > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > G'day all, > > > > I might join in the Ken Ring bashing session as well. > > > > Dunno about Ken's accuracy for Central Australia. From the 9th > until > > > > the > > > > 13th of November the region had a period of humidity and Storms. > While > > > > Alice > > > > Springs recorded only around 5mm, New Crown station on the > western > edge > > > > of > > > > the Simpson Desert recorded around 27mm. For them, this is a > > > > significant > > > > rain event. Many areas around Alice Springs had good falls of > rain, > but > > > > these aren't recorded due to the remoteness of the country. Ken > did > not > > > > mention even the possibilty of rain. > > > > He predicts rain for around November 22nd. We shall see - maybe > my > > > > faith > > > > will be restored... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Duncan > > > > Alice Springs, N.T. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Laurier Williams" > > > > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > > > > > Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 11:38 am > > > > Subject: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts > of > > > > Australia > > > > > on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April > 2001. > > > > I've > > > > only > > > > > had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my > assessment. > > > > It > > > > is > > > > > based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements > > > > (forecasts) > > > > > made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In > > > > addition, > > > > I've > > > > > noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. > > > > > > > > > > I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation > of > > > > any > > > > > individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with > evidence. > > > > > > > > > > For October we have: > > > > > > > > > > "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain > than > > > > last > > > > > month. " > > > > > 1. True, the dry spell continued. > > > > > 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the > overall > > > > metro > > > > > area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the > only > > > > stations > > > > > for which totals were received each day in both months. There > will > be > > > > a > > > > > fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the > > > > meantime > > > > > these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. > > > > > Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP > > > > > Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) > > > > > Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN > > > > > Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN > > > > > Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN > > > > > Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN > > > > > Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP > > > > > Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME > > > > > Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP > > > > > Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP > > > > > Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP > > > > > Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP > > > > > Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN > > > > > Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN > > > > > Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN > > > > > Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP > > > > > Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) > > > > > > > > > > UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 > > > > > > > > > > "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. > " > > > > > Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to > eliminate > > > > dew. > > > > > Figures are date/mm > > > > > Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 > > > > > Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 > > > > > Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 > > > > > Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 > > > > > Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 > > > > > Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 > > > > > Richmond: 11/1.0 > > > > > > > > > > So > > > > > 3rd False > > > > > 10th True > > > > > 15th False > > > > > 17th False > > > > > Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed > > > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the > previous > > > > month, > > > > but > > > > > (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." > > > > > 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which > being > > > > > significantly less than "about half" scores a False. > > > > > 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so > False > > > > > > > > > > "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, > 14th-15th, > > > > 21st > > > > and > > > > > 27th." > > > > > The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW > slopes, > > > > > eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain > (either > > > > amounts > > > > > or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th > (about > > > > > two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) > > > > > So, 1st to 6th False > > > > > 14th-15th True > > > > > 21st False > > > > > 27th False > > > > > 24th missed > > > > > > > > > > So Ken's score for October: > > > > > True 3 > > > > > False 8 > > > > > Neither True nor False 1 > > > > > Missed events 3 > > > > > > > > > > For November, the jury's still out, but a few early > observations: > > > > > > > > > > "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with > most > > > > possibly > > > > > between 16th-21st." > > > > > Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not > intermittently > > > > every > > > > few > > > > > days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are > 3.0mm > > > > at > > > > > Chatswood and Turramurra. > > > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine > hours. > > > > " > > > > > 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm > to > > > > date. > > > > > > > > > > "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and > 25th. > > > > " > > > > > The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. > > > > > > > > > > Further update on November after month's end. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > + > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > > > your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > - > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Heavy storm falls around Brisbane Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 00:43:28 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 20mm today at Mt. Crosby to midnight (13mm from the afternoon storms (Amberley 24mm), and 7mm after 9:00pm), a bit disappointing compared to some regional falls, particularly when radar showed the main storm passing directly over the area around 2:30pm. But I am not complaining, 20mm is still a good fall given recent history, and follows up nicely on the 12mm 2 days ago. John. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Laurier Williams Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:52 PM To: Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com Subject: aus-wx: Heavy storm falls around Brisbane I'm a bit surprised there's been no mention on the list of the 73.4mm that fell in 2 hours to 6pm at Nambour this afternoon. Also, the flood rain network has reported a few large totals since 9am (up to 10pm) -- 91mm at Wamuran, 95 at Round Mt Reservoir, and a whopping 170 at North Pine Dam, 153 of which fell in the hour to 4pm. I think North Pine Dam is somewhere between Sandgate and Burpengary. Can anyone confirm such heavy rain? Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 00:59:00 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Phil, I would think that forecasting a max requires rather more of an exact science than predicting wet/dry periods. From my obs at Mt. Crosby cf to Ken's website for Brisbane, Ken has actually been just about spot on since Oct 1st, except for the instance of 12mm which fell two days ago in a forecast 'dry' period. Apart from that event, in each of his few forecast wet periods, we received some (in one case just a trace) rain, and nothing in the dry periods. So that makes Ken right 45 days out of 46 and mostly not needing his "1 day" leeway. Call it chance if you will, but I don't like to think about that correlation coefficient. John. >snip -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Phil Smith Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 12:37 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Is anyone ready to try some BoM-bashing instead? For ammo check out http://www.weather.org.hk/discus/messages/1/3967.html? FridayNovember1520021032pm for a graph of the BoM's performance on Melbourne's maximum temperatures for the last seven days. But in all fairness, this is not an exact science. More often than not the forecast maximum will be "in error". It just happens that this week the errors have all been in the same direction. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Paul Mossman" To: Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:14:13 +0930 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > Don ..... > > While it seems interetsing that you should wish to defend the > profession, > the finger pointing aint going to advance an argument very far. > > The BOM constantly get it wrong, yet we are all ready to back them with > "models wrong"..."difficult set-up..." etc etc. > > Just sit back and enjoy it - labelling, accusing etc will only see you > in > Court. Let his work speak the loudest.... > > Rgds, > Paul > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don White" > To: > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:34 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > Phil > > I am not into "Ken bashing" but it annoys me when a fraud like Ken > > professes to be a weather predictor when all the evidence shows > clearly > > that his so called predictions are no better than chance - in fact, a > > random assesment of recent weather in sydney, would be more > accuarate. > > Sure, eventually he has to be right but he is so dishonest that he > > changes his parameters at will. > > His theories have been shown to be wrong... time and again his > limited > > forecasts that have been available to us have been shown to be total > > rubbish, but he persists in trying to justify his forecasts by > changing > > his interpreations eg his stupid comments today about early November > > stating showers... storms in SE Australia... 500 kms away from Sydney > > and then tries to use that to justify his forecast of rain in Sydney. > > On 26 October Ken posted on this list the following: > > Hi all > > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), > in > > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > > My prediction for Sydney: > > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, > 16th-21st, > > and > > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > > My prediction for Brisbane: > > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, > heaviest > > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, > mostly > > dry > > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around > 150mm > > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > > Ken > > It rained in Sydney today - 15 Novewmber - for the first time this > > month. > > surely that aloe shows the futility of trying to do something of > which > > he is incapable! I enjoy an intellectual disvcussion - we have gone > past > > that poitn with Ken's rubbsish. It cannot be justified because it is > > plainly wrong. > > All other professions (eg medicine, law engineering etc) have > > professional bodies for a reasom. Imagine the science of medicine > > putting up with such ignorant utterences... but we have to tolerate > it > > because we are yet at that level. > > If Ken wants to put forward his theories --- fine. If he can't > accept > > the fact that his forecasts are useless, then we can't just ignore > them > > because they "bring down" the whole credibility of meteorology. No > one > > is saying that this science is perfect... but if I cannot forecast > with > > 80-85% accuracy then there is little point .. after all, a forecast > for > > a city such as Sydeny based on presistence alone would be 75% > > accurate... and all that is saying is that tomorrow will be the same > as > > today. > > > > Ken has been wrong every day in November that he has forecast rain > for > > Sysdney. Eventually, he will be right, but so what? Eventually it > will > > rain - probably this week! > > As a science and as a fledging industry we must reject such > utterances > > made on the pretext for forecasting the weather otherwise we will all > be > > eventually judged by the lowest common demoninator.That is why I > believe > > we cannot allow Ken to go unchallenged. > > The trouble with Ken is that he is either unwilling or too stupid to > > admit he is wrong. > > I will not give a day by day forecast beyond 5-7 days because I do > not > > beleive that the science of meteorology is sophisticated enough to > make > > such outlooks commercially viable. I will prepare climatic > assessments a > > season ahead based on variation to normal. To try to do more is not > and > > has never been justified.. Ken's attempts have shown that to be true > > even if he doesnt want to face reality. > > > > Don White > > s > > Phil Smith wrote: > > > > > > >From over here, it appears the level of Ken-bashing is inversely > > > proportional to the amount of interesting weather that is happening > in > > > Oz. > > > So let some decent storms come rolling through so Ken can quietly > go > back > > > to what he loves doing - having a go at predicting the weather - > while > > > the rest of us read some exciting chase reports etc. > > > > > > Phil > > > <>< > > > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: "Duncan & Mandy" > > > To: > > > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:02:05 +1030 > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > G'day all, > > > > I might join in the Ken Ring bashing session as well. > > > > Dunno about Ken's accuracy for Central Australia. From the 9th > until > > > > the > > > > 13th of November the region had a period of humidity and Storms. > While > > > > Alice > > > > Springs recorded only around 5mm, New Crown station on the > western > edge > > > > of > > > > the Simpson Desert recorded around 27mm. For them, this is a > > > > significant > > > > rain event. Many areas around Alice Springs had good falls of > rain, > but > > > > these aren't recorded due to the remoteness of the country. Ken > did > not > > > > mention even the possibilty of rain. > > > > He predicts rain for around November 22nd. We shall see - maybe > my > > > > faith > > > > will be restored... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Duncan > > > > Alice Springs, N.T. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Laurier Williams" > > > > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > > > > > Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 11:38 am > > > > Subject: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts > of > > > > Australia > > > > > on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April > 2001. > > > > I've > > > > only > > > > > had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my > assessment. > > > > It > > > > is > > > > > based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements > > > > (forecasts) > > > > > made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In > > > > addition, > > > > I've > > > > > noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. > > > > > > > > > > I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation > of > > > > any > > > > > individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with > evidence. > > > > > > > > > > For October we have: > > > > > > > > > > "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain > than > > > > last > > > > > month. " > > > > > 1. True, the dry spell continued. > > > > > 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the > overall > > > > metro > > > > > area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the > only > > > > stations > > > > > for which totals were received each day in both months. There > will > be > > > > a > > > > > fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the > > > > meantime > > > > > these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. > > > > > Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP > > > > > Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) > > > > > Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN > > > > > Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN > > > > > Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN > > > > > Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN > > > > > Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP > > > > > Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME > > > > > Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP > > > > > Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP > > > > > Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP > > > > > Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP > > > > > Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN > > > > > Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN > > > > > Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN > > > > > Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP > > > > > Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) > > > > > > > > > > UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 > > > > > > > > > > "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. > " > > > > > Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to > eliminate > > > > dew. > > > > > Figures are date/mm > > > > > Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 > > > > > Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 > > > > > Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 > > > > > Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 > > > > > Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 > > > > > Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 > > > > > Richmond: 11/1.0 > > > > > > > > > > So > > > > > 3rd False > > > > > 10th True > > > > > 15th False > > > > > 17th False > > > > > Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed > > > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the > previous > > > > month, > > > > but > > > > > (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." > > > > > 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which > being > > > > > significantly less than "about half" scores a False. > > > > > 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so > False > > > > > > > > > > "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, > 14th-15th, > > > > 21st > > > > and > > > > > 27th." > > > > > The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW > slopes, > > > > > eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain > (either > > > > amounts > > > > > or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th > (about > > > > > two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) > > > > > So, 1st to 6th False > > > > > 14th-15th True > > > > > 21st False > > > > > 27th False > > > > > 24th missed > > > > > > > > > > So Ken's score for October: > > > > > True 3 > > > > > False 8 > > > > > Neither True nor False 1 > > > > > Missed events 3 > > > > > > > > > > For November, the jury's still out, but a few early > observations: > > > > > > > > > > "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with > most > > > > possibly > > > > > between 16th-21st." > > > > > Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not > intermittently > > > > every > > > > few > > > > > days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are > 3.0mm > > > > at > > > > > Chatswood and Turramurra. > > > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine > hours. > > > > " > > > > > 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm > to > > > > date. > > > > > > > > > > "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and > 25th. > > > > " > > > > > The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. > > > > > > > > > > Further update on November after month's end. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > + > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > > > your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > - > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 05:31:24 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com maybe Phil - I'm sure I could charge an excessive consultants fee and do quite well for myself ! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 7:06 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > Maybe you should hire yourself out to drought-stricken cockies to pedal > around their properties! > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Third" > To: > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:24:08 +1000 > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > I can concur with that - 23mm and counting in Petrie (N of Brisbane). > > > > I actually have a significant theory on Brisbane rainfall - It rains > > when I > > get on my pushbike - hmmmm - maybe I should go for a ride out west. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "John Woodbridge" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:27 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > Pissing down now in Brisbane.. > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Heavy storm falls around Brisbane Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 05:49:08 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com North Pine dam is about 2km from my house behind Petrie and Strathpine). In my back yard we had 49mm total for the last 24 hours. The dam is quite large so I guess it depends where they take their measurements and how localised the heavy falls were - seems a big difference though. I'm also in the SES here and with a total like that would expect some localised flooding issues esecially with the majority of the total falling in a short period of time. So unless the rain only fell at the dam it seems to high. We only had one callout yesterday and that was a simple leaking roof. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:51 PM Subject: aus-wx: Heavy storm falls around Brisbane > I'm a bit surprised there's been no mention on the list of the 73.4mm that > fell in 2 hours to 6pm at Nambour this afternoon. > Also, the flood rain network has reported a few large totals since 9am (up > to 10pm) -- 91mm at Wamuran, 95 at Round Mt Reservoir, and a whopping 170 at > North Pine Dam, 153 of which fell in the hour to 4pm. I think North Pine Dam > is somewhere between Sandgate and Burpengary. Can anyone confirm such heavy > rain? > > Laurier > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:13:03 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:11 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > >From over here, it appears the level of Ken-bashing is inversely > proportional to the amount of interesting weather that is happening in > Oz. > So let some decent storms come rolling through so Ken can quietly go back > to what he loves doing - having a go at predicting the weather - How about someone else stick some forecasts out there alongside mine. Are there any real-life forecasters on this forum list, or just knockers? Be brave enough to put a forecast out there, instead of cowardly attacking me from behind a safe wall. Even for the 5-7 days some skite that they can do. If you criticise my offerings so savagely, show an alternative forecast. But I bet I won't see that. How about someone take note of what I am actually claiming, not what members want me to be claiming so they can bash it. The gist of my October forecast was DRYNESS. I was correct. The dates I mentioned were POTENTIAL for rain, that's what I said, not for actual rain. Without the potential it aint gonna rain. The orography has a lot to do with it. WITH the potential, it will rain if rain is about. The times it rained, it WAS about, AND the potential was there. People are trying to apply meteorology to what I do, which is basically astronomy and lunar astrology. I am NOT a meteorologist, and have NEVER claimed to be one. It may be more relevant to stop judging me along those lines. And I certainly don't claim 100%. Some are assuming I do. Nah, wake up fellas.. Pity all the bashing though, because it means I can't discuss what I'm doing, and the method I use to arrive at my forecasts. An assessment on THAT would be more worthwhile, because then members could try it for their own areas. But whilst the head-kickers of the likes of Don White and David Jones are around, the climate is just too hostile. I'm sure members can all understand that. Think how they would react. How about stop saying I should have told everyone about rain that did occur e.g. in remote areas of Central Australia. WHAT? Why? I'm not asked to do that. The magazines I write for have a readership in the bigger towns. To blame me for what I didn't say is silly. I don't even LOOK UP those areas, so can hardly be blamed for missing them. How about a similar analysis on the BoM's track record, and the rain/droughts/frosts THEY didn't forecast either. “>Pissing down now in Brisbane..” By leaving out my successes my would-be assessors are doing exactly what they blame me for. Such a negative bias in this assessment process makes it invalid and a waste of time. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 07:45:21 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Don, Laurier, David etc, This, and related threads have become rather boring, excessive and a total waste of time. You guys have tried time and time again to catch Ken out and basically litter the list with what I call boring continuous threads. If you want to hammer anyone do it personally please. It's as bad as the stupid "The cloud" thread. How about David Jones, Don White and Laurier Williams and so on try and state their forecasts for similar periods that Ken does rather than bash someone else's with statistical crap. By doing this we can all analyse for ourselves. Let's get back to what this list was designed for speaking about the weather and so on - variation is a key to success. Especially now that rain and storms have revisited and the GMS-5 is going to be replaced by GOES 9. The weather is definitely changing and it will be interesting to see if the drought for coastal areas at least persists until about February - March as suggested by the BoM. Ken suggests the drought will be breaking November? Forget dates buddies - it is common sense that anyone with some knowledge will understand that following by the moon is a "potential" as suggested by Ken in this recent post and on some other posts if it was to be "true". People who have followed fishing and hunting with solunar tables will realise that the behaviour of fish have been affected by the moon. But again it is a potential and other factors can affect feeding patterns. I would not even try elaborate further on this issue. I would rather see this methodology being used for predictions rather than the gang-up approach. Let people decide for themselves. I do understand that there may be a conflict of interest involved here by those involved in commercial activities using this list as a hunting ground for more business... Let's keep that component out of the picture. Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 08:29:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2002 21:29:48.0691 (UTC) FILETIME=[20021E30:01C28CEE] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Morning, Finally got my friggen email working again - 665 to read. Can I order one of these or is it too late? Thanks, Macca -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 9:43 PM To: Aussie-wx Subject: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Australian Sky & Weather are proud to announce a significant video by Roger Hill who has provided a generous discount to purchase an almost 4 hour masterpiece of storm video. For those of you who don't know Roger's history, he has been voted as the 'Most Desired Accessory for a Chase Vehicle' in the USA - where Roger goes, severe weather follows....... If you are interested in obtaining a copy have a look here for more details http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm Price: $70AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in Australia) Format - NTSC Very limited production run. Join the pre-order list and have this video before Christmas by sending an email to cadence at australianskynweather.com Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:39:04 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy wrote > Hi Don, Laurier, David etc, > > This, and related threads have become rather boring, excessive > and a total > waste of time. Your opinion, Jimmy, but patently not shared by everyone on the list. > You guys have tried time and time again to catch > Ken out And succeeded. > If you want to hammer anyone do it personally please. Ken's forecasts are in the public domain, as has been his vocal support for them. so why should any criticism of them have to be private? And I object to genuine criticism being characterised as "hammering". > > How about David Jones, Don White and Laurier Williams and so on try and > state their forecasts for similar periods that Ken does rather than bash > someone else's with statistical crap. If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls down, do I have to become a builder to prove them wrong. False logic, Jimmy. And do you really believe that verifying forecast rain by comparing it to actual rain measured is "statistical crap"? > Let's get back to what this list was designed for speaking about the > weather and so on - variation is a key to success. The list was designed for speaking about all aspects of the weather, which include forecast verification. If your interests lie solely in one area of weather, such as thunderstorms, you have the right and capability to use the delete key. > I would rather see this methodology being used for predictions > rather than > the gang-up approach. Let people decide for themselves. Again, why characterise genuine criticism with colourful language -- "the gang-up approach." Isn't healthy debate one of the primary reasons for communication devices like this list? Or should we shy away from anything approaching intellectual rigour? > I do understand > that there may be a conflict of interest involved here by those > involved in > commercial activities using this list as a hunting ground for more > business... Let's keep that component out of the picture. > I agree, but this applies equally to Ken as it does to Don and the Bureau, so presumably your criticism is directed even-handedly on both sides. I should put on the record that my only "commercial" return from meteorology is in the supply of data; I do no commercial forecasting as I believe I am not qualified to do so. Jimmy and list: medics, lawyers, architects, builders, broadcasters and many others areas in society cleaned up their professional ethics long ago, as did the meteorologists in the US when they brought in an accreditation system for forecasters initiated, I think, by the American Meteorological Association. In Australia, accreditation for forecasters has been talked about from time to time, but I don't think the industry has the mettle to take it on, and the Bureau has been reluctant to press for something that would be seen as its own self-interest. I have no problem with people holding and espousing any ideas they want to; but when they charge for something that is patently wrong, disprovable and misleading it goes against the fundamental rules of fairness that most societies have developed. If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against misleading conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually rigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we deserve what we get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:44:10 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, I note you do not offer any response to the quite serious forecast verification issues I raised when I started this thread. I am genuinely trying to establish whether your forecasts are accurate. You will note that there has been no invective in any of my communications. Are you going to respond in a similar vein? Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Friday, 15 November, 2002 20:13 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Smith" > To: > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:11 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > >From over here, it appears the level of Ken-bashing is inversely > > proportional to the amount of interesting weather that is happening in > > Oz. > > So let some decent storms come rolling through so Ken can > quietly go back > > to what he loves doing - having a go at predicting the weather - > > How about someone else stick some forecasts out there alongside mine. Are > there any real-life forecasters on this forum list, or just knockers? Be > brave enough to put a forecast out there, instead of cowardly attacking me > from behind a safe wall. Even for the 5-7 days some skite that > they can do. > If you criticise my offerings so savagely, show an alternative > forecast. But > I bet I won't see that. > > How about someone take note of what I am actually claiming, not > what members > want me to be claiming so they can bash it. The gist of my > October forecast > was DRYNESS. I was correct. The dates I mentioned were POTENTIAL for rain, > that's what I said, not for actual rain. Without the potential it > aint gonna > rain. The orography has a lot to do with it. WITH the potential, it will > rain if rain is about. The times it rained, it WAS about, AND the > potential > was there. People are trying to apply meteorology to what I do, which is > basically astronomy and lunar astrology. I am NOT a > meteorologist, and have > NEVER claimed to be one. It may be more relevant to stop judging me along > those lines. And I certainly don't claim 100%. Some are assuming > I do. Nah, > wake up fellas.. > > Pity all the bashing though, because it means I can't discuss what I'm > doing, and the method I use to arrive at my forecasts. An > assessment on THAT > would be more worthwhile, because then members could try it for their own > areas. But whilst the head-kickers of the likes of Don White and > David Jones > are around, the climate is just too hostile. I'm sure members can all > understand that. Think how they would react. > > How about stop saying I should have told everyone about rain that > did occur > e.g. in remote areas of Central Australia. WHAT? Why? I'm not asked to do > that. The magazines I write for have a readership in the bigger towns. To > blame me for what I didn't say is silly. I don't even LOOK UP those areas, > so can hardly be blamed for missing them. How about a similar analysis on > the BoM's track record, and the rain/droughts/frosts THEY didn't forecast > either. “>Pissing down now in Brisbane..” By leaving out my successes my > would-be assessors are doing exactly what they blame me for. Such > a negative > bias in this assessment process makes it invalid and a waste of time. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:04:12 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Macca, Finalising the initial order for the video on Tuesday night next week - I've had a quick peek at the tapes......it's certainly 'droolable' stuff if you like severe weather!! At least you've got your computer back - there were 3 days this week while mine was off having a "lobotomy" & I nearly went spare!! Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 8:29 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video > Morning, > > Finally got my friggen email working again - 665 to read. > > Can I order one of these or is it too late? > > Thanks, > > Macca > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill > Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 9:43 PM > To: Aussie-wx > Subject: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video > > > Australian Sky & Weather are proud to announce a significant video by > Roger Hill who has provided a generous discount to purchase an almost 4 > hour masterpiece of storm video. For those of you who don't know Roger's > history, he has been voted as the 'Most Desired Accessory for a Chase > Vehicle' in the USA - where Roger goes, severe weather follows....... > > If you are interested in obtaining a copy have a look here for more > details http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm > Price: $70AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in > Australia) > Format - NTSC > Very limited production run. > > Join the pre-order list and have this video before Christmas by sending > an email to cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:33:46 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Laurier, Interesting you didn't approach my whole e-mail - well can I assume that all other aspects of my e-mail you agree with or were you not interested in them? One important point you missed that I would like addressed so that others can also get involved is to ask those with any criticism to post their forecasts or perhaps one that they support more so be it for the sake of science or whatever. Then we ALL can have access to a much fairer base to measure with. It will also become more interesting in my opinion. Rather than approaching your comments Laurier each at one time, I would like to generalise the theme of the whole e-mail. I do believe your approach to debate is far healthier than some others and this is what I am trying to address - I despise the comments where people are called "stupid" etc. I am also against lengthy posts and usually look forward to variability of the subjects. I suppose others on the list can correct me kindly on such a note. I stand corrected if I am wrong in assuming from the past that lengthy subjects lost a lot of its flavour. I also agree that Ken must reply to your genuine and logical approach as the criticism is genuine and fair as well as polite. Though please change the subject to something more pleasant. Jimmy Deguara At 09:39 PM 15/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: >Jimmy wrote > > > Hi Don, Laurier, David etc, > > > > This, and related threads have become rather boring, excessive > > and a total > > waste of time. > >Your opinion, Jimmy, but patently not shared by everyone on the list. > > > You guys have tried time and time again to catch > > Ken out > >And succeeded. > > > If you want to hammer anyone do it personally please. > >Ken's forecasts are in the public domain, as has been his vocal support for >them. so why should any criticism of them have to be private? And I object >to genuine criticism being characterised as "hammering". > > > > > How about David Jones, Don White and Laurier Williams and so on try and > > state their forecasts for similar periods that Ken does rather than bash > > someone else's with statistical crap. > >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls down, do I have to >become a builder to prove them wrong. False logic, Jimmy. And do you really >believe that verifying forecast rain by comparing it to actual rain measured >is "statistical crap"? > > > Let's get back to what this list was designed for speaking about the > > weather and so on - variation is a key to success. > >The list was designed for speaking about all aspects of the weather, which >include forecast verification. If your interests lie solely in one area of >weather, such as thunderstorms, you have the right and capability to use the >delete key. > > > I would rather see this methodology being used for predictions > > rather than > > the gang-up approach. Let people decide for themselves. > >Again, why characterise genuine criticism with colourful language -- "the >gang-up approach." Isn't healthy debate one of the primary reasons for >communication devices like this list? Or should we shy away from anything >approaching intellectual rigour? > > > I do understand > > that there may be a conflict of interest involved here by those > > involved in > > commercial activities using this list as a hunting ground for more > > business... Let's keep that component out of the picture. > > >I agree, but this applies equally to Ken as it does to Don and the Bureau, >so presumably your criticism is directed even-handedly on both sides. I >should put on the record that my only "commercial" return from meteorology >is in the supply of data; I do no commercial forecasting as I believe I am >not qualified to do so. > > >Jimmy and list: medics, lawyers, architects, builders, broadcasters and many >others areas in society cleaned up their professional ethics long ago, as >did the meteorologists in the US when they brought in an accreditation >system for forecasters initiated, I think, by the American Meteorological >Association. In Australia, accreditation for forecasters has been talked >about from time to time, but I don't think the industry has the mettle to >take it on, and the Bureau has been reluctant to press for something that >would be seen as its own self-interest. > >I have no problem with people holding and espousing any ideas they want to; >but when they charge for something that is patently wrong, disprovable and >misleading it goes against the fundamental rules of fairness that most >societies have developed. > >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against misleading >conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually >rigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we deserve what we >get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. > >Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Weather at Seven Hills Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:35:33 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
The latest data for this month:
 
 
(Scroll down to see long term data)
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Rhett Blanch" To: Subject: aus-wx: Heavy rain and Severe Storms Northern Tablelands and Nth NSW 14/11 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:54:28 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Some good falls on Thurday night apparantly in Nth NSW. Barraba experience flash flooding and Deepwater had a significant hail event - hail hanging piled up until well into the next day. Better description at the link below: http://tamworth.yourguide.com.au/detail.asp?story_id=192269 Rhett Tip for Aussie Weather Users: If your using Outlook can I suggest: Tools>Rules Wizard> Click the New.. button Select "Check when new messages arrive...", then hit next. Check "with specific words in the subject" Check "with specific works in the body" Click the hyperlink "specific words in the subject". Type in the field "Add New:" the text "aus-wx" and click "Add" and then OK. Click the hyperlink "specific words in the body". Type in the field "Add New:" the text "Ken" and click "Add" and then OK. Hit next and check "delete it" Hit next again. Name your rule "aus-wx-peace-at-last" Click OK Sit back an enjoy the Aussie Weather list in blistful ignorance. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:08:08 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:04 AM 16/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Hi Macca, > >Finalising the initial order for the video on Tuesday night next week - >I've had a quick peek at the tapes......it's certainly 'droolable' stuff >if you like severe weather!! Hmm, droolage eh? ;-) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:45:11 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy I have no problem responding to polite requests to explain myself, and, where possible, errors I make. Where those who are doing the asking are attached to the BoM or whatever, I would be interested in a similar call for the same response from them, where a forecast I have made tallies with that of the BoM. David Jones is on this list and works for the BoM, so a parallel call to him to explain misforecasts would be welcome. would-be bashers We have already read a post by John Woodbridge, for which I thank him most sincerely. In case members missed it: ">From my obs at Mt. Crosby cf to Ken's website for Brisbane, Ken has actually been just about spot on since Oct 1st, except for the instance of 12mm which fell two days ago in a forecast 'dry' period. Apart from that event, in each of his few forecast wet periods, we received some (in one case just a trace) rain, and nothing in the dry periods. So that makes Ken right 45 days out of 46 and mostly not needing his "1 day" leeway.." I really don't see the need to comment further, other than to say that if you think I have been inaccurate in your area then maybe you were standing in a different place to where my forecasts applied. General-area approaches are what most long range predictions work with, and potentials rather than actual rain. If it rains in one part of a district and not in another, then clearly the potential is there for that district, but the rain might not have been be over every nook and cranny of that district. This is fairly obvious. On the subject of my call for others, especially James, Laurier, Don et all to also put up forecasts before they attack me for mine; in response to (Laurier)> >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls down, do I have to become a builder to prove them wrong..yes, Laurier, I'm afraid so. That's the hard part, but the responsibility that goes with mounting the platform to criticise. You have to demonstrate you can at least do the same only better. Otherwise you could just be anybody off the street and it would be a waste of people's time to have to listen to you. Prove that you have a working knowledge of long range forecasting techniques by doing it too. Otherwise leave me alone. I'm doing my best - but - just bashing - is that the best YOU can do? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 11:33 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > Hi Laurier, > > Interesting you didn't approach my whole e-mail - well can I assume that > all other aspects of my e-mail you agree with or were you not interested in > them? One important point you missed that I would like addressed so that > others can also get involved is to ask those with any criticism to post > their forecasts or perhaps one that they support more so be it for the sake > of science or whatever. Then we ALL can have access to a much fairer base > to measure with. It will also become more interesting in my opinion. > > Rather than approaching your comments Laurier each at one time, I would > like to generalise the theme of the whole e-mail. I do believe your > approach to debate is far healthier than some others and this is what I am > trying to address - I despise the comments where people are called "stupid" > etc. I am also against lengthy posts and usually look forward to > variability of the subjects. I suppose others on the list can correct me > kindly on such a note. I stand corrected if I am wrong in assuming from the > past that lengthy subjects lost a lot of its flavour. > > I also agree that Ken must reply to your genuine and logical approach as > the criticism is genuine and fair as well as polite. Though please change > the subject to something more pleasant. > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 09:39 PM 15/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: > >Jimmy wrote > > > > > Hi Don, Laurier, David etc, > > > > > > This, and related threads have become rather boring, excessive > > > and a total > > > waste of time. > > > >Your opinion, Jimmy, but patently not shared by everyone on the list. > > > > > You guys have tried time and time again to catch > > > Ken out > > > >And succeeded. > > > > > If you want to hammer anyone do it personally please. > > > >Ken's forecasts are in the public domain, as has been his vocal support for > >them. so why should any criticism of them have to be private? And I object > >to genuine criticism being characterised as "hammering". > > > > > > > > How about David Jones, Don White and Laurier Williams and so on try and > > > state their forecasts for similar periods that Ken does rather than bash > > > someone else's with statistical crap. > > > >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls down, do I have to > >become a builder to prove them wrong. False logic, Jimmy. And do you really > >believe that verifying forecast rain by comparing it to actual rain measured > >is "statistical crap"? > > > > > Let's get back to what this list was designed for speaking about the > > > weather and so on - variation is a key to success. > > > >The list was designed for speaking about all aspects of the weather, which > >include forecast verification. If your interests lie solely in one area of > >weather, such as thunderstorms, you have the right and capability to use the > >delete key. > > > > > I would rather see this methodology being used for predictions > > > rather than > > > the gang-up approach. Let people decide for themselves. > > > >Again, why characterise genuine criticism with colourful language -- "the > >gang-up approach." Isn't healthy debate one of the primary reasons for > >communication devices like this list? Or should we shy away from anything > >approaching intellectual rigour? > > > > > I do understand > > > that there may be a conflict of interest involved here by those > > > involved in > > > commercial activities using this list as a hunting ground for more > > > business... Let's keep that component out of the picture. > > > > >I agree, but this applies equally to Ken as it does to Don and the Bureau, > >so presumably your criticism is directed even-handedly on both sides. I > >should put on the record that my only "commercial" return from meteorology > >is in the supply of data; I do no commercial forecasting as I believe I am > >not qualified to do so. > > > > > >Jimmy and list: medics, lawyers, architects, builders, broadcasters and many > >others areas in society cleaned up their professional ethics long ago, as > >did the meteorologists in the US when they brought in an accreditation > >system for forecasters initiated, I think, by the American Meteorological > >Association. In Australia, accreditation for forecasters has been talked > >about from time to time, but I don't think the industry has the mettle to > >take it on, and the Bureau has been reluctant to press for something that > >would be seen as its own self-interest. > > > >I have no problem with people holding and espousing any ideas they want to; > >but when they charge for something that is patently wrong, disprovable and > >misleading it goes against the fundamental rules of fairness that most > >societies have developed. > > > >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against misleading > >conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually > >rigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we deserve what we > >get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. > > > >Laurier > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Liz Kennedy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Michael's forecast accuracy. Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:30:42 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com lol at michael...hehehe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Thompson" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:20 PM Subject: aus-wx: Michael's forecast accuracy. > Looking into the crystal ball I see...................................... > > Melbourne ....next August a day either side of the 15th to 17th you will > have strato cumulus. > > Wollongong..............next November, a day either side of the 29th to > 30th, a trough will stall just 200km north and provide severe weather to the > NE third of NSW, whilst Wollongong will miss out. > > .................................wait there is > more............................... > > I see storms in Darwin this December....................strong winds in > Tasmania sometime in the next six weeks. > > Michael > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 17:34:45 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Paul... I would have thought a weather-watcher like yourself would not make a statement such as "the BOM constantly get it wrong... That is plainlu not right. Wrong sometimes - sure - but in general their level of accuracy exceeds 85% I am not a defender of some of the forecasters in the BOM, especially in the Sydney Office (you can almost pick who is the senior met. of duty by their forecasts) but overall, their accuracy is pretty good and getting better. It is difficult to assess accuracy in forecasts due to their nature but the BOM also knows its limitations and would not issue a specific day forecast weeks / months ahead. I am quite happy for Ken to make assessments.... what I find objectionable is his inability to accept that his statements are constantly proven to have an accuracy less than chance... and then to make the misleading statements on his accuracy. There are always the gullible who want to believe. If I forecast the weather for Sydney to be the same (within the parameters of 2 +/- 3 degrees max temp and stick to 5 categories of weather - sunny, partly cloudy, shower or two (less than 1 hr rain in daylight hours), few showers, thunderstorms and rain, then I will be right more than 75% of the time. I did an experiment for statisitical analysis some years ago withe those 5 categories from momths of November to MzArch and dropping the storm category for other months. A random selection of the 4 or 5 marbles each indicating 1 of the categories led to an accacuary of just under 80%. I would never promotre that as a serious work but it gave better results than Ken in the past month. Imagine the attitude in the community to our profession if someone claiming profession knowledge in the area copuld be shown as less compentant to chance. Don White Paul Mossman wrote: > > Don ..... > > While it seems interetsing that you should wish to defend the profession, > the finger pointing aint going to advance an argument very far. > > The BOM constantly get it wrong, yet we are all ready to back them with > "models wrong"..."difficult set-up..." etc etc. > > Just sit back and enjoy it - labelling, accusing etc will only see you in > Court. Let his work speak the loudest.... > > Rgds, > Paul > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don White" > To: > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:34 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > Phil > > I am not into "Ken bashing" but it annoys me when a fraud like Ken > > professes to be a weather predictor when all the evidence shows clearly > > that his so called predictions are no better than chance - in fact, a > > random assesment of recent weather in sydney, would be more accuarate. > > Sure, eventually he has to be right but he is so dishonest that he > > changes his parameters at will. > > His theories have been shown to be wrong... time and again his limited > > forecasts that have been available to us have been shown to be total > > rubbish, but he persists in trying to justify his forecasts by changing > > his interpreations eg his stupid comments today about early November > > stating showers... storms in SE Australia... 500 kms away from Sydney > > and then tries to use that to justify his forecast of rain in Sydney. > > On 26 October Ken posted on this list the following: > > Hi all > > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in > > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > > My prediction for Sydney: > > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, > > and > > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > > My prediction for Brisbane: > > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest > > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly > > dry > > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm > > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > > Ken > > It rained in Sydney today - 15 Novewmber - for the first time this > > month. > > surely that aloe shows the futility of trying to do something of which > > he is incapable! I enjoy an intellectual disvcussion - we have gone past > > that poitn with Ken's rubbsish. It cannot be justified because it is > > plainly wrong. > > All other professions (eg medicine, law engineering etc) have > > professional bodies for a reasom. Imagine the science of medicine > > putting up with such ignorant utterences... but we have to tolerate it > > because we are yet at that level. > > If Ken wants to put forward his theories --- fine. If he can't accept > > the fact that his forecasts are useless, then we can't just ignore them > > because they "bring down" the whole credibility of meteorology. No one > > is saying that this science is perfect... but if I cannot forecast with > > 80-85% accuracy then there is little point .. after all, a forecast for > > a city such as Sydeny based on presistence alone would be 75% > > accurate... and all that is saying is that tomorrow will be the same as > > today. > > > > Ken has been wrong every day in November that he has forecast rain for > > Sysdney. Eventually, he will be right, but so what? Eventually it will > > rain - probably this week! > > As a science and as a fledging industry we must reject such utterances > > made on the pretext for forecasting the weather otherwise we will all be > > eventually judged by the lowest common demoninator.That is why I believe > > we cannot allow Ken to go unchallenged. > > The trouble with Ken is that he is either unwilling or too stupid to > > admit he is wrong. > > I will not give a day by day forecast beyond 5-7 days because I do not > > beleive that the science of meteorology is sophisticated enough to make > > such outlooks commercially viable. I will prepare climatic assessments a > > season ahead based on variation to normal. To try to do more is not and > > has never been justified.. Ken's attempts have shown that to be true > > even if he doesnt want to face reality. > > > > Don White > > s > > Phil Smith wrote: > > > > > > >From over here, it appears the level of Ken-bashing is inversely > > > proportional to the amount of interesting weather that is happening in > > > Oz. > > > So let some decent storms come rolling through so Ken can quietly go > back > > > to what he loves doing - having a go at predicting the weather - while > > > the rest of us read some exciting chase reports etc. > > > > > > Phil > > > <>< > > > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: "Duncan & Mandy" > > > To: > > > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:02:05 +1030 > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > G'day all, > > > > I might join in the Ken Ring bashing session as well. > > > > Dunno about Ken's accuracy for Central Australia. From the 9th until > > > > the > > > > 13th of November the region had a period of humidity and Storms. While > > > > Alice > > > > Springs recorded only around 5mm, New Crown station on the western > edge > > > > of > > > > the Simpson Desert recorded around 27mm. For them, this is a > > > > significant > > > > rain event. Many areas around Alice Springs had good falls of rain, > but > > > > these aren't recorded due to the remoteness of the country. Ken did > not > > > > mention even the possibilty of rain. > > > > He predicts rain for around November 22nd. We shall see - maybe my > > > > faith > > > > will be restored... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Duncan > > > > Alice Springs, N.T. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Laurier Williams" > > > > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > > > > Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 11:38 am > > > > Subject: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts of > > > > Australia > > > > > on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April 2001. > > > > I've > > > > only > > > > > had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my > assessment. > > > > It > > > > is > > > > > based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements > > > > (forecasts) > > > > > made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In > > > > addition, > > > > I've > > > > > noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. > > > > > > > > > > I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation of > > > > any > > > > > individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with evidence. > > > > > > > > > > For October we have: > > > > > > > > > > "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain than > > > > last > > > > > month. " > > > > > 1. True, the dry spell continued. > > > > > 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the overall > > > > metro > > > > > area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the only > > > > stations > > > > > for which totals were received each day in both months. There will > be > > > > a > > > > > fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the > > > > meantime > > > > > these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. > > > > > Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP > > > > > Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) > > > > > Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN > > > > > Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN > > > > > Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN > > > > > Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN > > > > > Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP > > > > > Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME > > > > > Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP > > > > > Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP > > > > > Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP > > > > > Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP > > > > > Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN > > > > > Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN > > > > > Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN > > > > > Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP > > > > > Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) > > > > > > > > > > UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 > > > > > > > > > > "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. " > > > > > Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to eliminate > > > > dew. > > > > > Figures are date/mm > > > > > Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 > > > > > Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 > > > > > Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 > > > > > Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 > > > > > Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 > > > > > Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 > > > > > Richmond: 11/1.0 > > > > > > > > > > So > > > > > 3rd False > > > > > 10th True > > > > > 15th False > > > > > 17th False > > > > > Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed > > > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the previous > > > > month, > > > > but > > > > > (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." > > > > > 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which being > > > > > significantly less than "about half" scores a False. > > > > > 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so > False > > > > > > > > > > "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, 14th-15th, > > > > 21st > > > > and > > > > > 27th." > > > > > The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW > slopes, > > > > > eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain (either > > > > amounts > > > > > or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th (about > > > > > two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) > > > > > So, 1st to 6th False > > > > > 14th-15th True > > > > > 21st False > > > > > 27th False > > > > > 24th missed > > > > > > > > > > So Ken's score for October: > > > > > True 3 > > > > > False 8 > > > > > Neither True nor False 1 > > > > > Missed events 3 > > > > > > > > > > For November, the jury's still out, but a few early observations: > > > > > > > > > > "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with most > > > > possibly > > > > > between 16th-21st." > > > > > Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not intermittently > > > > every > > > > few > > > > > days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are > 3.0mm > > > > at > > > > > Chatswood and Turramurra. > > > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine hours. > > > > " > > > > > 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm to > > > > date. > > > > > > > > > > "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and 25th. > > > > " > > > > > The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. > > > > > > > > > > Further update on November after month's end. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > + > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > - > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Mossman" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 16:27:56 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Don, I dont have a problem with anyone pointing out erroneous material. I just dont like to see it get emotive."Ken bashing" and the like I think is quite immature and does not really adavnace anyones argument. The BOM up here frequently get it wrong with forecasts. In fact I havnt seen a legit forecast for ages now. But then its all a matter of subjectivity isnt it.... Rgds, Paul. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don White" To: Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 4:04 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > Paul... > I would have thought a weather-watcher like yourself would not make a > statement such as "the BOM constantly get it wrong... > That is plainlu not right. Wrong sometimes - sure - but in general their > level of accuracy exceeds 85% > I am not a defender of some of the forecasters in the BOM, especially in > the Sydney Office (you can almost pick who is the senior met. of duty by > their forecasts) but overall, their accuracy is pretty good and getting > better. It is difficult to assess accuracy in forecasts due to their > nature but the BOM also knows its limitations and would not issue a > specific day forecast weeks / months ahead. > I am quite happy for Ken to make assessments.... what I find > objectionable is his inability to accept that his statements are > constantly proven to have an accuracy less than chance... and then to > make the misleading statements on his accuracy. There are always the > gullible who want to believe. > If I forecast the weather for Sydney to be the same (within the > parameters of 2 +/- 3 degrees max temp and stick to 5 categories of > weather - sunny, partly cloudy, shower or two (less than 1 hr rain in > daylight hours), few showers, thunderstorms and rain, then I will be > right more than 75% of the time. > I did an experiment for statisitical analysis some years ago withe those > 5 categories from momths of November to MzArch and dropping the storm > category for other months. > A random selection of the 4 or 5 marbles each indicating 1 of the > categories led to an accacuary of just under 80%. I would never promotre > that as a serious work but it gave better results than Ken in the past > month. > Imagine the attitude in the community to our profession if someone > claiming profession knowledge in the area copuld be shown as less > compentant to chance. > > Don White > > > Paul Mossman wrote: > > > > Don ..... > > > > While it seems interetsing that you should wish to defend the profession, > > the finger pointing aint going to advance an argument very far. > > > > The BOM constantly get it wrong, yet we are all ready to back them with > > "models wrong"..."difficult set-up..." etc etc. > > > > Just sit back and enjoy it - labelling, accusing etc will only see you in > > Court. Let his work speak the loudest.... > > > > Rgds, > > Paul > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Don White" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:34 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > Phil > > > I am not into "Ken bashing" but it annoys me when a fraud like Ken > > > professes to be a weather predictor when all the evidence shows clearly > > > that his so called predictions are no better than chance - in fact, a > > > random assesment of recent weather in sydney, would be more accuarate. > > > Sure, eventually he has to be right but he is so dishonest that he > > > changes his parameters at will. > > > His theories have been shown to be wrong... time and again his limited > > > forecasts that have been available to us have been shown to be total > > > rubbish, but he persists in trying to justify his forecasts by changing > > > his interpreations eg his stupid comments today about early November > > > stating showers... storms in SE Australia... 500 kms away from Sydney > > > and then tries to use that to justify his forecast of rain in Sydney. > > > On 26 October Ken posted on this list the following: > > > Hi all > > > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in > > > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > > > My prediction for Sydney: > > > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, > > > and > > > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > > > My prediction for Brisbane: > > > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest > > > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly > > > dry > > > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm > > > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > > > Ken > > > It rained in Sydney today - 15 Novewmber - for the first time this > > > month. > > > surely that aloe shows the futility of trying to do something of which > > > he is incapable! I enjoy an intellectual disvcussion - we have gone past > > > that poitn with Ken's rubbsish. It cannot be justified because it is > > > plainly wrong. > > > All other professions (eg medicine, law engineering etc) have > > > professional bodies for a reasom. Imagine the science of medicine > > > putting up with such ignorant utterences... but we have to tolerate it > > > because we are yet at that level. > > > If Ken wants to put forward his theories --- fine. If he can't accept > > > the fact that his forecasts are useless, then we can't just ignore them > > > because they "bring down" the whole credibility of meteorology. No one > > > is saying that this science is perfect... but if I cannot forecast with > > > 80-85% accuracy then there is little point .. after all, a forecast for > > > a city such as Sydeny based on presistence alone would be 75% > > > accurate... and all that is saying is that tomorrow will be the same as > > > today. > > > > > > Ken has been wrong every day in November that he has forecast rain for > > > Sysdney. Eventually, he will be right, but so what? Eventually it will > > > rain - probably this week! > > > As a science and as a fledging industry we must reject such utterances > > > made on the pretext for forecasting the weather otherwise we will all be > > > eventually judged by the lowest common demoninator.That is why I believe > > > we cannot allow Ken to go unchallenged. > > > The trouble with Ken is that he is either unwilling or too stupid to > > > admit he is wrong. > > > I will not give a day by day forecast beyond 5-7 days because I do not > > > beleive that the science of meteorology is sophisticated enough to make > > > such outlooks commercially viable. I will prepare climatic assessments a > > > season ahead based on variation to normal. To try to do more is not and > > > has never been justified.. Ken's attempts have shown that to be true > > > even if he doesnt want to face reality. > > > > > > Don White > > > s > > > Phil Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > >From over here, it appears the level of Ken-bashing is inversely > > > > proportional to the amount of interesting weather that is happening in > > > > Oz. > > > > So let some decent storms come rolling through so Ken can quietly go > > back > > > > to what he loves doing - having a go at predicting the weather - while > > > > the rest of us read some exciting chase reports etc. > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > <>< > > > > > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: "Duncan & Mandy" > > > > To: > > > > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:02:05 +1030 > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > > > G'day all, > > > > > I might join in the Ken Ring bashing session as well. > > > > > Dunno about Ken's accuracy for Central Australia. From the 9th until > > > > > the > > > > > 13th of November the region had a period of humidity and Storms. While > > > > > Alice > > > > > Springs recorded only around 5mm, New Crown station on the western > > edge > > > > > of > > > > > the Simpson Desert recorded around 27mm. For them, this is a > > > > > significant > > > > > rain event. Many areas around Alice Springs had good falls of rain, > > but > > > > > these aren't recorded due to the remoteness of the country. Ken did > > not > > > > > mention even the possibilty of rain. > > > > > He predicts rain for around November 22nd. We shall see - maybe my > > > > > faith > > > > > will be restored... > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Duncan > > > > > Alice Springs, N.T. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Laurier Williams" > > > > > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > > > > > Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 11:38 am > > > > > Subject: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ken currently has October and November 2002 forecasts for parts of > > > > > Australia > > > > > > on his site, and says that they were compiled back in April 2001. > > > > > I've > > > > > only > > > > > > had time to look at NSW (Sydney and Wagga), but here's my > > assessment. > > > > > It > > > > > is > > > > > > based on a simple semantic assessment of whether the statements > > > > > (forecasts) > > > > > > made by Ken came true or not, based on available evidence. In > > > > > addition, > > > > > I've > > > > > > noted rain events that Ken should have forecast but did not. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd welcome Ken's agreement or disagreement with the validation of > > > > > any > > > > > > individual forecast events, backed up, of course, with evidence. > > > > > > > > > > > > For October we have: > > > > > > > > > > > > "Sydney (1) continues its dry spell, (2) with even less rain than > > > > > last > > > > > > month. " > > > > > > 1. True, the dry spell continued. > > > > > > 2. Neither true nor false, if "Sydney" is taken to be the overall > > > > > metro > > > > > > area. Here are some randomly distributed totals. These are the only > > > > > stations > > > > > > for which totals were received each day in both months. There will > > be > > > > > a > > > > > > fuller picture when all postal rain returns are in, but in the > > > > > meantime > > > > > > these stations give quite a good spread across the metro area. > > > > > > Cronulla South: Sept 23.8, Oct 25.0 UP > > > > > > Marrickville: 20.0, 19.0 DOWN (just) > > > > > > Airport: 15.0, 9.8 DOWN > > > > > > Newport: 34.0, 8.0 DOWN > > > > > > Little Bay: 58.8, 14.0 DOWN > > > > > > Observatory Hill: 21.8, 5.8 DOWN > > > > > > Strathfield: 8.0, 13.0 UP > > > > > > Parramatta North: 8.0, 8.0 SAME > > > > > > Bankstown AP: 6.2, 18.2 UP > > > > > > Frenchs Forest: 33.2, 38.0 UP > > > > > > Homebush Olympic Park: 8.8, 34.4 UP > > > > > > Prospect Dam: 5.2, 11.3 UP > > > > > > Liverpool: 7.3, 1.8 DOWN > > > > > > Richmond RAAF: 22.4, 1.0 DOWN > > > > > > Badgery's Creek: 6.4, 0.4 DOWN > > > > > > Seven Hills: 6.5, 16.5 UP > > > > > > Penrith Lakes: 4.4, 5.6 UP (just) > > > > > > > > > > > > UP 8, DOWN 8, SAME 1, TOTAL 17 > > > > > > > > > > > > "Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. " > > > > > > Depends on what you call "rain". I'll take it as >0.2mm to eliminate > > > > > dew. > > > > > > Figures are date/mm > > > > > > Observatory Hill: 10/3.0 14/2.0 > > > > > > Airport: 10/5.8 11/2.2 21/1.2 > > > > > > Bankstown: 10/0.6 11/0.6 21/17.0 > > > > > > Frenchs Forest: 10/3.0 21/1.0 22/33.0 28/1.0 > > > > > > Homebush: 10/2.0, 13/0.4, 14/0.4 21/31.0 > > > > > > Prospect Dam: 02/2.2 05/1.5 10/3.8 11/0.4 14/0.4 21/2.0 22/1.0 > > > > > > Richmond: 11/1.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > So > > > > > > 3rd False > > > > > > 10th True > > > > > > 15th False > > > > > > 17th False > > > > > > Significant falls on 21 and 22 missed > > > > > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga may only get (1) about half the rain of the previous > > > > > month, > > > > > but > > > > > > (2) also less than half the sunshine hours also." > > > > > > 1. Rain at the airport was 36.0 in Sept, 0.2 in Oct, which being > > > > > > significantly less than "about half" scores a False. > > > > > > 2. Sunshine in October was 332, up on September's 272 hours, so > > False > > > > > > > > > > > > "Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, 14th-15th, > > > > > 21st > > > > > and > > > > > > 27th." > > > > > > The only fall was 0.2 on the 8th. Across the broader area (SW > > slopes, > > > > > > eastern Riverina), the only days with any significant rain (either > > > > > amounts > > > > > > or spread) were 15th (about half stations 5 to 15mm) and 24th (about > > > > > > two-thirds stations 2 to 5mm.) > > > > > > So, 1st to 6th False > > > > > > 14th-15th True > > > > > > 21st False > > > > > > 27th False > > > > > > 24th missed > > > > > > > > > > > > So Ken's score for October: > > > > > > True 3 > > > > > > False 8 > > > > > > Neither True nor False 1 > > > > > > Missed events 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > For November, the jury's still out, but a few early observations: > > > > > > > > > > > > "Sydney sees rain at last, intermittently every few days, with most > > > > > possibly > > > > > > between 16th-21st." > > > > > > Up to 14th virtually no rain at all, certainly not intermittently > > > > > every > > > > > few > > > > > > days. The highest totals anywhere in the metro area to date are > > 3.0mm > > > > > at > > > > > > Chatswood and Turramurra. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Wagga Wagga will be way down again, with a lot more sunshine hours. > > > > > " > > > > > > 0.0 at Wagga AP to date, and top falls in the area all <1.4mm to > > > > > date. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Any falls for Wagga Wagga could be around 9th, 15th, 23rd and 25th. > > > > > " > > > > > > The 9th and several days either side were bone dry. > > > > > > > > > > > > Further update on November after month's end. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > + > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > - > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 07:14:09 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken My request for you to explain forecasts which seemed to me to be in error was politely made, and I believe your inference that I was "Ken-bashing" is unnecessarily defensive. Throughout this debate, I have concentrated simply on the accuracy of forecasts you have made. I also believe that, as a member of the public who does not engage in long-range forecasting, I have a perfect right to compare your forecasts to what actually happened and draw conclusions. If a builder builds me a house that falls down, I don't need to be a builder to tell that it has fallen down. If a forecast is made for rain in an area and no rain falls in the area, I don't need to be a forecaster to be able to objectively and accurately say that the forecast was wrong. One important point is your use of the word "potential". The way you use the word in your published forecast is quite different to the way you have used it in your most recent emails due to the placement of the word. Your published forecast for Sydney and Wagga for October says: "Sydney continues its dry spell, with even less rain than last month. Potential dates for rain are only on 3rd, 10th, 15th and 17th. Wagga Wagga may only get about half the rain of the previous month, but also less than half the sunshine hours also. Biggest falls for Wagga Wagga should be around 1st-6th, 14th-15th, 21st and 27th." "Potential dates for rain..." translates as "possible dates that rain will occur." It is a forecast that rain may occur on those dates. If I read your responses correctly, what you meant to say was "Dates on which there may be the potential for rain are...". It is a forecast that there will be the potential for rain on those dates. I wasn't aware of this subtle but critical difference in meaning until I read your responses, and returned to the original forecast. Since then, I have shown the paragraph to 18 people and asked them what it meant with regard to rain in Sydney, and all have said they thought you were forecasting rain in Sydney on those days. One of these people is a linguist of world standing. I think it would be worth your while changing the wording, so it is clear that you are not actually predicting rain, but only the potential for rain. I note, again, that you have not commented on the discrepancies between your forecast and what actually happened in Sydney and Wagga in October. It cannot all be explained by the difference between forecasting rain and forecasting the potential for rain. By the way, I did refer to the general areas, rather than points, in making these comparisons; your comments below seem to have ignored this fact. I am still hopeful that you will respond to my original comparisons between your forecasts and what actually happened in the Sydney and Wagga areas. Regards Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Saturday, 16 November, 2002 03:45 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > Jimmy > I have no problem responding to polite requests to explain myself, and, > where possible, errors I make. Where those who are doing the asking are > attached to the BoM or whatever, I would be interested in a > similar call for > the same response from them, where a forecast I have made tallies > with that > of the BoM. David Jones is on this list and works for the BoM, so > a parallel > call to him to explain misforecasts would be welcome. > > would-be bashers > We have already read a post by John Woodbridge, for which I thank him most > sincerely. In case members missed it: > ">From my obs at Mt. Crosby cf to Ken's website for Brisbane, Ken has > actually > been just about spot on since Oct 1st, except for the instance of > 12mm which > fell two days ago in a forecast 'dry' period. Apart from that event, in > each of his few forecast wet periods, we received some (in one case just a > trace) rain, and nothing in the dry periods. So that makes Ken > right 45 days > out of 46 and mostly not needing his "1 day" > leeway.." > I really don't see the need to comment further, other than to say that if > you think I have been inaccurate in your area then maybe you were standing > in a different place to where my forecasts applied. General-area > approaches > are what most long range predictions work with, and potentials rather than > actual rain. If it rains in one part of a district and not in > another, then > clearly the potential is there for that district, but the rain might not > have been be over every nook and cranny of that district. This is fairly > obvious. > On the subject of my call for others, especially James, Laurier, > Don et all > to also put up forecasts before they attack me for mine; in response to > (Laurier)> >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls > down, do I > have to become a builder to prove them wrong..yes, Laurier, I'm afraid so. > That's the hard part, but the responsibility that goes with mounting the > platform to criticise. You have to demonstrate you can at least > do the same > only better. Otherwise you could just be anybody off the street > and it would > be a waste of people's time to have to listen to you. Prove that > you have a > working knowledge of long range forecasting techniques by doing it too. > Otherwise leave me alone. I'm doing my best - but - just bashing - is that > the best YOU can do? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jimmy Deguara" > To: > Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 11:33 AM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > > Hi Laurier, > > > > Interesting you didn't approach my whole e-mail - well can I assume that > > all other aspects of my e-mail you agree with or were you not interested > in > > them? One important point you missed that I would like addressed so that > > others can also get involved is to ask those with any criticism to post > > their forecasts or perhaps one that they support more so be it for the > sake > > of science or whatever. Then we ALL can have access to a much > fairer base > > to measure with. It will also become more interesting in my opinion. > > > > Rather than approaching your comments Laurier each at one time, I would > > like to generalise the theme of the whole e-mail. I do believe your > > approach to debate is far healthier than some others and this > is what I am > > trying to address - I despise the comments where people are called > "stupid" > > etc. I am also against lengthy posts and usually look forward to > > variability of the subjects. I suppose others on the list can correct me > > kindly on such a note. I stand corrected if I am wrong in assuming from > the > > past that lengthy subjects lost a lot of its flavour. > > > > I also agree that Ken must reply to your genuine and logical approach as > > the criticism is genuine and fair as well as polite. Though > please change > > the subject to something more pleasant. > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > At 09:39 PM 15/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: > > >Jimmy wrote > > > > > > > Hi Don, Laurier, David etc, > > > > > > > > This, and related threads have become rather boring, excessive > > > > and a total > > > > waste of time. > > > > > >Your opinion, Jimmy, but patently not shared by everyone on the list. > > > > > > > You guys have tried time and time again to catch > > > > Ken out > > > > > >And succeeded. > > > > > > > If you want to hammer anyone do it personally please. > > > > > >Ken's forecasts are in the public domain, as has been his vocal support > for > > >them. so why should any criticism of them have to be private? And I > object > > >to genuine criticism being characterised as "hammering". > > > > > > > > > > > How about David Jones, Don White and Laurier Williams and so on try > and > > > > state their forecasts for similar periods that Ken does rather than > bash > > > > someone else's with statistical crap. > > > > > >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls down, do > I have to > > >become a builder to prove them wrong. False logic, Jimmy. And do you > really > > >believe that verifying forecast rain by comparing it to actual rain > measured > > >is "statistical crap"? > > > > > > > Let's get back to what this list was designed for speaking about the > > > > weather and so on - variation is a key to success. > > > > > >The list was designed for speaking about all aspects of the weather, > which > > >include forecast verification. If your interests lie solely in one area > of > > >weather, such as thunderstorms, you have the right and > capability to use > the > > >delete key. > > > > > > > I would rather see this methodology being used for predictions > > > > rather than > > > > the gang-up approach. Let people decide for themselves. > > > > > >Again, why characterise genuine criticism with colourful > language -- "the > > >gang-up approach." Isn't healthy debate one of the primary reasons for > > >communication devices like this list? Or should we shy away > from anything > > >approaching intellectual rigour? > > > > > > > I do understand > > > > that there may be a conflict of interest involved here by those > > > > involved in > > > > commercial activities using this list as a hunting ground for more > > > > business... Let's keep that component out of the picture. > > > > > > >I agree, but this applies equally to Ken as it does to Don and the > Bureau, > > >so presumably your criticism is directed even-handedly on both sides. I > > >should put on the record that my only "commercial" return from > meteorology > > >is in the supply of data; I do no commercial forecasting as I believe I > am > > >not qualified to do so. > > > > > > > > >Jimmy and list: medics, lawyers, architects, builders, broadcasters and > many > > >others areas in society cleaned up their professional ethics > long ago, as > > >did the meteorologists in the US when they brought in an accreditation > > >system for forecasters initiated, I think, by the American > Meteorological > > >Association. In Australia, accreditation for forecasters has > been talked > > >about from time to time, but I don't think the industry has > the mettle to > > >take it on, and the Bureau has been reluctant to press for > something that > > >would be seen as its own self-interest. > > > > > >I have no problem with people holding and espousing any ideas they want > to; > > >but when they charge for something that is patently wrong, disprovable > and > > >misleading it goes against the fundamental rules of fairness that most > > >societies have developed. > > > > > >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against > misleading > > >conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually > > >rigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we > deserve what we > > >get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. > > > > > >Laurier > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steven Williams" To: Subject: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 20:34:46 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
It is interesting reading mixed comments on BOM's accuracy. I can report the NZ Meteorological Service was a joke
15 years ago, today there are very rarely wrong. Yes, I am constantly impressed with their accuracy. And no doubt
BOM have gone through a similar transformation. Its a world wide trend...forecasts are much better now than recent
history.
Cheers
Steven W (Auckland)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 17:44:33 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Received 5mm here. AC John Woodbridge wrote: > > Pissing down now in Brisbane.. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 17:50:48 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
This is almost entirely due to advances in computer modelling together with improved sources of data and capacity to analyse that data (compute power).  We are now in a situation most of the models used in this part of world produce reasonably accurate synoptic prognosis for about 4 days in advance.   The only criticism which may be applied, it is that perhaps there is too heavy a reliance made on computer modelling with the odd failure to 'look out the window' at what is actually happening.
 
I'm not sure what the issue is in Darwin, but the weather there is no stagnant from one day to the next, I do not know how one could get it wrong.  33C Max and dry for 6 months of the year, 33C Max with high humidity and afternoon thunderstorm for the the other half.  (I joke)
 
John.
>snip
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Steven Williams
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 5:35 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy

It is interesting reading mixed comments on BOM's accuracy. I can report the NZ Meteorological Service was a joke
15 years ago, today there are very rarely wrong. Yes, I am constantly impressed with their accuracy. And no doubt
BOM have gone through a similar transformation. Its a world wide trend...forecasts are much better now than recent
history.
Cheers
Steven W (Auckland)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 17:59:36 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com If I remember correctly, Ken brought the subject back up. In somewhat of a provocative manner boasting also. Surely if Ken has the right "boast" he is correct (although Ken does that if he's incorrect also!) Then people have the right to say "Ken is wrong" then? That's just part of the forecasting game... It's quite simple to play really...make a forecast, if you're bold and daring about it and it's wrong, you'll get shot down. If you're bold and daring and you're right...you'll be arrogant. If you're humble and wrong, people will dismiss it quietly. If you're humble and correct, then you'll be praised. Ken makes bold and daring forecasts, and claims other methods are wrong. That's just the case...no one likes some one who's arrogant. Furthermore, during State of Origin...if I walked into a NSW pub on the night wearing a QLD jersey and yelled "GO QLD!"...I would expect to get some flak! If I didn't want any...I wouldn't be so loud initially. But all in all, that is part of the 'fun.' Unfortunately, you can't retract what is already said. In the mean time, I have enjoyed the discussion. I have enjoyed the comparisons between them. AC Jimmy Deguara wrote: > > Hi Don, Laurier, David etc, > > This, and related threads have become rather boring, excessive and a total > waste of time. You guys have tried time and time again to catch Ken out and > basically litter the list with what I call boring continuous threads. If > you want to hammer anyone do it personally please. It's as bad as the > stupid "The cloud" thread. > > How about David Jones, Don White and Laurier Williams and so on try and > state their forecasts for similar periods that Ken does rather than bash > someone else's with statistical crap. By doing this we can all analyse for > ourselves. > > Let's get back to what this list was designed for speaking about the > weather and so on - variation is a key to success. Especially now that rain > and storms have revisited and the GMS-5 is going to be replaced by GOES 9. > The weather is definitely changing and it will be interesting to see if the > drought for coastal areas at least persists until about February - March as > suggested by the BoM. Ken suggests the drought will be breaking November? > Forget dates buddies - it is common sense that anyone with some knowledge > will understand that following by the moon is a "potential" as suggested by > Ken in this recent post and on some other posts if it was to be "true". > People who have followed fishing and hunting with solunar tables will > realise that the behaviour of fish have been affected by the moon. But > again it is a potential and other factors can affect feeding patterns. I > would not even try elaborate further on this issue. > > I would rather see this methodology being used for predictions rather than > the gang-up approach. Let people decide for themselves. I do understand > that there may be a conflict of interest involved here by those involved in > commercial activities using this list as a hunting ground for more > business... Let's keep that component out of the picture. > > Jimmy Deguara > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > from > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: aus-wx: Please define.. Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:26:09 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against misleading > conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually > vigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we deserve what we > get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. Laurier, well said in the latter part; something I also uphold. But I'm worried about this notion of yours of "misleading conduct". Can you define that, please? Getting forecasts wrong? Blimey, then every forecasting agency, especially the BoM will be had up. Having different theories? Then you forbid new research..Something disprovable? Then that includes all meterological projections by anyone, which are correlational rather than causal. "rules of fairness' ..? We don't have an exact science. Possibly the only fairness would be that anyone who calls another stupid, or ignorant etc should be barred from the discussion, because the ideas should be what are under focus, not the personalities. Would you care to comment on this? Ken > > >I have no problem with people holding and espousing any ideas they want > to; > > >but when they charge for something that is patently wrong, disprovable > and > > >misleading it goes against the fundamental rules of fairness that most > > >societies have developed. > > > > > >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against > misleading > > >conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually > > >rigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we deserve what we > > >get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. > > > > > >Laurier > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 20:12:35 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: "weather mailing list" Subject: aus-wx: arguments Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
i've watched this list lately with interest, quite entertaining actually.
 
as far as i can see, laurier, david and don are right to be arcing up over this.
 
ken,as i've said about someone else on another subject, your literal articulation in dancing around the subject and twisting things to suit yourself makes even the most astute politition look like an amateur. over the last few weeks you have presented yourself as a sharleton, snake oil merchant and peddler of generalised half truths, you are no more capable of forcasting future weather than someone who claims they can contact the dead.( there's idiots out there that believe that too ).
 
jimmy, jimmy, jimmy, what can i say, the majority of people are way too smart to try that sort of forcasting rubbish, you are so stuck up, way too much education, the list is not boring, it's exiting and vibrant, give up your job and go veg out on a beach for a couple of years.
 
personalities are what create ideas, they are an integral part of the argument. expect issues to become emotive and personal.
 
richard
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP6.gif: 00000001,283a2198,00000000,00000000 From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:44:14 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > I am still hopeful that you will respond to my original comparisons between > your forecasts and what actually happened in the Sydney and Wagga areas. > Regards > Laurier And I am still hopeful that you will post up some forecasts alongside mine in future, to make for an even playing field. I have already done enough, putting out my ideas. With respect, the only ideas you seem to have come up with thus far have been how to even further criticise me, in every single of your posts. You may enjoy it - I don't. There can be no end to this bickering. Let's see those forecasts go up and THEN we can all have a meaty discussion. Ken > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Saturday, 16 November, 2002 03:45 > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > > > > Jimmy > > I have no problem responding to polite requests to explain myself, and, > > where possible, errors I make. Where those who are doing the asking are > > attached to the BoM or whatever, I would be interested in a > > similar call for > > the same response from them, where a forecast I have made tallies > > with that > > of the BoM. David Jones is on this list and works for the BoM, so > > a parallel > > call to him to explain misforecasts would be welcome. > > > > would-be bashers > > We have already read a post by John Woodbridge, for which I thank him most > > sincerely. In case members missed it: > > ">From my obs at Mt. Crosby cf to Ken's website for Brisbane, Ken has > > actually > > been just about spot on since Oct 1st, except for the instance of > > 12mm which > > fell two days ago in a forecast 'dry' period. Apart from that event, in > > each of his few forecast wet periods, we received some (in one case just a > > trace) rain, and nothing in the dry periods. So that makes Ken > > right 45 days > > out of 46 and mostly not needing his "1 day" > > leeway.." > > I really don't see the need to comment further, other than to say that if > > you think I have been inaccurate in your area then maybe you were standing > > in a different place to where my forecasts applied. General-area > > approaches > > are what most long range predictions work with, and potentials rather than > > actual rain. If it rains in one part of a district and not in > > another, then > > clearly the potential is there for that district, but the rain might not > > have been be over every nook and cranny of that district. This is fairly > > obvious. > > On the subject of my call for others, especially James, Laurier, > > Don et all > > to also put up forecasts before they attack me for mine; in response to > > (Laurier)> >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls > > down, do I > > have to become a builder to prove them wrong..yes, Laurier, I'm afraid so. > > That's the hard part, but the responsibility that goes with mounting the > > platform to criticise. You have to demonstrate you can at least > > do the same > > only better. Otherwise you could just be anybody off the street > > and it would > > be a waste of people's time to have to listen to you. Prove that > > you have a > > working knowledge of long range forecasting techniques by doing it too. > > Otherwise leave me alone. I'm doing my best - but - just bashing - is that > > the best YOU can do? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jimmy Deguara" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 11:33 AM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > > > > > Hi Laurier, > > > > > > Interesting you didn't approach my whole e-mail - well can I assume that > > > all other aspects of my e-mail you agree with or were you not interested > > in > > > them? One important point you missed that I would like addressed so that > > > others can also get involved is to ask those with any criticism to post > > > their forecasts or perhaps one that they support more so be it for the > > sake > > > of science or whatever. Then we ALL can have access to a much > > fairer base > > > to measure with. It will also become more interesting in my opinion. > > > > > > Rather than approaching your comments Laurier each at one time, I would > > > like to generalise the theme of the whole e-mail. I do believe your > > > approach to debate is far healthier than some others and this > > is what I am > > > trying to address - I despise the comments where people are called > > "stupid" > > > etc. I am also against lengthy posts and usually look forward to > > > variability of the subjects. I suppose others on the list can correct me > > > kindly on such a note. I stand corrected if I am wrong in assuming from > > the > > > past that lengthy subjects lost a lot of its flavour. > > > > > > I also agree that Ken must reply to your genuine and logical approach as > > > the criticism is genuine and fair as well as polite. Though > > please change > > > the subject to something more pleasant. > > > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > > > At 09:39 PM 15/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: > > > >Jimmy wrote > > > > > > > > > Hi Don, Laurier, David etc, > > > > > > > > > > This, and related threads have become rather boring, excessive > > > > > and a total > > > > > waste of time. > > > > > > > >Your opinion, Jimmy, but patently not shared by everyone on the list. > > > > > > > > > You guys have tried time and time again to catch > > > > > Ken out > > > > > > > >And succeeded. > > > > > > > > > If you want to hammer anyone do it personally please. > > > > > > > >Ken's forecasts are in the public domain, as has been his vocal support > > for > > > >them. so why should any criticism of them have to be private? And I > > object > > > >to genuine criticism being characterised as "hammering". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about David Jones, Don White and Laurier Williams and so on try > > and > > > > > state their forecasts for similar periods that Ken does rather than > > bash > > > > > someone else's with statistical crap. > > > > > > > >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls down, do > > I have to > > > >become a builder to prove them wrong. False logic, Jimmy. And do you > > really > > > >believe that verifying forecast rain by comparing it to actual rain > > measured > > > >is "statistical crap"? > > > > > > > > > Let's get back to what this list was designed for speaking about the > > > > > weather and so on - variation is a key to success. > > > > > > > >The list was designed for speaking about all aspects of the weather, > > which > > > >include forecast verification. If your interests lie solely in one area > > of > > > >weather, such as thunderstorms, you have the right and > > capability to use > > the > > > >delete key. > > > > > > > > > I would rather see this methodology being used for predictions > > > > > rather than > > > > > the gang-up approach. Let people decide for themselves. > > > > > > > >Again, why characterise genuine criticism with colourful > > language -- "the > > > >gang-up approach." Isn't healthy debate one of the primary reasons for > > > >communication devices like this list? Or should we shy away > > from anything > > > >approaching intellectual rigour? > > > > > > > > > I do understand > > > > > that there may be a conflict of interest involved here by those > > > > > involved in > > > > > commercial activities using this list as a hunting ground for more > > > > > business... Let's keep that component out of the picture. > > > > > > > > >I agree, but this applies equally to Ken as it does to Don and the > > Bureau, > > > >so presumably your criticism is directed even-handedly on both sides. I > > > >should put on the record that my only "commercial" return from > > meteorology > > > >is in the supply of data; I do no commercial forecasting as I believe I > > am > > > >not qualified to do so. > > > > > > > > > > > >Jimmy and list: medics, lawyers, architects, builders, broadcasters and > > many > > > >others areas in society cleaned up their professional ethics > > long ago, as > > > >did the meteorologists in the US when they brought in an accreditation > > > >system for forecasters initiated, I think, by the American > > Meteorological > > > >Association. In Australia, accreditation for forecasters has > > been talked > > > >about from time to time, but I don't think the industry has > > the mettle to > > > >take it on, and the Bureau has been reluctant to press for > > something that > > > >would be seen as its own self-interest. > > > > > > > >I have no problem with people holding and espousing any ideas they want > > to; > > > >but when they charge for something that is patently wrong, disprovable > > and > > > >misleading it goes against the fundamental rules of fairness that most > > > >societies have developed. > > > > > > > >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against > > misleading > > > >conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually > > > >rigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we > > deserve what we > > > >get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. > > > > > > > >Laurier > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > > body of your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "macdonald" To: Subject: aus-wx: WAZ UP IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:14:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Everyone
What a beautiful cool day with cloudy cover and fresh south easterlies... The grass is already greening, and Victor will be venturing from his shed after months of inactivity...hehe
 
Last 3 days have brought the best rain for a while.
13th min 18.5 max 31.0, 8pm ( duration around 20mins)... a thunderstorm with heavy rain, lots of thunder and lightning. 25.5mm
15th min 20.5 max 29.2, 1pm - thunderstorm with heavy rain, really loud lightning/thunder...(deeper bass than my Vagas Gerwin 15inche speakers pumping out thunderstuck), and 37.5mm.
Rainfall so far for 2002 is 588mm.
 
cheers
Sam
X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: arguments Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:35:17 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Nov 2002 10:35:17.0382 (UTC) FILETIME=[DAE5AA60:01C28D5B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com :rolleyes: When is this going to end? >From: "Richard Modistach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: "weather mailing list" >Subject: aus-wx: arguments >Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 20:12:35 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) > >i've watched this list lately with interest, quite entertaining actually. > >as far as i can see, laurier, david and don are right to be arcing up over >this. > >ken,as i've said about someone else on another subject, your literal >articulation in dancing around the subject and twisting things to suit >yourself makes even the most astute politition look like an amateur. over >the last few weeks you have presented yourself as a sharleton, snake oil >merchant and peddler of generalised half truths, you are no more capable of >forcasting future weather than someone who claims they can contact the dead >( there's idiots out there that believe that too ). > >jimmy, jimmy, jimmy, what can i say, the majority of people are way too >smart to try that sort of forcasting rubbish, you are so stuck up, way too >much education, the list is not boring, it's exiting and vibrant, give up >your job and go veg out on a beach for a couple of years. > >personalities are what create ideas, they are an integral part of the >argument. expect issues to become emotive and personal. > >richard _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:45:36 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Steven.. please remind yourself what you said on the NZ Weather Forum for 3/11/02 and 31/10/02 as below. Some contributors doubted the accuracy of the metservice, and you seemed to put up posts that agreed with their doubts.
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 8:34 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy

It is interesting reading mixed comments on BOM's accuracy. I can report the NZ Meteorological Service was a joke
15 years ago, today there are very rarely wrong. Yes, I am constantly impressed with their accuracy. And no doubt
BOM have gone through a similar transformation. Its a world wide trend...forecasts are much better now than recent
history.
Cheers
Steven W (Auckland)
From: "macdonald" To: Subject: aus-wx: MY LOCATION IS Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:08:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Opps.. my location is Tallai, in the Gold Coast Hinterland.
http://www.geocites.com/ratman6900/index.html
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:59:43 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: WAZ UP IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
where are you?
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Saturday, 16 November 2002 9:57:17 PM
Subject: aus-wx: WAZ UP IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS
 
Hi Everyone
What a beautiful cool day with cloudy cover and fresh south easterlies... The grass is already greening, and Victor will be venturing from his shed after months of inactivity...hehe
 
Last 3 days have brought the best rain for a while.
13th min 18.5 max 31.0, 8pm ( duration around 20mins)... a thunderstorm with heavy rain, lots of thunder and lightning. 25.5mm
15th min 20.5 max 29.2, 1pm - thunderstorm with heavy rain, really loud lightning/thunder...(deeper bass than my Vagas Gerwin 15inche speakers pumping out thunderstuck), and 37.5mm.
Rainfall so far for 2002 is 588mm.
 
cheers
Sam
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP7.gif: 00000001,28efc60e,00000000,00000000 From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:37:43 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That's because fish live in a world of tides. Prawns for example run on a dark, no moon. I think it is natural selection, this is the safest time for prawns to run. Over millions of generations the ones that decided to run on full moons were picked off by predators more easilly. Fish respond to tides in a similar way. > Ken in this recent post and on some other posts if it was to be "true". > People who have followed fishing and hunting with solunar tables will > realise that the behaviour of fish have been affected by the moon. But --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:46:23 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I am constantly defending the BOm at work. Once people know my interest in weather they always say something  like "  the Bureau always gets it wrong ". I actually tell them that these days the forecasts are quite accurate.
 
I tend to agree with Don's statement about depending who is the senior forecaster on shift.  A couple of day alst week the forecats were more descriptive which is refreshing.
 
Michael
 
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 6:34 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy

It is interesting reading mixed comments on BOM's accuracy. I can report the NZ Meteorological Service was a joke
15 years ago, today there are very rarely wrong. Yes, I am constantly impressed with their accuracy. And no doubt
BOM have gone through a similar transformation. Its a world wide trend...forecasts are much better now than recent
history.
Cheers
Steven W (Auckland)
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02
X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:02:34 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: arguments Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 08:12 PM 16/11/2002 +1030, you wrote: >jimmy, jimmy, jimmy, what can i say, the majority of people are way too >smart to try that sort of forcasting rubbish, you are so stuck up, way too >much education, the list is not boring, it's exiting and vibrant, give up >your job and go veg out on a beach for a couple of years. > Sorry Richard, I quite often find it difficult understanding what you say normally but this time you have really lost me? Can you explain further? Jimmy Deguara +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:42:20 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: arguments Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
no.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Saturday, 16 November 2002 10:39:35 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: arguments
 
At 08:12 PM 16/11/2002 +1030, you wrote:
>jimmy, jimmy, jimmy, what can i say, the majority of people are way too
>smart to try that sort of forcasting rubbish, you are so stuck up, way too
>much education, the list is not boring, it's exiting and vibrant, give up
>your job and go veg out on a beach for a couple of years.
>

Sorry Richard, I quite often find it difficult understanding what you say
normally but this time you have really lost me? Can you explain further?

Jimmy Deguara

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP8.gif: 00000001,2212eb10,00000000,00000000 From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:40:29 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I thought this email list was for weather and weather opinions.......for F%$K sake, get over it. Man some of you must not have a life or any other problems to keep this garbage up. Ken gave an opinion, whether it is right or wrong.....I thought that was what this was about, not bitching at everyone. This list used to have some good content but I am gradually growing tired of the bullshit. Grow a life some of you and get some real problems, something worth winging about. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: arguments Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:41:22 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Nov 2002 12:41:22.0413 (UTC) FILETIME=[7801C9D0:01C28D6D] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com LOL this is so pathetic, you think it would get from bad to worse, just step back and take a look at yoursleves, in times like these you cant be friends. >From: Jimmy Deguara >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: arguments >Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:02:34 +1100 > >At 08:12 PM 16/11/2002 +1030, you wrote: >>jimmy, jimmy, jimmy, what can i say, the majority of people are way too >>smart to try that sort of forcasting rubbish, you are so stuck up, way too >>much education, the list is not boring, it's exiting and vibrant, give up >>your job and go veg out on a beach for a couple of years. >> > >Sorry Richard, I quite often find it difficult understanding what you say >normally but this time you have really lost me? Can you explain further? > >Jimmy Deguara > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jason Beer" To: Subject: aus-wx: Forcasts + argumants Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:45:56 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all, I am no forcaster or scientist, just someone who enjoys the various things of excitment, extremes, amazment and beauty it provides.
 
I have no objection to Ken posting his forecasts. He states the parameters his forecasts should be assessed in.
 
However, I do feel he ducks and weaves like a politician when he is confronted with people cross checking his claims. I do not beleive people had any other agenda than finding if what he claimed was as accurate as he did. eg. cyclone formation.
 
Ken does not acknowledge that his claims are not as correct as he states when confronted with information provided by people researching within their stated parameters. Nor do people have to give forcasts just because they point out inconsistancies in his forecasts.
 
I also feel some people are trying to just shoot him down because he is using what some people consider "fairyland methods". Which is not helpful either. It appears on face value that he does have some wins.
 
Let Ken continue to post his forecasts within his stated parameters, lets assess them on those parameters. Let Ken also acknowledge when it is pointed out that he has been proved not as correct as he firmly states he is.
 
This, if not turning into a slanging match, IS enjoyable and interesting.
In fact if people on this list with their own scientific methods or otherwise work together, who knows a hybrid accurate formular may be determined???
 
On crictism of the BOM for their forcasts I have thought for years that when a 4 day forecast is given that the 4th day as it becomes the 3rd and 2nd day changes. From a purely unscientific perspective the original 4th day prediction was correct by the time it came around. Despite the changes in between. Based on Melbourne.
 
eg.
1. Saturday(Today) 20 fine, Sunday 30 sunny, Monday 25 sunny, Tuesday 20 overcast(lets follow this day).
2. Sunday 24 sunny, Monday 30 sunny, Tuesday 25 showers(changed). Wednesday(not relevant in this example now)
3. Monday 28 showers, Tuesday 32 sunny(changed). Wednesday(not relevant in this example now), Thursday(not relevant in this example now),
4. Tuesday 20 overcast(see original 4 day forecast!), rest of the days not relevant.
 
Before anyone jumps down my throat; I am not a scientist nor I am not a forecaster. I am someone interested in weather phenomenom and add only personal observations to this list, backed up by nothing more than memory and 25 + years of experiencing Melbourne wether primarily and much of Australias weather in close quarters.
 
Are we as humans so arrogant to think we can measure every possible wave or radiation etc that may exist in this planet and universe that may be effecting our planets weather? If we cannot measure it and do not know it exists how can we allow for it to make our forecasts?
 
As a gut feeling, I am sure the moon, sun, internal Earth forces and other planets do play a part in our weather. To what degree, I do not know.
 
Make a point, explain the parameters you base it on. Challenge it based on stated parameters giving a wrong, right or OK assessment. Then accept the facts presented and do not personally go after one another.
 
Cloudy and 6 plus in Stockholm. Snow all melted.
 
I predict Christmas day in Melbourne will be windy(northerly) 38 and sunny with a change coming through about 7pm after clouding over about 5.30pm bringing massive hail and heavy rain storms and wind. SES get ready. Notice, I do not put a year on it!
 
cheers
 
Jas
From: "Paul Mossman" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: arguments Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 22:32:41 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy stuck up? LOL.... have another pill Richard. Jimmy is the most down to earth bloke I have met. Also, I would hazard a guess that he knows...hmmm...100000% more about weather then you. So on balance he has a little more credibility. So how about freedom of opinion and expression reign again - let Don and Laurier and David do it there way, and Ken do it his. But at least someone get it right!!!! > >From: Jimmy Deguara > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: arguments > >Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:02:34 +1100 > > > >At 08:12 PM 16/11/2002 +1030, you wrote: > >>jimmy, jimmy, jimmy, what can i say, the majority of people are way too > >>smart to try that sort of forcasting rubbish, you are so stuck up, way too > >>much education, the list is not boring, it's exiting and vibrant, give up > >>your job and go veg out on a beach for a couple of years. > >> > > > >Sorry Richard, I quite often find it difficult understanding what you say > >normally but this time you have really lost me? Can you explain further? > > > >Jimmy Deguara > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > >To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > >message. > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Please define.. Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:10:41 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The words are as defined in any english dictionary and in the context of previous correspondence. Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Saturday, 16 November, 2002 09:26 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: Please define.. > > > >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against > misleading > > conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually > > vigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we > deserve what we > > get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. > Laurier, well said in the latter part; something I also uphold. But I'm > worried about this notion of yours of "misleading conduct". Can you define > that, please? Getting forecasts wrong? Blimey, then every forecasting > agency, especially the BoM will be had up. Having different theories? Then > you forbid new research..Something disprovable? Then that includes all > meterological projections by anyone, which are correlational rather than > causal. "rules of fairness' ..? We don't have an exact science. > Possibly the only fairness would be that anyone who calls another stupid, > or ignorant etc should be barred from the discussion, because the ideas > should be what are under focus, not the personalities. > Would you care to comment on this? > Ken > > > > > >I have no problem with people holding and espousing any > ideas they want > > to; > > > >but when they charge for something that is patently wrong, > disprovable > > and > > > >misleading it goes against the fundamental rules of fairness > that most > > > >societies have developed. > > > > > > > >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against > > misleading > > > >conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually > > > >rigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we > deserve what > we > > > >get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. > > > > > > > >Laurier > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:11:22 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, this is prevarication. You have had an opportunity to support your position and refused it. Those that have eyes to see and minds to reason will have drawn their own conclusions. Until you address my original post rather than answering question with question, there is no point in continuing this conversation. Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Saturday, 16 November, 2002 09:44 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > > > I am still hopeful that you will respond to my original comparisons > between > > your forecasts and what actually happened in the Sydney and Wagga areas. > > Regards > > Laurier > > And I am still hopeful that you will post up some forecasts alongside mine > in future, to make for an even playing field. I have already done enough, > putting out my ideas. With respect, the only ideas you seem to > have come up > with thus far have been how to even further criticise me, in > every single of > your posts. You may enjoy it - I don't. There can be no end to this > bickering. Let's see those forecasts go up and THEN we can all > have a meaty > discussion. > Ken > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > > Sent: Saturday, 16 November, 2002 03:45 > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > > > > > > > Jimmy > > > I have no problem responding to polite requests to explain > myself, and, > > > where possible, errors I make. Where those who are doing the > asking are > > > attached to the BoM or whatever, I would be interested in a > > > similar call for > > > the same response from them, where a forecast I have made tallies > > > with that > > > of the BoM. David Jones is on this list and works for the BoM, so > > > a parallel > > > call to him to explain misforecasts would be welcome. > > > > > > would-be bashers > > > We have already read a post by John Woodbridge, for which I thank him > most > > > sincerely. In case members missed it: > > > ">From my obs at Mt. Crosby cf to Ken's website for Brisbane, Ken has > > > actually > > > been just about spot on since Oct 1st, except for the instance of > > > 12mm which > > > fell two days ago in a forecast 'dry' period. Apart from > that event, in > > > each of his few forecast wet periods, we received some (in > one case just > a > > > trace) rain, and nothing in the dry periods. So that makes Ken > > > right 45 days > > > out of 46 and mostly not needing his "1 day" > > > leeway.." > > > I really don't see the need to comment further, other than to say that > if > > > you think I have been inaccurate in your area then maybe you were > standing > > > in a different place to where my forecasts applied. General-area > > > approaches > > > are what most long range predictions work with, and potentials rather > than > > > actual rain. If it rains in one part of a district and not in > > > another, then > > > clearly the potential is there for that district, but the > rain might not > > > have been be over every nook and cranny of that district. > This is fairly > > > obvious. > > > On the subject of my call for others, especially James, Laurier, > > > Don et all > > > to also put up forecasts before they attack me for mine; in > response to > > > (Laurier)> >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls > > > down, do I > > > have to become a builder to prove them wrong..yes, Laurier, I'm afraid > so. > > > That's the hard part, but the responsibility that goes with > mounting the > > > platform to criticise. You have to demonstrate you can at least > > > do the same > > > only better. Otherwise you could just be anybody off the street > > > and it would > > > be a waste of people's time to have to listen to you. Prove that > > > you have a > > > working knowledge of long range forecasting techniques by > doing it too. > > > Otherwise leave me alone. I'm doing my best - but - just bashing - is > that > > > the best YOU can do? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Jimmy Deguara" > > > To: > > > Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 11:33 AM > > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > > > > > > > > Hi Laurier, > > > > > > > > Interesting you didn't approach my whole e-mail - well can I assume > that > > > > all other aspects of my e-mail you agree with or were you not > interested > > > in > > > > them? One important point you missed that I would like addressed so > that > > > > others can also get involved is to ask those with any criticism to > post > > > > their forecasts or perhaps one that they support more so be > it for the > > > sake > > > > of science or whatever. Then we ALL can have access to a much > > > fairer base > > > > to measure with. It will also become more interesting in my opinion. > > > > > > > > Rather than approaching your comments Laurier each at one time, I > would > > > > like to generalise the theme of the whole e-mail. I do believe your > > > > approach to debate is far healthier than some others and this > > > is what I am > > > > trying to address - I despise the comments where people are called > > > "stupid" > > > > etc. I am also against lengthy posts and usually look forward to > > > > variability of the subjects. I suppose others on the list > can correct > me > > > > kindly on such a note. I stand corrected if I am wrong in assuming > from > > > the > > > > past that lengthy subjects lost a lot of its flavour. > > > > > > > > I also agree that Ken must reply to your genuine and > logical approach > as > > > > the criticism is genuine and fair as well as polite. Though > > > please change > > > > the subject to something more pleasant. > > > > > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > > > > > At 09:39 PM 15/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: > > > > >Jimmy wrote > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Don, Laurier, David etc, > > > > > > > > > > > > This, and related threads have become rather boring, excessive > > > > > > and a total > > > > > > waste of time. > > > > > > > > > >Your opinion, Jimmy, but patently not shared by everyone > on the list. > > > > > > > > > > > You guys have tried time and time again to catch > > > > > > Ken out > > > > > > > > > >And succeeded. > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to hammer anyone do it personally please. > > > > > > > > > >Ken's forecasts are in the public domain, as has been his vocal > support > > > for > > > > >them. so why should any criticism of them have to be private? And I > > > object > > > > >to genuine criticism being characterised as "hammering". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about David Jones, Don White and Laurier Williams and so on > try > > > and > > > > > > state their forecasts for similar periods that Ken does rather > than > > > bash > > > > > > someone else's with statistical crap. > > > > > > > > > >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls down, do > > > I have to > > > > >become a builder to prove them wrong. False logic, Jimmy. > And do you > > > really > > > > >believe that verifying forecast rain by comparing it to actual rain > > > measured > > > > >is "statistical crap"? > > > > > > > > > > > Let's get back to what this list was designed for speaking about > the > > > > > > weather and so on - variation is a key to success. > > > > > > > > > >The list was designed for speaking about all aspects of > the weather, > > > which > > > > >include forecast verification. If your interests lie solely in one > area > > > of > > > > >weather, such as thunderstorms, you have the right and > > > capability to use > > > the > > > > >delete key. > > > > > > > > > > > I would rather see this methodology being used for predictions > > > > > > rather than > > > > > > the gang-up approach. Let people decide for themselves. > > > > > > > > > >Again, why characterise genuine criticism with colourful > > > language -- "the > > > > >gang-up approach." Isn't healthy debate one of the primary reasons > for > > > > >communication devices like this list? Or should we shy away > > > from anything > > > > >approaching intellectual rigour? > > > > > > > > > > > I do understand > > > > > > that there may be a conflict of interest involved here by those > > > > > > involved in > > > > > > commercial activities using this list as a hunting > ground for more > > > > > > business... Let's keep that component out of the picture. > > > > > > > > > > >I agree, but this applies equally to Ken as it does to Don and the > > > Bureau, > > > > >so presumably your criticism is directed even-handedly on > both sides. > I > > > > >should put on the record that my only "commercial" return from > > > meteorology > > > > >is in the supply of data; I do no commercial forecasting > as I believe > I > > > am > > > > >not qualified to do so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jimmy and list: medics, lawyers, architects, builders, broadcasters > and > > > many > > > > >others areas in society cleaned up their professional ethics > > > long ago, as > > > > >did the meteorologists in the US when they brought in an > accreditation > > > > >system for forecasters initiated, I think, by the American > > > Meteorological > > > > >Association. In Australia, accreditation for forecasters has > > > been talked > > > > >about from time to time, but I don't think the industry has > > > the mettle to > > > > >take it on, and the Bureau has been reluctant to press for > > > something that > > > > >would be seen as its own self-interest. > > > > > > > > > >I have no problem with people holding and espousing any ideas they > want > > > to; > > > > >but when they charge for something that is patently wrong, > disprovable > > > and > > > > >misleading it goes against the fundamental rules of fairness that > most > > > > >societies have developed. > > > > > > > > > >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against > > > misleading > > > > >conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually > > > > >rigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we > > > deserve what we > > > > >get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. > > > > > > > > > >Laurier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in > the body of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > > > body of your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:26:22 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: So how about the weather? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com GASP is hinting at the inland NSW/QLD trough reforming after the next change comes through the eastern states mid week... looks like it could be a good start for TDU'ers leaving late next week for a week or 2 chasing! Best of luck to those heading out next week, Jane, Anthony, James Chambers, Clyve, Robert, Dave Ellem. Hope you get some big ones!!! For those that are a bit tired of the Ken emails... there is always the delete key, no need to get pee'd off and post to the list telling everyone. Matt Smith http://www.sydneystormchasers.com (chasing for 2 weeks from Dec 11 with James Harris and Daniel Weatherhead) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: aus-wx: Forecast verification Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:34:46 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Paul wrote: > So how about freedom of opinion and expression reign again - let Don and > Laurier and David do it there way, and Ken do it his. But at least someone > get it right!!!! Spot on, Paul, and I think the list is showing admirable freedom of opinion even if things get a bit heated at times. As to "someone get it right!!!!" -- oh, I wish, I wish. We all know that that will probably never happen, but an openness in discussing successes and failures has to lead in the right direction. Jason raised a point dear to my heart with the accuracy of four-day forecasts. He gave this classic sequence for Melbourne: 1. Saturday(Today) 20 fine, Sunday 30 sunny, Monday 25 sunny, Tuesday 20 overcast(lets follow this day). 2. Sunday 24 sunny, Monday 30 sunny, Tuesday 25 showers(changed). Wednesday(not relevant in this example now) 3. Monday 28 showers, Tuesday 32 sunny(changed). Wednesday(not relevant in this example now), Thursday(not relevant in this example now), 4. Tuesday 20 overcast(see original 4 day forecast!), rest of the days not relevant. So Tuesday's forecast progressively changed from overcast (20) to showers (25), to sunny (32) to overcast (20) as the days clicked over. Wow! This one would give Ken a field day . Seriously, why doesn't anyone, the Bureau included, conduct forecast verification on the plain language components of forecasts. I know it is statistically easier to verify maximum temperatures, or a grid of rainfall amount forecasts, but the forecast that the public reads or hears is made up of descriptive elements, each of which, with care, can be compared to a statement, in the same terms, of what actually happened. Words like "overcast", "showers" and "sunny" have a clearly defined meaning in forecasts (see the BoM glossary), so must have an equally clear meaning if used to describe a day's weather after the event. Are there any statistics wizzards out there that can tell me why performing forecast verification on these, the most important elements in public forecasts, are not being done? On a related issue, the semantics of weather forecasts seems to me to be a little studied area though it should be of immense significance. What does a (statistically reliable) cross-section of the community understand from various forecast elements, and how closely does this match what the forecaster intended. It's an axiom of communication theory that the receiver NEVER fully comprehends the intention of the sender, but to what extent is this a barrier in the daily weather forecast. Laurier Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: So how about the weather? Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:40:20 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com And what is great to see, Matt, is the steady buildup of moisture in the eastern states. If the past few days are anything to go by, the TDU crew could have a good time in N NSW and S Qld, possibly even in Thargomindah. I'm off to Victoria for two weeks holiday, and things are even looking a bit interesting there! Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Matthew Smith > Sent: Saturday, 16 November, 2002 13:26 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: So how about the weather? > > > > GASP is hinting at the inland NSW/QLD trough reforming after the next > change comes through the eastern states mid week... looks like it could > be a good start for TDU'ers leaving late next week for a week or 2 > chasing! > Best of luck to those heading out next week, Jane, Anthony, James > Chambers, Clyve, Robert, Dave Ellem. > Hope you get some big ones!!! > > For those that are a bit tired of the Ken emails... there is always the > delete key, no need to get pee'd off and post to the list telling > everyone. > > Matt Smith > http://www.sydneystormchasers.com > (chasing for 2 weeks from Dec 11 with James Harris and Daniel > Weatherhead) > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Need a forecast. Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:26:19 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Now tomorrow is the first inter-pub cricket match between my local and a neighbouring pub. I know tomorrow in Melbourne is going to be about 33C with a late change. Now if the change comes through during the cricket “match” (i.e. rain) the winner will be the first team who is able to stumble back to the pub. . . .

 

What I want to know, is do I carry an extra six pack to the game- or will it just be additional weight while I’m trying to run back to the pub?

 

Any more accurate info regarding time, would be greatly appreciated as long as the source of that info does not involve lunar phase or sunspot activity J

 

James

 

James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

ph. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

 

Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:29:21 +1100 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I think this has gone far enough. It is time to agree to disagree. Everyone now knows what everyone else thinks. Further argument will not be productive. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Need a forecast. Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:58:50 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I would take a case (or 3), a fold up chair and a big metal cricket bat. then i would sit in the middle of the pitch drinking the beer, and watching the Cg's hit the stragically placed metal bat, not more that 100m away from me...
 
on a serious note, Don't know...haven't looked at what this next system is doing yet...

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 1:26 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Need a forecast.

Now tomorrow is the first inter-pub cricket match between my local and a neighbouring pub. I know tomorrow in Melbourne is going to be about 33C with a late change. Now if the change comes through during the cricket “match” (i.e. rain) the winner will be the first team who is able to stumble back to the pub. . . .

 

What I want to know, is do I carry an extra six pack to the game- or will it just be additional weight while I’m trying to run back to the pub?

 

Any more accurate info regarding time, would be greatly appreciated as long as the source of that info does not involve lunar phase or sunspot activity J

 

James

 

James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

ph. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

 


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 1/11/2002

From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: The lunar theory... Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:11:26 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >snip ...I am quite happy for Ken to make assessments.... what I find objectionable is his inability to accept that his statements are constantly proven to have an accuracy less than chance... Interesting point in this... If Ken's methods based upon lunar theory were completely baseless then you would expect his forecasts to be no better than chance. Conversely, you would expect his forecasts to be no worse than chance. So, if his methods are yielding a forecast for a region which is 'constantly' less accurate than chance, then an effect has been shown albeit the inverse of what was intended, and therefore some credence to the theory must be given. John. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steven Williams" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 07:49:26 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
But Ken, You hav'nt included all those post inwhich i have praised the Met Service.
 
Can I say say ken, you are your own worst enemy. Considering you have a public profile in NZ atleast you
need to do a crash course in public relations...badly.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Ring
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy

Steven.. please remind yourself what you said on the NZ Weather Forum for 3/11/02 and 31/10/02 as below. Some contributors doubted the accuracy of the metservice, and you seemed to put up posts that agreed with their doubts.
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 8:34 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy

It is interesting reading mixed comments on BOM's accuracy. I can report the NZ Meteorological Service was a joke
15 years ago, today there are very rarely wrong. Yes, I am constantly impressed with their accuracy. And no doubt
BOM have gone through a similar transformation. Its a world wide trend...forecasts are much better now than recent
history.
Cheers
Steven W (Auckland)
From: "Steven Williams" To: Subject: aus-wx: snowing to 500m Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:03:25 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Snow falling to about the 500m over the SI this morning.  Christchurch airport reports temp of 3.8C this morning
with continuous rain.  Thats quite wintry for November. On Friday Ch airport recorded 25C.  This weather is so El nino.
The big high that has been dominating the weather of south Australia has been directing cold snaps up onto NZ.
 
 
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:31:58 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Laurier, I agree. I have no wish to further define or defend. My only wish is to compare forecasts. So put them up and I will too. Otherwise I don't want to take part in any more discussions. Nothing personal, but your constant calling for me to satisfy your own narrow asessment parameters is only wasting everyone's time. I've stated where I'm coming from - that's it. Move on, now. Put up the forecasts. Let's take Tazzie. Nice big high coming there, will last till a front moves through on 22nd which won't finally leave till 28th. What d'you reckon? Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 2:11 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > Ken, this is prevarication. You have had an opportunity to support your > position and refused it. Those that have eyes to see and minds to reason > will have drawn their own conclusions. > > Until you address my original post rather than answering question with > question, there is no point in continuing this conversation. > > Laurier > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Saturday, 16 November, 2002 09:44 > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > > > > > > > I am still hopeful that you will respond to my original comparisons > > between > > > your forecasts and what actually happened in the Sydney and Wagga areas. > > > Regards > > > Laurier > > > > And I am still hopeful that you will post up some forecasts alongside mine > > in future, to make for an even playing field. I have already done enough, > > putting out my ideas. With respect, the only ideas you seem to > > have come up > > with thus far have been how to even further criticise me, in > > every single of > > your posts. You may enjoy it - I don't. There can be no end to this > > bickering. Let's see those forecasts go up and THEN we can all > > have a meaty > > discussion. > > Ken > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > > > Sent: Saturday, 16 November, 2002 03:45 > > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > > > > > > > > > > Jimmy > > > > I have no problem responding to polite requests to explain > > myself, and, > > > > where possible, errors I make. Where those who are doing the > > asking are > > > > attached to the BoM or whatever, I would be interested in a > > > > similar call for > > > > the same response from them, where a forecast I have made tallies > > > > with that > > > > of the BoM. David Jones is on this list and works for the BoM, so > > > > a parallel > > > > call to him to explain misforecasts would be welcome. > > > > > > > > would-be bashers > > > > We have already read a post by John Woodbridge, for which I thank him > > most > > > > sincerely. In case members missed it: > > > > ">From my obs at Mt. Crosby cf to Ken's website for Brisbane, Ken has > > > > actually > > > > been just about spot on since Oct 1st, except for the instance of > > > > 12mm which > > > > fell two days ago in a forecast 'dry' period. Apart from > > that event, in > > > > each of his few forecast wet periods, we received some (in > > one case just > > a > > > > trace) rain, and nothing in the dry periods. So that makes Ken > > > > right 45 days > > > > out of 46 and mostly not needing his "1 day" > > > > leeway.." > > > > I really don't see the need to comment further, other than to say that > > if > > > > you think I have been inaccurate in your area then maybe you were > > standing > > > > in a different place to where my forecasts applied. General-area > > > > approaches > > > > are what most long range predictions work with, and potentials rather > > than > > > > actual rain. If it rains in one part of a district and not in > > > > another, then > > > > clearly the potential is there for that district, but the > > rain might not > > > > have been be over every nook and cranny of that district. > > This is fairly > > > > obvious. > > > > On the subject of my call for others, especially James, Laurier, > > > > Don et all > > > > to also put up forecasts before they attack me for mine; in > > response to > > > > (Laurier)> >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls > > > > down, do I > > > > have to become a builder to prove them wrong..yes, Laurier, I'm afraid > > so. > > > > That's the hard part, but the responsibility that goes with > > mounting the > > > > platform to criticise. You have to demonstrate you can at least > > > > do the same > > > > only better. Otherwise you could just be anybody off the street > > > > and it would > > > > be a waste of people's time to have to listen to you. Prove that > > > > you have a > > > > working knowledge of long range forecasting techniques by > > doing it too. > > > > Otherwise leave me alone. I'm doing my best - but - just bashing - is > > that > > > > the best YOU can do? > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Jimmy Deguara" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 11:33 AM > > > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken Bashing - get back to the weather > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Laurier, > > > > > > > > > > Interesting you didn't approach my whole e-mail - well can I assume > > that > > > > > all other aspects of my e-mail you agree with or were you not > > interested > > > > in > > > > > them? One important point you missed that I would like addressed so > > that > > > > > others can also get involved is to ask those with any criticism to > > post > > > > > their forecasts or perhaps one that they support more so be > > it for the > > > > sake > > > > > of science or whatever. Then we ALL can have access to a much > > > > fairer base > > > > > to measure with. It will also become more interesting in my opinion. > > > > > > > > > > Rather than approaching your comments Laurier each at one time, I > > would > > > > > like to generalise the theme of the whole e-mail. I do believe your > > > > > approach to debate is far healthier than some others and this > > > > is what I am > > > > > trying to address - I despise the comments where people are called > > > > "stupid" > > > > > etc. I am also against lengthy posts and usually look forward to > > > > > variability of the subjects. I suppose others on the list > > can correct > > me > > > > > kindly on such a note. I stand corrected if I am wrong in assuming > > from > > > > the > > > > > past that lengthy subjects lost a lot of its flavour. > > > > > > > > > > I also agree that Ken must reply to your genuine and > > logical approach > > as > > > > > the criticism is genuine and fair as well as polite. Though > > > > please change > > > > > the subject to something more pleasant. > > > > > > > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > > > > > > > At 09:39 PM 15/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: > > > > > >Jimmy wrote > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Don, Laurier, David etc, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This, and related threads have become rather boring, excessive > > > > > > > and a total > > > > > > > waste of time. > > > > > > > > > > > >Your opinion, Jimmy, but patently not shared by everyone > > on the list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > You guys have tried time and time again to catch > > > > > > > Ken out > > > > > > > > > > > >And succeeded. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to hammer anyone do it personally please. > > > > > > > > > > > >Ken's forecasts are in the public domain, as has been his vocal > > support > > > > for > > > > > >them. so why should any criticism of them have to be private? And I > > > > object > > > > > >to genuine criticism being characterised as "hammering". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about David Jones, Don White and Laurier Williams and so on > > try > > > > and > > > > > > > state their forecasts for similar periods that Ken does rather > > than > > > > bash > > > > > > > someone else's with statistical crap. > > > > > > > > > > > >If a builder puts up a shoddy house that partly falls down, do > > > > I have to > > > > > >become a builder to prove them wrong. False logic, Jimmy. > > And do you > > > > really > > > > > >believe that verifying forecast rain by comparing it to actual rain > > > > measured > > > > > >is "statistical crap"? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's get back to what this list was designed for speaking about > > the > > > > > > > weather and so on - variation is a key to success. > > > > > > > > > > > >The list was designed for speaking about all aspects of > > the weather, > > > > which > > > > > >include forecast verification. If your interests lie solely in one > > area > > > > of > > > > > >weather, such as thunderstorms, you have the right and > > > > capability to use > > > > the > > > > > >delete key. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would rather see this methodology being used for predictions > > > > > > > rather than > > > > > > > the gang-up approach. Let people decide for themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > >Again, why characterise genuine criticism with colourful > > > > language -- "the > > > > > >gang-up approach." Isn't healthy debate one of the primary reasons > > for > > > > > >communication devices like this list? Or should we shy away > > > > from anything > > > > > >approaching intellectual rigour? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do understand > > > > > > > that there may be a conflict of interest involved here by those > > > > > > > involved in > > > > > > > commercial activities using this list as a hunting > > ground for more > > > > > > > business... Let's keep that component out of the picture. > > > > > > > > > > > > >I agree, but this applies equally to Ken as it does to Don and the > > > > Bureau, > > > > > >so presumably your criticism is directed even-handedly on > > both sides. > > I > > > > > >should put on the record that my only "commercial" return from > > > > meteorology > > > > > >is in the supply of data; I do no commercial forecasting > > as I believe > > I > > > > am > > > > > >not qualified to do so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jimmy and list: medics, lawyers, architects, builders, broadcasters > > and > > > > many > > > > > >others areas in society cleaned up their professional ethics > > > > long ago, as > > > > > >did the meteorologists in the US when they brought in an > > accreditation > > > > > >system for forecasters initiated, I think, by the American > > > > Meteorological > > > > > >Association. In Australia, accreditation for forecasters has > > > > been talked > > > > > >about from time to time, but I don't think the industry has > > > > the mettle to > > > > > >take it on, and the Bureau has been reluctant to press for > > > > something that > > > > > >would be seen as its own self-interest. > > > > > > > > > > > >I have no problem with people holding and espousing any ideas they > > want > > > > to; > > > > > >but when they charge for something that is patently wrong, > > disprovable > > > > and > > > > > >misleading it goes against the fundamental rules of fairness that > > most > > > > > >societies have developed. > > > > > > > > > > > >If a society isn't prepared to self-regulate or legislate against > > > > misleading > > > > > >conduct like this, the only alternative is a healty, intellectually > > > > > >rigourous debate. If we shy away even from the debate, we > > > > deserve what we > > > > > >get. This list is a perfectly suitable location for such a debate. > > > > > > > > > > > >Laurier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in > > the body of > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > > > > body of your > > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > > body of your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: The lunar theory... Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:44:34 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That's exactly why I don't try to debate this. The whole RNG thread a while back was like the police holding their own inquiries into corruption charges. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 4:11 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: The lunar theory... > >snip > ...I am quite happy for Ken to make assessments.... what I find > objectionable is his inability to accept that his statements are > constantly proven to have an accuracy less than chance... > > Interesting point in this... If Ken's methods based upon lunar theory were > completely baseless then you would expect his forecasts to be no better than > chance. Conversely, you would expect his forecasts to be no worse than > chance. > > So, if his methods are yielding a forecast for a region which is > 'constantly' less accurate than chance, then an effect has been shown albeit > the inverse of what was intended, and therefore some credence to the theory > must be given. > > John. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: snowing to 500m Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:03:03 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
> (Steven wrote)This weather is so El nino. The big high that has been dominating the weather of south Australia has been directing cold snaps up onto NZ.
Hmm..a while back there were claims that the high over Australia was causing a high here!
I think it's more likely that the cold snaps here have been because the moon turned from its southerly declination on the 9th and is presently dragging polar air northwards. It happens every November, when the new Moon coincides with the southern declination and the air tide is bigger than normal, especially as lunar perigee occurred as well just a day before. You'll find unseasonal frosts at this time have destroyed grape crops in the Hawkes Bay for the last few years. If not a frost then much rain. This last lot of rain both here and in the SE of Australia is in my opinion due to that. Last year the SD was on Nov.19th. Strong winds and heavy rain lashed NSW and Premier Bob Carr declared metropolitan Sydney a disaster area.
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:25:33 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
No, but that wasn't under discussion. I was merely pointing out that your past comments have been mixed, in response to your current claim that the metservice is "rarely wrong". Your words, not mine. There have been times when I, too, have praised them. But already others have said that it depends who's on duty as to how accurate they seem to get.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy

But Ken, You hav'nt included all those post inwhich i have praised the Met Service.
 
Can I say say ken, you are your own worst enemy. Considering you have a public profile in NZ atleast you
need to do a crash course in public relations...badly.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Ring
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy

Steven.. please remind yourself what you said on the NZ Weather Forum for 3/11/02 and 31/10/02 as below. Some contributors doubted the accuracy of the metservice, and you seemed to put up posts that agreed with their doubts.
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 8:34 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Forecast accuracy

It is interesting reading mixed comments on BOM's accuracy. I can report the NZ Meteorological Service was a joke
15 years ago, today there are very rarely wrong. Yes, I am constantly impressed with their accuracy. And no doubt
BOM have gone through a similar transformation. Its a world wide trend...forecasts are much better now than recent
history.
Cheers
Steven W (Auckland)
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: WAZ UP IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:09:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Can you explain to me what rain is :-))
Next time it rains my kids will start crying because they wont know what it is...
----- Original Message -----
From: macdonald
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 9:14 PM
Subject: aus-wx: WAZ UP IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS

Hi Everyone
What a beautiful cool day with cloudy cover and fresh south easterlies... The grass is already greening, and Victor will be venturing from his shed after months of inactivity...hehe
 
Last 3 days have brought the best rain for a while.
13th min 18.5 max 31.0, 8pm ( duration around 20mins)... a thunderstorm with heavy rain, lots of thunder and lightning. 25.5mm
15th min 20.5 max 29.2, 1pm - thunderstorm with heavy rain, really loud lightning/thunder...(deeper bass than my Vagas Gerwin 15inche speakers pumping out thunderstuck), and 37.5mm.
Rainfall so far for 2002 is 588mm.
 
cheers
Sam
From: "macdonald" To: Subject: aus-wx: WAZ UP IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:10:14 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hey Bussy,
It must be so dry down your way in n/e Victoria. Bathurst looks really dry and brown... still 588mm is very very low for here. Your poor kids are gonna get a terrible shock when they see water falling from the sky.. hehehe....just tell them someone in heaven is crying.. :))
cheers
Sam
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:14:44 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aussie Weather Subject: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. Som,eone mentioned the need to look into what "Joe public" underrstands about weather forecasts and the ned to communicate. This need varies, depending on who you are communicating with. Consider terms such as fine,dry, mostly sunny, partly cloudy, partly sunny, a shower or two, a few showers, occasional showers, ioslated showers, scattered showers, rain at times, rain periods.....the list goes on. All are unse by the BOM at various times. To the wetaher professional, all have slightly different means and a good forecast will pich the most appropriate. Then we have tempertaure words - cold, cool mild warm, very warm, hot, very hot - obviously in public weather forecasts these are issued in terms of the average. What might be warm in Winter could be cool in summer etc. Then there's worlds like chance and risk when referring to summer storm and so on. From my experience, the public latches onto a word. A forecast such as "Tomorrow will be mainly fine and very warm with the chance of an afternoon thunderstorm" is interpreted by the public as it's gonig to rain tomorrow. Any mention of a precipitation word is often translated like this. I prepare foerecats for a range of business - ranging from rural,to building industry to film and advertising - who all have their specific needs which are different to those of the general public and consequently world of assessment are different. The use of probability forecasts allows them to use the additional information provided to make professional judgements in their own areas of expertise. Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher officiendo is entitled to get upset but "joe public" knows what is meant. It is our job to educate and communicate. Don White excuse typos - rushed this. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:08:07 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
lol, good to see you add to the mayhem glen.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Saturday, 16 November 2002 11:21:22 PM
Subject: RE: aus-wx: Ken's forecast accuracy
 
I thought this email list was for weather and weather opinions.......for
F%$K sake, get over it. Man some of you must not have a life or any other
problems to keep this garbage up. Ken gave an opinion, whether it is right
or wrong.....I thought that was what this was about, not bitching at
everyone. This list used to have some good content but I am gradually
growing tired of the bullshit. Grow a life some of you and get some real
problems, something worth winging about.



+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP9.gif: 00000001,5dd298a1,00000000,00000000 From: "Steven Williams" To: Subject: aus-wx: Heavy snow warning for North island Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 13:11:26 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Meteorological service issued a heavy snow warning for the Central North island today
 

Severe Weather Warning

Issued by MetService at 10:55am 17-Nov-2002

HEAVY SNOW EXPECTED FOR CENTRAL NORTH ISLAND 
Snow is falling around the central plateau area, and forecasters
expect further falls through to Monday morning.
In the 24 hours from 11am Sunday to 11am Monday, 10-15cm is expected
to fall near the top of the Desert Road, with lighter falls down to
700 metres. The heaviest falls are expected to occur between 11am and
5pm Sunday.
The snow is also likely to affect the Napier-Taupo Road. 
 
 
From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:51:20 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher > officiendo is entitled to get upset but "joe public" knows what is > meant. It is our job to educate and communicate What a load of crap! So what your saying is that just because I like to read this list then I'm not a "joe public" anymore? I'm not a "weather officiendo" or connected to the BoM in anyway. I have enough on my plate just to understand a fraction of the things you guys get talking about on this list but one thing I do know & what most members of the "joe public" brigade know also - there is NO such thing as a "mini tornado" & everybody get a bit of a laugh out of it. Just the other week here in Adelaide the local paper, "The Advertiser", had a weather forecast saying the we could expect "thunder showers" - what the??? You say it's your job to "educate and communicate" - well do that. But stop using make believe terms or the next event maybe blamed on the Toothfairy or Easterbunny. :P "joe public" is not a dumb as you think Don. ahh... now I feel better... lol Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don White" To: "Aussie Weather" Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:44 AM Subject: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions > Hi all. > Som,eone mentioned the need to look into what "Joe public" underrstands > about weather forecasts and the ned to communicate. > This need varies, depending on who you are communicating with. > Consider terms such as fine,dry, mostly sunny, partly cloudy, partly > sunny, a shower or two, a few showers, occasional showers, ioslated > showers, scattered showers, rain at times, rain periods.....the list > goes on. All are unse by the BOM at various times. To the wetaher > professional, all have slightly different means and a good forecast will > pich the most appropriate. > Then we have tempertaure words - cold, cool mild warm, very warm, hot, > very hot - obviously in public weather forecasts these are issued in > terms of the average. What might be warm in Winter could be cool in > summer etc. > Then there's worlds like chance and risk when referring to summer storm > and so on. > > From my experience, the public latches onto a word. > A forecast such as "Tomorrow will be mainly fine and very warm with the > chance of an afternoon thunderstorm" is interpreted by the public as > it's gonig to rain tomorrow. > Any mention of a precipitation word is often translated like this. > > I prepare foerecats for a range of business - ranging from rural,to > building industry to film and advertising - who all have their specific > needs which are different to those of the general public and > consequently world of assessment are different. > The use of probability forecasts allows them to use the additional > information provided to make professional judgements in their own areas > of expertise. > > Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher > officiendo is entitled to get upset but "joe public" knows what is > meant. It is our job to educate and communicate. > > Don White > excuse typos - rushed this. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Probably obvious Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 17:50:50 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Probably pretty obvious but how do they work out the UV index?
Today being cloudy got me wondering as of course you can still get badly burnt on a cloudy day.
Can I work it out from here?
Thanks.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: WAZ UP IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 18:10:21 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Average about 640mm per year. Currently "stuck" on 300.2mm. Maybe we'll get the other 340mm next month :-))
----- Original Message -----
From: macdonald
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 9:10 AM
Subject: aus-wx: WAZ UP IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS

Hey Bussy,
It must be so dry down your way in n/e Victoria. Bathurst looks really dry and brown... still 588mm is very very low for here. Your poor kids are gonna get a terrible shock when they see water falling from the sky.. hehehe....just tell them someone in heaven is crying.. :))
cheers
Sam
From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: So how about the weather? Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 22:07:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yes, I wish I could join the chase, but alas young children and chasing away from home do not mix ( unless you want a divorce ). I may be able to get away for a weekend. I have limited Internet access at work, the BOM site only, so any chasers that need a radar fix can ring between 9am and 5pm on 02 4252 6135. Thanks Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Smith" To: Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 12:26 AM Subject: aus-wx: So how about the weather? > > GASP is hinting at the inland NSW/QLD trough reforming after the next > change comes through the eastern states mid week... looks like it could > be a good start for TDU'ers leaving late next week for a week or 2 > chasing! > Best of luck to those heading out next week, Jane, Anthony, James > Chambers, Clyve, Robert, Dave Ellem. > Hope you get some big ones!!! > > For those that are a bit tired of the Ken emails... there is always the > delete key, no need to get pee'd off and post to the list telling > everyone. > > Matt Smith > http://www.sydneystormchasers.com > (chasing for 2 weeks from Dec 11 with James Harris and Daniel > Weatherhead) > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:02:35 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Paul I think what takes the cake for me is "negative storm surges" which are supposed to explain why the tide is sometimes lower than normal (post of 13/11/02). Last June we had a "rain bomb". Seems like there's some guy in a metoffice dreaming up new words to educate everybody with. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stargazer" To: Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 7:21 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions > > Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher > > officiendo is entitled to get upset but "joe public" knows what is > > meant. It is our job to educate and communicate > > What a load of crap! > So what your saying is that just because I like to read this list then I'm > not a "joe public" anymore? > I'm not a "weather officiendo" or connected to the BoM in anyway. I have > enough on my plate just to understand a fraction of the things you guys get > talking about on this list but one thing I do know & what most members of > the "joe public" brigade know also - there is NO such thing as a "mini > tornado" & everybody get a bit of a laugh out of it. Just the other week > here in Adelaide the local paper, "The Advertiser", had a weather forecast > saying the we could expect "thunder showers" - what the??? > You say it's your job to "educate and communicate" - well do that. But stop > using make believe terms or the next event maybe blamed on the Toothfairy or > Easterbunny. :P > > "joe public" is not a dumb as you think Don. > > ahh... now I feel better... lol > > Regs. Paul. > (Stargazer) > http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don White" > To: "Aussie Weather" > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:44 AM > Subject: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions > > > > Hi all. > > Som,eone mentioned the need to look into what "Joe public" underrstands > > about weather forecasts and the ned to communicate. > > This need varies, depending on who you are communicating with. > > Consider terms such as fine,dry, mostly sunny, partly cloudy, partly > > sunny, a shower or two, a few showers, occasional showers, ioslated > > showers, scattered showers, rain at times, rain periods.....the list > > goes on. All are unse by the BOM at various times. To the wetaher > > professional, all have slightly different means and a good forecast will > > pich the most appropriate. > > Then we have tempertaure words - cold, cool mild warm, very warm, hot, > > very hot - obviously in public weather forecasts these are issued in > > terms of the average. What might be warm in Winter could be cool in > > summer etc. > > Then there's worlds like chance and risk when referring to summer storm > > and so on. > > > > From my experience, the public latches onto a word. > > A forecast such as "Tomorrow will be mainly fine and very warm with the > > chance of an afternoon thunderstorm" is interpreted by the public as > > it's gonig to rain tomorrow. > > Any mention of a precipitation word is often translated like this. > > > > I prepare foerecats for a range of business - ranging from rural,to > > building industry to film and advertising - who all have their specific > > needs which are different to those of the general public and > > consequently world of assessment are different. > > The use of probability forecasts allows them to use the additional > > information provided to make professional judgements in their own areas > > of expertise. > > > > Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher > > officiendo is entitled to get upset but "joe public" knows what is > > meant. It is our job to educate and communicate. > > > > Don White > > excuse typos - rushed this. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:08:42 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'd say 24th-28th we'll see more rain potential for Sydney. Anyone else like to either agree or predict something different? Ken Ring ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Thompson" To: Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:52 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? > If I remember rightly there was some rain forecast for Sydney by you earlier > this month ? > > To be fair that first rain forecast came close, but surface conditions did > not marry up with unstable upper air - the result nothing. Since July to > present in Shellharbour we have had just over 20mm of rain. This month has > had several 0.2mm falls, but hardly a 1mm on total yet. > > Michael > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:58 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? > > > > >From my website > > .."Sydney sees rain.... between 16th-21st..." > > One would have to say, with my give or take 24 hrs, that this is now > looking > > likely. > > Ken > > > > 14/11/02 "ABC News > > A cloudband crosses northern and eastern Australia ahead of a trough, > > causing isolated showers and storms in the NT, QLD and NSW > > New South Wales > > Sydney > > Late shower". > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Richard Modistach > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:48 AM > > Subject: aus-wx: uh-oh! > > > > > > here we go again, still, aus-wx has been a bit quiet latley. > > > > richard > > > > -------Original Message------- > > > > From: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Date: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 11:11:51 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: More sea science > > > > Must bite tounge . . . must . . . . noooooooo LOL- keep fishing ken J > > > > James Holbeach > > -------------------------------- > > Trapdoor Ski Club > > Mt. Hotham, Australia > > ph. 0417 553 757 > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > > -------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 8:30 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: aus-wx: More sea science > > > > "..Sand from Waitemata Harbour is being considered to restore a North > Shore > > beach because local Maori object to sand from the Coromandel. A Ngati > Whatua > > representative said the Coromandel sand was unacceptable because it > included > > elements of blood and bone from another tribe's area. > > > http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004042&thesection=news&t > > hesubsection=general > > So in this country, tribe's blood doesn't get dissolved in water and some > > can tell sand and tiny bits of bone one beach from another only 50 miles > > away. Incredible. But then, some can also detect a sealevel rise of 1mm > per > > year, which is what NIWA scientists did in 1999 at Lyttleton, a study well > > publicised at the time. On a constantly undulating sea, coming in and out > ea > > ch day, 1mm is amazing. It just shows you how clever NZers are. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Steven Williams > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges > > > > South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea > > levels dropped by 0.5m. > > Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ. Story > here > > if anybody is interested. > > > > > http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004050&thesection=news&t > > hesubsection=general > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > > IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: s355334 at student.uq.edu.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 22:09:57 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Leslie Muir Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm gonna say more like the 25-29th some more potential rain for Sydney At 10:08 PM 17/11/2002, you wrote: >I'd say 24th-28th we'll see more rain potential for Sydney. Anyone else like >to either agree or predict something different? >Ken Ring > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Michael Thompson" >To: >Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:52 PM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? > > > > If I remember rightly there was some rain forecast for Sydney by you >earlier > > this month ? > > > > To be fair that first rain forecast came close, but surface conditions did > > not marry up with unstable upper air - the result nothing. Since July to > > present in Shellharbour we have had just over 20mm of rain. This month has > > had several 0.2mm falls, but hardly a 1mm on total yet. > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ken Ring" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:58 AM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? > > > > > > > >From my website > > > .."Sydney sees rain.... between 16th-21st..." > > > One would have to say, with my give or take 24 hrs, that this is now > > looking > > > likely. > > > Ken > > > > > > 14/11/02 "ABC News > > > A cloudband crosses northern and eastern Australia ahead of a trough, > > > causing isolated showers and storms in the NT, QLD and NSW > > > New South Wales > > > Sydney > > > Late shower". > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Richard Modistach > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:48 AM > > > Subject: aus-wx: uh-oh! > > > > > > > > > here we go again, still, aus-wx has been a bit quiet latley. > > > > > > richard > > > > > > -------Original Message------- > > > > > > From: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Date: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 11:11:51 PM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: More sea science > > > > > > Must bite tounge . . . must . . . . noooooooo LOL- keep fishing ken J > > > > > > James Holbeach > > > -------------------------------- > > > Trapdoor Ski Club > > > Mt. Hotham, Australia > > > ph. 0417 553 757 > > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > > > -------------------------------- > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > > Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 8:30 PM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: aus-wx: More sea science > > > > > > "..Sand from Waitemata Harbour is being considered to restore a North > > Shore > > > beach because local Maori object to sand from the Coromandel. A Ngati > > Whatua > > > representative said the Coromandel sand was unacceptable because it > > included > > > elements of blood and bone from another tribe's area. > > > > > >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004042&thesection=news&t > > > hesubsection=general > > > So in this country, tribe's blood doesn't get dissolved in water and >some > > > can tell sand and tiny bits of bone one beach from another only 50 miles > > > away. Incredible. But then, some can also detect a sealevel rise of 1mm > > per > > > year, which is what NIWA scientists did in 1999 at Lyttleton, a study >well > > > publicised at the time. On a constantly undulating sea, coming in and >out > > ea > > > ch day, 1mm is amazing. It just shows you how clever NZers are. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Steven Williams > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 PM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges > > > > > > South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea > > > levels dropped by 0.5m. > > > Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ. Story > > here > > > if anybody is interested. > > > > > > > > >http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004050&thesection=news&t > > > hesubsection=general > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > > > IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: aus-wx: Drought in Illawarra -photos Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:10:10 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Nov 2002 12:07:22.0888 (UTC) FILETIME=[E2C4B880:01C28E31] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Took some pictures of Lake Illawarra today, they speak for themselves. Also dying trees near Oak Flats. http://ozthunder.com/temp/drought.htm Michael --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: aus-wx: Drought in Illawarra -photos Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:10:10 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Nov 2002 12:07:22.0888 (UTC) FILETIME=[E2C4B880:01C28E31] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Took some pictures of Lake Illawarra today, they speak for themselves. Also dying trees near Oak Flats. http://ozthunder.com/temp/drought.htm Michael --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:22:48 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
the advance models are showing intensification of moisture infeed through ne and central wa and north and east nt.
this week has got a feeder from that pushing across central and northern sa and into vic and nsw contracting to ne nsw later in the week.
it appears there will be an intermittant break over next weekend and early next week.
what happens next week is open for discussion but imo the feeder will return only deeper, possible exiting times ahead.
it may not happen but the possibility is in a state of enhancement atm
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Sunday, 17 November 2002 10:50:26 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming?
 
I'm gonna say more like the 25-29th
some more potential rain for Sydney


At 10:08 PM 17/11/2002, you wrote:
>I'd say 24th-28th we'll see more rain potential for Sydney. Anyone else like
>to either agree or predict something different?
>Ken Ring
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Michael Thompson" <thunder at ozthunder.com>
>To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
>Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:52 PM
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming?
>
>
> > If I remember rightly there was some rain forecast for Sydney by you
>earlier
> > this month ?
> >
> > To be fair that first rain forecast came close, but surface conditions did
> > not marry up with unstable upper air - the result nothing. Since July to
> > present in Shellharbour we have had just over 20mm of rain. This month has
> > had several 0.2mm falls, but hardly a 1mm on total yet.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ken Ring" <ken at weatherman.co.nz>
> > To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: aus-wx: good rain coming?
> >
> >
> > > >From my website
> > > .."Sydney sees rain.... between 16th-21st..."
> > > One would have to say, with my give or take 24 hrs, that this is now
> > looking
> > > likely.
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > 14/11/02 "ABC News
> > > A cloudband crosses northern and eastern Australia ahead of a trough,
> > > causing isolated showers and storms in the NT, QLD and NSRe aus-wx good rain coming.ems W
> > > New South Wales
> > > Sydney
> > > Late shower".
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Richard Modistach
> > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:48 AM
> > > Subject: aus-wx: uh-oh!
> > >
> > >
> > > here we go again, still, aus-wx has been a bit quiet latley.
> > >
> > > richard
> > >
> > > -------Original Message-------
> > >
> > > From: aussie-weather at world.std.com
> > > Date: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 11:11:51 PM
> > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
> > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: More sea science
> > >
> > > Must bite tounge . . . must . . . . noooooooo LOL- keep fishing ken J
> > >
> > > James Holbeach
> > > --------------------------------
> > > Trapdoor Ski Club
> > > Mt. Hotham, Australia
> > > ph. 0417 553 757
> > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au
> > > --------------------------------
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com
> > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 8:30 PM
> > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
> > > Subject: aus-wx: More sea science
> > >
> > > "..Sand from Waitemata HRe aus-wx good rain coming.ems arbour is being considered to restore a North
> > Shore
> > > beach because local Maori object to sand from the Coromandel. A Ngati
> > Whatua
> > > representative said the Coromandel sand was unacceptable because it
> > included
> > > elements of blood and bone from another tribe's area.
> > >
> >
>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004042&thesection=news&t
> > > hesubsection=general
> > > So in this country, tribe's blood doesn't get dissolved in water and
>some
> > > can tell sand and tiny bits of bone one beach from another only 50 miles
> > > away. Incredible. But then, some can also detect a sealevel rise of 1mm
> > per
> > > year, which is what NIWA scientists did in 1999 at Lyttleton, a study
>well
> > > publicised at the time. On a constantly undulating sea, coming in and
>out
> > ea
> > > ch day, 1mm is amazing. It just shows you how clever NZers are.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Steven Williams
> > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 PM
> > > Subject: aus-wx: Negative storm surges
> > >
> > > South island experienced two negative storm surges last winter when sea
> > > levels dropped by 0.5m.
> > > Deep lows to the south of the country sucked water away from NZ. Story
> > here
> > > if anybody is interested.
> > >
> > >
> >
>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3004050&tRe aus-wx good rain coming.ems hesection=news&t
> > > hesubsection=general
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________
> > > IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
> > >
> > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
> > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail
>to:majordomo at world.std.com
> > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
>your
> > > message.
> > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02
> >
> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> > message.
> > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP10.gif: 00000001,0d1984af,00000000,00000000 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 05:50:53 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Stargazer.. The fact that you are on this list means you have an interest in weather. You obviously don't deal with many people who aren't at all interested in the wetaher other than what it will be tomorrow. The first question I get asked is often as basic as the difference between rain and showers. Do you know the difference or the difference between "a few"or "scattered"or öccasional"or "isolated". It is you who used the word dumb for Joe Public... I donm't believe that - just that many - especially farmers etc want to know more but we can't leave that to people like you. And, why know call a small torndado a mini ? And there are plenty of them Cheeers, Don Stargazer wrote: > > > Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher > > officiendo is entitled to get upset but "joe public" knows what is > > meant. It is our job to educate and communicate > > What a load of crap! > So what your saying is that just because I like to read this list then I'm > not a "joe public" anymore? > I'm not a "weather officiendo" or connected to the BoM in anyway. I have > enough on my plate just to understand a fraction of the things you guys get > talking about on this list but one thing I do know & what most members of > the "joe public" brigade know also - there is NO such thing as a "mini > tornado" & everybody get a bit of a laugh out of it. Just the other week > here in Adelaide the local paper, "The Advertiser", had a weather forecast > saying the we could expect "thunder showers" - what the??? > You say it's your job to "educate and communicate" - well do that. But stop > using make believe terms or the next event maybe blamed on the Toothfairy or > Easterbunny. :P > > "joe public" is not a dumb as you think Don. > > ahh... now I feel better... lol > > Regs. Paul. > (Stargazer) > http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don White" > To: "Aussie Weather" > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:44 AM > Subject: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions > > > Hi all. > > Som,eone mentioned the need to look into what "Joe public" underrstands > > about weather forecasts and the ned to communicate. > > This need varies, depending on who you are communicating with. > > Consider terms such as fine,dry, mostly sunny, partly cloudy, partly > > sunny, a shower or two, a few showers, occasional showers, ioslated > > showers, scattered showers, rain at times, rain periods.....the list > > goes on. All are unse by the BOM at various times. To the wetaher > > professional, all have slightly different means and a good forecast will > > pich the most appropriate. > > Then we have tempertaure words - cold, cool mild warm, very warm, hot, > > very hot - obviously in public weather forecasts these are issued in > > terms of the average. What might be warm in Winter could be cool in > > summer etc. > > Then there's worlds like chance and risk when referring to summer storm > > and so on. > > > > From my experience, the public latches onto a word. > > A forecast such as "Tomorrow will be mainly fine and very warm with the > > chance of an afternoon thunderstorm" is interpreted by the public as > > it's gonig to rain tomorrow. > > Any mention of a precipitation word is often translated like this. > > > > I prepare foerecats for a range of business - ranging from rural,to > > building industry to film and advertising - who all have their specific > > needs which are different to those of the general public and > > consequently world of assessment are different. > > The use of probability forecasts allows them to use the additional > > information provided to make professional judgements in their own areas > > of expertise. > > > > Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher > > officiendo is entitled to get upset but "joe public" knows what is > > meant. It is our job to educate and communicate. > > > > Don White > > excuse typos - rushed this. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Mark Hardy" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 08:55:21 +1100 Organization: The Weather Company X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com "Thunder shower" and "thundery shower" and terms commonly used by the Bureau of Met to describe a weak thunderstorm. Mark Hardy The Weather Company Pty. Ltd. http://www.theweather.com.au -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Stargazer Sent: Sunday, 17 November 2002 5:21 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions > Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher > officiendo is entitled to get upset but "joe public" knows what is > meant. It is our job to educate and communicate What a load of crap! So what your saying is that just because I like to read this list then I'm not a "joe public" anymore? I'm not a "weather officiendo" or connected to the BoM in anyway. I have enough on my plate just to understand a fraction of the things you guys get talking about on this list but one thing I do know & what most members of the "joe public" brigade know also - there is NO such thing as a "mini tornado" & everybody get a bit of a laugh out of it. Just the other week here in Adelaide the local paper, "The Advertiser", had a weather forecast saying the we could expect "thunder showers" - what the??? You say it's your job to "educate and communicate" - well do that. But stop using make believe terms or the next event maybe blamed on the Toothfairy or Easterbunny. :P "joe public" is not a dumb as you think Don. ahh... now I feel better... lol Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don White" To: "Aussie Weather" Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 8:44 AM Subject: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions > Hi all. > Som,eone mentioned the need to look into what "Joe public" > underrstands about weather forecasts and the ned to communicate. This > need varies, depending on who you are communicating with. Consider > terms such as fine,dry, mostly sunny, partly cloudy, partly sunny, a > shower or two, a few showers, occasional showers, ioslated showers, > scattered showers, rain at times, rain periods.....the list goes on. > All are unse by the BOM at various times. To the wetaher professional, > all have slightly different means and a good forecast will pich the > most appropriate. Then we have tempertaure words - cold, cool mild > warm, very warm, hot, very hot - obviously in public weather forecasts > these are issued in terms of the average. What might be warm in Winter > could be cool in summer etc. > Then there's worlds like chance and risk when referring to summer storm > and so on. > > From my experience, the public latches onto a word. > A forecast such as "Tomorrow will be mainly fine and very warm with > the chance of an afternoon thunderstorm" is interpreted by the public > as it's gonig to rain tomorrow. Any mention of a precipitation word is > often translated like this. > > I prepare foerecats for a range of business - ranging from rural,to > building industry to film and advertising - who all have their > specific needs which are different to those of the general public and > consequently world of assessment are different. The use of probability > forecasts allows them to use the additional information provided to > make professional judgements in their own areas of expertise. > > Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher > officiendo is entitled to get upset but "joe public" knows what is > meant. It is our job to educate and communicate. > > Don White > excuse typos - rushed this. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:05:12 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Most common version of this in BNE, is "showers with local thunder" (Whenever I hear this I have a fleeting impression of thunder sounds coming out of next doors back yard, lol). But I think it is one thing to use terms defined by the BoM, and quite another to use terms perpetuated by the media in ignorance. Now what a 'wetaher' is, I do not know..., sounds suspiciously like a Kiwi term. ("A wetaher ripped through Aukland yesterday..." or maybe it is just some kind of roach??) John. >snip "Thunder shower" and "thundery shower" and terms commonly used by the Bureau of Met to describe a weak thunderstorm. >snip Many of this list get worked up by the word "mini tornado" - a wetaher +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: cold in Sweden To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:19:30 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > Hi all, > > A bit of snow in Stockholm in the last 2 days also down to -10c last night > and max temp today about -5c or so. > > To those that have records: > > In Sweden there has hardly been any precipitation since last March / April. > The odd storm in summer. > > Can anyone find records if Sweden suffered a similar dry spell at the same > time OZ did in 82/83 ? > I couldn't find (easily) any current rainfall data from Sweden, but could from Finland; Helsinki has had 281mm of rain since the beginning of March, which is about 60% of normal for the 8 1/2 month period. By European standards this is a big departure from normal over such an extended period. In 1982 Stockholm was drier than normal (although only by about 10%), and Helsinki was near normal (although that was, in part, due to a very wet November). I'm not aware of any known connections between El Nino and Scandinavian weather, although a connection has been suggested between it and heavy central European summer rains. As flood rains in central Europe are often associated with blocking high pressure over Scandinavia that hints at a possible El Nino influence further north, but I haven't seen that tested in any rigorous sense. (For what it's worth, the summers of 1994 and 1997, particularly 1994, were hot and dry in Scandinavia. I remember this well because I was in Sweden and Norway in July-August 1994 and arrived in Stockholm to a succession of mid-30s days - not something they're used to! Stockholm is full of lakes and they were certainly getting plenty of use...) As some of you would have seen in the news in the last 24 hours, there has been severe flooding in the Swiss Alps, as well as northern Scotland (presumably from two different systems). Unlike the August event, the southern side of the Alps seem to have copped the brunt of it this time, with reports of 48-hour totals in the 400-500mm range near the Swiss-Italian border. Extreme short-period rainfall is quite common in this area - with the combination of topography and copious available water from the still-warm Mediterranean - but 400 is getting up there. (Once again, August 1994 provided some personal fact-finding in this respect :-) Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: hitler? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:22:52 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:11:21 +1300 > >From: "Ken Ring" > >Subject: aus-wx: Ouch > > > >> Until this industry gets rid of people like you, the > >> > repsect for weather forecasting will be hald back > >> > Don White > > > >This is very disturbing comment. It has shades of Klu Klux Klan and > >Hitler'sGermany. > > Ken how can you possibly claim that calling for accountability in an > industry is like Hitler's Germany? Just as in a modern society we require > engineers to be trained and demonstrate their skills, doctors to be trained > and demonstrate their skills, etc etc., so too it should be with > professional meteorologist - this is not censoring - it is what makes a > modern society. Until such time as you can unambiguously demonstrate skill > in your forecasts you should not be allowed to practice. Further you should > not be able to practice unless you demonstrate professional competency. I don't know how familiar readers of this list are with Godwin's Law. This is a newsgroup convention which states that, once Hitler is mentioned in any discussion thread, then the thread should be considered closed, since further intelligent discussion is no longer possible. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: im back To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:32:36 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C28690.102EA460 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > HI All,=20 > > Been away for awhile.. tore achillies tendon. Off work for 5 weeks, = > slowly healing back. Sick and tired of walking on crutches.. plaster off = > next Wed.=20 > Hope the recovery is going well. I can sympathise; I've had an operation myself a couple of weeks ago for a calf muscle problem (which is why I've been very quiet recently). Off the crutches on the weekend and gradually shuffling faster.... Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne convection Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:35:12 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Afternoon all, Convection has started up west and southwest of Melbourne south of the ranges - middle level, but there are a couple of tops trying hard to glaciate & a 20-40mm/hr shower west of Werribee... Let the good times roll!!!!!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne convection Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:00:17 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2002 03:00:17.0465 (UTC) FILETIME=[9FB46A90:01C28EAE] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jane, Whats your thoughts on this afternoon? Can we expect much? The shower actually reached pink on radar :) Karl >From: "Jane ONeill" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne convection >Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:35:12 +1100 > >Afternoon all, > >Convection has started up west and southwest of Melbourne south of the >ranges - middle level, but there are a couple of tops trying hard to >glaciate & a 20-40mm/hr shower west of Werribee... > >Let the good times roll!!!!!! > >Jane >-------------------------------- >Jane ONeill - Melbourne >cadence at australianskynweather.com > >Australian Sky and Weather >www.stormchasers.au.com > >ASWA - Victoria >http://www.severeweather.asn.au >-------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:05:26 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne convection Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Lookout... victorians (especially the one below ;) are getting excited... expect a flood of emails now.. the cloud has been seen! PS Blair - I like Godwins Law.. we should apply it here. Matt Smith Jane ONeill wrote: > Afternoon all, > > Convection has started up west and southwest of Melbourne south of the > ranges - middle level, but there are a couple of tops trying hard to > glaciate & a 20-40mm/hr shower west of Werribee... > > Let the good times roll!!!!!! > > Jane > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky and Weather > www.stormchasers.au.com > > ASWA - Victoria > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne convection Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:26:06 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Karl, I'd keep an eye out along the ranges near to the trough - it'll be interesting to see how the low level moisture goes - those bases are pretty high atm (~12,000' I'd guess looking at the sounding from this morning). from the Area 30 forecast: ISOLATED THUNDERSTORMS/SHOWERS NE LAMEROO/CAMUS, MOSTLY NEAR THE RANGES. (Lameroo is in SA, CAMUS is between King & Flinders Is, south of Westernport Bay if you are drawing lines on a map...) Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Lijnders" To: Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 2:00 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne convection > > Hi Jane, > > Whats your thoughts on this afternoon? Can we expect much? The shower > actually reached pink on radar :) > > Karl > > > > > > >From: "Jane ONeill" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne convection > >Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:35:12 +1100 > > > >Afternoon all, > > > >Convection has started up west and southwest of Melbourne south of the > >ranges - middle level, but there are a couple of tops trying hard to > >glaciate & a 20-40mm/hr shower west of Werribee... > > > >Let the good times roll!!!!!! > > > >Jane > >-------------------------------- > >Jane ONeill - Melbourne > >cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > >Australian Sky and Weather > >www.stormchasers.au.com > > > >ASWA - Victoria > >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >-------------------------------- > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: In Search of Supercells 2002 - the video Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:35:09 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Afternoon all, I'm finalising the initial order tomorrow Tuesday 19th - if you'd like a copy before Christmas please let me know. Moe information can be found here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: aus-wx: Sydney forecast for December Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:42:36 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > you should not be allowed to practice. Further you should > > not be able to practice unless you demonstrate professional competency. For those interested, my potential-for-rain reading for Sydney for December: 4th-5th 13th 19th 21st 25th-28th Day of 31st, clearing by evening New Years Day fine cheers Ken www.predictweather.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Another Question: Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:05:34 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Howdy, hoping all are having a Happy and Safe November:
          I may have had this explained to me in time past, but I've forgotten the answer, my question is: What causes pavement/concrete surfaces to "sweat"? Is it due to high humidity? This happens occasionally here.
          Thanks for your answers. Wish ya'll could be here to check out our beautiful fall foliage. Oh yes....another question....Would ya'll know what causes tree leaves to change color at different rates? I've seen 2 of the same kind of small trees, about 5 feet apart-a sidewalk between them-one trees leaves have almost fully turned color while the others leaves have just started to turn. I was wondering why the difference in timing.
           Again Thanks!      Yours     David (in an Autumn wonderland) Powell
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:19:47 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne convection X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com What, Matthew? You don't mean THE CLOUD do you? \ Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Smith To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:05:26 +1100 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne convection > Lookout... victorians (especially the one below ;) are getting > excited... > expect a flood of emails now.. the cloud has been seen! > > PS Blair - I like Godwins Law.. we should apply it here. > > Matt Smith > > Jane ONeill wrote: > > > Afternoon all, > > > > Convection has started up west and southwest of Melbourne south of > the > > ranges - middle level, but there are a couple of tops trying hard to > > glaciate & a 20-40mm/hr shower west of Werribee... > > > > Let the good times roll!!!!!! > > > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > Australian Sky and Weather > > www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > ASWA - Victoria > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jason Beer" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: cold in Sweden Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:32:11 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well done Blair, I thought that had been forgotten! So it would appear on face value or at least coincidence that dryness in Scandinavia has been matching to a degree this year. But 10% for 82 is probably not enough to justify a vague sort of link. I have been fortunate enough to experience 3 excellent summers in Sweden. One shocker though. In fact my first 18 months in Sweden I almost never saw the sun! Winter and summer. Tough, very very tough! I have seen 2 Northern Lights. One was white and the other green. Sweden is not much for wild blizzards either. I have only had one in 5 yrs. Boring. Did get an excellent Thunderstorm a few months back. Also very rare for a cracker jack. I even went inside from my balcony the lightning strikes were so good! I´ve lived in Darwin too, this was almost as good as any it could throw up. Best craker Jacks I´ve had have been in Melbourne, Injune Queensland, Darwin, All of Victoria one special weekend about 10 yrs ago - a friend and I spent a night chasing storms all over Victoria(although we didn´t realise we were doing that at the time - we were looking for a camping spot!). I still have a very vivid memory of a MASSIVE Octapus near Daylesford. Wow! Best strike I´ve ever seen anywhere. TV, pictures etc etc. Saw an excellent on in NY one evening. I raced up to the Empire State Building to watch it with my Camera. I was about 1 second from having my Camera ready when The World Trade Centre lightning rod was hit at a 45 degree angle. shit, missed it by that much! No one will be getting that opportunity again. Good on you Blair. cheers Jas -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Blair Trewin Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:20 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: cold in Sweden > > > > Hi all, > > A bit of snow in Stockholm in the last 2 days also down to -10c last night > and max temp today about -5c or so. > > To those that have records: > > In Sweden there has hardly been any precipitation since last March / April. > The odd storm in summer. > > Can anyone find records if Sweden suffered a similar dry spell at the same > time OZ did in 82/83 ? > I couldn't find (easily) any current rainfall data from Sweden, but could from Finland; Helsinki has had 281mm of rain since the beginning of March, which is about 60% of normal for the 8 1/2 month period. By European standards this is a big departure from normal over such an extended period. In 1982 Stockholm was drier than normal (although only by about 10%), and Helsinki was near normal (although that was, in part, due to a very wet November). I'm not aware of any known connections between El Nino and Scandinavian weather, although a connection has been suggested between it and heavy central European summer rains. As flood rains in central Europe are often associated with blocking high pressure over Scandinavia that hints at a possible El Nino influence further north, but I haven't seen that tested in any rigorous sense. (For what it's worth, the summers of 1994 and 1997, particularly 1994, were hot and dry in Scandinavia. I remember this well because I was in Sweden and Norway in July-August 1994 and arrived in Stockholm to a succession of mid-30s days - not something they're used to! Stockholm is full of lakes and they were certainly getting plenty of use...) As some of you would have seen in the news in the last 24 hours, there has been severe flooding in the Swiss Alps, as well as northern Scotland (presumably from two different systems). Unlike the August event, the southern side of the Alps seem to have copped the brunt of it this time, with reports of 48-hour totals in the 400-500mm range near the Swiss-Italian border. Extreme short-period rainfall is quite common in this area - with the combination of topography and copious available water from the still-warm Mediterranean - but 400 is getting up there. (Once again, August 1994 provided some personal fact-finding in this respect :-) Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jacob at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:13:19 +0800 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jacob Subject: aus-wx: Perth Storm Potential - 21st November Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It's looking great for storms in Perth and around the SW this Thursday. A deep trough off the west coast is expected to form, pumping in hot NE winds. LI's are showing -6 with a cape of 1600 over perth and 2200 to the NE. Looks even better for areas to the north of Esperance on Friday with LI's of -10 at 9Z! Jacob +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Stargazer" To: "Aussie-Weather" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:50:27 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don White" To: Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:20 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions > Stargazer.. > The fact that you are on this list means you have an interest in > weather. True >You obviously don't deal with many people who aren't at all > interested in the wetaher other than what it will be tomorrow. Most people I talk to have no interest in the weather. How would you know what I "obviously" do or don't do??? >The first question I get asked is often as basic as the difference between > rain and showers. > Do you know the difference or the difference between "a few"or > "scattered"or öccasional"or "isolated". Hey, your the expert, you tell me... ;) > It is you who used the word dumb for Joe Public... I donm't believe that Then why use such childish terms? If you can use the Richter scale for earthquakes & expect "joe public" to understand that then why not the F-scale for tornadoes? I think The Fujita scale is a little easer to grasp then the Richter scale. > - just that many - especially farmers etc want to know more but we can't > leave that to people like you. People like me? What on Earth do you mean by that Don? > And, why know call a small torndado a mini ? And there are plenty of > them ??? > > Cheeers, > Don Yeh, good on ya... lol :) Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Melbourne convection Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:43:01 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2002 09:42:41.0274 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6894DA0:01C28EE6] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, Well I guess you could call it complete luck but I managed to get a thunderstorm today. I was thinking most of the stuff was going to be on the ranges but I was surprised when Nick Sykes called me to say there were glaciating towers near St Kilda. I was fortunate enough to be working in Braeside and this weak cell cruised right over the top of me producing one (yes just one) very nice rumble of thunder. :-) Macca -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 2:26 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne convection Hi Karl, I'd keep an eye out along the ranges near to the trough - it'll be interesting to see how the low level moisture goes - those bases are pretty high atm (~12,000' I'd guess looking at the sounding from this morning). from the Area 30 forecast: ISOLATED THUNDERSTORMS/SHOWERS NE LAMEROO/CAMUS, MOSTLY NEAR THE RANGES. (Lameroo is in SA, CAMUS is between King & Flinders Is, south of Westernport Bay if you are drawing lines on a map...) Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Lijnders" To: Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 2:00 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne convection > > Hi Jane, > > Whats your thoughts on this afternoon? Can we expect much? The shower > actually reached pink on radar :) > > Karl > > > > > > >From: "Jane ONeill" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne convection > >Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:35:12 +1100 > > > >Afternoon all, > > > >Convection has started up west and southwest of Melbourne south of the > >ranges - middle level, but there are a couple of tops trying hard to > >glaciate & a 20-40mm/hr shower west of Werribee... > > > >Let the good times roll!!!!!! > > > >Jane > >-------------------------------- > >Jane ONeill - Melbourne > >cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > >Australian Sky and Weather > >www.stormchasers.au.com > > > >ASWA - Victoria > >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >-------------------------------- > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Cloud Seeding Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 05:05:12 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey All, Just doing the evening/morning search of the US news sites, and found the following on the NewsOK.com website about cloud seeding. What surprised me the most was that the insurance companies in Oklahoma actually funded it. Could this be a possible idea for the Australian insurance industry to possibly think of something in Oz, or are we considered to be a "small" hail risk??? The story can be found at: http://newsok.com/cgi-bin/show_article?ID=948419&pic=none&TP=getarticle PaulY +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Crepuscular rays Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:31:31 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Some rather nice crepuscular rays and altocumulus this evening just before sunset.... http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02jon.htm Today was a rather nice tantaliser (luckier for some.....) - and this trough will be interesting over the next day or so.... jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Another Question: Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:38:11 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
This is new one for me ?  Perhaps the concrete is slightly porous and the soil underneath quite wet.
 
Michael
 
----- Original Message -----
From: arky dave
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 6:05 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Another Question:

Howdy, hoping all are having a Happy and Safe November:
          I may have had this explained to me in time past, but I've forgotten the answer, my question is: What causes pavement/concrete surfaces to "sweat"? Is it due to high humidity? This happens occasionally here.
          Thanks for your answers. Wish ya'll could be here to check out our beautiful fall foliage. Oh yes....another question....Would ya'll know what causes tree leaves to change color at different rates? I've seen 2 of the same kind of small trees, about 5 feet apart-a sidewalk between them-one trees leaves have almost fully turned color while the others leaves have just started to turn. I was wondering why the difference in timing.
           Again Thanks!      Yours     David (in an Autumn wonderland) Powell
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02
From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne convection Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:40:19 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Now didn't you all read that E Mail recently, about the ' stupid cloud ' thread. Personaly I like THE CLOUD. Michael > What, Matthew? You don't mean THE CLOUD do you? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:46:19 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: RE: aus-wx: Words and Public Perceptions Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 08:55 18/11/02 +1100, you wrote: >"Thunder shower" and "thundery shower" and terms commonly used by the >Bureau of Met to describe a weak thunderstorm. > >Mark Hardy >The Weather Company Pty. Ltd. >http://www.theweather.com.au "Thundery showers" is quite often used by the MetService here in New Zealand. I find it's not a very good word to describe a thunderstorm delivering showers. The term to me describes an event where the rain could 'thunder down' as in heavy outfall of water falling from the clouds, thundering down! JohnGaul NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:53:18 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2000/docs/0005-06.htm some nice photographs ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:32:23 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Another Question: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
that's right, it happens in my workshop, the ground underneath needs to be damp from extended wet and the atmosphere also has to be damp and the whole floor seems to be wet, very annoying, comes from the days when no plastic was laid under the slab.  as soon as the atmosphere dries out the floor is still dampish but not wet. havn't seen a wet floor for a looooooong time.
 
regards
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Monday, 18 November 2002 9:23:05 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Another Question:
 
This is new one for me ?  Perhaps the concrete is slightly porous and the soil underneath quite wet.
 
Michael
 
----- Original Message -----
From: arky dave
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 6:05 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Another Question:

Howdy, hoping all are having a Happy and Safe November:
          I may have had this explained to me in time past, but I've forgotten the answer, my question is: What causes pavement/concrete surfaces to "sweat"? Is it due to high humidity? This happens occasionally here.
          Thanks for your answers. Wish ya'll could be here to check out our beautiful fall foliage. Oh yes....another question....Would ya'll know what causes tree leaves to change color at different rates? I've seen 2 of the same kind of small trees, about 5 feet apart-a sidewalk between them-one trees leaves have almost fully turned color while the others leaves have just started to turn. I was wondering why the difference in timing.
           Again Thanks!      Yours     David (in an Autumn wonderland) Powell
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP11.gif: 00000001,680a4bed,00000000,00000000 From: "Stargazer" To: "Aussie-Weather" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Crepuscular rays Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:35:28 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Nice :) What camera are you using Jane? Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:01 PM Subject: aus-wx: Crepuscular rays > Some rather nice crepuscular rays and altocumulus this evening just > before sunset.... > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02jon.htm > > Today was a rather nice tantaliser (luckier for some.....) - and this > trough will be interesting over the next day or so.... > > jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Crepuscular rays Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:26:35 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Paul, It's a Canon A40 digital - pics taken on half resolution. Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stargazer" To: "Aussie-Weather" Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:05 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Crepuscular rays > Nice :) > > What camera are you using Jane? > > Regs. Paul. > (Stargazer) > http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jane ONeill" > To: "Aussie-wx" > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:01 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Crepuscular rays > > > > Some rather nice crepuscular rays and altocumulus this evening just > > before sunset.... > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02jon.htm > > > > Today was a rather nice tantaliser (luckier for some.....) - and this > > trough will be interesting over the next day or so.... > > > > jane > > > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- - > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:26:48 +1100 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ahhhhh! What memories that brought back. I've certainly not seen drier snow at home since that event either - no surprise really. You can tell how dry snow is by observing the rate that it covers warm surfaces like the road and it was pretty quick that Sunday arvo. Oh, and I sway to eucalyptus forests under snow over pine, just. Thanks for that, Jimmy, I hadn't seen that report before. Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 9:53 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2000/docs/0005-06.htm some nice photographs ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:42:06 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: RE: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Andrew, No worries. That report just went up tonight. Nicely written I might say by Jeff. Jimmy Deguara At 10:26 PM 18/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Ahhhhh! What memories that brought back. I've certainly not seen drier >snow at home since that event either - no surprise really. You can tell >how dry snow is by observing the rate that it covers warm surfaces like >the road and it was pretty quick that Sunday arvo. > >Oh, and I sway to eucalyptus forests under snow over pine, just. > >Thanks for that, Jimmy, I hadn't seen that report before. > >Andrew. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy >Deguara >Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 9:53 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane > > >http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2000/docs/0005-06.htm > >some nice photographs > >----------------------------------------- >Please note the change to my new e-mail >address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - >http://www.thunderbolttours.com >----------------------------------------- >Jimmy Deguara >Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > >from >Schofields, Sydney >NSW Australia > >e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Web Page with Michael Bath > >Australian Severe Weather Home Page >http://www.australiasevereweather.com > >Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather >your_email_address" in the body of your message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Another Question: Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 00:48:54 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Sounds like one lot of trees could be more south-facing and so getting more sun, drying first and shielding the rest.
...Would ya'll know what causes tree leaves to change color at different rates? I've seen 2 of the same kind of small trees, about 5 feet apart-a sidewalk between them-one trees leaves have almost fully turned color while the others leaves have just started to turn. I was wondering why the difference in timing.
           Again Thanks!      Yours     David (in an Autumn wonderland) Powell
From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:17:49 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Great memories for me too!!! I was at Mt. Hotham at the time- nearly 1m of snow in 24hrs WooHoo!!!! This link describes the event well: http://www.australianweathernews.com/news/2000/05/20000528.html And this is a pic of Zirkys ( at Hotham) taken on 29th May (I think) I have a few more if people are interested http://www.trapdoor.com.au/PicoW/Zirkys-maydump2000.jpg It is known in the snow industry as "The May dump of 2000" and was an awesome experience to behold. Max temp at Hotham for the Saturday was -7C (according to the lodge weather station. James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Miskelly Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 10:27 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane Ahhhhh! What memories that brought back. I've certainly not seen drier snow at home since that event either - no surprise really. You can tell how dry snow is by observing the rate that it covers warm surfaces like the road and it was pretty quick that Sunday arvo. Oh, and I sway to eucalyptus forests under snow over pine, just. Thanks for that, Jimmy, I hadn't seen that report before. Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 9:53 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2000/docs/0005-06.htm some nice photographs ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Bathurst Weather station Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:59:28 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
HI All.
 
Ive started up my wx station since we just maybe getting some storms this afternoon.. I shall leave this going on 1 min updates..
 
 
Dave
Bathurst
 
 
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:04:28 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Another Question: X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Here in HK, everyone has concrete floors and when humidity reaches 100% they always become wet. Actually they get wet from condensation from the air when the humidity passes about 94% or 95%. When it reaches 100%, if there is no aircon running, it can appear to be raining inside! Clouds of moisture form indoors, it condenses on the ceiling, and then drips to the floors. So my guess is very high humidity has caused it. Do you have a record of what the humidity was at the time the concrete was sweating? Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "arky dave" To: Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:05:34 -0600 Subject: aus-wx: Another Question: > Howdy, hoping all are having a Happy and Safe November: > I may have had this explained to me in time past, but I've > forgotten the answer, my question is: What causes pavement/concrete > surfaces to "sweat"? Is it due to high humidity? This happens > occasionally here. > Thanks for your answers. Wish ya'll could be here to check > out our beautiful fall foliage. Oh yes....another question....Would > ya'll know what causes tree leaves to change color at different rates? > I've seen 2 of the same kind of small trees, about 5 feet apart-a > sidewalk between them-one trees leaves have almost fully turned color > while the others leaves have just started to turn. I was wondering why > the difference in timing. > Again Thanks! Yours David (in an Autumn wonderland) > Powell > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David James Powell" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Another Question: X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.00 X-IPAddress: 208.189.4.104 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:05:55 -0600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks for that answer; I'm not sure of the humidity level, but I'd guess that it was pretty high. I think I've seen it when it was also foggy. > Here in HK, everyone has concrete floors and when humidity reaches 100% > they always become wet. Actually they get wet from condensation from > the air when the humidity passes about 94% or 95%. When it reaches > 100%, if there is no aircon running, it can appear to be raining > inside! Clouds of moisture form indoors, it condenses on the ceiling, > and then drips to the floors. > So my guess is very high humidity has caused it. Do you have a record > of what the humidity was at the time the concrete was sweating? > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "arky dave" > To: > Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:05:34 -0600 > Subject: aus-wx: Another Question: > > > Howdy, hoping all are having a Happy and Safe November: > > I may have had this explained to me in time past, but I've > > forgotten the answer, my question is: What causes pavement/concrete > > surfaces to "sweat"? Is it due to high humidity? This happens > > occasionally here. > > Thanks for your answers. Wish ya'll could be here to check > > out our beautiful fall foliage. Oh yes....another question....Would > > ya'll know what causes tree leaves to change color at different rates? > > I've seen 2 of the same kind of small trees, about 5 feet apart-a > > sidewalk between them-one trees leaves have almost fully turned color > > while the others leaves have just started to turn. I was wondering why > > the difference in timing. > > Again Thanks! Yours David (in an Autumn wonderland) > > Powell > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ ------------------------ > > > -- Sent using Voltage Net Webmail http://www.voltage.net/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David James Powell" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.00 X-IPAddress: 208.189.4.104 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:09:32 -0600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Great Pic! I'm hoping we get a little of that this Winter! I know I'll be dreaming about it!...drool....(All we need is a little cold air and a Low pressure to our South). > Great memories for me too!!! I was at Mt. Hotham at the time- nearly 1m > of snow in 24hrs WooHoo!!!! > > This link describes the event well: > http://www.australianweathernews.com/news/2000/05/ 20000528.html > > And this is a pic of Zirkys ( at Hotham) taken on 29th May (I think) I > have a few more if people are interested > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/PicoW/Zirkys- maydump2000.jpg > > > It is known in the snow industry as "The May dump of 2000" and was an > awesome experience to behold. Max temp at Hotham for the Saturday was -7C > (according to the lodge weather station. > > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Andrew > Miskelly > Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 10:27 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: RE: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane > > Ahhhhh! What memories that brought back. I've certainly not seen drier > snow at home since that event either - no surprise really. You can tell > how dry snow is by observing the rate that it covers warm surfaces like > the road and it was pretty quick that Sunday arvo. > > Oh, and I sway to eucalyptus forests under snow over pine, just. > > Thanks for that, Jimmy, I hadn't seen that report before. > > Andrew. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy > Deguara > Sent: Monday, 18 November 2002 9:53 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: An old snow chase from Jeff Brislane > > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2 000/docs/0005-06.htm > > some nice photographs > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - > http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > from > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ ------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ ------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ ------------------------ > > -- Sent using Voltage Net Webmail http://www.voltage.net/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Another Question: Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:00:13 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi, Surfaces will become damp when their temperature falls below dewpoint, or conversely, if the dewpoint of the air rises above the temperature of the surface. Surfaces such as tiled or concrete floors with large thermal mass typically only change temperature very slowly and thus condensation will occur in very humid atmospheres if the air temp and (importantly) dewpoint rises above the surface temp. Cooling a room with dry cold aircon air, and then suddenly opening all windows on a hot humid day will often cause gross condensation, and has been known to kill off the odd computer system or TV. John. >snip -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Phil Smith Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:04 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Another Question: Here in HK, everyone has concrete floors and when humidity reaches 100% they always become wet. Actually they get wet from condensation from the air when the humidity passes about 94% or 95%. When it reaches 100%, if there is no aircon running, it can appear to be raining inside! Clouds of moisture form indoors, it condenses on the ceiling, and then drips to the floors. So my guess is very high humidity has caused it. Do you have a record of what the humidity was at the time the concrete was sweating? Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "arky dave" To: Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:05:34 -0600 Subject: aus-wx: Another Question: > Howdy, hoping all are having a Happy and Safe November: > I may have had this explained to me in time past, but I've > forgotten the answer, my question is: What causes pavement/concrete > surfaces to "sweat"? Is it due to high humidity? This happens > occasionally here. > Thanks for your answers. Wish ya'll could be here to check > out our beautiful fall foliage. Oh yes....another question....Would > ya'll know what causes tree leaves to change color at different rates? > I've seen 2 of the same kind of small trees, about 5 feet apart-a > sidewalk between them-one trees leaves have almost fully turned color > while the others leaves have just started to turn. I was wondering why > the difference in timing. > Again Thanks! Yours David (in an Autumn wonderland) > Powell > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: SA Storms, VIC Rain Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:14:48 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Nov 2002 04:14:48.0652 (UTC) FILETIME=[332728C0:01C28F82] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Looks like some thunderstorm activity is developing north of Adelaide with a few strikes on tracker, and out west around Ceduna its taking off ahead of the frontal system. The front and cloud seems to have stalled over the past 24 hours. What are peoples thoughts on rain and storms across VIC and SA over the next 24-36 hours? Cheers Karl :) _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Total totals? Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:53:55 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I don't understand the Total Totals. Is there an easy explanation?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:24:41 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Drought in Illawarra -photos Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tragic Michael. It is incredible when you see areas near the coast getting very dry like you have in those photographs. We'll see how long we last and rainfall creaps in again. Jimmy Deguara At 11:10 PM 17/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Took some pictures of Lake Illawarra today, they speak for themselves. Also >dying trees near Oak Flats. > >http://ozthunder.com/temp/drought.htm > >Michael > > > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:35:08 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Niangala Tornado damage assesment Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I finally typed up a report about the October 13 Niangala Tornado (NSW) for anyone intrested in a bit of reading about one of the more significant aussie tornadoes in recent times. http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2002/October13tornado.htm I will get around to witness accounts another time. Enjoy. Matthew Smith http://www.sydneystormchasers.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.109.175.217] From: "John Roenfeldt" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Total totals? Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:10:54 +0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Nov 2002 10:11:54.0528 (UTC) FILETIME=[15F86200:01C28FB4] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
 
Total Totals is an indication of instability in the atmosphere.  It is based on the lapse rate from 850mb - 500mb and the dewpoint (moisture) at the 850mb level.
 
Basically there is a chance of isolated thunderstorms with values from 44 upwards through to values around 60 which would indicate moderate to severe thunderstorms.
 
As with any Instability Index it is useful only when used with other measures of the atmosphere.
 
regards,
 
John Roenfeldt
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 3:53 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Total totals?

I don't understand the Total Totals. Is there an easy explanation?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Drought in Illawarra -photos Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:25:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I was shocked by the pictures Michael. How deep is the water usually do you know? And is it ever open to the sea? I imagine that the smell around that area is rather overpowering just now. The last time we went down to Lake Heights in July probably, it all looked so lovely. Judy Mayo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Thompson" To: Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 11:10 PM Subject: aus-wx: Drought in Illawarra -photos > Took some pictures of Lake Illawarra today, they speak for themselves. Also > dying trees near Oak Flats. > > http://ozthunder.com/temp/drought.htm > > Michael > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Drought in Illawarra -photos Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:40:51 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That part of the Lake is generally only shallow 2ft or so, but it was always covered by water. the lake only blocked in August this year, it would be open to sea about 90% of the time. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Mayo" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:25 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Drought in Illawarra -photos > I was shocked by the pictures Michael. How deep is the water usually do you > know? And is it ever open to the sea? I imagine that the smell around that > area is rather overpowering just now. The last time we went down to Lake > Heights in July probably, it all looked so lovely. > Judy Mayo > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Thompson" > To: > Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 11:10 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Drought in Illawarra -photos > > > > Took some pictures of Lake Illawarra today, they speak for themselves. > Also > > dying trees near Oak Flats. > > > > http://ozthunder.com/temp/drought.htm > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 8/11/02 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:46:17 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: aus-wx: I Just Thought I would Let you Know Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com We have had a lot of rain here in Canterbury and wind on the east coast of the South Island. Nice little active trough out to the east. I recorded 124 mm over the last few days and there has been snow to low levels as well. No thunder as the conditions for TS develpment have been very poor. It's like winter ... but conditions are improving over the next couple of days, but then ... JohnGaul NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Leonid Shower Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:39:45 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I just found on the NASA site that the Leonid Shower is visible in the US. 
 
Last night about 9.45 pm While we were out walking the dog we had the great fortune of seeing something speed across the sky.  I wonder if we saw a rather larger Meteor from the Leonid Shower as what we saw as near as I can describe it was near to soft ball size and really spectacular.
 
Did anyone else see anything last night or tonight?
 
Judy Mayo
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:21:55 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Leonid Shower X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 8/8 cloud cover here :( Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Adam Mayo" To: Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:39:45 +1100 Subject: aus-wx: Leonid Shower > I just found on the NASA site that the Leonid Shower is visible in the > US. > > Last night about 9.45 pm While we were out walking the dog we had the > great fortune of seeing something speed across the sky. I wonder if we > saw a rather larger Meteor from the Leonid Shower as what we saw as > near as I can describe it was near to soft ball size and really > spectacular. > > Did anyone else see anything last night or tonight? > > Judy Mayo > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Leonid Shower Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:23:29 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The only thing falling from the sky here south of Adelaide atm is a couple drops of rain... about eleventeen drops I think I counted ;) I wonder what kind of show it's putting on up there? Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:51 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Leonid Shower > 8/8 cloud cover here :( > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: dactyl at world.std.com To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:20:49 -0500 Subject: aus-wx: Leonid Shower in the US X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com HI All I am in the New York City area. Unfortunately, the bright moon and the light pollution made it difficult to see the Leonids from here, however I did get up around 330 AM US Eastern Time and managed to see a few meteors. Nothing compares to last years fireball/meteor extravaganza though! If any of you ever get to the United States the place to visit in the warmer months is Mount Washington in New Hampshire in Northeast US. The night observers there enjoyed the Leonids. :) You can read their report on this website and also view their webcams which show you their conditions at 6,288 feet (yes, feet, I am a Yank). http://www.mountwashington.org/cam/northeast/index.html http://www.spaceweather.com - most of you astro freaks know about this but for those that don't this is great site Now back to Aussie weather.... Tara This email is virus free. Scanned before leaving mailbox with Norton Antivirus 2002 Yes Simon, I stole this idea from your e-mail :) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: Rain/Storms for SE NSW and the ACT. Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 05:36:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Hi all.

I have been looking at the models and after 2 days of Unexpected afternoon convective storms developing here in Canberra (well, 1 day as the BoM then forecasted the possibility on Tuesday...), today should be the first real possibilty of decent rainfall totals across the SE of the country. Along with the rain storms are likely extending from west near Wagga to a bit east of Canberra. AVN has progged the best CAPE and Li's almost Smack bang ontop of Canberra and though not much its better than nothing.

The Progs have got +500 cape and -2 Li's which on the 21z 18th data slowly contracted north and by 21z today (8am on the 21st) was posistioned near Bathurst.

The Latest Data i have seen (12z 19th) has progged it a little less than before, and slighty further north. Cape going to 400 and Li's -2 still. interesting to see what does develop, even if its some much needed rain, and on that note this is from the BoM...

0.4 mm of rain was recorded to 9 am this morning. This was the first rain recorded since
the 24 October. The 35 day period from 15 October to 18 November, during which
only 0.4 mm of rain was recorded, was only the 7th occasion since 1939 that
Canberra has experienced such a lengthy dry spell and the first time that such a
period has commenced in October. The previous dry period of similar length
occurred between 9/2/1985-17/3/1985. During this period, no rain was recorded at
all at the airport.
 
My figures that i have been working with (from the AP AWS), and are current to the end of October are as Follows...
For YTD we are 36.1mm Under average.
More signifigantly From March to YTD we are 158.4mm under the Average for the same months.
Mondays 0.4mm leaves us with 64.1mm to make up this month to make it the 4th November of Above avergage rains (only month to do it the last 3)
 
Anyway Back to the Current weather...
What are your thoughts on the Chances today?

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/2002
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Total totals? Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 06:46:27 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Thanks John. Much appreciated.
 
 
Total Totals is an indication of instability in the atmosphere.  It is based on the lapse rate from 850mb - 500mb and the dewpoint (moisture) at the 850mb level.
 
Basically there is a chance of isolated thunderstorms with values from 44 upwards through to values around 60 which would indicate moderate to severe thunderstorms.
 
As with any Instability Index it is useful only when used with other measures of the atmosphere.
 
regards,
 
John Roenfeldt
 
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I Just Thought I would Let you Know Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 06:49:26 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That's pretty awesome for this time of year. Also the fact that you got 124 mm and I've only had 300 here for the whole 11 months :-( Subject: aus-wx: I Just Thought I would Let you Know > We have had a lot of rain here in Canterbury and wind on the east coast of > the South Island. > Nice little active trough out to the east. > I recorded 124 mm over the last few days and there has been snow to low > levels as well. > No thunder as the conditions for TS develpment have been very poor. > It's like winter ... but conditions are improving over the next couple of > days, > but then ... > > > JohnGaul > NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Victorian rain Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 07:57:32 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Morning all, 1.2mm overnight has pushed my month to date total to 15.2mm and my year to date total to 596mm, unless we have the 'flooding rains' after the drought (thank you Dorothea Mackellar!!) I have no chance of getting anywhere near my average of 825 - 850mm......looks like Canberra in March!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] From: "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Niangala Tornado damage assesment Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:58:31 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Nov 2002 21:58:31.0838 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCBC7BE0:01C29016] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Thanks Matt for taking the trouble to investigate and write the report.

I guess it was an interesting forensic task.

Michael

>From: Matthew Smith
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Subject: aus-wx: Niangala Tornado damage assesment
>Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:35:08 +1100
>
>I finally typed up a report about the October 13 Niangala Tornado (NSW)
>for anyone intrested in a bit of reading about one of the more
>significant aussie tornadoes in recent times.
>
>http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2002/October13tornado.htm
>
>I will get around to witness accounts another time.
>Enjoy.
>
>Matthew Smith
>http://www.sydneystormchasers.com
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian rain Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:05:43 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well, Seven Hills is chugging along..537mm to date, the 6th driest in 52 years. Comes in at a 1 in 8 year event (using a gamma distribution) so nothing to write home about I guess. But it's 307mm below the YTD average. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:57 AM Subject: aus-wx: Victorian rain > Morning all, > > 1.2mm overnight has pushed my month to date total to 15.2mm and my year to > date total to 596mm, unless we have the 'flooding rains' after the drought > (thank you Dorothea Mackellar!!) I have no chance of getting anywhere near > my average of 825 - 850mm......looks like Canberra in March!! > > Jane > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky and Weather > www.stormchasers.au.com > > ASWA - Victoria > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "macdonald" To: Subject: aus-wx: Snow reported September 11th Wongwibinda. Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:52:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello All,
This is really strange i came across this while searching the net for Guyra snowfalls. Wongwibinda, is around 1200 metres above sea level and is around 50km east of Guyra. It is amazing. I'll have send away for the Guyra obs to see what the temp was for that morning.
cheers
This is from ABC rural site. for the Nortern NSW.
Presenter: Kate Sieper
Producer: Jodie Gunders

Date: Wednesday, 11 September  2002   Shift: Morning   Time to Air: 08:30

0900 News

0905 It’s Snowing in Wongwibinda - Kylie Hume - Resident Spring has sprung, but it seems it hasn’t brought warmer weather to the tiny locality of Wongwibinda, between Ebor and Guyra, with residents reporting snow falls this morning.

X-Sender: jacob at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:05:15 +0800 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jacob Subject: Re: aus-wx: Perth Storm Potential - 21st November Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com http://www.weatherzone.com.au/charts/convectiveOutlook.jsp?chart=d1 It's looking good. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: goriley at mail.tsn.cc X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:33:12 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Glen O'Riley" Subject: aus-wx: Leaving Aus-Wx Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com OK folks, I'm leaving 99% of my email lists for a whilst and aussie weather list is one of them. I have personal reasons for the decision, it is not my reaction to anyone in particular. With a bit of luck, sometime early in the new year I may rejoin the list. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: BoM Calendar Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:59:13 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey All, Just looking through today's Herald Sun, and they have a center spread with 6 images from next years BoM calendar Quite impressive, and I thoroughly recommend people getting a copy of the paper....the images are quite spectacular. Oh, and it also has details on how to buy the calendar, so go out and buy a copy. PaulY +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:09:42 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Leaving Aus-Wx Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
sorry to see you go glen, :(
all the best with what ever's happening in your life,
hope to see you back soon.  : wave:
 
regards
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Wednesday, 20 November 2002 3:24:09 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Leaving Aus-Wx
 
OK folks, I'm leaving 99% of my email lists for a whilst and aussie weather
list is one of them. I have personal reasons for the decision, it is not my
reaction to anyone in particular. With a bit of luck, sometime early in the
new year I may rejoin the list.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP12.gif: 00000001,3bfe6949,00000000,00000000 X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:43:17 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 07:57 AM 20/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Morning all, > >1.2mm overnight has pushed my month to date total to 15.2mm and my year to >date total to 596mm, unless we have the 'flooding rains' after the drought >(thank you Dorothea Mackellar!!) I have no chance of getting anywhere near >my average of 825 - 850mm......looks like Canberra in March!! Just a dribble here and another load of dust dumped on the car. :-( I'm looking forward to a 100mm downpour just to wash the crap out of the sky. :( 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:44:17 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: BoM Calendar Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 12:59 AM 20/11/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Hey All, > >Just looking through today's Herald Sun, and they have a center spread with >6 images from next years BoM calendar Quite impressive, and I thoroughly >recommend people getting a copy of the paper....the images are quite >spectacular. Oh, and it also has details on how to buy the calendar, so go >out and buy a copy. Now I find out. :( 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Leaving Aus-Wx Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:52:43 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com All the best and hope to see you again soon. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: aus-wx: Leaving Aus-Wx > OK folks, I'm leaving 99% of my email lists for a whilst and aussie weather > list is one of them. I have personal reasons for the decision, it is not my > reaction to anyone in particular. With a bit of luck, sometime early in the > new year I may rejoin the list. > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Long range forecasts Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:31:25 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I've heard lots of long range weather forecast stories just lately of the breaking of the drought. One for today (20th), another for the 23rd etc.
Not poking fun of anyone who made these predictions but what areas were they for.
Apparently from what I can gather the one for the 20th was from Lennox Walker which was predicted in 1950 someone said?!?!
 
But what part of Australia were these predictions for? The areas "they" lived in or the whole country.
 
What I mean is, I can say it's gunna be dry here next week and I may be correct, but in Darwin, say they may get torrential rain.
 
I am interested in Lennox Walker's and Indigo Jones' predictions as I have never seen them and would like too.
Anyone know where I can start?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Patrick Tobin" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range forecasts Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 20:27:58 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Bussy - I don't know where you can start, but I did hear an interview on ABC local radio this afternoon saying that there was a 70 year old prediction (from under the floorboards) that Alice Springs will get a deluge tomorrow.
 
As I watch yet another rainband fall apart before it gets to Canberra (despite some models consistently predicting at least 15mm from this one - AVN, GASP and NOGAPS all held out hopes of decent falls), I think all human predictions have some way to go. It seems that the models are having trouble accounting for the obviously strong rain suppression regime that is currently in place over SE Australia.
 
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:31 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Long range forecasts

I've heard lots of long range weather forecast stories just lately of the breaking of the drought. One for today (20th), another for the 23rd etc.
Not poking fun of anyone who made these predictions but what areas were they for.
Apparently from what I can gather the one for the 20th was from Lennox Walker which was predicted in 1950 someone said?!?!
 
But what part of Australia were these predictions for? The areas "they" lived in or the whole country.
 
What I mean is, I can say it's gunna be dry here next week and I may be correct, but in Darwin, say they may get torrential rain.
 
I am interested in Lennox Walker's and Indigo Jones' predictions as I have never seen them and would like too.
Anyone know where I can start?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:46:22 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: Weather page with a difference Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello, Here is something quite different for the list to see - weather from Malta - my parent's home place and from the same town. My cousin is also a weather freak and has some nice lightning photographs and the like http://www.weathermalta.net/ http://www.weathermalta.net/photo_lightnings.html lightning section - his favourite section I suppose Enjoy. ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Long Range Forecasts Fw: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:04:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Bussy, This information may help you find the information that you need. Judy Mayo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 6:05 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Old Predictions for 2002/2003 from Southern Highlands > > > ABC > > tracked it down to someone in Kyogle, who reckoned they had made it up, > but > > who knows :) > >... no > > >noe can find the paper... so I think it may be an urban myth. > > > > How absolutely unfortunate for a guy like Jones to have his life's work > called an urban myth that someone made up. The Crohamhurst Observatory was > set up in 1935. Lennox joined in 1953, an observatory that was world famous > in its time. Get the book "Only An Australian" by Lennox Walker. ISBN 0 646 > 829855 0 > > "Long-range Forecasting > Australian farmers have always had an insatiable appetite for long-range > weather forecasts and, for many years, the late Inigo Jones, who had worked > under Clement Wragge in Brisbane, provided seasonal forecasts from his > privately operated Crohamhurst Observatory in southeast Queensland. Despite > two Ministerially commissioned investigations which concluded that his > forecasting methods had no scientific basis, the demand for his forecasts > remained and after his death the service continued under Lennox Walker..." > http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/fam/1604.html > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: IT IS RAINING IN MONA VALE NSW 10.12PM Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:18:29 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Dont know for how long, but it is raining.  Guess the dog won't get that walk now.
 Judy Mayo
X-Sender: meso at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:26:04 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Mal Ninnes Subject: Re: aus-wx: IT IS RAINING IN MONA VALE NSW 10.12PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'day Judy, Raining lightly here in Wentworthville with a fresh smelling breeze :) WooHoo just had a quick flash of lightning, Max King confirmed the rumble of thunder. Wonder if we have SDS bad? My first post in a while - purely from a few drops of rain on the ground and that 'rain' smell in the air. :) Mal Ninnes Wentworthville, Western Sydney. At 10:18 PM 11/20/02 +1100, you wrote: > Guess the dog won't get that walk now. Judy Mayo +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Rands" To: "Aus Wx" Subject: aus-wx: Penrith 22:39 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:40:03 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Message
Hi Guys, just got in from outside, nice damp smell and some sprnikling rain and some reasonable winds from a generally SE direction. No temp though - everything is packed up for house moving...
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Rands
ICQ: 137833127 or MSN: Uncle Paul
Web: http://prands.docspages.com/
 
From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Niangala Tornado damage assesment Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:59:16 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
A very interesting report Matt. That part of the country is certainly a severe storm hotspot. On one of first extended chases back in 1997 I dove through Hanging Rock which is not far from Niangala. There was a forest of mature pines, several very large pines had been layed flat facing east - I believe this was straight line winds in this case.  Then in 1998 myself, Jimmy and Paul Yole drove through the same area returning from another chase tour. This time we noted minor tree damage in another forest.
 
Why such a hotspot ?  Altitude helps, but also I like the way the mountains drop off on the western side. No gradual slopes, from Tamworth to Hanging Rock is no far in a straight line but you pick up 600m in height. That puts hot dry plains air in close contact to perhaps a moist seabreeze feeding up the eastern valleys. I note that Niangala is near one of the headwaters of the Manning River.
 
Michael
 

>From: Matthew Smith
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Subject: aus-wx: Niangala Tornado damage assesment
>Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:35:08 +1100
>
>I finally typed up a report about the October 13 Niangala Tornado (NSW)
>for anyone intrested in a bit of reading about one of the more
>significant aussie tornadoes in recent times.
>
>http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2002/October13tornado.htm
>
>I will get around to witness accounts another time.
>Enjoy.
>
>Matthew Smith
>http://www.sydneystormchasers.com
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/02
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range forecasts Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:14:26 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Surely not. Must be amateurs.
(NZ Herald yesterday)"EL NINO HAS AUSTRALIANS FACING CRUEL SUMMER..Forecasters predict that the worst of the dry weather is yet to come and that there will be little or no rain till January at least.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:31 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Long range forecasts

I've heard lots of long range weather forecast stories just lately of the breaking of the drought. One for today (20th), another for the 23rd etc.
Not poking fun of anyone who made these predictions but what areas were they for.
Apparently from what I can gather the one for the 20th was from Lennox Walker which was predicted in 1950 someone said?!?!
 
But what part of Australia were these predictions for? The areas "they" lived in or the whole country.
 
What I mean is, I can say it's gunna be dry here next week and I may be correct, but in Darwin, say they may get torrential rain.
 
I am interested in Lennox Walker's and Indigo Jones' predictions as I have never seen them and would like too.
Anyone know where I can start?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range forecasts Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:38:20 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
On my website since last month
"Alice Springs may get rain on 22nd.."
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range forecasts

Hi Bussy - I don't know where you can start, but I did hear an interview on ABC local radio this afternoon saying that there was a 70 year old prediction (from under the floorboards) that Alice Springs will get a deluge tomorrow.
 
As I watch yet another rainband fall apart before it gets to Canberra (despite some models consistently predicting at least 15mm from this one - AVN, GASP and NOGAPS all held out hopes of decent falls), I think all human predictions have some way to go. It seems that the models are having trouble accounting for the obviously strong rain suppression regime that is currently in place over SE Australia.
 
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:31 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Long range forecasts

I've heard lots of long range weather forecast stories just lately of the breaking of the drought. One for today (20th), another for the 23rd etc.
Not poking fun of anyone who made these predictions but what areas were they for.
Apparently from what I can gather the one for the 20th was from Lennox Walker which was predicted in 1950 someone said?!?!
 
But what part of Australia were these predictions for? The areas "they" lived in or the whole country.
 
What I mean is, I can say it's gunna be dry here next week and I may be correct, but in Darwin, say they may get torrential rain.
 
I am interested in Lennox Walker's and Indigo Jones' predictions as I have never seen them and would like too.
Anyone know where I can start?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 06:12:56 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: IT IS RAINING IN MONA VALE NSW 10.12PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Mal/Max, We did also have a couple of flashes and thunder here but I would not even have bothered settign up a camera. It was a pleasant site though to confirm a frustrating forecast of storms later. Jimmy Deguara At 10:26 PM 20/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >G'day Judy, > >Raining lightly here in Wentworthville with a fresh smelling breeze :) >WooHoo just had a quick flash of lightning, Max King confirmed the rumble >of thunder. > >Wonder if we have SDS bad? My first post in a while - purely from a few >drops of rain on the ground and that 'rain' smell in the air. :) > > >Mal Ninnes >Wentworthville, Western Sydney. > > > > >At 10:18 PM 11/20/02 +1100, you wrote: > > Guess the dog won't get that walk now. Judy Mayo > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne sunset Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:50:42 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Morning all, Some great images of the sunset in Melbourne on the 18th November from James Tom of Upwey (Mt Dandenong area) can be found here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02oth.htm and for more of the Spring photography, go here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02.htm Enjoy!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: aus-wx: Long-range Rain forecast challenge for all Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:33:42 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All, Here is an interesting challenge for everyone to try. As suggested by some in the heated 'long range forecasting' debate, don't criticise the method without valid proof and that people should do some forecasting themselves so methods & results could be compared. The actual challenge is to see if anyone, using any method they wish, can consistently beat climatology at predicting rainfall amount in several districts around Aus. The 'Chance or random' method is too easy to beat so clim is used for comparison. With absolutely no experience in long term forecasting, my advantage in this areas should be the same with most people on this list (next to nothing!). I am hoping that other people see my forecasting methods and forecasts, and try it themselves - both professional & weather enthusiasts alike. I am also aiming to encourage long range forecasters to improve their wordings so no ambiguerity with users of their products and when it comes to verification. Forecast Method --------------- My long range forecasts will be based on a special index that I have developed - called Tuan's Special Index (TSI). This TSI is based on a multiple regression equation with no less than 16 parameters in it (:Wow!). Some of the independent variables include: -SOI -Sunspots -Moon -Stars -Cricket chirps -Tea leaves -$A vs $US -Current Julian day -location of forecasts - PI -various others I believe this equation will give me supperior forecasts to the BoM(traditional method), Ken (mainly moon), Indigo-Hayden (mainly sunspots) and others. After all, I am taking into account everything, and more, these three groups are saying is the most important factors in determining their long range forecasts :). Perhaps the *clinching* variable that I have included in my equation, that no one else has discussed at all, is the flapping of the butterfly's wing in Sth America. After all, everyone knows that the flapping by butterflys over there is responsible for ALL the TCs that occur in the Aus region ;) ! Historic Results ---------------- Using my TSI, I have calculated the following results for the last 5 years over SE Aus Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1998 0.82 0.19 0.16 0.36 0.83 0.33 0.83 0.07 0.77 0.19 0.70 0.30 1999 0.47 0.22 0.87 0.96 0.16 0.81 0.07 0.02 0.93 0.49 0.83 0.02 2000 0.43 0.99 0.40 0.91 0.74 0.28 0.06 0.17 0.68 0.37 0.82 0.19 2001 0.31 0.21 0.99 0.71 0.76 0.31 0.06 0.55 0.93 0.62 0.04 0.82 2002 0.25 0.65 0.82 0.75 0.30 0.53 0.86 0.16 0.03 0.15 Now, people should compare these results with their own recorded temperature/rainfall/solar hours/etc and would be amaze at the good correlation between my TSI and their observed data. There has been a lot of *bickering* about wordings of forecasts and how to verify them correctly. The rainfall forecasts must be extremely easy to understand and verify. It will all be a simple Yes or No to all forecasts. 0.2mm above or below the range will simply mean incorrect forecasts - no ifs, no buts about it! No leeway to forecasts at all. You are encourage to only use the rainfall forecast range of approx 60-70% (~1SD) of clim ave. Ie 60-70% of correct if using clim. Any higher (eg 2SD or 95% of clim) would be useless to farmers, the major users of our forecasts, and defeat the whole purpose of this exercise. As I am using 60-70% region, I am expecting to score at least 75/100 'Yes'. Given more time, and experience, hopefully should be able to sharpen the forecast more while increasing score to 80+ ? People familar with the Clim of the regions I have selected should do pretty well. Forecast area ------------- The areas I have selected are: Sthn NSW, Wstn NSW, Sthn Qld, Cen WA & Cen SA. These areas are predominatly farming areas and I have choosen several different states (4) and subsections (25) to remove as much of the luck element as possible. These 25 areas are located inland (except 19 & 21), which may make them harder(?) to forecast due to less influence by water. The forecasts will cover the coming 3 months (Dec to Feb) separately & together. With 25 different areas gives a total of 100 forecasts. For each months, the new update should be avail at least a week before the valid start date. The forecast subsections are: - 70 to 74 (Sthn NSW) - 46 to 50 (Wstn NSW) - 41 to 45 (Sthn Qld) - 7, 7A, 10, 12 & 13 (Cen WA) - 16, 17 19 20 & 21 (Cen SA) Visual map of these areas can be seen at at: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/rain_districts.shtml Fees & Refund ------------- For a very strictly limited time, my forecasts can be purchase for $AUS $99.99 + GST per month. This is 50 % off the retail price! I will include a set of stainless steel steak knife, only if you use your credit card and call in the next hour. Phone 1900 WX FORECAST. What's more, my forecasts have a guarrantee. If your area is wrong, I will refund DOUBLE the fee that you pay to me. How many people can guarrantee this? MY FORECASTS ------------ District Dec Jan Feb All 3 Low Hi Low Hi Low Hi Low Hi 71 25 75 25 80 30 90 100 220 80 245 72 15 60 15 65 20 75 50 190 50 200 73 15 55 15 60 20 65 50 155 50 180 74 5 45 5 50 8 55 20 125 18 150 75 2 35 5 40 5 50 15 95 12 125 46 2 30 2 30 5 35 8 80 9 95 47 2 25 2 25 5 30 8 65 9 80 48 10 50 10 55 15 60 45 130 35 165 49 5 40 5 45 5 50 15 110 15 135 50 10 50 15 55 15 65 50 140 40 170 41 50 100 50 110 55 120 170 275 155 330 42 25 95 30 105 35 110 100 250 90 310 43 25 85 30 100 35 105 100 240 90 290 44 20 60 20 65 25 80 75 175 65 205 45 10 50 15 55 15 60 50 130 40 165 7 5 30 5 35 5 40 20 95 15 105 7A 2 25 2 25 5 25 10 55 9 75 10 1 25 1 25 2 25 5 50 4 75 12 2 25 5 30 5 35 15 65 12 90 13 2 40 5 45 5 50 15 110 12 135 16 2 25 2 25 2 25 8 55 6 75 17 2 30 2 35 2 35 8 75 6 100 19 2 30 2 35 2 35 8 75 6 100 20 2 30 2 30 2 30 8 70 6 90 21 2 30 5 35 5 35 15 75 12 100 *note:may need to change some value only if found to have made a typo somewhere or glaring error. Verification ------------ I am hoping someone will verify my forecasts & others (James?) so no one can be accussed of being biased in any way. Rainfall amount should be taken as the average of at least 3 recognised weather stations or the average value for the area as published by the BoM located here: http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/climate/rainmaps.cgi Discussion ---------- Although most of this email is in jest, my forecasts are quite real & serious. In reality, my forecasts have come from: BoM analogues & SOI data. NCC Seasonal Climate Outlook. Also used some international models. - Will try something similar with temperature in the near future. If anyone has any queries for me, will reply when back on Sat. Oh yeah...in case you didn't realise it already, i was only *half joking about using butterflies. But it get your attention, didn't it? :) Tuan (Melbourne) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:37:38 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long-range Rain forecast challenge for all Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
ROFL, go tuan,
 
dont forget the  " hold the map upside down, back to front, look at it in the mirror, left toe in right ear, finger up the bum singing up there cazaly " method.
 
richard

 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Thursday, 21 November 2002 3:16:24 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Long-range Rain forecast challenge for all
 
Hi All,

Here is an interesting challenge for everyone to try. As suggested by some
in the heated 'long range forecasting' debate, don't criticise the method
without valid proof and that people should do some forecasting themselves so
methods & results could be compared.

The actual challenge is to see if anyone, using any method they wish, can
consistently beat climatology at predicting rainfall amount in several
districts around Aus. The 'Chance or random' method is too easy to beat so
clim is used for comparison.

With absolutely no experience in long term forecasting, my advantage in this
areas should be the same with most people on this list (next to nothing!). I
am hoping that other people see my forecasting methods and forecasts, and
try it themselves - both professional & weather enthusiasts alike. I am also
aiming to encourage long range forecasters to improve their wordings so no
ambiguerity with users of their products and when it comes to verification.


Forecast Method
---------------
My long range forecasts will be based on a special index that I have
developed - called Tuan's Special Index (TSI). This TSI is based on a
multiple regression equation with no less than 16 parameters in it (:Wow!).

Some of the independent variables include:
-SOI -Sunspots -Moon -Stars -Cricket chirps -Tea leaves
-$A vs $US -Current Julian day -location of forecasts
- PI -various others

I believe this equation will give me supperior forecasts to the
BoM(traditional method), Ken (mainly moon), Indigo-Hayden (mainly sunspots)
and others. After all, I am taking into account everything, and more, these
three groups are saying is the most important factors in determining their
long range forecasts :).

Perhaps the *clinching* variable that I have included in my equation, that
no one else has discussed at all, is the flapping of the butterfly's wing in
Sth America. After all, everyone Re aus-wx Long-range Rain for.ems knows that the flapping by butterflys over
there is responsible for ALL the TCs that occur in the Aus region ;) !


Historic Results
----------------
Using my TSI, I have calculated the following results for the last 5 years
over SE Aus

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1998 0.82 0.19 0.16 0.36 0.83 0.33 0.83 0.07 0.77 0.19 0.70 0.30
1999 0.47 0.22 0.87 0.96 0.16 0.81 0.07 0.02 0.93 0.49 0.83 0.02
2000 0.43 0.99 0.40 0.91 0.74 0.28 0.06 0.17 0.68 0.37 0.82 0.19
2001 0.31 0.21 0.99 0.71 0.76 0.31 0.06 0.55 0.93 0.62 0.04 0.82
2002 0.25 0.65 0.82 0.75 0.30 0.53 0.86 0.16 0.03 0.15

Now, people should compare these results with their own recorded
temperature/rainfall/solar hours/etc and would be amaze at the good
correlation between my TSI and their observed data.

There has been a lot of *bickering* about wordings of forecasts and how to
verify them correctly. The rainfall forecasts must be extremely easy to
understand and verify. It will all be a simple Yes or No to all forecasts.
0.2mm above or below the range will simply mean incorrect forecasts - no
ifs, no buts about it! No leeway to forecasts at all.

You are encourage to only use the rainfall forecast range of approx 60-70%
(~1SD) of clim ave. Ie 60-70% of correct if using clim. Any higher (eg 2SD
or 95% of clim) would be useless to farmers, the major users of our
forecasts, and defeat the whole purpose of this exercise. As I am using
60-70% region, I am expecting to score at least 75/100 'Yes'. Given more
time, and experience, hopefully should be able to sharpen the forecast more
while increasing score to 80+ ? People familar with the Clim of the regions
I have selected should do pretty well.

Forecast area
-------------
The areas I have selected are: Sthn NSW, Wstn NSW, Sthn Qld, Cen WA & Cen
SA. These areas are predominatly farming areas and I have choosen several
different states (4) and subsections (25) to remove as mucRe aus-wx Long-range Rain for.ems h of the luck
element as possible. These 25 areas are located inland (except 19 & 21),
which may make them harder(?) to forecast due to less influence by water.
The forecasts will cover the coming 3 months (Dec to Feb) separately &
together. With 25 different areas gives a total of 100 forecasts. For each
months, the new update should be avail at least a week before the valid
start date.

The forecast subsections are:
- 70 to 74 (Sthn NSW)
- 46 to 50 (Wstn NSW)
- 41 to 45 (Sthn Qld)
- 7, 7A, 10, 12 & 13 (Cen WA)
- 16, 17 19 20 & 21 (Cen SA)

Visual map of these areas can be seen at at:
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/rain_districts.shtml

Fees & Refund
-------------
For a very strictly limited time, my forecasts can be purchase for $AUS
$99.99 + GST per month. This is 50 % off the retail price! I will include a
set of stainless steel steak knife, only if you use your credit card and
call in the next hour. Phone 1900 WX FORECAST. What's more, my forecasts
have a guarrantee. If your area is wrong, I will refund DOUBLE the fee that
you pay to me. How many people can guarrantee this?


MY FORECASTS
------------
District Dec Jan Feb All 3
Low Hi Low Hi Low Hi Low Hi
71 25 75 25 80 30 90 100 220 80 245
72 15 60 15 65 20 75 50 190 50 200
73 15 55 15 60 20 65 50 155 50 180
74 5 45 5 50 8 55 20 125 18 150
75 2 35 5 40 5 50 15 95 12 125

46 2 30 2 30 5 35 8 80 9 95
47 2 25 2 25 5 30 8 65 9 80
48 10 50 10 55 15 60 45 130 35 165
49 5 40 5 45 5 50 15 110 15 135
50 10 50 15 55 15 65 50 140 40 170

41 50 100 50 110 55 120 170 275 155 330
42 25 95 30 105 35 110 100 250 90 310
43 25 85 30 100 35 105 100 240 90 290
44 20 60 20 65 25 80 75 175 65 205
45 10 50 15 55 15 60 50 130 40 165

7 5 30 5 35 5 40 20 95 15 105
7A 2 25 2 25 5 25 10 55 9 75
10 1 25 1 25 2 25 5 50Re aus-wx Long-range Rain for.ems 4 75
12 2 25 5 30 5 35 15 65 12 90
13 2 40 5 45 5 50 15 110 12 135

16 2 25 2 25 2 25 8 55 6 75
17 2 30 2 35 2 35 8 75 6 100
19 2 30 2 35 2 35 8 75 6 100
20 2 30 2 30 2 30 8 70 6 90
21 2 30 5 35 5 35 15 75 12 100

*note:may need to change some value only if found to have made a typo
somewhere or glaring error.


Verification
------------
I am hoping someone will verify my forecasts & others (James?) so no one can
be accussed of being biased in any way. Rainfall amount should be taken as
the average of at least 3 recognised weather stations or the average value
for the area as published by the BoM located here:
http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/climate/rainmaps.cgi


Discussion
----------
Although most of this email is in jest, my forecasts are quite real &
serious. In reality, my forecasts have come from:
BoM analogues & SOI data. NCC Seasonal Climate Outlook. Also used some
international models.


- Will try something similar with temperature in the near future.


If anyone has any queries for me, will reply when back on Sat.

Oh yeah...in case you didn't realise it already, i was only *half joking
about using butterflies. But it get your attention, didn't it? :)



Tuan (Melbourne)


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP13.gif: 00000001,26e20b84,00000000,00000000 From: "Duncan & Mandy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range forecasts Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:25:20 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
We shall see...
At the moment the 22nd is looking like the day to fall exactly between 2 troughs bringing rain. The latest trough produced widespread rain here 19th and 20th, although not that much fell in Alice Springs itself - about 12mm. Should bring some relief to interior Qld. when it gets there.
Cheers,
Duncan
Alice Springs, N.T. 
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Ring
Sent: Wednesday, 20 November 2002 11:08 pm
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range forecasts

On my website since last month
"Alice Springs may get rain on 22nd.."
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range forecasts

Hi Bussy - I don't know where you can start, but I did hear an interview on ABC local radio this afternoon saying that there was a 70 year old prediction (from under the floorboards) that Alice Springs will get a deluge tomorrow.
 
As I watch yet another rainband fall apart before it gets to Canberra (despite some models consistently predicting at least 15mm from this one - AVN, GASP and NOGAPS all held out hopes of decent falls), I think all human predictions have some way to go. It seems that the models are having trouble accounting for the obviously strong rain suppression regime that is currently in place over SE Australia.
 
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:31 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Long range forecasts

I've heard lots of long range weather forecast stories just lately of the breaking of the drought. One for today (20th), another for the 23rd etc.
Not poking fun of anyone who made these predictions but what areas were they for.
Apparently from what I can gather the one for the 20th was from Lennox Walker which was predicted in 1950 someone said?!?!
 
But what part of Australia were these predictions for? The areas "they" lived in or the whole country.
 
What I mean is, I can say it's gunna be dry here next week and I may be correct, but in Darwin, say they may get torrential rain.
 
I am interested in Lennox Walker's and Indigo Jones' predictions as I have never seen them and would like too.
Anyone know where I can start?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:31:05 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2002 08:30:59.0975 (UTC) FILETIME=[52006970:01C29138] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com See below for details.... Melbourne 14th - 17th November (and I think even 13th - 18th to allow for the 24hr error) saw no rain fall in Melbourne - as per the BoM's AWS titled "Melbourne".... Cheers, Macca -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 7:44 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Melbourne potential for rain in November 14th pm-17th am 23rd am - 25th am 27th pm - 28th pm otherwise mostly dry Ken Ring www.predictweather.com Does anyone have a rundown of monthly average rainfall figures for each month for Melbourne? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:49 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > At 11:40 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > > > > OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to see how > > > we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a "closest > >to > > > the pin" competition. :) > > > Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will be > > > interesting to see what happens. > >Fair enough, Tony. You name a month, anywhere, anytime, and I'll give you > >the goods from my perspective. We can compare it with the same by anyone > >else, if they have the courage to put it on the table alongside mine. But we > >would need to set ground rules at the outset. The rules would have to be > >what a "dry" day versus a "wet" one meant, because would a day with a bit of > >rain, say overnight whilst mostly dry in the daytime be called a wet day? > >Also, which part of a city would we be talking about? I get some data from > >the airport and some from old newspapers columns. > > OK, well, Melbourne (CBD) has an annual average rainfall of around > 660mm. This rainfall is also fairly evenly spread throughout the year, > though in summer, it tends to be dominated by a small number of heavy rain > days, while in winter, it comes in dribs and drabs (showers, drizzle, > etc). From memory, the airport is a bit drier than the city (I don't > recall the exact figures). > > Doesn't the Bureau consider a "rain day" one with more than 0.2mm > rainfall? Sounds good enough to me. > > I'm just looking at when the drought might break... > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:40:58 +1100 (EST) From: Robert Goler Subject: aus-wx: Splitting cell north of Perth? X-X-Sender: robert at tornado.maths.monash.edu.au To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey all A bit of activity on the Perth radar at the moment! The 256km radar shows a nice cell splitting about 150km north of Perth. The 00Z sounding did show some not too bad wind shear. Cheers -- Robert A. Goler School of Mathematical Sciences PO Box 28M Monash University Clayton, Vic 3800 Australia ph. +61 3 9905 4424 email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:16:02 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long-range Rain forecast challenge for all Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 03:33 PM 21/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >I believe this equation will give me supperior forecasts to the >BoM(traditional method), Ken (mainly moon), Indigo-Hayden (mainly sunspots) >and others. After all, I am taking into account everything, and more, these >three groups are saying is the most important factors in determining their >long range forecasts :). Interesting experiment. I can see it coming down to the various weighting factors. Get those wrong, and you could be consistently worse than traditional methods. :) >Perhaps the *clinching* variable that I have included in my equation, that >no one else has discussed at all, is the flapping of the butterfly's wing in >Sth America. After all, everyone knows that the flapping by butterflys over >there is responsible for ALL the TCs that occur in the Aus region ;) ! LOL :-) Chaos reigns supreme.... 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Mossman" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:56:45 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ever heard of the word "pedantic..." Ken could similarly argue that "Melbourne" encompasses all CBD area and Melbourne City Council areas. Was there rain recorded there? Pedantic posts like these do not further anyones point of view...... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:01 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming > See below for details.... > > Melbourne 14th - 17th November (and I think even 13th - 18th to allow for > the 24hr error) saw no rain fall in Melbourne - as per the BoM's AWS titled > "Melbourne".... > > Cheers, > > Macca > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 7:44 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > Melbourne potential for rain in November > 14th pm-17th am > 23rd am - 25th am > 27th pm - 28th pm > otherwise mostly dry > > Ken Ring > www.predictweather.com > > Does anyone have a rundown of monthly average rainfall figures for each > month for Melbourne? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:49 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > > At 11:40 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to see > how > > > > we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a > "closest > > >to > > > > the pin" competition. :) > > > > Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will be > > > > interesting to see what happens. > > >Fair enough, Tony. You name a month, anywhere, anytime, and I'll give you > > >the goods from my perspective. We can compare it with the same by anyone > > >else, if they have the courage to put it on the table alongside mine. But > we > > >would need to set ground rules at the outset. The rules would have to be > > >what a "dry" day versus a "wet" one meant, because would a day with a bit > of > > >rain, say overnight whilst mostly dry in the daytime be called a wet day? > > >Also, which part of a city would we be talking about? I get some data > from > > >the airport and some from old newspapers columns. > > > > OK, well, Melbourne (CBD) has an annual average rainfall of around > > 660mm. This rainfall is also fairly evenly spread throughout the year, > > though in summer, it tends to be dominated by a small number of heavy rain > > days, while in winter, it comes in dribs and drabs (showers, drizzle, > > etc). From memory, the airport is a bit drier than the city (I don't > > recall the exact figures). > > > > Doesn't the Bureau consider a "rain day" one with more than 0.2mm > > rainfall? Sounds good enough to me. > > > > I'm just looking at when the drought might break... > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:21:24 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Splitting cell north of Perth? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Extremely interesting!! I dont recall seeing a storm split around perth on radar so clearly before! Hope the WA chasers are out and about! this could be a big event! Matt Smith Robert Goler wrote: > Hey all > > A bit of activity on the Perth radar at the moment! > The 256km radar shows a nice cell splitting about 150km north of Perth. > The 00Z sounding did show some not too bad wind shear. > > Cheers > > -- > > Robert A. Goler > > School of Mathematical Sciences > PO Box 28M > Monash University > Clayton, Vic 3800 > Australia > > ph. +61 3 9905 4424 > email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au > http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ > > -- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:06:37 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Niangala Tornado damage assesment Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello all, Having done the study myself, it seems what I would have looked for was more carnage in terms of the trees and so on but a fair few trees were uprooted with some snapped. The forest region was also not full thick forest but moderate (lots of daylight shining through. As to the hourse, the walls of the house and the internal damage was not consistent with F3 but again it depends on the strength of the house. What I mean internal damage allowed for walls to remain intact whereas I would have anticipated western section of the house to be crushed and the eastern side to remain less damaged for F3 status. I would not say the house was that strong considering the roof was lifted right off. As mentioned by Ezza's boyfriend who is an engineer? the walls broke at the weakest point and based on wind flow dynamics would have aided in those brick walls to be collpased. Had the corner on the western side caved in then I would have definitely said F3 as this represents strength. I also believe though I would have to view the footage again that the path width was more consistently 100 metres wide or thereabouts. Of course, this is only my assessment and logic behind it but I would like to see other's who have viewed it to comment their views. Jimmy Deguara At 08:35 PM 19/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >I finally typed up a report about the October 13 Niangala Tornado (NSW) >for anyone intrested in a bit of reading about one of the more >significant aussie tornadoes in recent times. > >http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2002/October13tornado.htm > >I will get around to witness accounts another time. >Enjoy. > >Matthew Smith >http://www.sydneystormchasers.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:39:51 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long-range Rain forecast challenge for all X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey mate! Just check out that equation again! You forgot to mention our pet butterfly, Marvin, who lives outside our bedroom window on the 17th floor here in Hong Kong. He successfully kept typhoons out of Hong Kong for the whole of this season (except for Typhoon Hagupit which came while he took his annual leave - we recalled him from leave in time to prevent a direct hit). You must admit such a powerful set of wings must have significant effects especially on WA (same time zone), maybe a little less weighting for NT and SA (one and a half hours ahead), and maybe a little less weighting again for QLD, NSW, VIC and TAS (two hours ahead). Don't the Kiwis even allow the Marvin effect in their forecasting? Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Tuan Phan" To: Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:33:42 +1100 Subject: aus-wx: Long-range Rain forecast challenge for all > Hi All, > [snip] > Perhaps the *clinching* variable that I have included in my equation, > that > no one else has discussed at all, is the flapping of the butterfly's > wing in > Sth America. After all, everyone knows that the flapping by butterflys > over > there is responsible for ALL the TCs that occur in the Aus region ;) ! [snip] > > Tuan (Melbourne) [snip] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 01:59:05 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Oh? I saved the following post: Melbourne Possible shower (that's from ABCNews Online for 17th November) Even if it didn't rain, and I wasn't all over that place so don't know, the potential was obviously there or the ABC wouldn't have written that. Potential is all I am concerned with. I am claiming that potential is what the moon arranges. I make no other claim. If you think I do then I have not been careful enough with my wording. And even though they don't say so in so many words, I believe all forecasting agencies are only claiming potential too. In July I said that you'd have to wait till November to see some rain. I meant potential. I think that it's pretty clear that this month has seen more POSSIBLE rain than in the months between July and now. Already I believe I did more than the BoM could do. In fact quite the opposite. Those BoM people in this list told me how stupid my claim of dryness till November was. Go back and see David Jones's reply to my post of 24/7/02. regards Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:31 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming > See below for details.... > > Melbourne 14th - 17th November (and I think even 13th - 18th to allow for > the 24hr error) saw no rain fall in Melbourne - as per the BoM's AWS titled > "Melbourne".... > > Cheers, > > Macca > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 7:44 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > Melbourne potential for rain in November > 14th pm-17th am > 23rd am - 25th am > 27th pm - 28th pm > otherwise mostly dry > > Ken Ring > www.predictweather.com > > Does anyone have a rundown of monthly average rainfall figures for each > month for Melbourne? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:49 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > > At 11:40 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to see > how > > > > we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a > "closest > > >to > > > > the pin" competition. :) > > > > Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will be > > > > interesting to see what happens. > > >Fair enough, Tony. You name a month, anywhere, anytime, and I'll give you > > >the goods from my perspective. We can compare it with the same by anyone > > >else, if they have the courage to put it on the table alongside mine. But > we > > >would need to set ground rules at the outset. The rules would have to be > > >what a "dry" day versus a "wet" one meant, because would a day with a bit > of > > >rain, say overnight whilst mostly dry in the daytime be called a wet day? > > >Also, which part of a city would we be talking about? I get some data > from > > >the airport and some from old newspapers columns. > > > > OK, well, Melbourne (CBD) has an annual average rainfall of around > > 660mm. This rainfall is also fairly evenly spread throughout the year, > > though in summer, it tends to be dominated by a small number of heavy rain > > days, while in winter, it comes in dribs and drabs (showers, drizzle, > > etc). From memory, the airport is a bit drier than the city (I don't > > recall the exact figures). > > > > Doesn't the Bureau consider a "rain day" one with more than 0.2mm > > rainfall? Sounds good enough to me. > > > > I'm just looking at when the drought might break... > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > Attachment Converted: possible_shower_sm.gif: 00000001,46fdf592,00000000,00000000 From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long-range Rain forecast challenge for all Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 02:40:30 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com We can do better than that. We have Painted Apple Moth effect, whereby one or two critters flapping under the mangroves can bring on an artificial typhoon in the shape of a plague of aeroplanes spewing poison over 5,000 homes. Betcha Marvin couldn't beat that..(g) Ken > Don't the Kiwis even allow the Marvin effect in their forecasting? > Phil > <>< +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.109.173.59] From: "John Roenfeldt" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Splitting cell north of Perth? Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:04:03 +0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2002 14:05:01.0562 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBB7E5A0:01C29166] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Robert and all, I was on that cell and it wasnt that great. The split cell on the eastern side was a tiny little affair, although it did look quite pretty. The western split was a lot better and I filmed a nice lowering) (non rotating) on the NW flank that lasted a couple of minutes. The best bit was the lightning show on the drive home. cheers, John Roenfeldt http://www.inflowimages.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Goler" To: Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:40 PM Subject: aus-wx: Splitting cell north of Perth? > > Hey all > > A bit of activity on the Perth radar at the moment! > The 256km radar shows a nice cell splitting about 150km north of Perth. > The 00Z sounding did show some not too bad wind shear. > > > Cheers > > -- > > Robert A. Goler > > School of Mathematical Sciences > PO Box 28M > Monash University > Clayton, Vic 3800 > Australia > > ph. +61 3 9905 4424 > email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au > http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ > > -- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.109.173.59] From: "John Roenfeldt" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Splitting cell north of Perth? Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:05:50 +0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2002 14:06:41.0472 (UTC) FILETIME=[3744F400:01C29167] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com .............sigh............ not to be :-( > Extremely interesting!! I dont recall seeing a storm split around perth on > radar so clearly before! > > Hope the WA chasers are out and about! this could be a big event! > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long-range Rain forecast challenge for all Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 06:59:57 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com And you must also take into account that the earth spins at approximately 1,000 mph and therefore it should be really windy. (In theory). And gravity must really suck as we should all get thrown off into space.... Where's my medication.... > Hey mate! Just check out that equation again! > You forgot to mention our pet butterfly, Marvin, who lives outside our > bedroom window on the 17th floor here in Hong Kong. He successfully kept > typhoons out of Hong Kong for the whole of this season (except for > Typhoon Hagupit which came while he took his annual leave - we recalled > him from leave in time to prevent a direct hit). > You must admit such a powerful set of wings must have significant effects > especially on WA (same time zone), maybe a little less weighting for NT > and SA (one and a half hours ahead), and maybe a little less weighting > again for QLD, NSW, VIC and TAS (two hours ahead). > Don't the Kiwis even allow the Marvin effect in their forecasting? > > Phil +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:33:05 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2002 20:32:58.0848 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E0FDE00:01C2919D] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com How did I know there would be just another excuse..... You were happy to post to the list when your "mooncast" for Alice Springs came true but then when someone posts some information to show otherwise for another location there is just another excuse....."OH BUT THE POTENTIAL WAS THERE"..... Geeze - given your forecasting parameters, Ken, (of which seems to be ever growing) you could basically say I think its going to rain every day of the year and still not be wrong! Macca -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 11:59 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Oh? I saved the following post: Melbourne Possible shower (that's from ABCNews Online for 17th November) Even if it didn't rain, and I wasn't all over that place so don't know, the potential was obviously there or the ABC wouldn't have written that. Potential is all I am concerned with. I am claiming that potential is what the moon arranges. I make no other claim. If you think I do then I have not been careful enough with my wording. And even though they don't say so in so many words, I believe all forecasting agencies are only claiming potential too. In July I said that you'd have to wait till November to see some rain. I meant potential. I think that it's pretty clear that this month has seen more POSSIBLE rain than in the months between July and now. Already I believe I did more than the BoM could do. In fact quite the opposite. Those BoM people in this list told me how stupid my claim of dryness till November was. Go back and see David Jones's reply to my post of 24/7/02. regards Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:31 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming > See below for details.... > > Melbourne 14th - 17th November (and I think even 13th - 18th to allow for > the 24hr error) saw no rain fall in Melbourne - as per the BoM's AWS titled > "Melbourne".... > > Cheers, > > Macca > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 7:44 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > Melbourne potential for rain in November > 14th pm-17th am > 23rd am - 25th am > 27th pm - 28th pm > otherwise mostly dry > > Ken Ring > www.predictweather.com > > Does anyone have a rundown of monthly average rainfall figures for each > month for Melbourne? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:49 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > > At 11:40 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to see > how > > > > we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a > "closest > > >to > > > > the pin" competition. :) > > > > Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will be > > > > interesting to see what happens. > > >Fair enough, Tony. You name a month, anywhere, anytime, and I'll give you > > >the goods from my perspective. We can compare it with the same by anyone > > >else, if they have the courage to put it on the table alongside mine. But > we > > >would need to set ground rules at the outset. The rules would have to be > > >what a "dry" day versus a "wet" one meant, because would a day with a bit > of > > >rain, say overnight whilst mostly dry in the daytime be called a wet day? > > >Also, which part of a city would we be talking about? I get some data > from > > >the airport and some from old newspapers columns. > > > > OK, well, Melbourne (CBD) has an annual average rainfall of around > > 660mm. This rainfall is also fairly evenly spread throughout the year, > > though in summer, it tends to be dominated by a small number of heavy rain > > days, while in winter, it comes in dribs and drabs (showers, drizzle, > > etc). From memory, the airport is a bit drier than the city (I don't > > recall the exact figures). > > > > Doesn't the Bureau consider a "rain day" one with more than 0.2mm > > rainfall? Sounds good enough to me. > > > > I'm just looking at when the drought might break... > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:41:53 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2002 20:41:46.0959 (UTC) FILETIME=[68D735F0:01C2919E] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Paul - posts like this from you are just as pedantic. Your input here was not required - next time you have a brain fart like this, perhaps keep it to yourself. Providing Ken with more forecasting parameters is what we all want isn't it..... Ken - Can you please identify exactly under what circumstances (if possible at all) that your forecasts would be considered wrong? Macca -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Paul Mossman Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 8:27 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Ever heard of the word "pedantic..." Ken could similarly argue that "Melbourne" encompasses all CBD area and Melbourne City Council areas. Was there rain recorded there? Pedantic posts like these do not further anyones point of view...... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:01 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming > See below for details.... > > Melbourne 14th - 17th November (and I think even 13th - 18th to allow for > the 24hr error) saw no rain fall in Melbourne - as per the BoM's AWS titled > "Melbourne".... > > Cheers, > > Macca > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 7:44 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > Melbourne potential for rain in November > 14th pm-17th am > 23rd am - 25th am > 27th pm - 28th pm > otherwise mostly dry > > Ken Ring > www.predictweather.com > > Does anyone have a rundown of monthly average rainfall figures for each > month for Melbourne? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:49 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > > At 11:40 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to see > how > > > > we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a > "closest > > >to > > > > the pin" competition. :) > > > > Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will be > > > > interesting to see what happens. > > >Fair enough, Tony. You name a month, anywhere, anytime, and I'll give you > > >the goods from my perspective. We can compare it with the same by anyone > > >else, if they have the courage to put it on the table alongside mine. But > we > > >would need to set ground rules at the outset. The rules would have to be > > >what a "dry" day versus a "wet" one meant, because would a day with a bit > of > > >rain, say overnight whilst mostly dry in the daytime be called a wet day? > > >Also, which part of a city would we be talking about? I get some data > from > > >the airport and some from old newspapers columns. > > > > OK, well, Melbourne (CBD) has an annual average rainfall of around > > 660mm. This rainfall is also fairly evenly spread throughout the year, > > though in summer, it tends to be dominated by a small number of heavy rain > > days, while in winter, it comes in dribs and drabs (showers, drizzle, > > etc). From memory, the airport is a bit drier than the city (I don't > > recall the exact figures). > > > > Doesn't the Bureau consider a "rain day" one with more than 0.2mm > > rainfall? Sounds good enough to me. > > > > I'm just looking at when the drought might break... > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: Some rain in Sydney's North Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:26:30 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Message
I recorded 1.5 mm, mostly last night here between Chatswood West & North Ryde in Sydney's Northern Suburbs.
 
To view each days statistics visit my homepage at: 
From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: pedantic and rain. Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:33:28 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Ever heard of the word "pedantic..." > >Ken could similarly argue that "Melbourne" encompasses all CBD area and >Melbourne City Council areas. Was there rain recorded there? > >Pedantic posts like these do not further anyone's point of view...... Come on Paul... get off your high horse. Maybe Ken can define what area Melbourne is, and thereby make his forecasts more useful.... Then again, you probably find there is recordable rainfall in "Melbourne" on average on about 25 days in November, which kinda makes "yes it will rain forecasts" quite useless. Anyway, back to the weather, this coming Sunday/Monday looks very promising for the SE, with high temperature, high dew points, and high total-totals. Even Melbourne should get a trace or two out of this. Elsewhere, I wouldn't be surprised to see widespread 5-15+mm falls, possibly heavier. Regards, David Dr David Jones Head of Climate Analysis Section National Climate Centre Bureau of Meteorology GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia email : D.Jones at bom.gov.au Fax : (+61 3) 9669 4678 Ph (work) : (+61 3) 9669 4085 Ph (home) : (+61 3) 9755 1923 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:35:27 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2002 23:35:27.0592 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC059E80:01C291B6] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thats a fair point Macca, So there is no possiblity of you being wrong, its all good in theory, but what about it happening practically? Cheerio Karl :) >From: "Andrew McDonald" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming >Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:33:05 +1100 > >How did I know there would be just another excuse..... > >You were happy to post to the list when your "mooncast" for Alice Springs >came true but then when someone posts some information to show otherwise >for >another location there is just another excuse....."OH BUT THE POTENTIAL WAS >THERE"..... > >Geeze - given your forecasting parameters, Ken, (of which seems to be ever >growing) you could basically say I think its going to rain every day of the >year and still not be wrong! > >Macca > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring >Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 11:59 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > >Oh? I saved the following post: > > Melbourne > > Possible shower > > >(that's from ABCNews Online for 17th November) > >Even if it didn't rain, and I wasn't all over that place so don't know, the >potential was obviously there or the ABC wouldn't have written that. >Potential is all I am concerned with. I am claiming that potential is what >the moon arranges. I make no other claim. If you think I do then I have not >been careful enough with my wording. And even though they don't say so in >so >many words, I believe all forecasting agencies are only claiming potential >too. > >In July I said that you'd have to wait till November to see some rain. I >meant potential. I think that it's pretty clear that this month has seen >more POSSIBLE rain than in the months between July and now. Already I >believe I did more than the BoM could do. In fact quite the opposite. Those >BoM people in this list told me how stupid my claim of dryness till >November >was. Go back and see David Jones's reply to my post of 24/7/02. >regards >Ken > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Andrew McDonald" >To: >Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:31 PM >Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming > > > > See below for details.... > > > > Melbourne 14th - 17th November (and I think even 13th - 18th to allow >for > > the 24hr error) saw no rain fall in Melbourne - as per the BoM's AWS >titled > > "Melbourne".... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Macca > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 7:44 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > > > > Melbourne potential for rain in November > > 14th pm-17th am > > 23rd am - 25th am > > 27th pm - 28th pm > > otherwise mostly dry > > > > Ken Ring > > www.predictweather.com > > > > Does anyone have a rundown of monthly average rainfall figures for each > > month for Melbourne? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:49 AM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > > > > > At 11:40 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to >see > > how > > > > > we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a > > "closest > > > >to > > > > > the pin" competition. :) > > > > > Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will >be > > > > > interesting to see what happens. > > > >Fair enough, Tony. You name a month, anywhere, anytime, and I'll give >you > > > >the goods from my perspective. We can compare it with the same by >anyone > > > >else, if they have the courage to put it on the table alongside mine. >But > > we > > > >would need to set ground rules at the outset. The rules would have to >be > > > >what a "dry" day versus a "wet" one meant, because would a day with a >bit > > of > > > >rain, say overnight whilst mostly dry in the daytime be called a wet >day? > > > >Also, which part of a city would we be talking about? I get some data > > from > > > >the airport and some from old newspapers columns. > > > > > > OK, well, Melbourne (CBD) has an annual average rainfall of around > > > 660mm. This rainfall is also fairly evenly spread throughout the >year, > > > though in summer, it tends to be dominated by a small number of heavy >rain > > > days, while in winter, it comes in dribs and drabs (showers, drizzle, > > > etc). From memory, the airport is a bit drier than the city (I don't > > > recall the exact figures). > > > > > > Doesn't the Bureau consider a "rain day" one with more than 0.2mm > > > rainfall? Sounds good enough to me. > > > > > > I'm just looking at when the drought might break... > > > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > > http://vkradio.com > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: pedantic and rain. Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:07:17 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I don't have anything concrete on this David, but a neighbour here (Toogoolawah, near Esk - Brisbane Valley - north-west of Brisbane) said to me yesterday that she heard that Inigo Jones had predicted there to be a *deluge* on the 23rd November. That fits with what you are also hinting at. It's only hear-say from my part though. This neighbour is an elderly farmer's wife ... not a weather buff :) The weather here currently is bringing in a fair bit of wind and the skies are starting to cloud. Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jones" To: Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: aus-wx: pedantic and rain. Anyway, back to the weather, this coming Sunday/Monday looks very promising for the SE, with high temperature, high dew points, and high total-totals. Even Melbourne should get a trace or two out of this. Elsewhere, I wouldn't be surprised to see widespread 5-15+mm falls, possibly heavier. Regards, David Dr David Jones Head of Climate Analysis Section National Climate Centre Bureau of Meteorology GPO Box 1289K, Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia email : D.Jones at bom.gov.au Fax : (+61 3) 9669 4678 Ph (work) : (+61 3) 9669 4085 Ph (home) : (+61 3) 9755 1923 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.11.188.12] From: "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Convective Bomb! Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:37:39 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2002 02:37:39.0850 (UTC) FILETIME=[2027CEA0:01C291D0] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi every1, Just checked the latest AVN run and it looks like some seriously low LIs and high CAPE values in NSW tomorrow and Sunday!! The bullseye region with LIs about -6 and CAPE about 2400 is near 34 S and 147 E (which my trusty Mapquest site tells me is within a bulls-roar of West Wyalong.) Anybody in this area it would be nice to see how this convective bomb scenario pans out! Cheers, Kevin Phyland _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: pedantic and rain. Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:41:52 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com David wrote > Anyway, back to the weather, this coming Sunday/Monday looks very promising > for the SE, with high temperature, high dew points, and high total-totals. > Even Melbourne should get a trace or two out of this. Elsewhere, I wouldn't > be surprised to see widespread 5-15+mm falls, possibly heavier. I've already said rain this weekend for Melbourne (23rd-25th and 27th-28th - posted 27/10/02)so no sudden surprises there, also Tasmania..23rd-26th. For Sydney, I have said rain 24th-28th, posted 27/10/02 and 18/11/02. That means mostly dry on the weekend. Very nice to see that the BoM is putting out extended range forecasts at last in answer to my challenge, even if only to agree with my forecasts. What a team! :) Ken +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:07:54 +1100 (EST) From: Robert Goler Subject: aus-wx: Weatherzone visible Oz images X-X-Sender: robert at tornado.maths.monash.edu.au To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all Did anyone save the visible oz (or NSW) sat pics from Weatherzone from around midday to 4pm today?? eg, here's the one I have: http://data.theweather.com.au/access/imageserver.jsp?image=satellite/sat_vis_AUS_latest.jpg If yay, then could I get a copy of the images? Cheers -- Robert A. Goler School of Mathematical Sciences PO Box 28M Monash University Clayton, Vic 3800 Australia ph. +61 3 9905 4424 email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: NSW STA - South COAST To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:40:09 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 22/11/2002 04:40:04 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST NSW Severe Thunderstorm Advice BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE Issued at 1635 on Friday the 22nd of November 2002 The Bureau of Meteorology in Sydney has issued a Severe Thunderstorm Advice for people in the following weather forecast districts: South Coast This advice is valid until 8 pm and it should not be used after this time. Thunderstorms are forecast within the advice area this afternoon. Some of these are expected to be severe, bringing large hailstones, damaging winds and very heavy rainfall. At 4:20pm a very large thunderstorm was located just to the west-southwest of Narooma and was moving northeast. Locations which may be affected by this particular storm include Bodalla, Tuross Head and Moruya. ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.109.175.112] From: "John Roenfeldt" To: Subject: aus-wx: WA Storms - Left Mover Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:11:16 +0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2002 15:12:15.0092 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A4D7B40:01C29239] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
hi all,

cut a long story short I chased this mornings storms down to Wagin and then back up to Brookton to wait fopr the afternoon action. Got some great storms and lots of pics and footage. Did over 900kms and 13.5 hours worth of chasing.
 
Storms had supercellul structure but I could not tell if there was rotation or not, so the jury is out on that one.  It will be interesting to review my footage to see when I can pick any up.
 
Everything else was there though, a nice lowering, good flanking line, v-notch, long lasting, etc


My photos consist of slides but I did take the digital camera and got a couple of shots so you guys would not have to wait until the slides are developed.

http://www.inflowimages.com/1.jpg
 
These photos are no where near as good as the others I took but they do give you some idea of what the storm looked like.
 
The morning storm I chased was also very interesting.  Maybe I can take some stills off the video....


regards
 
John Roenfeldt
 
From: "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: Rain in Sydney's North Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:28:07 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
4mm has fallen here at my place between Chatswood West & North Ryde in Sydney's Northern Suburbs around 9:15am this morning. I recorded a heavy fall of 12mm/hour at one point.
 
 
 
From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Seven Hills data Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:45:13 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Latest figures for this month:
 
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Basin-Friday22nd Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 10:06:23 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi guys!
 
I thought that today had some potential, but these days lately have done completely nothing- so i wasn't holding my breath.
I saw some nice towers go up at about 2pm to the south, but nothing closer. There was a lot of junk cu littering the western sky. I suspected that the dry layer aloft was providing a pretty nice cap--and i was hoping for a late firer.
 
As i drove home from work at about 6pm i saw some rather nice towers to the SW. These kept growing, but still didn't penetrate the cap. Then at about 6:15pm---booooom. Thar she blows. The cap popped and so did my dinner plans.
 
I filmed the storm for around 30 minutes before the structure really began to get me interested. I saw this lovely lowering, and observed old fashion rotation in the middle layers. A few inflow bands laters, and i was on the way south.
 
The storm has developed a lovely lp shape. However, as Matt pointed out--once it came off the ranges-it died.
 
Still some great structure :)
 
Some pics can be found here
 
dann
 
X-Originating-IP: [203.109.175.179] From: "John Roenfeldt" To: Subject: aus-wx: WA Storms - Left Mover Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 08:26:39 +0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2002 00:27:39.0584 (UTC) FILETIME=[213F6C00:01C29287] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
hi all,

cut a long story short I chased this mornings storms down to Wagin and then back up to Brookton to wait fopr the afternoon action. Got some great storms and lots of pics and footage. Did over 900kms and 13.5 hours worth of chasing.
 
Storms had supercellul structure but I could not tell if there was rotation or not, so the jury is out on that one.  It will be interesting to review my footage to see when I can pick any up.
 
Everything else was there though, a nice lowering, good flanking line, v-notch, long lasting, etc


My photos consist of slides but I did take the digital camera and got a couple of shots so you guys would not have to wait until the slides are developed.

http://www.inflowimages.com/1.jpg
 
These photos are no where near as good as the others I took but they do give you some idea of what the storm looked like.
 
The morning storm I chased was also very interesting.  Maybe I can take some stills off the video....


regards
 
John Roenfeldt
 
X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.112] From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Another Question: Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:01:44 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2002 02:01:44.0667 (UTC) FILETIME=[45FABAB0:01C29294] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all not sure about the concrete sweating but I thinks Phil's answer is correct.regarding the fall of leaves we in Canberra have many species planted here.I understand it like us is inherited ie Hair colour etc it is in the Trees' Genes Gavin SSWW Canberra ACT >From: "Phil Smith" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Another Question: >Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:04:28 +0800 > >Here in HK, everyone has concrete floors and when humidity reaches 100% >they always become wet. Actually they get wet from condensation from >the air when the humidity passes about 94% or 95%. When it reaches >100%, if there is no aircon running, it can appear to be raining >inside! Clouds of moisture form indoors, it condenses on the ceiling, >and then drips to the floors. >So my guess is very high humidity has caused it. Do you have a record >of what the humidity was at the time the concrete was sweating? > >Phil ><>< > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk >Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: "arky dave" >To: >Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:05:34 -0600 >Subject: aus-wx: Another Question: > > > Howdy, hoping all are having a Happy and Safe November: > > I may have had this explained to me in time past, but I've > > forgotten the answer, my question is: What causes pavement/concrete > > surfaces to "sweat"? Is it due to high humidity? This happens > > occasionally here. > > Thanks for your answers. Wish ya'll could be here to check > > out our beautiful fall foliage. Oh yes....another question....Would > > ya'll know what causes tree leaves to change color at different rates? > > I've seen 2 of the same kind of small trees, about 5 feet apart-a > > sidewalk between them-one trees leaves have almost fully turned color > > while the others leaves have just started to turn. I was wondering why > > the difference in timing. > > Again Thanks! Yours David (in an Autumn wonderland) > > Powell > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.112] From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: cold in Sweden Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:07:43 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Nov 2002 02:07:44.0188 (UTC) FILETIME=[1C4547C0:01C29295] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Blair, a silly question ;What are you doing in Nordic Land? Iguess you know we are now officially in Drought in Canberra and have volentary water restrictions-first in 30 years! Gavin OB Canberra >From: Blair Trewin >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: cold in Sweden >Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:19:30 +1100 > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > A bit of snow in Stockholm in the last 2 days also down to -10c last >night > > and max temp today about -5c or so. > > > > To those that have records: > > > > In Sweden there has hardly been any precipitation since last March / >April. > > The odd storm in summer. > > > > Can anyone find records if Sweden suffered a similar dry spell at the >same > > time OZ did in 82/83 ? > > > >I couldn't find (easily) any current rainfall data from Sweden, but >could from Finland; Helsinki has had 281mm of rain since the >beginning of March, which is about 60% of normal for the 8 1/2 >month period. By European standards this is a big departure from >normal over such an extended period. > >In 1982 Stockholm was drier than normal (although only by about 10%), >and Helsinki was near normal (although that was, in part, due to a very >wet November). I'm not aware of any known connections between El Nino >and Scandinavian weather, although a connection has been suggested >between it and heavy central European summer rains. As flood rains >in central Europe are often associated with blocking high pressure >over Scandinavia that hints at a possible El Nino influence >further north, but I haven't seen that tested in any rigorous >sense. > >(For what it's worth, the summers of 1994 and 1997, particularly >1994, were hot and dry in Scandinavia. I remember this well because >I was in Sweden and Norway in July-August 1994 and arrived in >Stockholm to a succession of mid-30s days - not something they're >used to! Stockholm is full of lakes and they were certainly >getting plenty of use...) > >As some of you would have seen in the news in the last 24 hours, >there has been severe flooding in the Swiss Alps, as well as northern >Scotland (presumably from two different systems). Unlike the August >event, the southern side of the Alps seem to have copped the brunt of >it this time, with reports of 48-hour totals in the 400-500mm range >near the Swiss-Italian border. Extreme short-period rainfall is >quite common in this area - with the combination of topography and >copious available water from the still-warm Mediterranean - but >400 is getting up there. (Once again, August 1994 provided some >personal fact-finding in this respect :-) > >Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: Bathurst rain To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:36:07 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 23/11/2002 02:36:08 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com HI All.. Massive rainfalls which lasted about 15 - 20min. Driving down William Street Bathurst was turned into a river. 2 foot of water running down the street.. Many power outages all over Bathurst areas. Rain has now gone. Have people checked out the lightning tracker. Busy day for me in at work!! Dave. ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:55:02 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: Re: aus-wx: I Just Thought I would Let you Know Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 06:49 20/11/02 +1100, you wrote: >That's pretty awesome for this time of year. Also the fact that you got 124 >mm and I've only had 300 here for the whole 11 months :-( > >Subject: aus-wx: I Just Thought I would Let you Know No sign of a drought this side of the ditch, well actually looks like no sign of a summer either. Oct and November being below average months for heat. Lots of rain here in ChCh plus hail, tornadoes whatever, you name it. I can remember posting last year of how boring it was here whilst you Aussie's could wip up a good storm with a drop of the hat!! As far as thunderous activity goes, it's quietened down a bit now. JohnGaul NZTS > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Question Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 19:04:33 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi everyone,
I am hoping to publish a rainfall research article in Weather, a publication of the Royal Meteorological Society.
I want to submit a map of the Sydney and adjacent Blue Mountains/coastal areas  with a topographical relief (ie showing heights above sea level). If it has annual rainfall averages that would be even better but I can't find anything on the BoM's site (such usages would of course be subject to obtaining permission if required).
Does anyone know of an appropriate website?
 
Thanx 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: aus-wx: Long-range Forecasts & Butterflies Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:14:21 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com In reply to some observations, queries etc. [Phil Smith] >Hey mate! Just check out that equation again! >You forgot to mention our pet butterfly, Marvin, who lives outside our >bedroom window on the 17th floor here in Hong Kong. He successfully kept >typhoons out of Hong Kong for the whole of this season (except for >Typhoon Hagupit which came while he took his annual leave - we recalled >him from leave in time to prevent a direct hit). An outstanding observation to backup my theory. By having more than one butterfly, you would observe less TCs (or prevent a direct hit should one already form nearby) to HK. However, you must keep in mind that 2 butterflies will not give you 2 times the benefits of one butterfly. There is the law of diminishing returns in force (I.e. You simply can't have 1 zillion butterflies to totally wipe out all TC is your region) >You must admit such a powerful set of wings must have significant effects >especially on WA (same time zone), maybe a little less weighting for NT >and SA (one and a half hours ahead), and maybe a little less weighting >again for QLD, NSW, VIC and TAS (two hours ahead). You are absolutely correct on this point. The butterfly's radius of influence has a logarithmic decay in both the x (longitude) and y (latitude) direction which I did not describe previously. I mentioned that butterflies in Sth America causes TCs in Aus, while you observed that in HK, they PREVENT TCs. This shows the DIPOLE effect very clearly, which is common in some met observation with various phenomenon (Sth America is approx opposite to Aus on the globe!!!). If the butterfly force in Sth Amer is GREATER than AUS, there is a GREATER risk of TCs in our region of longitude (When force is +ve, more risk for Aus region). Exactly the same way as the SOI work, which people are familar with. For the stormchasers out there, to create more storms, you should send as many butterflies to Sth Amer as possible to boost their advantage. Must have a very good story should custom start asking questions about the butterflies or the feds bust down your door. Using "I am a stormchaser" excuse is NOT adviced! Those who are not keen on severe wx stuff (think Sydney metro and the various hail storm incidents!) You may want to import or breed butterflies to oppose the forces on the other side of the globe. There are several additional complications. Firstly, there is the additional decay effect with latitude not mentioned before. Due to the uneven solar radiation, mid lat are generally cooler than tropics. Butterflies generally prefer warm climate and don't work as well in cooler temp. My research indicate that at ~30s, you would need 10 butterflies to have the same effect as one in the tropics. At 45s, you would need 100. At 60s, 1000 (if you can keep any alive at this latitude). Again, have a good excuse when the feds come for you! >Don't the Kiwis even allow the Marvin effect in their forecasting? They should if they haven't been doing it! [Ken Ring wrote] >We can do better than that. We have Painted Apple Moth effect, whereby one >or two critters flapping under the mangroves can bring on an artificial >typhoon in the shape of a plague of aeroplanes spewing poison over 5,000 >homes. Betcha Marvin couldn't beat that..(g) Good point Ken. Didn't have time to mention that moths can also increase/decrease chance of TCs. Moths are generally smaller and thus does not have as big of an impact as a butterfly. In my 16 parameters multiple regression eqn, you would have noted that I included PI in it. This is because the power conversion of Moths & Butterflies is exactly PI. (I.e. for every one butterfly, you need 3.14159265358979323846 moths to produce the equivalent power. Even to 20 decimal places, this is still too inaccurate to use in my equation). As most people already know, a small error in the initialisation of the equation will lead to very big errors in a few days. This is the main reason why I generally talk about butterflies and not moths. Generally public also recognise and admire butterflies more than moths. Tony Langdon (VK3JED) >LOL :-) Chaos reigns supreme.... An understanable thinking but unfortunately incorrect. Chaos is simply what we don't understand. Scientist has yet to prove that Chaos exists - you can always filter out patterns from a seemingly chaotic mess. Someone (on the tip of my tounge!!!) wrote that you can calculate the weather a long way ahead if you had a really fast computer. I completely agree with him. If you have a computer a zillion times faster than today, and used all the satellite/radar to track all butterflies, months, etc extremely accurately simultaneously, you should be able to produce forecasts a month out as accurate as +24Hr forecasts we currently enjoy! This is a much easier way than trying to crunch all those numbers and trying to solve these non-linear partial differential equations, which has no general solution, and making lots of potentially fatal assumptions along the way!!! Anyone else with me? tuan (melbourne -----Original Message----- From: "Tuan Phan" To: Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:33:42 +1100 Subject: aus-wx: Long-range Rain forecast challenge for all > Hi All, > [snip] > Perhaps the *clinching* variable that I have included in my equation, > that > no one else has discussed at all, is the flapping of the butterfly's > wing in > Sth America. After all, everyone knows that the flapping by butterflys > over > there is responsible for ALL the TCs that occur in the Aus region ;) ! [snip] > > Tuan (Melbourne) [snip] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 08:04:19 EST Subject: aus-wx: Re: jet stream chart To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I cant seem to find any charts that show the current jet streams over Australia .
Can anyone direct me to a quick link ?

Regards

Dennis Cottle
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:41:17 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: jet stream chart Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Saturday, 23 November 2002 11:39:01 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Re: jet stream chart
 
I cant seem to find any charts that show the current jet streams over Australia .
Can anyone direct me to a quick link ?

Regards

Dennis Cottle
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP14.gif: 00000001,0cbb8220,00000000,00000000 From: "Ben Quinn" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: jet stream chart Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:48:56 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
G'day Dennis, all
 
The FNMOC site has some good 300mb charts
 
 
I don't know if they still do but the analysis charts used to become available about 2-2:30pm (and am for the 12z forecast) of an afternoon, which must be about as recent as we can get charts of this kind.  Note the AVN forecast hasn't updated for several days - NGP and MRF are still there though
 
TWC has a MSLP analysis with the jetstream location plotted over it that is available much sooner but it doesn't include wind speeds
 
(i think you have to be registered to view that page)
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: jet stream chart

-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Saturday, 23 November 2002 11:39:01 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Re: jet stream chart
 
I cant seem to find any charts that show the current jet streams over Australia .
Can anyone direct me to a quick link ?

Regards

Dennis Cottle
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP15.gif: 00000001,3e18dd17,00000000,00000000 From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: El Nino Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 11:28:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
From today's Herald:
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
X-Sender: meso at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 14:38:43 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Mal Ninnes Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm confused. Is this about weather, or turkeys and oysters? :-) At 11:28 AM 11/24/02 +1100, you wrote: > From today's Herald: >http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/11/24/103769794 >Keith Barnett +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 14:24:50 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
i'm even more confused, what the hell has the price of oysters got to do with the lack of rain, or is this just jumping on the 'jack the price up bandwagon' coming up to christmas.
 
Richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Sunday, 24 November 2002 2:19:29 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino
 
I'm confused. Is this about weather, or turkeys and oysters? :-)




At 11:28 AM 11/24/02 +1100, you wrote:
> From today's Herald:
>http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/11/24/103769794
>Keith Barnett


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP16.gif: 00000001,11674a6d,00000000,00000000 From: "Duncan & Mandy" To: Subject: aus-wx: Ken's prediction Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:02:07 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken Ring predicted sometime ago that there would be a possibility of rain on November the 22nd. With Ken's rules of error for 1 day each side of the predicted date, rain did fall in the district within eyesight on the 23rd, so therefore there was the 'possibility' that rain could have fallen in township of Alice Springs. 3mm did actually fall in the Bureau's rain guage at the airport, about 10km south of town. The BOM in their 'outlook' forecast was for a fine and sunny day for the 22nd and 23rd. Their forecast for today (24th) was for storms, and currently that is the situation. But for the 23rd, I guess it's 1 for Ken's prediction, 0 for BOM's forecast. What puts some doubt over Ken's prediction is that, except for the 22nd, there has been isolated rain (according to radar) in the Alice Springs district since 18th November, and probably will remain that way until the 27th November. Anyway, Ken said he only predicts for the odd date for areas that are isolated, so on hard facts, along with his prediction for this area in October, which was correct, Ken has a 100% strike record. Cheers, Duncan Alice Springs, N.T. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 9:13 am Subject: aus-wx: 6 months of forecast > Here's my end of the bargain. > regards > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:35:58 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Come on Ken that's a bit unfair. Apart from that, you should be sufficiently 'savvy' to recognise media hyberbole.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Ring
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino

The article describes Blair Trewin as the country's leading forecaster. This is someone who said (of me) "you should not be allowed to practice... unless you demonstrate professional competency(18/11)."
In July I said the drought would last until November(24/7) and I ain't even forecaster in the country. If predicting the dryness to break in November, back in July, is a measure of incompetency, then all I can say is it's a funny old world.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: aus-wx: El Nino

From today's Herald:
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: El Nino Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:36:11 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Oh geeze..... Do we have to continue with all the b*tching and moaning on here and can we PLEASE get back to talking about the weather...not who has said what about someone else and crap like that. This is getting beyond annoying. If you want to flame each other's means and practices, create another email list please and leave this one alone to those who actually want to talk about weather...not compete against each other. PaulY -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 11:59 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino The article describes Blair Trewin as the country's leading forecaster. This is someone who said (of me) "you should not be allowed to practice... unless you demonstrate professional competency(18/11)." In July I said the drought would last until November(24/7) and I ain't even forecaster in the country. If predicting the dryness to break in November, back in July, is a measure of incompetency, then all I can say is it's a funny old world. http://abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s733412.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: Keith Barnett To: Weather list Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 1:28 PM Subject: aus-wx: El Nino From today's Herald: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/11/24/1037697944979.html Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:23:36 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
back then you said the drought would last at least until november,
you didn't predict the dry would actually break in nov.
but now that your saying you did, don't count your chooks, it aint broke yet, but knowing the way you twist thing to suit yourself if one square km in aus. goes out of drought you'll say you were right.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Sunday, 24 November 2002 3:00:01 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino
 
The article describes Blair Trewin as the country's leading forecaster. This is someone who said (of me) "you should not be allowed to practice... unless you demonstrate professional competency(18/11)."
In July I said the drought would last until November(24/7) and I ain't even forecaster in the country. If predicting the dryness to break in November, back in July, is a measure of incompetency, then all I can say is it's a funny old world.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: aus-wx: El Nino

From today's Herald:
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP17.gif: 00000001,5301cfd1,00000000,00000000 From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:59:00 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
The article describes Blair Trewin as the country's leading forecaster. This is someone who said (of me) "you should not be allowed to practice... unless you demonstrate professional competency(18/11)."
In July I said the drought would last until November(24/7) and I ain't even forecaster in the country. If predicting the dryness to break in November, back in July, is a measure of incompetency, then all I can say is it's a funny old world.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: aus-wx: El Nino

From today's Herald:
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
X-Originating-IP: [203.220.169.55] From: "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long-range Forecasts & Butterflies Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:55:02 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2002 05:55:02.0386 (UTC) FILETIME=[07AEE520:01C2937E] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tuan, ..well actually I think that chaos theory probably best describes in the macro-world what Quantum Mechanics describes in the pico-world. Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle basically says that the act of observation changes the measurements... If that ain't as good an analogy to the "Butterfly Effect" I'll go he... :)) Cheers, Kevin Phyland. > Tony Langdon (VK3JED) > >LOL :-) Chaos reigns supreme.... >An understanable thinking but unfortunately incorrect. Chaos is simply what >we don't understand. Scientist has yet to prove that Chaos exists - you can >always filter out patterns from a seemingly chaotic mess. Someone (on the _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Way, way off topic Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 18:15:40 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Sorry about the way off topic but I was watering the plants before and found a perfectly white spider. About the same size and build of a redback but no stripe. Just pure white. Anyone know what it may be?
An Albino perhaps?
Have it in a jar at present. Tried taking a picture but can't get close enough for a clear shot.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "christine" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way, way off topic Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 19:29:45 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
the spider is called a flower spider,they can be any colour,an insect visiting the flower for pollen or nectar is seized and bitten,then sucked dry.....hope that helps
chris
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 6:15 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Way, way off topic

Sorry about the way off topic but I was watering the plants before and found a perfectly white spider. About the same size and build of a redback but no stripe. Just pure white. Anyone know what it may be?
An Albino perhaps?
Have it in a jar at present. Tried taking a picture but can't get close enough for a clear shot.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way, way off topic Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 19:39:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
We have seen large redbacks that were living in a building and they were in of varying fawn shades and with a red stripe definitely there.
 
Also we did discover a very light specimen near where our "favourite" redback colony is in our garden, it had a very very small red patch on its back.
 
Judy Mayo
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 6:15 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Way, way off topic

Sorry about the way off topic but I was watering the plants before and found a perfectly white spider. About the same size and build of a redback but no stripe. Just pure white. Anyone know what it may be?
An Albino perhaps?
Have it in a jar at present. Tried taking a picture but can't get close enough for a clear shot.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 21:40:28 +1100 (EST) From: Robert Goler Subject: aus-wx: Chase to NSW today X-X-Sender: robert at tornado.maths.monash.edu.au To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey all I did a chase today with the target area being northern Vic/southern NSW, and I found a few little cells from around 1pm to 5pm. I was always on the southern side of the action, and so structure-wise it wasn't the best - the amorphous grey of precipitation was aplenty. I could see a few hardish looking tops further to the north, and conversing with Macca, it seemed as though this was from some large cells near Berrigan which got to pink on the radar. There was lightning static on the radio, but I didn't see any for myself. I did drive through a few rain curtains near the small town of Rennie in NSW, which turned out to be barely 10-20mm, but it packed a punch with some very strong gusts of wind, which I estimated at times gusting to 30-40 knots! Some very impressive walls of dust (a very apt description!!!) were kicked up and when driving through them, the visibility was reduced to a few m. It typically took 10-20 secs to pass. There was quite a bit of tree debris on some roads, with one road having about half a dozen foot-diameter branches strewn across it over a distance of 1km. Naturally I had to get out and move them myself in order to get through! It was a pretty good chase even though I didn't see any good cloud structure. I was impressed by the strong winds though. In all, 837km travelled, which goes with my 930km I drove yesterday on a scenic drive along the Great Alpine Road. Cheers -- Robert A. Goler School of Mathematical Sciences PO Box 28M Monash University Clayton, Vic 3800 Australia ph. +61 3 9905 4424 email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ken's prediction Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 03:48:37 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > (Richard Modistach)back then you said the drought would last at least until november, you didn't predict the >dry would actually break in nov. Richard, I think I did. On 24/7/02 I said "In my opinion not really much to look forward to immediately. Could be some rain between July 27th-29th but not a great deal - and I'd expect it to clear again by 30th. I'd be surprised if Sydney got more than 25mm in August and same for September. August's rain will be mainly between 6th-9th. October could be lucky to see 10mm, but November, aha, I think you'll see around 40-50mm. Most of that will be from 16th-24th November." My inference was that the dryness would be alleviated in November. > (Duncan)October, which was correct, Ken has a 100% strike record. Thanks Duncan, much obliged, that's all the feedback I wanted to hear, to see if I was on track. Ladies and gentlemen, I think I have done enough to state my case. I'm moving on as a favour to those who have stated they want to get rid of me. Clearly what I do makes a lot of people feel uneasy and sadly, no serious forecasts have appeared to enable us to have a real comparison of methods. So I can't see much point in my staying on this list. If anyone wants further longrange information from me I suggest they email me privately and I'll be more than happy to give anyone my prediction for any area. I will also discontinue further Australian forecasts from my website. I wish you all the very best regards Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Duncan & Mandy" To: Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 5:32 PM Subject: aus-wx: Ken's prediction > Ken Ring predicted sometime ago that there would be a possibility of rain on > November the 22nd. With Ken's rules of error for 1 day each side of the > predicted date, rain did fall in the district within eyesight on the 23rd, > so therefore there was the 'possibility' that rain could have fallen in > township of Alice Springs. 3mm did actually fall in the Bureau's rain guage > at the airport, about 10km south of town. The BOM in their 'outlook' > forecast was for a fine and sunny day for the 22nd and 23rd. Their forecast > for today (24th) was for storms, and currently that is the situation. > But for the 23rd, I guess it's 1 for Ken's prediction, 0 for BOM's forecast. > What puts some doubt over Ken's prediction is that, except for the 22nd, > there has been isolated rain (according to radar) in the Alice Springs > district since 18th November, and probably will remain that way until the > 27th November. > Anyway, Ken said he only predicts for the odd date for areas that are > isolated, so on hard facts, along with his prediction for this area in > October, which was correct, Ken has a 100% strike record. > Cheers, > Duncan > Alice Springs, N.T. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 9:13 am > Subject: aus-wx: 6 months of forecast > > > > Here's my end of the bargain. > > regards > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: celt at xtra.co.nz X-Originating-IP: [210.55.84.107] To: Subject: aus-wx: OT? Dewpoints and Compressors Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 8:56:52 +1300 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Well I know this is effectively off-topic, but as it mentions dew-points I thought I might get away with it :) We are currently looking at a new compressor and this is an excerpt from Company A's email, trying to sway our decision against Company B's model. Company A: Offering refrigerated unit Company B: offering thermal mass model ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Upon reviewing, we note that [company B] state "Most applications the ideal dewpoint is +2 to +3 C, in warmer climates +6 to +10C is still acceptable". This lends towards the unit succumbing to a floating Dewpoint & will mean that in order for the unit to try & maintain 3C, that the unit has to heat up the air again to cut in, therefore becoming a cycling operation. This means that the dewpoint must rise (see the 6 to 10C comment above & also note that the technical brochure states power input at max 50C & 10C dewpoint - indicated as footnote 3). Say you an average of 8C at most times. This means that at any time, without the true dewpoint being constantly maintained (as in our refrigerated type), you will be introducing various quantities of condensate into your system. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Is this dew-point argument from Company A valid? Thanks for any enlightenment or comments (assuming there is logic to the argument) Cheers Pete +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 07:12:34 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: OT? Dewpoints and Compressors Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
whats this about "a thermal mass model"?
i take it we're talking about an 'air' compressor here?
what type of compressor is it, reciprocating, hydrovane or screw?
what operating pressure and volume are we talking about.?
what application is it being used for.?
at this stage i can't see what the dewpoint has got to do with the running of the compressor.
refrigeration units are add on systems to chill the air after it's been compressed to condense and separate the water out of the air, as the air goes into the receiver any temperature rise above the refrigeration point causes the air to be below 100% thus maintaining dry lines.
refrigeration units can be used on any type of compressor.
it sounds like they're trying to refrigerate the air before the compressor.
i'm curious about this one
please private mail me
 
regards
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Monday, 25 November 2002 6:40:07 AM
Subject: aus-wx: OT? Dewpoints and Compressors
 
Hi all,
Well I know this is effectively off-topic, but as it mentions dew-points I thought I might get away with it :)

We are currently looking at a new compressor and this is an excerpt from Company A's email, trying to sway
our decision against Company B's model.

Company A: Offering refrigerated unit
Company B: offering thermal mass model

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Upon reviewing, we note that [company B] state
"Most applications the ideal dewpoint is +2 to +3 C, in warmer climates +6 to +10C is still acceptable".

This lends towards the unit succumbing to a floating Dewpoint & will mean that in order for the unit to try & maintain 3C, that the unit has to heat up the air again to cut in, therefore becoming a cycling operation.

This means that the dewpoint must rise (see the 6 to 10C comment above & also note that the technical brochure states power input at max 50C & 10C dewpoint - indicated as footnote 3). Say you an average of 8C at most times. This means that at any time, without the true dewpoint being constantly maintained (as in our refrigerated type), you will be introducing various quantities of condensate into your system.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Is this dew-point argument from Company A valid?

Thanks for any enlightenment or comments (assuming there is logic to the argument)

Cheers
Pete


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP18.gif: 00000001,4c0e58d6,00000000,00000000 From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:30:45 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C293E3.2AE19000 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > The article describes Blair Trewin as the country's leading forecaster. = > This is someone who said (of me) "you should not be allowed to = > practice... unless you demonstrate professional competency(18/11)."=20 If the Sun-Herald said that about me I'm flattered. Ken, however, should get his facts a bit straighter, because at no time have I made any such comment (I presume it was quoted text in a reply I'd made to someone else) - not that I have major problems with the sentiment. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:29:30 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Having the hottest November day in 20 years (I think it was an El Nino year then too)  42.0 at 3pm. May go higher by the looks of it.
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:41:48 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C29497.726CCA20 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Having the hottest November day in 20 years (I think it was an El Nino = > year then too) 42.0 at 3pm. May go higher by the looks of it. Richmond's 42.1 (assuming that's the final maximum) is the second- highest on record for November after 25 November 1982 (so it's not even a date record). The 37.9 at Observatory Hill isn't quite as extreme, but is still the highest since 39.2 in 1988. (There have been two November 40s there, in 1946 and 1982). Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:41:42 +1100 (EST) From: Robert Goler Subject: aus-wx: AVN model page X-X-Sender: robert at tornado.maths.monash.edu.au To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey all Does anyone have a working link to that AVN model page which allows you to plot all sorts of parameters, eg CAPE, LIs, etc??? The one that normally gets me there: http://sgi62.wwb.noaa.gov:8080/cgi-bin/disp_avn.sh has gived me a "URL could not be retrieved" error over the past few hours, even though it was working yesterday. Cheers -- Robert A. Goler School of Mathematical Sciences PO Box 28M Monash University Clayton, Vic 3800 Australia ph. +61 3 9905 4424 email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: cold in Sweden To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:06:27 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Hi Blair, a silly question ;What are you doing in Nordic Land? Iguess you > know we are now officially in Drought in Canberra and have volentary water > restrictions-first in 30 years! > Gavin OB Canberra > I'm not in Scandinavia at the moment - but I go there reasonably regularly in my other life as a competitive orienteer (rather less competitive this year than usual :-) This means that I had the dubious pleasure of experiencing the non-existent summer that Jason referred to (I'm not sure whether he was talking about 1998 or 2000, but they were both shockers). By the way, is there any truth in the rumour that one of the earliest noted breaches of the Canberra water restrictions came in the form of the sprinklers outside the AFFA building? (AFFA is the government department responsible, among other things, for federal drought assistance). Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:23:14 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: AVN model page Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Monday, 25 November 2002 7:19:50 PM
Subject: aus-wx: AVN model page
 
Hey all

Does anyone have a working link to that AVN model page which allows you to
plot all sorts of parameters, eg CAPE, LIs, etc??? The one that normally
gets me there:
http://sgi62.wwb.noaa.gov:8080/cgi-bin/disp_avn.sh
has gived me a "URL could not be retrieved" error over the past few hours,
even though it was working yesterday.


Cheers

--

Robert A. Goler

School of Mathematical Sciences
PO Box 28M
Monash University
Clayton, Vic 3800
Australia

ph. +61 3 9905 4424
email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au
http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/

--

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP19.gif: 00000001,3e62e516,00000000,00000000 From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Water restrictions. What the? Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:51:51 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
This one really gets up my nose.
Albury has water restrictions, Corowa has water restrictions. South of these, Wodonga doesn't and neither does Rutherglen.
We all get our water from the same hole. What's going on?
Oh, I forgot. Maybe its an election thing that will be re-addressed after Saturday, and then we'll be on restrictions :-)
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Water restrictions. What the? Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:26:11 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
The Dam levels in Canberra dropped to 58% over the weekend, down ~2% in a Fortnight. Forced restricions go into affect when the level reaches 55%. So give it a month and we will be into forced restrictions here.

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:51 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Water restrictions. What the?

This one really gets up my nose.
Albury has water restrictions, Corowa has water restrictions. South of these, Wodonga doesn't and neither does Rutherglen.
We all get our water from the same hole. What's going on?
Oh, I forgot. Maybe its an election thing that will be re-addressed after Saturday, and then we'll be on restrictions :-)
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 17/11/2002
From: "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: Stinker in Canberra Overnight Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 03:21:11 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all, just a quick note saying that it is currently 3:20am and its 27C+, so hard to sleep right now. when will this insanity stop???
 
If the temp stays above 26.0C then we will have a new Record of All time OVERNIGHT temp, i say Overnight because the Min will be offcially recorded as 25.5 due to it being that at 9am Monday morning. (thx wiz for the info ;o) )

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 17/11/2002
From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:31:46 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

A nice cell moving towards melb. Photoshop overlays of radar show it should just pass over central Melbourne at about 9:07am  . . . . give or take a minute or two. J

 

Will have the digital camera at the ready J

 

 

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/Melbradar261102.jpg

 

 

James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

ph. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

 

X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:51:21 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2002 21:51:22.0261 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB2ABC50:01C294CC] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Very humid ATM, 20/17 already one storm through this morning, another couple feel possible after this lot come through too. Lots of AccAs, would like to see a few more breaks in the cloud, but this will do :) Storm on target to hit me. Karl :) >From: "James Holbeach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov >Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:31:46 +1100 > >A nice cell moving towards melb. Photoshop overlays of radar show it >should just pass over central Melbourne at about 9:07am . . . . give or >take a minute or two. :-) > >Will have the digital camera at the ready :-) > > >http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/Melbradar261102.jpg > > >James Holbeach >-------------------------------- >Trapdoor Ski Club >Mt. Hotham, Australia >ph. 0417 553 757 >http://www.trapdoor.com.au >-------------------------------- > _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:19:22 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Bloody thing slowed down- was travelling at 76km/h and was on track to hit right on schedule. Is now looking more like 9:30ish, but look at all that red!!! :D James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Karl Lijnders Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2002 8:51 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Very humid ATM, 20/17 already one storm through this morning, another couple feel possible after this lot come through too. Lots of AccAs, would like to see a few more breaks in the cloud, but this will do :) Storm on target to hit me. Karl :) >From: "James Holbeach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov >Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:31:46 +1100 > >A nice cell moving towards melb. Photoshop overlays of radar show it >should just pass over central Melbourne at about 9:07am . . . . give or >take a minute or two. :-) > >Will have the digital camera at the ready :-) > > >http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/Melbradar261102.jpg > > >James Holbeach >-------------------------------- >Trapdoor Ski Club >Mt. Hotham, Australia >ph. 0417 553 757 >http://www.trapdoor.com.au >-------------------------------- > _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:22:21 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I have vidcam rdy for a direct hit from Heathcote. Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Lijnders" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:51 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov > > Very humid ATM, 20/17 already one storm through this morning, another couple > feel possible after this lot come through too. Lots of AccAs, would like to > see a few more breaks in the cloud, but this will do :) > > Storm on target to hit me. > > Karl :) > > > > > > >From: "James Holbeach" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov > >Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:31:46 +1100 > > > >A nice cell moving towards melb. Photoshop overlays of radar show it > >should just pass over central Melbourne at about 9:07am . . . . give or > >take a minute or two. :-) > > > >Will have the digital camera at the ready :-) > > > > > >http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/Melbradar261102.jpg > > > > > >James Holbeach > >-------------------------------- > >Trapdoor Ski Club > >Mt. Hotham, Australia > >ph. 0417 553 757 > >http://www.trapdoor.com.au > >-------------------------------- > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:33:20 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com WOW, that was excellent! Pity I left the USB connector to the camera at home- will have to put the pics up later this afternoon. James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Karl Lijnders Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2002 8:51 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Very humid ATM, 20/17 already one storm through this morning, another couple feel possible after this lot come through too. Lots of AccAs, would like to see a few more breaks in the cloud, but this will do :) Storm on target to hit me. Karl :) >From: "James Holbeach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov >Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:31:46 +1100 > >A nice cell moving towards melb. Photoshop overlays of radar show it >should just pass over central Melbourne at about 9:07am . . . . give or >take a minute or two. :-) > >Will have the digital camera at the ready :-) > > >http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/Melbradar261102.jpg > > >James Holbeach >-------------------------------- >Trapdoor Ski Club >Mt. Hotham, Australia >ph. 0417 553 757 >http://www.trapdoor.com.au >-------------------------------- > _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Stinker in Canberra Overnight To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:52:13 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0154_01C294FA.DE838010 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi all, just a quick note saying that it is currently 3:20am and its = > 27C+, so hard to sleep right now. when will this insanity stop??? > > If the temp stays above 26.0C then we will have a new Record of All time = > OVERNIGHT temp, i say Overnight because the Min will be offcially = > recorded as 25.5 due to it being that at 9am Monday morning. (thx wiz = > for the info ;o) ) > Ended up at 23.1 after a dip just before 9. This is the 8th highest 24-hour minimum for any month (and the highest since 1983). It's the second-highest for November after 26.0 on 6 November 1946. (The 1946 one is an interesting one, though - it's in our database as a 24-hour minimum but from the hourly temperatures it looks like it's only an overnight minimum, as it got lower during the 24 hours whether you take the day from 0900 to 0900 or midnight to midnight - both standards were in use at the time). Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:53:08 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Can anyone explain why Sydney is so much hotter than every where else in Australia? Especially the Western suburbs. I know they are in like a valley, but why so much hotter than even Brisbane? December 1 The Weather Channel will be on Foxtel. It is about time! Damian 'My Website': http://www.geocities.com/damoreds/index.html +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:26:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Depends what you mean by 'so much hotter than everywhere else'. In general terms there are plenty of places on average hotter than Sydney. Certain parts of the Hunter Valley and mid north coast often come in with the highest daily max on individual occasions. In terms of yesterday's heat, I don't know if Sydney (or more correctly the western suburbs) was the highest in NSW but it would have a lot to to with local effects, sea breezes, absence of cloud cover etc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Damian" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:53 AM Subject: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? > Can anyone explain why Sydney is so much hotter than every where else in > Australia? Especially the Western suburbs. I know they are in like a valley, > but why so much hotter than even Brisbane? > > December 1 The Weather Channel will be on Foxtel. > It is about time! > > > > Damian > 'My Website': http://www.geocities.com/damoreds/index.html > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.199] From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:31:14 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2002 23:31:14.0531 (UTC) FILETIME=[BED69330:01C294DA] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Damien, There are two factors, a hot northwest airflow from the hot inland and a compression effect as the air descends from the Central Tablelands to the coastal plains. Most of the coast from the Hunter down to Narooma had that effect yesterday except where the sea breeze was able to penetrate onto the coast.I suspect parts of inland Queensland and the Centre would have been much hotter. Gavin Canberra >From: "Damian" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? >Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:53:08 +1100 > >Can anyone explain why Sydney is so much hotter than every where else in >Australia? Especially the Western suburbs. I know they are in like a >valley, >but why so much hotter than even Brisbane? > >December 1 The Weather Channel will be on Foxtel. >It is about time! > > > >Damian >'My Website': http://www.geocities.com/damoreds/index.html > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:46:02 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Depends what you mean by 'so much hotter than everywhere else'. In general > terms there are plenty of places on average hotter than Sydney. > Certain parts of the Hunter Valley and mid north coast often come in with > the highest daily max on individual occasions. > In terms of yesterday's heat, I don't know if Sydney (or more correctly the > western suburbs) was the highest in NSW but it would have a lot to to with > local effects, sea breezes, absence of cloud cover etc. Penrith appears to have been the hottest place in Australia (not just NSW) yesterday, although we won't be able to confirm this until the WA 0900 observations come in in a couple of hours. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:06:25 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I think it got 42.6 according to the news..here we had 42.5. If it was the highest it shows the widespread effect of that cloud cover. Blair, how often could we expect Penrith to be the hottest in Australia on any one day? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Blair Trewin" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:46 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? > > > > Depends what you mean by 'so much hotter than everywhere else'. In general > > terms there are plenty of places on average hotter than Sydney. > > Certain parts of the Hunter Valley and mid north coast often come in with > > the highest daily max on individual occasions. > > In terms of yesterday's heat, I don't know if Sydney (or more correctly the > > western suburbs) was the highest in NSW but it would have a lot to to with > > local effects, sea breezes, absence of cloud cover etc. > > Penrith appears to have been the hottest place in Australia (not > just NSW) yesterday, although we won't be able to confirm this until the > WA 0900 observations come in in a couple of hours. > > Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:19:56 +0000 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It is more a question of adiabatic warming of the north westerly airflow coming over the great dividing range down into the Sydney Basin. Since the ranges are about 1100 metres high, and the basin virtually at about 100 metres, the effective descent is about 1000 metres, which can produce a 10 degree Celsius temperature rise. At present, the temperatures the other side of the ranges NW of Sydney are in the high 20's. On the top of the range NW of Sydney at 94754 the altitude is 1130 metres, and the temperature is 24 C. The temperature can therefore rise 10 degrees C as the air descends from 1130 metres to say 130 metres, ie, the temperature of the air flowing down into the basin now can rise from 24 C to 34 C. If you look at the chart below, and follow the heavy line from NW of Sydney to Sydney, you will see the warm air of the slopes gradually adiabatically cooling as it rises up the back of the ranges, is cooler on top and then warms on descent into Sydney. Hope that helps. http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~ventus45/OddBits/NorWester.gif On the chart, the station plot figures are: left top = Temp dry C left bottom = Temp dew C right top = Altitude metres right bottom = wmo station ID and the wind barb of course. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: NE storm Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:29:42 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Had a storm pass over here at approximately midday which dumped 17mm in about 10 minutes or so. My Wx station shows 360mm/hr rainfall rate. :-)
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Originating-IP: [210.11.188.12] From: "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Wycheproof AWASH!!!!!!!!! Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:44:29 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Nov 2002 02:44:29.0866 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE3248A0:01C294F5] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi every1, Well...where to begin...prior to today the total rainfall for the year here in Wycheproof had been 141 mm...awful, to say the least. Today dawned humid but didn't look very promising with mostly Sc and a bit of As but the humidity was enough to give me some hope. By 11 a.m. it had warmed up considerably and started to look very dark to the NW - humidity levels had seemed to increase and it was very eerie with little wind, dark skies and high humidity... Well...at noon the whole thing exploded!!! Lightning every ten or so seconds was almost totally obscured by what can only be described as a tropical cloudburst. In the hour between noon and 1 p.m. I recorded 36 mm. (not bad - it increased the annual rainfall total by 25% in an hour!!) Still raining here atm (1.41 p.m.) and still dark to the west...I just heard that a farmer to my west reported 55 mm!!!! I'm not sure if this welcome drinking water is good news or bad however as the SES are currently sandbagging a number of businesses at the foot of Mt. Wycheproof (flash flooding never lasts long here - but it sure does move fast!!) School (where I work) got three rooms flooded out and most of the mulch/sand/leaf debris in town is now clogging up the storm drains... However, thought I'd let you know that we finally got some rain! Cheers, Kevin Phyland Wycheproof P-12 College _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Why is Sydney so hot? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:51:33 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > I think it got 42.6 according to the news..here we had 42.5. > If it was the highest it shows the widespread effect of that cloud cover. > Blair, how often could we expect Penrith to be the hottest in Australia on > any one day? I've had a look at the period from 1 January 1998 to the present; in that time yesterday is the first time that the national high has occurred in the Sydney area. The only other instances anywhere in the eastern half of NSW were three at Evans Head during last summer, and one at Jerrys Plains in March 1998. The furthest south any other national highs have occurred anywhere else in that time were a few instances in eastern SA in February 2001 (twice at Lameroo and once at Parafield Airport). Perhaps the strangest location (given the time of year) was one at Gingin (not far north of Perth) in June 2000. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Bathurst Rain Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:17:00 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Well it has arrived again. A nice rainfall in Bathurst.. winds upto 35 km/h. That nice fresh smell of rain on hot roads, dont you love it. Hope Orange area are getting this to dowse those fires around CUDAL. HEard many choppers on radio scanner last night arriving for bushfire fighting.
 
Dave
 
 
From: "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: aus-wx: Chaos & Butterflies Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:20:45 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Kevin, You are absolutely right. You were the only one that seem to notice my slight of hand (and replied anyway!) The only thing that was completely genuine in my posts on this topic was my forecasts for the various areas! Just wanted to see how far I could go with the butterfly stuff. Well, if lots of people believe alternative methods such as using the moon & sunspots etc, I may as well give my (insane/stupid/etc) theory a shot. :) You know what they say, "to con someone, don't offer them 10% return on their money. Start at 1000% return p.a. with absolutely no risk whatso ever. This figure is more believable than 10%!" Cheers, tuan -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Phyland Sent: Sunday, 24 November 2002 16:55 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long-range Forecasts & Butterflies Hi Tuan, ..well actually I think that chaos theory probably best describes in the macro-world what Quantum Mechanics describes in the pico-world. Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle basically says that the act of observation changes the measurements... If that ain't as good an analogy to the "Butterfly Effect" I'll go he... :)) Cheers, Kevin Phyland. > Tony Langdon (VK3JED) > >LOL :-) Chaos reigns supreme.... >An understanable thinking but unfortunately incorrect. Chaos is simply what >we don't understand. Scientist has yet to prove that Chaos exists - you can >always filter out patterns from a seemingly chaotic mess. Someone (on the _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: Fw: aus-wx: Bathurst Rain Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:44:54 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Listening to radio scanner, prev storm has brought down trees in my immediate area. Another storm about to head down on us. I can see it from the west. Very dusty brown clouds. Looking very nasty.
 
Well keep posted
 
Dave
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:17 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Bathurst Rain

Well it has arrived again. A nice rainfall in Bathurst.. winds upto 35 km/h. That nice fresh smell of rain on hot roads, dont you love it. Hope Orange area are getting this to dowse those fires around CUDAL. HEard many choppers on radio scanner last night arriving for bushfire fighting.
 
Dave
 
 
From: "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: NSW STA Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:59:49 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST

NSW Severe Thunderstorm Advice
BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY
NEW SOUTH WALES REGIONAL OFFICE
Issued at 1745 on Tuesday the 26th of November 2002

The Bureau of Meteorology in Sydney has issued a Severe Thunderstorm Advice
for people in the following weather forecast districts:

Southern Tablelands
Southwest Slopes
South Coast

This advice is valid until 9pm and it should not be used after this time.

Thunderstorms are expected in the Advice area this afternoon and evening.
Some of these are expected to be severe bringing large hailstones, damaging
winds and very heavy rainfall.
From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Patchy storms Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:50:25 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
See Wangaratta had 54.2mm today. I'm 40k north of there and had 19.6mm.
48mm of Wangaratta's rainfall fell between 4 and 5 I think this arvo and I wouldn't doubt it a bit. It was one of the heaviest looking downpour's I've seen for a long time. I watched the storms as I drove my school bus around the area just north of there. Of course I was concentrating. Driver Under Instruction boards should be mandatory when there are storms, along with a driver of course.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:37:27 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 08:31 AM 26/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >A nice cell moving towards melb. Photoshop overlays of radar show it >should just pass over central Melbourne at about 9:07am . . . . give or >take a minute or two. J Nice wicked cell in Melb just after 9AM :-) Pity there's so few windows in the orifice. :( 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David Carroll" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Patchy storms Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:06:45 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Bussy emailed me earlier re the storm damage at Myrtleford/Beechworth. Appar the Myrtleford Kindagarten was destroyed, along with other damage in the area
 
Anyone have more news on this.  BOM mentioned possible tornado.
 
Dave
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:50 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Patchy storms

See Wangaratta had 54.2mm today. I'm 40k north of there and had 19.6mm.
48mm of Wangaratta's rainfall fell between 4 and 5 I think this arvo and I wouldn't doubt it a bit. It was one of the heaviest looking downpour's I've seen for a long time. I watched the storms as I drove my school bus around the area just north of there. Of course I was concentrating. Driver Under Instruction boards should be mandatory when there are storms, along with a driver of course.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Some Pictures: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:09:11 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Here are some photos and a brief movie of this mornings storm in melb. pics are about 100kb in size. A view of the storm down Flemington Rd at 8:55am http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/smallP1010007.jpg The storm in progress . . . http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/smallP1010009.jpg http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/smallP1010015.jpg http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/smallP1010016.jpg and the movie {7.4Mb- only if u r on cable :) } http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/P1010017.MOV Cheers James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Tony Langdon (VK3JED) Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2002 8:37 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov At 08:31 AM 26/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: >A nice cell moving towards melb. Photoshop overlays of radar show it >should just pass over central Melbourne at about 9:07am . . . . give or >take a minute or two. J Nice wicked cell in Melb just after 9AM :-) Pity there's so few windows in the orifice. :( 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Liz Kennedy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Bathurst Rain Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 05:53:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Lucky you Dave, we got about 2 minutes worth of drops!
Enjoy this mornings freshness.
 
Beth
Tamworth
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:44 PM
Subject: Fw: aus-wx: Bathurst Rain

Listening to radio scanner, prev storm has brought down trees in my immediate area. Another storm about to head down on us. I can see it from the west. Very dusty brown clouds. Looking very nasty.
 
Well keep posted
 
Dave
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:17 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Bathurst Rain

Well it has arrived again. A nice rainfall in Bathurst.. winds upto 35 km/h. That nice fresh smell of rain on hot roads, dont you love it. Hope Orange area are getting this to dowse those fires around CUDAL. HEard many choppers on radio scanner last night arriving for bushfire fighting.
 
Dave
 
 
From: "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Patchy storms Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:04:07 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I received this report in my news David.
 
Love
Sha
 
»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.»§«
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "ABC News Online" <abc-newsmail at YOUR.abc.net.au>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:46 PM
Subject: ABC - NewsMail

ABC News
Tuesday November 26, 2002

Myrtleford storm damage may cost millions

The north-east Victorian town of Myrtleford has been badly hit by
today's storms, with damage expected to run into the millions.

Teams of State Emergency Service (SES) personnel are being brought in
from a wide area to help with the clean-up.

A construction worker has been injured when a building he was working on
partly collapsed in the wild winds, which accompanied the rain and hail.

The SES estimates about 30 buildings have been damaged, including a
kindergarten and water pumping station.

However, shire officials put the total at more like 50.

High voltage power lines are still down, hampering clean up efforts.

Emergency accommodation has been arranged at a caravan park for people
who cannot stay in their homes.

The council says it will begin a major clean-up of street debris
tomorrow.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Patchy storms

Bussy emailed me earlier re the storm damage at Myrtleford/Beechworth. Appar the Myrtleford Kindagarten was destroyed, along with other damage in the area
 
Anyone have more news on this.  BOM mentioned possible tornado.
 
Dave
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:50 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Patchy storms

See Wangaratta had 54.2mm today. I'm 40k north of there and had 19.6mm.
48mm of Wangaratta's rainfall fell between 4 and 5 I think this arvo and I wouldn't doubt it a bit. It was one of the heaviest looking downpour's I've seen for a long time. I watched the storms as I drove my school bus around the area just north of there. Of course I was concentrating. Driver Under Instruction boards should be mandatory when there are storms, along with a driver of course.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.422 / Virus Database: 237 - Release Date: 20/11/2002
From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:34:45 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C29497.726CCA20 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > Having the hottest November day in 20 years (I think it was an El Nino = > > year then too) 42.0 at 3pm. May go higher by the looks of it. > > Richmond's 42.1 (assuming that's the final maximum) is the second- > highest on record for November after 25 November 1982 (so it's not > even a date record). > > The 37.9 at Observatory Hill isn't quite as extreme, but is still > the highest since 39.2 in 1988. (There have been two November 40s > there, in 1946 and 1982). > Observatory Hill got to 37.9 on Tuesday, too. This makes two successive days over 100 F (37.8 C), only the third time this has happened at that site in 144 years of record (after 4-5/1/1946 and 25-28/1/1960). Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "stephen galowski" To: Subject: aus-wx: western suburbs of brisbane Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:54:51 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com it seems to me that brisbane will have a scorcher today it is already verry muggy and hot at 10:59 am on wednesday here is the current reading from my weather station temperature : 30.772 barometer : 1011.83 hpa humidity 40. rain 0.00 dew point 15.646 evaporation 26.29 mm / day solar radiation 1093.8 wind speed 3.22 km/h wind direction 119.19 deg as monitored in the western surburbs of brisbane Stephen galowski +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:21:09 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I remember the January 1960 heatwave vividly. Strong to gale force northwesterlies (what else would bring such heat?) but I especially remember one of the newspaper placards that read in great big 4 inch high letters:'Today's forecast: 110' (Fahrenheit of course), in red letters with flames on them. As it happened it only got to 105 due to a thin high cloud cover developing. Now Blair one of the weather maps from that period might be good to put in the AMOS Journal? Would be quite topical given what we have just been through and the climatic outlook. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Blair Trewin" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:34 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' > > > > > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C29497.726CCA20 > > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > > > Having the hottest November day in 20 years (I think it was an El Nino = > > > year then too) 42.0 at 3pm. May go higher by the looks of it. > > > > Richmond's 42.1 (assuming that's the final maximum) is the second- > > highest on record for November after 25 November 1982 (so it's not > > even a date record). > > > > The 37.9 at Observatory Hill isn't quite as extreme, but is still > > the highest since 39.2 in 1988. (There have been two November 40s > > there, in 1946 and 1982). > > > > Observatory Hill got to 37.9 on Tuesday, too. This makes two > successive days over 100 F (37.8 C), only the third time this has > happened at that site in 144 years of record (after 4-5/1/1946 and > 25-28/1/1960). > > Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "stephen galowski" To: Subject: aus-wx: western suburbs update Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:23:01 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com since 10:59 am today , wednesday the barometer has now dropped 3 hpa and still has a downward movement barometer now 1009.40 hpa at 2:30 pm on wednesday 27-11-2002 Stephen +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Annoyed again Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:47:59 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Annoyed by my local Prime TV station repeatedly mentioning the MINI tornado that hit Myrtleford. Might ring them tomorrow.
Local radio station which I, and my school bus kids listen to did the same and an email has been sent.
Must congratulate channel seven and channel nine who did the right thing. Channel nine especially by saying straight out that a tornado has hit....
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "peter tristram" To: Subject: aus-wx: storms Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 21:55:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Some active cells particularly south of Coffs this arvo. 15mm at Repton and 22 at Gleniffer. My daughter was at home for the 4pm one and was most impressed with the heaviness of the rain. I suppose the lawn'll need mowing again. Peter --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.132.18.241] From: "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:16:22 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2002 11:16:23.0069 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B1AE4D0:01C29606] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Time for a murderous rampage with the shotgun down the the local TV station I think! >From: "Bussy" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: "aussie-weather" >Subject: aus-wx: Annoyed again >Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:47:59 +1100 > >Annoyed by my local Prime TV station repeatedly mentioning the MINI tornado >that hit Myrtleford. Might ring them tomorrow. >Local radio station which I, and my school bus kids listen to did the same >and an email has been sent. >Must congratulate channel seven and channel nine who did the right thing. >Channel nine especially by saying straight out that a tornado has hit.... > >Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "David Carroll" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:32:14 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Just heard on 10 news.. They mentioned tornado like storm.. least wasnt mini tornado. !! Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Liam Domanski" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:16 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again > > Time for a murderous rampage with the shotgun down the the local TV station > I think! > > > > >From: "Bussy" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: "aussie-weather" > >Subject: aus-wx: Annoyed again > >Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:47:59 +1100 > > > >Annoyed by my local Prime TV station repeatedly mentioning the MINI tornado > >that hit Myrtleford. Might ring them tomorrow. > >Local radio station which I, and my school bus kids listen to did the same > >and an email has been sent. > >Must congratulate channel seven and channel nine who did the right thing. > >Channel nine especially by saying straight out that a tornado has hit.... > > > >Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: Canberra's Rainfall stats Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:55:09 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all
With Canberra only just officially drought declared and Mandatory water restrictions only weeks away (we are in Voluntary restrictions right now) I thought I would just do some rainfall stats, so here goes...
 
    Total Average Difference+/-
Best Month Feb 211.0 53.6 157.4
Worst Month Nov 0.8 64.5 -63.7
         
Rainfall YTD   477.6 577.4 -99.8
March to Current Month   240.2 462.3 -222.1
6 months to End NOV   151.2 311.6 -160.4
         
The Last 3 include the 0.8 recorded at the AP so far this month
it is not official though it soon will be.      

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:45:52 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) From: "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
use a 4 -10, that's a mini shotgun. :-)))))))))))))
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Wednesday, 27 November 2002 9:59:08 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again
 
Time for a murderous rampage with the shotgun down the the local TV station
I think!



>From: "Bussy" <bussie at netc.net.au>
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: "aussie-weather" <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
>Subject: aus-wx: Annoyed again
>Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:47:59 +1100
>
>Annoyed by my local Prime TV station repeatedly mentioning the MINI tornado
>that hit Myrtleford. Might ring them tomorrow.
>Local radio station which I, and my school bus kids listen to did the same
>and an email has been sent.
>Must congratulate channel seven and channel nine who did the right thing.
>Channel nine especially by saying straight out that a tornado has hit....
>
>Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)


_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP20.gif: 00000001,6d755706,00000000,00000000 Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 05:11:17 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com As I have noted before, I can't quite agree with or understand the outrage over the use of mini tornado in the media especially if that is what occurred. To describe an event associated with a thunderstorm as a mini cyclone is totally wrong - we all know why, but if it is a small or weak tornado, then the word mini or small or weak and any other adjective relative to size are just as justified as each other if they convey the correct impression. Cheers, Don White > Bussy wrote: > > Annoyed by my local Prime TV station repeatedly mentioning the MINI > tornado that hit Myrtleford. Might ring them tomorrow. > Local radio station which I, and my school bus kids listen to did the > same and an email has been sent. > Must congratulate channel seven and channel nine who did the right > thing. Channel nine especially by saying straight out that a tornado > has hit.... > > Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Patrick Tobin" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra's Rainfall stats Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 08:30:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Simon - haven't you been reading the list over the last few weeks? The drought is over - as Ken predicted, we got good drenching rain yesterday (the 27th)....or was that a low flying cockatoo that left my shoulder feeling wet??    ;-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:55 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Canberra's Rainfall stats

Hi all
With Canberra only just officially drought declared and Mandatory water restrictions only weeks away (we are in Voluntary restrictions right now) I thought I would just do some rainfall stats, so here goes...
 
    Total Average Difference+/-
Best Month Feb 211.0 53.6 157.4
Worst Month Nov 0.8 64.5 -63.7
         
Rainfall YTD   477.6 577.4 -99.8
March to Current Month   240.2 462.3 -222.1
6 months to End NOV   151.2 311.6 -160.4
         
The Last 3 include the 0.8 recorded at the AP so far this month
it is not official though it soon will be.      

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002
X-Originating-IP: [203.29.156.4] From: "T Middleton" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Some Pictures: Melbourne storms 26th Nov Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:45:46 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2002 23:45:46.0829 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B982FD0:01C2966F] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi all, thanks for posting these James. cheers Tony Anvil Industries - http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils >From: "James Holbeach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Some Pictures: Melbourne storms 26th Nov >Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:09:11 +1100 > >Here are some photos and a brief movie of this mornings storm in melb. >pics are about 100kb in size. > >A view of the storm down Flemington Rd at 8:55am >http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/smallP1010007.jpg > >The storm in progress . . . >http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/smallP1010009.jpg > >http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/smallP1010015.jpg > >http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/smallP1010016.jpg > >and the movie {7.4Mb- only if u r on cable :) } >http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/P1010017.MOV > >Cheers > >James > >James Holbeach >-------------------------------- >Trapdoor Ski Club >Mt. Hotham, Australia >ph. 0417 553 757 >http://www.trapdoor.com.au >-------------------------------- > >-----Original Message----- >From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Tony Langdon >(VK3JED) >Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2002 8:37 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne storms 26th Nov > >At 08:31 AM 26/11/2002 +1100, you wrote: > > >A nice cell moving towards melb. Photoshop overlays of radar show it > >should just pass over central Melbourne at about 9:07am . . . . give >or > >take a minute or two. J > >Nice wicked cell in Melb just after 9AM :-) Pity there's so few windows >in >the orifice. :( > >73 de Tony, VK3JED >http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.58.9.23] From: "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: real mini tornado Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:01:58 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Nov 2002 03:01:58.0039 (UTC) FILETIME=[83C84A70:01C2968A] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com


MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:23:04 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Blair -- I have the sequence of the 4 days I could send you - they are fairly clear newspaper ones. In those good old days, the morning papers printed to 3 pm chart.... so much for computerisation sppeding things up ! Cheers, Don White Blair Trewin wrote: > > > > > I remember the January 1960 heatwave vividly. Strong to gale force > > northwesterlies (what else would bring such heat?) but I especially remember > > one of the newspaper placards that read in great big 4 inch high > > letters:'Today's forecast: 110' (Fahrenheit of course), in red letters with > > flames on them. As it happened it only got to 105 due to a thin high cloud > > cover developing. > > Now Blair one of the weather maps from that period might be good to put in > > the AMOS Journal? Would be quite topical given what we have just been > > through and the climatic outlook. > > I don't do as many pre-1965 ones as I'd like because of the difficulty > of getting publishable charts (the stored ones pre-1965 are often the > working charts which are too cluttered with observations to use), > but I've found a decent newspaper chart for 27 January 1960, so > guess what's going to be in the next issue? > > Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:26:57 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > I remember the January 1960 heatwave vividly. Strong to gale force > northwesterlies (what else would bring such heat?) but I especially remember > one of the newspaper placards that read in great big 4 inch high > letters:'Today's forecast: 110' (Fahrenheit of course), in red letters with > flames on them. As it happened it only got to 105 due to a thin high cloud > cover developing. > Now Blair one of the weather maps from that period might be good to put in > the AMOS Journal? Would be quite topical given what we have just been > through and the climatic outlook. I don't do as many pre-1965 ones as I'd like because of the difficulty of getting publishable charts (the stored ones pre-1965 are often the working charts which are too cluttered with observations to use), but I've found a decent newspaper chart for 27 January 1960, so guess what's going to be in the next issue? Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:32:30 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Don and All. Using the term weak is in my opinion OK, but Mini is a No-No. why? Because the term mini is more of a descriptive size term, and not a strength term as weak is. If I hear mini tornado splattered around the news, the first thing I think of is water going down the drain, that's what I call a mini tornado, lol. Also, the media has for years described major wind damage in localised areas as mini (Tornado/Cyclone) with getting all the facts and details right. I guess that is another reason why the Wx community get worked up over it. By definition (and fujita scale) there is no such thing as Mini, and by definition A thunderstorm is recorded on the first Audible sound of thunder of Visual of Lighting in the recording station, and tho the term "thundery shower" is used widely by the BoM and is more acceptable to use, it is still wrong by definition, and if I were to report on something wrong by definition then I am misleading everyone who reads/hears that report. Anyways, off to work. p.s, I'm Sure i've wrote a similar thing to Aussie-Wx the last time the Mini came up..lol Cheers --------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra, ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------- Proud member of the Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don White" To: Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 5:11 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again > As I have noted before, I can't quite agree with or understand the > outrage over the use of mini tornado in the media especially if that is > what occurred. > To describe an event associated with a thunderstorm as a mini cyclone is > totally wrong - we all know why, but if it is a small or weak tornado, > then the word mini or small or weak and any other adjective relative to > size are just as justified as each other if they convey the correct > impression. > > Cheers, > Don White > > > Bussy wrote: > > > > Annoyed by my local Prime TV station repeatedly mentioning the MINI > > tornado that hit Myrtleford. Might ring them tomorrow. > > Local radio station which I, and my school bus kids listen to did the > > same and an email has been sent. > > Must congratulate channel seven and channel nine who did the right > > thing. Channel nine especially by saying straight out that a tornado > > has hit.... > > > > Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k with the very latest Virus definition files. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Mark Hardy" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Annoyed again Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:11:21 +1100 Organization: The Weather Company X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I think 'mini' is fine but really should only be used whilst holding a semi-clenched outturned palm with extended small finger into the corner of one's mouth. . I agree with Don, isn't a small tornado and mini tornado... Mark Hardy The Weather Company Pty. Ltd. http://www.theweather.com.au -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Don White Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2002 5:11 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again As I have noted before, I can't quite agree with or understand the outrage over the use of mini tornado in the media especially if that is what occurred. To describe an event associated with a thunderstorm as a mini cyclone is totally wrong - we all know why, but if it is a small or weak tornado, then the word mini or small or weak and any other adjective relative to size are just as justified as each other if they convey the correct impression. Cheers, Don White > Bussy wrote: > > Annoyed by my local Prime TV station repeatedly mentioning the MINI > tornado that hit Myrtleford. Might ring them tomorrow. Local radio > station which I, and my school bus kids listen to did the same and an > email has been sent. Must congratulate channel seven and channel nine > who did the right thing. Channel nine especially by saying straight > out that a tornado has hit.... > > Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:29:34 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Blair -- I have the sequence of the 4 days I could send you - they are > fairly clear newspaper ones. In those good old days, the morning papers > printed to 3 pm chart.... so much for computerisation sppeding things up > ! > > Cheers, > Don White > Don, Thanks for the offer, but the newspaper clippings are in our library, so I should be able to use those ones. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 20:31:12 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Luckily the bushfire west of Jamberoo so far is only a mini bushfire. We have had some mini drizzle from mini clouds, that combined with mini maximum temperatures has relieved the situation. However, the mini drought worsens, there has been a mini drop in water level at Lake Illawarra and rotting weed has resulted in a mini smell when mini winds from west mini blow. Tomorrow may see some mini showers and mini thunderstorms, with higher mini moisture levels we may see some more mini rain than the previous few mini storm days. Not so Mini Michael > As I have noted before, I can't quite agree with or understand the > outrage over the use of mini tornado in the media especially if that is > what occurred. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 20:40:25 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tomorrow looks great for eastern NSW!!!!!!!! Camera's/film/full tank at the ready to shoot off after work ! Keep an eye out! shear is nice and LL moisture is good.. and with the shortwave comming through later... hail maybe? or a couple of lines of storms passing through lasting all night would be fantastic ! BTW Daniel Weatherhead has put up some photos of the bushfires at Llandilo (west sydney somewhere) from the other day, including a great photo of one of the elvis helitanker choppers! worth a look! http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2002/November26.htm Matt Smith Michael Thompson wrote: > Luckily the bushfire west of Jamberoo so far is only a mini bushfire. We > have had some mini drizzle from mini clouds, that combined with mini maximum > temperatures has relieved the situation. > > However, the mini drought worsens, there has been a mini drop in water > level at Lake Illawarra and rotting weed has resulted in a mini smell when > mini winds from west mini blow. > > Tomorrow may see some mini showers and mini thunderstorms, with higher mini > moisture levels we may see some more mini rain than the previous few mini > storm days. > > Not so Mini Michael > > > As I have noted before, I can't quite agree with or understand the > > outrage over the use of mini tornado in the media especially if that is > > what occurred. > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/02 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jason Beer" To: Subject: aus-wx: Mini = misleading Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:57:37 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well, I think Mini Tornado is misleading. When I was a kid/teenager and they used to say Mini Tornado I always thought of a strong Willy Willy. In fact, it is not until recently that I now know that Australia have "real" tornados. And it appears quite regular Water Spouts. Using the F scale should be how we rate them as so many of us are exposed to this via TV from the US anyway. It is not unfamilar and can always be explained during a broadcast. I do not believe the F scale has F because it was named after a person. More like how strongly you emphasis the F word when you see one coming! Mini is misleading. Am I mistaken or do all our "Mini" tornados that cause damage to property seem to strike at night??????? Where are the Tornado prone areas of Australia? It appears north Eastern Victoria is one. cheers Jas -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael Thompson Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 10:31 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again Luckily the bushfire west of Jamberoo so far is only a mini bushfire. We have had some mini drizzle from mini clouds, that combined with mini maximum temperatures has relieved the situation. However, the mini drought worsens, there has been a mini drop in water level at Lake Illawarra and rotting weed has resulted in a mini smell when mini winds from west mini blow. Tomorrow may see some mini showers and mini thunderstorms, with higher mini moisture levels we may see some more mini rain than the previous few mini storm days. Not so Mini Michael > As I have noted before, I can't quite agree with or understand the > outrage over the use of mini tornado in the media especially if that is > what occurred. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 21:17:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I have the afternoon off and will be taken the chase gear to work. I worry about the mositure in the middle to upper layers however, there may be some middle layer cloud to contend with. 200mb jet is over 90 knots, but direction shear all happens in the first few thousand feet. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Smith" To: Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 8:40 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again > Tomorrow looks great for eastern NSW!!!!!!!! Camera's/film/full tank at the > ready to shoot off after work ! > Keep an eye out! shear is nice and LL moisture is good.. and with the shortwave > comming through later... hail maybe? or a couple of lines of storms passing > through lasting all night would be fantastic ! > > BTW Daniel Weatherhead has put up some photos of the bushfires at Llandilo (west > sydney somewhere) from the other day, including a great photo of one of the > elvis helitanker choppers! worth a look! > > http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2002/November26.htm > > Matt Smith > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > Luckily the bushfire west of Jamberoo so far is only a mini bushfire. We > > have had some mini drizzle from mini clouds, that combined with mini maximum > > temperatures has relieved the situation. > > > > However, the mini drought worsens, there has been a mini drop in water > > level at Lake Illawarra and rotting weed has resulted in a mini smell when > > mini winds from west mini blow. > > > > Tomorrow may see some mini showers and mini thunderstorms, with higher mini > > moisture levels we may see some more mini rain than the previous few mini > > storm days. > > > > Not so Mini Michael > > > > > As I have noted before, I can't quite agree with or understand the > > > outrage over the use of mini tornado in the media especially if that is > > > what occurred. > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/02 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: JFHx6 at aol.com Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 06:11:30 EST Subject: Re: aus-wx: Annoyed again To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 234 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

i wish to unsubscribe,too much information thanks.

                                                     john  at JFHX6 at aol.com
From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: NE storm Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 21:47:01 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Bussy,
 
Interesting to see the 360mm/hour rain rate your wx station recorded.
 
My wx station (WM-918) recorded 245mm/hour at 15:30:00 on 13 June 2002 but I thought it was a faulty reading. I wasn't at the house at the time but those who were said that the rain was indeed extremely heavy with all the roof gutters overflowing.
 
I kept the reading on my max recordings with a '?' mark beside it & placed the next highest rain rate recorded as the official max, which is 53 mm/hour at 02:10:00 on 08 September 2002 (only had my wx station since May 2002), but maybe that reading might be copping the "delete key" treatment soon...
 
Are you able to confirm/do you believe that your 360mm/hour is correct? If so, then maybe my smaller 245mm/hour might have more truth about it then I first thought!
 
:)
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:59 PM
Subject: aus-wx: NE storm

Had a storm pass over here at approximately midday which dumped 17mm in about 10 minutes or so. My Wx station shows 360mm/hr rainfall rate. :-)
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Storms updates - 29/11. Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 23:07:24 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all.
 
Anyone out storm chasing tomorrow need updates.. I shall be at work from 7.30am to 4pm.
 
Please contact me via SMS on 0408863956. Will keep radar and lightning tracker up all day.
Email david.carroll at countryenergy.com.au or normal email which can be checked at work.
 
 
Dave
 
 
 
 
From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Storms updates - 29/11. Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 01:10:43 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hopefully i can get something here in Canberra, but i will also have Wagga, Y'wonga and Sydney 256km's radars Running and saving every frame of it (i hope) as the browser i use does it automatically, if you would like more than those 3, then email me, i will open them up and get em going.
I will be out of the house most of the afternoon though.
 
BoM has called for (once again, like for the 10th time in the last 2.5 weeks) Local showers and thunderstorms for the ACT area, and with the amount of Build up here in the last few weeks, all leading to nothing, im not holding my breath. 10 days of "oooo, something is developing" and then to get nothing, its quite annoying.

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 11:07 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Storms updates - 29/11.

Hi all.
 
Anyone out storm chasing tomorrow need updates.. I shall be at work from 7.30am to 4pm.
 
Please contact me via SMS on 0408863956. Will keep radar and lightning tracker up all day.
Email david.carroll at countryenergy.com.au or normal email which can be checked at work.
 
 
Dave
 
 
 
 
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 14/11/2002
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 07:24:13 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Keith... Actually a feature at the time was the lack of strength oin the NW winds - but the proximity on two of the four days of a decayoing front on the south coast was sufficient to keep out the sea breeze On the hottest day - 27 Jan 1960, the maximum gust was hust 24 miles per hour from WNW. The forecast for that day had been for a cooler change in the morning with a top of 85 early - the change did not come and the top was 108.3 - or 42.4 and it hasn't reach that since. It remains Sydney's third hottest day ever. From 25th to 29th, Sydney's top temps were 39.4, 41.4, 42.4 and 39.7. On the 29th, Sydney's top of 29.5 was recorded at 12.05 am - then relief. Don White Keith Barnett wrote: > > I remember the January 1960 heatwave vividly. Strong to gale force > northwesterlies (what else would bring such heat?) but I especially remember > one of the newspaper placards that read in great big 4 inch high > letters:'Today's forecast: 110' (Fahrenheit of course), in red letters with > flames on them. As it happened it only got to 105 due to a thin high cloud > cover developing. > Now Blair one of the weather maps from that period might be good to put in > the AMOS Journal? Would be quite topical given what we have just been > through and the climatic outlook. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Blair Trewin" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:34 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney 'scorcher' > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C29497.726CCA20 > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > > > > > Having the hottest November day in 20 years (I think it was an El Nino > = > > > > year then too) 42.0 at 3pm. May go higher by the looks of it. > > > > > > Richmond's 42.1 (assuming that's the final maximum) is the second- > > > highest on record for November after 25 November 1982 (so it's not > > > even a date record). > > > > > > The 37.9 at Observatory Hill isn't quite as extreme, but is still > > > the highest since 39.2 in 1988. (There have been two November 40s > > > there, in 1946 and 1982). > > > > > > > Observatory Hill got to 37.9 on Tuesday, too. This makes two > > successive days over 100 F (37.8 C), only the third time this has > > happened at that site in 144 years of record (after 4-5/1/1946 and > > 25-28/1/1960). > > > > Blair > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 08:38:34 +1100 (EST) From: Robert Goler Subject: aus-wx: Pics of Vic storms from Tuesday X-X-Sender: robert at tornado.maths.monash.edu.au To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey all Here are my pics from a storm chase I did on Tuesday: http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/Weather/2002_11_26/today.html Cheers -- Robert A. Goler School of Mathematical Sciences PO Box 28M Monash University Clayton, Vic 3800 Australia ph. +61 3 9905 4424 email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:02:20 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: Pics of Vic storms from Tuesday To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sensational pics Robert. Nice drive too! :P Tim. ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 08:38:34 +1100 (EST) >From: Robert Goler >Subject: aus-wx: Pics of Vic storms from Tuesday >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Hey all > >Here are my pics from a storm chase I did on Tuesday: > >http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/Weather/2 002_11_26/today.html > > >Cheers > >-- > >Robert A. Goler > >School of Mathematical Sciences >PO Box 28M >Monash University >Clayton, Vic 3800 >Australia > >ph. +61 3 9905 4424 >email: Robert.Goler at maths.monash.edu.au >http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/ > >-- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: SEQ rain Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:25:08 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Further handy rain across much of SEQ last night, 19mm in the 6 hours from 6:00pm to midnight at Mt. Crosby. Drought breaking?? Well I'm not sure you could officially call SEQ drought affected when compared to inland NSW, although it has been well down on average YTD. With my total for November now 52.3mm (cf Nov Ipswich mean 77.7mm) it is starting to look respectable, things are certainly greening up, and it was nice this morning to wake up and still be on the "right side" of the trough line with almost full overcast. Total YTD is now 495.8mm, which is running at about 64% of mean (Ipswich, 122 years). The total was helped by relatively good winter rain, both June & August being above average. Sep and Oct were less than half of average, but then, a tendency to spring time drought is not unusual in SEQ. John. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: NSW STA To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:51:07 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 29/11/2002 12:51:10 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com IDN28300 BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY NSW REGIONAL OFFICE TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST NSW SEVERE THUNDERSTORM ADVICE Issued at 12:01 PM Friday 29 November 2002. UPDATED The Bureau of Meteorology in SYDNEY has issued a Severe Thunderstorm Advice for people in the following weather forecast districts: Mid North Coast Northwest Slopes and Plains, Northern Tablelands, Central West Slopes, Central Tablelands, Hunter, Southern Tablelands north of the ACT. This advice is valid until 4 PM and should not be used after this time. Thunderstorms are forecast within the advice area. Some of these are expected to be severe bringing very heavy rainfall, damaging winds and possible large large hailstones. The STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE advises that people should: ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: updates from storms To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:09:32 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 29/11/2002 02:09:35 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com HI All. A report that has come thtrough.. A property called Roseneath at Curban/Gilgandra area reported high winds. The hay shed has completely been destroyed.. Tin from shed blown all over property. All of the Gulargumbone & Coonamble shires are without power. Have many other power outages in NW NSW and Central NSW. If anyone requires updates pls email me. Dave ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: updates from storms To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:42:26 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > HI All. > > A report that has come thtrough.. A property called Roseneath at > Curban/Gilgandra area reported high winds. The hay shed has completely been > destroyed.. Tin from shed blown all over property. All of the > Gulargumbone & Coonamble shires are without power. > > Have many other power outages in NW NSW and Central NSW. > > If anyone requires updates pls email me. > 31.6mm at Mudgee in the hour from 1300-1400. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "stephen galowski" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: SEQ rain Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:16:29 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi john i'm about 5-10 minutes away east of you in pinjarra hills my total rain fall here was 16 mm of rain from 7 pm to midnight and i do think we may be in for more rain today Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:25 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: SEQ rain > Hi all, > > Further handy rain across much of SEQ last night, 19mm in the 6 hours from > 6:00pm to midnight at Mt. Crosby. Drought breaking?? Well I'm not sure you > could officially call SEQ drought affected when compared to inland NSW, > although it has been well down on average YTD. > > With my total for November now 52.3mm (cf Nov Ipswich mean 77.7mm) it is > starting to look respectable, things are certainly greening up, and it was > nice this morning to wake up and still be on the "right side" of the trough > line with almost full overcast. > > Total YTD is now 495.8mm, which is running at about 64% of mean (Ipswich, > 122 years). The total was helped by relatively good winter rain, both June > & August being above average. Sep and Oct were less than half of average, > but then, a tendency to spring time drought is not unusual in SEQ. > > John. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:38:50 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
It is actually thundering and seemingly getting closer.  We can't see the storm for the low drifting misty cloud.  I have looked at the radar.  Can any of you guys see what is going on from other parts of Sydney.
 
Judy
X-Originating-IP: [210.50.30.21] From: "Rune Peitersen" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:52:06 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2002 04:52:06.0474 (UTC) FILETIME=[112132A0:01C29763] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G;day Judy, at Quakers Hill just made it home from work b4 the storm front hit, AM radio was beserk on the way home, it was my only way of telling there were great storms around as visibility was poor!, have recieved 21 mm here in 50 mins, with heavy rain and strong winds along with erratic cg's in all directions, no hail though, looks like more of a rain event now with some embedded stuff, some sunny breaks earlier would have set it up even better, still cg's around the place here :) >From: "Adam Mayo" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder >Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:38:50 +1100 > >It is actually thundering and seemingly getting closer. We can't see the >storm for the low drifting misty cloud. I have looked at the radar. Can >any of you guys see what is going on from other parts of Sydney. > >Judy _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "stephen galowski" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:52:48 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
i'll have a look for you judy from  brisbane qld
Stephen
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Mayo
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder

It is actually thundering and seemingly getting closer.  We can't see the storm for the low drifting misty cloud.  I have looked at the radar.  Can any of you guys see what is going on from other parts of Sydney.
 
Judy
From: "stephen galowski" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:05:39 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com there is about 150 to 300 km of lighting on the storm tracker so it is getting close to sydney , time I think for you to disconnect all pc, and faxes from the phone lines and power points Stephen Galowski ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rune Peitersen" To: Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 2:52 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder > G;day Judy, at Quakers Hill just made it home from work b4 the storm > front hit, AM radio was beserk on the way home, it was my only way of > telling there were great storms around as visibility was poor!, have > recieved 21 mm here in 50 mins, with heavy rain and strong winds along with > erratic cg's in all directions, no hail though, looks like more of a rain > event now with some embedded stuff, some sunny breaks earlier would have set > it up even better, still cg's around the place here :) > > > > > > > >From: "Adam Mayo" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder > >Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:38:50 +1100 > > > >It is actually thundering and seemingly getting closer. We can't see the > >storm for the low drifting misty cloud. I have looked at the radar. Can > >any of you guys see what is going on from other parts of Sydney. > > > >Judy > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 16:13:51 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Rune, We are having some great rain. The sky is a funny colour - so long since that happened. All jokes aside the streets lights are on, so I'm not imagining it. I'll look in the rain gauge when it stops. The lightning tracker on the weather company is spectacular although a few minutes ago was still showing 15.25 today. Judy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rune Peitersen" To: Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 3:52 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder > G;day Judy, at Quakers Hill just made it home from work b4 the storm > front hit, AM radio was beserk on the way home, it was my only way of > telling there were great storms around as visibility was poor!, have > recieved 21 mm here in 50 mins, with heavy rain and strong winds along with > erratic cg's in all directions, no hail though, looks like more of a rain > event now with some embedded stuff, some sunny breaks earlier would have set > it up even better, still cg's around the place here :) > > > > > > > >From: "Adam Mayo" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: aus-wx: Mona Vale Thunder > >Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:38:50 +1100 > > > >It is actually thundering and seemingly getting closer. We can't see the > >storm for the low drifting misty cloud. I have looked at the radar. Can > >any of you guys see what is going on from other parts of Sydney. > > > >Judy > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: peterba at postoffice X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:14:37 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Peter Baddiley Subject: Re: aus-wx: SEQ rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Stephen For interest, the rainfalls for the greater Brisbane area (and elsewhere) are available in map form via the Qld Flood Warning Centre website at: www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/qld and directly (for the Brisbane area) at http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/qld/qld_metro.shtml Regards, Peter At 14:16Friday29/11/02, you wrote: >Hi john >i'm about 5-10 minutes away east of you in pinjarra hills >my total rain fall here was 16 mm of rain from 7 pm to midnight > >and i do think we may be in for more rain today >Stephen > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "John Woodbridge" >To: >Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:25 AM >Subject: RE: aus-wx: SEQ rain > > > > Hi all, > > > > Further handy rain across much of SEQ last night, 19mm in the 6 hours from > > 6:00pm to midnight at Mt. Crosby. Drought breaking?? Well I'm not sure >you > > could officially call SEQ drought affected when compared to inland NSW, > > although it has been well down on average YTD. > > > > With my total for November now 52.3mm (cf Nov Ipswich mean 77.7mm) it is > > starting to look respectable, things are certainly greening up, and it was > > nice this morning to wake up and still be on the "right side" of the >trough > > line with almost full overcast. > > > > Total YTD is now 495.8mm, which is running at about 64% of mean (Ipswich, > > 122 years). The total was helped by relatively good winter rain, both >June > > & August being above average. Sep and Oct were less than half of average, > > but then, a tendency to spring time drought is not unusual in SEQ. > > > > John. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: Unbelievable Rain Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 17:36:38 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At my place between Chatswood West & North Ryde in Sydney's Northern Suburbs I recorded a rain rate of 93mm/hour during this afternoons storm. I have never seen it rain so hard. The gutters on the roof could not stand the pelting rain & it washed like a waterfall off the entire roof! So far this afternoon I have recorded 38mm of rain. Damian 'My Website': http://www.geocities.com/weatherdamo/index.html +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: updates from storms Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:06:24 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Very strong Northerlies here at approximately 4.30pm. 61kmh here and lots of raised dust and a massive dump later of 1 mm. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some damage around here as well. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: aus-wx: updates from storms > HI All. > > A report that has come thtrough.. A property called Roseneath at > Curban/Gilgandra area reported high winds. The hay shed has completely been > destroyed.. Tin from shed blown all over property. All of the > Gulargumbone & Coonamble shires are without power. > > Have many other power outages in NW NSW and Central NSW. > > If anyone requires updates pls email me. > > Dave +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Weather humour Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:35:03 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Varied "slightly" from the original.
 
A visitor once asked, "Does it ever rain in Rutherglen?"
 
A farmer quickly answered, "Yes, it does. Do you remember in the Bible where it rained for 40 days and 40 nights?"
 
The visitor replied, "Yes, I'm familiar with Noah's flood."
 
"Well," the farmer puffed up, "We got about two and a half millimetres out of that."

Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Paul Yole" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Hurricane 2002: El Nino meant fewer hurricanes in 2002 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 03:29:49 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey All, Just doing some general browsing online, and came across the following report MIAMI - El Nino, the climate phenomenon that can affect weather around the world, wasn't expected to weaken the 2002 Atlantic hurricane season. But the season that officially ends Saturday could be considered mild compared with recent years and forecasters say coastal residents can thank El Nino. The rest of the report can been seen at http://www.naplesnews.com/02/11/florida/d867042a.htm PaulY Attachment Converted: "c:\program files\eudora\attach\winmail.dat" From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:04:28 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Anyone else having problems getting onto WeatherZone? Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: Hourly charts back on Australian Weather News Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:05:03 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm back from leave, and the hourly charts have resumed on AWN. Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 08:16:56 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Working okay here Laurier PaulY -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Laurier Williams Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 8:04 AM To: Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com Subject: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? Anyone else having problems getting onto WeatherZone? Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:27:02 +1100 Organization: BoM X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Laurier, Your thinking is correct. Having trouble as well. tuan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 12:04 AM Subject: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? > Anyone else having problems getting onto WeatherZone? > > Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:38:28 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yeah its down for me too Laurier. dann ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 12:04 AM Subject: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? > Anyone else having problems getting onto WeatherZone? > > Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:46:25 +1100 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Mmm, I'm looking into it... Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Laurier Williams Sent: Saturday, 30 November 2002 12:04 AM To: Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com Subject: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? Anyone else having problems getting onto WeatherZone? Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 00:49:41 +1100 Organization: BoM X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, I think it has just come back up as I managed to get in ok now. tuan ----- Original Message ----- From: "dann weatherhead" To: Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 12:38 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? > Yeah its down for me too Laurier. > > dann > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laurier Williams" > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 12:04 AM > Subject: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? > > > > Anyone else having problems getting onto WeatherZone? > > > > Laurier > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: Canberra 29th November 2002 Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 01:25:45 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi All.
Well, what can i say? get your bats ready to hit me with tho...
 
As i was walking out the door Early this afternoon, knowing something may develop later, i looked at the digi cam and decided not to take it on 2 reasons, 1. the way it has been of late, i din't think anything special would develop. 2. I was having Coffee with a Hot chick from work, and didn't want to lug it around. but now to the days events.
 
After coffee i went into Woden town center and got my hair cut etc etc, after leaving there at 4:20pm i was greeted to a massive dark skies to the NW, tho i couldn't see it properly i could tell something was menacing. this is the first time i started yelling at my self for not bringing the Cam. I had a 15m walk up the road to my mates place of work. after walking for a few minutes, i got a clearer look of what was lurking, this baby was the darkest thing i have seen in ages. I Called my mate to tell him i was on the way, but maybe be longer due to the fact is was moments away from Pissing down. I walked a little further and then it came, fortuantely i was able to find shelter under an Eve of Phillip Fire station. As i was standing there the rain started to get heavier, and being iquistive bugga, i was looking at the way the storm was moving, I saw lightning hit black mountain and on the scan back closer toward me i saw what i believe to be a funnel, the contrast was poor but it certainly had a funnel shape, and visable rotation with strong upward movement of some scud that developed right near it. When i saw it, it was about 1/3rd the way down and before i lost it in the rain it was about 1/2 the way down. I then enjoyed the rain and Cg's dropping 1km away from me, it quickly passed and before i could leave the fire station the crew was called out to what i heard was a Traffic accident. the rain had eased and i headed off to my mates work, all the while seeing Lightning flickering to my east.
<END PART 1>
 
Later on, about 8:30pm i was with my mates heading to dinner at Sizzlers, on the way i had noticed 2 storms flickering away to the W and SW respectively, i knew we were in for some more. after about 30 minutes of sitting down the Lightning fest began. i didn't go outside but i could see the sky light up every 5 seconds, The closest one Hit about 2kms away, and let off a MIGHTY rumble, i thought the windows were going to break. it soon passed and i got home and checked the radars and trackers, well i have caught the  whole lot with the trackers, but the radar stopped updating at 2:40pm, grrrrrrrrrr.
 
So a rundown of what Canberra got today.
Fantastic RAIN!!!!
Super Cg's
Small Hail,
A Funnel cloud
and did i mention the RAIN!!!!!!!!

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 14/11/2002
User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 02:49:57 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: WeatherZone down? From: Dale Small To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ive had no trouble tonight at all accessing Might be outside (user server) link problems, DNS/Ping times are as per normal to Wz. *Dale* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 02:53:50 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra 29th November 2002 From: Dale Small To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Canberra 29th November 2002 Lmfao Simon all..

Next time take them cams with you d/h.
You chose a chick over that kind of storm?
Are you out of your mind???







on 30/11/2002 00:25, Simon Angell at simon at canberra-wx.com wrote:

Hi All.
Well, what can i say? get your bats ready to hit me with tho...

As i was walking out the door Early this afternoon, knowing something may develop later, i looked at the digi cam and decided not to take it on 2 reasons, 1. the way it has been of late, i din't think anything special would develop. 2. I was having Coffee with a Hot chick from work, and didn't want to lug it around. but now to the days events.

After coffee i went into Woden town center and got my hair cut etc etc, after leaving there at 4:20pm i was greeted to a massive dark skies to the NW, tho i couldn't see it properly i could tell something was menacing. this is the first time i started yelling at my self for not bringing the Cam. I had a 15m walk up the road to my mates place of work. after walking for a few minutes, i got a clearer look of what was lurking, this baby was the darkest thing i have seen in ages. I Called my mate to tell him i was on the way, but maybe be longer due to the fact is was moments away from Pissing down. I walked a little further and then it came, fortuantely i was able to find shelter under an Eve of Phillip Fire station. As i was standing there the rain started to get heavier, and being iquistive bugga, i was looking at the way the storm was moving, I saw lightning hit black mountain and on the scan back closer toward me i saw what i believe to be a funnel, the contrast was poor but it certainly had a funnel shape, and visable rotation with strong upward movement of some scud that developed right near it. When i saw it, it was about 1/3rd the way down and before i lost it in the rain it was about 1/2 the way down. I then enjoyed the rain and Cg's dropping 1km away from me, it quickly passed and before i could leave the fire station the crew was called out to what i heard was a Traffic accident. the rain had eased and i headed off to my mates work, all the while seeing Lightning flickering to my east.
<END PART 1>

Later on, about 8:30pm i was with my mates heading to dinner at Sizzlers, on the way i had noticed 2 storms flickering away to the W and SW respectively, i knew we were in for some more. after about 30 minutes of sitting down the Lightning fest began. i didn't go outside but i could see the sky light up every 5 seconds, The closest one Hit about 2kms away, and let off a MIGHTY rumble, i thought the windows were going to break. it soon passed and i got home and checked the radars and trackers, well i have caught the  whole lot with the trackers, but the radar stopped updating at 2:40pm, grrrrrrrrrr.

So a rundown of what Canberra got today.
Fantastic RAIN!!!!
Super Cg's
Small Hail,
A Funnel cloud
and did i mention the RAIN!!!!!!!!

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com <http://www.canberra-wx.com>
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au <http://www.severeweather.asn.au>
--------------------------------------------------------------


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 14/11/2002


From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra 29th November 2002 Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 04:06:05 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Canberra 29th November 2002
Ta Dale all.
Yes, yes and yes to all 3.

Simon
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 14/11/2002
From: "Third" To: "weather" Subject: Re: aus-wx: SEQ rain Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 06:30:49 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com We have had 22mm over the last 2 days 10mm then 12mm at Petrie. My November total is 96.5 mm. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:25 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: SEQ rain > Hi all, > > Further handy rain across much of SEQ last night, 19mm in the 6 hours from > 6:00pm to midnight at Mt. Crosby. Drought breaking?? Well I'm not sure you > could officially call SEQ drought affected when compared to inland NSW, > although it has been well down on average YTD. > > With my total for November now 52.3mm (cf Nov Ipswich mean 77.7mm) it is > starting to look respectable, things are certainly greening up, and it was > nice this morning to wake up and still be on the "right side" of the trough > line with almost full overcast. > > Total YTD is now 495.8mm, which is running at about 64% of mean (Ipswich, > 122 years). The total was helped by relatively good winter rain, both June > & August being above average. Sep and Oct were less than half of average, > but then, a tendency to spring time drought is not unusual in SEQ. > > John. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 10:09:10 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather humour X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Gee, I didn't reckon you were that old Bussie! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:35:03 +1100 Subject: aus-wx: Weather humour > Varied "slightly" from the original. > > A visitor once asked, "Does it ever rain in Rutherglen?" > > A farmer quickly answered, "Yes, it does. Do you remember in the Bible > where it rained for 40 days and 40 nights?" > > The visitor replied, "Yes, I'm familiar with Noah's flood." > > "Well," the farmer puffed up, "We got about two and a half millimetres > out of that." > > Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Wendy" To: Subject: aus-wx: hail storm Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:06:02 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2002 05:07:29.0339 (UTC) FILETIME=[619CF8B0:01C2982E] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi everyone, Today at about 3pm we had a hail storm here at St Clair NSW (near Penrith).. it lasted for about 10 mins max with hail the size marbles and a bit bigger covering the ground. I don't know how cold it got but it became very chilly indeed. The storm has since passed and now we have blue skies again!! Wendy --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.422 / Virus Database: 237 - Release Date: 20/11/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: hail storm Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:04:37 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Wendy and Everyone It is now 4.55pm and the sun is shining at Mona Vale as well. The temperature right now is 20 degrees but I don't know if it went any lower, it did feel colder though as the storm front arrived. We had 7mm of rain and marble size hail as well. Yesterdays storm gave us 28 mm so our grass is looking better already. Judy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wendy" To: Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 4:06 PM Subject: aus-wx: hail storm > Hi everyone, > > Today at about 3pm we had a hail storm here at St Clair NSW (near Penrith).. > it lasted for about 10 mins max with hail the size marbles and a bit bigger > covering the ground. I don't know how cold it got but it became very chilly > indeed. The storm has since passed and now we have blue skies again!! > > Wendy > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.422 / Virus Database: 237 - Release Date: 20/11/2002 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Duncan & Mandy" To: "aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com" Subject: aus-wx: Wet in Alice Springs Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 16:52:27 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'day all, We've had around 150mm in the past week in western Alice Springs. We've had large storms everynight, which have been widespread. What was looking to be one of the driest years on record with only around 80 mm for the year is now a memory. Although it's been dry and sunny for the last two days, a low in W.A. looks to heading this way, which means more regular storms next week! If this pattern continues, I would suggest that inland Queensland and perhaps even N.S.W. may get drought breaking rains. Cheers, Duncan, Alice Springs, N.T. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather humour Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:54:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yeah! I still owe Moses a quarter...... > Gee, I didn't reckon you were that old Bussie! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steve Baynham" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra 29th November 2002 Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:42:55 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
hey simon! everyone else.
ya have to make a good impression on a girl. some may think you look like a dork carrying around a video camera. fortunately, i had no such dilemna. the storms that you were talking about late in teh evening to the W and SW i got plenty of photos of. after we got pelted by the rain from it, i went to a vantage point with a view looking out to jerrabomberra and queanbeyan and got some nice CG and crawler shots that turn out ok when i get them developed this week. will post the pics as soon as i get them back.
a fanf**kingtastic week for canberra!!!
YEEEEEEEHHAAAAAAAAHHH!!!!!!!!!
 
 
Steve Baynham
icq : 26863574
 
Brisbane Storm Chasers
http://www.bsch.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Association
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 1:25 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Canberra 29th November 2002

Hi All.
Well, what can i say? get your bats ready to hit me with tho...
 
As i was walking out the door Early this afternoon, knowing something may develop later, i looked at the digi cam and decided not to take it on 2 reasons, 1. the way it has been of late, i din't think anything special would develop. 2. I was having Coffee with a Hot chick from work, and didn't want to lug it around. but now to the days events.
 
After coffee i went into Woden town center and got my hair cut etc etc, after leaving there at 4:20pm i was greeted to a massive dark skies to the NW, tho i couldn't see it properly i could tell something was menacing. this is the first time i started yelling at my self for not bringing the Cam. I had a 15m walk up the road to my mates place of work. after walking for a few minutes, i got a clearer look of what was lurking, this baby was the darkest thing i have seen in ages. I Called my mate to tell him i was on the way, but maybe be longer due to the fact is was moments away from Pissing down. I walked a little further and then it came, fortuantely i was able to find shelter under an Eve of Phillip Fire station. As i was standing there the rain started to get heavier, and being iquistive bugga, i was looking at the way the storm was moving, I saw lightning hit black mountain and on the scan back closer toward me i saw what i believe to be a funnel, the contrast was poor but it certainly had a funnel shape, and visable rotation with strong upward movement of some scud that developed right near it. When i saw it, it was about 1/3rd the way down and before i lost it in the rain it was about 1/2 the way down. I then enjoyed the rain and Cg's dropping 1km away from me, it quickly passed and before i could leave the fire station the crew was called out to what i heard was a Traffic accident. the rain had eased and i headed off to my mates work, all the while seeing Lightning flickering to my east.
<END PART 1>
 
Later on, about 8:30pm i was with my mates heading to dinner at Sizzlers, on the way i had noticed 2 storms flickering away to the W and SW respectively, i knew we were in for some more. after about 30 minutes of sitting down the Lightning fest began. i didn't go outside but i could see the sky light up every 5 seconds, The closest one Hit about 2kms away, and let off a MIGHTY rumble, i thought the windows were going to break. it soon passed and i got home and checked the radars and trackers, well i have caught the  whole lot with the trackers, but the radar stopped updating at 2:40pm, grrrrrrrrrr.
 
So a rundown of what Canberra got today.
Fantastic RAIN!!!!
Super Cg's
Small Hail,
A Funnel cloud
and did i mention the RAIN!!!!!!!!

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 14/11/2002