http://australiasevereweather.com/ at : "third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 05:28:44 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It just started raining ! ----- Original Message ----- at : "Kevin Phyland" To: Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:28 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > Hi every1, > > Sorry Bussy :)) > > But we've equalled our lowest Jan on record....zero again... > > Oh well...that's not that unusual for January in Wycheproof....in fact I > think there are only five months of the year where zero isn't the lowest > ever recorded...:(( > > Cheers, > Kevin at Wycheproof. > > > > > > > > at : "Bussy" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > >Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:43:19 +1100 > > > >Sorry for the one liner but, 0.2 here for January. You guys are getting > >drowned! > >----- Original Message ----- > > at : "third" > >To: > >Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:09 AM > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > > > > > > yes - we are actually about 15 or so K's inland at Redcliffe and in my > > > experience would generally get less rainfall than Redcliffe. Though the > > > tracking of one storm can make a big difference when the totals are so > >low. > > > Redcliffe would normally get more storms than us as well. The worst of > >the > > > storms seem to track South of here and cross the Redcliffe Peninsula or > > > track North of here and head up through the Caboolture area. Our 24 mm > >fell > > > in the first couple of days in January. But you are right it is > >certainly > > > better than nothing ! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > at : "John Woodbridge" > > > To: > > > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 AM > > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > > > > > > > > > Hi third(?) > > > > > > > > An interesting post as it demonstrates the advantage that coastal > > > > communities have when it comes to showers at light on-shore > >conditions. > > > > Yet the 99 year Redcliffe mean of 115mm for Jan seems stangely low > > > compared > > > > to Brisbane airport at 158mm for Jan, and also Redcliffe for Feb at > >152mm. > > > > I wonder if the 115 is not a error in the BoM site data as it would > >seem > > > 155 > > > > or 165 would be a rather more likely figure. Then again, even with > >100 > > > > years worth of data, a few heavy falls may really skew the mean. > >Highest > > > > recorded Jan rain for Redcliffe is listed as only 445mm cf Ipswich at > > > 780mm, > > > > Brisbane Airport at 804mm and Brisbane city at 872mm. > > > > > > > > I wish we had received your 24mm, it would have made a significant > > > > difference to the state of some of the vegetation around here... > > > > > > > > John. > > > > >snip > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of third > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:29 PM > > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > > > > > > > > > > > We got a little rain that you didn't here in Petrie - My total for the > > > month > > > > is 24mm. The lowest on record for January at the nearest BOM station > >at > > > > Redcliffe is 19.8mm. Mean 115.5. (My lawn looks like it does in the > > > middle > > > > of winter !!) > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > at : "John Woodbridge" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:21 AM > > > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > At Mt. Crosby we are just 48 hours away at scoring a record > >monthly > > > low > > > > > rainfall, with the total for the month still sitting at Nil. Not a > > > single > > > > > measurable drop since Dec 26th. Previous record low for Jan is > >10.9mm > > > > > (Ipswich), and the forecast is remaining fine... > > > > > > > > > > All pretty amazing when you consider that January is normally our > > > wettest > > > > > month with a long term mean of 125mm. For this drought, this is now > >the > > > > > worst month yet experienced in terms of missing rainfall. There > >are > > > some > > > > > very sick looking trees around. > > > > > > > > > > John. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > > message. > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 08:53:35 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com i see the reamains of TC beni are heading to the great land of OZ at a great rate of knots! (just as predicted - I remember seeing that happen once before) LOL Cheers Brian http://ps.gen.nz/~windy/otherdat.htm ----- Original Message ----- at : "third" To: Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:28 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > It just started raining ! > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Kevin Phyland" > To: > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:28 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > > > Hi every1, > > > > Sorry Bussy :)) > > > > But we've equalled our lowest Jan on record....zero again... > > > > Oh well...that's not that unusual for January in Wycheproof....in fact I > > think there are only five months of the year where zero isn't the lowest > > ever recorded...:(( > > > > Cheers, > > Kevin at Wycheproof. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at : "Bussy" > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >To: > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > >Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:43:19 +1100 > > > > > >Sorry for the one liner but, 0.2 here for January. You guys are getting > > >drowned! > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > at : "third" > > >To: > > >Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:09 AM > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > > > > > > > > > yes - we are actually about 15 or so K's inland at Redcliffe and in > my > > > > experience would generally get less rainfall than Redcliffe. Though > the > > > > tracking of one storm can make a big difference when the totals are so > > >low. > > > > Redcliffe would normally get more storms than us as well. The worst > of > > >the > > > > storms seem to track South of here and cross the Redcliffe Peninsula > or > > > > track North of here and head up through the Caboolture area. Our 24 > mm > > >fell > > > > in the first couple of days in January. But you are right it is > > >certainly > > > > better than nothing ! > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > at : "John Woodbridge" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 AM > > > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi third(?) > > > > > > > > > > An interesting post as it demonstrates the advantage that coastal > > > > > communities have when it comes to showers at light on-shore > > >conditions. > > > > > Yet the 99 year Redcliffe mean of 115mm for Jan seems stangely low > > > > compared > > > > > to Brisbane airport at 158mm for Jan, and also Redcliffe for Feb at > > >152mm. > > > > > I wonder if the 115 is not a error in the BoM site data as it would > > >seem > > > > 155 > > > > > or 165 would be a rather more likely figure. Then again, even with > > >100 > > > > > years worth of data, a few heavy falls may really skew the mean. > > >Highest > > > > > recorded Jan rain for Redcliffe is listed as only 445mm cf Ipswich > at > > > > 780mm, > > > > > Brisbane Airport at 804mm and Brisbane city at 872mm. > > > > > > > > > > I wish we had received your 24mm, it would have made a significant > > > > > difference to the state of some of the vegetation around here... > > > > > > > > > > John. > > > > > >snip > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of third > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:29 PM > > > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We got a little rain that you didn't here in Petrie - My total for > the > > > > month > > > > > is 24mm. The lowest on record for January at the nearest BOM > station > > >at > > > > > Redcliffe is 19.8mm. Mean 115.5. (My lawn looks like it does in the > > > > middle > > > > > of winter !!) > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > at : "John Woodbridge" > > > > > To: > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:21 AM > > > > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > At Mt. Crosby we are just 48 hours away at scoring a record > > >monthly > > > > low > > > > > > rainfall, with the total for the month still sitting at Nil. Not > a > > > > single > > > > > > measurable drop since Dec 26th. Previous record low for Jan is > > >10.9mm > > > > > > (Ipswich), and the forecast is remaining fine... > > > > > > > > > > > > All pretty amazing when you consider that January is normally our > > > > wettest > > > > > > month with a long term mean of 125mm. For this drought, this is > now > > >the > > > > > > worst month yet experienced in terms of missing rainfall. There > > >are > > > > some > > > > > > very sick looking trees around. > > > > > > > > > > > > John. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > >your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > >your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:05:44 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Bussy and everyone,
 
We only got 8.5 mm for January at Mona Vale NSW, does anyone know what the previous lowest rainfall for the northern beaches or could this be the lowest.
 
The grass is brown now and those who water their grass are getting so obvious.
 
Judy Mayo
at : "Steven Williams" To: Cc: "Steven Williams" Subject: aus-wx: Bushfire smoke Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 12:32:12 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
At first glance it looks like an overcast layer of cirrostratus, but closer inspection fails to detect a halo.
We are not used to such polluted looking skies in NZ, but everytime there is a major bush fire event in Australia
we seem to get the smoke in our atmosphere.  Makes sunset and sunrise particularly colourful.
Cheers
Steven williams(Auckland)
at : "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Weather at Seven Hills Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 11:45:23 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
My observations for January 2003 may be seen at
 
 
and for all years in January
 
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
at : "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall!! Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 12:50:37 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi All,
 
Well for Mt. Crosby at least Nil is my recorded rainfall for Jan, as I record at midnight to midnight.  However it has indeed started raining, if you can call a tiny pricking off/on ultralight drizzle rain.  2.4mm in the guage as at 9:00am, which still cleans up the record for the driest January in this part of the world...  Will be interesting to see what Amberley reports.  I suspect many centres in SEQ will have recorded their driest ever January.
 
John.
>snip

 -----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 9:06 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Record low Jan rainfall likely

Hi Bussy and everyone,
 
We only got 8.5 mm for January at Mona Vale NSW, does anyone know what the previous lowest rainfall for the northern beaches or could this be the lowest.
 
The grass is brown now and those who water their grass are getting so obvious.
 
Judy Mayo
at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Wishful Thinking Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 16:27:53 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Dear All,
 
We just went outside to farewell a visitor and discovered that the ants are very busy building a dirt wall around their hole in the ground.  We haven't actually seen any evidence of ant activity for months now. 
 
Do they know something,  I hope so!
 
Judy
at : "Stargazer" To: "Aussie-Weather" Subject: aus-wx: January results Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 16:21:05 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all,
 
January results are here if interested for Morphett Vale, Adelaide.
 
 
I thought January was going to pass by without any rainfall until the 29th/30th came by & got a total of 22mm :)
 
 
at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Wishful Thinking Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 16:57:19 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I hope so Judy! Might explain why the ants in Kings Langley have vacated their free 12 month periodical tenancy of my kitchen..!!
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 4:27 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Wishful Thinking

Dear All,
 
We just went outside to farewell a visitor and discovered that the ants are very busy building a dirt wall around their hole in the ground.  We haven't actually seen any evidence of ant activity for months now. 
 
Do they know something,  I hope so!
 
Judy
at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather at Seven Hills Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 19:06:47 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Dummy asks, What's the return period mean? Tried several times to work out what it meant. I bet it's obvious :-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather at Seven Hills

My observations for January 2003 may be seen at
 
 
and for all years in January
 
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather at Seven Hills Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 19:10:20 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
No, that's not a silly question. Broadly speaking, it's how often we might expect the particular event to recur.
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather at Seven Hills

Dummy asks, What's the return period mean? Tried several times to work out what it meant. I bet it's obvious :-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather at Seven Hills

My observations for January 2003 may be seen at
 
 
and for all years in January
 
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 20:02:40 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 22:12:14 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Stargazer" To: "Aussie-Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Shuttle & Crew Lost! Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 03:01:23 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Space Shuttle Columbia and crew lost!
 
Columbia shuttle breaks up over Texas
 
 
This is no joke!
 
:((((((((((((((((((
 
 
at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Shuttle & Crew Lost! Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 03:16:15 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Stargazer
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 3:01 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Shuttle & Crew Lost!

Space Shuttle Columbia and crew lost!
 
Columbia shuttle breaks up over Texas
 
 
This is no joke!
 
:((((((((((((((((((
 
 
at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Shuttle & Crew Lost! Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 03:46:56 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Mission Status Center - Live Updates!
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Stargazer
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Shuttle & Crew Lost!

 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Stargazer
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 3:01 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Shuttle & Crew Lost!

Space Shuttle Columbia and crew lost!
 
Columbia shuttle breaks up over Texas
 
 
This is no joke!
 
:((((((((((((((((((
 
 
at : "Brooker, Sean SD" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Information: shuttle down Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 04:24:08 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Have just been sent this image of shuttle
 
Sean

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: shuttle down Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 07:19:26 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Another radar image showing the same
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 3:54 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Information: shuttle down

Have just been sent this image of shuttle
 
Sean

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 07:50:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
The nearest thing I have to a weather stick is the plastic red indian in my house, which has a piece of impregnated blotting paper, and the following caption:
'Apon blue
Sky is too
Apron pink
Weather stink'
 
(The blue being due to the absorption of moisture by the cobalt chloride impregnation)
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: shuttle down Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 08:11:23 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Looped radar image showing the same also.
 
Debris at the Space Shuttle Columbia was being picked up by National
Weather Service Doppler Radars in Texas and Louisiana this morning:
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Stargazer
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: shuttle down

Another radar image showing the same
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 3:54 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Information: shuttle down

Have just been sent this image of shuttle
 
Sean

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Weather Sticks ???? THE TRADITIONAL STORY Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 09:34:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Bussy, Keith and Everyone,
 
Here is the traditional story about the weather stick. 
Judy
 
----- Original Message -----
 
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:43 AM
Subject: Weather Stick

Judy - Here we go with the legend. It is rather lengthy but well worth reading about.
 
Long ago, through the mists of time live
dee Gree, the Seeker, who constantly sought answers to his questions. Why, where and how were the words he lived by. The ansers to his questions provided many benefits to his people.
 
Dee Gree had a daughter Mercury, a truly wonderful child who had a very special power. Mercury could predict the weather. She could tell when it would rain, when the sun would shine, or as was most often the case, when it might do a little of both.
 
Dee Gree was very fond of Mercury and fairly imagined that the sun rose and set upon her. However misfortune befell the Seeker. One tragic day an unexpected and extremely violent storm arose, and poor Mercury, even though she had seen it coming, was swept away in the torrent and drowned.
 
 
dee Gree was overwrought but he vowed that he would find the answer to Mercury's power, and thus prevent similar tragedy for his people. His fevered quest caused great upheaval in the land. He sought high, he sought low, and she sought everywhere for weeks and months without rest, until finally Mother Nature itself, wishing for some peace and quiet should at Dee Gree, "Go Climb aTree".
 
Dee Gree in his fervor heard "Climate Tree" and was reminded of the special tree with the finger like branches growing by his daughter's bedroom window. After much study and contemplation Dee Gree saw the answer; up for the sun and down for the rain. At last he understood his poor daughter's secret. Now you too can obtain some degree of insight into what tomorrow will bring since Mercury's secret has been passed on the Round Barn and they have created "The Weatherstick".
 
It should be noted that since the time of Dee Gree history records that no man's daughter has been swept away who had the wisdom to have a Weatherstick attached to his door and paid heed to its message.
 
Well there is the "legend" but as to how the stick actually works your guess is as good as mine. All I know is that it predicts the weather better than the weatherman. It is made here in Ontario. The address of the company who makes it is  The Round Tree, Thessalon, Ontario Canada P0R 1L0. They may be able to give some anwers for you. I don't have an email for them.
 
Our weather is a bit warmer - actually coming to 0 degrees which is warm for us. It is supposed to be about 0 to minus 5 for the next week. 
at : "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: JAN. 2003: Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 19:16:20 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
G'February to All! Heres the weather for January, 2003* in Mena, Arkansas.
 
Avg. High: 48.3F(6.8C)
Avg. Low: 27.9F(-3.2C)
       High: 68F(20.0C) Jan 8
        Low: 11F(-11.6C) Jan 24
Rain For Month: 0.20IN(5.0mm)
                     (-2.50IN/-63.5mm)
Rain For Year: 0.20IN(5.0mm)
                      (-2.50IN/-63.5mm)
 
*Readings are for 24 days. I was in hospital, so no readings for Jan 15-16 and 18-22.
A very, very dry month as measureable rain was recorded on only 1 day-the 14th. Trace of rain on the 29th. Brief Snow flurries on the 12th and 15th.
Hoping All have a Wonderful Month Yours David Powell
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:59:23 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: "weather mailing list" Subject: aus-wx: 'the smoke' Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
havn't seen 'the cloud' but 'the smoke' is back.
 
richard
naracoorte
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP73.gif: 00000001,44dc26a6,00000000,00000000 at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 19:57:11 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
That would be great if you could forward it on.
I remember as a young kid that my mum and dad had this little house thing on the shelf that when it was going to rain the blue man came out or dry the pink lady came out, or the other way around as I'm not sure. Anyone else have one of these or know how they worked?
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:09:32 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I have one myself. It's called a 'weather house'. When it's supposed to be going to rain, a man with an umbrella comes out. If it's supposed to be fine, a lady comes out.
I suspect it also works on humidity; the degree of moisture causing a sensitive thread to lengthen or shorten, activating a mechanical device that's attached to the common platform shared by the man and the woman. As it turns one way or the other, so the man or woman comes out.
I found a trap though with these. The instructions for use say 'only adjust once' (you do that by turning the chimney top on the house, which supports the mechanism). I found that doing it again (or if someone starts playing with it etc) for some reason renders the whole thing totally inaccurate (relative to the accuracy it had in the first place).
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

That would be great if you could forward it on.
I remember as a young kid that my mum and dad had this little house thing on the shelf that when it was going to rain the blue man came out or dry the pink lady came out, or the other way around as I'm not sure. Anyone else have one of these or know how they worked?
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:11:16 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Further to my previous post, Admiral FitzRoy's Storm Barometer is another curious (and apparently extremely unreliable) oddity.
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

That would be great if you could forward it on.
I remember as a young kid that my mum and dad had this little house thing on the shelf that when it was going to rain the blue man came out or dry the pink lady came out, or the other way around as I'm not sure. Anyone else have one of these or know how they worked?
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:22:11 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Can you still get them? I'd love to be able to show my kids and others as they think I was dreaming :-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

I have one myself. It's called a 'weather house'. When it's supposed to be going to rain, a man with an umbrella comes out. If it's supposed to be fine, a lady comes out.
I suspect it also works on humidity; the degree of moisture causing a sensitive thread to lengthen or shorten, activating a mechanical device that's attached to the common platform shared by the man and the woman. As it turns one way or the other, so the man or woman comes out.
I found a trap though with these. The instructions for use say 'only adjust once' (you do that by turning the chimney top on the house, which supports the mechanism). I found that doing it again (or if someone starts playing with it etc) for some reason renders the whole thing totally inaccurate (relative to the accuracy it had in the first place).
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

That would be great if you could forward it on.
I remember as a young kid that my mum and dad had this little house thing on the shelf that when it was going to rain the blue man came out or dry the pink lady came out, or the other way around as I'm not sure. Anyone else have one of these or know how they worked?
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 23:09:40 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Bussy
They do work. I sell them at here, having imported them in bulk at the US. They are balsam fur, in other words balsa wood and you could easily make one yourself. Yes they absorb moisture and droop accordingly. An old bit of seaweed would do the same job but these look cuter. You get about 6-8 hours weather warning at them. I have them all around the house. Early in the morning they tend to be drooped a little, due to the moisture at the night, so you allow for that.
cheers
Ken
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

That would be great if you could forward it on.
I remember as a young kid that my mum and dad had this little house thing on the shelf that when it was going to rain the blue man came out or dry the pink lady came out, or the other way around as I'm not sure. Anyone else have one of these or know how they worked?
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: 'the smoke' Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 21:35:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Watched the smoke head south to lie over Bass Strait as well as southern Victoria and then drift west during the day -  for sunrise & sunset in Melbourne today, see the top 3 images on my Summer photo page http://www.stormchasers.au.com/summer02jon.htm  I've got more shots at the sunset tonight which will make it up later in the week.  A number of people pulled over and were taking pics also - 2 of them had no idea that the smoke was the cause of the red sun!!  I'm amazed.......
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at australianskynweather.com
 
Australian Sky & Weather
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
 
***The journey is the reward***
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:29 PM
Subject: aus-wx: 'the smoke'

havn't seen 'the cloud' but 'the smoke' is back.
 
richard
naracoorte
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP81.gif: 00000001,01b93d31,00000000,00000000 User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 00:08:12 +1200 Subject: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails at : Neville Gibb To: aus-wx Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: Richard Modistach emails Hi All!

I'm fairly new to this forum.
I have a query about the following messages posted by Richard Modistach

havn't seen 'the cloud' but 'the smoke' is back.
 
richard
naracoorte

(with a flash attachment that sort of looks like this)
) IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

I've never heard of this in NZ and my immediate reaction is to dump it pronto. I've also never seen a reply to it on this forum and assume everyone else does the same. Would this be a correct assumption or am I just out of touch.

Neville
at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 01:07:03 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: Richard Modistach emails
The Attachment is at an Email program called Incredimail, and is nothing to worry about.

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
Current wx, forecast For Canberra
For mobile phones with WAP.

http://wap.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au

***WEBSITE UPDATE***
Redesign is going good, and i *could*
have the new product ready shortly.
However - Im am now playing with CSS
and this means a few more weeks wait.
the final product will be much better though!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
To: aus-wx
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:08 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails

Hi All!

I'm fairly new to this forum.
I have a query about the following messages posted by Richard Modistach

havn't seen 'the cloud' but 'the smoke' is back.
 
richard
naracoorte

(with a flash attachment that sort of looks like this)
) IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

I've never heard of this in NZ and my immediate reaction is to dump it pronto. I've also never seen a reply to it on this forum and assume everyone else does the same. Would this be a correct assumption or am I just out of touch.

Neville
at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 01:03:22 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: Richard Modistach emails
Hi Neville,
 
Not sure who started (spotted??? lol ) the CLOUD first but for a while there back around June/July 2002 we had a period of no clouds over a large area of Australia & it got to the stage where people were keeping an eye out for any cloud to appear & when it did reports hit the list here like *news headlines* (all tongue in cheek of course :) - a bit of a running joke on this list. 
 
Photos of the elusive CLOUD even made it to some websites, eg.... 
 
Oh, & the "IncrediMail" thing... it's just a new fad for email. Using their program u can add backgrounds, animated pictures/characters to your every day email to *spice it up, so to speak... a bit of a gimmick but otherwise no harm.
 
Hope this helps
:)
 
 
----- Original Message -----
To: aus-wx
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 10:38 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails

Hi All!

I'm fairly new to this forum.
I have a query about the following messages posted by Richard Modistach

havn't seen 'the cloud' but 'the smoke' is back.
 
richard
naracoorte

(with a flash attachment that sort of looks like this)
) IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

I've never heard of this in NZ and my immediate reaction is to dump it pronto. I've also never seen a reply to it on this forum and assume everyone else does the same. Would this be a correct assumption or am I just out of touch.

Neville
at : "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 06:22:22 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: Richard Modistach emails
Neville,
 
life was breathed into 'The Cloud' by Michael Thompson (ASWA NSW) a couple / few years ago and the saga began here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/humour.htm and has been not so seriously tracked about the place ever since.
 
'The Cloud' should only be worried about if it is sitting over you throwing flangs at you and you have no shelter <g>
 
Cheers,
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at australianskynweather.com
 
Australian Sky & Weather
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
 
***The journey is the reward***
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
To: aus-wx
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:08 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails

Hi All!

I'm fairly new to this forum.
I have a query about the following messages posted by Richard Modistach

havn't seen 'the cloud' but 'the smoke' is back.
 
richard
naracoorte

(with a flash attachment that sort of looks like this)
) IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

I've never heard of this in NZ and my immediate reaction is to dump it pronto. I've also never seen a reply to it on this forum and assume everyone else does the same. Would this be a correct assumption or am I just out of touch.

Neville
at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 07:40:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I'm sure you can but I don't quite know where..probably a gift shop or a major department store.
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Can you still get them? I'd love to be able to show my kids and others as they think I was dreaming :-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

I have one myself. It's called a 'weather house'. When it's supposed to be going to rain, a man with an umbrella comes out. If it's supposed to be fine, a lady comes out.
I suspect it also works on humidity; the degree of moisture causing a sensitive thread to lengthen or shorten, activating a mechanical device that's attached to the common platform shared by the man and the woman. As it turns one way or the other, so the man or woman comes out.
I found a trap though with these. The instructions for use say 'only adjust once' (you do that by turning the chimney top on the house, which supports the mechanism). I found that doing it again (or if someone starts playing with it etc) for some reason renders the whole thing totally inaccurate (relative to the accuracy it had in the first place).
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

That would be great if you could forward it on.
I remember as a young kid that my mum and dad had this little house thing on the shelf that when it was going to rain the blue man came out or dry the pink lady came out, or the other way around as I'm not sure. Anyone else have one of these or know how they worked?
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:52:23 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
jeeze, sorry about that neville, didn't realise i was hoofin' out attachments,
they dont come back to me, probably because i got incredimail.lol.
 
smoke's still around, a sprinkling of Cu coming in at the ne,
nothing to get exited about, windy and mid 30s today.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Monday, 3 February 2003 5:36:44 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails
 
Thanks Jane, Paul & Simon,

for putting me in the picture. I guess I was out of touch with the Incredimail thing - just looked a bit suspicious with the two different names and all (pays to be cautious). Well worth a look though.

Cheers

Neville

at : "Jane ONeill" <cadence at australianskynweather.com>
Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 06:22:22 +1100
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails


Neville,

life was breathed into 'The Cloud' by Michael Thompson (ASWA NSW) a couple / few years ago and the saga began here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/humour.htm and has been not so seriously tracked about the place ever since.

'The Cloud' should only be worried about if it is sitting over you throwing flangs at you and you have no shelter <g>

Cheers,

Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at australianskynweather.com

Australian Sky & Weather
http://www.stormchasers.au.com

Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au

***The journey is the reward***
--------------------------------





----- Original Message -----
at : Neville Gibb <mailto:nev.gibb at ihug.co.nz>  
To: aus-wx <mailto:aussie-weather at world.std.com>  
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:08 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails

Hi All!

I'm fairly new to this forum.
I have a query about the following messages posted by Richard Modistach

havn't seen 'the cloud' but 'the smoke' is back.

richard
naracoorte

(with a flash attachment that sort of looks like this)
) IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

I've never heard of this in NZ and my immediate reaction is to dump it pronto. I've also never seen a reply to it on this forum and assume everyone else does the same. Would this be a correct assumption or am I just out of touch.

Neville


 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP82.gif: 00000001,2d73dc0a,00000000,00000000 User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 20:02:52 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails
Thanks Jane, Paul & Simon,

for putting me in the picture. I guess I was out of touch with the Incredimail thing - just looked a bit suspicious with the two different names and all (pays to be cautious). Well worth a look though.

Cheers

Neville

at : "Jane ONeill" <cadence at australianskynweather.com>
Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 06:22:22 +1100
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails


Neville,

life was breathed into 'The Cloud' by Michael Thompson (ASWA NSW) a couple / few years ago and the saga began here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/humour.htm and has been not so seriously tracked about the place ever since.

'The Cloud' should only be worried about if it is sitting over you throwing flangs at you and you have no shelter <g>

Cheers,

Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at australianskynweather.com

Australian Sky & Weather
http://www.stormchasers.au.com

Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au

***The journey is the reward***
--------------------------------





----- Original Message -----
at : Neville Gibb <mailto:nev.gibb at ihug.co.nz>  
To: aus-wx <mailto:aussie-weather at world.std.com>  
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:08 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails

Hi All!

I'm fairly new to this forum.
I have a query about the following messages posted by Richard Modistach

havn't seen 'the cloud' but 'the smoke' is back.

richard
naracoorte

(with a flash attachment that sort of looks like this)
) IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

I've never heard of this in NZ and my immediate reaction is to dump it pronto. I've also never seen a reply to it on this forum and assume everyone else does the same. Would this be a correct assumption or am I just out of touch.

Neville


User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 21:17:56 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails S'alright Richard,

Sorry if I caused any embarrassment.

Neville
:)

at : "Richard Modistach" <hambone at dodo.com.au>
Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 17:52:23 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time)
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails


jeeze, sorry about that neville, didn't realise i was hoofin' out attachments,
they dont come back to me, probably because i got incredimail.lol.

smoke's still around, a sprinkling of Cu coming in at the ne,
nothing to get exited about, windy and mid 30s today.

richard

-------Original Message-------

at : aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Monday, 3 February 2003 5:36:44 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails

Thanks Jane, Paul & Simon,

for putting me in the picture. I guess I was out of touch with the Incredimail thing - just looked a bit suspicious with the two different names and all (pays to be cautious). Well worth a look though.

Cheers

Neville

at : "Jane ONeill" <cadence at australianskynweather.com>
Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 06:22:22 +1100
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails


Neville,

life was breathed into 'The Cloud' by Michael Thompson (ASWA NSW) a couple / few years ago and the saga began here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/humour.htm and has been not so seriously tracked about the place ever since.

'The Cloud' should only be worried about if it is sitting over you throwing flangs at you and you have no shelter <g>

Cheers,

Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at australianskynweather.com

Australian Sky & Weather
http://www.stormchasers.au.com

Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au

***The journey is the reward***
--------------------------------





----- Original Message -----
at : Neville Gibb <mailto:nev.gibb at ihug.co.nz>  
To: aus-wx <mailto:aussie-weather at world.std.com>  
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:08 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Re: Richard Modistach emails

Hi All!

I'm fairly new to this forum.
I have a query about the following messages posted by Richard Modistach

havn't seen 'the cloud' but 'the smoke' is back.

richard
naracoorte

(with a flash attachment that sort of looks like this)
) IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

I've never heard of this in NZ and my immediate reaction is to dump it pronto. I've also never seen a reply to it on this forum and assume everyone else does the same. Would this be a correct assumption or am I just out of touch.

Neville



____________________________________________________
 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved -
Click Here

Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:13:45 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
i remembered a long time ago my grandma on my dads side had one of those little houses, she died in the late sixties, i remember it in out house years ago but havn't seen it for a long time. rang up mum today, she's 84 going on 60, and asked her what ever happened to it, it was tucked away in a little corner of the house amoungst a lot of other stuff. she said granny had it a long time before she met dad and they got married in 1940, so that would make it around 70yrs old, genuine made in western-germany with german instructions on the back,(english too), has a thermometer in the middle in C &F. it still works ok. .
been to hundreds of auctions, clearing sales, swapmeets, markets, garage sales ect. over the years and never seen one up for grabs.
it's mine now, hehe
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Monday, 3 February 2003 7:13:59 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???
 
I'm sure you can but I don't quite know where..probably a gift shop or a major department store.
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Can you still get them? I'd love to be able to show my kids and others as they think I was dreaming :-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

I have one myself. It's called a 'weather house'. When it's supposed to be going to rain, a man with an umbrella comes out. If it's supposed to be fine, a lady comes out.
I suspect it also works on humidity; the degree of moisture causing a sensitive thread to lengthen or shorten, activating a mechanical device that's attached to the common platform shared by the man and the woman. As it turns one way or the other, so the man or woman comes out.
I found a trap though with these. The instructions for use say 'only adjust once' (you do that by turning the chimney top on the house, which supports the mechanism). I found that doing it again (or if someone starts playing with it etc) for some reason renders the whole thing totally inaccurate (relative to the accuracy it had in the first place).
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

That would be great if you could forward it on.
I remember as a young kid that my mum and dad had this little house thing on the shelf that when it was going to rain the blue man came out or dry the pink lady came out, or the other way around as I'm not sure. Anyone else have one of these or know how they worked?
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP83.gif: 00000001,410445d5,00000000,00000000 at : "Peter" To: Subject: aus-wx: Flying Ants Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:18:03 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, I know many posts have been made re natures signs of impending weather, but here as of time of writing, we are getting heaps of flying ants. In the past this has preceded significant rain. Living in Central Vic, this is encouraging. Cheers Peter +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: The NEWS is back on Australian Weather News Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:29:01 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com After spending a month reformatting the Australian Weather News site, I've at last got back to writing up the weather news again! First effort is at http://www.australianweathernews.com/news/2003/030202.CFM. Each day's news page is a composite of several pages pulled together with Coldfusion. I've tested it on IE6, Opera and Netscape 4.76, and the Netscape on a large resolution monitor doesn't like the style sheets too much, but the stats I'm getting indicate that <1% of users are still using pre 6.0 Netscape. I'd be very interested in any feedback on how it appears on different browsers/systems/screens. Cheers Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks??? Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:50:35 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
 
They do work. They are balsam fur, in other words balsa wood and you could easily make one yourself. Yes they absorb moisture and droop accordingly. An old bit of seaweed would do the same job but these look cuter. You get about 6-8 hours weather warning at the sticks. I have them all around the house. Early in the morning they tend to be drooped a little, due to the moisture at the night, so you allow for that.
cheers
Ken
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

i remembered a long time ago my grandma on my dads side had one of those little houses, she died in the late sixties, i remember it in out house years ago but havn't seen it for a long time. rang up mum today, she's 84 going on 60, and asked her what ever happened to it, it was tucked away in a little corner of the house amoungst a lot of other stuff. she said granny had it a long time before she met dad and they got married in 1940, so that would make it around 70yrs old, genuine made in western-germany with german instructions on the back,(english too), has a thermometer in the middle in C &F. it still works ok. .
been to hundreds of auctions, clearing sales, swapmeets, markets, garage sales ect. over the years and never seen one up for grabs.
it's mine now, hehe
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Monday, 3 February 2003 7:13:59 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???
 
I'm sure you can but I don't quite know where..probably a gift shop or a major department store.
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Can you still get them? I'd love to be able to show my kids and others as they think I was dreaming :-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

I have one myself. It's called a 'weather house'. When it's supposed to be going to rain, a man with an umbrella comes out. If it's supposed to be fine, a lady comes out.
I suspect it also works on humidity; the degree of moisture causing a sensitive thread to lengthen or shorten, activating a mechanical device that's attached to the common platform shared by the man and the woman. As it turns one way or the other, so the man or woman comes out.
I found a trap though with these. The instructions for use say 'only adjust once' (you do that by turning the chimney top on the house, which supports the mechanism). I found that doing it again (or if someone starts playing with it etc) for some reason renders the whole thing totally inaccurate (relative to the accuracy it had in the first place).
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

That would be great if you could forward it on.
I remember as a young kid that my mum and dad had this little house thing on the shelf that when it was going to rain the blue man came out or dry the pink lady came out, or the other way around as I'm not sure. Anyone else have one of these or know how they worked?
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Hi Bussy,
 
About 12 months ago a friend in Canada sent me a weather stick.  I think it is made at a piece of Hickory wood and yes it does seem to "work". 
 
We have it attached to the rail on our deck.  Right now the air is very humid, we are about a kilometre at the sea.  The stick is about half way up [or down],  I happened to be on the deck one day taking photos of a storm that was coming and just before the rain started I saw the stick drop down to its lowest position, in really dry weather with not much humidity it stands almost straight up, but like the picture the slight bowing in the stick never straightens right out.
 
She sent it to me for a bit of a joke since she knows how interested I am in the weather.  I will actually forward your e-mail to her and perhaps she will know more about it.  I know that we do kind of joke about it, saying that the stick says rain or the stick says no rain.  But other than saying that it indicates rain and then when the air begins to dry out afterwards it begins to resume its usual upward position, we really have no idea how.  It doesn't seem to be able to absorb much moisture, it doesn't swell, or become soft and to touch it is very hard and dried up feeling ALL of the time.
 
I was actually quite surprised when I found your e-mail.
Judy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Weather sticks???

Anyone ever heard of these or know how/why/if they work?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP85.gif: 00000001,44b2907f,00000000,00000000 at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Flying Ants Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 07:08:16 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Standby. In the next few days if the ants have it right (flying variety). ----- Original Message ----- at : "Peter" To: Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:18 PM Subject: aus-wx: Flying Ants > Hi all, > I know many posts have been made re natures signs of impending > weather, but here as of time of writing, we are getting heaps of flying > ants. In the past this has preceded significant rain. Living in Central Vic, > this is encouraging. > Cheers Peter > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "third" To: Subject: aus-wx: Rain Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 06:08:55 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 51mm over the last 24hrs here in Petrie ! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "R & R McKenzie" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Flying Ants Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:37:37 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I hope those ants are correct, and that a bit of rain drops on us before it gets to you... Cheers Robyn in Ballarat ----- Original Message ----- at : "Peter" To: Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:18 PM Subject: aus-wx: Flying Ants > Hi all, > I know many posts have been made re natures signs of impending > weather, but here as of time of writing, we are getting heaps of flying > ants. In the past this has preceded significant rain. Living in Central Vic, > this is encouraging. > Cheers Peter > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Rain Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 10:30:38 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 43mm at Mt. Crosby for eth 24 hours to midnight last night. Wonderful, and it is still raining, follwing on at 5mm on each of Sat & Sun. Not a single wet day in Jan, and not a single dry day in Feb thus far. John. -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of third Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:09 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Rain 51mm over the last 24hrs here in Petrie ! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.431 / Virus Database: 242 - Release Date: 2002-12-17 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.139.223.183] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: The NEWS is back on Australian Weather News Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:33:15 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2003 00:33:15.0966 (UTC) FILETIME=[01E6FDE0:01C2CBE5] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Laurier, Looks good I had no problem downloading it. Looks like 'Benni' is about to be a category 1 Cyclone off Mackay! Gavin SSWW Canberrra > at : "Laurier Williams" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" >Subject: aus-wx: The NEWS is back on Australian Weather News >Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:29:01 -0000 > >After spending a month reformatting the Australian Weather News site, I've >at last got back to writing up the weather news again! First effort is at >http://www.australianweathernews.com/news/2003/030202.CFM. > >Each day's news page is a composite of several pages pulled together with >Coldfusion. I've tested it on IE6, Opera and Netscape 4.76, and the >Netscape >on a large resolution monitor doesn't like the style sheets too much, but >the stats I'm getting indicate that <1% of users are still using pre 6.0 >Netscape. I'd be very interested in any feedback on how it appears on >different browsers/systems/screens. > >Cheers > >Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: carls at xenios.qldnet.com.au Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:31:20 +1000 To: aussie-weather-list at : Carl Smith Subject: aus-wx: Cat 1 Tropical Cyclone BENI approaching Mackay. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com BoM TC Advice pasted below. Links to all warnings etc. on my website at http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/current.htm Regards, Carl. >IDQP0005 >BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY >Queensland Region >Tropical Cyclone Warning Centre > >Media: The Standard Emergency Warning Signal should NOT be used with this >advice. > > > >TOP PRIORITY >TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVICE NUMBER 2 >Issued by the Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane >For 1050 EST on Tuesday the 4th of February 2003 > >A Cyclone WARNING is current for coastal and island communities between Mackay >and The Town Of 1770. A Cyclone WATCH extends north to Bowen. > >Tropical Cyclone BENI has reformed off the central Queensland coast and is >expected to slowly intensity. Gales should develop between Mackay and the Town >of 1770 during the afternoon. > >Areas of heavy rain are expected to develop south at Mackay later today and >overnight. > >Details of Tropical Cyclone BENI, Category 1, for 11am EST Tuesday 4 February >2003: >Central Pressure : 995 Hectopascals >Location of Centre : within 30 kilometres of > latitude 20.9 degrees south > longitude 151.6 degrees east > about 250 kilometres east of Mackay. >Recent Movement : towards the west at 15 kilometres per hour. > >Maximum wind gusts : 100 kilometres per hour, and slowly increasing. > >People between Mackay and the Town of 1770 should take precautions >and listen to >the next advice at 2 pm today. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:33:17 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: The NEWS is back on Australian Weather News X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Beni is already a Cat 1 tropical cyclone approaching Mackay. Both Carl and I have the details up on our pages for those who like to follow TCs. http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/current.htm These pages, which we usually try to keep identical, have sets of gathered links leading to useful information on any tropical cyclones anywhere in the world. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:33:15 +1100 Subject: Re: aus-wx: The NEWS is back on Australian Weather News > Laurier, > Looks good I had no problem downloading it. > Looks like 'Benni' is about to be a category 1 Cyclone off Mackay! > Gavin SSWW Canberrra > > > > > > > > at : "Laurier Williams" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > >Subject: aus-wx: The NEWS is back on Australian Weather News > >Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:29:01 -0000 > > > >After spending a month reformatting the Australian Weather News site, > I've > >at last got back to writing up the weather news again! First effort is > at > >http://www.australianweathernews.com/news/2003/030202.CFM. > > > >Each day's news page is a composite of several pages pulled together > with > >Coldfusion. I've tested it on IE6, Opera and Netscape 4.76, and the > >Netscape > >on a large resolution monitor doesn't like the style sheets too much, > but > >the stats I'm getting indicate that <1% of users are still using pre > 6.0 > >Netscape. I'd be very interested in any feedback on how it appears on > >different browsers/systems/screens. > > > >Cheers > > > >Laurier > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Was weather stick Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:24:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Anyone heard of these? I'm intrigued by some of these things. Anyone got one of these?
Would that be the same camphor of a moth ball? If it is should we put some out somewhere and would it show a change when an electrical storm was approaching?
 
Very curious.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Was weather stick Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:56:08 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
The mahogany one on the left of the image is the same as my one. It's the same camphor, dissolved in a solution of ammonium chloride and alcohol.
It's much more responsive to temperature changes. In the recent hot weather the camphor crystals almost completely disappeared. On a cold morning in winter they condense out and fill up most of the test tube. Sometimes the crystals are seen floating like tiny snowflakes all up and down in the liquid. This is supposed to foretell snow in the Northern Hemisphere.
There is a theory that says you can tell what direction the wind is about to change to by the direction the crystals are facing (they tend to accrete themselves on one side of the tube). I must admit I have observed some correlation but it's probably for different reasons altgoether, totally unknown to me.
Admiral Fitzroy maintained that the whole thing worked on electromagnetic forces or something like that.
 
For further details of the Admiral Fitzroy Barometer and Weather Stick, read the following (it's a bit long but will only take a few minutes):
 

Unusual Weather Instruments

Admiral FitzRoy's Crystal

Stormglass-Barometer

Admiral Fitz Roy was a founding member of the British Meteorlogical

Service, and one of the few scientific people of the 1800s to study the

various storm glasses that were in widespread use for weather forecasting.

These storm glasses were composed of a super-saturated mixture of various

chemical compounds, hermetically sealed within a heavy glass tube; crystals

would alternately form and grow into strange and fascinating organic and

crystalline shapes, or melt and dissappear back into solution. Observers

reported that the changing character of the crystals conformed to outside

weather events, in a way that could not be explained by normal temperature

or pressure effects. Fitz Roy studied these various storm glasses,

eventually developing one specific mixture which he found to be most

suitable for weather forecasting. To quote at his Weather Book of 1863:

"Considerably more than a century ago, what were called 'storm glasses'

were made in this country. Who was the inventor, is now very uncertain; but

they were sold on old London Bridge...

Since 1825 we have generally had some of these vials...when it was fairly

demonstrated that if fixed, undisturbed, in free air, not exposed to

radiation, fire, or sun, but in the ordinary light of a well-ventillated

room, or preferably in the outer air, the chemical mixture in a so-called

storm glass varies in character with the direction of the wind -- not its

force... though it may so vary at another cause, electrical tension. As

the atmospheric current veers toward, comes at , or is only approaching

at the polar direction, this chemical mixture -- if closely, even

microscopically watched -- is found to grow like fir, or fern leaves -- or

like hoar frost -- or even large but delicate crystallisations..."

Fitz Roy described a variety of different crystal shapes and patterns that

developed within the storm glass according to different wind directions and

weather conditions. However, with the rise of the doctrine of "empty

space", and the suppression of more recent research evidence on the aether

and life energy theories, the idea of an unusual energetic basis to weather

was no longer addressed in textbooks. Still, many industrial workers,

particularly chemists working with sensitive film emulsions, kept making

repeated observations of unusual chemical reactions associated with subtle

weather changes and sunspot activity, even under controlled laboratory

conditions (see: Chemical Basis of Medical Climatology, in our book

section). The older ideas are now being re-examined by many scientists.

Natural Energy Works has made arrangements with a European instrument

maker, and can now offer these fascinating, hand-crafted instruments, each

of which is mounted on an attractive wooden display with thermometer and

dust cover.

An Unusual Weather Instrument!

* Watch the crystals grow and form unusual and fascinating organic shapes,

like feathers and tree branches.

* Study the changing forms of the crystals, which are influenced by subtle

energetic radiations at Sun, Earth, and Atmosphere!

* Learn to forecast atmospheric conditions the "Old Fashioned" way.

* Convince yourself, by direct observations, that there is an unusual

energetic basis to weather and physical chemistry.

$249. Fitzroy Stormglass Barometer

[Image]

MAINE WOODSMAN'S WEATHERSTICK

A Rustic Weather Predictor at the Backwoods of Maine

"It really works!"

Originally developed by the Native Americans of the Northeast, this special

tree branch ( at the balsam fir tree) accurately predicts weather changes.

Hung on an outside wall or door casing exposed to the weather, the stick

will spontaneously bend down when foul weather is approaching, and up for

fair weather! This bending effect continues in some tree species even when

the limb is "dead" and dry. Some say this is an affect of humidity, but in

the living plant, relative humidity is always at saturation, or 100%.

Others say it is an affect of the Earth's electrostatic or orgone (life)

energy field, which is stronger on clear days and weaker during periods of

clouds and rain.

We know you will be fascinated by the unusual behavior of the Maine

Woodsman's Weatherstick.

$ 6.95 for each Weatherstick

$18.00 for 3 Weathersticks

[Image]

[Image]Return to Book/Product Catalog Table of Contents and Ordering

Information

[Image]Return to OBRL Home Page

This page, and all contents, Copyright (C) 1996

by the Orgone Biophysical Research Laboratory, Inc.

----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:24 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Was weather stick

Anyone heard of these? I'm intrigued by some of these things. Anyone got one of these?
Would that be the same camphor of a moth ball? If it is should we put some out somewhere and would it show a change when an electrical storm was approaching?
 
Very curious.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:42:53 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: "weather mailing list" Subject: aus-wx: trough line Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
a line of cells starting to build west of mt. gambier and cells rapidly intensifing around adelaide hills, with a bit of luck nocturnal cooling should spark these right up, dunno if it'll get to me though.
bom forcasting up to 5mm at this, last time it was 5-15 mm and we got 32mm, hope it goes the same way. 
 
richard
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP86.gif: 00000001,6d889026,00000000,00000000 at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 20:02:48 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Petrie Where???? Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- at : "third" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:38 AM Subject: aus-wx: Rain > 51mm over the last 24hrs here in Petrie ! > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 20:06:48 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com & where pray tell is *Mt. Crosby*??? Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- at : "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:00 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Rain > 43mm at Mt. Crosby for eth 24 hours to midnight last night. Wonderful, and > it is still raining, follwing on at 5mm on each of Sat & Sun. > > Not a single wet day in Jan, and not a single dry day in Feb thus far. > > John. > > -----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of third > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:09 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: Rain > > > 51mm over the last 24hrs here in Petrie ! > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.431 / Virus Database: 242 - Release Date: 2002-12-17 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 20:49:44 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Flying Ants Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 07:08 AM 4/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Standby. In the next few days if the ants have it right (flying variety). Hmm that's usually a sign. Haven't seen any myself, but could be good news for the NE... 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Peter" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Flying Ants Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:00:43 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, If the trough going through, hooks into moisture at Cyc Beni???????????? Who knows? Cheers Peter(Didjman) -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Tony Langdon (VK3JED) Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 20:50 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Flying Ants At 07:08 AM 4/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Standby. In the next few days if the ants have it right (flying variety). Hmm that's usually a sign. Haven't seen any myself, but could be good news for the NE... 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:10:39 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: RE: aus-wx: Flying Ants Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Peter, Good point!!! The avn model is pointing for a continuation of the moist infeed and the winds area generally suggesting that the cloud mass will move south towards central NSW coast at least.. By the way, the tortoises/turtles were moving to generally high ground - 3 of them. They often do this before significant rainfall events. We'll see. Jimmy Deguara At 09:00 PM 4/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Hi all, > If the trough going through, hooks into moisture at Cyc >Beni???????????? >Who knows? >Cheers Peter(Didjman) > >-----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Tony Langdon >(VK3JED) >Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 20:50 >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Flying Ants > > >At 07:08 AM 4/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: > > >Standby. In the next few days if the ants have it right (flying variety). > >Hmm that's usually a sign. Haven't seen any myself, but could be good news >for the NE... > >73 de Tony, VK3JED >http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Flying Ants Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:13:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Blank
hi all.
I do remember flying ants around chrissy here, we end up with the first rain in a while, allbeit ~10mm (33 days with out rain, and counting)

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
Current wx, forecast For Canberra
For mobile phones with WAP.

http://wap.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au

***WEBSITE UPDATE***
Redesign is going good, and i *could*
have the new product ready shortly.
However - Im am now playing with CSS
and this means a few more weeks wait.
the final product will be much better though!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Embedded Content: Blank Bkgrd2.gif: 00000001,425105c2,00000000,00000000 at : "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Strange summer Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:22:10 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, I'm interested to know why the 'storm season' (or in Victoria the 'almost-no-storm-season') has been as it has so far..... SST's are rather different to those of this time last year....cooler of the east coast well north and warmer in Port Phillip Bay and Bass Strait by up to 2°C on last year. Is it that the upper troughs are peaking further west? why has there hardly been a blocking high in the Tasman if temperatures have been lower than usual? Anyone have any quick thoughts that might help build a pattern? Does anyone recognise the pattern at past summers? (Blair?) Thanks for your thoughts... Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:28:13 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Flying Ants Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:13 PM 4/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >hi all. >I do remember flying ants around chrissy here, we end up with the first >rain in a while, allbeit ~10mm (33 days with out rain, and counting) They've been a sure sign of rain here too :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Rockbank firedevil Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 22:49:54 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com More images of the Rockbank firedevil at early January - west of Melbourne http://www.stormchasers.au.com/06_01_03.htm courtesy of and copyright to Shawn Smits of the Melton Express Telegraph. More of Shawn's images can be found here (at the bottom) http://www.stormchasers.au.com/vicimages.htm - another weather photographer who has rediscovered the delights of the weather lens... Enjoy, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Dennis Cottle" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Strange summer Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 23:29:57 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jane I think I asked a similar ? of you about 2 years ago when it was a good thunder period . The ? was something like does a trough and a cold front combining on the chart indicate that thunder storms are possible ? The answer was yes at most of the informed people on the list with the proviso of moisture , upper cross winds ,temp. and instability of the air mass.Crossing of the fingers was also mentioned . I have had my fingers crossed since about Nov. 2002 in Nth. Bayswater Vic. I think . Cheers Dennis Cottle +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Rain Signs: Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:20:47 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
G'Feb to All:
          Around here a good sign of rain is when the flies start to gather into groups, also when the birds have to fly lower to catch insects to eat (due to higher humidity). Also if there is a ring around the moon, this can mean stormy weather in a couple of days or so. Theres nothing I like better than to hear the Spring Peepers chirping after a good rain.
 
I'm hoping for copious amounts of rain for ya'll and a good SNOW for me!

Just my $0.02 worth (+any applicable tax).
Yours  David Powell
at : "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Strange summer Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 05:57:33 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Dennis & all, sorry, should have been more specific - I'm talking about the whole of the Australian longitudes rather than just Melbourne - I'm looking at the synoptic / broad scale setups..... Cheers, jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- at : "Dennis Cottle" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:29 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Strange summer > Jane > I think I asked a similar ? of you about 2 years ago when it was a good > thunder period . The ? was something like does a trough and a cold front > combining on the chart indicate that thunder storms are possible ? > The answer was yes at most of the informed people on the list with the > proviso of moisture , upper cross winds ,temp. and instability of the air > mass.Crossing of the fingers was also mentioned . > I have had my fingers crossed since about Nov. 2002 in Nth. Bayswater Vic. I > think . > > Cheers > > Dennis Cottle > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 05:49:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com where indeed !!! Petrie is a suburb just North of Brisbane. Mt Crosby is a suburb West of Brisbane ----- Original Message ----- at : "Stargazer" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 7:32 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain > >Petrie > > Where???? > > Regs. Paul. > (Stargazer) > http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "third" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:38 AM > Subject: aus-wx: Rain > > > > 51mm over the last 24hrs here in Petrie ! > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Farmer's forecast Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:06:14 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I remember years ago someone asking an old farmer when it was going to rain?
He just replied casually, "eventually".
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Flying Ants Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 09:17:44 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2003 22:17:45.0184 (UTC) FILETIME=[3DFDDE00:01C2CC9B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

was staying in rainforest near mossman (nth pt douglas) in November.  first night there a downpour coincided with an home invasion of hatching (presumably) flying ants.

at the time, put this down to either the precipitation event bring on the masshatching or the lights in the house bring on the hatching or a combination of the two events.

> at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Flying Ants
>Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 21:28:13 +1100
>
>At 09:13 PM 4/02/2003 +1100, you wrote:
>
>>hi all.
>>I do remember flying ants around chrissy here, we end up with the
>>first rain in a while, allbeit ~10mm (33 days with out rain, and
>>counting)
>
>They've been a sure sign of rain here too :)
>
>73 de Tony, VK3JED
>http://vkradio.com
>
>+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail
>to:majordomo at world.std.com
>with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
>your
>message.
>-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Farmer's forecast Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 09:21:36 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2003 22:21:36.0528 (UTC) FILETIME=[C7E22900:01C2CC9B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Cruel but fair Bussy - my favourite is, as each day passes, we're one day closer to rain

> at : "Bussy"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: "aussie-weather"
>Subject: aus-wx: Farmer's forecast
>Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:06:14 +1100
>
>I remember years ago someone asking an old farmer when it was going to rain?
>He just replied casually, "eventually".
>
>Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)


The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 09:37:26 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: The NEWS is back on Australian Weather News X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Looks just great on my WinXP-IE6 at 1024x768x32-bit system being a nice new Dell 2GHz displaying on an ancient Topcon 17 inch MA17S CRT monitor. You have done a lot of work! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:29:01 -0000 Subject: aus-wx: The NEWS is back on Australian Weather News > After spending a month reformatting the Australian Weather News site, > I've > at last got back to writing up the weather news again! First effort is > at > http://www.australianweathernews.com/news/2003/030202.CFM. > > Each day's news page is a composite of several pages pulled together > with > Coldfusion. I've tested it on IE6, Opera and Netscape 4.76, and the > Netscape > on a large resolution monitor doesn't like the style sheets too much, > but > the stats I'm getting indicate that <1% of users are still using pre > 6.0 > Netscape. I'd be very interested in any feedback on how it appears on > different browsers/systems/screens. > > Cheers > > Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "signshop" To: Subject: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:45:21 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi I was wondering if you can help me, my daughter is getting married in Sydney on Sat 22 March 2003 and I am trying to get some idea as to weather predictions for then, as the reception is on a boat on the harbour. Do you know of any contacts. Thank you kindly Sue +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Perth Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:53:31 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi everyone,
 
Can someone please tell me the overnight temperature in Perth on last Sunday/Monday.
 
Thanks,
Judy
at : Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Perth To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:17:06 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C2CD37.1CEBB560 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi everyone, > > Can someone please tell me the overnight temperature in Perth on last = > Sunday/Monday. > > Thanks, > Judy > Assuming you're referring to the morning of 3 February, 9.2 at the airport and 10.3 in the city - both rather on the low side but no records broken. For future reference (by everyone), daily climate data files for the last 2 weeks are available via the SILO web site at: http://www.bom.gov.au/silo/ Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jacob at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 14:19:42 +0800 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jacob Subject: Re: aus-wx: Perth Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It was 10.3C Jacob At 04:53 PM 5/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Can someone please tell me the overnight temperature in Perth on last > Sunday/Monday. > > Thanks, > Judy +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Perth Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:36:20 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Jacob ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jacob" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:19 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Perth > > It was 10.3C > > Jacob > > > At 04:53 PM 5/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Can someone please tell me the overnight temperature in Perth on last > > Sunday/Monday. > > > > Thanks, > > Judy > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Perth Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:50:13 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks as well, Blair. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Blair Trewin" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:17 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Perth > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C2CD37.1CEBB560 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Can someone please tell me the overnight temperature in Perth on last = > > Sunday/Monday. > > > > Thanks, > > Judy > > > > Assuming you're referring to the morning of 3 February, 9.2 at the > airport and 10.3 in the city - both rather on the low side but no > records broken. > > For future reference (by everyone), daily climate data > files for the last 2 weeks are available via the SILO web site at: > > http://www.bom.gov.au/silo/ > > Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:03:13 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
ken ring's your man,
are you out there ken,
you're wanted.
 
if  no good try here and scroll down,
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Wednesday, 5 February 2003 4:42:13 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Long range weather
 
Hi

I was wondering if you can help me, my daughter is getting married in Sydney
on Sat 22 March 2003 and I am trying to get some idea as to weather
predictions for then, as the reception is on a boat on the harbour.

Do you know of any contacts.

Thank you kindly
Sue

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP87.gif: 00000001,5e583fb3,00000000,00000000 at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Big query Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:54:54 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Just a theory and probably a stupid one. All the rain bands etc that have crossed Victoria lately have largely missed the NE. Could the heat generated by the fires and radiated into the air have an impact by maybe "driving" them away. A fair amount of the NE now looks like a desert with burnt out trees/forest etc.
My theory is that there is nothing to stop the radiant heat raising into the air and ultimately "blocks" anything that comes our way.
Like I said, probably a stupid thought, but maybe a theory there somewhere?
Where's my pills...........
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Patrick Tobin" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Big query Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:33:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Bussy, I think the arid landscape that you see is the end result of the El Nino process.  El Nino's impact on the global circulation is such that it favours the maintenance of upper ridges over Eastern Australia. It is these upper features which have been driving away or destroying features approaching at the west. We in Canberra have similarly been watching system after system gradually die as they edge across southern NSW towards the ACT (not that there have been that many systems mind you!!). If the El Nino begins to wane (reflecting the current rise in the SOI) then you will start to see systems maintaining (or heaven forbid even intensifying as they move over our longitudes) - start to look for active NW cloud bands developing in the Autumn.
 
The westward movement of Beni into Queensland, its interaction with an upper low and the subsequent advection of moisture south westwards marks a significant deviation at recent dominant patterns (where all Coral Sea systems have moved rapidly to the SE well before they got anywhere near the Qld coast). This could mark a change in the seasonal pattern (hopefully) or might still be an abberation. Time will tell.
 
At a very local level, the parched landscape may be having a minor impact on local conditions. In conditions of marginal instability, the absence of any readily available surface moisture may be enough to inhibit convection that would have occured in a more moist environment (all else being equal, moister air is more buoyant). The bare earth will, however, be hotter in the afternoons, so in the right conditions (where the air is unstable) you may get more vigorous convection and slightly more severe storms than may have occured otherwise. But these effects would be quite localised and relatively minor in the grand scheme of the global circulation.
 
 
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:54 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Big query

Just a theory and probably a stupid one. All the rain bands etc that have crossed Victoria lately have largely missed the NE. Could the heat generated by the fires and radiated into the air have an impact by maybe "driving" them away. A fair amount of the NE now looks like a desert with burnt out trees/forest etc.
My theory is that there is nothing to stop the radiant heat raising into the air and ultimately "blocks" anything that comes our way.
Like I said, probably a stupid thought, but maybe a theory there somewhere?
Where's my pills...........
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Sender: carls at xenios.qldnet.com.au Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:47:43 +1000 To: aussie-weather-list at : Carl Smith Subject: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hittin
S.F. man's astounding photo
Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it
disintegrated

Sabin Russell, Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 5, 2003

Top investigators of the Columbia space shuttle disaster are analyzing a
startling photograph -- snapped by an amateur astronomer at a San Francisco
hillside -- that appears to show a purplish electrical bolt striking the craft
as it streaked across the California sky.

The digital image is one of five snapped by the shuttle buff at roughly 5:53
a.m. Saturday as sensors on the doomed orbiter began showing the first
indications of trouble. Seven minutes later, the craft broke up in flames over
Texas.

The photographer requested that his name not be used and said he would not
release the image to the public until NASA experts had time to examine it.

Although there are several possible benign explanations for the image -- such
as a barely perceptible jiggle of the camera as it took the time exposure --
NASA's zeal to examine the photo demonstrates the lengths at which the agency
is going to tap the resources of ordinary Americans in solving the puzzle.

Late Tuesday, NASA dispatched former shuttle astronaut Tammy Jernigan, now a
manager at Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, to the San Francisco home of the
astronomer to examine his digital images and to take the camera itself to
Mountain View, where it was to be transported by a NASA T-38 jet to Houston
this morning.

A Chronicle reporter was present when the astronaut arrived. First seeing the
image on a large computer screen, she had one word: "Wow."

Jernigan, who is no longer working for NASA, quizzed the photographer on the
aperture of the camera, the direction he faced and the estimated exposure time -
- about four to six seconds on the automatic Nikon 880 camera. It was mounted
on a tripod, and the shutter was triggered manually.

In the critical shot, a glowing purple rope of light corkscrews down toward the
plasma trail, appears to pass behind it, then cuts sharply toward it at
below. As it merges with the plasma trail, the streak itself brightens for a
distance, then fades.

"It certainly appears very anomalous," said Jernigan. "We sure will be very
interested in taking a very hard look at this."

Jernigan flew five shuttle missions herself during the 1990s, including three
on Columbia. On her last flight, the pilot of the craft was Rick Husband, who
was at the controls when Columbia perished.

"He was one of the finest people I could ever hope to know," said Jernigan.

It was an astounding day for the San Francisco photographer, who said he had
not had any success in reaching NASA through its published telephone hot lines.

He ultimately reached investigators through a connection with a relative who
attends the same church as former astronaut Jack Lousma, who flew 24 million
miles in the Skylab 3 mission in 1973.

Lousma put him in direct touch with Ralph Roe Jr., chief engineer for the
shuttle program at Johnson Space Flight Center in Houston.

After a series of telephone conversations Tuesday afternoon, the photographer
had a veteran shuttle mission specialist knocking at his door by dinnertime.
Within hours, he was left with a receipt, and his camera was on its way to
Houston.

URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/05/CAMERA.TMP

 

©2003 San Francisco Chronicle
at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 07:31:53 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-106.7, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, OUTLOOK_FW_MSG, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id QAA21370 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:47 am, Carl Smith wrote this piece of wisdom: > >S.F. man's astounding photo > >Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it > >disintegrated Video taken at the same time at another location, shows no such streaking. It's an artifact at the lens of his equipment taking a photo of a bright moving object against are dark backdrop. David - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+QYLNZOfFgbBAbXARAmjKAKCk6NK8032+TtFrAnMgP9gDlEkSsACgg1Mf VZpdkCb8IIgz0o8Gt71Usjs= =ESmG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Big query Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 08:43:41 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2003 21:43:42.0033 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6978410:01C2CD5F] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Bussy

the following is not quite 'down on all fours' with your point, but is relevant to the current bushires/drought we've been having.

i tried to get some discussion going on Weatherzone about this.  there was a bloke at the CFA on the 7.30 report last week and he casually, as if it was gospel truth that everyone knew about, mentioned that the bushfires were acting to lower the chances of any precipitation events, on a macro scale.

i s'pose this is quite plausible.  when you look at the diagrams of the fires extent (comparable to the famed '39 event) and you hear about the scale (both vertical and horizontal) of the smoke, it's not beyond the realm of possiblity the fires have impacted on the weather.

my 2 cents worth.

> at : "Bussy"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: "aussie-weather"
>Subject: aus-wx: Big query
>Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:54:54 +1100
>
>Just a theory and probably a stupid one. All the rain bands etc that have crossed Victoria lately have largely missed the NE. Could the heat generated by the fires and radiated into the air have an impact by maybe "driving" them away. A fair amount of the NE now looks like a desert with burnt out trees/forest etc.
>My theory is that there is nothing to stop the radiant heat raising into the air and ultimately "blocks" anything that comes our way.
>Like I said, probably a stupid thought, but maybe a theory there somewhere?
>Where's my pills...........
>
>Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)


Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: getting the gear off for the drought Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 08:47:44 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2003 21:47:44.0461 (UTC) FILETIME=[371717D0:01C2CD60] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
see on last night's seven thirty report that the women of Ouyen have decided their nude rain dance will take place on march 3rd.  seems it's taken some time for the good ladies of the mallee town to decide on a date.  maybe they've been keeping a close eye on the movements of the SOI and the SST anomaly charts, for favourable post dance happenings!


STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
at : "Peter Konnecke" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: getting the gear off for the drought Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:11:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Ouyen here we come .... yeehaw .... (in jest)
 
Isn't it wonderful the charachter of Aussies when the chips are down to come out and put a bit of fun back into life in the face of such terrible times. 
 
Pete
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:47 AM
Subject: aus-wx: getting the gear off for the drought

see on last night's seven thirty report that the women of Ouyen have decided their nude rain dance will take place on march 3rd.  seems it's taken some time for the good ladies of the mallee town to decide on a date.  maybe they've been keeping a close eye on the movements of the SOI and the SST anomaly charts, for favourable post dance happenings!


STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 08:31:02 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I agree with David. When I was really into photography years ago, I had enough strange streaks at some kind of reflection/refraction within the lens system to be quite annoying. I was into astronomy in those days, and it was often a beautiful shot of some bright object in the night sky that was marred by just such a streak. I know lens systems have become a lot better in the last forty years, but they are still not perfect, and I have a strong hunch that David is correct. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 07:31:53 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:47 am, Carl Smith wrote this piece of wisdom: > > >S.F. man's astounding photo > > >Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before > it > > >disintegrated > > Video taken at the same time at another location, shows no such > streaking. > It's an artifact at the lens of his equipment taking a photo of a > bright > moving object against are dark backdrop. > > David > > - -- > If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If > you teach > them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+QYLNZOfFgbBAbXARAmjKAKCk6NK8032+TtFrAnMgP9gDlEkSsACgg1Mf > VZpdkCb8IIgz0o8Gt71Usjs= > =ESmG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.138.156.197] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Big query Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 12:27:18 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2003 01:27:18.0804 (UTC) FILETIME=[E39C4D40:01C2CD7E] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, I believe it is possible as the large areas of burnt counrty would alter the radiation pattern .There is some argument that land clearing in southern Asia has intensified the Thar Desert- the some effect might occur in SE Australia until we get regrowth there.I notice that the convection over the Brindabellas is quite strong at present particularly over the burnt north eastern slopes.Hoever the increased particulate matter may supress rainfall rather than increase it? Any ideas? > at : "michael king" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Big query >Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 08:43:41 +1100 > _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail X-Message-Info: dHZMQeBBv44lPE7o4B5bAg== Received: at TheWorld.com ([199.172.62.105]) by mc9-f42.bay6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:56:14 -0800 Received: at europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA05355; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:55:47 -0500 Received: ( at daemon at localhost) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA02836 for aussie-weather-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:53:22 -0500 (EST) Received: at TheWorld.com (pcls3.std.com [199.172.62.105]) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA28135 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:46:39 -0500 (EST) Received: at hotmail.com (f79.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.79]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA24475 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:46:38 -0500 Received: at mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:43:42 -0800 Received: at 152.91.9.49 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 21:43:41 GMT X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Big query Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 08:43:41 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2003 21:43:42.0033 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6978410:01C2CD5F] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Precedence: list Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Return-Path: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Content-Type: text/html; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-4FFA631E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Bussy

the following is not quite 'down on all fours' with your point, but is relevant to the current bushires/drought we've been having.

i tried to get some discussion going on Weatherzone about this.  there was a bloke at the CFA on the 7.30 report last week and he casually, as if it was gospel truth that everyone knew about, mentioned that the bushfires were acting to lower the chances of any precipitation events, on a macro scale.

i s'pose this is quite plausible.  when you look at the diagrams of the fires extent (comparable to the famed '39 event) and you hear about the scale (both vertical and horizontal) of the smoke, it's not beyond the realm of possiblity the fires have impacted on the weather.

my 2 cents worth.

> at : "Bussy"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: "aussie-weather"
>Subject: aus-wx: Big query
>Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:54:54 +1100
>
>Just a theory and probably a stupid one. All the rain bands etc that have crossed Victoria lately have largely missed the NE. Could the heat generated by the fires and radiated into the air have an impact by maybe "driving" them away. A fair amount of the NE now looks like a desert with burnt out trees/forest etc.
>My theory is that there is nothing to stop the radiant heat raising into the air and ultimately "blocks" anything that comes our way.
>Like I said, probably a stupid thought, but maybe a theory there somewhere?
>Where's my pills...........
>
>Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)


Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:13:11 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-106.7, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, OUTLOOK_FW_MSG, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id VAA09698 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:31 am, Phil Smith wrote this piece of wisdom: > I agree with David. When I was really into photography years ago, I had > enough strange streaks at some kind of reflection/refraction within > the lens system to be quite annoying. I was into astronomy in those > days, and it was often a beautiful shot of some bright object in the > night sky that was marred by just such a streak. > I know lens systems have become a lot better in the last forty years, > but they are still not perfect, and I have a strong hunch that David is > correct. Yep. That's why NASA asked for the camera as well as the image. They can take photos with the camera at similiar conditions and see what the results are. David - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+QcS3ZOfFgbBAbXARApd/AJ4qfAz6bgjpJcACGSHon85KL5LW8wCdEmMe zRw47S2OSykGtXyt0mCicxI= =oskA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:51:31 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Or maybe keep the camera and/or the film with the reply that there was something wrong with it ... whilst they dispose of any possible *clues* !! There is much more to this in the form of *hidden agendas *. I have researched a lot of info about the geomagnetic forces at that time and amazing *eruptions* on SOHO imagery. Also a Sudden Impulse Warning right at the time if the explosion ... etc etc etc !! Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "David Findlay" To: Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated Yep. That's why NASA asked for the camera as well as the image. They can take photos with the camera at similiar conditions and see what the results are. David - -- --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:40:22 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-106.9, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, OUTLOOK_FW_MSG, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id AAA10974 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:51 pm, Sha wrote this piece of wisdom: > Or maybe keep the camera and/or the film with the reply that there was > something wrong with it ... whilst they dispose of any possible *clues* !! > There is much more to this in the form of *hidden agendas *. I have > researched a lot of info about the geomagnetic forces at that time and > amazing *eruptions* on SOHO imagery. Also a Sudden Impulse Warning right > at the time if the explosion ... etc etc etc !! Those sorts of things have occured many many times before during spaceflight with out any event. Anything you see on the sun, takes 3 or 4 days to have an influence on the earth. Also there is clear evidence of damage to the wing at launch. Why cover up stuff? Anyway if you want to believe that *everything* is a big cover up you can, and what I say isn't going to change that. David - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+QfVGZOfFgbBAbXARArMuAJ0fXzv8zSYXQqI4nYxEQep01wNZUQCeICp5 cjtza1QmXv5hTlFO6PguLfM= =APJC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:45:52 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-106.8, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, OUTLOOK_FW_MSG, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id BAA22263 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:51 pm, Sha wrote this piece of wisdom: > Or maybe keep the camera and/or the film with the reply that there was > something wrong with it ... whilst they dispose of any possible *clues* !! > There is much more to this in the form of *hidden agendas *. I have > researched a lot of info about the geomagnetic forces at that time and > amazing *eruptions* on SOHO imagery. Also a Sudden Impulse Warning right > at the time if the explosion ... etc etc etc !! BTW, there was no explosion, it rolled out of control and broke up at high speed. - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+QgSgZOfFgbBAbXARAkeSAJ4qWuBudo8yFqbUmEaW8KlCnIG/IQCfeSTh xL+lZf7C6evWTV60sxn2bFs= =y8uC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:31:56 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ah-ha!!!! ;) Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- at : "third" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 6:19 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain > where indeed !!! > > Petrie is a suburb just North of Brisbane. Mt Crosby is a suburb West of > Brisbane > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Stargazer" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 7:32 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain > > > > >Petrie > > > > Where???? > > > > Regs. Paul. > > (Stargazer) > > http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:14:24 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Sha Re: "I have researched a lot of info about the geomagnetic forces at that time and amazing *eruptions* on SOHO imagery. Also a Sudden Impulse Warning right at the time if the explosion ... etc etc etc !!" Could you elaborate Please? Or perhaps provide some URL ref. Thanks Neville > at : "Sha" > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:51:31 +1000 > To: > Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting > Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated > > Or maybe keep the camera and/or the film with the reply that there was > something wrong with it ... whilst they dispose of any possible *clues* !! > There is much more to this in the form of *hidden agendas *. I have > researched a lot of info about the geomagnetic forces at that time and > amazing *eruptions* on SOHO imagery. Also a Sudden Impulse Warning right at > the time if the explosion ... etc etc etc !! > > Love > Sha > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "David Findlay" > To: > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:13 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting > Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated > > > > Yep. That's why NASA asked for the camera as well as the image. They can > take > photos with the camera at similiar conditions and see what the results are. > > David > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:22:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm intrigued here and not being a real "star watcher" realise that there are lots of other things out there that we don't know about yet or I don't watch for. My mind is more than open to lots of things that nature has yet to throw at us. Always been a firm believer that nature gives us lots of warnings on many things but we've lost our way over the centuries and forgotten the basics. Just my opinion and not a thread of knowledge to back it up :-) What is a sudden impulse warning though? ----- Original Message ----- at : "Sha" To: Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 1:51 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated > Or maybe keep the camera and/or the film with the reply that there was > something wrong with it ... whilst they dispose of any possible *clues* !! > There is much more to this in the form of *hidden agendas *. I have > researched a lot of info about the geomagnetic forces at that time and > amazing *eruptions* on SOHO imagery. Also a Sudden Impulse Warning right at > the time if the explosion ... etc etc etc !! > > Love > Sha > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "David Findlay" > To: > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:13 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting > Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated > > > > Yep. That's why NASA asked for the camera as well as the image. They can > take > photos with the camera at similiar conditions and see what the results are. > > David > > - -- > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:02:28 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
just saw on the news that nasa now doesn't think the foam would have done the damage, too light, theyre considering either a meteorite or space junk.
quite possibly they'll never know what or when.
no matter what we do, how careful or how good we think we are we are always at the
mercy of the whims of nature.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Thursday, 6 February 2003 6:52:35 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated
 
I'm intrigued here and not being a real "star watcher" realise that there
are lots of other things out there that we don't know about yet or I don't
watch for. My mind is more than open to lots of things that nature has yet
to throw at us. Always been a firm believer that nature gives us lots of
warnings on many things but we've lost our way over the centuries and
forgotten the basics. Just my opinion and not a thread of knowledge to back
it up :-)
What is a sudden impulse warning though?
----- Original Message -----
at : "Sha" <shambhala at hotkey.net.au>
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting
Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated


> Or maybe keep the camera and/or the film with the reply that there was
> something wrong with it ... whilst they dispose of any possible *clues* !!
> There is much more to this in the form of *hidden agendas *. I have
> researched a lot of info about the geomagnetic forces at that time and
> amazing *eruptions* on SOHO imagery. Also a Sudden Impulse Warning right
at
> the time if the explosion ... etc etc etc !!
>
> Love
> Sha
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> at : "David Findlay" <david at davsoft.com.au>
> To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:13 PM
> Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: FW: Mysterious purple streak is shown
hitting
> Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated
>
>
>
> Yep. That's why NASA asked for the camera as well as the image. They can
> take
> photos with the camera at similiar conditions and see what the resulRe aus-wx OFFTOPIC FW Myste.ems ts
are.
>
> David
>
> - --
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP88.gif: 00000001,3433f2d9,00000000,00000000 X-Sender: meso at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 03:25:19 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Mal Ninnes Subject: aus-wx: Next NSW ASWA Meeting - Saturday 8th February Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello aussie-weather people, The next NSW ASWA meeting will be held on Saturday, 8th of February. Venue: The Weather Company, 7 West St, North Sydney. Time: 7pm Parking: Free in the streets around the TWC building. Press the 'Weather21' buzzer to be let in. Due to a late change, the scheduled presentation this month will now re-appear during an upcoming month. As a result, the main focus this Saturday night will be on ex TC Beni, and also pyrocumulus clouds (which a lot of people have taken photos of lately). If you have any video or photos that you'd like to share with everyone else, please bring them along. Naturally, we'll be able to discuss a lot more, so bring along your questions too :) We usually order pizza as well, so bring about $5 for that. For more information, visit http://www.severeweather.asn.au/states/nsw/index.htm or email meso at iinet.net.au Friends and relatives are welcome - come along and discuss the weather! See you there, Malcolm Ninnes and Matthew Pearce NSW ASWA State Reps +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Rain Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 09:39:16 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Mt Crosby is 26Km due west of Brisbane CBD, and 11km due north of Ipswich. -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Stargazer Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 7:37 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain & where pray tell is *Mt. Crosby*??? Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- at : "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:00 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Rain > 43mm at Mt. Crosby for eth 24 hours to midnight last night. Wonderful, and > it is still raining, follwing on at 5mm on each of Sat & Sun. > > Not a single wet day in Jan, and not a single dry day in Feb thus far. > > John. > > -----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of third > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:09 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: Rain > > > 51mm over the last 24hrs here in Petrie ! > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.431 / Virus Database: 242 - Release Date: 2002-12-17 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Strange summer Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:05:47 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jane, Patrick, For my money, Patrick has the answer to your question Jane. This summer in Brisbane has been very unusual up to end of Jan. Not only has it been exceptionally dry in SEQ (all time record for Jan), but not that hot either. Normally when it is dry it is also darn hot and while it was hot in the run up to xmas, with bursts of dry continental air pushing temps just inland at the coast up around the 40C mark on many occasions between Oct 1 and Xmas, since then the air stream has been predominantly SE but relatively dry for an on-shore situation. IMO the reason for this can be traced directly to El Nino, with warm water sitting in the mid Pacific causing a series of TC's to form in the Solomon/Fiji region. The impact of these lows has been to shape the Tasman highs such that the Quidge (Queensland ridge) is directing a cool maritime air stream onto the SEQ coast at somewhere in the vicinity of New Zealand instead of a warmer tropical airmass at further North. This relatively dry airstream then dries even further as it tracks inland, turning towards Melbourne around the Tasman high. In short there has been a substantial shortage of moisture available for westward moving troughs to interact with. TC Beni has now changed that (temporarilly at least), and Brisbane at last has a moist onshore airstream of more tropical origin, with consequent much needed rainfall (almost 5 inches at Mt. Crosby since Feb 1). But the conditions we have now would, in a normal year, commence mid December. John. >snip Bussy, I think the arid landscape that you see is the end result of the El Nino process. El Nino's impact on the global circulation is such that it favours the maintenance of upper ridges over Eastern Australia. It is these upper features which have been driving away or destroying features approaching at the west. We in Canberra have similarly been watching system after system gradually die as they edge across southern NSW towards the ACT (not that there have been that many systems mind you!!). If the El Nino begins to wane (reflecting the current rise in the SOI) then you will start to see systems maintaining (or heaven forbid even intensifying as they move over our longitudes) - start to look for active NW cloud bands developing in the Autumn. The westward movement of Beni into Queensland, its interaction with an upper low and the subsequent advection of moisture south westwards marks a significant deviation at recent dominant patterns (where all Coral Sea systems have moved rapidly to the SE well before they got anywhere near the Qld coast). This could mark a change in the seasonal pattern (hopefully) or might still be an abberation. Time will tell. ... >snip -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2003 8:22 PM To: Aussie-wx Subject: aus-wx: Strange summer Evening all, I'm interested to know why the 'storm season' (or in Victoria the 'almost-no-storm-season') has been as it has so far..... SST's are rather different to those of this time last year....cooler of the east coast well north and warmer in Port Phillip Bay and Bass Strait by up to 2°C on last year. Is it that the upper troughs are peaking further west? why has there hardly been a blocking high in the Tasman if temperatures have been lower than usual? Anyone have any quick thoughts that might help build a pattern? Does anyone recognise the pattern at past summers? (Blair?) Thanks for your thoughts... Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: SNNNOOOWWW!!! Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:11:19 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello Everbody:
       Well, I'm a real Happy fella now. Yesterday (Wed. Feb. 5) it started Snowing about 10 P.M. and the Snow has stopped now 6P.M. Thur. Feb. 6 but we got 3 GLORIOUS INCHES of white magic (7.6cm). We were in a Snow Advisory today with local schools and many activities cancelled. The morning Low was 31F(-0.5C) the High today was around 35F(1.6C). The preliminary forecast was for an INCH or less. Needless to say, I'm glad they missed it. (A year ago today, we had 5INCHES[12.7cm] Snow on the ground.
       I hope this news can give ya'll some cool relief!
 
Yours *Deliriously Happy* David Powell
at : "Tina Jones" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: SNNNOOOWWW!!! Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:23:13 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
It would help if I knew where you were??????  LOL, I'm assuming not anywhere in Australia.....
-----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of arky dave
Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 11:11 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: SNNNOOOWWW!!!

Hello Everbody:
       Well, I'm a real Happy fella now. Yesterday (Wed. Feb. 5) it started Snowing about 10 P.M. and the Snow has stopped now 6P.M. Thur. Feb. 6 but we got 3 GLORIOUS INCHES of white magic (7.6cm). We were in a Snow Advisory today with local schools and many activities cancelled. The morning Low was 31F(-0.5C) the High today was around 35F(1.6C). The preliminary forecast was for an INCH or less. Needless to say, I'm glad they missed it. (A year ago today, we had 5INCHES[12.7cm] Snow on the ground.
       I hope this news can give ya'll some cool relief!
 
Yours *Deliriously Happy* David Powell
at : "Sha" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:07:33 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi guys In reply to a few who questioned further about my comments yesterday, here is a bit more. I am rather reluctant to voice too much though as there are many conservatives in this group who are quick to condemn anything *out of the box*. If anything I have said here doesn't fit your realm of thought, then please just delete it without aggravation :) I have been putting together my thoughts and researching vastly on what may have happened to the Columbia Shuttle. I never felt easy about the tragedy and absolutely know there is something that took place of which we aren't aware. I have concentrated on possible connections with what we saw happening with the Sun just days before. In particular, on 31 January at 21:59 UTC there was an amazing shot of the sun, looking so like the Eye of Ra ... this can be seen at the SOHO site !! http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov There were massive *explosions* that were seen to be *erupting* at the surface during the span of a couple of days. What I found to be *not right* was that on discovering a radar shot at this identical time, over the area of the explosion of the Columbia, the National Weather Service site that I was accessing suddenly *locked* its files ! I had saved the shot of which I spoke, and when I then went to move to the next view, I received a message : "Radar Data temporarily unavailable for this Site". This same screen came up no matter which radar image I tried to view, except for the current times. Anything at the 31 January and around the 1 February were no longer available. This set up warning bells for me !! Hours later, the message was still there and now the pages are no longer able to be found ! Now, it is not that I even properly understand what I was looking at in the radar shot, because I am not a meteorologist, but I do know that there was something *out of the ordinary* that has been kept quiet !! I have since accessed another site. I discovered another *odd* lockout in that the SOHO EIT images were not available around the couple of days surrounding the tragedy. All the images contained the words : CCD BAKEOUT. Now this was fully explained at the site, but I query WHY ?? This is the history showing : http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/eit/bake_history.html 2003 February 1 02:00 56.0 hr Heater off 2003 February 3 10:00 Another fact ....... the solar winds made an amazing leap on 31 January : "On Jan 31, several C and one minor M Class solar flares were observed. The solar wind striking the Earth increased at 390 km/sec. to over 1,000 km/sec. This increase in solar wind hit the Earth precisely at the time of the tragic Columbia Space Shuttle accident. "There is currently no evidence of a correlation between the two. However, it is well-known that a space shuttle in re-entry is under tremendous stress and is performing a delicate balancing act. It is possible these increased solar winds unbalanced the Columbia resulting in its unfortunate accident." http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=2349 Another major aspect that I find needs to be researched is that right at the time of the Columbia explosion a SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING was issued by NOAA : http://www.sec.noaa.gov/alerts/alerts_timeline.html ALERT MESSAGE : SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING Space Weather Message Code: WARSUD Serial Number: 26 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1344 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic Sudden Impulse expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1345 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1400 UTC IP Shock Passage Observed: 2003 Feb 01 1305 UTC ALERT MESSAGE : SUMMARY Space Weather Message Code: WARK04 Serial Number: 533 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1347 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1350 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1500 UTC Warning Condition: Onset What does this mean ?? It certainly means, to me, that there is grave need to look deeply into things !! The Summary of this Sudden Impulse shows a "Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected". This is not high, as can be seen at the description here : "The Warning Alerts at the Chart, including the Sudden Impulse Warning, are all either K=4 or K=5. I detail the description and effects here : G 1 Minor Kp = 5 Power systems: weak power grid fluctuations can occur. Spacecraft operations: minor impact on satellite operations possible." It is my opinion that what has taken place is an *intrusion* at an exterior means, and the Star Wars equipment immediately comes to my mind, has caused these *anomalies* to show up. It is this exterior force that caused the Columbia to explode !! I continue my research .............. With Love Sha --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 09:15:25 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: SNNNOOOWWW!!! X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tina, "Arky Dave" is at Arkansas. Meanwhile here in HK the HKO predicted temperatures of 13-16 for yesterday but when I checked in the morning it was 6.7C - a bloke will have to get out his winter woolies if this keeps up. Also I reckon I have somehow become acclimatised to the HK climate. I felt like it was freezing at 6.7 yet I used to think nothing of going camping at Yarangobily at negative the same amount -7C. So I'm worried that this tropical climate for the past fourteen years has been turning me into some sort of a weakling. Fancy even thinking it's freezing when it's 6.7C! And just to get back on topic, the last snowfall officially recorded here was 103 years ago in 1900, when the sea-level temperature fell to zero. However, I did see a light covering of snow on the Summit of Mount Lantau here in December 1989. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "Tina Jones" To: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:23:13 +1100 Subject: RE: aus-wx: SNNNOOOWWW!!! > It would help if I knew where you were?????? LOL, I'm assuming not > anywhere > in Australia..... > -----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of arky dave > Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 11:11 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: SNNNOOOWWW!!! > > > Hello Everbody: > Well, I'm a real Happy fella now. Yesterday (Wed. Feb. 5) it > started Snowing about 10 P.M. and the Snow has stopped now 6P.M. Thur. > Feb. > 6 but we got 3 GLORIOUS INCHES of white magic (7.6cm). We were in a > Snow > Advisory today with local schools and many activities cancelled. The > morning > Low was 31F(-0.5C) the High today was around 35F(1.6C). The preliminary > forecast was for an INCH or less. Needless to say, I'm glad they missed > it. > (A year ago today, we had 5INCHES[12.7cm] Snow on the ground. > I hope this news can give ya'll some cool relief! > > Yours *Deliriously Happy* David Powell > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tina Jones" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:26:10 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Very interesting questions Sha, keep up the good work. I hope all will respect your wishes to just hit delete without causing aggravation if they are unable to keep to sensible and polite debate on the issue. -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Sha Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 12:08 PM To: Aussie Weather Subject: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Hi guys In reply to a few who questioned further about my comments yesterday, here is a bit more. I am rather reluctant to voice too much though as there are many conservatives in this group who are quick to condemn anything *out of the box*. If anything I have said here doesn't fit your realm of thought, then please just delete it without aggravation :) I have been putting together my thoughts and researching vastly on what may have happened to the Columbia Shuttle. I never felt easy about the tragedy and absolutely know there is something that took place of which we aren't aware. I have concentrated on possible connections with what we saw happening with the Sun just days before. In particular, on 31 January at 21:59 UTC there was an amazing shot of the sun, looking so like the Eye of Ra ... this can be seen at the SOHO site !! http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov There were massive *explosions* that were seen to be *erupting* at the surface during the span of a couple of days. What I found to be *not right* was that on discovering a radar shot at this identical time, over the area of the explosion of the Columbia, the National Weather Service site that I was accessing suddenly *locked* its files ! I had saved the shot of which I spoke, and when I then went to move to the next view, I received a message : "Radar Data temporarily unavailable for this Site". This same screen came up no matter which radar image I tried to view, except for the current times. Anything at the 31 January and around the 1 February were no longer available. This set up warning bells for me !! Hours later, the message was still there and now the pages are no longer able to be found ! Now, it is not that I even properly understand what I was looking at in the radar shot, because I am not a meteorologist, but I do know that there was something *out of the ordinary* that has been kept quiet !! I have since accessed another site. I discovered another *odd* lockout in that the SOHO EIT images were not available around the couple of days surrounding the tragedy. All the images contained the words : CCD BAKEOUT. Now this was fully explained at the site, but I query WHY ?? This is the history showing : http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/eit/bake_history.html 2003 February 1 02:00 56.0 hr Heater off 2003 February 3 10:00 Another fact ....... the solar winds made an amazing leap on 31 January : "On Jan 31, several C and one minor M Class solar flares were observed. The solar wind striking the Earth increased at 390 km/sec. to over 1,000 km/sec. This increase in solar wind hit the Earth precisely at the time of the tragic Columbia Space Shuttle accident. "There is currently no evidence of a correlation between the two. However, it is well-known that a space shuttle in re-entry is under tremendous stress and is performing a delicate balancing act. It is possible these increased solar winds unbalanced the Columbia resulting in its unfortunate accident." http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=2349 Another major aspect that I find needs to be researched is that right at the time of the Columbia explosion a SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING was issued by NOAA : http://www.sec.noaa.gov/alerts/alerts_timeline.html ALERT MESSAGE : SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING Space Weather Message Code: WARSUD Serial Number: 26 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1344 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic Sudden Impulse expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1345 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1400 UTC IP Shock Passage Observed: 2003 Feb 01 1305 UTC ALERT MESSAGE : SUMMARY Space Weather Message Code: WARK04 Serial Number: 533 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1347 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1350 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1500 UTC Warning Condition: Onset What does this mean ?? It certainly means, to me, that there is grave need to look deeply into things !! The Summary of this Sudden Impulse shows a "Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected". This is not high, as can be seen at the description here : "The Warning Alerts at the Chart, including the Sudden Impulse Warning, are all either K=4 or K=5. I detail the description and effects here : G 1 Minor Kp = 5 Power systems: weak power grid fluctuations can occur. Spacecraft operations: minor impact on satellite operations possible." It is my opinion that what has taken place is an *intrusion* at an exterior means, and the Star Wars equipment immediately comes to my mind, has caused these *anomalies* to show up. It is this exterior force that caused the Columbia to explode !! I continue my research .............. With Love Sha --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:32:41 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-106.4, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_02_03, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id UAA08467 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:07 am, Sha wrote this piece of wisdom: > In reply to a few who questioned further about my comments yesterday, here > is a bit more. I am rather reluctant to voice too much though as there are > many conservatives in this group who are quick to condemn anything *out of > the box*. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. I'm not one that condemns anything out of the box, in fact some of my spaceflight research goes into stuff that is not mainstream science. But in order to categorically state this is what happened evidence is needed. You can't just base something one instance. You need to show more instances, show that it is a repeatable phenonema. You need to follow standard scientific method which is to form a hypothesis, try to disprove it, then if you can't, then try to prove and improve your hypothesis. Prove it by experimentation as well. You look at those explosions on the sun, but fail to note that there have been thousands of similiar explosions when other vehicles have been reentering with out any problem. Why wasn't the ISS affected? These are minor events. If it was a major event, whole satelite networks would have been taken out. TV sats are in the van allen belts, the highest radiation areas around earth, yet were not affected by this. They would be the first to go. These things, then bringing "star wars" does not help your credibility. Thanks, David - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Qwy5ZOfFgbBAbXARAqzmAKCQhB1kC3D74k9hJP2qF9JikhJ25QCdEBc8 Zmz2PPb5txrtiSP4E6cqmFc= =g6Sw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:37:25 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I thoroughly agree. Has made me think on a different level. Am looking forward to anymore info you can find out Sha...great job PaulY -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Tina Jones Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:26 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Very interesting questions Sha, keep up the good work. I hope all will respect your wishes to just hit delete without causing aggravation if they are unable to keep to sensible and polite debate on the issue. -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Sha Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 12:08 PM To: Aussie Weather Subject: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Hi guys In reply to a few who questioned further about my comments yesterday, here is a bit more. I am rather reluctant to voice too much though as there are many conservatives in this group who are quick to condemn anything *out of the box*. If anything I have said here doesn't fit your realm of thought, then please just delete it without aggravation :) I have been putting together my thoughts and researching vastly on what may have happened to the Columbia Shuttle. I never felt easy about the tragedy and absolutely know there is something that took place of which we aren't aware. I have concentrated on possible connections with what we saw happening with the Sun just days before. In particular, on 31 January at 21:59 UTC there was an amazing shot of the sun, looking so like the Eye of Ra ... this can be seen at the SOHO site !! http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov There were massive *explosions* that were seen to be *erupting* at the surface during the span of a couple of days. What I found to be *not right* was that on discovering a radar shot at this identical time, over the area of the explosion of the Columbia, the National Weather Service site that I was accessing suddenly *locked* its files ! I had saved the shot of which I spoke, and when I then went to move to the next view, I received a message : "Radar Data temporarily unavailable for this Site". This same screen came up no matter which radar image I tried to view, except for the current times. Anything at the 31 January and around the 1 February were no longer available. This set up warning bells for me !! Hours later, the message was still there and now the pages are no longer able to be found ! Now, it is not that I even properly understand what I was looking at in the radar shot, because I am not a meteorologist, but I do know that there was something *out of the ordinary* that has been kept quiet !! I have since accessed another site. I discovered another *odd* lockout in that the SOHO EIT images were not available around the couple of days surrounding the tragedy. All the images contained the words : CCD BAKEOUT. Now this was fully explained at the site, but I query WHY ?? This is the history showing : http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/eit/bake_history.html 2003 February 1 02:00 56.0 hr Heater off 2003 February 3 10:00 Another fact ....... the solar winds made an amazing leap on 31 January : "On Jan 31, several C and one minor M Class solar flares were observed. The solar wind striking the Earth increased at 390 km/sec. to over 1,000 km/sec. This increase in solar wind hit the Earth precisely at the time of the tragic Columbia Space Shuttle accident. "There is currently no evidence of a correlation between the two. However, it is well-known that a space shuttle in re-entry is under tremendous stress and is performing a delicate balancing act. It is possible these increased solar winds unbalanced the Columbia resulting in its unfortunate accident." http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=2349 Another major aspect that I find needs to be researched is that right at the time of the Columbia explosion a SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING was issued by NOAA : http://www.sec.noaa.gov/alerts/alerts_timeline.html ALERT MESSAGE : SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING Space Weather Message Code: WARSUD Serial Number: 26 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1344 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic Sudden Impulse expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1345 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1400 UTC IP Shock Passage Observed: 2003 Feb 01 1305 UTC ALERT MESSAGE : SUMMARY Space Weather Message Code: WARK04 Serial Number: 533 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1347 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1350 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1500 UTC Warning Condition: Onset What does this mean ?? It certainly means, to me, that there is grave need to look deeply into things !! The Summary of this Sudden Impulse shows a "Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected". This is not high, as can be seen at the description here : "The Warning Alerts at the Chart, including the Sudden Impulse Warning, are all either K=4 or K=5. I detail the description and effects here : G 1 Minor Kp = 5 Power systems: weak power grid fluctuations can occur. Spacecraft operations: minor impact on satellite operations possible." It is my opinion that what has taken place is an *intrusion* at an exterior means, and the Star Wars equipment immediately comes to my mind, has caused these *anomalies* to show up. It is this exterior force that caused the Columbia to explode !! I continue my research .............. With Love Sha --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:38:39 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Tina :) Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tina Jones" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:26 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Very interesting questions Sha, keep up the good work. I hope all will respect your wishes to just hit delete without causing aggravation if they are unable to keep to sensible and polite debate on the issue. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:52:35 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I have done a lot on a website I am putting up on this topic Paul. It is a work in progress, but please feel free to look if it interests you : http://www.geocities.com/serpentine_moon/columbia.html I will be adding to it constantly. I have yet to complete the radar images page, but hope to do that today. This is the particular page on the issues of the sun : http://www.geocities.com/serpentine_moon/sun.html Again, I request that anybody who finds what I have written to be out of their realm of thought, then please just pass it by without aggravation. I say this in advance, because I do look at things with an unconventional approach :) Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "Paul Yole" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:37 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy I thoroughly agree. Has made me think on a different level. Am looking forward to anymore info you can find out Sha...great job PaulY --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:59:15 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at a scientific point of view, I have no trouble in accepting that electromagnetic disturbances due to solar wind could have caused this tragedy, however the shuttle is well shielded at such events (as they occur fairly often during the peak of the solar cycle- as we are at at the moment), so any effect would be unusual. The solar "wind" is not powerful enough to "blow" the shuttle off course. It is a very very tenuous stream of electrically charged particles traveling very fast. I can imagine, however, that it is possible that EM interference could have thrown the delicate re-entry angle balancing act (all controlled by auto pilot) out of "wack" . . . An interesting theory, which would, no doubt, be receiving much attention. James James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Sha Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 12:08 PM To: Aussie Weather Subject: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Hi guys In reply to a few who questioned further about my comments yesterday, here is a bit more. I am rather reluctant to voice too much though as there are many conservatives in this group who are quick to condemn anything *out of the box*. If anything I have said here doesn't fit your realm of thought, then please just delete it without aggravation :) I have been putting together my thoughts and researching vastly on what may have happened to the Columbia Shuttle. I never felt easy about the tragedy and absolutely know there is something that took place of which we aren't aware. I have concentrated on possible connections with what we saw happening with the Sun just days before. In particular, on 31 January at 21:59 UTC there was an amazing shot of the sun, looking so like the Eye of Ra ... this can be seen at the SOHO site !! http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov There were massive *explosions* that were seen to be *erupting* at the surface during the span of a couple of days. What I found to be *not right* was that on discovering a radar shot at this identical time, over the area of the explosion of the Columbia, the National Weather Service site that I was accessing suddenly *locked* its files ! I had saved the shot of which I spoke, and when I then went to move to the next view, I received a message : "Radar Data temporarily unavailable for this Site". This same screen came up no matter which radar image I tried to view, except for the current times. Anything at the 31 January and around the 1 February were no longer available. This set up warning bells for me !! Hours later, the message was still there and now the pages are no longer able to be found ! Now, it is not that I even properly understand what I was looking at in the radar shot, because I am not a meteorologist, but I do know that there was something *out of the ordinary* that has been kept quiet !! I have since accessed another site. I discovered another *odd* lockout in that the SOHO EIT images were not available around the couple of days surrounding the tragedy. All the images contained the words : CCD BAKEOUT. Now this was fully explained at the site, but I query WHY ?? This is the history showing : http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/eit/bake_history.html 2003 February 1 02:00 56.0 hr Heater off 2003 February 3 10:00 Another fact ....... the solar winds made an amazing leap on 31 January : "On Jan 31, several C and one minor M Class solar flares were observed. The solar wind striking the Earth increased at 390 km/sec. to over 1,000 km/sec. This increase in solar wind hit the Earth precisely at the time of the tragic Columbia Space Shuttle accident. "There is currently no evidence of a correlation between the two. However, it is well-known that a space shuttle in re-entry is under tremendous stress and is performing a delicate balancing act. It is possible these increased solar winds unbalanced the Columbia resulting in its unfortunate accident." http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=2349 Another major aspect that I find needs to be researched is that right at the time of the Columbia explosion a SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING was issued by NOAA : http://www.sec.noaa.gov/alerts/alerts_timeline.html ALERT MESSAGE : SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING Space Weather Message Code: WARSUD Serial Number: 26 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1344 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic Sudden Impulse expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1345 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1400 UTC IP Shock Passage Observed: 2003 Feb 01 1305 UTC ALERT MESSAGE : SUMMARY Space Weather Message Code: WARK04 Serial Number: 533 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1347 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1350 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1500 UTC Warning Condition: Onset What does this mean ?? It certainly means, to me, that there is grave need to look deeply into things !! The Summary of this Sudden Impulse shows a "Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected". This is not high, as can be seen at the description here : "The Warning Alerts at the Chart, including the Sudden Impulse Warning, are all either K=4 or K=5. I detail the description and effects here : G 1 Minor Kp = 5 Power systems: weak power grid fluctuations can occur. Spacecraft operations: minor impact on satellite operations possible." It is my opinion that what has taken place is an *intrusion* at an exterior means, and the Star Wars equipment immediately comes to my mind, has caused these *anomalies* to show up. It is this exterior force that caused the Columbia to explode !! I continue my research .............. With Love Sha --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:01:21 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com David, I am attempting to put across that what happened was an *extraordinary* event and therefore to take the tack of experimentation, etc that you suggest, is not feasible in this case. When I noted the *explosions* on the sun, I also followed through by showing that they weren't BIG events !! ...... only G4 or G5. In saying this, I again am pointing to an *extraordinary* event having taken place. If you note the probable affects of G4, as I quoted, you will see that little impact is made to space vehicles. On the topic of my mention of *Star Wars* I do trust you appreciate that I refer to the technology owned by the US government and not the film series. To be very brief, this equipment constantly orbits Earth, under the guise of *keeping us protected against unknown forces* ....... or something along those lines David. It is a vast piece of high-technology apparatus and has the ability to use scalar or microwave beams against its *enemy*. These are facts ... not fiction !! Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "David Findlay" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:32 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. I'm not one that condemns anything out of the box, in fact some of my spaceflight research goes into stuff that is not mainstream science. But in order to categorically state this is what happened evidence is needed. You can't just base something one instance. You need to show more instances, show that it is a repeatable phenonema. You need to follow standard scientific method which is to form a hypothesis, try to disprove it, then if you can't, then try to prove and improve your hypothesis. Prove it by experimentation as well. You look at those explosions on the sun, but fail to note that there have been thousands of similiar explosions when other vehicles have been reentering with out any problem. Why wasn't the ISS affected? These are minor events. If it was a major event, whole satelite networks would have been taken out. TV sats are in the van allen belts, the highest radiation areas around earth, yet were not affected by this. They would be the first to go. These things, then bringing "star wars" does not help your credibility. Thanks, David --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "David James Powell" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: SNNNOOOWWW!!! X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.00 X-IPAddress: 208.189.4.57 Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 20:04:17 -0600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'Day Tina: I am in Mena, Arkansas USA. Mena lies close to 94DEG16MIN WEST by 34DEG34MIN North. Mena has a population of 5,700+ with an elevation (USGS marker in Janssen Park) of 1,177FT(358.8M). Mena is almost midway between Fort Smith and Texarkana, Arkansas; 12Miles(19.3Km) to our west is the Oklahoma border. Hope this helps Yours David Powell > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > It would help if I knew where you were?????? LOL, I'm assuming not anywhere > in Australia..... > -----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of arky dave > Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 11:11 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: SNNNOOOWWW!!! > > > Hello Everbody: > Well, I'm a real Happy fella now. Yesterday (Wed. Feb. 5) it > started Snowing about 10 P.M. and the Snow has stopped now 6P.M. Thur. Feb. > 6 but we got 3 GLORIOUS INCHES of white magic (7.6cm). We were in a Snow > Advisory today with local schools and many activities cancelled. The morning > Low was 31F(-0.5C) the High today was around 35F (1.6C). The preliminary > forecast was for an INCH or less. Needless to say, I'm glad they missed it. > (A year ago today, we had 5INCHES[12.7cm] Snow on the ground. > I hope this news can give ya'll some cool relief! > > Yours *Deliriously Happy* David Powell > > -- Sent using Voltage Net Webmail http://www.voltage.net/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:05:48 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry just a little further to that . . . I don't think you need a left-field theory like a "star wars" laser LOL Simple EM interference due to a Sudden Impulse Event throwing stabilizing thrusters out could explain it. James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Sha Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 12:08 PM To: Aussie Weather Subject: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Hi guys In reply to a few who questioned further about my comments yesterday, here is a bit more. I am rather reluctant to voice too much though as there are many conservatives in this group who are quick to condemn anything *out of the box*. If anything I have said here doesn't fit your realm of thought, then please just delete it without aggravation :) I have been putting together my thoughts and researching vastly on what may have happened to the Columbia Shuttle. I never felt easy about the tragedy and absolutely know there is something that took place of which we aren't aware. I have concentrated on possible connections with what we saw happening with the Sun just days before. In particular, on 31 January at 21:59 UTC there was an amazing shot of the sun, looking so like the Eye of Ra ... this can be seen at the SOHO site !! http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov There were massive *explosions* that were seen to be *erupting* at the surface during the span of a couple of days. What I found to be *not right* was that on discovering a radar shot at this identical time, over the area of the explosion of the Columbia, the National Weather Service site that I was accessing suddenly *locked* its files ! I had saved the shot of which I spoke, and when I then went to move to the next view, I received a message : "Radar Data temporarily unavailable for this Site". This same screen came up no matter which radar image I tried to view, except for the current times. Anything at the 31 January and around the 1 February were no longer available. This set up warning bells for me !! Hours later, the message was still there and now the pages are no longer able to be found ! Now, it is not that I even properly understand what I was looking at in the radar shot, because I am not a meteorologist, but I do know that there was something *out of the ordinary* that has been kept quiet !! I have since accessed another site. I discovered another *odd* lockout in that the SOHO EIT images were not available around the couple of days surrounding the tragedy. All the images contained the words : CCD BAKEOUT. Now this was fully explained at the site, but I query WHY ?? This is the history showing : http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/eit/bake_history.html 2003 February 1 02:00 56.0 hr Heater off 2003 February 3 10:00 Another fact ....... the solar winds made an amazing leap on 31 January : "On Jan 31, several C and one minor M Class solar flares were observed. The solar wind striking the Earth increased at 390 km/sec. to over 1,000 km/sec. This increase in solar wind hit the Earth precisely at the time of the tragic Columbia Space Shuttle accident. "There is currently no evidence of a correlation between the two. However, it is well-known that a space shuttle in re-entry is under tremendous stress and is performing a delicate balancing act. It is possible these increased solar winds unbalanced the Columbia resulting in its unfortunate accident." http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=2349 Another major aspect that I find needs to be researched is that right at the time of the Columbia explosion a SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING was issued by NOAA : http://www.sec.noaa.gov/alerts/alerts_timeline.html ALERT MESSAGE : SUDDEN IMPULSE WARNING Space Weather Message Code: WARSUD Serial Number: 26 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1344 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic Sudden Impulse expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1345 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1400 UTC IP Shock Passage Observed: 2003 Feb 01 1305 UTC ALERT MESSAGE : SUMMARY Space Weather Message Code: WARK04 Serial Number: 533 Issue Time: 2003 Feb 01 1347 UTC WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected Valid at : 2003 Feb 01 1350 UTC Valid To: 2003 Feb 01 1500 UTC Warning Condition: Onset What does this mean ?? It certainly means, to me, that there is grave need to look deeply into things !! The Summary of this Sudden Impulse shows a "Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected". This is not high, as can be seen at the description here : "The Warning Alerts at the Chart, including the Sudden Impulse Warning, are all either K=4 or K=5. I detail the description and effects here : G 1 Minor Kp = 5 Power systems: weak power grid fluctuations can occur. Spacecraft operations: minor impact on satellite operations possible." It is my opinion that what has taken place is an *intrusion* at an exterior means, and the Star Wars equipment immediately comes to my mind, has caused these *anomalies* to show up. It is this exterior force that caused the Columbia to explode !! I continue my research .............. With Love Sha --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:27:42 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Sue, After drinking lots of tea (I needed the tea leaves :) ), this is the VERY BEST forecast you can expect for the important day. Location: Sydney Date:Mar 22, 2003 Temp: Min will be 16.9 Max will be 24.1 RH: 9am 73% 3pm 63% Mean Wind Speed (km/hr)/Direction: 9am 7.9 at WNW (add 45 deg either side) 3pm 15.2 at E (add 45 deg either side) Cloud Cover Clear (1 or 2 Ocktas) = 23% but Cloudy (>5 Octas) = 43% (Expect, 4 Octas, ie Partly cloudy with sunny breaks) Sunshine: 6.4 hrs I think this is all the info you would need. Best wishes tuan (Melb) (To those questioning my forecast, I CAN prove they are the Best & most accurate Sue can expect at this level of detail this far out!) -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of signshop Sent: Wednesday, 5 February 2003 14:45 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Long range weather Hi I was wondering if you can help me, my daughter is getting married in Sydney on Sat 22 March 2003 and I am trying to get some idea as to weather predictions for then, as the reception is on a boat on the harbour. Do you know of any contacts. Thank you kindly Sue +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:33:21 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-106.5, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_05_08, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id VAA16914 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:01 pm, Sha wrote this piece of wisdom: > David, I am attempting to put across that what happened was an > *extraordinary* event and therefore to take the tack of experimentation, > etc that you suggest, is not feasible in this case. Well show by plausible theory and concrete scientific facts how such and event could cause what happened. > When I noted the *explosions* on the sun, I also followed through by > showing that they weren't BIG events !! ...... only G4 or G5. In saying > this, I again am pointing to an *extraordinary* event having taken place. > If you note the probable affects of G4, as I quoted, you will see that > little impact is made to space vehicles. Yep. It would be extraordinary for a G4 to take out a shuttle. > On the topic of my mention of *Star Wars* I do trust you appreciate that I > refer to the technology owned by the US government and not the film series. > To be very brief, this equipment constantly orbits Earth, under the guise > of *keeping us protected against unknown forces* ....... or something along > those lines David. It is a vast piece of high-technology apparatus and has > the ability to use scalar or microwave beams against its *enemy*. These > are facts ... not fiction !! I do understand exactly what you're talking about. Particle weapons in space weren't all that success as far as we know. It was designed to shoot down missiles and spy sats. But if you're trying to say that the US shot down it's own shuttle, i find that hard to beleive. Someone else suggested the possibility of aliens shooting it down, but that also is rather illogical, why would they shoot down a returning spacecraft. All I'm trying to say is that you need to follow scientific process and provide proof of what you are saying if you want any credibility to these claims. David - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+QxrxZOfFgbBAbXARAkjSAJoD+9NyDA54LChoyxui1scq1VPbNwCgksi8 I2YxaGJycHqIPp5x21cJ75Y= =wit8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:20:54 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com whats wrong with the damaged tiles theory as a smoking gun? (but now they say they would not have been damaged by the foam) or the rising new moon at about the time of the tragedy (just an idea) ? Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "David Findlay" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:33 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:01 pm, Sha wrote this piece of wisdom: > > David, I am attempting to put across that what happened was an > > *extraordinary* event and therefore to take the tack of experimentation, > > etc that you suggest, is not feasible in this case. > > Well show by plausible theory and concrete scientific facts how such and event > could cause what happened. > > > When I noted the *explosions* on the sun, I also followed through by > > showing that they weren't BIG events !! ...... only G4 or G5. In saying > > this, I again am pointing to an *extraordinary* event having taken place. > > If you note the probable affects of G4, as I quoted, you will see that > > little impact is made to space vehicles. > > Yep. It would be extraordinary for a G4 to take out a shuttle. > > > On the topic of my mention of *Star Wars* I do trust you appreciate that I > > refer to the technology owned by the US government and not the film series. > > To be very brief, this equipment constantly orbits Earth, under the guise > > of *keeping us protected against unknown forces* ....... or something along > > those lines David. It is a vast piece of high-technology apparatus and has > > the ability to use scalar or microwave beams against its *enemy*. These > > are facts ... not fiction !! > > I do understand exactly what you're talking about. Particle weapons in space > weren't all that success as far as we know. It was designed to shoot down > missiles and spy sats. But if you're trying to say that the US shot down it's > own shuttle, i find that hard to beleive. Someone else suggested the > possibility of aliens shooting it down, but that also is rather illogical, > why would they shoot down a returning spacecraft. > > All I'm trying to say is that you need to follow scientific process and > provide proof of what you are saying if you want any credibility to these > claims. > > David > > - -- > If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach > them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+QxrxZOfFgbBAbXARAkjSAJoD+9NyDA54LChoyxui1scq1VPbNwCgksi8 > I2YxaGJycHqIPp5x21cJ75Y= > =wit8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:04:55 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-106.9, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id XAA10599 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 01:20 pm, Brian Hamilton wrote this piece of wisdom: > whats wrong with the damaged tiles theory as a smoking gun? (but now they Damaged tiles is something that there is some evidence for. It's gotta be more than just a conincidence that the first signs of trouble were at the same area that got hit by foam during launch. > say they would not have been damaged by the foam) Don't think of foam as a peice of foam in your couch, but this stuff is very hard. It was also propelled by a Mach 2 airflow. So it wouldn't just bounce of the tiles, it would be rammed into them. They'll do wind tunnel testing no doubt to see what does happen to tiles hit by foam. > or the rising new moon at about the time of the tragedy (just an idea) ? The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem before. David - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+QzBnZOfFgbBAbXARAnPDAJ4uku7iq6Q8apykaxWm/A5qysYdGQCeNAWZ 0YHSk2Vr8N/vQ6lbJGgL0xg= =chQY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Chris Daley" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:43:53 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Sha, First off, I want to say that I am not trying to put down your idea's or theories and I am not an expert in this area, so I will try not to sound like one. I will start with the 'Star Wars' equipment that has been mentioned, it is still on paper only and it was only last year that George W Bush resurrected plans to build it, in doing so breaking a treaty that had been signed by the US and Russia as well as a few other countries not to use space as a battlefield. The US Govt. has been quite open about it's intentions in regards to this and they plan to have the first satellites in orbit within the next few years at what I have read. As for the Shuttle, IMHO, I can't see solar winds as being the primary cause for this tragedy. If the solar winds had enough force behind them to affect the Shuttle after it had started it's atmospheric interface, imagine the damage it would have caused the thousands of man made satellites that are orbiting Earth. There are amateur radio and science satellites up there that only weigh in the tens of kilo's and not the thousands of kilo's that the Shuttle weighs that would have been knocked out of their orbit's causing communication problems and possibly even some of them to re-enter the atmosphere. Like I said, I am no expert, but I do know that wind and drag have two different effects on aircraft and I would imagine that it would be similar with the Shuttle. NASA has stated that during re-entry the shuttle was experiencing increased drag on the port side which required corrections by rudder inputs at the autopilot. They also stated that the corrections were larger than on any other re-entry by any Shuttle. Again, IMHO, that could only have been caused by drag, not wind. The faster an aircraft travels, the less the effect of crosswind there is, even windshear doesn't have as much of an effect on aircraft as cruise speed, only when they are on approach to land do they get into trouble as they are basically as slow as they can fly. I would imagine that at 18 times the speed of sound any effect of solar or atmospheric wind would be negligible. But, like I have stated, I am no expert and these are just my educated guesses. I congratulate you on your investigations and your courage in posting what many would call crack pot theories. Keep it up, Galileo was called a crack pot once. Chris ----- Original Message ----- at : "Sha" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:01 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > David, I am attempting to put across that what happened was an > *extraordinary* event and therefore to take the tack of experimentation, etc > that you suggest, is not feasible in this case. > > When I noted the *explosions* on the sun, I also followed through by showing > that they weren't BIG events !! ...... only G4 or G5. In saying this, I > again am pointing to an *extraordinary* event having taken place. If you > note the probable affects of G4, as I quoted, you will see that little > impact is made to space vehicles. > > On the topic of my mention of *Star Wars* I do trust you appreciate that I > refer to the technology owned by the US government and not the film series. > To be very brief, this equipment constantly orbits Earth, under the guise of > *keeping us protected against unknown forces* ....... or something along > those lines David. It is a vast piece of high-technology apparatus and has > the ability to use scalar or microwave beams against its *enemy*. These are > facts ... not fiction !! > > Love > Sha > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "David Findlay" > To: > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:32 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. I'm not one that condemns > anything out of the box, in fact some of my spaceflight research goes into > stuff that is not mainstream science. But in order to categorically state > this is what happened evidence is needed. You can't just base something one > instance. You need to show more instances, show that it is a repeatable > phenonema. You need to follow standard scientific method which is to form a > hypothesis, try to disprove it, then if you can't, then try to prove and > improve your hypothesis. Prove it by experimentation as well. > > You look at those explosions on the sun, but fail to note that there have > been > thousands of similiar explosions when other vehicles have been reentering > with out any problem. Why wasn't the ISS affected? > > These are minor events. If it was a major event, whole satelite networks > would > have been taken out. TV sats are in the van allen belts, the highest > radiation areas around earth, yet were not affected by this. They would be > the first to go. These things, then bringing "star wars" does not help your > credibility. Thanks, > > David > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:46:56 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem before. > well, some research (limited) has shown more air crashes occur around certain moon events. I find it hard to believe, but there does seem to be a trend, thats all. Interesting is how i see it, thats all! Brian +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.168.8] at : "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:09:14 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2003 06:09:14.0577 (UTC) FILETIME=[709C2C10:01C2CE6F] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ho ho ho Tuan.... Persistence forecasting cum long-term averages for that day strike again! Cheers, Kevin at Wycheproof. > at : "Tuan Phan" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather >Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:27:42 +1100 > > >Hi Sue, > >After drinking lots of tea (I needed the tea leaves :) ), this is the VERY >BEST forecast you can expect for the important day. > >Location: Sydney > >Date:Mar 22, 2003 > >Temp: Min will be 16.9 > Max will be 24.1 > >RH: 9am 73% > 3pm 63% > >Mean Wind Speed (km/hr)/Direction: > 9am 7.9 at WNW (add 45 deg either side) > 3pm 15.2 at E (add 45 deg either side) > >Cloud Cover > Clear (1 or 2 Ocktas) = 23% >but Cloudy (>5 Octas) = 43% > (Expect, 4 Octas, ie Partly cloudy with sunny breaks) > >Sunshine: 6.4 hrs > >I think this is all the info you would need. > >Best wishes >tuan (Melb) > >(To those questioning my forecast, I CAN prove they are the Best & most >accurate Sue can expect at this level of detail this far out!) > > > >-----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of signshop >Sent: Wednesday, 5 February 2003 14:45 >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Long range weather > > >Hi > >I was wondering if you can help me, my daughter is getting married in >Sydney >on Sat 22 March 2003 and I am trying to get some idea as to weather >predictions for then, as the reception is on a boat on the harbour. > >Do you know of any contacts. > >Thank you kindly >Sue > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.168.8] at : "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:20:49 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2003 06:20:50.0354 (UTC) FILETIME=[0F535120:01C2CE71] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi every1, I was NOT going to reply to this thread (which probably better belongs on a "Conspiracy Theory" list than a weather one) but I have to just have 2.2cents worth for the hell of it... A couple of points immediately occurred after Sha's and others' posts: [1] Occam's Razor. Better known as the KISS principle. The simplest answer is most often correct. There is no need to introduce extraneous sources for the damage to the shuttle as it has been well documented (now) that damage to shuttles at lift-off have been a disturbingly common occurrence. (Not to mention that Columbia was very old for a shuttle). [2] Shuttles (as has been pointed out already) are reasonably protected at solar flares etc while in space...however I'm a little more dubious about their influence at all at heights less than 70 km... [3] CCD imagery at satellites however IS prone to influences at solar flares (although again the strength of that influence at the presumed time is debatable) so a dearth of imagery afterwards points more to damage of the charge-couple-device rather than an immediate cover-up... [4] Thinking outside the box is encouraged and commended. I'm not saying you're wrong Sha...just that a basic tenet of logic goes as follows: Event A occurs followed closely by Event B. This does not automatically mean however that Event A CAUSED Event B! Cheers, Kevin at Wycheproof. > at : "Brian Hamilton" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy >Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:20:54 +1300 > >whats wrong with the damaged tiles theory as a smoking gun? (but now they >say they would not have been damaged by the foam) >or the rising new moon at about the time of the tragedy (just an idea) ? > >Cheers >Brian >----- Original Message ----- > at : "David Findlay" >To: >Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:33 PM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:01 pm, Sha wrote this piece of wisdom: > > > David, I am attempting to put across that what happened was an > > > *extraordinary* event and therefore to take the tack of >experimentation, > > > etc that you suggest, is not feasible in this case. > > > > Well show by plausible theory and concrete scientific facts how such and >event > > could cause what happened. > > > > > When I noted the *explosions* on the sun, I also followed through by > > > showing that they weren't BIG events !! ...... only G4 or G5. In >saying > > > this, I again am pointing to an *extraordinary* event having taken >place. > > > If you note the probable affects of G4, as I quoted, you will see that > > > little impact is made to space vehicles. > > > > Yep. It would be extraordinary for a G4 to take out a shuttle. > > > > > On the topic of my mention of *Star Wars* I do trust you appreciate >that >I > > > refer to the technology owned by the US government and not the film >series. > > > To be very brief, this equipment constantly orbits Earth, under the >guise > > > of *keeping us protected against unknown forces* ....... or something >along > > > those lines David. It is a vast piece of high-technology apparatus >and >has > > > the ability to use scalar or microwave beams against its *enemy*. >These > > > are facts ... not fiction !! > > > > I do understand exactly what you're talking about. Particle weapons in >space > > weren't all that success as far as we know. It was designed to shoot >down > > missiles and spy sats. But if you're trying to say that the US shot down >it's > > own shuttle, i find that hard to beleive. Someone else suggested the > > possibility of aliens shooting it down, but that also is rather >illogical, > > why would they shoot down a returning spacecraft. > > > > All I'm trying to say is that you need to follow scientific process and > > provide proof of what you are saying if you want any credibility to >these > > claims. > > > > David > > > > - -- > > If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you >teach > > them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQE+QxrxZOfFgbBAbXARAkjSAJoD+9NyDA54LChoyxui1scq1VPbNwCgksi8 > > I2YxaGJycHqIPp5x21cJ75Y= > > =wit8 > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:59:05 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-107, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id CAA21612 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 04:20 pm, Kevin Phyland wrote this piece of wisdom: > I was NOT going to reply to this thread (which probably better belongs on a > "Conspiracy Theory" list than a weather one) but I have to just have > 2.2cents worth for the hell of it... I'd like to note the "Which is more likely" rule and then point you at this article, which seems to have the cause pinpointed http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030207avweek/ As such it is a design flaw, and I don't think we'll see the shuttle ever fly again. Hopefully they will replace it with a better ssto. David - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Q1k5ZOfFgbBAbXARAvX/AJ98HYEJLBYog7Kg1CJdETOLtTneqgCffT/3 c+aLcRZADqZXyeug+Ov90yM= =8vn4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Suze" To: Subject: aus-wx: SOI Data search... Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 20:02:22 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi, I've been researching the SOI correlations part-time and am wanting to access data prior record-keeping c.1880's. I once brushed across a web article about potential historical El Nino data derived at coral heads, but can't find the article now ... wondering if anyone here might know of a resource available to help me? Suze =^. .^= +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Suze" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 20:02:23 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? No details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating lunar declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? Suze =^. .^= -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Tuan Phan Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 12:28 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Hi Sue, After drinking lots of tea (I needed the tea leaves :) ), this is the VERY BEST forecast you can expect for the important day. Location: Sydney Date:Mar 22, 2003 Temp: Min will be 16.9 Max will be 24.1 RH: 9am 73% 3pm 63% Mean Wind Speed (km/hr)/Direction: 9am 7.9 at WNW (add 45 deg either side) 3pm 15.2 at E (add 45 deg either side) Cloud Cover Clear (1 or 2 Ocktas) = 23% but Cloudy (>5 Octas) = 43% (Expect, 4 Octas, ie Partly cloudy with sunny breaks) Sunshine: 6.4 hrs I think this is all the info you would need. Best wishes tuan (Melb) (To those questioning my forecast, I CAN prove they are the Best & most accurate Sue can expect at this level of detail this far out!) -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of signshop Sent: Wednesday, 5 February 2003 14:45 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Long range weather Hi I was wondering if you can help me, my daughter is getting married in Sydney on Sat 22 March 2003 and I am trying to get some idea as to weather predictions for then, as the reception is on a boat on the harbour. Do you know of any contacts. Thank you kindly Sue +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : sgalow at ihug.com.au To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: SOI Data search... Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 20:30:26 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com it depends for australia it is at the bureau of met web site http://www.bom.gov.au/ ----- Original Message ----- at : "Suze" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:02 PM Subject: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > Hi, > I've been researching the SOI correlations part-time and am wanting to > access data prior record-keeping c.1880's. I once brushed across a web > article about potential historical El Nino data derived at coral heads, > but can't find the article now ... wondering if anyone here might > know of a resource available to help me? > Suze =^. .^= > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Chris Daley" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:40:14 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, I can't say that your wrong, don't know enough to say that, but my understanding of the upper atmosphere where the Shuttle was at the time the air isn't dense enough. I can understand the if what you hypothesis is correct, in the dense lower air where Dash 8's are usually found playing, but up in the very extremities of the atmosphere? I saw an interview a while ago with a Joseph W Kittinger, who in 1960 established a World record for the longest freefall when he jumped at a balloon at 102,800ft and opened his parachute at 18,000ft. He said in the interview that he freefell for four and a half minutes but didn't hear or feel any wind for the first minute and a half. He said it almost felt like he was hanging there as there was no sensation of falling because of the lack of air and wind. The purpose of the jump was to test parachutes for the space program to see if they could get a design the astronauts could use if they had to bail out of their modules at high altitudes. That and the fact that there would have to be thousands of extremely lucky pilots and passengers across the world if this is such a big problem for aviation. There are hundreds of aircraft in the air each minute of every day around the world. If these king airtides are such a factor, surely there would be more accidents. Ken, I am not saying your wrong and I don't want to get into the same type of conversation that has happened here previously, but to say that this is what happened to the Shuttle without taking other factors into account is jumping the gun I feel. Chris ----- Original Message ----- at : "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:17 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > I totally agree with Brian and have put together a fairly extensive article > on the role of the moon in air crashes, in particular Ansett 708 in NZ. It > can be seen on my website www.predictweather.com under the heading "Ansett > 708". The shuttle sharply hit an incoming "king airtide" within the hour of > a rising new moon, which has a potential to produce huge turbulence. Many > unexplained fatal aircrashes have occurred at this and other moon-event > times, something I believe aircraft accident investigations will one day > have to look into. This tragedy was at one of those times. > > > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem > before. > This is irrelevant. Not all cars hit the same pothole, especially when that > pothole might be moving. If I go into a shop and ask for something I am > sometimes met with "we don't stock it because we never get asked for it". > When I say but I'M asking for it, it doesn't seem to count.. > > Ken Ring > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Brian Hamilton" > To: > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:46 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > > > > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem > > before. > > > > > well, some research (limited) has shown more air crashes occur around > > certain moon events. > > I find it hard to believe, but there does seem to be a trend, thats all. > > Interesting is how i see it, thats all! > > Brian > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:51:44 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Sue
Saturday 22nd March Sydney
It looks to be the end of a short wet spell. Mostly sunny but the odd early afternoon shower would be my judgement. About 25deg, light northeasterly wind. Scattered cloud. The day will be good, any showers will be passing quickly.
regards
Ken Ring
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather

ken ring's your man,
are you out there ken,
you're wanted.
 
if  no good try here and scroll down,
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Wednesday, 5 February 2003 4:42:13 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Long range weather
 
Hi

I was wondering if you can help me, my daughter is getting married in Sydney
on Sat 22 March 2003 and I am trying to get some idea as to weather
predictions for then, as the reception is on a boat on the harbour.

Do you know of any contacts.

Thank you kindly
Sue

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP91.gif: 00000001,776c7833,00000000,00000000 at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 00:17:11 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I totally agree with Brian and have put together a fairly extensive article on the role of the moon in air crashes, in particular Ansett 708 in NZ. It can be seen on my website www.predictweather.com under the heading "Ansett 708". The shuttle sharply hit an incoming "king airtide" within the hour of a rising new moon, which has a potential to produce huge turbulence. Many unexplained fatal aircrashes have occurred at this and other moon-event times, something I believe aircraft accident investigations will one day have to look into. This tragedy was at one of those times. > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem before. This is irrelevant. Not all cars hit the same pothole, especially when that pothole might be moving. If I go into a shop and ask for something I am sometimes met with "we don't stock it because we never get asked for it". When I say but I'M asking for it, it doesn't seem to count.. Ken Ring www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:46 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem > before. > > > well, some research (limited) has shown more air crashes occur around > certain moon events. > I find it hard to believe, but there does seem to be a trend, thats all. > Interesting is how i see it, thats all! > Brian > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Suze" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: SOI Data search... Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:37:42 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks, I'm familiar with BoM, great site they have. I'd pulled SOI tables at the Long Paddock website a few years ago, didn't know BoM had them? A mate just sent this link below...so I'll see if Warren Beck is available for some advice...perhaps info if I ask reeeely nicely : ) Oh, my location is Logan, Qld, currently enjoying this cooler weather and the recent soaking rains *refreshing... Suze =^. .^= 'Corals Lock El Nino History in Radiocarbon' http://www.newswise.com/articles/2001/10/CORALS.UAZ.html -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of sgalow at ihug.com.au Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 8:30 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: SOI Data search... it depends for australia it is at the bureau of met web site http://www.bom.gov.au/ ----- Original Message ----- at : "Suze" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:02 PM Subject: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > Hi, > I've been researching the SOI correlations part-time and am wanting to > access data prior record-keeping c.1880's. I once brushed across a web > article about potential historical El Nino data derived at coral heads, > but can't find the article now ... wondering if anyone here might > know of a resource available to help me? > Suze =^. .^= > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:44:05 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com, at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 03:20 AM 8/02/2003 +1300, Ken Ring wrote: >Chris >Fair comment. Firstly, according to Neville Gibb, The shuttle was about >0.7km high, the atmosphere is about 100km high, the earth is about 13,000km >wide. At mach 18.6 the shuttle could cover 1,000km on a few minutes. So Umm, Ken, the Shuttle broke up at around 60km. It first got into difficulty at a higher altitude. 0.7km is 700 metres, there would have been a lot of closeup newsreel footage... >Shuttle wasn't that high up and in fact low enough to encounter the >friction-heating effect or wouldn't have caught fire. Fire only happens >where there's enough oxygen. Did it catch fire? at what I saw, it was under the influence of frictional heating (which was excessive on some parts of the left wing, apparently). >One can't help wondering if the parachutist also suffered mentally somewhat >at 100,000 feet, and therefore if his reporting memory was reliable! I'm sure he'd have been in a pressure suit to avoid oxygen deprivation and other nasty effects of the extremely low pressure (like one's bodily fluids having a tendancy to boil). 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.169.103] at : "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: SOI Data search... Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 01:18:47 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2003 14:18:47.0384 (UTC) FILETIME=[D42AD580:01C2CEB3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Suze et al, Before I start may I say that I speak ONLY as an interested amateur... SOIs are great...they tell you the average difference in atmospheric pressure between Tahiti and Darwin. They can't actually tell you much more unless you know the changes in SSTs in the Pacific at the same time. The Bureau's records of SOIs go back a fair way I admit but the vast majority of them were back-calculated after the 1970s when the interaction between the ocean currents and weather in Australia was first mooted. Going back beyond 1880 seems to be stretching some data beyond its reliability. Also, if "long-term" patterns or predictability is your goal, it begs the eternal question of what actually TRIGGERS an El Nino or La Nina event. Where you live (Logan) is susceptible to El Nino events on a regular basis but the majority of Australia historically has a poor record of SOI - drought correlation barring 1982-3 and the current one. I point you to the 1968 drought (in Victoria) etc... just poke through the numbers on the BoM site... "Long-term" has always been a bugbear for climatologists..I've harped on this before...how long is long enough to determine a trend? (How long is a piece of string?) An analysis of the SOIs was practically the first thing I did when the data became widely available...the correlations between low rainfall and low SOI TRENDS are positive for eastern Australia (particularly north of say Sydney...I'm not giving a limit here btw)...but for the rest of Australia it seems that many other factors need to be considered. The rainfall in south-eastern Australia during the growing season relies on (among other things) a coincidence between fronts and available moisture. The north-west rainbands that Victorians so love to see originate in the ocean off the NW coast of Australia and consequently the SSTs there are a large factor in the potential for moisture. I believe it is only in the last five years however that a link *may* have been established between the warming of the Eastern Pacific and the temperature changes in the ocean south of Indonesia. I'm yet to see any correlative data atm.. Where am I going here? The usual place. Statistics are a valid tool for many things. I don't believe that we have anywhere near enough data on temperature, pressure (and certainly SSTs and SOIs) to draw any conclusions pattern-wise about weather patterns that may have been occurring for thousands/millions or just tens of years. Having said that, it is totally appropriate to keep looking! Just don't try to draw too long a bow when saying A causes B... Sorry for the rant, Kevin at (a very dry) Wycheproof. > at : "Suze" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: RE: aus-wx: SOI Data search... >Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:37:42 +1000 > >Thanks, I'm familiar with BoM, great site they have. I'd pulled SOI tables > at the Long Paddock website a few years ago, didn't know BoM had them? A >mate just sent this link below...so I'll see if Warren Beck is available >for >some advice...perhaps info if I ask reeeely nicely : ) Oh, my location is >Logan, Qld, currently enjoying this cooler weather and the recent soaking >rains *refreshing... >Suze =^. .^= >'Corals Lock El Nino History in Radiocarbon' >http://www.newswise.com/articles/2001/10/CORALS.UAZ.html > > >-----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of >sgalow at ihug.com.au >Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 8:30 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > > >it depends >for australia it is at the bureau of met web site >http://www.bom.gov.au/ >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Suze" >To: >Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:02 PM >Subject: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > > > > Hi, > > I've been researching the SOI correlations part-time and am wanting to > > access data prior record-keeping c.1880's. I once brushed across a web > > article about potential historical El Nino data derived at coral >heads, > > but can't find the article now ... wondering if anyone here >might > > know of a resource available to help me? > > Suze =^. .^= > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 03:20:37 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Chris Fair comment. Firstly, according to Neville Gibb, The shuttle was about 0.7km high, the atmosphere is about 100km high, the earth is about 13,000km wide. At mach 18.6 the shuttle could cover 1,000km on a few minutes. So Shuttle wasn't that high up and in fact low enough to encounter the friction-heating effect or wouldn't have caught fire. Fire only happens where there's enough oxygen. It is a problem for aviation because there are lots of accidents that are unexplained but they just leave it at that. The reluctance to attribute anything to the moon goes back 300 years and is more to do with religious dogma and politics rather than science, which is why they won't be looking at the moon anytime soon. It's the same with weather forecasting. Interesting about the parachutist, but of course one report at one jump doesn't tell us much. Jet streams occur around 35,000 feet. When Glaisher ballooned at 37,000 feet in 1862 he became unconscious and almost paralysed. One can't help wondering if the parachutist also suffered mentally somewhat at 100,000 feet, and therefore if his reporting memory was reliable! cheers Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Chris Daley" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:40 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > Ken, I can't say that your wrong, don't know enough to say that, but my > understanding of the upper atmosphere where the Shuttle was at the time the > air isn't dense enough. I can understand the if what you hypothesis is > correct, in the dense lower air where Dash 8's are usually found playing, > but up in the very extremities of the atmosphere? > > I saw an interview a while ago with a Joseph W Kittinger, who in 1960 > established a World record for the longest freefall when he jumped at a > balloon at 102,800ft and opened his parachute at 18,000ft. He said in the > interview that he freefell for four and a half minutes but didn't hear or > feel any wind for the first minute and a half. He said it almost felt like > he was hanging there as there was no sensation of falling because of the > lack of air and wind. The purpose of the jump was to test parachutes for > the space program to see if they could get a design the astronauts could use > if they had to bail out of their modules at high altitudes. > > That and the fact that there would have to be thousands of extremely lucky > pilots and passengers across the world if this is such a big problem for > aviation. There are hundreds of aircraft in the air each minute of every > day around the world. If these king airtides are such a factor, surely > there would be more accidents. > > Ken, I am not saying your wrong and I don't want to get into the same type > of conversation that has happened here previously, but to say that this is > what happened to the Shuttle without taking other factors into account is > jumping the gun I feel. > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:17 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > I totally agree with Brian and have put together a fairly extensive > article > > on the role of the moon in air crashes, in particular Ansett 708 in NZ. It > > can be seen on my website www.predictweather.com under the heading "Ansett > > 708". The shuttle sharply hit an incoming "king airtide" within the hour > of > > a rising new moon, which has a potential to produce huge turbulence. Many > > unexplained fatal aircrashes have occurred at this and other moon-event > > times, something I believe aircraft accident investigations will one day > > have to look into. This tragedy was at one of those times. > > > > > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem > > before. > > This is irrelevant. Not all cars hit the same pothole, especially when > that > > pothole might be moving. If I go into a shop and ask for something I am > > sometimes met with "we don't stock it because we never get asked for it". > > When I say but I'M asking for it, it doesn't seem to count.. > > > > Ken Ring > > www.predictweather.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Brian Hamilton" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:46 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > > > > > > > > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem > > > before. > > > > > > > well, some research (limited) has shown more air crashes occur around > > > certain moon events. > > > I find it hard to believe, but there does seem to be a trend, thats all. > > > Interesting is how i see it, thats all! > > > Brian > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 10:28:04 -0600 at : Tom Johnstone Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy X-Sender: itjohnstone at wiscmail.wisc.edu (Unverified) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 02:04 PM 2/7/2003 +1000, David wrote: > > say they would not have been damaged by the foam) > >Don't think of foam as a peice of foam in your couch, but this stuff is very >hard. It was also propelled by a Mach 2 airflow. So it wouldn't just bounce >of the tiles, it would be rammed into them. They'll do wind tunnel testing no >doubt to see what does happen to tiles hit by foam. NASA is indeed saying that the foam, which is extremely lightweight, would most probably not caused much damage, and that there was no ice problem that day. But I wonder - we've all heard amazing stories about pieces of straw/hay being embedded in wooden barns/walls etc after the passage of a cyclone or tornado, with equates to a wind of maybe 300-400 km/h. The force of impact at the foam must have been much greater than that, given the accelaration and velocity of the shuttle at the time. Any thoughts anyone? Tom +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 10:39:56 -0600 at : Tom Johnstone Subject: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're living X-Sender: itjohnstone at wiscmail.wisc.edu (Unverified) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Here's my current situation: My current residence: Madison, Wisconsin, USA Feb 7th min. temp : -20C My home town: Perth, WA, Australia Feb 7th max temp: +36C Difference: 56C !!!! My record: Madison, WI, Dec 25th, 2000, min temp: -29.4C Perth, WA, Dec 25th, 2000, max temp: 38.7c Difference: 68.1C !!!!! Anyone got some good ones? It could be temp -related, or rain, or wind etc. Tom +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 06:26:20 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com the point is that it is atmosphere that causes the friction heating.... yes the atmopshere is very thin at that altitude.... but its travelling that fast, its as if its much thicker....i.e "scoops it up" so the notion is that a lunar atmospheric tide could have meant an increase is the amount of atmosphere etc...which might have made a difference....that was the "idea" but i like the tile's problem my self! Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: ; Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:44 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > At 03:20 AM 8/02/2003 +1300, Ken Ring wrote: > > >Chris > >Fair comment. Firstly, according to Neville Gibb, The shuttle was about > >0.7km high, the atmosphere is about 100km high, the earth is about 13,000km > >wide. At mach 18.6 the shuttle could cover 1,000km on a few minutes. So > > Umm, Ken, the Shuttle broke up at around 60km. It first got into > difficulty at a higher altitude. 0.7km is 700 metres, there would have > been a lot of closeup newsreel footage... > > >Shuttle wasn't that high up and in fact low enough to encounter the > >friction-heating effect or wouldn't have caught fire. Fire only happens > >where there's enough oxygen. > > Did it catch fire? at what I saw, it was under the influence of > frictional heating (which was excessive on some parts of the left wing, > apparently). > > >One can't help wondering if the parachutist also suffered mentally somewhat > >at 100,000 feet, and therefore if his reporting memory was reliable! > > I'm sure he'd have been in a pressure suit to avoid oxygen deprivation and > other nasty effects of the extremely low pressure (like one's bodily fluids > having a tendancy to boil). > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:15:04 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com i agree with you Tom on this notion Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tom Johnstone" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:28 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > At 02:04 PM 2/7/2003 +1000, David wrote: > > > > say they would not have been damaged by the foam) > > > >Don't think of foam as a peice of foam in your couch, but this stuff is very > >hard. It was also propelled by a Mach 2 airflow. So it wouldn't just bounce > >of the tiles, it would be rammed into them. They'll do wind tunnel testing no > >doubt to see what does happen to tiles hit by foam. > > NASA is indeed saying that the foam, which is extremely lightweight, would > most probably not caused much damage, and that there was no ice problem > that day. But I wonder - we've all heard amazing stories about pieces of > straw/hay being embedded in wooden barns/walls etc after the passage of a > cyclone or tornado, with equates to a wind of maybe 300-400 km/h. The force > of impact at the foam must have been much greater than that, given the > accelaration and velocity of the shuttle at the time. Any thoughts anyone? > > Tom > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 07:33:45 +1100 at : Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The damage that occurred early on would have got worse as the launch continued, at continuous vibration and dynamic pressure and thermal effects. It is possible that the damage may have weakened the support mounts for the U shaped heat absorbing section on the leading edge of the wing. In short, the condition of the wing may have been far more serious than was visually apparent in orbit. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : jindivik at optusnet.com.au X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.411 (Entity 5.404) To: "aussie-weather at world . std . com" Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 07:36:51 +1100 Subject: Re: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Ken, Like I said, I am no expert. > Ken Ring wrote: > > Chris > Fair comment. Firstly, according to Neville Gibb, The shuttle was > about > 0.7km high, the atmosphere is about 100km high, the earth is about > 13,000km > wide. At mach 18.6 the shuttle could cover 1,000km on a few minutes. > So > Shuttle wasn't that high up and in fact low enough to encounter the > friction-heating effect or wouldn't have caught fire. Fire only > happens > where there's enough oxygen. If you want to get really technical, or extremly technical for my brain, the sun is in a region of relativly low oxygen, but thats burning like a sun of a gun, if you will excuss the pun. As it has been said already, the shuttle burned up but it isn't clear if it actually caught fire or not. > It is a problem for aviation because there are lots of accidents that > are > unexplained but they just leave it at that. The reluctance to > attribute > anything to the moon goes back 300 years and is more to do with > religious > dogma and politics rather than science, which is why they won't be > looking > at the moon anytime soon. It's the same with weather forecasting. I totally understand the reluctance of some sections of the scientific community to explain accidents to the effects of the moon, but surely if they can attribute some landing accidents to windshear they would have no problem attributing some accidents to a violent tidal airflow. But on the subject, wouldn't a tidal airflow of a size and magnitude enought to effect the Shuttles re-entry have some pretty major effects on aviation and ground life at the same time? > Interesting about the parachutist, but of course one report at one > jump > doesn't tell us much. Jet streams occur around 35,000 feet. When > Glaisher > ballooned at 37,000 feet in 1862 he became unconscious and almost > paralysed. > One can't help wondering if the parachutist also suffered mentally > somewhat > at 100,000 feet, and therefore if his reporting memory was reliable! As it was a series of tests, the particular jump I mentioned was one of three that Joseph Kittinger made as well as about 8 being made by other jumpers, to test the suitability for use by astronauts they had to be wearing what the astronauts would be wearing. A side effect of the parachute tests was that they also proved the reliability of the suits worn by the astronauts. Best Regards, Chris > cheers > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Chris Daley" > To: > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:40 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > Ken, I can't say that your wrong, don't know enough to say that, > but my > > understanding of the upper atmosphere where the Shuttle was at the > time > the > > air isn't dense enough. I can understand the if what you > hypothesis is > > correct, in the dense lower air where Dash 8's are usually found > playing, > > but up in the very extremities of the atmosphere? > > > > I saw an interview a while ago with a Joseph W Kittinger, who in > 1960 > > established a World record for the longest freefall when he jumped > at a > > balloon at 102,800ft and opened his parachute at 18,000ft. He said > in the > > interview that he freefell for four and a half minutes but didn't > hear or > > feel any wind for the first minute and a half. He said it almost > felt > like > > he was hanging there as there was no sensation of falling because > of the > > lack of air and wind. The purpose of the jump was to test > parachutes for > > the space program to see if they could get a design the astronauts > could > use > > if they had to bail out of their modules at high altitudes. > > > > That and the fact that there would have to be thousands of > extremely lucky > > pilots and passengers across the world if this is such a big > problem for > > aviation. There are hundreds of aircraft in the air each minute of > every > > day around the world. If these king airtides are such a factor, > surely > > there would be more accidents. > > > > Ken, I am not saying your wrong and I don't want to get into the > same type > > of conversation that has happened here previously, but to say that > this is > > what happened to the Shuttle without taking other factors into > account is > > jumping the gun I feel. > > > > Chris > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Ken Ring" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:17 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > > > > I totally agree with Brian and have put together a fairly > extensive > > article > > > on the role of the moon in air crashes, in particular Ansett 708 > in NZ. > It > > > can be seen on my website www.predictweather.com under the > heading > "Ansett > > > 708". The shuttle sharply hit an incoming "king airtide" within > the hour > > of > > > a rising new moon, which has a potential to produce huge > turbulence. > Many > > > unexplained fatal aircrashes have occurred at this and other > moon-event > > > times, something I believe aircraft accident investigations will > one day > > > have to look into. This tragedy was at one of those times. > > > > > > > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a > problem > > > before. > > > This is irrelevant. Not all cars hit the same pothole, especially > when > > that > > > pothole might be moving. If I go into a shop and ask for > something I am > > > sometimes met with "we don't stock it because we never get asked > for > it". > > > When I say but I'M asking for it, it doesn't seem to count.. > > > > > > Ken Ring > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > at : "Brian Hamilton" > > > To: > > > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:46 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a > problem > > > > before. > > > > > > > > > well, some research (limited) has shown more air crashes occur > around > > > > certain moon events. > > > > I find it hard to believe, but there does seem to be a trend, > thats > all. > > > > Interesting is how i see it, thats all! > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > your > > > message. > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of your > > message. > > > > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > -+ > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > -+ > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > -+ > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > -+ > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 08:42:06 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yes, Sorry Ken - "Firstly, according to Neville Gibb, The shuttle was about 0.7km high, ... " that should have read about 70km up (not 0.7km), or more precisely 63km at reports. Should have corrected it earlier but the error seemed so obvious, surprised nobody pointed it out. Neville > at : "Ken Ring" > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 03:20:37 +1300 > To: > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > Chris > Fair comment. Firstly, according to Neville Gibb, The shuttle was about > 0.7km high, the atmosphere is about 100km high, the earth is about 13,000km > wide. At mach 18.6 the shuttle could cover 1,000km on a few minutes. So > Shuttle wasn't that high up and in fact low enough to encounter the > friction-heating effect or wouldn't have caught fire. Fire only happens > where there's enough oxygen. > It is a problem for aviation because there are lots of accidents that are > unexplained but they just leave it at that. The reluctance to attribute > anything to the moon goes back 300 years and is more to do with religious > dogma and politics rather than science, which is why they won't be looking > at the moon anytime soon. It's the same with weather forecasting. > Interesting about the parachutist, but of course one report at one jump > doesn't tell us much. Jet streams occur around 35,000 feet. When Glaisher > ballooned at 37,000 feet in 1862 he became unconscious and almost paralysed. > One can't help wondering if the parachutist also suffered mentally somewhat > at 100,000 feet, and therefore if his reporting memory was reliable! > cheers > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Chris Daley" > To: > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:40 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > >> Ken, I can't say that your wrong, don't know enough to say that, but my >> understanding of the upper atmosphere where the Shuttle was at the time > the >> air isn't dense enough. I can understand the if what you hypothesis is >> correct, in the dense lower air where Dash 8's are usually found playing, >> but up in the very extremities of the atmosphere? >> >> I saw an interview a while ago with a Joseph W Kittinger, who in 1960 >> established a World record for the longest freefall when he jumped at a >> balloon at 102,800ft and opened his parachute at 18,000ft. He said in the >> interview that he freefell for four and a half minutes but didn't hear or >> feel any wind for the first minute and a half. He said it almost felt > like >> he was hanging there as there was no sensation of falling because of the >> lack of air and wind. The purpose of the jump was to test parachutes for >> the space program to see if they could get a design the astronauts could > use >> if they had to bail out of their modules at high altitudes. >> >> That and the fact that there would have to be thousands of extremely lucky >> pilots and passengers across the world if this is such a big problem for >> aviation. There are hundreds of aircraft in the air each minute of every >> day around the world. If these king airtides are such a factor, surely >> there would be more accidents. >> >> Ken, I am not saying your wrong and I don't want to get into the same type >> of conversation that has happened here previously, but to say that this is >> what happened to the Shuttle without taking other factors into account is >> jumping the gun I feel. >> >> Chris >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> at : "Ken Ring" >> To: >> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:17 PM >> Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy >> >> >>> I totally agree with Brian and have put together a fairly extensive >> article >>> on the role of the moon in air crashes, in particular Ansett 708 in NZ. > It >>> can be seen on my website www.predictweather.com under the heading > "Ansett >>> 708". The shuttle sharply hit an incoming "king airtide" within the hour >> of >>> a rising new moon, which has a potential to produce huge turbulence. > Many >>> unexplained fatal aircrashes have occurred at this and other moon-event >>> times, something I believe aircraft accident investigations will one day >>> have to look into. This tragedy was at one of those times. >>> >>>>> The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a > problem >>> before. >>> This is irrelevant. Not all cars hit the same pothole, especially when >> that >>> pothole might be moving. If I go into a shop and ask for something I am >>> sometimes met with "we don't stock it because we never get asked for > it". >>> When I say but I'M asking for it, it doesn't seem to count.. >>> >>> Ken Ring >>> www.predictweather.com >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> at : "Brian Hamilton" >>> To: >>> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:46 PM >>> Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a > problem >>>> before. >>>>> >>>> well, some research (limited) has shown more air crashes occur around >>>> certain moon events. >>>> I find it hard to believe, but there does seem to be a trend, thats > all. >>>> Interesting is how i see it, thats all! >>>> Brian >>>> >>>> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >>>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >> to:majordomo at world.std.com >>>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >> your >>>> message. >>> > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >>>> >>> >>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com >>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your >>> message. >>> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >> > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:19:16 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com i read it :) it was very informative :) Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Neville Gibb" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > Thank you David > > for posting that comprehensive rather official 'Space Flight Now' URL > report. Although rather lengthy it does shed a lot of light on the matter. I > wonder if anyone here has bothered reading it, so I'll post it again - > > http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030207avweek/ > > Neville > > > > > at : David Findlay > > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:59:05 +1000 > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 04:20 pm, Kevin Phyland wrote this piece of wisdom: > >> I was NOT going to reply to this thread (which probably better belongs on a > >> "Conspiracy Theory" list than a weather one) but I have to just have > >> 2.2cents worth for the hell of it... > > > > I'd like to note the "Which is more likely" rule and then point you at this > > article, which seems to have the cause pinpointed > > http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030207avweek/ > > > > As such it is a design flaw, and I don't think we'll see the shuttle ever fly > > again. Hopefully they will replace it with a better ssto. > > > > David > > > > - -- > > If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach > > them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > > > iD8DBQE+Q1k5ZOfFgbBAbXARAvX/AJ98HYEJLBYog7Kg1CJdETOLtTneqgCffT/3 > > c+aLcRZADqZXyeug+Ov90yM= > > =8vn4 > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 09:56:57 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thank you David for posting that comprehensive rather official 'Space Flight Now' URL report. Although rather lengthy it does shed a lot of light on the matter. I wonder if anyone here has bothered reading it, so I'll post it again - http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030207avweek/ Neville > at : David Findlay > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:59:05 +1000 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 04:20 pm, Kevin Phyland wrote this piece of wisdom: >> I was NOT going to reply to this thread (which probably better belongs on a >> "Conspiracy Theory" list than a weather one) but I have to just have >> 2.2cents worth for the hell of it... > > I'd like to note the "Which is more likely" rule and then point you at this > article, which seems to have the cause pinpointed > http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030207avweek/ > > As such it is a design flaw, and I don't think we'll see the shuttle ever fly > again. Hopefully they will replace it with a better ssto. > > David > > - -- > If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach > them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+Q1k5ZOfFgbBAbXARAvX/AJ98HYEJLBYog7Kg1CJdETOLtTneqgCffT/3 > c+aLcRZADqZXyeug+Ov90yM= > =8vn4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: The Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:20:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Maybe after 20 odd years of service and extreme stresses of course, that maybe it had a metal fatigue problem and entering the atmosphere it decided to break up???????
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're living Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:21:49 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Here where I live goes well below zero in winter and into the 40's in summer. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tom Johnstone" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 3:39 AM Subject: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're living > Here's my current situation: > > My current residence: Madison, Wisconsin, USA > Feb 7th min. temp : -20C > > My home town: Perth, WA, Australia > Feb 7th max temp: +36C > > Difference: 56C !!!! > > > My record: > > Madison, WI, Dec 25th, 2000, min temp: -29.4C > Perth, WA, Dec 25th, 2000, max temp: 38.7c > Difference: 68.1C !!!!! > > > Anyone got some good ones? It could be temp -related, or rain, or wind etc. > > Tom > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:12:04 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I appreciate all of the discussions on this tragedy. I would just like a minute to clarify a couple of points in regard to what I initially put forward, before the topic is closed. When I pointed out the anomalies in regard to the sun and geomagnetic conditions, I did so to create query. I was not indicating that the solar atmosphere *caused* the tragedy .... but I was definitely wanting people to look at the situation that there were incredible anomalies taking place, concurrent with the times connected to Columbia. In actual fact, I stated that the G4 and G5 conditions only caused : "Spacecraft operations: minor impact on satellite operations possible." I pre-empted my post by saying that I was approaching things at a *non-conforming* angle ... and as such, expected there to be controversy. Science is a wonderful area of interest, but often people are *afraid* to delve into the unknown, but instead stay safely with theories and previous precedents that have been set. To my way of thinking, science promotes continual question and we must be prepared to look at other aspects that may not even *fit* any previous theories ! The media have told the world that the area of concern was the damage caused by the tile coming off at launch. The media have told us all many, many things in our lives .... how many times are they incorrect ? I guess my point here is that as if NASA are going to admit that something out of the ordinary was apparent in the atmosphere at the time of the tragedy !! Red Herrings are critical for them to keep the attention away at what may have been taking place. I have read many articles that discuss the facts that the tile was not a serious enough concern to have created the tragedy. Naturally, the media and NASA have played this angle to the fullest because that is where they want people to keep looking. Discrepancies as to the huge explosion that took place point away at the tile being the cause. Debris was found at Texas.to California ... a vast area. If one looks at the radar shots on the media, they are all showing the debris field above Shreveport Louisiana, and are taken mainly 1 1/2 to 2 hours after the explosion. This is not relevant to the cause ... simply the repercussions of the event. Despite the media spin of an unfortunate accident, the nature of the crash of Columbia was evident at eyewitness accounts. The telltale sonic boom at the deployment of the weapon was so strong: "It was like a car hitting the house or an explosion. It shook that much," .... is one report in the news. Media reports put the noise down to the effects of the shuttle break-up, but this is clearly spurious. "The shuttle was gliding at 203,000 feet. Aircraft-generated sonic booms 40 miles up in super-thin air do not shake homes at ground level. Nor do small debris parts. Just try generating air pressure changes at ground level when 40 miles up - no matter how fast you are going." Just after a previous shuttle launch in November, 1985 a sonic boom occurred over the launch site, after the shuttle had departed. The same effects took place on least two previous shuttle launches. Scalar expert T. E. Bearden put these down to testing of the weapons. Source material: Scientist Tom Bearden, Cheniere.Org - http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html "The scalar boom effect is caused in a way similar to a thunderstorm. In that case the lightning cleaves apart large masses of air which boom. The scalar weapon can generate a massive version of the same effect. This is not a "beam" weapon like the one used to down the two WTC towers. It remotely produces local space-time distortion effects by connecting through the complex plane around which all space-time is wrapped." "So it is quite possible that an unfortunate but normal type of accident is what destroyed the shuttle; such accidents do happen unavoidably, in spite of the best intentions and efforts of everyone, and the shuttles are aging. It is also possible that a little burst of EM energy deliberately placed on that shuttle, at a Yakuza scalar interferometer, could have initiated the break-up and catastrophic failure of the vehicle." "...... sound itself doesn't carry through space, but a bunch of EM pulses let loose at an explosion, etc. does, and when it enters the atmosphere it retranslates into sound that is representative of what happened out there." http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/ Of course, this opens the topic of just how the weather is being manipulated by this equipment !!!!!!!!! .... if anybody chooses to follow that angle :) Love Sha --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:07:44 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
quotes by sha,
 
<"This is not a "beam" weapon like the one used to down the two WTC towers.">
 
WHAT???????
 
couldn't the sonic booms have been caused by the debris when it entered more dense atmosphere closer to earth.
 
richard
 
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Saturday, 8 February 2003 10:53:15 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle
 
I appreciate all of the discussions on this tragedy. I would just like a
minute to clarify a couple of points in regard to what I initially put
forward, before the topic is closed.

When I pointed out the anomalies in regard to the sun and geomagnetic
conditions, I did so to create query. I was not indicating that the solar
atmosphere *caused* the tragedy .... but I was definitely wanting people to
look at the situation that there were incredible anomalies taking place,
concurrent with the times connected to Columbia. In actual fact, I stated
that the G4 and G5 conditions only caused : "Spacecraft operations: minor
impact on satellite operations possible."

I pre-empted my post by saying that I was approaching things at a
*non-conforming* angle ... and as such, expected there to be controversy.
Science is a wonderful area of interest, but often people are *afraid* to
delve into the unknown, but instead stay safely with theories and previous
precedents that have been set. To my way of thinking, science promotes
continual question and we must be prepared to look at other aspects that may
not even *fit* any previous theories !

The media have told the world that the area of concern was the damage
caused by the tile coming off at launch. The media have told us all many,
many things in our lives .... how many times are they incorrect ? I guess
my point here is that as if NASA are going to admit that something out of
the ordinary was apparent in the atmosphere at the time of the tragedy !!
Red Herrings are critical for them to keep the attention away at what may
have been taking place. I have read many articles that discuss the facts
that the tile was not a serious enough concern to have created the tragedy.
Naturally, the media and NASA have played this angle to the fullest because
that is where they want people to keep looking.

Discrepancies as to the huge explosion that took place point away at thetile being the cause. Debris was found at Texas.to California ... a vast
area. If one looks at the radar shots on the media, they are all showing
the debris field above Shreveport Louisiana, and are taken mainly 1 1/2 to 2
hours after the explosion. This is not relevant to the cause ... simply the
repercussions of the event.

Despite the media spin of an unfortunate accident, the nature of the crash
of Columbia was evident at eyewitness accounts. The telltale sonic boom
at the deployment of the weapon was so strong: "It was like a car hitting
the house or an explosion. It shook that much," .... is one report in the
news. Media reports put the noise down to the effects of the shuttle
break-up, but this is clearly spurious. "The shuttle was gliding at 203,000
feet. Aircraft-generated sonic booms 40 miles up in super-thin air do not
shake homes at ground level. Nor do small debris parts. Just try
generating air pressure changes at ground level when 40 miles up - no matter
how fast you are going."

Just after a previous shuttle launch in November, 1985 a sonic boom occurred
over the launch site, after the shuttle had departed. The same effects took
place on least two previous shuttle launches. Scalar expert T. E. Bearden
put these down to testing of the weapons. Source material: Scientist Tom
Bearden, Cheniere.Org - http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html

"The scalar boom effect is caused in a way similar to a thunderstorm. In
that case the lightning cleaves apart large masses of air which boom. The
scalar weapon can generate a massive version of the same effect. This is
not a "beam" weapon like the one used to down the two WTC towers. It
remotely produces local space-time distortion effects by connecting through
the complex plane around which all space-time is wrapped."

"So it is quite possible that an unfortunate but normal type of accident is
what destroyed the shuttle; suchRe aus-wx Columbia Shuttle.ems accidents do happen unavoidably, in spite
of the best intentions and efforts of everyone, and the shuttles are aging.
It is also possible that a little burst of EM energy deliberately placed on
that shuttle, at a Yakuza scalar interferometer, could have initiated the
break-up and catastrophic failure of the vehicle."

"...... sound itself doesn't carry through space, but a bunch of EM pulses
let loose at an explosion, etc. does, and when it enters the atmosphere it
retranslates into sound that is representative of what happened out there."
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/

Of course, this opens the topic of just how the weather is being manipulated
by this equipment !!!!!!!!! .... if anybody chooses to follow that angle :)

Love
Sha


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP92.gif: 00000001,105ccb17,00000000,00000000 at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:01:24 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Not according to all I have read Richard.  One thing of note on this is that the booms were heard at the quoted time of the *accident* .... 8.00 CST, but the radar screens don't show the debris trail for another 1 or 2 hours ....... why ???  I don't know the answer to that one ??
 
Love
Sha
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle

quotes by sha,
 
<"This is not a "beam" weapon like the one used to down the two WTC towers.">
 
WHAT???????
 
couldn't the sonic booms have been caused by the debris when it entered more dense atmosphere closer to earth.
 
richard
 

 .
___________________________________________________
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 12:03:24 +1100 at : Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The only sensible connection between the solar activity and the event that I can deduce is the rather simple and obvious one that everybody has avoided. The thin upper atmosphere is mostly hot ionized gas, of very low density. During solar flares etc these gasses are excited and heated, and they expand much much higher than normal. Remember that the re-entry path was calculated for "normal" conditions. If the gas was hotter than normal, and extending up higher than normal, the effects on the shuttle would have been:- (a) Earlier onset of gas heating on re-entry at a higher altitude and much higher speed, (b) Note, Heat build up is a function of speed cubed, (c) The length of flight through the expanded gas would be longer, at higher than normal speeds relative to the normal onset of aerodynamic drag and dynamic pressures, and of course, heating. (d) Producing drag sooner than expected / wanted, would have started to force the shuttle away at the pre computed trajectory, which would have forced the flight control computers to correct sooner and more often, trying to maintain the pre computed trajectory to Kennedy. (e) Since the trajectory can only be controlled by controlling the drag, which can only be controlled by the roll angle, and increasing the roll angle produces more drag and heat, this active controlling / manoeuvring by the computers would have exacerbated the heat build-up. (f) Apparently the pilots were aware that the flight control system was issuing many more "inputs" than usual. (g) There is evidence that on two previous shuttle flights some years ago, there were also an "abnormal" number of corrections by the computers, and the shuttle cross range error did become quite large, and they did have to "fly it back to the trajectory", but apparently the errors were not too great, so nobody seems to have done much about getting to the bottom of why it happened. What solar activity was current at the time of these events I do not know. Perhaps a critical "heads up" warning was missed ? +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:48:41 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
yep, no probs sha, just a query.
you seem to be checking things out fairly deeply
i find your insight into other possibilities  very interesting.
 
richard

 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Saturday, 8 February 2003 11:41:41 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle
 
Not according to all I have read Richard.  One thing of note on this is that the booms were heard at the quoted time of the *accident* .... 8.00 CST, but the radar screens don't show the debris trail for another 1 or 2 hours ....... why ???  I don't know the answer to that one ??
 
Love
Sha
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle

quotes by sha,
 
<"This is not a "beam" weapon like the one used to down the two WTC towers.">
 
WHAT???????
 
couldn't the sonic booms have been caused by the debris when it entered more dense atmosphere closer to earth.
 
richard
 

 .
 
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP93.gif: 00000001,7292a903,00000000,00000000 at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:23:32 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-107, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id VAA21517 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:01 am, Sha wrote this piece of wisdom: > Not according to all I have read Richard. One thing of note on this is > that the booms were heard at the quoted time of the *accident* .... 8.00 > CST, but the radar screens don't show the debris trail for another 1 or 2 > hours ....... why ??? I don't know the answer to that one ?? Because what you are seeing on radar is dust, paper, insulation etc, not the debris. The debris fell very quickly. The radar in that region only scans as high as 20000 ft. Anything above that is not on radar. By the time the dust and bits of paper, insulation and stuff fell through the atmosphere it would take a few hours. David - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+RGooZOfFgbBAbXARAro5AKCaixA3AQrhnpUbPjbiiN2/j2UbvwCghHeS /G5VrzOH0vZsJHjPBWx5rhI= =Y2ph -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:35:48 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle
No Neville ........ they are all using UTC which is GMT - standard world time.  The tragedy occurred at 14:00 UTC or 8 am CST and 9 am EST.  I haven't yet finished my radar page, but there is a screen shot on this page of mine, http://www.geocities.com/serpentine_moon/questions , taken at 15:43 UTC.  This shows the most debris at any of the shots, and yet it is an hour and a half after the explosion ?
 
Love
Sha
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle

Hi Sha

Could it be that the radar screens show EST rather than CST. There's an hour difference there. Just a thought. I haven't seen them.

Neville
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003
at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:39:21 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I have just mentioned in an email just prior to this one, a link to a radar shot I am showing on one of my pages David. It shows the most *stuff* an hour and a half afterwards and I wondered why. If it is showing the dust, etc .... that's an awful lot of dust !!!! Can you give any more insight to this please ? Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "David Findlay" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 12:23 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:01 am, Sha wrote this piece of wisdom: > Not according to all I have read Richard. One thing of note on this is > that the booms were heard at the quoted time of the *accident* .... 8.00 > CST, but the radar screens don't show the debris trail for another 1 or 2 > hours ....... why ??? I don't know the answer to that one ?? Because what you are seeing on radar is dust, paper, insulation etc, not the debris. The debris fell very quickly. The radar in that region only scans as high as 20000 ft. Anything above that is not on radar. By the time the dust and bits of paper, insulation and stuff fell through the atmosphere it would take a few hours. David --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 14:51:28 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Hi Sha

Could it be that the radar screens show EST rather than CST. There's an hour difference there. Just a thought. I haven't seen them.

Neville

at : "Sha" <shambhala at hotkey.net.au>
Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:01:24 +1000
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle


Not according to all I have read Richard.  One thing of note on this is that the booms were heard at the quoted time of the *accident* .... 8.00 CST, but the radar screens don't show the debris trail for another 1 or 2 hours ....... why ???  I don't know the answer to that one ??

Love
Sha

----- Original Message -----
at : Richard Modistach <mailto:hambone at dodo.com.au>  
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle

quotes by sha,

<"This is not a "beam" weapon like the one used to down the two WTC towers.">

WHAT???????

couldn't the sonic booms have been caused by the debris when it entered more dense atmosphere closer to earth.

richard


.
___________________________________________________


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003


at : David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:56:08 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-107, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id WAJ21013 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:39 pm, Sha wrote this piece of wisdom: > If it is showing the dust, etc .... that's an awful lot of dust !!!! > > Can you give any more insight to this please ? Firstly the radar is configured to see drops of water. Thus anything solid is going to appear far more "bright" on weather radar. There's lots of stuff like insulation, papers, patches, clothes, fabrics, body parts, that were shredded by the hypersonic airflows, along with dust at pulverised parts and stuff. Although the density isn't huge, maybe on item per 100 metres sq, on weather radar that is going appear quite brightly. I can't remember the image, but I think some migrations of birds also appear brightly on radar. David - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+RHHJZOfFgbBAbXARAvicAJ9Svs+h7aFNp7XOMFj4PUwxFnL2BwCdFCvn PsQePKmBi15fO8h92POM9TQ= =2NtH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 14:36:32 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Sue, To your query: >may I ask if you've been >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of the Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & England. All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL aviation customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on average, beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're incorporating lunar >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a ride. I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not inland. Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar 22, rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' parameters are found here http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply the clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. >You sound very >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - persistence, climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say 1deg). However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size of the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead forecast do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a particular location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the climatology technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is same as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error value is simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the interested location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple statistical program can work out what this value would be. 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, will at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique apart at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad odds. 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve the expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly by increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. In summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like the first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have done so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling deg days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat climatology. Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r forecasts. 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who forecast for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, combined with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It doesn't mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected error. Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. Best wishes, tuan >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? No >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating lunar >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? >Suze =^. .^= >snip +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Paul Mossman" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:27:54 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ever heard the term "pride cometh before BIG fall"......? I look forward to what the conditions will be. I will sya one thing tho - did not Ken predict back a few months ago about the current rain scenario in Qld / East Coast etc? As for the moon - lets not have jibes at what other people believe. YOU dont know it all..... even though you may think you do. If the moon has such an effect on the massive bodies of water that cover this planet, then it must have an effect on the weather. Even a person with an inkling of science could agree with that...... Paul ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tuan Phan" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 1:06 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > Hi Sue, > > To your query: > > >may I ask if you've been > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job > involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of the > Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated > under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & England. > All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL aviation > customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on average, > beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount > each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) > > >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're incorporating > lunar > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? > > The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a > ride. > > I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not inland. > Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar 22, > rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' > parameters are found here > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml > There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply the > clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. > > >You sound very > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities > Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. > For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: > > 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - persistence, > climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. > Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) > because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. > > 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say 1deg). > However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size of > the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead forecast > do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 > days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach > limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a particular > location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the climatology > technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is same > as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error value is > simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the interested > location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple > statistical program can work out what this value would be. > > 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for > 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, will > at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% > higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be > found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique apart > at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad odds. > > 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve the > expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly by > increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. In > summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting > anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! > > 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like the > first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have done > so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling deg > days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat climatology. > Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to > clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp > only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r > forecasts. > > 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who forecast > for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, combined > with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. > > Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It doesn't > mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected error. > Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. > > Best wishes, > tuan > > > > > >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so > >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? No > >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating lunar > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > >Suze =^. .^= > > > >snip > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:15:00 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, [By Ken] >The shuttle sharply hit an incoming "king airtide" within the hour of >a rising new moon, I would be interested if anyone can explain to me how the moon can produce a noticeable air tide.? And how can such a (king) airtide destroyed the shuttle? at where I sit, it appears that the uneven air drag (due to damage to left wing) caused the shuttle to careered(sp) out of control. The damage to left wing could be an existing fault already (due to wear & tear) but was exasperated by falling foam at lift off and/or space junk during re-entry. I am sure systematic testing discover the most probable reason shortly. Given the current available info, other vastly different theories appear to violate Occam's Razor, as mentioned already. >...which has a potential to produce huge turbulence This is very new to me. If you have any more info on this theory Ken, I am interested in finding out more about this. I am sure the aviation industry would be as well. If you have some solid theory, proof evidence to back up the claims, they would be willing to grant you lots of money for research. tuan >I totally agree with Brian and have put together a fairly extensive article >on the role of the moon in air crashes, in particular Ansett 708 in NZ. It >can be seen on my website www.predictweather.com under the heading "Ansett >708". The shuttle sharply hit an incoming "king airtide" within the hour of >a rising new moon, which has a potential to produce huge turbulence. Many >unexplained fatal aircrashes have occurred at this and other moon-event >times, something I believe aircraft accident investigations will one day >have to look into. This tragedy was at one of those times. >> > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem >before. >This is irrelevant. Not all cars hit the same pothole, especially when that >pothole might be moving. If I go into a shop and ask for something I am >sometimes met with "we don't stock it because we never get asked for it". >When I say but I'M asking for it, it doesn't seem to count.. > >Ken Ring >www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:46 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem > before. > > > well, some research (limited) has shown more air crashes occur around > certain moon events. > I find it hard to believe, but there does seem to be a trend, thats all. > Interesting is how i see it, thats all! > Brian > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.202] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 17:01:02 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2003 06:01:03.0451 (UTC) FILETIME=[764A0AB0:01C2CF37] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi all, We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a severe t'storm moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern Canberra) It started about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at the south to 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg to 19.3 in minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella Plains recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B o m thinks the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of streets and sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage lines on the hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as well as causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 hours of data when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of the storm with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west and we are on a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome. Gavin O'Brien Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T. _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 17:16:26 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day in a row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual... Some shots are here www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/ Simon ----- Original Message ----- at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:01 PM Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > > hi all, > We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a severe t'storm > moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern Canberra) It started > about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at the south to > 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg to 19.3 in > minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella Plains > recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B o m thinks > the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of streets and > sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage lines on the > hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as well as > causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 hours of data > when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old > thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of the storm > with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west and we are on > a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome. > Gavin O'Brien > Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 18:05:20 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 05:16 PM 8/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day in a >row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms >really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual... >Some shots are here > www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/ At least you got to see that much.... I'm gonna have to watch several re-runs of Twister to treat my SDS. :-/ 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.169.85] at : "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 18:10:33 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2003 07:10:34.0324 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C52C140:01C2CF41] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi every1, In the interests of fair play and although I am skeptical it would be remiss of me if I did not forward this email on: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/06/MN22145.DTL&type=science Cheers, Kevin at Wycheproof. _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:13:14 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
uh oh, just been looking at the radar for canberra, looks like theyre getting plastered.
anyone got any idea of rainfall rates\totals so far,
 
isn't too much rain going to stuff the water supply!!!!!????
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Saturday, 8 February 2003 4:53:50 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon.
 
I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day in a
row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms
really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual...
Some shots are here
www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/

Simon
----- Original Message -----
at : "Gavin O'Brien" <mrcenterprises at hotmail.com>
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:01 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon.


>
> hi all,
> We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a severe t'storm
> moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern Canberra) It
started
> about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at the south to
> 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg to 19.3
in
> minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella Plains
> recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B o m
thinks
> the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of streets and
> sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage lines on
the
> hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as well as
> causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 hours of data
> when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old
> thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of the storm
> with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west and we are
on
> a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome.
> Gavin O'Brien
> Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________Re aus-wx Severe Thunderstorm.ems _
> Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>
>
>


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP94.gif: 00000001,3fbc76c2,00000000,00000000 at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 18:47:21 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks for posting this Kevin, as I didn't like to push things too far, but I am so glad you did. I saw the same report on a few different sites. I have taken an interest in these sprites and elves ... actually I feel sure that I posted to this list something about them being over Australia only days before the shuttle tragedy. The sad irony of this is that these very phenomena were one of the Columbia's experiments !! Here is another site that has a few articles on the high=altitude possibilities : http://www.electricwarrior.com/index.htm go to» "Shuttle Sparks High-Altitude Electrophysics " Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "Kevin Phyland" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:10 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Hi every1, In the interests of fair play and although I am skeptical it would be remiss of me if I did not forward this email on: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/06/MN22145.DTL&type =science Cheers, Kevin at Wycheproof. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 21:55:40 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com before you do, get Ken to lay down his definations of his words he uses to forecast the weather. i.e, showers, rain, cloud, etc. Ken needs to write down what he counts as still being corrrect for the weather for that day. Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:13 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather > >The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a > ride..It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them.." > > Tuan, it would be more honest to say that it was only your opinion. Some > have found that lunar forecasts work for them, so you cannot speak for > everybody, a mistake some professional meteorologists seem to continually > make. Sue may indeed find what I said useful - and I am certainly not > rubbishing what YOU forecast based on BoM methods. Perhaps you need to learn > that there are other approaches out there and that the BoM doesn't hold all > the answers. > I suggest forget great fame and riches. Let's just have a simple but solid > test, your methods against mine.. Name a month and a town in Australia, well > beyond the reach of 14 days. You submit your forecast based on your averages > etc and I'll submit mine based on the moon. Let's look at day/dates for the > potential of expected rainfall for that location. Surely shouldn't be too > difficult for someone with access to all the data you say you have. Are you > game to put yourself on the line? Or are you just the latest spout off..? > cheers > Ken Ring > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tuan Phan" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:36 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > > > > Hi Sue, > > > > To your query: > > > > >may I ask if you've been > > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > > > I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job > > involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of > the > > Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated > > under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & England. > > All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL > aviation > > customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on average, > > beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount > > each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) > > > > >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're incorporating > > lunar > > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? > > > > The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what > > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for > a > > ride. > > > > I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not > inland. > > Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar 22, > > rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' > > parameters are found here > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml > > There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply > the > > clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. > > > > >You sound very > > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities > > Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. > > For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: > > > > 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - persistence, > > climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. > > Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) > > because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. > > > > 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say 1deg). > > However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size > of > > the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead > forecast > > do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 > > days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach > > limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a > particular > > location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the climatology > > technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is > same > > as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error value > is > > simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the interested > > location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple > > statistical program can work out what this value would be. > > > > 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for > > 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, > will > > at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% > > higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be > > found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique apart > > at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad > odds. > > > > 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve the > > expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly by > > increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. In > > summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting > > anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! > > > > 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like the > > first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have > done > > so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling > deg > > days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat > climatology. > > Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to > > clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp > > only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r > > forecasts. > > > > 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who forecast > > for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, > combined > > with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. > > > > Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It > doesn't > > mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected > error. > > Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. > > > > Best wishes, > > tuan > > > > > > > > > > >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so > > >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? > No > > >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating > lunar > > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very > > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been > > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > >Suze =^. .^= > > > > > > >snip > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:56:38 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Not much by the look of this:
 
 
this is up to 7pm.
 
There was 52mm at Bathurst this afternoon.
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon.

uh oh, just been looking at the radar for canberra, looks like theyre getting plastered.
anyone got any idea of rainfall rates\totals so far,
 
isn't too much rain going to stuff the water supply!!!!!????
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Saturday, 8 February 2003 4:53:50 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon.
 
I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day in a
row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms
really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual...
Some shots are here
www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/

Simon
----- Original Message -----
at : "Gavin O'Brien" <mrcenterprises at hotmail.com>
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:01 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon.


>
> hi all,
> We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a severe t'storm
> moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern Canberra) It
started
> about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at the south to
> 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg to 19.3
in
> minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella Plains
> recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B o m
thinks
> the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of streets and
> sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage lines on
the
> hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as well as
> causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 hours of data
> when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old
> thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of the storm
> with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west and we are
on
> a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome.
> Gavin O'Brien
> Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T.
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>
>
>


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP95.gif: 00000001,2c0cfbcf,00000000,00000000 at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 22:13:54 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a ride..It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them.." Tuan, it would be more honest to say that it was only your opinion. Some have found that lunar forecasts work for them, so you cannot speak for everybody, a mistake some professional meteorologists seem to continually make. Sue may indeed find what I said useful - and I am certainly not rubbishing what YOU forecast based on BoM methods. Perhaps you need to learn that there are other approaches out there and that the BoM doesn't hold all the answers. I suggest forget great fame and riches. Let's just have a simple but solid test, your methods against mine.. Name a month and a town in Australia, well beyond the reach of 14 days. You submit your forecast based on your averages etc and I'll submit mine based on the moon. Let's look at day/dates for the potential of expected rainfall for that location. Surely shouldn't be too difficult for someone with access to all the data you say you have. Are you game to put yourself on the line? Or are you just the latest spout off..? cheers Ken Ring www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tuan Phan" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:36 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > Hi Sue, > > To your query: > > >may I ask if you've been > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job > involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of the > Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated > under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & England. > All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL aviation > customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on average, > beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount > each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) > > >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're incorporating > lunar > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? > > The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a > ride. > > I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not inland. > Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar 22, > rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' > parameters are found here > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml > There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply the > clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. > > >You sound very > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities > Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. > For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: > > 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - persistence, > climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. > Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) > because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. > > 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say 1deg). > However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size of > the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead forecast > do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 > days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach > limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a particular > location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the climatology > technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is same > as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error value is > simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the interested > location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple > statistical program can work out what this value would be. > > 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for > 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, will > at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% > higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be > found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique apart > at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad odds. > > 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve the > expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly by > increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. In > summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting > anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! > > 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like the > first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have done > so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling deg > days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat climatology. > Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to > clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp > only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r > forecasts. > > 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who forecast > for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, combined > with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. > > Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It doesn't > mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected error. > Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. > > Best wishes, > tuan > > > > > >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so > >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? No > >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating lunar > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > >Suze =^. .^= > > > >snip > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 22:43:52 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tuan I think there is much claim now that other, unknown factors could have been responsible for the Shuttle disaster. It will probably go into the bin of all the other unexplained air accidents, whereby systems were found later to have been in working order yet a tragedy still mysteriously occurred. You only have to look up air accidents on any search engine and get truckloads of reports. If you match these to where the moon was at location, I believe a causality can be seen. Basically, when the moon is out of the sky it takes with it an airbulge, akin to a water bulge of the seatide, creating a daily airtide; "in" when the moon is overhead and "out" when the moon goes below the horizon. When the moon is ON the horizon there is often a wind change, akin to the sea change as the tide turns. When the moon is at maximum declination, lunar equinox, perigee and apogee, as well as full and new moon times, and especially when these factors combine together, certain consistent atmospheric conditions can be expected. You say a "noticeable" air tide. This is the problem. We have not developed instrumentation to notice it, as we have been preoccupied with the barometer for 150 years. The barometer will not measure height of the atmosphere(cf height of the sea= seatide), only weight of the atmosphere at any place, which is not the same thing. The airtide is a change in atmospheric height, which I claim can increase by up to 20% for instance during lunar perigee. The Shuttle disaster occurred at a combination of new moon and southern declination; both times of a heavier airtide in the northern hemisphere(opposite hemispheres to declinations create higher tides). It also occurred near the hour of moonrise. This may or may not have been factorial, but is certainly very much in line with other so far unexplained air mishaps. Sure, more work has to be done. I have often in the past appealed to authorities to start looking at the moon, but I get the same dogmatic reaction as you have expressed elsewhere – that any notion that the moon has any effect on anything to do with the atmosphere must be coming at a nutter. I get no funding at anyone. It is up to the tax-funded organisations to do the work. One can scoff only after extensive investigation into it, but not before. Cheers Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tuan Phan" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:15 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > Hi all, > > [By Ken] > >The shuttle sharply hit an incoming "king airtide" within the hour of > >a rising new moon, > > I would be interested if anyone can explain to me how the moon can produce a > noticeable air tide.? > > And how can such a (king) airtide destroyed the shuttle? > > at where I sit, it appears that the uneven air drag (due to damage to left > wing) caused the shuttle to careered(sp) out of control. The damage to left > wing could be an existing fault already (due to wear & tear) but was > exasperated by falling foam at lift off and/or space junk during re-entry. I > am sure systematic testing discover the most probable reason shortly. > > Given the current available info, other vastly different theories appear to > violate Occam's Razor, as mentioned already. > > > >...which has a potential to produce huge turbulence > > This is very new to me. If you have any more info on this theory Ken, I am > interested in finding out more about this. I am sure the aviation industry > would be as well. If you have some solid theory, proof evidence to back up > the claims, they would be willing to grant you lots of money for research. > > tuan > > > > > >I totally agree with Brian and have put together a fairly extensive article > >on the role of the moon in air crashes, in particular Ansett 708 in NZ. It > >can be seen on my website www.predictweather.com under the heading "Ansett > >708". The shuttle sharply hit an incoming "king airtide" within the hour of > >a rising new moon, which has a potential to produce huge turbulence. Many > >unexplained fatal aircrashes have occurred at this and other moon-event > >times, something I believe aircraft accident investigations will one day > >have to look into. This tragedy was at one of those times. > > >> > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem > >before. > >This is irrelevant. Not all cars hit the same pothole, especially when that > >pothole might be moving. If I go into a shop and ask for something I am > >sometimes met with "we don't stock it because we never get asked for it". > >When I say but I'M asking for it, it doesn't seem to count.. > > > >Ken Ring > >www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Brian Hamilton" > To: > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:46 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > > > > > The moon has risen every day for millenia, it hasn't caused a problem > > before. > > > > > well, some research (limited) has shown more air crashes occur around > > certain moon events. > > I find it hard to believe, but there does seem to be a trend, thats all. > > Interesting is how i see it, thats all! > > Brian > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 22:49:53 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Very pertinent, Kevin. "Heavy rain and sleet over East Texas followed the tragedy, hampering efforts to recover wreckage"(NZ Herald). This also is suggestion of electrical atmospheric disturbance. Ken ----- Original Message ----- at : "Kevin Phyland" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 8:10 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle > > Hi every1, > > In the interests of fair play and although I am skeptical it would be remiss > of me if I did not forward this email on: > > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/02/06/MN22145.DTL&type =science > > Cheers, > Kevin at Wycheproof. > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 21:11:34 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id FAA03514 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 10:43 PM 8/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: >Basically, when the moon is out of the sky it takes with it an airbulge, >akin to a water bulge of the seatide, creating a daily airtide; "in" when >the moon is overhead and "out" when the moon goes below the horizon. When >the moon is ON the horizon there is often a wind change, akin to the sea >change as the tide turns. When the moon is at maximum declination, lunar >equinox, perigee and apogee, as well as full and new moon times, and >especially when these factors combine together, certain consistent >atmospheric conditions can be expected. This makes sense to me. Afterall, ocean tides and even land tides are well known phenomena. In other planetary systems, land tides are very noticeable (e.g. Io orbiting Jupiter) and can cause extreme heating effects. As the atmosphere is a lower density fluid than water, it is only common sense to expect it has tides. And as you maintain, such tides would not show up significantly on a ground based barometer, due to the balance of forces involved (I would expect a _minor_ variation in barometric pressure though, because the forces are probably not perfectly in balance on the ground). >You say a "noticeable" air tide. This is the problem. We have not developed >instrumentation to notice it, as we have been preoccupied with the barometer >for 150 years. The barometer will not measure height of the atmosphere(cf >height of the sea= seatide), only weight of the atmosphere at any place, >which is not the same thing. The airtide is a change in atmospheric height, >which I claim can increase by up to 20% for instance during lunar perigee. The upper atmosphere is also subject to a number of variables. Lunar tides are only one. Solar activity is another (it's a known fact that Skylab was brought down to Earth earlier than expected due to a period of significant solar activity before its re-entry. Lunar tide measurements would have to take these into account... One crude way of detecting lunar tides might be to measure the drag on very low Earth orbiting satellites (could this be done using GPS?). ISS might be another possibility, since it's affected by atmospheric drag (and also had on board thrusters to maintain its orbit). >The Shuttle disaster occurred at a combination of new moon and southern >declination; both times of a heavier airtide in the northern >hemisphere(opposite hemispheres to declinations create higher tides). It >also occurred near the hour of moonrise. This may or may not have been >factorial, but is certainly very much in line with other so far unexplained >air mishaps. I can see it being a factor that affects the deceleration of the shuttle (and therefore the peak temperature). Certainly more investigation needed on how different upper atmospheric "profiles" affect re-entry. >Sure, more work has to be done. I have often in the past appealed to >authorities to start looking at the moon, but I get the same dogmatic >reaction as you have expressed elsewhere ­ that any notion that the moon has >any effect on anything to do with the atmosphere must be coming at a >nutter. I get no funding at anyone. It is up to the tax-funded >organisations to do the work. One can scoff only after extensive >investigation into it, but not before. Ken, while I haven't agrees with all of your theories, I do believe there is something in this that warrants investigation. My gut feeling (OK, unscientific :) ) says that a high lunar tide alone is probably not enough to cause a disaster like Columbia, but I can certainly see how it could exacerbate the effects of a fault with the shuttle itself (by causing higher than expected heating against a damaged heat shield, for instance). The worst case scenario I can see is where a spacecraft commences re-entry at a point of relatively "low tide". If it is travelling at a lower tide area to a higher tide area (as it moved around the Earth), the air density will increase faster than expected with time, so re-entry temperatures will be a bit higher (because the spacecraft hits denser air at a faster velocity). I hope NASA takes this possibility into account when they do their calculations. :-) Anyway, just mulling over Ken's theory a bit. I don't know how much this would be a factor. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:27:24 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com No worries, Brian, the square-off won't happen because the BoM has often stated it cannot confidently predict weather beyond 14 days, otherwise they would be able to warn of severe storms, floods etc well in advance and save the country zillions of dollars. So either they can or they can't. But they can't have it both ways. Ken ----- Original Message ----- at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 9:55 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather > before you do, get Ken to lay down his definations of his words he uses to > forecast the weather. > i.e, showers, rain, cloud, etc. > Ken needs to write down what he counts as still being corrrect for the > weather for that day. > Cheers > Brian > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:13 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather > > > > >The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite > what > > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for > a > > ride..It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can > beat > > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them.." > > > > Tuan, it would be more honest to say that it was only your opinion. Some > > have found that lunar forecasts work for them, so you cannot speak for > > everybody, a mistake some professional meteorologists seem to continually > > make. Sue may indeed find what I said useful - and I am certainly not > > rubbishing what YOU forecast based on BoM methods. Perhaps you need to > learn > > that there are other approaches out there and that the BoM doesn't hold > all > > the answers. > > I suggest forget great fame and riches. Let's just have a simple but solid > > test, your methods against mine.. Name a month and a town in Australia, > well > > beyond the reach of 14 days. You submit your forecast based on your > averages > > etc and I'll submit mine based on the moon. Let's look at day/dates for > the > > potential of expected rainfall for that location. Surely shouldn't be too > > difficult for someone with access to all the data you say you have. Are > you > > game to put yourself on the line? Or are you just the latest spout off..? > > cheers > > Ken Ring > > www.predictweather.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Tuan Phan" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:36 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > > > > > > > Hi Sue, > > > > > > To your query: > > > > > > >may I ask if you've been > > > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > > > > > I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job > > > involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of > > the > > > Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated > > > under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & > England. > > > All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL > > aviation > > > customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on > average, > > > beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount > > > each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) > > > > > > >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're > incorporating > > > lunar > > > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? > > > > > > The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite > what > > > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself > for > > a > > > ride. > > > > > > I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not > > inland. > > > Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar > 22, > > > rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' > > > parameters are found here > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml > > > There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply > > the > > > clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. > > > > > > >You sound very > > > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities > > > Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. > > > For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: > > > > > > 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - > persistence, > > > climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. > > > Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) > > > because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. > > > > > > 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say > 1deg). > > > However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size > > of > > > the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead > > forecast > > > do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 > > > days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach > > > limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a > > particular > > > location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the > climatology > > > technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is > > same > > > as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error > value > > is > > > simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the > interested > > > location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple > > > statistical program can work out what this value would be. > > > > > > 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for > > > 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, > > will > > > at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% > > > higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be > > > found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique > apart > > > at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad > > odds. > > > > > > 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve > the > > > expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly > by > > > increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. > In > > > summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting > > > anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! > > > > > > 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > > > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like > the > > > first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have > > done > > > so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling > > deg > > > days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat > > climatology. > > > Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to > > > clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp > > > only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r > > > forecasts. > > > > > > 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who > forecast > > > for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, > > combined > > > with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. > > > > > > Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It > > doesn't > > > mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected > > error. > > > Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > tuan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters > so > > > >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're > ustilsing? > > No > > > >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating > > lunar > > > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very > > > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been > > > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > > >Suze =^. .^= > > > > > > > > > >snip > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.139.223.11] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 22:47:45 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2003 11:47:45.0884 (UTC) FILETIME=[E58169C0:01C2CF67] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Keith, Severe T'Storms observed visually over the Brindabella Ranges (Mt Bimberi to Mt Morgan and later around Mt Coree to the north but only 1.7 mm at Gilmore .I doubt any Gauges are working up there due to bushfire damage.I would say rainfall was intense enough to cause flash flooding type runoff but I can't say if it would have gone into Corin or Bendora Dams. > at : "Keith Barnett" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. >Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:56:38 +1100 > >Not much by the look of this: > >http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/nsw/southcoast.shtml > >this is up to 7pm. > >There was 52mm at Bathurst this afternoon. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : Richard Modistach > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 7:43 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday >afternoon. > > > uh oh, just been looking at the radar for canberra, looks like >theyre getting plastered. > anyone got any idea of rainfall rates\totals so far, > > isn't too much rain going to stuff the water supply!!!!!???? > > richard > > -------Original Message------- > > at : aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Saturday, 8 February 2003 4:53:50 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday >afternoon. > > I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second >day in a > row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the >storms > really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual... > Some shots are here > www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/ > > Simon > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Gavin O'Brien" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:01 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday >afternoon. > > > > > > hi all, > > We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a >severe t'storm > > moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern >Canberra) It > started > > about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at >the south to > > 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg >to 19.3 > in > > minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella >Plains > > recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B >o m > thinks > > the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of >streets and > > sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage >lines on > the > > hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as >well as > > causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 >hours of data > > when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old > > thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of >the storm > > with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west >and we are > on > > a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome. > > Gavin O'Brien > > Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T. > > > > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body >of your > > message. > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body >of your > message. > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > . > > > ____________________________________________________ > IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.139.223.11] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 22:50:09 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2003 11:50:09.0798 (UTC) FILETIME=[3B48F260:01C2CF68] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Richard, see my earlier message on the list.We missed it all! The action was on the Brindabella Ranges. Gavin Southside Weather Watch Canberra > at : "Richard Modistach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. >Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:13:14 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) > >uh oh, just been looking at the radar for canberra, looks like theyre >getting plastered. >anyone got any idea of rainfall rates\totals so far, > >isn't too much rain going to stuff the water supply!!!!!???? > >richard > >-------Original Message------- > > at : aussie-weather at world.std.com >Date: Saturday, 8 February 2003 4:53:50 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > >I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day in a >row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms >really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual... >Some shots are here >www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/ > >Simon >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Gavin O'Brien" >To: >Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:01 PM >Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > > > > > > hi all, > > We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a severe >t'storm > > moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern Canberra) It >started > > about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at the south >to > > 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg to 19.3 >in > > minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella Plains > > recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B o m >thinks > > the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of streets and > > sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage lines on >the > > hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as well as > > causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 hours of >data > > when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old > > thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of the >storm > > with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west and we >are >on > > a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome. > > Gavin O'Brien > > Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T. > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > >. _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.139.223.11] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 22:52:28 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2003 11:52:28.0955 (UTC) FILETIME=[8E3A9EB0:01C2CF68] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tony, You got nothing? What Suburb are you? Gavin SSWW Gilmore > at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. >Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 18:05:20 +1100 > >At 05:16 PM 8/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: > >>I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day in >>a >>row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms >>really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual... >>Some shots are here >> www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/ > >At least you got to see that much.... I'm gonna have to watch several >re-runs of Twister to treat my SDS. :-/ > >73 de Tony, VK3JED >http://vkradio.com > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:16:09 +0100 (CET) at : Robert Goler To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Offtopic: Munich weather X-MIME-Autoconverted: at QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by europe.std.com id HAA01231 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all Given the amount of non-aussie weather related stuff appearing on the list recently, I don't feel as guilty posting this here. :-) A bit over 2 weeks ago I moved to Munich, Germany to work at Munich University, and needless to say, coming at Melbourne, the weather has been different. During the past week, it has snowed on all but 1 day, with at least 20-25cm in total falling (currently snowing as I write at 1pm). Having seen snow only twice in Australia (total depth of 2-3cm), it has been a fantastic experience for me. The temperatures have been consistently around or below 0°C, a bit of a shock coming at 30°C in Melbourne. Last Saturday night was the coldest I experienced, with my Kestrel 4000 (thanks to Australian Sky & Weather! http://www.australianskynweather.com/) recording a -15°C on my walk home at the train station. The wind chill was -20°C, which was entirely due to my walking as there was no wind around. On the warmest day, the temperature would've reached +7°C. The locals class a windy day here as one where the wind gusts to 10 knots!!!! Since I have been here, there has only been 2 such days where the wind would ruffle my hair....that is if I had any!!! :-) The clouds here have been predominantly altostratus or stratus or cirrostratus. That is, there has been absolutely no structure in them to determine wind direction/shear, and nothing to take pictures of. There have only been about 3-4 instances where the clouds were sort of photogenic. I want that Melbourne strato-cu!!!! On the two days which were free of low/mid level clouds to reveal cirrus, sundogs were easily visible on either side of the sun. I have been amazed that despite the cold, snow and rain, heaps of people still cycle to work or the train station, or to the shops. At the train station near my house (which itself is on the western outskirts of Munich, about 15km at the centre of town), 100-200 bikes are parked each day. As of yesterday, I too have joined the clan....nothing like cycling with the snow rushing in your face!! I should be hitting the ski slopes within the next few weeks since I am fully equipped now with health insurance..... Regarding other things, I came here with very little German speaking ability, and I have managed to get around with few problems. The people are very polite and understanding to foreigners, especially the women when you say "Du bist shön", which means "You are beautiful"!!! A compliment does go a long way, indeed!! The German beer is absolutely astounding.....way, way better than aussie beer. If you weren't an alcoholic before coming to Germany, you'll certainly leave as one!!!! ;-P I hope to put up some pics as soon as I can get my video camera connected to my computer. Cheers Rob +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:58:48 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Anyway, just mulling over Ken's theory a bit. I don't know how much this > would be a factor. I don't know either, Tony. This would all be relatively novel to mainstream science because the moon has been factored out of any weather/atmospheric consideration for so long now. People who try to analyse or appraise my work do so through the eyes of their own training, and so are bound to find fault as it most certainly won't stack up under that narrow analysis. With lunar theory the rules are different, the methods too, the results are fuzzier and there is no possible control group so the classic scientific method is inapplicable. The maths of the moon's tidal effect has always been portrayed as being puny and insignificant, quite ignoring that the moon can pull huge oceans around and even the land itself, which shows that the maths itself has been flawed, and this is because Newton's original work was not fully understood. He was using astrological physics which is quite a different beast to gravitational physics as we now know it. What is required is a fresh look, a preparedness to put aside all of what we've been taught about gravitation and what causes weather, a re examination of the moon's intricate movements and its impact on the atmosphere and a search for correlations, not null hypotheses. It doesn't take much to see that there is a whole new area here that is thus far uninvestigated. I am also maintaining that there would be vacuum "holes" in an incoming/outgoing airtide, akin to the vaccuum pockets behind rocks in an outgoing stream, which could conceivably cause significant downdrafts, especially near mountainous terrain; also electrical discharge disturbances that would culminate in extreme weather as the earth's magnetic field gets intersected by that of the rising/setting moon in the manner of a dynamo, and/or the moon shielding then releasing again the rush of the solar wind. As you say, we are very willing to explore the effects of, say, Jupiter's moons on that planet's weather patterns, but we almost totally ignore and belittle our own glorious nearest celestial neighbour. Our science is too selective and so I think should be called a morality; not yet a true science. Ken Ring www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 11:11 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > At 10:43 PM 8/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > > >Basically, when the moon is out of the sky it takes with it an airbulge, > >akin to a water bulge of the seatide, creating a daily airtide; "in" when > >the moon is overhead and "out" when the moon goes below the horizon. When > >the moon is ON the horizon there is often a wind change, akin to the sea > >change as the tide turns. When the moon is at maximum declination, lunar > >equinox, perigee and apogee, as well as full and new moon times, and > >especially when these factors combine together, certain consistent > >atmospheric conditions can be expected. > > This makes sense to me. Afterall, ocean tides and even land tides are well > known phenomena. In other planetary systems, land tides are very > noticeable (e.g. Io orbiting Jupiter) and can cause extreme heating > effects. As the atmosphere is a lower density fluid than water, it is only > common sense to expect it has tides. And as you maintain, such tides would > not show up significantly on a ground based barometer, due to the balance > of forces involved (I would expect a _minor_ variation in barometric > pressure though, because the forces are probably not perfectly in balance > on the ground). > > >You say a "noticeable" air tide. This is the problem. We have not developed > >instrumentation to notice it, as we have been preoccupied with the barometer > >for 150 years. The barometer will not measure height of the atmosphere(cf > >height of the sea= seatide), only weight of the atmosphere at any place, > >which is not the same thing. The airtide is a change in atmospheric height, > >which I claim can increase by up to 20% for instance during lunar perigee. > > The upper atmosphere is also subject to a number of variables. Lunar tides > are only one. Solar activity is another (it's a known fact that Skylab was > brought down to Earth earlier than expected due to a period of significant > solar activity before its re-entry. Lunar tide measurements would have to > take these into account... One crude way of detecting lunar tides might be > to measure the drag on very low Earth orbiting satellites (could this be > done using GPS?). ISS might be another possibility, since it's affected > by atmospheric drag (and also had on board thrusters to maintain its orbit). > > >The Shuttle disaster occurred at a combination of new moon and southern > >declination; both times of a heavier airtide in the northern > >hemisphere(opposite hemispheres to declinations create higher tides). It > >also occurred near the hour of moonrise. This may or may not have been > >factorial, but is certainly very much in line with other so far unexplained > >air mishaps. > > I can see it being a factor that affects the deceleration of the shuttle > (and therefore the peak temperature). Certainly more investigation needed > on how different upper atmospheric "profiles" affect re-entry. > > >Sure, more work has to be done. I have often in the past appealed to > >authorities to start looking at the moon, but I get the same dogmatic > >reaction as you have expressed elsewhere ­ that any notion that the moon has > >any effect on anything to do with the atmosphere must be coming at a > >nutter. I get no funding at anyone. It is up to the tax-funded > >organisations to do the work. One can scoff only after extensive > >investigation into it, but not before. > > > Ken, while I haven't agrees with all of your theories, I do believe there > is something in this that warrants investigation. My gut feeling (OK, > unscientific :) ) says that a high lunar tide alone is probably not enough > to cause a disaster like Columbia, but I can certainly see how it could > exacerbate the effects of a fault with the shuttle itself (by causing > higher than expected heating against a damaged heat shield, for instance). > > The worst case scenario I can see is where a spacecraft commences re-entry > at a point of relatively "low tide". If it is travelling at a lower tide > area to a higher tide area (as it moved around the Earth), the air density > will increase faster than expected with time, so re-entry temperatures will > be a bit higher (because the spacecraft hits denser air at a faster > velocity). I hope NASA takes this possibility into account when they do > their calculations. :-) > > Anyway, just mulling over Ken's theory a bit. I don't know how much this > would be a factor. > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:20:48 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks David :) Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "David Findlay" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 12:56 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Firstly the radar is configured to see drops of water. Thus anything solid is going to appear far more "bright" on weather radar. There's lots of stuff like insulation, papers, patches, clothes, fabrics, body parts, that were shredded by the hypersonic airflows, along with dust at pulverised parts and stuff. Although the density isn't huge, maybe on item per 100 metres sq, on weather radar that is going appear quite brightly. I can't remember the image, but I think some migrations of birds also appear brightly on radar. David --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:04:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com well, about an hour after i typed this i got some flashes at the cells near yass, also a spot of rain at the anvil. went to my mates house in gungahlin saw a great inflow band streaching and estimated 10kms at the core of the Yass storms. was of the NE edge and direction NE at the storm (or SW into the storm if you like). It was heading N'ly at the time, so no affect on my mates house except a few spots of rain at the anvil, and perhaps 2 anvil crawlers. very dissapointing for me today. All in all, i heard thunder 5 times, saw lightning 2 times, and had ~1mm of "rain" Simon ----- Original Message ----- at : "Simon Angell" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:16 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day in a > row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms > really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual... > Some shots are here > www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/ > > Simon > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Gavin O'Brien" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:01 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > > > > > > hi all, > > We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a severe t'storm > > moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern Canberra) It > started > > about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at the south to > > 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg to 19.3 > in > > minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella Plains > > recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B o m > thinks > > the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of streets and > > sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage lines on > the > > hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as well as > > causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 hours of data > > when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old > > thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of the storm > > with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west and we are > on > > a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome. > > Gavin O'Brien > > Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T. > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: SPRITE CHASING at THE BACK PORCH Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 00:09:46 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tornado chasing, quite the vogue these days, wears out one's car, burns up gasoline, and taxes the nerves of even the hardiest of twister trackers. But there are other mysterious, thunderstorm-related phenomena that can be viewed above distant thunderheads in the peace and tranquillity of a summer night while sitting in a rocking chair on your back porch. Less than ten years ago, nobody had heard of sprites, blue jets and elves, in fact, the terms hadn't even entered the meteorological vocabulary. Recent research, however, has confirmed over a century of frequent but generally ignored observations of an entire menagerie of strange, luminous, lightning-related flashes dancing high above thunderstorm tops. And you can, if you know how, observe some of these with the naked eye. Here's the story of how sprites were discovered and how you might be able to spot some on your own. (Continue on at this link ...http://www.fma-research.com/Papers&presentations/spr-view-1.html ) (It is written by an American.) I came across this other site on Sprites as well : Sprites and Elves : http://ibis.nmt.edu/sprites/index.html Love Sha --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 28/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:12:20 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
yeah got that thanks gavin,
the radar loop had it looking like canberra was getting cleaved
hopefully enough to settle the dust and start some regrowth and ground cover without any runoff.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Sunday, 9 February 2003 1:05:44 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon.
 
Richard,
see my earlier message on the list.We missed it all! The action was on the
Brindabella Ranges.
Gavin Southside Weather Watch Canberra






> at : "Richard Modistach" <hambone at dodo.com.au>
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon.
>Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:13:14 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time)
>
>uh oh, just been looking at the radar for canberra, looks like theyre
>getting plastered.
>anyone got any idea of rainfall rates\totals so far,
>
>isn't too much rain going to stuff the water supply!!!!!????
>
>richard
>
>-------Original Message-------
>
> at : aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Date: Saturday, 8 February 2003 4:53:50 PM
>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon.
>
>I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day in a
>row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms
>really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual...
>Some shots are here
>www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/
>
>Simon
>----- Original Message -----
> at : "Gavin O'Brien" <mrcenterprises at hotmail.com>
>To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
>Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:01 PM
>Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon.
>
&Re aus-wx Severe Thunderstorm.ems gt;
> >
> > hi all,
> > We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a severe
>t'storm
> > moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern Canberra) It
>started
> > about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at the south
>to
> > 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg to 19.3
>in
> > minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella Plains
> > recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B o m
>thinks
> > the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of streets and
> > sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage lines on
>the
> > hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as well as
> > causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 hours of
>data
> > when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old
> > thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of the
>storm
> > with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west and we
>are
>on
> > a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome.
> > Gavin O'Brien
> > Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T.
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral
> >
> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail
>to:majordomo at world.std.com
> > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> > message.
> > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
>with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
>message.
>-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>
>.


_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP96.gif: 00000001,5dfa641e,00000000,00000000 Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:29:10 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: "weather mailing list" Subject: aus-wx: what the hell's going on here Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Just had a look at the composite radar loop for nsw running on 50 frames at 20fps.
That NW moving storm t-boning moree and then moving to the west looked totally awsome as it sideswiped a SE moving storm that cut through Goondiwindi.
That's the first time i've seen such a sideswipe by two storms running in such opposite directions, is this a normal occurance or did i see something rare?.
would there have been any meso or tornadic action on the shear line?
 
richard
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP97.gif: 00000001,37ded218,00000000,00000000 at : "Stargazer" To: "Aussie-Weather" Subject: aus-wx: BoM 16 level radar Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 02:38:15 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all,
 
Will ASWA members get access to BoM 16 level radar any time in the near future?

Regs, Paul.                                                       *
(Stargazer)                                                    *     .*
http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer
                                                                      *
X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 09:20:38 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 10:52 PM 8/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Tony, You got nothing? What Suburb are you? Oh, I'm in Melbourne - SDS city this year. :-/ 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:00:17 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy at : Neville Gibb To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id RAA13658 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tony and Ken I've also been mulling over Ken's theory a bit and have done a few rough calculations. As mentioned, Feb 1st 'CST' was a New Moon when Columbia crossed the US. The shuttle was about 63km high, the atmosphere is about 100km high and the earth is about 13,000km wide. At mach 18.6 the shuttle could cover 1,000km in just a few minutes. In San Francisco the moon would not rise for further 1:57 hrs after the shuttle had passed just to the north at 7:52am CST. However in just 8 minutes the moon would be on the central Texas horizon. The shuttle would have followed a trajectory over Texas of Latitude 34°N to 32°N, before it broke up at 8:00am CST. To view a moonrise at 8:00am CST on Latitude 33°N, you would have to be on Longitude 99°W, or 2° west of Dallas in Central North Texas. In other words, the time and location for moonrise, matched EXACTLY the time and location that the shuttle broke apart. Just a little more food for thought. Neville > at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 21:11:34 +1100 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > At 10:43 PM 8/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > >> Basically, when the moon is out of the sky it takes with it an airbulge, >> akin to a water bulge of the seatide, creating a daily airtide; "in" when >> the moon is overhead and "out" when the moon goes below the horizon. When >> the moon is ON the horizon there is often a wind change, akin to the sea >> change as the tide turns. When the moon is at maximum declination, lunar >> equinox, perigee and apogee, as well as full and new moon times, and >> especially when these factors combine together, certain consistent >> atmospheric conditions can be expected. > > This makes sense to me. Afterall, ocean tides and even land tides are well > known phenomena. In other planetary systems, land tides are very > noticeable (e.g. Io orbiting Jupiter) and can cause extreme heating > effects. As the atmosphere is a lower density fluid than water, it is only > common sense to expect it has tides. And as you maintain, such tides would > not show up significantly on a ground based barometer, due to the balance > of forces involved (I would expect a _minor_ variation in barometric > pressure though, because the forces are probably not perfectly in balance > on the ground). > >> You say a "noticeable" air tide. This is the problem. We have not developed >> instrumentation to notice it, as we have been preoccupied with the barometer >> for 150 years. The barometer will not measure height of the atmosphere(cf >> height of the sea= seatide), only weight of the atmosphere at any place, >> which is not the same thing. The airtide is a change in atmospheric height, >> which I claim can increase by up to 20% for instance during lunar perigee. > > The upper atmosphere is also subject to a number of variables. Lunar tides > are only one. Solar activity is another (it's a known fact that Skylab was > brought down to Earth earlier than expected due to a period of significant > solar activity before its re-entry. Lunar tide measurements would have to > take these into account... One crude way of detecting lunar tides might be > to measure the drag on very low Earth orbiting satellites (could this be > done using GPS?). ISS might be another possibility, since it's affected > by atmospheric drag (and also had on board thrusters to maintain its orbit). > >> The Shuttle disaster occurred at a combination of new moon and southern >> declination; both times of a heavier airtide in the northern >> hemisphere(opposite hemispheres to declinations create higher tides). It >> also occurred near the hour of moonrise. This may or may not have been >> factorial, but is certainly very much in line with other so far unexplained >> air mishaps. > > I can see it being a factor that affects the deceleration of the shuttle > (and therefore the peak temperature). Certainly more investigation needed > on how different upper atmospheric "profiles" affect re-entry. > >> Sure, more work has to be done. I have often in the past appealed to >> authorities to start looking at the moon, but I get the same dogmatic >> reaction as you have expressed elsewhere ­ that any notion that the moon has >> any effect on anything to do with the atmosphere must be coming at a >> nutter. I get no funding at anyone. It is up to the tax-funded >> organisations to do the work. One can scoff only after extensive >> investigation into it, but not before. > > > Ken, while I haven't agrees with all of your theories, I do believe there > is something in this that warrants investigation. My gut feeling (OK, > unscientific :) ) says that a high lunar tide alone is probably not enough > to cause a disaster like Columbia, but I can certainly see how it could > exacerbate the effects of a fault with the shuttle itself (by causing > higher than expected heating against a damaged heat shield, for instance). > > The worst case scenario I can see is where a spacecraft commences re-entry > at a point of relatively "low tide". If it is travelling at a lower tide > area to a higher tide area (as it moved around the Earth), the air density > will increase faster than expected with time, so re-entry temperatures will > be a bit higher (because the spacecraft hits denser air at a faster > velocity). I hope NASA takes this possibility into account when they do > their calculations. :-) > > Anyway, just mulling over Ken's theory a bit. I don't know how much this > would be a factor. > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:10:46 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Hi Sha

Thanks for URL. Great site! Wasn't getting at you about the times. I've just found it seems to be a fairly common mistake. You've certainly provided a lot of interesting food for thought. Keep it up!
:)
Cheers

Neville

at : "Sha" <shambhala at hotkey.net.au>
Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:35:48 +1000
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle


No Neville ........ they are all using UTC which is GMT - standard world time.  The tragedy occurred at 14:00 UTC or 8 am CST and 9 am EST.  I haven't yet finished my radar page, but there is a screen shot on this page of mine, http://www.geocities.com/serpentine_moon/questions , taken at 15:43 UTC.  This shows the most debris at any of the shots, and yet it is an hour and a half after the explosion ?

Love
Sha

----- Original Message -----
at : Neville Gibb <mailto:nev.gibb at ihug.co.nz>  
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle

Hi Sha

Could it be that the radar screens show EST rather than CST. There's an hour difference there. Just a thought. I haven't seen them.

Neville


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003


X-Sender: meso at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 10:59:25 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Mal Ninnes Subject: Re: aus-wx: BoM 16 level radar Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Paul, Nope, this doesn't apply to us. The 16-level upgrade of the BoM radar system (which occurred way back before June 2002) will not apply to GIF images available on the web. Only users of PC-Rapic and polar-format archive decoders will be able to see the new 16-scale reflectivity images. For us, the new 16-level data gets mapped back into the existing 6-level scale. Regards, Malcolm At 02:38 AM 2/9/03 +1030, you wrote: >Hi all, >Will ASWA members get access to BoM 16 level radar any time in the near future? >http://mirror.bom.gov.au/weather/radar/16level/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:23:07 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, >I think there is much claim now that other, unknown factors could have been >responsible for the Shuttle disaster. It will probably go into the bin of >all the other unexplained air accidents, whereby systems were found later to >have been in working order yet a tragedy still mysteriously occurred. You >only have to look up air accidents on any search engine and get truckloads >of reports. If you match these to where the moon was at location, I believe >a causality can be seen. > >Basically, when the moon is out of the sky it takes with it an airbulge, >akin to a water bulge of the seatide, creating a daily airtide; "in" when >the moon is overhead and "out" when the moon goes below the horizon. When >the moon is ON the horizon there is often a wind change, akin to the sea >change as the tide turns. When the moon is at maximum declination, lunar >equinox, perigee and apogee, as well as full and new moon times, and >especially when these factors combine together, certain consistent >atmospheric conditions can be expected. Personally, I think it is still too early to really know what happened. There is nothing wrong with speculating and have read many ideas floated about. Given the lack of evidence I have apart at various news articles, I think I will wait for NASA's findings on what they believe is the most probable cause and see if I agree with them. I hope they get a good idea otherwise the other 3 shuttles will be grounded indefinitely. >You say a "noticeable" air tide. This is the problem. We have not developed >instrumentation to notice it, as we have been preoccupied with the barometer >for 150 years. The barometer will not measure height of the atmosphere(cf >height of the sea= seatide), only weight of the atmosphere at any place, >which is not the same thing. The airtide is a change in atmospheric height, >which I claim can increase by up to 20% for instance during lunar perigee. I still have trouble accepting this theory in this current form and with your current evidence. Have not dismissed it totally but have trouble with some points. Without a doubt, there is an air tide, given that air can be seen as a liquid. However, air is much less dense than water (I think about 3 orders of magnitude), hence it's influence by the moon is extremely small, compared to the solar & other factors. Your claim of 'up to 20%' (25% on NZ forum) seems far too large to not be detected by satellites at space. Taking the moon & density of air into account, my napkin calculations of the air tide has it to vary by only .1% (at best but more likely 0.01%) between peaks and trough (ie ~100m assuming ~100km atmos). Given we already know that the solar has a big impact on the pressure tide, my napkin calc has the air tide to vary in the km, dwarfing any influence of the moon. In the SH, we can ignore the Coriolis when thinking about which way water spins down the sink, as it is several order of magnitude smaller than the other factors. at this, my reasoning is that the solar influence is too great compared to the moon's influence. And for implistic purposes, the moon's influence is not significant and can be ignored. >Sure, more work has to be done. Totally agree. >I have often in the past appealed to >authorities to start looking at the moon, but I get the same dogmatic >reaction as you have expressed elsewhere – that any notion that the moon has >any effect on anything to do with the atmosphere must be coming at a >nutter. Mainly because your theories can't be tested and/or don't pass the 'proof' requirement that other theories must go through, and/or evidence you have is too weak to back up your conclusions. >I get no funding at anyone. It is up to the tax-funded >organisations to do the work. One can scoff only after extensive >investigation into it, but not before. On the NZ forum, I noted you make some extraordinary claims, linking the full moon to menstral cycles, crime, mental patients, and others. I did a very quick check on Google and found that many research have been carried out to test these claims. http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/moon.html Best to let everyone else come to their own conclusions about these studies. Regards, tuan >Cheers > >Ken > >www.predictweather.com >snip +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:25:53 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, >>The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what >some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a >ride..It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat >clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them.." > >Tuan, it would be more honest to say that it was only your opinion. Some >have found that lunar forecasts work for them, Very true Ken (to "some have found that lunar forecasts work for them"). But I don't believe personal testimony or opinion would pass as scientific fact. My daily horoscope are generally damn accurate but I could never claim them to be anything but for entertainment value. I still stand by my claim that clim is best at lead time >14days (when a non-descriptive forecast has to be made). >... so you cannot speak for >everybody, a mistake some professional meteorologists seem to continually >make. Sue may indeed find what I said useful - and I am certainly not >rubbishing what YOU forecast based on BoM methods. I understand my limitations very well, hence could not give Sue a personal forecast but one by climatology instead (and gave very detail reason why this was so). If I gave her a personal forecast, I would have been taking her for a ride. I do not take credit for work done by others that showed no methods can beat clim at lead time >14days. I simply can find no flaw in their work and agree with their logic & conclusions, until new irrefuteable evidence is uncovered. Perhaps you may be interested in publishing your moon theory that improves or contradict their work. Until then, it is NOT my opinion, but scientific fact. >Perhaps you need to learn >that there are other approaches out there and that the BoM doesn't hold all >the answers. Of course BoM don't hold all answers. That would be naive of me. Many people around the world, including me, are constantly working on new forecast methods that may push the forecast limit beyond 14 days. Until I, or any one else publish contradictory, verifiable results, the status quo remains. >I suggest forget great fame and riches. Let's just have a simple but solid >test, your methods against mine.. Name a month and a town in Australia, well >beyond the reach of 14 days. You submit your forecast based on your averages >etc and I'll submit mine based on the moon. Let's look at day/dates for the >potential of expected rainfall for that location. Surely shouldn't be too >difficult for someone with access to all the data you say you have. Are you >game to put yourself on the line? Or are you just the latest spout off..? Done! Will do separate email to reduce clutter. tuan >cheers >Ken Ring >www.predictweather.com >snip +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:32:34 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Paul, I think you misunderstood/misread my email to Sue. Requests for forecasts months in advance is pretty common for the BoM and I was trying to help her understand the current limitations. >Ever heard the term "pride cometh before BIG fall"......? I look forward to >what the conditions will be. I though I had made it clear that research published by others have shown that NO forecast methods have been found to be superior to the climatology technique to date for lead time >14 days, giving the amount of details & numbers she was after. Yes this also include my 16-parameters Butterfly Oscillation Index (BOI). If you believe their work to be mathematically flawed, I encourage you to take it up with them. Pride has nothing to do with what I told Sue. I thought it was pretty clear that the numbers she got was based climatology and even showed her where it came at . Do you actually believe people forecast to 1 decimal place that far out??? I never mention that it was MY personal forecast. Plagarism would be the first thing I would be accused of if I try to claim the clim values as my very own. >I will sya one thing tho - did not Ken predict >back a few months ago about the current rain scenario in Qld / East Coast >etc? Huh??? I never predicted anything for Qld/East coast and have no idea about what Ken did. Irrevalant to this debate. >As for the moon - lets not have jibes at what other people believe. >YOU dont know it all..... even though you may think you do. No one can claim they know it all for any subject, and I never made any such claim. My basic understanding of the weather and its influence comes at classic Newtonian. Where that breaks down, quantum mechanics (Einstein) takes over. Work by Newton, and others before & after him have shown that effects of the moon on our weather is many order of magnitude smaller than other factors and thus can be ignored, just like the Coriolis when dealing with small scale. If you or others have scientific research that shows Newton's Laws are incorrect, I recommend they be verified & published. Then I would take back my words. I will even guarantee the responsible person the Nobel Prize in Physics, a similar prize to what I guarantee anyone who claims to have found a cure for cancer & AIDS. > If the moon has such an >effect on the massive bodies of water that cover this planet, then it must >have an effect on the weather. Illogical assumption without evidence. My basic understanding of gravity. Gravity is the interaction between 2 masses, the heavier the mass, the bigger the tug between the two. Water and land is dense enough to be affected by the moon's gravity, but air is too thin (several order of magnitude lower than water) to feel any effect. If I erred somewhere, do correct me. >Even a person with an inkling of science could agree with that...... No I don't. tuan >Paul ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tuan Phan" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 1:06 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > Hi Sue, > > To your query: > > >may I ask if you've been > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job > involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of the > Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated > under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & England. > All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL aviation > customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on average, > beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount > each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) > > >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're incorporating > lunar > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? > > The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a > ride. > > I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not inland. > Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar 22, > rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' > parameters are found here > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml > There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply the > clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. > > >You sound very > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities > Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. > For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: > > 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - persistence, > climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. > Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) > because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. > > 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say 1deg). > However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size of > the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead forecast > do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 > days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach > limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a particular > location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the climatology > technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is same > as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error value is > simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the interested > location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple > statistical program can work out what this value would be. > > 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for > 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, will > at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% > higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be > found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique apart > at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad odds. > > 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve the > expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly by > increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. In > summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting > anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! > > 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like the > first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have done > so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling deg > days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat climatology. > Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to > clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp > only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r > forecasts. > > 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who forecast > for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, combined > with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. > > Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It doesn't > mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected error. > Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. > > Best wishes, > tuan > > > > > >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so > >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? No > >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating lunar > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > >Suze =^. .^= > > > >snip > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: aus-wx: Moon vs Clim Challenge Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 14:12:33 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, I am willing to take up your challenge. Here are some the basic terms. 1. It is a test to see if forecasting by the moon is significantly better than climatology (and vice versa) at lead-time >14 days (and not BoM or me vs Moon). 2. To reduce possibility of chance, bias, bad luck factor, etc, the location for the forecasts will be: NZ – Auckland, Wellington & Christchurch Aus – Melbourne, Canberra & Sydney O/S – Any international capital you care to choose. Can be scrapped if >6 cities is too much. 3. You can nominate any arbitrators and/or verification technique you wish. 4. Forecast will be in this very basic in this form: City Date Min Max Rain lvl Eg NZAA 01/03/2003 15 22 0 or 1 or 2 or Melbourne Mar 1 2003 18 25 Yes * For rain level, 0 is no rain, 1 is <10mm and 2 is =>10 mm. If this is too complex, we can go with yes or no option which is fine with me. Starting date will be March 1, 2003 and will go for at least one full month (31 days) and hopefully 2 months (if you are up to it Ken). 5. Total forecasts will be 6 (cities) x 2 (min & max) x 2 or 3 (rain lvl) x 31 (days). 6. Total 744 forecasts with ‘Yes/No’ rain, 1116 forecasts with ‘0, 1 or 2’ rain lvl. 7. The actual observation will be at the official value as determined by the BoM and NZMetService. 8. There may not be enough evidence to support either side, and we both will have to accept this. 9. Judge/s (chosen by you) decision is final. Given the starting date is soon & you & I need time to prepare, the first few days of the forecast period need not be strictly >= 14 days. (but still must be at >9 days lead). Will be digging around for clim data especially NZ stuff. However, should not matter if I take a while to find it, as it is fixed already :) Ken, I will be out of the office till Wednesday. Looking forward to your reply. Hopefully you will be happy with these terms and we can start shortly. Regards, tuan +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: Cobar storm warning To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 14:51:56 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 09/02/2003 02:51:56 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com HI all. More storms firing up now. Cobar area, North Dubbo, south of orange.. Another interesting afternoon. TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST NSW SEVERE THUNDERSTORM ADVICE Issued at 2:31 PM Sunday 09 February 2003. The Bureau of Meteorology in SYDNEY has issued a Severe Thunderstorm Advice for people in the following weather forecast district: Upper Western east of a line at Wanaaring to Cobar and west of Brewarrina. ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.54.206.153] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 14:59:38 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2003 03:59:38.0465 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA832510:01C2CFEF] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Tony, that explains it.Been fairly quiet down there this summer.I can see some strong Cb tops through the smoke haze to our Southwest on the Brindabellas again (1pm Sunday) but I am not holding my breath as I think they will remain slow moving and on the Ranges again.Expect a severe T'storm Warning at B O M any time soon! Gavin SSWW Canberra > at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. >Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 09:20:38 +1100 > >At 10:52 PM 8/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: > >>Tony, You got nothing? What Suburb are you? > >Oh, I'm in Melbourne - SDS city this year. :-/ > >73 de Tony, VK3JED >http://vkradio.com > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.54.206.153] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cobar storm warning Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 15:02:57 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2003 04:02:58.0016 (UTC) FILETIME=[21743600:01C2CFF0] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com David, We have some activity on the Brindabellas (Ranges) now . while I don't think we will get them in Canberra there could be some severe Wx on the Ranges Gavin SSWW Canberra > at : David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Cobar storm warning >Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 14:51:56 +1100 > >HI all. > >More storms firing up now. Cobar area, North Dubbo, south of orange.. >Another interesting afternoon. > > > > > > TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST > NSW SEVERE THUNDERSTORM ADVICE > > Issued at 2:31 PM Sunday 09 February 2003. > > The Bureau of Meteorology in SYDNEY has issued a Severe Thunderstorm > Advice > for people in the following weather forecast district: > > Upper Western east of a line at Wanaaring to Cobar and west of > Brewarrina. > > > > > > > > >##################################################################################### >This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain >confidential >information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and >notify the >sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, >and are >not necessarily the views of Country Energy. >##################################################################################### > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: BoM 16 level radar Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 14:38:52 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Oh.... Bugger :( Regs, Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- at : "Mal Ninnes" To: Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 10:29 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: BoM 16 level radar > Hi Paul, > > Nope, this doesn't apply to us. The 16-level upgrade of the BoM radar > system (which occurred way back before June 2002) will not apply to GIF > images available on the web. Only users of PC-Rapic and polar-format > archive decoders will be able to see the new 16-scale reflectivity images. > For us, the new 16-level data gets mapped back into the existing 6-level > scale. > > Regards, > Malcolm > > > At 02:38 AM 2/9/03 +1030, you wrote: > >Hi all, > >Will ASWA members get access to BoM 16 level radar any time in the near > future? > >http://mirror.bom.gov.au/weather/radar/16level/ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: Bathurst storms 8 feb To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:09:17 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 09/02/2003 03:09:17 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. Bathurst storm yesterday afternoon was massive to all proportions. Flash Flooding in CBD area, lightning strikes knocked out alot of power around Bathurst, Blayney, Hill End, Sofala. Lightning also struck major zone substation. Many people still off this morning. It certainly was a site to have so much rain. Dave Bathurst. ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.54.206.153] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 15:11:38 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2003 04:11:38.0677 (UTC) FILETIME=[57CAC650:01C2CFF1] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Simon, You may not be able to see them but there are some large Cb tops in the Bimberi area of the Brindabellas and a line of large Cu along the main Range to our west. smoke haze has visibility below 35 km at present so clouds are hard to see. Gavin SSWW Canberra > at : "Simon Angell" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. >Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:04:41 +1100 > >well, about an hour after i typed this i got some flashes at the cells >near yass, also a spot of rain at the anvil. went to my mates house in >gungahlin saw a great inflow band streaching and estimated 10kms at the >core of the Yass storms. was of the NE edge and direction NE at the storm >(or SW into the storm if you like). It was heading N'ly at the time, so no >affect on my mates house except a few spots of rain at the anvil, and >perhaps 2 anvil crawlers. very dissapointing for me today. All in all, i >heard thunder 5 times, saw lightning 2 times, and had ~1mm of "rain" > >Simon > >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Simon Angell" >To: >Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:16 PM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > > > > I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day >in >a > > row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms > > really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual... > > Some shots are here > > www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/ > > > > Simon > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Gavin O'Brien" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:01 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > > > > > > > > > > hi all, > > > We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a severe >t'storm > > > moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern Canberra) It > > started > > > about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at the >south >to > > > 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg to >19.3 > > in > > > minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella Plains > > > recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B o m > > thinks > > > the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of streets >and > > > sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage lines >on > > the > > > hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as well >as > > > causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 hours of >data > > > when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old > > > thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of the >storm > > > with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west and we >are > > on > > > a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome. > > > Gavin O'Brien > > > Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T. > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.54.206.153] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Offtopic: Munich weather Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 15:16:52 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2003 04:16:52.0358 (UTC) FILETIME=[12C2B260:01C2CFF2] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Robert, My brother is currently in Berlin,While I realise Wx can vary in that distance your comments are welcome! Its 28 here in Canberra! Gavin SSWW Canberra > at : Robert Goler >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Offtopic: Munich weather >Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:16:09 +0100 (CET) > > >Hi all > >Given the amount of non-aussie weather related stuff appearing on the list >recently, I don't feel as guilty posting this here. :-) > >A bit over 2 weeks ago I moved to Munich, Germany to work at Munich >University, and needless to say, coming at Melbourne, the weather has >been different. During the past week, it has snowed on all but 1 day, >with at least 20-25cm in total falling (currently snowing as I write at >1pm). Having seen snow only twice in Australia (total depth of 2-3cm), it >has been a fantastic experience for me. The temperatures have been >consistently around or below 0°C, a bit of a shock coming at 30°C in >Melbourne. Last Saturday night was the coldest I experienced, with my >Kestrel 4000 (thanks to Australian Sky & Weather! >http://www.australianskynweather.com/) recording a -15°C on my walk home > at the train station. The wind chill was -20°C, which was entirely due >to my walking as there was no wind around. On the warmest day, the >temperature would've reached +7°C. > >The locals class a windy day here as one where the wind gusts to 10 >knots!!!! Since I have been here, there has only been 2 such days where >the wind would ruffle my hair....that is if I had any!!! :-) >The clouds here have been predominantly altostratus or stratus or >cirrostratus. That is, there has been absolutely no structure in them to >determine wind direction/shear, and nothing to take pictures of. There >have only been about 3-4 instances where the clouds were sort of >photogenic. I want that Melbourne strato-cu!!!! On the two days which >were free of low/mid level clouds to reveal cirrus, sundogs were easily >visible on either side of the sun. > >I have been amazed that despite the cold, snow and rain, heaps of people >still cycle to work or the train station, or to the shops. At the train >station near my house (which itself is on the western outskirts of Munich, >about 15km at the centre of town), 100-200 bikes are parked each day. >As of yesterday, I too have joined the clan....nothing like cycling with >the snow rushing in your face!! > >I should be hitting the ski slopes within the next few weeks since I am >fully equipped now with health insurance..... Regarding other things, I >came here with very little German speaking ability, and I have managed to >get around with few problems. The people are very polite and >understanding to foreigners, especially the women when you say "Du bist >shön", which means "You are beautiful"!!! A compliment does go a long >way, indeed!! The German beer is absolutely astounding.....way, way >better than aussie beer. If you weren't an alcoholic before coming to >Germany, you'll certainly leave as one!!!! ;-P > >I hope to put up some pics as soon as I can get my video camera connected >to my computer. > > >Cheers > >Rob > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 14:55:12 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >- we've all heard amazing stories about pieces of > straw/hay being embedded in wooden barns/walls etc Sorry, but I had to put this in... > Scientists at NASA built a gun specifically to launch dead chickens > at the windshields of airliners, military jets and the space shuttle, > all travelling at maximum velocity. The idea is to simulate the frequent > incidents of collisions with airborne fowl to test the strength of the > windshields. > British engineers heard about the gun and were eager to > test it on the windshields of their new high-speed trains. Arrangements > were made, and a gun was sent to the British engineers. When the gun > was fired, the engineers stood shocked as the chicken hurled out of the > barrel, crashed into the shatterproof shield, smashed it to > smithereens, blasted through the control console, snapped the > engineer's backrest in two and embedded itself in the back wall of the > cabin, like an arrow shot at a bow. > The horrified Brits sent NASA the disastrous results of the experiment, > along with the designs of the windshield and begged the US scientists > for suggestions. > > NASA responded with a one-line memo: "Defrost the chicken." :) Regs, Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tom Johnstone" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:58 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > At 02:04 PM 2/7/2003 +1000, David wrote: > > > > say they would not have been damaged by the foam) > > > >Don't think of foam as a peice of foam in your couch, but this stuff is very > >hard. It was also propelled by a Mach 2 airflow. So it wouldn't just bounce > >of the tiles, it would be rammed into them. They'll do wind tunnel testing no > >doubt to see what does happen to tiles hit by foam. > > NASA is indeed saying that the foam, which is extremely lightweight, would > most probably not caused much damage, and that there was no ice problem > that day. But I wonder - we've all heard amazing stories about pieces of > straw/hay being embedded in wooden barns/walls etc after the passage of a > cyclone or tornado, with equates to a wind of maybe 300-400 km/h. The force > of impact at the foam must have been much greater than that, given the > accelaration and velocity of the shuttle at the time. Any thoughts anyone? > > Tom > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: This list is . . . . Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:48:05 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Hilarious sometimes . . .  

 

Am I the only person who has been pissing themselves?

 

J

 

Peace Love and Mungbeans baby . . . .

 

James

 

James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

ph. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

 

Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:53:20 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: This list is . . . . Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
not yet, but you send me some of that stuff you been smokin' and i'll join in.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Sunday, 9 February 2003 3:40:08 PM
Subject: aus-wx: This list is . . . .
 

Hilarious sometimes . . .  

 

Am I the only person who has been pissing themselves?

 

J

 

Peace Love and Mungbeans baby . . . .

 

James

 

James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

ph. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

 

 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP100.gif: 00000001,0432f61f,00000000,00000000 Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 23:29:35 -0600 at : Tom Johnstone Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy X-Sender: itjohnstone at wiscmail.wisc.edu (Unverified) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com he he he. That's great. But seriously, if such a gun really exists, would they not have been able to use it to test the possible effect of foam hitting a wing during launch? Tom At 02:55 PM 2/9/2003 +1030, you wrote: > >- we've all heard amazing stories about pieces of > > straw/hay being embedded in wooden barns/walls etc > > >Sorry, but I had to put this in... > > > Scientists at NASA built a gun specifically to launch dead chickens > > at the windshields of airliners, military jets and the space shuttle, > > all travelling at maximum velocity. The idea is to simulate the frequent > > incidents of collisions with airborne fowl to test the strength of the > > windshields. > > British engineers heard about the gun and were eager to > > test it on the windshields of their new high-speed trains. Arrangements > > were made, and a gun was sent to the British engineers. When the gun > > was fired, the engineers stood shocked as the chicken hurled out of the > > barrel, crashed into the shatterproof shield, smashed it to > > smithereens, blasted through the control console, snapped the > > engineer's backrest in two and embedded itself in the back wall of the > > cabin, like an arrow shot at a bow. > > The horrified Brits sent NASA the disastrous results of the experiment, > > along with the designs of the windshield and begged the US scientists > > for suggestions. > > > > NASA responded with a one-line memo: "Defrost the chicken." > >:) > >Regs, Paul. >(Stargazer) >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tom Johnstone" >To: >Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:58 AM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > At 02:04 PM 2/7/2003 +1000, David wrote: > > > > > > say they would not have been damaged by the foam) > > > > > >Don't think of foam as a peice of foam in your couch, but this stuff is >very > > >hard. It was also propelled by a Mach 2 airflow. So it wouldn't just >bounce > > >of the tiles, it would be rammed into them. They'll do wind tunnel >testing no > > >doubt to see what does happen to tiles hit by foam. > > > > NASA is indeed saying that the foam, which is extremely lightweight, would > > most probably not caused much damage, and that there was no ice problem > > that day. But I wonder - we've all heard amazing stories about pieces of > > straw/hay being embedded in wooden barns/walls etc after the passage of a > > cyclone or tornado, with equates to a wind of maybe 300-400 km/h. The >force > > of impact at the foam must have been much greater than that, given the > > accelaration and velocity of the shuttle at the time. Any thoughts anyone? > > > > Tom > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Suze" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: El Nino Data Search (was SOI Data search...) Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:32:36 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Kevin, Grateful for your advice - and taken on board : ) It's hard to define my goal now, I put research down in 98 when diverted on a work project. I'd begun with an initial desire to forecast El Nino (like so many others), and then became side-tracked learning more about the physics of the planet first. One piece of fascinating info led to another and looking back it has all helped broaden my understanding of our homesphere in space. I realised early that the SOI stats were a bit of a weak correlation for El Nino/La Nina phases and effects; this prompted me to look for additional factors. I feel I can't ignore the SOI though; I still want to see it mesh with the machine, so to speak. I was under the impression the barometric pressure records had been manually kept at both Darwin and Tahiti since 1876 - providing ability to back-calculate the SOI data. But to be honest, I don't know the differences in 'calculating the SOI now' compared to 'back-calculating the SOI' - hence the significance is lost on me at the moment. What triggers an El Nino? Why do the trade winds falter and fail? At the moment I'm learning about length-of-day factors. I tend to wander into other sciences to check ideas on celestial/atmospheric/terrestrial interactions. Always something to learn about this big planet, and nothing in isolation at the rest - so it's a blast trying to figure out all the complex interactions! It would've been more appropriate to title the letter El Nino data search...sorry bout that. Regarding 'long-term', in weather forecasting clients I've spoken with are eager for a 6 to 24 month lead; with an exclusive group requesting a 10 year lead on violent weather. In research I'm looking at nested cycles with various periods; as climate change is a related area of interest of mine I'll tend to analyse data over thousands of years down to days... I enjoyed your rant Kevin : ) cheers... Suze -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Phyland Sent: Saturday, 8 February 2003 12:19 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: SOI Data search... Hi Suze et al, Before I start may I say that I speak ONLY as an interested amateur... SOIs are great...they tell you the average difference in atmospheric pressure between Tahiti and Darwin. They can't actually tell you much more unless you know the changes in SSTs in the Pacific at the same time. The Bureau's records of SOIs go back a fair way I admit but the vast majority of them were back-calculated after the 1970s when the interaction between the ocean currents and weather in Australia was first mooted. Going back beyond 1880 seems to be stretching some data beyond its reliability. Also, if "long-term" patterns or predictability is your goal, it begs the eternal question of what actually TRIGGERS an El Nino or La Nina event. Where you live (Logan) is susceptible to El Nino events on a regular basis but the majority of Australia historically has a poor record of SOI - drought correlation barring 1982-3 and the current one. I point you to the 1968 drought (in Victoria) etc... just poke through the numbers on the BoM site... "Long-term" has always been a bugbear for climatologists..I've harped on this before...how long is long enough to determine a trend? (How long is a piece of string?) An analysis of the SOIs was practically the first thing I did when the data became widely available...the correlations between low rainfall and low SOI TRENDS are positive for eastern Australia (particularly north of say Sydney...I'm not giving a limit here btw)...but for the rest of Australia it seems that many other factors need to be considered. The rainfall in south-eastern Australia during the growing season relies on (among other things) a coincidence between fronts and available moisture. The north-west rainbands that Victorians so love to see originate in the ocean off the NW coast of Australia and consequently the SSTs there are a large factor in the potential for moisture. I believe it is only in the last five years however that a link *may* have been established between the warming of the Eastern Pacific and the temperature changes in the ocean south of Indonesia. I'm yet to see any correlative data atm.. Where am I going here? The usual place. Statistics are a valid tool for many things. I don't believe that we have anywhere near enough data on temperature, pressure (and certainly SSTs and SOIs) to draw any conclusions pattern-wise about weather patterns that may have been occurring for thousands/millions or just tens of years. Having said that, it is totally appropriate to keep looking! Just don't try to draw too long a bow when saying A causes B... Sorry for the rant, Kevin at (a very dry) Wycheproof. > at : "Suze" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: RE: aus-wx: SOI Data search... >Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:37:42 +1000 > >Thanks, I'm familiar with BoM, great site they have. I'd pulled SOI tables > at the Long Paddock website a few years ago, didn't know BoM had them? A >mate just sent this link below...so I'll see if Warren Beck is available >for >some advice...perhaps info if I ask reeeely nicely : ) Oh, my location is >Logan, Qld, currently enjoying this cooler weather and the recent soaking >rains *refreshing... >Suze =^. .^= >'Corals Lock El Nino History in Radiocarbon' >http://www.newswise.com/articles/2001/10/CORALS.UAZ.html > > >-----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of >sgalow at ihug.com.au >Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 8:30 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > > >it depends >for australia it is at the bureau of met web site >http://www.bom.gov.au/ >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Suze" >To: >Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:02 PM >Subject: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > > > > Hi, > > I've been researching the SOI correlations part-time and am wanting to > > access data prior record-keeping c.1880's. I once brushed across a web > > article about potential historical El Nino data derived at coral >heads, > > but can't find the article now ... wondering if anyone here >might > > know of a resource available to help me? > > Suze =^. .^= > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Suze" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:32:38 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tuan ...you've spelt my name (Suze) incorrectly ; you may have me confused with the lady (Sue) who asked for the forecast? I appreciate you taking the time to reply so thoroughly, it helps me understand how professionals are approaching forecasting. Doesn't matter that your forecasts are enclosed within a private arena, I gather your peers and clients provide verification. Am I understanding you correctly, in that you're providing relatively detailed forecasts for your clients *weeks* in advance - such as the one you've shared for 22nd Mar Sydney; or are your regular client forecasts of a shorter length? In my weather forecasting research I tend to regard 14 days as short term, 12 weeks as mid-term, with long-term 6 to 24 months in advance. Is there an agreed definition of short, mid and long term utilised by meterologists? Thanks for your honest response on lunar factors; though I hold an opposing belief, we can agree to disagree, as too much time can be lost to debating preferred approaches. Besides which, if you achieve quality results without incorporating lunar factors, I appreciate you would feel there's no necessity to look any further. Yep, I understand why you've forecast those values for 22 Mar, and appreciate the tweaking allowance; thanks very much for explaining in such detail. Suze =^. .^= -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Tuan Phan Sent: Saturday, 8 February 2003 1:37 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Hi Sue, To your query: >may I ask if you've been >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of the Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & England. All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL aviation customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on average, beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're incorporating lunar >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a ride. I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not inland. Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar 22, rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' parameters are found here http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply the clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. >You sound very >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - persistence, climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say 1deg). However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size of the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead forecast do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a particular location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the climatology technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is same as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error value is simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the interested location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple statistical program can work out what this value would be. 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, will at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique apart at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad odds. 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve the expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly by increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. In summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like the first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have done so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling deg days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat climatology. Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r forecasts. 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who forecast for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, combined with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It doesn't mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected error. Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. Best wishes, tuan >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? No >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating lunar >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? >Suze =^. .^= >snip +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Chris Daley" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 17:19:28 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Guys, The thing you have to remember though Neville is that video has been shown now at California that shows smaller pieces coming away at the Shuttle which NASA have said that IF they were parts/panels/tiles coming off the Shuttle, the damage was already done. But, that is just conjecture at the moment as NASA haven't said yes or no as they are still analysing the tape. Chris ----- Original Message ----- at : "Neville Gibb" To: Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 10:00 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > Hi Tony and Ken > > I've also been mulling over Ken's theory a bit and have done a few rough > calculations. > > As mentioned, Feb 1st 'CST' was a New Moon when Columbia crossed the US. > > The shuttle was about 63km high, the atmosphere is about 100km high and the > earth is about 13,000km wide. At mach 18.6 the shuttle could cover 1,000km > in just a few minutes. > > In San Francisco the moon would not rise for further 1:57 hrs after the > shuttle had passed just to the north at 7:52am CST. However in just 8 > minutes the moon would be on the central Texas horizon. > > The shuttle would have followed a trajectory over Texas of Latitude 34°N to > 32°N, before it broke up at 8:00am CST. To view a moonrise at 8:00am CST on > Latitude 33°N, you would have to be on Longitude 99°W, or 2° west of Dallas > in Central North Texas. > > In other words, the time and location for moonrise, matched EXACTLY the time > and location that the shuttle broke apart. > > Just a little more food for thought. > > Neville > > > > at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 21:11:34 +1100 > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > > > At 10:43 PM 8/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > > > >> Basically, when the moon is out of the sky it takes with it an airbulge, > >> akin to a water bulge of the seatide, creating a daily airtide; "in" when > >> the moon is overhead and "out" when the moon goes below the horizon. When > >> the moon is ON the horizon there is often a wind change, akin to the sea > >> change as the tide turns. When the moon is at maximum declination, lunar > >> equinox, perigee and apogee, as well as full and new moon times, and > >> especially when these factors combine together, certain consistent > >> atmospheric conditions can be expected. > > > > This makes sense to me. Afterall, ocean tides and even land tides are well > > known phenomena. In other planetary systems, land tides are very > > noticeable (e.g. Io orbiting Jupiter) and can cause extreme heating > > effects. As the atmosphere is a lower density fluid than water, it is only > > common sense to expect it has tides. And as you maintain, such tides would > > not show up significantly on a ground based barometer, due to the balance > > of forces involved (I would expect a _minor_ variation in barometric > > pressure though, because the forces are probably not perfectly in balance > > on the ground). > > > >> You say a "noticeable" air tide. This is the problem. We have not developed > >> instrumentation to notice it, as we have been preoccupied with the barometer > >> for 150 years. The barometer will not measure height of the atmosphere(cf > >> height of the sea= seatide), only weight of the atmosphere at any place, > >> which is not the same thing. The airtide is a change in atmospheric height, > >> which I claim can increase by up to 20% for instance during lunar perigee. > > > > The upper atmosphere is also subject to a number of variables. Lunar tides > > are only one. Solar activity is another (it's a known fact that Skylab was > > brought down to Earth earlier than expected due to a period of significant > > solar activity before its re-entry. Lunar tide measurements would have to > > take these into account... One crude way of detecting lunar tides might be > > to measure the drag on very low Earth orbiting satellites (could this be > > done using GPS?). ISS might be another possibility, since it's affected > > by atmospheric drag (and also had on board thrusters to maintain its orbit). > > > >> The Shuttle disaster occurred at a combination of new moon and southern > >> declination; both times of a heavier airtide in the northern > >> hemisphere(opposite hemispheres to declinations create higher tides). It > >> also occurred near the hour of moonrise. This may or may not have been > >> factorial, but is certainly very much in line with other so far unexplained > >> air mishaps. > > > > I can see it being a factor that affects the deceleration of the shuttle > > (and therefore the peak temperature). Certainly more investigation needed > > on how different upper atmospheric "profiles" affect re-entry. > > > >> Sure, more work has to be done. I have often in the past appealed to > >> authorities to start looking at the moon, but I get the same dogmatic > >> reaction as you have expressed elsewhere ­ that any notion that the moon has > >> any effect on anything to do with the atmosphere must be coming at a > >> nutter. I get no funding at anyone. It is up to the tax-funded > >> organisations to do the work. One can scoff only after extensive > >> investigation into it, but not before. > > > > > > Ken, while I haven't agrees with all of your theories, I do believe there > > is something in this that warrants investigation. My gut feeling (OK, > > unscientific :) ) says that a high lunar tide alone is probably not enough > > to cause a disaster like Columbia, but I can certainly see how it could > > exacerbate the effects of a fault with the shuttle itself (by causing > > higher than expected heating against a damaged heat shield, for instance). > > > > The worst case scenario I can see is where a spacecraft commences re-entry > > at a point of relatively "low tide". If it is travelling at a lower tide > > area to a higher tide area (as it moved around the Earth), the air density > > will increase faster than expected with time, so re-entry temperatures will > > be a bit higher (because the spacecraft hits denser air at a faster > > velocity). I hope NASA takes this possibility into account when they do > > their calculations. :-) > > > > Anyway, just mulling over Ken's theory a bit. I don't know how much this > > would be a factor. > > > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino Data Search (was SOI Data search...) Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 19:35:41 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi what about the 11 year sun spot cycle giving rise to a strong el nino in the following year? (i.e 1971, 1982, 1993 and now next year 2004 ?), first told to me by Neil Cherry of Lincoln Univeristy in 1988. Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Suze" To: Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 6:32 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: El Nino Data Search (was SOI Data search...) > Hi Kevin, > Grateful for your advice - and taken on board : ) > > It's hard to define my goal now, I put research down in 98 when diverted on > a work project. I'd begun with an initial desire to forecast El Nino (like > so many others), and then became side-tracked learning more about the > physics of the planet first. One piece of fascinating info led to another > and looking back it has all helped broaden my understanding of our > homesphere in space. > > I realised early that the SOI stats were a bit of a weak correlation for El > Nino/La Nina phases and effects; this prompted me to look for additional > factors. I feel I can't ignore the SOI though; I still want to see it mesh > with the machine, so to speak. I was under the impression the barometric > pressure records had been manually kept at both Darwin and Tahiti since > 1876 - providing ability to back-calculate the SOI data. But to be honest, I > don't know the differences in 'calculating the SOI now' compared to > 'back-calculating the SOI' - hence the significance is lost on me at the > moment. > > What triggers an El Nino? Why do the trade winds falter and fail? > At the moment I'm learning about length-of-day factors. I tend to wander > into other sciences to check ideas on celestial/atmospheric/terrestrial > interactions. Always something to learn about this big planet, and nothing > in isolation at the rest - so it's a blast trying to figure out all the > complex interactions! > > It would've been more appropriate to title the letter El Nino data > search...sorry bout that. > > Regarding 'long-term', in weather forecasting clients I've spoken with are > eager for a 6 to 24 month lead; with an exclusive group requesting a 10 year > lead on violent weather. In research I'm looking at nested cycles with > various periods; as climate change is a related area of interest of mine > I'll tend to analyse data over thousands of years down to days... > > I enjoyed your rant Kevin : ) > cheers... > Suze > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Phyland > Sent: Saturday, 8 February 2003 12:19 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: RE: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > > > Hi Suze et al, > > Before I start may I say that I speak ONLY as an interested amateur... > > SOIs are great...they tell you the average difference in atmospheric > pressure between Tahiti and Darwin. They can't actually tell you much more > unless you know the changes in SSTs in the Pacific at the same time. > > The Bureau's records of SOIs go back a fair way I admit but the vast > majority of them were back-calculated after the 1970s when the interaction > between the ocean currents and weather in Australia was first mooted. > > Going back beyond 1880 seems to be stretching some data beyond its > reliability. Also, if "long-term" patterns or predictability is your goal, > it begs the eternal question of what actually TRIGGERS an El Nino or La Nina > event. > > Where you live (Logan) is susceptible to El Nino events on a regular basis > but the majority of Australia historically has a poor record of SOI - > drought correlation barring 1982-3 and the current one. I point you to the > 1968 drought (in Victoria) etc... just poke through the numbers on the BoM > site... > > "Long-term" has always been a bugbear for climatologists..I've harped on > this before...how long is long enough to determine a trend? (How long is a > piece of string?) > > An analysis of the SOIs was practically the first thing I did when the data > became widely available...the correlations between low rainfall and low SOI > TRENDS are positive for eastern Australia (particularly north of say > Sydney...I'm not giving a limit here btw)...but for the rest of Australia it > seems that many other factors need to be considered. > > The rainfall in south-eastern Australia during the growing season relies on > (among other things) a coincidence between fronts and available moisture. > The north-west rainbands that Victorians so love to see originate in the > ocean off the NW coast of Australia and consequently the SSTs there are a > large factor in the potential for moisture. I believe it is only in the last > five years however that a link *may* have been established between the > warming of the Eastern Pacific and the temperature changes in the ocean > south of Indonesia. I'm yet to see any correlative data atm.. > > Where am I going here? > > The usual place. Statistics are a valid tool for many things. I don't > believe that we have anywhere near enough data on temperature, pressure (and > certainly SSTs and SOIs) to draw any conclusions pattern-wise about weather > patterns that may have been occurring for thousands/millions or just tens of > years. > > Having said that, it is totally appropriate to keep looking! Just don't try > to draw too long a bow when saying A causes B... > > > Sorry for the rant, > Kevin at (a very dry) Wycheproof. > > > > > > > > > at : "Suze" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > >Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:37:42 +1000 > > > >Thanks, I'm familiar with BoM, great site they have. I'd pulled SOI tables > > at the Long Paddock website a few years ago, didn't know BoM had them? A > >mate just sent this link below...so I'll see if Warren Beck is available > >for > >some advice...perhaps info if I ask reeeely nicely : ) Oh, my location is > >Logan, Qld, currently enjoying this cooler weather and the recent soaking > >rains *refreshing... > >Suze =^. .^= > >'Corals Lock El Nino History in Radiocarbon' > >http://www.newswise.com/articles/2001/10/CORALS.UAZ.html > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of > >sgalow at ihug.com.au > >Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 8:30 PM > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > > > > > >it depends > >for australia it is at the bureau of met web site > >http://www.bom.gov.au/ > >----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Suze" > >To: > >Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:02 PM > >Subject: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > > > > > > > Hi, > > > I've been researching the SOI correlations part-time and am wanting to > > > access data prior record-keeping c.1880's. I once brushed across a web > > > article about potential historical El Nino data derived at coral > >heads, > > > but can't find the article now ... wondering if anyone here > >might > > > know of a resource available to help me? > > > Suze =^. .^= > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: aus-wx: barometer offset or QFE? Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 19:38:54 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi everyone
 
I have had arguments over this before.
For personal weather stations (i.e electronic) and the gathering of that data by a PC and software, such as
 
should a simple barometer offset to give MSL pressurer, based on your nearest metar reading be enough, or should you be using QFE adjusted reading, based on your altitude (and your last 12 hour temperature, etc).
That option is available in the above software
 
thanks!
Cheers
Brian
at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: This list is . . . . Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 19:42:38 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
if you are refering to the moon stuff, I hope people dont belive i think the moon CONTROLS the weather as Ken does.
But i do think there maybe a pontential influence,
i.e, if there is a weather system around that will bring unsettled weather when ken says rain, then the weather will be more unsettled than normal forecasts would predict , and vice versa (i.e sometimes the forecast overshoots or undershoots what actualy eventuates, and maybe the moon is to blame....).
But it could be all codswallup!
Cheers
Brian
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: aus-wx: This list is . . . .

Hilarious sometimes . . .  

 

Am I the only person who has been pissing themselves?

 

J

 

Peace Love and Mungbeans baby . . . .

 

James

 

James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

ph. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

 

at : David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: storms To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 17:57:43 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 09/02/2003 05:57:42 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com HI. Storms around Oberon area. A few lightning strikes hitting poles. Faults around Dubbo/Wellington/Coonabarabran. More to follow. Dave ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: El Nino Data Search (was SOI Data search...) Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:17:37 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Suze, If you are interested I can send you the PowerPoint presentation I gave at the ASWA AGM last year (I don't know if you were there..I suspect not). It generally addresses El Nino, and also specifically addresses correlations of rainfall (Sydney) and thunderstorm occurrence (Seven Hills, where I live). Might show other things useful to you although it wasn't an attempt at forecasting future trends. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Suze" To: Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 4:32 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: El Nino Data Search (was SOI Data search...) Hi Kevin, Grateful for your advice - and taken on board : ) It's hard to define my goal now, I put research down in 98 when diverted on a work project. I'd begun with an initial desire to forecast El Nino (like so many others), and then became side-tracked learning more about the physics of the planet first. One piece of fascinating info led to another and looking back it has all helped broaden my understanding of our homesphere in space. I realised early that the SOI stats were a bit of a weak correlation for El Nino/La Nina phases and effects; this prompted me to look for additional factors. I feel I can't ignore the SOI though; I still want to see it mesh with the machine, so to speak. I was under the impression the barometric pressure records had been manually kept at both Darwin and Tahiti since 1876 - providing ability to back-calculate the SOI data. But to be honest, I don't know the differences in 'calculating the SOI now' compared to 'back-calculating the SOI' - hence the significance is lost on me at the moment. What triggers an El Nino? Why do the trade winds falter and fail? At the moment I'm learning about length-of-day factors. I tend to wander into other sciences to check ideas on celestial/atmospheric/terrestrial interactions. Always something to learn about this big planet, and nothing in isolation at the rest - so it's a blast trying to figure out all the complex interactions! It would've been more appropriate to title the letter El Nino data search...sorry bout that. Regarding 'long-term', in weather forecasting clients I've spoken with are eager for a 6 to 24 month lead; with an exclusive group requesting a 10 year lead on violent weather. In research I'm looking at nested cycles with various periods; as climate change is a related area of interest of mine I'll tend to analyse data over thousands of years down to days... I enjoyed your rant Kevin : ) cheers... Suze -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Phyland Sent: Saturday, 8 February 2003 12:19 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: SOI Data search... Hi Suze et al, Before I start may I say that I speak ONLY as an interested amateur... SOIs are great...they tell you the average difference in atmospheric pressure between Tahiti and Darwin. They can't actually tell you much more unless you know the changes in SSTs in the Pacific at the same time. The Bureau's records of SOIs go back a fair way I admit but the vast majority of them were back-calculated after the 1970s when the interaction between the ocean currents and weather in Australia was first mooted. Going back beyond 1880 seems to be stretching some data beyond its reliability. Also, if "long-term" patterns or predictability is your goal, it begs the eternal question of what actually TRIGGERS an El Nino or La Nina event. Where you live (Logan) is susceptible to El Nino events on a regular basis but the majority of Australia historically has a poor record of SOI - drought correlation barring 1982-3 and the current one. I point you to the 1968 drought (in Victoria) etc... just poke through the numbers on the BoM site... "Long-term" has always been a bugbear for climatologists..I've harped on this before...how long is long enough to determine a trend? (How long is a piece of string?) An analysis of the SOIs was practically the first thing I did when the data became widely available...the correlations between low rainfall and low SOI TRENDS are positive for eastern Australia (particularly north of say Sydney...I'm not giving a limit here btw)...but for the rest of Australia it seems that many other factors need to be considered. The rainfall in south-eastern Australia during the growing season relies on (among other things) a coincidence between fronts and available moisture. The north-west rainbands that Victorians so love to see originate in the ocean off the NW coast of Australia and consequently the SSTs there are a large factor in the potential for moisture. I believe it is only in the last five years however that a link *may* have been established between the warming of the Eastern Pacific and the temperature changes in the ocean south of Indonesia. I'm yet to see any correlative data atm.. Where am I going here? The usual place. Statistics are a valid tool for many things. I don't believe that we have anywhere near enough data on temperature, pressure (and certainly SSTs and SOIs) to draw any conclusions pattern-wise about weather patterns that may have been occurring for thousands/millions or just tens of years. Having said that, it is totally appropriate to keep looking! Just don't try to draw too long a bow when saying A causes B... Sorry for the rant, Kevin at (a very dry) Wycheproof. > at : "Suze" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: RE: aus-wx: SOI Data search... >Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:37:42 +1000 > >Thanks, I'm familiar with BoM, great site they have. I'd pulled SOI tables > at the Long Paddock website a few years ago, didn't know BoM had them? A >mate just sent this link below...so I'll see if Warren Beck is available >for >some advice...perhaps info if I ask reeeely nicely : ) Oh, my location is >Logan, Qld, currently enjoying this cooler weather and the recent soaking >rains *refreshing... >Suze =^. .^= >'Corals Lock El Nino History in Radiocarbon' >http://www.newswise.com/articles/2001/10/CORALS.UAZ.html > > >-----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of >sgalow at ihug.com.au >Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 8:30 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > > >it depends >for australia it is at the bureau of met web site >http://www.bom.gov.au/ >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Suze" >To: >Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:02 PM >Subject: aus-wx: SOI Data search... > > > > Hi, > > I've been researching the SOI correlations part-time and am wanting to > > access data prior record-keeping c.1880's. I once brushed across a web > > article about potential historical El Nino data derived at coral >heads, > > but can't find the article now ... wondering if anyone here >might > > know of a resource available to help me? > > Suze =^. .^= > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: barometer offset or QFE? Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:20:20 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I always set my barograph/barometer  to MSL. I don't think either approach is wrong..it depends what you want to use it for, as long as the setting (reading) is correct for the choice made.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 5:38 PM
Subject: aus-wx: barometer offset or QFE?

Hi everyone
 
I have had arguments over this before.
For personal weather stations (i.e electronic) and the gathering of that data by a PC and software, such as
 
should a simple barometer offset to give MSL pressurer, based on your nearest metar reading be enough, or should you be using QFE adjusted reading, based on your altitude (and your last 12 hour temperature, etc).
That option is available in the above software
 
thanks!
Cheers
Brian
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 18:36:22 +1100 at : Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: barometer offset or QFE? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Refer to the "thickness" threads in TWC's forums, there has been "EXTENSIVE" discussion of this issue there. Essentially, all the station can measure is station pressure, QFE if you like. Conversion to to a quasi QNH is a subject on it's own. BoM stations' QNH are calculated based on long term climatalogical data, which a home station does not have, obviously. The only other way to do it is to use a standard calculation based on the station elevation and either the assumed adiabatic rate, or, some custom fudge generated depending on local temperature and an assumed adiabatic, not necessarily the standard dry 10 C / km. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 22:14:48 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy at : Neville Gibb To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id FAA00835 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Chris True, and I acknowledge that problems were first noticed at 7:52am over the Californian coast. I'm not suggesting the moon was the cause and the shuttle was probably already doomed, but maybe the moon just provided the catalyst. Also worth noting is the Sun rose about 30 minutes before the Moon which of course gives us the gravitational combo that produces Spring Tides. Ken states air-tides occur within 1 hr of moonrise/set, so given the Suns position and the shuttles height, maybe we could allow a little more leeway. All just 'smoking gun' stuff, of course - interesting though! Cheers Neville > at : "Chris Daley" > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 17:19:28 +1100 > To: > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > Hi Guys, > > The thing you have to remember though Neville is that video has been shown > now at California that shows smaller pieces coming away at the Shuttle > which NASA have said that IF they were parts/panels/tiles coming off the > Shuttle, the damage was already done. But, that is just conjecture at the > moment as NASA haven't said yes or no as they are still analysing the tape. > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Neville Gibb" > To: > Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 10:00 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy > > >> Hi Tony and Ken >> >> I've also been mulling over Ken's theory a bit and have done a few rough >> calculations. >> >> As mentioned, Feb 1st 'CST' was a New Moon when Columbia crossed the US. >> >> The shuttle was about 63km high, the atmosphere is about 100km high and > the >> earth is about 13,000km wide. At mach 18.6 the shuttle could cover 1,000km >> in just a few minutes. >> >> In San Francisco the moon would not rise for further 1:57 hrs after the >> shuttle had passed just to the north at 7:52am CST. However in just 8 >> minutes the moon would be on the central Texas horizon. >> >> The shuttle would have followed a trajectory over Texas of Latitude 34°N > to >> 32°N, before it broke up at 8:00am CST. To view a moonrise at 8:00am CST > on >> Latitude 33°N, you would have to be on Longitude 99°W, or 2° west of > Dallas >> in Central North Texas. >> >> In other words, the time and location for moonrise, matched EXACTLY the > time >> and location that the shuttle broke apart. >> >> Just a little more food for thought. >> >> Neville >> >> >>> at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" >>> Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 21:11:34 +1100 >>> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>> Subject: Re: aus-wx: My view of the Columbia Shuttle tragedy >>> >>> At 10:43 PM 8/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: >>> >>>> Basically, when the moon is out of the sky it takes with it an > airbulge, >>>> akin to a water bulge of the seatide, creating a daily airtide; "in" > when >>>> the moon is overhead and "out" when the moon goes below the horizon. > When >>>> the moon is ON the horizon there is often a wind change, akin to the > sea >>>> change as the tide turns. When the moon is at maximum declination, > lunar >>>> equinox, perigee and apogee, as well as full and new moon times, and >>>> especially when these factors combine together, certain consistent >>>> atmospheric conditions can be expected. >>> >>> This makes sense to me. Afterall, ocean tides and even land tides are > well >>> known phenomena. In other planetary systems, land tides are very >>> noticeable (e.g. Io orbiting Jupiter) and can cause extreme heating >>> effects. As the atmosphere is a lower density fluid than water, it is > only >>> common sense to expect it has tides. And as you maintain, such tides > would >>> not show up significantly on a ground based barometer, due to the > balance >>> of forces involved (I would expect a _minor_ variation in barometric >>> pressure though, because the forces are probably not perfectly in > balance >>> on the ground). >>> >>>> You say a "noticeable" air tide. This is the problem. We have not > developed >>>> instrumentation to notice it, as we have been preoccupied with the > barometer >>>> for 150 years. The barometer will not measure height of the > atmosphere(cf >>>> height of the sea= seatide), only weight of the atmosphere at any > place, >>>> which is not the same thing. The airtide is a change in atmospheric > height, >>>> which I claim can increase by up to 20% for instance during lunar > perigee. >>> >>> The upper atmosphere is also subject to a number of variables. Lunar > tides >>> are only one. Solar activity is another (it's a known fact that Skylab > was >>> brought down to Earth earlier than expected due to a period of > significant >>> solar activity before its re-entry. Lunar tide measurements would have > to >>> take these into account... One crude way of detecting lunar tides might > be >>> to measure the drag on very low Earth orbiting satellites (could this be >>> done using GPS?). ISS might be another possibility, since it's > affected >>> by atmospheric drag (and also had on board thrusters to maintain its > orbit). >>> >>>> The Shuttle disaster occurred at a combination of new moon and southern >>>> declination; both times of a heavier airtide in the northern >>>> hemisphere(opposite hemispheres to declinations create higher tides). > It >>>> also occurred near the hour of moonrise. This may or may not have been >>>> factorial, but is certainly very much in line with other so far > unexplained >>>> air mishaps. >>> >>> I can see it being a factor that affects the deceleration of the shuttle >>> (and therefore the peak temperature). Certainly more investigation > needed >>> on how different upper atmospheric "profiles" affect re-entry. >>> >>>> Sure, more work has to be done. I have often in the past appealed to >>>> authorities to start looking at the moon, but I get the same dogmatic >>>> reaction as you have expressed elsewhere ­ that any notion that the > moon has >>>> any effect on anything to do with the atmosphere must be coming at a >>>> nutter. I get no funding at anyone. It is up to the tax-funded >>>> organisations to do the work. One can scoff only after extensive >>>> investigation into it, but not before. >>> >>> >>> Ken, while I haven't agrees with all of your theories, I do believe > there >>> is something in this that warrants investigation. My gut feeling (OK, >>> unscientific :) ) says that a high lunar tide alone is probably not > enough >>> to cause a disaster like Columbia, but I can certainly see how it could >>> exacerbate the effects of a fault with the shuttle itself (by causing >>> higher than expected heating against a damaged heat shield, for > instance). >>> >>> The worst case scenario I can see is where a spacecraft commences > re-entry >>> at a point of relatively "low tide". If it is travelling at a lower > tide >>> area to a higher tide area (as it moved around the Earth), the air > density >>> will increase faster than expected with time, so re-entry temperatures > will >>> be a bit higher (because the spacecraft hits denser air at a faster >>> velocity). I hope NASA takes this possibility into account when they do >>> their calculations. :-) >>> >>> Anyway, just mulling over Ken's theory a bit. I don't know how much > this >>> would be a factor. >>> >>> >>> 73 de Tony, VK3JED >>> http://vkradio.com >>> >>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com >>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >>> message. >>> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >>> >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:14:56 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle
Thanks Neville ... I'm adding to it all the time.
 
love
Sha
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle

Hi Sha

Thanks for URL. Great site! Wasn't getting at you about the times. I've just found it seems to be a fairly common mistake. You've certainly provided a lot of interesting food for thought. Keep it up!
:)
Cheers

Neville
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 19:15:23 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're living X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Both Sydney and Melbourne have been my homes in the past and both have greater ranges than Hong Kong where I live now. My personal lowest temperature was an unofficial one of -12C on a max/min thermometer attached to a tentpole in the camping ground near Yarangobilly NSW donkeys years ago (possibly late 1960s but more likely early 1970's). I was in the next tent and the milk froze so we had to peel off the carton and slice it with the breadknife to add it to our cuppa. My highest was reported on the radio that day as 48C in the shade up in NW Western Australia on a day I was driving about 1000 km (1972 I think). The thermometer in my Mistubishi Colt sat on 60C for several hours and we each drank ten litres of water. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "Bussy" To: Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:21:49 +1100 Subject: Re: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're living > Here where I live goes well below zero in winter and into the 40's in > summer. > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tom Johnstone" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 3:39 AM > Subject: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're > living > > > > Here's my current situation: > > > > My current residence: Madison, Wisconsin, USA > > Feb 7th min. temp : -20C > > > > My home town: Perth, WA, Australia > > Feb 7th max temp: +36C > > > > Difference: 56C !!!! > > > > > > My record: > > > > Madison, WI, Dec 25th, 2000, min temp: -29.4C > > Perth, WA, Dec 25th, 2000, max temp: 38.7c > > Difference: 68.1C !!!!! > > > > > > Anyone got some good ones? It could be temp -related, or rain, or > wind > etc. > > > > Tom > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.29.139] at : "James Harris" To: Subject: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 22:45:50 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2003 11:45:53.0404 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCE013C0:01C2D030] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle
Evening All,

We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst area yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at

Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports at the last two months.

James H
at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 00:58:31 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I did see one at 3pm on the way to work, but that haze was giving me the s#!ts. got to see a few flashes of purple lightning during a quick break at work at 10pm, ust got home and checked the radar and storm tracker, more stuff to the west, slowly coming this way, i could get to see a decent light show after all. Cheers --------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra, ACT www.canberra-wx.com *NEW*- A Small WAP service, Current wx, forecast For Canberra For mobile phones with WAP. http://wap.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------- Proud member of the Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au ***WEBSITE UPDATE*** Redesign is going good, and i *could* have the new product ready shortly. However - Im am now playing with CSS and this means a few more weeks wait. the final product will be much better though! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 3:11 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > Simon, > You may not be able to see them but there are some large Cb tops in the > Bimberi area of the Brindabellas and a line of large Cu along the main Range > to our west. smoke haze has visibility below 35 km at present so clouds are > hard to see. > Gavin > SSWW Canberra > > > > > > > > at : "Simon Angell" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > >Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:04:41 +1100 > > > >well, about an hour after i typed this i got some flashes at the cells > >near yass, also a spot of rain at the anvil. went to my mates house in > >gungahlin saw a great inflow band streaching and estimated 10kms at the > >core of the Yass storms. was of the NE edge and direction NE at the storm > >(or SW into the storm if you like). It was heading N'ly at the time, so no > >affect on my mates house except a few spots of rain at the anvil, and > >perhaps 2 anvil crawlers. very dissapointing for me today. All in all, i > >heard thunder 5 times, saw lightning 2 times, and had ~1mm of "rain" > > > >Simon > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Simon Angell" > >To: > >Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:16 PM > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > > > > > > > I could see the development at here, unfotunately for the second day > >in > >a > > > row, NW Canberra got nothing - not even a drop of rain here. the storms > > > really broke up over the bindabella's as per usual... > > > Some shots are here > > > www.canberra-wx.com/tempfiles/today/ > > > > > > Simon > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > at : "Gavin O'Brien" > > > To: > > > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:01 PM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Severe Thunderstorm Gilmore A.C.T. Friday afternoon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi all, > > > > We had our first recorded rainfall since 2nd January when a severe > >t'storm > > > > moved northeast across the Tuggeranong Valley (Southern Canberra) It > > > started > > > > about 4.10 pm 21.5mm fell in 7-8 minutes with wind gusts at the > >south > >to > > > > 66km/hr and small hail.Temperature fell at the max of 33.3 deg to > >19.3 > > > in > > > > minutes but rise again to 26.5 by 5.30 pm. A chap at Isabella Plains > > > > recorded 22 mm . THe tuggeranong AWS only recorded 5.6 mm but B o m > > > thinks > > > > the raingauge was blocked. There was local flash flooding of streets > >and > > > > sheet runoff on the hills leading to some mud flows in drainage lines > >on > > > the > > > > hills.Lightning strikes put the local TV Translators off air as well > >as > > > > causing our weather station computor to 'lockup' .We lost 3 hours of > >data > > > > when power failed to the data logger-thank heavens for the old > > > > thermohygoraph and anolog aneometer! we would have no record of the > >storm > > > > with out them as backup.There are some severe T'storms to west and we > >are > > > on > > > > a severe Thunderstorm Watch.Any other reports welcome. > > > > Gavin O'Brien > > > > Southside Weather Watch Canberra A.C.T. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > > message. > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 01:03:53 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle
As per usual, SSC have done a fantatic job, safe to say you guys didn't attend the ASWA meeting then? would have been a small turnout i reckon, lol
 
Simon
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 10:45 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003

Evening All,

We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst area yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at

Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports at the last two months.

James H
at : "Phillip Basil-Jones" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 01:19:23 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Columbia Shuttle
11 ppl came. Wasn't much to talk about either.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003

As per usual, SSC have done a fantatic job, safe to say you guys didn't attend the ASWA meeting then? would have been a small turnout i reckon, lol
 
Simon
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 10:45 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003

Evening All,

We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst area yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at

Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports at the last two months.

James H
at : "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 02:59:29 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tuan, The amount of 'tug' as you put it, also has rather a lot to do with distance between the masses, and while the Sun is a much larger mass than the Moon, it is a hell of lot further away. Thus, due to the proximity of the Moon, it has much greater influence on sea tides than the Sun. While the tug on air may well be a lot less than the tug on water, one thing is certain, i.e., the tug due to the moon is proportionally greater on it than the tug due to the sun, so the air tide due to the moon is obviously going to be much greater also. John. >snip My basic understanding of gravity. Gravity is the interaction between 2 masses, the heavier the mass, the bigger the tug between the two. Water and land is dense enough to be affected by the moon's gravity, but air is too thin (several order of magnitude lower than water) to feel any effect. If I erred somewhere, do correct me. >snip I still have trouble accepting this theory in this current form and with your current evidence. Have not dismissed it totally but have trouble with some points. Without a doubt, there is an air tide, given that air can be seen as a liquid. However, air is much less dense than water (I think about 3 orders of magnitude), hence it's influence by the moon is extremely small, compared to the solar & other factors. Your claim of 'up to 20%' (25% on NZ forum) seems far too large to not be detected by satellites at space. Taking the moon & density of air into account, my napkin calculations of the air tide has it to vary by only .1% (at best but more likely 0.01%) between peaks and trough (ie ~100m assuming ~100km atmos). Given we already know that the solar has a big impact on the pressure tide, my napkin calc has the air tide to vary in the km, dwarfing any influence of the moon. -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Tuan Phan Sent: Sunday, 9 February 2003 12:33 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather Paul, I think you misunderstood/misread my email to Sue. Requests for forecasts months in advance is pretty common for the BoM and I was trying to help her understand the current limitations. >Ever heard the term "pride cometh before BIG fall"......? I look forward to >what the conditions will be. I though I had made it clear that research published by others have shown that NO forecast methods have been found to be superior to the climatology technique to date for lead time >14 days, giving the amount of details & numbers she was after. Yes this also include my 16-parameters Butterfly Oscillation Index (BOI). If you believe their work to be mathematically flawed, I encourage you to take it up with them. Pride has nothing to do with what I told Sue. I thought it was pretty clear that the numbers she got was based climatology and even showed her where it came at . Do you actually believe people forecast to 1 decimal place that far out??? I never mention that it was MY personal forecast. Plagarism would be the first thing I would be accused of if I try to claim the clim values as my very own. >I will sya one thing tho - did not Ken predict >back a few months ago about the current rain scenario in Qld / East Coast >etc? Huh??? I never predicted anything for Qld/East coast and have no idea about what Ken did. Irrevalant to this debate. >As for the moon - lets not have jibes at what other people believe. >YOU dont know it all..... even though you may think you do. No one can claim they know it all for any subject, and I never made any such claim. My basic understanding of the weather and its influence comes at classic Newtonian. Where that breaks down, quantum mechanics (Einstein) takes over. Work by Newton, and others before & after him have shown that effects of the moon on our weather is many order of magnitude smaller than other factors and thus can be ignored, just like the Coriolis when dealing with small scale. If you or others have scientific research that shows Newton's Laws are incorrect, I recommend they be verified & published. Then I would take back my words. I will even guarantee the responsible person the Nobel Prize in Physics, a similar prize to what I guarantee anyone who claims to have found a cure for cancer & AIDS. > If the moon has such an >effect on the massive bodies of water that cover this planet, then it must >have an effect on the weather. Illogical assumption without evidence. My basic understanding of gravity. Gravity is the interaction between 2 masses, the heavier the mass, the bigger the tug between the two. Water and land is dense enough to be affected by the moon's gravity, but air is too thin (several order of magnitude lower than water) to feel any effect. If I erred somewhere, do correct me. >Even a person with an inkling of science could agree with that...... No I don't. tuan >Paul ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tuan Phan" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 1:06 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > Hi Sue, > > To your query: > > >may I ask if you've been > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job > involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of the > Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated > under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & England. > All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL aviation > customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on average, > beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount > each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) > > >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're incorporating > lunar > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? > > The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a > ride. > > I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not inland. > Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar 22, > rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' > parameters are found here > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml > There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply the > clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. > > >You sound very > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities > Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. > For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: > > 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - persistence, > climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. > Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) > because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. > > 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say 1deg). > However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size of > the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead forecast > do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 > days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach > limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a particular > location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the climatology > technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is same > as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error value is > simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the interested > location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple > statistical program can work out what this value would be. > > 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for > 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, will > at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% > higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be > found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique apart > at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad odds. > > 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve the > expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly by > increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. In > summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting > anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! > > 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like the > first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have done > so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling deg > days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat climatology. > Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to > clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp > only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r > forecasts. > > 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who forecast > for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, combined > with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. > > Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It doesn't > mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected error. > Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. > > Best wishes, > tuan > > > > > >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so > >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? No > >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating lunar > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > >Suze =^. .^= > > > >snip > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 06:28:30 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi ok, so , now, the earth is dense in mass and a solid mass at that...and it gets pulled 50cm in height by the moon as it passes..... The ocean is not as dense, and not as solid (i.e it moves more easily), and it gets pulled a few metres in height as the moon passes The atmosphere is 1000 less dense than the ocean, but it can get moved about extrememly easily, so , how much will it get pulled up as the moon passes? That is the million dollar Q, is it not? Some say an insignifcant amount If you follow my reasong above, it might actualy get pulled up 100's of metres.... Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 5:59 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > Tuan, > > The amount of 'tug' as you put it, also has rather a lot to do with distance > between the masses, and while the Sun is a much larger mass than the Moon, > it is a hell of lot further away. Thus, due to the proximity of the Moon, > it has much greater influence on sea tides than the Sun. While the tug on > air may well be a lot less than the tug on water, one thing is certain, > i.e., the tug due to the moon is proportionally greater on it than the tug > due to the sun, so the air tide due to the moon is obviously going to be > much greater also. > > John. > > >snip > My basic understanding of gravity. Gravity is the interaction between 2 > masses, the heavier the mass, the bigger the tug between the two. Water and > land is dense enough to be affected by the moon's gravity, but air is too > thin (several order of magnitude lower than water) to feel any effect. If I > erred somewhere, do correct me. > > >snip > I still have trouble accepting this theory in this current form and with > your current evidence. Have not dismissed it totally but have trouble with > some points. Without a doubt, there is an air tide, given that air can be > seen as a liquid. However, air is much less dense than water (I think about > 3 orders of magnitude), hence it's influence by the moon is extremely small, > compared to the solar & other factors. Your claim of 'up to 20%' (25% on NZ > forum) seems far too large to not be detected by satellites at space. > Taking the moon & density of air into account, my napkin calculations of the > air tide has it to vary by only .1% (at best but more likely 0.01%) between > peaks and trough (ie ~100m assuming ~100km atmos). Given we already know > that the solar has a big impact on the pressure tide, my napkin calc has the > air tide to vary in the km, dwarfing any influence of the moon. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Tuan Phan > Sent: Sunday, 9 February 2003 12:33 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > > > Paul, > > I think you misunderstood/misread my email to Sue. Requests for forecasts > months in advance is pretty common for the BoM and I was trying to help her > understand the current limitations. > > >Ever heard the term "pride cometh before BIG fall"......? I look forward to > >what the conditions will be. > I though I had made it clear that research published by others have shown > that NO forecast methods have been found to be superior to the climatology > technique to date for lead time >14 days, giving the amount of details & > numbers she was after. Yes this also include my 16-parameters Butterfly > Oscillation Index (BOI). If you believe their work to be mathematically > flawed, I encourage you to take it up with them. > > Pride has nothing to do with what I told Sue. I thought it was pretty clear > that the numbers she got was based climatology and even showed her where it > came at . Do you actually believe people forecast to 1 decimal place that > far out??? I never mention that it was MY personal forecast. Plagarism would > be the first thing I would be accused of if I try to claim the clim values > as my very own. > > >I will sya one thing tho - did not Ken predict > >back a few months ago about the current rain scenario in Qld / East Coast > >etc? > Huh??? I never predicted anything for Qld/East coast and have no idea about > what Ken did. Irrevalant to this debate. > > >As for the moon - lets not have jibes at what other people believe. > >YOU dont know it all..... even though you may think you do. > No one can claim they know it all for any subject, and I never made any such > claim. My basic understanding of the weather and its influence comes at > classic Newtonian. Where that breaks down, quantum mechanics (Einstein) > takes over. Work by Newton, and others before & after him have shown that > effects of the moon on our weather is many order of magnitude smaller than > other factors and thus can be ignored, just like the Coriolis when dealing > with small scale. > > If you or others have scientific research that shows Newton's Laws are > incorrect, I recommend they be verified & published. Then I would take back > my words. I will even guarantee the responsible person the Nobel Prize in > Physics, a similar prize to what I guarantee anyone who claims to have found > a cure for cancer & AIDS. > > > If the moon has such an > >effect on the massive bodies of water that cover this planet, then it must > >have an effect on the weather. > Illogical assumption without evidence. > > My basic understanding of gravity. Gravity is the interaction between 2 > masses, the heavier the mass, the bigger the tug between the two. Water and > land is dense enough to be affected by the moon's gravity, but air is too > thin (several order of magnitude lower than water) to feel any effect. If I > erred somewhere, do correct me. > > >Even a person with an inkling of science could agree with that...... > No I don't. > > tuan > >Paul > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tuan Phan" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 1:06 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > > > > Hi Sue, > > > > To your query: > > > > >may I ask if you've been > > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > > > I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job > > involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of > the > > Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated > > under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & England. > > All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL > aviation > > customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on average, > > beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount > > each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) > > > > >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're incorporating > > lunar > > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? > > > > The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what > > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for > a > > ride. > > > > I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not > inland. > > Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar 22, > > rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' > > parameters are found here > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml > > There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply > the > > clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. > > > > >You sound very > > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities > > Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. > > For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: > > > > 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - persistence, > > climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. > > Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) > > because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. > > > > 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say 1deg). > > However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size > of > > the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead > forecast > > do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 > > days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach > > limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a > particular > > location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the climatology > > technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is > same > > as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error value > is > > simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the interested > > location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple > > statistical program can work out what this value would be. > > > > 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for > > 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, > will > > at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% > > higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be > > found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique apart > > at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad > odds. > > > > 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve the > > expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly by > > increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. In > > summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting > > anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! > > > > 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like the > > first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have > done > > so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling > deg > > days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat > climatology. > > Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to > > clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp > > only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r > > forecasts. > > > > 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who forecast > > for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, > combined > > with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. > > > > Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It > doesn't > > mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected > error. > > Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. > > > > Best wishes, > > tuan > > > > > > > > > > >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so > > >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? > No > > >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating > lunar > > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very > > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been > > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > >Suze =^. .^= > > > > > > >snip > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 12:29:49 -0600 at : Tom Johnstone Subject: Re: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're living X-Sender: itjohnstone at wiscmail.wisc.edu (Unverified) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Actually, what I was referring to was prompted by a phone call back home, where due to the time difference, my brother was complaining about the mid day heat, and I was complaining about the midnight cold here in Madison. It got me to thinking about the difference, at any given time, between where I'm living and my home town - I often find myself thinking, in the middle of a cold spell here in Madison, about how hot it is in Perth. For example, last night here in Madison it was -19C, while in Perth the maximum was +41C, a difference of 60C! Tom At 07:15 PM 2/9/2003 +0800, you wrote: >Both Sydney and Melbourne have been my homes in the past and both have >greater ranges than Hong Kong where I live now. >My personal lowest temperature was an unofficial one of -12C on a >max/min thermometer attached to a tentpole in the camping ground near >Yarangobilly NSW donkeys years ago (possibly late 1960s but more likely >early 1970's). I was in the next tent and the milk froze so we had to >peel off the carton and slice it with the breadknife to add it to our >cuppa. My highest was reported on the radio that day as 48C in the >shade up in NW Western Australia on a day I was driving about 1000 km >(1972 I think). The thermometer in my Mistubishi Colt sat on 60C for >several hours and we each drank ten litres of water. > >Phil ><>< > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk >Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk >MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk >Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > >-----Original Message----- > at : "Bussy" >To: >Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:21:49 +1100 >Subject: Re: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're >living > > > Here where I live goes well below zero in winter and into the 40's in > > summer. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Tom Johnstone" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 3:39 AM > > Subject: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're > > living > > > > > > > Here's my current situation: > > > > > > My current residence: Madison, Wisconsin, USA > > > Feb 7th min. temp : -20C > > > > > > My home town: Perth, WA, Australia > > > Feb 7th max temp: +36C > > > > > > Difference: 56C !!!! > > > > > > > > > My record: > > > > > > Madison, WI, Dec 25th, 2000, min temp: -29.4C > > > Perth, WA, Dec 25th, 2000, max temp: 38.7c > > > Difference: 68.1C !!!!! > > > > > > > > > Anyone got some good ones? It could be temp -related, or rain, or > > wind > > etc. > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 12:32:40 -0600 at : Tom Johnstone Subject: Re: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're living X-Sender: itjohnstone at wiscmail.wisc.edu (Unverified) To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I liked this story though. Reminds me of when I was camping up in the Pilbera in the 1970s and one of the guys up there was telling us of when they first introduced the Range Rover to Australia, and a couple of city folk at Perth drove them up there on holiday. After a couple of particularly hot days, they found that their dashboard had started to droop - it was literally starting to melt. Don't know if it's true, but having been up there in summer, it wasn't hard to believe. Tom At 07:15 PM 2/9/2003 +0800, you wrote: >Both Sydney and Melbourne have been my homes in the past and both have >greater ranges than Hong Kong where I live now. >My personal lowest temperature was an unofficial one of -12C on a >max/min thermometer attached to a tentpole in the camping ground near >Yarangobilly NSW donkeys years ago (possibly late 1960s but more likely >early 1970's). I was in the next tent and the milk froze so we had to >peel off the carton and slice it with the breadknife to add it to our >cuppa. My highest was reported on the radio that day as 48C in the >shade up in NW Western Australia on a day I was driving about 1000 km >(1972 I think). The thermometer in my Mistubishi Colt sat on 60C for >several hours and we each drank ten litres of water. > >Phil ><>< > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk >Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk >MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk >Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > >-----Original Message----- > at : "Bussy" >To: >Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:21:49 +1100 >Subject: Re: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're >living > > > Here where I live goes well below zero in winter and into the 40's in > > summer. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Tom Johnstone" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 3:39 AM > > Subject: aus-wx: extreme difference between home and where you're > > living > > > > > > > Here's my current situation: > > > > > > My current residence: Madison, Wisconsin, USA > > > Feb 7th min. temp : -20C > > > > > > My home town: Perth, WA, Australia > > > Feb 7th max temp: +36C > > > > > > Difference: 56C !!!! > > > > > > > > > My record: > > > > > > Madison, WI, Dec 25th, 2000, min temp: -29.4C > > > Perth, WA, Dec 25th, 2000, max temp: 38.7c > > > Difference: 68.1C !!!!! > > > > > > > > > Anyone got some good ones? It could be temp -related, or rain, or > > wind > > etc. > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:33:30 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all again This whole moon atmosphere tide thing has me thinking Some say the atmosphereic tide is neglible, at 0.1 % Now some basic principles of gravity: The gravitational pull on an object by another object is the same regardless of that object mass. So that means a jumbo jet and a feather dropped at a great altitude in a vacuum will fall to earth at the same speed (well actualy the jumbo jet will hae its own gravitational pull trying to pull the earth to it, but its soo small we can forget that). Now, with the atmosphere, it is in layers. I.e it is heaviest at the surface, i.e has more mass, becuause of the weight of atmosphere above, and lightest at the very edge in space, where it has no more weight above and is very thin, i.e spread out, i.e low density, compared to at the surface. BUT it is still pulled by the moons gravity (and earths gravity the opposite way) by the same amount as at the surface. So the whole vertical profile of the atmosphere gets pulled by the moon by the same amount (actualy the top will be pulled slight stronger becuase it is closer to the moon, but by a very small difference, so we can ignore that) SO, how much does the atmosphere get pulled up by the moon as a atmosphere tidal bulge? I think you would find it will be much more than some think. But how do you measure it? (as the barometer does not work, as there is still the same mass under that bulge) Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:13 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather > >The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for a > ride..It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them.." > > Tuan, it would be more honest to say that it was only your opinion. Some > have found that lunar forecasts work for them, so you cannot speak for > everybody, a mistake some professional meteorologists seem to continually > make. Sue may indeed find what I said useful - and I am certainly not > rubbishing what YOU forecast based on BoM methods. Perhaps you need to learn > that there are other approaches out there and that the BoM doesn't hold all > the answers. > I suggest forget great fame and riches. Let's just have a simple but solid > test, your methods against mine.. Name a month and a town in Australia, well > beyond the reach of 14 days. You submit your forecast based on your averages > etc and I'll submit mine based on the moon. Let's look at day/dates for the > potential of expected rainfall for that location. Surely shouldn't be too > difficult for someone with access to all the data you say you have. Are you > game to put yourself on the line? Or are you just the latest spout off..? > cheers > Ken Ring > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tuan Phan" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:36 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather > > > > Hi Sue, > > > > To your query: > > > > >may I ask if you've been > > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > > > I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job > > involves forecasting and analysis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of > the > > Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated > > under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US & England. > > All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL > aviation > > customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on average, > > beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount > > each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :) > > > > >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're incorporating > > lunar > > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? > > > > The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite what > > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for > a > > ride. > > > > I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not > inland. > > Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar 22, > > rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts' > > parameters are found here > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml > > There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply > the > > clim average with some minor fine tunning by me. > > > > >You sound very > > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities > > Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly. > > For your understanding and other interested people, this is why: > > > > 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques - persistence, > > climatology, manual, etc. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. > > Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days) > > because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics. > > > > 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say 1deg). > > However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size > of > > the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead > forecast > > do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10 > > days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach > > limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a > particular > > location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the climatology > > technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is > same > > as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error value > is > > simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the interested > > location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple > > statistical program can work out what this value would be. > > > > 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for > > 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc, > will > > at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4% > > higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be > > found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique apart > > at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad > odds. > > > > 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve the > > expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly by > > increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage. In > > summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting > > anything but clim increases your average error by 41%! > > > > 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat > > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like the > > first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have > done > > so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling > deg > > days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat > climatology. > > Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to > > clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp > > only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r > > forecasts. > > > > 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who forecast > > for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques, > combined > > with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better. > > > > Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It > doesn't > > mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected > error. > > Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident. > > > > Best wishes, > > tuan > > > > > > > > > > >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters so > > >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're ustilsing? > No > > >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating > lunar > > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data? You sound very > > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been > > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility? > > >Suze =^. .^= > > > > > > >snip > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:21:55 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
even if the tidal influence was 1000m, the difference in gas density at that height would be negligble and would be a very gradual change over many 1000s of km, it's not like hitting a brick wall or anything. we're talking tides on a global scale, not waves on a local scale. whilst not denying that atmospheric tides exist their influence on re-entry would be negligble and at worst would simply invole some minor course alterations.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Monday, 10 February 2003 6:06:00 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather
 
Hi all again

This whole moon atmosphere tide thing has me thinking
Some say the atmosphereic tide is neglible, at 0.1 %
Now some basic principles of gravity:
The gravitational pull on an object by another object is the same regardless
of that object mass.
So that means a jumbo jet and a feather dropped at a great altitude in a
vacuum will fall to earth at the same speed (well actualy the jumbo jet will
hae its own gravitational pull trying to pull the earth to it, but its soo
small we can forget that).
Now, with the atmosphere, it is in layers.
I.e it is heaviest at the surface, i.e has more mass, becuause of the weight
of atmosphere above, and lightest at the very edge in space, where it has no
more weight above and is very thin, i.e spread out, i.e low density,
compared to at the surface.
BUT it is still pulled by the moons gravity (and earths gravity the opposite
way) by the same amount as at the surface.
So the whole vertical profile of the atmosphere gets pulled by the moon by
the same amount (actualy the top will be pulled slight stronger becuase it
is closer to the moon, but by a very small difference, so we can ignore
that)
SO, how much does the atmosphere get pulled up by the moon as a atmosphere
tidal bulge?
I think you would find it will be much more than some think.
But how do you measure it? (as the barometer does not work, as there is
still the same mass under that bulge)
Cheers
Brian
----- Original Message -----
at : "Ken Ring" <ken at weatherman.co.nz>
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather


> >The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite
what
> some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself for
a
> ride..It would be amaziRe aus-wx Long range weather.ems ng if anyone can come up with a method that can
beat
> clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them.."
>
> Tuan, it would be more honest to say that it was only your opinion. Some
> have found that lunar forecasts work for them, so you cannot speak for
> everybody, a mistake some professional meteorologists seem to continually
> make. Sue may indeed find what I said useful - and I am certainly not
> rubbishing what YOU forecast based on BoM methods. Perhaps you need to
learn
> that there are other approaches out there and that the BoM doesn't hold
all
> the answers.
> I suggest forget great fame and riches. Let's just have a simple but solid
> test, your methods against mine.. Name a month and a town in Australia,
well
> beyond the reach of 14 days. You submit your forecast based on your
averages
> etc and I'll submit mine based on the moon. Let's look at day/dates for
the
> potential of expected rainfall for that location. Surely shouldn't be too
> difficult for someone with access to all the data you say you have. Are
you
> game to put yourself on the line? Or are you just the latest spout off..?
> cheers
> Ken Ring
> www.predictweather.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> at : "Tuan Phan" <t.phan at bom.gov.au>
> To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:36 PM
> Subject: RE: aus-wx: Long range weather
>
>
> > Hi Sue,
> >
> > To your query:
> >
> > >may I ask if you've been
> > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility?
> >
> > I am an operational forecaster with the BoM in Melb. A part of my job
> > involves forecasting and analyRe aus-wx Long range weather.ems sis of all sig wx >10k ft for our half of
> the
> > Sthn Hemisphere. Every single forecast of mine is analysed and evaluated
> > under set conditions, and also against forecasters at the US &
England.
> > All my results are available, unfortunately, to internally and ALL
> aviation
> > customers (eg Qantas, Virgin) only. Put it simply, if I can't, on
average,
> > beat other overseas forecasters & save them at least a six figure amount
> > each year with my forecasts, I wouldn't have a job :)
> >
> > >what system you're ustilsing? ... just wondering if you're
incorporating
> > lunar
> > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical data?
> >
> > The moon has no effect on the weather OR climate of the earth despite
what
> > some people will sell you. They are simply taking you and/or themself
for
> a
> > ride.
> >
> > I have assumed that the wedding is to be held near the city and not
> inland.
> > Forecast of temp & RH is at the clim average (1859 to 1992) for Mar
22,
> > rather than just the monthly average of Mar. The other 'forecasts'
> > parameters are found here
> > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066062.shtml
> > There is nothing mysterious about the forecasts at all. They are simply
> the
> > clim average with some minor fine tunning by me.
> >
> > >You sound very
> > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities
> > Yes! I sound cocky but you will see why this is so shortly.
> > For your understanding and other interested people, this is why:
> >
> > 1. There are several types of basic forecasting techniques -
persistence,
> > climatology, manual, etc. Each have theRe aus-wx Long range weather.ems ir strengths and weaknesses.
> > Basically, manual forecasts are best for short term (1 to say 6/7 days)
> > because of the human factor. Persistence is very strong in the tropics.
> >
> > 2. With persistence & manual, expected error for +24Hr is low (say
1deg).
> > However this increases with longer outlooks but with a limit to the size
> of
> > the error (ie. you don't expect a 100deg error for a 6 months ahead
> forecast
> > do you? ;) ). Anyway the current limit for manual is believed to be 7-10
> > days but theory suggests 14 days is possible. Persistence tends to reach
> > limit faster than manual but both will have the SAME limit for a
> particular
> > location. What this value is will be discussed later. For the
climatology
> > technique (ignoring seasonal factors, etc), expected error for day 1 is
> same
> > as for day 10 and also for day n in the future. This expected error
value
> is
> > simply the standard deviation (range of possible value) of the
interested
> > location (generally low for tropics & higher for mid-lat). Any simple
> > statistical program can work out what this value would be.
> >
> > 3. Having found the expected error of clim, the expected error for
> > 'persistence', 'manual', moon, sun, stars, butterflies techniques etc,
> will
> > at least be (SQRT 2) times the expected error of climatology (ie 41.4%
> > higher), regardless of the location. The full maths proof of this can be
> > found in several met journals. Therefore, using ANY other technique
apart
> > at clim for Mar 22, is simply guessing/gambling with very, very bad
> odds.
> >
> > 4. Note: It is very possible to tweak the clim ave slightly to improve
the
> > expected error. Eg, say El Nino conditions so I could 'hedge' slightly
byRe aus-wx Long range weather.ems
> > increasing the temp (say .3deg) and/or decrease RH by a few percentage.
In
> > summary for l.r forecasting: without a damn good reason, forecasting
> > anything but clim increases your average error by 41%!
> >
> > 5. It would be amazing if anyone can come up with a method that can beat
> > clim for lead time > 14days. Great fame & riches await them, just like
the
> > first person to find a cure for cancer, even though many claim to have
> done
> > so already. Aquila Inc used to run a forecast comp for 'heating/cooling
> deg
> > days for 14+ lead time. $US50k to anyone who comes 1st AND beat
> climatology.
> > Not surprisingly, no one was able to, or even consistently get close to
> > clim. (Basically, every technique under the sun :) was used but the comp
> > only backed up the maths showing how powerful clim is, when used for l.r
> > forecasts.
> >
> > 6. An aside: at day 7, NWPs still have some skill. If people who
forecast
> > for various TV channels (day 5-7) used basic 'hedging' techniques,
> combined
> > with basic clim and NWP data, their average error would be a lot better.
> >
> > Sue, at this hopefully you can see why I forecast those values. It
> doesn't
> > mean it will be correct but it is the only one with the BEST expected
> error.
> > Do seek a second opinion if you are not confident.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > tuan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >Hi Tuan, I'm a newbie to the list, muchly enjoying reading the letters
so
> > >far. I'm intrigued with your l.r.forecast, what system you're
ustilsing?
> No
> > >details necessary of course...just wondering if you're incorporating
> lunar
> > >declination cycles, or are you cycling historical datRe aus-wx Long range weather.ems a? You sound very
> > >confident in your l.r.forecasting abilities; may I ask if you've been
> > >publishing your forecasts and results to establish credibility?
> > >Suze =^. .^=
> >
> >
> > >snip
> >
> >
> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail
to:majordomo at world.std.com
> > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
your
> > message.
> > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP101.gif: 00000001,752f7e8e,00000000,00000000 at : David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:46:00 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 10/02/2003 10:45:56 AM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi James, Fantastic report.. It was a great storm.. It all started around 2.30pm.. I was in the shopping centre and you could here the huge cracks at lightning hitting very close to shopping area. I spotted many strikes hit in the town area at friends place. Traffic lights over Bathurst all out, flooded roads towards Orange were closed. At one stage a fault was reported where the road was flooded.. there was no way getting accross the water. Police and SES called to many houses flooded. Hail came down, only small though, last about 10 min. A report heard was a car stranded in water was washed away, driver was stuck. Last night I had worked and we had more storms which came at the South. Oberon had a few problems last night as well with lightning strikes. Hope we see some more storms today Regards Dave ----- Forwarded by David Carroll/People/Country Energy on 10/02/2003 08:23 AM ----- "James Harris" To: Sent by: cc: aussie-weather-approval at wor Subject: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 ld.std.com 09/02/2003 10:45 PM Please respond to aussie-weather Evening All, We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst area yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2003/February08.htm Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports at the last two months. James H ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:03:23 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Evening All, > > We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst > area yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at > http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2003/February08.htm > > Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports > at the last two months. > > James H Morning all, I was running around to the west of James & Matt on Saturday and will have pics up (hopefully tonight) of storms beginning near Cowra and out to the Parkes & Peak Hill area during the afternoon and evening. Also saw a rather impressive (enormous!!) dust devil, but unfortunately the video is rather shaky and it was well out on the other side of a 50kmh town - Canowindra!!!!!!!!!!! (that has to be the definition of "FRUSTRATION"!!!!! Areas out that way saw puddles like they probably hadn't seen for a lot of months. A lot of blowing dust on the outflow of rainshafts was a common feature the further west I went. Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward.*** -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:16:53 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Feb 2003 01:16:53.0470 (UTC) FILETIME=[1888E7E0:01C2D0A2] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

thanks jane, david, matt, james

am kicking myself - targeted Cowra - Bathurst area saturday morning, after looking at Li, CAPE data, then as i was leaving was 'seduced', to stay put, by a large cell, over the Sth ACT.

with the lack of steering winds, this lugubrious storm basically sat there and did SFA.

oh well - look forward to reading all the reports, and there's always this afternoon and tomorrow!

> at : "Jane ONeill"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003
>Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:03:23 +1100
>
> > Evening All,
> >
> > We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst
> > area yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at
> > http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2003/February08.htm
> >
> > Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports
> > at the last two months.
> >
> > James H
>
>Morning all,
>
>I was running around to the west of James & Matt on Saturday and will have
>pics up (hopefully tonight) of storms beginning near Cowra and out to the
>Parkes & Peak Hill area during the afternoon and evening. Also saw a rather
>impressive (enormous!!) dust devil, but unfortunately the video is rather
>shaky and it was well out on the other side of a 50kmh town -
>Canowindra!!!!!!!!!!! (that has to be the definition of "FRUSTRATION"!!!!!
>
>Areas out that way saw puddles like they probably hadn't seen for a lot of
>months. A lot of blowing dust on the outflow of rainshafts was a common
>feature the further west I went.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Jane
>--------------------------------
>Jane ONeill - Melbourne
>cadence at australianskynweather.com
>
>Australian Sky and Weather
>www.stormchasers.au.com
>
>ASWA - Victoria
>http://www.severeweather.asn.au
>
>***The journey is the reward.***
>--------------------------------
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Find our more. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
at : David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:04:15 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 10/02/2003 01:04:20 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com HI All. Anyone wanting to see the reports at the local paper, goto this link. http://www.bathurst.yourguide.com.au/home.asp I have a copy of the paper if anyone wanted it faxed.. Pls email me off list.. Dave "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent by: cc: aussie-weather-approval at wor Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 ld.std.com 10/02/2003 12:16 PM Please respond to aussie-weather thanks jane, david, matt, james am kicking myself - targeted Cowra - Bathurst area saturday morning, after looking at Li, CAPE data, then as i was leaving was 'seduced', to stay put, by a large cell, over the Sth ACT. with the lack of steering winds, this lugubrious storm basically sat there and did SFA. oh well - look forward to reading all the reports, and there's always this afternoon and tomorrow! > at : "Jane ONeill" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 >Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:03:23 +1100 > > > Evening All, > > > > We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst > > area yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at > > http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2003/February08.htm > > > > Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports > > at the last two months. > > > > James H > >Morning all, > >I was running around to the west of James & Matt on Saturday and will have >pics up (hopefully tonight) of storms beginning near Cowra and out to the >Parkes & Peak Hill area during the afternoon and evening. Also saw a rather >impressive (enormous!!) dust devil, but unfortunately the video is rather >shaky and it was well out on the other side of a 50kmh town - >Canowindra!!!!!!!!!!! (that has to be the definition of "FRUSTRATION"!!!!! > >Areas out that way saw puddles like they probably hadn't seen for a lot of >months. A lot of blowing dust on the outflow of rainshafts was a common >feature the further west I went. > >Cheers, > >Jane >-------------------------------- >Jane ONeill - Melbourne >cadence at australianskynweather.com > >Australian Sky and Weather >www.stormchasers.au.com > >ASWA - Victoria >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >***The journey is the reward.*** >-------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Find our more. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: Bathurst rain To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:29:01 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 10/02/2003 01:29:13 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com HI Well its raining again in Bathurst... A nice steady fall.. Anyone looking at radar for Sydney.. pink/red images near Appin.. Dave ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Storm Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:32:07 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello Everyone,
 
We had a lovely 8.5 mm at Mona Vale  at the storm but weren't home at the time.  We found the best place at Clontarf to watch it at .
 
Judy
at : "Matthew Piper" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:57:49 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Columbia ShuttleJeff Brislane and myself also encountered the severe storm which hit Bathurst on Saturday. We were situated at the top of Mount Panorama and gained what I can only describe as a truly astonishing view of this storm. Sit back and enjoy some of the following photographic delights :) Rain Shaft Video Stills http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst1.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst2.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst3.jpg Lightning Video Stills http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning1.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning2.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning3.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning4.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning5.jpg ----- Original Message ----- at : James Harris To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 10:45 PM Subject: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Evening All, We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst area yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2003/February08.htm Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports at the last two months. James H +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:20:15 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Hi Richard

With respect, this sounds like opinion based on assumption.
I'm no 'air-tide' expert, but here's another assumption: If air is pulled laterally towards the moon at moonrise, then a short time later it is replaced as the moon rises, this could create eddy's. Not a 'brick wall' but a wall of sorts nevertheless.
Just a thought.

Neville

at : "Richard Modistach" <hambone at dodo.com.au>
Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:21:55 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time)
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather


even if the tidal influence was 1000m, the difference in gas density at that height would be negligble and would be a very gradual change over many 1000s of km, it's not like hitting a brick wall or anything. we're talking tides on a global scale, not waves on a local scale. whilst not denying that atmospheric tides exist their influence on re-entry would be negligble and at worst would simply invole some minor course alterations.

richard

-------Original Message-------

at : aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Monday, 10 February 2003 6:06:00 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather

Hi all again

This whole moon atmosphere tide thing has me thinking
Some say the atmosphereic tide is neglible, at 0.1 %
Now some basic principles of gravity:
The gravitational pull on an object by another object is the same regardless
of that object mass.
So that means a jumbo jet and a feather dropped at a great altitude in a
vacuum will fall to earth at the same speed (well actualy the jumbo jet will
hae its own gravitational pull trying to pull the earth to it, but its soo
small we can forget that).
Now, with the atmosphere, it is in layers.
I.e it is heaviest at the surface, i.e has more mass, becuause of the weight
of atmosphere above, and lightest at the very edge in space, where it has no
more weight above and is very thin, i.e spread out, i.e low density,
compared to at the surface.
BUT it is still pulled by the moons gravity (and earths gravity the opposite
way) by the same amount as at the surface.
So the whole vertical profile of the atmosphere gets pulled by the moon by
the same amount (actualy the top will be pulled slight stronger becuase it
is closer to the moon, but by a very small difference, so we can ignore
that)
SO, how much does the atmosphere get pulled up by the moon as a atmosphere
tidal bulge?
I think you would find it will be much more than some think.
But how do you measure it? (as the barometer does not work, as there is
still the same mass under that bulge)
Cheers
Brian
----- Original Message -----
at : "Ken Ring" <ken at weatherman.co.nz>
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ <mailto:
. ____________________________________________________
 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved -
Click Here

XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service at : "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:59:16 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Awseome, love the look of the shelf cloud forming in Lightning4. John. >snip -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Matthew Piper Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:58 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Re: aus-wx: Columbia ShuttleJeff Brislane and myself also encountered the severe storm which hit Bathurst on Saturday. We were situated at the top of Mount Panorama and gained what I can only describe as a truly astonishing view of this storm. Sit back and enjoy some of the following photographic delights :) Rain Shaft Video Stills http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst1.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst2.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst3.jpg Lightning Video Stills http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning1.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning2.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning3.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning4.jpg http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning5.jpg ----- Original Message ----- at : James Harris To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 10:45 PM Subject: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Evening All, We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst area yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2003/February08.htm Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports at the last two months. James H +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Phillip Basil-Jones" To: Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Gustfront/storm photos 10/02/03 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:07:27 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I've added some images of yesterdays storm!! SDS has gone for now :)
 
X-Sender: carls at xenios.qldnet.com.au (Unverified) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:26:37 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Carl Smith Subject: Re: aus-wx: Moon vs Clim Challenge X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id AAA09008 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tuan, Ken, and All. I have an interest in the possibilities of longer-range weather forecasting. In the past I attempted to evaluate a set of LR forecasts by astrometeorologists and lunar LR-forecaster Ken Ring for the Sydney Olympics, albeit rather inadequately prepared for and evaluated - it was all set up too close to the time to allow adequate preparation by forecasters, there was no pre-set forecast format, and evaluation was rather difficult given the diverse nature of the forecasting formats and lack of clear definitions of terms. You can see the results at http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/Olympics.htm I also evaluated an exercise comparing Ken Ring's forecasts over a certain period with a set of random number generators set up by BoM forecaster Harald Richter which was run though the aus-wx list, the challenge being set up by Harald to prove random numbers could do better than the Moon. Ken's original forecasts were a quick response to an email question regarding the bushfire situation around Sydney at the time - he had not prepared them with the same degree of diligence he would have given to a client or if he had been knowingly submitting them for public evaluation. Evaluation methodology was not adequately prepared beforehand. As a result there was some very different and at times contradictory views expressed regarding evaluating the results as they unfolded on the list, and in the final analysis there were several evaluation methods used with their advantages, biases, and shortcomings spelled out. You can see the results at http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/ezines/lr-rain-analysis.htm - I suggest you both read this page carefully before deciding on evaluation methods. I would be happy to take part in the evaluation of the current Moon vs Clim Challenge, as I have an interest in developing better evaluation methods for longer range forecasting. I feel we need to establish forecast validation rules acceptable to both parties before the period of the exercise. For example, if a forecast was made for a day: Min 15, Max 25, Rain 0 and observations showed Min 16, Max 24, Rain 0.5 mm would this be validated as an accurate forecast? Tuan - do you know how the BoM evaluates the accuracy of it's forecasts - i.e. what ranges of error in temp and rainfall are used for validation. Also, for the purposes of this exercise, what ranges of same would you consider to constitute a validation of the Clim method (if these differ at the BoM methods). Ken - I know you allow a +-1 day accuracy for your lunar based forecasts as stated clearly on your website - as I have asked Tuan, I am also asking you to post what ranges of of error you would consider as validating your forecast. I also know you see your forecasts as 'rain windows' spanning several days, so need to ask whether you find Tuan's forecast format acceptable or if you would like to suggest changes you feel more suited to your methods. If you both agree on the forecast format, validation and comparison will be easier. If you both wish to use the same forecasting format with different validation techniques, I would suggest that all forecasts be evaluated using both methods rather than trying to come to some compromise that may not be satisfactory to either party, and that others may also suggest validation methods that could differ yet again, so all forecasts could also be evaluated using these methods. In this way the exercise may be useful in determining a more concrete set of ground rules for further research into evaluating longer range forecasts by whatever methodology. If you both agree, I will set up a web page to display your forecasts and methodologies, the ranges of error and method(s) of evaluation, the observations as they become available, and the results. I would also appreciate it if someone could undertake to collect all relevent official observations for the cities involved and post them on the list daily - my internet time can be limited by other circumstances and I cannot say for sure I will definitely be able to get the obs at BoM / NZMS websites every day. If the Ken Ring vs the RNG's exercise was anything to go by, I am sure many will be curious to see how this exercise unfolds day by day, and to evaluate for themselves how both parties methods are doing. I look forward to your replies. Regards, Carl. >Ken, > >I am willing to take up your challenge. Here are some the basic terms. > >1. It is a test to see if forecasting by the moon is significantly better >than climatology (and vice versa) at lead-time >14 days (and not BoM or me >vs Moon). >2. To reduce possibility of chance, bias, bad luck factor, etc, >the location >for the forecasts will be: > > NZ – Auckland, Wellington & Christchurch > Aus – Melbourne, Canberra & Sydney > O/S – Any international capital you care to choose. Can be >scrapped if >6 >cities is too much. > >3. You can nominate any arbitrators and/or verification >technique you wish. >4. Forecast will be in this very basic in this form: > > City Date Min Max > Rain lvl >Eg NZAA 01/03/2003 15 22 > 0 or 1 or 2 >or Melbourne Mar 1 2003 18 25 Yes > >* For rain level, 0 is no rain, 1 is <10mm and 2 is =>10 mm. If this is too >complex, we can go with yes or no option which is fine with me. > >Starting date will be March 1, 2003 and will go for at least one full month >(31 days) and hopefully 2 months (if you are up to it Ken). > >5. Total forecasts will be 6 (cities) x 2 (min & max) x 2 or 3 >(rain lvl) x >31 (days). >6. Total 744 forecasts with ‘Yes/No’ rain, 1116 forecasts with ‘0, 1 or 2’ >rain lvl. >7. The actual observation will be at the official value as determined by >the BoM and NZMetService. >8. There may not be enough evidence to support either side, and >we both will >have to accept this. >9. Judge/s (chosen by you) decision is final. > >Given the starting date is soon & you & I need time to prepare, the first >few days of the forecast period need not be strictly >= 14 days. (but still >must be at >9 days lead). Will be digging around for clim data especially NZ >stuff. However, should not matter if I take a while to find it, as it is >fixed already :) > >Ken, I will be out of the office till Wednesday. Looking forward to your >reply. Hopefully you will be happy with these terms and we can start >shortly. > >Regards, >tuan > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Gustfront/storm photos 10/02/03 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:45:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Great photos, which suburb did you take them at ? 
 
We watched the storm  at Clontarf  but only managed to get one photo of the main storm, still in the camera.  However we saw the most interesting cloud grow along the leading edge of the storm  -  don't know the name for it, but it was similar to a roll cloud.  It grew really quickly stretching out over an estimated 15 kilometres in only a few minutes. Can anyone tell me what it would have been.
 
We received 9 mm of rain at Mona Vale and the plants certainly appreciated its arrival.
 
Judy
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:07 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Gustfront/storm photos 10/02/03

I've added some images of yesterdays storm!! SDS has gone for now :)
 
X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:59:50 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2003 05:59:50.0347 (UTC) FILETIME=[C9F481B0:01C2D192] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Drool! Stunning!  I take it you were inside the car, Matt?

That looks like a funnel in 'lightning shot 4'?

> at : "Matthew Piper"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003
>Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:57:49 +1100
>
>Re: aus-wx: Columbia ShuttleJeff Brislane and myself also encountered the
>severe storm which hit Bathurst on Saturday. We were situated at the top of
>Mount Panorama and gained what I can only describe as a truly astonishing
>view of this storm. Sit back and enjoy some of the following photographic
>delights :)
>
>Rain Shaft Video Stills
>
>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst1.jpg
>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst2.jpg
>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst3.jpg
>
>Lightning Video Stills
>
>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning1.jpg
>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning2.jpg
>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning3.jpg
>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning4.jpg
>http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning5.jpg
>
>----- Original Message -----
> at : James Harris
>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 10:45 PM
>Subject: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003
>
>
>Evening All,
>
>We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst area
>yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at
>http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2003/February08.htm
>
>Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports
> at the last two months.
>
>James H
>
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Click here for more. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:42:01 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com My yearly rainfall here in Rutherglen is point 2mm. Please don't tease me :-) ----- Original Message ----- at : "Matthew Piper" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:57 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 > Re: aus-wx: Columbia ShuttleJeff Brislane and myself also encountered the > severe storm which hit Bathurst on Saturday. We were situated at the top of > Mount Panorama and gained what I can only describe as a truly astonishing > view of this storm. Sit back and enjoy some of the following photographic > delights :) > > Rain Shaft Video Stills > > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst1.jpg > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst2.jpg > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/bathurst3.jpg > > Lightning Video Stills > > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning1.jpg > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning2.jpg > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning3.jpg > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning4.jpg > http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/mpiper/Lightning5.jpg > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : James Harris > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 10:45 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 > > > Evening All, > > We'll Matt Smith and myself were lucky enough to be out in the Bathurst area > yesterday. A Full report can now be seen at > http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2003/February08.htm > > Over the next few weeks SSC should be updated with even more chase reports > at the last two months. > > James H > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Moon vs Clim Challenge Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:44:11 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Carl and Tuan It seems I did not get Tuan's message as below. Never mind, I see it on Carl's post. Yes, I welcome the test. It will be an interesting exercise. The 6 cities mentioned are fine; an international city could be done too but quite frankly if we don't see something emerge at the 6 then I doubt we'd see it on 7 either. So to save time let's just stick to the 6. Obviously if the 6 are accurate for either system then the methods will work anywhere. Max/min/0 or 1 or 2 is okay by me also. Instead of March I suggest our beginning date to be April 1st and we go to May 31st. I say this because I will soon be putting up March's forecasts for both countries on my website. I also suggest we both forward our data to Carl's private email, if he is acceptable and if he is indeed setting up a table for it. An independent arbitrator is better than an open forum. I think if we both get our data to Carl by the end of February that that gives all of us easy time to get ready. Debate will no doubt ensue at those who say it did rain in Melbourne/it didn't where I was. We'll just have to ride that one out. As I do not have access to the data that Tuan would have, it grants me some leeway. Also, thanks to Carl for offering his time and input. and..er..what's the prize? (just kidding) cheers Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Carl Smith" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:26 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Moon vs Clim Challenge > Hi Tuan, Ken, and All. > > I have an interest in the possibilities of longer-range weather forecasting. > > In the past I attempted to evaluate a set of LR forecasts by > astrometeorologists and lunar LR-forecaster Ken Ring for the Sydney > Olympics, albeit rather inadequately prepared for and evaluated - it > was all set up too close to the time to allow adequate preparation by > forecasters, there was no pre-set forecast format, and evaluation was > rather difficult given the diverse nature of the forecasting formats > and lack of clear definitions of terms. > > You can see the results at http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/Olympics.htm > > I also evaluated an exercise comparing Ken Ring's forecasts over a > certain period with a set of random number generators set up by BoM > forecaster Harald Richter which was run though the aus-wx list, the > challenge being set up by Harald to prove random numbers could do > better than the Moon. Ken's original forecasts were a quick response > to an email question regarding the bushfire situation around Sydney > at the time - he had not prepared them with the same degree of > diligence he would have given to a client or if he had been knowingly > submitting them for public evaluation. Evaluation methodology was not > adequately prepared beforehand. As a result there was some very > different and at times contradictory views expressed regarding > evaluating the results as they unfolded on the list, and in the final > analysis there were several evaluation methods used with their > advantages, biases, and shortcomings spelled out. > > You can see the results at > http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/ezines/lr-rain-analysis.htm - I > suggest you both read this page carefully before deciding on > evaluation methods. > > I would be happy to take part in the evaluation of the current Moon > vs Clim Challenge, as I have an interest in developing better > evaluation methods for longer range forecasting. > > I feel we need to establish forecast validation rules acceptable to > both parties before the period of the exercise. > > For example, if a forecast was made for a day: > Min 15, Max 25, Rain 0 > and observations showed > Min 16, Max 24, Rain 0.5 mm > would this be validated as an accurate forecast? > > Tuan - do you know how the BoM evaluates the accuracy of it's > forecasts - i.e. what ranges of error in temp and rainfall are used > for validation. Also, for the purposes of this exercise, what ranges > of same would you consider to constitute a validation of the Clim > method (if these differ at the BoM methods). > > Ken - I know you allow a +-1 day accuracy for your lunar based > forecasts as stated clearly on your website > - as I have asked Tuan, I am also > asking you to post what ranges of of error you would consider as > validating your forecast. I also know you see your forecasts as 'rain > windows' spanning several days, so need to ask whether you find > Tuan's forecast format acceptable or if you would like to suggest > changes you feel more suited to your methods. > > If you both agree on the forecast format, validation and comparison > will be easier. > > If you both wish to use the same forecasting format with different > validation techniques, I would suggest that all forecasts be > evaluated using both methods rather than trying to come to some > compromise that may not be satisfactory to either party, and that > others may also suggest validation methods that could differ yet > again, so all forecasts could also be evaluated using these methods. > > In this way the exercise may be useful in determining a more concrete > set of ground rules for further research into evaluating longer range > forecasts by whatever methodology. > > If you both agree, I will set up a web page to display your forecasts > and methodologies, the ranges of error and method(s) of evaluation, > the observations as they become available, and the results. > > I would also appreciate it if someone could undertake to collect all > relevent official observations for the cities involved and post them > on the list daily - my internet time can be limited by other > circumstances and I cannot say for sure I will definitely be able to > get the obs at BoM / NZMS websites every day. > > If the Ken Ring vs the RNG's exercise was anything to go by, I am > sure many will be curious to see how this exercise unfolds day by > day, and to evaluate for themselves how both parties methods are > doing. > > I look forward to your replies. > > Regards, > Carl. > > >Ken, > > > >I am willing to take up your challenge. Here are some the basic terms. > > > >1. It is a test to see if forecasting by the moon is significantly better > >than climatology (and vice versa) at lead-time >14 days (and not BoM or me > >vs Moon). > >2. To reduce possibility of chance, bias, bad luck factor, etc, > >the location > >for the forecasts will be: > > > > NZ - Auckland, Wellington & Christchurch > > Aus - Melbourne, Canberra & Sydney > > O/S - Any international capital you care to choose. Can be > >scrapped if >6 > >cities is too much. > > > >3. You can nominate any arbitrators and/or verification > >technique you wish. > >4. Forecast will be in this very basic in this form: > > > > City Date Min Max > > Rain lvl > >Eg NZAA 01/03/2003 15 22 > > 0 or 1 or 2 > >or Melbourne Mar 1 2003 18 25 Yes > > > >* For rain level, 0 is no rain, 1 is <10mm and 2 is =>10 mm. If this is too > >complex, we can go with yes or no option which is fine with me. > > > >Starting date will be March 1, 2003 and will go for at least one full month > >(31 days) and hopefully 2 months (if you are up to it Ken). > > > >5. Total forecasts will be 6 (cities) x 2 (min & max) x 2 or 3 > >(rain lvl) x > >31 (days). > >6. Total 744 forecasts with 'Yes/No' rain, 1116 forecasts with '0, 1 or 2' > >rain lvl. > >7. The actual observation will be at the official value as determined by > >the BoM and NZMetService. > >8. There may not be enough evidence to support either side, and > >we both will > >have to accept this. > >9. Judge/s (chosen by you) decision is final. > > > >Given the starting date is soon & you & I need time to prepare, the first > >few days of the forecast period need not be strictly >= 14 days. (but still > >must be at >9 days lead). Will be digging around for clim data especially NZ > >stuff. However, should not matter if I take a while to find it, as it is > >fixed already :) > > > >Ken, I will be out of the office till Wednesday. Looking forward to your > >reply. Hopefully you will be happy with these terms and we can start > >shortly. > > > >Regards, > >tuan > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 21:33:25 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
yep, no problem neville
 
i see what you mean, i think it would have about the same effect as a strong wind blowing as one drives along in ones car, at worst, noticable but imo not something that would be a root cause of catastrophic failure.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Tuesday, 11 February 2003 8:02:53 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather
 
Hi Richard

With respect, this sounds like opinion based on assumption.
I'm no 'air-tide' expert, but here's another assumption: If air is pulled laterally towards the moon at moonrise, then a short time later it is replaced as the moon rises, this could create eddy's. Not a 'brick wall' but a wall of sorts nevertheless.
Just a thought.

Neville

at : "Richard Modistach" <hambone at dodo.com.au>
Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 07:21:55 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time)
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather


even if the tidal influence was 1000m, the difference in gas density at that height would be negligble and would be a very gradual change over many 1000s of km, it's not like hitting a brick wall or anything. we're talking tides on a global scale, not waves on a local scale. whilst not denying that atmospheric tides exist their influence on re-entry would be negligble and at worst would simply invole some minor course alterations.

richard

-------Original Message-------

at : aussie-weather at world.std.com
Date: Monday, 10 February 2003 6:06:00 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather

Hi all again

This whole moon atmosphere tide thing has me thinking
Some say the atmosphereic tide is neglible, at 0.1 %
Now some basic principles of gravity:
The gravitational pull on an object by another object is the same regardless
of that object mass.
So that means a jumbo jet and a feather dropped at a great altitude in a
vacuum will fall to earth at the same speed (well actualy the jumbo jet will
hae its own gravitational pull trying to pull the earth to it, but its soo
small we can forget that).
Now, with the atmosphere, it is in lRe aus-wx Long range weather.ems ayers.
I.e it is heaviest at the surface, i.e has more mass, becuause of the weight
of atmosphere above, and lightest at the very edge in space, where it has no
more weight above and is very thin, i.e spread out, i.e low density,
compared to at the surface.
BUT it is still pulled by the moons gravity (and earths gravity the opposite
way) by the same amount as at the surface.
So the whole vertical profile of the atmosphere gets pulled by the moon by
the same amount (actualy the top will be pulled slight stronger becuase it
is closer to the moon, but by a very small difference, so we can ignore
that)
SO, how much does the atmosphere get pulled up by the moon as a atmosphere
tidal bulge?
I think you would find it will be much more than some think.
But how do you measure it? (as the barometer does not work, as there is
still the same mass under that bulge)
Cheers
Brian
----- Original Message -----
at : "Ken Ring" <ken at weatherman.co.nz>
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Long range weather


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ <mailto:
. ____________________________________________________
 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved -
Click Here

 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP104.gif: 00000001,0e8c3a6d,00000000,00000000 at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Storm Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 23:17:02 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello Everyone,
 
We had a lovely 8.5 mm at Mona Vale  at the storm but weren't home at the time.  We found the best place at Clontarf to watch it at .
 
Judy
at : "Phillip Basil-Jones" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Gustfront/storm photos 10/02/03 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:47:55 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
This was at Concord (near Homebush, at queen elizibith park and the cricket oval accross the road), which always seems to be in the right spot for storms with nice gusters. Most of the time we get the northern end of it.
----- Original Message -----
at : Adam Mayo
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Gustfront/storm photos 10/02/03

Great photos, which suburb did you take them at ? 
 
We watched the storm  at Clontarf  but only managed to get one photo of the main storm, still in the camera.  However we saw the most interesting cloud grow along the leading edge of the storm  -  don't know the name for it, but it was similar to a roll cloud.  It grew really quickly stretching out over an estimated 15 kilometres in only a few minutes. Can anyone tell me what it would have been.
 
We received 9 mm of rain at Mona Vale and the plants certainly appreciated its arrival.
 
Judy
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:07 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Gustfront/storm photos 10/02/03

I've added some images of yesterdays storm!! SDS has gone for now :)
 
at : "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Perth Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 01:39:29 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Blair wrote: > For future reference (by everyone), daily climate data > files for the last 2 weeks are available via the SILO web site at: > > http://www.bom.gov.au/silo/ > Also, daily temperature and rainfall extremes for the past few years are available at http://www.australianweathernews.com/news/2003/news2003headlines.cfm Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:13:07 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Suze - I am so sorry for mistaking you for... *wack* (gets slap across the face). I was in such a rush that I didn't even notice the different e-mail addresses :o . Most of my work are only 18-36hr out. I give 'detail' wx (clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance, for their special occasions like weddings. The Climate section of the BoM has outlooks at 1month-12+ months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill out to at least 9 months. I consider 7-14 days mid-term & >1 mth long-term. I am always on the lookout for methods that may extent forecasts out to 2 weeks (the theoretical limit). However, I always demand evidence before accepting anything as 'fact'. Detailed forecasts out to 15 days are now possible using the relatively new 'ensemble' technique. Preliminary results are quite exciting but reserve all judgement until all results are published & verified, before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days out with some skill (beating clim consistently). John W - Thanks for correcting my mistake. Sue - Best wishes for the wedding. (Apologies for mistake with Suze as well) Columbia - a colleague mentioned that the possibility of the shuttle being struck by Stratospheric lightning could also be under investigation, as possible cause of initial damage to left wing Clim vs Moon challenge - Carl Smith has volunteered to be the umpire (gratefully accepted). Final details of format to be work out. Challenge will be carried off-list to reduce email clutter in everyone's boxes. Results, when ready, will be made available for comments and reanalysis. Cheeers, tuan +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:17:52 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly! Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
hi paul,
 
your prayers may be answered.
 
 
richard

 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Wednesday, 12 February 2003 2:03:54 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly!
 
Hey All,

Just a quick email to let everyone know that we are needing rain quite badly
out here (Like most of Australia). The Wimmera Mallee storages are currently
showing 7% of capacity with 4 dams dry.. They have estimated 5% by April,
but if we don't get anything soon, we'll most likely be going up to Stage 4
restrictions, and a couple of towns around here will go onto Stage 5.

A list of dams and levels can be found at
http://www.wmwater.org.au/updates/storage.asp

Hopefully this nude female rain dance up at Ouyen later this month can open
up the heavens (No...males can't attend...LOL)

PaulY (Praying for rain)


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP106.gif: 00000001,5ace5156,00000000,00000000 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:17:52 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly! Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
hi paul,
 
your prayers may be answered.
 
 
richard

 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Wednesday, 12 February 2003 2:03:54 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly!
 
Hey All,

Just a quick email to let everyone know that we are needing rain quite badly
out here (Like most of Australia). The Wimmera Mallee storages are currently
showing 7% of capacity with 4 dams dry.. They have estimated 5% by April,
but if we don't get anything soon, we'll most likely be going up to Stage 4
restrictions, and a couple of towns around here will go onto Stage 5.

A list of dams and levels can be found at
http://www.wmwater.org.au/updates/storage.asp

Hopefully this nude female rain dance up at Ouyen later this month can open
up the heavens (No...males can't attend...LOL)

PaulY (Praying for rain)


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP108.gif: 00000001,5ace5156,00000000,00000000 at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly! Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 19:01:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hang on! Didn't they do a nudey somewhere the other day? Oh sorry that was against war in Iraq. Maybe several inches were achieved somewhere. I'm out.... ----- Original Message ----- at : "Paul Yole" To: "Aussie Weather" Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:23 PM Subject: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly! > Hey All, > > Just a quick email to let everyone know that we are needing rain quite badly > out here (Like most of Australia). The Wimmera Mallee storages are currently > showing 7% of capacity with 4 dams dry.. They have estimated 5% by April, > but if we don't get anything soon, we'll most likely be going up to Stage 4 > restrictions, and a couple of towns around here will go onto Stage 5. > > A list of dams and levels can be found at > http://www.wmwater.org.au/updates/storage.asp > > Hopefully this nude female rain dance up at Ouyen later this month can open > up the heavens (No...males can't attend...LOL) > > PaulY (Praying for rain) > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly! Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 19:30:43 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Well I hope the soil moisture forecast means I'm going to get a soggy back yard.
 
This 9 day prognostic , if reliable, may explain the expectation of heavy rain over the northeast half of NSW
 
 
It's the only model I know of that goes out that far.
 
Haven't seen anything like that for February since 1992 when we had 10 inches in 2 days.
 
February 1992 was a month with strongly negative SOI (minus 10.2) so maybe there's hope.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly!

hi paul,
 
your prayers may be answered.
 
 
richard

 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Wednesday, 12 February 2003 2:03:54 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly!
 
Hey All,

Just a quick email to let everyone know that we are needing rain quite badly
out here (Like most of Australia). The Wimmera Mallee storages are currently
showing 7% of capacity with 4 dams dry.. They have estimated 5% by April,
but if we don't get anything soon, we'll most likely be going up to Stage 4
restrictions, and a couple of towns around here will go onto Stage 5.

A list of dams and levels can be found at
http://www.wmwater.org.au/updates/storage.asp

Hopefully this nude female rain dance up at Ouyen later this month can open
up the heavens (No...males can't attend...LOL)

PaulY (Praying for rain)


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP107.gif: 00000001,0986484b,00000000,00000000 at : "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Central Tablelands Chase - 8 Feb 2003 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 20:36:12 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com A few shots at an amazing chase on Saturday!!!!! 12 storms, 2 dustdevils, torrential rain, blowing dust all between 2pm & 7.30pm!! http://www.stormchasers.au.com/08_02_03.htm Enjoy!!!! I'd give up a supercell of 3 for a repeat of the Saturday chase.... Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:54:48 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tuan, don't these two statements conflict? 1. "I give 'detail' wx(clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill out to at least 9 months." 2. "(I)reserve all judgement until all results are published..before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days out with some skill". Just a bit confused Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tuan Phan" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:13 PM Subject: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > Hi all, > > Suze - I am so sorry for mistaking you for... *wack* (gets slap across the > face). I was in such a rush that I didn't even notice the different e-mail > addresses :o . Most of my work are only 18-36hr out. I give 'detail' wx > (clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance, for their special > occasions like weddings. The Climate section of the BoM has outlooks at > 1month-12+ months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill out > to at least 9 months. I consider 7-14 days mid-term & >1 mth long-term. > > I am always on the lookout for methods that may extent forecasts out to 2 > weeks (the theoretical limit). However, I always demand evidence before > accepting anything as 'fact'. Detailed forecasts out to 15 days are now > possible using the relatively new 'ensemble' technique. Preliminary results > are quite exciting but reserve all judgement until all results are published > & verified, before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days > out with some skill (beating clim consistently). > > John W - Thanks for correcting my mistake. > > Sue - Best wishes for the wedding. (Apologies for mistake with Suze as well) > > Columbia - a colleague mentioned that the possibility of the shuttle being > struck by Stratospheric lightning could also be under investigation, as > possible cause of initial damage to left wing > > Clim vs Moon challenge - Carl Smith has volunteered to be the umpire > (gratefully accepted). Final details of format to be work out. Challenge > will be carried off-list to reduce email clutter in everyone's boxes. > Results, when ready, will be made available for comments and reanalysis. > > > Cheeers, > tuan > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Steve Baynham" To: "weather" Subject: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:57:34 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hey everyone, heres som ecaptures i got yesterday afternnon at Chisholm, Southern Cnaberra. first is of a storm that passed over bungendoRe, east of canbeera. rest is of a thundery strom that missed tuugeranong but went on to hit tharwa. south of canberra. http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021101.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021102.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021103.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021104.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021105.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021106.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021107.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021108.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021109.jpg Steve Baynham icq : 26863574 Brisbane Storm Chasers http://www.bsch.au.com Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au Homepage http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:23:23 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics at : Dale Small To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics LOL

Awesome pix Steve.. have another drink on me - ehehehehe
*offtopic comment for those who werent present at the time*

:)
*Dale*







on 12/02/2003 21:57, Steve Baynham at bayns at broad.net.au wrote:

hey everyone,
heres som ecaptures i got yesterday afternnon at Chisholm, Southern
Cnaberra.
first is of a storm that passed over bungendoRe, east of canbeera. rest is
of a thundery strom that
missed tuugeranong but went on  to hit tharwa. south of canberra.
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021101.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021102.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021103.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021104.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021105.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021106.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021107.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021108.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021109.jpg



Steve Baynham
icq : 26863574

Brisbane Storm Chasers
http://www.bsch.au.com

Australian Severe Weather Association
http://www.severeweather.asn.au

Homepage
http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 01:17:50 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics
Saw the later storm develop about 5kms to my SW whilst on a break at work, sat outside for 20 minutes, i so nearly didn't go back, lol. *CREAMAGE*
 
Simon
----- Original Message -----
at : Dale Small
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics

LOL

Awesome pix Steve.. have another drink on me - ehehehehe
*offtopic comment for those who werent present at the time*

:)
*Dale*







on 12/02/2003 21:57, Steve Baynham at bayns at broad.net.au wrote:

hey everyone,
heres som ecaptures i got yesterday afternnon at Chisholm, Southern
Cnaberra.
first is of a storm that passed over bungendoRe, east of canbeera. rest is
of a thundery strom that
missed tuugeranong but went on  to hit tharwa. south of canberra.
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021101.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021102.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021103.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021104.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021105.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021106.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021107.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021108.jpg
http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021109.jpg



Steve Baynham
icq : 26863574

Brisbane Storm Chasers
http://www.bsch.au.com

Australian Severe Weather Association
http://www.severeweather.asn.au

Homepage
http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


X-Originating-IP: [144.138.240.109] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 01:33:08 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2003 14:33:08.0491 (UTC) FILETIME=[A97E15B0:01C2D2A3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well done Steve, I also watched the Tuggeranong storm last night at my front verandah at Gilmore.It seemed to peak south of Banks-Condor as it moved southeast.The afternoon storm was quite unusual since it was very isolated and quite intense,seemed to reach a great height too. Gavin SSWW Gilmore A.C.T. > at : "Steve Baynham" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: "weather" >Subject: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics >Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:57:34 +1100 > >hey everyone, >heres som ecaptures i got yesterday afternnon at Chisholm, Southern >Cnaberra. >first is of a storm that passed over bungendoRe, east of canbeera. rest is >of a thundery strom that >missed tuugeranong but went on to hit tharwa. south of canberra. >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021101.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021102.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021103.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021104.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021105.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021106.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021107.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021108.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021109.jpg > > > >Steve Baynham >icq : 26863574 > >Brisbane Storm Chasers >http://www.bsch.au.com > >Australian Severe Weather Association >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >Homepage >http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.138.240.109] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly! Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 01:37:29 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2003 14:37:30.0130 (UTC) FILETIME=[45710720:01C2D2A4] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Richard,Agreed,Hope you are right.The pressure and wind patterns do seem to be changing and SOI is in + territory again.We may go to stage 3 or 4 inCanberra soon Gavin SSWW Canberra > at : "Richard Modistach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly! >Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:17:52 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) > >hi paul, > >your prayers may be answered. > >http://grads.iges.org/pix/prec7.html > >richard > > >-------Original Message------- > > at : aussie-weather at world.std.com >Date: Wednesday, 12 February 2003 2:03:54 PM >To: Aussie Weather >Subject: aus-wx: Needing rain...badly! > >Hey All, > >Just a quick email to let everyone know that we are needing rain quite >badly >out here (Like most of Australia). The Wimmera Mallee storages are >currently >showing 7% of capacity with 4 dams dry.. They have estimated 5% by April, >but if we don't get anything soon, we'll most likely be going up to Stage 4 >restrictions, and a couple of towns around here will go onto Stage 5. > >A list of dams and levels can be found at >http://www.wmwater.org.au/updates/storage.asp > >Hopefully this nude female rain dance up at Ouyen later this month can open >up the heavens (No...males can't attend...LOL) > >PaulY (Praying for rain) > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > >. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 07:17:44 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, I did definitely the most lengthy metropolitan Sydney chase in an afternoon ever. Who would have thought that the 12th February 2003 would fire so well. After the early action, I arrived home briefly, got some more video of a lowering and interesting structure there of the storm I had been chasing. Then I picked up Geoff and went south. The first LP supercell had pulsed and matured and then weakened by the time we got nearer it but the 2nd one pulsed and matured when we were very close. These are at the 2nd LP supercell observed 12th February 2003: http://www.australiasevereweather.com/temp/20030212lp/clip0020.jpg http://www.australiasevereweather.com/temp/20030212lp/clip0031.jpg http://www.australiasevereweather.com/temp/20030212lp/clip0050.jpg Needless to say, Geoff Thurtell and I were over the moon when this one came into view. A whole report of all the action during the afternoon will be made available later. The LP supercell by the way on animation was spinning like a top - clear rotation. Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher at Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Patrick Tobin" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:34:23 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Steve - great pics... I also managed to get some pics of both storms but at an angle to the north of where you were. It was a great set of views. Bungendore storm http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/20030213Bung/ Tharwa Storm http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/20030213Tugg/ Patrick ----- Original Message ----- at : "Steve Baynham" To: "weather" Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:57 PM Subject: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics > hey everyone, > heres som ecaptures i got yesterday afternnon at Chisholm, Southern > Cnaberra. > first is of a storm that passed over bungendoRe, east of canbeera. rest is > of a thundery strom that > missed tuugeranong but went on to hit tharwa. south of canberra. > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021101.jpg > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021102.jpg > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021103.jpg > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021104.jpg > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021105.jpg > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021106.jpg > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021107.jpg > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021108.jpg > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021109.jpg > > > > Steve Baynham > icq : 26863574 > > Brisbane Storm Chasers > http://www.bsch.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > Homepage > http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:21:35 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Jimmy and Everyone,
 
We know how excited you were to see a storm like that and IN Sydney!  I will have to show a lot of our friends around here, so that they will realise that at least two of them have occurred in the Metro Area.
 
It appears in the photos to be as large as the one that we were lucky enough to witness of the beach last February 8th, must be a lucky month.
 
For all of you who never found my photos they are on the Australian Severe Weather photo pages under Wall Clouds.
 
Judy Mayo
at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:35:04 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, >Tuan, don't these two statements conflict? >1. "I give 'detail' wx(clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance. >Recent research showed evidence of skill out to at least 9 months." >2. "(I)reserve all judgement until all results are published..before I will >believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days out with some skill". >Just a bit confused >Ken >www.predictweather.com My fault at not explaining things clearer. Wx & climate forecasting/outlooks are too completely different animals. "Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get" (borrowed at BoM web site). Climate forecasts differ greatly at wx ones due to the different time scale and spatial area we are talking about. eg. Wx forecast: Melbourne (14/02/2003) - Fine. Mainly sunny. Min 16 Max 29 Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall. I get cautious when people claim they can do wx forecasts at climate time scale and be 'extremely' accurate. Or when they try to mix & match both types together and claim they can forecast extremely well at BOTH end of the time scale. And also without a consistent methodology or use the "secret herbs & spices, so can't tell" excuse. Prefer seeing some hard data and coming to my own conclusions rather than taking anyone's claim as fact. Just my personal opinion. tuan, the skeptic ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tuan Phan" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:13 PM Subject: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > Hi all, > > Suze - I am so sorry for mistaking you for... *wack* (gets slap across the > face). I was in such a rush that I didn't even notice the different e-mail > addresses :o . Most of my work are only 18-36hr out. I give 'detail' wx > (clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance, for their special > occasions like weddings. The Climate section of the BoM has outlooks at > 1month-12+ months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill out > to at least 9 months. I consider 7-14 days mid-term & >1 mth long-term. > > I am always on the lookout for methods that may extent forecasts out to 2 > weeks (the theoretical limit). However, I always demand evidence before > accepting anything as 'fact'. Detailed forecasts out to 15 days are now > possible using the relatively new 'ensemble' technique. Preliminary results > are quite exciting but reserve all judgement until all results are published > & verified, before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days > out with some skill (beating clim consistently). > > John W - Thanks for correcting my mistake. > > Sue - Best wishes for the wedding. (Apologies for mistake with Suze as well) > > Columbia - a colleague mentioned that the possibility of the shuttle being > struck by Stratospheric lightning could also be under investigation, as > possible cause of initial damage to left wing > > Clim vs Moon challenge - Carl Smith has volunteered to be the umpire > (gratefully accepted). Final details of format to be work out. Challenge > will be carried off-list to reduce email clutter in everyone's boxes. > Results, when ready, will be made available for comments and reanalysis. > > > Cheeers, > tuan > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:54:20 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2003 22:54:20.0357 (UTC) FILETIME=[ADB8AF50:01C2D2E9] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Nice shots, Steve, Patrick

I chased the Bungendore one while doing the dishes, out my east looking kitchen window.  Seemed to be a corkscrew component to the updraft at some stages.

Michael

> at : "Patrick Tobin"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics
>Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:34:23 +1100
>
>Hi Steve - great pics...
>
>I also managed to get some pics of both storms but at an angle to the
>north of where you were.
>It was a great set of views.
>
>Bungendore storm
>
>http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/20030213Bung/
>
>Tharwa Storm
>
>http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/20030213Tugg/
>
>Patrick
>
>----- Original Message -----
> at : "Steve Baynham"
>To: "weather"
>Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:57 PM
>Subject: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics
>
>
> > hey everyone,
> > heres som ecaptures i got yesterday afternnon at Chisholm, Southern
> > Cnaberra.
> > first is of a storm that passed over bungendoRe, east of canbeera. rest is
> > of a thundery strom that
> > missed tuugeranong but went on to hit tharwa. south of canberra.
> > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021101.jpg
> > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021102.jpg
> > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021103.jpg
> > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021104.jpg
> > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021105.jpg
> > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021106.jpg
> > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021107.jpg
> > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021108.jpg
> > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021109.jpg
> >
> >
> >
> > Steve Baynham
> > icq : 26863574
> >
> > Brisbane Storm Chasers
> > http://www.bsch.au.com
> >
> > Australian Severe Weather Association
> > http://www.severeweather.asn.au
> >
> > Homepage
> > http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany
> >
> >
> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> > message.
> > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Click here for more. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:58:04 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com All scientits are sceptics until proven otherwise. Thats what modern day science is all about Thats what having a science degree does: you learn how to wade through all the evidence to come up with your own conclusions, bassed on others conclusions as well.....and you go at there. Often means the wheels turn slowly, but it means things get done right. To be told you are a ostrich with your head in the sand by Ken Ring does is not a good idea, Ken! So, let the games begin! (getting some hard evidence) Ps, ken's Fen forecast for NZ is going great....first month in a long time he has been OK...maybe its because the moon is better at influcening the weather when the weather is more settled in the first place and not going about doing its own thing and with chaos being the ruler more than at this time of the year ! ? Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tuan Phan" To: Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:35 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > Ken, > > >Tuan, don't these two statements conflict? > >1. "I give 'detail' wx(clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance. > >Recent research showed evidence of skill out to at least 9 months." > >2. "(I)reserve all judgement until all results are published..before I will > >believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days out with some skill". > >Just a bit confused > >Ken > >www.predictweather.com > > > My fault at not explaining things clearer. > > Wx & climate forecasting/outlooks are too completely different animals. > "Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get" (borrowed at BoM web > site). Climate forecasts differ greatly at wx ones due to the different > time scale and spatial area we are talking about. > > eg. Wx forecast: Melbourne (14/02/2003) - Fine. Mainly sunny. Min 16 Max 29 > Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average > temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall. > > I get cautious when people claim they can do wx forecasts at climate time > scale and be 'extremely' accurate. Or when they try to mix & match both > types together and claim they can forecast extremely well at BOTH end of the > time scale. And also without a consistent methodology or use the "secret > herbs & spices, so can't tell" excuse. > > Prefer seeing some hard data and coming to my own conclusions rather than > taking anyone's claim as fact. > Just my personal opinion. > > tuan, the skeptic > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tuan Phan" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:13 PM > Subject: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Suze - I am so sorry for mistaking you for... *wack* (gets slap across the > > face). I was in such a rush that I didn't even notice the different e-mail > > addresses :o . Most of my work are only 18-36hr out. I give 'detail' wx > > (clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance, for their special > > occasions like weddings. The Climate section of the BoM has outlooks at > > 1month-12+ months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill out > > to at least 9 months. I consider 7-14 days mid-term & >1 mth long-term. > > > > I am always on the lookout for methods that may extent forecasts out to 2 > > weeks (the theoretical limit). However, I always demand evidence before > > accepting anything as 'fact'. Detailed forecasts out to 15 days are now > > possible using the relatively new 'ensemble' technique. Preliminary > results > > are quite exciting but reserve all judgement until all results are > published > > & verified, before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days > > out with some skill (beating clim consistently). > > > > John W - Thanks for correcting my mistake. > > > > Sue - Best wishes for the wedding. (Apologies for mistake with Suze as > well) > > > > Columbia - a colleague mentioned that the possibility of the shuttle being > > struck by Stratospheric lightning could also be under investigation, as > > possible cause of initial damage to left wing > > > > Clim vs Moon challenge - Carl Smith has volunteered to be the umpire > > (gratefully accepted). Final details of format to be work out. Challenge > > will be carried off-list to reduce email clutter in everyone's boxes. > > Results, when ready, will be made available for comments and reanalysis. > > > > > > Cheeers, > > tuan > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:30:14 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, >Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average >temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall >So how do you propose to do daily forecasts at least two months ahead, >according to our up and coming challenge? By just quoting % probabilities? >I'm still a tad confused. >Ken That example was just made up by me for basic illustration purposes. The challenge is basically to do wx style forecasts at lead time >14 days to see if any method can beat the wx style forecasts achieved by a 'no skill/base level' method using clim stats. Best I think to email me directly so people don't get anoyed with their email boxes getting clogged. Just a touch busy at the moment with hard deadlines coming up. Will email you after 6pm when get some free time. tuan >snip +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:31:50 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall So how do you propose to do daily forecasts at least two months ahead, according to our up and coming challenge? By just quoting % probabilities? I'm still a tad confused. Ken ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tuan Phan" To: Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:35 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > Ken, > > >Tuan, don't these two statements conflict? > >1. "I give 'detail' wx(clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance. > >Recent research showed evidence of skill out to at least 9 months." > >2. "(I)reserve all judgement until all results are published..before I will > >believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days out with some skill". > >Just a bit confused > >Ken > >www.predictweather.com > > > My fault at not explaining things clearer. > > Wx & climate forecasting/outlooks are too completely different animals. > "Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get" (borrowed at BoM web > site). Climate forecasts differ greatly at wx ones due to the different > time scale and spatial area we are talking about. > > eg. Wx forecast: Melbourne (14/02/2003) - Fine. Mainly sunny. Min 16 Max 29 > Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average > temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall. > > I get cautious when people claim they can do wx forecasts at climate time > scale and be 'extremely' accurate. Or when they try to mix & match both > types together and claim they can forecast extremely well at BOTH end of the > time scale. And also without a consistent methodology or use the "secret > herbs & spices, so can't tell" excuse. > > Prefer seeing some hard data and coming to my own conclusions rather than > taking anyone's claim as fact. > Just my personal opinion. > > tuan, the skeptic > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tuan Phan" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:13 PM > Subject: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Suze - I am so sorry for mistaking you for... *wack* (gets slap across the > > face). I was in such a rush that I didn't even notice the different e-mail > > addresses :o . Most of my work are only 18-36hr out. I give 'detail' wx > > (clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance, for their special > > occasions like weddings. The Climate section of the BoM has outlooks at > > 1month-12+ months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill out > > to at least 9 months. I consider 7-14 days mid-term & >1 mth long-term. > > > > I am always on the lookout for methods that may extent forecasts out to 2 > > weeks (the theoretical limit). However, I always demand evidence before > > accepting anything as 'fact'. Detailed forecasts out to 15 days are now > > possible using the relatively new 'ensemble' technique. Preliminary > results > > are quite exciting but reserve all judgement until all results are > published > > & verified, before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days > > out with some skill (beating clim consistently). > > > > John W - Thanks for correcting my mistake. > > > > Sue - Best wishes for the wedding. (Apologies for mistake with Suze as > well) > > > > Columbia - a colleague mentioned that the possibility of the shuttle being > > struck by Stratospheric lightning could also be under investigation, as > > possible cause of initial damage to left wing > > > > Clim vs Moon challenge - Carl Smith has volunteered to be the umpire > > (gratefully accepted). Final details of format to be work out. Challenge > > will be carried off-list to reduce email clutter in everyone's boxes. > > Results, when ready, will be made available for comments and reanalysis. > > > > > > Cheeers, > > tuan > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:34:03 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > To be told you are a ostrich with your head in the sand by Ken Ring does is > not a good idea, Ken! If the cap fits, wear it. Also not a good idea to bring personal vendettas at one forum into another. I suggest you don't pursue this, Brian. Ken ----- Original Message ----- at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:58 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > All scientits are sceptics until proven otherwise. > Thats what modern day science is all about > Thats what having a science degree does: you learn how to wade through all > the evidence to come up with your own conclusions, bassed on others > conclusions as well.....and you go at there. > Often means the wheels turn slowly, but it means things get done right. > To be told you are a ostrich with your head in the sand by Ken Ring does is > not a good idea, Ken! > So, let the games begin! (getting some hard evidence) > Ps, ken's Fen forecast for NZ is going great....first month in a long time > he has been OK...maybe its because the moon is better at influcening the > weather when the weather is more settled in the first place and not going > about doing its own thing and with chaos being the ruler more than at this > time of the year ! ? > > Cheers > Brian > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tuan Phan" > To: > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:35 AM > Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > > > > > Ken, > > > > >Tuan, don't these two statements conflict? > > >1. "I give 'detail' wx(clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance. > > >Recent research showed evidence of skill out to at least 9 months." > > >2. "(I)reserve all judgement until all results are published..before I > will > > >believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days out with some skill". > > >Just a bit confused > > >Ken > > >www.predictweather.com > > > > > > My fault at not explaining things clearer. > > > > Wx & climate forecasting/outlooks are too completely different animals. > > "Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get" (borrowed at BoM > web > > site). Climate forecasts differ greatly at wx ones due to the different > > time scale and spatial area we are talking about. > > > > eg. Wx forecast: Melbourne (14/02/2003) - Fine. Mainly sunny. Min 16 Max > 29 > > Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average > > temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall. > > > > I get cautious when people claim they can do wx forecasts at climate time > > scale and be 'extremely' accurate. Or when they try to mix & match both > > types together and claim they can forecast extremely well at BOTH end of > the > > time scale. And also without a consistent methodology or use the "secret > > herbs & spices, so can't tell" excuse. > > > > Prefer seeing some hard data and coming to my own conclusions rather than > > taking anyone's claim as fact. > > Just my personal opinion. > > > > tuan, the skeptic > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Tuan Phan" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:13 PM > > Subject: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Suze - I am so sorry for mistaking you for... *wack* (gets slap across > the > > > face). I was in such a rush that I didn't even notice the different > e-mail > > > addresses :o . Most of my work are only 18-36hr out. I give 'detail' wx > > > (clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance, for their special > > > occasions like weddings. The Climate section of the BoM has outlooks > at > > > 1month-12+ months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill > out > > > to at least 9 months. I consider 7-14 days mid-term & >1 mth long-term. > > > > > > I am always on the lookout for methods that may extent forecasts out to > 2 > > > weeks (the theoretical limit). However, I always demand evidence before > > > accepting anything as 'fact'. Detailed forecasts out to 15 days are now > > > possible using the relatively new 'ensemble' technique. Preliminary > > results > > > are quite exciting but reserve all judgement until all results are > > published > > > & verified, before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 > days > > > out with some skill (beating clim consistently). > > > > > > John W - Thanks for correcting my mistake. > > > > > > Sue - Best wishes for the wedding. (Apologies for mistake with Suze as > > well) > > > > > > Columbia - a colleague mentioned that the possibility of the shuttle > being > > > struck by Stratospheric lightning could also be under investigation, as > > > possible cause of initial damage to left wing > > > > > > Clim vs Moon challenge - Carl Smith has volunteered to be the umpire > > > (gratefully accepted). Final details of format to be work out. Challenge > > > will be carried off-list to reduce email clutter in everyone's boxes. > > > Results, when ready, will be made available for comments and reanalysis. > > > > > > > > > Cheeers, > > > tuan > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:10:14 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Huh? And my "I belive in the moon" T shirts were just about to be printed off! Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:31 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > >Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average > temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall > So how do you propose to do daily forecasts at least two months ahead, > according to our up and coming challenge? By just quoting % probabilities? > I'm still a tad confused. > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tuan Phan" > To: > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:35 AM > Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > > > Ken, > > > > >Tuan, don't these two statements conflict? > > >1. "I give 'detail' wx(clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance. > > >Recent research showed evidence of skill out to at least 9 months." > > >2. "(I)reserve all judgement until all results are published..before I > will > > >believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days out with some skill". > > >Just a bit confused > > >Ken > > >www.predictweather.com > > > > > > My fault at not explaining things clearer. > > > > Wx & climate forecasting/outlooks are too completely different animals. > > "Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get" (borrowed at BoM > web > > site). Climate forecasts differ greatly at wx ones due to the different > > time scale and spatial area we are talking about. > > > > eg. Wx forecast: Melbourne (14/02/2003) - Fine. Mainly sunny. Min 16 Max > 29 > > Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average > > temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall. > > > > I get cautious when people claim they can do wx forecasts at climate time > > scale and be 'extremely' accurate. Or when they try to mix & match both > > types together and claim they can forecast extremely well at BOTH end of > the > > time scale. And also without a consistent methodology or use the "secret > > herbs & spices, so can't tell" excuse. > > > > Prefer seeing some hard data and coming to my own conclusions rather than > > taking anyone's claim as fact. > > Just my personal opinion. > > > > tuan, the skeptic > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Tuan Phan" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:13 PM > > Subject: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Suze - I am so sorry for mistaking you for... *wack* (gets slap across > the > > > face). I was in such a rush that I didn't even notice the different > e-mail > > > addresses :o . Most of my work are only 18-36hr out. I give 'detail' wx > > > (clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance, for their special > > > occasions like weddings. The Climate section of the BoM has outlooks > at > > > 1month-12+ months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill > out > > > to at least 9 months. I consider 7-14 days mid-term & >1 mth long-term. > > > > > > I am always on the lookout for methods that may extent forecasts out to > 2 > > > weeks (the theoretical limit). However, I always demand evidence before > > > accepting anything as 'fact'. Detailed forecasts out to 15 days are now > > > possible using the relatively new 'ensemble' technique. Preliminary > > results > > > are quite exciting but reserve all judgement until all results are > > published > > > & verified, before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 > days > > > out with some skill (beating clim consistently). > > > > > > John W - Thanks for correcting my mistake. > > > > > > Sue - Best wishes for the wedding. (Apologies for mistake with Suze as > > well) > > > > > > Columbia - a colleague mentioned that the possibility of the shuttle > being > > > struck by Stratospheric lightning could also be under investigation, as > > > possible cause of initial damage to left wing > > > > > > Clim vs Moon challenge - Carl Smith has volunteered to be the umpire > > > (gratefully accepted). Final details of format to be work out. Challenge > > > will be carried off-list to reduce email clutter in everyone's boxes. > > > Results, when ready, will be made available for comments and reanalysis. > > > > > > > > > Cheeers, > > > tuan > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:13:57 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com NOW he tells me!! I take it all back..and I'll order a container-load. Ken ----- Original Message ----- at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > Huh? > And my "I belive in the moon" T shirts were just about to be printed off! > Cheers > Brian > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:31 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > > > >Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average > > temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall > > So how do you propose to do daily forecasts at least two months ahead, > > according to our up and coming challenge? By just quoting % probabilities? > > I'm still a tad confused. > > Ken > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Tuan Phan" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:35 AM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > > > > > > Ken, > > > > > > >Tuan, don't these two statements conflict? > > > >1. "I give 'detail' wx(clim) forecast when people ask, months in > advance. > > > >Recent research showed evidence of skill out to at least 9 months." > > > >2. "(I)reserve all judgement until all results are published..before I > > will > > > >believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days out with some skill". > > > >Just a bit confused > > > >Ken > > > >www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > My fault at not explaining things clearer. > > > > > > Wx & climate forecasting/outlooks are too completely different animals. > > > "Climate is what you expect, weather is what you get" (borrowed at BoM > > web > > > site). Climate forecasts differ greatly at wx ones due to the > different > > > time scale and spatial area we are talking about. > > > > > > eg. Wx forecast: Melbourne (14/02/2003) - Fine. Mainly sunny. Min 16 Max > > 29 > > > Climate forecast: SE Aus (Autumn 2003) - 60% prob above average > > > temperature. 40% prob above median rainfall. > > > > > > I get cautious when people claim they can do wx forecasts at climate > time > > > scale and be 'extremely' accurate. Or when they try to mix & match both > > > types together and claim they can forecast extremely well at BOTH end of > > the > > > time scale. And also without a consistent methodology or use the "secret > > > herbs & spices, so can't tell" excuse. > > > > > > Prefer seeing some hard data and coming to my own conclusions rather > than > > > taking anyone's claim as fact. > > > Just my personal opinion. > > > > > > tuan, the skeptic > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > at : "Tuan Phan" > > > To: > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:13 PM > > > Subject: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Suze - I am so sorry for mistaking you for... *wack* (gets slap across > > the > > > > face). I was in such a rush that I didn't even notice the different > > e-mail > > > > addresses :o . Most of my work are only 18-36hr out. I give 'detail' > wx > > > > (clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance, for their special > > > > occasions like weddings. The Climate section of the BoM has outlooks > > at > > > > 1month-12+ months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill > > out > > > > to at least 9 months. I consider 7-14 days mid-term & >1 mth > long-term. > > > > > > > > I am always on the lookout for methods that may extent forecasts out > to > > 2 > > > > weeks (the theoretical limit). However, I always demand evidence > before > > > > accepting anything as 'fact'. Detailed forecasts out to 15 days are > now > > > > possible using the relatively new 'ensemble' technique. Preliminary > > > results > > > > are quite exciting but reserve all judgement until all results are > > > published > > > > & verified, before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 > > days > > > > out with some skill (beating clim consistently). > > > > > > > > John W - Thanks for correcting my mistake. > > > > > > > > Sue - Best wishes for the wedding. (Apologies for mistake with Suze as > > > well) > > > > > > > > Columbia - a colleague mentioned that the possibility of the shuttle > > being > > > > struck by Stratospheric lightning could also be under investigation, > as > > > > possible cause of initial damage to left wing > > > > > > > > Clim vs Moon challenge - Carl Smith has volunteered to be the umpire > > > > (gratefully accepted). Final details of format to be work out. > Challenge > > > > will be carried off-list to reduce email clutter in everyone's boxes. > > > > Results, when ready, will be made available for comments and > reanalysis. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheeers, > > > > tuan > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:35:26 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Judy, Yes good observation. There is a marked similarity between the structure achieved on the 8th February 2002 (just over a year to the time of occurrence of this storm) and this storm. The "Cow Catcher" structure was the give-away however the storm on the northern Beaches seems to have had more precipitation attached to it. I also recall that temperatures aloft were cooling rather rapidly. There was not much of a cap with storms developing early afternoon. This storm was close to the coast feeding on available moisture. This event of yesterday seemed to have more explosive updraughts breaking through a resistant cap. The updraughts were vertical and the precipitation was reported to have been mostly just hail and some quite severe hail reports in that. I will wait until verification of these reports to come through before commenting on hail size. As I said these storms developed during the late afternoon and due to impressive heating breaking the cap. One other thing is that this storm developed inland and required higher dew points to lower the LCL. By the way, Judy is referring to the following link: http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall03.htm http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall04.htm Supercells are almost always spectacular. Jimmy Deguara At 09:21 AM 13/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Hi Jimmy and Everyone, > >We know how excited you were to see a storm like that and IN Sydney! I >will have to show a lot of our friends around here, so that they will >realise that at least two of them have occurred in the Metro Area. > >It appears in the photos to be as large as the one that we were lucky >enough to witness of the beach last February 8th, must be a lucky month. > >For all of you who never found my photos they are on the Australian Severe >Weather photo pages under Wall Clouds. > >Judy Mayo +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Dust devils Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:28:45 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Bussy would probably call this a small devil this afternoon - but it's not!! http://www.stormchasers.au.com/summer02oth.htm Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Dust devils Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:28:45 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Bussy would probably call this a small devil this afternoon - but it's not!! http://www.stormchasers.au.com/summer02oth.htm Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: LP Supercell Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:36:19 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I have been hiking in the Moreton National Park for the last 4 days. I suspected that something would fire in that time. Monday was one of the most explosive mornings i have ever seen. Driving down to Bundanoon small CJ's built instantly into massive cells, with extremely mature bases and structure at 11am. The lower level shear was superb, with all development having great lean. As the afternoon progressed, storms fired everywhere around us as we hiked into Kangaroo Valley. at noon til around 5pm, there was constant thunder, and some of the closest and most frequent flangs i have every observed. Pile that all up with 2cm hail, and 40mm+ and it was a good start. Yesterday I could see the storms to the north breaking the cap later in the afternoon, and massive updrafts curling up into the late afternoon sun. The structure in these storms are awesome Jimmy! Well done indeed. Where were these storms? dann -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:35 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Hi Judy, Yes good observation. There is a marked similarity between the structure achieved on the 8th February 2002 (just over a year to the time of occurrence of this storm) and this storm. The "Cow Catcher" structure was the give-away however the storm on the northern Beaches seems to have had more precipitation attached to it. I also recall that temperatures aloft were cooling rather rapidly. There was not much of a cap with storms developing early afternoon. This storm was close to the coast feeding on available moisture. This event of yesterday seemed to have more explosive updraughts breaking through a resistant cap. The updraughts were vertical and the precipitation was reported to have been mostly just hail and some quite severe hail reports in that. I will wait until verification of these reports to come through before commenting on hail size. As I said these storms developed during the late afternoon and due to impressive heating breaking the cap. One other thing is that this storm developed inland and required higher dew points to lower the LCL. By the way, Judy is referring to the following link: http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall03.htm http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall04.htm Supercells are almost always spectacular. Jimmy Deguara At 09:21 AM 13/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Hi Jimmy and Everyone, > >We know how excited you were to see a storm like that and IN Sydney! I >will have to show a lot of our friends around here, so that they will >realise that at least two of them have occurred in the Metro Area. > >It appears in the photos to be as large as the one that we were lucky >enough to witness of the beach last February 8th, must be a lucky month. > >For all of you who never found my photos they are on the Australian Severe >Weather photo pages under Wall Clouds. > >Judy Mayo +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:03:01 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: RE: aus-wx: LP Supercell Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Dan, Good to see some action go up around the place. Sorry I forgot to mention and it has caused a little confusion the location of the storm (at 1:00am thinking was a low priority). The LP supercell was south of Camden. The first LP supercell was further to the east somewhere - NW of Wollongong. I hope this helps. Jimmy Deguara At 09:36 PM 13/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: >I have been hiking in the Moreton National Park for the last 4 days. I >suspected that something would fire in that time. >Monday was one of the most explosive mornings i have ever seen. Driving >down to Bundanoon small CJ's built instantly into massive cells, with >extremely mature bases and structure at 11am. The lower level shear was >superb, with all development having great lean. As the afternoon >progressed, storms fired everywhere around us as we hiked into Kangaroo >Valley. at noon til around 5pm, there was constant thunder, and some of >the closest and most frequent flangs i have every observed. Pile that all up >with 2cm hail, and 40mm+ and it was a good start. > >Yesterday I could see the storms to the north breaking the cap later in the >afternoon, and massive updrafts curling up into the late afternoon sun. > >The structure in these storms are awesome Jimmy! >Well done indeed. > >Where were these storms? > >dann > >-----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara >Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:35 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell > > >Hi Judy, > >Yes good observation. There is a marked similarity between the structure >achieved on the 8th February 2002 (just over a year to the time of >occurrence of this storm) and this storm. The "Cow Catcher" structure was >the give-away however the storm on the northern Beaches seems to have >had more precipitation attached to it. I also recall that temperatures >aloft were cooling rather rapidly. There was not much of a cap with storms >developing early afternoon. This storm was close to the coast feeding on >available moisture. > >This event of yesterday seemed to have more explosive updraughts breaking >through a resistant cap. The updraughts were vertical and the precipitation >was reported to have been mostly just hail and some quite severe hail >reports in that. I will wait until verification of these reports to come >through before commenting on hail size. As I said these storms developed >during the late afternoon and due to impressive heating breaking the cap. >One other thing is that this storm developed inland and required higher dew >points to lower the LCL. > >By the way, Judy is referring to the following link: > >http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall03.htm > >http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall04.htm > >Supercells are almost always spectacular. > >Jimmy Deguara > > > >At 09:21 AM 13/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: > >Hi Jimmy and Everyone, > > > >We know how excited you were to see a storm like that and IN Sydney! I > >will have to show a lot of our friends around here, so that they will > >realise that at least two of them have occurred in the Metro Area. > > > >It appears in the photos to be as large as the one that we were lucky > >enough to witness of the beach last February 8th, must be a lucky month. > > > >For all of you who never found my photos they are on the Australian Severe > >Weather photo pages under Wall Clouds. > > > >Judy Mayo > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Phillip Basil-Jones" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:08:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Very nice photos there Jimmy, it seems around that area is a bit of a hotspot for LP supercells. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:03 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: LP Supercell > Hi Dan, > > Good to see some action go up around the place. > > Sorry I forgot to mention and it has caused a little confusion the location > of the storm (at 1:00am thinking was a low priority). The LP supercell was > south of Camden. The first LP supercell was further to the east somewhere - > NW of Wollongong. > > I hope this helps. > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 09:36 PM 13/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: > >I have been hiking in the Moreton National Park for the last 4 days. I > >suspected that something would fire in that time. > >Monday was one of the most explosive mornings i have ever seen. Driving > >down to Bundanoon small CJ's built instantly into massive cells, with > >extremely mature bases and structure at 11am. The lower level shear was > >superb, with all development having great lean. As the afternoon > >progressed, storms fired everywhere around us as we hiked into Kangaroo > >Valley. at noon til around 5pm, there was constant thunder, and some of > >the closest and most frequent flangs i have every observed. Pile that all up > >with 2cm hail, and 40mm+ and it was a good start. > > > >Yesterday I could see the storms to the north breaking the cap later in the > >afternoon, and massive updrafts curling up into the late afternoon sun. > > > >The structure in these storms are awesome Jimmy! > >Well done indeed. > > > >Where were these storms? > > > >dann > > > >-----Original Message----- > > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara > >Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:35 PM > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell > > > > > >Hi Judy, > > > >Yes good observation. There is a marked similarity between the structure > >achieved on the 8th February 2002 (just over a year to the time of > >occurrence of this storm) and this storm. The "Cow Catcher" structure was > >the give-away however the storm on the northern Beaches seems to have > >had more precipitation attached to it. I also recall that temperatures > >aloft were cooling rather rapidly. There was not much of a cap with storms > >developing early afternoon. This storm was close to the coast feeding on > >available moisture. > > > >This event of yesterday seemed to have more explosive updraughts breaking > >through a resistant cap. The updraughts were vertical and the precipitation > >was reported to have been mostly just hail and some quite severe hail > >reports in that. I will wait until verification of these reports to come > >through before commenting on hail size. As I said these storms developed > >during the late afternoon and due to impressive heating breaking the cap. > >One other thing is that this storm developed inland and required higher dew > >points to lower the LCL. > > > >By the way, Judy is referring to the following link: > > > >http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall03.htm > > > >http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall04.htm > > > >Supercells are almost always spectacular. > > > >Jimmy Deguara > > > > > > > >At 09:21 AM 13/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: > > >Hi Jimmy and Everyone, > > > > > >We know how excited you were to see a storm like that and IN Sydney! I > > >will have to show a lot of our friends around here, so that they will > > >realise that at least two of them have occurred in the Metro Area. > > > > > >It appears in the photos to be as large as the one that we were lucky > > >enough to witness of the beach last February 8th, must be a lucky month. > > > > > >For all of you who never found my photos they are on the Australian Severe > > >Weather photo pages under Wall Clouds. > > > > > >Judy Mayo > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > >--- > >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > >Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 > > > >--- > >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > >Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:27:35 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Phil, At 10:08 PM 13/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: Very nice photos there Jimmy, Cheers Phil. > it seems around that area is a bit of a >hotspot for LP supercells. Not quite sure about the term "hotspot" - question is do we have many LP supercells full stop? I would regard having many in a database before I would start using the term hotspot. However as to development of supercells over all, perhaps yes. The SW suburbs seem to be more in line for supercells that develop around the Southern Highlands and the high country to the SW. Jimmy Deguara >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Jimmy Deguara" >To: >Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:03 PM >Subject: RE: aus-wx: LP Supercell > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > Good to see some action go up around the place. > > > > Sorry I forgot to mention and it has caused a little confusion the >location > > of the storm (at 1:00am thinking was a low priority). The LP supercell was > > south of Camden. The first LP supercell was further to the east >somewhere - > > NW of Wollongong. > > > > I hope this helps. > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > At 09:36 PM 13/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: > > >I have been hiking in the Moreton National Park for the last 4 days. I > > >suspected that something would fire in that time. > > >Monday was one of the most explosive mornings i have ever seen. Driving > > >down to Bundanoon small CJ's built instantly into massive cells, with > > >extremely mature bases and structure at 11am. The lower level shear was > > >superb, with all development having great lean. As the afternoon > > >progressed, storms fired everywhere around us as we hiked into Kangaroo > > >Valley. at noon til around 5pm, there was constant thunder, and some of > > >the closest and most frequent flangs i have every observed. Pile that all >up > > >with 2cm hail, and 40mm+ and it was a good start. > > > > > >Yesterday I could see the storms to the north breaking the cap later in >the > > >afternoon, and massive updrafts curling up into the late afternoon sun. > > > > > >The structure in these storms are awesome Jimmy! > > >Well done indeed. > > > > > >Where were these storms? > > > > > >dann > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara > > >Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:35 PM > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell > > > > > > > > >Hi Judy, > > > > > >Yes good observation. There is a marked similarity between the structure > > >achieved on the 8th February 2002 (just over a year to the time of > > >occurrence of this storm) and this storm. The "Cow Catcher" structure was > > >the give-away however the storm on the northern Beaches seems to have > > >had more precipitation attached to it. I also recall that temperatures > > >aloft were cooling rather rapidly. There was not much of a cap with >storms > > >developing early afternoon. This storm was close to the coast feeding on > > >available moisture. > > > > > >This event of yesterday seemed to have more explosive updraughts breaking > > >through a resistant cap. The updraughts were vertical and the >precipitation > > >was reported to have been mostly just hail and some quite severe hail > > >reports in that. I will wait until verification of these reports to come > > >through before commenting on hail size. As I said these storms developed > > >during the late afternoon and due to impressive heating breaking the cap. > > >One other thing is that this storm developed inland and required higher >dew > > >points to lower the LCL. > > > > > >By the way, Judy is referring to the following link: > > > > > >http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall03.htm > > > > > >http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/wall04.htm > > > > > >Supercells are almost always spectacular. > > > > > >Jimmy Deguara > > > > > > > > > > > >At 09:21 AM 13/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: > > > >Hi Jimmy and Everyone, > > > > > > > >We know how excited you were to see a storm like that and IN Sydney! I > > > >will have to show a lot of our friends around here, so that they will > > > >realise that at least two of them have occurred in the Metro Area. > > > > > > > >It appears in the photos to be as large as the one that we were lucky > > > >enough to witness of the beach last February 8th, must be a lucky >month. > > > > > > > >For all of you who never found my photos they are on the Australian >Severe > > > >Weather photo pages under Wall Clouds. > > > > > > > >Judy Mayo > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > >--- > > >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > >Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 > > > > > >--- > > >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > >Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Fw: [EDIS] TORNADO WARNING [FLASH: Fresno Area] Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:41:33 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com This might interest some people. Dave ----- Original Message ----- at : "EDIS Email Service" To: Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:08 AM Subject: [EDIS] TORNADO WARNING [FLASH: Fresno Area] > NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY CA > 406 PM PST THU FEB 13 2003 > > THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN HANFORD CA HAS ISSUED A > > * TORNADO WARNING FOR... > WEST CENTRAL FRESNO COUNTY IN CENTRAL CALIFORNIA > > * UNTIL 430 PM PST > > * AT 358 PM PST...DOPPLER RADAR INDICATED A TORNADO 7 MILES NORTHWEST > OF FIREBAUGH...OR ABOUT 25 MILES WEST OF MADERA...MOVING NORTHEAST > AT 20 MPH. > > THE SAFEST PLACE TO BE DURING A TORNADO IS IN A BASEMENT. GET UNDER A > WORKBENCH OR OTHER PIECE OF STURDY FURNITURE. IF NO BASEMENT IS > AVAILABLE...SEEK SHELTER ON THE LOWEST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING IN AN > INTERIOR HALLWAY OR ROOM SUCH AS A CLOSET. USE BLANKETS OR PILLOWS TO > COVER YOUR BODY AND ALWAYS STAY AWAY at WINDOWS. > > IF IN MOBILE HOMES OR VEHICLES...EVACUATE THEM AND GET INSIDE A > SUBSTANTIAL SHELTER. IF NO SHELTER IS AVAILABLE...LIE FLAT IN THE > NEAREST DITCH OR OTHER LOW SPOT AND COVER YOUR HEAD WITH YOUR HANDS. > > LAT...LON 3680 12079 3667 12064 3683 12042 3698 12055 > > > [TORHNX / WFUS56 KHNX 1045181254] > > EDIS-02-13-03 1607 PST > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > To update or terminate your subscription to this email service > visit our webpage at http://www.incident.com/edismail.html. > Please DO NOT reply to this message: replies may be treated as > errors and result in your subscription being deleted. If > you have trouble with the Web form, or for other queries, email > . (But for faster service try the > Web method first!) > > EDIS is operated by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services, > State of California. This email relay service is offered by > incident.com on a non-commercial, subscription-only basis. > Because of the complexity of this system and its dependence on > other systems, we cannot be responsible for delays or failures > in forwarding or transmission. > --------------------------------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: EO Natural Hazards Four Cyclones in the Indian Ocean Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 12:11:32 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Everyone,
 
Four Cyclones in the Indian Ocean.  Quite a sight.
Judy

 http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/shownh.php3?img_id=5410
Attachment Converted: "c:\program files\eudora\attach\EO Natural Hazards Four Cyclones in the Indian Ocean.url" at : "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: BRRRRRRR!!!!!!! Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:57:08 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello All:
        Wishing everyone a Grand Aussie Summer:
I've just seen on weather.com, the conditions atop Mount Washington, New Hampshire(elev. 6,288FT/1,917.0M)
At 10:45 P.M. EST, Temp.:-32F(-35.5C), cloudy/blowing snow/fog, Visibility: 1/10th Mile(160.9M), Wind: WNW at 93MPH(149.7Kph) gusting to 105MPH(169.0Kph), Wind Chill:-78F(-61.1C). Wow, that's just about Mindblowing!
Cheers Yours David Powell
at : "Phillip Basil-Jones" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: BRRRRRRR!!!!!!! Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:20:32 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Wow! Even the thought of that makes you shiver.
----- Original Message -----
at : arky dave
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:57 PM
Subject: aus-wx: BRRRRRRR!!!!!!!

Hello All:
        Wishing everyone a Grand Aussie Summer:
I've just seen on weather.com, the conditions atop Mount Washington, New Hampshire(elev. 6,288FT/1,917.0M)
At 10:45 P.M. EST, Temp.:-32F(-35.5C), cloudy/blowing snow/fog, Visibility: 1/10th Mile(160.9M), Wind: WNW at 93MPH(149.7Kph) gusting to 105MPH(169.0Kph), Wind Chill:-78F(-61.1C). Wow, that's just about Mindblowing!
Cheers Yours David Powell
at : "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:15:50 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Guys, I was in Canberra all week for work, but managed to chase the Bungendore Storm. I first picked it up just north of Sutton. It was a very photogenic little series of storms. I say series as it was composed of a series of several pulses, each one tagging onto the southern flank. I hit its peak around the range west of Bungendore ( between Bungendore and the Hume Hwy ) where I encountered some small hail, hail at one stage was the only precip on a dry road. It did not make the journey off the range too well and died over Bungendore itself, I think east of the range was stable seabreeze. In fact it was interesting watching the east wind come in about sunset on three evenings during the week. The storm you can as the Thawra storm had potential but just did not deliver. It started along a convergence line, that at one stage tried to develop a inflow band. I should have a panorama of this one taken at Queanbeyan. I'll have a report and pics up later tonight of tomorrow. Michael ----- Original Message ----- at : "Patrick Tobin" To: Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:34 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics > Hi Steve - great pics... > > I also managed to get some pics of both storms but at an angle to the > north of where you were. > It was a great set of views. > > Bungendore storm > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/20030213Bung/ > > Tharwa Storm > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/20030213Tugg/ > > Patrick > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Steve Baynham" > To: "weather" > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:57 PM > Subject: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics > > > > hey everyone, > > heres som ecaptures i got yesterday afternnon at Chisholm, Southern > > Cnaberra. > > first is of a storm that passed over bungendoRe, east of canbeera. rest is > > of a thundery strom that > > missed tuugeranong but went on to hit tharwa. south of canberra. > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021101.jpg > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021102.jpg > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021103.jpg > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021104.jpg > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021105.jpg > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021106.jpg > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021107.jpg > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021108.jpg > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021109.jpg > > > > > > > > Steve Baynham > > icq : 26863574 > > > > Brisbane Storm Chasers > > http://www.bsch.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Association > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > > Homepage > > http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: BRRRRRRR!!!!!!! Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:20:53 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Now that's cold!!! Nearly want to make you put on a jumper (pullover).
----- Original Message -----
at : arky dave
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:57 PM
Subject: aus-wx: BRRRRRRR!!!!!!!

Hello All:
        Wishing everyone a Grand Aussie Summer:
I've just seen on weather.com, the conditions atop Mount Washington, New Hampshire(elev. 6,288FT/1,917.0M)
At 10:45 P.M. EST, Temp.:-32F(-35.5C), cloudy/blowing snow/fog, Visibility: 1/10th Mile(160.9M), Wind: WNW at 93MPH(149.7Kph) gusting to 105MPH(169.0Kph), Wind Chill:-78F(-61.1C). Wow, that's just about Mindblowing!
Cheers Yours David Powell
at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:25:40 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com WOW, fantastic stuff Michael - our most stormy week in ages, and you happen to be working here, how's that for luck!!! Simon ----- Original Message ----- at : "Michael Thompson" To: Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 5:15 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics > Hi Guys, > > I was in Canberra all week for work, but managed to chase the Bungendore > Storm. I first picked it up just north of Sutton. It was a very photogenic > little series of storms. I say series as it was composed of a series of > several pulses, each one tagging onto the southern flank. > > I hit its peak around the range west of Bungendore ( between Bungendore and > the Hume Hwy ) where I encountered some small hail, hail at one stage was > the only precip on a dry road. > > It did not make the journey off the range too well and died over Bungendore > itself, I think east of the range was stable seabreeze. > In fact it was interesting watching the east wind come in about sunset on > three evenings during the week. > > The storm you can as the Thawra storm had potential but just did not > deliver. It started along a convergence line, that at one stage tried to > develop a inflow band. I should have a panorama of this one taken at > Queanbeyan. > > I'll have a report and pics up later tonight of tomorrow. > > Michael > > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Patrick Tobin" > To: > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:34 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics > > > > Hi Steve - great pics... > > > > I also managed to get some pics of both storms but at an angle to the > > north of where you were. > > It was a great set of views. > > > > Bungendore storm > > > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/20030213Bung/ > > > > Tharwa Storm > > > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~patricktobin/wx/20030213Tugg/ > > > > Patrick > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Steve Baynham" > > To: "weather" > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:57 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: ACT/NSW storm pics > > > > > > > hey everyone, > > > heres som ecaptures i got yesterday afternnon at Chisholm, Southern > > > Cnaberra. > > > first is of a storm that passed over bungendoRe, east of canbeera. rest > is > > > of a thundery strom that > > > missed tuugeranong but went on to hit tharwa. south of canberra. > > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021101.jpg > > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021102.jpg > > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021103.jpg > > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021104.jpg > > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021105.jpg > > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021106.jpg > > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021107.jpg > > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021108.jpg > > > http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021109.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve Baynham > > > icq : 26863574 > > > > > > Brisbane Storm Chasers > > > http://www.bsch.au.com > > > > > > Australian Severe Weather Association > > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > > > > Homepage > > > http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:58:25 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com We are a couple of cents short of $11 per litre here. Most of it is tax. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "Paul Yole" To: "Aussie Weather" , "Wx-Chase" Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:34:55 -0800 Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > Hey All, > > With the rising cost of gas prices on the planet, could this be a sign > of > things to come??? > > http://www.coolfunnypictures.com/GasPrices!.html > > PaulY > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:02:44 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
starve the lizards  phil.
 
what's the exchange rate to $A?
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Friday, 14 February 2003 5:32:13 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices
 
We are a couple of cents short of $11 per litre here. Most of it is tax.

Phil
<><

International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk
Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk
MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com
Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk
Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm
Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm



-----Original Message-----
at : "Paul Yole" <pyole78 at yahoo.com.au>
To: "Aussie Weather" <aussie-weather at world.std.com>, "Wx-Chase" <WX-
CHASE at listserv.UIUC.EDU>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:34:55 -0800
Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices

> Hey All,
>
> With the rising cost of gas prices on the planet, could this be a sign
> of
> things to come???
>
> http://www.coolfunnypictures.com/GasPrices!.html
>
> PaulY
>
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
> +
> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail
> to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
> your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au-----------------------------
> -

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather senRe aus-wx Gas Prices.ems d e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP109.gif: 00000001,73c9350e,00000000,00000000 X-Originating-IP: [144.139.221.160] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: EO Natural Hazards Four Cyclones in the Indian Ocean Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:42:15 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2003 10:42:15.0428 (UTC) FILETIME=[BD3FEC40:01C2D415] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Judy and Adam and all, Specacular!I have not seen such an active pattern in the Indian Ocean in all my years in this business (ie since 1967) although such events do occurr in the Norh West Pacific .How often if ever does such event occurr in the Indian Ocean .Any ideas any one why so active this season ?Is it related to the El Nino?If I get a moment I will check the Annual Typhoon Reports at JWTC which I have back to the 1970 season. Gavin SSWW Canberra > at : "Adam Mayo" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: EO Natural Hazards Four Cyclones in the Indian Ocean >Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 12:11:32 +1100 > >Hi Everyone, > >Four Cyclones in the Indian Ocean. Quite a sight. >Judy > > http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/shownh.php3?img_id=5410 ><< EONaturalHazardsFourCyclonesintheIndianOcean.url >> _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:54:15 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com AUD$1 = HKD$4.2, I think so HKD$11 = AUD$2.62 per litre. That's just about an arm and a leg for sure! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "Richard Modistach" To: Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:02:44 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > starve the lizards phil. > > what's the exchange rate to $A? > > richard > > -------Original Message------- > > at : aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Friday, 14 February 2003 5:32:13 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > We are a couple of cents short of $11 per litre here. Most of it is > tax. > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > at : "Paul Yole" > To: "Aussie Weather" , "Wx-Chase" CHASE at listserv.UIUC.EDU> > Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:34:55 -0800 > Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > Hey All, > > > > With the rising cost of gas prices on the planet, could this be a > sign > > of > > things to come??? > > > > http://www.coolfunnypictures.com/GasPrices!.html > > > > PaulY > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > . +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:56:31 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: BRRRRRRR!!!!!!! X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That explains why brass monkeys are bloody scarce around Mount Washington. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "arky dave" To: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:57:08 -0600 Subject: aus-wx: BRRRRRRR!!!!!!! > Hello All: > Wishing everyone a Grand Aussie Summer: > I've just seen on weather.com, the conditions atop Mount Washington, > New Hampshire(elev. 6,288FT/1,917.0M) > At 10:45 P.M. EST, Temp.:-32F(-35.5C), cloudy/blowing snow/fog, > Visibility: 1/10th Mile(160.9M), Wind: WNW at 93MPH(149.7Kph) gusting > to 105MPH(169.0Kph), Wind Chill:-78F(-61.1C). Wow, that's just about > Mindblowing! > Cheers Yours David Powell > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:56:51 +1300 at : Ross X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: EO Natural Hazards Four Cyclones in the Indian Ocean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I remember 3 in the southwest Pacific in 1997. at the west; Ron, Susan and Tristan. Susan 'ate' Ron south of Fiji, and Tristan escaped westwards to the Indian Ocean (via the Coral Sea and Timor Sea), was renamed (twice!) and eventually (I think?) produced world record rainfall intensities on La Reunion. Cheers Ross > Adam Mayo wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > Four Cyclones in the Indian Ocean. Quite a sight. > Judy > > http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/shownh.php3?img_id=5410 > > Name: EO Natural Hazards Four Cyclones in the Indian > Ocean.url > EO Natural Hazards Four Cyclones in the Indian Ocean.url Type: Internet Shortcut > (application/x-unknown-content-type-InternetShortcut) > Encoding: quoted-printable +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:53:11 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com How much!!!! Our unleaded here is 102.9 cents per litre and 59.9 for gas. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Neville Gibb" To: Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:41 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > Gid'day All > > I know this is a weather forum, but seems you brought it up: > Regular's just gone up to here to NZ$115.50 (A$107.56) per litre. > What's the average in Oz? > > Neville > > > at : "Phil Smith" > > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:54:15 +0800 > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > AUD$1 = HKD$4.2, I think so HKD$11 = AUD$2.62 per litre. That's just > > about an arm and a leg for sure! > > > > Phil > > <>< > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > at : "Richard Modistach" > > To: > > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:02:44 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > >> starve the lizards phil. > > > >> > > > >> what's the exchange rate to $A? > > > >> > > > >> richard > > > >> > > > >> -------Original Message------- > > > >> > > > >> at : aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >> Date: Friday, 14 February 2003 5:32:13 PM > > > >> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > >> > > > >> We are a couple of cents short of $11 per litre here. Most of it is > >> tax. > > > >> > > > >> Phil > > > >> <>< > > > >> > > > >> International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > >> Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > >> MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > > > >> Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > >> Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > > > >> Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> at : "Paul Yole" > > > >> To: "Aussie Weather" , "Wx-Chase" > > >> CHASE at listserv.UIUC.EDU> > > > >> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:34:55 -0800 > > > >> Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > >> > > > >>> Hey All, > > > >>> > > > >>> With the rising cost of gas prices on the planet, could this be a > >> sign > > > >>> of > > > >>> things to come??? > > > >>> > > > >>> http://www.coolfunnypictures.com/GasPrices!.html > > > >>> > > > >>> PaulY > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > >>> + > > > >>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > > >>> to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > >>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > >>> your > > > >>> message. > > > >>> > >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > >>> - > > > >> > > > >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > >> > > > >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >> to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >> your > > > >> message. > > > >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > >> > > > >> > > > >> . > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "S. McGhee" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:16:28 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I think Neville meant NZ$1.15 / litre, although I haven't recently checked the exchange rate..... :) (In Far North of NZ we can pay upto NZ$1.22 litre at the moment, trouble is, stations are so remote around here it's not worth trying to shop around - 30km to next nearest Fuel Stop). Cheers Pete ----- Original Message ----- at : Bussy To: Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 12:53 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > How much!!!! > Our unleaded here is 102.9 cents per litre and 59.9 for gas. > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Neville Gibb" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:41 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > Gid'day All > > > > I know this is a weather forum, but seems you brought it up: > > Regular's just gone up to here to NZ$115.50 (A$107.56) per litre. > > What's the average in Oz? > > > > Neville > > > > > at : "Phil Smith" > > > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:54:15 +0800 > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > > > AUD$1 = HKD$4.2, I think so HKD$11 = AUD$2.62 per litre. That's just > > > about an arm and a leg for sure! > > > > > > Phil > > > <>< > > > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > at : "Richard Modistach" > > > To: > > > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:02:44 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > > >> starve the lizards phil. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> what's the exchange rate to $A? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> richard > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -------Original Message------- > > > > > >> > > > > > >> at : aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > > >> Date: Friday, 14 February 2003 5:32:13 PM > > > > > >> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > > >> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > > >> > > > > > >> We are a couple of cents short of $11 per litre here. Most of it is > > >> tax. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Phil > > > > > >> <>< > > > > > >> > > > > > >> International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > > > >> Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > > > >> MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > > > > > >> Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > > > >> Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > > > > > >> Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > > > >> at : "Paul Yole" > > > > > >> To: "Aussie Weather" , "Wx-Chase" > > > > >> CHASE at listserv.UIUC.EDU> > > > > > >> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:34:55 -0800 > > > > > >> Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hey All, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> With the rising cost of gas prices on the planet, could this be a > > >> sign > > > > > >>> of > > > > > >>> things to come??? > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> http://www.coolfunnypictures.com/GasPrices!.html > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> PaulY > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > >>> + > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > >>> to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > >>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > >>> your > > > > > >>> message. > > > > > >>> > > >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > >>> - > > > > > >> > > > > > >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > >> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > >> to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > >> your > > > > > >> message. > > > > > >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> . > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:41:14 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Gid'day All I know this is a weather forum, but seems you brought it up: Regular's just gone up to here to NZ$115.50 (A$107.56) per litre. What's the average in Oz? Neville > at : "Phil Smith" > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:54:15 +0800 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > AUD$1 = HKD$4.2, I think so HKD$11 = AUD$2.62 per litre. That's just > about an arm and a leg for sure! > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > at : "Richard Modistach" > To: > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:02:44 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > >> starve the lizards phil. > >> > >> what's the exchange rate to $A? > >> > >> richard > >> > >> -------Original Message------- > >> > >> at : aussie-weather at world.std.com > >> Date: Friday, 14 February 2003 5:32:13 PM > >> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > >> > >> We are a couple of cents short of $11 per litre here. Most of it is >> tax. > >> > >> Phil > >> <>< > >> > >> International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > >> Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > >> MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > >> Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > >> Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > >> Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> at : "Paul Yole" > >> To: "Aussie Weather" , "Wx-Chase" >> CHASE at listserv.UIUC.EDU> > >> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:34:55 -0800 > >> Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > >> > >>> Hey All, > >>> > >>> With the rising cost of gas prices on the planet, could this be a >> sign > >>> of > >>> things to come??? > >>> > >>> http://www.coolfunnypictures.com/GasPrices!.html > >>> > >>> PaulY > >>> > >>> > >>> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > >>> + > >>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >>> to:majordomo at world.std.com > >>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >>> your > >>> message. > >>> >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > >>> - > >> > >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> > >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >> to:majordomo at world.std.com > >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >> your > >> message. > >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >> > >> > >> . > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:15:45 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 12:41 PM 15/02/2003 +1200, you wrote: >Gid'day All > >I know this is a weather forum, but seems you brought it up: >Regular's just gone up to here to NZ$115.50 (A$107.56) per litre. >What's the average in Oz? In Melbourne, it seems to vary between 90c and $1.05 (was near the latter last night :( ). 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:42:54 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com ...oops. Sorry, your right Pete. I meant NZ$1.15 (A$1.07) - too busy watching the boat race. A few weeks ago, it was below a dollar in Auckland. Exchange rate today is NZ$1.00 to A$0.9313 Cheers Neville > at : "S. McGhee" > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:16:28 +1300 > To: > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > I think Neville meant NZ$1.15 / litre, although I haven't recently checked > the exchange rate..... :) > > (In Far North of NZ we can pay upto NZ$1.22 litre at the moment, trouble is, > stations are so remote around here it's not worth trying to shop around - > 30km to next nearest Fuel Stop). > > Cheers > Pete > ----- Original Message ----- > at : Bussy > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 12:53 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > >> How much!!!! >> Our unleaded here is 102.9 cents per litre and 59.9 for gas. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> at : "Neville Gibb" >> To: >> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:41 AM >> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices >> >> >>> Gid'day All >>> >>> I know this is a weather forum, but seems you brought it up: >>> Regular's just gone up to here to NZ$115.50 (A$107.56) per litre. >>> What's the average in Oz? >>> >>> Neville >>> >>>> at : "Phil Smith" >>>> Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>>> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:54:15 +0800 >>>> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>>> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices >>>> >>>> AUD$1 = HKD$4.2, I think so HKD$11 = AUD$2.62 per litre. That's just >>>> about an arm and a leg for sure! >>>> >>>> Phil >>>> <>< >>>> >>>> International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk >>>> Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk >>>> MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com >>>> Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk >>>> Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm >>>> Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> at : "Richard Modistach" >>>> To: >>>> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:02:44 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) >>>> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices >>>> >>>>> starve the lizards phil. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> what's the exchange rate to $A? >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> richard >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> -------Original Message------- >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> at : aussie-weather at world.std.com >>>> >>>>> Date: Friday, 14 February 2003 5:32:13 PM >>>> >>>>> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> We are a couple of cents short of $11 per litre here. Most of it is >>>>> tax. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Phil >>>> >>>>> <>< >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk >>>> >>>>> Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk >>>> >>>>> MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com >>>> >>>>> Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk >>>> >>>>> Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm >>>> >>>>> Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> >>>>> at : "Paul Yole" >>>> >>>>> To: "Aussie Weather" , "Wx-Chase" >>> >>>>> CHASE at listserv.UIUC.EDU> >>>> >>>>> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:34:55 -0800 >>>> >>>>> Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Hey All, >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> With the rising cost of gas prices on the planet, could this be a >>>>> sign >>>> >>>>>> of >>>> >>>>>> things to come??? >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> http://www.coolfunnypictures.com/GasPrices!.html >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> PaulY >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- >>>> >>>>>> + >>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >>>> >>>>>> to:majordomo at world.std.com >>>> >>>>>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >>>> >>>>>> your >>>> >>>>>> message. >>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- >>>> >>>>>> - >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >>>>> >>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >>>>> to:majordomo at world.std.com >>>> >>>>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >>>>> your >>>> >>>>> message. >>>> >>> >>> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> . >>>> >>>> > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >>>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >> to:majordomo at world.std.com >>>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your >>>> message. >>> >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >>>> >>> >>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com >>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your >>> message. >>> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >>> >> >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >> > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Stargazer" To: "Aussie-Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Snow Rollers in Indiana Last Wednesday Night Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:10:23 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, I thought the articles below on "Snow Rollers" might be of some interest if you haven't seen them already :) Regs, Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jesse Ferrell (WeatherMatrix)" To: Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:31 AM Subject: [STORMREPORTS] Snow Rollers in Indiana Last Night > Last time I posted this it was 3 years ago in Kansas, course they probably > happen more frequently than that. > > http://www.cybervox.org/archive/stormreports/200012-200101/0142.html > > PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT > NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE INDIANAPOLIS IN > 1040 AM EST WED FEB 12 2003 > > ...SNOW ROLLERS OCCURRED IN CENTRAL INDIANA LAST NIGHT... > > THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE AT INDIANAPOLIS HAS RECEIVED NUMEROUS > REPORTS OF A PHENOMENA KNOWN AS SNOW ROLLERS THIS MORNING. SNOW > ROLLERS ARE WHERE THE WIND LITERALLY BLOWS THE SNOW INTO A ROLL. > SNOW ROLLERS LOOK VERY MUCH LIKE A ROLL MADE WHEN SOMEONE CONSTRUCTS > A SNOWMAN...ONLY THEY HAVE A NATURAL CAUSE. > > THE FORMATION OF SNOW ROLLERS REQUIRES BOTH A STRONG WIND AND SNOW > WITH JUST THE RIGHT TEXTURE. IF SNOW IS TOO POWDERY IT DRIFTS > WITHOUT ASSUMING ANY DEFINITE SHAPE. IF SNOW IS TOO WELL PACKED THE > WIND HAS NO EFFECT ON IT. > > POWDERY SNOW FELL ON CENTRAL INDIANA TUESDAY MORNING. DURING THE > DAY THE SNOW SETTLED INTO A TEXTURE THAT COULD KEEP SHAPES...BUT WAS > STILL PLIABLE ENOUGH TO BE MOVED AROUND BY THE WIND. WHEN THE WIND > PICKED UP LAST NIGHT...SNOW ROLLERS WERE ABLE TO FORM. > > SNOW ROLLERS ARE NOT VERY COMMON IN INDIANA BECAUSE OUR SNOW TENDS > NOT TO BE THE RIGHT TEXTURE...IT IS USUALLY WETTER AND MORE DENSE. > ALSO WINDS STRONG ENOUGH TO CAUSE ROLLERS ARE NOT THAT COMMON IN THE > HOOSIER STATE. ONLY RARELY DO RIGHT WINDS AND THE RIGHT SNOW TEXTURE > COME TOGETHER. These things are EVERYWHERE! Here are some news reports at Ohio, Illinois and Indiana this week: Snow Roller Slide Show: http://html.nbc4columbus.com/sh/slideshow/_auto/sh11364s1.html Two Dozen New Articles: http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=snow+rollers News Article With Additional Photos at AccuWeather: http://www.accuweather.com/iwxpage/adc/homepage/premiumlogin.htm (requires account to see full article) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.221.136.100] at : "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Record dry? Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:46:41 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2003 02:46:42.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[786D4950:01C2D49C] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi every1, Although this is probably a question only Blair could answer...as of this morning it has now been 45 days without any measurable precipitation here in Wycheproof. While I'm sure there have been longer totally dry spells I'm curious as to the longest consecutive number of days without rain in Wycheproof. I notice Bussy mentioned only 1 point of rain this year so far and think that for Rutherglen that may also be getting into record territory.. Any thoughts? Cheers, Kevin at Wycheproof. 2003 Rainfall = 0.0 _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: sydney weather Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:24:00 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Anyone keeping an eye on sydney radar loop..
 
good get very interesting.
 
Dave
at : "David Carroll" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:46:30 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
so much for my english..
 
could get interesting.  lol
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:24 PM
Subject: aus-wx: sydney weather

Anyone keeping an eye on sydney radar loop..
 
good get very interesting.
 
Dave
at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:51:22 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Nope....my eyes are affixed to Canberra 128km =D
 
Simon
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:24 PM
Subject: aus-wx: sydney weather

Anyone keeping an eye on sydney radar loop..
 
good get very interesting.
 
Dave
at : "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: NSW STA Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 15:15:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
TOP PRIORITY FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST
SYDNEY SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WARNING
Issued at 3:09 PM Saturday 15 February 2003.
The Bureau of Meteorology in SYDNEY has issued a Severe Thunderstorm
Warning for the following areas:

Wollondilly,
Wingecarribee and
Hawkesbury Council Areas.

This warning is current at until 4:10 PM.

Thunderstorms were located near the area southwest of Yerranderie and near
Bilpin at 2:55 PM. These storms are moving towards the east. Severe
Thunderstorms are forecast to affect the southern reaches of Lake
Burragorang, the Wollemi National Park northeast of Bilpin and the Nattai
National Park in the next 30 minutes and Colo, Oakdale, Picton and the
Nattai Tablelands within 60 minutes.

Large hailstones, damaging winds and very heavy rainfall are possible.
X-Originating-IP: [203.54.207.81] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:16:38 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2003 05:16:39.0239 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B2FCD70:01C2D4B1] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, At Gilmore Visibility was down to less than 100 metres as a cloud of ash and dust swept across the Tuggeranong Valley with North west winds up to 63 km/hr at 1459 hours Only extended about 1500 feet vertically Temperature only fell slightly to 29 degrees appears it was a down draft at a Large Cumulas which is now dropping a few drops of rain Visibility now up to 30 km again Took some photos at height of the squal Gavin O'Brien SSWW Gilmore ACT _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.54.207.81] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:19:16 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2003 05:19:16.0996 (UTC) FILETIME=[C9379C40:01C2D4B1] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Simon, Did you experience the ash\dust storm around 3pm? Gavin Gilmore > at : "Simon Angell" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather >Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:51:22 +1100 > >Nope....my eyes are affixed to Canberra 128km =D > >Simon > ----- Original Message ----- > at : David Carroll > To: Aussie Weather > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:24 PM > Subject: aus-wx: sydney weather > > > Anyone keeping an eye on sydney radar loop.. > > good get very interesting. > > Dave _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:38:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I was at the Belconnen Mall at the time. just heard it on the radio on the way home, very extreme by the souds of it.... ----- Original Message ----- at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:16 PM Subject: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm > > > Hi all, > At Gilmore Visibility was down to less than 100 metres as a cloud of ash and > dust swept across the Tuggeranong Valley with North west winds up to 63 > km/hr at 1459 hours Only extended about 1500 feet vertically Temperature > only fell slightly to 29 degrees appears it was a down draft at a Large > Cumulas which is now dropping a few drops of rain > Visibility now up to 30 km again Took some photos at height of the squal > Gavin O'Brien SSWW Gilmore ACT > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.54.207.81] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:46:06 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2003 05:46:06.0772 (UTC) FILETIME=[88B7EF40:01C2D4B5] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Simon sorry that should be 4 pm Summer time? Gavin > at : "Gavin O'Brien" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather >Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:19:16 +1100 > >Simon, >Did you experience the ash\dust storm around 3pm? >Gavin >Gilmore > > > > > > >> at : "Simon Angell" >>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>To: >>Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather >>Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:51:22 +1100 >> >>Nope....my eyes are affixed to Canberra 128km =D >> >>Simon >> ----- Original Message ----- >> at : David Carroll >> To: Aussie Weather >> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:24 PM >> Subject: aus-wx: sydney weather >> >> >> Anyone keeping an eye on sydney radar loop.. >> >> good get very interesting. >> >> Dave > > >_________________________________________________________________ >MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to >http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:57:31 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yeah, heard it on 106.3 at 4:30pm.... Some very nice towers around the pace, but as of yet hardly a drop of rain here....... Simon ----- Original Message ----- at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:46 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather Simon sorry that should be 4 pm Summer time? Gavin > at : "Gavin O'Brien" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather >Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:19:16 +1100 > >Simon, >Did you experience the ash\dust storm around 3pm? >Gavin >Gilmore > > > > > > >> at : "Simon Angell" >>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>To: >>Subject: Re: aus-wx: sydney weather >>Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:51:22 +1100 >> >>Nope....my eyes are affixed to Canberra 128km =D >> >>Simon >> ----- Original Message ----- >> at : David Carroll >> To: Aussie Weather >> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:24 PM >> Subject: aus-wx: sydney weather >> >> >> Anyone keeping an eye on sydney radar loop.. >> >> good get very interesting. >> >> Dave > > >_________________________________________________________________ >MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to >http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record dry? Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 18:40:49 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Just happens to be in today's Border Morning Mail. Albury 44 days. Record for Albury is 75 days. Wodonga at Nov 7 1928 to Jan 28 1929. Corowa 86 days at Jan 26 to April 21 1923. Benalla 59 days at Oct 4 to Dec12 1895. Wangaratta 73 days at Dec 12 1881 to Mar 3 1882. Wagga 59 days at Jan 23 to Mar 21 1968. Bright 33 days at Mar 15 to Apr 16 1980. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Kevin Phyland" To: Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:46 PM Subject: aus-wx: Record dry? > > Hi every1, > > Although this is probably a question only Blair could answer...as of this > morning it has now been 45 days without any measurable precipitation here in > Wycheproof. While I'm sure there have been longer totally dry spells I'm > curious as to the longest consecutive number of days without rain in > Wycheproof. > > I notice Bussy mentioned only 1 point of rain this year so far and think > that for Rutherglen that may also be getting into record territory.. > > Any thoughts? > > Cheers, > Kevin at Wycheproof. > > 2003 Rainfall = 0.0 > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Steve Baynham" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm pics Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 16:57:27 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hey guys the dust storm was quite an awesome sight. i had been watching the storm approach for the last hour. it picked up ash and dust at here to around tumut i think. i went on the roof just after it crossed the ranges to see what it would do. i could see all the dust swirling 100m at the ground, several kms away. by the time i went and got the camera it looked more like very heavy rain. http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021504.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021505.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021506.jpg i have some other cloud formations at earlier in the day http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021501.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021502.jpg http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021503.jpg Steve Baynham icq : 26863574 Brisbane Storm Chasers http://www.bsch.au.com Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au Homepage http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany ----- Original Message ----- at : Simon Angell To: Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:38 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm > I was at the Belconnen Mall at the time. just heard it on the radio on the > way home, very extreme by the souds of it.... > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Gavin O'Brien" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:16 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > At Gilmore Visibility was down to less than 100 metres as a cloud of ash > and > > dust swept across the Tuggeranong Valley with North west winds up to 63 > > km/hr at 1459 hours Only extended about 1500 feet vertically Temperature > > only fell slightly to 29 degrees appears it was a down draft at a Large > > Cumulas which is now dropping a few drops of rain > > Visibility now up to 30 km again Took some photos at height of the squal > > Gavin O'Brien SSWW Gilmore ACT > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.51.19.138] at : "stuart hely" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm pics Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 06:34:00 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2003 06:34:00.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[63F3BD80:01C2D585] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Steve, Is that storm approaching Canberra now? Stuart > at : "Steve Baynham" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm pics >Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 16:57:27 +1100 > >hey guys >the dust storm was quite an awesome sight. i had been watching the storm >approach for the last hour. it picked up ash and dust at here to around >tumut i think. i went on the roof just after it crossed the ranges to see >what it would do. i could see all the dust swirling 100m at the ground, >several kms away. by the time i went and got the camera it looked more like >very heavy rain. >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021504.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021505.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021506.jpg >i have some other cloud formations at earlier in the day >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021501.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021502.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021503.jpg > > > >Steve Baynham >icq : 26863574 > >Brisbane Storm Chasers >http://www.bsch.au.com > >Australian Severe Weather Association >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >Homepage >http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany > >----- Original Message ----- > at : Simon Angell >To: >Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:38 PM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm > > > > I was at the Belconnen Mall at the time. just heard it on the radio on >the > > way home, very extreme by the souds of it.... > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Gavin O'Brien" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:16 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > At Gilmore Visibility was down to less than 100 metres as a cloud of >ash > > and > > > dust swept across the Tuggeranong Valley with North west winds up to >63 > > > km/hr at 1459 hours Only extended about 1500 feet vertically >Temperature > > > only fell slightly to 29 degrees appears it was a down draft at a >Large > > > Cumulas which is now dropping a few drops of rain > > > Visibility now up to 30 km again Took some photos at height of the >squal > > > Gavin O'Brien SSWW Gilmore ACT > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Steve Baynham" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm pics Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:56:50 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com stuart, no this was yesterday. just been overcast all day with occassional drizzle here Steve Baynham icq : 26863574 Brisbane Storm Chasers http://www.bsch.au.com Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au Homepage http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany ----- Original Message ----- at : stuart hely To: Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 5:34 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm pics > Steve, > > Is that storm approaching Canberra now? > > Stuart > > > > > > > > at : "Steve Baynham" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm pics > >Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 16:57:27 +1100 > > > >hey guys > >the dust storm was quite an awesome sight. i had been watching the storm > >approach for the last hour. it picked up ash and dust at here to around > >tumut i think. i went on the roof just after it crossed the ranges to see > >what it would do. i could see all the dust swirling 100m at the ground, > >several kms away. by the time i went and got the camera it looked more like > >very heavy rain. > >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021504.jpg > >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021505.jpg > >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021506.jpg > >i have some other cloud formations at earlier in the day > >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021501.jpg > >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021502.jpg > >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021503.jpg > > > > > > > >Steve Baynham > >icq : 26863574 > > > >Brisbane Storm Chasers > >http://www.bsch.au.com > > > >Australian Severe Weather Association > >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > >Homepage > >http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > at : Simon Angell > >To: > >Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:38 PM > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm > > > > > > > I was at the Belconnen Mall at the time. just heard it on the radio on > >the > > > way home, very extreme by the souds of it.... > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > at : "Gavin O'Brien" > > > To: > > > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:16 PM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > At Gilmore Visibility was down to less than 100 metres as a cloud of > >ash > > > and > > > > dust swept across the Tuggeranong Valley with North west winds up to > >63 > > > > km/hr at 1459 hours Only extended about 1500 feet vertically > >Temperature > > > > only fell slightly to 29 degrees appears it was a down draft at a > >Large > > > > Cumulas which is now dropping a few drops of rain > > > > Visibility now up to 30 km again Took some photos at height of the > >squal > > > > Gavin O'Brien SSWW Gilmore ACT > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > > message. > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:22:30 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Monday to Wednesday it is between 82.5 and 89.5 but miraculously it jumps up to 90 to 97c per litre for the weekend !! (That's just North of Brisbane prices !!) ----- Original Message ----- at : "Bussy" To: Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 9:53 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > How much!!!! > Our unleaded here is 102.9 cents per litre and 59.9 for gas. > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Neville Gibb" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:41 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > Gid'day All > > > > I know this is a weather forum, but seems you brought it up: > > Regular's just gone up to here to NZ$115.50 (A$107.56) per litre. > > What's the average in Oz? > > > > Neville > > > > > at : "Phil Smith" > > > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:54:15 +0800 > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > > > AUD$1 = HKD$4.2, I think so HKD$11 = AUD$2.62 per litre. That's just > > > about an arm and a leg for sure! > > > > > > Phil > > > <>< > > > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > at : "Richard Modistach" > > > To: > > > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:02:44 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > > >> starve the lizards phil. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> what's the exchange rate to $A? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> richard > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -------Original Message------- > > > > > >> > > > > > >> at : aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > > >> Date: Friday, 14 February 2003 5:32:13 PM > > > > > >> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > > >> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > > >> > > > > > >> We are a couple of cents short of $11 per litre here. Most of it is > > >> tax. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Phil > > > > > >> <>< > > > > > >> > > > > > >> International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > > > > >> Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > > > > >> MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > > > > > >> Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > > > > >> Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > > > > > >> Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > > > >> at : "Paul Yole" > > > > > >> To: "Aussie Weather" , "Wx-Chase" > > > > >> CHASE at listserv.UIUC.EDU> > > > > > >> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:34:55 -0800 > > > > > >> Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hey All, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> With the rising cost of gas prices on the planet, could this be a > > >> sign > > > > > >>> of > > > > > >>> things to come??? > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> http://www.coolfunnypictures.com/GasPrices!.html > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> PaulY > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > > > >>> + > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > > >>> to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > >>> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > > >>> your > > > > > >>> message. > > > > > >>> > > >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > > > >>> - > > > > > >> > > > > > >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > >> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > >> to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > >> your > > > > > >> message. > > > > > >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> . > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.29.139] at : "James Harris" To: Subject: aus-wx: Central NSW Chase - 15 February 03 Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:21:59 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2003 08:22:02.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[7BAE93F0:01C2D594] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yesterday was one of the best days this season after a great chase to Bathurst, Canowindra, Parkes and Dubbo. 5 storms all together each one showing different characteristics than the other. The Bathurst cell was quite a sight with some awesome structure whilst the Parkes cell was very lightning active however with the Dust outflow pushing so far ahead vision was terrible. Its amazing what can happen when you have a trough, good wind shear and plenty of moisture available for Storm development. The Full report can be seen here http://www.sydneystormchasers.com/2003/February15.htm James +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: A grim reminder Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:31:42 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
It's 20 years ago today that we had the Ash Wednesday Bushfires. Of course, back then this date fell on Wednesday.
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: A grim reminder Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:42:00 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Speaking of grim reminders, some images of the forest between Chiltern & Beechworth..... http://www.stormchasers.au.com/20_01_03.htm taken by Bussy
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at australianskynweather.com
 
Australian Sky & Weather
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
 
***The journey is the reward***
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 7:31 PM
Subject: aus-wx: A grim reminder

It's 20 years ago today that we had the Ash Wednesday Bushfires. Of course, back then this date fell on Wednesday.
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:35:20 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: A grim reminder Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
yep, we had a commemorative memorial service here at regional head office this morning, not sure if the same happened in vic.
 
richard
naracoorte
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Sunday, 16 February 2003 7:01:27 PM
Subject: aus-wx: A grim reminder
 
It's 20 years ago today that we had the Ash Wednesday Bushfires. Of course, back then this date fell on Wednesday.
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP112.gif: 00000001,6a3ecffc,00000000,00000000 at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: A grim reminder Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 20:46:11 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
There was a memorial at Mt. Lofty summit in the Adelaide hills today also which was reported on the evening tv news.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: A grim reminder

yep, we had a commemorative memorial service here at regional head office this morning, not sure if the same happened in vic.
 
richard
naracoorte
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Sunday, 16 February 2003 7:01:27 PM
Subject: aus-wx: A grim reminder
 
It's 20 years ago today that we had the Ash Wednesday Bushfires. Of course, back then this date fell on Wednesday.
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:24:22 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: LP supercell Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello, I have built a little bit of a collage of the LP supercell event http://www.australiasevereweather.com/temp/20030212lp/collage01.jpg Report not written up as yet. Will do that as soon as I can. Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher at Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.153.182] at : "Dave Ellem" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP supercell Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:41:47 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2003 11:41:53.0848 (UTC) FILETIME=[66FAFB80:01C2D5B0] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jimmy, Beautiful collection of images there. Definitely some incredible structure in that supercell. An exciting chase I'm sure!! Can't wait for the report/videos! Dave Ellem ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 10:24 PM Subject: aus-wx: LP supercell > Hello, > > I have built a little bit of a collage of the LP supercell event > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/temp/20030212lp/collage01.jpg > > Report not written up as yet. Will do that as soon as I can. > > Jimmy Deguara > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > at > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: aus-wx: Canberra 11th Feb storm chase Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 23:31:09 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2003 12:22:34.0200 (UTC) FILETIME=[158B2580:01C2D5B6] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I have the chase report up for the storm near Canberra on the 11th February.
 
 
Regards
Michael
 
X-Originating-IP: [203.54.206.152] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm pics Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 01:21:09 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2003 14:21:09.0309 (UTC) FILETIME=[A67A9ED0:01C2D5C6] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com steve, Where were the photos taken at ? GavinSSWW Gilmore A.C.T. > at : "Steve Baynham" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm pics >Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 16:57:27 +1100 > >hey guys >the dust storm was quite an awesome sight. i had been watching the storm >approach for the last hour. it picked up ash and dust at here to around >tumut i think. i went on the roof just after it crossed the ranges to see >what it would do. i could see all the dust swirling 100m at the ground, >several kms away. by the time i went and got the camera it looked more like >very heavy rain. >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021504.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021505.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021506.jpg >i have some other cloud formations at earlier in the day >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021501.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021502.jpg >http://www.bsch.au.com/photos/steve/03021503.jpg > > > >Steve Baynham >icq : 26863574 > >Brisbane Storm Chasers >http://www.bsch.au.com > >Australian Severe Weather Association >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >Homepage >http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany > >----- Original Message ----- > at : Simon Angell >To: >Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:38 PM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm > > > > I was at the Belconnen Mall at the time. just heard it on the radio on >the > > way home, very extreme by the souds of it.... > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Gavin O'Brien" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:16 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Canberra Duststorm > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > At Gilmore Visibility was down to less than 100 metres as a cloud of >ash > > and > > > dust swept across the Tuggeranong Valley with North west winds up to >63 > > > km/hr at 1459 hours Only extended about 1500 feet vertically >Temperature > > > only fell slightly to 29 degrees appears it was a down draft at a >Large > > > Cumulas which is now dropping a few drops of rain > > > Visibility now up to 30 km again Took some photos at height of the >squal > > > Gavin O'Brien SSWW Gilmore ACT > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Steve _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Dry in the U.S. Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 13:13:20 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Cheers and Regards to All:
       Since the discussion is on the exceedingly dry weather.......I have for your FYI:(According to the 1995 USA Today Weather Almanac).
        The driest year in a US town was: 0.00IN (0.0mm) in Death Valley, California in 1929. (elev. -282FT/-85.9M). The driest year in an Arkansas town was: 19.11IN(485.3mm) at Index, Arkansas (Miller County) in 1936 (elev. 300FT/91.4M).
 
The city with the highest yearly average rainfall(by state): 222.01IN(5,639.0mm) at Papaikou Mauka, Hawaii. The city with the "lowest" high yearly average(by state): 18.61IN(472.6mm) at Lamoille, Nevada. The wettest year in an Arkansas town was: 98.55IN(2,503.1mm) at Newhope, Arkansas in 1957.(elev.850FT/259.1M--in Pike County). Of the cities listed by state that have the wettest average year, the wettest average month is: 34.32IN(871.7mm) for October in Little Port Walter, Alaska. Of the cities with the wettest average, the "lowest" monthly average is: 0.40IN(10.1mm) for May in Crown King, Arizona.
 
Currently in Mena, (Sun., Feb. 16) at 1:07 P.M. (after a Pacific cold front passed yesterday) we are cloudy, light Snow flurries and 27F(-2.7C).
 
Enjoy the rest of February! Yours David Powell
User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:45:25 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Bussy, Pete, Tony & Third Here's the results of what you gave me so far. I guess Brisbane's got the cheapest gas on average. Gas Prices, Feb 15th - Regular unleaded $ per litre A$2.620 - (HK$11.00) Hong Kong A$1.139 - (NZ$1.220) NZ, remote far nth A$1.078 - (NZ$1.155) Auckland A$1.050 - Melbourne A$1.029 - Rutherglen, NE Victoria A$0.970 - Brisbane, just nth of, Sat to Sun A$0.900 - Brisbane, just nth of, Sat to Sun A$0.900 - Melbourne A$0.895 - Brisbane, just nth of, Mon to Wen A$0.825 - Brisbane, just nth of, Mon to Wen --------------------------------------------------------------- A$1.029 - Rutherglen, NE Victoria A$1.026 - Melbourne (ave) A$0.899 - Brisbane, just nth of (ave) A$0.985 - OZ AVERAGE ? Neville > > Gid'day All > > I know this is a weather forum, but seems you brought it up: > Regular's just gone up here in NZ (Ak) to NZ$1.155 (A$1.078) per litre. > What's the average in Oz? > > Neville > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record dry? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:00:46 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Hi every1, > > Although this is probably a question only Blair could answer...as of this > morning it has now been 45 days without any measurable precipitation here in > Wycheproof. While I'm sure there have been longer totally dry spells I'm > curious as to the longest consecutive number of days without rain in > Wycheproof. > > I notice Bussy mentioned only 1 point of rain this year so far and think > that for Rutherglen that may also be getting into record territory.. > > Any thoughts? > On the raw data at Wycheproof the record dry spell is 102 days, at 18 November 1889 to 27 February 1890. However, the data suggest that small rainfall totals were under-reported in the early years of the record (and perhaps not just the early years) - 73% of all pre-1900 daily rainfalls were 2mm or greater, compared to a typical 55% to 60% in more recent years (and around 45% at Mildura, which can be taken as a reasonable benchmark as it's Bureau-staffed). There have been 31 spells of 45 or more dry days in 120 years of record. 14 of those spells, including all those of 65 days or more, were prior to 1915. The longest spells since 1915 have been 64 days in 1931-32, 58 in 1954-5, 56 in 1953 and 55 in 1986. Currently 47, and counting... Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record dry? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:07:46 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Just happens to be in today's Border Morning Mail. > Albury 44 days. Record for Albury is 75 days. > Wodonga at Nov 7 1928 to Jan 28 1929. > Corowa 86 days at Jan 26 to April 21 1923. > Benalla 59 days at Oct 4 to Dec12 1895. > Wangaratta 73 days at Dec 12 1881 to Mar 3 1882. > Wagga 59 days at Jan 23 to Mar 21 1968. > Bright 33 days at Mar 15 to Apr 16 1980. > Note Bright's records only date at 1969, hence the shorter period. In passing through the area yesterday, I noticed that the Ovens River at Wangaratta appears to have ceased to flow (in as far as I could tell at the bridge at 110 km/h, there looked like there were full-width sandbars). Are there any locals who can confirm (or otherwise?). Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:09:59 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dry in the U.S. X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Seeing all this info about how dry it has been in Australia and in some places in the US, I feel like turning back the clock to June 2001 when we had the wettest June on record. Here is the opening paragraph at the Observatory's weather summary for that month: QUOTE The weather of June 2001 was marked by persistent heavy rain and squally thunderstorms under the repeated influence of active troughs of low pressure near the south China coast. The monthly rainfall amounted to 1083.6 millimetres, about three times the monthly normal figure of 376.0 millimetres. This is a new record for June, the previous record being 962.9 millimetres in June 1966. The accumulated rainfall since 1 January was 1493.6 millimetres, 50 per cent above the normal figure of 992.5 millimetres for the same period. The month was slightly cooler than usual. The mean temperature was 27.6 degrees, 0.2 degrees below normal. END QUOTE I'd love to be able to share some of that moisture with the farmers of Oz. Trouble is, it's so dry here less than two years later, that we need some more here as well. This morning the Observatory was promising rain, but the best the weather could do was a kind of fine mist, even lighter than a drizzle - not enough to wet anybody. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "arky dave" To: Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 13:13:20 -0600 Subject: aus-wx: Dry in the U.S. > Cheers and Regards to All: > Since the discussion is on the exceedingly dry weather.......I > have for your FYI:(According to the 1995 USA Today Weather Almanac). > The driest year in a US town was: 0.00IN (0.0mm) in Death > Valley, California in 1929. (elev. -282FT/-85.9M). The driest year in > an Arkansas town was: 19.11IN(485.3mm) at Index, Arkansas (Miller > County) in 1936 (elev. 300FT/91.4M). > > The city with the highest yearly average rainfall(by state): > 222.01IN(5,639.0mm) at Papaikou Mauka, Hawaii. The city with the > "lowest" high yearly average(by state): 18.61IN(472.6mm) at Lamoille, > Nevada. The wettest year in an Arkansas town was: 98.55IN(2,503.1mm) at > Newhope, Arkansas in 1957.(elev.850FT/259.1M--in Pike County). Of the > cities listed by state that have the wettest average year, the wettest > average month is: 34.32IN(871.7mm) for October in Little Port Walter, > Alaska. Of the cities with the wettest average, the "lowest" monthly > average is: 0.40IN(10.1mm) for May in Crown King, Arizona. > > Currently in Mena, (Sun., Feb. 16) at 1:07 P.M. (after a Pacific cold > front passed yesterday) we are cloudy, light Snow flurries and > 27F(-2.7C). > > Enjoy the rest of February! Yours David Powell > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record dry? Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:07:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Residents of Wangaratta are now on very strict restrictions apparently as the Ovens River dropped dramatically in the last week according to today's Border Mail. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Blair Trewin" To: Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 12:07 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record dry? > > > > Just happens to be in today's Border Morning Mail. > > Albury 44 days. Record for Albury is 75 days. > > Wodonga at Nov 7 1928 to Jan 28 1929. > > Corowa 86 days at Jan 26 to April 21 1923. > > Benalla 59 days at Oct 4 to Dec12 1895. > > Wangaratta 73 days at Dec 12 1881 to Mar 3 1882. > > Wagga 59 days at Jan 23 to Mar 21 1968. > > Bright 33 days at Mar 15 to Apr 16 1980. > > > > Note Bright's records only date at 1969, hence the shorter period. > > In passing through the area yesterday, I noticed that the Ovens > River at Wangaratta appears to have ceased to flow (in as far as I > could tell at the bridge at 110 km/h, there looked like there > were full-width sandbars). Are there any locals who can confirm > (or otherwise?). > > Blair > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: bathurst rain - storms Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:16:33 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Just a great downpour in Bathurst, last 10 min and gone. Overflowed gutters in minutes, i was drenched getting car in shed, worried about heavy drops and possible hail.. No hail though.
 
Plenty of thunder activity around. Its moving now North of Bathurst. Although another storm pink on radar heading this way.
 
Just listening to radio scanner, Cowra copping damage at storms, minor flooding. Tree damage at high winds. Winds picked up really well in Bathurst as well.
 
Wx station is up and running, unfort rain guage out of action.
 
 
Just heard also tree fallen onto house in Bathurst.. Police attending. all happening here. and more to come.
 
Dave
 
 
at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:37:28 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Just watched on Channel Seven Melbourne that an Earthquake well over magnitude 6 is due to hit the Melbourne CBD as it is supposed to get a rumble every 30 years or something, and Melb hasn't had one for over a hundred years. They even showed an animation of a couple of Sky scrapers falling down etc if it hit.
Why do people believe in scaring other people like this?
That's like telling someone that they will be hit by lightning! They'd be too scared to go outside!
Even to the point of showing the buildings crumbling to about half height and saying some deaths would occur!
Any wonder I hate TV.
While having a sook. I wonder where all the moisture disappeared to over the weekend? I got so excited and never got anything here. Bugger.....
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:07:04 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

I think the question is . . . what on earth were you doing watching dribble like TT or ACA?

 

Anyone who watches those shows- should go to their bedroom, and give themselves a full frontal lobotomy (if they hadn’t already) . . . .

 

-----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Bussy
Sent: Monday, 17 February 2003 6:37 PM
To: aussie-weather
Subject: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

 

Just watched on Channel Seven Melbourne that an Earthquake well over magnitude 6 is due to hit the Melbourne CBD as it is supposed to get a rumble every 30 years or something, and Melb hasn't had one for over a hundred years. They even showed an animation of a couple of Sky scrapers falling down etc if it hit.

Why do people believe in scaring other people like this?

That's like telling someone that they will be hit by lightning! They'd be too scared to go outside!

Even to the point of showing the buildings crumbling to about half height and saying some deaths would occur!

Any wonder I hate TV.

While having a sook. I wonder where all the moisture disappeared to over the weekend? I got so excited and never got anything here. Bugger.....

 

Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)

at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:20:22 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I'd rather have a bottle a'front o'me.
TV is corrupt these days in its news reporting. But there's a (hopefully) good show on ABC this Wednesday night at 8.30 called 'Wild Weather'. Does anyone know if it's been on before?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 7:07 PM
Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

I think the question is . . . what on earth were you doing watching dribble like TT or ACA?

 

Anyone who watches those shows- should go to their bedroom, and give themselves a full frontal lobotomy (if they hadn’t already) . . . .

 

-----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Bussy
Sent: Monday, 17 February 2003 6:37 PM
To: aussie-weather
Subject: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

 

Just watched on Channel Seven Melbourne that an Earthquake well over magnitude 6 is due to hit the Melbourne CBD as it is supposed to get a rumble every 30 years or something, and Melb hasn't had one for over a hundred years. They even showed an animation of a couple of Sky scrapers falling down etc if it hit.

Why do people believe in scaring other people like this?

That's like telling someone that they will be hit by lightning! They'd be too scared to go outside!

Even to the point of showing the buildings crumbling to about half height and saying some deaths would occur!

Any wonder I hate TV.

While having a sook. I wonder where all the moisture disappeared to over the weekend? I got so excited and never got anything here. Bugger.....

 

Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)

X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:59:05 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 07:07 PM 17/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >I think the question is . . . what on earth were you doing watching >dribble like TT or ACA? > > > >Anyone who watches those shows- should go to their bedroom, and give >themselves a full frontal lobotomy (if they hadn t already) . . . . Not necessary, but the salt shaker should be in hand while watching these shows. ;-) A few grains (tablespoons? ;) ) will be needed. :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:52:13 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
No, I don't think it has. New for 2003 they said ... mind you, one could read anything into that ;)
Starts this Wednesday at 8.30pm on ABC. Looks good at what I've seen on the adds, a bit like "Walking with Dinosaurs" program style.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

I'd rather have a bottle a'front o'me.
TV is corrupt these days in its news reporting. But there's a (hopefully) good show on ABC this Wednesday night at 8.30 called 'Wild Weather'. Does anyone know if it's been on before?
at : "Pete McGhee" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:32:04 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Stargazer
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

No, I don't think it has. New for 2003 they said ... mind you, one could read anything into that ;)
Starts this Wednesday at 8.30pm on ABC. Looks good at what I've seen on the adds, a bit like "Walking with Dinosaurs" program style.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

I'd rather have a bottle a'front o'me.
TV is corrupt these days in its news reporting. But there's a (hopefully) good show on ABC this Wednesday night at 8.30 called 'Wild Weather'. Does anyone know if it's been on before?
at : "Pete McGhee" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:33:44 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
The NZ Wx forum has half a dozen comments on this series  FWIW
 
 
Generally enough new footage to make it interesting to watch.
 
Cheers
Pete
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Stargazer
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

No, I don't think it has. New for 2003 they said ... mind you, one could read anything into that ;)
Starts this Wednesday at 8.30pm on ABC. Looks good at what I've seen on the adds, a bit like "Walking with Dinosaurs" program style.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

I'd rather have a bottle a'front o'me.
TV is corrupt these days in its news reporting. But there's a (hopefully) good show on ABC this Wednesday night at 8.30 called 'Wild Weather'. Does anyone know if it's been on before?
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:31:14 +1030 at : Richard Albury User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra 11th Feb storm chase Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Michael Thompson wrote:
I have the chase report up for the storm near Canberra on the 11th February.
 
 
Regards
Michael
 
Hi Michael

Thanks for sharing your pics. As usual of excellent quality. I appreciate the effort you took to share with us. *HUG*

Richard S.Aust
at : "Patrick Tobin" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra 11th Feb storm chase Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:26:33 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Thanks Michael - it was good to know what was under that particular cell.
 
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 11:31 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Canberra 11th Feb storm chase

I have the chase report up for the storm near Canberra on the 11th February.
 
 
Regards
Michael
 
at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:10:20 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I agree with what you say about ridiculous *scare tactics* Bussy .... but I was intrigued about the possibilities of an earthquake so I did a search for the news item.
 
I discovered that the report was actually released 29 December ... so how crazy that they are just reporting it tonight ????
 
I have pasted what I found below because a lot of the articles are archived and the URL's will not work.
 
Love
Sha
 
Big quake overdue in Victoria
By Mary Papadakis
29Dec02 http://www.news.com.au/common/printpage/0,6093,5760188,00.html


VICTORIA is in the firing line of a potentially "catastrophic" earthquake expected to hit southeast Australia.

Geological studies conducted by the University of Melbourne have revealed intense underground seismic activity in the area running at Adelaide to southeast Victoria.

Researchers are unable to predict when or where the quake will hit, but say it is inevitable.

It is feared the next "big one" could reach as high as 6.0 on the Richter scale, putting lives and infrastructure at risk.

The devastating quake that struck Newcastle 13 years ago yesterday, killing 13 people, injuring 162 and damaging 300 buildings, measured 5.6.

Professor Mike Sandiford is behind one of the two university studies that challenge Australia's image as a geologically comatose continent.

"We tend to think that we live on a pretty ancient continent without any geological activity, but we are prone to earthquakes," he said. "We are just lucky it happens so infrequently.

"The estimated return period of a quake greater than 6.0 in southeast Australia is about 30 years, but none have been recorded in the last 100 years.

"Most earthquakes experienced by this region are less than three on the Richter scale and occur several times a year. It is unusually quiet at the moment, with nothing over 1.5 for the last few months."

Professor Sandiford said a large earthquake should be expected in southeast Australia every 10,000 to 20,000 years on any one of the major fault lines.

He said evidence of tectonic activity across Victoria and SA included the reshaping of mountains in areas such as the Otway and Dandenong ranges, the Mornington Peninsula and Mount Lofty Ranges near Adelaide.

Earthquakes had raised the Otways by 250 metres in the past three million years, a period considered recent by geological standards.

The Selwyn fault line, which runs east at Mt Martha to the Dandenong Ranges, had produced about six metres of uplift in the past 100,000 years.

"This is potentially six big earthquakes," Professor Sandiford said.

"When these big quakes reoccur, they have the potential to cause catastrophic damage to cities such as Melbourne, Adelaide and the La Trobe Valley area, which straddle some of these major fault lines.

"It's a scary thing. The danger depends on how close the rupture point is to the surface."

Professor Sandiford said some faults around Adelaide had moved slabs of the continent up to 30 metres in the past million years.

"A typical earthquake of magnitude 6.0 might produce a displacement of about one metre. Thirty metres is equivalent to 30 (to) 50 big earthquakes in the last million years," he said.

In the second study, a team of researchers at the university's earth sciences department investigated sediments and seismic data at petroleum surveys.

The study confirmed the mountain-building power of earthquakes in southeast Australia during the past 10 million years.

Researchers detected evidence of faulting, buckling and uplift in the young sediment.

They obtained the age of various faults and folds by using a combination of fossils and radioactive isotope dating methods.

Lead researcher Dr Malcolm Wallace said the tectonic activity was responsible for heavy mineral deposits such as titanium in the Murray Basin and the damming of the Murray River and formation of the Barmah Swamp near Echuca 60,000 years ago.

Earthquakes had also made the thick sequences of brown coal relied upon for power generation economically accessible, Dr Wallace said.

"While this is still nothing compared to the activity along the plate margins of, for example, New Zealand and California, it defies the notion that Australia is an inactive continent," he said.

This report appears on news.com.au.

----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:37 PM
Subject: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

Just watched on Channel Seven Melbourne that an Earthquake well over magnitude 6 is due to hit the Melbourne CBD as it is supposed to get a rumble every 30 years or something, and Melb hasn't had one for over a hundred years. They even showed an animation of a couple of Sky scrapers falling down etc if it hit.
Why do people believe in scaring other people like this?
That's like telling someone that they will be hit by lightning! They'd be too scared to go outside!
Even to the point of showing the buildings crumbling to about half height and saying some deaths would occur!
Any wonder I hate TV.
While having a sook. I wonder where all the moisture disappeared to over the weekend? I got so excited and never got anything here. Bugger.....
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.455 / Virus Database: 255 - Release Date: 13/02/2003
at : "Suze" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:51:07 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Didn't see the tv item you're referring to, but...consider at least they have raised the potential - albeit perhaps in a rather alarmist fashion by the sounds of things. You may find that it's not easy to raise awareness in Oz about this potential, especially when the government is building a new reactor at Lucas Heights...ahem. Possibly if you keep tuning in to the same show...a future segment may broach the Lucas Heights issue - ergo quake program a primer... || Suze -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Sha Sent: Monday, 17 February 2003 11:10 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted I agree with what you say about ridiculous *scare tactics* Bussy .... but I was intrigued about the possibilities of an earthquake so I did a search for the news item. I discovered that the report was actually released 29 December ... so how crazy that they are just reporting it tonight ???? I have pasted what I found below because a lot of the articles are archived and the URL's will not work. Love Sha Big quake overdue in Victoria By Mary Papadakis 29Dec02 http://www.news.com.au/common/printpage/0,6093,5760188,00.html VICTORIA is in the firing line of a potentially "catastrophic" earthquake expected to hit southeast Australia. Geological studies conducted by the University of Melbourne have revealed intense underground seismic activity in the area running at Adelaide to southeast Victoria. Researchers are unable to predict when or where the quake will hit, but say it is inevitable. It is feared the next "big one" could reach as high as 6.0 on the Richter scale, putting lives and infrastructure at risk. The devastating quake that struck Newcastle 13 years ago yesterday, killing 13 people, injuring 162 and damaging 300 buildings, measured 5.6. Professor Mike Sandiford is behind one of the two university studies that challenge Australia's image as a geologically comatose continent. "We tend to think that we live on a pretty ancient continent without any geological activity, but we are prone to earthquakes," he said. "We are just lucky it happens so infrequently. "The estimated return period of a quake greater than 6.0 in southeast Australia is about 30 years, but none have been recorded in the last 100 years. "Most earthquakes experienced by this region are less than three on the Richter scale and occur several times a year. It is unusually quiet at the moment, with nothing over 1.5 for the last few months." Professor Sandiford said a large earthquake should be expected in southeast Australia every 10,000 to 20,000 years on any one of the major fault lines. He said evidence of tectonic activity across Victoria and SA included the reshaping of mountains in areas such as the Otway and Dandenong ranges, the Mornington Peninsula and Mount Lofty Ranges near Adelaide. Earthquakes had raised the Otways by 250 metres in the past three million years, a period considered recent by geological standards. The Selwyn fault line, which runs east at Mt Martha to the Dandenong Ranges, had produced about six metres of uplift in the past 100,000 years. "This is potentially six big earthquakes," Professor Sandiford said. "When these big quakes reoccur, they have the potential to cause catastrophic damage to cities such as Melbourne, Adelaide and the La Trobe Valley area, which straddle some of these major fault lines. "It's a scary thing. The danger depends on how close the rupture point is to the surface." Professor Sandiford said some faults around Adelaide had moved slabs of the continent up to 30 metres in the past million years. "A typical earthquake of magnitude 6.0 might produce a displacement of about one metre. Thirty metres is equivalent to 30 (to) 50 big earthquakes in the last million years," he said. In the second study, a team of researchers at the university's earth sciences department investigated sediments and seismic data at petroleum surveys. The study confirmed the mountain-building power of earthquakes in southeast Australia during the past 10 million years. Researchers detected evidence of faulting, buckling and uplift in the young sediment. They obtained the age of various faults and folds by using a combination of fossils and radioactive isotope dating methods. Lead researcher Dr Malcolm Wallace said the tectonic activity was responsible for heavy mineral deposits such as titanium in the Murray Basin and the damming of the Murray River and formation of the Barmah Swamp near Echuca 60,000 years ago. Earthquakes had also made the thick sequences of brown coal relied upon for power generation economically accessible, Dr Wallace said. "While this is still nothing compared to the activity along the plate margins of, for example, New Zealand and California, it defies the notion that Australia is an inactive continent," he said. This report appears on news.com.au. ----- Original Message ----- at : Bussy To: aussie-weather Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:37 PM Subject: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Just watched on Channel Seven Melbourne that an Earthquake well over magnitude 6 is due to hit the Melbourne CBD as it is supposed to get a rumble every 30 years or something, and Melb hasn't had one for over a hundred years. They even showed an animation of a couple of Sky scrapers falling down etc if it hit. Why do people believe in scaring other people like this? That's like telling someone that they will be hit by lightning! They'd be too scared to go outside! Even to the point of showing the buildings crumbling to about half height and saying some deaths would occur! Any wonder I hate TV. While having a sook. I wonder where all the moisture disappeared to over the weekend? I got so excited and never got anything here. Bugger..... Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.455 / Virus Database: 255 - Release Date: 13/02/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jacob at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:16:10 +0800 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jacob Subject: aus-wx: html format and plain text Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi everyone, Just a reminder, when posting to the list, could everyone please try to post in plain text format. Html format can be a bit of a pain for some users, particularly when there is java involved. Thanks. Jacob (Co-list owner) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Suze" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:32:23 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tuan, thanx...all forgiven ; ) I've extended my browsing around BoM recently...so much more than used to be - excellant resource - yes, been reading the Climate section now. Thanx for clarifying the forecast terms, very helpful to understand your short/mid/long range in your practical work. Yep, I well appreciate the excitement of new discovery is best contained, hence my caution; and much research still to perform. So best for me to stay focused and reluctantly forego debate on the shiniest gizmos . I'm fascinated with your months prior forecasts for special occassions; do you prefer to use the new 'ensemble' tech for these? Best wishes to both yourself and Ken in your forecasting comparisons, it will almost be an anti-climax if you both tie || Suze -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Tuan Phan Sent: Wednesday, 12 February 2003 5:13 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Hi all, Suze - I am so sorry for mistaking you for... *wack* (gets slap across the face). I was in such a rush that I didn't even notice the different e-mail addresses :o . Most of my work are only 18-36hr out. I give 'detail' wx (clim) forecast when people ask, months in advance, for their special occasions like weddings. The Climate section of the BoM has outlooks at 1month-12+ months in advance. Recent research showed evidence of skill out to at least 9 months. I consider 7-14 days mid-term & >1 mth long-term. I am always on the lookout for methods that may extent forecasts out to 2 weeks (the theoretical limit). However, I always demand evidence before accepting anything as 'fact'. Detailed forecasts out to 15 days are now possible using the relatively new 'ensemble' technique. Preliminary results are quite exciting but reserve all judgement until all results are published & verified, before I will believe that it is possible to forecast 14 days out with some skill (beating clim consistently). +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:02:43 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Nah. Never watch those. Peter Mitchell on the news.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 7:07 PM
Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

I think the question is . . . what on earth were you doing watching dribble like TT or ACA?

 

Anyone who watches those shows- should go to their bedroom, and give themselves a full frontal lobotomy (if they hadn’t already) . . . .

 

-----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Bussy
Sent: Monday, 17 February 2003 6:37 PM
To: aussie-weather
Subject: aus-wx: I'm disgusted

 

Just watched on Channel Seven Melbourne that an Earthquake well over magnitude 6 is due to hit the Melbourne CBD as it is supposed to get a rumble every 30 years or something, and Melb hasn't had one for over a hundred years. They even showed an animation of a couple of Sky scrapers falling down etc if it hit.

Why do people believe in scaring other people like this?

That's like telling someone that they will be hit by lightning! They'd be too scared to go outside!

Even to the point of showing the buildings crumbling to about half height and saying some deaths would occur!

Any wonder I hate TV.

While having a sook. I wonder where all the moisture disappeared to over the weekend? I got so excited and never got anything here. Bugger.....

 

Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)

at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: More Bushfires Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:06:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Another fire started here yesterday between Beechworth and Stanley. Currently under some "new" thick smoke here :-((
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:09:37 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: html format and plain text Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jacob, I thought also we could try posting weather stuff rather than off topic stuff. Earthquakes should be posted on geology lists. There are many things you can discuss on weather - at present weather to past weather despite the fact there might be no significant weather in Victoria at the moment. I just feel there have been a few off topics and not announced as such but there have been more and more of late. Thanks. Jimmy Deguara At 11:16 PM 17/2/2003 +0800, you wrote: >Hi everyone, > >Just a reminder, when posting to the list, could everyone please try to >post in plain text format. > >Html format can be a bit of a pain for some users, particularly when there >is java involved. > >Thanks. > >Jacob (Co-list owner) > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Tuan Phan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx:Tidying loose ends Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:17:17 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Suze & others, Yes, some of the info available on the BoM website is incredible. Without a doubt, one of the best wx & climate site on the whole internet. > I'm fascinated with your months prior forecasts for special occassions; > do you prefer to use the new 'ensemble' tech for these? No. Enseble doesn't go that far out. When a friend ask for a (say) forecast for the coming week, I will look at all the model guidance, observations & use my experience to give them the best forecast I can. If anyone asks for a forecast for next month/year/decade, I know my limitation so I simply look the clim ave and report this. Research has shown that if I don't, I am simply gambling, and we all know that the house ALWAYS wins in the long run. Ensemble technique is not new. I am guessing theory is many decades old. It is only in the last decades that much development & testing has taken place (due to increased power of computers). Several agencies around the world have the technique but very few forecasters use it operationally. (This may change in a few years) NOAA actually make the output available to the public (to 15 days out!). Unfortunately I don't have the website on hand, but I am sure others would know. The European conglomerate (ECMWF) will be releasing it shortly to their private clients only. I was lucky enough to get a look at some of their products and provide feedback. Some incredible products they have. Still awaiting to see how 'skilful' their stuff is actually but prelim investigation looks very favourable. My section at work produces the BoM's ensemble models. Some very interesting development as well but we are probably a couple of years behind other agencies. I personally think ensemble technique will be very big in the future as it comunicates exactly how certain/confident we are of an event at happening (which is what wx forecasting is largely about). This potentially has a huge impact on any industries affected by the wx, in terms of risk management & planning. > Best wishes to both yourself and Ken in your forecasting comparisons, > it will almost be an anti-climax if you both tie || Suze Unfortunately to those interested, Ken has decided to pull out, but has suggested a better time may occur later in the year. However, he has mentioned that he is prepared to post up forecasts a month ahead for any Australian city and keep doing this each month for anyone interested. Suze, it would not be anti-climax if tie occured. I am interested at a science point of view (and not competition). at this proposed test, no clear conclusion could be have, only initial indication & future direction. Aquila Inc & many others had a huge interest in forecasting for time >14 days. They had a cattle call for ANY 'alternative' techniques in hope of finding one that can beat clim. They were offering potential multimillion dollar contracts to anyone that can beat clim consistently and supply their method (wx derivatives is worth $billions to them each year!). Needless to say, none came even close so the search for wx's holy grail continues dispite so many claims on the net. Enough rambling at me. cheeers, tuan >snip +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm disgusted To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:27:24 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The report isn't even all that surprising. There have been several instances of 6+ earthquakes in SE Australia in the period of the historic record, including two which are believed to have been in the 6.5-7.0 range (Cape Jaffa in 1899, and Flinders Island in, IIRC, 1886). Based on the historic data one would expect the return period for a 6+ earthquake to be no more than 100 years, and probably somewhat less. Of course, the return period for such an earthquake occurring close enough to Melbourne (or any other specified population centre) to cause serious damage would be much greater than 100 years. As I understand it, Newcastle was a particularly shallow earthquake, which would have contributed significantly to the damage there. Blair > > I agree with what you say about ridiculous *scare tactics* Bussy .... = > but I was intrigued about the possibilities of an earthquake so I did a = > search for the news item. > > I discovered that the report was actually released 29 December ... so = > how crazy that they are just reporting it tonight ???? > > I have pasted what I found below because a lot of the articles are = > archived and the URL's will not work. > > Love > Sha > > Big quake overdue in Victoria > By Mary Papadakis > 29Dec02 http://www.news.com.au/common/printpage/0,6093,5760188,00.html > > VICTORIA is in the firing line of a potentially "catastrophic" = > earthquake expected to hit southeast Australia.=20 > > Geological studies conducted by the University of Melbourne have = > revealed intense underground seismic activity in the area running at = > Adelaide to southeast Victoria.=20 > Researchers are unable to predict when or where the quake will hit, but = > say it is inevitable.=20 > > It is feared the next "big one" could reach as high as 6.0 on the = > Richter scale, putting lives and infrastructure at risk.=20 > > The devastating quake that struck Newcastle 13 years ago yesterday, = > killing 13 people, injuring 162 and damaging 300 buildings, measured = > 5.6.=20 > > Professor Mike Sandiford is behind one of the two university studies = > that challenge Australia's image as a geologically comatose continent.=20 > > "We tend to think that we live on a pretty ancient continent without any = > geological activity, but we are prone to earthquakes," he said. "We are = > just lucky it happens so infrequently.=20 > > "The estimated return period of a quake greater than 6.0 in southeast = > Australia is about 30 years, but none have been recorded in the last 100 = > years.=20 > > "Most earthquakes experienced by this region are less than three on the = > Richter scale and occur several times a year. It is unusually quiet at = > the moment, with nothing over 1.5 for the last few months."=20 > > Professor Sandiford said a large earthquake should be expected in = > southeast Australia every 10,000 to 20,000 years on any one of the major = > fault lines.=20 > > He said evidence of tectonic activity across Victoria and SA included = > the reshaping of mountains in areas such as the Otway and Dandenong = > ranges, the Mornington Peninsula and Mount Lofty Ranges near Adelaide.=20 > > Earthquakes had raised the Otways by 250 metres in the past three = > million years, a period considered recent by geological standards.=20 > > The Selwyn fault line, which runs east at Mt Martha to the Dandenong = > Ranges, had produced about six metres of uplift in the past 100,000 = > years.=20 > > "This is potentially six big earthquakes," Professor Sandiford said.=20 > > "When these big quakes reoccur, they have the potential to cause = > catastrophic damage to cities such as Melbourne, Adelaide and the La = > Trobe Valley area, which straddle some of these major fault lines.=20 > > "It's a scary thing. The danger depends on how close the rupture point = > is to the surface."=20 > > Professor Sandiford said some faults around Adelaide had moved slabs of = > the continent up to 30 metres in the past million years.=20 > > "A typical earthquake of magnitude 6.0 might produce a displacement of = > about one metre. Thirty metres is equivalent to 30 (to) 50 big = > earthquakes in the last million years," he said.=20 > > In the second study, a team of researchers at the university's earth = > sciences department investigated sediments and seismic data at = > petroleum surveys.=20 > > The study confirmed the mountain-building power of earthquakes in = > southeast Australia during the past 10 million years.=20 > > Researchers detected evidence of faulting, buckling and uplift in the = > young sediment.=20 > > They obtained the age of various faults and folds by using a combination = > of fossils and radioactive isotope dating methods.=20 > > Lead researcher Dr Malcolm Wallace said the tectonic activity was = > responsible for heavy mineral deposits such as titanium in the Murray = > Basin and the damming of the Murray River and formation of the Barmah = > Swamp near Echuca 60,000 years ago.=20 > > Earthquakes had also made the thick sequences of brown coal relied upon = > for power generation economically accessible, Dr Wallace said.=20 > > "While this is still nothing compared to the activity along the plate = > margins of, for example, New Zealand and California, it defies the = > notion that Australia is an inactive continent," he said.=20 > > This report appears on news.com.au.=20 > > > =20 > ----- Original Message -----=20 > at : Bussy=20 > To: aussie-weather=20 > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:37 PM > Subject: aus-wx: I'm disgusted > > > Just watched on Channel Seven Melbourne that an Earthquake well over = > magnitude 6 is due to hit the Melbourne CBD as it is supposed to get a = > rumble every 30 years or something, and Melb hasn't had one for over a = > hundred years. They even showed an animation of a couple of Sky scrapers = > falling down etc if it hit. > Why do people believe in scaring other people like this? > That's like telling someone that they will be hit by lightning! They'd = > be too scared to go outside! > Even to the point of showing the buildings crumbling to about half = > height and saying some deaths would occur! > Any wonder I hate TV. > While having a sook. I wonder where all the moisture disappeared to over = > the weekend? I got so excited and never got anything here. Bugger..... > > Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.455 / Virus Database: 255 - Release Date: 13/02/2003 > ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01C2D6D9.BE0C0020 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > charset=3Diso-8859-1"> > > > > >
I agree = > with what you=20 > say about ridiculous *scare tactics* Bussy .... but I was intrigued = > about the=20 > possibilities of an earthquake so I did a search for the news=20 > item.
>
size=3D4> 
>
I = > discovered that the=20 > report was actually released 29 December ... so how crazy that they are = > just=20 > reporting it tonight ????
>
size=3D4> 
>
I have = > pasted what I=20 > found below because a lot of the articles are archived and the URL's = > will not=20 > work.
>
size=3D4> 
>
size=3D4>Love
>
size=3D4>Sha
>
size=3D4> 
>
Big quake overdue in = > Victoria
size=3D1>By Mary Papadakis
29Dec02 href=3D"http://www.news.com.au/common/printpage/0,6093,5760188,00.html">h= > ttp://www.news.com.au/common/printpage/0,6093,5760188,00.html
<= > /FONT>
face=3DVerdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif size=3D2>
VICTORIA is in = > the firing=20 > line of a potentially "catastrophic" earthquake expected to hit = > southeast=20 > Australia.

Geological studies conducted by the University of = > > Melbourne have revealed intense underground seismic activity in the area = > running=20 > at Adelaide to southeast Victoria.=20 >

Researchers are unable to predict when or where the quake will hit, = > but say=20 > it is inevitable.=20 >

It is feared the next "big one" could reach as high as 6.0 on the = > Richter=20 > scale, putting lives and infrastructure at risk.=20 >

The devastating quake that struck Newcastle 13 years ago yesterday, = > killing=20 > 13 people, injuring 162 and damaging 300 buildings, measured 5.6.=20 >

Professor Mike Sandiford is behind one of the two university studies = > that=20 > challenge Australia's image as a geologically comatose continent.=20 >

"We tend to think that we live on a pretty ancient continent without = > any=20 > geological activity, but we are prone to earthquakes," he said. "We are = > just=20 > lucky it happens so infrequently.=20 >

"The estimated return period of a quake greater than 6.0 in southeast = > > Australia is about 30 years, but none have been recorded in the last 100 = > years.=20 >

"Most earthquakes experienced by this region are less than three on = > the=20 > Richter scale and occur several times a year. It is unusually quiet at = > the=20 > moment, with nothing over 1.5 for the last few months."=20 >

Professor Sandiford said a large earthquake should be expected in = > southeast=20 > Australia every 10,000 to 20,000 years on any one of the major fault = > lines.=20 >

He said evidence of tectonic activity across Victoria and SA included = > the=20 > reshaping of mountains in areas such as the Otway and Dandenong ranges, = > the=20 > Mornington Peninsula and Mount Lofty Ranges near Adelaide.=20 >

Earthquakes had raised the Otways by 250 metres in the past three = > million=20 > years, a period considered recent by geological standards.=20 >

The Selwyn fault line, which runs east at Mt Martha to the = > Dandenong=20 > Ranges, had produced about six metres of uplift in the past 100,000 = > years.=20 >

"This is potentially six big earthquakes," Professor Sandiford said.=20 >

"When these big quakes reoccur, they have the potential to cause = > catastrophic=20 > damage to cities such as Melbourne, Adelaide and the La Trobe Valley = > area, which=20 > straddle some of these major fault lines.=20 >

"It's a scary thing. The danger depends on how close the rupture = > point is to=20 > the surface."=20 >

Professor Sandiford said some faults around Adelaide had moved slabs = > of the=20 > continent up to 30 metres in the past million years.=20 >

"A typical earthquake of magnitude 6.0 might produce a displacement = > of about=20 > one metre. Thirty metres is equivalent to 30 (to) 50 big earthquakes in = > the last=20 > million years," he said.=20 >

In the second study, a team of researchers at the university's = > earth=20 > sciences department investigated sediments and seismic data at = > petroleum=20 > surveys.=20 >

The study confirmed the mountain-building power of earthquakes in = > southeast=20 > Australia during the past 10 million years.=20 >

Researchers detected evidence of faulting, buckling and uplift in the = > young=20 > sediment.=20 >

They obtained the age of various faults and folds by using a = > combination of=20 > fossils and radioactive isotope dating methods.=20 >

Lead researcher Dr Malcolm Wallace said the tectonic activity was = > responsible=20 > for heavy mineral deposits such as titanium in the Murray Basin and the = > damming=20 > of the Murray River and formation of the Barmah Swamp near Echuca 60,000 = > years=20 > ago.=20 >

Earthquakes had also made the thick sequences of brown coal relied = > upon for=20 > power generation economically accessible, Dr Wallace said.=20 >

"While this is still nothing compared to the activity along the plate = > margins=20 > of, for example, New Zealand and California, it defies the notion that = > Australia=20 > is an inactive continent," he said.=20 >

This report appears on news.com.au.

> > > > > > width=3D1=20 > code=3DMeasure.class> VALUE=3D"sr800x600:cd16:lgen-au:jey:cky:tz10:ctmodem:hpn"> NAME=3D"cid" VALUE=3D"au_newscorp_0"> VALUE=3D"http%3A//search.aol.com.au/dirsearch.adp%3Fquery%3DEarthquake%25= > 20to%2520hit%2520Melbourne%26query_mod%3Dlr%2520lang%255fen%2520restrict%= > 2520countryAU"> > > =0A= > =0A= >
>
----- Original Message -----=20 >
at : title=3Dbussie at netc.net.au href=3D"mailto:bussie at netc.net.au">Bussy = >
> >
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:37 PM
>
Subject: aus-wx: I'm disgusted
>

>
Just watched on Channel Seven Melbourne that an = > Earthquake=20 > well over magnitude 6 is due to hit the Melbourne CBD as it is supposed = > to get a=20 > rumble every 30 years or something, and Melb hasn't had one for over a = > hundred=20 > years. They even showed an animation of a couple of Sky scrapers = > falling=20 > down etc if it hit.
>
Why do people believe in scaring other people like=20 > this?
>
That's like telling someone that they will = > be hit by=20 > lightning! They'd be too scared to go outside!
>
Even to the point of showing the buildings crumbling = > to about=20 > half height and saying some deaths would occur!
>
Any wonder I hate TV.
>
While having a sook. I wonder where all the moisture = > > disappeared to over the weekend? I got so excited and never got anything = > here.=20 > Bugger.....
>
 
>
Bussy (Rutherglen NE = > Victoria)
>
 
>

---
Outgoing mail is certified = > Virus=20 > Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system ( href=3D"http://www.grisoft.com">http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: = > 6.0.455 /=20 > Virus Database: 255 - Release Date: = > 13/02/2003
> > ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01C2D6D9.BE0C0020-- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:56:32 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: html format and plain text X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy, I have to disagree that earthquake discussion is entirely off-topic on a weather list. The magnificent lightning displays sometimes seen during earthquakes (I saw a ripper display of earthquake lightning during a quake in South Gippsland, Victoria in mid 1969) not to mention connections between weather events and the timing of earthquakes and the fact that earthquakes are known to cause tsunamis must just about allow the inclusion of some discussion of them here. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : Jimmy Deguara To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:09:37 +1100 Subject: Re: aus-wx: html format and plain text > Hi Jacob, > > I thought also we could try posting weather stuff rather than off topic > stuff. Earthquakes should be posted on geology lists. > > There are many things you can discuss on weather - at present weather > to > past weather despite the fact there might be no significant weather in > Victoria at the moment. I just feel there have been a few off topics > and > not announced as such but there have been more and more of late. > > Thanks. > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 11:16 PM 17/2/2003 +0800, you wrote: > > >Hi everyone, > > > >Just a reminder, when posting to the list, could everyone please try > to > >post in plain text format. > > > >Html format can be a bit of a pain for some users, particularly when > there > >is java involved. > > > >Thanks. > > > >Jacob (Co-list owner) > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Peter May To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Predictions Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:12:08 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. Well here I sit on the south coast after moving house watching my weather station's barometric reading fluctuate up and down. Whilst my station currently is a cheaper variety, it has a prediction/forecast output. It currently says to expect cloudy and at the moment it is cloudy. How does it do this? What I mean is predictions at a person at say BOM that looks at info at various sources etc, plays join the dots to make up those maps of highs and lows and other factors and then throws a dart at a board and gives a forecast I understand. But how does the station do it? I am in no way saying the station is correct but even as a stab in the dark it must use a formula or something? Any ideas? Regards, Peter -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:29:49 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: html format and plain text X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com May I shout out a loud and resounding "Amen!" to Jacob's post. While the WinXP machine I am on today handles HTML okay, I recently checked my e-mail on a 1987-vintage machine running Xenix as the OS with no GUI at all where the only e-mail client was the text-based "mail" program. Messages in HTML are pretty well unintelligible without a lot of hard work. Using the mail or mailx programs that come on old Unix machines presents the same difficulties. Every time I see an e-mail with somebody's "prettied up" formatting, I shudder and think of those who, for one reason or another, happen to be on a non-windows machine and using a very efficient, but text-only, e- mail client, and I picture them swearing profusely at the sender. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : Jacob To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:16:10 +0800 Subject: aus-wx: html format and plain text > > Hi everyone, > > Just a reminder, when posting to the list, could everyone please try to > post in plain text format. > > Html format can be a bit of a pain for some users, particularly when > there > is java involved. > > Thanks. > > Jacob (Co-list owner) > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: bathurst storms Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:56:21 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all..
 
Looking on radar now, nice cell building up west of Bathurst, red on radar.. Its really black looking here.. Already started to spit rain.  Another cell also just started between Orange and parkes. see what this does as well.
 
Dave
 
 
at : "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Record dry? Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 04:10:01 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Blair Trewin > In passing through the area yesterday, I noticed that the Ovens > River at Wangaratta appears to have ceased to flow (in as far as I > could tell at the bridge at 110 km/h, there looked like there > were full-width sandbars). Are there any locals who can confirm > (or otherwise?). Blair, this morning's Vic river heights bulletin gives the Ovens at Wangaratta as 7.33m and rising, which would suggest some flow. One thing we've lost with the change to telemetered river gauges is the report of "no flow" when the last trickle stops. I suppose you could work it out at the datum level, but only Qld seems to have these on the web (at http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/qld/networks/section6.shtml). Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record dry? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:22:56 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Blair Trewin > > > In passing through the area yesterday, I noticed that the Ovens > > River at Wangaratta appears to have ceased to flow (in as far as I > > could tell at the bridge at 110 km/h, there looked like there > > were full-width sandbars). Are there any locals who can confirm > > (or otherwise?). > > Blair, this morning's Vic river heights bulletin gives the Ovens at > Wangaratta as 7.33m and rising, which would suggest some flow. One thing > we've lost with the change to telemetered river gauges is the report of "no > flow" when the last trickle stops. I suppose you could work it out at the > datum level, but only Qld seems to have these on the web (at > http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/qld/networks/section6.shtml). > > Laurier > It sounds like an additional release was done at Lake Buffalo which has worked its way down the river by now. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.138.156.81] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: html format and plain text Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:23:33 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2003 06:23:33.0951 (UTC) FILETIME=[43617CF0:01C2D716] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy, its been so quiet lately, it doesn't suprise me maybe when we get some action in autumn people will get back on topic Gavin SSWW Canberra > at : Jimmy Deguara >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: html format and plain text >Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:09:37 +1100 > >Hi Jacob, > >I thought also we could try posting weather stuff rather than off topic >stuff. Earthquakes should be posted on geology lists. > >There are many things you can discuss on weather - at present weather to >past weather despite the fact there might be no significant weather in >Victoria at the moment. I just feel there have been a few off topics and >not announced as such but there have been more and more of late. > >Thanks. > >Jimmy Deguara > >At 11:16 PM 17/2/2003 +0800, you wrote: > >>Hi everyone, >> >>Just a reminder, when posting to the list, could everyone please try to >>post in plain text format. >> >>Html format can be a bit of a pain for some users, particularly when there >>is java involved. >> >>Thanks. >> >>Jacob (Co-list owner) >> >> >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >>to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.169.13] at : "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:50:47 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2003 06:50:47.0318 (UTC) FILETIME=[10F18360:01C2D71A] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Gee whillikers Peter! Where can I get of them fine'n'dandy weather-stations that does forecasts and gets them right? Here I was sitting here in the mallee wondering why I spent so long learning how to join the dots and throw darts when I could just buy a prediction machine.... And if you believe THAT I know a bridge shaped like a coathanger that you can buy cheap.... Cheers, Kevin at Wycheproof. > at : Peter May >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Predictions >Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:12:08 +1100 > >Hi all. > >Well here I sit on the south coast after moving house watching my weather >station's barometric reading fluctuate up and down. Whilst my station >currently is a cheaper variety, it has a prediction/forecast output. It >currently says to expect cloudy and at the moment it is cloudy. > >How does it do this? What I mean is predictions at a person at say BOM >that looks at info at various sources etc, plays join the dots to make up >those maps of highs and lows and other factors and then throws a dart at a >board and gives a forecast I understand. But how does the station do it? I >am in no way saying the station is correct but even as a stab in the dark >it >must use a formula or something? > >Any ideas? > >Regards, Peter > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Peter May To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Predictions Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:53:38 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id CAA19056 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry I didn't try to say it was right all I said was it had a go at predicting. In fact in the software I am putting together I have a field that is for the percentage of time it actually rains compared to how many times it predicted it. More or less simply to see what percentage. I will be interested at the end of say 12 months to see it's accuracy. As far as throwing darts. It was a tounge in cheek shot at metro boys. It is a job to them like being an electrician is to me. However the majority of people seem to think that what the weather man says should happen. The always get the rough end of the stick and are allowed no mistakes. If I cut a wire wrong I simply join it up again.... My appoligies to anyone that read my previous message and took it the way you may have. All I am trying to find out is how the systems seem to come up with the idea of what is going to happen. I sought of get the idea of the barometer dropping and predicting rain but how does it come up with PARTLY CLOUDY or CLOUDY? Regards, Peter -----Original Message----- at : Kevin Phyland [mailto:kjphyland at hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 5:51 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions Gee whillikers Peter! Where can I get of them fine'n'dandy weather-stations that does forecasts and gets them right? Here I was sitting here in the mallee wondering why I spent so long learning how to join the dots and throw darts when I could just buy a prediction machine.... And if you believe THAT I know a bridge shaped like a coathanger that you can buy cheap.... Cheers, Kevin at Wycheproof. > at : Peter May >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Predictions >Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:12:08 +1100 > >Hi all. > >Well here I sit on the south coast after moving house watching my weather >station's barometric reading fluctuate up and down. Whilst my station >currently is a cheaper variety, it has a prediction/forecast output. It >currently says to expect cloudy and at the moment it is cloudy. > >How does it do this? What I mean is predictions at a person at say BOM >that looks at info at various sources etc, plays join the dots to make up >those maps of highs and lows and other factors and then throws a dart at a >board and gives a forecast I understand. But how does the station do it? I >am in no way saying the station is correct but even as a stab in the dark >it >must use a formula or something? > >Any ideas? > >Regards, Peter > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.169.13] at : "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Predictions Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:17:37 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2003 07:17:38.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0FF4950:01C2D71D] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Peter, np...my reply was exactly as tongue-in-cheek as your post... :)) Cheers, Kevin. Now at 49 days without rain... > at : Peter May >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" >Subject: RE: aus-wx: Predictions >Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:53:38 +1100 > >Sorry I didn't try to say it was right all I said was it had a go at >predicting. In fact in the software I am putting together I have a field >that is for the percentage of time it actually rains compared to how many >times it predicted it. More or less simply to see what percentage. I will >be >interested at the end of say 12 months to see it's accuracy. > >As far as throwing darts. It was a tounge in cheek shot at metro boys. It >is >a job to them like being an electrician is to me. However the majority of >people seem to think that what the weather man says should happen. The >always get the rough end of the stick and are allowed no mistakes. If I cut >a wire wrong I simply join it up again.... > >My appoligies to anyone that read my previous message and took it the way >you may have. All I am trying to find out is how the systems seem to come >up >with the idea of what is going to happen. I sought of get the idea of the >barometer dropping and predicting rain but how does it come up with PARTLY >CLOUDY or CLOUDY? > >Regards, Peter > >-----Original Message----- > at : Kevin Phyland [mailto:kjphyland at hotmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 5:51 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions > > >Gee whillikers Peter! > >Where can I get of them fine'n'dandy weather-stations that does forecasts >and gets them right? > >Here I was sitting here in the mallee wondering why I spent so long >learning > >how to join the dots and throw darts when I could just buy a prediction >machine.... > >And if you believe THAT I know a bridge shaped like a coathanger that you >can buy cheap.... > >Cheers, >Kevin at Wycheproof. > > > > > > > > at : Peter May > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: aus-wx: Predictions > >Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:12:08 +1100 > > > >Hi all. > > > >Well here I sit on the south coast after moving house watching my weather > >station's barometric reading fluctuate up and down. Whilst my station > >currently is a cheaper variety, it has a prediction/forecast output. It > >currently says to expect cloudy and at the moment it is cloudy. > > > >How does it do this? What I mean is predictions at a person at say BOM > >that looks at info at various sources etc, plays join the dots to make >up > >those maps of highs and lows and other factors and then throws a dart at >a > >board and gives a forecast I understand. But how does the station do it? >I > >am in no way saying the station is correct but even as a stab in the dark > >it > >must use a formula or something? > > > >Any ideas? > > > >Regards, Peter > > > >-- > >This message has been scanned for viruses and > >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >believed to be clean. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > >_________________________________________________________________ >MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to >http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Peter May To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Predictions Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:22:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ahhh. The light shines. Pity it isn't in my direction :-) Where can I find more info on this etc? -----Original Message----- at : Brian Hamilton [mailto:windy at ps.gen.nz] Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 6:25 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions Hi Peter the station also uses the dew point.... if the dew point is rising, then there is a change in air mass occuring if that occurs with a dropping barometer, then a frontal system is most likely on its way Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Peter May" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:53 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Predictions > Sorry I didn't try to say it was right all I said was it had a go at > predicting. In fact in the software I am putting together I have a field > that is for the percentage of time it actually rains compared to how many > times it predicted it. More or less simply to see what percentage. I will be > interested at the end of say 12 months to see it's accuracy. > > As far as throwing darts. It was a tounge in cheek shot at metro boys. It is > a job to them like being an electrician is to me. However the majority of > people seem to think that what the weather man says should happen. The > always get the rough end of the stick and are allowed no mistakes. If I cut > a wire wrong I simply join it up again.... > > My appoligies to anyone that read my previous message and took it the way > you may have. All I am trying to find out is how the systems seem to come up > with the idea of what is going to happen. I sought of get the idea of the > barometer dropping and predicting rain but how does it come up with PARTLY > CLOUDY or CLOUDY? > > Regards, Peter > > -----Original Message----- > at : Kevin Phyland [mailto:kjphyland at hotmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 5:51 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions > > > Gee whillikers Peter! > > Where can I get of them fine'n'dandy weather-stations that does forecasts > and gets them right? > > Here I was sitting here in the mallee wondering why I spent so long learning > > how to join the dots and throw darts when I could just buy a prediction > machine.... > > And if you believe THAT I know a bridge shaped like a coathanger that you > can buy cheap.... > > Cheers, > Kevin at Wycheproof. > > > > > > > > at : Peter May > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: aus-wx: Predictions > >Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:12:08 +1100 > > > >Hi all. > > > >Well here I sit on the south coast after moving house watching my weather > >station's barometric reading fluctuate up and down. Whilst my station > >currently is a cheaper variety, it has a prediction/forecast output. It > >currently says to expect cloudy and at the moment it is cloudy. > > > >How does it do this? What I mean is predictions at a person at say BOM > >that looks at info at various sources etc, plays join the dots to make up > >those maps of highs and lows and other factors and then throws a dart at a > >board and gives a forecast I understand. But how does the station do it? I > >am in no way saying the station is correct but even as a stab in the dark > >it > >must use a formula or something? > > > >Any ideas? > > > >Regards, Peter > > > >-- > >This message has been scanned for viruses and > >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >believed to be clean. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 20:24:50 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Peter the station also uses the dew point.... if the dew point is rising, then there is a change in air mass occuring if that occurs with a dropping barometer, then a frontal system is most likely on its way Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Peter May" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:53 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Predictions > Sorry I didn't try to say it was right all I said was it had a go at > predicting. In fact in the software I am putting together I have a field > that is for the percentage of time it actually rains compared to how many > times it predicted it. More or less simply to see what percentage. I will be > interested at the end of say 12 months to see it's accuracy. > > As far as throwing darts. It was a tounge in cheek shot at metro boys. It is > a job to them like being an electrician is to me. However the majority of > people seem to think that what the weather man says should happen. The > always get the rough end of the stick and are allowed no mistakes. If I cut > a wire wrong I simply join it up again.... > > My appoligies to anyone that read my previous message and took it the way > you may have. All I am trying to find out is how the systems seem to come up > with the idea of what is going to happen. I sought of get the idea of the > barometer dropping and predicting rain but how does it come up with PARTLY > CLOUDY or CLOUDY? > > Regards, Peter > > -----Original Message----- > at : Kevin Phyland [mailto:kjphyland at hotmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 5:51 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions > > > Gee whillikers Peter! > > Where can I get of them fine'n'dandy weather-stations that does forecasts > and gets them right? > > Here I was sitting here in the mallee wondering why I spent so long learning > > how to join the dots and throw darts when I could just buy a prediction > machine.... > > And if you believe THAT I know a bridge shaped like a coathanger that you > can buy cheap.... > > Cheers, > Kevin at Wycheproof. > > > > > > > > at : Peter May > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: aus-wx: Predictions > >Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:12:08 +1100 > > > >Hi all. > > > >Well here I sit on the south coast after moving house watching my weather > >station's barometric reading fluctuate up and down. Whilst my station > >currently is a cheaper variety, it has a prediction/forecast output. It > >currently says to expect cloudy and at the moment it is cloudy. > > > >How does it do this? What I mean is predictions at a person at say BOM > >that looks at info at various sources etc, plays join the dots to make up > >those maps of highs and lows and other factors and then throws a dart at a > >board and gives a forecast I understand. But how does the station do it? I > >am in no way saying the station is correct but even as a stab in the dark > >it > >must use a formula or something? > > > >Any ideas? > > > >Regards, Peter > > > >-- > >This message has been scanned for viruses and > >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >believed to be clean. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:25:48 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Wishing All a Fantastic February:
        Gasoline prices here seem to rise daily. This situation takes me back to 1978 when I was a junior (Grade/Year 11) in High School. I had Coordinated Careers Education (CCE) class in school, so I drove home at Mena High at lunchtime (12NOON) to go to work for my dad.
Anyway, back then I thought US$0.70 for regular per US gallon,($0.79 for unleaded) was pretty high, and it seemed that the prices rose almost daily.
        Now, what I wouldn't give for those times again...gas has been over $1.00 a US gallon here for a number of years. As of today, Feb. 17th, where I usually get gas (DJ's Grocery Store[the closest store to the house--7 blocks away]) regular has climbed to US$1.59 a gallon, with Diesel being US$1.69 a gallon. The cheapest gas is at the Wal-Mart Supercenter(Murphy Oil) and even it is US$1.54 a gallon. Just a few weeks ago, gas prices were around US$1.27 a gallon. THESE kind of prices used to be what Californians etc. would pay for gasoline. Price-wise there is very little variety. *RANT* The greed of these oil people never cease to amaze me! Anything can be used as a pretext for raising prices. I WISH we could boycott these places and mabye they'd lighten up and come down on their outrageous prices. We could all ride bicycles like they do in Europe, China, etc. Nevertheless, (Rich) people are still buying fuel-inefficient vehicles (like Humvees) , which most people couldn't afford to put gas into.  They also need to get rid of that annoying 9/10 (cents) after the prices (eg. gas= $1.59 9/10). Bring back the days of '57 Chevys and $0.25 a gallon gas! *End Rant, looking for Benadryl*
Your gas$challenged US correspondent  David Powell
at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 20:51:17 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com http://www.weatherwatchers.org/bbs/wx-200board/ have a look here, at older archives some usefull info on it Cheers Brian ----- Original Message ----- at : "Peter May" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:22 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Predictions > Ahhh. The light shines. Pity it isn't in my direction :-) > > Where can I find more info on this etc? > > -----Original Message----- > at : Brian Hamilton [mailto:windy at ps.gen.nz] > Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 6:25 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions > > > Hi Peter > the station also uses the dew point.... > if the dew point is rising, then there is a change in air mass occuring > if that occurs with a dropping barometer, then a frontal system is most > likely on its way > > Cheers > Brian > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Peter May" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:53 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Predictions > > > > Sorry I didn't try to say it was right all I said was it had a go at > > predicting. In fact in the software I am putting together I have a field > > that is for the percentage of time it actually rains compared to how many > > times it predicted it. More or less simply to see what percentage. I will > be > > interested at the end of say 12 months to see it's accuracy. > > > > As far as throwing darts. It was a tounge in cheek shot at metro boys. It > is > > a job to them like being an electrician is to me. However the majority of > > people seem to think that what the weather man says should happen. The > > always get the rough end of the stick and are allowed no mistakes. If I > cut > > a wire wrong I simply join it up again.... > > > > My appoligies to anyone that read my previous message and took it the way > > you may have. All I am trying to find out is how the systems seem to come > up > > with the idea of what is going to happen. I sought of get the idea of the > > barometer dropping and predicting rain but how does it come up with PARTLY > > CLOUDY or CLOUDY? > > > > Regards, Peter > > > > -----Original Message----- > > at : Kevin Phyland [mailto:kjphyland at hotmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 5:51 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions > > > > > > Gee whillikers Peter! > > > > Where can I get of them fine'n'dandy weather-stations that does forecasts > > and gets them right? > > > > Here I was sitting here in the mallee wondering why I spent so long > learning > > > > how to join the dots and throw darts when I could just buy a prediction > > machine.... > > > > And if you believe THAT I know a bridge shaped like a coathanger that you > > can buy cheap.... > > > > Cheers, > > Kevin at Wycheproof. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at : Peter May > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >Subject: aus-wx: Predictions > > >Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:12:08 +1100 > > > > > >Hi all. > > > > > >Well here I sit on the south coast after moving house watching my weather > > >station's barometric reading fluctuate up and down. Whilst my station > > >currently is a cheaper variety, it has a prediction/forecast output. It > > >currently says to expect cloudy and at the moment it is cloudy. > > > > > >How does it do this? What I mean is predictions at a person at say BOM > > >that looks at info at various sources etc, plays join the dots to make > up > > >those maps of highs and lows and other factors and then throws a dart at > a > > >board and gives a forecast I understand. But how does the station do it? > I > > >am in no way saying the station is correct but even as a stab in the dark > > >it > > >must use a formula or something? > > > > > >Any ideas? > > > > > >Regards, Peter > > > > > >-- > > >This message has been scanned for viruses and > > >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > >believed to be clean. > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: aus-wx: cool summer spot Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:02:43 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com If you guys think its too hot, check out a cool summer location here: http://www.tokaanuskihire.co.nz/sb/sbweather.html :) Cheers Brian +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: html format and plain text Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 20:17:25 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry all. I started this thread and apologise if I've upset anyone. In my opinion nature has her/his earthquakes and volcano's etc and all comes down to balancing our planet. If that doesn't affect our weather around the planet well then I'm apologising big time. Once again. I apologise and will crawl back under by (burnt out) log :-) ----- Original Message ----- at : "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:56 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: html format and plain text > Jimmy, > I have to disagree that earthquake discussion is entirely off-topic on a > weather list. The magnificent lightning displays sometimes seen during > earthquakes (I saw a ripper display of earthquake lightning during a > quake in South Gippsland, Victoria in mid 1969) not to mention > connections between weather events and the timing of earthquakes and the > fact that earthquakes are known to cause tsunamis must just about allow > the inclusion of some discussion of them here. > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > at : Jimmy Deguara > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:09:37 +1100 > Subject: Re: aus-wx: html format and plain text > > > Hi Jacob, > > > > I thought also we could try posting weather stuff rather than off topic > > stuff. Earthquakes should be posted on geology lists. > > > > There are many things you can discuss on weather - at present weather > > to > > past weather despite the fact there might be no significant weather in > > Victoria at the moment. I just feel there have been a few off topics > > and > > not announced as such but there have been more and more of late. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > At 11:16 PM 17/2/2003 +0800, you wrote: > > > > >Hi everyone, > > > > > >Just a reminder, when posting to the list, could everyone please try > > to > > >post in plain text format. > > > > > >Html format can be a bit of a pain for some users, particularly when > > there > > >is java involved. > > > > > >Thanks. > > > > > >Jacob (Co-list owner) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Predictions Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 20:19:47 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm to be proved wrong here again but Diurnal changes in the barometer reading are normal during the day/night. The readings go up and down slightly. 5 either way????? Your weather station know doubt runs on Barometric pressure :-) ----- Original Message ----- at : "Peter May" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:12 PM Subject: aus-wx: Predictions > Hi all. > > Well here I sit on the south coast after moving house watching my weather > station's barometric reading fluctuate up and down. Whilst my station > currently is a cheaper variety, it has a prediction/forecast output. It > currently says to expect cloudy and at the moment it is cloudy. > > How does it do this? What I mean is predictions at a person at say BOM > that looks at info at various sources etc, plays join the dots to make up > those maps of highs and lows and other factors and then throws a dart at a > board and gives a forecast I understand. But how does the station do it? I > am in no way saying the station is correct but even as a stab in the dark it > must use a formula or something? > > Any ideas? > > Regards, Peter > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Record dry? Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 20:24:35 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Seems there was a hell of a mix up with NE water who released all available water and left Wangaratta with nothing but what "leaked" through the retaining wall upstream (I think). As far as I can find out, the Oven's stopped flowing. Releases have begun at Lake Buffalo because of the mistake, and possibly why the river has shown an increase in height. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Laurier Williams" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Record dry? > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Blair Trewin > > > In passing through the area yesterday, I noticed that the Ovens > > River at Wangaratta appears to have ceased to flow (in as far as I > > could tell at the bridge at 110 km/h, there looked like there > > were full-width sandbars). Are there any locals who can confirm > > (or otherwise?). > > Blair, this morning's Vic river heights bulletin gives the Ovens at > Wangaratta as 7.33m and rising, which would suggest some flow. One thing > we've lost with the change to telemetered river gauges is the report of "no > flow" when the last trickle stops. I suppose you could work it out at the > datum level, but only Qld seems to have these on the web (at > http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/qld/networks/section6.shtml). > > Laurier > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Rhett & AJ" To: Subject: aus-wx: Mammatus Pictures at WA - help! Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 20:53:24 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi, Bit of an embarrassing one this. If you happen to be on the list and you sent me some spectacular pictures of mammatus clouds in WA recently could you please contact me off-list. My web-based mail has corrupted the email you sent when I attempted to download it tonight (I still have the pictures) so I do not have your name (Mark??) or email address!! By the way everyone the pictures are sensational - big fat mammatus at sunset! I'm just a bit worried about putting them up anywhere without first getting permission. Thanks Rhett rhettaj at optusnet.com.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Peter Konnecke" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: More Bushfires Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:10:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Bussy,
 
We left Wangaratta this morning for Sydney and arrived home at 5pm. The smoke was so thick at Wangaratta last night that it woke me up
wheezing about 1230am. It was getting in through the AC in the hotel room. This morning the visibility was down to a few hundred metres
between Wangaratta and Chiltern.
 
We were in Beechworth yesterday and wondered why the WIN-TV and PRIME news crews were at the CFA station filming. We got there about
1pm and left about 3pm (after a great feed at the Bakery as usual) by which time most of the smoke had cleared.
 
Last Friday morning the smoke was equally bad in Benalla. I will put some pics up on my site when I get the chance and advise accordingly.
 
Pete
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:06 AM
Subject: aus-wx: More Bushfires

Another fire started here yesterday between Beechworth and Stanley. Currently under some "new" thick smoke here :-((
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra 11th Feb storm chase Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:49:16 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
thanks Patrick, the hail falling onto dry road was the highlight. It is only the second time that I have experienced hail that has fallen before a drop of rain.
 
michael
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra 11th Feb storm chase

Thanks Michael - it was good to know what was under that particular cell.
 
Patrick
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 11:31 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Canberra 11th Feb storm chase

I have the chase report up for the storm near Canberra on the 11th February.
 
 
Regards
Michael
 
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:53:00 +1000 at : Tim Eckert Subject: aus-wx: heavy rain To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Webmail Mirapoint Direct 3.2.1-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tarcoola in South Australia's Western Agricultural area has recorded 73mm in the last 30 hours!!! (still currently raining there too) This is rather exceptional given that they recieved only 63mm for the WHOLE of 2002!! Other sites on Eyre Peninsula and in the North of the state have recorded totals between 15 and 30mm in that time at this system. Just starting to rain here in Adelaide, expected to rain most of the day and into tomorrow, with showers and thunderstorms expected then until Sunday. :) Cheers, Tim Eckert Adelaide. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:12:39 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: cool summer spot X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com As Bussy said the other day, a bloke might even have to put a jumper on if he goes there! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:02:43 +1300 Subject: aus-wx: cool summer spot > If you guys think its too hot, check out a cool summer location here: > http://www.tokaanuskihire.co.nz/sb/sbweather.html > > :) > Cheers > Brian > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brooker, Sean SD" To: "Aussie-Weather (E-mail)" Subject: aus-wx: Information: Question Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:53:00 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
What are "noctilucent clouds"?
 
 
 
Cheers
Sean Brooker
Port Hedland
WA

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:59:17 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well, Dave, US$1.59 equals HK$12.37 but your price is per gallon. Here we currently pay HK$11.40 (US$1.465, AUD$2.479) per litre. So you have now exceeded one quarter of our petrol price. In Australia in the 1970's I crossed the Nullarbor Plain. Having been forewarned about petrol prices, I filled my tank and a 20-litre can in Kalgoorlie. I reached Ceduna before I had to fill up, but the petrol prices in between were horrific. Don't know if it's still that way. At night time we pulled off the road miles fom anywhere and set up our tent. In the middle of the night we had one of the best thunderstorms ever. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "arky dave" To: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:25:48 -0600 Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > Wishing All a Fantastic February: > Gasoline prices here seem to rise daily. This situation takes > me back to 1978 when I was a junior (Grade/Year 11) in High School. I > had Coordinated Careers Education (CCE) class in school, so I drove > home at Mena High at lunchtime (12NOON) to go to work for my dad. > Anyway, back then I thought US$0.70 for regular per US gallon,($0.79 > for unleaded) was pretty high, and it seemed that the prices rose > almost daily. > Now, what I wouldn't give for those times again...gas has been > over $1.00 a US gallon here for a number of years. As of today, Feb. > 17th, where I usually get gas (DJ's Grocery Store[the closest store to > the house--7 blocks away]) regular has climbed to US$1.59 a gallon, > with Diesel being US$1.69 a gallon. The cheapest gas is at the Wal-Mart > Supercenter(Murphy Oil) and even it is US$1.54 a gallon. Just a few > weeks ago, gas prices were around US$1.27 a gallon. THESE kind of > prices used to be what Californians etc. would pay for gasoline. > Price-wise there is very little variety. *RANT* The greed of these oil > people never cease to amaze me! Anything can be used as a pretext for > raising prices. I WISH we could boycott these places and mabye they'd > lighten up and come down on their outrageous prices. We could all ride > bicycles like they do in Europe, China, etc. Nevertheless, (Rich) > people are still buying fuel-inefficient vehicles (like Humvees) , > which most people couldn't afford to put gas into. They also need to > get rid of that annoying 9/10 (cents) after the prices (eg. gas= $1.59 > 9/10). Bring back the days of '57 Chevys and $0.25 a gallon gas! *End > Rant, looking for Benadryl* > Your gas$challenged US correspondent David Powell > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brooker, Sean SD" To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: Information: aus-wx: Gas Prices Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:23:02 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com RE: Information: aus-wx: Gas Prices

In Port Hedland we have been paying AU$1.15 for about a year now.

Sean Brooker

-----Original Message-----
at : Phil Smith [mailto:SmithP at ics.edu.hk]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 8:59 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices


Well, Dave, US$1.59 equals HK$12.37 but your price is per gallon.  Here
we currently pay HK$11.40 (US$1.465, AUD$2.479) per litre.  So you have
now exceeded one quarter of our petrol price.
In Australia in the 1970's I crossed the Nullarbor Plain.  Having been
forewarned about petrol prices, I filled my tank and a 20-litre can in
Kalgoorlie.  I reached Ceduna before I had to fill up, but the petrol
prices in between were horrific.  Don't know if it's still that way.  At
night time we pulled off the road miles fom anywhere and set up our
tent.  In the middle of the night we had one of the best thunderstorms
ever.

Phil
<><

International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk
Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk
MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com
Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk
Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm
Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm



-----Original Message-----
at : "arky dave" <dajapo at voltage.net>
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:25:48 -0600
Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices

> Wishing All a Fantastic February:
>         Gasoline prices here seem to rise daily. This situation takes
> me back to 1978 when I was a junior (Grade/Year 11) in High School. I
> had Coordinated Careers Education (CCE) class in school, so I drove
> home at Mena High at lunchtime (12NOON) to go to work for my dad.
> Anyway, back then I thought US$0.70 for regular per US gallon,($0.79
> for unleaded) was pretty high, and it seemed that the prices rose
> almost daily.
>         Now, what I wouldn't give for those times again...gas has been
> over $1.00 a US gallon here for a number of years. As of today, Feb.
> 17th, where I usually get gas (DJ's Grocery Store[the closest store to
> the house--7 blocks away]) regular has climbed to US$1.59 a gallon,
> with Diesel being US$1.69 a gallon. The cheapest gas is at the Wal-Mart
> Supercenter(Murphy Oil) and even it is US$1.54 a gallon. Just a few
> weeks ago, gas prices were around US$1.27 a gallon. THESE kind of
> prices used to be what Californians etc. would pay for gasoline.
> Price-wise there is very little variety. *RANT* The greed of these oil
> people never cease to amaze me! Anything can be used as a pretext for
> raising prices. I WISH we could boycott these places and mabye they'd
> lighten up and come down on their outrageous prices. We could all ride
> bicycles like they do in Europe, China, etc. Nevertheless, (Rich)
> people are still buying fuel-inefficient vehicles (like Humvees) ,
> which most people couldn't afford to put gas into.  They also need to
> get rid of that annoying 9/10 (cents) after the prices (eg. gas= $1.59
> 9/10). Bring back the days of '57 Chevys and $0.25 a gallon gas! *End
> Rant, looking for Benadryl*
> Your gas$challenged US correspondent  David Powell
>

 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
 with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
 message.
 -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

EOM

NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein.  If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:11:23 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
At the risk of appearing stupid  -  would the clouds gain their luminous quality at the city lights, or the moon or at something else.  And would it apply to single clouds or complete cloud cover.  You have made me really curious.
Judy
----- Original Message -----
at : Ken Ring
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question

Luminous at night, especially certain high clouds.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Information: Question

What are "noctilucent clouds"?
 
 
 
Cheers
Sean Brooker
Port Hedland
WA

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:13:42 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Clouds reflecting city lights are not usually referred to as noctilucent. Noctilucent clouds are very high up in the atmosphere where they can still receive some sunlight or refracted sunlight even though it is completely dark on the earth below. Someone posted some links to pictures of them on this list a year or so back when someone posted a similar question. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "Adam Mayo" To: Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:11:23 +1100 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question > At the risk of appearing stupid - would the clouds gain their > luminous quality at the city lights, or the moon or at something > else. And would it apply to single clouds or complete cloud cover. > You have made me really curious. > Judy > ----- Original Message ----- > at : Ken Ring > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:41 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question > > > Luminous at night, especially certain high clouds. > ----- Original Message ----- > at : Brooker, Sean SD > To: Aussie-Weather (E-mail) > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:53 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Information: Question > > > What are "noctilucent clouds"? > > > > Cheers > Sean Brooker > Port Hedland > WA > > > EOM > > > > NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain > information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege > intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the > intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message > to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this > message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this > message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of > the information therein. If you have received this message in error > please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:41:42 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Luminous at night, especially certain high clouds.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Information: Question

What are "noctilucent clouds"?
 
 
 
Cheers
Sean Brooker
Port Hedland
WA

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

at : David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: Blayney storm - 17 feb. To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:07:23 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 19/02/2003 03:07:18 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com HI All, IN regards to storms on Monday 17th. Been speaking to residents at Blayney area. Seems like they had some huge winds. A carport was sucked inwards, crushing a car (1 week old). Bird Aviary was launched several metres, a metal pole was also launched into air , into back yard which cut a clothes line in half. Would not of liked to be in Blayney for that day. Many other reports at cops around Cowra, Mandurama with trees down. Im hoping to get copies of photos re damage to carport.. Dave ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "David James Powell" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.00 X-IPAddress: 208.189.4.88 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:49:01 -0600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello, Neville: Let me clarify, the prices that I'm NOW paying for gas, awhile back was what people on the West Coast would be paying for gas (our prices THEN were lower than theirs). Yes, I think West Coast people are paying over US$2gallon, if this keeps up, sooner or later--we here may be paying that much. *Surely Hope Not*. I just wonder how low gas prices would be if the capped oil wells were opened up, idle reserves were tapped and greed wasn't so rampant? Have a good one! David Powell > Jimmy's not going to like this (not weather related), but - > > Sean, you just bumped up the Oz Average. > Arky Dave, there's 3.785 litres to a US gallon, so that's a lot cheaper than > everyone over here's paying, although I could've sworn I saw something on > the news about LA'ites complaining of paying US$2.09 1/10 per gallon, but > I'll take your word for it. > Here's the latest summary to date: > > GAS PRICES FOR REGULAR PER LITRE - (FEB 19TH) > > A$2.479 - (HK$11.40) Hong Kong > A$1.136 - (NZ$1.220) NZ, remote far nth > A$1.071 - (NZ$1.155) Auckland > A$0.711 - (US$0.420) California > A$0.689 - (US$0.407) California > > A$1.150 - Port Hedland, WA > A$1.029 - Rutherglen, NE Victoria > A$0.975 - Melbourne (ave) > A$0.899 - Brisbane, just nth of (ave) > A$1.013 - OZ AVERAGE > > > Neville > > > > at : "Brooker, Sean SD" > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:23:02 +1100 > To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" > Subject: RE: Information: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > In Port Hedland we have been paying AU$1.15 for about a year now. > > Sean Brooker > > -----Original Message----- > at : Phil Smith [mailto:SmithP at ics.edu.hk] > Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 8:59 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > Well, Dave, US$1.59 equals HK$12.37 but your price is per gallon. Here > we currently pay HK$11.40 (US$1.465, AUD$2.479) per litre. So you have > now exceeded one quarter of our petrol price. > In Australia in the 1970's I crossed the Nullarbor Plain. Having been > forewarned about petrol prices, I filled my tank and a 20-litre can in > Kalgoorlie. I reached Ceduna before I had to fill up, but the petrol > prices in between were horrific. Don't know if it's still that way. At > night time we pulled off the road miles fom anywhere and set up our > tent. In the middle of the night we had one of the best thunderstorms > ever. > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > -----Original Message----- > at : "arky dave" > To: > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:25:48 -0600 > Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > Wishing All a Fantastic February: > > Gasoline prices here seem to rise daily. This situation takes > > me back to 1978 when I was a junior (Grade/Year 11) in High School. I > > had Coordinated Careers Education (CCE) class in school, so I drove > > home at Mena High at lunchtime (12NOON) to go to work for my dad. > > Anyway, back then I thought US$0.70 for regular per US gallon,($0.79 > > for unleaded) was pretty high, and it seemed that the prices rose > > almost daily. > > Now, what I wouldn't give for those times again...gas has been > > over $1.00 a US gallon here for a number of years. As of today, Feb. > > 17th, where I usually get gas (DJ's Grocery Store[the closest store to > > the house--7 blocks away]) regular has climbed to US$1.59 a gallon, > > with Diesel being US$1.69 a gallon. The cheapest gas is at the Wal-Mart > > Supercenter(Murphy Oil) and even it is US$1.54 a gallon. Just a few > > weeks ago, gas prices were around US$1.27 a gallon. THESE kind of > > prices used to be what Californians etc. would pay for gasoline. > > Price-wise there is very little variety. *RANT* The greed of these oil > > people never cease to amaze me! Anything can be used as a pretext for > > raising prices. I WISH we could boycott these places and mabye they'd > > lighten up and come down on their outrageous prices. We could all ride > > bicycles like they do in Europe, China, etc. Nevertheless, (Rich) > > people are still buying fuel-inefficient vehicles (like Humvees) , > > which most people couldn't afford to put gas into. They also need to > > get rid of that annoying 9/10 (cents) after the prices (eg. gas= $1.59 > > 9/10). Bring back the days of '57 Chevys and $0.25 a gallon gas! *End > > Rant, looking for Benadryl* > > Your gas$challenged US correspondent David Powell > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ ------------------------ > > EOM > > NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is > confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the > intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person > responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised > that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, > copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is > the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this > message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the > message. > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ ------------------------ > > > > > > > > -- Sent using Voltage Net Webmail http://www.voltage.net/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:19:34 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy's not going to like this (not weather related), but - Sean, you just bumped up the Oz Average. Arky Dave, there's 3.785 litres to a US gallon, so that's a lot cheaper than everyone over here's paying, although I could've sworn I saw something on the news about LA'ites complaining of paying US$2.09 1/10 per gallon, but I'll take your word for it. Here's the latest summary to date: GAS PRICES FOR REGULAR PER LITRE - (FEB 19TH) A$2.479 - (HK$11.40) Hong Kong A$1.136 - (NZ$1.220) NZ, remote far nth A$1.071 - (NZ$1.155) Auckland A$0.711 - (US$0.420) California A$0.689 - (US$0.407) California A$1.150 - Port Hedland, WA A$1.029 - Rutherglen, NE Victoria A$0.975 - Melbourne (ave) A$0.899 - Brisbane, just nth of (ave) A$1.013 - OZ AVERAGE Neville at : "Brooker, Sean SD" Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:23:02 +1100 To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: Information: aus-wx: Gas Prices In Port Hedland we have been paying AU$1.15 for about a year now. Sean Brooker -----Original Message----- at : Phil Smith [mailto:SmithP at ics.edu.hk] Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 8:59 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices Well, Dave, US$1.59 equals HK$12.37 but your price is per gallon. Here we currently pay HK$11.40 (US$1.465, AUD$2.479) per litre. So you have now exceeded one quarter of our petrol price. In Australia in the 1970's I crossed the Nullarbor Plain. Having been forewarned about petrol prices, I filled my tank and a 20-litre can in Kalgoorlie. I reached Ceduna before I had to fill up, but the petrol prices in between were horrific. Don't know if it's still that way. At night time we pulled off the road miles fom anywhere and set up our tent. In the middle of the night we had one of the best thunderstorms ever. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "arky dave" To: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:25:48 -0600 Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > Wishing All a Fantastic February: > Gasoline prices here seem to rise daily. This situation takes > me back to 1978 when I was a junior (Grade/Year 11) in High School. I > had Coordinated Careers Education (CCE) class in school, so I drove > home at Mena High at lunchtime (12NOON) to go to work for my dad. > Anyway, back then I thought US$0.70 for regular per US gallon,($0.79 > for unleaded) was pretty high, and it seemed that the prices rose > almost daily. > Now, what I wouldn't give for those times again...gas has been > over $1.00 a US gallon here for a number of years. As of today, Feb. > 17th, where I usually get gas (DJ's Grocery Store[the closest store to > the house--7 blocks away]) regular has climbed to US$1.59 a gallon, > with Diesel being US$1.69 a gallon. The cheapest gas is at the Wal-Mart > Supercenter(Murphy Oil) and even it is US$1.54 a gallon. Just a few > weeks ago, gas prices were around US$1.27 a gallon. THESE kind of > prices used to be what Californians etc. would pay for gasoline. > Price-wise there is very little variety. *RANT* The greed of these oil > people never cease to amaze me! Anything can be used as a pretext for > raising prices. I WISH we could boycott these places and mabye they'd > lighten up and come down on their outrageous prices. We could all ride > bicycles like they do in Europe, China, etc. Nevertheless, (Rich) > people are still buying fuel-inefficient vehicles (like Humvees) , > which most people couldn't afford to put gas into. They also need to > get rid of that annoying 9/10 (cents) after the prices (eg. gas= $1.59 > 9/10). Bring back the days of '57 Chevys and $0.25 a gallon gas! *End > Rant, looking for Benadryl* > Your gas$challenged US correspondent David Powell > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ EOM NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 06:59:25 +0000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Norman Lynagh Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices X-Mailer: Turnpike (32) Version 4.00 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com In message , Neville Gibb writes >Jimmy's not going to like this (not weather related), but - > >Sean, you just bumped up the Oz Average. >Arky Dave, there's 3.785 litres to a US gallon, so that's a lot cheaper than >everyone over here's paying, although I could've sworn I saw something on >the news about LA'ites complaining of paying US$2.09 1/10 per gallon, but >I'll take your word for it. >Here's the latest summary to date: > >GAS PRICES FOR REGULAR PER LITRE - (FEB 19TH) > >A$2.479 - (HK$11.40) Hong Kong >A$1.136 - (NZ$1.220) NZ, remote far nth >A$1.071 - (NZ$1.155) Auckland >A$0.711 - (US$0.420) California >A$0.689 - (US$0.407) California > >A$1.150 - Port Hedland, WA >A$1.029 - Rutherglen, NE Victoria >A$0.975 - Melbourne (ave) >A$0.899 - Brisbane, just nth of (ave) >A$1.013 - OZ AVERAGE > > And here in the UK it's around A$2.00 per litre. Norman. =================================================================== Norman Lynagh Weather Consultancy Chalfont St. Giles Buckinghamshire England =================================================================== +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Phillip Basil-Jones" To: Subject: aus-wx: Feb 15th Rotation Succession Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:01:04 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I've decided to capture frames at my video and put them into a collage like format showing the succession of rotation. These shots were taken at Ryde looking SE towards Concord/Breakfast point areas on the 15th of Februrary Any feedback is greatly appreciated http://members.datafast.net.au/dft0803/roto15.jpg +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Phillip Basil-Jones" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Feb 15th Rotation Succession Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:10:37 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ignore the bottom whoops! ----- Original Message ----- at : "Phillip Basil-Jones" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:01 PM Subject: aus-wx: Feb 15th Rotation Succession > I've decided to capture frames at my video and put them into a collage > like format showing the succession of rotation. These shots were taken at > Ryde looking SE towards Concord/Breakfast point areas on the 15th of > Februrary > > Any feedback is greatly appreciated > > http://members.datafast.net.au/dft0803/roto15.jpg > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.168.182] at : "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:11:33 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2003 07:11:33.0690 (UTC) FILETIME=[224089A0:01C2D7E6] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Sean et al... Without trying to be a bit pedantic here...google is your friend! A simple search of google.com will tell you nearly all you need to know re noctilucent clouds etc... I've noticed this a few times on the list...a simple google search will answer most questions...it saves bandwidth and unnecessary posts..of course I feel you should be free to post anything wx wise on the list but if you have the technology to access the list you *should* have access to the web... sorry if I sound a bit stuffy...but I tell my students the same thing at school...if I *tell* you the answer it saves you at research skills and consequent thinking... Cheers, Kevin at Wycheproof. P.S. feel free to ignore this post if you don't have access to the web or an encyclopaedia... > at : "Ken Ring" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question >Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:41:42 +1300 > >Luminous at night, especially certain high clouds. > ----- Original Message ----- > at : Brooker, Sean SD > To: Aussie-Weather (E-mail) > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:53 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Information: Question > > > What are "noctilucent clouds"? > > > > Cheers > Sean Brooker > Port Hedland > WA > > > EOM > > > > NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information >that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for >use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the >person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be >advised that you have received this message in error and that any >dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly >forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have >received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and >delete the message. > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Les Crossan" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Information: Question Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:31:02 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Noctilucent cloud is visible only in summertime in latitudes > 50 degrees N (or S) the definitive website is http://www.nlcnet.co.uk/ with a few more pictures here http://www.cc0020209.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/action.htm.
 
Les
 

Les Crossan,
Wallsend, Tyne & Wear 55N 01-30W,
Home of the Wallsend Stormcam - http://www.uksevereweather.org.uk




-----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 3:42 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question

Luminous at night, especially certain high clouds.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Information: Question

What are "noctilucent clouds"?
 
 
 
Cheers
Sean Brooker
Port Hedland
WA

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:34:32 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi David Sorry, I must have misread that to think you were originally talking about Californian prices, but of course you're in Arkansas. Interesting the amount of price variation between states. I'll adjust the summary then. (Oh, and Gid'day Norman at the UK) GAS PRICES, FEB 19TH - REGULAR $ PER LITRE A$2.479 - (HK$11.40) Hong Kong A$2.000 - (UK*0.742) UK ? A$1.136 - (NZ$1.220) NZ, remote far nth A$1.071 - (NZ$1.155) Auckland A$0.934 - (US$0.552) LA, California A$0.700 - (US$0.413) Mena, Arkansas (ave) A$1.150 - Port Hedland A$1.029 - Rutherglen, NE Victoria A$0.975 - Melbourne (ave) A$0.899 - Brisbane, just nth of (ave) A$1.013 - OZ AVERAGE Now back to the weather Neville > at : "David James Powell" > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:49:01 -0600 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > Hello, Neville: Let me clarify, the prices that > I'm NOW paying for gas, awhile back was what > people on the West Coast would be paying for gas > (our prices THEN were lower than theirs). Yes, I > think West Coast people are paying over > US$2gallon, if this keeps up, sooner or later--we > here may be paying that much. *Surely Hope Not*. > I just wonder how low gas prices would be if the > capped oil wells were opened up, idle reserves > were tapped and greed wasn't so rampant? > Have a good one! David Powell > >> Jimmy's not going to like this (not weather > related), but - >> >> Sean, you just bumped up the Oz Average. >> Arky Dave, there's 3.785 litres to a US gallon, > so that's a lot cheaper than >> everyone over here's paying, although I > could've sworn I saw something on >> the news about LA'ites complaining of paying > US$2.09 1/10 per gallon, but >> I'll take your word for it. >> Here's the latest summary to date: >> >> GAS PRICES FOR REGULAR PER LITRE - (FEB 19TH) >> >> A$2.479 - (HK$11.40) Hong Kong >> A$1.136 - (NZ$1.220) NZ, remote far nth >> A$1.071 - (NZ$1.155) Auckland >> A$0.711 - (US$0.420) California >> A$0.689 - (US$0.407) California >> >> A$1.150 - Port Hedland, WA >> A$1.029 - Rutherglen, NE Victoria >> A$0.975 - Melbourne (ave) >> A$0.899 - Brisbane, just nth of (ave) >> A$1.013 - OZ AVERAGE >> >> >> Neville >> >> >> >> at : "Brooker, Sean SD" > >> Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:23:02 +1100 >> To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" weather at world.std.com> >> Subject: RE: Information: aus-wx: Gas Prices >> >> >> In Port Hedland we have been paying AU$1.15 for > about a year now. >> >> Sean Brooker >> >> -----Original Message----- >> at : Phil Smith [mailto:SmithP at ics.edu.hk] >> Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 8:59 AM >> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices >> >> Well, Dave, US$1.59 equals HK$12.37 but your > price is per gallon. Here >> we currently pay HK$11.40 (US$1.465, AUD$2.479) > per litre. So you have >> now exceeded one quarter of our petrol price. >> In Australia in the 1970's I crossed the > Nullarbor Plain. Having been >> forewarned about petrol prices, I filled my > tank and a 20-litre can in >> Kalgoorlie. I reached Ceduna before I had to > fill up, but the petrol >> prices in between were horrific. Don't know if > it's still that way. At >> night time we pulled off the road miles fom > anywhere and set up our >> tent. In the middle of the night we had one of > the best thunderstorms >> ever. >> >> Phil >> <>< >> >> International Christian School E-mail: > SmithP at ics.edu.hk >> Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk >> MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com >> Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk >> Testimony: > http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm >> Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> at : "arky dave" >> To: >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:25:48 -0600 >> Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices >> >>> Wishing All a Fantastic February: >>> Gasoline prices here seem to rise > daily. This situation takes >>> me back to 1978 when I was a junior > (Grade/Year 11) in High School. I >>> had Coordinated Careers Education (CCE) class > in school, so I drove >>> home at Mena High at lunchtime (12NOON) to > go to work for my dad. >>> Anyway, back then I thought US$0.70 for > regular per US gallon,($0.79 >>> for unleaded) was pretty high, and it seemed > that the prices rose >>> almost daily. >>> Now, what I wouldn't give for those > times again...gas has been >>> over $1.00 a US gallon here for a number of > years. As of today, Feb. >>> 17th, where I usually get gas (DJ's Grocery > Store[the closest store to >>> the house--7 blocks away]) regular has > climbed to US$1.59 a gallon, >>> with Diesel being US$1.69 a gallon. The > cheapest gas is at the Wal-Mart >>> Supercenter(Murphy Oil) and even it is > US$1.54 a gallon. Just a few >>> weeks ago, gas prices were around US$1.27 a > gallon. THESE kind of >>> prices used to be what Californians etc. > would pay for gasoline. >>> Price-wise there is very little variety. > *RANT* The greed of these oil >>> people never cease to amaze me! Anything can > be used as a pretext for >>> raising prices. I WISH we could boycott these > places and mabye they'd >>> lighten up and come down on their outrageous > prices. We could all ride >>> bicycles like they do in Europe, China, etc. > Nevertheless, (Rich) >>> people are still buying fuel-inefficient > vehicles (like Humvees) , >>> which most people couldn't afford to put gas > into. They also need to >>> get rid of that annoying 9/10 (cents) after > the prices (eg. gas= $1.59 >>> 9/10). Bring back the days of '57 Chevys and > $0.25 a gallon gas! *End >>> Rant, looking for Benadryl* >>> Your gas$challenged US correspondent David > Powell >>> >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ > ------------------------ >> >> EOM >> >> NOTICE - This message and any attached files > may contain information that is >> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege > intended only for use by the >> intended recipient. If you are not the intended > recipient or the person >> responsible for delivering the message to the > intended recipient, be advised >> that you have received this message in error > and that any dissemination, >> copying or use of this message or attachment is > strictly forbidden, as is >> the disclosure of the information therein. If > you have received this >> message in error please notify the sender > immediately and delete the >> message. >> >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ > ------------------------ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Sent using Voltage Net Webmail > http://www.voltage.net/ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:55:32 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry mate. Have to disagree here. When I got onto the net the first time I didn't even know what email was let alone that I could search for stuff, some how or another. I didn't even know that I could find a site called google. I learn by everything I read here and pass to others what I've found. I found Melb Stormchasers by mistake and it went at there. Which I must thank Jane a million for. So I like to look out for people like me. And By the way I'm still like that :-) I like to reply off list as much as I can to new comers and help where I can. Don't get me wrong, I'm not starting a blue here so sorry if it seems that way :-) ----- Original Message ----- at : "Kevin Phyland" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:11 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question > Hi Sean et al... > > Without trying to be a bit pedantic here...google is your friend! > > A simple search of google.com will tell you nearly all you need to know re > noctilucent clouds etc... > > I've noticed this a few times on the list...a simple google search will > answer most questions...it saves bandwidth and unnecessary posts..of course > I feel you should be free to post anything wx wise on the list but if you > have the technology to access the list you *should* have access to the > web... > > sorry if I sound a bit stuffy...but I tell my students the same thing at > school...if I *tell* you the answer it saves you at research skills and > consequent thinking... > > Cheers, > Kevin at Wycheproof. > > P.S. feel free to ignore this post if you don't have access to the web or an > encyclopaedia... > > > > > > > > at : "Ken Ring" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question > >Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:41:42 +1300 > > > >Luminous at night, especially certain high clouds. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : Brooker, Sean SD > > To: Aussie-Weather (E-mail) > > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:53 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Information: Question > > > > > > What are "noctilucent clouds"? > > > > > > > > Cheers > > Sean Brooker > > Port Hedland > > WA > > > > > > EOM > > > > > > > > NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information > >that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for > >use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the > >person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be > >advised that you have received this message in error and that any > >dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly > >forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have > >received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and > >delete the message. > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:37:15 +1200 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question at : Neville Gibb To: Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Bussy & Kevin I sort of agree with you both: Firstly, my apologies for encouraging the thread on 'Gas Prices' - it just sort of snowballed. Your quite right Kevin, this has no place on a weather forum, although there were plenty of regulars willing to post and few not so regulars like Norman and Sean, who hopefully we'll hear a bit more at with some weather related reports at further afield. I thought Sean's question was quite pertinent and the responses, quite interesting. The idea of a forum is not to just primarily post what is happening, but also to promote discussion and learn at others queries. I hope this is not just the domain of experts otherwise it would be very boring indeed. But that's just my opinion. Neville ps, As for earthquakes being related to weather, I think Ken Ring might have a few ideas on that subject. pps, Bussy I prefer the simpler version :) > at : "Bussy" > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:55:32 +1100 > To: > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question > > Sorry mate. Have to disagree here. When I got onto the net the first time I > didn't even know what email was let alone that I could search for stuff, > some how or another. I didn't even know that I could find a site called > google. I learn by everything I read here and pass to others what I've > found. I found Melb Stormchasers by mistake and it went at there. Which I > must thank Jane a million for. > So I like to look out for people like me. And By the way I'm still like that > :-) > I like to reply off list as much as I can to new comers and help where I > can. > Don't get me wrong, I'm not starting a blue here so sorry if it seems that > way :-) > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Kevin Phyland" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:11 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question > > >> Hi Sean et al... >> >> Without trying to be a bit pedantic here...google is your friend! >> >> A simple search of google.com will tell you nearly all you need to know re >> noctilucent clouds etc... >> >> I've noticed this a few times on the list...a simple google search will >> answer most questions...it saves bandwidth and unnecessary posts..of > course >> I feel you should be free to post anything wx wise on the list but if you >> have the technology to access the list you *should* have access to the >> web... >> >> sorry if I sound a bit stuffy...but I tell my students the same thing at >> school...if I *tell* you the answer it saves you at research skills and >> consequent thinking... >> >> Cheers, >> Kevin at Wycheproof. >> >> P.S. feel free to ignore this post if you don't have access to the web or > an >> encyclopaedia... >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> at : "Ken Ring" >>> Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>> To: >>> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Information: Question >>> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:41:42 +1300 >>> >>> Luminous at night, especially certain high clouds. >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> at : Brooker, Sean SD >>> To: Aussie-Weather (E-mail) >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:53 PM >>> Subject: aus-wx: Information: Question >>> >>> >>> What are "noctilucent clouds"? >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> Sean Brooker >>> Port Hedland >>> WA >>> >>> >>> EOM >>> >>> >>> >>> NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information >>> that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for >>> use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or > the >>> person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, > be >>> advised that you have received this message in error and that any >>> dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly >>> forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have >>> received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and >>> delete the message. >>> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to >> http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 08:56:00 +1000 at : Tim Eckert Subject: aus-wx: Adelaide heavy rain To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Webmail Mirapoint Direct 3.2.1-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Good morning. Extraordinary amounts of rain recieved in Adelaide metro area since midnight. I've recieved 46mm to 9am at my house. Kent Town (Adelaide) has recieved 34mm, which is actually their highest Feb daily fall since the main office moved at West Terrace in 1977. Could get unbelievable 24 hr totals to midnight tonight (well for Adelaide anyway) as it looks like it will rain most of the day. Cheers, Tim Eckert Holden Hill NE suburbs, Adelaide +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:06:21 +1030 at : Richard Albury User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Adelaide Glorius heavenly heavy rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tim Eckert wrote: >Good morning. >Extraordinary amounts of rain recieved in Adelaide >metro area since midnight. >I've recieved 46mm to 9am at my house. Kent Town >(Adelaide) has recieved 34mm, which is actually their >highest Feb daily fall since the main office moved > at West Terrace in 1977. >Could get unbelievable 24 hr totals to midnight >tonight (well for Adelaide anyway) as it looks like it will >rain most of the day. > >Cheers, >Tim Eckert >Holden Hill >NE suburbs, Adelaide > Hi Tim everyone The first decent rain Adelaide has had for the past 79 days. It is also been the wettest February day since 1939. At the time of writing this (15.00 hours - 20/2/0003) I have gauged 51 mm (2.2") rain since 00.01 hours and it looks like the rain band will clear Adelaide approx. 20.00 hrs with scattered showers following. Parts of S.Aust have had gauging of 100 +mm (4"+) mainly in the mid Nth, Adelaide Hills and on Yorke and most of Eyre Peninsulars. It's hoping that this lovely rain will put paid to the drought that has more or less crippled this State and help to alleviate the crippling drought over much of Australia at present. just my lil input. :-) Richard Kurralta Park.S.Aust > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > >. > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Chas Osborn" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:37:45 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Neville Here in Oombulgurri $1.50 per litre minimum purchase 200litre ($300). It is the same price in Kalumburu but they have a bowser. Chas Oombulgurri WA ----- Original Message ----- at : "Neville Gibb" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:34 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > Hi David > Sorry, I must have misread that to think you were originally talking about > Californian prices, but of course you're in Arkansas. Interesting the amount > of price variation between states. I'll adjust the summary then. > (Oh, and Gid'day Norman at the UK) > > GAS PRICES, FEB 19TH - REGULAR $ PER LITRE > > A$2.479 - (HK$11.40) Hong Kong > A$2.000 - (UK*0.742) UK ? > A$1.136 - (NZ$1.220) NZ, remote far nth > A$1.071 - (NZ$1.155) Auckland > A$0.934 - (US$0.552) LA, California > A$0.700 - (US$0.413) Mena, Arkansas (ave) > > A$1.150 - Port Hedland > A$1.029 - Rutherglen, NE Victoria > A$0.975 - Melbourne (ave) > A$0.899 - Brisbane, just nth of (ave) > > A$1.013 - OZ AVERAGE > > > Now back to the weather > > Neville > > > > at : "David James Powell" > > Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:49:01 -0600 > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > > > > Hello, Neville: Let me clarify, the prices that > > I'm NOW paying for gas, awhile back was what > > people on the West Coast would be paying for gas > > (our prices THEN were lower than theirs). Yes, I > > think West Coast people are paying over > > US$2gallon, if this keeps up, sooner or later--we > > here may be paying that much. *Surely Hope Not*. > > I just wonder how low gas prices would be if the > > capped oil wells were opened up, idle reserves > > were tapped and greed wasn't so rampant? > > Have a good one! David Powell > > > >> Jimmy's not going to like this (not weather > > related), but - > >> > >> Sean, you just bumped up the Oz Average. > >> Arky Dave, there's 3.785 litres to a US gallon, > > so that's a lot cheaper than > >> everyone over here's paying, although I > > could've sworn I saw something on > >> the news about LA'ites complaining of paying > > US$2.09 1/10 per gallon, but > >> I'll take your word for it. > >> Here's the latest summary to date: > >> > >> GAS PRICES FOR REGULAR PER LITRE - (FEB 19TH) > >> > >> A$2.479 - (HK$11.40) Hong Kong > >> A$1.136 - (NZ$1.220) NZ, remote far nth > >> A$1.071 - (NZ$1.155) Auckland > >> A$0.711 - (US$0.420) California > >> A$0.689 - (US$0.407) California > >> > >> A$1.150 - Port Hedland, WA > >> A$1.029 - Rutherglen, NE Victoria > >> A$0.975 - Melbourne (ave) > >> A$0.899 - Brisbane, just nth of (ave) > >> A$1.013 - OZ AVERAGE > >> > >> > >> Neville > >> > >> > >> > >> at : "Brooker, Sean SD" > > > >> Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:23:02 +1100 > >> To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" > weather at world.std.com> > >> Subject: RE: Information: aus-wx: Gas Prices > >> > >> > >> In Port Hedland we have been paying AU$1.15 for > > about a year now. > >> > >> Sean Brooker > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> at : Phil Smith [mailto:SmithP at ics.edu.hk] > >> Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 8:59 AM > >> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Gas Prices > >> > >> Well, Dave, US$1.59 equals HK$12.37 but your > > price is per gallon. Here > >> we currently pay HK$11.40 (US$1.465, AUD$2.479) > > per litre. So you have > >> now exceeded one quarter of our petrol price. > >> In Australia in the 1970's I crossed the > > Nullarbor Plain. Having been > >> forewarned about petrol prices, I filled my > > tank and a 20-litre can in > >> Kalgoorlie. I reached Ceduna before I had to > > fill up, but the petrol > >> prices in between were horrific. Don't know if > > it's still that way. At > >> night time we pulled off the road miles fom > > anywhere and set up our > >> tent. In the middle of the night we had one of > > the best thunderstorms > >> ever. > >> > >> Phil > >> <>< > >> > >> International Christian School E-mail: > > SmithP at ics.edu.hk > >> Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > >> MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > >> Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > >> Testimony: > > http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > >> Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> at : "arky dave" > >> To: > >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:25:48 -0600 > >> Subject: aus-wx: Gas Prices > >> > >>> Wishing All a Fantastic February: > >>> Gasoline prices here seem to rise > > daily. This situation takes > >>> me back to 1978 when I was a junior > > (Grade/Year 11) in High School. I > >>> had Coordinated Careers Education (CCE) class > > in school, so I drove > >>> home at Mena High at lunchtime (12NOON) to > > go to work for my dad. > >>> Anyway, back then I thought US$0.70 for > > regular per US gallon,($0.79 > >>> for unleaded) was pretty high, and it seemed > > that the prices rose > >>> almost daily. > >>> Now, what I wouldn't give for those > > times again...gas has been > >>> over $1.00 a US gallon here for a number of > > years. As of today, Feb. > >>> 17th, where I usually get gas (DJ's Grocery > > Store[the closest store to > >>> the house--7 blocks away]) regular has > > climbed to US$1.59 a gallon, > >>> with Diesel being US$1.69 a gallon. The > > cheapest gas is at the Wal-Mart > >>> Supercenter(Murphy Oil) and even it is > > US$1.54 a gallon. Just a few > >>> weeks ago, gas prices were around US$1.27 a > > gallon. THESE kind of > >>> prices used to be what Californians etc. > > would pay for gasoline. > >>> Price-wise there is very little variety. > > *RANT* The greed of these oil > >>> people never cease to amaze me! Anything can > > be used as a pretext for > >>> raising prices. I WISH we could boycott these > > places and mabye they'd > >>> lighten up and come down on their outrageous > > prices. We could all ride > >>> bicycles like they do in Europe, China, etc. > > Nevertheless, (Rich) > >>> people are still buying fuel-inefficient > > vehicles (like Humvees) , > >>> which most people couldn't afford to put gas > > into. They also need to > >>> get rid of that annoying 9/10 (cents) after > > the prices (eg. gas= $1.59 > >>> 9/10). Bring back the days of '57 Chevys and > > $0.25 a gallon gas! *End > >>> Rant, looking for Benadryl* > >>> Your gas$challenged US correspondent David > > Powell > >>> > >> > >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > > your_email_address" in the body of your > >> message. > >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ > > ------------------------ > >> > >> EOM > >> > >> NOTICE - This message and any attached files > > may contain information that is > >> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege > > intended only for use by the > >> intended recipient. If you are not the intended > > recipient or the person > >> responsible for delivering the message to the > > intended recipient, be advised > >> that you have received this message in error > > and that any dissemination, > >> copying or use of this message or attachment is > > strictly forbidden, as is > >> the disclosure of the information therein. If > > you have received this > >> message in error please notify the sender > > immediately and delete the > >> message. > >> > >> > >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > > your_email_address" in the body of your > >> message. > >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------ > > ------------------------ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Sent using Voltage Net Webmail > > http://www.voltage.net/ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:31:14 +1030 at : Richard Albury User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Oops sorry Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Every one I inadvertenty wrote 1939 when I should have said 1979 in regards to the wettest february day here in S.Aust. many apologies. Richard Kurralta Park S.Aust > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > . > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Debbie Parker" To: Subject: aus-wx: Vic Rain Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:32:53 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.24 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All, Some good rainfall in Vic - mainly Mallee & Western district. It has just started to rain in Boronia (Melb) - at least I think that's what it is - it's been such a long time! Cheers Debbie +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:25:56 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic Rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 10:32 PM 20/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Hi All, >Some good rainfall in Vic - mainly Mallee & Western district. >It has just started to rain in Boronia (Melb) - at least I think that's what >it is - it's been such a long time! Some rain in Collingwood tonight (was lovely sitting on a friend's verandah). Seems a bit drier at Niddrie. :-/ Looking for more of it... 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Adelaide heavy rain Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 00:22:03 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Ended up with 30mm for the day, midnight to midnight, here at Morphett Vale, South of Adelaide. A nice round figure :) Regs, Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tim Eckert" To: Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:26 AM Subject: aus-wx: Adelaide heavy rain > Good morning. > Extraordinary amounts of rain recieved in Adelaide > metro area since midnight. > I've recieved 46mm to 9am at my house. Kent Town > (Adelaide) has recieved 34mm, which is actually their > highest Feb daily fall since the main office moved > at West Terrace in 1977. > Could get unbelievable 24 hr totals to midnight > tonight (well for Adelaide anyway) as it looks like it will > rain most of the day. > > Cheers, > Tim Eckert > Holden Hill > NE suburbs, Adelaide > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic Rain Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 07:02:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 6.6 mm so far here since 1am. Just looks great with the dust washed off everything!! > Hi All, > Some good rainfall in Vic - mainly Mallee & Western district. > It has just started to rain in Boronia (Melb) - at least I think that's what > it is - it's been such a long time! > > Cheers > Debbie +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Peter" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Vic Rain Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 08:37:04 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Only 12mm here as at 0800. At least the cars are washed, and we got 200Litres for the garden off the roof. Cheers Peter -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Bussy Sent: Friday, 21 February 2003 07:03 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic Rain 6.6 mm so far here since 1am. Just looks great with the dust washed off everything!! > Hi All, > Some good rainfall in Vic - mainly Mallee & Western district. > It has just started to rain in Boronia (Melb) - at least I think that's what > it is - it's been such a long time! > > Cheers > Debbie +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 08:59:25 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 6mm overnight & this morning at my home between Chatswood West & North Ryde in Sydney's Northern Suburbs. I have noticed that a new weather station has been set up in the memorial rose gardens in Chatrswood between the train lines & the council building. Does anyone know if the information recieved at this weather station is on the internet? Damian 'My Website': http://www.geocities.com/weatherdamo/index.html +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:23:06 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Vic Rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 08:37 AM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Only 12mm here as at 0800. At least the cars are washed, and we got >200Litres for the garden off the roof. No gauge here, but some nice rain overnight. Hope to see more of it. :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Vic Rain Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:56:50 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Whooooohooooo......this is exactly just what we needed out here in the Wimmera!!!! 29mm to midnight last night, and just checked the gauge here, and we've had another 35mm at midnight to 9am...AND IT'S STILL RAINING!!!! Hopefully this will put some water back in our storages as they had dipped below 7% this week PaulY -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Bussy Sent: Friday, 21 February 2003 07:03 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic Rain 6.6 mm so far here since 1am. Just looks great with the dust washed off everything!! > Hi All, > Some good rainfall in Vic - mainly Mallee & Western district. > It has just started to rain in Boronia (Melb) - at least I think that's what > it is - it's been such a long time! > > Cheers > Debbie +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:25:05 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Everyone I just go soaked walking home at the shops. Looked in rainguage and we have a total of 17mm to noon. That rain sure feels good. Judy +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:08:00 +1000 at : Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: Adelaide heavy rain To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Webmail Mirapoint Direct 3.2.1-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Finished with 69mm here. Best totals in SA were in the North West, Mid North, and the Murraylands. Tieyon 213mm Tarcoola 110mm Marla 102mm Pinnaroo 96mm Lameroo 95mm Mt Crawford 87mm Clare 84mm Still heavy rain falling up in the far north in the Oodnadatta region down to the Woomera area due to a low south of Alice Springs. Tim Eckert Adelaide ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 00:22:03 +1030 > at : "Stargazer" >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Adelaide heavy rain >To: > >Hi all, > >Ended up with 30mm for the day, midnight to midnight, here at Morphett Vale, >South of Adelaide. >A nice round figure :) > >Regs, Paul. >(Stargazer) >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tim Eckert" >To: >Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:26 AM >Subject: aus-wx: Adelaide heavy rain > > >> Good morning. >> Extraordinary amounts of rain recieved in Adelaide >> metro area since midnight. >> I've recieved 46mm to 9am at my house. Kent Town >> (Adelaide) has recieved 34mm, which is actually their >> highest Feb daily fall since the main office moved >> at West Terrace in 1977. >> Could get unbelievable 24 hr totals to midnight >> tonight (well for Adelaide anyway) as it looks like it will >> rain most of the day. >> >> Cheers, >> Tim Eckert >> Holden Hill >> NE suburbs, Adelaide >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------- ----------------- >> > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:31:29 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 12:25 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Hello Everyone > >I just go soaked walking home at the shops. Looked in rainguage and we >have a total of 17mm to noon. Light rain continues to fall in Melbourne. Nice soaking type rain that should get some vegetation growing... :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:12:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very decent rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm. Was magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:31 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain > At 12:25 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: > > >Hello Everyone > > > >I just go soaked walking home at the shops. Looked in rainguage and we > >have a total of 17mm to noon. > > Light rain continues to fall in Melbourne. Nice soaking type rain that > should get some vegetation growing... :) > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:48:27 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very decent >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm. Was >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams. Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather..... And the rain continues to fall. :-) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:48:27 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very decent >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm. Was >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams. Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather..... And the rain continues to fall. :-) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:48:27 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very decent >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm. Was >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams. Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather..... And the rain continues to fall. :-) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:48:27 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very decent >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm. Was >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams. Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather..... And the rain continues to fall. :-) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:48:27 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very decent >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm. Was >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams. Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather..... And the rain continues to fall. :-) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Peter May To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:44:38 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 42 mm here on the south coast..... -----Original Message----- at : Tony Langdon (VK3JED) [mailto:vk3jed-1 at optusnet.com.au] Sent: Friday, 21 February 2003 6:48 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very decent >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm. Was >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams. Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather..... And the rain continues to fall. :-) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:29:34 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all.
Rain started here about 12:30am, just spitting but rain none the less. took 2 hours before the first measurable rains at the airport.
 
a total of 45.4mm recorded at the airport and 70mm recorded at tuggernong in the whole event.. this area recived close to 60mm, maybe more with 54mm recorded between 9am and 3pm at the 2 manual obs stations around the area. Holt (~2kms away) having 12mm to 9am and 54mm at 9am (64mm Wooohoooo)
 
The creek is flowing again, but for how long?....
 
Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
Current wx, forecast For Canberra
For mobile phones with WAP.

http://wap.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au

***WEBSITE UPDATE***
Redesign is 95% complete. YAY....

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

(Pic taken in August 02...)
 
----- Original Message -----
at : "Peter May" <manager at sale-net.com.au>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:44 PM
Subject: RE: aus-wx: Sydney Rain

> 42 mm here on the south coast.....
>
> -----Original Message-----
> at : Tony Langdon (VK3JED) [mailto:vk3jed-1 at optusnet.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, 21 February 2003 6:48 PM
> To:
aussie-weather at world.std.com
> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain
>
>
> At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote:
>
> >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very decent
> >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm. Was
> >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams.
>
> Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather.....  And the rain
> continues to fall. :-)
>
> 73 de Tony, VK3JED
>
http://vkradio.com
>
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
>  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
>  message.
>  
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
>  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
>  message.
>  
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>
>
>
X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 22:49:58 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ." >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though :) Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:14:31 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Far at it Ken.
Some areas may find alot of relief at the rain, but with almost 100% of NSW drought declared, we are going to need some more follow up rain, Canberra Recieved ~30mm ocer dec 31st to 2nd of Jan, then no rain for 45 days, so it kinda puts that 30mm to waste, we need a few days of fine wetaher, followed by more rain, which is very possible, still the drought will be declared ended when catchments start filling back up above (IMO) 75% or more... still ALONG way to go here, even worse in NE Vic where damn levels fell to a combined 7%...the got upto 70mm around that area at this event, lets hope the follow up rain comes in.
 

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
Current wx, forecast For Canberra
For mobile phones with WAP.

http://wap.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au

***WEBSITE UPDATE***
Redesign is 95% complete
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
at : "Ken Ring" <ken at weatherman.co.nz>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought?

> No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered broken.
> Ken
>
www.predictweather.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" <
vk3jed-1 at optusnet.com.au>
> To: <
aussie-weather at world.std.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:49 AM
> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought?
>
>
> > At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote:
> >
> > >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ."
> > >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though   :)
> >
> > Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-)
> >
> > 73 de Tony, VK3JED
> >
http://vkradio.com
> >
> >  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> >  message.
> > 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
>
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
>  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
>  message.
>  
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>
>
>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:05:04 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
gasp & avn have got a bit of a cold snap (relativly speaking) for next weekend se aus. with a bit of a sprinkle, won't need a lot now, just regular to keep things ticking along while the weather organizes itself for another big dump. hope it comes off.
grape growers are gnashing their teeth atm over these high humidity levels.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Friday, 21 February 2003 10:52:17 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought?
 
Far at it Ken.
Some areas may find alot of relief at the rain, but with almost 100% of NSW drought declared, we are going to need some more follow up rain, Canberra Recieved ~30mm ocer dec 31st to 2nd of Jan, then no rain for 45 days, so it kinda puts that 30mm to waste, we need a few days of fine wetaher, followed by more rain, which is very possible, still the drought will be declared ended when catchments start filling back up above (IMO) 75% or more... still ALONG way to go here, even worse in NE Vic where damn levels fell to a combined 7%...the got upto 70mm around that area at this event, lets hope the follow up rain comes in.
 

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
Current wx, forecast For Canberra
For mobile phones with WAP.

http://wap.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au

***WEBSITE UPDATE***
Redesign is 95% complete
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
at : "Ken Ring" <ken at weatherman.co.nz>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought?

> No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered broken.
> Ken
>
www.predictweather.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" <
vk3jed-1 at optusnet.com.au>
> To: <
aussie-weather at world.std.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:49 AM
> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought?
>
>
> > At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote:
> >
> > >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ."
> > >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though   :)
> >
> > Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-)
> >
> > 73 de Tony, VK3JED
> >
http://vkradio.com
> >
> >  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> >  message.
> > 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
>
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
>  with "unsubscribe aussie-weaRe aus-wx Still drought.ems ther your_email_address" in the body of your
>  message.
>  
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>
>
>
 
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP119.gif: 00000001,4f67f50c,00000000,00000000 X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:39:16 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 02:43 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: >No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered broken. Would depend on the area. Around Melbourne, far at it.. the rain's only been light, though consistent over a long period of time. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:39:16 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 02:43 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: >No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered broken. Would depend on the area. Around Melbourne, far at it.. the rain's only been light, though consistent over a long period of time. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 02:19:39 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
at ABC News Online Feb 20th: "Despite recent rain over Broken Hill and the western NSW region, the National Climate Centre says drought-breaking rain is still some way off. The National Climate Centre's senior forecaster, Dr David Jones, says any break will probably be in April or May, and may not be enough to end the drought."
But news channels in NZ have today described your recent rain as drought-breaking. So I'm just wondering..is it or isn't it?
Just for the record, my website did report some coming - this post has been there since 31st of January..
"February's Outlook for Australia
Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ."
Don't want to start another round of arguments, though   :)
cheers
Ken Ring

 
at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 02:43:12 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered broken. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:49 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > > >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ." > >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though :) > > Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-) > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 02:43:12 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered broken. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:49 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > > >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ." > >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though :) > > Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-) > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 07:05:17 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi
I think it is really good that Ken got the rain trend for australia (although the where abouts of the rain he has not got the trend so wel, bu the days for rain he got correct)
He is having his best month for Auckland NZ so far, apart at one badly missed rain day a few days ago (20mm)
I am amazed that his much trumpeted heavy rain event for the 28th Februrary now shows up on the latest NOGAPS model!
Now, traditionaly the end of Fenruary is a good time to get drought breaking rain in the upper NI, but is that becuase of the moon trend Ken has been able to pick up on (which has been there all along, well at least every other year, the years in between we would have had to waited until mid march)?????
Food for thought.
:)
Cheers
Brian
-----
X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 08:32:11 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2003 21:32:12.0226 (UTC) FILETIME=[B20B5220:01C2D9F0] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Just to re-iterate drought not broken, at least in Canberra where I am.

As many have stated here and elsewhere, good rain that often foreshadows the start of the end of droughts in South East Australia often comes at monsoon related events.  This was the case in March 1982-1983 and has been the case with this recent widespread fall also.

> at : "Ken Ring"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought?
>Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:16:04 +1300
>
>Thanks Brian, I didn't know the 28th was looking that good here.
>In that case there's hope for my other forecasts for Australia:
>Good rain Canberra for end of March, but for Sydney not till May, and for Melbourne not till August.
>cheers
>Ken Ring
>www.predictweather.com
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
> at : Brian Hamilton
> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 7:05 AM
> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought?
>
>
> Hi
> I think it is really good that Ken got the rain trend for australia (although the where abouts of the rain he has not got the trend so wel, bu the days for rain he got correct)
> He is having his best month for Auckland NZ so far, apart at one badly missed rain day a few days ago (20mm)
> I am amazed that his much trumpeted heavy rain event for the 28th Februrary now shows up on the latest NOGAPS model!
> Now, traditionaly the end of Fenruary is a good time to get drought breaking rain in the upper NI, but is that becuase of the moon trend Ken has been able to pick up on (which has been there all along, well at least every other year, the years in between we would have had to waited until mid march)?????
> Food for thought.
> :)
> Cheers
> Brian
> -----


MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Find our more. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:16:04 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Thanks Brian, I didn't know the 28th was looking that good here.
In that case there's hope for my other forecasts for Australia:
Good rain Canberra for end of March, but for Sydney not till May, and for Melbourne not till August.
cheers
Ken Ring
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought?

Hi
I think it is really good that Ken got the rain trend for australia (although the where abouts of the rain he has not got the trend so wel, bu the days for rain he got correct)
He is having his best month for Auckland NZ so far, apart at one badly missed rain day a few days ago (20mm)
I am amazed that his much trumpeted heavy rain event for the 28th Februrary now shows up on the latest NOGAPS model!
Now, traditionaly the end of Fenruary is a good time to get drought breaking rain in the upper NI, but is that becuase of the moon trend Ken has been able to pick up on (which has been there all along, well at least every other year, the years in between we would have had to waited until mid march)?????
Food for thought.
:)
Cheers
Brian
-----
at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:58:09 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The rain has been great, but not enough. Fingers crossed it will continue! James' Prediction: * Most states will see rain 12-15th June LOL I promise I'll tell everyone whether I'm right, OR im WRONG. LOL :) James James Holbeach ------------------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham http://www.trapdoor.com.au Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 ------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Saturday, 22 February 2003 12:43 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered broken. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:49 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > > >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ." > >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though :) > > Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-) > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.138.240.123] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:54:56 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2003 02:54:56.0771 (UTC) FILETIME=[C8366530:01C2DA1D] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Simon we had 5.3 mm to 8am friiday and 53.3 mm to 8am today (Sat) a total of 61.8 mm at Gilmore si far Cu developing si good chance of more showers later today and tonight with a weak low over us.Our local streams also flowed but have stopped again.Noted Lake George had a shallow sheet of water yesterday morning and a lot of water on paddocks between here and Sydney also seen yesterday It rained steadily all the way to Sydney and return trip as far as Goulburn then drizzle to here Gavin SSWW Gilmore > at : "Simon Angell" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) >Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:29:34 +1100 > >Hi all. >Rain started here about 12:30am, just spitting but rain none the less. took >2 hours before the first measurable rains at the airport. > >a total of 45.4mm recorded at the airport and 70mm recorded at tuggernong >in the whole event.. this area recived close to 60mm, maybe more with 54mm >recorded between 9am and 3pm at the 2 manual obs stations around the area. >Holt (~2kms away) having 12mm to 9am and 54mm at 9am (64mm Wooohoooo) > >The creek is flowing again, but for how long?.... > >Cheers >--------------------------------- >Simon Angell >Canberra, ACT >www.canberra-wx.com >*NEW*- A Small WAP service, >Current wx, forecast For Canberra >For mobile phones with WAP. >http://wap.canberra-wx.com >--------------------------------------------- >Proud member of the >Australian Severe Weather Association. >www.severeweather.asn.au >***WEBSITE UPDATE*** >Redesign is 95% complete. YAY.... >----------------------------------------------------------------------- > >(Pic taken in August 02...) > >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Peter May" >To: >Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:44 PM >Subject: RE: aus-wx: Sydney Rain > > > > 42 mm here on the south coast..... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > at : Tony Langdon (VK3JED) [mailto:vk3jed-1 at optusnet.com.au] > > Sent: Friday, 21 February 2003 6:48 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain > > > > > > At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: > > > > >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very >decent > > >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm. >Was > > >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams. > > > > Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather..... And the >rain > > continues to fall. :-) > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:38:27 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Gavin, et al.
Yeah, some very dark patches to my south right now, this is the kinda darkness you associate with a monster Cb, this however, is a Moisture (heavily too) laden Cu field. Some smaller Cu closer to me can be classified as TCu and im sitting under a deck of crap, lol.
 
Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
Current wx, forecast For Canberra
For mobile phones with WAP.

http://wap.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au

***WEBSITE UPDATE***
Redesign is 95% complete!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
at : "Gavin O'Brien" <mrcenterprises at hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra)

Simon
we had 5.3 mm to 8am friiday and 53.3 mm to 8am today (Sat)  a total of 61.8
mm at Gilmore si far Cu developing si good chance of more showers later
today and tonight with a weak low over us.Our local streams also flowed but
have stopped again.Noted Lake George had a shallow sheet of water yesterday
morning and a lot of water on paddocks between here and Sydney also seen
yesterday It rained steadily all the way to Sydney and return trip as far as
Goulburn then drizzle to here
Gavin SSWW Gilmore






> at : "Simon Angell" <
simon at canberra-wx.com>
>Reply-To:
aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra)
>Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:29:34 +1100
>
>Hi all.
>Rain started here about 12:30am, just spitting but rain none the less. took
>2 hours before the first measurable rains at the airport.
>
>a total of 45.4mm recorded at the airport and 70mm recorded at tuggernong
>in the whole event.. this area recived close to 60mm, maybe more with 54mm
>recorded between 9am and 3pm at the 2 manual obs stations around the area.
>Holt (~2kms away) having 12mm to 9am and 54mm at 9am (64mm Wooohoooo)
>
>The creek is flowing again, but for how long?....
>
>Cheers
>---------------------------------
>Simon Angell
>Canberra, ACT
>www.canberra-wx.com
>*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
>Current wx, forecast For Canberra
>For mobile phones with WAP.
>http://wap.canberra-wx.com
>---------------------------------------------
>Proud member of the
>Australian Severe Weather Association.
>www.severeweather.asn.au
>***WEBSITE UPDATE***
>Redesign is 95% complete. YAY....
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>(Pic taken in August 02...)
>
>----- Original Message -----
> at : "Peter May" <
manager at sale-net.com.au>
>To: <
aussie-weather at world.std.com>
>Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:44 PM
>Subject: RE: aus-wx: Sydney Rain
>
>
> > 42 mm here on the south coast.....
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > at : Tony Langdon (VK3JED) [mailto:vk3jed-1 at optusnet.com.au]
> > Sent: Friday, 21 February 2003 6:48 PM
> > To:
aussie-weather at world.std.com
> > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain
> >
> >
> > At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote:
> >
> > >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very
>decent
> > >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm.
>Was
> > >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams.
> >
> > Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather.....  And the
>rain
> > continues to fall. :-)
> >
> > 73 de Tony, VK3JED
> >
http://vkradio.com
> >
> >  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail
>to:majordomo at world.std.com
> >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
>your
> >  message.
> > 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail
>to:majordomo at world.std.com
> >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
>your
> >  message.
> > 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
> >
> >


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to 
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp

 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
 with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
 message.
 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:49:06 +1100 at : Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather Subject: aus-wx: Now this is a neat little program with heaps of number crunching and graphing uses. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Graphmatica http://www8.pair.com/ksoft/about.html Graphmatica page

Graphmatica


Graphmatica is a powerful, easy-to-use, equation plotter with numerical and calculus features. Graph Cartesian functions, relations, and inequalities, plus polar, parametric, and ordinary differential equations. Up to 25 graphs on screen at once. Offers copy to clipboard (bitmap and WMF), Button Bar, on-line help and demo files. In summary, a great tool for students and teachers of anything at high-school algebra through college calculus.

Current platforms:

Win32 screen shot

Version 2.0 for Win32

This version works on all 32-bit Windows systems: 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, and XP. It shares the same rock-solid core technology with the older versions, but also supports the modern conveniences you've come to expect at 32-bit applications like support for long filenames and a standard graphical toolbar, plus new features like data plotting/curve fitting and support for implicit functions.
Windows 3.1 screen shot

Version 1.60e for Windows

If you can't run a 32-bit operating system, this version works on any system running Windows 3.1 or OS/2 3.0. It is functionally equivalent to the previous version for Win32.
DOS screen shot

Version 3.60e for DOS

The DOS version is the grandaddy of them all--it has been around since 1990. But its most recent incarnation has almost all of the features of the Windows version, making it a powerful choice for low-end PCs. Still have 286's with no hard drives? No problem! It runs on anything with graphics and 512K of RAM! Supports CGA-SVGA graphics, Microsoft and compatible mice, and printing on Epson dot-matrix or HP LaserJet/DeskJet compatible printers.

Potential future platforms

Macintosh
I have a partner who has been making some progress on the Mac port. However, it's too early to make any promises about when that might be done...
Linux
Maybe one of these days I'll get around to putting a Linux partition on my hard drive...
Java
If I ever get motivated enough to try to learn Swing, I will probably do it by trying to port this program. It would be interesting to see how well it really works...
About the author...

Back to kSoft homepage...


kSoft, Inc. ksoft at graphmatica.com Last updated: Wed 19 Feb 2003
at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Rain Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:04:01 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Everyone, Mona Vale received a total of 70 mm of rain up to 9am Saturday. That is wonderful considering that we only got 8.5m for the whole of January. The grass and trees are already greener, even the dead looking patch on the footpath has sent up many green shoots. Judy +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.49.187.103] at : "effes Melbourne" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 06:37:05 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2003 06:37:05.0601 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0D07310:01C2DA3C] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Even if above average falls are recorded in Victoria during the next few months, it is still a long way at being over. Remember that Victoria has had 6 years of below normal rain, and some areas in Melbourne's water catchments have had their driest 6 years on record. Melbourne hasnt recorded above normal rain since 1996, showing how the last La Nina did absolutely nothing for us. But, there looks to be another good system coming up this weekend, with the interaction between the monsoon low over the Pilbara, and a northward moving cold pool.... Rainlover > at : "James Holbeach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: RE: aus-wx: Still drought? >Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:58:09 +1100 > >The rain has been great, but not enough. Fingers crossed it will >continue! > >James' Prediction: >* Most states will see rain 12-15th June > >LOL > >I promise I'll tell everyone whether I'm right, OR im WRONG. > >LOL > >:) > >James > >James Holbeach >------------------------------------------- >Trapdoor Ski Club >Mt. Hotham >http://www.trapdoor.com.au >Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 >------------------------------------------- > >-----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring >Sent: Saturday, 22 February 2003 12:43 AM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > >No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered >broken. >Ken >www.predictweather.com > >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" >To: >Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:49 AM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > > > > At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > > > > >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ." > > >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though :) > > > > Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-) > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.49.187.103] at : "effes Melbourne" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 06:37:05 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2003 06:37:05.0601 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0D07310:01C2DA3C] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Even if above average falls are recorded in Victoria during the next few months, it is still a long way at being over. Remember that Victoria has had 6 years of below normal rain, and some areas in Melbourne's water catchments have had their driest 6 years on record. Melbourne hasnt recorded above normal rain since 1996, showing how the last La Nina did absolutely nothing for us. But, there looks to be another good system coming up this weekend, with the interaction between the monsoon low over the Pilbara, and a northward moving cold pool.... Rainlover > at : "James Holbeach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: RE: aus-wx: Still drought? >Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 12:58:09 +1100 > >The rain has been great, but not enough. Fingers crossed it will >continue! > >James' Prediction: >* Most states will see rain 12-15th June > >LOL > >I promise I'll tell everyone whether I'm right, OR im WRONG. > >LOL > >:) > >James > >James Holbeach >------------------------------------------- >Trapdoor Ski Club >Mt. Hotham >http://www.trapdoor.com.au >Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 >------------------------------------------- > >-----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring >Sent: Saturday, 22 February 2003 12:43 AM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > >No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered >broken. >Ken >www.predictweather.com > >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" >To: >Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:49 AM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > > > > At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > > > > >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ." > > >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though :) > > > > Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-) > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "S. McGhee" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Now this is a neat little program with heaps of number crunching and graphing uses. Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 19:49:24 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Graphmatica pageJust the link would have been better :) Pete ----- Original Message ----- at : Peter Creswick To: aussie-weather Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 6:49 PM Subject: aus-wx: Now this is a neat little program with heaps of number crunching and graphing uses. Graphmatica http://www8.pair.com/ksoft/about.htm [Heaps of html deleted for brevity] +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David.Carroll at CountryEnergy.com.au Subject: aus-wx: heavy rain - Eugowra To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:50:52 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on CENTRAL01/Servers/Country Energy(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 22/02/2003 05:50:53 PM Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. Had some heavy rain around Eugowra falling, much debris, trees, water covering road. Council having grader in to clear roads. Also have storms at Mudgee now, causing many outages. All night been extremely busy. Rain still falling in Bathurst/Oberon again. Dave ##################################################################################### This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of Country Energy. ##################################################################################### +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Now this is a neat little program with heaps of number crunching and graphing uses. Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 20:12:15 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey Pete, there could be a good system develop just to the north of north cape this week and bring heaps of rain to the northern half of the NI of NZ, at later tuesday,...at least thats what NOGAPS has...so get ready :) (or maybe it wont?) Cheers Brian +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:22:43 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all.
Just had a fantastic downpour!!! the yard has atleast a cm of water over it it, and water is coming in once of the doors where water pools during heavy rain - first time it has done that in YEARS!!!!! (it didn't even do that with the ~65mm yesterday) - estimated 20mm in ~15 minutes and as i type it has stopped.
 
Simon
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra)

Hi Gavin, et al.
Yeah, some very dark patches to my south right now, this is the kinda darkness you associate with a monster Cb, this however, is a Moisture (heavily too) laden Cu field. Some smaller Cu closer to me can be classified as TCu and im sitting under a deck of crap, lol.
 
Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
Current wx, forecast For Canberra
For mobile phones with WAP.

http://wap.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au

***WEBSITE UPDATE***
Redesign is 95% complete!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
at : "Gavin O'Brien" <mrcenterprises at hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra)

Simon
we had 5.3 mm to 8am friiday and 53.3 mm to 8am today (Sat)  a total of 61.8
mm at Gilmore si far Cu developing si good chance of more showers later
today and tonight with a weak low over us.Our local streams also flowed but
have stopped again.Noted Lake George had a shallow sheet of water yesterday
morning and a lot of water on paddocks between here and Sydney also seen
yesterday It rained steadily all the way to Sydney and return trip as far as
Goulburn then drizzle to here
Gavin SSWW Gilmore






> at : "Simon Angell" <
simon at canberra-wx.com>
>Reply-To:
aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra)
>Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:29:34 +1100
>
>Hi all.
>Rain started here about 12:30am, just spitting but rain none the less. took
>2 hours before the first measurable rains at the airport.
>
>a total of 45.4mm recorded at the airport and 70mm recorded at tuggernong
>in the whole event.. this area recived close to 60mm, maybe more with 54mm
>recorded between 9am and 3pm at the 2 manual obs stations around the area.
>Holt (~2kms away) having 12mm to 9am and 54mm at 9am (64mm Wooohoooo)
>
>The creek is flowing again, but for how long?....
>
>Cheers
>---------------------------------
>Simon Angell
>Canberra, ACT
>www.canberra-wx.com
>*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
>Current wx, forecast For Canberra
>For mobile phones with WAP.
>http://wap.canberra-wx.com
>---------------------------------------------
>Proud member of the
>Australian Severe Weather Association.
>www.severeweather.asn.au
>***WEBSITE UPDATE***
>Redesign is 95% complete. YAY....
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>(Pic taken in August 02...)
>
>----- Original Message -----
> at : "Peter May" <
manager at sale-net.com.au>
>To: <
aussie-weather at world.std.com>
>Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:44 PM
>Subject: RE: aus-wx: Sydney Rain
>
>
> > 42 mm here on the south coast.....
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > at : Tony Langdon (VK3JED) [mailto:vk3jed-1 at optusnet.com.au]
> > Sent: Friday, 21 February 2003 6:48 PM
> > To:
aussie-weather at world.std.com
> > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain
> >
> >
> > At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote:
> >
> > >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very
>decent
> > >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 mm.
>Was
> > >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up dams.
> >
> > Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather.....  And the
>rain
> > continues to fall. :-)
> >
> > 73 de Tony, VK3JED
> >
http://vkradio.com
> >
> >  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail
>to:majordomo at world.std.com
> >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
>your
> >  message.
> > 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >  To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail
>to:majordomo at world.std.com
> >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
>your
> >  message.
> > 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
> >
> >


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to 
http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp

 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
 with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
 message.
 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


at : Peter May To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Was it predicted Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 19:28:56 +1100 Sensitivity: Company-Confidential X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Was the local wet weather predicted via a long range forecast in anyones area? Not that it really matters but I am just interested... Peter. PS: What a great chance to play with the rain section of my software..... ************************************* Beach Bum Solutions www.beach-bum-solutions.com Mystery Bay NSW Aus ************************************ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 20:27:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Alright, I'll put in my prediction at a local farmer. When will it rain again? Eventually. ----- Original Message ----- at : "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Still drought? > The rain has been great, but not enough. Fingers crossed it will > continue! > > James' Prediction: > * Most states will see rain 12-15th June > > LOL > > I promise I'll tell everyone whether I'm right, OR im WRONG. > > LOL > > :) > > James > > James Holbeach > ------------------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 > ------------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Saturday, 22 February 2003 12:43 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > > No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered > broken. > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:49 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > > > > At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > > > > >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ." > > >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though :) > > > > Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-) > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > http://vkradio.com > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Now this is a neat little program with heaps of number crunching and graphing uses. Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 20:36:01 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Graphmatica page
I'm the ignorant one and asks, "What can I use this for Peter"?
No offence meant, but I'm serious. I see lots of plots but are they for me? (Joe Citizen)
What are they and what do they do?
Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 4:49 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Now this is a neat little program with heaps of number crunching and graphing uses.

Graphmatica

http://www8.pair.com/ksoft/about.html


Graphmatica


Graphmatica is a powerful, easy-to-use, equation plotter with numerical and calculus features. Graph Cartesian functions, relations, and inequalities, plus polar, parametric, and ordinary differential equations. Up to 25 graphs on screen at once. Offers copy to clipboard (bitmap and WMF), Button Bar, on-line help and demo files. In summary, a great tool for students and teachers of anything at high-school algebra through college calculus.

Current platforms:

Win32 screen shot

Version 2.0 for Win32

This version works on all 32-bit Windows systems: 95, 98, ME, NT, 2000, and XP. It shares the same rock-solid core technology with the older versions, but also supports the modern conveniences you've come to expect at 32-bit applications like support for long filenames and a standard graphical toolbar, plus new features like data plotting/curve fitting and support for implicit functions.
Windows 3.1 screen shot

Version 1.60e for Windows

If you can't run a 32-bit operating system, this version works on any system running Windows 3.1 or OS/2 3.0. It is functionally equivalent to the previous version for Win32.
DOS screen shot

Version 3.60e for DOS

The DOS version is the grandaddy of them all--it has been around since 1990. But its most recent incarnation has almost all of the features of the Windows version, making it a powerful choice for low-end PCs. Still have 286's with no hard drives? No problem! It runs on anything with graphics and 512K of RAM! Supports CGA-SVGA graphics, Microsoft and compatible mice, and printing on Epson dot-matrix or HP LaserJet/DeskJet compatible printers.

Potential future platforms

Macintosh
I have a partner who has been making some progress on the Mac port. However, it's too early to make any promises about when that might be done...
Linux
Maybe one of these days I'll get around to putting a Linux partition on my hard drive...
Java
If I ever get motivated enough to try to learn Swing, I will probably do it by trying to port this program. It would be interesting to see how well it really works...
About the author...

Back to kSoft homepage...


kSoft, Inc. ksoft at graphmatica.com Last updated: Wed 19 Feb 2003
at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 20:47:23 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com When the Sydney Warragamba Dam starts filling at a rapid rate I'll believe the drought's over at least in this neck of the woods. The models are showing some interesting possibilities for next week with GASP showing a monsoon depression interacting with a sharp upper trough, like what happened about ~10-12(?) years ago, when Broken Hill received its entire annual rainfall in 24 hours. But I think this is only a remote chance at this early stage. The weather's full of good wishings and hopes.... ----- Original Message ----- at : "Bussy" To: Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 8:27 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > Alright, I'll put in my prediction at a local farmer. > When will it rain again? > Eventually. > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "James Holbeach" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:58 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Still drought? > > > > The rain has been great, but not enough. Fingers crossed it will > > continue! > > > > James' Prediction: > > * Most states will see rain 12-15th June > > > > LOL > > > > I promise I'll tell everyone whether I'm right, OR im WRONG. > > > > LOL > > > > :) > > > > James > > > > James Holbeach > > ------------------------------------------- > > Trapdoor Ski Club > > Mt. Hotham > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > > Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 > > ------------------------------------------- > > > > -----Original Message----- > > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Saturday, 22 February 2003 12:43 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > > > > No, I really don't. Just want to know if the drought is considered > > broken. > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:49 AM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? > > > > > > > At 02:19 AM 22/02/2003 +1300, you wrote: > > > > > > >Most states will see rain between ..17th-20th. ." > > > >Don't want to start another round of arguments, though :) > > > > > > Well, seems that was close to the mark.... :-) > > > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > > http://vkradio.com > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Fearby" To: Cc: Subject: aus-wx: 155+ mm of rain in Tamworth NSW at one Strom (22/Feb/2003) + 49mm at rain earlier that day. Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 02:30:24 +1100 Organization: Fearby.com Software X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 155+ mm of rain in Tamworth NSW at one Strom (22/Feb/2003) + 49mm at rain earlier that day.

Hello

I would like to report that Tamworth has received over 155mm of rain at one storm that occurred at 8pm (22/Feb) to 2am on the (23/Feb).

We received 49 mm of rain at the 8PM on the 21/Feb to 8PM on the 22/Feb.  After this rain was recorded (and the rain gauge emptied) we received a huge electrical storm at the south that dumped over 155mm or rain. 

It was pouring flat out for over 2 hours.  I was outside preventing flood damage that was gushing over the gutters for over an hour.  Shops (Tamworth Flight Centre etc) in the main street received flood damage.

The rain is still falling and we are pleased to receive over 200mm of rain in one day.

Simon
simon at fearby.com
0415149980
http://simon.fearby.com

at : "Simon Fearby" To: Cc: , Subject: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 02:57:21 +1100 Organization: Fearby.com Software X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: High Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings?

Hello

Is there anything that could go wrong with the BOM's rain gauges?

The city has just received the biggest downpour of rain in living memory, I received 155+mm over the last 6 hours and everyone I spoke to received about the same. 

The BOM's last 72 hours or readings at Tamworth is reporting only 8mm or rainfall in the city over the past 6 hours.  I know their rain gauge is about 10 km away at the City but the rain was widespread and poured for hours?

Q) What rain recording instruments do the BOM use?

Q) Do they fail often?

The BOM Rel Humidity reported levels at 105% then all readings failed after that during the storm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current Observations for Tamworth: http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDN65092/IDN65092.95762.shtml
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date Time       Temp    Dew  Rel Hum    Wind dir, Wind speed, Wind gust, Press  Rain since 9am
                                                                               
23 02:00        20.5    -       -       ENE     9       5       13      7       1007.7  10.6
23 01:00        20.7    -       -       E       17      9       20      11      1008.4  10.2
23 00:00        20.9    -       -       ENE     9       5       13      7       1008.6  9.2
22 23:00        21.2    -       105     ESE     7       4       15      8       1008.6  9
22 22:00        24.2    22.1    88      WNW     9       5       15      8       1008.2  3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The storm left us 2 hours ago but we have been receiving quite heavy rain since then and the BOM gauge has not moved.

Simon

at : "David Carroll" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: 155+ mm of rain in Tamworth NSW at one Strom (22/Feb/2003) + 49mm at rain earlier that day. Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 03:29:09 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 155+ mm of rain in Tamworth NSW at one Strom (22/Feb/2003) + 49mm at rain earlier that day.
HI Simon,
 
Thats a great effort.. Mind you that storm built up at Bathurst area earlier on tonight, I was watching that cell as it headed your way.. I can say, not much of that cell put much in Bathurst.
 
While working tonight, Mudgee staff reported a power line downed by huge amounts of rain, then the dams gates opened to release water, which inturned flooded areas. 2 poles were found down at very soft ground. Customer reported arcing power line to house and shed.   A major job tomorrow for crews at power company.
 
Anyone have reports of rain received at Mudgee?? 
 
Dave
Bathurst
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 2:30 AM
Subject: aus-wx: 155+ mm of rain in Tamworth NSW at one Strom (22/Feb/2003) + 49mm at rain earlier that day.

Hello

I would like to report that Tamworth has received over 155mm of rain at one storm that occurred at 8pm (22/Feb) to 2am on the (23/Feb).

We received 49 mm of rain at the 8PM on the 21/Feb to 8PM on the 22/Feb.  After this rain was recorded (and the rain gauge emptied) we received a huge electrical storm at the south that dumped over 155mm or rain. 

It was pouring flat out for over 2 hours.  I was outside preventing flood damage that was gushing over the gutters for over an hour.  Shops (Tamworth Flight Centre etc) in the main street received flood damage.

The rain is still falling and we are pleased to receive over 200mm of rain in one day.

Simon
simon at fearby.com
0415149980
http://simon.fearby.com

at : "Chas Osborn" To: Subject: aus-wx: North West Cyclone Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:50:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I just had a look at the Bom 4 day forcast http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDG00074.shtml and they have a cyclone developing Tuesday near Broome.
Is this new news or have I had my head in the sand?
 
Chas
 
Oombulgurri WA
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:17:37 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: North West Cyclone X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Chas and all, The area is being monitored. It is a bit early yet to say definitely that a TC will occur, but there have been several cases where a monsoon low like this one have intensified into a TC when they have moved offshore. Watch http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/wrap_fwo.pl?IDW10800.txt for outlook predictions at BoM Perth. Also, many of you might be interested in a newly updated page at BoM Perth which gives a seasonal Tropical Cyclone Outlook; check out http://www.bom.gov.au/announcements/media_releases/wa/20030220.shtml for details. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "Chas Osborn" To: Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:50:39 +1100 Subject: aus-wx: North West Cyclone > I just had a look at the Bom 4 day forcast > http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDG00074.shtml and they have a cyclone > developing Tuesday near Broome. > Is this new news or have I had my head in the sand? > > Chas > > Oombulgurri WA +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.152] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:22:59 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2003 00:23:00.0004 (UTC) FILETIME=[B89BE640:01C2DAD1] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Phil, Our AWS here in Tuggeranong had an interesting failure last Friday week.Most of us recorded around 20 to 25 mm in about 10 to 15 minutes during a severe T'storm yet we were being told on the local media that flash flooding at heavy rain was occurring! but only 5 mm had been recorded! The gauge keep sending data that it was raining all night-which it wasn't.Reason? Ash and cinders at the bush fires had blocked the Gauge.Real total not known as rain and hail probably overflowed the Funnel. Latest rain event was properly recorded so it has been cleared. Unusual? Gavin SSWW Gilmore Canberra ACT > at : "Phil Smith" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? >Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:39:44 +0800 > >Some rain gauge stories that come to mind at years gone by: >1. I once heard of a bird building a nest in an automatic rain gauge >2. In another case, Granny put a plastic shower cap over it >saying, "When I saw that thing in your yard with the electric wires >coming at it and I heard the thunder, I thought I had better put a >cover over it so it wouldn't get wet." >3. Someone (on this list some years ago, I think) mentioned a rain gauge >being piddled in. >4. A newly-appointed gardener, while watering the flower beds at a >regional weather station here in Hong Kong, saw that the rain >gauge "looked a little dusty", so he hosed it down until it "looked >bright and shiny". >I don't know where BoM gauges are located or how well they are fenced >off at "accidents" but any instrument is capable of wrong readings at >times for a whole multitude of reasons. > >Phil ><>< > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk >Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk >MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk >Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > >-----Original Message----- > at : "Simon Fearby" >To: >Cc: , >Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 02:57:21 +1100 >Subject: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? > > > Hello > > > > Is there anything that could go wrong with the BOM's rain gauges? > > > > The city has just received the biggest downpour of rain in living > > memory, I received 155+mm over the last 6 hours and everyone I spoke to > > received about the same. > > > > The BOM's last 72 hours or readings at Tamworth is reporting only 8mm > > or rainfall in the city over the past 6 hours. I know their rain gauge > > is about 10 km away at the City but the rain was widespread and > > poured > > for hours? > > > > Q) What rain recording instruments do the BOM use? > > > > Q) Do they fail often? > > > > The BOM Rel Humidity reported levels at 105% then all readings failed > > after that during the storm. > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Current Observations for Tamworth: > > http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDN65092/IDN65092.95762.shtml > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date Time Temp Dew Rel Hum Wind dir, Wind speed, Wind gust, > > Press Rain since 9am > > > > > > 23 02:00 20.5 - - ENE 9 5 13 > > 7 1007.7 10.6 > > 23 01:00 20.7 - - E 17 9 20 > > 11 1008.4 10.2 > > 23 00:00 20.9 - - ENE 9 5 13 > > 7 1008.6 9.2 > > 22 23:00 21.2 - 105 ESE 7 4 15 > > 8 1008.6 9 > > 22 22:00 24.2 22.1 88 WNW 9 5 15 > > 8 1008.2 3 > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > The storm left us 2 hours ago but we have been receiving quite heavy > > rain since then and the BOM gauge has not moved. > > > > Simon > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:26:42 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Re No. 3 I think that might have been my story, the pet dog having decided it wanted an honorary degree in the physics of rainmaking without going to the expense. I'm happy to say the increase in the rainfall that resulted was not statistically (or otherwise) significant, especially as it gave itself away, if you know what I mean... But as any dutiful meteorologist would surely have done, it was noted in the books for what it was. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:39 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? > Some rain gauge stories that come to mind at years gone by: > 1. I once heard of a bird building a nest in an automatic rain gauge > 2. In another case, Granny put a plastic shower cap over it > saying, "When I saw that thing in your yard with the electric wires > coming at it and I heard the thunder, I thought I had better put a > cover over it so it wouldn't get wet." > 3. Someone (on this list some years ago, I think) mentioned a rain gauge > being piddled in. > 4. A newly-appointed gardener, while watering the flower beds at a > regional weather station here in Hong Kong, saw that the rain > gauge "looked a little dusty", so he hosed it down until it "looked > bright and shiny". > I don't know where BoM gauges are located or how well they are fenced > off at "accidents" but any instrument is capable of wrong readings at > times for a whole multitude of reasons. > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > at : "Simon Fearby" > To: > Cc: , > Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 02:57:21 +1100 > Subject: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? > > > Hello > > > > Is there anything that could go wrong with the BOM's rain gauges? > > > > The city has just received the biggest downpour of rain in living > > memory, I received 155+mm over the last 6 hours and everyone I spoke to > > received about the same. > > > > The BOM's last 72 hours or readings at Tamworth is reporting only 8mm > > or rainfall in the city over the past 6 hours. I know their rain gauge > > is about 10 km away at the City but the rain was widespread and > > poured > > for hours? > > > > Q) What rain recording instruments do the BOM use? > > > > Q) Do they fail often? > > > > The BOM Rel Humidity reported levels at 105% then all readings failed > > after that during the storm. > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Current Observations for Tamworth: > > http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDN65092/IDN65092.95762.shtml > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date Time Temp Dew Rel Hum Wind dir, Wind speed, Wind gust, > > Press Rain since 9am > > > > > > 23 02:00 20.5 - - ENE 9 5 13 > > 7 1007.7 10.6 > > 23 01:00 20.7 - - E 17 9 20 > > 11 1008.4 10.2 > > 23 00:00 20.9 - - ENE 9 5 13 > > 7 1008.6 9.2 > > 22 23:00 21.2 - 105 ESE 7 4 15 > > 8 1008.6 9 > > 22 22:00 24.2 22.1 88 WNW 9 5 15 > > 8 1008.2 3 > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > The storm left us 2 hours ago but we have been receiving quite heavy > > rain since then and the BOM gauge has not moved. > > > > Simon > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.152] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Was it predicted Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:41:20 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2003 00:41:20.0939 (UTC) FILETIME=[48D13FB0:01C2DAD4] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Peter, For the last 10 years up to last October,I used to publish a weather summary for the Tuggeranong Valley in the Tuggeranong Chronicle and the Valley View(before it folded) I am on record as predicting the drought in our area some 6-7 months before it started (ie severe rainfall deficiets)and did indicate last October that I expected the current drought would ease in late March April in our region- this rainfall event was early but it has occurred quite frequently in late January-February iver the the last decade or so in Eastern Australia.Pressure of business and work stopped me but now I have sold our busines, I am organising a web site for my AWS data and long range forecasts work soon. Gavin SSWW Canberra. > at : Peter May >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Was it predicted >Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 19:28:56 +1100 > >Was the local wet weather predicted via a long range forecast in anyones >area? Not that it really matters but I am just interested... > > > > > >Peter. > > >PS: What a great chance to play with the rain section of my software..... > > > >************************************* >Beach Bum Solutions > >www.beach-bum-solutions.com >Mystery Bay NSW Aus >************************************ > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.152] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:48:24 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2003 00:48:24.0331 (UTC) FILETIME=[452DBDB0:01C2DAD5] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Simon, Models look good for more rain by next weekend;keep us posted on your rainfalls Gavin > at : "Simon Angell" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) >Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:22:43 +1100 > >Hi all. >Just had a fantastic downpour!!! the yard has atleast a cm of water over it >it, and water is coming in once of the doors where water pools during heavy >rain - first time it has done that in YEARS!!!!! (it didn't even do that >with the ~65mm yesterday) - estimated 20mm in ~15 minutes and as i type it >has stopped. > >Simon > ----- Original Message ----- > at : Simon Angell > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 2:38 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) > > > Hi Gavin, et al. > Yeah, some very dark patches to my south right now, this is the kinda >darkness you associate with a monster Cb, this however, is a Moisture >(heavily too) laden Cu field. Some smaller Cu closer to me can be >classified as TCu and im sitting under a deck of crap, lol. > > Cheers > --------------------------------- > Simon Angell > Canberra, ACT > www.canberra-wx.com > *NEW*- A Small WAP service, > Current wx, forecast For Canberra > For mobile phones with WAP. > http://wap.canberra-wx.com > --------------------------------------------- > Proud member of the > Australian Severe Weather Association. > www.severeweather.asn.au > ***WEBSITE UPDATE*** > Redesign is 95% complete! > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "Gavin O'Brien" > To: > Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 1:54 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) > > > Simon > we had 5.3 mm to 8am friiday and 53.3 mm to 8am today (Sat) a total of >61.8 > mm at Gilmore si far Cu developing si good chance of more showers later > today and tonight with a weak low over us.Our local streams also flowed >but > have stopped again.Noted Lake George had a shallow sheet of water >yesterday > morning and a lot of water on paddocks between here and Sydney also seen > yesterday It rained steadily all the way to Sydney and return trip as >far as > Goulburn then drizzle to here > Gavin SSWW Gilmore > > > > > > > > at : "Simon Angell" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain (and canberra) > >Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:29:34 +1100 > > > >Hi all. > >Rain started here about 12:30am, just spitting but rain none the less. >took > >2 hours before the first measurable rains at the airport. > > > >a total of 45.4mm recorded at the airport and 70mm recorded at >tuggernong > >in the whole event.. this area recived close to 60mm, maybe more with >54mm > >recorded between 9am and 3pm at the 2 manual obs stations around the >area. > >Holt (~2kms away) having 12mm to 9am and 54mm at 9am (64mm Wooohoooo) > > > >The creek is flowing again, but for how long?.... > > > >Cheers > >--------------------------------- > >Simon Angell > >Canberra, ACT > >www.canberra-wx.com > >*NEW*- A Small WAP service, > >Current wx, forecast For Canberra > >For mobile phones with WAP. > >http://wap.canberra-wx.com > >--------------------------------------------- > >Proud member of the > >Australian Severe Weather Association. > >www.severeweather.asn.au > >***WEBSITE UPDATE*** > >Redesign is 95% complete. YAY.... > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >(Pic taken in August 02...) > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Peter May" > >To: > >Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:44 PM > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: Sydney Rain > > > > > > > 42 mm here on the south coast..... > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > at : Tony Langdon (VK3JED) [mailto:vk3jed-1 at optusnet.com.au] > > > Sent: Friday, 21 February 2003 6:48 PM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sydney Rain > > > > > > > > > At 06:12 PM 21/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: > > > > > > >Good to see that some parts of the state have at last got some very > >decent > > > >rainfall. Still need lots more here with a total today of only 8 >mm. > >Was > > > >magnificent to watch the news and see run-off actually filling up >dams. > > > > > > Indeed, I'm enjoying this welcome change in the weather..... And >the > >rain > > > continues to fall. :-) > > > > > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > > > http://vkradio.com > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > > believed to be clean. > > > > > > -- > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > > believed to be clean. > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Duncan & Mandy" To: "aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com" Subject: aus-wx: Big downpour in Alice Springs Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:54:12 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'day, Yesterday afternoon in Western Alice Springs we had a 2 hour downpour that recorded 71mm, although for other parts of Alice they only got around 10-15mm. Our street was a raging torrent, which isn't particularly unusual for this time of the year. On Thursday it rained all day, with around 20mm falling in the guage. We haven't really been affected by the drought - there's lots green grass and consistent 20mm falls about twice a month. Roads are closed in the western N.T. regions around Kintore, which would indicate they are getting the rains as well. Tennant Creek has received over 300mm for the past week, with more falling at the moment. As most of you would know, Darwin has received a good wet season, esp. this year. So pretty much the whole of the N.T. is drought free. Cheers, Duncan A very humid Alice Springs, N.T. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Liz Kennedy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:54:31 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings?
Hi Simon,
 
I'm not sure how well you know the Tamworth area, but my parents are located in the Daruka/Tintinhull area to the North of Tamworth and they also recieved 155mm, which they were delighted with. My dad's brother lives in Calala, to the south east of Tamworth and recieved only drizzle, nothing close to 155mm. I'm not 100% sure, but I think Tamworth's rainfall gets measured at the Airport, so the only explanation is that perhaps this rainfall wasn't quite as widespread as it seemed. A little hard to fathom that though when really, we are only talking about a difference of 10 kilometres.
 
Cheers,
Liz Kennedy
Port Macquarie
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 2:57 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings?

Hello

Is there anything that could go wrong with the BOM's rain gauges?

The city has just received the biggest downpour of rain in living memory, I received 155+mm over the last 6 hours and everyone I spoke to received about the same. 

The BOM's last 72 hours or readings at Tamworth is reporting only 8mm or rainfall in the city over the past 6 hours.  I know their rain gauge is about 10 km away at the City but the rain was widespread and poured for hours?

Q) What rain recording instruments do the BOM use?

Q) Do they fail often?

The BOM Rel Humidity reported levels at 105% then all readings failed after that during the storm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current Observations for Tamworth: http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDN65092/IDN65092.95762.shtml
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date Time       Temp    Dew  Rel Hum    Wind dir, Wind speed, Wind gust, Press  Rain since 9am
                                                                               
23 02:00        20.5    -       -       ENE     9       5       13      7       1007.7  10.6
23 01:00        20.7    -       -       E       17      9       20      11      1008.4  10.2
23 00:00        20.9    -       -       ENE     9       5       13      7       1008.6  9.2
22 23:00        21.2    -       105     ESE     7       4       15      8       1008.6  9
22 22:00        24.2    22.1    88      WNW     9       5       15      8       1008.2  3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The storm left us 2 hours ago but we have been receiving quite heavy rain since then and the BOM gauge has not moved.

Simon

at : "peter tristram" To: Subject: aus-wx: LOW Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 19:15:08 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Torrential rain now in the Bellinger Valley after the storms followed the escarpment all day. Some big totals at the automatic stations just south too. The BOM radar shows a low just north of Coffs. Wind screamed in at the SE 30 mins ago and is really howling - could be wild night (and my creek should start flowing again soon). Peter --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.456 / Virus Database: 256 - Release Date: 18/02/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Rhett & AJ" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 21:04:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi, Yes Tamworth's AWS is at the airport which is about 10km at the town. It's quite an atypical site with respect to city it represents - sort out of the middle of a broad rolling plain where the actually city is at the foot of a mound of steep hills on the edge of the valley. My parents reported heavy rain at their place at Oxley Vale, although talking to people who live in East Tamworth (only 2km away) it appears to have been markedly heavier there. At Hallsville about 10km North rainfall was considerably less. So it appears to be have been very localised against the hills at the East of the Peel Valley (localised topographic effect??), this being reflected in the Airport reading. Regards Rhett -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Liz Kennedy Sent: Sunday, 23 February 2003 6:55 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? Hi Simon, I'm not sure how well you know the Tamworth area, but my parents are located in the Daruka/Tintinhull area to the North of Tamworth and they also recieved 155mm, which they were delighted with. My dad's brother lives in Calala, to the south east of Tamworth and recieved only drizzle, nothing close to 155mm. I'm not 100% sure, but I think Tamworth's rainfall gets measured at the Airport, so the only explanation is that perhaps this rainfall wasn't quite as widespread as it seemed. A little hard to fathom that though when really, we are only talking about a difference of 10 kilometres. Cheers, Liz Kennedy Port Macquarie ----- Original Message ----- at : Simon Fearby To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Cc: webclim at bom.gov.au ; webops at bom.gov.au Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 2:57 AM Subject: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? Hello Is there anything that could go wrong with the BOM's rain gauges? The city has just received the biggest downpour of rain in living memory, I received 155+mm over the last 6 hours and everyone I spoke to received about the same. The BOM's last 72 hours or readings at Tamworth is reporting only 8mm or rainfall in the city over the past 6 hours. I know their rain gauge is about 10 km away at the City but the rain was widespread and poured for hours? Q) What rain recording instruments do the BOM use? Q) Do they fail often? The BOM Rel Humidity reported levels at 105% then all readings failed after that during the storm. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Current Observations for Tamworth: http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDN65092/IDN65092.95762.shtml ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Date Time Temp Dew Rel Hum Wind dir, Wind speed, Wind gust, Press Rain since 9am 23 02:00 20.5 - - ENE 9 5 13 7 1007.7 10.6 23 01:00 20.7 - - E 17 9 20 11 1008.4 10.2 23 00:00 20.9 - - ENE 9 5 13 7 1008.6 9.2 22 23:00 21.2 - 105 ESE 7 4 15 8 1008.6 9 22 22:00 24.2 22.1 88 WNW 9 5 15 8 1008.2 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- The storm left us 2 hours ago but we have been receiving quite heavy rain since then and the BOM gauge has not moved. Simon +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 22:13:59 +1100 at : Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: LOW Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Peter... I have just noticed in the 12 hours to 9 pm, Gleniffer had 167 mm - and in the Macleay, Boonanghi 116mm. Lots in the last 1 hour at both and + 60 mm in Coffs area between 8 and 9 pm. Don W peter tristram wrote: > > Torrential rain now in the Bellinger Valley after the storms followed the > escarpment all day. Some big totals at the automatic stations just south > too. The BOM radar shows a low just north of Coffs. Wind screamed in at > the SE 30 mins ago and is really howling - could be wild night (and my creek > should start flowing again soon). > Peter > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.456 / Virus Database: 256 - Release Date: 18/02/2003 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ian Isles" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: swirling low over coffs harbour - local report Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 22:31:38 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2003 11:31:47.0618 (UTC) FILETIME=[2687E020:01C2DB2F] X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id GAA19213 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Report at Coffs Harbour. At 5.00pm we got a severe storm warning for the mid north coast. There was dark threatening cloud about - but nothing specific. At that time I checked the radar and the rain was spinning into a localised low down at Kempsey. About 6.30 I had a look and it was getting very dark down south with a curved band of cloud towards the south. Over the next few hours it continued to turn like a mini hurricane with strong winds, torrential rain and occasional lightning. It came through Coffs Harbour at about 8.00pm There has been power surges and tree's down with reports of black outs. Ive watched the weather for a lot of years, and ive never seen a low develop so quickly and spin like this ever. A quite amazing system. At the present minute the centre of the storm is up towards grafton. Ian Isles Coffs Harbour -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Don White Sent: Sunday, 23 February 2003 10:14 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: LOW Peter... I have just noticed in the 12 hours to 9 pm, Gleniffer had 167 mm - and in the Macleay, Boonanghi 116mm. Lots in the last 1 hour at both and + 60 mm in Coffs area between 8 and 9 pm. Don W peter tristram wrote: > > Torrential rain now in the Bellinger Valley after the storms followed the > escarpment all day. Some big totals at the automatic stations just south > too. The BOM radar shows a low just north of Coffs. Wind screamed in at > the SE 30 mins ago and is really howling - could be wild night (and my creek > should start flowing again soon). > Peter > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.456 / Virus Database: 256 - Release Date: 18/02/2003 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 00:44:35 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings?
Here's a news report I read on the Tamworth rain.
 
Love
Sha
 

Tamworth flooding may cost millions

It is now feared a flash flood in Tamworth overnight may have left a damage bill of millions of dollars.

More than 150 millimetres of rain fell in less than an hour, sending a torrent of water out of the mountains above the city.

The wall of water picked up cars, pushing them along the street, destroyed brick retaining walls, lifted pavement and caused extensive damage to many homes.

In the central business area the drainage system was unable to cope and water entered scores of shops, destroying merchandise.

Police say in Fitzroy Street, off the central business area the flood water was more than a metre deep.

Water also entered many homes when their guttering systems failed.

However the torrential rain was in a narrow strip and a majority of people living in Tamworth were not aware of what was happening a few blocks away.

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings?

Hi Simon,
 
I'm not sure how well you know the Tamworth area, but my parents are located in the Daruka/Tintinhull area to the North of Tamworth and they also recieved 155mm, which they were delighted with. My dad's brother lives in Calala, to the south east of Tamworth and recieved only drizzle, nothing close to 155mm. I'm not 100% sure, but I think Tamworth's rainfall gets measured at the Airport, so the only explanation is that perhaps this rainfall wasn't quite as widespread as it seemed. A little hard to fathom that though when really, we are only talking about a difference of 10 kilometres.
 
Cheers,
Liz Kennedy
Port Macquarie
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 2:57 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings?

Hello

Is there anything that could go wrong with the BOM's rain gauges?

The city has just received the biggest downpour of rain in living memory, I received 155+mm over the last 6 hours and everyone I spoke to received about the same. 

The BOM's last 72 hours or readings at Tamworth is reporting only 8mm or rainfall in the city over the past 6 hours.  I know their rain gauge is about 10 km away at the City but the rain was widespread and poured for hours?

Q) What rain recording instruments do the BOM use?

Q) Do they fail often?

The BOM Rel Humidity reported levels at 105% then all readings failed after that during the storm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current Observations for Tamworth: http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDN65092/IDN65092.95762.shtml
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date Time       Temp    Dew  Rel Hum    Wind dir, Wind speed, Wind gust, Press  Rain since 9am
                                                                               
23 02:00        20.5    -       -       ENE     9       5       13      7       1007.7  10.6
23 01:00        20.7    -       -       E       17      9       20      11      1008.4  10.2
23 00:00        20.9    -       -       ENE     9       5       13      7       1008.6  9.2
22 23:00        21.2    -       105     ESE     7       4       15      8       1008.6  9
22 22:00        24.2    22.1    88      WNW     9       5       15      8       1008.2  3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The storm left us 2 hours ago but we have been receiving quite heavy rain since then and the BOM gauge has not moved.

Simon


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.456 / Virus Database: 256 - Release Date: 18/02/2003

at : simon at fearby.com To: Blair Trewin , Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? Cc: Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:09:53 Pacific Standard Time X-Originating-Ip: [153.107.47.83] X-Mailer: NOCC v0.9.5 X-AntiSpam: Checked for restricted content by Gordano's AntiSpam Software Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Blair >The airport got 6mm in the hour at 10 to 11 on Saturday night - was that when the heavy rain was happening in town? There was about 40mm of rain each hour at 9PM to 12 then 10mm an hour until 2AM. A further 9mm was recorded at 3AM to 9AM the next morning. Friends at Attunga (22km NNW of Tamworth) received over 80mm). The storm came at the SSW and headed towards the NNNE The Airport is WWNW of me and the Storm must have turned (or developed) 90 deg towards Attunga for them to receive the rain. It is unusual that the Airport did not record more rain. Simon Blair Trewin wrote : > > > > Is there anything that could go wrong with the BOM's rain gauges? > > Yes - but I don't think it's happened this time. > > > The city has just received the biggest downpour of rain in living > > memory, I received 155+mm over the last 6 hours and everyone I spoke to > > received about the same. > > > > The BOM's last 72 hours or readings at Tamworth is reporting only 8mm > > or rainfall in the city over the past 6 hours. I know their rain gauge > > is about 10 km away at the City but the rain was widespread and poured > > for hours? > > In a convective situation it's not unknown to get that sort of > contrast over a distance of 10km. The Tamworth AWS got 63mm in the > 24 hours to 9 a.m. Saturday (which was consistent with other > readings in the area), so I don't think there is a systematic > problem with the gauge (which doesn't rule out a temporary blockage). > > The airport got 6mm in the hour at 10 to 11 on Saturday night - > was that when the heavy rain was happening in town? > > > Q) What rain recording instruments do the BOM use? > > At the AWSs it would be a tipping-bucket rain gauge. As the name > implies, this is a set-up where there are two buckets on a see-saw, > each with a capacity of 0.2mm - when one bucket fills up the see-saw > tips and a pulse is registered. > > > Q) Do they fail often? > > Not unheard of, but the most common sources of failure would be: > > - a communications failure - this doesn't seem to be applicable > here > - a gauge obstruction - but the way this will usually affect > rainfall is that you get zero unless/until the obstruction is > dislodged - there are some AWSs which are prone to this (Dunns Hill > in the Dandenongs, for example), and sometimes in a rain event they > will not register the first millimetre or two after a dry spell > , but then keep pace > with other stations. > > Neither of these seem applicable in the Tamworth situation. > > > The BOM Rel Humidity reported levels at 105% then all readings failed > > after that during the storm. > > > This looks to be, for the output, like a faulty wet-bulb sensor - once > the wet-bulb rose above the dry-bulb by more than a certain amount > then the quality-control software would have cut off the humidity/ > wet-bulb obs. > > Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Last one to the pub is a MCSE professional! -- My 3D FishTank Simulator / Screen Saver ----------------- ( DirectX 8.1 ) ----- Main: http://www.fearby.com/products/3dfishtank/default.shtml Screenshots: http://www.fearby.com/products/3dfishtank/screenshots.shtml Download: http://www.fearby.com/products/3dfishtank/evaluation.shtml ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 07:11:34 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi, Here is the full report of the LP supercell 12the February 2003 which was mentioned a week or so ago complete with video stills, photographs and videos!!! I recommend the first video to be downloaded which is at the top of the report - timelapse video of the LP http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2003/docs/200302-01.htm This is one of my favourite storm events. The balance in the rotation is phenomenal. Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher at Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.51.17.22] at : "stuart hely" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 22:59:18 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2003 22:59:18.0322 (UTC) FILETIME=[31DDC920:01C2DB8F] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy, That's a fantastic video! Well worth watching a couple of times. Stuart > at : Jimmy Deguara >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report >Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 07:11:34 +1100 > >Hi, > >Here is the full report of the LP supercell 12the February 2003 which was >mentioned a week or so ago complete with video stills, photographs and >videos!!! I recommend the first video to be downloaded which is at the top >of the report - timelapse video of the LP > >http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2003/docs/200302-01.htm > >This is one of my favourite storm events. The balance in the rotation is >phenomenal. > >Jimmy Deguara > > >----------------------------------------- >Please note the change to my new e-mail address: >jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com >----------------------------------------- >Jimmy Deguara >Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > at >Schofields, Sydney >NSW Australia > >e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Web Page with Michael Bath > >Australian Severe Weather Home Page >http://www.australiasevereweather.com > >Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Problems with the BOM rain gauges/readings? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:23:11 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Is there anything that could go wrong with the BOM's rain gauges? Yes - but I don't think it's happened this time. > The city has just received the biggest downpour of rain in living > memory, I received 155+mm over the last 6 hours and everyone I spoke to > received about the same. > > The BOM's last 72 hours or readings at Tamworth is reporting only 8mm > or rainfall in the city over the past 6 hours. I know their rain gauge > is about 10 km away at the City but the rain was widespread and poured > for hours? In a convective situation it's not unknown to get that sort of contrast over a distance of 10km. The Tamworth AWS got 63mm in the 24 hours to 9 a.m. Saturday (which was consistent with other readings in the area), so I don't think there is a systematic problem with the gauge (which doesn't rule out a temporary blockage). The airport got 6mm in the hour at 10 to 11 on Saturday night - was that when the heavy rain was happening in town? > Q) What rain recording instruments do the BOM use? At the AWSs it would be a tipping-bucket rain gauge. As the name implies, this is a set-up where there are two buckets on a see-saw, each with a capacity of 0.2mm - when one bucket fills up the see-saw tips and a pulse is registered. > Q) Do they fail often? Not unheard of, but the most common sources of failure would be: - a communications failure - this doesn't seem to be applicable here - a gauge obstruction - but the way this will usually affect rainfall is that you get zero unless/until the obstruction is dislodged - there are some AWSs which are prone to this (Dunns Hill in the Dandenongs, for example), and sometimes in a rain event they will not register the first millimetre or two after a dry spell , but then keep pace with other stations. Neither of these seem applicable in the Tamworth situation. > The BOM Rel Humidity reported levels at 105% then all readings failed > after that during the storm. > This looks to be, for the output, like a faulty wet-bulb sensor - once the wet-bulb rose above the dry-bulb by more than a certain amount then the quality-control software would have cut off the humidity/ wet-bulb obs. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:08:41 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy, it's not hard to tell you are a teacher! That whole page is an excellent teaching tool for anyone interested in learning about storms. I checked all your videos, but that time-lapse of the LP supercell is unforgettable. Well done! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : Jimmy Deguara To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 07:11:34 +1100 Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report > Hi, > > Here is the full report of the LP supercell 12the February 2003 which > was > mentioned a week or so ago complete with video stills, photographs and > videos!!! I recommend the first video to be downloaded which is at the > top > of the report - timelapse video of the LP > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2003/docs/200302-01.ht > m > > This is one of my favourite storm events. The balance in the rotation > is > phenomenal. > > Jimmy Deguara > > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - > http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > at > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:04:33 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Excellent work Jimmy!! Now I know what is actually meant by rotation!!! Now that's teaching other people :-) ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:11 AM Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report > Hi, > > Here is the full report of the LP supercell 12the February 2003 which was > mentioned a week or so ago complete with video stills, photographs and > videos!!! I recommend the first video to be downloaded which is at the top > of the report - timelapse video of the LP > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2003/docs/200302-01.htm > > This is one of my favourite storm events. The balance in the rotation is > phenomenal. > > Jimmy Deguara > > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > at > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Phillip Basil-Jones" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:18:41 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Very good report and film as per usual Jimmy D! What a nice storm that was! ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:11 AM Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report > Hi, > > Here is the full report of the LP supercell 12the February 2003 which was > mentioned a week or so ago complete with video stills, photographs and > videos!!! I recommend the first video to be downloaded which is at the top > of the report - timelapse video of the LP > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2003/docs/200302-01.htm > > This is one of my favourite storm events. The balance in the rotation is > phenomenal. > > Jimmy Deguara > > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > at > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:23:24 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Bussy and Phil, Yes the rotation showed on this very much displays clearly what is meant by a mesocyclone. Actually, LP supercells are very good to do such as you can see the whole mesocyclone at wall cloud up to the top of the cloud. Thanks for those who took the time to download the videos. Jimmy Deguara At 07:04 PM 24/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Excellent work Jimmy!! Now I know what is actually meant by rotation!!! >Now that's teaching other people :-) >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Jimmy Deguara" >To: >Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:11 AM >Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report > > > > Hi, > > > > Here is the full report of the LP supercell 12the February 2003 which was > > mentioned a week or so ago complete with video stills, photographs and > > videos!!! I recommend the first video to be downloaded which is at the top > > of the report - timelapse video of the LP > > > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2003/docs/200302-01.htm > > > > This is one of my favourite storm events. The balance in the rotation is > > phenomenal. > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Please note the change to my new e-mail > > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > > ----------------------------------------- > > Jimmy Deguara > > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > > > at > > Schofields, Sydney > > NSW Australia > > > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:28:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Awesome report Jimmy. Fantastically covered both pictures and video wise. Extremely informative. The timelapse is simply brilliant!!! dann -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Bussy Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:05 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Excellent work Jimmy!! Now I know what is actually meant by rotation!!! Now that's teaching other people :-) ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:11 AM Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report > Hi, > > Here is the full report of the LP supercell 12the February 2003 which was > mentioned a week or so ago complete with video stills, photographs and > videos!!! I recommend the first video to be downloaded which is at the top > of the report - timelapse video of the LP > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2003/docs/200302-01.htm > > This is one of my favourite storm events. The balance in the rotation is > phenomenal. > > Jimmy Deguara > > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > at > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Max" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:48:14 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Awesome pictures and video's Jimmy. I'm very impressed Max ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:23 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report > Hi Bussy and Phil, > > Yes the rotation showed on this very much displays clearly what is meant by > a mesocyclone. Actually, LP supercells are very good to do such as you can > see the whole mesocyclone at wall cloud up to the top of the cloud. > > Thanks for those who took the time to download the videos. > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 07:04 PM 24/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: > >Excellent work Jimmy!! Now I know what is actually meant by rotation!!! > >Now that's teaching other people :-) > >----- Original Message ----- > > at : "Jimmy Deguara" > >To: > >Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:11 AM > >Subject: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here is the full report of the LP supercell 12the February 2003 which was > > > mentioned a week or so ago complete with video stills, photographs and > > > videos!!! I recommend the first video to be downloaded which is at the top > > > of the report - timelapse video of the LP > > > > > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/storm_news/2003/docs/200302-01.htm > > > > > > This is one of my favourite storm events. The balance in the rotation is > > > phenomenal. > > > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > Please note the change to my new e-mail > > > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > > > > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > > > > > at > > > Schofields, Sydney > > > NSW Australia > > > > > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > > > > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > > > > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > > > > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:53:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2003 09:44:44.0013 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C2D49D0:01C2DBE9] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Anybody else notice that hinterland areas did remakably well, whilst just a few kms away coastal stations scored significantly  less.
 
I was only commenting on the opposite pattern just 6 months ago.
 
The daily rainfall bulletin this morning had some good examples.
 
Nelson Bay 0.8mm   yet inland at Stroud 16mm
 
Norah Head 3mm .................Cessnock 29mm
 
Jervis Bay  0.8mm............Nowra AWS 9mm
 
Even in Sydney there was a simila trend
 
Airport 3mm ......................Penrith 12mm
 
Michael
 
at : "peter tristram" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: swirling low over coffs harbour - local report Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:25:07 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry I didn't keep posting last night but the power flickered and eventually gave up the ghost. Lots of wind damage around the lower Bellinger with trees uprooted and powerlines down - spent the afternoon chainsawing up fallen trees so my son could mow the lawn! The heavier rain went north of Coffs and along the escarpment with falls of over 250mm reported at lots of centres - 90mm here and my creek now flows for the first time in 6 months. Good showers around as I write. Jimmy, your time lapse video showing the rotation through the mid levels and the updrafts bursting to the top levels is fantastic. It hasn't been a good season for storms here. Peter --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.456 / Virus Database: 256 - Release Date: 18/02/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Nathan Thompson" To: Subject: aus-wx: Lightning Video Capture at 2nd November 2002 available on my site. Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:28:39 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi,
 
Lightning Video Capture at 2nd November 2002 available on my website.
 
 
Hope you like these images.
 
at Nathan.
X-Originating-IP: [144.138.156.42] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 01:08:59 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2003 14:08:59.0773 (UTC) FILETIME=[46F242D0:01C2DC0E] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Michael I suspect afternoon convection due heating inland with instability and plenty of moisture would explain this-any other views? Gavin SSWW Canberra > at : "Michael Thompson" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb >Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:53:48 +1100 > >Anybody else notice that hinterland areas did remakably well, whilst just a >few kms away coastal stations scored significantly less. > >I was only commenting on the opposite pattern just 6 months ago. > >The daily rainfall bulletin this morning had some good examples. > >Nelson Bay 0.8mm yet inland at Stroud 16mm > >Norah Head 3mm .................Cessnock 29mm > >Jervis Bay 0.8mm............Nowra AWS 9mm > >Even in Sydney there was a simila trend > >Airport 3mm ......................Penrith 12mm > >Michael _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Subject: RE: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:48:13 +1300 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Thread-Index: AcLcPKk32FDft5tRTFS5sBXO1EXO7QAAMSrA at : "Pete McGhee" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2003 19:48:14.0484 (UTC) FILETIME=[AB4CAD40:01C2DC3D] X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id OAA18110 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jimmy, Another thumbs-up of appreciation :) Thanks should also go to you for taking the time to set-up the time-lapse so the convectively challenged over here in NZ can gain some vicarious stormy pleasures! I have the clip cycling full-screen as my screensaver, drawing many (curious) comments at passing colleagues. Keep up the good work Pete McGhee -----Original Message----- at : Jimmy Deguara [mailto:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com] Sent: Monday, 24 February 2003 21:23 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: LP Supercell Report Hi Bussy and Phil, Yes the rotation showed on this very much displays clearly what is meant by a mesocyclone. Actually, LP supercells are very good to do such as you can see the whole mesocyclone at wall cloud up to the top of the cloud. Thanks for those who took the time to download the videos. Jimmy Deguara +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Satellite Photo Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:50:53 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2003 02:50:53.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[B6656600:01C2DC78] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

The current satellite photo has the most pronounced north westerly monsoonal flow I've ever seen.  As such, I thought it was worth pointing out.  It seems just about every large group of clouds, which are part of this monsoonal flow, are aligned in this north west - south east orientation. (see link below)

The current active pulse over the Northern Territory seems to have been going for almost 2 weeks now, and despite forecasts of it abating slightly in the next couple of days, shows very little sign of weakening - Darwin had another 50 mm overnight.

http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDX1124.shtml



Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Click here for more. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
at : "Suze" To: Subject: aus-wx: Rain yabbies...? Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:59:02 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hmm....where do these little things come at ? This is the third time since 1983 I've found a delicate one centimeter yabby floating happily in rain run-off under my house. No creeks or ponds near me - a curiosity which gets the kids imagination going I sugested they might have fallen at the Scorpio constellation...uhm, I don't think they believe me . Beautiful 126mm of rain here in Logan over the last week - ground sodden, under house flooded - it's a blessing, no complaints here. Luvin this rain. cheers...Suze +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Peter May To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Rain yabbies...? Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:01:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Not an answer to your question but when I was a boy I remember a tornado sweeping over/through my home town of Numurkah. Years later I joined up with an old electrician in bussiness. We were discussing the event. At the time his house was on the outskirts of town and one of the first the tornado hit. Apparently it had gone across a dam, sucked up bits pieces fish and yabbies. Hit his house and dumped them all in his yard.... Regards, Peter -----Original Message----- at : Suze [mailto:suze at astralynx.com] Sent: Tuesday, 25 February 2003 2:59 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Rain yabbies...? Hmm....where do these little things come at ? This is the third time since 1983 I've found a delicate one centimeter yabby floating happily in rain run-off under my house. No creeks or ponds near me - a curiosity which gets the kids imagination going I sugested they might have fallen at the Scorpio constellation...uhm, I don't think they believe me . Beautiful 126mm of rain here in Logan over the last week - ground sodden, under house flooded - it's a blessing, no complaints here. Luvin this rain. cheers...Suze +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: aus-wx: heavy rain off NI NZ Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:21:26 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi
very heavy rain band just off the NE of the NI of NZ...moving slowly SW.....
could get lots of rain in places....
 
Cheers
Brian
X-Sender: carls at xenios.qldnet.com.au Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:39:13 +1000 To: aussie-weather-list at : Carl Smith Subject: aus-wx: Confluence of tropical origin systems dumps heavy rains across much of SE Australia. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All. Having looked at recent satellite images, I realised where all the moisture dumped over much of SE Australia over recent days came at . First, there was a monsoon low that travelled at the Arafura Sea over the Northern Territory into the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf near the WA NT border, then moving SSE through central Australia to the SA border, before recurving NE back up into central Queensland. I thought this was itself quite unusual and interesting until I had another look to see where all the moisture that hit SE Australia came at , which left me a bit gob-smacked! All the moisture at ex-tropical cyclones Fiona and Isha was sucked into a trough associated with a Southern Ocean front and transported ESE, with ex-Fiona passing S of SW WA before recurving into the Great Australian Bight and ex-Isha cut across SW WA to meet it, and the whole disorganised mess then moved NE overland through SA and NSW and up the coast into Queensland and the southern Coral Sea. You will find the sequence of images of this amazing event with comments on my page at: http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/2002-2003/droughtbreaker/index.htm If you click on any of the small embedded images or the link below it you will get the full resolution version of the image. Regards, Carl. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Barometer Question: Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:03:49 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Regards To All:
      My question is: How high can the Barometer be during foul weather?
 
At 10:44 P.M. (Mon., Feb. 24) at Mena Airport, moderate Snow, visibility: 3/4 of a Mile(1,207.3M), Temperature: 23F(-5.0C).
Barometer: 30.43"(1,030.5hPa).
 
We've gotten about 5IN(127.0mm) Snow so far, and are under a Winter Storm Warning for tonight and tomorrow.  Around 3:20 P.M., the sleet/snow pellets hit, followed an hour later by the Snow. We're forecasted for a freezing rain event on Wednesday and another Snow event possible on Friday......Bring it on!!! (During our rainstorm on Friday, the baro at Mena Airport was at 29.47"(998.0hPa).
Just wondering the highest barometer during foul weather.
THANKS and enjoy your week!
In a Snowy Mena---David Powell.
X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Confluence of tropical origin systems dumps heavy rains across much of SE Australia. Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:31:25 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2003 05:31:25.0403 (UTC) FILETIME=[238332B0:01C2DC8F] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

A fascinating exposition Carl, thank you - reminded me of Clyve Herbert's use of satellite images in association with a presentation about 'the duck' at the ASWA conference in 2001.

> at : Carl Smith
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: aussie-weather-list
>Subject: aus-wx: Confluence of tropical origin systems dumps heavy rains across much of SE Australia.
>Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:39:13 +1000
>
>Hi All.
>
>Having looked at recent satellite images, I realised where all the
>moisture dumped over much of SE Australia over recent days came
> at .
>
>First, there was a monsoon low that travelled at the Arafura Sea
>over the Northern Territory into the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf near the
>WA NT border, then moving SSE through central Australia to the SA
>border, before recurving NE back up into central Queensland.
>
>I thought this was itself quite unusual and interesting until I had
>another look to see where all the moisture that hit SE Australia
>came at , which left me a bit gob-smacked!
>
>All the moisture at ex-tropical cyclones Fiona and Isha was sucked
>into a trough associated with a Southern Ocean front and transported
>ESE, with ex-Fiona passing S of SW WA before recurving into the
>Great Australian Bight and ex-Isha cut across SW WA to meet it, and
>the whole disorganised mess then moved NE overland through SA and
>NSW and up the coast into Queensland and the southern Coral Sea.
>
>You will find the sequence of images of this amazing event with
>comments on my page at:
>http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/2002-2003/droughtbreaker/index.htm
>
>If you click on any of the small embedded images or the link below
>it you will get the full resolution version of the image.
>
>Regards,
>Carl.
>+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail
>to:majordomo at world.std.com
>with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
>your
>message.
>-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Find our more. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:49:47 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: Latest pictures for those weather bored :) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi, Sorry this was in my outbox and never got sent oh well here it is: Included here are submissions at others. Some impressive photographs http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/recd17.htm http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/recd18.htm Geoff Thurtell's photographs for the LP supercell are also included: http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/2003/0212gt08.jpg http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/2003/0212gt09.jpg http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/2003/0212gt10.jpg http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/2003/0212gt11.jpg http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/2003/0212gt12.jpg http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/2003/0212gt12.jpg http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/2003/0212gt13.jpg These are a great example to show the transition of change in the stages of the LP supercell. An interesting detected similarity of this day to a previous event in 1995 are the following: http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/1995/1028jd07.jpg October 28th 1995 exhibiting features of an LP supercell (likely "cow catcher" structure at the front of the lowering wall cloud) compares almost with http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/2003/0212gt06.jpg Yes that is right almost over the same area 12th February 2003 8 years on.... In this photograph, the breakdown had begun to occur - and it looked more impressive just minutes earlier. Of course I am not suggesting that this latter one was a supercell - just that there was interesting structural similarities. Here is a better view of the cell in 1995 half hour or so earlier showing some strong updraughts http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/1995/1028jd05.jpg http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/1995/1028jd06.jpg I was always curious why this storm remained rain free for so long and then produced a lowering below the main base!!!! ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher at Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:20:19 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Confluence of tropical origin systems dumps heavy rains across much of SE Australia. X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Carl, are you able to combine the smaller images into an animation? Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : Carl Smith To: aussie-weather-list Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:39:13 +1000 Subject: aus-wx: Confluence of tropical origin systems dumps heavy rains across much of SE Australia. > Hi All. > > Having looked at recent satellite images, I realised where all the > moisture dumped over much of SE Australia over recent days came at . > > First, there was a monsoon low that travelled at the Arafura Sea > over the Northern Territory into the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf near the > WA NT border, then moving SSE through central Australia to the SA > border, before recurving NE back up into central Queensland. > > I thought this was itself quite unusual and interesting until I had > another look to see where all the moisture that hit SE Australia came > at , which left me a bit gob-smacked! > > All the moisture at ex-tropical cyclones Fiona and Isha was sucked > into a trough associated with a Southern Ocean front and transported > ESE, with ex-Fiona passing S of SW WA before recurving into the Great > Australian Bight and ex-Isha cut across SW WA to meet it, and the > whole disorganised mess then moved NE overland through SA and NSW and > up the coast into Queensland and the southern Coral Sea. > > You will find the sequence of images of this amazing event with > comments on my page at: > http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/2002-2003/droughtbreaker/index.htm > > If you click on any of the small embedded images or the link below it > you will get the full resolution version of the image. > > Regards, > Carl. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:34:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Yeah i noted this. Sunday was pretty exceptional in this case. We got 30mm + on Sunday at Blaxland which is under 10 kms at Penrith and stations further up scored even more.
 
dann
-----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael Thompson
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 8:54 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb

Anybody else notice that hinterland areas did remakably well, whilst just a few kms away coastal stations scored significantly  less.
 
I was only commenting on the opposite pattern just 6 months ago.
 
The daily rainfall bulletin this morning had some good examples.
 
Nelson Bay 0.8mm   yet inland at Stroud 16mm
 
Norah Head 3mm .................Cessnock 29mm
 
Jervis Bay  0.8mm............Nowra AWS 9mm
 
Even in Sydney there was a simila trend
 
Airport 3mm ......................Penrith 12mm
 
Michael
 
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:46:48 +0800 at : "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Barometer Question: X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com This question often comes up in relation to tropical cyclones. Air pressure is always relative. If the whole surrounding region has very high pressures and your area is lower than its surrounds then you have a low which may attract bad weather even though your barometer may have a high reading. Conversely, if a whole region has low pressure but your station is significantly higher, then your location may be a high which may then repel bad weather, even though your barometer has a low reading. The reason this comes up with TCs is that there are various rules of thumb for figuring out the intensity of the cyclone at its central pressure. However sometimes these rules of thumb don't work because of a whole region of surrounding high pressure or low pressure. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk MSN Messenger: doctordisk at hotmail.com Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Testimony: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/PhilSmith/about.htm Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- at : "arky dave" To: Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:03:49 -0600 Subject: aus-wx: Barometer Question: > Regards To All: > My question is: How high can the Barometer be during foul > weather? > > At 10:44 P.M. (Mon., Feb. 24) at Mena Airport, moderate Snow, > visibility: 3/4 of a Mile(1,207.3M), Temperature: 23F(-5.0C). > Barometer: 30.43"(1,030.5hPa). > > We've gotten about 5IN(127.0mm) Snow so far, and are under a Winter > Storm Warning for tonight and tomorrow. Around 3:20 P.M., the > sleet/snow pellets hit, followed an hour later by the Snow. We're > forecasted for a freezing rain event on Wednesday and another Snow > event possible on Friday......Bring it on!!! (During our rainstorm on > Friday, the baro at Mena Airport was at 29.47"(998.0hPa). > Just wondering the highest barometer during foul weather. > THANKS and enjoy your week! > In a Snowy Mena---David Powell. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:54:56 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: RE: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com We only got 9.0mm reported on Monday morning - so Sunday's rainfall. Schofields We did have the whopping 44.6mm on Friday to Saturday morning Jimmy Deguara At 05:34 PM 25/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Yeah i noted this. Sunday was pretty exceptional in this case. We got 30mm >+ on Sunday at Blaxland which is under 10 kms at Penrith and stations >further up scored even more. > >dann >-----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael Thompson >Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 8:54 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb > >Anybody else notice that hinterland areas did remakably well, whilst just >a few kms away coastal stations scored significantly less. > >I was only commenting on the opposite pattern just 6 months ago. > >The daily rainfall bulletin this morning had some good examples. > >Nelson Bay 0.8mm yet inland at Stroud 16mm > >Norah Head 3mm .................Cessnock 29mm > >Jervis Bay 0.8mm............Nowra AWS 9mm > >Even in Sydney there was a simila trend > >Airport 3mm ......................Penrith 12mm > >Michael > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain yabbies...? Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:10:08 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yabbies migrate. Sorry for the short answer but that's it :-) > Hmm....where do these little things come at ? This is the third time since > 1983 I've found a delicate one centimeter yabby floating happily in rain > run-off under my house. No creeks or ponds near me - a curiosity which gets > the kids imagination going I sugested they might have fallen at the > Scorpio constellation...uhm, I don't think they believe me . Beautiful > 126mm of rain here in Logan over the last week - ground sodden, under house > flooded - it's a blessing, no complaints here. Luvin this rain. > cheers...Suze +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:57:19 +1030 (Cen. Australia Daylight Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (1800838) at : "Richard Modistach" X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: 3.0 X-CNT: ; To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain yabbies...? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
they also burrow down and hibernate for up to 20yrs.
there are over 40 different species of freashwater decapod
in aus, not all live in water, some are known as land yabbies
and 2cm is full grown for some, the largest are in tasmania
and can grow up to 1m long at tip of tail to outstreached claws.
and they can live and grow in mountain streams you can step across.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Tuesday, 25 February 2003 6:45:33 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain yabbies...?
 
Yabbies migrate. Sorry for the short answer but that's it :-)


> Hmm....where do these little things come at ? This is the third time
since
> 1983 I've found a delicate one centimeter yabby floating happily in rain
> run-off under my house. No creeks or ponds near me - a curiosity which
gets
> the kids imagination going <hehe> I sugested they might have fallen at
the
> Scorpio constellation...uhm, I don't think they believe me <ggg>.
Beautiful
> 126mm of rain here in Logan over the last week - ground sodden, under
house
> flooded - it's a blessing, no complaints here. Luvin this rain.
> cheers...Suze



+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP123.gif: 00000001,1bb1840b,00000000,00000000 at : "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:20:07 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Gavin Convection for once was not the reason. The airmass was very humid with DP's very high, just the slightest bit of lift caused rain. This was the reason. The on shore air stream was also nice and thick, this gives you two other factors, firstly lifting is more effective and starts even 5-10kms back at the ranges, secondly the cloud generated was not sheared back east at 1000 to 2000m as is common in Late Winter - Spring, therefore the showers produced best falls at point of lift. michael ----- Original Message ----- at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:08 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb > Michael I suspect afternoon convection due heating inland with instability > and plenty of moisture would explain this-any other views? > Gavin SSWW Canberra > > > > > > > > at : "Michael Thompson" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb > >Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:53:48 +1100 > > > >Anybody else notice that hinterland areas did remakably well, whilst just a > >few kms away coastal stations scored significantly less. > > > >I was only commenting on the opposite pattern just 6 months ago. > > > >The daily rainfall bulletin this morning had some good examples. > > > >Nelson Bay 0.8mm yet inland at Stroud 16mm > > > >Norah Head 3mm .................Cessnock 29mm > > > >Jervis Bay 0.8mm............Nowra AWS 9mm > > > >Even in Sydney there was a simila trend > > > >Airport 3mm ......................Penrith 12mm > > > >Michael > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Barometer Question: Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:39:05 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I suppose it depends on your definition of foul. I have seen close to 1040 here with light drizzle, that was an exception and fell out of a paper thin deck of stratus
 
Michael
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
at : arky dave
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:03 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Barometer Question:

Regards To All:
      My question is: How high can the Barometer be during foul weather?
 
At 10:44 P.M. (Mon., Feb. 24) at Mena Airport, moderate Snow, visibility: 3/4 of a Mile(1,207.3M), Temperature: 23F(-5.0C).
Barometer: 30.43"(1,030.5hPa).
 
We've gotten about 5IN(127.0mm) Snow so far, and are under a Winter Storm Warning for tonight and tomorrow.  Around 3:20 P.M., the sleet/snow pellets hit, followed an hour later by the Snow. We're forecasted for a freezing rain event on Wednesday and another Snow event possible on Friday......Bring it on!!! (During our rainstorm on Friday, the baro at Mena Airport was at 29.47"(998.0hPa).
Just wondering the highest barometer during foul weather.
THANKS and enjoy your week!
In a Snowy Mena---David Powell.
X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:40:54 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yes Michael, This is a common occurrence and often one overlooked. It can mean that those usually fairly dry can cop much more rain. We often are out of that effect in fact perhaps the start of that effect. 9.0mm compared to 30mm is significant. Jimmy Deguara At 08:20 PM 25/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Hi Gavin > >Convection for once was not the reason. The airmass was very humid with DP's >very high, just the slightest bit of lift caused rain. This was the reason. >The on shore air stream was also nice and thick, this gives you two other >factors, firstly lifting is more effective and starts even 5-10kms back at >the ranges, secondly the cloud generated was not sheared back east at 1000 >to 2000m as is common in Late Winter - Spring, therefore the showers >produced best falls at point of lift. > >michael > > > >----- Original Message ----- > at : "Gavin O'Brien" >To: >Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:08 AM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb > > > > Michael I suspect afternoon convection due heating inland with instability > > and plenty of moisture would explain this-any other views? > > Gavin SSWW Canberra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at : "Michael Thompson" > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >To: > > >Subject: aus-wx: Coastal Rainfall patterns 23-24th Feb > > >Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:53:48 +1100 > > > > > >Anybody else notice that hinterland areas did remakably well, whilst just >a > > >few kms away coastal stations scored significantly less. > > > > > >I was only commenting on the opposite pattern just 6 months ago. > > > > > >The daily rainfall bulletin this morning had some good examples. > > > > > >Nelson Bay 0.8mm yet inland at Stroud 16mm > > > > > >Norah Head 3mm .................Cessnock 29mm > > > > > >Jervis Bay 0.8mm............Nowra AWS 9mm > > > > > >Even in Sydney there was a simila trend > > > > > >Airport 3mm ......................Penrith 12mm > > > > > >Michael > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "third" To: Subject: aus-wx: a bit wet here Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:41:49 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Here in Petrie we had 24mm total rainfall for January and we are up to 282mm for February (74mm falling yesterday). +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:42:30 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I actually sent this through yesterday, but used my wrong email address ...

 
Some of you guys my not think this fits the weather .... I actually do think it does, so am taking the liberty of sending it along.
 
To my way of thinking, we have already commenced receiving the repercussions of the CME - one only has to noite the recent emails regarding the massive rain and storms that have suddenly hit !

Love
Sha
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 6:32 PM
Subject: Earth Changes TV/Breaking News - Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1"

Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1"...02/23/03
by Mitch Battros (ECTV)

There is a great deal of noise circulating the newsrooms surrounding the arrival of comet "C/2002 V1". There is good reason it should be.

First I want to bring attention to the SOHO (solar and heliospheric observatory) photos made available by Nasa and JPL. It appears there may have been a grave mistake, or another cover up by the United States Space Agencies. First take a look at the photo which is circulating the internet. Photo: http://science.nasa.gov/spaceweather/swpod2003/21feb03/soho1.gif

Note: when viewing the SOHO photos, remember to reverse the east and west limbs. This does not affect north and south.

You can see comet "C/2002 V1" coming in at the north and coming around the western limb. As the comet heads down towards the western side, we see a tremendous CME (coronal mass ejection) explode at the Sun, directly towards the comet. No one disputes this fact. However, what we can see clearly in this next photo is the photo had been turned upside down.

That's right, upside down. Photo: http://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2003_02_12/C2002_v1.gif

This means the CME is directly Earth bound. If this is correct, watch for sudden windstorms to occur. Also watch for huge and spectacular Aurora's which may come down to 35 degree's latitude. Keep an eye on the Kp index and GOES for spikes in geomagnetic flux. http://www.maj.com/sun/noaa.html

Now, lets consider the size of this comet. I had to take a double look when I located the diameter of comet "C/2002 V". It is approximately 176,000 miles across. This is twice the size of Jupiter. Twenty two times the size of Earth. Remember, the size of the last known "planet buster" asteroid 65 million years ago was about 6 miles in diameter. Any celestial orb 1 kilometer or (.6 miles) is considered a great danger to Earth. This would mean even a small particle at the tail of this comet could be devastating.

I do not believe there is any danger of a near miss, however, there is no doubt in my mind, a celestial orb of this size coming into our solar system will have an effect on ever planet. Just what that will be, no one in the science community really knows.

This story is only beginning to develop. I believe some of our astronomy colleagues will be coming forward with new information in the coming days. Hmm, nothing like a war to distract a person looking to the sky's. But perhaps this surge of energy we witnessed last Friday will continue. Perhaps an invasion of Iraq can be avoided, while at the same time safety of all counties can be secure. Again, only time will tell how this plays out.

A Reminder: There is still a few days left to take advantage of ECTV's 2 for 1 special. Until the end of February, you will receive 2 years for the price of 1. You won't regret gaining full access to the number one rated website in Earth Science and Space Weather. Join Today... http://www.earthchangestv.com/subscribe.htm

Survival Tips:  http://www.earthchangestv.com/survival/index.htm

Thought For The Day

There are four parts to the Dalai Lama’s practice. "First remember that we all want the same thing: to avoid suffering and find happiness. Second, begin each day with five minutes of "compassionate breathing": "Breathe in cherishing of the self; breathe out cherishing of others." Third, extend that compassion throughout the day. He said, "Everyone is my teacher." And finally, no matter what happens, stay in the practice. Be faithful to it even when you don’t see results. "Tell everyone you know about it."

                                                                                                                    Dalai Lama
 

Receive Your "Free" ECTV Newsletter: http://www.earthchangestv.com/newsletter.htm

Subscribe To ECTV 2 for 1 Special For Full Access: http://www.earthchangestv.com/subscribe.htm

Herbal Magnetic Therapies of America: 1 888 411-HEAL http://www.herbalmagnetic.com

Survey Pledge:  http://www.earthchangestv.com/donation.htm, or you can send by postal mail: Earth Changes TV, PO Box
53546, Albuquerque, NM 87153

ECTV Survey: http://www.earthchangestv.com/survey.htm
 

Mitch Battros
Producer - Earth Changes TV
http://www.earthchangestv.com


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 24/02/2003

at : "Sha" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: What about this Comet ?????? Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:46:40 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Another email that I also used my wrong subscription address guys .....
 

Why is the media silent?  Are they are afraid to create a panic ??

This Comet is 22 TIMES THE SIZE OF EARTH ... one would expect that fact alone would warrant media discussion !

.... please use your discretion and discernment and decide what you think

.... it may be important

.... maybe expect some earth changes - the weather is already extraordinary worldwide these last few days in particular, with an increase in earthquakes and volcanic activity as well as flooding - one needs to question whether or not  this is caused by the passby of the Comet ?

...... until further notice, we have no way of knowing what, if anything will effect us or where...

Given our knowledge that the SOHO images are being held back at the public - and also altered to reflect a different scenario than the actual facts : including tipping the images upside down to make it appear as the CME was facing away at Earth instead of the actuality of pointing towards Earth - scientists are puzzling to know just what this event may cause. (I have a composite picture I made of the 2 distinct differences : taken at 2003/02/18 and 2002/02/18 respectively 05:54 and 06:42- the attachments are too big to come through the list so please email me if you're interested and I'll send them to you.)  NOTE WELL THE DATES DISCREPANCY !! 

OBVIOUSLY NASA SLIPPED UP BADLY HERE AND ACCIDENTALLY TYPED 2002 INSTEAD OF 2003 WHEN THEY ALTERED THE IMAGES !!!!

One cannot also put aside the behaviour of the sun just prior to the Columbia disaster as well - remember the *Eye of Ra* on 31 January, with the incredible solar winds following that event (see photo).

(If you'd like to see the pics, please email at shambhala at cyberone.com.au and I'll send them to you.)

We shall see what we shall see !!!

With Love

Sha

»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.»§«,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.»§«

http://www.free-minds.org/comet_story.htm

DANGER COMET PHOTO/STORY UPDATE

THIS IS NOT A HOAX...THIS IS A WARNING FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE SENSE...


WE ARE  NOT TRYING TO  CREATE ANY UNDUE FEAR/APPREHENSION, BUT MERELY TO HAVE PEOPLE PREPARED BASED ON THE ALREADY ANNOUNCED GOVERNMENT PREPARATION STEPS MADE  PUBLIC ON FEBRUARY 19TH.


 
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 24/02/2003
at : "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Still drought? Not in SEQ Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 01:33:33 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All, Well, perhaps an unnecessary addendum to this thread. After an all time unbeatable record breaking January rainfall of 0.0mm at Mt. Crosby SEQ, February has been a total contrast with very few dry days and it is now the wettest month here since Feb 1999. My currunt total for the month is 290mm and it is still raining... Moreover the rain has been well spread out and the greening of the bush is nothing short of spectacular! It seems that the trees are trying to get 3 months of summer growing into 3 weeks. John. at a very soggy SEQ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:47:51 +0100 (CET) at : Robert Goler To: Aussie Weather Subject: Re: aus-wx: What about this Comet ?????? X-MIME-Autoconverted: at QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by europe.std.com id MAA08272 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > .... maybe expect some earth changes - the weather is already > extraordinary worldwide these last few days in particular, with an > increase in earthquakes and volcanic activity as well as flooding - one > needs to question whether or not this is caused by the passby of the > Comet ? WTF??? It may be flooding in Oz, but for the last 2 weeks the weather in Germany has been great. Clear skies, during the day, isolated fog patches at night. Daytime temperatures are now cracking into the positives, reaching +5°C today, and around -5 to -10°C at night.....the locals say it's typical weather for this time of year..... -- Robert A. Goler Meteorologisches Institut München Theresienstr. 37 D-80333 München Tel.: +49 89 2180 4387 Fax.: +49 89 2180 4182 http://www.meteo.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~robert/ -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: What about this Comet ?????? Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 06:39:03 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I find it hard to believe a comet (i.e the actual ice core) is that size
(unless you are counting its tail and corona etc in the size?)
I would go along more woth the moon being at periogee just after full moon,or something like that
Cheers
Brian
at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: a bit wet here Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 06:49:26 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That's scary :-) That's nearly more than I got in total for last year!! > Here in Petrie we had 24mm total rainfall for January and we are up to 282mm > for February (74mm falling yesterday). +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 07:04:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Is the comet going to visible to the naked eye here?
And where would you look too?
 
at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:17:24 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
you need to turn the photo upside down AND back to front to get the solar thing to point towards the comet....!??
Cheers
Brian
Subject: RE: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:33:28 +1300 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Thread-Index: AcLdE3Gv6wy+tbskRoGDZu3PWrDH2wAx289A at : "Pete McGhee" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2003 21:33:30.0103 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A1D6870:01C2DD15] X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id QAA10295 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At mag 3.7 the comet would be visible under dark skies except for the fact it is visually sitting right next to the sun Pete Geocentric Data Right Ascension (J2000):23h 1m 9.4s Declination (J2000):-26° 24' 36" Constellation:Piscis Austrinus Magnitude:3.7 Distance at Earth: 1.0963 AU Light time:547 seconds Heliocentric Data Distance at Sun:0.3522 AU Perihelion:0.0993 AU (18-Feb-2003) Aphelion:19,866.30 AU Period:990,015.5 years Eccentricity:0.999990 Inclination to ecliptic:81.825° Longitude of ascending node:64.084° Argument of perihelion:152.151° -----Original Message----- at : Bussy [mailto:bussie at netc.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 09:05 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Is the comet going to visible to the naked eye here? And where would you look too? +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Not in SEQ Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:23:50 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Just for what it's worth, the media here are pretty convinced. Headline yesterday at NZ Herald: Flash floods herald end of 11 months of drought." Reference is to NSW and Victoria, elsewhere E and SE Australia. ----- Original Message ----- at : "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:33 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Still drought? Not in SEQ > Hi All, > > Well, perhaps an unnecessary addendum to this thread. After an all time > unbeatable record breaking January rainfall of 0.0mm at Mt. Crosby SEQ, > February has been a total contrast with very few dry days and it is now the > wettest month here since Feb 1999. My currunt total for the month is 290mm > and it is still raining... Moreover the rain has been well spread out and > the greening of the bush is nothing short of spectacular! It seems that the > trees are trying to get 3 months of summer growing into 3 weeks. > > John. > > at a very soggy SEQ > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/2003 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:06:51 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
there is no upside down in space
Ken
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1"

you need to turn the photo upside down AND back to front to get the solar thing to point towards the comet....!??
Cheers
Brian
at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:44:11 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Laugh . . .

 

Oh people, please tell me you don’t believe this.

 

This is a hoax. I’ve seen it about a dozen times already. But if you want to send off your e-mails to a strange address and get more spam, or spend money on a subscription to some web-site, or start stressing or  whatever. Fools and their money are soon parted.

 

The picture has not been turned upside down (not that it would make a difference). The solar wind “spirals” outwards at the sun, causing the tail to look like that. But I’m sure a scientific explanation would not interest you . . .

 

Don’t believe everything you hear on the internet . . . .

 

Sha, please stop spreading bullshit like this, some people might be dumb enough to believe it LOL.

 

Cheers

 

James

 

-----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring
Sent:
Wednesday, 26 February 2003 10:07 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1"

 

there is no upside down in space

Ken

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:17 AM

Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1"

 

you need to turn the photo upside down AND back to front to get the solar thing to point towards the comet....!??

Cheers
Brian

at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:20:23 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
It's not space that has been switched upside down or back to front Ken .... it is the SOHO image.
 
I am not even attempting to state what NASA have done to the images Brian ... but it is quite apparent that they have definitely tampered with them.  It seems that maybe they have mirrored it ... hence the upside down and back to front alteration ??  for what reason ... who knows ??

Love
Sha
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Ken Ring
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1"

there is no upside down in space
Ken
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1"

you need to turn the photo upside down AND back to front to get the solar thing to point towards the comet....!??
Cheers
Brian
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 24/02/2003
X-Originating-IP: [61.9.128.172] at : "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Comets, Government conspiracies, MIB's and Ancient Egyptian Gods Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:23:35 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2003 00:23:35.0819 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D3215B0:01C2DD2D] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I too am a little sceptical on the size of the thing. Surely if it's that big (2 times Jupiter), then it would have been picked up a long way out. Jupiter is a bloody big planet. With today's astronomy gear, something bigger than that would be hard to miss coming into our solar system. If it's all true, and there has been a cover up, isn't it funny there's a nice little dispute going on in the Middle East to avert people's eyes! Just a funny note, in the second CME in this animated shot at SOHO: http://science.nasa.gov/spaceweather/swpod2003/21feb03/soho1.gif Any one notice the eye shape in the ejected particles (on the 18th, time 0654-0854)? Maybe it's Ra's eye! "You've been bad little humans, and now I'm coming to get you!" Stay cool peoples! Liam _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Subject: RE: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:50:33 +1300 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Thread-Index: AcLdMJwdvsNv2YPoTgqYh6llH7B7sgAyH1cA at : "Pete McGhee" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2003 00:50:35.0377 (UTC) FILETIME=[12870610:01C2DD31] X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id TAA19372 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com ....Probably the same reason the photos are printed back-to-front in the newspapers and magazines. With no obvious reference to up/down/left or right it would be an easy mistake to make with a large round object such as the sun. Pete -----Original Message----- at : Sha [mailto:bilby at cyberone.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 13:20 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" It's not space that has been switched upside down or back to front Ken .... it is the SOHO image. I am not even attempting to state what NASA have done to the images Brian ... but it is quite apparent that they have definitely tampered with them. It seems that maybe they have mirrored it ... hence the upside down and back to front alteration ?? for what reason ... who knows ?? Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : Ken Ring To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:06 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" there is no upside down in space Ken ----- Original Message ----- at : Brian Hamilton To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:17 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" you need to turn the photo upside down AND back to front to get the solar thing to point towards the comet....!?? Cheers Brian --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 24/02/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: s355334 at student.uq.edu.au (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:09:51 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Leslie Muir Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com This is the funniest rubbish i have had in my inbox in a while. The gravitational effects of a comet twice the size of jupiter would be nothing less than tremendous, and getting something that size to move as fast as this "comet" is would be well beyond my imagination. Why do people continue to believe such nonsense, do they have this great desire to believe that the government is covering up everything. Ohh, and how does a comet create Aurora's?? Les At 10:42 PM 25/02/2003, you wrote: >I actually sent this through yesterday, but used my wrong email address ... > > >Some of you guys my not think this fits the weather .... I actually do >think it does, so am taking the liberty of sending it along. > >To my way of thinking, we have already commenced receiving the >repercussions of the CME - one only has to noite the recent emails >regarding the massive rain and storms that have suddenly hit ! > >Love >Sha > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Subject: aus-wx: TDU 2003/04 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:37:50 +1300 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: aus-wx: Comets, Government conspiracies,MIB's and Ancient Egyptian Gods Thread-Index: AcLdMJmc2q4roTKNSOCNisVFplc/hwAxaZuw at : "Pete McGhee" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2003 01:38:04.0161 (UTC) FILETIME=[B488F710:01C2DD37] X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id UAA29927 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Enough about comets etc. "..And now for something completely different" :) Is this "Thunder Down Under" lark a definite annual event? i.e. Some semblance of organisation or is it an informal "get in the cars and go" ? Having recently compared Jimmys photo's with my shots of NZ Cbs, I'm now looking at travelling over to do a bit of proper chasing at the end of this year/start of 2004. I was wondering the best way to hook up with anyone who would have a reasonable batting average for catching up with nice cells(rotation would be good! :) and is likely to be participating in TDU. I am currently working on NSW as state of choice at the moment, that is, unless anyone can give a better target zone for finding one of these supercell things? Cheers Pete (Currently building my own Doppler out of cardboard and licorice - Doesn't quite work as expected though, I think the crickets keep eating the circuitry) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay Organization: Davsoft To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:27:45 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-106.8, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, NOSPAM_INC, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_02_03, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id VAA14214 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:20 am, Sha proclaimed: > It's not space that has been switched upside down or back to front Ken .... > it is the SOHO image. > > I am not even attempting to state what NASA have done to the images Brian > ... but it is quite apparent that they have definitely tampered with them. > It seems that maybe they have mirrored it ... hence the upside down and > back to front alteration ?? for what reason ... who knows ?? May I just ask if there's a reason why this needs to be sent in Arial 16 Bold Italics? It's hard to read on certain monitors, and there seems to be no justification in this message for the extra bandwidth used. It'd recommend using standard text rather than HTML mail, it's more standards compliant and may be easier to read for people who may suffer at vision problems. Thanks, David - -- It's not that engineers are boring people, we just get excited about boring things. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+XCYhZOfFgbBAbXARAgmzAJ9l8l+U1tLu+pkD7EpHSZ9yPxqaYwCbBIZt WXmenORUFQdbCVNncpfgIqM= =+gqx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:19:10 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Relative sizes..if the sun is the size of a medicine ball then Jupiter is a grapefruit, Earth is a peppercorn and the moon is a pinhead an inch away. And this thing is twice the size of Jupiter?? To hit Earth the thing has to really fine-focus its steering to even locate us. Using a large coconut, try to hit a peppercorn that is over thirty metres away.. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Leslie Muir" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:09 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" > > This is the funniest rubbish i have had in my inbox in a while. > The gravitational effects of a comet twice the size of jupiter would be > nothing less than tremendous, and getting something that size to move as > fast as this "comet" is would be well beyond my imagination. > > Why do people continue to believe such nonsense, do they have this great > desire to believe that the government is covering up everything. > > Ohh, and how does a comet create Aurora's?? > > Les > > > At 10:42 PM 25/02/2003, you wrote: > >I actually sent this through yesterday, but used my wrong email address ... > > > > > >Some of you guys my not think this fits the weather .... I actually do > >think it does, so am taking the liberty of sending it along. > > > >To my way of thinking, we have already commenced receiving the > >repercussions of the CME - one only has to noite the recent emails > >regarding the massive rain and storms that have suddenly hit ! > > > >Love > >Sha > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:45:35 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 11:09 AM 26/02/2003 +1000, you wrote: >This is the funniest rubbish i have had in my inbox in a while. >The gravitational effects of a comet twice the size of jupiter would be >nothing less than tremendous, and getting something that size to move as >fast as this "comet" is would be well beyond my imagination. Well, at that close to the Sun, I'm sure it'd screw up the Earth's orbit somewhat as it came and went. Certainly would take a bit of the nice "circularity" out of our orbit... 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.169.8] at : "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:01:10 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2003 05:01:10.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[1466ADA0:01C2DD54] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Actually...I'd recommend that tripe like this 22 times the size of Earth comet b/s be sent to a different list altogether... There's gotta be a million conspiracy-theory lists you could subscribe to Sha, unless the governments of the world have shut them all down! (Which would show a staggeringly impressive unanimity of purpose not heretofore demonstrated!!!) The quality of "weather" posts on this list has deteriorated to the point of farce (barring the odd relevant one of course). If you feel slighted perhaps you should - if not...pax. Cheers, Kevin at Wycheproof. > at : David Findlay >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" >Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:27:45 +1000 > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:20 am, Sha proclaimed: > > It's not space that has been switched upside down or back to front Ken >.... > > it is the SOHO image. > > > > I am not even attempting to state what NASA have done to the images >Brian > > ... but it is quite apparent that they have definitely tampered with >them. > > It seems that maybe they have mirrored it ... hence the upside down and > > back to front alteration ?? for what reason ... who knows ?? > >May I just ask if there's a reason why this needs to be sent in Arial 16 >Bold >Italics? It's hard to read on certain monitors, and there seems to be no >justification in this message for the extra bandwidth used. It'd recommend >using standard text rather than HTML mail, it's more standards compliant >and >may be easier to read for people who may suffer at vision problems. >Thanks, > >David > > >- -- >It's not that engineers are boring people, we just get excited about boring >things. >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQE+XCYhZOfFgbBAbXARAgmzAJ9l8l+U1tLu+pkD7EpHSZ9yPxqaYwCbBIZt >WXmenORUFQdbCVNncpfgIqM= >=+gqx >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Still drought? Not in SEQ Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:50:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Pity it never fell here! Stuck on 8mm for the year so far :-( (NE Victoria) > Just for what it's worth, the media here are pretty convinced. Headline > yesterday at NZ Herald: Flash floods herald end of 11 months of drought." > Reference is to NSW and Victoria, elsewhere E and SE Australia. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: OT: 'read reciepts' + Cb's. Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:03:43 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 00000000BDDB6A37B2C20A47AABD1418CA2AB6ECE43B2600 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Firstly, someone on this list asked a very good question. As many of you may have noticed I request a "read" receipt when I post on this list. This is deliberate- but not because of this list. Below is the e-mail I sent to the person who asked the question of whether this was deliberate. Yes I do it deliberately, but it is a very good question. Quite often, I need to know when an e-mail is read for legal and other purposes, so by default I request a "read" receipt. However, I never automatically send a receipt, as if a spam message requests a receipt, then by replying, you are confirming that your e-mail address is valid. So yes, it is deliberate, but unless you know the person needs a receipt, do not say "yes" and check "do not ask me this question again", just check yes or no as you wish. There is no harm in saying "NO" and check "do not ask me this question again". Good Question! Secondly, Some wicked Cb's in central and NE Vic. at the moment! Unfortunately they are not quite Cb's at Sub Zero :-) LOL! WZ people may know what I mean:-) Cheers James James Holbeach ------------------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham http://www.trapdoor.com.au Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 ------------------------------------------- Attachment Converted: "c:\program files\eudora\attach\winmail.dat" X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:12:15 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Kevin, You are so correct, let's get back to the weather - there is so much to learn and know about the weather. The owners of this list are too lacks on warning privately until it has exploded to the stage that people leave. Anyone want to talk about unrelated weather stuff, please move elsewhere. It get's really annoying reading the same crap posts over and over again when it is unrelated. Weather related - quite humid and quiet at the moment. Bored and looking for some good reading, how about looking at this link which I have included on our site: http://www.bangladeshtornadoes.org/ 9000 CAPE wow!!!! Jimmy Deguara At 04:01 PM 26/2/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Actually...I'd recommend that tripe like this 22 times the size of Earth >comet b/s be sent to a different list altogether... > >There's gotta be a million conspiracy-theory lists you could subscribe to >Sha, unless the governments of the world have shut them all down! > >(Which would show a staggeringly impressive unanimity of purpose not >heretofore demonstrated!!!) > >The quality of "weather" posts on this list has deteriorated to the point >of farce (barring the odd relevant one of course). If you feel slighted >perhaps you should - if not...pax. > >Cheers, >Kevin at Wycheproof. > > > > > >> at : David Findlay >>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Something's Up With Comet "C/2002 V1" >>Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:27:45 +1000 >> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:20 am, Sha proclaimed: >> > It's not space that has been switched upside down or back to front Ken >> .... >> > it is the SOHO image. >> > >> > I am not even attempting to state what NASA have done to the images Brian >> > ... but it is quite apparent that they have definitely tampered with them. >> > It seems that maybe they have mirrored it ... hence the upside down and >> > back to front alteration ?? for what reason ... who knows ?? >> >>May I just ask if there's a reason why this needs to be sent in Arial 16 Bold >>Italics? It's hard to read on certain monitors, and there seems to be no >>justification in this message for the extra bandwidth used. It'd recommend >>using standard text rather than HTML mail, it's more standards compliant and >>may be easier to read for people who may suffer at vision problems. Thanks, >> >>David >> >> >>- -- >>It's not that engineers are boring people, we just get excited about boring >>things. >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) >> >>iD8DBQE+XCYhZOfFgbBAbXARAgmzAJ9l8l+U1tLu+pkD7EpHSZ9yPxqaYwCbBIZt >>WXmenORUFQdbCVNncpfgIqM= >>=+gqx >>-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > >_________________________________________________________________ >MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to >http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: 192.168.15.1:vk3jed-1 at 127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:19:50 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: OT: 'read reciepts' + Cb's. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 07:03 PM 26/02/2003 +1100, you wrote: >Secondly, Some wicked Cb's in central and NE Vic. at the moment! >Unfortunately they are not quite Cb's at Sub Zero :-) LOL! Cool. :-) I was watching some convection to the NE of Melbourne this afternoon. Unfortunately, the air at the upper levels seemed to be a bit dry to keep it going, because as the clouds billowed upwards (at a great rate, I might add), the tops then just evaporated away. :-( 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: TDU 2003/04 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:29:44 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Pete it is as you suspected a rather disorganised event, and that is purposeful. Could you imagine trying to get agreement in a group of 15 to 20 storm chasers on where to chase, we are all adults and have different opinions, with none wrong either. The thunder downunder was probably as close to organisation as it will ever get back in 2000. Th tradition now is more around the time of year, rather than an event as such. Having said that I am sure you will find some chasers to team up with. With two small children I am off the scene for a couple of years. Michael ----- Original Message ----- at : "Pete McGhee" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:37 PM Subject: aus-wx: TDU 2003/04 > Enough about comets etc. > > "..And now for something completely different" :) > > Is this "Thunder Down Under" lark a definite annual event? i.e. Some > semblance of organisation or is it an informal "get in the cars and go" > ? > > Having recently compared Jimmys photo's with my shots of NZ Cbs, I'm > now looking at travelling over to do a bit of proper chasing at the end > of this year/start of 2004. I was wondering the best way to hook up with > anyone who would have a reasonable batting average for catching up with > nice cells(rotation would be good! :) and is likely to be participating > in TDU. > > I am currently working on NSW as state of choice at the moment, that > is, unless anyone can give a better target zone for finding one of these > supercell things? > > Cheers > Pete > (Currently building my own Doppler out of cardboard and licorice - > Doesn't quite work as expected though, I think the crickets keep eating > the circuitry) > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.118.152] at : "Catherine" To: Subject: aus-wx: RE:Comet Crap Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 18:52:16 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2003 07:52:19.0586 (UTC) FILETIME=[FD02E620:01C2DD6B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, I don't message often if at all because I very obviously don't have the same level of knowledge as others on this list and also because I like listening to your posts. You have all taught me so much just at my listening. I don't have the knowledge to say definitely that this comet has wreaked havoc on earths' atmosphere and climate however no-one appears to have any knowledge to prove otherwise, it is simply an interesting piece on information that may or may not be true, and Sha did say in her post that "Some of you guys my not think this fits the weather .... I actually do think it does, so am taking the liberty of sending it along". However, having said this I don't think it was relevant for this list nor do I think that it should have turned into a discussion. As is done with a lot of posts why not simply email the person privately or just ignore it. (Hell it gets done to a lot of posts) and I also agree with David - Sha the constant use of your desired font is really quite irritating to read and I am 20-20. Please don't hate me for defending Sha I simply wanted to say that slamming her for her post is a bit harsh in a public forum and the old adage - if you cant say anything nice don't say anything at all' (something I had forgotten btw) Ok sorry about that Catherine +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Re: Cb's. Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:41:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com You're right about the wicked Cb's!!! Macca & I were on opposite sides of one of them tonight & we got some brilliant shots!!! Put them up later... Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- Secondly, Some wicked Cb's in central and NE Vic. at the moment! Unfortunately they are not quite Cb's at Sub Zero :-) LOL! WZ people may know what I mean:-) Cheers James James Holbeach ------------------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham http://www.trapdoor.com.au Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 ------------------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:16:24 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com As there are a number of sceptics here, many of whom are very ill mannered, I suggest they quickly hit the delete button - but for any others who may have an interest in this event, that MUST have an impact on the weather - you may be interested to know that this Comet NEAT will soon begin a long journey back out into the fringes of the solar system. While Earth orbits the Sun every year, comet NEAT requires about 37,000 years to make a single, elongated loop. In other words ... it will be a damn long time before you guys see anything like this again !! Just to keep this email *legitimate* ... as per the precedence set by others here ... the weather here in SE Qld has had nothing but lots of rain and a fair bit of wind this last week. I guess in adding that snippet, I am keeping things interesting :) ........ sorry to be so snide. Here is a URL that some may find interesting reading : http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/neat_soho_030218.html Love Sha "The SOHO spacecraft is currently generating spectacular images of a recently found comet called NEAT as the icy body circles the Sun and appears to have been struck by a massive solar eruption. The chance encounter could lead to new discoveries about the interactions of comets with hot, charged particles billowing at the Sun. NEAT is putting on what may turn out to be the most remarkable comet show ever witnessed by SOHO, which has photographed more than 500 comets rounding the Sun. "It is far the brightest and largest comet seen," Paal Brekke, SOHO deputy project scientist, told SPACE.com" .... remainder of article at URL quoted. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 25/02/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 01:39:35 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sha, Sha, Sha . . . . Yes it is a spectacular comet . . . . and yes you do make me laugh. Very, very hard. LOL, can I have some of what u are smoking! Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is 22 times the size of the earth? A await your humorous response with baited breath. James p.s. are there any people on this list who are not interested in flamboyant pseudo-science theories like those of Sha and kens? Or am I the only person interested in stuff which can be actually justified by facts, not emotional, unfounded bullshit? p.p.s no this is not weather related, it is more suited to a discussion list on, I don't know- perhaps astrology, or water divining? But it is providing me with much amusement! LOL -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Sha Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 1:16 AM To: Aussie Weather Subject: aus-wx: Weather or not ? As there are a number of sceptics here, many of whom are very ill mannered, I suggest they quickly hit the delete button - but for any others who may have an interest in this event, that MUST have an impact on the weather - you may be interested to know that this Comet NEAT will soon begin a long journey back out into the fringes of the solar system. While Earth orbits the Sun every year, comet NEAT requires about 37,000 years to make a single, elongated loop. In other words ... it will be a damn long time before you guys see anything like this again !! Just to keep this email *legitimate* ... as per the precedence set by others here ... the weather here in SE Qld has had nothing but lots of rain and a fair bit of wind this last week. I guess in adding that snippet, I am keeping things interesting :) ........ sorry to be so snide. Here is a URL that some may find interesting reading : http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/neat_soho_030218.html Love Sha "The SOHO spacecraft is currently generating spectacular images of a recently found comet called NEAT as the icy body circles the Sun and appears to have been struck by a massive solar eruption. The chance encounter could lead to new discoveries about the interactions of comets with hot, charged particles billowing at the Sun. NEAT is putting on what may turn out to be the most remarkable comet show ever witnessed by SOHO, which has photographed more than 500 comets rounding the Sun. "It is far the brightest and largest comet seen," Paal Brekke, SOHO deputy project scientist, told SPACE.com" .... remainder of article at URL quoted. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 25/02/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:58:15 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com You disappoint me James ... I actually held a high respect for you during the fires that threatened Hotham. It is sad that you need to be so bad mannered and selfish in your interests. In answer to your question : "Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is 22 times the size of the earth? A await your humorous response with baited breath. " I read it mate !! Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:39 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Sha, Sha, Sha . . . . Yes it is a spectacular comet . . . . and yes you do make me laugh. Very, very hard. LOL, can I have some of what u are smoking! Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is 22 times the size of the earth? A await your humorous response with baited breath. James p.s. are there any people on this list who are not interested in flamboyant pseudo-science theories like those of Sha and kens? Or am I the only person interested in stuff which can be actually justified by facts, not emotional, unfounded bullshit? p.p.s no this is not weather related, it is more suited to a discussion list on, I don't know- perhaps astrology, or water divining? But it is providing me with much amusement! LOL --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 25/02/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [61.9.128.172] at : "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: The comet "hoax" (last post on comets!!!!) Back to weather!!! Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:06:57 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2003 15:06:57.0796 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4D5F440:01C2DDA8] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. I thought I'd just post one last email on the topic, just to clear up some loose ends. Did some esearch on the "comet" (C/2002 V1 NEAT). There are NO references to it being 22 times the size of earth, or that it's heading on a collision course with earth or any other crap like that. The only thing unusual about it, is it has a 37,000 year orbit path, is one of the brightest comets seen for a while (they did think at one stage it may be visible during the day, but I think that has now passed without that happening). It is a large comet, yes, but not the biggest ever seen (and CERTAINLY not anywhere near double the size of jupiter!!!!!) It is currently headed for the sun, and has just passed out of view of the SOHO satelite's cameras. It crossed earth's orbit earlier this year, and once round the sun, will head back out into the far reaches of the solar system (not sure if it will make another pass by earth, and be visible again). I have no idea where this alarmist rubbish about it's size and possible close call to earth came at . If an object twice the size of jupiter were to enter the solar system (that would make it second in size only to the sun!), it's gravitational pull would be so great as to shift planets in their orbits, and basically screw up the entire solar system's balance. That means BIG trouble! Also, just about everyone on earth would know about it too! Anyway keep it real! Let's hear about some tornadoes! Liam _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:10:55 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com In answer to your question : "Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is 22 times the size of the earth? A await your humorous response with baited breath. " I read it mate !! I first read it was 2 times the size of Pluto not 22 times the size of the Earth... ----- Original Message ----- at : "Sha" To: Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:58 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? > You disappoint me James ... I actually held a high respect for you during > the fires that threatened Hotham. It is sad that you need to be so bad > mannered and selfish in your interests. > > In answer to your question : > "Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is > 22 times the size of the earth? > > A await your humorous response with baited breath. " > > I read it mate !! > > Love > Sha > > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "James Holbeach" > To: > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:39 AM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather or not ? > > > Sha, Sha, Sha . . . . > > Yes it is a spectacular comet . . . . and yes you do make me laugh. > > Very, very hard. > > LOL, can I have some of what u are smoking! > > Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is > 22 times the size of the earth? > > A await your humorous response with baited breath. > > James > > p.s. are there any people on this list who are not interested in > flamboyant pseudo-science theories like those of Sha and kens? Or am I > the only person interested in stuff which can be actually justified by > facts, not emotional, unfounded bullshit? > p.p.s no this is not weather related, it is more suited to a discussion > list on, I don't know- perhaps astrology, or water divining? But it is > providing me with much amusement! LOL > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 25/02/2003 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:27:18 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com During the fires, people believed me because I posted facts, referenced. Not fancy/fiction. Where did u read it? I guess what I don't like, is to see this list degenerate into unsubstantiated "theories", "conspiracies", and pseudo science. I'll give you an example. Ken Ring: Tropical cyclones and Tornados form mainly during the full moon. Scientific analysis: Not true. Ken Ring: nothing, no response- no admission of being wrong on this keystone of his theories . . . . yet his theories/prediction/money-making schemes, still propagate this list? Why? Because people like him thrive on others ignorance, and willingness to accept things posted as "facts" blindly, and without question. Notice there have been no posts when he has been wrong? Why? Because people do not care. People at non-science backgrounds want to believe that outlandish theories are right, whether based in fact or fantasy. Why? Because they make immediate sense. Example: a strange looking picture at SOHO = image must have been tampered with. The truth is far more complex, but people do not want to hear that- bullshit is so much more interesting! I fear you are falling into the same trap. This is a weather list, and as such is a SCIENTIFIC discussion. If you post to this list you MUST be able to back up your claims with proof, not hearsay. You must also be welcome to criticism, scrutiny, and willing to admit when you are wrong. That is what is amusing me, not you personally. Anyway- enough on that . . . Liam, I agree . . . lets leave this list open to a scientific discussion about the weather, not Smiles Peace love an mungbeans peoples :) James James Holbeach ------------------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham http://www.trapdoor.com.au Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 ------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Sha Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 1:58 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? You disappoint me James ... I actually held a high respect for you during the fires that threatened Hotham. It is sad that you need to be so bad mannered and selfish in your interests. In answer to your question : "Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is 22 times the size of the earth? A await your humorous response with baited breath. " I read it mate !! Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:39 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Sha, Sha, Sha . . . . Yes it is a spectacular comet . . . . and yes you do make me laugh. Very, very hard. LOL, can I have some of what u are smoking! Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is 22 times the size of the earth? A await your humorous response with baited breath. James p.s. are there any people on this list who are not interested in flamboyant pseudo-science theories like those of Sha and kens? Or am I the only person interested in stuff which can be actually justified by facts, not emotional, unfounded bullshit? p.p.s no this is not weather related, it is more suited to a discussion list on, I don't know- perhaps astrology, or water divining? But it is providing me with much amusement! LOL --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 25/02/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:27:59 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ok James ... you and others keep saying to stop the discussion, but at the same time make criticism for a lack of or incorrect facts. I shall make this short as I am going to bed very late ..... Now, I didn't say the comet was on a crash course to Earth .... I spoke of its proximity to the sun and the CME that erupted ... probably towards earth and maybe hitting the comet. As to the size ... I cannot find the page on which I saw the original measurement of 22 times Earth. But, here is something else that may sort out your desperate need for factual information : With the average notified size of the Comet Neat coma being 6 - 12 arcmins diameter and Jupiter being noted as usually displaying a diameter near 0.8 arcmin, that makes the Comet Neat coma 7.5 to 15 times the size of Jupiter ... then the tail needs to be added on as well, which is at least that again. See URL details below for confirmation. If you look at the SOHO images, it can be seen that the comet is not just a flyspeck. http://cometography.com/defmeasure.html "What is a degree? This measure is based on the fact that a circle is composed of 360 degrees. at the perspective of an observer on Earth the sky above us is a sphere with a circumference of 360 degrees. At any one time 180 degrees of sky are visible above your horizon. Such high numbers are usually only used to measure the tails of bright, naked-eye comets. The moon and the sun make nice measuring sticks as each is very close to one-half degree in diameter. Among deep-sky objects, the Andromeda Galaxy is about 2.5 degrees long. What is an arcmin? This measure technically represents 1/60 of a degree. For comets it is typically used to measure the diameter of the coma and the length of comet tails. When at its brightest, Jupiter usually displays a diameter near 0.8 arcmin. Among popular deep sky objects, the Ring Nebula (M57) has a diameter of just over 1 arcmin and the Dumb-bell nebula in Vulpecula is about 8 arcmin long and 5 arcmin wide. What is an arcsec? Technically it is 1/3600 of a degree and 1/60 of an arcmin. It is typically used to measure the diameter of the nuclear condensation within a comet, as well as the coma and tail of very distant comets. Planets represent other astronomical objects whose diameters are given in arcsec. As noted under arcmin, Jupiter usually attains a diameter of 45 to 50 arcsec when closest to Earth. On the smaller side, Uranus typically reaches a diameter of 3 arcsec each year, while Neptune is normally around 2 arcsec." http://cometography.com/lcomets/2002v1.html "S. H. Pravdo (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) announced that the 1.2-m Schmidt telescope at Haleakala had found a comet on 2002 November 6.60 in the course of the Near Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT) program. It exhibited a tail extending 10 arcsec toward PA 225°. With additional images on November 6.61 and November 6.62, the magnitude was estimated as between 17.1 and 17.5. The comet was confirmed by M. Blasco and S. Sanchez (Mallorca) on November 6.83 using the 0.40-m Schmidt telescope. They noted the coma was 15 arcsec across. On January 1 and 2, most observers reported magnitudes ranging at 7.6 to 8.6 and coma diameter estimates ranging at 6 to 12 arcmin. On the 14th and 15th, most observers reported magnitudes ranging at 6.8 to 7.5 and coma diameter estimates ranging at 5 to 12 arcmin. Occasional reports of a tail were received throughout this period. " Here is another reference : This site shows images that make it apparent that pieces of the comet have broken away :http://www.astrored.net/cometas/ Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- at : "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:27 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather or not ? During the fires, people believed me because I posted facts, referenced. Not fancy/fiction. Where did u read it? I guess what I don't like, is to see this list degenerate into unsubstantiated "theories", "conspiracies", and pseudo science. I'll give you an example. Ken Ring: Tropical cyclones and Tornados form mainly during the full moon. Scientific analysis: Not true. Ken Ring: nothing, no response- no admission of being wrong on this keystone of his theories . . . . yet his theories/prediction/money-making schemes, still propagate this list? Why? Because people like him thrive on others ignorance, and willingness to accept things posted as "facts" blindly, and without question. Notice there have been no posts when he has been wrong? Why? Because people do not care. People at non-science backgrounds want to believe that outlandish theories are right, whether based in fact or fantasy. Why? Because they make immediate sense. Example: a strange looking picture at SOHO = image must have been tampered with. The truth is far more complex, but people do not want to hear that- bullshit is so much more interesting! I fear you are falling into the same trap. This is a weather list, and as such is a SCIENTIFIC discussion. If you post to this list you MUST be able to back up your claims with proof, not hearsay. You must also be welcome to criticism, scrutiny, and willing to admit when you are wrong. That is what is amusing me, not you personally. Anyway- enough on that . . . Liam, I agree . . . lets leave this list open to a scientific discussion about the weather, not Smiles Peace love an mungbeans peoples :) James --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 25/02/2003 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 06:22:54 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I thought that was the case, the size includes all the viisble part, tail, etc. What is the actual size of the ice core? (which would create the gravitatioanl pull, not the streaming ice particles) Cheers Brian +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: aus-wx: Re: tc and moon pahses Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:37:18 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi There was some research done on the freq of TC formation for each of the 4 moon phases by someone here in NZ. I am sure someone on this list can enlighten us on the discovery. Cheers Brian +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:09:51 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com James, I have never said, nor do I believe that Tropical cyclones and Tornados form mainly during the full moon. What I said was that these occur mainly at the full moon to the last quarter. If you misquote someone and then comment on your own misquote there can be little valuable discussion. Money-making schemes? You have the wrong guy. I give most of my stuff away. I don't recall insulting you with untruths. Please keep my name away at your poisonous pen. As for alternative theories, ever hear of live and let live? Ken Ring www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- at : "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:27 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather or not ? > During the fires, people believed me because I posted facts, referenced. > Not fancy/fiction. Where did u read it? > > I guess what I don't like, is to see this list degenerate into > unsubstantiated "theories", "conspiracies", and pseudo science. > > I'll give you an example. > Ken Ring: Tropical cyclones and Tornados form mainly during the full > moon. > Scientific analysis: Not true. > Ken Ring: nothing, no response- no admission of being wrong on this > keystone of his theories . . . . yet his > theories/prediction/money-making schemes, still propagate this list? > > Why? Because people like him thrive on others ignorance, and willingness > to accept things posted as "facts" blindly, and without question. > > Notice there have been no posts when he has been wrong? Why? Because > people do not care. People at non-science backgrounds want to believe > that outlandish theories are right, whether based in fact or fantasy. > Why? Because they make immediate sense. Example: a strange looking > picture at SOHO = image must have been tampered with. The truth is far > more complex, but people do not want to hear that- bullshit is so much > more interesting! > > I fear you are falling into the same trap. > > This is a weather list, and as such is a SCIENTIFIC discussion. If you > post to this list you MUST be able to back up your claims with proof, > not hearsay. > > You must also be welcome to criticism, scrutiny, and willing to admit > when you are wrong. > > That is what is amusing me, not you personally. > > Anyway- enough on that . . . Liam, I agree . . . lets leave this list > open to a scientific discussion about the weather, not > > Smiles > Peace love an mungbeans peoples :) > > James > > James Holbeach > ------------------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 > ------------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Sha > Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 1:58 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? > > You disappoint me James ... I actually held a high respect for you > during > the fires that threatened Hotham. It is sad that you need to be so bad > mannered and selfish in your interests. > > In answer to your question : > "Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is > 22 times the size of the earth? > > A await your humorous response with baited breath. " > > I read it mate !! > > Love > Sha > > > ----- Original Message ----- > at : "James Holbeach" > To: > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:39 AM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather or not ? > > > Sha, Sha, Sha . . . . > > Yes it is a spectacular comet . . . . and yes you do make me laugh. > > Very, very hard. > > LOL, can I have some of what u are smoking! > > Just one point (cause I have to ask). . . how do you know this comet is > 22 times the size of the earth? > > A await your humorous response with baited breath. > > James > > p.s. are there any people on this list who are not interested in > flamboyant pseudo-science theories like those of Sha and kens? Or am I > the only person interested in stuff which can be actually justified by > facts, not emotional, unfounded bullshit? > p.p.s no this is not weather related, it is more suited to a discussion > list on, I don't know- perhaps astrology, or water divining? But it is > providing me with much amusement! LOL > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.458 / Virus Database: 257 - Release Date: 25/02/2003 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay Organization: Davsoft To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OT: 'read reciepts' + Cb's. Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:25:03 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin () X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id UAA20538 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > So yes, it is deliberate, but unless you know the person needs a receipt, > do not say "yes" and check "do not ask me this question again", just check > yes or no as you wish. There is no harm in saying "NO" and check "do not > ask me this question again". Heh. Didn't notice. My mail program automatically detects them as a risk to my security and ignores it. :-) David - -- It's not that engineers are boring people, we just get excited about boring things. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+XT7EZOfFgbBAbXARAmb5AJ4mBx92BSAvqieyOuGI4vFk6Kvw0QCfXzUl URaVxdnZMVdcvE21jD4He+I= =pMDu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: APOD: anticrepuscular rays Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:05:06 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Todays Astronomy picture of the day (http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html) shows a great photograph of anticrepuscular rays which have been discussed on this list before. A good link describing them (and their difference to their more popular " crepuscular" counterparts can be found here. http://www.sundog.clara.co.uk/atoptics/anti1.htm ) Small version: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0302/antihorse_peterson.jpg Explanation: What's happening over the horizon? Although the scene may appear somehow supernatural, nothing more unusual is occurring than a setting Sun and some well placed clouds. Pictured above are anticrepuscular rays. To understand them, start by picturing common crepuscular rays that are seen any time that sunlight pours though scattered clouds. Now although sunlight indeed travels along straight lines, the projections of these lines onto the spherical sky are great circles. Therefore, the crepuscular rays at a setting (or rising) sun will appear to re-converge on the other side of the sky. At the anti-solar point 180 degrees around at the Sun, they are referred to as anticrepuscular rays. While enjoying the sunset after dinner near Horseshoe Canyon in Utah, the photographer chanced to find that an even more spectacular sight was occurring in the other direction just over the canyon -- a particularly vivid set of anticrepuscular rays. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0302/antihorse_peterson_big.jpg James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay Organization: Davsoft To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:40:47 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-106.6, required 5, AWL, BALANCE_FOR_LONG, IN_REP_TO, NOSPAM_INC, PGP_SIGNATURE, PORN_10, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK, USER_AGENT, USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_NOT_PRESENT) X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id UAA27631 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:16 am, Sha proclaimed: > As there are a number of sceptics here, many of whom are very ill mannered, > I suggest they quickly hit the delete button - but for any others who may > have an interest in this event, that MUST have an impact on the weather - > you may be interested to know that this Comet NEAT will soon begin a long > journey back out into the fringes of the solar system. While Earth orbits > the Sun every year, comet NEAT requires about 37,000 years to make a > single, elongated loop. In other words ... it will be a damn long time > before you guys see anything like this again !! Well there will be many other comets no doubt. About 30 that we know of pass periapsis of the sun each year. However if you do the math you'd see that even on a closest approach in the last 100 years, the planet Jupiter has more gravitational effect on us than the comet(which I must state is still a tiny effect). > "The SOHO spacecraft is currently generating spectacular images of a > recently found comet called NEAT as the icy body circles the Sun and > appears to have been struck by a massive solar eruption. The chance > encounter could lead to new discoveries about the interactions of comets > with hot, charged particles billowing at the Sun. There are effects on the upper atmosphere of solar activity. However due to the chaotic nature of weather it is hard to definatelivy say that X caused Y. Studies of thousands of occurances would have to be undertaken to determine a link. Thanks, David - -- It's not that engineers are boring people, we just get excited about boring things. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+XWyfZOfFgbBAbXARAnGaAJ0fY9LG6KrItseDkh2lNR12RKGsqACeJZwp I0BmXxX4q3TCqxwQQLScI3k= =zc5V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay Organization: Davsoft To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:43:56 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin () X-MIME-Autoconverted: at quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id UAA27049 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:22 am, Brian Hamilton proclaimed: > I thought that was the case, the size includes all the viisble part, tail, > etc. > What is the actual size of the ice core? (which would create the > gravitatioanl pull, not the streaming ice particles) While the coma can be larger than the earth(but usually isn't) and tail can be as well, the actual nucleus of the comet is usually under 250km in diameter IIRC. Thanks, David - -- It's not that engineers are boring people, we just get excited about boring things. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+XW1cZOfFgbBAbXARAm36AJ4mNKeb7pEy+tMWLnAG9V6OeNYhyACfaWb3 tyz9QO7hb5YfddjXYnVkbfY= =Lu8Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : David Findlay Organization: Davsoft To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:44:22 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin () Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:16 am, Sha proclaimed: > As there are a number of sceptics here, many of whom are very ill mannered, > I suggest they quickly hit the delete button - but for any others who may > have an interest in this event, that MUST have an impact on the weather - > you may be interested to know that this Comet NEAT will soon begin a long > journey back out into the fringes of the solar system. While Earth orbits > the Sun every year, comet NEAT requires about 37,000 years to make a > single, elongated loop. In other words ... it will be a damn long time > before you guys see anything like this again !! Well there will be many other comets no doubt. About 30 that we know of pass periapsis of the sun each year. However if you do the math you'd see that even on a closest approach in the last 100 years, the planet Jupiter has more gravitational effect on us than the comet(which I must state is still a tiny effect). > "The SOHO spacecraft is currently generating spectacular images of a > recently found comet called NEAT as the icy body circles the Sun and > appears to have been struck by a massive solar eruption. The chance > encounter could lead to new discoveries about the interactions of comets > with hot, charged particles billowing at the Sun. There are effects on the upper atmosphere of solar activity. However due to the chaotic nature of weather it is hard to definatelivy say that X caused Y. Studies of thousands of occurances would have to be undertaken to determine a link. Thanks, David - -- It's not that engineers are boring people, we just get excited about boring things. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+XW12ZOfFgbBAbXARAt14AJ4iXjrydhIDRWKQmUfRVrgjfB/mvACdH9Ya nXeaUBRrmYfiCwYyGUD8X4M= =iaO9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Brian Hamilton" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather or not ? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:06:25 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > I thought that was the case, the size includes all the viisble part, tail, > > etc. > > What is the actual size of the ice core? (which would create the > > gravitatioanl pull, not the streaming ice particles) > > While the coma can be larger than the earth(but usually isn't) and tail can be > as well, the actual nucleus of the comet is usually under 250km in diameter > IIRC. Thanks, Thanks for clearing that up. I thought it was something like that (that the actual solid mass ice core is not very big at all) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jacob at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:39:09 +0800 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jacob Subject: aus-wx: Lets get back to weather Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi everyone, Ok most of us have had our say on the comet, but lets try to get back to the weather now. It has just turned into a slagging event. So please lets stop abusing each other and get back to weather topics now. Thanks. Jacob (co-list owner) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Rainfall at last Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:58:51 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Have had two nice slow moving storms this morning and I have doubled my yearly rainfall with 9.8 this morning and more stuff brewing. Good stuff. At 10 this morning it was as black as the inside of a cow after a warm but clear start to the day.
DP has just bobbed over the 19 mark again now :-))
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Max" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lets get back to weather Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:12:13 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Here here Jacob! ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jacob" To: Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: aus-wx: Lets get back to weather > > Hi everyone, > > Ok most of us have had our say on the comet, but lets try to get back to > the weather now. It has just turned into a slagging event. So please lets > stop abusing each other and get back to weather topics now. > > Thanks. > > Jacob (co-list owner) > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Rainfall Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:44:49 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I got a whole 11 mm for the day here. The sky is clearing to the west now. At 12.15 pm I was showing 102 mm/hr but very briefly of course :-)
Any rainfall is more than welcome at present and I reckon we got the right amount for now. It will help hold the topsoil together if we get another heavy storm/shower or whatever.
Run off is not a good thing at present as it will only fill water catchments with topsoil (mud).
So I'm happy at present with what we've had here.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:37:31 +1100 at : weathernut at austarnet.com.au Subject: aus-wx: 27/2/2003 Thunderstorm pics. To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Webmail Mirapoint Direct 3.2.1-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi. I recorded 17.1mm out of 2 thunderstorms. :) I have to rescan most of my pic`s as my scanner hates humid weather. Here are some pic`s that were taken in the main part of Wagga Wagga http://home.austarnet.com.au/440077/stormimg/stor m1.jpg http://home.austarnet.com.au/440077/stormimg/stor m4.jpg http://home.austarnet.com.au/440077/stormimg/stor m6.jpg http://home.austarnet.com.au/440077/stormimg/stor m8.jpg (This pic was taken just after the storm.*Sorry for the poor image i have to rescan it*) http://home.austarnet.com.au/440077/stormimg/stor m9.jpg -------------------------------------- Name:Robert M. Nick name:Weathernut Email:weathernut at austarnet.com.au Web site:http://home.austarnet.com.au/440077/southwestweather.html ---------------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Storms during the past week Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:02:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, Just a few images of storms I have encountered this week. 1. Monday - north of Glen Innes, NSW http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0224jon01.jpg 2. Wednesday evening - southeast of Eildon, Vic http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0226jon01.jpg 3. Thursday evening - southeast of Yea, Vic http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0227jon01.jpg http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0227jon02.jpg Lots more to come when I get the chance.... Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Debbie Parker" To: Subject: aus-wx: Landline Sunday 23rd Feb 2003 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:15:54 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.24 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi All,
I'm probably a tad slow as some of you might have discussed this on the List or on WZ & I missed it but.......... did anyone else see one Blair Trewin on Landline on Sunday commenting on the likelihood of above average rainfall for autumn??
I just got around to watching my tape.
Or has it been a regular event??
Only a few seconds but worthwhile nonetheless!
Onya Blair.
:-)
 
Debbie
 
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 06:58:45 -0600 at : Sam Barricklow Organization: Home Page http://www.k5kj.net/ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aussie Weather Subject: aus-wx: [Fwd: meteor shower this weekend] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I thought y'all might be interested in this since you are near the optimum viewing location on the planet for this shower. All the best, Sam Sam Barricklow wrote: > http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/28feb_tucanids.htm?list614065 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: Canberra's wake up. 28/02/03 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:29:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Untitled Document
Hi all,
After watching (on radar & storm tracker) a squall line form East of Melbourne during the night, extending NW through the early hours i was eagerly awaiting the days offerings, and i didn't have to wait long, With Canberra Radar down, and Wagga on Windfinding i was watching Storm tracker place a few Strikes near Cootamundra, they quickly died off and i jumped into to bed to catch some ZzzZzz's.
After settling down for about an hour, and seeing the first light shine on some morning cloud i started drifting off...After 10 or so Minutes i heard a boom, which got me interested, then heard it again, and again, i quickly got up and out side, and was greeted to a wall of black to my west, the sun was just rising over the horizon and lighting up the anvil a brilliant peachy orange. i ran inside to find a camera with film, and then jumped on the roof, as i was getting up there the thunder was almost constant, and it had started spitting.
By the time i woked out how to work the camera, i grabbed a few quick pics before being forced off the roof with CC's popping off right over head. The rain then came down, lasting 10 minutes, and as i type it still is sprinkling, estimated 5mm fell. Thunder easing off now also, but what a fantatic wake up, even though i wasn't asleep...and i don't think i will sleep...have to be up in 3 hours anyways, *YAWN*.

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
*NEW*- A Small WAP service,
Current wx, forecast For Canberra
For mobile phones with WAP.

http://wap.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Proud member of the
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au

***WEBSITE UPDATE***
Redesign is 95% complete!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Embedded Content: email1.jpg: 00000001,700a0be4,00000000,00000000 at : "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: OT: 'read reciepts' + Cb's. Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:57:26 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com A big thank-you to John! I didn't realise you could turn off the "request read receipt" for individual messages, but I do now! So unless I forget- nobody should have to put up with those annoying little things when I post to this list again . . . . Sorry! LOL Jimbob p.s. Jane: great shots! Who took them? James Holbeach ------------------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham http://www.trapdoor.com.au Ph: (M) +61 (0)417 553 757 ------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of David Findlay Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 9:25 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: OT: 'read reciepts' + Cb's. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > So yes, it is deliberate, but unless you know the person needs a receipt, > do not say "yes" and check "do not ask me this question again", just check > yes or no as you wish. There is no harm in saying "NO" and check "do not > ask me this question again". Heh. Didn't notice. My mail program automatically detects them as a risk to my security and ignores it. :-) David - -- It's not that engineers are boring people, we just get excited about boring things. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+XT7EZOfFgbBAbXARAmb5AJ4mBx92BSAvqieyOuGI4vFk6Kvw0QCfXzUl URaVxdnZMVdcvE21jD4He+I= =pMDu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:58:18 +1100 at : weathernut at austarnet.com.au Subject: Re: aus-wx: 27/2/2003 Thunderstorm pics. To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Cc: Web at austarnet.com.au, site at austarnet.com.au, moved. at austarnet.com.au X-Mailer: Webmail Mirapoint Direct 3.2.1-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. My site has moved to a new host.atm i working on the site to make it a little bit easyer for people to use.If you have a web link just email it to webmaster at weatherwatching.oz2k.com *New web address is http://www.weatherwatching.oz2k.com -------------------------------------- Name:Robert M. Nick name:Weathernut Email:weathernut at austarnet.com.au *New* Web site:http://www.weatherwatching.oz2k.com ---------------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Storms during the past week Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:27:52 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jane, Your photos are great. Especially the one taken near Glen Innes. Judy ----- Original Message ----- at : "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:02 PM Subject: aus-wx: Storms during the past week > Evening all, > > Just a few images of storms I have encountered this week. > > 1. Monday - north of Glen Innes, NSW > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0224jon01.jpg > > 2. Wednesday evening - southeast of Eildon, Vic > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0226jon01.jpg > > 3. Thursday evening - southeast of Yea, Vic > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0227jon01.jpg > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0227jon02.jpg > > Lots more to come when I get the chance.... > > Cheers, > > Jane > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > ***The journey is the reward*** > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jacob at mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:15:38 +0800 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Jacob Subject: aus-wx: Off topic: #Weather AFL Tipping comp Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Our annual Weather AFL Tipping Comp is back, so any AFL lovers out there come and join! Here are they details: You are invited to join my AFL 2003 Footy tipping competition at OzTips.com - Your Sports Tipping Headquarters online. Comp Number: 22230 Comp Name: Weather Footy Competition Password to join: supercell To join: ---------------- 1. Go to http://www.OzTips.com 2. at the home page, select "I'm new and I want to tip", and setup a user account (if you don't already have one on OzTips.com). 3. Select "I want to join a Tipping Comp" on the home page, or the "Tipping" tab. 4. Enter the Comp Number and Password details above. 5. That's it. Full instructions on how to tip can be found on the site by clicking on the "Help" tab. Jacob +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] at : "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Storms during the past week Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:24:15 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2003 05:24:16.0167 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2E83B70:01C2DEE9] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Nice shots Jane - how much more solid does scud have to get before it becomes a 'suspicious lowering' (re. the Eildon shot)?

> at : "Jane ONeill"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: "Aussie-wx"
>Subject: aus-wx: Storms during the past week
>Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:02:48 +1100
>
>Evening all,
>
>Just a few images of storms I have encountered this week.
>
>1. Monday - north of Glen Innes, NSW
>http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0224jon01.jpg
>
>2. Wednesday evening - southeast of Eildon, Vic
>http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0226jon01.jpg
>
>3. Thursday evening - southeast of Yea, Vic
>http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0227jon01.jpg
>http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0227jon02.jpg
>
>Lots more to come when I get the chance....
>
>Cheers,
>
>Jane
>--------------------------------
>Jane ONeill - Melbourne
>cadence at australianskynweather.com
>
>Australian Sky & Weather
>http://www.stormchasers.au.com
>
>Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
>http://www.severeweather.asn.au
>
>***The journey is the reward***
>--------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Click here for more. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
X-Sender: carls at xenios.qldnet.com.au Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:30:24 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com at : Carl Smith Subject: Re: aus-wx: Confluence of tropical origin systems dumps heavy rains across much of SE Australia. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Phil and All. >Carl, are you able to combine the smaller images into an animation? > >Phil ><>< Yes, I did so in my Mac, but it is very jerky due to the 24hr gap between frames - I could have added many intermediate frames to make a very large file with smoother animation, but as I am trying to keep my website size down (I already have about 40MB in my 2MB personal webspace allotment on the server) and a US meteorologist emailed me privately wanting access to the full resolution images (click on any small image or the link below it to see them), I have instead added 'prev | next' links above all the images on the page so you can click through them forwards or backwards, so effectively animating at any desired speed - reverse animating by clicking through the original full disk image windows in Photoshop was how I first determined where all the moisture that hit SE Aust. came at . Here is the URL again if anyone wants another look: http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/2002-2003/droughtbreaker/index.htm BTW, you will find links to TC Graham off WA and the Low NE of Fraser Island on my webpage at: http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/current.htm - latest Qld TC Outlook says Qld Low will not become TC although it is intensifying. Regards, Carl. -- Carl Smith, Gold Coast, Qld., Australia. carls at qldnet.com.au For links to current tropical cyclone information: http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/current.htm +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rainfall Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:42:30 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
We ended up with 324mm for the month of February here in Petrie - I wish I could send some down that way !!
 
----- Original Message -----
at : Bussy
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:44 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Rainfall

I got a whole 11 mm for the day here. The sky is clearing to the west now. At 12.15 pm I was showing 102 mm/hr but very briefly of course :-)
Any rainfall is more than welcome at present and I reckon we got the right amount for now. It will help hold the topsoil together if we get another heavy storm/shower or whatever.
Run off is not a good thing at present as it will only fill water catchments with topsoil (mud).
So I'm happy at present with what we've had here.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
at : "Carolyn" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Landline Sunday 23rd Feb 2003 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:24:53 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Message
Yeah I saw it.  It was real "quickie" YOu had to be quick to see what was going on, but he was there.  
 
Carolyn
-----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Debbie Parker
Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 11:16 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Landline Sunday 23rd Feb 2003

Hi All,
I'm probably a tad slow as some of you might have discussed this on the List or on WZ & I missed it but.......... did anyone else see one Blair Trewin on Landline on Sunday commenting on the likelihood of above average rainfall for autumn??
I just got around to watching my tape.
Or has it been a regular event??
Only a few seconds but worthwhile nonetheless!
Onya Blair.
:-)
 
Debbie
 
at : "third" To: Subject: aus-wx: Petrie rainfall Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:39:27 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com If anyone is interested - I have put together a new (very amateur I'm afraid website). The weather related stuff is only my daily rainfall stats at out in the front yard. There is also info on the State Emergency Service and a fairly comprehensive Super 12 rugby page (not very weather). www.users.bigpond.com/crflintoft/index.htm if anyone is interested. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Landline Sunday 23rd Feb 2003 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:01:15 +1100 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I didn't even know it was going to be on Landline - the footage was taken for the ABC news on the night of Tuesday 18/2. (David Jones does many of our TV interviews, but he was on the 7.30 Report that night and they wanted someone different for the news). By the way, they filmed for about 15 minutes to get the 5 seconds of footage for the news (I don't know if any more went to air on Landline). Blair > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C2DF4E.5203F770 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Yeah I saw it. It was real "quickie" YOu had to be quick to see what > was going on, but he was there. > > Carolyn > > -----Original Message----- > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Debbie > Parker > Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 11:16 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: Landline Sunday 23rd Feb 2003 > > > Hi All, > I'm probably a tad slow as some of you might have discussed this on the > List or on WZ & I missed it but.......... did anyone else see one Blair > Trewin on Landline on Sunday commenting on the likelihood of above > average rainfall for autumn?? > I just got around to watching my tape. > Or has it been a regular event?? > Only a few seconds but worthwhile nonetheless! > Onya Blair. > :-) > > Debbie > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C2DF4E.5203F770 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > charset=3Dus-ascii"> > Message > > > > > >
Yeah I saw = > it.  It was=20 > real "quickie" YOu had to be quick to see what was going on, but he was=20 > there.  
>
size=3D2> 
>
size=3D2>Carolyn
>
>
>
align=3Dleft> face=3DTahoma size=3D2>-----Original Message-----
at :=20 > aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com=20 > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of = > Debbie=20 > Parker
Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 11:16 = > PM
To:=20 > aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Landline = > Sunday 23rd=20 > Feb 2003

>
Hi All,
>
I'm probably a tad slow as some of you might have = > discussed=20 > this on the List or on WZ & I missed it but.......... did anyone = > else see=20 > one Blair Trewin on Landline on Sunday commenting on the likelihood of = > above=20 > average rainfall for autumn??
>
I just got around to watching my tape. = >
>
Or has it been a regular event??
>
Only a few seconds but worthwhile = > nonetheless!=20 >
>
Onya Blair.
>
:-)
>
 
>
Debbie
>
 
> > ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C2DF4E.5203F770-- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Suze" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Rain yabbies...? Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:14:34 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
thanx everyone for your responses <g>. Between yabbie-napping twisters, adventurous migrations of yabbies, and the secret underground yabbies! truly, the kids (7yrs neighbours) are blown away with the info, and their little heads are ticking about their natural world (and i so love to encourage that). their preferential answer is ...of course... the yabbie-napping twister! (no, I don't think we had any twisters, but...a child's imagination is something i'm pained to stifle). so now i'm being treated to repetitions of their fave lines at  the movie twister, particularly..."i've gotta go julia, we've got cows" LOL! i do love that line. thanx, for answering, very educational. cheers...Suze
-----Original Message-----
at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard Modistach
Sent: Tuesday, 25 February 2003 6:27 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain yabbies...?

they also burrow down and hibernate for up to 20yrs.
there are over 40 different species of freashwater decapod
in aus, not all live in water, some are known as land yabbies
and 2cm is full grown for some, the largest are in tasmania
and can grow up to 1m long at tip of tail to outstreached claws.
and they can live and grow in mountain streams you can step across.
 
richard
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Tuesday, 25 February 2003 6:45:33 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain yabbies...?
 
Yabbies migrate. Sorry for the short answer but that's it :-)


> Hmm....where do these little things come at ? This is the third time
since
> 1983 I've found a delicate one centimeter yabby floating happily in rain
> run-off under my house. No creeks or ponds near me - a curiosity which
gets
> the kids imagination going <hehe> I sugested they might have fallen at
the
> Scorpio constellation...uhm, I don't think they believe me <ggg>.
Beautiful
> 126mm of rain here in Logan over the last week - ground sodden, under
house
> flooded - it's a blessing, no complaints here. Luvin this rain.
> cheers...Suze



+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
message.
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Embedded Content: IMSTP126.gif: 00000001,496212b5,00000000,00000000 at : "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: February Averages Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:18:06 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
These are the averages for my backyard between Chatswood West & North Ryde on the Lane Cove River in Sydney's Northern suburbs:
 
Average Maximum: 30.2
Average Minimum:  17.9
Rainfall:                     93mm
Highest Maximum:   35.9 on the 28th
Lowest Minimum:    15.3 on the 24th
 
Last Year
Average Maximum25.7
Average Minimum:  17.9
Rainfall                     293mm
 
 
 
You can view each days statistics for this year & last year on my website at:
at : "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: February Rainfall Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:24:37 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I received exactly 200 mm more rainfall last February. This February I recorded 93mm in my backyard in Sydney's Northern suburbs compared to 293mm last year! I can't even remember what weather event caused so much rain last year? Damian 'My Website': http://www.geocities.com/weatherdamo/index.html +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.126] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com, dattilo at ozemail.com.au, hibberd at netspeed.com.au, jaywilkins at ozemail.com.au, John.Ryan at aph.gov.au, LeisaChan at national.com.au Subject: aus-wx: Fwd: Fw: Petrol Prices Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:21:45 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2003 09:21:46.0017 (UTC) FILETIME=[D07AC910:01C2DF0A] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Normally I would not do this but I agree with John's ideas as I have known him for years and respect his ideas.May be it just might work! Gavin O'Brien > at : "John Mulcair" >To: "Howard Murray" ,"Mike Lavercombe" >,"Paul Hardman" >,"Richard Dickman" ,"John >Stackpoole" ,"Mark Fowler" >,"Fr. Havas" >,"Franco Bortolotto" >,"Gavin O'Brien" >,"Jim Rice" ,"Jim Rice" >,"John Mulcair" >,"Mark Pickham" >,"Mike Cassidy" ,"Rob >Blencoe" ,"Tony Seesink" >,"Michael Lawton" >,"Richard Bale" >,"Rob Hanna" ,"Paul >Bluck" >Subject: Fw: Petrol Prices >Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:05:31 +1100 > > >----- Original Message ----- > at : "David Mulcair" >To: "john mulcair" >Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 3:57 PM >Subject: FW: Petrol Prices > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > at : Mulcair, Olga [mailto:Olga.Mulcair at finance.gov.au] > > Sent: Friday, 28 February 2003 3:40 PM > > To: Davey Work (E-mail) > > Subject: FW: Petrol Prices > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > at : O'Shea, Greg > > Sent: Friday, 28 February 2003 2:29 PM > > To: eSG - IT Services & Transition Projects; eSG - EO IT Services; eSG - > > New Business Models; Account Managers - IT (eSolutions) > > Subject: FW: Petrol Prices > > Importance: High > > > > > > Don't buy BP - see below > > > > -----Original Message----- > > at : Cooke, Susan [mailto:Susan.Cooke at ato.gov.au] > > Sent: Friday, 28 February 2003 1:41 PM > > To: 'medusa at alphalink.com.au'; 'amanda.robertson at act.gov.au'; > > 'tedl at naa.gov.au'; 'steves at naa.gov.au'; O'Shea, Greg; > > 'christabel.wright at dcita.gov.au'; 'aelfrida at webone.com.au'; Wainwright, > > Janet; Inglis, Barbara; McLenaghan, Chris; King, Peter J; Brick, > > Eleanor; 'rosemarywebb at ozemail.com.au'; 'Benjamin, David'; > > 'seymoura at rba.gov.au' > > Subject: FW: Petrol Prices > > Importance: High > > > > > > **************************************************************** > > IMPORTANT > > > > The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient >only > > and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any >review, > > re-transmission, disclosure dissemination or other use of, or taking of >any > > action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other >than > > the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties. >If > > you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Privacy Hotline >of > > the Australian Taxation Office, telephone 13 28 69 and delete all copies >of > > this transmission together with any attachments. > > **************************************************************** > > > > > > > > Importance: High > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if this will work but at this stage anything is worth a >try. > > > > >____________________________________________________________________________ > > _________ > > > > > > Great if it works!!! > > "Price of Petrol" - READ THIS > > > > Received the following which sounds like a good idea. A very interesting > > idea...will it work ? We are going to hit close to $1.35 a litre by the > > winter. Want petrol prices to come down? We need to take some >intelligent, > > united action. Philip Hollsworth, offered this good idea This makes MUCH > > MORE SENSE than the "don't buy petrol on a certain day" campaign that >was > > going around last April or May! The oil companies just laughed at that > > because they knew we wouldn't continue to "hurt ourselves by refusing to >buy > > petrol. It was more of an inconvenience to us than it was a problem for > > them. BUT, whoever thought of this idea, has come up with a plan that >can > > really work. Please read it and join in! Now that the oil companies and >the > > OPEC nations have conditioned us to think that the cost of a litre is >CHEAP > > at .89 /.95 / $1.10 cents, we need to take aggressive action to teach >them > > that BUYERS control the marketplace not sellers. With the price of >petrol > > going up more each day, we consumers need to take action. The only way >we > > are going to see the price of petrol come down is if we hit someone in >the > > pocket by not purchasing their Petrol! And we can do that WITHOUT >hurting > > ourselves. > > > > Here's the idea For the rest of this year, DON'T purchase ANY petrol > at > > the two biggest oil companies (which now are one - BP) If they are not > > selling any petrol, they will be inclined to reduce their prices. If >they > > reduce their prices, the other companies will have to follow suit. But >to > > have an impact, we need to reach literally millions of BP petrol buyers. > > It's really simple to do!! Now, don't wimp out on me at this >point...keep > > reading and I'll explain how simple it is to reach millions of people!! >I >am > > sending this note to a; lot of people. If each of you send it to at >least > > ten more (30 x 10 = 300)... and those 300 send it to at least ten more >(300 > > x 10 = 3,000) ... and so on, by the time the message reaches the sixth > > generation of people, we will have reached over THREE MILLION consumers! > > Again, all You have to do is send this to 10 people. That's all. (and >not > > buy at BP) How long would all that take? If each of us sends this email >out > > to ten more people within one day of receipt, all 300 MILLION people >could > > conceivably be contacted within the next 8 days!!! I'll bet you didn't >think > > you and I had that much potential, did you! Acting together we can make >a > > difference. If this makes sense to you, please pass this message on. >PLEASE > > HOLD OUT UNTIL THEY LOWER THEIR PRICES TO THE 80 cents a LITRE RANGE >Action > > It's easy to make this happen. Just forward this email, and buy your >petrol > > at Shell, Caltex, Mobil, g,a.s. or Gulf Outlets and drive by BP >Stations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Finance Australian Business Number: 61 970 632 495 > > Finance Web Site: www.finance.gov.au > > > > IMPORTANT: > > This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and may > > contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not >the > > intended recipient, you are notified that any use or dissemination of >this > > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >transmission > > in error, please notify us immediately by telephone on 61-2-6215-2222 >and > > delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.126] at : "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Landline Sunday 23rd Feb 2003 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:27:52 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2003 09:27:52.0253 (UTC) FILETIME=[AAC5F6D0:01C2DF0B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Blair,I saw your clip in Canberra TV News well done. Gavin SSWW Canberra > at : Blair Trewin >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Landline Sunday 23rd Feb 2003 >Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:01:15 +1100 (EST) > >I didn't even know it was going to be on Landline - the footage was >taken for the ABC news on the night of Tuesday 18/2. (David Jones >does many of our TV interviews, but he was on the 7.30 Report that >night and they wanted someone different for the news). > >By the way, they filmed for about 15 minutes to get the 5 seconds >of footage for the news (I don't know if any more went to air on >Landline). > >Blair > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C2DF4E.5203F770 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="us-ascii" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Yeah I saw it. It was real "quickie" YOu had to be quick to see what > > was going on, but he was there. > > > > Carolyn > > > > -----Original Message----- > > at : aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Debbie > > Parker > > Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 11:16 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: aus-wx: Landline Sunday 23rd Feb 2003 > > > > > > Hi All, > > I'm probably a tad slow as some of you might have discussed this on the > > List or on WZ & I missed it but.......... did anyone else see one Blair > > Trewin on Landline on Sunday commenting on the likelihood of above > > average rainfall for autumn?? > > I just got around to watching my tape. > > Or has it been a regular event?? > > Only a few seconds but worthwhile nonetheless! > > Onya Blair. > > :-) > > > > Debbie > > > > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C2DF4E.5203F770 > > Content-Type: text/html; > > charset="us-ascii" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > > > > > > charset=3Dus-ascii"> > > Message > > > > > > > > > > > >
Yeah I saw = > > it.  It was=20 > > real "quickie" YOu had to be quick to see what was going on, but he >was=20 > > there.  
> >
> size=3D2> 
> >
> size=3D2>Carolyn
> >
> >
> >
> align=3Dleft> > face=3DTahoma size=3D2>-----Original Message-----
at :=20 > > aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com=20 > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of = > > Debbie=20 > > Parker
Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 11:16 = > > PM
To:=20 > > aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Landline = > > Sunday 23rd=20 > > Feb 2003

> >
Hi All,
> >
I'm probably a tad slow as some of you might have >= > > discussed=20 > > this on the List or on WZ & I missed it but.......... did anyone = > > else see=20 > > one Blair Trewin on Landline on Sunday commenting on the likelihood of >= > > above=20 > > average rainfall for autumn??
> >
I just got around to watching my tape. = > >
> >
Or has it been a regular event??
> >
Only a few seconds but worthwhile = > > nonetheless!=20 > >
> >
Onya Blair.
> >
:-)
> >
 
> >
Debbie
> >
 
> > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C2DF4E.5203F770-- > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
at : "Adam Mayo" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: February Rainfall Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 21:18:55 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Damian, At Mona Vale during February, 2002 we had heavy rain overnight on the 1st, however I only have the total as 71mm which included 30 and 31st Jan. Then 94 mm to midday on 4th, 78.5mm to 9am on 5th, and another 32.5 to 4pm on 5th, 8mm to 9am on 8th, 12.5mm to 9am on 7th, on Friday the 8th we saw the two wallclouds over Mona Vale and Narrabeen but no rain at them. I never made any notation about thunder and lightning, so now I don't even know what happened other than how much rain we got. Perhaps somebody else keeps a track of whether they were storm days or not. Judy. ----- Original Message ----- at : "Damian" To: Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 6:24 PM Subject: aus-wx: February Rainfall > I received exactly 200 mm more rainfall last February. > This February I recorded 93mm in my backyard in Sydney's Northern suburbs > compared to 293mm last year! > I can't even remember what weather event caused so much rain last year? > > > Damian > 'My Website': http://www.geocities.com/weatherdamo/index.html > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.49.187.103] at : "effes Melbourne" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: WZ down Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:48:55 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2003 10:48:55.0539 (UTC) FILETIME=[FD848430:01C2DF16] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Anyone else experiencing problems with the forum page at the moment? I click on the link and it comes up saying an abnormal error has occurred. Sorry for being off topic Cheers Michael _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_mobile.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ at : "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne funnel Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:28:15 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, A couple of video stills of the funnel at near Mentone ~5.50pm courtesy of Lindsay Vincent. David, would this be the same one that you saw? http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0228lv01.jpg http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Feb03/0228lv02.jpg Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au ***The journey is the reward*** -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe at aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------