http://australiasevereweather.com/ From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 00:27:45 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All Just thought i would add, there was heavy snow reported up near Sutton Forest (near Goulburn, 1/2 way between Canberra and Sydney) yesterday, heavy enough to delay some delievery trucks into Canberra yesterday arfternoon. I had noticed a resonable area of convection north of the ACT yesterday at 2:30pm around the areas of the snowfalls, and initilally thought of a large thunderstorm was the reason, but then got a call saying the trucks had been delayed and then it clicked. :-) Cheers --------------------------------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------------------- Member of: Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au --------------------------------------------------------- This email is virus free. Scanned before leaving my mailbox using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k Scanned with the latest definition File. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Lijnders" To: Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > Good Afternoon Clyve, > > Thanks for replying. It was a dynamic little system. My Sister who lives in > Monbulk also recieved sleet for a good 20 minutes. She was rather > surprised. It quite possibly snowed in the Dandenongs during Saturday > afternoon with the cold air. > > Quite surprised to see another 4mm in the guage to 9am this morning from > overnight drizzle and light showers. > > Next system shows a bit of interest, could pick up few showers and a storm > Wednesday if it holds its integrity. > > Karl :) > > > > > >From: "Clyve Herbert" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > >Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:43:23 +1000 > > > >Hi Karl. I have to say I was very surprised to see sleet! My youngest boy > >pointed it out to me as I was having a late breakfast and enjoying the > >sound > >of falling rain. The fall of sleet lasted about 5 minutes with definite > >flakes (wet) some rather large falling within the rain, the temp dipped to > >5.7c. Leopold elevation is only about 50m, however I have seen sleet here > >in > >1986 with a temp of 5.5.c. With a fall of sleet to low levels I was on the > >blower to find if snow or sleet was falling elsewhere, it seems that a band > >of active cold air showers with thunder and hail had passed near the Otway > >range around 8am to 9am and produced hail sleet and snow at least down to > >300m , this area of enhanced CB activity moved to the northeast and > >affected the Geelong to Melton area later in the morning. Also I was > >following up reports of sleet from around the Melton area and to the wet of > >Werribee. regards Clyve Herbert. > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Karl Lijnders > >To: > >Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 5:45 PM > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > > > > > > > > > Just on 11mm of rain here today, very heavy downpours through the > >afternoon, > > > a few thunderstorms to the west of the city too. Been a fairly good > >system, > > > was hoping for more widespread thunderstorm activity, but the rain was > >nice. > > > > > > Sleet down on the coast, thats amazing. What is Leopold's elevation? > > > > > > Karl :) > > > > > > >From: "Clyve Herbert" > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > >To: > > > >Subject: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > > >Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 11:14:11 +1000 > > > > > > > >Hi all... Well, surprise,surprise, The thermal trough has just passed > > > >through central Victoria, about 1045 my air temp fell to 6c here at > >Leopold > > > >with light to moderate rain, I nearly choked on my marmalade toast when > > > >sleet started to fall, sleet fell for about 5 minutes and then changed > >to > > > >rain very rapidly although the rain still contained bits of soft ice, > >looks > > > >like this air will be cold enough to bring a few flakes to the > > > >Dandenong's..regards Clyve Herbert. > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:28:03 EDT Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way off but To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Bussie
cursur lock and (AOL) are the only problems we have had to date after about 12 months .
AOL seems to build up probs. over time . We are only runnining a celeron 466 MHZ chip on a average main board whith far to much built in  -modem and video - not recomemed . I would also recomened  to anyone wnen your key board gets to the stage that the letter E looks like an F and R like P buy a new keyboarb . I cant touch type .

Regards  Dennis Cottle
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:23:39 -0400 (EDT) From: David Hart Apparently-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls1.std.com [199.172.62.103]) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08519 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:44:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hotmail.com (f86.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.165.86]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08311 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:44:21 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:44:16 -0700 Received: from 144.138.103.22 by sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:44:14 GMT X-Originating-IP: [144.138.103.22] From: "Robert Goler" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Gulf Line field experiment Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 01:44:14 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2002 15:44:16.0105 (UTC) FILETIME=[3B6C0D90:01C26898] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all Just thought I'd mention that I'm currently in Karumba (northern Qld) involved in the Gulf Line field experiment. (I = Robert Goler) For those not in the know, this is a field experiment involving people from Monash Uni in Melbourne (where I'm from), people from the BoM and people from the University of Munich in Germany. We're all here to collect data from weather stations, pilot balloons, and radiosondes to study the morning glory around the southern Cape York Peninsula, and the north Australian cloud line over the northern peninsula. There is no mobile coverage up here, so I'll occasionally post an email or two on the list when something interesting happens. For some basic info about what these cloud lines look like, see here: http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/Thesis/introduction.html I arrived on Sunday with a fellow student after driving all the way up from Melbourne leaving Wednesday. Had to drive up with Monash Uni's 4wd as we had to take a whole load of equipment up with us. The trip was pretty uneventful, ie no break downs or fatal encounters with wildlife...although quite a few bugs got up close and personal with the windshield. The most exciting parts were the dust filled skies around Jerilderie on Wednesday, and coming into Goondiwindi on Thursday night where we did see some distant lightning further to the north. For the record we stayed the night at West Wyalong, Goondiwindi, Rockhampton (a real dodgey place!) and Townsville, and sampled what nightlife they had on offer...hence the late starts the following morning...hehe! In Karumba we've had southerlies the past 2 days as a cold front passed through early on Sunday morning. However conditions should be ok for the next few days for morning glories to form, so hopefully something exciting will happen! Cheers, Robert _________________________________________________________________ Join the world^Òs largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 07:25:58 +1000 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Simon.. Don't believe everything you hear. First of all,I assume you are referring to Sunday afternoon, 2nd - Sutton forest is near Bowral - Mittagong and quite a distance from Goulburn. 3rd - the 3 pm temps in both Bowral and Moss Vale were 11 degrees.(In goulburn it was 12) and in Moss Vale it fell to 9 at 4pm - hardly "snow" temps. Bowral did report past storm at 6 pm. A friend who was in Bowral playing golf told me there was a fair bit of small hail as the storm passed around 4-4.30 but nothing unusual for such an event. Snow remains the most mis-reported meteorological phenomenon in Australia... more so even than the famous "mini tornado"! So, as a weather list, let's not encourage this. Cheers, Don White Simon Angell wrote: > > Hi All > Just thought i would add, there was heavy snow reported up near Sutton > Forest (near Goulburn, 1/2 way between Canberra and Sydney) yesterday, heavy > enough to delay some delievery trucks into Canberra yesterday arfternoon. I > had noticed a resonable area of convection north of the ACT yesterday at > 2:30pm around the areas of the snowfalls, and initilally thought of a large > thunderstorm was the reason, but then got a call saying the trucks had been > delayed and then it clicked. :-) > > Cheers > --------------------------------------------------------- > Simon Angell > Canberra ACT > www.canberra-wx.com > --------------------------------------------------------- > Member of: > Australian Severe Weather Association. > www.severeweather.asn.au > --------------------------------------------------------- > This email is virus free. > Scanned before leaving my mailbox > using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k > Scanned with the latest definition File. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karl Lijnders" > To: > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:33 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > > > > Good Afternoon Clyve, > > > > Thanks for replying. It was a dynamic little system. My Sister who lives > in > > Monbulk also recieved sleet for a good 20 minutes. She was rather > > surprised. It quite possibly snowed in the Dandenongs during Saturday > > afternoon with the cold air. > > > > Quite surprised to see another 4mm in the guage to 9am this morning from > > overnight drizzle and light showers. > > > > Next system shows a bit of interest, could pick up few showers and a storm > > Wednesday if it holds its integrity. > > > > Karl :) > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Clyve Herbert" > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >To: > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > >Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:43:23 +1000 > > > > > >Hi Karl. I have to say I was very surprised to see sleet! My youngest boy > > >pointed it out to me as I was having a late breakfast and enjoying the > > >sound > > >of falling rain. The fall of sleet lasted about 5 minutes with definite > > >flakes (wet) some rather large falling within the rain, the temp dipped > to > > >5.7c. Leopold elevation is only about 50m, however I have seen sleet here > > >in > > >1986 with a temp of 5.5.c. With a fall of sleet to low levels I was on > the > > >blower to find if snow or sleet was falling elsewhere, it seems that a > band > > >of active cold air showers with thunder and hail had passed near the > Otway > > >range around 8am to 9am and produced hail sleet and snow at least down to > > >300m , this area of enhanced CB activity moved to the northeast and > > >affected the Geelong to Melton area later in the morning. Also I was > > >following up reports of sleet from around the Melton area and to the wet > of > > >Werribee. regards Clyve Herbert. > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: Karl Lijnders > > >To: > > >Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 5:45 PM > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just on 11mm of rain here today, very heavy downpours through the > > >afternoon, > > > > a few thunderstorms to the west of the city too. Been a fairly good > > >system, > > > > was hoping for more widespread thunderstorm activity, but the rain was > > >nice. > > > > > > > > Sleet down on the coast, thats amazing. What is Leopold's elevation? > > > > > > > > Karl :) > > > > > > > > >From: "Clyve Herbert" > > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > >To: > > > > >Subject: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > > > >Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 11:14:11 +1000 > > > > > > > > > >Hi all... Well, surprise,surprise, The thermal trough has just passed > > > > >through central Victoria, about 1045 my air temp fell to 6c here at > > >Leopold > > > > >with light to moderate rain, I nearly choked on my marmalade toast > when > > > > >sleet started to fall, sleet fell for about 5 minutes and then > changed > > >to > > > > >rain very rapidly although the rain still contained bits of soft ice, > > >looks > > > > >like this air will be cold enough to bring a few flakes to the > > > > >Dandenong's..regards Clyve Herbert. > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > >your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.221.127.32] From: "Dave Ellem" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way off but Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:22:43 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2002 22:22:54.0643 (UTC) FILETIME=[EBFB5030:01C268CF] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Bussy
The best thing I find about XP is it's stability and it's ability to hardly ever be reset. As I run my AWS 24hrs a day I have the PC on all the time. I think I didn't reset my PC for close to a month not so long ago and it was still running fast before I did reset it. I would certainly recommend it.
 
Dave Ellem
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way off but

Bussie
cursur lock and (AOL) are the only problems we have had to date after about 12 months .
AOL seems to build up probs. over time . We are only runnining a celeron 466 MHZ chip on a average main board whith far to much built in  -modem and video - not recomemed . I would also recomened  to anyone wnen your key board gets to the stage that the letter E looks like an F and R like P buy a new keyboarb . I cant touch type .

Regards  Dennis Cottle
From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way off but Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:13:23 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
whats AOL?
 
regards
richard
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way off but

Bussie
cursur lock and (AOL) are the only problems we have had to date after about 12 months .
AOL seems to build up probs. over time . We are only runnining a celeron 466 MHZ chip on a average main board whith far to much built in  -modem and video - not recomemed . I would also recomened  to anyone wnen your key board gets to the stage that the letter E looks like an F and R like P buy a new keyboarb . I cant touch type .

Regards  Dennis Cottle
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way off but Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:01:27 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Australia On-Line
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way off but

whats AOL?
 
regards
richard
From: "Carolyn" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Way off but Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:10:01 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal X-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I forgot Bussy, the only problem I had was with the drives for my add-ons...needed new drivers that were compat with xp. Carolyn OH AOL is an internet service.... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Carolyn" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Way off but Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:10:32 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal X-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I forgot Bussy, the only problem I had was with the drives for my add-ons...needed new drivers that were compat with xp. Carolyn OH AOL is an internet service.... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne water restriction levels Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:33:32 +1000 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:02:35 +0930 >From: "Richard Modistach" >Subject: aus-wx: water restrictions for melb. > >heard on the news tonight melbourne's about to officially go onto water >restrictions, I wonder if this setup coming through wed-thurs\sun-mon can >delay things a bit, probably hardly make a dent anyway, better to bite th= >e >bullet now, god only knows what the future holds. > >just out of interest, does anyone have historical data for the last 20-30= >yrs >on melbs. water restrictions?, when and for how long. Richard this is typical media hyperbole. The trigger point for restrictions in Melbourne in October is 52% and the reservoirs are at 54.1%... 2% might not sound like much but it is. The trigger point for November is 54%, so we could conceivably go into restriction a month from now if we have next to no rain this month (but October is one of our wettest months around Melbourne). Further details on the % triggers can be found at http://www.melbournewater.com.au/system/navsearch.asp Looking at these, I would expect the crunch period for restrictions to be -December-January when the cut-off is 53-52%. A very dry October-November could see our dams approaching these values. As for bringing restriction in earlier, personally I think that is just silly. These restriction levels are well thought out trigger levels based on history; bringing them in earlier would just amount to scaremongering. Philosophically, I don't agree with the way restrictions are imposed as they ignore the most wasteful water practices in our society. For example, why should home owners be able to purchase top loading washing machines which use ~200 litres of water per load while a front loader will do the same job with half as many litres. The same goes for water saving shower heads, dual flush toilets, dish washers etc (BTW I have water tanks, dual flush toilets, a water saving dish washers, a front loading washing machine, and recycle grey water). Depriving home owners of keeping their gardens alive during drought seems like a silly knee jerk reaction to me. Regards, David +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Way off but Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:52:37 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I run XP Professional on the desktop (upgraded from Win 98) and XP Home on the laptop (came with it). Both seem pretty stable and run a lot quicker than Win 98.I'm annoyed that Java doesn't come with it (due to Microsoft's lawsuit). I upgraded the desktop from 256 to 512MB of RAM and this made quite a difference to speed (not surprisingly) not only for XP but everything else.Clock speed is 1GHz. There have been a few times when things suddenly run dead slow ie things seem to get stuck in the pipeline until you hit Alt-F4 and then it fixes itself so I don't know what that is.
I would recommend upgrading..the benefits far outweigh the disadvantages.
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:41 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Way off but

Way off topic but a serious question.
Anyone running XP and any thoughts on it. Thinking of jumping up.
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne water restriction levels Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:59:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com As the drought index here passes 150mm and the grass dies off I often wonder how to recycle all the waste.I think we'd all have those water saving facilities if local councils used some of their rate revenue to finance/subsidise water storage tanks. Where I live we have the highest ,or one of the highest, rates (cents per $) in NSW. Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jones" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne water restriction levels > > >Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:02:35 +0930 > >From: "Richard Modistach" > >Subject: aus-wx: water restrictions for melb. > > > >heard on the news tonight melbourne's about to officially go onto water > >restrictions, I wonder if this setup coming through wed-thurs\sun-mon can > >delay things a bit, probably hardly make a dent anyway, better to bite th= > >e > >bullet now, god only knows what the future holds. > > > >just out of interest, does anyone have historical data for the last 20-30= > >yrs > >on melbs. water restrictions?, when and for how long. > > Richard this is typical media hyperbole. The trigger point for restrictions > in Melbourne in October is 52% and the reservoirs are at 54.1%... 2% might > not sound like much but it is. The trigger point for November is 54%, so we > could conceivably go into restriction a month from now if we have next to no > rain this month (but October is one of our wettest months around Melbourne). > Further details on the % triggers can be found at > http://www.melbournewater.com.au/system/navsearch.asp > Looking at these, I would expect the crunch period for restrictions to be > -December-January when the cut-off is 53-52%. A very dry October-November > could see our dams approaching these values. > > As for bringing restriction in earlier, personally I think that is just > silly. These restriction levels are well thought out trigger levels based on > history; bringing them in earlier would just amount to scaremongering. > > Philosophically, I don't agree with the way restrictions are imposed as they > ignore the most wasteful water practices in our society. For example, why > should home owners be able to purchase top loading washing machines which > use ~200 litres of water per load while a front loader will do the same job > with half as many litres. The same goes for water saving shower heads, dual > flush toilets, dish washers etc (BTW I have water tanks, dual flush toilets, > a water saving dish washers, a front loading washing machine, and recycle > grey water). Depriving home owners of keeping their gardens alive during > drought seems like a silly knee jerk reaction to me. > > Regards, > > David > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:09:59 +1000 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Took the words right out of my mouth! I made a similar reply on WZ. Sutton Forrest is pretty close to the Moss Vale AWS at which it was indeed quite mild, and the fact that that was the band of showers that eventually produced winter hail in Sydney seems to suggest to me that that's the explanation. (too many 'that's!) Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Don White Sent: Tuesday, 1 October 2002 7:26 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast Simon.. Don't believe everything you hear. First of all,I assume you are referring to Sunday afternoon, 2nd - Sutton forest is near Bowral - Mittagong and quite a distance from Goulburn. 3rd - the 3 pm temps in both Bowral and Moss Vale were 11 degrees.(In goulburn it was 12) and in Moss Vale it fell to 9 at 4pm - hardly "snow" temps. Bowral did report past storm at 6 pm. A friend who was in Bowral playing golf told me there was a fair bit of small hail as the storm passed around 4-4.30 but nothing unusual for such an event. Snow remains the most mis-reported meteorological phenomenon in Australia... more so even than the famous "mini tornado"! So, as a weather list, let's not encourage this. Cheers, Don White Simon Angell wrote: > > Hi All > Just thought i would add, there was heavy snow reported up near Sutton > Forest (near Goulburn, 1/2 way between Canberra and Sydney) yesterday, > heavy enough to delay some delievery trucks into Canberra yesterday > arfternoon. I had noticed a resonable area of convection north of the > ACT yesterday at 2:30pm around the areas of the snowfalls, and > initilally thought of a large thunderstorm was the reason, but then > got a call saying the trucks had been delayed and then it clicked. :-) > > Cheers > --------------------------------------------------------- > Simon Angell > Canberra ACT > www.canberra-wx.com > --------------------------------------------------------- > Member of: > Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au > --------------------------------------------------------- > This email is virus free. > Scanned before leaving my mailbox > using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k > Scanned with the latest definition File. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karl Lijnders" > To: > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:33 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > > > > Good Afternoon Clyve, > > > > Thanks for replying. It was a dynamic little system. My Sister who > > lives > in > > Monbulk also recieved sleet for a good 20 minutes. She was rather > > surprised. It quite possibly snowed in the Dandenongs during > > Saturday afternoon with the cold air. > > > > Quite surprised to see another 4mm in the guage to 9am this morning > > from overnight drizzle and light showers. > > > > Next system shows a bit of interest, could pick up few showers and a > > storm Wednesday if it holds its integrity. > > > > Karl :) > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Clyve Herbert" > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > >To: > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > >Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:43:23 +1000 > > > > > >Hi Karl. I have to say I was very surprised to see sleet! My > > >youngest boy pointed it out to me as I was having a late breakfast > > >and enjoying the sound of falling rain. The fall of sleet lasted > > >about 5 minutes with definite flakes (wet) some rather large > > >falling within the rain, the temp dipped > to > > >5.7c. Leopold elevation is only about 50m, however I have seen > > >sleet here in 1986 with a temp of 5.5.c. With a fall of sleet to > > >low levels I was on > the > > >blower to find if snow or sleet was falling elsewhere, it seems > > >that a > band > > >of active cold air showers with thunder and hail had passed near > > >the > Otway > > >range around 8am to 9am and produced hail sleet and snow at least > > >down to 300m , this area of enhanced CB activity moved to the > > >northeast and affected the Geelong to Melton area later in the > > >morning. Also I was following up reports of sleet from around the > > >Melton area and to the wet > of > > >Werribee. regards Clyve Herbert. > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: Karl Lijnders > > >To: > > >Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 5:45 PM > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just on 11mm of rain here today, very heavy downpours through > > > > the > > >afternoon, > > > > a few thunderstorms to the west of the city too. Been a fairly > > > > good > > >system, > > > > was hoping for more widespread thunderstorm activity, but the > > > > rain was > > >nice. > > > > > > > > Sleet down on the coast, thats amazing. What is Leopold's > > > > elevation? > > > > > > > > Karl :) > > > > > > > > >From: "Clyve Herbert" > > > > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > >To: > > > > >Subject: aus-wx: Sleet Vic coast > > > > >Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 11:14:11 +1000 > > > > > > > > > >Hi all... Well, surprise,surprise, The thermal trough has just > > > > >passed through central Victoria, about 1045 my air temp fell to > > > > >6c here at > > >Leopold > > > > >with light to moderate rain, I nearly choked on my marmalade > > > > >toast > when > > > > >sleet started to fall, sleet fell for about 5 minutes and then > changed > > >to > > > > >rain very rapidly although the rain still contained bits of > > > > >soft ice, > > >looks > > > > >like this air will be cold enough to bring a few flakes to the > > > > >Dandenong's..regards Clyve Herbert. > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > > _ > > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > > > > body of > > >your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > > > of > your > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------- > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: "Wx-Chase" , "Australian Weather Mailing List" Subject: aus-wx: Ozone hole Splits Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:19:02 -0400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hey All, Doing my usual morning news round-up online, and came across this on news.com.au. Hopefully this could be the beginning of the end for the Ozone Hole :o) http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5203527%255E1702,00.html PaulY Paul Yole Daddy to Liam Alexander - 08/13/02 "I can neither confirm nor deny I have anything to say" +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: September Averages Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:33:40 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Here are the September averages from my backyard in Sydney's Northern Suburbs between Chatswood West & North Ryde on the Lane Cove River:
 
Average Maximum: 25.3
Average minimum: 7.8
Rainfall: Exactly 20mm
Highest Maximum: 33.4 on the 25th
Lowest Minimum: 2.4 on the 18th
 
You can see each days data entered onto my website at:
X-Authentication-Warning: shell01.TheWorld.com: dhart owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 00:02:32 -0400 From: David Hart To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Sorry about that gang Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I was replying to someone who was not able to send mail to the list. The old "reply" button sent it to the whole list. -dkh- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 202.12.87.169 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 19:04:57 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Ozone hole Splits Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:19 PM 30/09/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Hey All, > >Doing my usual morning news round-up online, and came across this on >news.com.au. Hopefully this >could be the beginning of the end for the Ozone Hole :o) > >http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5203527%255E1702,00.html My gut feeling is the polar vortex isn't as stable as in previous years, allowing mixing between the polar and temperate air masses in the stratosphere. The result would be a smaller ozone hole with different properties to the usual. I'll be very interested to see next year's readings. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne water restriction levels Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:18:00 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com David, I agree with your post. Here in Broadford, we are on H2O restrictions, including NON WATERING of lawns. Since the start of last summer, I have saved all dishwashing water for the lawn, and carried it out in buckets. I wrang the local water authority about this, and they said that if you can prove you are recycling waste water, there is not an issue. How do you prove that to an officious inspector if one comes along checking a neighbours complaint?? (I have told neighbours for months about the buckets to save their water bills). My few cents worth. Peter (Didjman) ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jones" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne water restriction levels > > >Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:02:35 +0930 > >From: "Richard Modistach" > >Subject: aus-wx: water restrictions for melb. > > > >heard on the news tonight melbourne's about to officially go onto water > >restrictions, I wonder if this setup coming through wed-thurs\sun-mon can > >delay things a bit, probably hardly make a dent anyway, better to bite th= > >e > >bullet now, god only knows what the future holds. > > > >just out of interest, does anyone have historical data for the last 20-30= > >yrs > >on melbs. water restrictions?, when and for how long. > > Richard this is typical media hyperbole. The trigger point for restrictions > in Melbourne in October is 52% and the reservoirs are at 54.1%... 2% might > not sound like much but it is. The trigger point for November is 54%, so we > could conceivably go into restriction a month from now if we have next to no > rain this month (but October is one of our wettest months around Melbourne). > Further details on the % triggers can be found at > http://www.melbournewater.com.au/system/navsearch.asp > Looking at these, I would expect the crunch period for restrictions to be > -December-January when the cut-off is 53-52%. A very dry October-November > could see our dams approaching these values. > > As for bringing restriction in earlier, personally I think that is just > silly. These restriction levels are well thought out trigger levels based on > history; bringing them in earlier would just amount to scaremongering. > > Philosophically, I don't agree with the way restrictions are imposed as they > ignore the most wasteful water practices in our society. For example, why > should home owners be able to purchase top loading washing machines which > use ~200 litres of water per load while a front loader will do the same job > with half as many litres. The same goes for water saving shower heads, dual > flush toilets, dish washers etc (BTW I have water tanks, dual flush toilets, > a water saving dish washers, a front loading washing machine, and recycle > grey water). Depriving home owners of keeping their gardens alive during > drought seems like a silly knee jerk reaction to me. > > Regards, > > David > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.5 Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 20:00:13 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne water restriction levels From: Dale Small To: X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Razor-id: 419544749a47d026ca970ec4fe8ed0de3fffe013 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Welcome to Brisbane folks. Have been under (basic and season pending) restrictions here for years, with penalties for abusers. Works the same in Beaudesert shire where i am, the water carters are doing a roaring trade right now. Get used to it =) We are a fragile world..... From: "Peter Matters" Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:18:00 +1000 To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne water restriction levels David, I agree with your post. Here in Broadford, we are on H2O restrictions, including NON WATERING of lawns. Since the start of last summer, I have saved all dishwashing water for the lawn, and carried it out in buckets. I wrang the local water authority about this, and they said that if you can prove you are recycling waste water, there is not an issue. How do you prove that to an officious inspector if one comes along checking a neighbours complaint?? (I have told neighbours for months about the buckets to save their water bills). My few cents worth. Peter (Didjman) ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jones" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne water restriction levels > > >Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:02:35 +0930 > >From: "Richard Modistach" > >Subject: aus-wx: water restrictions for melb. > > > >heard on the news tonight melbourne's about to officially go onto water > >restrictions, I wonder if this setup coming through wed-thurs\sun-mon can > >delay things a bit, probably hardly make a dent anyway, better to bite th= > >e > >bullet now, god only knows what the future holds. > > > >just out of interest, does anyone have historical data for the last 20-30= > >yrs > >on melbs. water restrictions?, when and for how long. > > Richard this is typical media hyperbole. The trigger point for restrictions > in Melbourne in October is 52% and the reservoirs are at 54.1%... 2% might > not sound like much but it is. The trigger point for November is 54%, so we > could conceivably go into restriction a month from now if we have next to no > rain this month (but October is one of our wettest months around Melbourne). > Further details on the % triggers can be found at > http://www.melbournewater.com.au/system/navsearch.asp > Looking at these, I would expect the crunch period for restrictions to be > -December-January when the cut-off is 53-52%. A very dry October-November > could see our dams approaching these values. > > As for bringing restriction in earlier, personally I think that is just > silly. These restriction levels are well thought out trigger levels based on > history; bringing them in earlier would just amount to scaremongering. > > Philosophically, I don't agree with the way restrictions are imposed as they > ignore the most wasteful water practices in our society. For example, why > should home owners be able to purchase top loading washing machines which > use ~200 litres of water per load while a front loader will do the same job > with half as many litres. The same goes for water saving shower heads, dual > flush toilets, dish washers etc (BTW I have water tanks, dual flush toilets, > a water saving dish washers, a front loading washing machine, and recycle > grey water). Depriving home owners of keeping their gardens alive during > drought seems like a silly knee jerk reaction to me. > > Regards, > > David > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Bloody scary stuff Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:21:23 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
HomeForecasts, Warnings, Flood Warnings, Charts, Observations, Marine Services, Satellite ImagesMaps, Rainfall Outlook, Climate Averages, Climate and Our EnvironmentFlood Warning Service, Water Resources Assessment, Hydrometeorological Advisory ServiceOur Products, Services and Access MethodsRegistered User information and LOGINEducational Brochures, Library, School Projects, Career InformationPublicationsMedia Releases, Conferences, EventsBureau Contacts, Charter, Organisation, Programs, WMOHelp - FAQs, GlossarySearch the site for words or phrasesFeedback Now. This is bloody scary. Victoria at the start of October with these warnings.
People forget. Ash Wednesday again? I Damn well hope not.....
Navigation Bar Graphic

See Glossary to find out what the weather terms mean.

IDV22000

BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY
VICTORIAN REGIONAL OFFICE

Priority Fire Weather Warning
Issued at 1636 on Tuesday the 1st of October 2002 for Wednesday 2 October 2002

Fire Danger will be extreme on Wednesday 2 October in the Mallee, Wimmera,
Northern Country and North Central districts.



CFA advises people living in areas at risk of fire to activate their bush fire
plan.

© Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2002, Bureau of Meteorology (ABN 92 637 533 532)
Please note the
Copyright Notice and Disclaimer relating to the use of the information on this site and our site Privacy Policy.
Users of these web pages are deemed to have read and accepted the conditions described in the
Copyright Notice and Disclaimer.
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Embedded Content: ban650.gif: 00000001,00000001,00000000,137ee85a X-Originating-IP: [210.50.200.86] From: "Ben Jerrems" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Sorry about that gang Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 22:39:21 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2002 12:39:22.0012 (UTC) FILETIME=[913D8DC0:01C26947] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

No probs mate!




BEANZVISION Photographics.
>From: David Hart
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Subject: aus-wx: Sorry about that gang
>Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 00:02:32 -0400
>
>I was replying to someone who was not able to send mail to the list. The
>old "reply" button sent it to the whole list.
>
>-dkh-
>
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 202.12.87.169 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 22:55:57 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne water restriction levels Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 07:18 PM 1/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >David, > I agree with your post. Here in Broadford, we are on H2O >restrictions, including NON WATERING of lawns. Since the start of last >summer, I have saved all dishwashing water for the lawn, and carried it out >in buckets. I wrang the local water authority about this, and they said that >if you can prove you are recycling waste water, there is not an issue. Well, the most severe restrictions I can recall were in Woodend during the 1982 drought. For several months, we were restricted to 60l per person/day. Baths were shared, that water was then recycled into the washing, then used to water the garden. Couldn't afford to let anything go to waste, and had to read the meter each day to make sure we stayed under the limit. From memory, these restrictions were in force for the spring and summer, until the drought broke in March/April 1983. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 202.12.87.169 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 22:59:51 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Bloody scary stuff Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 08:21 PM 1/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: > Now. This is bloody scary. Victoria at the start of October with these > warnings. >People forget. Ash Wednesday again? I Damn well hope not..... I was close to the Mt Macedon Ash Wednesday fires and will never forget that day, or the ones that followed. I was off school, because they deemed it unsafe to take buses through, and on one of those days I helped Dad and local contractors install temporary power for people burnt out and starting to rebuild. Later in the day, we went to Aireys Inlet to arrange a new fire station (Dad was in the property section of the CFA), and the devastation there was total as well. I was thinking only this morning that this year is like the lead up to Ash Wednesday. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 23:25:47 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: Featured image of the month Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/features/200210.htm 1st September 2001 including the LP supercell near Wyong linked from this page http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/index.html further down ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: September 2002 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:07:00 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Greetings Everyone:
          For your interest/contrast/comparison, here are the totals for Mena, Arkansas for September 2002:
 
AVG. HIGH: 86.0F(30.0C)
AVG. LOW: 61.9F(16.6C)
        High: 95F(35.0C) Sep. 3, 6
         Low: 46F(7.7C) Sep. 24
RAIN FOR MONTH: 3.30IN(83.8 mm)
                                      (-1.70IN/-43.1 mm)
RAIN FOR YEAR: 46.20IN(1,173.4 mm)
                                    (+4.00IN/+101.6 mm)
Here's wishing all of you a Safe & Happy month of October. Happy Storm Chasing. I suppose our temps may be a little similar--except yoours are on the upswing and ours are on the decrease. Enjoy     Yours       David Powell
From: "Craig Arthur" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Featured image of the month Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:55:59 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I just wish I'd had a camera with me on that day! I know several other people wish I did too! Nice photos Jimmy. Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:25 PM Subject: aus-wx: Featured image of the month > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/features/200210.htm > 1st September 2001 including the LP supercell near Wyong > > linked from this page > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/index.html further down > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > from > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 08:00:11 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Featured image of the month Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Craig Thanks for the comments and I think all the others who took the photos also appreciate them. Yes I know the situation Craig and I know the culprits as well...... And I also found out there was someone else with a video camera on that day with you??? Jimmy Deguara At 06:55 AM 2/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >I just wish I'd had a camera with me on that day! > >I know several other people wish I did too! > >Nice photos Jimmy. > >Craig > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jimmy Deguara" >To: >Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:25 PM >Subject: aus-wx: Featured image of the month > > > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/features/200210.htm > > 1st September 2001 including the LP supercell near Wyong > > > > linked from this page > > > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/index.html further down > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Please note the change to my new e-mail > > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > > ----------------------------------------- > > Jimmy Deguara > > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > > > from > > Schofields, Sydney > > NSW Australia > > > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Bloody scary stuff Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:08:37 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all,
        I was explaining to my daughter just the other day of the real possibility of an Ash Wednesday repeat. Rember the big fire near Puckapunyal this year? It got to within 12 klms of here before the wind change. At the time, my daughter found it amusing seeing us put important stuff in the cars.
Things are not looking good.
Cheers Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 8:21 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Bloody scary stuff

HomeForecasts, Warnings, Flood Warnings, Charts, Observations, Marine Services, Satellite ImagesMaps, Rainfall Outlook, Climate Averages, Climate and Our EnvironmentFlood Warning Service, Water Resources Assessment, Hydrometeorological Advisory ServiceOur Products, Services and Access MethodsRegistered User information and LOGINEducational Brochures, Library, School Projects, Career InformationPublicationsMedia Releases, Conferences, EventsBureau Contacts, Charter, Organisation, Programs, WMOHelp - FAQs, GlossarySearch the site for words or phrasesFeedback Now. This is bloody scary. Victoria at the start of October with these warnings.
People forget. Ash Wednesday again? I Damn well hope not.......
From: "Ben Tichborne" To: Subject: aus-wx: Re: aussie-weather-digest V1 #1664 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:15:56 +1200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Simon.. > Don't believe everything you hear. > First of all,I assume you are referring to Sunday afternoon, > 2nd - Sutton forest is near Bowral - Mittagong and quite a distance from > Goulburn. 3rd - the 3 pm temps in both Bowral and Moss Vale were 11 > degrees.(In goulburn it was 12) and in Moss Vale it fell to 9 at 4pm - > hardly "snow" temps. Bowral did report past storm at 6 pm. A friend who > was in Bowral playing golf told me there was a fair bit of small hail as > the storm passed around 4-4.30 but nothing unusual for such an event. > Snow remains the most mis-reported meteorological phenomenon in > Australia... more so even than the famous "mini tornado"! So, as a > weather list, let's not encourage this. Cheers, Don White I think it gets mis-reported when people are passing through an area and see a coating of white on the ground, but only after the frozen stuff has stopped falling. They then assume it's snow. The majority of people would most probably know the difference between hail and snow when it's falling, but fewer probably recognise the difference when it's on the ground. (you have to look closely) Another sign distinguishing snow and hail is the location of the fall - snow usually settles above a certain altitude, while hail is less discriminatory about altitude. However, (especially this time of the year in SE Australia and NZ), heavy thunder and hailstorms may quite possibly lower the temperature of the air where they hit, locally lowering freezing levels for a time, allowing snow to fall to lower levels than expected. It seems likely that the changeable weather affecting SE Australia and NZ is set to continue for some time - blame El NIno or more likely some other cause. One thing that irritates me a bit about the media reporting on weather events is that when they cover a wintry outbreak this time of the year in SE Oz and NZ , they often refer to it as the 'last gasp of winter'. And guess what happens a few weeks later - another wintry blast (just as cold as the previous one) strikes. Ben Christchurch NZ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: fire weather Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:51:36 +1000 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:21:23 +1000 >From: "Bussy" >Subject: aus-wx: Bloody scary stuff >Now. This is bloody scary. Victoria at the start of October with these = >warnings.=20 >People forget. Ash Wednesday again? I Damn well hope not..... This is the second such warning in two weeks, but hopefully conditions won't be as bad as last time (that was the Sunday when the fire broke out near Cape Otway and in the upper Yarra). My understanding is that northern Victoria has observed crown fires even in June, so extreme fire danger in October (which distinctly uncomfortable), is probably not that rare. BTW further to my post earlier in the week, the progs are showing a convergence towards a significant trough/low developing through central Vic in the coming two days (eg NOGAPS at http://152.80.49.205/CGI/PUBLIC/wxmap_all.cgi?type=prod&area=ngp_ausnz&prod= prp ) This type of system is the "almost-classic" heavy rain producer for central Victoria. This is certainly one to watch. I wouldn't be surprised to see 25-50mm falls in the topographically favored central areas IF this eventuates. Also... watch for a strong front early next week... Regards, David +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Re: aussie-weather-digest V1 #1664 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:50:11 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com " I think it gets mis-reported when people are passing through an area and see a coating of white on the ground, but only after the frozen stuff has stopped falling. They then assume it's snow. The majority of people would most probably know the difference between hail and snow when it's falling, but fewer probably recognise the difference when it's on the ground. (you have to look closely) Another sign distinguishing snow and hail is the location of the fall - snow usually settles above a certain altitude, while hail is less discriminatory about altitude. However, (especially this time of the year in SE Australia and NZ), heavy thunder and hailstorms may quite possibly lower the temperature of the air where they hit, locally lowering freezing levels for a time, allowing snow to fall to lower levels than expected." What about Sago? Is that snow or hail :) James Holbeach James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ben Tichborne Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2002 8:16 AM To: aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Re: aussie-weather-digest V1 #1664 > Simon.. > Don't believe everything you hear. > First of all,I assume you are referring to Sunday afternoon, > 2nd - Sutton forest is near Bowral - Mittagong and quite a distance from > Goulburn. 3rd - the 3 pm temps in both Bowral and Moss Vale were 11 > degrees.(In goulburn it was 12) and in Moss Vale it fell to 9 at 4pm - > hardly "snow" temps. Bowral did report past storm at 6 pm. A friend who > was in Bowral playing golf told me there was a fair bit of small hail as > the storm passed around 4-4.30 but nothing unusual for such an event. > Snow remains the most mis-reported meteorological phenomenon in > Australia... more so even than the famous "mini tornado"! So, as a > weather list, let's not encourage this. Cheers, Don White I think it gets mis-reported when people are passing through an area and see a coating of white on the ground, but only after the frozen stuff has stopped falling. They then assume it's snow. The majority of people would most probably know the difference between hail and snow when it's falling, but fewer probably recognise the difference when it's on the ground. (you have to look closely) Another sign distinguishing snow and hail is the location of the fall - snow usually settles above a certain altitude, while hail is less discriminatory about altitude. However, (especially this time of the year in SE Australia and NZ), heavy thunder and hailstorms may quite possibly lower the temperature of the air where they hit, locally lowering freezing levels for a time, allowing snow to fall to lower levels than expected. It seems likely that the changeable weather affecting SE Australia and NZ is set to continue for some time - blame El NIno or more likely some other cause. One thing that irritates me a bit about the media reporting on weather events is that when they cover a wintry outbreak this time of the year in SE Oz and NZ , they often refer to it as the 'last gasp of winter'. And guess what happens a few weeks later - another wintry blast (just as cold as the previous one) strikes. Ben Christchurch NZ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Re: aussie-weather-digest V1 #1664 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:01:56 +1000 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > What about Sago? Is that snow or hail :) > James Holbeach Hail. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: aussie-weather-digest V1 #1664 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:01:49 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com and we always called it sago snow when I was in a kid in Canberra...... Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2002 10:01 Subject: RE: aus-wx: Re: aussie-weather-digest V1 #1664 > > What about Sago? Is that snow or hail :) > > James Holbeach > > Hail. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Louisiana Hurricane season Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:12:46 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello All:
       I came across this off-beat look at Louisiana's Hurricane Season(Procedures & Precautions). I thought it was pretty good. The web address is: http://www.debsfunpages.com/hurricane.htm .
       Enjoy & have a good week      yours      David Powell
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 10:27:27 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Louisiana Hurricane season X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That's a good page! Thanks Dave. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "arky dave" To: Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:12:46 -0500 Subject: aus-wx: Louisiana Hurricane season > Hello All: > I came across this off-beat look at Louisiana's Hurricane > Season(Procedures & Precautions). I thought it was pretty good. The web > address is: http://www.debsfunpages.com/hurricane.htm . > Enjoy & have a good week yours David Powell > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "arky dave" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: NE NSW storms 23/9 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 21:33:54 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I LOVE time-lapse movies and that was a super one!!! Well done!!! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Bath" To: Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 4:46 AM Subject: aus-wx: NE NSW storms 23/9 > Hi all, > > Some impressive storms on the NSW North Coast this afternoon. Probably some > severe weather about, but only reports of small hail and intense rain at > this stage. > > One cell managed to develop right in front of the webcam, so I've uploaded > a small movie file if you'd like to see: > It's 412km in size and covers the period from 3.22pm to 4.55pm. It is a > good one to loop over and over :) > > http://australiasevereweather.com/video/webcam/2002/0923mb01.mpg > > cheers, Michael > > > > ================================================================== > Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au > McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ > North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ > Australia co-webmaster: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ > Australian Severe Weather Association president > ================================================================== > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:24:07 +1000 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Niangala Tornado (NSW) - Oct 13 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Grabbed this link from the weatherzone forum: http://tamworth.yourguide.com.au/detail.asp?class=news&subclass=local&story_id=185171&category=general%20news&m=10&y=2002 Looks like we got footage/photos of a tornadic storm from a distance !!! Niangala is SE of Tamworth.. ill try and look it up on whereis.com.au later.... If anyone wants to come along on saturday to try and find a damage track, let me know as I may head up. Photograph in the link above of the damaged house looks like the tornado was F2, maybe stronger. Photos etc from James Harris will be up at www.sydneystormchasers.com later this evening when he gets back from work. I must say.. its a pretty good feeling when a tornado occurs less than 1 hours drive from your original target area, even if you didnt see it! Matthew Smith +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006 Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 22:24:02 +1000 Subject: aus-wx: Mildura obs From: Greg Stewart To: "aussie-weather at world.std.com" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 02/10 17:30 NNW 10 16 28.8 -22.8 2 47.2 (Very High) 0.0 1012.5 Just in case anyone is interested......2% humidity -22.8 dew point. Is this some sort of record? Greg Stewart +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: September Averages Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 22:34:20 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all,
Only managed to scrape together 35mm of rain in the old gauge for September... the lowest amount I've recorded so far since I got my wx station.
 
September's readings from my wx station (in Morphett Vale, SA) can be found here if anyone is interested : http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer/monthsumseptember2002.htm
 
:)
 
From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: SE Aust trough Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:30:08 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Morning all, Will be interesting to monitor this situation for the next few days.....especially with cyclogenesis over our part of the world. The drier low levels (below 650hPa) that were evident over Mt Gambier yesterday morning in the sounding had reached Melbourne by last night, with mid-level moisture remaining between 650 and 300hPa. 21:34 UTC, 02/10/2002 AREA FORECAST 022300 TO 031100 AREAS 30/32 OVERVIEW: NORTHWESTERLY FLOW SHIFTING SOUTHERLY TO W OF TROUGH EXPECTED NEAR NARACOORTE/PORTLAND 05Z, MILDURA/KING ISLAND 11Z. PATCHY RAIN W OF RENMARK/KING ISLAND EXTENDING SLOWLY EASTWARD TO W OF BALRANALD/FLIKI BY 05Z AND W OF 148E BY 11Z. ISOLATED SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS NE OF HAY/MANSFIELD/DELEGATE AFTER 04Z, MAINLY RANGES. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:26:12 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: Subject: aus-wx: Hurricane Lili bears down on Louisiana X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Lili is already Category 4 which makes it the most powerful Hurricane to hit the Gulf states coast in at least 20 years (can anyone find the exact records please?). We need to pray that the people living in those low-lying coastlands of Louisiana will obey the authorities and get out in time, or the toll there could be high. I have just finished adding links to some text-only local NWS warning pages to my page at http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm as it is receiving many hits from the US right now. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Rainfall data Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:42:04 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I have posted a summary of monthly rainfall data at my house at
 
 
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: DON'T OPEN EMAILS FROM CLYVE HERBERT atm Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:49:52 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com There is a virus which is not from Clyve or his address but has used his name. Don't open them - delete them. Titled Re:aus-wx: Can the ASWA please teach newsreaders. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: aus-wx: Moning Glory Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:25:23 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Just wondering if anyone else got this post from David Hart as it didn't arrive in my Aussie-wx folder, I found it buried in my normal emails .. it's good reading. :) Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Hart" Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 4:53 AM > Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls1.std.com [199.172.62.103]) > by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08519 > for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:44:22 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from hotmail.com (f86.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.165.86]) > by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08311 > for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:44:21 -0400 > Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; > Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:44:16 -0700 > Received: from 144.138.103.22 by sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; > Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:44:14 GMT > X-Originating-IP: [144.138.103.22] > From: "Robert Goler" > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Gulf Line field experiment > Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 01:44:14 +1000 > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > Message-ID: > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2002 15:44:16.0105 (UTC) FILETIME=[3B6C0D90:01C26898] > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > > Hi all > > Just thought I'd mention that I'm currently in Karumba (northern Qld) > involved in the Gulf Line field experiment. (I = Robert Goler) > > For those not in the know, this is a field experiment involving people from > Monash Uni in Melbourne (where I'm from), people from the BoM and people > from the University of Munich in Germany. We're all here to collect data > from weather stations, pilot balloons, and radiosondes to study the morning > glory around the southern Cape York Peninsula, and the north Australian > cloud line over the northern peninsula. There is no mobile coverage up > here, so I'll occasionally post an email or two on the list when something > interesting happens. For some basic info about what these cloud lines look > like, see here: > http://www.maths.monash.edu.au/~robert/Thesis/introduction.html > > I arrived on Sunday with a fellow student after driving all the way up from > Melbourne leaving Wednesday. Had to drive up with Monash Uni's 4wd as we > had to take a whole load of equipment up with us. The trip was pretty > uneventful, ie no break downs or fatal encounters with wildlife...although > quite a few bugs got up close and personal with the windshield. The most > exciting parts were the dust filled skies around Jerilderie on Wednesday, > and coming into Goondiwindi on Thursday night where we did see some distant > lightning further to the north. > For the record we stayed the night at West Wyalong, Goondiwindi, Rockhampton > (a real dodgey place!) and Townsville, and sampled what nightlife they had > on offer...hence the late starts the following morning...hehe! > > In Karumba we've had southerlies the past 2 days as a cold front passed > through early on Sunday morning. However conditions should be ok for the > next few days for morning glories to form, so hopefully something exciting > will happen! > > Cheers, > > Robert > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world^Òs largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: meso at pop.iprimus.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:01:29 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Mal Ninnes Subject: aus-wx: Next NSW ASWA Meeting - Saturday 12th October X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Oct 2002 09:00:44.0498 (UTC) FILETIME=[5B6B4320:01C26ABB] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello aussie-weather people, The next NSW ASWA meeting will be held on Saturday, 12th of October. Venue: The Weather Company, 7 West St, North Sydney. Time: 7pm Parking: Free in the streets around the TWC building. Press the 'Weather21' buzzer to be let in. Agenda: * Discussion, photos & video of Friday 27th Sept Sydney evening storms, and the Sept 18/19 windstorms, plus other recent events * Discussion about Thunder Down Under this year * ASWA polo shirts will be for sale for $25 each, along with hats and stickers * Storm News update * ASWA committee update * Current weather analysis by Matthew Pearce If you have any video/slides/photos/charts, etc that you'd like to show at this meeting, please bring it along. We usually order pizza as well, so bring a few dollars for that :) Friends and relatives are welcome - come along and discuss the weather! See you there, Malcolm Ninnes and Matthew Pearce NSW ASWA State Reps +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: DON'T OPEN EMAILS FROM CLYVE HERBERT atm Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:04:56 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com got it twice, NAV stopped it though. Cheers --------------------------------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------------------- Member of: Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au --------------------------------------------------------- This email is virus free. Scanned before leaving my mailbox using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k Scanned with the latest definition File. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 6:49 PM Subject: aus-wx: DON'T OPEN EMAILS FROM CLYVE HERBERT atm > There is a virus which is not from Clyve or his address but has used his > name. Don't open them - delete them. > > Titled Re:aus-wx: Can the ASWA please teach newsreaders. > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.5 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:11:12 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: DON'T OPEN EMAILS FROM CLYVE HERBERT atm From: Dale Small To: X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Razor-id: 8cfa9285772ed4eb9126592f9ea1b088b9dcbed9 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thankyou Jane. Simon (Can-Wx) has recieved a few so im led to believe, looks like we better ALL have a close look at our systems again, Warnings are running rife in #weather chat. Luckily, operating a mac im not remotely susceptible to these, but now that i have spoken up, if my mail server is alerting to me to virii/trojans, i wont be such a nice person as i am now. Cmon everyone, lets sort this crap out now before this mailing list dissolves. Turn the bloody html coding off and get on with business. The experienced will KNOW that html coding will harbour virii and trojans, if it will take less than a minute of your time to disable it before posting to the list, it will save a hell of a lot of anger, frustration, computers and ill feeling directed to the aus-wx mailing list, where it is not rightfully deserved. Its simple, and isnt restricted to this mailing list only. Regards Dale X From: "Jane ONeill" Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:49:52 +1000 To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: DON'T OPEN EMAILS FROM CLYVE HERBERT atm There is a virus which is not from Clyve or his address but has used his name. Don't open them - delete them. Titled Re:aus-wx: Can the ASWA please teach newsreaders. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: Virus Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:51:22 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Dale wrote: Turn the bloody html coding off and get on with business. Clyve's computer didn't send this virus to anyone - the address that the email came from is not his - it's a fake. The virus creates the code and forms the attachment (if any) - and then sends it out from an unrelated computer. That's why the sending email addresses are always wrong. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Virus and Clyve Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:37:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I would never doubt anything Clyve ever sent. What a knowledgeable man !!!
If he would ever try to virus effect anyone !! A man who freely gives out information in a term I can understand. Rock on Clyve !
CLYVE is not infected !!!!
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Trying to learn Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:40:04 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
A low forming/swirling in the SW of Victoria ATM?
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Trying to learn Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 21:23:25 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Bussy,
              Spot on! It is clearly depicted on the radar / tracker. The wrap around is in SA.
Cheers Peter (Didjman)
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 8:40 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Trying to learn

A low forming/swirling in the SW of Victoria ATM?
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: SE Aust trough Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 21:37:47 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Amazing 'rotation' showing up on the radar tonight over western Victoria and southeastern SA, with lightning tracker showing storms along the cloudbands wrapping into the circulation!! The cloudband through the west of the state (from Mildura and south) is only moving east v. e. r. y slowly. Nick Sykes and Paul Yole are out there somewhere!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: September Averages Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 22:19:57 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
That's a downpour !!.  I have not had 35mm since July 1 to date. That being said this dry is the most acute I have seen. I have seen longer term dry spells with more rain, but nothing matching the last three months.
 
Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: Stargazer
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: September Averages

Hi all,
Only managed to scrape together 35mm of rain in the old gauge for September... the lowest amount I've recorded so far since I got my wx station.
 
September's readings from my wx station (in Morphett Vale, SA) can be found here if anyone is interested : http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer/monthsumseptember2002.htm
 
:)
 
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 23:00:08 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: SE Aust trough To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com We got our first storm today at about 3pm. Lightning was only every 10 secs or so mainly, but very spectacular, with several Cg crawlers. Heavy rain accompanied the storm. Another storm moved through about 45 mins later. Just on dusk, very quick development formed along the trough line and wrapped around the low. Some heavy storms were evident on radar just to my SW near Dartmoor, from here the lightning was quite spectacular again. At about 8pm we got our 3rd storm, not as much lightning but some pea-sized hail was recieved. Since then only the occaisional shower. Tim Eckert Hamilton SW Victoria ---- Original message ---- >Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 21:37:47 +1000 >From: "Jane ONeill" >Subject: aus-wx: SE Aust trough >To: "Aussie-wx" > >Amazing 'rotation' showing up on the radar tonight over western Victoria >and southeastern SA, with lightning tracker showing storms along the >cloudbands wrapping into the circulation!! The cloudband through the >west of the state (from Mildura and south) is only moving east v. e. r. >y slowly. > >Nick Sykes and Paul Yole are out there somewhere!! > > >Jane > >-------------------------------- >Jane ONeill - Melbourne >cadence at stormchasers.au.com > >Melbourne Storm Chasers >http://www.stormchasers.au.com > >ASWA - Victoria >http://www.severeweather.asn.au >-------------------------------- > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:32:09 +1000 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: SE Aust trough Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~ventus45/OddBits/MtGambier.gif +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:58:09 +1000 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: SE Aust trough Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The Mt Gambier sonde went all the way up to 20hPa tonight (26,500m / 87,000 feet). http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~ventus45/OddBits/MtGambier_sonde.gif +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:09:33 +1000 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: SE Aust trough Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~ventus45/OddBits/MtGambier_hodo.gif http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~ventus45/OddBits/MtGambier_hodo1.gif +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 09:03:03 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Australian Weather Mailing List Subject: aus-wx: Storm Season Celebrations Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Just wondering if anyone did anything to celebrate the official start of the storm season (Oct 1)??? I was in Sydney and we had a BBQ with a few friends at Matt Pearce's (it was also going to be the night before I went back to Brisbane). Realising that it coincided with the night before storm season I couldn't resist the temptation to buy a cake. Needless to say, when I told the cake shop what to write on it, I got a very weird and surprised look and reaction...I have no idea, what's so unusual about the writing on the cake??? http://www.downunderchase.com/anthony/HappyStormSeason.jpg (James Harris is the person in the photo - sorry James!) -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Drool on.... Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:30:15 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "David Carroll" To: "Aussie Weather" Subject: aus-wx: off topic - Bob Jane t-marts 1000 Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:53:17 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
HI all,
 
Just curious how many people might be heading to Bathurst for the car races next week. 
 
I will be operating a UHF CB on CH 25 if anyone heads to Bathurst and is also armed with a radio scanner.
 
Please email me off list
 
 
David
Mt Panorama Frequency Page
http://www.hotkey.net.au/~davidkc
ICQ 64538477
From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Morning glory Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:19:51 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com This report from Robert Goler in the Gulf Country...................... We have had morning glories pass over Karumba from the northeast yesterday and this morning, and they were markedly different. The morning glory that passed yesterday did not have any cloud when it went over us, and so it was only noticeable by its wind gusts. The wind was originally from the southeast, and then it changed at around 3am to be gusting to around 15 knots from the northeast - the onset of the morning glory. This lasted a couple of minutes, and then the wind settled down, until another gust came. 3 gusts in all passed over us. The morning glory for this morning was quite spectacular with at least 15 cloud lines passing overhead. The broad scale cloud could be seen in the normal lo-res satellite imagery available on the net. We awoke at 5am and the first cloud line had already passed. Everything outside was wet, with water literally dripping off the cars due to the high humidity of the air associated with the morning glory. We tracked a few balloons to observe the wind speed and direction until 8am when the last of the cloud lines passed through. The hi-res sat pics also showed a morning glory coming from the south, but located west of Karumba. One of the goals of this experiment is to verify model forecasts from a high-resolution version of LAPS which is used to forecast the Gulf cloud lines. The forecast for today was for the convergence line associated with the sea breezes to pass over Karumba at 6am. As a result, we set our alarms to wake up at 5am to give us time to set up the equipment to take observations. However, the morning glory is a wave system which moves faster than the convergence line, and so propagates ahead of it. This is why we were caught out this morning, with the leading cloud of the morning glory already having passed us when we awoke. Tomorrow is looking not favourable for morning glories over Karumba. There is a trough to the south which is forecast to pass through tomorrow morning, putting us into southeasterlies. This would mean that one would need to be out in the Gulf to observe it. Cheers Robert +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:58:42 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: DON'T OPEN EMAILS FROM CLYVE HERBERT atm X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Interestingly enough, I have not received any to this address, but I have received them to my other address, so the infected computer has my Doctor Disk address in its address book, but may not have my ICS address. That is likely to be true of very few people on this list. So, check your address books! And everybody, please, every day, always keep your anti-virus software up to date. I had received two copies of the Bugbear worm (and recognised it as an unknown worm so I didn't get infected) before it was reported to the anti-virus companies on 30th September. We must be always vigilant. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:49:52 +1000 Subject: aus-wx: DON'T OPEN EMAILS FROM CLYVE HERBERT atm > There is a virus which is not from Clyve or his address but has used > his > name. Don't open them - delete them. > > Titled Re:aus-wx: Can the ASWA please teach newsreaders. > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:06:05 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com This is a great forecast & the satpics tell the story of the main centre over the NW of the state!! http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/10040930vicvis.gif 22:50 UTC, 03/10/2002 AMEND AREA FORECAST 032230 TO 041100 AREAS 30/32 AMD OVERVIEW: LOW PRESSURE COMPLEX OVER VICTORIA, MAIN CENTRE NEAR WARRACKNABEAL 23Z, MANGALORE 05Z, MANSFIELD 11Z, BUT 60NM TO N AT 18500FT. WINDS GENERALLY CIRCULATING CLOCKWISE AROUND LOW. SCATTERED THUNDERSTORMS E OF 143E AND ALSO ALONG RANGES, MAINLY AFTER 03Z. RAIN AREAS ON AND S OF THE RANGES AND DEVELOPING REMAINDER E OF 144E AFTER 03Z. LOCALLY HEAVY RAIN. SCATTERED SHOWERS REMAINDER. AREAS OF LOW CLOUD SEA/COAST/RANGES AND IN PRECIPITATION. AMD WIND: CLOCKWISE WINDS ABOUT LOW CENTRE [SEE OVERVIEW FOR POSITION] 2000 5000 7000 10000 14000 18500 VRB/20 VRB/20 VRB/25 VRB/30 MS06 VRB/30 MS14 VRB/30 MS23 REMARKS: WIND ALL LEVELS VRB/15 WITHIN 80NM OF MAIN LOW CENTRE. AMD CLOUD: SCT CB 4000/30000 E OF 143E AND ALSO ALONG RANGES, MAINLY AFTER 03Z. BKN ST 0600/3000 SEA/COAST/RANGES AND IN PRECIPITATION. BKN CUSC 3000/8000, WITH SCT CU TOPS TO 15000 AFTER 02Z. AREAS BKN ACAS ABV 10000, SCT IN NW. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.5 Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 11:34:18 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: (Off topic) Bugbear virus From: Dale Small To: X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Razor-id: 110bb544742bda7d3e0048c0b0712416531cc64a Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello again everyone I have emailed Jane privately with an apology for the rather strongly worded post last night, bought upon by a spam attack to this machine, from various email addresses, containing this virus. Some information about the bugbear, and this is a wild virus, highly damaging to users so please do all you can to obtain the latest virus definitions, my contacts are telling me that as i type this, mail and web systems across australia and around the world are being shut down as a result of very rapid replication. Just a little information about this, if it is way off topic to the list, could the owners please notify me personally and sort the situation out that way. The information below has been snipped directly from Symantecs website and i suggest you have a look at the information in further detail, i will not create a massive email for this list. http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.bugbear at mm.html Please do all you can to prevent infection, this is a very dangerous piece of work and has to be knocked on the head quickly Regards Dale --- W32.Bugbear at mm is a mass-mailing worm. It can also spread through network shares. It has keystroke-logging and backdoor capabilities. The worm also attempts to terminate the processes of various antivirus and firewall programs. Because the worm does not properly handle the network resource types, it may flood shared printer resources, which causes them to print garbage or disrupt their normal functionality. It is written in the Microsoft Visual C++ 6 programming language and is compressed with UPX v0.76.1-1.22. Also Known As: W32/Bugbear-A [Sophos], WORM_BUGBEAR.A [Trend], Win32.Bugbear [CA], W32/Bugbear at MM [McAfee], I-Worm.Tanatos [AVP], W32/Bugbear [Panda], Tanatos [F-Secure] Type: Worm Infection Length: 50,688 bytes Systems Affected: Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Me Systems Not Affected: Macintosh, Unix, Linux CVE References: CVE-2001-0154 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Interesting article Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:13:35 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 X-Davsoft-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://www.spacedaily.com/news/greenhouse-02l.html - -- If you give someone a program, you will frustrate them for a day. If you teach them how to program, you will frustrate them for a lifetime. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9nRVvZOfFgbBAbXARAov/AKCQQVoqynorlqqGkG4JCl04W1J44ACfed6J f3Ky17gRydhMhs5gMtUDmJ0= =Cdqv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.132.18.241] From: "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne storms Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:49:23 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Oct 2002 04:49:23.0983 (UTC) FILETIME=[692509F0:01C26B61] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. Just watching melbourne radar. Very interesting watching the storms as they wrap around the low and track east to west. Raining on and off here in Donvale, with thunder and tiny hail for the past hour or more. STA out for Melbourne too. Welcome back spring! Liam _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: NSW STA Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:59:43 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi All,
The BoM have Issued a STA for the Southern tablelands and SW slopes south of the ACT * http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/wrap_fwo.pl?IDN28300.txt *
My weathercam is pointhing south for those who are interested www.canberra-wx.com/weathercam.htm Currently clouded, but it is building to my north and East, and if anything does develop i will put my shoes on and foot chase (well walk to my lookout 50m away and sit and watch), lol.
Interesting propagation of the storms today due to the Low on the border region of Vic and NSW,  mainly moving N to S.
 
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
From: debp at relax.com.au Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:32:20 +1000 X-Authentication-Warning: users.relax.com.au: nobody set sender to debp at relax.com.au using -f To: aussie-weather at world.std.com User-Agent: IMP/PHP3 Imap webMail Program 2.0.11 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Melbourne storms Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Lots of thunder in Boronia too - moderate rain but no hail as yet. Quoting Liam Domanski : > Hi all. > > Just watching melbourne radar. Very interesting watching the storms as > they > wrap around the low and track east to west. > > Raining on and off here in Donvale, with thunder and tiny hail for the past > > hour or more. > > STA out for Melbourne too. > > Welcome back spring! > > > > Liam > > ________________________________________________________ _________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with \"unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address\" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------ ------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:45:11 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jane Where is that vis satpic from? Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill > Sent: Friday, 04 October, 2002 11:06 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria > > > This is a great forecast & the satpics tell the story of the main centre > over the NW of the state!! > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/10040930vicvis.gif > > 22:50 UTC, 03/10/2002 > AMEND AREA FORECAST 032230 TO 041100 AREAS 30/32 > > AMD OVERVIEW: > LOW PRESSURE COMPLEX OVER VICTORIA, MAIN CENTRE NEAR WARRACKNABEAL 23Z, > MANGALORE 05Z, MANSFIELD 11Z, BUT 60NM TO N AT 18500FT. WINDS > GENERALLY CIRCULATING CLOCKWISE AROUND LOW. SCATTERED THUNDERSTORMS E OF > 143E AND ALSO ALONG RANGES, MAINLY AFTER 03Z. RAIN AREAS ON AND S OF THE > RANGES AND DEVELOPING REMAINDER E OF 144E AFTER 03Z. LOCALLY HEAVY RAIN. > SCATTERED SHOWERS REMAINDER. AREAS OF LOW CLOUD > SEA/COAST/RANGES AND IN PRECIPITATION. > > AMD WIND: > CLOCKWISE WINDS ABOUT LOW CENTRE [SEE OVERVIEW FOR POSITION] > 2000 5000 7000 10000 14000 18500 > VRB/20 VRB/20 VRB/25 VRB/30 MS06 VRB/30 MS14 VRB/30 MS23 > REMARKS: > WIND ALL LEVELS VRB/15 WITHIN 80NM OF MAIN LOW CENTRE. > > AMD CLOUD: > SCT CB 4000/30000 E OF 143E AND ALSO ALONG RANGES, MAINLY AFTER 03Z. > BKN ST 0600/3000 SEA/COAST/RANGES AND IN PRECIPITATION. > BKN CUSC 3000/8000, WITH SCT CU TOPS TO 15000 AFTER 02Z. > AREAS BKN ACAS ABV 10000, SCT IN NW. > > Jane > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > ASWA - Victoria > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 19:48:20 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, You win some - you loose some! After seeing exploding TCu over Puckapunyal and the vicinity of Yea around 1300, I checked the tracker to see it going off around Benalla. On asking the family if they cared for a drive (I had already pointed out the TCu's), we headed out after a quick call to Jane, for Euroa - initially. There was something big to the east of the Strathbogies sporning TCu and some scud, all tracking West. The base was very black, but any structure was obscured by foreground cloud. We reached Euroa, and kept heading up the Hume for Benalla from where we could see large updraughts over Bright / Mt Buffalo area, creating all the cloud moving across Euroa / Seymour. With family on board, we decided to head for the Glenrowan truckstop - aka "Maccas" Various updraughts continued to spring up in a line from Mt Buffalo to Wadonga and beyond. All up, it was a 300klm round trip to Maccas and back, but the kids weren't complaining. I have cloud pics if anyone is interested. P.S. 1.5 mm fell in Broadford in our absence:-)) Cheers Peter(Didjman) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:06 AM Subject: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria > This is a great forecast & the satpics tell the story of the main centre > over the NW of the state!! > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/10040930vicvis.gif ------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: NSW STA Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 19:59:46 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Damn. You have no idea how close this storm came to us/me. Black as the inside of a cow and so slow moving. I've watched it since 4pm today when I could see it develop. Watching on radar it has just missed here by the smallest of margins. It was visually showing very heavy rain and lots of crawlers especially. Bugger, bugger, bugger........
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:59 PM
Subject: aus-wx: NSW STA

Hi All,
The BoM have Issued a STA for the Southern tablelands and SW slopes south of the ACT * http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/wrap_fwo.pl?IDN28300.txt *
My weathercam is pointhing south for those who are interested www.canberra-wx.com/weathercam.htm Currently clouded, but it is building to my north and East, and if anything does develop i will put my shoes on and foot chase (well walk to my lookout 50m away and sit and watch), lol.
Interesting propagation of the storms today due to the Low on the border region of Vic and NSW,  mainly moving N to S.
 
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 20:02:42 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I've got some too, but very disappointed :-(( ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Matters" To: Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 7:48 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria > Hi all, > You win some - you loose some! > After seeing exploding TCu over Puckapunyal and the vicinity of Yea around > 1300, I checked the tracker to see it going off around Benalla. On asking > the family if they cared for a drive (I had already pointed out the TCu's), > we headed out after a quick call to Jane, for Euroa - initially. There was > something big to the east of the Strathbogies sporning TCu and some scud, > all tracking West. The base was very black, but any structure was obscured > by foreground cloud. We reached Euroa, and kept heading up the Hume for > Benalla from where we could see large updraughts over Bright / Mt Buffalo > area, creating all the cloud moving across Euroa / Seymour. With family on > board, we decided to head for the Glenrowan truckstop - aka "Maccas" Various > updraughts continued to spring up in a line from Mt Buffalo to Wadonga and > beyond. All up, it was a 300klm round trip to Maccas and back, but the kids > weren't complaining. I have cloud pics if anyone is interested. > > P.S. 1.5 mm fell in Broadford in our absence:-)) > > Cheers Peter(Didjman) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jane ONeill" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:06 AM > Subject: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria > > > > This is a great forecast & the satpics tell the story of the main centre > > over the NW of the state!! > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/10040930vicvis.gif > ------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 20:08:34 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Up above! Sorry couldn't help myself. Warning. Clown at work.... Seriously though I'm interested too. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Complex over Victoria > Jane > > Where is that vis satpic from? > > Laurier > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:07:09 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: SE Aust trough To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Here are my pics from yesterday's action out here in the west: http://au.geocities.com/auswxchaser/3Oct02 Also some pics of some convective activity in NE VIC on 27th September, and in Canberra on the 28th and 29th: http://au.geocities.com/auswxchaser/Sept02 And don't forget my main weather page at: http://au.geocities.com/timjeckert/ Cheers, Tim Eckert Hamilton SW Victoria ---- Original message ---- >Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 23:00:08 +1000 >From: Tim Eckert >Subject: Re: aus-wx: SE Aust trough >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >We got our first storm today at about 3pm. Lightning >was only every 10 secs or so mainly, but very >spectacular, with several Cg crawlers. Heavy rain >accompanied the storm. Another storm moved >through about 45 mins later. >Just on dusk, very quick development formed along >the trough line and wrapped around the low. Some >heavy storms were evident on radar just to my SW >near Dartmoor, from here the lightning was quite >spectacular again. At about 8pm we got our 3rd storm, >not as much lightning but some pea-sized hail was >recieved. Since then only the occaisional shower. > >Tim Eckert >Hamilton >SW Victoria > > >---- Original message ---- >>Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 21:37:47 +1000 >>From: "Jane ONeill" > >>Subject: aus-wx: SE Aust trough >>To: "Aussie-wx" >> >>Amazing 'rotation' showing up on the radar tonight >over western Victoria >>and southeastern SA, with lightning tracker showing >storms along the >>cloudbands wrapping into the circulation!! The >cloudband through the >>west of the state (from Mildura and south) is only >moving east v. e. r. >>y slowly. >> >>Nick Sykes and Paul Yole are out there somewhere!! >> >> >>Jane >> >>-------------------------------- >>Jane ONeill - Melbourne >>cadence at stormchasers.au.com >> >>Melbourne Storm Chasers >>http://www.stormchasers.au.com >> >>ASWA - Victoria >>http://www.severeweather.asn.au >>-------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com >> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather >your_email_address" in the body of your >> message. >> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au-------------- -- >-------------- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: paisley2 at mail.chariot.net.au Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 20:42:21 +0930 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Phil Bagust Subject: Re: aus-wx: Morning glory Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >This report from Robert Goler in the Gulf Country...................... > This is very interesting stuff! I hope we get more of these reports. I've read some stuff from glider pilots flying in these things and seen some photos - it all looks very spectacular! Maybe one of these days the ASWA will have to organise a Morning Glory chase! Phil Phil'Paisley'Bagust: paisley2 at chariot.net.au: Philip.Bagust at unisa.edu.au - - - - - - - 'The Playpen' at www.chariot.net.au/~paisley2 - - - - - - - "...I'd wring your neck, if you had one..." Noel Coward +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:19:25 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Just had a quick storm go across here. One which I have watched for hours and now has dumped a whole 2mm and that is all.
This storm has had lots of crawlers and no cc's or cg's that I know of.
Why are the strikes not going to cloud or ground?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Current radar Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:28:53 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Anyone else notice that anything that is west of Wagga is being "ignored" by radar?
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Sorry. Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:30:11 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Should've been I suppose a certain distance East of Wagga :-)
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:08:33 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Why are the strikes not going to cloud or ground? Also a question I would like to know the answer to... Seems that was a common theme from the storms out this way... What determines whether a storm puts out Cc's or Cg's or crawlers? ---- Original message ---- >Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:19:25 +1000 >From: "Bussy" >Subject: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers >To: "aussie-weather" > >Just had a quick storm go across here. One which I have watched for hours and now has dumped a whole 2mm and that is all. >This storm has had lots of crawlers and no cc's or cg's that I know of. >Why are the strikes not going to cloud or ground? > >Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:33:36 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Oct 2002 12:35:43.0248 (UTC) FILETIME=[8E161100:01C26BA2] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all.. For the second time in just over a month my computer was again disabled by some miserable little .......anyway all that, despite having up to date anti virus everything. Back to better things, I found a remarkable supercell lurking around the Broadford area of Victoria this afternoon complete with fully rotating updraft and two inflow tails.... I still cant believe it but I will send some Photo's later. Best wishes Clyve Herbert.
From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Morning glory Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 00:20:38 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com saw a film a while ago where a guy 'surfed' the morning glory under a paraglider. regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Bagust" To: Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Morning glory > >This report from Robert Goler in the Gulf Country...................... > > > This is very interesting stuff! I hope we get more of these reports. I've > read some stuff from glider pilots flying in these things and seen some > photos - it all looks very spectacular! Maybe one of these days the ASWA > will have to organise a Morning Glory chase! > > Phil > > Phil'Paisley'Bagust: paisley2 at chariot.net.au: Philip.Bagust at unisa.edu.au > - - - - - - - 'The Playpen' at www.chariot.net.au/~paisley2 - - - - - - - > "...I'd wring your neck, if you had one..." Noel Coward > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 00:58:44 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 10:33 PM 4/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Hi all.. For the second time in just over a month my computer was again >disabled by some miserable little .......anyway all that, despite having >up to date anti virus everything. Back to better things, I found a >remarkable supercell lurking around the Broadford area of Victoria this >afternoon complete with fully rotating updraft and two inflow tails.... I >still cant believe it but I will send some Photo's later. Best wishes >Clyve Herbert. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 There's your problem. If you want to minimise the risk, ditch Outlook (Virus Distributor) Express and use another program. :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Morning glory Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 08:51:38 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Images of the morning glory taken this week can be found here.... http://www.stormchasers.au.com/glory.htm Thanks to Robert Goler for forwarding them on!! -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 09:19:37 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Victorian weather!!!!!!
 
First images of this amazing beast......
 
Photos of the powerful Broadford supercell taken today at around 1630 showing the southern inflow tail the whole updraft column was rotating...unbelievable!!!!
 
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at stormchasers.au.com
 
Melbourne Storm Chasers
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:33 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Hi all.. For the second time in just over a month my computer was again disabled by some miserable little .......anyway all that, despite having up to date anti virus everything. Back to better things, I found a remarkable supercell lurking around the Broadford area of Victoria this afternoon complete with fully rotating updraft and two inflow tails.... I still cant believe it but I will send some Photo's later. Best wishes Clyve Herbert.
X-Sender: mbath at mail.ozemail.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 10:22:48 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Michael Bath Subject: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Forwarded from another list I'm on !!! http://australiasevereweather.com/temp/lili_waterspouts.jpg > >Attached is a picture taken offshore yesterday morning by a Seacor >employee as Lili approached shore. Enjoy! > >-Bob Weinzapfel > >****************************************** >* Bob Weinzapfel * >* Graduate Research Assistant * >* School of Meteorology, * >* University of Oklahoma * >* bobwein at ou.edu (405)325-8896 * >******************************************* =================================================================== Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ =================================================================== +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 10:30:24 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all,
        This adds insult to injury - a supercell above my home!!! At 1630, I was in Glenrowan, taking the family to McDonalds after the useless chase North. The pic is amazing. I have captures of exploding TCu's to the north and east taken around 1330.
Cheers Peter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Victorian weather!!!!!!
 
First images of this amazing beast......
 
Photos of the powerful Broadford supercell taken today at around 1630 showing the southern inflow tail the whole updraft column was rotating...unbelievable!!!!
 
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at stormchasers.au.com
 
Melbourne Storm Chasers
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:33 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Hi all.. For the second time in just over a month my computer was again disabled by some miserable little .......anyway all that, despite having up to date anti virus everything. Back to better things, I found a remarkable supercell lurking around the Broadford area of Victoria this afternoon complete with fully rotating updraft and two inflow tails.... I still cant believe it but I will send some Photo's later. Best wishes Clyve Herbert.
From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 10:34:06 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all,
       My guage at home only had 1.5mm when we returned at around 1900. All that remained of any storms were long Cirrus bands.
Cheers Peter
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Victorian weather!!!!!!
 
First images of this amazing beast......
 
Photos of the powerful Broadford supercell taken today at around 1630 showing the southern inflow tail the whole updraft column was rotating...unbelievable!!!!
 
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at stormchasers.au.com
 
Melbourne Storm Chasers
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:33 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Hi all.. For the second time in just over a month my computer was again disabled by some miserable little .......anyway all that, despite having up to date anti virus everything. Back to better things, I found a remarkable supercell lurking around the Broadford area of Victoria this afternoon complete with fully rotating updraft and two inflow tails.... I still cant believe it but I will send some Photo's later. Best wishes Clyve Herbert.
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 10:48:32 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Gee. That's one wild looking bit of sky!!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Victorian weather!!!!!!
 
First images of this amazing beast......
 
Photos of the powerful Broadford supercell taken today at around 1630 showing the southern inflow tail the whole updraft column was rotating...unbelievable!!!!
 
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at stormchasers.au.com
 
Melbourne Storm Chasers
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:33 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Hi all.. For the second time in just over a month my computer was again disabled by some miserable little .......anyway all that, despite having up to date anti virus everything. Back to better things, I found a remarkable supercell lurking around the Broadford area of Victoria this afternoon complete with fully rotating updraft and two inflow tails.... I still cant believe it but I will send some Photo's later. Best wishes Clyve Herbert.
From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: 100mm+ in E Gippsland storms this morning Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:18:15 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com An intense thunderstorm gave Mallacoota 102mm and Gabo Island 93mm, most falling between 3 and 9 this morning. Mallacoota recorded 52 and Gabo 53 between 6 and 9, and Gabo's observer reported slight/moderate storm at the 3 and 6am obs, and heavy storm at 9. No hail. The lightning tracker has shown storms moving SE in the area but constantly backbuilding southeast of the low over the NSW Southern Tablelands. Eden reported 64mm and Merimbula 31. Is anyone in the area? This is the biggest rain event in Victoria for quite a while! Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:27:14 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Clyve,
        Can you tell me which Direction you were looking in these pics, and your location? I might be able to put a fix on the cell's position for you. The hills at the back look like Mt Tallarook.
Cheers Peter
From: "Simon Clarke" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:29:07 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2002 04:27:32.0409 (UTC) FILETIME=[85CC7A90:01C26C27] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com MB As you would probably know now from that list.... sad but true... it is allegedly a fake..... would have been impressive though... it had me fooled at first....but yes...the sea is too calm for Lili's approach. Whether it is a genuine pic of another event... who knows... people look closely ! Regards Simon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Bath" To: Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 10:22 AM Subject: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili > > Forwarded from another list I'm on !!! > > http://australiasevereweather.com/temp/lili_waterspouts.jpg > > > > > > > >Attached is a picture taken offshore yesterday morning by a Seacor > >employee as Lili approached shore. Enjoy! > > > >-Bob Weinzapfel > > > >****************************************** > >* Bob Weinzapfel * > >* Graduate Research Assistant * > >* School of Meteorology, * > >* University of Oklahoma * > >* bobwein at ou.edu (405)325-8896 * > >******************************************* > > > =================================================================== > Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au > McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ > North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ > Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ > =================================================================== > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 14:43:16 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I noticed the smooth sea!!!!!!!!!!!! Cheers Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Clarke" To: Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 2:29 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili > MB > > As you would probably know now from that list.... sad but true... it is > allegedly a fake..... would have been impressive though... it had me fooled > at first....but yes...the sea is too calm for Lili's approach. > > Whether it is a genuine pic of another event... who knows... people look > closely ! > > Regards > Simon > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Bath" > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 10:22 AM > Subject: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili > > > > > > Forwarded from another list I'm on !!! > > > > http://australiasevereweather.com/temp/lili_waterspouts.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Attached is a picture taken offshore yesterday morning by a Seacor > > >employee as Lili approached shore. Enjoy! > > > > > >-Bob Weinzapfel > > > > > >****************************************** > > >* Bob Weinzapfel * > > >* Graduate Research Assistant * > > >* School of Meteorology, * > > >* University of Oklahoma * > > >* bobwein at ou.edu (405)325-8896 * > > >******************************************* > > > > > > =================================================================== > > Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au > > McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ > > North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ > > Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ > > =================================================================== > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Klipsi" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 06:57:22 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > I noticed the smooth sea!!!!!!!!!!!! > but yes...the sea is too calm for Lili's approach. could be the quiet eye of the storm ? just kidding... Klipsi +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 16:58:17 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:19 AM 5/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Victorian weather!!!!!! > >First images of this amazing beast...... > >Photos of the powerful Broadford supercell taken today at around 1630 >showing the southern inflow tail the whole updraft column was >rotating...unbelievable!!!! >http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/1004ch01.jpg >http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/1004ch02.jpg I KNEW I wanted to go out yesterday! I was so distracted, I couldn't focus on work. :-/ Nice photos! :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: A Rainbow Question Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 03:52:46 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
G'Day to Everyone:
       Thursday evening, just before sunset, I looked to the East and saw a faint rainbow. There were high clouds around(the extreme westward cloudband around TS Lili) but there was no rain around. Can there be a rainbow with no rain in the area? As with Isidore, all we got from Lili was some clouds and a little wind, but NO rain.
        Well, that's my question for this time. Have a good one and C-Ya'll later.   David Powell
From: "Steve Baynham" To: "weather" Subject: aus-wx: awesome Lili sat Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 20:37:43 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/Archive/Oct2002/Lili_tmo2002 274.jpg Steve Baynham icq : 26863574 Brisbane Storm Chasers http://www.bsch.au.com Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au Homepage http://www.angelfire.com/ok/gany +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 19:56:35 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: A Rainbow Question X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com If all of the angles are right, even rain at a great distance from you can refract a rainbow. It is also possible with virga. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "arky dave" To: Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 03:52:46 -0500 Subject: aus-wx: A Rainbow Question > G'Day to Everyone: > Thursday evening, just before sunset, I looked to the East and > saw a faint rainbow. There were high clouds around(the extreme westward > cloudband around TS Lili) but there was no rain around. Can there be a > rainbow with no rain in the area? As with Isidore, all we got from Lili > was some clouds and a little wind, but NO rain. > Well, that's my question for this time. Have a good one and > C-Ya'll later. David Powell > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:24:39 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I think I may have seen this before somewhere. Sorry. I think the middle one is a fake. If you look closely you can see where it is "plastered" onto the picture. Not sure but I think the left one may be too. Sorry Michael. I have seen this somewhere before. :-(( ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Bath" To: Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 10:22 AM Subject: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili > > Forwarded from another list I'm on !!! > > http://australiasevereweather.com/temp/lili_waterspouts.jpg > > > > > > > >Attached is a picture taken offshore yesterday morning by a Seacor > >employee as Lili approached shore. Enjoy! > > > >-Bob Weinzapfel > > > >****************************************** > >* Bob Weinzapfel * > >* Graduate Research Assistant * > >* School of Meteorology, * > >* University of Oklahoma * > >* bobwein at ou.edu (405)325-8896 * > >******************************************* > > > =================================================================== > Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au > McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ > North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ > Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ > =================================================================== > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: A Rainbow Question Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:28:08 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I'd say some rain which never reached the ground (Virga). Rainbows need rain as far as I know. :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: arky dave
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 6:52 PM
Subject: aus-wx: A Rainbow Question

G'Day to Everyone:
       Thursday evening, just before sunset, I looked to the East and saw a faint rainbow. There were high clouds around(the extreme westward cloudband around TS Lili) but there was no rain around. Can there be a rainbow with no rain in the area? As with Isidore, all we got from Lili was some clouds and a little wind, but NO rain.
        Well, that's my question for this time. Have a good one and C-Ya'll later.   David Powell
From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: A Rainbow Question Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 23:00:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Arky, There would have been rain / virga for the light to be refracted through the raindrops to create the rainbow.... http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Sept02/rainbow.jpg (Clyve's photo) and just for Jimmy, this shows what you find at the end of rainbows...cows (hehehe, sorry Jimmy, I just can't help myself) http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/DCP02916.JPG Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 9:56 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: A Rainbow Question > If all of the angles are right, even rain at a great distance from you > can refract a rainbow. It is also possible with virga. > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "arky dave" > To: > Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 03:52:46 -0500 > Subject: aus-wx: A Rainbow Question > > > G'Day to Everyone: > > Thursday evening, just before sunset, I looked to the East and > > saw a faint rainbow. There were high clouds around(the extreme westward > > cloudband around TS Lili) but there was no rain around. Can there be a > > rainbow with no rain in the area? As with Isidore, all we got from Lili > > was some clouds and a little wind, but NO rain. > > Well, that's my question for this time. Have a good one and > > C-Ya'll later. David Powell > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Klipsi" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: A Rainbow Question Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:58:50 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > and just for Jimmy, this shows what you find at the end of > rainbows...cows (hehehe, sorry Jimmy, I just can't help myself) > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/DCP02916.JPG > Jane weeeellll, the legend goes you may find gold. This pix here seems to prove it, but it was black gold... http://eclipse.span.ch/270502c.jpg ;-) Klipsi +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 06:20:28 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yes, it is definitely a fake. Pasted here is the message sent to the other list by Gary Padgett who first sent the photo to the other list: =================== Hey guys, Sorry to have to tell you this. After I'd sent that picture, the next time I downloaded e-mail there was a message from the sender, apologizing for sending it. Apparently he'd discovered it was a hoax in the sense it was not associated with Hurricane Lili. It is an impressive picture, though. Here is the message he sent: Hello all, I was actually emailed this picture from 2 separate people. The only information the emails said was what I passed on in mine. I was just informed from a professor here at OU that this photo is likely a hoax. Someone he talked to at NSSL said he received the picture 2 days ago, not after yesterday morning as the emails claimed. Take a look at the picture again and notice the blurriness around the edge of the ship (blending it with the background), the lack of significant waves (not even whitecaps), and the definite edge between the sharp water and the blurry water. If you open the image with a program that allows you to zoom in on it, you can see that it looks like 2 photos were likely spliced together to create this one. Also, the fact that the only information passed around about the photographer was that he was a Seacor employee is questionable. I know if I took the picture, I'd have my name on the edge of it or at least on the original email I sent out. I apologize for sending the group a fake photo. Regardless, the part of the image with the waterspouts looks like it's real and is quite impressive if that is the case. ================== Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Bussy" To: Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:24:39 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili > I think I may have seen this before somewhere. Sorry. I think the > middle one > is a fake. If you look closely you can see where it is "plastered" onto > the > picture. Not sure but I think the left one may be too. Sorry Michael. I > have > seen this somewhere before. :-(( > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Bath" > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 10:22 AM > Subject: aus-wx: triple waterspouts from Hurricane Lili > > > > > > Forwarded from another list I'm on !!! > > > > http://australiasevereweather.com/temp/lili_waterspouts.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Attached is a picture taken offshore yesterday morning by a Seacor > > >employee as Lili approached shore. Enjoy! > > > > > >-Bob Weinzapfel > > > > > >****************************************** > > >* Bob Weinzapfel * > > >* Graduate Research Assistant * > > >* School of Meteorology, * > > >* University of Oklahoma * > > >* bobwein at ou.edu (405)325-8896 * > > >******************************************* > > > > > > =================================================================== > > Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au > > McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ > > North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ > > Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ > > =================================================================== > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 08:32:40 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Great photos Clyve! Well done!!! AC -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 14:01:09 +0930 From: Richard Albury X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: in appreciation :) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jane ONeill wrote: > Hi Arky, > > There would have been rain / virga for the light to be refracted through > the raindrops to create the rainbow.... > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Sept02/rainbow.jpg (Clyve's photo) > > and just for Jimmy, this shows what you find at the end of > rainbows...cows (hehehe, sorry Jimmy, I just can't help myself) > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/DCP02916.JPG > > Jane > > --Hi Jane What excellent photo's u publish here. I am usiing them as wallpaper for my PC and I change them around every few days. My friends who see my desktop are amazed at them, so much so that they are becoming aware that there is a lot more to weather than first meets the eye. I point out that other dedicated meteorologists post just as many interesting photograhs on site as well from around australia and the world, which makes me more determined to buy a digital camera so I can add a few here as well. Again, thank you for such interesting photo's. I cherish them greatly. Richard - Kurralta Park.South Australia +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: in appreciation :) Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 16:41:46 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Richard, Pleased you are enjoying the pics - there are so many excellent photographers in Australia, and digital cameras in particular have freed a lot people up to be able to present what they saw, the way it actually was - not the way the printer at the photolab thought it should be printed or the way the old scanner decided it should look......then of course you have people like Tony Middleton who have an 'eye' as well as the technical knowledge to be able to create brilliant images using SLR's!! (thanks Tony! - check his photography out at http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils/ Although 99% of us aren't meteorologists ...we're all of us keen amateur weather enthusiasts!! ...a very hearty thank you to all of those people whose photographs are presented on the MSC site - its growing popularity is a direct result of both the stunning photographs and the reports sent in and complied by weather enthusiasts!! People now know a lot more about what Victoria can offer weatherwise that they ever did. Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Albury" To: Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 2:31 PM Subject: aus-wx: in appreciation :) > > > Jane ONeill wrote: > > > Hi Arky, > > > > There would have been rain / virga for the light to be refracted through > > the raindrops to create the rainbow.... > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Sept02/rainbow.jpg (Clyve's photo) > > > > and just for Jimmy, this shows what you find at the end of > > rainbows...cows (hehehe, sorry Jimmy, I just can't help myself) > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/DCP02916.JPG > > > > Jane > > > > --Hi Jane > > What excellent photo's u publish here. I am usiing them as wallpaper for my PC > and I change them around every few days. My friends who see my desktop are > amazed at them, so much so that they are becoming aware that there is a lot > more to weather than first meets the eye. > > I point out that other dedicated meteorologists post just as many interesting > photograhs on site as well from around australia and the world, which makes me > more determined to buy a digital camera so I can add a few here as well. > > Again, thank you for such interesting photo's. I cherish them greatly. > > Richard - Kurralta Park.South Australia > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:14:41 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: aus-wx: SW VIC storm To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. Just had a weak thunderstorm go through SW of here with 4 Cg's that I saw. Was a nice surprise even though BOM had forecast a possible storm. Seems it was high based and associated with a slight wind change maybe?? Interesting to also note that we have recorded our maximum temperature for today of 18.7C at 8pm this evening as a result of the strengthening northerlies gusting up to 37knot. Regards. Tim Eckert Hamilton SW Victoria +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 23:47:46 +0930 From: Richard Albury X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Just to clear up a point Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jane ONeill wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Pleased you are enjoying the pics - there are so many excellent > photographers in Australia, and digital cameras in particular have freed > a lot people up to be able to present what they saw, the way it actually > was - not the way the printer at the photolab thought it should be > printed or the way the old scanner decided it should look......then of > course you have people like Tony Middleton who have an 'eye' as well as > the technical knowledge to be able to create brilliant images using > SLR's!! (thanks Tony! - check his photography out at > http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils/ > > Although 99% of us aren't meteorologists ...we're all of us keen amateur > weather enthusiasts!! > > ...a very hearty thank you to all of those people whose photographs are > presented on the MSC site - its growing popularity is a direct result of > both the stunning photographs and the reports sent in and complied by > weather enthusiasts!! People now know a lot more about what Victoria > can offer weatherwise that they ever did. > > Cheers, > > Jane Hi Jane - everyone I must clear up a point before there is any misconception here. I am not a fully qualified meteorologist as such. I am an Observer Grade 1 with B o M. and have been for the past 30 years. I have a full paramater weather station; the instruments being manually read every 6 hours as opposed to electronic or self recording ones. My station consists of a Stevenson Screen holding Max- Min themometer plus a DP thermometer set, the standard B o M 8" raingauge, a windvane and anemometer (recently damaged in a squall that passed over). I am awaiting Council permission to re erect my windvane mast again. My recording instruments consist of a barograph and thermograph; the thermograph being kept indoors as is the barograph. Left outside in my S/Screen would be stolen in an instant. Also I have 2 barometers which I check off against each other, plus a mercurial barometer which is carefully stored away out of harms way - as you know mercury being poisonous and little fingers like touching. I operated the weather station for the Meningie air field in S.Aust upper south east for over 5 years, giving weather information to pilots of light air craft flying to Kangaroo Island and to Adelaide, the capital city(mainly) and to the local farming community. My station was called "Yalkuri" which is aboriginal for big wind. I started into weather basically because of astronomy. In my young days (< 9 years onwards) weather forecasts were very unreliable and many was the time I set myself for a night of observing to find the sky overcast, contrary to what the B o M forecasted. This kindled my interest and study of weather to the extent that it dominated my interests to this very day with astronomy coming in a close second. So please understand that I am not a scientist as such in the field of meteorology; just a very dedicated observer, and I have been for nore years than most have been living :) I am interested in all facets of weather'; yes even the balmy, boring stuff lolol. The one unchangable thing I have found out about weather is that it is so changable very quickly. I have been in many areas of varying weather patterns from tropical to temperate. I lived both in Darwin and in Melbourne at various times, not to mention a stint in Vietnam(1968 - 69). Again thank you to all that take the time to publish their photo's and reports. It is greatly appreciated by yours truly. If I can help out a budding weather person I would only be so pleased to do so, if you drop me a line or 2 :) Richard - Kurralta Park. S.Australia +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Thunderstom at Hotham Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 01:12:30 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com If only I had a camera for the Cb which descended over Mt Hotham on Friday- 3-5 cm of pea sized hail made the place look like a ski resort! It was fabulous, 6 strike per min at the peak, nearly all C2C but still good viewing . . . . If you have never experienced a thunderstorm on mount then I suggest you do so. . . . :) James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Cornelius Sent: Sunday, 6 October 2002 8:33 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Great photos Clyve! Well done!!! AC -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:46:57 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2002 00:49:02.0957 (UTC) FILETIME=[54C859D0:01C26D9B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello Peter   This storm was located almost due east of Broadford towards the Flowerdale area, the northern inflow band passed over Broadford. The decaying period of this storm passed near to Kilmore. I didn't mention this before but this amazing storm was Tornadic it produced suction vortices under the wall cloud for several minutes. The analysis of photographs show this happening, also another well know storm chaser was in the area with a video camera and videoed about 15 minutes of this storm. After I decided to move to a different location I drove south and saw Jane O'Neill, standing in a paddock!! she was only about half a kilometre from me all the time. Regards Clyve Herbert.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Clyve,
        Can you tell me which Direction you were looking in these pics, and your location? I might be able to put a fix on the cell's position for you. The hills at the back look like Mt Tallarook.
Cheers Peter
From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Victorian pressure oddities!!! Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:46:00 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Afternoon all, Have you noticed the oddity in the pressure fall across central and western Victoria?? It's interesting that pressures are falling to ~995 - 996hPa over the whole area at the sale time. Reflects very little pressure gradient. Also the mid level cloudline has been edging southwest...... Any thoughts??? (maybe a deepening of the trough?) Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "W.A. \(Bill\) Webb" To: Subject: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:05:20 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tim, Bussy, and Others. Haven't seen lightning for so long maybe I shouldn't comment, but here goes. Where the lightning goes depends on the relative strengths of positive and negative charges in cloud, atmosphere, and earth, and the distance between the accumulated charges. CG's - mostly negative flashes from cloud base (negative) to ground under storm (positive area). Occasionally, more powerful positive flashes from cloud top (positive) to ground away from under the storm (negative area). CC's - positive flashes from top of cloud 1 (positive) to bottom of cloud 1 or cloud 2 (negative). Normally more common at higher altitudes (farther from ground). C to Air - From top of cloud (positive) to negatively charged atmosphere. Can be seen from a long way off, and often the thunder is not heard (because of the distance away). Why the charges become so arranged? Maybe something to do with ice crystals (top of cloud) being positively charged, and water droplets (bottom of cloud) being negatively charged. I'm sure someone on the list will have some information. Maybe a bit too simple an explanation, but I'm willing to learn more! Regards, Bill, Proserpine (clear, with 15 to 20 knot ESE breeze, temp ~ 27°C, RH 51%) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Eckert" To: Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:08 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers | >Why are the strikes not going to cloud or ground? | | Also a question I would like to know the answer to... | Seems that was a common theme from the storms | out this way... What determines whether a storm puts | out Cc's or Cg's or crawlers? | | | ---- Original message ---- | >Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:19:25 +1000 | >From: "Bussy" | >Subject: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers | >To: "aussie-weather" | > | >Just had a quick storm go across here. One which I | have watched for hours and now has dumped a whole | 2mm and that is all. | >This storm has had lots of crawlers and no cc's or | cg's that I know of. | >Why are the strikes not going to cloud or ground? | > | >Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com | with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your | message. | -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell. Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:07:55 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Clive,
           Thx for the info. You confirmed my thoughts from your pics; the main updraught was in the vicinity of Strath Creek. I would love to see the video that was shot.
All this and I drove to Benalla and back to see a few distant storms over the Bright area!!! My wife has not let me live it down:-)) I still cant believe it lol! The area was exploding 3hrs before the Supercell, but all updraughts were vertical at the time (as per the few pics I emailed Jane). Everything was moving East to West, and updraughts were obscured by a lot of scud (at 1300). What caused things to organise??
Cheers Peter
 
PS. This is a huge learning experience for me!!
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Hello Peter   This storm was located almost due east of Broadford towards the Flowerdale area, the northern inflow band passed over Broadford. The decaying period of this storm passed near to Kilmore. I didn't mention this before but this amazing storm was Tornadic it produced suction vortices under the wall cloud for several minutes. The analysis of photographs show this happening, also another well know storm chaser was in the area with a video camera and videoed about 15 minutes of this storm. After I decided to move to a different location I drove south and saw Jane O'Neill, standing in a paddock!! she was only about half a kilometre from me all the time. Regards Clyve Herbert.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Broadford Supercell.

Clyve,
        Can you tell me which Direction you were looking in these pics, and your location? I might be able to put a fix on the cell's position for you. The hills at the back look like Mt Tallarook.
Cheers Peter
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 21:28:07 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id HAA14381 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks for that Bill. Quite often the more simple explanation is the better as it easier to understand for those of us not as technically minded. Tim. ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:05:20 +1000 >From: "W.A. \(Bill\) Webb" >Subject: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers >To: > >Hi Tim, Bussy, and Others. > >Haven't seen lightning for so long maybe I shouldn't comment, but here goes. > >Where the lightning goes depends on the relative strengths of positive and >negative charges in cloud, atmosphere, and earth, and the distance between >the accumulated charges. > >CG's - mostly negative flashes from cloud base (negative) to ground under >storm (positive area). Occasionally, more powerful positive flashes from >cloud top (positive) to ground away from under the storm (negative area). > >CC's - positive flashes from top of cloud 1 (positive) to bottom of cloud 1 >or cloud 2 (negative). Normally more common at higher altitudes (farther >from ground). > >C to Air - From top of cloud (positive) to negatively charged atmosphere. >Can be seen from a long way off, and often the thunder is not heard (because >of the distance away). > >Why the charges become so arranged? Maybe something to do with ice crystals >(top of cloud) being positively charged, and water droplets (bottom of >cloud) being negatively charged. I'm sure someone on the list will have some >information. > >Maybe a bit too simple an explanation, but I'm willing to learn more! > >Regards, >Bill, >Proserpine (clear, with 15 to 20 knot ESE breeze, temp ~ 27°C, RH 51%) > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tim Eckert" >To: >Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:08 PM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers > > >| >Why are the strikes not going to cloud or ground? >| >| Also a question I would like to know the answer to... >| Seems that was a common theme from the storms >| out this way... What determines whether a storm puts >| out Cc's or Cg's or crawlers? >| >| >| ---- Original message ---- >| >Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:19:25 +1000 >| >From: "Bussy" >| >Subject: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers >| >To: "aussie-weather" | weather at world.std.com> >| > >| >Just had a quick storm go across here. One which I >| have watched for hours and now has dumped a whole >| 2mm and that is all. >| >This storm has had lots of crawlers and no cc's or >| cg's that I know of. >| >Why are the strikes not going to cloud or ground? >| > >| >Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) >| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >| To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >| with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >| message. >| -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au-------------- ---------------- >| > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian pressure oddities!!! Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 23:48:57 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2002 13:48:57.0391 (UTC) FILETIME=[487053F0:01C26E08] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Good evening Jane :) I noticed that too. This may have attributed to the appearance of fairly decent thundery showers/storms across central parts this afternoon. It was quite a late development too with the first sign of real towers appearing at 2:30pm Bring on tomorrow Karl :) >From: "Jane ONeill" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Victorian pressure oddities!!! >Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:46:00 +1000 > >Afternoon all, > >Have you noticed the oddity in the pressure fall across central and western >Victoria?? It's interesting that pressures are falling to ~995 - 996hPa >over the whole area at the sale time. Reflects very little pressure >gradient. > >Also the mid level cloudline has been edging southwest...... > >Any thoughts??? (maybe a deepening of the trough?) > >Jane >-------------------------------- >Jane ONeill - Melbourne >cadence at stormchasers.au.com > >Melbourne Storm Chasers >http://www.stormchasers.au.com > >ASWA - Victoria >http://www.severeweather.asn.au >-------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Chas & Helen Osborn" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:19:48 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Bill Does ground just under a thunderstorm have a positive charge or does the storm move from a always negative area to a always positively charged area? Chas Strahan Tasmania ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Eckert" To: Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:28 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers > Thanks for that Bill. > Quite often the more simple explanation is the better > as it easier to understand for those of us not as > technically minded. > Tim. > > > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:05:20 +1000 > >From: "W.A. \(Bill\) Webb" > >Subject: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers > >To: > > > >Hi Tim, Bussy, and Others. > > > >Haven't seen lightning for so long maybe I shouldn't > comment, but here goes. > > > >Where the lightning goes depends on the relative > strengths of positive and > >negative charges in cloud, atmosphere, and earth, > and the distance between > >the accumulated charges. > > > >CG's - mostly negative flashes from cloud base > (negative) to ground under > >storm (positive area). Occasionally, more powerful > positive flashes from > >cloud top (positive) to ground away from under the > storm (negative area). > > > >CC's - positive flashes from top of cloud 1 (positive) > to bottom of cloud 1 > >or cloud 2 (negative). Normally more common at > higher altitudes (farther > >from ground). > > > >C to Air - From top of cloud (positive) to negatively > charged atmosphere. > >Can be seen from a long way off, and often the > thunder is not heard (because > >of the distance away). > > > >Why the charges become so arranged? Maybe > something to do with ice crystals > >(top of cloud) being positively charged, and water > droplets (bottom of > >cloud) being negatively charged. I'm sure someone > on the list will have some > >information. > > > >Maybe a bit too simple an explanation, but I'm > willing to learn more! > > > >Regards, > >Bill, > >Proserpine (clear, with 15 to 20 knot ESE breeze, > temp ~ 27°C, RH 51%) > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Tim Eckert" > >To: > >Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:08 PM > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers > > > > > >| >Why are the strikes not going to cloud or ground? > >| > >| Also a question I would like to know the answer to... > >| Seems that was a common theme from the storms > >| out this way... What determines whether a storm > puts > >| out Cc's or Cg's or crawlers? > >| > >| > >| ---- Original message ---- > >| >Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:19:25 +1000 > >| >From: "Bussy" > >| >Subject: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers > >| >To: "aussie-weather" >| weather at world.std.com> > >| > > >| >Just had a quick storm go across here. One which > I > >| have watched for hours and now has dumped a > whole > >| 2mm and that is all. > >| >This storm has had lots of crawlers and no cc's or > >| cg's that I know of. > >| >Why are the strikes not going to cloud or ground? > >| > > >| >Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) > >| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > >| To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > >| with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your > >| message. > >| -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au-------------- > ---------------- > >| > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- > -------------- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: debp at relax.com.au Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:26:33 +1000 X-Authentication-Warning: users.relax.com.au: nobody set sender to debp at relax.com.au using -f To: aussie-weather at world.std.com User-Agent: IMP/PHP3 Imap webMail Program 2.0.11 Subject: aus-wx: Hail Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All, Just had a brief hail shower in Boronia. Small 1 - 2 mm lasting about 3 minutes. Sun is shining now! Rgds Debbie Bornia, Melbourne +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Klipsi" To: Subject: aus-wx: chase storms from space Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:47:16 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com go see live streaming video from space shuttle at http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/realdata/nasatv/index.html or http://www.unitedspacealliance.com/live/NASATV.htm when it flies over nighttime you may see live streaming storms. I just saw amazing lightning going on as it flew over brazil at night, nonstop of cg activity seen from space, wonderful ! Klipsi +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Max" To: Subject: aus-wx: Sydney Fires Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 18:20:04 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Hi all,

For those of you who may not know, Sydney is again in a bushfire crisis. So far, 8 homes have been lost at Engadine, and others are under threat at Woronora Heights. Another fire is burning in the Berkshire Park, Windsor Downs area. Apparently no property is under threat from this fire at the moment. I’ll update when I know some more.

 

Max

 

__________________________________________________________________
Zac N/A
ICQ#: 
10691140

Current ICQ status:  

+  More ways to contact me
__________________________________________________________________

 

Embedded Content: image001.gif: 00000001,0e1acd69,00000000,00000000 From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Morning Glory update Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 19:14:32 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From Robert Goler, on relay from Gulf Country.... I'm currently in Weipa sitting in the met office, having arrived on Saturday evening. The last two mornings have seen tremendous morning glories over Karumba....doh!! The Gulf line which occurs over the northern peninsula hasn't been as impressive as last week...doh doh!!!! However, we did start making flights to collect data on how these cloud lines form....well to actually confirm the results I have obtained from the numerical modelling work I have done, and so far the atmosphere agrees with the model :-) Yesterday we did 5 hrs of flying in the afternoon from the west coast to the east coast making horizontal transects through the sea breezes, ranging from 200ft above ground level to around 5000 ft. Then at each end of the peninsula we climbed to 10000ft to take a sounding. Seeing the data come in was exciting as it all matched up with my modelling work. You could even see the east-coast sea breeze overriding the west-coast sea breeze as the leading edge of the east-coast sea breeze could be detected at a height of around 2500ft, but not at 200ft. And there was quite a bit of turbulence at the 1500ft level in the vicinity of the sea breeze interaction indicating a high shear region. It was also amazing to see how many fires are burning over the peninsula at the moment! This morning we did 5 hrs of flying through a pissy cloud line consisting of cu only about 1000ft deep - base at 1500ft, top at 2500ft - about 50 miles off the western coast. We flew a dozen 30 mile legs through the cloud line at heights ranging from 200ft to 10000ft with soundings taken 15 miles east and west of the cloud line. Once again, the data matched up with what I have been modelling, so that was good. The first night in Weipa was interested as I went down to the Albatross hotel where there were some Oktoberfest celebrations going on with a live band and lots of drinking. I was also fortunate enough to pick up that night, which was good, but I didn't get back to my hotel until 6:30am, just giving me enough time to shower and meet the other guys for breakfast and then start work. I kept dozing off throughout the day, much to the amusement of the other guys :-) Today the plane is currently down near Karumba in preparation for a southerly morning glory which is predicted for tomorrow morning. So tomorrow will be a quiet one for me. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: simple but effective virus protection.... Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 19:31:42 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com This is what I sent around to all of our branches today, & I thought I'd pass it on as it could be of help - the little downloadable cleaner is a must to have on your computer just in case!! Please take the following steps in Outlook Express to protect yourself from the bugbear virus. DO NOT leave this until tomorrow - it may be too late!! Steps to protect yourself against the bugbear virus (other than having up to date virus checkers): #1. Set your email program to not preview messages. Each email will then show as a single line in your inbox - if your preview pane is activated and a virus comes through, it will be on your computer before you even get to read the email - please turn 'Preview Pane' off. In Outlook Express, in the menu at the top go to View - Layout : Untick "Show Preview Pane" #2. In the menu at the top go to Tools - Options - Maintenance : make sure that there is a tick next to "Empty messages from the Deleted Items folder on Exit" #3. Click on the link below to download a cleaner for the bugbear virus should it get through these defences and VET and invade your computer. When downloading this file (which will take about 11 seconds), take note of the name of the file and where it is put: The file will be placed into a folder on your hard drive called C:\Sophtemp In this folder, double left click on the file called Rmbgbear.exe to run the cleaning program - it will instantly disinfect your computer if you have received the virus & it will tell you whether you have it any time you run it. You can run this program just by double clicking it if ever you are uncertain of the status of your system at any time. http://www.sophos.com.au/tools/bearsfx.exe Jane PS: if you need to know how to change the settings in Microsoft Outlook, let me know. -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: chase storms from space Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:01:21 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Great links! Thankyou! James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Klipsi Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2002 3:47 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: chase storms from space go see live streaming video from space shuttle at http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/realdata/nasatv/index.html or http://www.unitedspacealliance.com/live/NASATV.htm when it flies over nighttime you may see live streaming storms. I just saw amazing lightning going on as it flew over brazil at night, nonstop of cg activity seen from space, wonderful ! Klipsi +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "W.A. \(Bill\) Webb" To: Subject: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:51:25 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Chas and Others, From what I have read, positive under storm, negative away from under storm - but I was hoping someone with more knowledge/more recent knowledge, may be able to help - apparently a "grey area". Bear in mind we are talking "relative" differences here. Are you suggesting that the "charge" of the ground may control the movement (direction) of a/the storm?? While I am corresponding, thank you for your informative posts from Tasmania - I have a mate outside of Hobart, and it is great to relate his reports (he is not a "weather man") with your reports. Thanks to others "down there" also. Regards, Bill. Proserpine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chas & Helen Osborn" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:19 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lots of crawlers | Hello Bill | | Does ground just under a thunderstorm have a positive charge or does the | storm move from a always negative area to a always positively charged area? | | Chas | Strahan Tasmania +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: gthurtel at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 21:51:24 +1000 To: From: Geoff Thurtell Subject: aus-wx: Charge of the lightning brigade Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, It has been a long time since I sent a message to the list but I could not resist this one. I was leafing through the Sydney Morning Herald while eating my lunch today and came across an article on page 7 that contains some characters that may be familiar to this list. I have pasted a link below: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/10/07/1033538894396.html Also, as Max said in his earlier message, the bushfire situation in the Sydney area is a little precarious at the moment. The Engadine fire is endangering many properties. Fire fighters are hoping that the weak southerly change that is passing through Sydney at the moment will help them to bring the situation under control. Geoff Geoff Thurtell Schofields NSW +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.49.209.26] From: "Catherine Elliott" To: "AussieWeather" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Storm Season Celebrations Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:30:17 +1000 X-Mailer: MSN Explorer 7.00.0021.1900 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Oct 2002 13:35:21.0087 (UTC) FILETIME=[8C4BF8F0:01C26ECF] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
You look like you had a really fun time of it. I like the cake idea. nice piccy
 
cath


Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: simple but effective virus protection.... Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:06:43 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com thanks for that jane, i've done exactly as per your instructions, when i execute, a dos window instantly comes up with some jargon AND... 0 infected processes found in memory. 0 infected processes terminated. is this correct? regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:01 PM Subject: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: simple but effective virus protection.... > This is what I sent around to all of our branches today, & I thought I'd > pass it on as it could be of help - the little downloadable cleaner is a > must to have on your computer just in case!! > > Please take the following steps in Outlook Express to protect yourself > from the bugbear virus. DO NOT leave this until tomorrow - it may be too > late!! > > Steps to protect yourself against the bugbear virus (other than having > up to date virus checkers): > > #1. Set your email program to not preview messages. Each email will then > show as a single line in your inbox - if your preview pane is activated > and a virus comes through, it will be on your computer before you even > get to read the email - please turn 'Preview Pane' off. In Outlook > Express, in the menu at the top go to View - Layout : Untick "Show > Preview Pane" > > #2. In the menu at the top go to Tools - Options - Maintenance : make > sure that there is a tick next to "Empty messages from the Deleted Items > folder on Exit" > > #3. Click on the link below to download a cleaner for the bugbear virus > should it get through these defences and VET and invade your computer. > When downloading this file (which will take about 11 seconds), take note > of the name of the file and where it is put: > > The file will be placed into a folder on your hard drive called > C:\Sophtemp > > In this folder, double left click on the file called Rmbgbear.exe to > run the cleaning program - it will instantly disinfect your computer if > you have received the virus & it will tell you whether you have it any > time you run it. You can run this program just by double clicking it if > ever you are uncertain of the status of your system at any time. > http://www.sophos.com.au/tools/bearsfx.exe > > > Jane > > PS: if you need to know how to change the settings in Microsoft Outlook, > let me know. > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 03:35:23 +1000 (EST) From: Grant B To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'Day everyone, I've just uploaded a website. see www.hunterweather.com/~raymondterrace for details. Please tell me what you think. As you will be able to see, this is my first attempt at this sort of thing. Thanks, Grant



Yahoo! Messenger for SMS - Always be connected to your Messenger Friends
From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: simple but effective virus protection.... Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 06:12:26 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Richard, That's exactly what you should get if your computer isn't carrying the virus. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Modistach" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:36 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: simple but effective virus protection.... > thanks for that jane, > > i've done exactly as per your instructions, when i execute, a dos window > instantly comes up with some jargon AND... > > 0 infected processes found in memory. > 0 infected processes terminated. > > is this correct? > > regards > richard > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jane ONeill" > To: "Aussie-wx" > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:01 PM > Subject: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: simple but effective virus protection.... > > > > This is what I sent around to all of our branches today, & I thought I'd > > pass it on as it could be of help - the little downloadable cleaner is a > > must to have on your computer just in case!! > > > > Please take the following steps in Outlook Express to protect yourself > > from the bugbear virus. DO NOT leave this until tomorrow - it may be too > > late!! > > > > Steps to protect yourself against the bugbear virus (other than having > > up to date virus checkers): > > > > #1. Set your email program to not preview messages. Each email will then > > show as a single line in your inbox - if your preview pane is activated > > and a virus comes through, it will be on your computer before you even > > get to read the email - please turn 'Preview Pane' off. In Outlook > > Express, in the menu at the top go to View - Layout : Untick "Show > > Preview Pane" > > > > #2. In the menu at the top go to Tools - Options - Maintenance : make > > sure that there is a tick next to "Empty messages from the Deleted Items > > folder on Exit" > > > > #3. Click on the link below to download a cleaner for the bugbear virus > > should it get through these defences and VET and invade your computer. > > When downloading this file (which will take about 11 seconds), take note > > of the name of the file and where it is put: > > > > The file will be placed into a folder on your hard drive called > > C:\Sophtemp > > > > In this folder, double left click on the file called Rmbgbear.exe to > > run the cleaning program - it will instantly disinfect your computer if > > you have received the virus & it will tell you whether you have it any > > time you run it. You can run this program just by double clicking it if > > ever you are uncertain of the status of your system at any time. > > http://www.sophos.com.au/tools/bearsfx.exe > > > > > > Jane > > > > PS: if you need to know how to change the settings in Microsoft Outlook, > > let me know. > > > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- - > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Cc: Subject: aus-wx: Morning glory update 9/10/02 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:00:59 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From Robert Goler in the Gulf..... Here's this morning's sat pic showing a southerly morning glory (cloud lines oriented northeast-southwest over southern Gulf), a northeasterly morning glory passing through it (northwest-southeast lines of brighter cloud within southerly mg), and a Gulf line west of the peninsula further north. http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/nac1.gif Cheers, Rob +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "NANDINA" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: OFFTOPIC: simple but effective virus protection.... Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:58:29 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jane, thank you so much for that advice. Now I wonder if you can tell me how to get OE to accept a message rule in which the To: is blank? Tried leaving the response box blank, but it insists it needs a name. All my latest virus warnings came from a pseudo 'read' mail (I usually have a full inbox), but could not create a rule for this. Anyway, I have followed your instructions, perhaps I won't receive them any more:-) Cheers, Nandina --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 10/3/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Broadford supercell Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:34:40 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Evening all,
 
In an article submitted to Melbourne Storm Chasers by Clyve Herbert describing his encounter with the Broadford supercell of Friday (4th October), he says "I had seen photographs of such storms over the plains of the USA!!!....This one was only about 70 kilometres north of Melbourne Australia!"  
 
The article and images can be found here......
 
...more to come.....
 
Enjoy!! 
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at stormchasers.au.com
 
Melbourne Storm Chasers
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:21:29 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Australian Weather Mailing List , Wx-Chase Subject: aus-wx: October 9 SE QLD Supercell With Golfball Hail! Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tuesday night had a nice feel to it, a nice northerly and a bit of humidity…still a little cool, but nice! The sky eventually became quite overcast with Stratocumulus overnight from midnight onwards which was quite encouraging! But the N'ly stopped at around 3am…not a huge thing, although at the time I was hoping it would kick up again. The morning warmed up quickly, getting into the mid 20s quickly in the morning and the northerly very quickly began to kick up again (partly due to the seabreeze). A friend of mine had always wanted to come stormchasing with me…thinking today might be a good day I decided to bring her along to see what she thought of it. I had to pick her up from Bracken Ridge, and I left my place at 11:45am (after finishing work at 11am). I got there around 12:15 and we grabbed some lunch and fuel - I had originally decided to head out towards Warrill View, but some developing weak showers and storms were making that decision quite difficult! To the SW all I could see was flat CJs, while around me I already had some possible developing storms. After having a debate against myself, I decided to stick to the original idea as I wanted to play the SE change. Fifty minutes later at Ipswich I was getting quite concerned that the only development was to the north, but when we got onto the Cunningham Hwy I was quite relieved to start seeing some convection developing on the Border Ranges! We got Warrill View at around 2pm and we waited there for a little bit. It was quite warm, the thermo had been sitting on 32C. There was a light to moderate N/NE'ly blowing, it didn't feel overly humid but it certainly wasn't dry either! There were some CJs to the west and south…none of them were really doing anything which was disappointing. We waited for about 40 minutes before eventually deciding to head south towards Boonah. There seemed to be some weak cells in NE NSW and I thought that it might be our best chance and I was hoping something might develop on the actual trough and change. Things began to look a little nicer at Boonah, the storm wasn't that far away (40km or so) and it didn't seem to be moving that fast. However it was throwing up the odd nice updraft on the northern flank which got me interested. I wanted it to track NE'ly so it would go into chasable territory (that and if it did that chances are it would have meant that it was a lot stronger). I got a call from Jonty at the Bureau and we discussed it briefly…he mentioned that they were watching the storm as it was possibly developing at the intersection of the S'ly changes and the NE'ly winds but they weren't sure whether it would end up being south of that boundary. Joey and I headed just out of Boonah by about 7-8km and stopped again, on the northern flank a massive updraft had exploded! Although by the time we had stopped it didn't look quite as good. We shot eastwards to Beaudesert and sat out a few kilometers west of the town just before the trees started. We could see the band of rain off to the S and SE with the main updraft region to our SSW. The updraft region was looking interesting at this time, there was a small inflow region into the storm, and it had developed good outflow. A fibrous but otherwise relatively solid (for the strong 300mb shear) anvil was spreading well out towards the east, although the storm itself was not overly high (35,000 or so). I spoke to MB and discussed the situation with him, he said that the storm had intensified on radar (as it had appeared to visually) and there was a nice core of red. He said that it had supercellular characteristics on radar and was now moving NNE (also noticeable). But it was moving slowly…and the other strange thing is that we hadn't even seen a CG from the storm yet! Although we were getting rumbles of thunder constantly rolling into one another. There was a nice inflow band developing into the storm, it was beginning to stretch several kilometers out to the NNW! A quick word to Jonty about the structure and he replied with the storm also having supercellular characteristics on radar! I was amazed at the lack of lightning though…the rain curtain remained within 5km of us the entire time and we never even saw so much as a flash (although heard the continuous rumbling!) Eventually I told Joey that we should only sit in the car, to which she replied with "but there's no lightning!" But I just wanted to be safe as we were quite close and I didn't want the first CG we saw to be within 50m of us while standing in the open (or worse…) I think I jinxed the CG thing though…as I promised Joey that she'd see at least one CG. Did she see it? Well…going on, we decided to head west a bit just to get a better look at some of the lowerings underneath the main base. They weren't doing anything spectacular, but I was thinking of taking a road south just west of us. That was the original plan, but the we got overtaken by rain…originally just rain. Then it was torrential rain with strong gusty (60-70km/h) winds. A minute or two after the hail started…just a little at first but then just bucket loads of it! It was probably the heaviest hail I've been in, it was blanketing everything even before it was being washed away! The noise was DEAFENING!!! Joey got quite scared…I must say even I was taken back by the ferocity, there was debris falling all over the car and all over the road from the wind and hail!!! The stones were mostly 1-2cm but some were up to 3cm…these were solid and jagged though…not soft hail! I wanted to report it to the Bureau and also phone MB. Both of them I could hardly hear them on the phone and in the end I know with MB at least I just told him a whole pile of things and had a muffled response back that I couldn't understand over the hail and then hung up! The winds were gusty originally but then eased off a bit (but it was never calm!) This continued for around 5-6 minutes before the hail let-off briefly. I decided that I'd prefer to be east and trying to get north of the storm - that and get out of the hail region! Just going a couple of hundred metres westwards to find a place to turn around the hail actually got slightly bigger (a lot of 3cm's), and I briefly wondered if they would get even bigger further west but didn't really want to find out (3cm is the maximum size hail you really want on your car if you don't want too many dents!) He headed east, very strong winds and heavy rain greeted us getting out of the NE side of the storm. The rain eventually let off and it was only drizzle at Beaudesert. We headed northwards, but the storm was heading NNE and was going to intersect the highway. For some reasons the traffic lights in Beaudesert took half an eternity to change - I was getting impatient, but even then we got stuck behind slow drivers going out of Beaudesert. Eventually we got caught in the southeastern side of the storm which brought heavy rain and gusty winds once again. Very soon though the winds strengthened tending 70-80km/h with gusts nearing 90km/h and the hail started again! Initially it was pea size but it was gradually getting bigger… The hail got up to 1-2cm once again, although there was not as much hail as before (mostly rain and hail mixed in, but still a lot!) Visibility was quite poor and the highway collectively slowed to about 40km/h before everyone started pulling off…I really wanted to head further north and made a judgment that since the storm itself was moving quite slowly, if we were to continue we should be able to go through. I was concerned about the larger hail, but I thought that the main updraft region would still be a bit to our west and we were sitting on the eastern edge of the hail (which appeared to be the case given what happened later). Visibility continued to decline though…very soon we were crawling along at 20-30km/h with 2cm hail, torrential rain and gale force winds pounding the car! As we continued further north (I think the road took us NE which took us out of the hail core), things began to improve and eventually the rain and hail stopped (quite abruptly) it was quite eerie actually - although there was some drizzle. The Sun actually came out and a minute or two later though (with no clouds above us, the anvil was streaming off to the east) we got blasted by winds of 80-90km/h and torrential "drizzle" it was "drizzle" because the rain had been blown so hard (and presumably away from the storm) it was like a fine mist, but visibility was horrible!!! I couldn't believe it, we could see the Sun and we had visibility of only 20-30m or so on the road because of the rain/wind from the storm behind us (presumably a rain foot/microburst). Put it this way…the rain was blowing so low on the ground you hear me saying "oh we have fog up ahead!" And then as we go through it I say "Oh err…umm…this is rain!??" The main updraft you could see was to the SW…we spotted one possible funnel, but I would be quite hesitant to call it one (it didn't last very long and became very "scuddy" after). And would you believe…still not one CG!!! The storm had appeared a little smaller at this stage…the road curved back underneath the anvil and hail began to fall! There was a fair bit of hail actually…the hail was falling in front of the storm, this was mostly 2cm stones. You could see the tyre marks in the hail on the road - this was just from hail falling in front of the storm! (The road was far from covered, but there was enough to see where cars had driven previously). Many people had pulled over again - there was no rain at all, JUST hail (and I thought it humorous that people had their wipers on for hail and no rain, although I think I did too but it was the fact that I forgot to turn them off after :) I wanted to find a lookout or something and see whether the storm had any decent structure…opposite to a service station I sighted a road, "Johanna Rd" - well, given Joey's real name was Johanna I thought what the heck, so we took the road and it took us back SW. I was hoping for a clearing, but it actually was a shortcut from the north to take you back towards Jimboomba and into the car centre. Just as we were coming into the town there were "white explosions" on the ground. "Oh f…!!! That's massive hail!!!" I said…they weren't massive…but golf ball size easy! The weren't many of them though, it was hit and miss (i.e. there was a golf ball stone falling around us every second or two), but they were breaking into 2-3cm pieces when they hit the road! I quickly tried to do a U-turn thinking of taking shelter at the service station about 2km away. Joey fumbled to get the video camera back on…and then the stones were hitting some of the parked cars setting off car alarms!!!!!! We got one stone on the windscreen which looked about 3.5-4cm, it gave me a fright and I thought it was going to smash it as it made an absolute tremendous noise!!! But it didn't fortunately. I literally redlined the car in the lower three gears to get out of there and back to the service station ASAP! We were about 500m in front of the hail, so we parked underneath and I jumped out with the video camera. I had a few strange looks (as the hail was falling in front of the storm so no one really knew what was coming)…30 seconds later they soon found out as the service station tin roof began to get pummeled with hailstones. I was disappointed that the largest they were getting were only 3cm though, after seeing such big ones just barely 2km away! I guess large hail is very isolated in a storm normally so just 2km makes a difference. And given that we got hail there and Dale (who also lives in Jimboomba, only got drizzle) shows how localized the events can be! (Jimboomba is only all of 5-6km wide/long if that ). We waited it out at the service station and it went to the north…reported the hail and also talked to MB to get an idea on the further development to the S and SW. We decided to head south to a little lookout I knew near the Christian Outreach Centre just north of Beaudesert as the original supercell had weakened…although there was a lot of stratocumulus at this stage and it was difficult to see it. We were under a SE'ly after the storm so I assume the SE'lies were bringing in the stratocu. As we departed once again I expressed my amazement in not even seeing one CG from the storm!!! Golf ball hail but no CGs…go figure. At the lookout we saw that there was hail in the flooded gutters beside the road…most of the stones were only a centimeter, but a couple were around 1.5-2cm (not bad given the storm had gone over there about 30-40minutes ago…we were actually sitting in the car for 10 minutes and hadn't actually looked around us for hailstones in the gutter yet until Joey pointed them out as she hopped out). There were a couple of cells to our WSW, and then some 'muck' to our south. Originally I had promised Joey "At least one CG" - wanting to keep that promise we decided to head back to Beaudesert, shoot westwards towards Boonah and then north towards Ipswich (there is no road that goes NW across the Flinders Ranges which is annoying - well there is one, but I've never been on it before, I should try it one time but I would have imagined it to be quite windy and possibly unsealed). We got a few flashes of lightning (first lightning!!!) of the day on Boonah-Beaudesert Rd, and then we saw some very nice CC lightning bolts heading north (they were spreading through the cloud, although not crawlers). We also saw one CG…well, I saw one CG, Joey still hadn't seen her CG! :( Just north of Amberley on the Cunningham Hwy we got caught in some torrential rain…visibility was quite bad but still could do 60-70km/h (more so because we were following other cars in front and could see where they were going). Just as we got north of the storm there was a blinding flash behind us…a few seconds later a loud bang!!! The second CG, although none of us actually saw the bolt. The storms that had originally developed were weakening though and the lightning overall was infrequent. I decided to drop Joey home and then head back home myself. What a chase to start the 2002-2003 season though!!! It was very exciting, although I was hoping for some good structure (which didn't really happen). But who can complain when you get basically everything else!!! I checked the car for dents a little closer…there's some nice ones on the bonnet and a few on the roof, otherwise it faired well (I was wondering how a new and potentially softer car would handle hail). There's a fairly prominent dent on the right hand side of the bonnet though…but oh well, when I bought a new car in March I decided to not let it effect my chasing habits otherwise there would be no point in buying a car for that purpose (i.e. chasing). It's "broken in" now so the next lot of hail won't be so bad! -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "W.A. \(Bill\) Webb" To: Subject: aus-wx: Looking for Information Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:56:01 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi to All, Talking recently to some rellies who live near Myocum (about 13km by road west of Byron Bay). They recounted their experience with a bad storm which almost destroyed their 100 + year old (and solidly built) home on their farm. I undertook to get what information I could on the storm, being of the opinion that someone on this list would have spotted and monitored it. So that is the request, information - anyone?? Specifically - radar loops, sat images, damage/storm reports. Details as I have been told (and remembered) them - Date was 16th of June 2002 Fierce winds in the storm came from the (approx) North West (apparently unusual, as storms there usually come from the South West) Damage was in a very narrow path. Sheds ~ 200m south of the house were hardly hit. Another homestead ~ 800m to the north was not damaged, but experienced strong winds and torrential rain (I can't recall anyone talking about hail, but there may have been some). There was talk of a "tornado", but when I was there a couple of weeks ago, my limited knowledge and observations suggested straight line winds, but maybe swirling about a (fair) bit. However there was not much evidence left. Large trees knocked down and smashed, smaller trees snapped or twisted off. The roof of the house landed about 60m downwind. Timbers were driven deeply into the ground some distance from the house site. Some fences destroyed. I was told that the local SES, who helped them in the aftermath, said they had watched the storm on radar and were not surprised to get a call from someone in the area. Fortunately the rellies were not home at the time - they were bogged in a ditch on the side of the road between the highway and home! Friends got them out after the storm, and they arrived home to an even worse experience. That is all the info I have. Should have asked more questions of more people (and written it down!), but was there on another mission with little spare time. Would appreciate any help with information. Please e-mail me privately if you think necessary. Thanks in anticipation. Bill, Proserpine (still dry, too dry!) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.132.18.241] From: "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Vic storm chances Sat/Sun Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:04:05 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2002 04:04:06.0215 (UTC) FILETIME=[13B50D70:01C27012] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. What do people reckon about the system approaching for Sat & Sunday? Plenty of heating forcast for Saturday! Fingers crossed!! Who's up for a day out chasing? Liam _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "W.A. \(Bill\) Webb" To: Subject: aus-wx: Disclaimer Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:16:01 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi List, I have been reading the forecasts of a certain long-range forecaster for some time now, but never read the "fine print" which, some little time ago, began to appear folowing his forecasts. Thought I'd share it with you all. "It may be pointed out here and clearly understood that forecasts are not one hundred percent accurate and sometimes may not even eventuate. The predictions herewith are determined on predicted tides only and not on the tide heights that may actually occur, this was where an element of error could happen. Natural movement in the earth's crust, volcanic eruptions and earthquakes alter tide heights thereby changing anticipated weather patterns." Go BoM !! Regards, Bill, Proserpine. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.153.20] From: "Dave Ellem" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Looking for Information Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:47:45 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2002 04:50:22.0965 (UTC) FILETIME=[8AC77A50:01C27018] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Bill! Yes, that region was badly hit along with a few other towns on June 16th. I was chasing near Casino that day and saw a few houses with their rooves gone! I have written up a report for that day with radar/satpic/charts etc if you're interested. I didn't chase the storm that hit that area, but I saw some of the damage later, and it was pretty increadible!!! There was no large hail that day anywhere I don't think, mainy just strong winds and very heavy rain with smaller sized stones. Anyway, hope this helps: http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/storm_chasing/2002/docs/2002-06-01.htm Dave Ellem, Wollongbar, Northern Rivers, NE NSW ----- Original Message ----- From: "W.A. (Bill) Webb" To: Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:56 PM Subject: aus-wx: Looking for Information > Hi to All, > > Talking recently to some rellies who live near Myocum (about 13km by road > west of Byron Bay). They recounted their experience with a bad storm which > almost destroyed their 100 + year old (and solidly built) home on their > farm. > > I undertook to get what information I could on the storm, being of the > opinion that someone on this list would have spotted and monitored it. So > that is the request, information - anyone?? Specifically - radar loops, sat > images, damage/storm reports. > > Details as I have been told (and remembered) them - > > Date was 16th of June 2002 > > Fierce winds in the storm came from the (approx) North West (apparently > unusual, as storms there usually come from the South West) > > Damage was in a very narrow path. Sheds ~ 200m south of the house were > hardly hit. Another homestead ~ 800m to the north was not damaged, but > experienced strong winds and torrential rain (I can't recall anyone talking > about hail, but there may have been some). > > There was talk of a "tornado", but when I was there a couple of weeks ago, > my limited knowledge and observations suggested straight line winds, but > maybe swirling about a (fair) bit. However there was not much evidence left. > > Large trees knocked down and smashed, smaller trees snapped or twisted off. > The roof of the house landed about 60m downwind. Timbers were driven deeply > into the ground some distance from the house site. Some fences destroyed. > > I was told that the local SES, who helped them in the aftermath, said they > had watched the storm on radar and were not surprised to get a call from > someone in the area. > > Fortunately the rellies were not home at the time - they were bogged in a > ditch on the side of the road between the highway and home! Friends got them > out after the storm, and they arrived home to an even worse experience. > > That is all the info I have. Should have asked more questions of more people > (and written it down!), but was there on another mission with little spare > time. > > Would appreciate any help with information. Please e-mail me privately if > you think necessary. > > Thanks in anticipation. > Bill, > Proserpine (still dry, too dry!) > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:24:38 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic storm chances Sat/Sun Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 02:04 PM 10/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Who's up for a day out chasing? Well, I've got a slack weekend to fill, so I might be out there if the forecast looks good enough. :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:33:15 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I've bitten the bullet and now have Digital Atmosphere hard at work, uploading hourly plotted and analysed synoptic charts of Australia and southeastern Australia to http://australianweathernews.com/]Australian, or you can go directly to the page at http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml. There are enough AWS's around the country to allow a pretty accurate synoptic chart to be drawn hourly. If everything's working as it should be, you can get a fully plotted and analysed surface chart 15 minutes after real time. There's a 24-hour archive, so you can open up several windows, maximise them, then do your own animation to see how things are developing. In addition to the full Australian chart, there is a more detailed one covering NSW, Vic and Tas. If there's demand, I'll do ones for other areas. The charts are pretty big so as to get in lots of observations, but the files are small. Those with neanderthal screen resolutions will get some good mouse exercise. There are similar 3-hourly charts (with 24-hour archive) based on full synoptic data, complete with cloud and weather symbols. There's also a guide, so you can work out what the symbols mean. Because these charts use clock-time data (e.g. 9am local time), it takes 3 hours for them to gradually populate with observations, so they look a bit wierd as they're filling up. They are updated each 15 minutes as new data comes in. In addition, there are hourly temperature, humidity and wind streamline maps of Australia (with 24-hour archive). Animating the streamline maps is very useful in seeing where any convergence lines are moving. These are also available 15 mins past the hour. Let me know what you think, and any suggestions for improvement (bearing in mind that I don't have the programming genius of Andrew and TWC :laugh:) Cheers Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:49:11 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Fantastic addition to a great site. Cheers --------------------------------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------------------- Member of: Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au --------------------------------------------------------- This email is virus free. Scanned before leaving my mailbox using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k Scanned with the latest definition File. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > I've bitten the bullet and now have Digital Atmosphere hard at work, > uploading hourly plotted and analysed synoptic charts of Australia and > southeastern Australia to http://australianweathernews.com/]Australian, or > you can go directly to the page at > http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml. > > There are enough AWS's around the country to allow a pretty accurate > synoptic chart to be drawn hourly. If everything's working as it should be, > you can get a fully plotted and analysed surface chart 15 minutes after real > time. There's a 24-hour archive, so you can open up several windows, > maximise them, then do your own animation to see how things are developing. > In addition to the full Australian chart, there is a more detailed one > covering NSW, Vic and Tas. If there's demand, I'll do ones for other areas. > The charts are pretty big so as to get in lots of observations, but the > files are small. Those with neanderthal screen resolutions will get some > good mouse exercise. > > There are similar 3-hourly charts (with 24-hour archive) based on full > synoptic data, complete with cloud and weather symbols. There's also a > guide, so you can work out what the symbols mean. Because these charts use > clock-time data (e.g. 9am local time), it takes 3 hours for them to > gradually populate with observations, so they look a bit wierd as they're > filling up. They are updated each 15 minutes as new data comes in. > > In addition, there are hourly temperature, humidity and wind streamline maps > of Australia (with 24-hour archive). Animating the streamline maps is very > useful in seeing where any convergence lines are moving. These are also > available 15 mins past the hour. > > Let me know what you think, and any suggestions for improvement (bearing in > mind that I don't have the programming genius of Andrew and TWC :laugh:) > > Cheers > > Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.134.113.72] From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:31:30 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2002 12:31:31.0763 (UTC) FILETIME=[F6AB0030:01C27058] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Laurier, I join Simon in congratulating you on a job well done.Now we need a significant Wx event to see it at its best. Gavin Southside Weather Canberra A.C.T. >From: "Laurier Williams" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" >Subject: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available >Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:33:15 +1000 > >I've bitten the bullet and now have Digital Atmosphere hard at work, >uploading hourly plotted and analysed synoptic charts of Australia and >southeastern Australia to http://australianweathernews.com/]Australian, or >you can go directly to the page at >http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml. > >There are enough AWS's around the country to allow a pretty accurate >synoptic chart to be drawn hourly. If everything's working as it should be, >you can get a fully plotted and analysed surface chart 15 minutes after >real >time. There's a 24-hour archive, so you can open up several windows, >maximise them, then do your own animation to see how things are developing. >In addition to the full Australian chart, there is a more detailed one >covering NSW, Vic and Tas. If there's demand, I'll do ones for other areas. >The charts are pretty big so as to get in lots of observations, but the >files are small. Those with neanderthal screen resolutions will get some >good mouse exercise. > >There are similar 3-hourly charts (with 24-hour archive) based on full >synoptic data, complete with cloud and weather symbols. There's also a >guide, so you can work out what the symbols mean. Because these charts use >clock-time data (e.g. 9am local time), it takes 3 hours for them to >gradually populate with observations, so they look a bit wierd as they're >filling up. They are updated each 15 minutes as new data comes in. > >In addition, there are hourly temperature, humidity and wind streamline >maps >of Australia (with 24-hour archive). Animating the streamline maps is very >useful in seeing where any convergence lines are moving. These are also >available 15 mins past the hour. > >Let me know what you think, and any suggestions for improvement (bearing in >mind that I don't have the programming genius of Andrew and TWC :laugh:) > >Cheers > >Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:44:47 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Laurier, If that's not the work of a genius I'd love to see what would be. An excellent addition which will be of incalculable usefulness. Congratulations! Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > I've bitten the bullet and now have Digital Atmosphere hard at work, > uploading hourly plotted and analysed synoptic charts of Australia and > southeastern Australia to http://australianweathernews.com/]Australian, or > you can go directly to the page at > http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml. > > There are enough AWS's around the country to allow a pretty accurate > synoptic chart to be drawn hourly. If everything's working as it should be, > you can get a fully plotted and analysed surface chart 15 minutes after real > time. There's a 24-hour archive, so you can open up several windows, > maximise them, then do your own animation to see how things are developing. > In addition to the full Australian chart, there is a more detailed one > covering NSW, Vic and Tas. If there's demand, I'll do ones for other areas. > The charts are pretty big so as to get in lots of observations, but the > files are small. Those with neanderthal screen resolutions will get some > good mouse exercise. > > There are similar 3-hourly charts (with 24-hour archive) based on full > synoptic data, complete with cloud and weather symbols. There's also a > guide, so you can work out what the symbols mean. Because these charts use > clock-time data (e.g. 9am local time), it takes 3 hours for them to > gradually populate with observations, so they look a bit wierd as they're > filling up. They are updated each 15 minutes as new data comes in. > > In addition, there are hourly temperature, humidity and wind streamline maps > of Australia (with 24-hour archive). Animating the streamline maps is very > useful in seeing where any convergence lines are moving. These are also > available 15 mins past the hour. > > Let me know what you think, and any suggestions for improvement (bearing in > mind that I don't have the programming genius of Andrew and TWC :laugh:) > > Cheers > > Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.109.174.222] From: "John Roenfeldt" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:40:39 +0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2002 00:41:22.0819 (UTC) FILETIME=[EC2BDD30:01C270BE] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Excellent Laurier, We have needed current maps like this for a long time Well done, John Roenfeldt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 7:33 PM Subject: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > I've bitten the bullet and now have Digital Atmosphere hard at work, > uploading hourly plotted and analysed synoptic charts of Australia and > southeastern Australia to http://australianweathernews.com/]Australian, or > you can go directly to the page at > http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml. > > There are enough AWS's around the country to allow a pretty accurate > synoptic chart to be drawn hourly. If everything's working as it should be, > you can get a fully plotted and analysed surface chart 15 minutes after real > time. There's a 24-hour archive, so you can open up several windows, > maximise them, then do your own animation to see how things are developing. > In addition to the full Australian chart, there is a more detailed one > covering NSW, Vic and Tas. If there's demand, I'll do ones for other areas. > The charts are pretty big so as to get in lots of observations, but the > files are small. Those with neanderthal screen resolutions will get some > good mouse exercise. > > There are similar 3-hourly charts (with 24-hour archive) based on full > synoptic data, complete with cloud and weather symbols. There's also a > guide, so you can work out what the symbols mean. Because these charts use > clock-time data (e.g. 9am local time), it takes 3 hours for them to > gradually populate with observations, so they look a bit wierd as they're > filling up. They are updated each 15 minutes as new data comes in. > > In addition, there are hourly temperature, humidity and wind streamline maps > of Australia (with 24-hour archive). Animating the streamline maps is very > useful in seeing where any convergence lines are moving. These are also > available 15 mins past the hour. > > Let me know what you think, and any suggestions for improvement (bearing in > mind that I don't have the programming genius of Andrew and TWC :laugh:) > > Cheers > > Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Rain & Baro Pressure Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:56:11 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
G'October to All:
           We just got 4IN(101.6mm) rain from a slow-moving low-pressure system. I called the AWS at Mena Airport (during the rain)and the baro pressure was 30.09IN(1018 hPa). To me, this seems to be a high baromeric reading for having bad weather. Usually here, we start looking for stormy(bad) weather when the baro starts falling below 29.80IN(1009 hPA); in some storms our baro has been close to 29.50IN(999 hPa). I thought a baro at 30.00IN(1015 hPa)[or above] would indicate fair weather. My question would be: How high can the barometer be during foul weather?
Thanks for your help!      Yours      David Powell
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:10:29 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com As several others have already said, you have done a great job with these charts. Very useful indeed and with so much info, yet they download so quickly even here in Asia where download times from Aussie servers can so frequently timeout before you get the page. Each chart is fully displayed within three seconds of the click. Great work! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:33:15 +1000 Subject: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > I've bitten the bullet and now have Digital Atmosphere hard at work, > uploading hourly plotted and analysed synoptic charts of Australia and > southeastern Australia to http://australianweathernews.com/]Australian, > or > you can go directly to the page at > http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml. > > There are enough AWS's around the country to allow a pretty accurate > synoptic chart to be drawn hourly. If everything's working as it should > be, > you can get a fully plotted and analysed surface chart 15 minutes after > real > time. There's a 24-hour archive, so you can open up several windows, > maximise them, then do your own animation to see how things are > developing. > In addition to the full Australian chart, there is a more detailed one > covering NSW, Vic and Tas. If there's demand, I'll do ones for other > areas. > The charts are pretty big so as to get in lots of observations, but the > files are small. Those with neanderthal screen resolutions will get > some > good mouse exercise. > > There are similar 3-hourly charts (with 24-hour archive) based on full > synoptic data, complete with cloud and weather symbols. There's also a > guide, so you can work out what the symbols mean. Because these charts > use > clock-time data (e.g. 9am local time), it takes 3 hours for them to > gradually populate with observations, so they look a bit wierd as > they're > filling up. They are updated each 15 minutes as new data comes in. > > In addition, there are hourly temperature, humidity and wind streamline > maps > of Australia (with 24-hour archive). Animating the streamline maps is > very > useful in seeing where any convergence lines are moving. These are also > available 15 mins past the hour. > > Let me know what you think, and any suggestions for improvement > (bearing in > mind that I don't have the programming genius of Andrew and TWC > :laugh:) > > Cheers > > Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain & Baro Pressure Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:13:30 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
A classic example of this in Australia was in June 1967 when the barometer reached 1046 hPa over Tasmania (=near or over 1030 over eastern NSW) accompanied by flood rains on parts of the coast. The cause..A cold pool in the upper air and subsequent low pressure offshore. Low pressure doesn't always mean rain either.It depends on a lot of other facotrs.
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: arky dave
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:56 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Rain & Baro Pressure

G'October to All:
           We just got 4IN(101.6mm) rain from a slow-moving low-pressure system. I called the AWS at Mena Airport (during the rain)and the baro pressure was 30.09IN(1018 hPa). To me, this seems to be a high baromeric reading for having bad weather. Usually here, we start looking for stormy(bad) weather when the baro starts falling below 29.80IN(1009 hPA); in some storms our baro has been close to 29.50IN(999 hPa). I thought a baro at 30.00IN(1015 hPa)[or above] would indicate fair weather. My question would be: How high can the barometer be during foul weather?
Thanks for your help!      Yours      David Powell
From: "Chas & Helen Osborn" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain & Baro Pressure Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:28:03 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello Dave and Keith
 
Here on the west coast in the summer above 1013hpa showers stop.
In the winter a different story, I have seen well above 1020hpa with foul weather.
 
Chas
Strahan Tasmania
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rain & Baro Pressure

A classic example of this in Australia was in June 1967 when the barometer reached 1046 hPa over Tasmania (=near or over 1030 over eastern NSW) accompanied by flood rains on parts of the coast. The cause..A cold pool in the upper air and subsequent low pressure offshore. Low pressure doesn't always mean rain either.It depends on a lot of other facotrs.
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: arky dave
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:56 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Rain & Baro Pressure

G'October to All:
           We just got 4IN(101.6mm) rain from a slow-moving low-pressure system. I called the AWS at Mena Airport (during the rain)and the baro pressure was 30.09IN(1018 hPa). To me, this seems to be a high baromeric reading for having bad weather. Usually here, we start looking for stormy(bad) weather when the baro starts falling below 29.80IN(1009 hPA); in some storms our baro has been close to 29.50IN(999 hPa). I thought a baro at 30.00IN(1015 hPa)[or above] would indicate fair weather. My question would be: How high can the barometer be during foul weather?
Thanks for your help!      Yours      David Powell
From: "Chas & Helen Osborn" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:34:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello Laurier Great Charts! The weather symbols are very interesting can you help me with the meaning of columns W C E a http://www.australianweathernews.com/images/WxSymbols.jpg Chas Strahan Tasmania ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:10 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > As several others have already said, you have done a great job with > these charts. > Very useful indeed and with so much info, yet they download so quickly > even here in Asia where download times from Aussie servers can so > frequently timeout before you get the page. Each chart is fully > displayed within three seconds of the click. > Great work! > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Laurier Williams" > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:33:15 +1000 > Subject: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > > > I've bitten the bullet and now have Digital Atmosphere hard at work, > > uploading hourly plotted and analysed synoptic charts of Australia and > > southeastern Australia to http://australianweathernews.com/]Australian, > > or > > you can go directly to the page at > > http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml. > > > > There are enough AWS's around the country to allow a pretty accurate > > synoptic chart to be drawn hourly. If everything's working as it should > > be, > > you can get a fully plotted and analysed surface chart 15 minutes after > > real > > time. There's a 24-hour archive, so you can open up several windows, > > maximise them, then do your own animation to see how things are > > developing. > > In addition to the full Australian chart, there is a more detailed one > > covering NSW, Vic and Tas. If there's demand, I'll do ones for other > > areas. > > The charts are pretty big so as to get in lots of observations, but the > > files are small. Those with neanderthal screen resolutions will get > > some > > good mouse exercise. > > > > There are similar 3-hourly charts (with 24-hour archive) based on full > > synoptic data, complete with cloud and weather symbols. There's also a > > guide, so you can work out what the symbols mean. Because these charts > > use > > clock-time data (e.g. 9am local time), it takes 3 hours for them to > > gradually populate with observations, so they look a bit wierd as > > they're > > filling up. They are updated each 15 minutes as new data comes in. > > > > In addition, there are hourly temperature, humidity and wind streamline > > maps > > of Australia (with 24-hour archive). Animating the streamline maps is > > very > > useful in seeing where any convergence lines are moving. These are also > > available 15 mins past the hour. > > > > Let me know what you think, and any suggestions for improvement > > (bearing in > > mind that I don't have the programming genius of Andrew and TWC > > :laugh:) > > > > Cheers > > > > Laurier > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: aus-wx: Moisture build up QLD, NSW. Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:00:37 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2002 09:02:43.0231 (UTC) FILETIME=[F57E7AF0:01C27104] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all, There appears to be some moisture  build up (low to mid level) over eastern QLD and northeast NSW, a weak dry line also exists through east central QLD along a weak surface trough, it will be interesting to see if some of this moisture is advected to the south over the next 24 to 36 hours and interact with the approaching trough through SA. regards Clyve Herbert.
From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Morning glory images / Victorian sunsets Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:09:38 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, Robert Goler has sent more morning glory images form the 9th October taken by Roger Smith from the Uni of Munich. It's an amazing phenomenon!!!! http://www.stormchasers.au.com/glory.htm More photos from Victoria's spring weather to be found here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02.htm I spent 20 minutes standing in the middle of the road dodging traffic tonight to get these shots & Clyve has been out photographing again! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Moisture build up QLD, NSW. Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:33:20 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Clyve, it appears that it will. If mid level cloud can stay away I think Sunday could be a nice storm day in eastern NSW, not enough shear for supercells, but interesting none the less.
 
Michael
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:00 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Moisture build up QLD, NSW.

Hi all, There appears to be some moisture  build up (low to mid level) over eastern QLD and northeast NSW, a weak dry line also exists through east central QLD along a weak surface trough, it will be interesting to see if some of this moisture is advected to the south over the next 24 to 36 hours and interact with the approaching trough through SA. regards Clyve Herbert.
From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Darwin images Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:06:23 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, have updated the Darwin 2002 page http://www.stormchasers.au.com/darwin02.htm with a series of 12 images taken by Paul Mosman. Enjoy!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.132.18.241] From: "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Storms today/tonight (Vic) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 03:14:40 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2002 17:14:40.0743 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF4D5F70:01C27149] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Could be nice tomorrow night for lighting photos on the Doncaster shoppingtown roof! Probably heading out westward in the early arvo for some chasing, and following things back east. Liam _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Morning glory images / Victorian sunsets Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 07:31:01 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2002 21:30:50.0793 (UTC) FILETIME=[7890E190:01C2716D] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well I can honestly say those pictures of the morning glory are amongst the best I have ever seen. Absolutely amazing!!! Thanks to Robert for sending those down and also to Jane for putting those up. Macca-wx -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 9:10 PM To: Aussie-wx Subject: aus-wx: Morning glory images / Victorian sunsets Evening all, Robert Goler has sent more morning glory images form the 9th October taken by Roger Smith from the Uni of Munich. It's an amazing phenomenon!!!! http://www.stormchasers.au.com/glory.htm More photos from Victoria's spring weather to be found here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02.htm I spent 20 minutes standing in the middle of the road dodging traffic tonight to get these shots & Clyve has been out photographing again! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Sha" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Morning glory images / Victorian sunsets Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 08:02:15 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Absolutely magnificent beauty that you guys have captured !! Thanks so much for sharing :) Love Sha ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 9:09 PM Subject: aus-wx: Morning glory images / Victorian sunsets Evening all, Robert Goler has sent more morning glory images form the 9th October taken by Roger Smith from the Uni of Munich. It's an amazing phenomenon!!!! http://www.stormchasers.au.com/glory.htm More photos from Victoria's spring weather to be found here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02.htm I spent 20 minutes standing in the middle of the road dodging traffic tonight to get these shots & Clyve has been out photographing again! Jane --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 3/10/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:03:55 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Storms today/tonight (Vic) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 03:14 AM 12/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Could be nice tomorrow night for lighting photos on the Doncaster >shoppingtown roof! > > >Probably heading out westward in the early arvo for some chasing, and >following things back east. Keep us posted. I'll be on the road later today, but would be happy to divert if the opportunity for a chase comes up near the metro area. :) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:05:52 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Australian Weather Mailing List Subject: aus-wx: NSW/QLD Storms Next Few Days... Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Looks like an interesting couple of days for storm lovers (and I'm sure all the TDU people are getting itchy feet wondering where they'd be going if they were fortunate enough to be on TDU yet!) But alas...a little over a month left (but not long!!!) Today (Sat 12th...) There's been some mention of the moisture buildup over central Queensland, the satpics show this very well and if anything there could be too much moisture! There's a lot of moisture buildup in the mid levels also before drying out significant in the higher levels. This is from a persistent easterly flow through the region. One of my favourite towns, Cunnamulla has a 9am observation of 26/14, not bad! A 15-20 knot NE'ly too, so quite reasonable. Charleville is 24/13 (possibly under a bit of cloud), but its NE'ly is 17-29 knots! AVN is pushing a region of moderate (LIs are -2 to -4) broad instability across from Augathella, Charleville down to Cunnamulla, through Bourke and down into Cobar. It maxes out with -4 to -6 LIs through Bourke-Cunnamulla. Interestingly the trough though is placed a bit further west of this...this could end up being a blessing as with the amount of cloud about, it might be good to try and keep any convection to the afternoon. Although there are already some storms near Goondiwindi and then southwest of through in the central region of NSW. AVN is suggesting N'ly 850 winds at 20 knots, but slackens off the 700 flow in NSW down to 15 knots...further north towards Cunnamulla-Charleville it's nicer with 20 and 20-25 near Charleville from the WNW. 500mb is W'ly at 30 knots (starting to get a bit weak), however there is a 90 knot jet running across most of southern Queensland at 300mb from the W which is good, slackening off at 60-70 knots in northern NSW. The LI max is tempting as it appears to be sitting in clear air, but I'd be hesistant as storms that develop here may not move and it could get cluttered. I'd be thinking of sitting around Cunnamulla-Charleville and playing the Mitchell Hwy...this is probably a good compromise of instability, shear, cloud and trough position. Although most of the places along the trough should be OK. The main problem (if I were on TDU...is trying to move with the trough as the trough moves quickly eastwards). Tomorrow (Sun 13th...) After enjoying a 4 day tour in central and western Queensland the main trough decides it'd like to head east to visit the coastal regions again - quickly too! (Perhaps it left its sunnies behind...) Marching across half the state overnight, by tomorrow afternoon it basically sits over the top of Sydney, through the Hunter, back through Tamworth, NW Slopes and Plains and into the western Downs/eastern Maranoa. AVN increases the instability with -4 to -6 LIs through the western Downs, NW Slopes and Plains, Hunter and northern Sydney region. This is probably in response to an upper trough moving through the region with upper temps taking a dive be a degree or two. The Hunter at first glance looks quite good...there'll be some NW winds encroaching but at this stage I wouldn't think it would dry out too much. 850 winds are NW'ly over the Hunter at 20-25 knots, getting up to 30 knots over Sydney. N NSW and S QLD are only 20 knots. 700mb shows the main difference...20-25 knot W'ly over S QLD, increasing to 30-35 knots over the Hunter and 40-45 knots near Sydney! 500mb shows a similar picture across the region...35-40 knots over N NSW/S QLD and the Hunter...sneaking up to 40-45 knots W'ly over Sydney. 300mb could be stronger but not bad...55-60 knots from the W...getting up to 65-70 knots into southern Queensland. But looking at things I like the Hunter (although I myself if I were on TDU after chasing W QLD on Sat would probably head to the Downs or NW Slopes and Plains)...if I can get enough of my assignments done I might head into the Downs tomorrow. SE Coast and Northern Rivers also have a reasonable chance of storms...possibly more isolated towards the ranges though because the trough will be further west. It might still be a bit cool though on Sunday...and I think that things may not be the usual 'summer situation' at least for Queensland...we'll see. A lot of tomorrow though relies on how much convection develops today...as that is my main concern, if too much cloud is produced then that changes everything! And with a weakish jet/mid levels it won't shoot rapidly out to sea like we'd want it to. Monday 14th onwards... This is tough, with drier NW'ly winds pushing closer to the coast and the possibility of the trough moving through too early for SE QLD on Monday...I'd be thinking Wide Bay Burnett and then into Capricornia on Tuesday. These places don't look ideal as such...but I'm just trying to think what I would do if I were on TDU and having a bit of fun thinking about it :) Any other opinions? AC +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: NSW/QLD Storms Next Few Days... Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:49:21 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2002 03:51:27.0766 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4766B60:01C271A2] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Supercell, your analogy looks pretty good and a lot of it, here in Victoria we need just a bit more moisture,this looks better in the east of the state. The front looks to be a 'bulger' that is it seems it will pass more quickly through northern Victoria and advance across southern Victoria from the northwest (become positive longitunal) as the parent low slows down southwest of Mt Gambier, sometimes this can be a good thing with north-easterly flow ahead of the trough, and colder air over running in the upper layers. About Cunnamulla being your favourite town I hope this is meant weatherwise! although the cafe was a good meeting point. regards Clyve H. ----- Original Message ----- From: Anthony Cornelius To: Australian Weather Mailing List Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 10:05 AM Subject: aus-wx: NSW/QLD Storms Next Few Days... > Hi all, > > Looks like an interesting couple of days for storm lovers (and I'm sure > all the TDU people are getting itchy feet wondering where they'd be > going if they were fortunate enough to be on TDU yet!) But alas...a > little over a month left (but not long!!!) > > Today (Sat 12th...) > > There's been some mention of the moisture buildup over central > Queensland, the satpics show this very well and if anything there could > be too much moisture! There's a lot of moisture buildup in the mid > levels also before drying out significant in the higher levels. This is > from a persistent easterly flow through the region. One of my favourite > towns, Cunnamulla has a 9am observation of 26/14, not bad! A 15-20 knot > NE'ly too, so quite reasonable. Charleville is 24/13 (possibly under a > bit of cloud), but its NE'ly is 17-29 knots! AVN is pushing a region of > moderate (LIs are -2 to -4) broad instability across from Augathella, > Charleville down to Cunnamulla, through Bourke and down into Cobar. It > maxes out with -4 to -6 LIs through Bourke-Cunnamulla. Interestingly > the trough though is placed a bit further west of this...this could end > up being a blessing as with the amount of cloud about, it might be good > to try and keep any convection to the afternoon. Although there are > already some storms near Goondiwindi and then southwest of through in > the central region of NSW. AVN is suggesting N'ly 850 winds at 20 > knots, but slackens off the 700 flow in NSW down to 15 knots...further > north towards Cunnamulla-Charleville it's nicer with 20 and 20-25 near > Charleville from the WNW. 500mb is W'ly at 30 knots (starting to get a > bit weak), however there is a 90 knot jet running across most of > southern Queensland at 300mb from the W which is good, slackening off at > 60-70 knots in northern NSW. The LI max is tempting as it appears to be > sitting in clear air, but I'd be hesistant as storms that develop here > may not move and it could get cluttered. I'd be thinking of sitting > around Cunnamulla-Charleville and playing the Mitchell Hwy...this is > probably a good compromise of instability, shear, cloud and trough > position. Although most of the places along the trough should be OK. > The main problem (if I were on TDU...is trying to move with the trough > as the trough moves quickly eastwards). > > Tomorrow (Sun 13th...) > > After enjoying a 4 day tour in central and western Queensland the main > trough decides it'd like to head east to visit the coastal regions again > - quickly too! (Perhaps it left its sunnies behind...) Marching across > half the state overnight, by tomorrow afternoon it basically sits over > the top of Sydney, through the Hunter, back through Tamworth, NW Slopes > and Plains and into the western Downs/eastern Maranoa. AVN increases > the instability with -4 to -6 LIs through the western Downs, NW Slopes > and Plains, Hunter and northern Sydney region. This is probably in > response to an upper trough moving through the region with upper temps > taking a dive be a degree or two. The Hunter at first glance looks > quite good...there'll be some NW winds encroaching but at this stage I > wouldn't think it would dry out too much. 850 winds are NW'ly over the > Hunter at 20-25 knots, getting up to 30 knots over Sydney. N NSW and S > QLD are only 20 knots. 700mb shows the main difference...20-25 knot > W'ly over S QLD, increasing to 30-35 knots over the Hunter and 40-45 > knots near Sydney! 500mb shows a similar picture across the > region...35-40 knots over N NSW/S QLD and the Hunter...sneaking up to > 40-45 knots W'ly over Sydney. 300mb could be stronger but not > bad...55-60 knots from the W...getting up to 65-70 knots into southern > Queensland. But looking at things I like the Hunter (although I myself > if I were on TDU after chasing W QLD on Sat would probably head to the > Downs or NW Slopes and Plains)...if I can get enough of my assignments > done I might head into the Downs tomorrow. SE Coast and Northern Rivers > also have a reasonable chance of storms...possibly more isolated towards > the ranges though because the trough will be further west. It might > still be a bit cool though on Sunday...and I think that things may not > be the usual 'summer situation' at least for Queensland...we'll see. A > lot of tomorrow though relies on how much convection develops today...as > that is my main concern, if too much cloud is produced then that changes > everything! And with a weakish jet/mid levels it won't shoot rapidly > out to sea like we'd want it to. > > Monday 14th onwards... > > This is tough, with drier NW'ly winds pushing closer to the coast and > the possibility of the trough moving through too early for SE QLD on > Monday...I'd be thinking Wide Bay Burnett and then into Capricornia on > Tuesday. These places don't look ideal as such...but I'm just trying to > think what I would do if I were on TDU and having a bit of fun thinking > about it :) Any other opinions? > > AC > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Storms today/tonight (Vic) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:45:33 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com as long as you don't get arrested for trying to break and enter. lol good luck! regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Liam Domanski" To: Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 2:44 AM Subject: aus-wx: Storms today/tonight (Vic) > Could be nice tomorrow night for lighting photos on the Doncaster > shoppingtown roof! > > > Probably heading out westward in the early arvo for some chasing, and > following things back east. > > > Liam > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 18:02:05 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Phil and others for your compliments. Quick downloading was one of the aims, as I'd guess that users will probably want to open up a number of charts to make comparisons. Glad to hear that it's working in the real world! Cheers Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Phil Smith > Sent: Friday, 11 October, 2002 11:10 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > > > As several others have already said, you have done a great job with > these charts. > Very useful indeed and with so much info, yet they download so quickly > even here in Asia where download times from Aussie servers can so > frequently timeout before you get the page. Each chart is fully > displayed within three seconds of the click. > Great work! > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Laurier Williams" > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:33:15 +1000 > Subject: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > > > I've bitten the bullet and now have Digital Atmosphere hard at work, > > uploading hourly plotted and analysed synoptic charts of Australia and > > southeastern Australia to http://australianweathernews.com/]Australian, > > or > > you can go directly to the page at > > http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml. > > > > There are enough AWS's around the country to allow a pretty accurate > > synoptic chart to be drawn hourly. If everything's working as it should > > be, > > you can get a fully plotted and analysed surface chart 15 minutes after > > real > > time. There's a 24-hour archive, so you can open up several windows, > > maximise them, then do your own animation to see how things are > > developing. > > In addition to the full Australian chart, there is a more detailed one > > covering NSW, Vic and Tas. If there's demand, I'll do ones for other > > areas. > > The charts are pretty big so as to get in lots of observations, but the > > files are small. Those with neanderthal screen resolutions will get > > some > > good mouse exercise. > > > > There are similar 3-hourly charts (with 24-hour archive) based on full > > synoptic data, complete with cloud and weather symbols. There's also a > > guide, so you can work out what the symbols mean. Because these charts > > use > > clock-time data (e.g. 9am local time), it takes 3 hours for them to > > gradually populate with observations, so they look a bit wierd as > > they're > > filling up. They are updated each 15 minutes as new data comes in. > > > > In addition, there are hourly temperature, humidity and wind streamline > > maps > > of Australia (with 24-hour archive). Animating the streamline maps is > > very > > useful in seeing where any convergence lines are moving. These are also > > available 15 mins past the hour. > > > > Let me know what you think, and any suggestions for improvement > > (bearing in > > mind that I don't have the programming genius of Andrew and TWC > > :laugh:) > > > > Cheers > > > > Laurier > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 18:05:03 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Chas The symbol tables I put up were temporary ones until I received more appropriate ones from Tim Vasquez, which I now have, and they're up on the site. The ones you referred to were scans of some old UKMO reference books. For the record: W = past weather symbol C = Generic cloud symbol (used for plotting the cloud codes referred to in the international exchange 8-groups in the synop code) E = state of the earth, e.g. frozen, wet, damp, etc (we don't use this) a = pressure tendency Cheers Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Chas & Helen > Osborn > Sent: Friday, 11 October, 2002 12:34 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > > > Hello Laurier > > Great Charts! > The weather symbols are very interesting can you help me with the > meaning of > columns > W C E a > http://www.australianweathernews.com/images/WxSymbols.jpg > > Chas > Strahan Tasmania > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Smith" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:10 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > > > > As several others have already said, you have done a great job with > > these charts. > > Very useful indeed and with so much info, yet they download so quickly > > even here in Asia where download times from Aussie servers can so > > frequently timeout before you get the page. Each chart is fully > > displayed within three seconds of the click. > > Great work! > > > > Phil > > <>< > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Laurier Williams" > > To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" > > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:33:15 +1000 > > Subject: aus-wx: Hourly synoptic charts (and more) now available > > > > > I've bitten the bullet and now have Digital Atmosphere hard at work, > > > uploading hourly plotted and analysed synoptic charts of Australia and > > > southeastern Australia to > http://australianweathernews.com/]Australian, > > > or > > > you can go directly to the page at > > > http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml. > > > > > > There are enough AWS's around the country to allow a pretty accurate > > > synoptic chart to be drawn hourly. If everything's working as > it should > > > be, > > > you can get a fully plotted and analysed surface chart 15 > minutes after > > > real > > > time. There's a 24-hour archive, so you can open up several windows, > > > maximise them, then do your own animation to see how things are > > > developing. > > > In addition to the full Australian chart, there is a more detailed one > > > covering NSW, Vic and Tas. If there's demand, I'll do ones for other > > > areas. > > > The charts are pretty big so as to get in lots of > observations, but the > > > files are small. Those with neanderthal screen resolutions will get > > > some > > > good mouse exercise. > > > > > > There are similar 3-hourly charts (with 24-hour archive) based on full > > > synoptic data, complete with cloud and weather symbols. There's also a > > > guide, so you can work out what the symbols mean. Because these charts > > > use > > > clock-time data (e.g. 9am local time), it takes 3 hours for them to > > > gradually populate with observations, so they look a bit wierd as > > > they're > > > filling up. They are updated each 15 minutes as new data comes in. > > > > > > In addition, there are hourly temperature, humidity and wind > streamline > > > maps > > > of Australia (with 24-hour archive). Animating the streamline maps is > > > very > > > useful in seeing where any convergence lines are moving. > These are also > > > available 15 mins past the hour. > > > > > > Let me know what you think, and any suggestions for improvement > > > (bearing in > > > mind that I don't have the programming genius of Andrew and TWC > > > :laugh:) > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Laurier > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > + > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > - > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: Gabo island rainfall, 5/10/02 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 18:53:40 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I've just noticed that Gabo Islands storm fall of 93.4mm in the 24 hours to 9am 5/10/02 was an October record. Given that there's a 134 year record, this is a bit significant! The previous record was 90.9, though I don't know when. They had a further 78mm in the 24 hours to 9am 6/10/02. However 165mm fell in the 9 hours from 6am to 3pm on 5/10. I'm surprised that this event hasn't been more remarked upon; animating the WeatherZone lightning images, it's clear that a succession of thunderstorms kept backbuilding over the southeast of NSW/Vic. As a result, Gabo reported either moderate or heavy storms at each 3-hourly observation from 3am to 3pm. Seems a pity there were no chasers there. For once, all that was needed was to sit and watch! Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 00:10:29 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: aus-wx: Victorian storms To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. We had a fierce electrical storm rip through Hamilton at about 10.30pm tonight. Not much rain in it but the lightning was sensational!!!! Cgs every second or so and went straight over the top of my house. Had two flangs here with the second hitting not much more than a few hundred metres away at a guess which knocked the power off in the whole area. It also scared the crap out of me and lightning has to hit pretty close for it to do that. :P Apart from that we have had numerous showers through since about 6pm with the odd rumble along with it. If you call each of those showers a storm (which you should because they were electrically active) you could then say I've had about 7 storms tonight!!! LOL... Paul Yole has had fun chasing in the Stawell/Ararat region but I'll let him tell you all about that... Tim Eckert Hamilton SW Victoria +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.70] From: "Catherine Elliott" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: STA issued for Vic Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 01:00:02 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2002 15:00:02.0476 (UTC) FILETIME=[0AB166C0:01C27200] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thought I would jump the gun on some of you other guys and let you know that in Frankston we have had really steady rumbles for about 20 mins now, jumped online at 1/2 past and no warning from BOM but just checked following warning appeared. IDV26400 BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY VICTORIAN REGIONAL OFFICE NEWS FLASH - FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST Priority Severe Thunderstorm Advice Issued at 12:35am on Sunday the 13th of October 2002 for the Central district and for the West and South Gippsland district. Thunderstorms are being observed over the Central district moving to the southeast. These thunderstorms may result in severe thunderstorms during tonight. People in these districts are warned that the storms may produce: - Flash flooding - Damaging winds - Large hail The SES advises that people should keep a lookout for thunderstorms and, if storms approach, secure loose items, move vehicles under cover, then stay indoors until the storms have passed. Also do not drive vehicles through flooded areas. This advice will be updated at 3.30am Sunday. This one also just appeared as i went to copy previous. have fun chasing guys. i wish i had film in my camera i can see lightnning it is great. IDV26500 BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY VICTORIAN REGIONAL OFFICE NEWS FLASH - FOR IMMEDIATE BROADCAST Top Priority Severe Thunderstorm Warning for the Melbourne metropolitan area. Issued at 12:55am on Sunday the 13th of October 2002 A thunderstorm southeast of Mt Macedon is moving southeastwards into the northern and northeastern suburbs. This thunderstorm appears on radar to be severe and people in the northern and northeastern suburbs are warned that thunderstorms could produce: Heavy rain with local flash flooding Large hail Damaging wind. [ Radio media to play Severe Weather News Tag Alert 4 here ] The current thunderstorm warning, issued by the Bureau of Meteorology, indicates the strong probability of intense storm activity in this area. In the interests of community safety the SES suggests some simple precautions: - Secure any loose objects in the vicinity of your home, then: - Stay indoors if possible - If you are outdoors, avoid sheltering under trees - Listen to the radio station for the storm updates - Switch off computers and electrical appliances - Do not drive vehicles through flooded areas This warning will be updated at 3am. bye. cath _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Chris Daley" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 01:31:43 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Guys, 1:30am here and the storm is just about over Mooroolbark. Little bit of rain, but heaps of anvil crawlers and thunder. Can't see if there are any CG's happening because of the trees and most of the crawlers are hidden by MLC. Can't think of anything nicer to be woken up by. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Eckert" To: Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 12:10 AM Subject: aus-wx: Victorian storms > Hi all. > We had a fierce electrical storm rip through Hamilton > at about 10.30pm tonight. Not much rain in it but the > lightning was sensational!!!! Cgs every second or so > and went straight over the top of my house. Had two > flangs here with the second hitting not much more > than a few hundred metres away at a guess which > knocked the power off in the whole area. It also > scared the crap out of me and lightning has to hit > pretty close for it to do that. :P > Apart from that we have had numerous showers > through since about 6pm with the odd rumble along > with it. If you call each of those showers a storm > (which you should because they were electrically > active) you could then say I've had about 7 storms > tonight!!! LOL... > Paul Yole has had fun chasing in the Stawell/Ararat > region but I'll let him tell you all about that... > > Tim Eckert > Hamilton > SW Victoria > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 09:09:26 -0700 (PDT) From: christian monahan Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, heaps of CGs here, storm came from West and has now kind of split over nthn suburbs and is going towards Montmorency and towards Epping, got some great shots. lots of thunder, been going for over 2 hrs now. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:32:53 -0700 (PDT) From: christian monahan Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi again, have to share this. chased storm up into Plenty,probably the best visual display i've ever seen. there was literally 2 flashes a second, lots of multiple CGs,no rain.it kept moving N/E without dissipating in the slightest taking up the entire skyline. that was cool.anyone else watch it? __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 09:40:20 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Was awoken by a distant rumble at 0145 this morning. By the tracker at around 2300 local, I was not expecting anything!! We had two storms here - both fast movers moving NE - SW, with lightning every half second or less. Most was totally obscured though it was an excellent show and lit up some amazing cloud structures (but I have broken in my Vidcam, and will check for captures today). The second storm dropped hail that was up to the size of an apricot stone. All up we got 19mm, and a heap of video. Cheers from Broadford - Supercell Country:-)) Peter +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew McDonald" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victorian storms Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 09:55:03 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2002 23:54:47.0407 (UTC) FILETIME=[BECD57F0:01C2724A] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Morning all, See below for the report I sent to the weatherzone forum at 4:30 this morning..... _______________________________________________ BACK!!!!!!!!!! I MADE IT!!!!! YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!! OK - Put it this way....I chased and drove 990km today.....and here is the report for the first 830km......I got SFA.... But as for the last 160km!!!!!!! WHOLY **** !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS WAS THE BEST OVERNIGHT STORM OUTBREAK I HAVE SEEN SINCE OCT 18th 2000 - ACTUALLY NOW THAT I THINK ABOUT IT....THIS WAS HEAPS BETTER THAN THAT!!. I first saw lightning to my DISTANT SW from about Tocumwal and it was relatively infrequent (maybe 1 every 10 seconds at absolute best) until I got to the servo on the Hume Hwy near Seymour. A quick suck on the good old ULP and the car was ready for REAL (read Victorian and not NSW) action. As soon as I left the servo it went BESERK!!!! Since about 11:30pm there has been strobe (AND I MEAN STROBE AS IN UP TO 5 FLASHES PER SECOND!!!!) lightning. The cold upper air interacted with the warm NE'ly flow and BANG!!!!!!!! BIG BIG BIG BANG!!!!! Cells were visually VERY VERY strong with powerful updrafts and very good inflow/outflow organisation. Visually they looked severe. I watched as the first "warned" cell tracked down across the N and NE suburbs of Melbourne from a lookout near Wandong getting about 30 mins of video as the cell cruised about 10km to my S (maybe a tad less). I then gave chase down to Kalkallo where I realised there was more coming down from the NW so I stopped and watched that stuff head for me. I then headed for South MOrang where I knew there was a good lookout near the top of a hill (thinking FLANGS for the video of course). I didn't make it to the lookout before the car was enveloped in hail fog and the road was almost totally covered (but for the car tyre tracks). I pulled over (well - kinda slid) off the road and jumped out to find a dense cover (drifts of 2 inches) hail up to about 1.2cm. WHOA!!!!!! I WAS IN HAIL HEAVEN!!!!!!!!!!!!! After some video of that (with the ominous reminder, in the form of thunder, from the approaching next storm) I headed to my original destination (the lookout in South MOrang). Again I didn't make it that far as the hail on the road (and the leaf/other debris) got thicker and thicker until there was no more road....hehe - fun to drive on. I pulled over again and the hail was now in drifts of 3-4inches deep with fast rivers of hail/water/ice running down the sides of the road (all this from the first cell to pass over the NE burbs). The stones were a little larger too (1.5cm) so given the increase I gave the BoM a quick call and reported the hail. Anyway - upon finally reaching my destination (the lookout) the storm to my NW was only about 5km away and booming constantly with thunder. There was still hail everywhere at the lookout so I grabbed the torch and went in search of larger hail - and found it quite easily. Hail up to 2.5-3cm. I was now VERY VERY happy. Anyway - the cell to the NW was spitting out some f'unbelievable CG's so I jumped in the car and started videoing to the NW. I got about 10 (guessing) relatively close CG's before I decided to climb back into the front seat and start shooting towards the top of the hill (about 80-100m away). A few close CG's hit off to the SE and also over just behind the hill (all within about 500m) and then it happened. FLAASSSSSHHHHHHH (picture seeing 3 forked lightning very very very close right in front of you) CCCRRRRRRRAACCCCCCCCCCKKKKKBBBBBBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Well....I totally lost it....hehehe. The MMMAAAACCCCCCCCCCAAAAAAAAAa cry went out and it was just all over the shop (for those of you who don't knwo its just a figure of speech when one gets rather excited). I recovered from that incident (my heart rate went back down from about 20,000bpm) and decided to drive over the hill to watch the storm as it tore off to the SE. Over the hill I go and hello boys....the police are there. The road to Whittlesea was closed due to trees down. (note there was still copious amounts of hail here too - up to 2cm - not bad for 30mins after the storm). I parked the car, armed myself with the video camera and marched on down to the roadblock and introduced myself as being a member of ASWA to which I was greeted with great enthusiasm. The two cops were very friendly and were happy for me to stroll around taking footage of the 2.5ft diametre tree which had just causually been snapped off by the wind and layed nicely across half of the road. THe SES was about 80m further down the road removing another WHOLE tree off the road. After about 15 mins they came down to the other tree and one of the cops and I and the two SES guys set to work on this beast. I asked them if they had heard of any other damage and they said there were buildings damaged in Whittlesea. After a while when most of the work was done I headed off to get some more footage (hoping to catch the line of storms again...hehehe). I got up to the lookout at Kangaroo Ground and realised things were disappearing off into the abyss of the E ranges and imediately decided enough was enough. At 3:30am it was time to head home. So I turned around and left the storm to flash away at about 1-2 flashes per second and came home. And here I am - far far far too excited to sleep so I think I'll go and watch the footage from tonight....hehe. Hope the rest of you had a gawk at this stuff tonight as it was the best show we've had here in Melbourne since Feb 1st. I'm not sure if others would think so but I'd rate this as better than Feb (partly because I drove 990km to see it and the day was somewhat marginal until dinner time (the waitress at the pub in Narranderra was not too bad....hehe)). On that note, I bid thee all farewell. Cheerio, Macca-wx _________________________________________________ It sure was an awesome night and I have since reviewed the video footage and will endeavor to do some captures today. Interesting to see the wording of the first warning from the BoM - they based it on radar alone. It makes me wonder what it looked like on radar (supercell? or just severe?) as the shear on last nights sounding was not uncondusive for supercells with 30knts from the NE up to about 890mb swinging around to 30knts from the NW at 700mb. Any BoM guys care to comment? Hope all the NSW and QLD people have a good day today. Macca -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of christian monahan Sent: Sunday, 13 October 2002 3:33 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms hi again, have to share this. chased storm up into Plenty,probably the best visual display i've ever seen. there was literally 2 flashes a second, lots of multiple CGs,no rain.it kept moving N/E without dissipating in the slightest taking up the entire skyline. that was cool.anyone else watch it? __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Dry Fronts Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:41:18 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello to all my fellow weather watchers:
          To date this year in Mena, we've had 13 cold fronts (Canadian & Pacific) come through which were TOTALLY dry., a few others brought very little rain. (A few clouds and a wind shift--to Northerly--would mark their passage).
            I was wondering if Australia has many dry frontal passages?
P.S. I also got an e-mail from Shelly (shellypy at hotmail.com)--from Sydney--asking about raindays for this year. I replied to the e-mail, got a reply back, ran a virus test on my computer which said I was virus-free.
            Wishing everyone much Love and an awesome week  Yours   David Powell
From: "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:12:04 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Yes we look forward to hearing your updates from a 'different' part of Australia.
 
dann
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather

"Big" climate change! Good luck.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 6:55 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather

Hello Everyone
 
Today we say goodbye to Strahan! In five weeks we will in Kalumburu in Western Australia!
Climate change!!
Check out.
 
Sad to be leaving, excited about moving.
 
Chas
for the last time
Strahan Tasmania soon to be Kalumburu WA
 
From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:32:14 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2002 01:34:23.0684 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8F0D840:01C27258] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Macca......What can I say, it appears that you enjoyed yourself!. Hip Hip for Macca. On a more serious note your analysis of conditions was a bulls eye, here in Geelong we had a respectable storm between 0130 and 0300hrs with powerful CG's and some nice garden rain...regards Clyve Herbert. ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew McDonald To: Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 9:55 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victorian storms > Morning all, > > See below for the report I sent to the weatherzone forum at 4:30 this > morning..... > > _______________________________________________ > > BACK!!!!!!!!!! I MADE IT!!!!! YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!! > > OK - Put it this way....I chased and drove 990km today.....and here is the > report for the first 830km......I got SFA.... > > But as for the last 160km!!!!!!! WHOLY **** > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > THIS WAS THE BEST OVERNIGHT STORM OUTBREAK I HAVE SEEN SINCE OCT 18th 2000 - > ACTUALLY NOW THAT I THINK ABOUT IT....THIS WAS HEAPS BETTER THAN THAT!!. I > first saw lightning to my DISTANT SW from about Tocumwal and it was > relatively infrequent (maybe 1 every 10 seconds at absolute best) until I > got to the servo on the Hume Hwy near Seymour. A quick suck on the good old > ULP and the car was ready for REAL (read Victorian and not NSW) action. As > soon as I left the servo it went BESERK!!!! Since about 11:30pm there has > been strobe (AND I MEAN STROBE AS IN UP TO 5 FLASHES PER SECOND!!!!) > lightning. The cold upper air interacted with the warm NE'ly flow and > BANG!!!!!!!! BIG BIG BIG BANG!!!!! Cells were visually VERY VERY strong with > powerful updrafts and very good inflow/outflow organisation. Visually they > looked severe. I watched as the first "warned" cell tracked down across the > N and NE suburbs of Melbourne from a lookout near Wandong getting about 30 > mins of video as the cell cruised about 10km to my S (maybe a tad less). I > then gave chase down to Kalkallo where I realised there was more coming down > from the NW so I stopped and watched that stuff head for me. I then headed > for South MOrang where I knew there was a good lookout near the top of a > hill (thinking FLANGS for the video of course). I didn't make it to the > lookout before the car was enveloped in hail fog and the road was almost > totally covered (but for the car tyre tracks). I pulled over (well - kinda > slid) off the road and jumped out to find a dense cover (drifts of 2 inches) > hail up to about 1.2cm. WHOA!!!!!! I WAS IN HAIL HEAVEN!!!!!!!!!!!!! After > some video of that (with the ominous reminder, in the form of thunder, from > the approaching next storm) I headed to my original destination (the lookout > in South MOrang). Again I didn't make it that far as the hail on the road > (and the leaf/other debris) got thicker and thicker until there was no more > road....hehe - fun to drive on. I pulled over again and the hail was now in > drifts of 3-4inches deep with fast rivers of hail/water/ice running down the > sides of the road (all this from the first cell to pass over the NE burbs). > The stones were a little larger too (1.5cm) so given the increase I gave the > BoM a quick call and reported the hail. Anyway - upon finally reaching my > destination (the lookout) the storm to my NW was only about 5km away and > booming constantly with thunder. There was still hail everywhere at the > lookout so I grabbed the torch and went in search of larger hail - and found > it quite easily. Hail up to 2.5-3cm. I was now VERY VERY happy. Anyway - the > cell to the NW was spitting out some f'unbelievable CG's so I jumped in the > car and started videoing to the NW. I got about 10 (guessing) relatively > close CG's before I decided to climb back into the front seat and start > shooting towards the top of the hill (about 80-100m away). A few close CG's > hit off to the SE and also over just behind the hill (all within about 500m) > and then it happened. FLAASSSSSHHHHHHH (picture seeing 3 forked lightning > very very very close right in front of you) > CCCRRRRRRRAACCCCCCCCCCKKKKKBBBBBBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM > MM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Well....I totally lost it....hehehe. The > MMMAAAACCCCCCCCCCAAAAAAAAAa cry went out and it was just all over the shop > (for those of you who don't knwo its just a figure of speech when one gets > rather excited). I recovered from that incident (my heart rate went back > down from about 20,000bpm) and decided to drive over the hill to watch the > storm as it tore off to the SE. Over the hill I go and hello boys....the > police are there. The road to Whittlesea was closed due to trees down. (note > there was still copious amounts of hail here too - up to 2cm - not bad for > 30mins after the storm). I parked the car, armed myself with the video > camera and marched on down to the roadblock and introduced myself as being a > member of ASWA to which I was greeted with great enthusiasm. The two cops > were very friendly and were happy for me to stroll around taking footage of > the 2.5ft diametre tree which had just causually been snapped off by the > wind and layed nicely across half of the road. THe SES was about 80m further > down the road removing another WHOLE tree off the road. After about 15 mins > they came down to the other tree and one of the cops and I and the two SES > guys set to work on this beast. I asked them if they had heard of any other > damage and they said there were buildings damaged in Whittlesea. After a > while when most of the work was done I headed off to get some more footage > (hoping to catch the line of storms again...hehehe). I got up to the lookout > at Kangaroo Ground and realised things were disappearing off into the abyss > of the E ranges and imediately decided enough was enough. At 3:30am it was > time to head home. So I turned around and left the storm to flash away at > about 1-2 flashes per second and came home. And here I am - far far far too > excited to sleep so I think I'll go and watch the footage from > tonight....hehe. > > Hope the rest of you had a gawk at this stuff tonight as it was the best > show we've had here in Melbourne since Feb 1st. I'm not sure if others would > think so but I'd rate this as better than Feb (partly because I drove 990km > to see it and the day was somewhat marginal until dinner time (the waitress > at the pub in Narranderra was not too bad....hehe)). > > On that note, I bid thee all farewell. > > Cheerio, > > Macca-wx > > _________________________________________________ > > It sure was an awesome night and I have since reviewed the video footage and > will endeavor to do some captures today. Interesting to see the wording of > the first warning from the BoM - they based it on radar alone. It makes me > wonder what it looked like on radar (supercell? or just severe?) as the > shear on last nights sounding was not uncondusive for supercells with 30knts > from the NE up to about 890mb swinging around to 30knts from the NW at > 700mb. Any BoM guys care to comment? > > Hope all the NSW and QLD people have a good day today. > > Macca > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of christian > monahan > Sent: Sunday, 13 October 2002 3:33 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms > > > hi again, > have to share this. chased storm up into > Plenty,probably the best visual display i've ever > seen. there was literally 2 flashes a second, lots of > multiple CGs,no rain.it kept moving N/E without > dissipating in the slightest taking up the entire > skyline. that was cool.anyone else watch it? > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.50.252.206] From: "Ben Jerrems" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: melbourne lightning Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:16:06 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2002 02:16:07.0084 (UTC) FILETIME=[7D155EC0:01C2725E] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Hi all last night i saw some of the best bolts i have seen in a while! I have never seen Doncaster shoppingtown so empty! Not a soul. Photo's are on there way. The closest bolt i saw was just over a km, very bright very loud!!

Ben
BEANZVISION Photographics.

 


Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: Canberra STA Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:29:01 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all.
BoM have issued an STA for the ACT, http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/wrap_fwo.pl?IDN26200.txt Right now i can here thnder every couple of seconds, but its all imbeded in a layer of mid level crap!!!
 
Have to work in 1.5hrs, so hopefully it will hit before then!
 
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra STA Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:47:49 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
WOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOO, Just had 12 minutes of 1.5cm hail, with some stomes upto 2cm!!!!, webcam was updating at the time so i will see if i got any worthwile shots from it, otherwise i have to wait for my dad to bring around the stuff for the Digi.
 
Woooohooooooooo (biggest hail i have seen)
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 1:29 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Canberra STA

Hi all.
BoM have issued an STA for the ACT, http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/wrap_fwo.pl?IDN26200.txt Right now i can here thnder every couple of seconds, but its all imbeded in a layer of mid level crap!!!
 
Have to work in 1.5hrs, so hopefully it will hit before then!
 
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: aus-wx: Cold Pool vorticity. Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:05:50 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2002 04:07:57.0733 (UTC) FILETIME=[1CF12550:01C2726E] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all. Hope you are all enjoying your weather weekend.....Not a bad looking cold pool just south of Mt Gambier, this system has a maximum vorticity around 500hpa at around 40 south west of Tasmania and due south of Mt Gamb: and appears to be moving slowly east might kick off some ok cold air CB's across southern Vic and through Tasmania this afternoon....regards Clyve H.
From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cold Pool vorticity. Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:27:07 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Enjoy!
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 2:05 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Cold Pool vorticity.

Hi all. Hope you are all enjoying your weather weekend.....Not a bad looking cold pool just south of Mt Gambier, this system has a maximum vorticity around 500hpa at around 40 south west of Tasmania and due south of Mt Gamb: and appears to be moving slowly east might kick off some ok cold air CB's across southern Vic and through Tasmania this afternoon....regards Clyve H.
From: "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: NSW - Niangala Tornado - Oct 13 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:34:24 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Wow Matt! This certainly sounds like a significant event. I can't wait for the pics, report, analysis, caps etc etc Maybe a full rundown at the November ASWA meeting? Well done! dann ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Smith" To: Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 10:20 PM Subject: aus-wx: NSW - Niangala Tornado - Oct 13 > > I had the weekend off, and decided to take the long drive up to > Niangala, an hour and a half drive or so north of Gloucester on the > barrington tops, to inspect damage reported by a Tamworth newspaper > about a tornado that hit last sunday, the day a bunch of us were chasing > in the Hunter valley. > > Several houses damaged. At one farm, the house had the roof off, double > brick walls were down and glass shards from windows were embedded > throughout the house in the walls. I met up with the farmer after > walking around the area for a few minutes by myself, he drove me around > his property so we could cover more ground and get photos, lovely man, > Neil Stackman, and he is extremely lucky he and his family did not have > worse injuries (the worst being a deep cut that required 45 stitches to > his daughter) His account of being in the house whilst it roared > overhead (he said it sounded like an F1-11 jet), was amazing, yet seeing > his house in ruins i felt very sad, but happy they walked away. > > The tornado track seems to be over 15km long. Most of it travelled > through farmland/fields, with plenty of tree's down along the path, but > the last 3-4km of the track.... WOW what a site.... the tornado entered > a state forest..., I found a dirt road that went into it and hoped it > would intercept the tornado track... and it did. The damage width was > the same as back at the house, about 200m wide, but with the dense > vegitation, it gave a better idea of the exact width and damage path.. > it was like a 200m wide lawnmower had gone through the bush, with > massive gum tree's uprooted, tree's broken in half, tree's twisted off > 1/2 way up, branches down everywhere. The track was visible to the naked > eye so easily... absolutly mindblowing to see it and to think 6 days ago > it roared through the area. > My initial thoughts are that it reached F3 intensity at its most intense > phase, a very significant tornadic event. No photographs as it occured > just in the last glimmers of light after the sun set, but 1 witness saw > it and described a large black wirly cloud on the ground. > I took a roll of photos and some video of the damage, and will get them > scanned and send some to Rob Webb. > > Amazing site, but a long drive there and back to Newcastle in the high > 30 temps.. yuck. > > Matthew Smith > http://www.sydneystormchasers.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.50.86.83] From: "Ben Jerrems" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: big bolt photos Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 17:11:46 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2002 07:11:47.0018 (UTC) FILETIME=[CAE87AA0:01C27287] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all i have uploaded some snaps from last night, i didnt know which ones because there are so many but here are just a few...Comments welcome!
 
New album light night...
 
P.S. I have got my dates mixed up!
 
Ben
BEANZVISION Photographics.


Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Vic storms Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:26:39 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
A very active storm through here last night between 3.30 am and 4 am apparently, but I slept through it. Bugger.
No rain at all though :-(
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Dewpoint Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:29:43 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Just had a look for here and the Dewpoint has been below zero since Midday today and is currently still on minus 1.3C
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:33:00 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cold Pool vorticity. To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Some really nice looking 'coldies' down here this afternoon. Some heavy showers with a little hail mixed in on occasions. I've received 6.5mm this afternoon to add to the 5.5mm from last night's storms - ends up being a pretty good weekend weather-wise. Tim Eckert ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:05:50 +1000 >From: "Clyve Herbert" >Subject: aus-wx: Cold Pool vorticity. >To: > >Hi all. Hope you are all enjoying your weather weekend.....Not a bad looking cold pool just south of Mt Gambier, this system has a maximum vorticity around 500hpa at around 40 south west of Tasmania and due south of Mt Gamb: and appears to be moving slowly east might kick off some ok cold air CB's across southern Vic and through Tasmania this afternoon....regards Clyve H. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dry Fronts Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:50:48 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
As bizarre as it sounds here on the East Coast of NSW ( 34S ) we actually get some cold fronts that clear the skies and even raise the temperature the following day.
 
What happens is the front brings a west wind change that replaces the cool seabreeze.
 
Michael
 
----- Original Message -----
From: arky dave
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Dry Fronts

Hello to all my fellow weather watchers:
          To date this year in Mena, we've had 13 cold fronts (Canadian & Pacific) come through which were TOTALLY dry., a few others brought very little rain. (A few clouds and a wind shift--to Northerly--would mark their passage).
            I was wondering if Australia has many dry frontal passages?
P.S. I also got an e-mail from Shelly (shellypy at hotmail.com)--from Sydney--asking about raindays for this year. I replied to the e-mail, got a reply back, ran a virus test on my computer which said I was virus-free.
            Wishing everyone much Love and an awesome week  Yours   David Powell
X-Originating-IP: [210.50.218.37] From: "Ben Jerrems" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:00:32 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2002 11:00:32.0966 (UTC) FILETIME=[C035EE60:01C272A7] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

I saw it! and my photo's are here...

http://groups.msn.com/melbournelightning

Ben
BEANZVISION Photographics.

>From: christian monahan
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms
>Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
>
>hi again,
>have to share this. chased storm up into
>Plenty,probably the best visual display i've ever
>seen. there was literally 2 flashes a second, lots of
>multiple CGs,no rain.it kept moving N/E without
>dissipating in the slightest taking up the entire
>skyline. that was cool.anyone else watch it?
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
>http://faith.yahoo.com
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "Michael Andrews" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victorian storms Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:19:04 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Message
Hi all,
 
This is my first post here.
 
Ben, great photos. Did you take them from Doncaster Shoppingtown? Where do you shoot from? The top of the carpark or somewhere?
 
I woke to the storm but unfortunately all my slide film was in the fridge. There was plenty of lightning activity outside my place in Mt Evelyn but it all seemed to be crawlers above the cloud, couldnt really see it. Obviously I was wrong - damn. (Not much view here, too many trees).
 
Oh well looks like I missed the first good storm of the season, let's hope it's a sign of things to come. I desperately need to add more images to my gallery which I started back in February this year......:) (only have two images so far..)
 
That's it from me for now, this seems to be a great group!
 
Cheers,
 
Michael Andrews
Mt Evelyn, VIC
 
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ben Jerrems
Sent: Sunday, 13 October 2002 9:01 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms

I saw it! and my photo's are here...

http://groups.msn.com/melbournelightning

Ben
BEANZVISION Photographics.

X-Originating-IP: [210.50.37.42] From: "Ben Jerrems" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victorian storms Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 22:11:25 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2002 12:11:25.0614 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6FC84E0:01C272B1] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com



Yes mate they were taken from westfield, i like the view but too many lights.


BEANZVISION Photographics.
>From: "Michael Andrews"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victorian storms
>Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:19:04 +1000
>
>Hi all,
>
>This is my first post here.
>
>Ben, great photos. Did you take them from Doncaster Shoppingtown? Where
>do you shoot from? The top of the carpark or somewhere?
>
>I woke to the storm but unfortunately all my slide film was in the
>fridge. There was plenty of lightning activity outside my place in Mt
>Evelyn but it all seemed to be crawlers above the cloud, couldnt really
>see it. Obviously I was wrong - damn. (Not much view here, too many
>trees).
>
>Oh well looks like I missed the first good storm of the season, let's
>hope it's a sign of things to come. I desperately need to add more
>images to my gallery which I started back in February this year......:)
>(only have two images so far..)
>
>That's it from me for now, this seems to be a great group!
>
>Cheers,
>
>Michael Andrews
>Mt Evelyn, VIC
>www.michaelsphotography.net
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com
>[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ben Jerrems
>Sent: Sunday, 13 October 2002 9:01 PM
>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms
>
>
>
>I saw it! and my photo's are here...
>
>http://groups.msn.com/melbournelightning
>
>Ben
>BEANZVISION Photographics.
>


Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:16:05 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 12:10 AM 13/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Hi all. >We had a fierce electrical storm rip through Hamilton >at about 10.30pm tonight. Not much rain in it but the >lightning was sensational!!!! Cgs every second or so >and went straight over the top of my house. Had two Storm went through Niddrie at around 1AM. Was a rather weak cell, only infrequent CCs and moderate rain. More intense storms were reported in the eastern suburbs (I seem to have a knack of finding closet chasers out there - must direct a few towards ASWA :) ). 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.132.18.241] From: "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic storms Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 00:34:43 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2002 14:34:44.0334 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC3910E0:01C272C5] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Some awesome storms here in Donvale last night too! (I just knew this system would produce some great night storms!) I got woken up around 1 am with some rain and some thunder and lighting. The cell then seemed to move off to the east, but was soon followed by a HUUUGGEEEEE cell that produced massive amounts of rain, some hail 1 - 2cm, and strobe-like lightning. 2-3 flashes a second at the most intense period!!! With flangs aplenty! Anvil crawlers lit up everywhere, with only a few CG's. Most of the lightning started high up above the cloud cover, but then seemed to begin arcing through to the underside where it was visible when the storm seemed to intensify. The storm lasted around 30-40 mins before passing off into the night. Fell asleep listening to the thunder in the distance, and the rain on the roof. Still recovering from a gig with the band the night before. GO SPRING AND GO VIC!!!!!!!!!!! Liam >From: "Bussy" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: "aussie-weather" >Subject: aus-wx: Vic storms >Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:26:39 +1000 > >A very active storm through here last night between 3.30 am and 4 am >apparently, but I slept through it. Bugger. >No rain at all though :-( >Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.132.18.241] From: "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Cold air CB photos from Sunday Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 01:41:32 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2002 15:41:32.0578 (UTC) FILETIME=[01529020:01C272CF] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all After recovering from last nights brilliant storms, I went to look at a car in Sunbury. The clouds looked nice, with some big cold air CB's building to the west, and some dark based showers passing over the airport, with big white virga streaming down from them (hail shafts no doubt) While looking at the car, my mate and I were pummeled by winds approx 80-90km/h, freeeeeeezing cold of course, rain and some small hail. On the way home, driving down the Calder, I remembered I had the digital camera in the back and snapped a few shots of the massive coldie that had just passed over us, and heading eastwards. The cell had a nice updraught at the rear. Here's the pics! http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/liam-domanski/storm_photos/13-10-02/ Enjoy! Liam _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra STA Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 02:29:46 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all, Fantastic storm(s) here this afternoon, I will get my account up after work 2morrow, but for now all the pics are www.canberra-wx.com/pics/13oct02/ <--there, and 1 pic from the webcam during the action here --> www.canberra-wx.com/pics/13oct02/webcam.jpg
 
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra STA

WOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOO, Just had 12 minutes of 1.5cm hail, with some stomes upto 2cm!!!!, webcam was updating at the time so i will see if i got any worthwile shots from it, otherwise i have to wait for my dad to bring around the stuff for the Digi.
 
Woooohooooooooo (biggest hail i have seen)
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 1:29 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Canberra STA

Hi all.
BoM have issued an STA for the ACT, http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/wrap_fwo.pl?IDN26200.txt Right now i can here thnder every couple of seconds, but its all imbeded in a layer of mid level crap!!!
 
Have to work in 1.5hrs, so hopefully it will hit before then!
 
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.411 (Entity 5.404) From: Rhett Blanch To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:20:13 +1000 Subject: aus-wx: Hunter storms - 13 Oct Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, A successful chase yesterday saw storms in the Singleton - Cessnock - Maitland area NSW. I ran into 1cm hail North of Cessnock with some stone considerably larger. There were also some interesting lowerings and heaps of lightning. Photos below: http://www.wilgatree.com/reporting/20021013_hunter.htm More detailed report to follow - if anyone has radar of that area from yesterday can you let me know off list. Also some photos from last weekend (5th October) at Scone, NSW of a nice sunlit anvil at sunset: http://www.wilgatree.com/reporting/20021005_scone.htm Rhett Blanch +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hunter storms - 13 Oct Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:33:29 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com yep, got 512k willi at 48min past the hour and 128k at 50min past the hour. Both animated. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rhett Blanch" To: Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 8:20 AM Subject: aus-wx: Hunter storms - 13 Oct > Hi all, > A successful chase yesterday saw storms in the Singleton - Cessnock - Maitland > area NSW. I ran into 1cm hail North of Cessnock with some stone considerably > larger. There were also some interesting lowerings and heaps of lightning. Photos > below: > > http://www.wilgatree.com/reporting/20021013_hunter.htm > > More detailed report to follow - if anyone has radar of that area from yesterday can > you let me know off list. > > Also some photos from last weekend (5th October) at Scone, NSW of a nice > sunlit anvil at sunset: > http://www.wilgatree.com/reporting/20021005_scone.htm > > > > Rhett Blanch > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.40.161.253] From: "Leslie Baxter" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Cold air CB photos from Sunday Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 02:59:39 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2002 02:59:40.0122 (UTC) FILETIME=[BCFD13A0:01C2732D] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yes a good weekend stormwise! Yes nice cold Cells sunday, actually some where a little bit electrically active! >From: "Liam Domanski" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Cold air CB photos from Sunday >Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 01:41:32 +1000 > >Hi all > >After recovering from last nights brilliant storms, I went to look at a car >in Sunbury. > >The clouds looked nice, with some big cold air CB's building to the west, >and some dark based showers passing over the airport, with big white virga >streaming down from them (hail shafts no doubt) > >While looking at the car, my mate and I were pummeled by winds approx >80-90km/h, freeeeeeezing cold of course, rain and some small hail. > >On the way home, driving down the Calder, I remembered I had the digital >camera in the back and snapped a few shots of the massive coldie that had >just passed over us, and heading eastwards. > >The cell had a nice updraught at the rear. > >Here's the pics! > >http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/liam-domanski/storm_photos/13-10-02/ > >Enjoy! > > >Liam > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: aus-wx: Tasmanian 'wrap around'+ Yarrawonga radar. Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:05:24 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2002 08:07:31.0889 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF050A10:01C27358] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all, An interesting cirrus wrap around moving around the cold pool low over Tasmania and coming ashore near Wilson's Prom, also some interesting returns from radar north of Yarrawonga, what's going on up there Bussie some red showing up,. regards Clyve h.
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Tasmanian 'wrap around'+ Yarrawonga radar. Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:28:25 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Some heavy showers about but they are very quick to pass over. The heaviest one I saw was when I was coming home between Chiltern and Rutherglen on my bus and the windscreen wiper decided to fall to bits. How convenient!
There has been some very dark clouds about though no doubt. The darkest one has just passed to the north travelling from the SW I think and is now in southern NSW. I have had a massive point 8 mm here but it all helps. Because the showers were quite heavy (but short) everything looks nice and green after the dust has been washed off.
Currently on 4mm for October :-((
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:05 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Tasmanian 'wrap around'+ Yarrawonga radar.

Hi all, An interesting cirrus wrap around moving around the cold pool low over Tasmania and coming ashore near Wilson's Prom, also some interesting returns from radar north of Yarrawonga, what's going on up there Bussie some red showing up,. regards Clyve h.
From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Chase 12th & 13th October - Vic & NSW Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:08:34 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, I chased the trough from Victoria's central highlands on Saturday evening up to Bundanoon on the NSW Southern Tablelands on Sunday afternoon...then I thought I'd better come back to Melbourne so I could be at work by 7.30 this morning. Brilliant lightning - I still have to do captures from the video, but there should be some good ones of Melbourne from the hill behind Sunbury and I then followed them (well, actually was in it) all the way up the Hume Highway to just north of Euroa, where I gave up driving and just 'experienced' a ripper of a storm. An hour later, another storm passed over with just a smattering of small hail. Sunday morning was coffee and toast in a cafe in Albury with a power point for the laptop ... you get strange looks from people when you go in and ask if they have a table with a power point . Resumed my trail north, passing through the front and into warmer, moister air & headed up towards Gunning, listening with some curiosity to the lightning the AM radio was capturing. If you know my radio, you also know that your sanity can be sorely tested during a stormchase because of the 'WHINE" - but when you have a close storm, you start to hear 'gaps in the whine'....and I was starting to hear gaps....the storm was actually on an intercept course with me!! Very lighting active, but embedded in a lot of junky Cu - so I had no idea which one it was, so I took pictures of everything!! Headed north once more and came upon clearer air near Goulburn - and some serious convection!! Nice cells on the ranges near Goulburn and also over the Morton National Park. Did a quick circuit through Exeter & Bundanoon, took a couple of shots of the cells wandering off the Illawarra coast, looked at the clock....1445 & thought, maybe it was time to head south again. Photos of the back end of the cell over Canberra made that part of the drive rather fascinating - the dynamics involved with those cells was rather curious ....check out this image http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/1013jon11.jpg Drove into a totally different airmass between Goulburn & Gunning & changed my photo mode from 'convection' to 'clouds & sunsets'.....best thing about digital cameras is that you can take photos at any time........ All in all - an absolutely brilliant weekend, but I'm not sure that I would quite recommend driving 1650kms in one day - you do end up just a bit tired the next day.....needless to say, SCD (Storm Chaser Dog) loved every minute of the trip, especially the McDonalds "one for you, one for me, one for you, one for me" deal with the chips on the way back last night!! The first 12 images can be found here (I'll be putting a few more up with the video stills later in the week) http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02jon.htm Enjoy!! -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Tasmanian 'wrap around'+ Yarrawonga radar. Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:46:24 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Checking the radar tonight, these rain bands (although narrow) are steadily expanding their way outwards from the low and edging towards Melbourne and the Otways!!  Worth watching, could be some rather good falls if the 25.8mm at Wilson's Prom is anything to go by!!
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at stormchasers.au.com
 
Melbourne Storm Chasers
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:05 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Tasmanian 'wrap around'+ Yarrawonga radar.

Hi all, An interesting cirrus wrap around moving around the cold pool low over Tasmania and coming ashore near Wilson's Prom, also some interesting returns from radar north of Yarrawonga, what's going on up there Bussie some red showing up,. regards Clyve h.
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:47:51 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. Just came across a photo on the Austarnet web site that a customer had sent in. The photo was of a street somewhere in Brisbane with snow covering the road and the roof of the houses!! Had no date except that it was 1983. Anyone know exactly when this was and where?? How often has it snowed in Brisbane? And no it doesn't look like a large hail storm.... :P Thanks for your help. Tim. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Chase 12th & 13th October - Vic & NSW Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:49:44 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jane I ended up just south of Bundanoon myself, albeit 2 hours later. You made the right move heading southwards when you did, the better cells were all south ( or east over the ocean ). The moisture levels were just far too low around the southern highlands. Sorry we did not have Storm chaser convergence. I thought earlier in the day that Jimmy was nearby - going just from this scene http://ozthunder.com/chase/131002c.jpg Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:08 PM Subject: aus-wx: Chase 12th & 13th October - Vic & NSW > Evening all, > > I chased the trough from Victoria's central highlands on Saturday > evening up to Bundanoon on the NSW Southern Tablelands on Sunday > afternoon...then I thought I'd better come back to Melbourne so I could > be at work by 7.30 this morning. Brilliant lightning - I still have to > do captures from the video, but there should be some good ones of > Melbourne from the hill behind Sunbury and I then followed them (well, > actually was in it) all the way up the Hume Highway to just north of > Euroa, where I gave up driving and just 'experienced' a ripper of a > storm. An hour later, another storm passed over with just a smattering > of small hail. > > Sunday morning was coffee and toast in a cafe in Albury with a power > point for the laptop ... you get strange looks from people when you go > in and ask if they have a table with a power point . Resumed my > trail north, passing through the front and into warmer, moister air & > headed up towards Gunning, listening with some curiosity to the > lightning the AM radio was capturing. If you know my radio, you also > know that your sanity can be sorely tested during a stormchase because > of the 'WHINE" - but when you have a close storm, you start to hear > 'gaps in the whine'....and I was starting to hear gaps....the storm was > actually on an intercept course with me!! Very lighting active, but > embedded in a lot of junky Cu - so I had no idea which one it was, so I > took pictures of everything!! > > Headed north once more and came upon clearer air near Goulburn - and > some serious convection!! Nice cells on the ranges near Goulburn and > also over the Morton National Park. Did a quick circuit through Exeter > & Bundanoon, took a couple of shots of the cells wandering off the > Illawarra coast, looked at the clock....1445 & thought, maybe it was > time to head south again. Photos of the back end of the cell over > Canberra made that part of the drive rather fascinating - the dynamics > involved with those cells was rather curious ....check out this image > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/1013jon11.jpg > > Drove into a totally different airmass between Goulburn & Gunning & > changed my photo mode from 'convection' to 'clouds & sunsets'.....best > thing about digital cameras is that you can take photos at any > time........ > > All in all - an absolutely brilliant weekend, but I'm not sure that I > would quite recommend driving 1650kms in one day - you do end up just a > bit tired the next day.....needless to say, SCD (Storm Chaser Dog) loved > every minute of the trip, especially the McDonalds "one for you, one for > me, one for you, one for me" deal with the chips on the way back last > night!! > > The first 12 images can be found here (I'll be putting a few more up > with the video stills later in the week) > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02jon.htm > > Enjoy!! > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:00:57 +1000 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tim, It never has. Don W Tim Eckert wrote: > > Hi all. > Just came across a photo on the Austarnet web site > that a customer had sent in. The photo was of a street > somewhere in Brisbane with snow covering the road > and the roof of the houses!! Had no date except that > it was 1983. Anyone know exactly when this was and > where?? > How often has it snowed in Brisbane? > And no it doesn't look like a large hail storm.... :P > Thanks for your help. > Tim. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:09:53 +1000 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tim... for a more detailed reply, the lowest temp in Brisbane in 1983 was 6.5 on a clear June morning. The lowest max was > 15 ! On 8 July Toowoomba had a max of 7.0 - the lowest max ever but no snow even there. Myths should never be allowed to get in the way of facts. I don't know the site you referred to - you gave no cross reference, but it is obviously a rubbishy one. Don W Tim Eckert wrote: > > Hi all. > Just came across a photo on the Austarnet web site > that a customer had sent in. The photo was of a street > somewhere in Brisbane with snow covering the road > and the roof of the houses!! Had no date except that > it was 1983. Anyone know exactly when this was and > where?? > How often has it snowed in Brisbane? > And no it doesn't look like a large hail storm.... :P > Thanks for your help. > Tim. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:41:17 -0400 (EDT) From: David Hart Apparently-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls2.std.com [199.172.62.104]) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA17763 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 01:31:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hotmail.com (f134.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.23.134]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA23103 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 01:31:16 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 22:31:10 -0700 Received: from 144.139.221.121 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 05:31:10 GMT X-Originating-IP: [144.139.221.121] From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra STA Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:31:10 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2002 05:31:10.0968 (UTC) FILETIME=[E78E1780:01C27342] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Simon, I was at the Fyshwick Markets about that time we had a brief thunderstorm with small hail for about 4 minutes with heavy rain and some loud thunderclaps but it was moving very fast.Yet at Gilmore it remained sunny with fresh northwesterly winds which peaked at 51 km/hr from the WNW at 1742hours. I suspect the plane that flipped at Bungendore a bit later might have encountered a strong gust with that squal amplified by down slope effects off the Ridge to the west(Lake George Range)It is quite windy again today >From: "Simon Angell" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra STA >Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:47:49 +1000 > >WOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOO, Just had 12 minutes of 1.5cm hail, with some stomes >upto 2cm!!!!, webcam was updating at the time so i will see if i got any >worthwile shots from it, otherwise i have to wait for my dad to bring >around the stuff for the Digi. > >Woooohooooooooo (biggest hail i have seen) >Cheers >--------------------------------------------------------- >Simon Angell >Canberra ACT >www.canberra-wx.com >--------------------------------------------------------- >Member of: >Australian Severe Weather Association. >www.severeweather.asn.au >--------------------------------------------------------- >This email is virus free. >Scanned before leaving my mailbox >using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k >Scanned with the latest definition File. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Simon Angell > To: Aussie-Wx > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 1:29 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Canberra STA > > > Hi all. > BoM have issued an STA for the ACT, >http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/wrap_fwo.pl?IDN26200.txt Right now i can here >thnder every couple of seconds, but its all imbeded in a layer of mid level >crap!!! > > Have to work in 1.5hrs, so hopefully it will hit before then! > > Cheers > --------------------------------------------------------- > Simon Angell > Canberra ACT > www.canberra-wx.com > --------------------------------------------------------- > Member of: > Australian Severe Weather Association. > www.severeweather.asn.au > --------------------------------------------------------- > This email is virus free. > Scanned before leaving my mailbox > using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k > Scanned with the latest definition File. _________________________________________________________________ Join the world^Òs largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:43:48 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tim, I wonder if this is the same picture I ran into about 2 years ago on the net. It was on a photo library site and showed cars deep in hail and people playing throwing hail balls at each other. This photo also said that it was Brisbane snow, but the dead give away ( if nothing else could convince one ) was the clothing that the people where wearing. Michael > > Just came across a photo on the Austarnet web site > > that a customer had sent in. The photo was of a street > > somewhere in Brisbane with snow covering the road > > and the roof of the houses!! Had no date except that > > it was 1983. Anyone know exactly when this was and > > where?? > > How often has it snowed in Brisbane? > > And no it doesn't look like a large hail storm.... :P > > Thanks for your help. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: New Pics Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 01:48:34 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I have uploaded a few pics from Last month, www.canberra-wx.com/gallery.htm The new ones have "NEW" next to them, from 1st and 4th of September and then there is a Sunset on 11th of October.
 
Cheers
---------------------------------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Member of:
Australian Severe Weather Association.
www.severeweather.asn.au
---------------------------------------------------------
This email is virus free.
Scanned before leaving my mailbox
using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k
Scanned with the latest definition File.
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Chase 12th & 13th October - Vic & NSW Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 06:54:59 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Can't help myself. Hey Clyve! There's those cows again :-) With closer inspection the last cow is wearing stockings I think. Sorry, just a "Victorian" joke. Great photo none the less. > I ended up just south of Bundanoon myself, albeit 2 hours later. You made > the right move heading southwards when you did, the better cells were all > south ( or east over the ocean ). > > The moisture levels were just far too low around the southern highlands. > > Sorry we did not have Storm chaser convergence. > > I thought earlier in the day that Jimmy was nearby - going just from this > scene > > http://ozthunder.com/chase/131002c.jpg > > Michael +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:56:53 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: Storm Chase 13/10/02 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi guys, David and I chased from the initiation area near and north of Mudgee. We remained with the storms until through to Jerrys Plains. Nice wall cloud which it looks like the other guys Matt James, Phil and Erin got as well. This particular wall cloud persisted for quite a long time. I wonder what would have happened had there been a NE wind.... The backsheared anvil was quite nice though the storms did not seem to me to be very deep. Some to the north had interesting overshoots but I think this was typical of the day. Report and photos later. ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: aus-wx: Moisture build up southeast Aus Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:32:16 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2002 01:34:23.0557 (UTC) FILETIME=[FDB0F750:01C273EA] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all, Seems to be some interesting moisture build up over the southeast of Australia over the past 24 hours hopefully the approaching trough might be able to kick off some badly needed rain, my only concern is the lack of upper relatively cold air at the moment. regards Clyve H.
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:27:27 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Don, Michael, and Sam for your responses. I did have my doubts about it being in Brisbane. Not knowing the city very well, I wasn't sure if there were any higher areas that could have recieved snow before. Anyway, on looking at the image again (it was quite small) it could be a large amount of half melted hail. I did not give the link to the site here because the Austarnet website changes the photo on every log-in. However I have uploaded the image here: http://snow.prohosting.com/teckert/Photos/brisbanesn ow1983.jpg ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:43:48 +1000 >From: "Michael Thompson" >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? >To: > >Hi Tim, I wonder if this is the same picture I ran into about 2 years ago on >the net. It was on a photo library site and showed cars deep in hail and >people playing throwing hail balls at each other. > >This photo also said that it was Brisbane snow, but the dead give away ( if >nothing else could convince one ) was the clothing that the people where >wearing. > >Michael > > > >> > Just came across a photo on the Austarnet web site >> > that a customer had sent in. The photo was of a street >> > somewhere in Brisbane with snow covering the road >> > and the roof of the houses!! Had no date except that >> > it was 1983. Anyone know exactly when this was and >> > where?? >> > How often has it snowed in Brisbane? >> > And no it doesn't look like a large hail storm.... :P >> > Thanks for your help. > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:46:11 +1000 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Not that there's any doubt now, but you can tell that that's hail by the way it's lying on the roof. Snow doesn't descend on the 'corners' so much... Thanks for posting the image, Tim. Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Tim Eckert Sent: Tuesday, 15 October 2002 2:27 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Thanks Don, Michael, and Sam for your responses. I did have my doubts about it being in Brisbane. Not knowing the city very well, I wasn't sure if there were any higher areas that could have recieved snow before. Anyway, on looking at the image again (it was quite small) it could be a large amount of half melted hail. I did not give the link to the site here because the Austarnet website changes the photo on every log-in. However I have uploaded the image here: http://snow.prohosting.com/teckert/Photos/brisbanesn ow1983.jpg ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:43:48 +1000 >From: "Michael Thompson" >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? >To: > >Hi Tim, I wonder if this is the same picture I ran into about 2 years ago on >the net. It was on a photo library site and showed cars deep in hail and >people playing throwing hail balls at each other. > >This photo also said that it was Brisbane snow, but the dead give away ( if >nothing else could convince one ) was the clothing that the people where >wearing. > >Michael > > > >> > Just came across a photo on the Austarnet web site >> > that a customer had sent in. The photo was of a street >> > somewhere in Brisbane with snow covering the road >> > and the roof of the houses!! Had no date except that >> > it was 1983. Anyone know exactly when this was and >> > where?? >> > How often has it snowed in Brisbane? >> > And no it doesn't look like a large hail storm.... :P >> > Thanks for your help. > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:38:22 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tim, Nice image! I'm pretty sure that it's hail. Snow has never been recorded in Brisbane before...the highest area is Mt Cootha (which really isn't a mountain at all with an elvation of about 220m I think). AC Tim Eckert wrote: > > Thanks Don, Michael, and Sam for your responses. > I did have my doubts about it being in Brisbane. Not > knowing the city very well, I wasn't sure if there were > any higher areas that could have recieved snow before. > Anyway, on looking at the image again (it was quite > small) it could be a large amount of half melted hail. > I did not give the link to the site here because the > Austarnet website changes the photo on every log-in. > However I have uploaded the image here: > http://snow.prohosting.com/teckert/Photos/brisbanesn > ow1983.jpg > > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:43:48 +1000 > >From: "Michael Thompson" > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? > >To: > > > >Hi Tim, I wonder if this is the same picture I ran into > about 2 years ago on > >the net. It was on a photo library site and showed > cars deep in hail and > >people playing throwing hail balls at each other. > > > >This photo also said that it was Brisbane snow, but > the dead give away ( if > >nothing else could convince one ) was the clothing > that the people where > >wearing. > > > >Michael > > > > > > > >> > Just came across a photo on the Austarnet web > site > >> > that a customer had sent in. The photo was of a > street > >> > somewhere in Brisbane with snow covering the > road > >> > and the roof of the houses!! Had no date except > that > >> > it was 1983. Anyone know exactly when this was > and > >> > where?? > >> > How often has it snowed in Brisbane? > >> > And no it doesn't look like a large hail > storm.... :P > >> > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- > -------------- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: s355334 at student.uq.edu.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:06:18 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Leslie Muir Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com My Dad has lived in Brisbane for a long while for pretty much is 60yr life, and he says hes never seen snow in Brisbane. He said hes seen hail so bad u cant see the grass, so that would be my guess as to what it was. But i doubt snow. Les Muir At 05:38 PM 15/10/2002, you wrote: >Hi Tim, > >Nice image! I'm pretty sure that it's hail. Snow has never been >recorded in Brisbane before...the highest area is Mt Cootha (which >really isn't a mountain at all with an elvation of about 220m I think). > >AC > >Tim Eckert wrote: > > > > Thanks Don, Michael, and Sam for your responses. > > I did have my doubts about it being in Brisbane. Not > > knowing the city very well, I wasn't sure if there were > > any higher areas that could have recieved snow before. > > Anyway, on looking at the image again (it was quite > > small) it could be a large amount of half melted hail. > > I did not give the link to the site here because the > > Austarnet website changes the photo on every log-in. > > However I have uploaded the image here: > > http://snow.prohosting.com/teckert/Photos/brisbanesn > > ow1983.jpg > > > > ---- Original message ---- > > >Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:43:48 +1000 > > >From: "Michael Thompson" > > > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? > > >To: > > > > > >Hi Tim, I wonder if this is the same picture I ran into > > about 2 years ago on > > >the net. It was on a photo library site and showed > > cars deep in hail and > > >people playing throwing hail balls at each other. > > > > > >This photo also said that it was Brisbane snow, but > > the dead give away ( if > > >nothing else could convince one ) was the clothing > > that the people where > > >wearing. > > > > > >Michael > > > > > > > > > > > >> > Just came across a photo on the Austarnet web > > site > > >> > that a customer had sent in. The photo was of a > > street > > >> > somewhere in Brisbane with snow covering the > > road > > >> > and the roof of the houses!! Had no date except > > that > > >> > it was 1983. Anyone know exactly when this was > > and > > >> > where?? > > >> > How often has it snowed in Brisbane? > > >> > And no it doesn't look like a large hail > > storm.... :P > > >> > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > > your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- > > -------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Melbourne Storm Chasers site Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:53:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com If you are trying to access the Melbourne Storm Chasers site for the next day or two - please use this link.... http://61.95.13.165/ until the real one reappears!!! We are currently shuffling and waiting for one link to catch up with the crowd, hence the slightly odd home atm. Thanks for your patience!! -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:13:20 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Tim, It's not exactly the same picture but very similar to the one I saw. It was hail in that picture. Regards Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Eckert" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:27 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? > Thanks Don, Michael, and Sam for your responses. > I did have my doubts about it being in Brisbane. Not > knowing the city very well, I wasn't sure if there were > any higher areas that could have recieved snow before. > Anyway, on looking at the image again (it was quite > small) it could be a large amount of half melted hail. > I did not give the link to the site here because the > Austarnet website changes the photo on every log-in. > However I have uploaded the image here: > http://snow.prohosting.com/teckert/Photos/brisbanesn > ow1983.jpg > > > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:43:48 +1000 > >From: "Michael Thompson" > > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? > >To: > > > >Hi Tim, I wonder if this is the same picture I ran into > about 2 years ago on > >the net. It was on a photo library site and showed > cars deep in hail and > >people playing throwing hail balls at each other. > > > >This photo also said that it was Brisbane snow, but > the dead give away ( if > >nothing else could convince one ) was the clothing > that the people where > >wearing. > > > >Michael > > > > > > > >> > Just came across a photo on the Austarnet web > site > >> > that a customer had sent in. The photo was of a > street > >> > somewhere in Brisbane with snow covering the > road > >> > and the roof of the houses!! Had no date except > that > >> > it was 1983. Anyone know exactly when this was > and > >> > where?? > >> > How often has it snowed in Brisbane? > >> > And no it doesn't look like a large hail > storm.... :P > >> > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- > -------------- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.401 / Virus Database: 226 - Release Date: 9/10/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Findlay To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:28:03 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 X-Davsoft-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 05:38 pm, Anthony Cornelius wrote this piece of wisdom: > Nice image! I'm pretty sure that it's hail. Snow has never been > recorded in Brisbane before...the highest area is Mt Cootha (which > really isn't a mountain at all with an elvation of about 220m I think). There HAS been snow in Brisbane. A few years back channel nine made a man made ski slope at Mt Cootha. Okay, so it didn't fall from the sky, but it was snow :-) David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9rAnVZOfFgbBAbXARAt18AJ9xGW2rNj5dKx2RD8fW87OE9gF8wgCgnUzx MxA7ktbINVd3kCSPcUPFVM8= =IRV2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Brisbane snow 1983?? Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:42:19 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com As a long term Brisbanite, I can confirm that there certainly was no snow in 1983. John. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Dry air observations / MSC site Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:18:05 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Afternoon all, You thought you'd seen dry air....check these out from the South Australian obs page:- Location / Temp / Depoint / RH% Giles 38.9 -20.7 2 Oodnadatta 41.9 -5.4 5 Moomba 36.6 -19.4 2 Jane PS: MSC is back live again!! -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Dry air observations / MSC site Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:50:25 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com And, rather amazingly, a -25 at Mt Isa, which is 1% and a mixing ratio of just 0.4 grams of water vapour per kilogram of air (see the mixing ratio map at http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts/MIXRAT99.GIF). Quite a few reports of raised dust, blowing dust and dust storms in western NSW/Vic and eastern SA on the 3pm map at http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts/synop06F.gif as the trough moves through western Vic. The only rain though is a few drops in Tassie. No storms. Strongest wind gusts 103km/h at Eildon (discounting the unreliable Mt Hotham AP AWS). Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill > Sent: Wednesday, 16 October, 2002 4:18 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: Dry air observations / MSC site > > > Afternoon all, > > You thought you'd seen dry air....check these out from the South > Australian > obs page:- > > Location / Temp / Depoint / RH% > Giles 38.9 -20.7 2 > Oodnadatta 41.9 -5.4 5 > Moomba 36.6 -19.4 2 > > Jane > > PS: MSC is back live again!! > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > ASWA - Victoria > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Highest wind gust Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:00:26 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Just recorded my highest wind gust here since I've had my weather station. 3 years I think. Not high by other places standards but this far inland its windy.
74.1kmh with an average of 46.2 from the NE.
Half of NSW's topsoil is in the air here at present I think. DP only hovering around the zero mark as it has done for the last few hours and a humidity of only 20%.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: Simon Angell To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:36:26 +1000 Organization: Canberra-Wx Subject: aus-wx: Canberra, 16th Oct 2002 X-Mailer: Opera 6.0 build 1010 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All. Have uploaded some pics from today, pretty uneventful till this afternoon, but good none the less. www.canberra-wx.com/gallery.htm you should see 16th October there. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra, 16th Oct 2002 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:29:59 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com After 1 or 2 hitches, everything appears to be working fine with it now. Also New pics from September have been uploaded, they are are marked withe the "new" thingy, about half way down the page. Cheers --------------------------------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------------------- Member of: Australian Severe Weather Association. www.severeweather.asn.au --------------------------------------------------------- This email is virus free. Scanned before leaving my mailbox using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k Scanned with the latest definition File. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Angell" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:36 PM Subject: aus-wx: Canberra, 16th Oct 2002 > Hi All. > Have uploaded some pics from today, pretty uneventful till this afternoon, but good none the less. > www.canberra-wx.com/gallery.htm you should see 16th October there. > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.132.18.241] From: "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Repeat of last Sat, this Friday in Vic? Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:03:20 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2002 01:03:20.0419 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC002B30:01C27578] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all Looking nice for storms on friday, with temps forcast near the 30's. Plenty of heating to get things going, although moisture is lacking a little. Could it be a repeat of Saturday? Hope so! Looking at screwing work for the arvo and going chasing!! Any thoughts? Liam _________________________________________________________________ Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:24:26 -0700 (PDT) From: christian monahan Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repeat of last Sat, this Friday in Vic? To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Any ideas about what areas are looking good for activity tomorrow or Saturday? __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steve Baynham" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Highest wind gust/ Dust Storm Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:24:35 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
hey bussy!
i reckon we would've equalled that here in Canberra aswell!! i was trying to sleep in the caravan... and it was movin man!!!!
sleepin in the caravan with the western window wide open last night was a big mistake. as you mentioned and apparently made it to national news, huge amounts of dust blanketted  ACT last night as a result from the gale force winds!! it would not have been so bad, but becos we had showers and everything was wet, the dust stuck to everything.
it was pretty cool!:) it was funny watching everyone wash their car today!! haha
we'll see what happens tonight
cyas
 
 
Steve Baynham
icq : 26863574
 
Brisbane Storm Chasers
http://www.bsch.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Association
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:00 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Highest wind gust

Just recorded my highest wind gust here since I've had my weather station. 3 years I think. Not high by other places standards but this far inland its windy.
74.1kmh with an average of 46.2 from the NE.
Half of NSW's topsoil is in the air here at present I think. DP only hovering around the zero mark as it has done for the last few hours and a humidity of only 20%.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:34:59 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: Latest pictures Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello, Feel free to check out the latest pictures which begin from the severe frost during the winter and end with the storms last Sunday http://www.australiasevereweather.com/photography/photos/new/jd20021017.html Finally a real storm last Sunday although most of the photographs are still in the camera. Enjoy. ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:43:41 -0400 (EDT) From: David Hart Apparently-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls3.std.com [199.172.62.105]) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA10697 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:29:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hotmail.com (f107.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.23.107]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA23684 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:29:22 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:29:16 -0700 Received: from 144.138.240.211 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:29:16 GMT X-Originating-IP: [144.138.240.211] From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Severe winds and dust in Canberra Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:29:16 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2002 13:29:16.0912 (UTC) FILETIME=[06894700:01C27518] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all, We have just experienced a wind storm with dust and a little very light rain.Around 11pm winds averaged 73 km/hr with a peak gust of 79 km hour at 11 pm winds have now eased to around 15 km/hr .Visibility was down to 10 km with a strong smell of dust - someones farm is blowing away .Temperature is still around 19 degrees and Barometer is now rising after a very steep 3 hour fall to 1001 Hpa.Suspect a frontal trough crossed us but Temperature has not fallen yet. Canberra Airport had a gust to 79km/hr around 6pm so they may well have had stronger winds in the past hour.Our Aneometer is on a 10 metre mast . Any other reports welcome Gavin Southside Whr Canberra _________________________________________________________________ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:43:51 -0400 (EDT) From: David Hart Apparently-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls2.std.com [199.172.62.104]) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA12736 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:34:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hotmail.com (f107.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.23.107]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA25370 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:34:04 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:33:59 -0700 Received: from 144.138.240.211 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:33:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [144.138.240.211] From: "Gavin O'Brien" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra, 16th Oct 2002 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:33:58 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2002 13:33:59.0034 (UTC) FILETIME=[AEB1ADA0:01C27518] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Simon, Hi, Did you experience the strong squals around 11pm we had 79 km/hr wind gusts and heaps of some one's farm blowing past. Wind has now dropped. Gavin Southside Whr. >From: "Simon Angell" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Canberra, 16th Oct 2002 >Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 21:29:59 +1000 > >After 1 or 2 hitches, everything appears to be working fine with it now. >Also New pics from September have been uploaded, they are are marked withe >the "new" thingy, about half way down the page. >Cheers >--------------------------------------------------------- >Simon Angell >Canberra ACT >www.canberra-wx.com >--------------------------------------------------------- >Member of: >Australian Severe Weather Association. >www.severeweather.asn.au >--------------------------------------------------------- >This email is virus free. >Scanned before leaving my mailbox >using Norton Antivirus 2002 for Win2k >Scanned with the latest definition File. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Simon Angell" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:36 PM >Subject: aus-wx: Canberra, 16th Oct 2002 > > > > Hi All. > > Have uploaded some pics from today, pretty uneventful till this >afternoon, >but good none the less. > > www.canberra-wx.com/gallery.htm you should see 16th October there. > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:17:14 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, Reports coming in of very muddy rain in southern Victoria associated with high based showers - the mud is an orange/red colour and requires windscreen washers (not just wipers) to keep the screen clean!! Lightning on the AM band also within 100kms of Melbourne.This afternoon, a lot of small branches down with shredded leaves all over the road around the Kew - Richmond area from the winds!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 07:11:20 EDT Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian storms To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com just checked my old email Macca
great report of the 13/10 storm
whatched it from Nth bayswater and I thought the 2nd one which moved Nth of me was better than the 1st which more or less crossed over here
keep up the chase reports  


Dennis Cottle
From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: aus-wx: Vic Winds. Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:40:22 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2002 11:42:32.0191 (UTC) FILETIME=[71D9E8F0:01C2769B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all. We had a mud bath shower here this evening at Leopold all local cars left out in the weather are covered in red dirt/mud. also a wind gust here at 1730 hrs from the west northwest of 107kph!, only damage is a few tree branches etc. regards Clyve Herbert.
X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 23:57:00 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 08:17 PM 18/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Evening all, > >Reports coming in of very muddy rain in southern Victoria associated >with high based showers - the mud is an orange/red colour and requires >windscreen washers (not just wipers) to keep the screen clean!! Had that. Was going to wash the car, but decided it wasn't worth the effort as more rain was coming... Yukky stuff. :( >Lightning on the AM band also within 100kms of Melbourne.This afternoon, >a lot of small branches down with shredded leaves all over the road >around the Kew - Richmond area from the winds!! Strong gusts with the change at around 6-6:30PM in Niddrie. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:05:18 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Aus-wx , Wx-Chase Subject: aus-wx: New Chase Reports: Golfball Hail Supercell; Small WC; Sunset Multicell CB Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Well...after trying to fix my main capture card I decided to use a different method of attack and buy a new HD for my old computer which has an older capture card on it and get that working, which did the trick! So I took some captures today and put them with some reports... http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/07_09_02ac.html Line of storms through Brisbane on the 9th of September, producing a small wall cloud http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/09_10_02ac.html Supercell on the Border Ranges moved NNE and gave golfball hail at Jimboomba on the 9th of October. http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/thumbs/131002.jpg 1000km chase gave a nice sunset multicell with some small hail/lightning later that evening from Moree-Glen Innes/Guyra! -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.109.175.9] From: "John Roenfeldt" To: Subject: aus-wx: Innaloo/Osborne Park tornado track damage survey Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 23:31:26 +0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2002 15:32:54.0134 (UTC) FILETIME=[A05F0960:01C276BB] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Late this afternoon I did a survey of this event. Report is up at: http://www.inflowimages.com/TornadoesInWa/innaloo.htm regards, John Roenfeldt http://www.inflowimages.com/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 07:43:58 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sounds like what we got on Wednesday arvo. My house roof is blue but at the minute it is orange/red as are most of the cars around here. Lots of red dust and six point four spots of rain and what a mess. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 8:17 PM Subject: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. > Evening all, > > Reports coming in of very muddy rain in southern Victoria associated > with high based showers - the mud is an orange/red colour and requires > windscreen washers (not just wipers) to keep the screen clean!! > > Lightning on the AM band also within 100kms of Melbourne.This afternoon, > a lot of small branches down with shredded leaves all over the road > around the Kew - Richmond area from the winds!! > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.29.156.6] From: "T Middleton" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vic Winds. Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:51:48 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2002 21:51:48.0551 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F23C570:01C276F0] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi Clyve,all Some rather gusty winds associated with the change also affected the SW Gippsland coast,100+km/h very likely. The prom had maximum gusts of 118km/h, and South Channel Island (in Port Phillip bay) a gust of 137km/h (74knts)!! at 19:09 friday. kind regards TM Anvil Industries - http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils >From: "Clyve Herbert" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Vic Winds. >Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:40:22 +1000 > >Hi all. We had a mud bath shower here this evening at Leopold all local >cars left out in the weather are covered in red dirt/mud. also a wind gust >here at 1730 hrs from the west northwest of 107kph!, only damage is a few >tree branches etc. regards Clyve Herbert. _________________________________________________________________ Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Cc: Subject: aus-wx: Live camera ready for the Wet Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 12:04:34 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Afternoon all, Received this note from Roy in Broome - thought you might like to bookmark the site now ready for the season!! ------------------------------------------- Hi Just to let you know we have recently connected a camera looking out to the West over Cable Beach in Broome WA. You/your members may be interested in this live camera when/if we have a cyclone or even big storms during the upcoming Wet Season in Broome. The link is www.BroomeCam.com No extreme weather at the moment - another month before the 'Wet' really starts to build up in Broome. Regards Roy Payne admin at broomecam.com -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Spring photos Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 16:28:41 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Afternoon all, Have added a few more images to the Spring 2002 page - check the last images added date for new images in all sections. http://www.stormchasers.au.com/spring02.htm Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at stormchasers.au.com Melbourne Storm Chasers http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:20:40 +1000 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: NSW - Niangala Tornado - Oct 13 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I had the weekend off, and decided to take the long drive up to Niangala, an hour and a half drive or so north of Gloucester on the barrington tops, to inspect damage reported by a Tamworth newspaper about a tornado that hit last sunday, the day a bunch of us were chasing in the Hunter valley. Several houses damaged. At one farm, the house had the roof off, double brick walls were down and glass shards from windows were embedded throughout the house in the walls. I met up with the farmer after walking around the area for a few minutes by myself, he drove me around his property so we could cover more ground and get photos, lovely man, Neil Stackman, and he is extremely lucky he and his family did not have worse injuries (the worst being a deep cut that required 45 stitches to his daughter) His account of being in the house whilst it roared overhead (he said it sounded like an F1-11 jet), was amazing, yet seeing his house in ruins i felt very sad, but happy they walked away. The tornado track seems to be over 15km long. Most of it travelled through farmland/fields, with plenty of tree's down along the path, but the last 3-4km of the track.... WOW what a site.... the tornado entered a state forest..., I found a dirt road that went into it and hoped it would intercept the tornado track... and it did. The damage width was the same as back at the house, about 200m wide, but with the dense vegitation, it gave a better idea of the exact width and damage path.. it was like a 200m wide lawnmower had gone through the bush, with massive gum tree's uprooted, tree's broken in half, tree's twisted off 1/2 way up, branches down everywhere. The track was visible to the naked eye so easily... absolutly mindblowing to see it and to think 6 days ago it roared through the area. My initial thoughts are that it reached F3 intensity at its most intense phase, a very significant tornadic event. No photographs as it occured just in the last glimmers of light after the sun set, but 1 witness saw it and described a large black wirly cloud on the ground. I took a roll of photos and some video of the damage, and will get them scanned and send some to Rob Webb. Amazing site, but a long drive there and back to Newcastle in the high 30 temps.. yuck. Matthew Smith http://www.sydneystormchasers.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: "Aussie-Wx" Subject: aus-wx: New pics Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 01:14:04 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all.
 
Just uploaded some new files to the wallpaper section of my website.
(click the wallpaper link at the top)
http://www.canberra-wx.com/gallery.htm
 

Simon
From: "Chas & Helen Osborn" To: "Aussie weather" Subject: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 07:55:31 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello Everyone
 
Today we say goodbye to Strahan! In five weeks we will in Kalumburu in Western Australia!
Climate change!!
Check out.
 
Sad to be leaving, excited about moving.
 
Chas
for the last time
Strahan Tasmania soon to be Kalumburu WA
 
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 06:28:11 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Wow! What a change of climate for you guys! The closest I have ever been to Kalumburu is Kununurra. I thoroughly enjoyed the virtual tours on the web-site. Looks like the kind of school I would like to teach at after overcrowded Hong Kong, though I think the rest of my family has become far too acclimatised to city living. We will look forward to hearing your updates after you have arrived and settled in. All the best for your big move. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Chas & Helen Osborn" To: "Aussie weather" Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 07:55:31 +1100 Subject: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather > Hello Everyone > > Today we say goodbye to Strahan! In five weeks we will in Kalumburu in > Western Australia! > Climate change!! > Check out. > http://www.kalumburu.com/ > > Sad to be leaving, excited about moving. > > Chas > for the last time > Strahan Tasmania soon to be Kalumburu WA > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 09:37:33 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
"Big" climate change! Good luck.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 6:55 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather

Hello Everyone
 
Today we say goodbye to Strahan! In five weeks we will in Kalumburu in Western Australia!
Climate change!!
Check out.
 
Sad to be leaving, excited about moving.
 
Chas
for the last time
Strahan Tasmania soon to be Kalumburu WA
 
From: "elizebeth wilson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:27:46 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Bussy, Can you please explain the cause of this "muddy rain" to me? I have never heard of it before. Beth, Tamworth NSW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bussy" To: Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 7:43 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. > Sounds like what we got on Wednesday arvo. My house roof is blue but at the > minute it is orange/red as are most of the cars around here. Lots of red > dust and six point four spots of rain and what a mess. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jane ONeill" > To: "Aussie-wx" > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 8:17 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. > > > > Evening all, > > > > Reports coming in of very muddy rain in southern Victoria associated > > with high based showers - the mud is an orange/red colour and requires > > windscreen washers (not just wipers) to keep the screen clean!! > > > > Lightning on the AM band also within 100kms of Melbourne.This afternoon, > > a lot of small branches down with shredded leaves all over the road > > around the Kew - Richmond area from the winds!! > > > > Jane > > > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 18:00:26 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Basically what has happened around here is that we have had ferocious winds from the North and North west which brings a lot of red soil (dust) with it from interior Australia. A little bit of rain and we have a mud bath that is nice and red. Very light rain and these "dusts" and you get one hell of a mess :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "elizebeth wilson" To: Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 3:27 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. > Hi Bussy, > > Can you please explain the cause of this "muddy rain" to me? I have never > heard of it before. > > Beth, > Tamworth NSW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bussy" > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 7:43 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. > > > > Sounds like what we got on Wednesday arvo. My house roof is blue but at > the > > minute it is orange/red as are most of the cars around here. Lots of red > > dust and six point four spots of rain and what a mess. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jane ONeill" > > To: "Aussie-wx" > > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 8:17 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. > > > > > > > Evening all, > > > > > > Reports coming in of very muddy rain in southern Victoria associated > > > with high based showers - the mud is an orange/red colour and requires > > > windscreen washers (not just wipers) to keep the screen clean!! > > > > > > Lightning on the AM band also within 100kms of Melbourne.This afternoon, > > > a lot of small branches down with shredded leaves all over the road > > > around the Kew - Richmond area from the winds!! > > > > > > Jane > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > > cadence at stormchasers.au.com > > > > > > Melbourne Storm Chasers > > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Klipsi" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Muddy rain in southern Victoria. Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 10:04:40 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > explain the cause of this "muddy rain" to me? I have never > heard of it before. sand dust flown in from desert, gets mixed with rain. here in europe we sometimes have great red rain, sand dust coming from african sahara all across mediteranean sea. we had a great mud rain last march in geneva switzerland. will try to find pictures and post. I work in a limousine rental company here in geneva and all black mercedes sedans were pretty dirty ;-) hehehe Klipsi http://eclipse.span.ch +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: New pics Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:20:23 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Simon,
 
thanks for thinking about this for me.  The image that I'm attaching was scanned so there are elements of grey in the background and when I try to make the white background transparent it doesn't work clearly and I don't know if there is an easy way to fix it other than pixel by pixel......
 
any ideas?
 
Many thanks,
 
Jane

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Sky & Weather
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject: aus-wx: New pics

Hi all.
 
Just uploaded some new files to the wallpaper section of my website.
(click the wallpaper link at the top)
http://www.canberra-wx.com/gallery.htm
 

Simon
Attachment Converted: "c:\program files\eudora\attach\logof.jpg" From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: New pics - please ignore, it's an image not a virus Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:54:41 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
<sigh>
 
Sorry, that previous email was meant for Simon - it's an image, it's not a virus. I didn't think that you could send an image via the list!! 
 
Jane
--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at australianskynweather.com
 
Australian Sky and Weather
www.stormchasers.au.com
 
ASWA - Victoria
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------
From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:27:55 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2002 00:30:04.0169 (UTC) FILETIME=[FFCB9790:01C27898] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Chas & Helen. I could not think of a much greater contrast in locations!. I will miss your reports from the 'deep south' of hail and gales, however, I and the list look forward to recieving your weather description from the ' deep north' of Australia.   Kalumburu would have to be one of the most remote lacalities on this continant (ave rainfall is about 1190mm with a Jan ave of 309mm). Best of luck.. regards Clyve Herbert.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 6:55 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather

Hello Everyone
 
Today we say goodbye to Strahan! In five weeks we will in Kalumburu in Western Australia!
Climate change!!
Check out.
 
Sad to be leaving, excited about moving.
 
Chas
for the last time
Strahan Tasmania soon to be Kalumburu WA
 
X-Originating-IP: [203.31.48.3] From: "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:37:53 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2002 03:37:54.0210 (UTC) FILETIME=[3D436020:01C278B3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

What a change!  Look forward to the updates.  There's a good book, written by a couple who spent a year living off the land, in that area, that you might like to get your hands on.  It tracks the seasons, vagaries, heat and adversity wonderfully well.  Now if I can only remember the name!

>From: "dann weatherhead"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: Re: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather
>Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:12:04 +1000
>
>Yes we look forward to hearing your updates from a 'different' part of Australia.
>
>dann
>www.sydneystormchasers.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bussy
> To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 9:37 AM
> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather
>
>
> "Big" climate change! Good luck.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chas & Helen Osborn
> To: Aussie weather
> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 6:55 AM
> Subject: aus-wx: Goodbye Strahan Weather
>
>
> Hello Everyone
>
> Today we say goodbye to Strahan! In five weeks we will in Kalumburu in Western Australia!
> Climate change!!
> Check out.
> http://www.kalumburu.com/
>
> Sad to be leaving, excited about moving.
>
> Chas
> for the last time
> Strahan Tasmania soon to be Kalumburu WA
>


Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
X-Originating-IP: [203.31.48.3] From: "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: NSW - Niangala Tornado - Oct 13 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:43:25 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2002 03:43:25.0965 (UTC) FILETIME=[03012BD0:01C278B4] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Thanks for the report Matthew.  I think these after the event examinations are just as interesting as accounts of events unfolding, especially for such a noteworthy event.  It seems, reading the accounts of the day (Oct 13) from here and at Weatherzone that quite a few chasers were thereabouts (AC to the north, and a couple of guys in the upper Hunter) but the possible F3 just escaped the collective chasers' grasp.

>From: Matthew Smith
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>Subject: aus-wx: NSW - Niangala Tornado - Oct 13
>Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:20:40 +1000
>
>
>I had the weekend off, and decided to take the long drive up to
>Niangala, an hour and a half drive or so north of Gloucester on the
>barrington tops, to inspect damage reported by a Tamworth newspaper
>about a tornado that hit last sunday, the day a bunch of us were chasing
>in the Hunter valley.
>
>Several houses damaged. At one farm, the house had the roof off, double
>brick walls were down and glass shards from windows were embedded
>throughout the house in the walls. I met up with the farmer after
>walking around the area for a few minutes by myself, he drove me around
>his property so we could cover more ground and get photos, lovely man,
>Neil Stackman, and he is extremely lucky he and his family did not have
>worse injuries (the worst being a deep cut that required 45 stitches to
>his daughter) His account of being in the house whilst it roared
>overhead (he said it sounded like an F1-11 jet), was amazing, yet seeing
>his house in ruins i felt very sad, but happy they walked away.
>
>The tornado track seems to be over 15km long. Most of it travelled
>through farmland/fields, with plenty of tree's down along the path, but
>the last 3-4km of the track.... WOW what a site.... the tornado entered
>a state forest..., I found a dirt road that went into it and hoped it
>would intercept the tornado track... and it did. The damage width was
>the same as back at the house, about 200m wide, but with the dense
>vegitation, it gave a better idea of the exact width and damage path..
>it was like a 200m wide lawnmower had gone through the bush, with
>massive gum tree's uprooted, tree's broken in half, tree's twisted off
>1/2 way up, branches down everywhere. The track was visible to the naked
>eye so easily... absolutly mindblowing to see it and to think 6 days ago
>it roared through the area.
>My initial thoughts are that it reached F3 intensity at its most intense
>phase, a very significant tornadic event. No photographs as it occured
>just in the last glimmers of light after the sun set, but 1 witness saw
>it and described a large black wirly cloud on the ground.
>I took a roll of photos and some video of the damage, and will get them
>scanned and send some to Rob Webb.
>
>Amazing site, but a long drive there and back to Newcastle in the high
>30 temps.. yuck.
>
>Matthew Smith
>http://www.sydneystormchasers.com
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
> with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> message.
> -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: Blair Trewin Subject: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October To: aussie-weather at world.std.com (Aussie Weather) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:03:51 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject to confirmation, the Australian record high temperature for October (45.6 at Marble Bar on 27 October 1960) appears to have been broken. Mandora was reporting 46.0 at noon, while Port Hedland and Roebourne have both been hovering near or above 45 for the last few hours, and Marble Bar was at 43.9 at noon. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Brooker, Sean SD" To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:18:48 +1000 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October

BHP Billiton - Boodarie Iron Plant recorded 46C at 1100 today.

Cheers
Sean Brooker
Turnaround - Area Co-ordinator
Boodarie Iron - Operations
Phone: 08 9160 5645


-----Original Message-----
From: Blair Trewin [mailto:blair at earthsci.unimelb.edu.au]
Sent: Monday, 21 October 2002 3:04 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October


Subject to confirmation, the Australian record high temperature
for October (45.6 at Marble Bar on 27 October 1960) appears to have
been broken. Mandora was reporting 46.0 at noon, while Port Hedland
and Roebourne have both been hovering near or above 45 for the last
few hours, and Marble Bar was at 43.9 at noon.

Blair
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
 with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
 message.
 -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

EOM

NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein.  If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:22:35 +1000 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Blair.. Radio in the Hunter reported Cessnock (39), Taree (40) and Newcastle Uni (38) all had their October record temp on Saturday. Is this correct? Don White Blair Trewin wrote: > > Subject to confirmation, the Australian record high temperature > for October (45.6 at Marble Bar on 27 October 1960) appears to have > been broken. Mandora was reporting 46.0 at noon, while Port Hedland > and Roebourne have both been hovering near or above 45 for the last > few hours, and Marble Bar was at 43.9 at noon. > > Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Early heat in WA Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:07:14 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, This from the BoM on the Western Australian Notes on the Weather page:- Very hot weather continued throughout the northern half with mostly clear skies. Mandora recorded 46.7C, the highest maximum temperature for October on record for Australia. The previous Australian record for October was also broken at several other towns including Port Hedland with 46.0C. As far as I can determine, Mandora is near Port Hedland. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:08:42 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C278D2.19637950 > Content-Type: text/plain > > BHP Billiton - Boodarie Iron Plant recorded 46C at 1100 today. > > Cheers > Sean Brooker > Turnaround - Area Co-ordinator > Boodarie Iron - Operations > Phone: 08 9160 5645 > > Where's Boodarie? (I'd guess somewhere in the Pilbara) and what kind of shelter/exposure does the thermometer have? Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Brooker, Sean SD" To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:34:57 +1000 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October

Boodarie is about 15km just south of South Hedland.
The sender is in the shade on the side of a security gate building that is always out of the sun.

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair Trewin [mailto:blair at earthsci.unimelb.edu.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 8:09 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October


>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C278D2.19637950
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> BHP Billiton - Boodarie Iron Plant recorded 46C at 1100 today.
>
> Cheers
> Sean Brooker
> Turnaround - Area Co-ordinator
> Boodarie Iron - Operations
> Phone: 08 9160 5645
>
>

Where's Boodarie? (I'd guess somewhere in the Pilbara) and what kind of
shelter/exposure does the thermometer have?

Blair

 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
 with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
 message.
 -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

EOM

NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein.  If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:03:38 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2796B.3B001D40 > Content-Type: text/plain > > Boodarie is about 15km just south of South Hedland. > The sender is in the shade on the side of a security gate building that is > always out of the sun. > Such a set-up will approximate a Stevenson screen temperature fairly well, but will over-read relative to a Stevenson screen because of re-radiation from the ground - typically by 1-1.5 degrees under clear skies. Port Hedland was 43.9 at 1100 yesterday, so, adjusting the 46.0 to a likely Stevenson screen temperature of 44.5-45.0, the two seem reasonably consistent. Port Hedland has reached 42.8 by 9.40 this morning. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:39:21 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Pt Headland 44.5C at 11:30 and a RH of 2%!!!! James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Blair Trewin Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 12:04 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2796B.3B001D40 > Content-Type: text/plain > > Boodarie is about 15km just south of South Hedland. > The sender is in the shade on the side of a security gate building that is > always out of the sun. > Such a set-up will approximate a Stevenson screen temperature fairly well, but will over-read relative to a Stevenson screen because of re-radiation from the ground - typically by 1-1.5 degrees under clear skies. Port Hedland was 43.9 at 1100 yesterday, so, adjusting the 46.0 to a likely Stevenson screen temperature of 44.5-45.0, the two seem reasonably consistent. Port Hedland has reached 42.8 by 9.40 this morning. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:52:26 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Makes the dewpoint minus 7. Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:39 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > Pt Headland 44.5C at 11:30 and a RH of 2%!!!! > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Blair Trewin > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 12:04 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not > understand > > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2796B.3B001D40 > > Content-Type: text/plain > > > > Boodarie is about 15km just south of South Hedland. > > The sender is in the shade on the side of a security gate building > that is > > always out of the sun. > > > > Such a set-up will approximate a Stevenson screen temperature fairly > well, but will over-read relative to a Stevenson screen because of > re-radiation from the ground - typically by 1-1.5 degrees under > clear skies. > > Port Hedland was 43.9 at 1100 yesterday, so, adjusting the 46.0 to > a likely Stevenson screen temperature of 44.5-45.0, the two seem > reasonably consistent. > > Port Hedland has reached 42.8 by 9.40 this morning. > > Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:09:52 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Would be a little lower than that... Port Hedland Date / Time 22 12:00 Temperature 44.9 C Dew Point -19.1 C Relative Humidity 1 % Wind Direction ESE Wind Speed 31 km/h Nautical Wind Speed 17 kt Wind Gust 43 km/h Nautical Wind Gust 23 kt Barometric Pressure 1007.9 hPa Cheers --------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra, ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------- Member of, Australian Severe weather Ass. www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Barnett" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:52 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > Makes the dewpoint minus 7. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to > be virus free. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Holbeach" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:39 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > > > Pt Headland 44.5C at 11:30 and a RH of 2%!!!! > > James Holbeach > > ---------------------------------------- > > Dept. Chemical Engineering > > University of Melbourne, Australia > > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Blair Trewin > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 12:04 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > > > > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not > > understand > > > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > > > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2796B.3B001D40 > > > Content-Type: text/plain > > > > > > Boodarie is about 15km just south of South Hedland. > > > The sender is in the shade on the side of a security gate building > > that is > > > always out of the sun. > > > > > > > Such a set-up will approximate a Stevenson screen temperature fairly > > well, but will over-read relative to a Stevenson screen because of > > re-radiation from the ground - typically by 1-1.5 degrees under > > clear skies. > > > > Port Hedland was 43.9 at 1100 yesterday, so, adjusting the 46.0 to > > a likely Stevenson screen temperature of 44.5-45.0, the two seem > > reasonably consistent. > > > > Port Hedland has reached 42.8 by 9.40 this morning. > > > > Blair > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k with the very latest Virus definition files. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 17/10/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:59:53 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Not according to my (official) dewpoint and humidity tables Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > Would be a little lower than that... > Port Hedland > Date / Time 22 12:00 > Temperature 44.9 C > Dew Point -19.1 C > Relative Humidity 1 % > Wind Direction ESE > Wind Speed 31 km/h > Nautical Wind Speed 17 kt > Wind Gust 43 km/h > Nautical Wind Gust 23 kt > Barometric Pressure 1007.9 hPa > > Cheers > --------------------------------- > Simon Angell > Canberra, ACT > www.canberra-wx.com > --------------------------------------------- > Member of, > Australian Severe weather Ass. > www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Barnett" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:52 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > Makes the dewpoint minus 7. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to > > be virus free. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James Holbeach" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:39 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > > > > > > > Pt Headland 44.5C at 11:30 and a RH of 2%!!!! > > > James Holbeach > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > Dept. Chemical Engineering > > > University of Melbourne, Australia > > > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Blair Trewin > > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 12:04 PM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > > > > > > > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not > > > understand > > > > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > > > > > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2796B.3B001D40 > > > > Content-Type: text/plain > > > > > > > > Boodarie is about 15km just south of South Hedland. > > > > The sender is in the shade on the side of a security gate building > > > that is > > > > always out of the sun. > > > > > > > > > > Such a set-up will approximate a Stevenson screen temperature fairly > > > well, but will over-read relative to a Stevenson screen because of > > > re-radiation from the ground - typically by 1-1.5 degrees under > > > clear skies. > > > > > > Port Hedland was 43.9 at 1100 yesterday, so, adjusting the 46.0 to > > > a likely Stevenson screen temperature of 44.5-45.0, the two seem > > > reasonably consistent. > > > > > > Port Hedland has reached 42.8 by 9.40 this morning. > > > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k > with the very latest Virus definition files. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 17/10/2002 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:04:08 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com On checking,oops! my mistake. That would be pretty close. Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > Would be a little lower than that... > Port Hedland > Date / Time 22 12:00 > Temperature 44.9 C > Dew Point -19.1 C > Relative Humidity 1 % > Wind Direction ESE > Wind Speed 31 km/h > Nautical Wind Speed 17 kt > Wind Gust 43 km/h > Nautical Wind Gust 23 kt > Barometric Pressure 1007.9 hPa > > Cheers > --------------------------------- > Simon Angell > Canberra, ACT > www.canberra-wx.com > --------------------------------------------- > Member of, > Australian Severe weather Ass. > www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Barnett" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:52 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > Makes the dewpoint minus 7. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to > > be virus free. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James Holbeach" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:39 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > > > > > > > Pt Headland 44.5C at 11:30 and a RH of 2%!!!! > > > James Holbeach > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > Dept. Chemical Engineering > > > University of Melbourne, Australia > > > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Blair Trewin > > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 12:04 PM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > > > > > > > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not > > > understand > > > > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > > > > > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2796B.3B001D40 > > > > Content-Type: text/plain > > > > > > > > Boodarie is about 15km just south of South Hedland. > > > > The sender is in the shade on the side of a security gate building > > > that is > > > > always out of the sun. > > > > > > > > > > Such a set-up will approximate a Stevenson screen temperature fairly > > > well, but will over-read relative to a Stevenson screen because of > > > re-radiation from the ground - typically by 1-1.5 degrees under > > > clear skies. > > > > > > Port Hedland was 43.9 at 1100 yesterday, so, adjusting the 46.0 to > > > a likely Stevenson screen temperature of 44.5-45.0, the two seem > > > reasonably consistent. > > > > > > Port Hedland has reached 42.8 by 9.40 this morning. > > > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k > with the very latest Virus definition files. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 17/10/2002 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:27:02 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id BAA01537 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well it was a new record . . . http://www.bom.gov.au/announcements/media_releases/wa/20021022.shtml . . . WA town hits 46.7°C, sets new Australian record for October The Australian record for the highest maximum temperature in October was yesterday broken in the Western Australian town of Mandora. The coastal Pilbara town, about half way between Broome and Port Hedland, recorded a maximum temperature of 46.7 degrees Celsius. The previous record of 45.6 degrees was recorded at both Marble Bar on October 27, 1960, and Port Hedland Post Office on October 25, 1926. The Australian record for the highest maximum temperature in October was also broken yesterday at Pardoo (46.2 degrees), Port Hedland (46.0) and Roebourne (45.8). James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith Barnett Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 3:04 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October On checking,oops! my mistake. That would be pretty close. Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > Would be a little lower than that... > Port Hedland > Date / Time 22 12:00 > Temperature 44.9 C > Dew Point -19.1 C > Relative Humidity 1 % > Wind Direction ESE > Wind Speed 31 km/h > Nautical Wind Speed 17 kt > Wind Gust 43 km/h > Nautical Wind Gust 23 kt > Barometric Pressure 1007.9 hPa > > Cheers > --------------------------------- > Simon Angell > Canberra, ACT > www.canberra-wx.com > --------------------------------------------- > Member of, > Australian Severe weather Ass. > www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Barnett" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:52 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > Makes the dewpoint minus 7. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > -- > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to > > be virus free. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James Holbeach" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:39 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > > > > > > > Pt Headland 44.5C at 11:30 and a RH of 2%!!!! > > > James Holbeach > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > Dept. Chemical Engineering > > > University of Melbourne, Australia > > > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Blair Trewin > > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 12:04 PM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October > > > > > > > > > > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not > > > understand > > > > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > > > > > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2796B.3B001D40 > > > > Content-Type: text/plain > > > > > > > > Boodarie is about 15km just south of South Hedland. > > > > The sender is in the shade on the side of a security gate building > > > that is > > > > always out of the sun. > > > > > > > > > > Such a set-up will approximate a Stevenson screen temperature fairly > > > well, but will over-read relative to a Stevenson screen because of > > > re-radiation from the ground - typically by 1-1.5 degrees under > > > clear skies. > > > > > > Port Hedland was 43.9 at 1100 yesterday, so, adjusting the 46.0 to > > > a likely Stevenson screen temperature of 44.5-45.0, the two seem > > > reasonably consistent. > > > > > > Port Hedland has reached 42.8 by 9.40 this morning. > > > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k > with the very latest Virus definition files. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 17/10/2002 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Brooker, Sean SD" To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:23:26 +1000 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October

Mandora is actually a cattle station
Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: James Holbeach [mailto:james at trapdoor.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 1:27 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October


Well it was a new record . . .
http://www.bom.gov.au/announcements/media_releases/wa/20021022.shtml

 . . .

WA town hits 46.7°C, sets new Australian record for October

The Australian record for the highest maximum temperature in October was
yesterday broken in the Western Australian town of Mandora. The coastal
Pilbara town, about half way between Broome and Port Hedland, recorded a
maximum temperature of 46.7 degrees Celsius. The previous record of 45.6
degrees was recorded at both Marble Bar on October 27, 1960, and Port
Hedland Post Office on October 25, 1926.
The Australian record for the highest maximum temperature in October was
also broken yesterday at Pardoo (46.2 degrees), Port Hedland (46.0) and
Roebourne (45.8).


James Holbeach
----------------------------------------
Dept. Chemical Engineering
University of Melbourne, Australia
ph. +61 3 8344 6652
----------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com
[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith
Barnett
Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 3:04 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October

On checking,oops! my mistake. That would be pretty close.
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
-----------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified
to
be virus free.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" <simon at canberra-wx.com>
To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October


> Would be a little lower than that...
> Port Hedland
> Date / Time  22 12:00
> Temperature  44.9 C
> Dew Point  -19.1 C
> Relative Humidity 1 %
> Wind Direction  ESE
> Wind Speed  31 km/h
> Nautical Wind Speed 17 kt
> Wind Gust  43 km/h
> Nautical Wind Gust 23 kt
> Barometric Pressure 1007.9 hPa
>
> Cheers
> ---------------------------------
> Simon Angell
> Canberra, ACT
> www.canberra-wx.com
> ---------------------------------------------
> Member of,
> Australian Severe weather Ass.
> www.severeweather.asn.au
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Keith Barnett" <kbarnett at bigpond.net.au>
> To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:52 PM
> Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October
>
>
> > Makes the dewpoint minus 7.
> > Keith Barnett
> > Weather fanatic and classical musician
> > Website: http://www.wthrman.com
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is
certified
to
> > be virus free.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "James Holbeach" <james at trapdoor.com.au>
> > To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:39 PM
> > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Pt Headland 44.5C at 11:30 and a RH of 2%!!!!
> > > James Holbeach
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > > Dept. Chemical Engineering
> > > University of Melbourne, Australia
> > > ph. +61 3 8344 6652
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com
> > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Blair
Trewin
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 12:04 PM
> > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
> > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October
> > >
> > > >
> > > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not
> > > understand
> > > > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
> > > >
> > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2796B.3B001D40
> > > > Content-Type: text/plain
> > > >
> > > > Boodarie is about 15km just south of South Hedland.
> > > > The sender is in the shade on the side of a security gate
building
> > > that is
> > > > always out of the sun.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Such a set-up will approximate a Stevenson screen temperature
fairly
> > > well, but will over-read relative to a Stevenson screen because of
> > > re-radiation from the ground - typically by 1-1.5 degrees under
> > > clear skies.
> > >
> > > Port Hedland was 43.9 at 1100 yesterday, so, adjusting the 46.0 to
> > > a likely Stevenson screen temperature of 44.5-45.0, the two seem
> > > reasonably consistent.
> > >
> > > Port Hedland has reached 42.8 by 9.40 this morning.
> > >
> > > Blair
> > >
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > >  To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail
> > > to:majordomo at world.std.com
> > >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body
of
> > > your
> > >  message.
> >
 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> > >
> > >
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> > >  To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail
> to:majordomo at world.std.com
> > >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body
of
> your
> > >  message.
> >
 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> > >
> >
> >
> >
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >  To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail
to:majordomo at world.std.com
> >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
your
> >  message.
> >
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
> with the very latest Virus definition files.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 17/10/2002
>
>
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail
to:majordomo at world.std.com
>  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
your
>  message.
>
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------


 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail
to:majordomo at world.std.com
 with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
your
 message.
 -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com
 with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
 message.
 -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

EOM

NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein.  If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:38:53 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, I don't remember my barometer ever being as low as 992hPa before (well not since 1993)!!! This trough is certainly amplifying nicely as it moves east! Port Fairy got down to 990.0hPa.. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:59:03 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 1002.3 here after 1017 at midnight (last night) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:38 PM Subject: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > Evening all, > > I don't remember my barometer ever being as low as 992hPa before (well > not since 1993)!!! This trough is certainly amplifying nicely as it > moves east! Port Fairy got down to 990.0hPa.. > > Jane > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:11:07 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2002 11:13:19.0268 (UTC) FILETIME=[06AE1640:01C279BC] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Bussy.......My pressure has just reached 991hpa (2045) after 1018 last midnight. The trough is just going through the Geelong district wind has just shifted to the west. regards Clyve h. ----- Original Message ----- From: Bussy To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:59 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > 1002.3 here after 1017 at midnight (last night) > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jane ONeill" > To: "Aussie-wx" > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:38 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > > > > Evening all, > > > > I don't remember my barometer ever being as low as 992hPa before (well > > not since 1993)!!! This trough is certainly amplifying nicely as it > > moves east! Port Fairy got down to 990.0hPa.. > > > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:17:46 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Mine is now 991hPa - Nth Melb James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jane ONeill Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 8:39 PM To: Aussie-wx Subject: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night Evening all, I don't remember my barometer ever being as low as 992hPa before (well not since 1993)!!! This trough is certainly amplifying nicely as it moves east! Port Fairy got down to 990.0hPa.. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:40:49 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: Strong dust devil Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hello, Today it looks as though a fairly strong dust devil occurred within a few hundred metres from out place. I was not home but it was described that at around 1pm a loud noise was heard similar to clanging noise. Well what was observed was material sheets of iron and so on clanging together. One was coloured green and therefore easily visible 50 or so metres in the air. I feel this is similar to but perhaps stronger than other dust devils I had observed developing over our dam. This one also MAY have developed over the dam which is where the sheets of iron would have come from. It was would have been great to capture on video but I was not here and these things develop quite quickly and randomly. I thought it would be great to share the experience with others. Cheers. Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Strong dust devil Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:00:22 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I wonder if it had to do with the onset of the northeaster today? Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:40 PM Subject: aus-wx: Strong dust devil > Hello, > > Today it looks as though a fairly strong dust devil occurred within a few > hundred metres from out place. I was not home but it was described that at > around 1pm a loud noise was heard similar to clanging noise. Well what was > observed was material sheets of iron and so on clanging together. One was > coloured green and therefore easily visible 50 or so metres in the air. > > I feel this is similar to but perhaps stronger than other dust devils I had > observed developing over our dam. This one also MAY have developed over the > dam which is where the sheets of iron would have come from. It was would > have been great to capture on video but I was not here and these things > develop quite quickly and randomly. I thought it would be great to share > the experience with others. > > Cheers. > > Jimmy Deguara > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > from > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: Hailstorm 13th October - north of Melbourne Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:49:17 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, Andrew McDonald's report and amazing images of the storms we had last Saturday 13th can be found here http://www.stormchasers.au.com/13_10_02.htm Enjoy!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 02:41:29 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for October
Hi everyone
A while back, in July actually, I predicted (by plotting the orbits of the moon)very dry conditions right through to November, to which David Jones replied
 
> Ken,
>...what is so special about the moon's behavior this year that
> leads you to believe that the August through November period should only get
> ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place it within the driest
> 10% of historical observations, and not far from the driest such period on
> record?
> Given the shear desperation of many rural producers currently enduring
> drought in eastern Australia, I trust you have a very good scientific theory
> to back your profound and detailed predictions.
> Regards,
> David
Given the continuing dry conditions, it may be said that my scientific theory is indeed good and sound.  I suggest more proof is not needed.  Would David care to respond?
Ken Ring
 
 
From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:32:44 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I have never seen Canberra AWS below 1000hpa (not to say it hasn't happned) but right now its 998.1hpa Cheers --------------------------------- Simon Angell Canberra, ACT www.canberra-wx.com --------------------------------------------- Member of, Australian Severe weather Ass. www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:17 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > Mine is now 991hPa - Nth Melb > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jane ONeill > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 8:39 PM > To: Aussie-wx > Subject: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > > Evening all, > > I don't remember my barometer ever being as low as 992hPa before (well > not since 1993)!!! This trough is certainly amplifying nicely as it > moves east! Port Fairy got down to 990.0hPa.. > > Jane > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k with the very latest Virus definition files. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 18/10/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.50.228.5] From: "Ben Jerrems" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: radar????? Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:52:00 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2002 14:52:00.0473 (UTC) FILETIME=[93871490:01C279DA] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Is it me or is the lightning tracker at weatherzone not working? Every time i hit on it (every half hour or so!) it seems to be stuck on the the time!!!!!


BEANZVISION Photographics.


Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 03:51:56 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mite.vosn.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - canberra-wx.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Pressure dropping very rapidly, now 991hpa, wind slowly picking up...
 
Canberra Airport
Date / Time  23 03:39
Temperature  15.8 C
Dew Point  0.4 C
Relative Humidity 36 %
Wind Direction  N
Wind Speed  22 km/h
Nautical Wind Speed 12 kt
Wind Gust  33 km/h
Nautical Wind Gust 18 kt
Barometric Pressure 991.2 hPa
Rain Since 9am  0.0 mm
 
7hpa drop in 3.5hours and wind has gone from 3knot gusts to 22knot gust....

Cheers
---------------------------------
Simon Angell
Canberra, ACT
www.canberra-wx.com
---------------------------------------------
Member of the ASWA ~|~
(Australian Severe Weather Ass.)
www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night

> I have never seen Canberra AWS below 1000hpa (not to say it hasn't happned)
> but right now its 998.1hpa
>
> Cheers
> ---------------------------------
> Simon Angell
> Canberra, ACT
>
www.canberra-wx.com
> ---------------------------------------------
> Member of,
> Australian Severe weather Ass.
>
www.severeweather.asn.au
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Holbeach" <
james at trapdoor.com.au>
> To: <
aussie-weather at world.std.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:17 PM
> Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night
>
>
> > Mine is now 991hPa - Nth Melb
> >
> > James Holbeach
> > --------------------------------
> > Trapdoor Ski Club
> > Mt. Hotham, Australia
> > ph. 0417 553 757
> >
http://www.trapdoor.com.au
> > --------------------------------
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com
> > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jane ONeill
> > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 8:39 PM
> > To: Aussie-wx
> > Subject: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night
> >
> > Evening all,
> >
> > I don't remember my barometer ever being as low as 992hPa before (well
> > not since 1993)!!!  This trough is certainly amplifying nicely as it
> > moves east! Port Fairy got down to 990.0hPa..
> >
> > Jane
> > --------------------------------
> > Jane ONeill - Melbourne
> >
cadence at australianskynweather.com
> >
> > Australian Sky & Weather
> >
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
> >
> > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
> >
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
> > --------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >  To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail
> >
to:majordomo at world.std.com
> >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of
> > your
> >  message.
> > 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
> >  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> >  To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail
to:majordomo at world.std.com
> >  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
> >  message.
> > 
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
> with the very latest Virus definition files.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 18/10/2002
>
>  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>  To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail
to:majordomo at world.std.com
>  with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your
>  message.
>  
-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
>
>
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k
with the very latest Virus definition files.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 18/10/2002
From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Low Bar Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:45:36 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
My barometer bottomed out at 995.7 at 12.07am this morning followed by a wind gust of 46kmh and point 4mm of rain. Lowest barometer I've recorded so far on my Wx station. Bet there were some much lower readings about than that.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hailstorm 13th October - north of Melbourne Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:53:32 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Great stuff! Love the pictures. Can someone explain to me again what a storm looks like :-( > Andrew McDonald's report and amazing images of the storms we had last > Saturday 13th can be found here > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/13_10_02.htm +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Low pressure Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:59:18 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Barograph is 'bottoming out' here at 991.0 which has broken the previous lowest reading of 992.6 in 1979 (for October). (The cold front can be seen approaching from the west.). Makes it a 1 in 90 year event.
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hailstorm 13th October - north of Melbourne Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:37:51 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com it's one of those things you get in central vic all the time and NOT in south east south australia, last storms here, oct 2001. regards richard naracoorte ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bussy" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:23 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Hailstorm 13th October - north of Melbourne > Great stuff! Love the pictures. Can someone explain to me again what a storm > looks like :-( > > > Andrew McDonald's report and amazing images of the storms we had last > > Saturday 13th can be found here > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/13_10_02.htm > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Strong dust devil Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:28:14 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com That's actually rather funny, we yesterday got the biggest dust devil I have ever seen on this property with the same tin banging noises. It also went for the longest that I have ever seen, all the way down our driveway and then down into the creek where I lost sight. The circumference on it was bigger than most here. Also on another topic, I woke up to an alarm on freewx this morning, the barometer here is sitting on 985hPa and falling rapidly. ------------------------------------ Glen O'Riley Computer Technician Kings Creek Krambach, 2429 Australia Phone: 02 65591232 Fax: 02 6559 1348 Mobile: 0439 878 633 Email: goriley at tsn.cc Web: www.mypage.tsn.cc/oriley ABN: 42 674 332 428 ------------------------------------ Storm Chaser Rail Fan Electronics & Radio NSW Rural Fire Service Firefighter NSW State Emergency Services Member ------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 9:41 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Strong dust devil Hello, Today it looks as though a fairly strong dust devil occurred within a few hundred metres from out place. I was not home but it was described that at around 1pm a loud noise was heard similar to clanging noise. Well what was observed was material sheets of iron and so on clanging together. One was coloured green and therefore easily visible 50 or so metres in the air. I feel this is similar to but perhaps stronger than other dust devils I had observed developing over our dam. This one also MAY have developed over the dam which is where the sheets of iron would have come from. It was would have been great to capture on video but I was not here and these things develop quite quickly and randomly. I thought it would be great to share the experience with others. Cheers. Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Rec High/Rec Low Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:48:03 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hello All:
       I was wondering if any town in Australia set a record low in the morning and set a record high on the afternoon of THE SAME DAY? I believe an occurrence such as this happened some time back in Chicago, Illinois.(They set a record high on the evening, then they set a record low in the morning as a powerful Arctic cold front came through). Chicago has some very changeable weather!!!
       Wishing ALL a Great rest of the month    Yours     David Powell
X-Sender: mbath at mail.ozemail.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:58:53 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Michael Bath Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com even 996 now on the NSW far north coast ! At 03:51 AM 23/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Pressure dropping very rapidly, now 991hpa, wind slowly picking up... > >Canberra Airport >Date / Time 23 03:39 >Temperature 15.8 C >Dew Point 0.4 C >Relative Humidity 36 % >Wind Direction N >Wind Speed 22 km/h >Nautical Wind Speed 12 kt >Wind Gust 33 km/h >Nautical Wind Gust 18 kt >Barometric Pressure 991.2 hPa >Rain Since 9am 0.0 mm > >7hpa drop in 3.5hours and wind has gone from 3knot gusts to 22knot gust.... > >Cheers >--------------------------------- >Simon Angell >Canberra, ACT >www.canberra-wx.com >--------------------------------------------- >Member of the ASWA ~|~ >(Australian Severe Weather Ass.) >www.severeweather.asn.au >-------------------------------------------------------------- >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" ><simon at canberra-wx.com> >To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com> >Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:32 AM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > > > I have never seen Canberra AWS below 1000hpa (not to say it hasn't happned) > > but right now its 998.1hpa > > > > Cheers > > --------------------------------- > > Simon Angell > > Canberra, ACT > > www.canberra-wx.com > > --------------------------------------------- > > Member of, > > Australian Severe weather Ass. > > www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James Holbeach" > <james at trapdoor.com.au> > > To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:17 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > > > > > > > Mine is now 991hPa - Nth Melb > > > > > > James Holbeach > > > -------------------------------- > > > Trapdoor Ski Club > > > Mt. Hotham, Australia > > > ph. 0417 553 757 > > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: > aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jane ONeill > > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 8:39 PM > > > To: Aussie-wx > > > Subject: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > > > > > > Evening all, > > > > > > I don't remember my barometer ever being as low as 992hPa before (well > > > not since 1993)!!! This trough is certainly amplifying nicely as it > > > moves east! Port Fairy got down to 990.0hPa.. > > > > > > Jane > > > -------------------------------- > > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k > > with the very latest Virus definition files. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system > (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 18/10/2002 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k >with the very latest Virus definition files. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system >(http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 18/10/2002 =================================================================== Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ =================================================================== Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:15:45 +1000 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 988 across the hunter valley and Sydney Matt Smith Michael Bath wrote: > even 996 now on the NSW far north coast ! > > At 03:51 AM 23/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: > > >Pressure dropping very rapidly, now 991hpa, wind slowly picking up... > > > >Canberra Airport > >Date / Time 23 03:39 > >Temperature 15.8 C > >Dew Point 0.4 C > >Relative Humidity 36 % > >Wind Direction N > >Wind Speed 22 km/h > >Nautical Wind Speed 12 kt > >Wind Gust 33 km/h > >Nautical Wind Gust 18 kt > >Barometric Pressure 991.2 hPa > >Rain Since 9am 0.0 mm > > > >7hpa drop in 3.5hours and wind has gone from 3knot gusts to 22knot gust.... > > > >Cheers > >--------------------------------- > >Simon Angell > >Canberra, ACT > >www.canberra-wx.com > >--------------------------------------------- > >Member of the ASWA ~|~ > >(Australian Severe Weather Ass.) > >www.severeweather.asn.au > >-------------------------------------------------------------- > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Simon Angell - www.canberra-wx.com" > ><simon at canberra-wx.com> > >To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com> > >Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:32 AM > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > > > > > I have never seen Canberra AWS below 1000hpa (not to say it hasn't happned) > > > but right now its 998.1hpa > > > > > > Cheers > > > --------------------------------- > > > Simon Angell > > > Canberra, ACT > > > www.canberra-wx.com > > > --------------------------------------------- > > > Member of, > > > Australian Severe weather Ass. > > > www.severeweather.asn.au > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "James Holbeach" > > <james at trapdoor.com.au> > > > To: <aussie-weather at world.std.com> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:17 PM > > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > > > > > > > > > > Mine is now 991hPa - Nth Melb > > > > > > > > James Holbeach > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > Trapdoor Ski Club > > > > Mt. Hotham, Australia > > > > ph. 0417 553 757 > > > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: > > aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jane ONeill > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 8:39 PM > > > > To: Aussie-wx > > > > Subject: aus-wx: Victoria Tuesday night > > > > > > > > Evening all, > > > > > > > > I don't remember my barometer ever being as low as 992hPa before (well > > > > not since 1993)!!! This trough is certainly amplifying nicely as it > > > > moves east! Port Fairy got down to 990.0hPa.. > > > > > > > > Jane > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > > > > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k > > > with the very latest Virus definition files. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system > > (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 18/10/2002 > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > >--- > >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > >Scanned with AVG and NAV for Win2k > >with the very latest Virus definition files. > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system > >(http://www.grisoft.com). > >Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 18/10/2002 > > =================================================================== > Michael Bath mailto:mbath at ozemail.com.au > McLeans Ridges co-webmaster: http://australiasevereweather.com/ > North Coast NSW webmaster: http://lightningphotography.com/ > Australia ASWA president: http://www.severeweather.asn.au/ > =================================================================== +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:55:50 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: aus-wx: Victorian Coldies To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. Just had a SEVERE Hail storm go through Hamilton!!!!!! I recorded 6mm in 5 mins at my house with hail now covering the yard. Could be a little flash flooding in the area as gutters are chockas. Wind gusts would've had to be in the vicinity of 40- 50knots!!!! Cheers. Tim Eckert. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: Rec High/Rec Low To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:23:58 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C279FB.8D54EAE0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hello All: > I was wondering if any town in Australia set a record low in the = > morning and set a record high on the afternoon of THE SAME DAY? I = > believe an occurrence such as this happened some time back in Chicago, = > Illinois.(They set a record high on the evening, then they set a record = > low in the morning as a powerful Arctic cold front came through). = > Chicago has some very changeable weather!!! > Wishing ALL a Great rest of the month Yours David Powell > The American usage of the term 'record high/low' differs from the Australian; normally in North America this refers to a record for the date (not the month, as would normally be implied in Australia). Obviously date records are much easier to set than monthly ones! Under the American usage, such events are rare but not unknown in Australia - for example the Canberra record high (17.7) and low (-6.7) for June 7 were both set in 1957. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:39:42 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Some very low barometer readings for October on the NSW central and north coasts as the trough moves through. At 1pm, most reports from Sydney north to Grafton were in the high 980s. Check the "latest" and recent synoptics at http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml and look for the pressure readings to the top right of each station. What's also interesting is that, although there are pretty solid pressure falls ahead of the trough (around 5 to 6hPa/3 hour on the south Qld coast), the rises behind are quite modest, mostly in the 2 to 3hPa/3 hour range. With such a vigorous change, you'd expect more ear-popping rises. (Pressure changes are shown on the 3-hourly synoptics just under the pressure reading) Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Maslin" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian Coldies Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:03:55 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi tim, i am interested to see if the hail was large or small like the hail that hit us here in diamond creek. We had pea size hail that lasted for ten minutes, its hailing again right now again pea sized. regards phill camp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Eckert" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:55 AM Subject: aus-wx: Victorian Coldies > Hi all. > Just had a SEVERE Hail storm go through > Hamilton!!!!!! > I recorded 6mm in 5 mins at my house with hail now > covering the yard. Could be a little flash flooding in > the area as gutters are chockas. > Wind gusts would've had to be in the vicinity of 40- > 50knots!!!! > > Cheers. > Tim Eckert. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:33:47 +1000 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Today's just one of those days where it's all happening. Anyone with some sort of summary in front of them will have reports highlighted for snow in Tassie, dust storms in NSW and QLD, temps of -2 in the Victorian high country ranging to 43 in the Kimberley, gales with gusts to 50 kts in the SE...the list goes on - and that's all within the last few hours. That's the way we like it! Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Laurier Williams Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 1:40 PM To: Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com Subject: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Some very low barometer readings for October on the NSW central and north coasts as the trough moves through. At 1pm, most reports from Sydney north to Grafton were in the high 980s. Check the "latest" and recent synoptics at http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml and look for the pressure readings to the top right of each station. What's also interesting is that, although there are pretty solid pressure falls ahead of the trough (around 5 to 6hPa/3 hour on the south Qld coast), the rises behind are quite modest, mostly in the 2 to 3hPa/3 hour range. With such a vigorous change, you'd expect more ear-popping rises. (Pressure changes are shown on the 3-hourly synoptics just under the pressure reading) Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:09:32 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yes, we have a very thick dust cloud right now, has limited vision severely. ------------------------------------ Glen O'Riley Computer Technician Kings Creek Krambach, 2429 Australia Phone: 02 65591232 Fax: 02 6559 1348 Mobile: 0439 878 633 Email: goriley at tsn.cc Web: www.mypage.tsn.cc/oriley ABN: 42 674 332 428 ------------------------------------ Storm Chaser Rail Fan Electronics & Radio NSW Rural Fire Service Firefighter NSW State Emergency Services Member ------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Miskelly Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 2:34 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Today's just one of those days where it's all happening. Anyone with some sort of summary in front of them will have reports highlighted for snow in Tassie, dust storms in NSW and QLD, temps of -2 in the Victorian high country ranging to 43 in the Kimberley, gales with gusts to 50 kts in the SE...the list goes on - and that's all within the last few hours. That's the way we like it! Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Laurier Williams Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 1:40 PM To: Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com Subject: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Some very low barometer readings for October on the NSW central and north coasts as the trough moves through. At 1pm, most reports from Sydney north to Grafton were in the high 980s. Check the "latest" and recent synoptics at http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml and look for the pressure readings to the top right of each station. What's also interesting is that, although there are pretty solid pressure falls ahead of the trough (around 5 to 6hPa/3 hour on the south Qld coast), the rises behind are quite modest, mostly in the 2 to 3hPa/3 hour range. With such a vigorous change, you'd expect more ear-popping rises. (Pressure changes are shown on the 3-hourly synoptics just under the pressure reading) Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Sha" To: "Crystal Unicorns" Subject: aus-wx: Threatening weather in southern Queensland - Australia Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:22:47 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Posted: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:49 AEST

Bushfires cause havoc in southern Qld

Rural and urban firefighters are again battling bushfires in southern Queensland.

This afternoon homes in Toowoomba are under threat.

Strong gusty winds are fanning the flames and a dust storm is expected to cause visibility problems.

One street has been evacuated in Blue Mountain Heights in Toowoomba's north, but authorities are considering evacuating the entire suburb later this afternoon.

Residents will be directed to community halls until the threat passes.

The Centenary Highway between Brisbane and Ipswich has been closed because of the fires.

Fire breaks have so far contained fires which continue to burn the Granite Belt.

A fire which earlier today threatened homes east of Warwick has been contained.

Firefighters from Ipswich, the Sunshine Coast and Caboolture have travelled to the area to fight the fires.

Conditions are expected to deteriorate later this afternoon and tonight. 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/justin/nat/newsnat-23oct2002-72.htm


Wed, Oct 23 2002 2:42 PM AEST

Dust storm blankets Qld, NSW

A massive dust storm is sweeping across inland Queensland and New South Wales today.

A strong weather change is moving east, whipping up dust from drought-parched lands, blanketing towns in a dark fog.

The weather bureau is warning aircraft of thick raised dust.

Senior forecaster Greg Bond says he has never seen dust on the satellite like this before.

"They're more prevalent when we have dry spells," he said.

Wendy Choice-Brooks, mayor of the Murweh Shire in Queensland's south-west, says Charleville residents have not seen a dust storm like this since 1965.

"It's just this dull, browny, orangey coloured soup that's come in," she said.

The dust cloud is expected to reach coastal areas late this afternoon.


Health warning

People with breathing difficulties are being advised to stay indoors during the current high levels across parts of the state.

Dr Steven Corbutt from New South Wales Health says people with asthma and other respiratory difficulties should be monitoring their conditions carefully.

"The advice we would give because it is dust, is that people will probably get less exposure if they stay indoors, and close the windows and probably avoid vigorous exercise on a day like today," he said.

"I do note however that as we speak the dust is clearing rapidly, it certainly has in the last hour. "

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2002/10/item20021023131925_1.htm


 


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/2002

From: "Paul Mossman" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:37:28 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Dont forget the hail in Vic!! Amazing contrast in weather. Paul in a Freezing Melb. :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Miskelly To: Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:03 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW > Today's just one of those days where it's all happening. Anyone with > some sort of summary in front of them will have reports highlighted for > snow in Tassie, dust storms in NSW and QLD, temps of -2 in the Victorian > high country ranging to 43 in the Kimberley, gales with gusts to 50 kts > in the SE...the list goes on - and that's all within the last few hours. > > That's the way we like it! > > Andrew. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Laurier > Williams > Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 1:40 PM > To: Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com > Subject: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW > > > Some very low barometer readings for October on the NSW central and > north coasts as the trough moves through. At 1pm, most reports from > Sydney north to Grafton were in the high 980s. Check the "latest" and > recent synoptics at http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml > and look for the pressure readings to the top right of each station. > > What's also interesting is that, although there are pretty solid > pressure falls ahead of the trough (around 5 to 6hPa/3 hour on the south > Qld coast), the rises behind are quite modest, mostly in the 2 to 3hPa/3 > hour range. With such a vigorous change, you'd expect more ear-popping > rises. (Pressure changes are shown on the 3-hourly synoptics just under > the pressure reading) > > Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.152.80] From: "Dave Ellem" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:47:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2002 06:47:17.0378 (UTC) FILETIME=[0710B620:01C27A60] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Dust has moved through the NE NSW region now, baro at 992hpa. I just went on a dust storm chase, and when SDS has set in, it is an alright substitute! Dave Ellem, Wollongbar, Northern Rivers, NE NSW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Mossman" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:07 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW > Dont forget the hail in Vic!! > > Amazing contrast in weather. > > Paul in a Freezing Melb. > :-) > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Andrew Miskelly > To: > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:03 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW > > > > Today's just one of those days where it's all happening. Anyone with > > some sort of summary in front of them will have reports highlighted for > > snow in Tassie, dust storms in NSW and QLD, temps of -2 in the Victorian > > high country ranging to 43 in the Kimberley, gales with gusts to 50 kts > > in the SE...the list goes on - and that's all within the last few hours. > > > > That's the way we like it! > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Laurier > > Williams > > Sent: Wednesday, 23 October 2002 1:40 PM > > To: Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com > > Subject: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW > > > > > > Some very low barometer readings for October on the NSW central and > > north coasts as the trough moves through. At 1pm, most reports from > > Sydney north to Grafton were in the high 980s. Check the "latest" and > > recent synoptics at http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml > > and look for the pressure readings to the top right of each station. > > > > What's also interesting is that, although there are pretty solid > > pressure falls ahead of the trough (around 5 to 6hPa/3 hour on the south > > Qld coast), the rises behind are quite modest, mostly in the 2 to 3hPa/3 > > hour range. With such a vigorous change, you'd expect more ear-popping > > rises. (Pressure changes are shown on the 3-hourly synoptics just under > > the pressure reading) > > > > Laurier > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > > your_email_address" in the body of your message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:50:31 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: RE: aus-wx: Strong dust devil Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Yes Glen, these can be widespread and great that you experienced it too. Don't muck around with some dust devils as they can be quite strong. Jimmy Dgeuara At 08:28 AM 23/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >That's actually rather funny, we yesterday got the biggest dust devil I >have ever seen on this property with the same tin banging noises. It >also went for the longest that I have ever seen, all the way down our >driveway and then down into the creek where I lost sight. The >circumference on it was bigger than most here. Also on another topic, I >woke up to an alarm on freewx this morning, the barometer here is >sitting on 985hPa and falling rapidly. > >------------------------------------ >Glen O'Riley >Computer Technician >Kings Creek >Krambach, 2429 >Australia >Phone: 02 65591232 >Fax: 02 6559 1348 >Mobile: 0439 878 633 >Email: goriley at tsn.cc >Web: www.mypage.tsn.cc/oriley >ABN: 42 674 332 428 >------------------------------------ >Storm Chaser >Rail Fan >Electronics & Radio >NSW Rural Fire Service Firefighter >NSW State Emergency Services Member >------------------------------------ > >-----Original Message----- >From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy >Deguara >Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 9:41 PM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Strong dust devil > > >Hello, > >Today it looks as though a fairly strong dust devil occurred within a >few >hundred metres from out place. I was not home but it was described that >at >around 1pm a loud noise was heard similar to clanging noise. Well what >was >observed was material sheets of iron and so on clanging together. One >was >coloured green and therefore easily visible 50 or so metres in the air. > >I feel this is similar to but perhaps stronger than other dust devils I >had >observed developing over our dam. This one also MAY have developed over >the >dam which is where the sheets of iron would have come from. It was would > >have been great to capture on video but I was not here and these things >develop quite quickly and randomly. I thought it would be great to share > >the experience with others. > >Cheers. > >Jimmy Deguara > >----------------------------------------- >Please note the change to my new e-mail >address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - >http://www.thunderbolttours.com >----------------------------------------- >Jimmy Deguara >Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > >from >Schofields, Sydney >NSW Australia > >e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Web Page with Michael Bath > >Australian Severe Weather Home Page >http://www.australiasevereweather.com > >Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather >your_email_address" in the body of your message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Weather readings Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:56:21 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I have just finished putting up the last 25 years of my weather readings at
 
 
These include the latest readings up to today.
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Dust over eastern Australia Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:09:16 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Afternoon all, A couple of amazing images of the dust through New South Wales & Queensland...... http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/dust1023.jpg http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/dust102301.jpg Many thanks to the BoM for the images. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather readings Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:30:45 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Wow, Keith. That's pretty impressive and represents a huge amount of work and dedication. Well done!
 
In the stats analysis at the bottom, what's meant by the line "anomalies this year"?
 
Laurier
 
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett
Sent: Wednesday, 23 October, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Weather list
Subject: aus-wx: Weather readings

I have just finished putting up the last 25 years of my weather readings at
 
 
These include the latest readings up to today.
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Weather readings Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:49:48 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
They are the departures of the particular month's averages from the 'avg all years' a little higher up.
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:30 PM
Subject: RE: aus-wx: Weather readings

Wow, Keith. That's pretty impressive and represents a huge amount of work and dedication. Well done!
 
In the stats analysis at the bottom, what's meant by the line "anomalies this year"?
 
Laurier
 
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett
Sent: Wednesday, 23 October, 2002 4:56 PM
To: Weather list
Subject: aus-wx: Weather readings

I have just finished putting up the last 25 years of my weather readings at
 
 
These include the latest readings up to today.
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dust over eastern Australia Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:28:23 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Amazing pics!! Excellent Res. Check out the following from the ABC website: 'Biggest dust storm in 20 years' passes across Qld A leading dust storm expert says a dust storm that is passing across central Queensland and due to hit Brisbane later today, is the biggest seen in eastern Australia in the past 20 years. The storm is travelling in a line from south of Hobart to Mount Isa and is carrying millions of tonnes of top soil. Professor Grant McTanish says hot northerly winds are carrying the storm. "It's timely in the sense that we could tell that it was going to happen," he said. "The convergence of high wind speeds and the drought with reduced vegetation cover to protect the soil... in a sense it was a disaster waiting to happen." Cheers Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:09 PM Subject: aus-wx: Dust over eastern Australia > Afternoon all, > > A couple of amazing images of the dust through New South Wales & > Queensland...... > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/dust1023.jpg > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/dust102301.jpg > > Many thanks to the BoM for the images. > > Jane > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky and Weather > www.stormchasers.au.com > > ASWA - Victoria > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 21:43:02 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Australian Sky & Weather are proud to announce a significant video by Roger Hill who has provided a generous discount to purchase an almost 4 hour masterpiece of storm video. For those of you who don't know Roger's history, he has been voted as the 'Most Desired Accessory for a Chase Vehicle' in the USA - where Roger goes, severe weather follows....... If you are interested in obtaining a copy have a look here for more details http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm Price: $70AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in Australia) Format - NTSC Very limited production run. Join the pre-order list and have this video before Christmas by sending an email to cadence at australianskynweather.com Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:55:08 +1000 From: Tim Eckert Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian Coldies To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: Mirapoint Webmail Direct 3.1.0.58-GA Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Further to this morning's action. Some really nice coldies were evident around the place this arvo with some more hail and heavy showers. I've recorded 18mm now in the last 24 hours. Photos from today can be found at:http://weatherchaser.members.easyspace.com/23O ct02 Cheers, Tim Eckert. ---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:55:50 +1000 >From: Tim Eckert >Subject: aus-wx: Victorian Coldies >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Hi all. >Just had a SEVERE Hail storm go through >Hamilton!!!!!! >I recorded 6mm in 5 mins at my house with hail now >covering the yard. Could be a little flash flooding in >the area as gutters are chockas. >Wind gusts would've had to be in the vicinity of 40- >50knots!!!! > >Cheers. >Tim Eckert. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------- -------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Rainfall analysis Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:57:52 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Those of you in NSW who were present at the March 2002 ASWA meeting will recall the talk I gave at that meeting on the results of my analysis of rainfall in Sydney (also at the May AMOS meeting).
 
I have now written it up and you can see it at the following address:
 
 
The article contains interactive spreadsheets which you can use if you have Microsoft Excel 97 or higher installed on your computer. You can click on the buttons and make the graph charts move. There are further explnatory guidelines on the charts themselves.
For those who don't have Excel, there are 'snapshots' of particular rainfall scenarios referred to in the text.
You may have to make some adjustments depending on the screen resolution you are using, or else just scroll the screen.
As far as I can see all the links are working..I have tested them from this end so you shouldn't have any problems.
I hope people find it interesting.
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 06:36:33 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jane, If it was me, I would also voted Roger Hill as a person who could "for-see things from a distance". I just realised I can't play NTSC tapes on our video player. Matthew and I bought some video tapes from the chaser picnic of Rocky's chases of the 1990's himself - we'll have to watch them at an ASWA meeting. Cheers. Jimmy Deguara At 09:43 PM 23/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Australian Sky & Weather are proud to announce a significant video by >Roger Hill who has provided a generous discount to purchase an almost 4 >hour masterpiece of storm video. For those of you who don't know Roger's >history, he has been voted as the 'Most Desired Accessory for a Chase >Vehicle' in the USA - where Roger goes, severe weather follows....... > >If you are interested in obtaining a copy have a look here for more >details http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm >Price: $70AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in >Australia) >Format - NTSC >Very limited production run. > >Join the pre-order list and have this video before Christmas by sending >an email to cadence at australianskynweather.com > >Jane > >-------------------------------- >Jane ONeill - Melbourne >cadence at australianskynweather.com > >Australian Sky & Weather >http://www.stormchasers.au.com > >Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) >http://www.severeweather.asn.au >-------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:36:58 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jimmy and others, I'm checking into it and I'll let you know the cost of the PAL version later today. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au > Hi Jane, > > If it was me, I would also voted Roger Hill as a person who could "for-see > things from a distance". > > I just realised I can't play NTSC tapes on our video player. Matthew and I > bought some video tapes from the chaser picnic of Rocky's chases of the > 1990's himself - we'll have to watch them at an ASWA meeting. > > Cheers. > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 09:43 PM 23/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: > >Australian Sky & Weather are proud to announce a significant video by > >Roger Hill who has provided a generous discount to purchase an almost 4 > >hour masterpiece of storm video. For those of you who don't know Roger's > >history, he has been voted as the 'Most Desired Accessory for a Chase > >Vehicle' in the USA - where Roger goes, severe weather follows....... > > > >If you are interested in obtaining a copy have a look here for more > >details http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm > >Price: $70AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in > >Australia) > >Format - NTSC > >Very limited production run. > > > >Join the pre-order list and have this video before Christmas by sending > >an email to cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > >Jane > > > >-------------------------------- > >Jane ONeill - Melbourne > >cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > >Australian Sky & Weather > >http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > >Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >-------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steven Markham" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:20:30 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Dear Jane, If PAL versions of these videos are not available you can buy a NTSC to PAL converter that will connect on the line from your TV to video so you can play any NTSC video. You get these at either Tandy or Dick Smith for around $50.00. They work great as they have a switch to change between NTSC or PAL. Hope this helps. Regards Steve Markham -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Jane ONeill Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 8:37 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Hi Jimmy and others, I'm checking into it and I'll let you know the cost of the PAL version later today. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au > Hi Jane, > > If it was me, I would also voted Roger Hill as a person who could "for-see > things from a distance". > > I just realised I can't play NTSC tapes on our video player. Matthew and I > bought some video tapes from the chaser picnic of Rocky's chases of the > 1990's himself - we'll have to watch them at an ASWA meeting. > > Cheers. > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 09:43 PM 23/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: > >Australian Sky & Weather are proud to announce a significant video by > >Roger Hill who has provided a generous discount to purchase an almost 4 > >hour masterpiece of storm video. For those of you who don't know Roger's > >history, he has been voted as the 'Most Desired Accessory for a Chase > >Vehicle' in the USA - where Roger goes, severe weather follows....... > > > >If you are interested in obtaining a copy have a look here for more > >details http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm > >Price: $70AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in > >Australia) > >Format - NTSC > >Very limited production run. > > > >Join the pre-order list and have this video before Christmas by sending > >an email to cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > >Jane > > > >-------------------------------- > >Jane ONeill - Melbourne > >cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > >Australian Sky & Weather > >http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > >Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >-------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:33:43 +1000 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for OctoberHi everyone=3D20 >A while back, in July actually, I predicted (by plotting the orbits of =3D >the moon)very dry conditions right through to November, to which David =3D >Jones replied >> Ken, >...what is so special about the moon's behavior this year that > leads you to believe that the August through November period should =3D only get > ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place it within the =3D driest > 10% of historical observations, and not far from the driest such =3D period on > record?=3D20 > Given the shear desperation of many rural producers currently enduring > drought in eastern Australia, I trust you have a very good scientific =3D theory > to back your profound and detailed predictions. > Regards, > David >Given the continuing dry conditions, it may be said that my scientific =3D >theory is indeed good and sound. I suggest more proof is not needed. =3D >Would David care to respond? >Ken Ring >www.predictweather.com Ken you really have got to be kidding? The blame for this drought lies very firmly at the feet of El Nino. Almost every single severe Australian drought is related to El Nino (take a lookie at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/ahead/soirain.shtml) including 1994, 1982, 1977, 1972,.... The current drought is because the tropical convection which usually dominates the Indonesian region has shifted to the central Pacific because the central Pacific sea temperatures are unusually high (this is El Nino). This shift has seen rainfall totals as much as 1000% of normal across islands in the central pacific and less than 50% of normal across Australia, and is the very reason why we in Australia have had front after front deliver near dry changes. Put simply, there has been no tropical moisture available for them to interact with. Regards, David +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.29.156.4] From: "T Middleton" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: 7th of Feb storms in Vic.report makes it online eventually........ Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:54:55 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2002 23:54:55.0581 (UTC) FILETIME=[9637D8D0:01C27AEF] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi all, I've just uploaded a chase report/photographic log of an impressive backbuilding storm in Sth/W.Gippsland on the 7th of February this year, the radar is amazing! the report/photographic log of it can be found at; http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils/020207backbuildingstorms.htm cheers TM Anvil Industries - http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils _________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:03:50 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' into the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia because the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade wind circulation in the area. Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jones" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: aus-wx: our "drought" > >RE: aus-wx: Australian record temperature for OctoberHi everyone=3D20 > >A while back, in July actually, I predicted (by plotting the orbits of =3D > >the moon)very dry conditions right through to November, to which David =3D > >Jones replied > > >> Ken, > >...what is so special about the moon's behavior this year that > > leads you to believe that the August through November period should =3D > only get > > ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place it within the =3D > driest > > 10% of historical observations, and not far from the driest such =3D > period on > > record?=3D20 > > Given the shear desperation of many rural producers currently enduring > > drought in eastern Australia, I trust you have a very good scientific =3D > theory > > to back your profound and detailed predictions. > > Regards, > > David > > >Given the continuing dry conditions, it may be said that my scientific =3D > >theory is indeed good and sound. I suggest more proof is not needed. =3D > >Would David care to respond? > >Ken Ring > >www.predictweather.com > > Ken you really have got to be kidding? The blame for this drought lies very > firmly at the feet of El Nino. Almost every single severe Australian drought > is related to El Nino (take a lookie at > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/ahead/soirain.shtml) including 1994, 1982, > 1977, 1972,.... > > The current drought is because the tropical convection which usually > dominates the Indonesian region has shifted to the central Pacific because > the central Pacific sea temperatures are unusually high (this is El Nino). > This shift has seen rainfall totals as much as 1000% of normal across > islands in the central pacific and less than 50% of normal across Australia, > and is the very reason why we in Australia have had front after front > deliver near dry changes. Put simply, there has been no tropical moisture > available for them to interact with. > > Regards, > > David > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:07:13 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Keith, Ken, David, Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates to a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water West), but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite finely tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to commence the cycle. So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less dense warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow by the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell Ken, if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon as a motivator for El Nino". John. >snip -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' into the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia because the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade wind circulation in the area. Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.28.69.145] From: "David Sercombe" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 02:55:08 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2002 02:55:08.0994 (UTC) FILETIME=[C383BA20:01C27B08] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, The dust started coming through here at about 2pm yesterday, with the temperature rising from 26 to 32 in the space of 20 mins!. Baro got down to 987hPa at 3pm. Quite an amazing afternoon of weather phenomena! David Sercombe Coffs Harbour, NE NSW From: "Dave Ellem" Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Low barometer readings NSW Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:47:10 +1000 Dust has moved through the NE NSW region now, baro at 992hpa. I just went on a dust storm chase, and when SDS has set in, it is an alright substitute! Dave Ellem, Wollongbar, Northern Rivers, NE NSW _________________________________________________________________ Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:35:25 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Hell Ken, > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon as > a motivator for El Nino". Hi John and all The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or maximum declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that includes everyone on this list!! The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does coincidence become theory..? regards Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates to > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water West), > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite finely > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > commence the cycle. > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less dense > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow by > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell Ken, > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon as > a motivator for El Nino". > > John. > >snip > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' into > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia because > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade wind > circulation in the area. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:41:19 +1000 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Ken, Can you explain your view on what heat has to do with a dust storm? I am of the opinion that the main triggers are the combination of strong winds and broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front, and that heat has little to do with it compared to these two. Of course heat is associated with dust storms because it is inherently relatively warm ahead of a cold front. Andrew. > Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon > is out of the sky during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the sun's heat. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Just a thought Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 04:47:28 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It's not all that bad Jimmy. I live about 50-80m away from the railway line here, and I quite enjoy it (Helps if your interested in trains and run to the window or to the station when you hear one approaching) PaulY -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:03 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Just a thought I was thinking just now, if a tornado sounds like a freight train, I would hate to be living near a railway line.... Cheers Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:50:57 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2002 04:50:57.0708 (UTC) FILETIME=[F14556C0:01C27B18] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Very interesting thoughts Ken Karl >From: "Ken Ring" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:35:25 +1300 > > > Hell Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The >moon >as > > a motivator for El Nino". > >Hi John and all >The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I >describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or >maximum >declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I >predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, >one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand >the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that >includes everyone on this list!! >The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon >can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The >reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the >atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which >offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form >from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we >are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. >Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does >coincidence become theory..? >regards >Ken >www.predictweather.com > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "John Woodbridge" >To: >Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM >Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino >relates >to > > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of >sitting > > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water >West), > > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite >finely > > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > > commence the cycle. > > > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less >dense > > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow >by > > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with >the > > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell >Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The >moon >as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > > > John. > > >snip > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' >into > > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia >because > > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade >wind > > circulation in the area. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month.  Try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:11:13 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken wrote: >Back in July on this forum I predicted the present drought ....... What date did the drought actually start? Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky and Weather www.stormchasers.au.com ASWA - Victoria http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Just a thought Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 05:26:47 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Nah, i can't tell the difference...although I'd most likely already be out watching either of them if I heard it...LOL PaulY -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:08 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: Just a thought Sorry Paul, It was my attemped humour. Can you tell the difference if a real tornado came through or the usual freight train:) Never mind. Jimmy Deguara At 04:47 AM 24/10/2002 +0000, you wrote: >It's not all that bad Jimmy. I live about 50-80m away from the railway line >here, and I quite enjoy it (Helps if your interested in trains and run to >the window or to the station when you hear one approaching) > >PaulY > >-----Original Message----- >From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara >Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:03 AM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Just a thought > > >I was thinking just now, if a tornado sounds like a freight train, I would >hate to be living near a railway line.... > >Cheers > >Jimmy Deguara > >----------------------------------------- >Please note the change to my new e-mail >address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com >----------------------------------------- >Jimmy Deguara >Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > >from >Schofields, Sydney >NSW Australia > >e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Web Page with Michael Bath > >Australian Severe Weather Home Page >http://www.australiasevereweather.com > >Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:37:13 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken I'll probably regret getting sucked into this thread, but here goes. >Back in July on this forum I >predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, >one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who >can't stand >the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that >includes everyone on this list!! I'm not a professional meteorologist, and I have a huge respect for informed amateur meteorologists to which the science owes its beginnings. Both the professional and amateur scientists, however, get a bit dogmatic over issues to do with scientific proof and evidence. I guess I'm in that camp, too. I'm happy to accept that the moon is made of green cheese provided someone can show me evidence. You made a number of challenging statements today that begged for proof or at least a substantiated explanation of cause and effect. If you're about challenging accepted dogma, you need to be able to justify your own. >Back in July on this forum I >predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. I think back in July quite a few people were predicting drought. Jane has asked "Which one?" which is a fair question. My additional questions are: 1. What predictors did you use to predict "it"? and 2. Where is the proof that "it" was caused by, or even related to, the predictors you used. >The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon >can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an >event. The >reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the >atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which >offers less resistance to the sun's heat. In another email, Andrew summarised the commonly accepted physics behind this type of duststorm. It's not quite obvious to me why the full moon could have anything to do with it. Can you please explain the connection, not between the lunar phase and question of heat, but between the lunar phase and this specific duststorm. What has been the lunar phase during the half-dozen or so major duststorms in Australia over the past century? Also, what evidence is there that the sun generates more heat on the ground during a full moon than otherwise? A tidal effect on the atmosphere sounds quite reasonable, but just how much more solar radiation does it allow through, and how do we know this? >Tropical cyclones also >only form >from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in >that case we >are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. This raises many questions, but I have just one. Have you a simple table correlating tropical cyclone formation dates with moon phases, say for the past decade or so? This would help convince me that TCs only form during the one lunar quarter. >Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does >coincidence become theory..? In my books, never. One in a million chances happen all the time, and, as Shaw said, "everything happens to everyone if you live long enough", or words to that effect. But coincidence can lead to theory. If all (or even most) major duststorms, and all (or even most) tropical cyclones can be shown to have occurred/formed during particular moon phases, it should certainly kick off a concerted study to explain the coincidence. And as the dates of all these events -- duststorms, cyclones and moon phases -- are precisely known, only a clerical job is needed to produce a table that proves the coincidences. I look forward to seeing it. Regards Laurier Laurier Williams Australian Weather News http://www.australianweathernews.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:45:49 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com " Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does coincidence become theory..?" Ken, Can you show me a statistical analysis, proving that when there is a full moon that ground temperatures are higher? I'm sure there is tons of data to support or disprove such a hypothesis. . . . Also . . . . can you explain why a full moon matters in your explanation? Surely a New Moon would have the same effect if it was in the right position? Could you please, again, support your explanation with some sound scientific data? Is it possible, that you are only looking for dust-storms more when there is a full moon, to justify your arguments? I would simply like to see some scientific data to back them up. If you are so confident about your theory- and I am not saying it is not possible (just unlikely), then surely you would not be adverse to examining such data, and allowing a rigorous examination of your "coincidences" . . . . James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 2:35 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hell Ken, > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon as > a motivator for El Nino". Hi John and all The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or maximum declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that includes everyone on this list!! The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does coincidence become theory..? regards Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates to > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water West), > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite finely > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > commence the cycle. > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less dense > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow by > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell Ken, > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon as > a motivator for El Nino". > > John. > >snip > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' into > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia because > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade wind > circulation in the area. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Craig Arthur" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:51:23 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, I am also reminded of a situation a couple of months back... On or around the 7th-9th watch out, NSW to QSLD, Wagga Wagga to Townsville. Forget verification, just watch those riverbanks. If they flood it's called lotsarain.. There has not been a significant rainfall event (that would quite possibly end this current drought) on or about the 7-9th of any month across eastern Australia since that forecast was made in early August 2002. I believe that could suggest a major flaw in the forecast method/theory used. Was it for August or for a later month? There was no indication of a month given. If the dust storm was related to the full moon, why not make a statement ahead of time? That would certainly have given your theory a lot of credibility. I note though that the famed Melbourne dust storm of 2 Feb 1983 occurred when the moon was a waning crescent (unless I am greatly mistaken) - a full week later in the lunar cycle than Wednesday's storm. Any comments? Craig -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 14:35 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hell Ken, > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon as > a motivator for El Nino". Hi John and all The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or maximum declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that includes everyone on this list!! The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does coincidence become theory..? regards Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates to > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water West), > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite finely > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > commence the cycle. > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less dense > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow by > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell Ken, > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon as > a motivator for El Nino". > > John. > >snip > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' into > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia because > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade wind > circulation in the area. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at pop.ihug.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:03:19 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: aus-wx: Just a thought Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I was thinking just now, if a tornado sounds like a freight train, I would hate to be living near a railway line.... Cheers Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:26:02 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Theories aside, I must say that watching the full moon rise last night in the haze of the dust storm at close to peak intensity (visibility down to less than 400m horizontally), was one of the most breathtakingly surreal atmospheric phenomena I have ever witnessed. A definite once in a lifetime event. Regards, John. >snip -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:35 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hell Ken, > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon as > a motivator for El Nino". Hi John and all The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or maximum declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that includes everyone on this list!! The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does coincidence become theory..? regards Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates to > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water West), > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite finely > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > commence the cycle. > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less dense > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow by > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell Ken, > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon as > a motivator for El Nino". > > John. > >snip > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' into > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia because > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade wind > circulation in the area. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:37:15 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: 7th of Feb storms in Vic.report makes it online eventually........ X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com As usual, Tony, marvellous photography. You blokes are still trying to make me homesick for Oz, aren't you! It's a conspiracy! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "T Middleton" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:54:55 +0000 Subject: aus-wx: 7th of Feb storms in Vic.report makes it online eventually........ > hi all, > I've just uploaded a chase report/photographic log of an impressive > backbuilding storm in Sth/W.Gippsland on the 7th of February this year, > the > radar is amazing! > the report/photographic log of it can be found at; > http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils/020207backbuildingstorms.htm > > > cheers TM > > Anvil Industries - http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:27:26 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Laurier, James, Jane and all Let's not be afraid of having strong ideas. Disagreement is healthy as long as personalities don't get in the way of facts. What I said in july was what David Jones responded to, in which I said NSW would see drought conditions right till November, a point he, a professional meteorologist, cast some doubt on when he replied "And, what is so special about the moon's behavior this year that leads you to believe that the August through November period should only get ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place it within the driest 10% of historical observations, and not far from the driest such period on record.." Any way I read it that did not sound like an agreement with me that the drought would last till now. Let's not mince words, the drought IS not far from the driest such period on record. I hate to harp on this but I was not incorrect, whereas David's response was, in hindsight, clearly misplaced. > (Jane)What date did the drought actually start? A drought does not have an official starting date. > What predictors did you use to predict "it"? Just the moon's position. > 2. Where is the proof that > "it" was caused by, or even related to, the predictors you used. What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is assumed when a result follows an event. > Can you show me a statistical analysis, proving that when there is a > full moon that ground temperatures are higher? I'm sure there is tons of > data to support or disprove such a hypothesis. . . . There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a graph I could be accused of presenting a certain bias. It is up to each skeptic to do his own work if he is serious about proving or disproving a lunar role. > Also . . . . can you explain why a full moon matters in your > explanation? Surely a New Moon would have the same effect if it was in > the right position? No, the New Moon is in the sky during the day and prevents solar radiation. >Could you please, again, support your explanation > with some sound scientific data? I dispute those two words. "Sound" is in the eye of the beholder. "Science" is ..what? That proposed by scientists? Are these the same bods who say CO2 is rising up to form a greenhouse cover when anyone who is not a scientist knows that CO2 is heavier than air? Or the scientists of old - Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Franklin, Kepler etc, all of whom were self-confessed astrologers? In my view, science is ONLY empirical and it is what I'm trying to do. > Is it possible, that you are only looking for dust-storms more when > there is a full moon, to justify your arguments? I would simply like to > see some scientific data to back them up. If you are so confident about > your theory- and I am not saying it is not possible (just unlikely), > then surely you would not be adverse to examining such data, and > allowing a rigorous examination of your "coincidences" . . . . I'm not looking for anything. You sound like you're are looking for an easy way to get out of doing some hard long correlation work.. > Can you please explain the connection, not > between the lunar phase and question of heat, but between the lunar phase > and this specific duststorm. Heat applied to the ground is part of the cause of the duststorm. > What has been the lunar phase during the half-dozen or so major duststorms > in Australia over the past century? Easy enough to look up yourself. I don't have access to Aussie records. I have to buy everything and I suggest you can do the same. The professionals have unlimited access to all the old files. Perhaps get one of them onto it. > Also, what evidence is there that the sun generates more heat on the ground > during a full moon than otherwise? A tidal effect on the atmosphere sounds > quite reasonable, but just how much more solar radiation does it allow > through, and how do we know this? About 20% more, I'd say. It would vary with location. It is easily measurable and the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, do it yourself. Get an old exposure meter, put a sunglass lens over it and point it to the sky, tracking the sun during the day every day over a month. You will find that when in the daytime the moon is out of the sky, the sun shines brighter. The moon is only out of the sky during full moon and last quarter. > Have you a simple table > correlating tropical cyclone formation dates with moon phases, say for the > past decade or so? This would help convince me that TCs only form during the > one lunar quarter. Sure I have. I don't make this stuff up. The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during that lunar phase time, something I did post to this forum at the end of summer. I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own record-keeping of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim. > If all (or even > most) major duststorms, and all (or even most) tropical cyclones can be > shown to have occurred/formed during particular moon phases, it should > certainly kick off a concerted study to explain the coincidence. And as the > dates of all these events -- duststorms, cyclones and moon phases -- are > precisely known, only a clerical job is needed to produce a table that > proves the coincidences. > I look forward to seeing it. Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been doing little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to do the work, which is what we see in meteorological circles. The moon is still ignored by forecasters, because of the heavy focus on barometric pressure, when weather is much more than simple pressure differential. A barometer ignores changes in atmospheric height, because it is set to read at sealevel. But the constant change in atmospheric height is what happens in the air tide, just as changes in sea height result in the sea tide. Without the barometer the meteorologists are stuffed - they have no science. The trouble is, the change in atmospheric height is hard to detect, but it can be seen in cloud height as the moon changes altitude. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:10:18 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com but did you get pictures? regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Theories aside, I must say that watching the full moon rise last night in > the haze of the dust storm at close to peak intensity (visibility down to > less than 400m horizontally), was one of the most breathtakingly surreal > atmospheric phenomena I have ever witnessed. A definite once in a lifetime > event. > > Regards, > John. > > >snip > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:35 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hell Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > Hi John and all > The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I > describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or maximum > declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I > predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, > one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand > the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that > includes everyone on this list!! > The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon > can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The > reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the > atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we > are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. > Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does > coincidence become theory..? > regards > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Woodbridge" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates > to > > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting > > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water > West), > > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite > finely > > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > > commence the cycle. > > > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less > dense > > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow by > > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the > > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > > > John. > > >snip > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' > into > > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia > because > > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade > wind > > circulation in the area. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:43:24 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Andrew I think you might have answered your own question..."broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front"..so..what is it that does the lifting? I would suggest that only heat or gravitational pull has the power to lift. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:41 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hi Ken, > > Can you explain your view on what heat has to do with a dust storm? > > I am of the opinion that the main triggers are the combination of strong > winds and broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front, and that heat > has little to do with it compared to these two. Of course heat is > associated with dust storms because it is inherently relatively warm > ahead of a cold front. > > Andrew. > > > > Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground > to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon > is out of the sky > during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted > atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the sun's > heat. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:07:37 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: RE: aus-wx: Just a thought Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry Paul, It was my attemped humour. Can you tell the difference if a real tornado came through or the usual freight train:) Never mind. Jimmy Deguara At 04:47 AM 24/10/2002 +0000, you wrote: >It's not all that bad Jimmy. I live about 50-80m away from the railway line >here, and I quite enjoy it (Helps if your interested in trains and run to >the window or to the station when you hear one approaching) > >PaulY > >-----Original Message----- >From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com >[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jimmy Deguara >Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:03 AM >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: aus-wx: Just a thought > > >I was thinking just now, if a tornado sounds like a freight train, I would >hate to be living near a railway line.... > >Cheers > >Jimmy Deguara > >----------------------------------------- >Please note the change to my new e-mail >address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com >----------------------------------------- >Jimmy Deguara >Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > >from >Schofields, Sydney >NSW Australia > >e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Web Page with Michael Bath > >Australian Severe Weather Home Page >http://www.australiasevereweather.com > >Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Just a thought Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:39:00 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com jimmy, i would have thought you would have seen enough twister films now to know that twisters make as much noise as a freight train but they dont sound like one. the amount of debris determines the amount of racket they make which unless its demolishing a town is not a lot compared to the wind noise they generate which is a sound all its own, a bit like a high piched very loud sssssssss that doesnt quite make it to a whistle, like a high wind blowing through a heap of power lines only a couple of octaves higher in pitch, i tried to simulate it once, the closest i got was to put 150psi from a 1\2" nozzle across a loose coil of fencing wire. most people probably compare them to a freight train as the closest analogy to something that most people have heard that comes close to a defening racket. regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:33 PM Subject: aus-wx: Just a thought > I was thinking just now, if a tornado sounds like a freight train, I would > hate to be living near a railway line.... > > Cheers > > Jimmy Deguara > > ----------------------------------------- > Please note the change to my new e-mail > address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com > ----------------------------------------- > Jimmy Deguara > Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > > from > Schofields, Sydney > NSW Australia > > e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > > Web Page with Michael Bath > > Australian Severe Weather Home Page > http://www.australiasevereweather.com > > Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:18:55 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Okay....enough of the flaming and stuff people, and lets get back to what everyone on the list enjoys....watching weather...not argueing about it. There's enough flame wars on Wx-Chase...you might wanna try there if you want to start one. PaulY -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:17 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Laurier Sorry you think I'm pulling your leg. I'm not. Facts? I would have thought a humungus dust storm was kind of enough for one day. Chuck in a drought, successfully predicted to last until November, based only on repeating moon orbits and you could begin to get someone's attention. The trouble is, whatever facts I come up with are never enough for some people. They go..oh yeah, that, mustve been coincidence. Just COULDN'T be evidence of something that might require that we change our minds about something or look outside of the square, just couldn't be. Must be El Nino, or La Nina, or La Nada or La la dee dah. Yeah, that explains it. Don't want any new age pesky moon stuff; that's for GIRL'S. A coincidence is just a high degree of correlation that thus far hasn't been adequately explained. Well, isn't high correlation solid science? > I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area Nah, I'm talking of the date they formed, not the date they reached Australia. Who gives a hoot where they end up? One always takes a few days after forming to get down here. That's what I mean - a skeptic will look at a later date in a different frame of reference and say sorry mate, no deal. which is why I'm not posting data here. I've done it already and got flamed. It just wastes my time. I think the suggestion by Tony that we all note the moon phase when a cyclone or dust storm forms is a good one. And you could add to that a big earthquake, an eruption, a tornado or a nice big hailstorm. Don't get me wrong folks, I thoroughly appreciate the discussion of this thread. I am as much a scientist, by training, as anyone on this list, but I know enough to know that concepts like proof, stats, criteria, logic, fact etc are all up for grabs when a new idea appears. Unfortunately the scientific method is flawed because it is really best suited to repeating what has already been tested, and it is always protective of established parameters. Also, the same scientist must do all the experiments, otherwise you cannot eliminate operator bias, which is clearly an impossibility, which means there cannot be a truly fair scientific experiment, only another expresion of opinion. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:49 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Ken > > Thanks for your swift response. > > I'm a bit surprised by some of your statements, from the standpoint of logic > rather than science. > > "What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > assumed when a result follows an event." > "There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a graph I could > be accused of presenting a certain bias." > "Easy enough to look up yourself." > "...the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, > do it yourself." > "I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own record-keeping > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim." > "Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been doing > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to do > the work..." > "Disagreement is healthy as long as personalities don't get in the way of > facts." > > Ken, I think you're pulling our legs, and doing it very successfully. I > simply asked you for some facts to support your arguments. I was not being > critical; just asking for facts. You provided none, but suggested that it > was up to others to prove you wrong; however, you dismiss the use of data > (facts) because they can "prove or disprove anything", and you dismiss the > whole the concept of proof. It seems to me that, under these circumstances, > argument or discussion is futile. That's why I think you're pulling our > legs. > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick bit of > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the facts to > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and April > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase at that > time, were: > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of the > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it can be > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates they > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. If I'm > wrong, please point out where. > > I love the weather, and trying to understand it. But fundamental to > understanding is a willingness to apply logical argument and to look for, > and share, information. I feel Ken's response does neither. > > Laurier > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Thursday, 24 October, 2002 6:27 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > Laurier, James, Jane and all > > Let's not be afraid of having strong ideas. Disagreement is > > healthy as long > > as personalities don't get in the way of facts. What I said in > > july was what > > David Jones responded to, in which I said NSW would see drought conditions > > right till November, a point he, a professional meteorologist, cast some > > doubt on when he replied "And, what is so special about the > > moon's behavior > > this year that leads you to believe that the August through > > November period > > should only get ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place it > > within the driest 10% of historical observations, and not far from the > > driest such period on record.." Any way I read it that did not > > sound like an > > agreement with me that the drought would last till now. Let's not mince > > words, the drought IS not far from the driest such period on > > record. I hate > > to harp on this but I was not incorrect, whereas David's response was, in > > hindsight, clearly misplaced. > > > > > (Jane)What date did the drought actually start? > > A drought does not have an official starting date. > > > > > What predictors did you use to predict "it"? > > Just the moon's position. > > > > > 2. Where is the proof that > > > "it" was caused by, or even related to, the predictors you used. > > What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > > assumed when a result follows an event. > > > > > > > Can you show me a statistical analysis, proving that when there is a > > > full moon that ground temperatures are higher? I'm sure there is tons of > > > data to support or disprove such a hypothesis. . . . > > There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be > > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a > > graph I could > > be accused of presenting a certain bias. It is up to each skeptic > > to do his > > own work if he is serious about proving or disproving a lunar role. > > > > > Also . . . . can you explain why a full moon matters in your > > > explanation? Surely a New Moon would have the same effect if it was in > > > the right position? > > No, the New Moon is in the sky during the day and prevents solar > > radiation. > > > > >Could you please, again, support your explanation > > > with some sound scientific data? > > I dispute those two words. "Sound" is in the eye of the beholder. > > "Science" > > is ..what? That proposed by scientists? Are these the same bods > > who say CO2 > > is rising up to form a greenhouse cover when anyone who is not a scientist > > knows that CO2 is heavier than air? Or the scientists of old - Copernicus, > > Galileo, Newton, Franklin, Kepler etc, all of whom were self-confessed > > astrologers? In my view, science is ONLY empirical and it is what > > I'm trying > > to do. > > > > > Is it possible, that you are only looking for dust-storms more when > > > there is a full moon, to justify your arguments? I would simply like to > > > see some scientific data to back them up. If you are so confident about > > > your theory- and I am not saying it is not possible (just unlikely), > > > then surely you would not be adverse to examining such data, and > > > allowing a rigorous examination of your "coincidences" . . . . > > I'm not looking for anything. You sound like you're are looking > > for an easy > > way to get out of doing some hard long correlation work.. > > > > > Can you please explain the connection, not > > > between the lunar phase and question of heat, but between the > > lunar phase > > > and this specific duststorm. > > Heat applied to the ground is part of the cause of the duststorm. > > > > > What has been the lunar phase during the half-dozen or so major > > duststorms > > > in Australia over the past century? > > Easy enough to look up yourself. I don't have access to Aussie records. I > > have to buy everything and I suggest you can do the same. The > > professionals > > have unlimited access to all the old files. Perhaps get one of > > them onto it. > > > > > > > Also, what evidence is there that the sun generates more heat on the > > ground > > > during a full moon than otherwise? A tidal effect on the > > atmosphere sounds > > > quite reasonable, but just how much more solar radiation does it allow > > > through, and how do we know this? > > About 20% more, I'd say. It would vary with location. It is easily > > measurable and the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, > > do it yourself. Get an old exposure meter, put a sunglass lens over it and > > point it to the sky, tracking the sun during the day every day > > over a month. > > You will find that when in the daytime the moon is out of the sky, the sun > > shines brighter. The moon is only out of the sky during full moon and last > > quarter. > > > > > > > Have you a simple table > > > correlating tropical cyclone formation dates with moon phases, > > say for the > > > past decade or so? This would help convince me that TCs only form during > > the > > > one lunar quarter. > > Sure I have. I don't make this stuff up. The 14 or so TC's last > > summer only > > formed during that lunar phase time, something I did post to this forum at > > the end of summer. I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own > > record-keeping > > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim. > > > > > If all (or even > > > most) major duststorms, and all (or even most) tropical cyclones can be > > > shown to have occurred/formed during particular moon phases, it should > > > certainly kick off a concerted study to explain the coincidence. And as > > the > > > dates of all these events -- duststorms, cyclones and moon phases -- are > > > precisely known, only a clerical job is needed to produce a table that > > > proves the coincidences. > > > I look forward to seeing it. > > Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been doing > > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to do > > the work, which is what we see in meteorological circles. The > > moon is still > > ignored by forecasters, because of the heavy focus on barometric pressure, > > when weather is much more than simple pressure differential. A barometer > > ignores changes in atmospheric height, because it is set to read at > > sealevel. But the constant change in atmospheric height is what happens in > > the air tide, just as changes in sea height result in the sea > > tide. Without > > the barometer the meteorologists are stuffed - they have no science. The > > trouble is, the change in atmospheric height is hard to detect, but it can > > be seen in cloud height as the moon changes altitude. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:20:18 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy, A PAL version will be available also. $82 including postage, handling & GST. Cheers, Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video > Hi Jane, > > If it was me, I would also voted Roger Hill as a person who could "for-see > things from a distance". > > I just realised I can't play NTSC tapes on our video player. Matthew and I > bought some video tapes from the chaser picnic of Rocky's chases of the > 1990's himself - we'll have to watch them at an ASWA meeting. > > Cheers. > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 09:43 PM 23/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: > >Australian Sky & Weather are proud to announce a significant video by > >Roger Hill who has provided a generous discount to purchase an almost 4 > >hour masterpiece of storm video. For those of you who don't know Roger's > >history, he has been voted as the 'Most Desired Accessory for a Chase > >Vehicle' in the USA - where Roger goes, severe weather follows....... > > > >If you are interested in obtaining a copy have a look here for more > >details http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm > >Price: $70AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in > >Australia) > >Format - NTSC > >Very limited production run. > > > >Join the pre-order list and have this video before Christmas by sending > >an email to cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > >Jane > > > >-------------------------------- > >Jane ONeill - Melbourne > >cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > >Australian Sky & Weather > >http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > >Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > >-------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:34:39 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 04:37 PM 24/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Also, what evidence is there that the sun generates more heat on the ground >during a full moon than otherwise? A tidal effect on the atmosphere sounds >quite reasonable, but just how much more solar radiation does it allow >through, and how do we know this? But my knowledge of tidal effects is that there is a tidal bulge on the side of an object (the Earth in this case) on the _opposite_ side of the unbalanced gravitational force (Moon)?? The atmosphere (and water) on the "near side" is pulled towards the Moon by gravity, obviously. On the "far" side, the atmosphere is pulled away by the "gravity gradient" (if you imagine the Moon and Earth to be equal size, you can imagine this to be the effect of centrifugal force as the Earth revolves around the centre of mass of the Earth-Moon system). Also, the Sun adds its bit to the tides, and it's above the horizon at the time. I'm not discounting Ken's theory, but I don't accept the explanation based on my understanding of the physics. But if Ken has a better explanation, I'm happy to stand corrected. >This raises many questions, but I have just one. Have you a simple table >correlating tropical cyclone formation dates with moon phases, say for the >past decade or so? This would help convince me that TCs only form during the >one lunar quarter. These sort of historical records would be good. Actually, we could start documenting those from now on. Why don't we all record the lunar phase whenever a TC is forming? >In my books, never. One in a million chances happen all the time, and, as >Shaw said, "everything happens to everyone if you live long enough", or >words to that effect. But coincidence can lead to theory. If all (or even >most) major duststorms, and all (or even most) tropical cyclones can be >shown to have occurred/formed during particular moon phases, it should >certainly kick off a concerted study to explain the coincidence. And as the >dates of all these events -- duststorms, cyclones and moon phases -- are >precisely known, only a clerical job is needed to produce a table that >proves the coincidences. Me too. I'll be most interested to see the correlations. To me, it's reasonable to expect that the Moon has some effect on the atmosphere (through gravity), and therefore the weather. However, as to how much effect, I have no idea, and would be interested to learn more. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dust over eastern Australia Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:46:55 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all, I've got a number more images courtesy of the BoM to go up, but I thought I'd share this amazing image with you...... http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/dust02296n16-3z.jpg more to come....... Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:50:07 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:27 PM 24/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: >There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be >constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a graph I could >be accused of presenting a certain bias. It is up to each skeptic to do his >own work if he is serious about proving or disproving a lunar role. It's the responsibility of _anyone_ who is trying to prove a point to come up with the facts. That's you, that's the skeptics, and me, if I was to get serious about this debate. And the facts need to be able to be verified by independent parties. > > Also . . . . can you explain why a full moon matters in your > > explanation? Surely a New Moon would have the same effect if it was in > > the right position? >No, the New Moon is in the sky during the day and prevents solar radiation. Disclaimer: I am working from memory, so figures may not be 100% accurate. I can understand this if the Earth is in eclipse, but if it's not, I don't understand how there'd be any significant drop in received solar radiation. I will concede that at Full Moon, there is a very small increase in incoming radiation - i.e. that reflected off the Moon, but at 16% (I think that's the Moon's albedo, from memory) of a 1/2 degree circle in the night sky, it's not very much. In the visible spectrum, it's less than 1/100000th of the total incoming radiation (Moon is Mag -12, Sun is Man -25, and 5 magnitude points is 100x, if I recall correctly). Doesn't rule out "upset the balance" theories, but does lower the odds of a significant radiation difference. The seasonal solar radiation difference (from aphelion in July to perihelion in January) is over 1000x greater than this - and the average surface temperature of the Earth is still warmer at apogee! (explanation: it's because of unequally distribution of land masses in the hemispheres - Source: Science at NASA). >Sure I have. I don't make this stuff up. The 14 or so TC's last summer only >formed during that lunar phase time, something I did post to this forum at >the end of summer. I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own record-keeping >of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim. Agreed. The more people that keep records, the more this can be examined. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: No offence to anyone Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:57:37 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Reading all the different threads with regards to moon, sun etc
I'm here to look and learn (and read) everyone's versions of what's going on. I feel a little disturbed that a bloke has a different opinion than the popular and he's being jumped on.
I have my opinions on some things with regards to mother natures signs etc, sometimes good, sometimes way out. Maybe I need to be jumped on too!
Can we try to make or see something positive from other(s) ideas without burying them first.
Just my opinion. Ok, I'll bury myself now...
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:58:41 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Just a thought Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 05:26 AM 24/10/2002 +0000, you wrote: >Nah, i can't tell the difference...although I'd most likely already be out >watching either of them if I heard it...LOL LOL, well that makes the decision easy. :-) 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dust over eastern Australia Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:00:45 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry for the short reply but just "WOW!!!" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:46 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dust over eastern Australia > Evening all, > > I've got a number more images courtesy of the BoM to go up, but I > thought I'd share this amazing image with you...... > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/dust02296n16-3z.jpg > > more to come....... > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:48:20 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jimmy, Splash out and get a cheap video that plays back NTSC, most do these days. The reason I say this is I find that converted tapes are slightly poorer quality than even the native NTSC. Of course native PAL is better, but the conversion is not lossless. Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:36 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: "In Search of Supercells 2002" - the video > Hi Jimmy and others, > > I'm checking into it and I'll let you know the cost of the PAL version later > today. > > Jane > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > > > Hi Jane, > > > > If it was me, I would also voted Roger Hill as a person who could "for-see > > things from a distance". > > > > I just realised I can't play NTSC tapes on our video player. Matthew and I > > bought some video tapes from the chaser picnic of Rocky's chases of the > > 1990's himself - we'll have to watch them at an ASWA meeting. > > > > Cheers. > > > > Jimmy Deguara > > > > At 09:43 PM 23/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: > > >Australian Sky & Weather are proud to announce a significant video by > > >Roger Hill who has provided a generous discount to purchase an almost 4 > > >hour masterpiece of storm video. For those of you who don't know Roger's > > >history, he has been voted as the 'Most Desired Accessory for a Chase > > >Vehicle' in the USA - where Roger goes, severe weather follows....... > > > > > >If you are interested in obtaining a copy have a look here for more > > >details http://www.stormchasers.au.com/supercells2002.htm > > >Price: $70AUD (including GST, postage & handling - delivered anywhere in > > >Australia) > > >Format - NTSC > > >Very limited production run. > > > > > >Join the pre-order list and have this video before Christmas by sending > > >an email to cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > > >Jane > > > > > >-------------------------------- > > >Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > >cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > > >Australian Sky & Weather > > >http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > > >Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > >-------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:49:02 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken Thanks for your swift response. I'm a bit surprised by some of your statements, from the standpoint of logic rather than science. "What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is assumed when a result follows an event." "There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a graph I could be accused of presenting a certain bias." "Easy enough to look up yourself." "...the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, do it yourself." "I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own record-keeping of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim." "Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been doing little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to do the work..." "Disagreement is healthy as long as personalities don't get in the way of facts." Ken, I think you're pulling our legs, and doing it very successfully. I simply asked you for some facts to support your arguments. I was not being critical; just asking for facts. You provided none, but suggested that it was up to others to prove you wrong; however, you dismiss the use of data (facts) because they can "prove or disprove anything", and you dismiss the whole the concept of proof. It seems to me that, under these circumstances, argument or discussion is futile. That's why I think you're pulling our legs. Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick bit of "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also only form from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the facts to back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and April 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase at that time, were: 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter Chris, 3/2/02, 3 Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 Upia, 25/3/02, 2 Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 Des, 5/3/02, 3 Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of the cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it can be argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates they reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. If I'm wrong, please point out where. I love the weather, and trying to understand it. But fundamental to understanding is a willingness to apply logical argument and to look for, and share, information. I feel Ken's response does neither. Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Thursday, 24 October, 2002 6:27 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > Laurier, James, Jane and all > Let's not be afraid of having strong ideas. Disagreement is > healthy as long > as personalities don't get in the way of facts. What I said in > july was what > David Jones responded to, in which I said NSW would see drought conditions > right till November, a point he, a professional meteorologist, cast some > doubt on when he replied "And, what is so special about the > moon's behavior > this year that leads you to believe that the August through > November period > should only get ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place it > within the driest 10% of historical observations, and not far from the > driest such period on record.." Any way I read it that did not > sound like an > agreement with me that the drought would last till now. Let's not mince > words, the drought IS not far from the driest such period on > record. I hate > to harp on this but I was not incorrect, whereas David's response was, in > hindsight, clearly misplaced. > > > (Jane)What date did the drought actually start? > A drought does not have an official starting date. > > > What predictors did you use to predict "it"? > Just the moon's position. > > > 2. Where is the proof that > > "it" was caused by, or even related to, the predictors you used. > What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > assumed when a result follows an event. > > > > Can you show me a statistical analysis, proving that when there is a > > full moon that ground temperatures are higher? I'm sure there is tons of > > data to support or disprove such a hypothesis. . . . > There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a > graph I could > be accused of presenting a certain bias. It is up to each skeptic > to do his > own work if he is serious about proving or disproving a lunar role. > > > Also . . . . can you explain why a full moon matters in your > > explanation? Surely a New Moon would have the same effect if it was in > > the right position? > No, the New Moon is in the sky during the day and prevents solar > radiation. > > >Could you please, again, support your explanation > > with some sound scientific data? > I dispute those two words. "Sound" is in the eye of the beholder. > "Science" > is ..what? That proposed by scientists? Are these the same bods > who say CO2 > is rising up to form a greenhouse cover when anyone who is not a scientist > knows that CO2 is heavier than air? Or the scientists of old - Copernicus, > Galileo, Newton, Franklin, Kepler etc, all of whom were self-confessed > astrologers? In my view, science is ONLY empirical and it is what > I'm trying > to do. > > > Is it possible, that you are only looking for dust-storms more when > > there is a full moon, to justify your arguments? I would simply like to > > see some scientific data to back them up. If you are so confident about > > your theory- and I am not saying it is not possible (just unlikely), > > then surely you would not be adverse to examining such data, and > > allowing a rigorous examination of your "coincidences" . . . . > I'm not looking for anything. You sound like you're are looking > for an easy > way to get out of doing some hard long correlation work.. > > > Can you please explain the connection, not > > between the lunar phase and question of heat, but between the > lunar phase > > and this specific duststorm. > Heat applied to the ground is part of the cause of the duststorm. > > > What has been the lunar phase during the half-dozen or so major > duststorms > > in Australia over the past century? > Easy enough to look up yourself. I don't have access to Aussie records. I > have to buy everything and I suggest you can do the same. The > professionals > have unlimited access to all the old files. Perhaps get one of > them onto it. > > > > Also, what evidence is there that the sun generates more heat on the > ground > > during a full moon than otherwise? A tidal effect on the > atmosphere sounds > > quite reasonable, but just how much more solar radiation does it allow > > through, and how do we know this? > About 20% more, I'd say. It would vary with location. It is easily > measurable and the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, > do it yourself. Get an old exposure meter, put a sunglass lens over it and > point it to the sky, tracking the sun during the day every day > over a month. > You will find that when in the daytime the moon is out of the sky, the sun > shines brighter. The moon is only out of the sky during full moon and last > quarter. > > > > Have you a simple table > > correlating tropical cyclone formation dates with moon phases, > say for the > > past decade or so? This would help convince me that TCs only form during > the > > one lunar quarter. > Sure I have. I don't make this stuff up. The 14 or so TC's last > summer only > formed during that lunar phase time, something I did post to this forum at > the end of summer. I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own > record-keeping > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim. > > > If all (or even > > most) major duststorms, and all (or even most) tropical cyclones can be > > shown to have occurred/formed during particular moon phases, it should > > certainly kick off a concerted study to explain the coincidence. And as > the > > dates of all these events -- duststorms, cyclones and moon phases -- are > > precisely known, only a clerical job is needed to produce a table that > > proves the coincidences. > > I look forward to seeing it. > Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been doing > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to do > the work, which is what we see in meteorological circles. The > moon is still > ignored by forecasters, because of the heavy focus on barometric pressure, > when weather is much more than simple pressure differential. A barometer > ignores changes in atmospheric height, because it is set to read at > sealevel. But the constant change in atmospheric height is what happens in > the air tide, just as changes in sea height result in the sea > tide. Without > the barometer the meteorologists are stuffed - they have no science. The > trouble is, the change in atmospheric height is hard to detect, but it can > be seen in cloud height as the moon changes altitude. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Chris G" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:27:28 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com always amazing how you only turn up when you ahve amazingly managed to get something right ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Ring To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:35 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > Hell Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > Hi John and all > The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I > describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or maximum > declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I > predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, > one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand > the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that > includes everyone on this list!! > The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon > can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The > reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the > atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we > are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. > Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does > coincidence become theory..? > regards > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Woodbridge" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates > to > > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting > > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water > West), > > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite > finely > > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > > commence the cycle. > > > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less > dense > > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow by > > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the > > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > > > John. > > >snip > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' > into > > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia > because > > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade > wind > > circulation in the area. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Chris G" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:29:22 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com most likely heat ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Ring To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:43 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hi Andrew > I think you might have answered your own question..."broad-scale lifting > found ahead of a cold front"..so..what is it that does the lifting? I would > suggest that only heat or gravitational pull has the power to lift. > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Miskelly" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:41 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Ken, > > > > Can you explain your view on what heat has to do with a dust storm? > > > > I am of the opinion that the main triggers are the combination of strong > > winds and broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front, and that heat > > has little to do with it compared to these two. Of course heat is > > associated with dust storms because it is inherently relatively warm > > ahead of a cold front. > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > > Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground > > to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon > is out of the sky > > during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted > > atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the sun's > > heat. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:36:27 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com :( -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard Modistach Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:40 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" but did you get pictures? regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Theories aside, I must say that watching the full moon rise last night in > the haze of the dust storm at close to peak intensity (visibility down to > less than 400m horizontally), was one of the most breathtakingly surreal > atmospheric phenomena I have ever witnessed. A definite once in a lifetime > event. > > Regards, > John. > > >snip > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:35 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hell Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > Hi John and all > The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I > describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or maximum > declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I > predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, > one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand > the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that > includes everyone on this list!! > The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon > can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The > reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the > atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we > are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. > Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does > coincidence become theory..? > regards > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Woodbridge" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates > to > > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting > > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water > West), > > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite > finely > > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > > commence the cycle. > > > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less > dense > > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow by > > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the > > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > > > John. > > >snip > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' > into > > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia > because > > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade > wind > > circulation in the area. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Clyve Herbert" To: Subject: aus-wx: Vorticity southwest Vic. Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:02:03 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2002 13:04:15.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[DADFF300:01C27B5D] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi all. Seems to be some mid level vorticity just southwest of Mt Gambier and moving eastward would be nice for Vic if it became slow moving!? .. a wish forecast maybe.....also not a bad tropical storm over the northeast of the NT it also has unusual upper outflow features. regards Clyve Herbert.
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 02:16:56 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Laurier Sorry you think I'm pulling your leg. I'm not. Facts? I would have thought a humungus dust storm was kind of enough for one day. Chuck in a drought, successfully predicted to last until November, based only on repeating moon orbits and you could begin to get someone's attention. The trouble is, whatever facts I come up with are never enough for some people. They go..oh yeah, that, mustve been coincidence. Just COULDN'T be evidence of something that might require that we change our minds about something or look outside of the square, just couldn't be. Must be El Nino, or La Nina, or La Nada or La la dee dah. Yeah, that explains it. Don't want any new age pesky moon stuff; that's for GIRL'S. A coincidence is just a high degree of correlation that thus far hasn't been adequately explained. Well, isn't high correlation solid science? > I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area Nah, I'm talking of the date they formed, not the date they reached Australia. Who gives a hoot where they end up? One always takes a few days after forming to get down here. That's what I mean - a skeptic will look at a later date in a different frame of reference and say sorry mate, no deal. which is why I'm not posting data here. I've done it already and got flamed. It just wastes my time. I think the suggestion by Tony that we all note the moon phase when a cyclone or dust storm forms is a good one. And you could add to that a big earthquake, an eruption, a tornado or a nice big hailstorm. Don't get me wrong folks, I thoroughly appreciate the discussion of this thread. I am as much a scientist, by training, as anyone on this list, but I know enough to know that concepts like proof, stats, criteria, logic, fact etc are all up for grabs when a new idea appears. Unfortunately the scientific method is flawed because it is really best suited to repeating what has already been tested, and it is always protective of established parameters. Also, the same scientist must do all the experiments, otherwise you cannot eliminate operator bias, which is clearly an impossibility, which means there cannot be a truly fair scientific experiment, only another expresion of opinion. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:49 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Ken > > Thanks for your swift response. > > I'm a bit surprised by some of your statements, from the standpoint of logic > rather than science. > > "What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > assumed when a result follows an event." > "There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a graph I could > be accused of presenting a certain bias." > "Easy enough to look up yourself." > "...the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, > do it yourself." > "I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own record-keeping > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim." > "Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been doing > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to do > the work..." > "Disagreement is healthy as long as personalities don't get in the way of > facts." > > Ken, I think you're pulling our legs, and doing it very successfully. I > simply asked you for some facts to support your arguments. I was not being > critical; just asking for facts. You provided none, but suggested that it > was up to others to prove you wrong; however, you dismiss the use of data > (facts) because they can "prove or disprove anything", and you dismiss the > whole the concept of proof. It seems to me that, under these circumstances, > argument or discussion is futile. That's why I think you're pulling our > legs. > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick bit of > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the facts to > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and April > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase at that > time, were: > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of the > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it can be > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates they > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. If I'm > wrong, please point out where. > > I love the weather, and trying to understand it. But fundamental to > understanding is a willingness to apply logical argument and to look for, > and share, information. I feel Ken's response does neither. > > Laurier > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Thursday, 24 October, 2002 6:27 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > Laurier, James, Jane and all > > Let's not be afraid of having strong ideas. Disagreement is > > healthy as long > > as personalities don't get in the way of facts. What I said in > > july was what > > David Jones responded to, in which I said NSW would see drought conditions > > right till November, a point he, a professional meteorologist, cast some > > doubt on when he replied "And, what is so special about the > > moon's behavior > > this year that leads you to believe that the August through > > November period > > should only get ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place it > > within the driest 10% of historical observations, and not far from the > > driest such period on record.." Any way I read it that did not > > sound like an > > agreement with me that the drought would last till now. Let's not mince > > words, the drought IS not far from the driest such period on > > record. I hate > > to harp on this but I was not incorrect, whereas David's response was, in > > hindsight, clearly misplaced. > > > > > (Jane)What date did the drought actually start? > > A drought does not have an official starting date. > > > > > What predictors did you use to predict "it"? > > Just the moon's position. > > > > > 2. Where is the proof that > > > "it" was caused by, or even related to, the predictors you used. > > What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > > assumed when a result follows an event. > > > > > > > Can you show me a statistical analysis, proving that when there is a > > > full moon that ground temperatures are higher? I'm sure there is tons of > > > data to support or disprove such a hypothesis. . . . > > There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be > > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a > > graph I could > > be accused of presenting a certain bias. It is up to each skeptic > > to do his > > own work if he is serious about proving or disproving a lunar role. > > > > > Also . . . . can you explain why a full moon matters in your > > > explanation? Surely a New Moon would have the same effect if it was in > > > the right position? > > No, the New Moon is in the sky during the day and prevents solar > > radiation. > > > > >Could you please, again, support your explanation > > > with some sound scientific data? > > I dispute those two words. "Sound" is in the eye of the beholder. > > "Science" > > is ..what? That proposed by scientists? Are these the same bods > > who say CO2 > > is rising up to form a greenhouse cover when anyone who is not a scientist > > knows that CO2 is heavier than air? Or the scientists of old - Copernicus, > > Galileo, Newton, Franklin, Kepler etc, all of whom were self-confessed > > astrologers? In my view, science is ONLY empirical and it is what > > I'm trying > > to do. > > > > > Is it possible, that you are only looking for dust-storms more when > > > there is a full moon, to justify your arguments? I would simply like to > > > see some scientific data to back them up. If you are so confident about > > > your theory- and I am not saying it is not possible (just unlikely), > > > then surely you would not be adverse to examining such data, and > > > allowing a rigorous examination of your "coincidences" . . . . > > I'm not looking for anything. You sound like you're are looking > > for an easy > > way to get out of doing some hard long correlation work.. > > > > > Can you please explain the connection, not > > > between the lunar phase and question of heat, but between the > > lunar phase > > > and this specific duststorm. > > Heat applied to the ground is part of the cause of the duststorm. > > > > > What has been the lunar phase during the half-dozen or so major > > duststorms > > > in Australia over the past century? > > Easy enough to look up yourself. I don't have access to Aussie records. I > > have to buy everything and I suggest you can do the same. The > > professionals > > have unlimited access to all the old files. Perhaps get one of > > them onto it. > > > > > > > Also, what evidence is there that the sun generates more heat on the > > ground > > > during a full moon than otherwise? A tidal effect on the > > atmosphere sounds > > > quite reasonable, but just how much more solar radiation does it allow > > > through, and how do we know this? > > About 20% more, I'd say. It would vary with location. It is easily > > measurable and the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, > > do it yourself. Get an old exposure meter, put a sunglass lens over it and > > point it to the sky, tracking the sun during the day every day > > over a month. > > You will find that when in the daytime the moon is out of the sky, the sun > > shines brighter. The moon is only out of the sky during full moon and last > > quarter. > > > > > > > Have you a simple table > > > correlating tropical cyclone formation dates with moon phases, > > say for the > > > past decade or so? This would help convince me that TCs only form during > > the > > > one lunar quarter. > > Sure I have. I don't make this stuff up. The 14 or so TC's last > > summer only > > formed during that lunar phase time, something I did post to this forum at > > the end of summer. I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own > > record-keeping > > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim. > > > > > If all (or even > > > most) major duststorms, and all (or even most) tropical cyclones can be > > > shown to have occurred/formed during particular moon phases, it should > > > certainly kick off a concerted study to explain the coincidence. And as > > the > > > dates of all these events -- duststorms, cyclones and moon phases -- are > > > precisely known, only a clerical job is needed to produce a table that > > > proves the coincidences. > > > I look forward to seeing it. > > Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been doing > > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to do > > the work, which is what we see in meteorological circles. The > > moon is still > > ignored by forecasters, because of the heavy focus on barometric pressure, > > when weather is much more than simple pressure differential. A barometer > > ignores changes in atmospheric height, because it is set to read at > > sealevel. But the constant change in atmospheric height is what happens in > > the air tide, just as changes in sea height result in the sea > > tide. Without > > the barometer the meteorologists are stuffed - they have no science. The > > trouble is, the change in atmospheric height is hard to detect, but it can > > be seen in cloud height as the moon changes altitude. > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:26:25 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vorticity southwest Vic. Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Clyve, Yes it is interesting!!! Are there any predictors for rain by the end of the month. Ken Ring you are suggesting so - drought until November - inclusive or it will begin raining November? Jimmy Deguara At 11:02 PM 24/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Hi all. Seems to be some mid level vorticity just southwest of Mt Gambier >and moving eastward would be nice for Vic if it became slow moving!? .. a >wish forecast maybe.....also not a bad tropical storm over the northeast >of the NT it also has unusual upper outflow features. regards Clyve Herbert. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:27:03 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com the trick is to keep the pot at a good simmer without becoming distracted and letting it boil over. regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "dann weatherhead" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:03 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > At least there's some life in the ol' aus-wx discussion list. I am enjoying > this debate. > Keep it up :) > > dann > > PS--I love (and have always loved) your brief and inspired musings Clyve. > They make me constantly re-examine my weather enriching the whole wonderful > world of the atmosphere as i cast my eye over. Thanks for your constant and > excellent contributions. > > dann > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Yole" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:18 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Okay....enough of the flaming and stuff people, and lets get back to what > > everyone on the list enjoys....watching weather...not argueing about it. > > There's enough flame wars on Wx-Chase...you might wanna try there if you > > want to start one. > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:17 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > Laurier > > Sorry you think I'm pulling your leg. I'm not. Facts? I would have thought > a > > humungus dust storm was kind of enough for one day. Chuck in a drought, > > successfully predicted to last until November, based only on repeating > moon > > orbits and you could begin to get someone's attention. The trouble is, > > whatever facts I come up with are never enough for some people. They > go..oh > > yeah, that, mustve been coincidence. Just COULDN'T be evidence of > something > > that might require that we change our minds about something or look > outside > > of the square, just couldn't be. Must be El Nino, or La Nina, or La Nada > or > > La la dee dah. Yeah, that explains it. Don't want any new age pesky moon > > stuff; that's for GIRL'S. > > A coincidence is just a high degree of correlation that thus far hasn't > been > > adequately explained. Well, isn't high correlation solid science? > > > I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area > > Nah, I'm talking of the date they formed, not the date they reached > > Australia. Who gives a hoot where they end up? One always takes a few days > > after forming to get down here. That's what I mean - a skeptic will look > at > > a later date in a different frame of reference and say sorry mate, no > deal. > > which is why I'm not posting data here. I've done it already and got > flamed. > > It just wastes my time. > > I think the suggestion by Tony that we all note the moon phase when a > > cyclone or dust storm forms is a good one. And you could add to that a big > > earthquake, an eruption, a tornado or a nice big hailstorm. > > Don't get me wrong folks, I thoroughly appreciate the discussion of this > > thread. I am as much a scientist, by training, as anyone on this list, but > I > > know enough to know that concepts like proof, stats, criteria, logic, fact > > etc are all up for grabs when a new idea appears. Unfortunately the > > scientific method is flawed because it is really best suited to repeating > > what has already been tested, and it is always protective of established > > parameters. Also, the same scientist must do all the experiments, > otherwise > > you cannot eliminate operator bias, which is clearly an impossibility, > which > > means there cannot be a truly fair scientific experiment, only another > > expresion of opinion. > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Laurier Williams" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:49 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > Ken > > > > > > Thanks for your swift response. > > > > > > I'm a bit surprised by some of your statements, from the standpoint of > > logic > > > rather than science. > > > > > > "What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > > > assumed when a result follows an event." > > > "There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can > be > > > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a graph I > > could > > > be accused of presenting a certain bias." > > > "Easy enough to look up yourself." > > > "...the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, > > > do it yourself." > > > "I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own record-keeping > > > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim." > > > "Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been > doing > > > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to > do > > > the work..." > > > "Disagreement is healthy as long as personalities don't get in the way > of > > > facts." > > > > > > Ken, I think you're pulling our legs, and doing it very successfully. I > > > simply asked you for some facts to support your arguments. I was not > being > > > critical; just asking for facts. You provided none, but suggested that > it > > > was up to others to prove you wrong; however, you dismiss the use of > data > > > (facts) because they can "prove or disprove anything", and you dismiss > the > > > whole the concept of proof. It seems to me that, under these > > circumstances, > > > argument or discussion is futile. That's why I think you're pulling our > > > legs. > > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick bit > of > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also only > > form > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the > facts > > to > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and > came > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and > April > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase at > that > > > time, were: > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of the > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it can be > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates > they > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. If > I'm > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > > > I love the weather, and trying to understand it. But fundamental to > > > understanding is a willingness to apply logical argument and to look > for, > > > and share, information. I feel Ken's response does neither. > > > > > > Laurier > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 October, 2002 6:27 PM > > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > > > > Laurier, James, Jane and all > > > > Let's not be afraid of having strong ideas. Disagreement is > > > > healthy as long > > > > as personalities don't get in the way of facts. What I said in > > > > july was what > > > > David Jones responded to, in which I said NSW would see drought > > conditions > > > > right till November, a point he, a professional meteorologist, cast > some > > > > doubt on when he replied "And, what is so special about the > > > > moon's behavior > > > > this year that leads you to believe that the August through > > > > November period > > > > should only get ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place > it > > > > within the driest 10% of historical observations, and not far from the > > > > driest such period on record.." Any way I read it that did not > > > > sound like an > > > > agreement with me that the drought would last till now. Let's not > mince > > > > words, the drought IS not far from the driest such period on > > > > record. I hate > > > > to harp on this but I was not incorrect, whereas David's response was, > > in > > > > hindsight, clearly misplaced. > > > > > > > > > (Jane)What date did the drought actually start? > > > > A drought does not have an official starting date. > > > > > > > > > What predictors did you use to predict "it"? > > > > Just the moon's position. > > > > > > > > > 2. Where is the proof that > > > > > "it" was caused by, or even related to, the predictors you used. > > > > What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality > is > > > > assumed when a result follows an event. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you show me a statistical analysis, proving that when there is a > > > > > full moon that ground temperatures are higher? I'm sure there is > tons > > of > > > > > data to support or disprove such a hypothesis. . . . > > > > There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can > be > > > > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a > > > > graph I could > > > > be accused of presenting a certain bias. It is up to each skeptic > > > > to do his > > > > own work if he is serious about proving or disproving a lunar role. > > > > > > > > > Also . . . . can you explain why a full moon matters in your > > > > > explanation? Surely a New Moon would have the same effect if it was > in > > > > > the right position? > > > > No, the New Moon is in the sky during the day and prevents solar > > > > radiation. > > > > > > > > >Could you please, again, support your explanation > > > > > with some sound scientific data? > > > > I dispute those two words. "Sound" is in the eye of the beholder. > > > > "Science" > > > > is ..what? That proposed by scientists? Are these the same bods > > > > who say CO2 > > > > is rising up to form a greenhouse cover when anyone who is not a > > scientist > > > > knows that CO2 is heavier than air? Or the scientists of old - > > Copernicus, > > > > Galileo, Newton, Franklin, Kepler etc, all of whom were self-confessed > > > > astrologers? In my view, science is ONLY empirical and it is what > > > > I'm trying > > > > to do. > > > > > > > > > Is it possible, that you are only looking for dust-storms more when > > > > > there is a full moon, to justify your arguments? I would simply like > > to > > > > > see some scientific data to back them up. If you are so confident > > about > > > > > your theory- and I am not saying it is not possible (just unlikely), > > > > > then surely you would not be adverse to examining such data, and > > > > > allowing a rigorous examination of your "coincidences" . . . . > > > > I'm not looking for anything. You sound like you're are looking > > > > for an easy > > > > way to get out of doing some hard long correlation work.. > > > > > > > > > Can you please explain the connection, not > > > > > between the lunar phase and question of heat, but between the > > > > lunar phase > > > > > and this specific duststorm. > > > > Heat applied to the ground is part of the cause of the duststorm. > > > > > > > > > What has been the lunar phase during the half-dozen or so major > > > > duststorms > > > > > in Australia over the past century? > > > > Easy enough to look up yourself. I don't have access to Aussie > records. > > I > > > > have to buy everything and I suggest you can do the same. The > > > > professionals > > > > have unlimited access to all the old files. Perhaps get one of > > > > them onto it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, what evidence is there that the sun generates more heat on the > > > > ground > > > > > during a full moon than otherwise? A tidal effect on the > > > > atmosphere sounds > > > > > quite reasonable, but just how much more solar radiation does it > allow > > > > > through, and how do we know this? > > > > About 20% more, I'd say. It would vary with location. It is easily > > > > measurable and the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once > > again, > > > > do it yourself. Get an old exposure meter, put a sunglass lens over it > > and > > > > point it to the sky, tracking the sun during the day every day > > > > over a month. > > > > You will find that when in the daytime the moon is out of the sky, the > > sun > > > > shines brighter. The moon is only out of the sky during full moon and > > last > > > > quarter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have you a simple table > > > > > correlating tropical cyclone formation dates with moon phases, > > > > say for the > > > > > past decade or so? This would help convince me that TCs only form > > during > > > > the > > > > > one lunar quarter. > > > > Sure I have. I don't make this stuff up. The 14 or so TC's last > > > > summer only > > > > formed during that lunar phase time, something I did post to this > forum > > at > > > > the end of summer. I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own > > > > record-keeping > > > > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim. > > > > > > > > > If all (or even > > > > > most) major duststorms, and all (or even most) tropical cyclones can > > be > > > > > shown to have occurred/formed during particular moon phases, it > should > > > > > certainly kick off a concerted study to explain the coincidence. And > > as > > > > the > > > > > dates of all these events -- duststorms, cyclones and moon phases -- > > are > > > > > precisely known, only a clerical job is needed to produce a table > that > > > > > proves the coincidences. > > > > > I look forward to seeing it. > > > > Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been > > doing > > > > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than > to > > do > > > > the work, which is what we see in meteorological circles. The > > > > moon is still > > > > ignored by forecasters, because of the heavy focus on barometric > > pressure, > > > > when weather is much more than simple pressure differential. A > barometer > > > > ignores changes in atmospheric height, because it is set to read at > > > > sealevel. But the constant change in atmospheric height is what > happens > > in > > > > the air tide, just as changes in sea height result in the sea > > > > tide. Without > > > > the barometer the meteorologists are stuffed - they have no science. > The > > > > trouble is, the change in atmospheric height is hard to detect, but it > > can > > > > be seen in cloud height as the moon changes altitude. > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vorticity southwest Vic. Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:32:26 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com he may mean up to at least november, with no garantee its going to rain after that. ragards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:56 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Vorticity southwest Vic. > Hi Clyve, > > Yes it is interesting!!! Are there any predictors for rain by the end of > the month. Ken Ring you are suggesting so - drought until November - > inclusive or it will begin raining November? > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 11:02 PM 24/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: > >Hi all. Seems to be some mid level vorticity just southwest of Mt Gambier > >and moving eastward would be nice for Vic if it became slow moving!? .. a > >wish forecast maybe.....also not a bad tropical storm over the northeast > >of the NT it also has unusual upper outflow features. regards Clyve Herbert. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:41:57 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm sorry but you have not answered my question. Can you provide statistically undeniable evidence for you claims? I doubt it! If you cannot then how do you expect anyone to believe you? Your "theories" are so out of left field as to be unacceptable without proper justification . . . prove it! I'd like to see it- but I bet you respond with more rhetoric and no hard facts. . . . James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 6:43 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Hi Andrew I think you might have answered your own question..."broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front"..so..what is it that does the lifting? I would suggest that only heat or gravitational pull has the power to lift. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:41 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hi Ken, > > Can you explain your view on what heat has to do with a dust storm? > > I am of the opinion that the main triggers are the combination of strong > winds and broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front, and that heat > has little to do with it compared to these two. Of course heat is > associated with dust storms because it is inherently relatively warm > ahead of a cold front. > > Andrew. > > > > Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground > to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon > is out of the sky > during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted > atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the sun's > heat. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Mossman" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:24:57 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ohh Please. Who made you the science "guru" all of a sudden? So the guys theories may not appeal to your scientific mind, but it does not mean that you simply and summarily dismiss his responses. I am sure that many "scientists" of the past faced such arrogance, elitism and scepticism before their theories were accepted. E.g. Galileo is one such person.... So stop attacking the person, open your mind to new possibilities and loose the elitist attitude. Paul. ----- Original Message ----- From: James Holbeach To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:11 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm sorry but you have not answered my question. Can you provide > statistically undeniable evidence for you claims? I doubt it! If you > cannot then how do you expect anyone to believe you? > > Your "theories" are so out of left field as to be unacceptable without > proper justification . . . prove it! I'd like to see it- but I bet you > respond with more rhetoric and no hard facts. . . . > > James > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 6:43 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > Hi Andrew > I think you might have answered your own question..."broad-scale lifting > found ahead of a cold front"..so..what is it that does the lifting? I > would > suggest that only heat or gravitational pull has the power to lift. > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Miskelly" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:41 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Ken, > > > > Can you explain your view on what heat has to do with a dust storm? > > > > I am of the opinion that the main triggers are the combination of > strong > > winds and broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front, and that > heat > > has little to do with it compared to these two. Of course heat is > > associated with dust storms because it is inherently relatively warm > > ahead of a cold front. > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > > Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground > > to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon > is out of the > sky > > during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted > > atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the > sun's > > heat. > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 02:52:19 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2002 16:52:19.0581 (UTC) FILETIME=[B7470AD0:01C27B7D] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I tend to agree with Paul, Why is everyone talking him down as if he is a piece of crap, its not fair and very very closed minded. His thoughts are interesting, very infact. I dont know whether for sure his predictions are correct, but give this person a fair go. We all have to hear eachothers thoughts on many issues and we accept them to a degree. I will keeping close track on Kens Predictions, why not start making notes on how well he predicts, test his model out your own way, you dig up the facts to proove he is incorrect then we will believe you. Freedom of speech and ideas :) Just my thoughts, you can flame and burn me to bits really, I dont care but my Goodness I am shocked to think that one person can be brutally talked down like this. I am sure Ken is an amatuer just like the rest of us here, with a few exceptions, so give him a fair go I say. These ideas may be far fetched to you, but what happens if he is correct? Karl :) >From: "Paul Mossman" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" >Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:24:57 +0930 > >Ohh Please. > >Who made you the science "guru" all of a sudden? So the guys theories may >not appeal to your scientific mind, but it does not mean that you simply >and >summarily dismiss his responses. > >I am sure that many "scientists" of the past faced such arrogance, elitism >and scepticism before their theories were accepted. E.g. Galileo is one >such >person.... > >So stop attacking the person, open your mind to new possibilities and loose >the elitist attitude. > >Paul. >----- Original Message ----- >From: James Holbeach >To: >Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:11 AM >Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > I'm sorry but you have not answered my question. Can you provide > > statistically undeniable evidence for you claims? I doubt it! If you > > cannot then how do you expect anyone to believe you? > > > > Your "theories" are so out of left field as to be unacceptable without > > proper justification . . . prove it! I'd like to see it- but I bet you > > respond with more rhetoric and no hard facts. . . . > > > > James > > > > James Holbeach > > -------------------------------- > > Trapdoor Ski Club > > Mt. Hotham, Australia > > ph. 0417 553 757 > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 6:43 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Andrew > > I think you might have answered your own question..."broad-scale lifting > > found ahead of a cold front"..so..what is it that does the lifting? I > > would > > suggest that only heat or gravitational pull has the power to lift. > > Ken > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Andrew Miskelly" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:41 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > Hi Ken, > > > > > > Can you explain your view on what heat has to do with a dust storm? > > > > > > I am of the opinion that the main triggers are the combination of > > strong > > > winds and broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front, and that > > heat > > > has little to do with it compared to these two. Of course heat is > > > associated with dust storms because it is inherently relatively warm > > > ahead of a cold front. > > > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > > > > > Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground > > > to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon > is out of the > > sky > > > during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted > > > atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the > > sun's > > > heat. > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month.  Try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Craig Arthur" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 04:46:51 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, May I venture to make a couple of points. 1. In early August 2002, you made a comment to this list about a significant rainfall event from Townsville to Wagga Wagga 'on or about the 7th - 9th', an event that would cause floods even! In the ensuing months, there has not been a significant rainfall event 'on or about the 7th - 9th' of any month. (I don't know which month the prediction was for, as there was no month given) 2. Just this past few days, there was the quote 'dust storms always occur with the full moon'. I would like it noted that the dust storm of 8 February 1983 that swept through Melbourne occurred when the moon had just entered the last quarter of it's phase. Now, kudos to you for predicting the drought (as much as one could predict a drought when it was already well established) - or more so Sydney's dry spell - but I would say that my first point shows a pretty big failure of the moon theory. My second point shows that it *may just be* a coincidence that the dust storm of 23 October 2002 occurred on the full moon. It may also be that the theory works well and the Melbourne dust storm was an anomoly. Regards Craig Arthur ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:16 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Laurier > Sorry you think I'm pulling your leg. I'm not. Facts? I would have thought a > humungus dust storm was kind of enough for one day. Chuck in a drought, > successfully predicted to last until November, based only on repeating moon > orbits and you could begin to get someone's attention. The trouble is, > whatever facts I come up with are never enough for some people. They go..oh > yeah, that, mustve been coincidence. Just COULDN'T be evidence of something > that might require that we change our minds about something or look outside > of the square, just couldn't be. Must be El Nino, or La Nina, or La Nada or > La la dee dah. Yeah, that explains it. Don't want any new age pesky moon > stuff; that's for GIRL'S. > A coincidence is just a high degree of correlation that thus far hasn't been > adequately explained. Well, isn't high correlation solid science? > > I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area > Nah, I'm talking of the date they formed, not the date they reached > Australia. Who gives a hoot where they end up? One always takes a few days > after forming to get down here. That's what I mean - a skeptic will look at > a later date in a different frame of reference and say sorry mate, no deal. > which is why I'm not posting data here. I've done it already and got flamed. > It just wastes my time. > I think the suggestion by Tony that we all note the moon phase when a > cyclone or dust storm forms is a good one. And you could add to that a big > earthquake, an eruption, a tornado or a nice big hailstorm. > Don't get me wrong folks, I thoroughly appreciate the discussion of this > thread. I am as much a scientist, by training, as anyone on this list, but I > know enough to know that concepts like proof, stats, criteria, logic, fact > etc are all up for grabs when a new idea appears. Unfortunately the > scientific method is flawed because it is really best suited to repeating > what has already been tested, and it is always protective of established > parameters. Also, the same scientist must do all the experiments, otherwise > you cannot eliminate operator bias, which is clearly an impossibility, which > means there cannot be a truly fair scientific experiment, only another > expresion of opinion. > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laurier Williams" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:49 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Ken > > > > Thanks for your swift response. > > > > I'm a bit surprised by some of your statements, from the standpoint of > logic > > rather than science. > > > > "What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > > assumed when a result follows an event." > > "There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be > > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a graph I > could > > be accused of presenting a certain bias." > > "Easy enough to look up yourself." > > "...the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, > > do it yourself." > > "I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own record-keeping > > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim." > > "Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been doing > > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to do > > the work..." > > "Disagreement is healthy as long as personalities don't get in the way of > > facts." > > > > Ken, I think you're pulling our legs, and doing it very successfully. I > > simply asked you for some facts to support your arguments. I was not being > > critical; just asking for facts. You provided none, but suggested that it > > was up to others to prove you wrong; however, you dismiss the use of data > > (facts) because they can "prove or disprove anything", and you dismiss the > > whole the concept of proof. It seems to me that, under these > circumstances, > > argument or discussion is futile. That's why I think you're pulling our > > legs. > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick bit of > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also only > form > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the facts > to > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and April > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase at that > > time, were: > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of the > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it can be > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates they > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. If I'm > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > I love the weather, and trying to understand it. But fundamental to > > understanding is a willingness to apply logical argument and to look for, > > and share, information. I feel Ken's response does neither. > > > > Laurier > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 October, 2002 6:27 PM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > Laurier, James, Jane and all > > > Let's not be afraid of having strong ideas. Disagreement is > > > healthy as long > > > as personalities don't get in the way of facts. What I said in > > > july was what > > > David Jones responded to, in which I said NSW would see drought > conditions > > > right till November, a point he, a professional meteorologist, cast some > > > doubt on when he replied "And, what is so special about the > > > moon's behavior > > > this year that leads you to believe that the August through > > > November period > > > should only get ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place it > > > within the driest 10% of historical observations, and not far from the > > > driest such period on record.." Any way I read it that did not > > > sound like an > > > agreement with me that the drought would last till now. Let's not mince > > > words, the drought IS not far from the driest such period on > > > record. I hate > > > to harp on this but I was not incorrect, whereas David's response was, > in > > > hindsight, clearly misplaced. > > > > > > > (Jane)What date did the drought actually start? > > > A drought does not have an official starting date. > > > > > > > What predictors did you use to predict "it"? > > > Just the moon's position. > > > > > > > 2. Where is the proof that > > > > "it" was caused by, or even related to, the predictors you used. > > > What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > > > assumed when a result follows an event. > > > > > > > > > > Can you show me a statistical analysis, proving that when there is a > > > > full moon that ground temperatures are higher? I'm sure there is tons > of > > > > data to support or disprove such a hypothesis. . . . > > > There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be > > > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a > > > graph I could > > > be accused of presenting a certain bias. It is up to each skeptic > > > to do his > > > own work if he is serious about proving or disproving a lunar role. > > > > > > > Also . . . . can you explain why a full moon matters in your > > > > explanation? Surely a New Moon would have the same effect if it was in > > > > the right position? > > > No, the New Moon is in the sky during the day and prevents solar > > > radiation. > > > > > > >Could you please, again, support your explanation > > > > with some sound scientific data? > > > I dispute those two words. "Sound" is in the eye of the beholder. > > > "Science" > > > is ..what? That proposed by scientists? Are these the same bods > > > who say CO2 > > > is rising up to form a greenhouse cover when anyone who is not a > scientist > > > knows that CO2 is heavier than air? Or the scientists of old - > Copernicus, > > > Galileo, Newton, Franklin, Kepler etc, all of whom were self-confessed > > > astrologers? In my view, science is ONLY empirical and it is what > > > I'm trying > > > to do. > > > > > > > Is it possible, that you are only looking for dust-storms more when > > > > there is a full moon, to justify your arguments? I would simply like > to > > > > see some scientific data to back them up. If you are so confident > about > > > > your theory- and I am not saying it is not possible (just unlikely), > > > > then surely you would not be adverse to examining such data, and > > > > allowing a rigorous examination of your "coincidences" . . . . > > > I'm not looking for anything. You sound like you're are looking > > > for an easy > > > way to get out of doing some hard long correlation work.. > > > > > > > Can you please explain the connection, not > > > > between the lunar phase and question of heat, but between the > > > lunar phase > > > > and this specific duststorm. > > > Heat applied to the ground is part of the cause of the duststorm. > > > > > > > What has been the lunar phase during the half-dozen or so major > > > duststorms > > > > in Australia over the past century? > > > Easy enough to look up yourself. I don't have access to Aussie records. > I > > > have to buy everything and I suggest you can do the same. The > > > professionals > > > have unlimited access to all the old files. Perhaps get one of > > > them onto it. > > > > > > > > > > Also, what evidence is there that the sun generates more heat on the > > > ground > > > > during a full moon than otherwise? A tidal effect on the > > > atmosphere sounds > > > > quite reasonable, but just how much more solar radiation does it allow > > > > through, and how do we know this? > > > About 20% more, I'd say. It would vary with location. It is easily > > > measurable and the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once > again, > > > do it yourself. Get an old exposure meter, put a sunglass lens over it > and > > > point it to the sky, tracking the sun during the day every day > > > over a month. > > > You will find that when in the daytime the moon is out of the sky, the > sun > > > shines brighter. The moon is only out of the sky during full moon and > last > > > quarter. > > > > > > > > > > Have you a simple table > > > > correlating tropical cyclone formation dates with moon phases, > > > say for the > > > > past decade or so? This would help convince me that TCs only form > during > > > the > > > > one lunar quarter. > > > Sure I have. I don't make this stuff up. The 14 or so TC's last > > > summer only > > > formed during that lunar phase time, something I did post to this forum > at > > > the end of summer. I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own > > > record-keeping > > > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim. > > > > > > > If all (or even > > > > most) major duststorms, and all (or even most) tropical cyclones can > be > > > > shown to have occurred/formed during particular moon phases, it should > > > > certainly kick off a concerted study to explain the coincidence. And > as > > > the > > > > dates of all these events -- duststorms, cyclones and moon phases -- > are > > > > precisely known, only a clerical job is needed to produce a table that > > > > proves the coincidences. > > > > I look forward to seeing it. > > > Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been > doing > > > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to > do > > > the work, which is what we see in meteorological circles. The > > > moon is still > > > ignored by forecasters, because of the heavy focus on barometric > pressure, > > > when weather is much more than simple pressure differential. A barometer > > > ignores changes in atmospheric height, because it is set to read at > > > sealevel. But the constant change in atmospheric height is what happens > in > > > the air tide, just as changes in sea height result in the sea > > > tide. Without > > > the barometer the meteorologists are stuffed - they have no science. The > > > trouble is, the change in atmospheric height is hard to detect, but it > can > > > be seen in cloud height as the moon changes altitude. > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:20:40 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com James > I'd like to see it- but I bet you > respond with more rhetoric and no hard facts.. Well, you CAN see it. On my website go to my Freemonth page. Scroll down and you'll find Australia weather for the whole month ahead, all states. I do this month in and month out. You'll see the whole of November. If you want October, well, its gone now, but the Healthy Options magazine prints it every month and that's on all book stands throughout Australia. I am told I am very accurate and that's good enough for me. I'm told that for many people my page alone sells the magazine. THESE ARE HARD FACTS. In fact, to my knowledge, no one else is putting out longrange forecasts for Australia a month ahead. Not any of the professionals OR amateurs. I am ALSO doing it for NZ and the UK, on the same page. I know of no one else doing it for any single ONE of those countries, let alone all three. And I'm not even a meteorologist. So where's THEIR work? Apart from telling us what will happen tomorrow, which we all know anyway, as far as a week out at most goes, they seem to be very busy sitting on their hands. And where's YOUR stuff, James? I'm out there. I'm doing it mate. Hey - I'm thoroughly enjoying this opportunity to present my case. Thanks everybody. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:41 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm sorry but you have not answered my question. Can you provide > statistically undeniable evidence for you claims? I doubt it! If you > cannot then how do you expect anyone to believe you? > > Your "theories" are so out of left field as to be unacceptable without > proper justification . . . prove it! I'd like to see it- but I bet you > respond with more rhetoric and no hard facts. . . . > > James > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 6:43 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > Hi Andrew > I think you might have answered your own question..."broad-scale lifting > found ahead of a cold front"..so..what is it that does the lifting? I > would > suggest that only heat or gravitational pull has the power to lift. > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Miskelly" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:41 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Ken, > > > > Can you explain your view on what heat has to do with a dust storm? > > > > I am of the opinion that the main triggers are the combination of > strong > > winds and broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front, and that > heat > > has little to do with it compared to these two. Of course heat is > > associated with dust storms because it is inherently relatively warm > > ahead of a cold front. > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > > Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground > > to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon > is out of the > sky > > during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted > > atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the > sun's > > heat. > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:42:36 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tony wrote > But my knowledge of tidal effects is that there is a tidal bulge on the > side of an object (the Earth in this case) on the _opposite_ side of the > unbalanced gravitational force (Moon)?? The atmosphere (and water) on the > "near side" is pulled towards the Moon by gravity, obviously. On the "far" > side, the atmosphere is pulled away by the "gravity gradient" (if you > imagine the Moon and Earth to be equal size, you can imagine this to be the > effect of centrifugal force as the Earth revolves around the centre of mass > of the Earth-Moon system). Not centrifugal force, because that would operate all around the circumference, not just at one point. Unfortunately for those who want simple explanations, normal physics doesn't explain it. Only astrological physics, explained initially by Sir Isaac Newton, hacks it, but not many understand it nowadays. Newton's work was dressed up for the scientific community by Sir George Darwin, Charles's dad, and being an influential figure everyone turned to him. But he got it wrong. When planets are at certain angles to a location on earth they exert a pull because they nullify earth's gravity. It's kind of like a narrow, sometimes momentary, special force "corridor". The moon gets itself into these angles and only when it does do we get tides, earthquakes, eruptions, and ..da da..heavy rain. The sun only evaporates water and applies heat to the ground. It cannot cause rain and it cannot cause weather to change at night, as we all know it does. > To me, it's > reasonable to expect that the Moon has some effect on the atmosphere > (through gravity), and therefore the weather.. Thanks for your openmindness, Tony Ken www.predictweather.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Rainfall Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:01:07 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I've finally made it! 300mm for the year. All I need now is 340mm in the next two months and I'll be right back on the average :-)
Point 8mm here over night but enough to get me to the magical mark.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "Craig Arthur" To: Subject: aus-wx: Re: Just a thought Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:34:14 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I've also heard tornadoes described as sounding like jet aircraft. Houses are pretty cheap in Arncliffe I think! ;) Craig Jimmy Deguara wrote: I was thinking just now, if a tornado sounds like a freight train, I would hate to be living near a railway line.... Cheers Jimmy Deguara ----------------------------------------- Please note the change to my new e-mail address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com ----------------------------------------- Jimmy Deguara Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher from Schofields, Sydney NSW Australia e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com Web Page with Michael Bath Australian Severe Weather Home Page http://www.australiasevereweather.com Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:58:16 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: Just a thought Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Craig, Love your sense of humour. Good stuff. Jimmy Deguara At 07:34 AM 25/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >I've also heard tornadoes described as sounding like jet aircraft. Houses >are pretty cheap in Arncliffe I think! ;) > >Craig > >Jimmy Deguara wrote: > > >I was thinking just now, if a tornado sounds like a freight train, I would >hate to be living near a railway line.... > >Cheers > >Jimmy Deguara > >----------------------------------------- >Please note the change to my new e-mail >address: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Storm Chasing Tours - Thunderbolt Tours - http://www.thunderbolttours.com >----------------------------------------- >Jimmy Deguara >Storm Chaser and Mathematics Teacher > >from >Schofields, Sydney >NSW Australia > >e-mail:jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com > >Web Page with Michael Bath > >Australian Severe Weather Home Page >http://www.australiasevereweather.com > >Member of the Australian Severe Weather Association >http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:10:15 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ohh Please. "Who made you the science "guru" all of a sudden? So the guys theories may not appeal to your scientific mind, but it does not mean that you simply and summarily dismiss his responses." I'm not dismissing them, I am simply asking for some scientific justification. That is all. I'm sorry if it has appeared that I am personally attacking you ken, I have not meant to. I guess I do not like to see a theory, such as yours, go by without some questioning. You claim that your "told" you are very accurate, to me is not really good enough. I'm sure that clairvoyants are told the same thing- The thing with this is that, while we cannot easily test whether a certain person met the love of their life, we can easily test whether your predictions are accurate! So lets do it! Ken could you please send me a years worth of your predictions. Last year, perhaps, and I'll do a simple analysis for you. You never know, it may well prove me wrong! :) James ----- Original Message ----- From: James Holbeach To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:11 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm sorry but you have not answered my question. Can you provide > statistically undeniable evidence for you claims? I doubt it! If you > cannot then how do you expect anyone to believe you? > > Your "theories" are so out of left field as to be unacceptable without > proper justification . . . prove it! I'd like to see it- but I bet you > respond with more rhetoric and no hard facts. . . . > > James > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 6:43 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > Hi Andrew > I think you might have answered your own question..."broad-scale lifting > found ahead of a cold front"..so..what is it that does the lifting? I > would > suggest that only heat or gravitational pull has the power to lift. > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Miskelly" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:41 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Ken, > > > > Can you explain your view on what heat has to do with a dust storm? > > > > I am of the opinion that the main triggers are the combination of > strong > > winds and broad-scale lifting found ahead of a cold front, and that > heat > > has little to do with it compared to these two. Of course heat is > > associated with dust storms because it is inherently relatively warm > > ahead of a cold front. > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > > Only during full moon can the sun generate enough heat on the ground > > to cause such an event. The reason is that the moon > is out of the > sky > > during the day and taking the atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted > > atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the > sun's > > heat. > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: please spare us Ken.. Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:29:27 +1000 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Laurier >Sorry you think I'm pulling your leg. I'm not. Facts? I would have thought a >humungus dust storm was kind of enough for one day. Chuck in a drought, >successfully predicted to last until November, So let me get this right Ken... You sucesfully predicted in July a drought which had commenced 4 months earlier in April, and somehow this is proof of your theories. And then... after a dust storm you tell us that you predicted it also on the basis of the moon. That is about as impressive as predicting lotto numbers the day after they are drawn and just a useful. Can I suggest at this stage that we start a new email list for ken and those interested in his views and let the rest of us get on with weather matters and proven science on aussie weather. Regards, David +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Damian" To: Subject: aus-wx: cold night smokey morning Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:12:49 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I recorded a cool 8.7 degrees here at my place last night between Chatswood West & North Ryde in Sydney's Northern Suburbs. But awoke this morning to a 'very' smokey air & can smell the smoke inside the house!
From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: cold night smokey morning Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:27:22 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Yes it's getting up everyone's nose I think. Stopped me going on my usual 4km+  walk. A bit chilly here last night, but not that cold! This morning's sounding
 
 
explains the smoke's persistence.
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Damian
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: aus-wx: cold night smokey morning

I recorded a cool 8.7 degrees here at my place last night between Chatswood West & North Ryde in Sydney's Northern Suburbs. But awoke this morning to a 'very' smokey air & can smell the smoke inside the house!
From: Blair Trewin Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:33:30 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick bit of > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the facts to > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and April > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase at that > time, were: > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of the > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it can be > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates they > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. If I'm > wrong, please point out where. If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones moving west of 90E). I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically significant difference between that distribution and the even distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC formation. Blair +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "macdonald" To: Subject: aus-wx: QUESTION ? Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:36:08 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi All,
I have some weather related questions for a Project i am working on with my team members. I have to complete it this weekend.... just need some good links.  I have a fair idea.
 
WHy does the inside of the car continue to heat up when the outside temperature outside remains constant?
 
Convection process and a diagram ( need a good link)
 
thankyou in advance,
It is very dry here in the Gold Coast hinterland. I seem to have problems with java, so i can't update my page. So far we've had 498mm for the year, which is very dry for here. I think we'll be lucky to 700mm this year. Hinze dam is 39.91%.
 
Cheers
Sam
Tallai/Guyra Weather
 
From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: What is the best source of water vapour images? Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:45:52 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com My usual source of water vapour satpix at https://207.133.112.37/sat/aust/ has become very eratic over the past few weeks. The only other source with specific Australian images that I'm aware of is CIMSS, and the useful archive of CIMSS images at http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil:80/archdat/pacific/winds/southern_hemisphere/, but these have upper wind overlays. There are a fair few global images available, but they lack detail in our region. Does anyone know of any other sources? Thanks Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: please spare us Ken.. Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:38:15 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > So let me get this right Ken... You sucesfully predicted in July a drought > which had commenced 4 months earlier in April, and somehow this is proof of > your theories. And then... after a dust storm you tell us that you predicted > it also on the basis of the moon. No, David, I didn't say that. I've already posted up your response around that time, so everyone can see what I said and what you said. I told you there would be only around 100mm or rain for Sydney from July to mid November and you scoffed at that suggestion. Stick to the facts, please. You were wrong and are not big enough to admit it. All I predicted was dry conditions right till November. Also I never said I predicted the dust storm, only pointed out the coincidence of it forming on the day of the full moon. I then suggested that the full moon was a causal factor in applying extra heat to the ground. > Can I suggest at this stage that we start a new email list for ken and those > interested in his views and let the rest of us get on with weather matters > and proven science on aussie weather. You don't have to read my messages, David. You certainly shouldn't try to get me censored just because I have different ideas to you. This isn't Iraq. > (Blair)If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html Thanks Blair, much appreciated. I'd welcome someone else verifying my work, if they have the time. Ken www.predictweather.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:41:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I succeed I'll post it up. Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Blair Trewin" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick bit of > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also only form > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the facts to > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and April > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase at that > > time, were: > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of the > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it can be > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates they > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. If I'm > > wrong, please point out where. > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > moving west of 90E). > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > significant difference between that distribution and the even > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > formation. > > Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:19:59 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm doing it too LOL I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! James James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith Barnett Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I succeed I'll post it up. Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Blair Trewin" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick bit of > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also only form > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the facts to > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and April > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase at that > > time, were: > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of the > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it can be > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates they > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. If I'm > > wrong, please point out where. > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > moving west of 90E). > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > significant difference between that distribution and the even > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > formation. > > Blair > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: cold night smokey morning Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:10:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Message
Yes, very cold here this morning. Unfortunately I didn't get a temp as I am 1/2 way in a move and the wx station is unplugged and still at my last joint. I have been waiting for a still day and someone to help me to pull the mast down and move it. It is a 2 man job at the best of times and attempts in the wind would be stupidity. All I know is that I woke up at 3am this morning with teeth chattering.
 
 

------------------------------------
Glen O'Riley
Computer Technician
Kings Creek
Krambach, 2429
Australia
Phone: 02 65591232
Fax: 02 6559 1348
Mobile: 0439 878 633
Email: goriley at tsn.cc
Web: www.mypage.tsn.cc/oriley
ABN: 42 674 332 428
------------------------------------
Storm Chaser
Rail Fan
Electronics & Radio
NSW Rural Fire Service Firefighter
NSW State Emergency Services Member
------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith Barnett
Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 10:27 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: cold night smokey morning

Yes it's getting up everyone's nose I think. Stopped me going on my usual 4km+  walk. A bit chilly here last night, but not that cold! This morning's sounding
 
 
explains the smoke's persistence.
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Damian
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: aus-wx: cold night smokey morning

I recorded a cool 8.7 degrees here at my place last night between Chatswood West & North Ryde in Sydney's Northern Suburbs. But awoke this morning to a 'very' smokey air & can smell the smoke inside the house!
XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Dust over eastern Australia Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:08:05 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Also impressive in this photo are the visible plumes of bush fires, particularly in NE NSW. John. >Snip -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:47 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Dust over eastern Australia Evening all, I've got a number more images courtesy of the BoM to go up, but I thought I'd share this amazing image with you...... http://www.stormchasers.au.com/Oct02/dust02296n16-3z.jpg more to come....... Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:32:47 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com James I'm thrilled you are taking the trouble to yest my predictions. Just look at my predictions for October and November for Australia on my website. There's plenty there to access and test out. Don't forget I ask for a 24 hour error either way. To those who are going to do a comparison matching moon phases to TC's, please note the day the TC's formed, not the day they reached Australia. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm doing it too LOL > > I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the > web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! > > Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! > > James > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > Barnett > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I > succeed I'll post it up. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > ----------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified > to > be virus free. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Blair Trewin" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick > bit > of > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also > only > form > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the > facts to > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed > during > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site > and > came > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and > April > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase > at > that > > > time, were: > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of > the > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it > can be > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates > they > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. > If > I'm > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > > moving west of 90E). > > > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > > significant difference between that distribution and the even > > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > > formation. > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:43:24 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I suppose for the purposes of this analysis, the question will really be defining when the TC actually formed. Normally, it is taken as when a Tropical Depression reaches Cat 1 strength and is formally named, but it may have been meandering around as a significant TD for quite some time (days/weeks) before that. Do you want to make a call on this Ken? John. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:33 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" James I'm thrilled you are taking the trouble to yest my predictions. Just look at my predictions for October and November for Australia on my website. There's plenty there to access and test out. Don't forget I ask for a 24 hour error either way. To those who are going to do a comparison matching moon phases to TC's, please note the day the TC's formed, not the day they reached Australia. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm doing it too LOL > > I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the > web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! > > Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! > > James > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > Barnett > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I > succeed I'll post it up. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > ----------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified > to > be virus free. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Blair Trewin" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick > bit > of > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also > only > form > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the > facts to > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed > during > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site > and > came > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and > April > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase > at > that > > > time, were: > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of > the > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it > can be > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates > they > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. > If > I'm > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > > moving west of 90E). > > > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > > significant difference between that distribution and the even > > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > > formation. > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:01:44 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Actually this has been a great learning experience! I have learnt how to calculate the age of the moon from a given date, and a ton about the calculations involved, you should see the size of the excel spread sheet! (in fact I'll post it for scrutiny later!) Ok, fist preliminary results of the TC data. Firstly, I did not analyze the data by moon Phase (moon illumination), as this is deceptive. Because the phase/illumination follows a sinusoidal curve, it will appear to be in the "full moon"/"New Moon" sections for more days, so of course you will see more cyclones then! Instead I used the moon age. The moon ranges from 0 days old (new moon) to 29.53 days old (new moon again). Below is a link to a plot of the number of cyclone reports in each of 5 moon age "bins" http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/nreports.gif e.g. Of the 21227 cyclone reports issued since Jan 1907, there were 3940 cyclone reports issued when the moon was 11.8 to 17 days old. Is this a statistically significant observation? For comparison here is some purely random data, "bined" in exactly the same fashion http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/rand.gif Although some variation is seen, there is no clear trend. Also the data may be slightly skewed considering reports prior to the 70's would have been made by first hand observations, as no satellite data was available! Maybe I'll try removing that data later, but as a preliminary, I think it can be concluded that there is no significant correlation between the age of the moon and the issuing of cyclone reports. Now I know this is not what Ken required, he wished to see relate when the cyclones first appeared, not the continuation . . . That will be next James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 3:33 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" James I'm thrilled you are taking the trouble to yest my predictions. Just look at my predictions for October and November for Australia on my website. There's plenty there to access and test out. Don't forget I ask for a 24 hour error either way. To those who are going to do a comparison matching moon phases to TC's, please note the day the TC's formed, not the day they reached Australia. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm doing it too LOL > > I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the > web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! > > Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! > > James > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > Barnett > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I > succeed I'll post it up. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > ----------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified > to > be virus free. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Blair Trewin" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick > bit > of > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also > only > form > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the > facts to > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed > during > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site > and > came > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and > April > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase > at > that > > > time, were: > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of > the > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it > can be > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates > they > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. > If > I'm > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > > moving west of 90E). > > > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > > significant difference between that distribution and the even > > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > > formation. > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:10:36 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Craig wrote > There has not been a significant rainfall event (that would quite possibly > end this current drought) on or about the 7-9th of any month across eastern > Australia since that forecast was made in early August 2002. I believe that > could suggest a major flaw in the forecast method/theory used. My records show that on the 6th and 7th there were showers in SE Australia, Tasmania , Adelaide and Melbourne. Also hail in Victoria(see post 7/8/02 from Liam), hail in Bathurst(post from Clyve on 8th), record cold temps in WA(Jacob's post for 9th), cb's everywhere on 11th(Leslie's post of 12th), hail in NE Vic,(Bussy's post), snow in Canberra, showers on the QLD coast(website BoM 9th) etc, so quite a bit of rain around. But it didn't make it as far east as I thought it would, however, so okay, I accept that I could have miscalculated. Is one or two mistakes acceptable? If the metservice gets one wrong do they take the satellites to the tip? I don't think so. Nor would they say their methodology was flawed. Let's not have one rule for me and one for the establishment. If you think I was wrong then I accept that. > If the dust storm was related to the full moon, why not make a statement > ahead of time? That would certainly have given your theory a lot of > credibility. I have always said that the full moon applies more heat to the ground. The dust storm was a function of heat. So are tornadoes and TCs. I've never said there's a dust storm every full moon. > I note though that the famed Melbourne dust storm of 2 Feb 1983 occurred > when the moon was a waning crescent (unless I am greatly mistaken) - a full > week later in the lunar cycle than Wednesday's storm. > Any comments? Sure. It happened about 6 days later than the full moon. If you read my previous post below you'll see that I said that the extra-heat time is full moon to last quarter. Your example falls nicely into that time frame. Thanks, a good example..got any more? > > Hell Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > Hi John and all > The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I > describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or > maximum > declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I > predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, > one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand > the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that > includes everyone on this list!! > The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon > can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The > reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the > atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we > are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. > Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does > coincidence become theory..? > regards > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Woodbridge" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates > to > > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting > > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water > West), > > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite > finely > > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > > commence the cycle. > > > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less > dense > > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow > by > > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the > > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell > Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > > > John. > > >snip > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' > into > > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia > because > > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade > wind > > circulation in the area. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #2 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:20:06 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ok, now I have done the same thing, but only including the date at which the cyclone first began . . . I have assumed that the date of the first report in the data is the date the cyclone first formed. Now we have 905 individual "Cyclones" Sorting these gives: http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/ncyclones.gif the equivalent random distribution for 905 samples gave this http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/rand905.gif Again, I see no clear relationship. Now, the question comes, is every "cyclone" reported in the database file really a cyclone??? That is next :) James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 3:33 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" James I'm thrilled you are taking the trouble to yest my predictions. Just look at my predictions for October and November for Australia on my website. There's plenty there to access and test out. Don't forget I ask for a 24 hour error either way. To those who are going to do a comparison matching moon phases to TC's, please note the day the TC's formed, not the day they reached Australia. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm doing it too LOL > > I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the > web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! > > Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! > > James > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > Barnett > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I > succeed I'll post it up. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > ----------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified > to > be virus free. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Blair Trewin" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick > bit > of > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also > only > form > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the > facts to > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed > during > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site > and > came > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and > April > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase > at > that > > > time, were: > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of > the > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it > can be > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates > they > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. > If > I'm > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > > moving west of 90E). > > > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > > significant difference between that distribution and the even > > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > > formation. > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.221.137.138] From: "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: wv images Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:20:27 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2002 07:20:27.0831 (UTC) FILETIME=[FE4B3C70:01C27BF6] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Laurier, These are CIMSS but they don't have any overlays that I'm aware of: http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/shemi/images/xxwvgms5e.GIF Cheers, Kevin from Wycheproof. _________________________________________________________________ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #2 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:29:20 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry one other thing . . . I have put the excel spreadsheet online, (but I am still working on it so it will change) http://www.trapdoor.com.au/cyclonesV2.xls.gz [4.5MB] I had gzip it as it is 21MB otherwise! You will need a decent computer to open/run it. Cheers James James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of John Woodbridge Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 3:43 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" I suppose for the purposes of this analysis, the question will really be defining when the TC actually formed. Normally, it is taken as when a Tropical Depression reaches Cat 1 strength and is formally named, but it may have been meandering around as a significant TD for quite some time (days/weeks) before that. Do you want to make a call on this Ken? John. -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:33 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" James I'm thrilled you are taking the trouble to yest my predictions. Just look at my predictions for October and November for Australia on my website. There's plenty there to access and test out. Don't forget I ask for a 24 hour error either way. To those who are going to do a comparison matching moon phases to TC's, please note the day the TC's formed, not the day they reached Australia. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm doing it too LOL > > I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the > web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! > > Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! > > James > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > Barnett > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I > succeed I'll post it up. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > ----------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified > to > be virus free. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Blair Trewin" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick > bit > of > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also > only > form > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the > facts to > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed > during > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site > and > came > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and > April > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase > at > that > > > time, were: > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of > the > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it > can be > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates > they > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. > If > I'm > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > > moving west of 90E). > > > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > > significant difference between that distribution and the even > > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > > formation. > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ XAntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus Internet Service From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #2 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:37:58 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com James, This actually gives a 404 page not found error... -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of James Holbeach Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 5:20 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #2 Ok, now I have done the same thing, but only including the date at which the cyclone first began . . . I have assumed that the date of the first report in the data is the date the cyclone first formed. Now we have 905 individual "Cyclones" Sorting these gives: http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/ncyclones.gif the equivalent random distribution for 905 samples gave this http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/rand905.gif Again, I see no clear relationship. Now, the question comes, is every "cyclone" reported in the database file really a cyclone??? That is next :) James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 3:33 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" James I'm thrilled you are taking the trouble to yest my predictions. Just look at my predictions for October and November for Australia on my website. There's plenty there to access and test out. Don't forget I ask for a 24 hour error either way. To those who are going to do a comparison matching moon phases to TC's, please note the day the TC's formed, not the day they reached Australia. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm doing it too LOL > > I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the > web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! > > Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! > > James > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > Barnett > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I > succeed I'll post it up. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > ----------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified > to > be virus free. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Blair Trewin" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick > bit > of > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also > only > form > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the > facts to > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed > during > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site > and > came > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and > April > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase > at > that > > > time, were: > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of > the > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it > can be > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates > they > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. > If > I'm > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > > moving west of 90E). > > > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > > significant difference between that distribution and the even > > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > > formation. > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:38:24 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hard to tell, John, and that's part of the problem. Operator bias is a big variable, which is why the question of proof is so arbitrary. Bearing in mind a possible heat factor between full moon and last q, I would say that first identification dates could be a guide. A visual test of a cyclone formation is what I generally use as my criterion, as showing up on isobaric maps. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 6:43 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I suppose for the purposes of this analysis, the question will really be > defining when the TC actually formed. Normally, it is taken as when a > Tropical Depression reaches Cat 1 strength and is formally named, but it may > have been meandering around as a significant TD for quite some time > (days/weeks) before that. > > Do you want to make a call on this Ken? > > John. > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:33 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > James > I'm thrilled you are taking the trouble to yest my predictions. Just look at > my predictions for October and November for Australia on my website. There's > plenty there to access and test out. Don't forget I ask for a 24 hour error > either way. > To those who are going to do a comparison matching moon phases to TC's, > please note the day the TC's formed, not the day they reached Australia. > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Holbeach" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:19 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > I'm doing it too LOL > > > > I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the > > web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! > > > > Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! > > > > James > > James Holbeach > > ---------------------------------------- > > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > > University of Melbourne, Australia > > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > > Barnett > > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I > > succeed I'll post it up. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ---- > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified > > to > > be virus free. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Blair Trewin" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick > > bit > > of > > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also > > only > > form > > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the > > facts to > > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed > > during > > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site > > and > > came > > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and > > April > > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase > > at > > that > > > > time, were: > > > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of > > the > > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it > > can be > > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates > > they > > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. > > If > > I'm > > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > > > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > > > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > > > > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > > > > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > > > > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > > > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > > > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > > > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > > > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > > > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > > > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > > > moving west of 90E). > > > > > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > > > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > > > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > > > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > > > significant difference between that distribution and the even > > > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > > > formation. > > > > > > Blair > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:47:12 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com James > Now I know this is not what Ken required, No, I'd say the time interval of full moon to last quarter is, in age, closer to 13-21 days, not 11-17. Even this is tricky, because the age-date of full moon can vary widely from 11 days to about 16 days old. I'm not trying to preset a null hypothesis, just pointing out the difficulties! Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:01 PM Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis > Actually this has been a great learning experience! I have learnt how to > calculate the age of the moon from a given date, and a ton about the > calculations involved, you should see the size of the excel spread > sheet! (in fact I'll post it for scrutiny later!) > > Ok, fist preliminary results of the TC data. > > Firstly, I did not analyze the data by moon Phase (moon illumination), > as this is deceptive. Because the phase/illumination follows a > sinusoidal curve, it will appear to be in the "full moon"/"New Moon" > sections for more days, so of course you will see more cyclones then! > > Instead I used the moon age. The moon ranges from 0 days old (new moon) > to 29.53 days old (new moon again). Below is a link to a plot of the > number of cyclone reports in each of 5 moon age "bins" > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/nreports.gif > > > e.g. Of the 21227 cyclone reports issued since Jan 1907, there were 3940 > cyclone reports issued when the moon was 11.8 to 17 days old. > > Is this a statistically significant observation? For comparison here is > some purely random data, "bined" in exactly the same fashion > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/rand.gif > > Although some variation is seen, there is no clear trend. Also the data > may be slightly skewed considering reports prior to the 70's would have > been made by first hand observations, as no satellite data was > available! Maybe I'll try removing that data later, but as a > preliminary, I think it can be concluded that there is no significant > correlation between the age of the moon and the issuing of cyclone > reports. > > Now I know this is not what Ken required, he wished to see relate when > the cyclones first appeared, not the continuation . . . > > That will be next > > > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 3:33 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > James > I'm thrilled you are taking the trouble to yest my predictions. Just > look at > my predictions for October and November for Australia on my website. > There's > plenty there to access and test out. Don't forget I ask for a 24 hour > error > either way. > To those who are going to do a comparison matching moon phases to TC's, > please note the day the TC's formed, not the day they reached Australia. > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Holbeach" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:19 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > I'm doing it too LOL > > > > I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the > > web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! > > > > Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! > > > > James > > James Holbeach > > ---------------------------------------- > > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > > University of Melbourne, Australia > > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > > Barnett > > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I > > succeed I'll post it up. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ---- > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is > certified > > to > > be virus free. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Blair Trewin" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one > quick > > bit > > of > > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also > > only > > form > > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for > the > > facts to > > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed > > during > > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site > > and > > came > > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 > and > > April > > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase > > at > > that > > > > time, were: > > > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of > > the > > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it > > can be > > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the > dates > > they > > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. > > If > > I'm > > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > > > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > > > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > > > > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > > > > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > > > > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > > > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > > > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > > > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > > > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > > > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > > > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > > > moving west of 90E). > > > > > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > > > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > > > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon > that > > > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > > > significant difference between that distribution and the even > > > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > > > formation. > > > > > > Blair > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Cyclones vs the Moon Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:47:28 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I have made a modest attempt at analysing this problem.
There are other people out there far more knowledgeable than me ,but here goes:
I carried out a chi square independence test using the null hypothesis that the moon does not have any significant effect on the formation of tropical cyclones.
I plotted the number of cyclones that occurred during each phase of the moon from the 1970-71 cyclone season onwards. This was the result:

New

83

1st

126

Full

90

Last

100

This was based on the different names of the cyclones, and using only the date they first appeared in the Bureau's data.
The data format was pretty hard to decipher which might mean that James's cyclone count of 905 is the more correct figure but even so, my estimate is still valid for the purpose of a test.
I theorised that if the moon had no influence, we should expect cyclones to occur (on average) evenly. That is to say, on average there should be 99.75 cyclones per phase.
The chi square test statistic came in at 5.089. The probability was 0.165405.
There is only a 16% probability that the difference between the observed and expected occurrences was due to the lunar phases.
If I have got it wrong, that's fine. I like to learn!
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:54:25 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Just looking at your preliminary graph of number of cyclone reports vs moon age, it strikes me that perhaps the higher number of hits occurred after 23.6 days, i.e. just after the full moon-last quarter time interval, and if your TC criteria was a TC well-formed, then perhaps it fits the theory. > Below is a link to a plot of the > number of cyclone reports in each of 5 moon age "bins" > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/nreports.gif > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #2 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:02:26 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Now, the question comes, is every "cyclone" reported in the database > file really a cyclone??? > > That is next :) Perhaps only pick those with names, and that last in excess of 3 or 4 days. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: QUESTION ? Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:45:14 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Just a guess I'd say solar radiation and the fact that the heat cannot escape from your car. Just my idea :-) I'm out...
----- Original Message -----
From: macdonald
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: aus-wx: QUESTION ?

Hi All,
I have some weather related questions for a Project i am working on with my team members. I have to complete it this weekend.... just need some good links.  I have a fair idea.
 
WHy does the inside of the car continue to heat up when the outside temperature outside remains constant?
 
Convection process and a diagram ( need a good link)
 
thankyou in advance,
It is very dry here in the Gold Coast hinterland. I seem to have problems with java, so i can't update my page. So far we've had 498mm for the year, which is very dry for here. I think we'll be lucky to 700mm this year. Hinze dam is 39.91%.
 
Cheers
Sam
Tallai/Guyra Weather
 
From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: wv images Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:51:47 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Been looking for one too! Thanks Kevin, much appreciated. Bussy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Phyland" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 5:20 PM Subject: aus-wx: wv images > > > Hi Laurier, > > These are CIMSS but they don't have any overlays that I'm aware of: > > http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/shemi/images/xxwvgms5e.GIF > > Cheers, > Kevin from Wycheproof. > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.220.169.124] From: "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: QUESTION ? Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:53:16 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2002 09:53:16.0394 (UTC) FILETIME=[572EECA0:01C27C0C] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi every1, Thought someone more expert mighta cleaned this one up already... but my spin on it is that a car sitting in the sun is a greenhouse. Solar radiation entering as short-wave radiation re-radiates as long-wave radiation which has less chance of passing through glass. So the air inside heats up (as a greenhouse does)...lotsa glass in cars. Anyway, Cheers, Kevin from Wycheproof. >From: "Bussy" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: QUESTION ? >Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:45:14 +1000 > >Just a guess I'd say solar radiation and the fact that the heat cannot >escape from your car. Just my idea :-) I'm out... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: macdonald > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:36 AM > Subject: aus-wx: QUESTION ? > > > Hi All, > I have some weather related questions for a Project i am working on with >my team members. I have to complete it this weekend.... just need some good >links. I have a fair idea. > > WHy does the inside of the car continue to heat up when the outside >temperature outside remains constant? > > Convection process and a diagram ( need a good link) > > thankyou in advance, > It is very dry here in the Gold Coast hinterland. I seem to have >problems with java, so i can't update my page. So far we've had 498mm for >the year, which is very dry for here. I think we'll be lucky to 700mm this >year. Hinze dam is 39.91%. > > Cheers > Sam > Tallai/Guyra Weather > http://www.geocities.com/ratman6900/index.html > _________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: QUESTION ? Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:36:46 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
lack of ventilation inside, plenty of ventilation outside
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: aus-wx: QUESTION ?

Just a guess I'd say solar radiation and the fact that the heat cannot escape from your car. Just my idea :-) I'm out...
----- Original Message -----
From: macdonald
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: aus-wx: QUESTION ?

Hi All,
I have some weather related questions for a Project i am working on with my team members. I have to complete it this weekend.... just need some good links.  I have a fair idea.
 
WHy does the inside of the car continue to heat up when the outside temperature outside remains constant?
 
Convection process and a diagram ( need a good link)
 
thankyou in advance,
It is very dry here in the Gold Coast hinterland. I seem to have problems with java, so i can't update my page. So far we've had 498mm for the year, which is very dry for here. I think we'll be lucky to 700mm this year. Hinze dam is 39.91%.
 
Cheers
Sam
Tallai/Guyra Weather
 
From: "Craig Arthur" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:18:46 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry to drag this out, but the Melbourne dust storm was in the last quarter - 8 days after the full moon. Your initial statement said 'the full moon'. There is a large difference between the two. Your initial statement is what I went by, only for you to come back and 'alter' your statement on the theory so that the event could be included. You would also do well not to claim rain days two days after your forecast time, one day leeway or not. Perhaps in future when posting your forecasts, try to be more specific. If that means you need to add your disclaimer of one day's leeway each time, I'm quite happy to see your forecasts. Regards, Craig -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 17:11 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Craig wrote > There has not been a significant rainfall event (that would quite possibly > end this current drought) on or about the 7-9th of any month across eastern > Australia since that forecast was made in early August 2002. I believe that > could suggest a major flaw in the forecast method/theory used. My records show that on the 6th and 7th there were showers in SE Australia, Tasmania , Adelaide and Melbourne. Also hail in Victoria(see post 7/8/02 from Liam), hail in Bathurst(post from Clyve on 8th), record cold temps in WA(Jacob's post for 9th), cb's everywhere on 11th(Leslie's post of 12th), hail in NE Vic,(Bussy's post), snow in Canberra, showers on the QLD coast(website BoM 9th) etc, so quite a bit of rain around. But it didn't make it as far east as I thought it would, however, so okay, I accept that I could have miscalculated. Is one or two mistakes acceptable? If the metservice gets one wrong do they take the satellites to the tip? I don't think so. Nor would they say their methodology was flawed. Let's not have one rule for me and one for the establishment. If you think I was wrong then I accept that. > If the dust storm was related to the full moon, why not make a statement > ahead of time? That would certainly have given your theory a lot of > credibility. I have always said that the full moon applies more heat to the ground. The dust storm was a function of heat. So are tornadoes and TCs. I've never said there's a dust storm every full moon. > I note though that the famed Melbourne dust storm of 2 Feb 1983 occurred > when the moon was a waning crescent (unless I am greatly mistaken) - a full > week later in the lunar cycle than Wednesday's storm. > Any comments? Sure. It happened about 6 days later than the full moon. If you read my previous post below you'll see that I said that the extra-heat time is full moon to last quarter. Your example falls nicely into that time frame. Thanks, a good example..got any more? > > Hell Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > Hi John and all > The book's been written already. In my Predicting Weather By The Moon, I > describe categorically how the El Nino is a function of the nodal or > maximum > declination cycle. It is no coincidence. Back in July on this forum I > predicted the present drought and I was somewhat laughed at. That's okay, > one expects it, especially from professional meteorologists who can't stand > the idea that an amateur might hold some of the answers. Not that that > includes everyone on this list!! > The dust storm? Full-moon-related, quite obviously. Only during full moon > can the sun generate enough heat on the ground to cause such an event. The > reason is that the moon is out of the sky during the day and taking the > atmosphere with it, leaving a depleted atmosphere above the horizon which > offers less resistance to the sun's heat. Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we > are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. > Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does > coincidence become theory..? > regards > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Woodbridge" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Hi Keith, Ken, David, > > > > Well yes, but what causes the depressions? It seems that El Nino relates > to > > a flow of warm water across to the East of the Pacific instead of sitting > > over the Western Pacific around Indonesia. This in turn is apparently > > related to a drop in the normal SE trades (which push surface water > West), > > but you would think that perhaps the drop in the SE trades is simply a > > natural consequence of the Low pressure area's moving East with the warm > > water... And maybe the whole thing is a bit of both, and is a quite > finely > > tuned feedback mechanism needing only a relatively small influence to > > commence the cycle. > > > > So, playing devils advocate then, is there a chance that drift of less > dense > > warm water across the Pacific is indeed initiated or influenced somehow > by > > the tidal pull of the moon as it interacts variably year to year with the > > summer/winter cycles, leading ultimately to the El Nino cycles? Hell > Ken, > > if the connection can be shown, there's a chance for a new book "The moon > as > > a motivator for El Nino". > > > > John. > > >snip > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Keith Barnett > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:04 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > This lends weight to (my) idea that all the moisture is being 'emptied' > into > > the tropical southwest Pacific and so can't get across to Australia > because > > the twin depressions either side of the equator have reversed the trade > wind > > circulation in the area. > > Keith Barnett > > Weather fanatic and classical musician > > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #2 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:42:40 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sorry my fault- spelling error, try it now :) James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of John Woodbridge Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 5:38 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #2 James, This actually gives a 404 page not found error... -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of James Holbeach Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 5:20 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #2 Ok, now I have done the same thing, but only including the date at which the cyclone first began . . . I have assumed that the date of the first report in the data is the date the cyclone first formed. Now we have 905 individual "Cyclones" Sorting these gives: http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/ncyclones.gif the equivalent random distribution for 905 samples gave this http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/rand905.gif Again, I see no clear relationship. Now, the question comes, is every "cyclone" reported in the database file really a cyclone??? That is next :) James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 3:33 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" James I'm thrilled you are taking the trouble to yest my predictions. Just look at my predictions for October and November for Australia on my website. There's plenty there to access and test out. Don't forget I ask for a 24 hour error either way. To those who are going to do a comparison matching moon phases to TC's, please note the day the TC's formed, not the day they reached Australia. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > I'm doing it too LOL > > I just need to find a file outlining moon phases- rather than the > web-site given as it is not easy to import into excel! > > Ken, I'm still waiting on your previous predictions! > > James > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > Barnett > Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 11:41 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > I'm going to give this a go, but there's a lot of data on there! If I > succeed I'll post it up. > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > ----------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified > to > be virus free. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Blair Trewin" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick > bit > of > > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also > only > form > > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the > facts to > > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed > during > > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site > and > came > > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and > April > > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase > at > that > > > time, were: > > > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of > the > > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it > can be > > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates > they > > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. > If > I'm > > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > If anyone feels like taking this study any further, a complete list > > of Australian region tropical cyclones can be found at: > > > > http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/how/ > > > > and a list of moon phases for all years between 1700 and 2015 at: > > > > http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html > > > > Probably best only to use post-1969 cyclone data (before the > > satellite era a lot of systems got missed, especially in their early > > stages). The data files only contain co-ordinates while the cyclones > > are in the Australian region (which extends well beyond Australia), > > but it is very rare for a cyclone to form outside the Australian > > region and move into it. (The reverse happens occasionally, with > > Coral Sea systems moving into PNG's region and Indian Ocean ones > > moving west of 90E). > > > > I don't have time to do this myself (at least not now), but it > > should be fairly straightforward to (for example) compile a > > frequency distribution of the number of days after the full moon that > > each cyclone forms, and see whether there is any statistically > > significant difference between that distribution and the even > > distribution you'd expect if the moon has no influence on TC > > formation. > > > > Blair > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 2002-10-03 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:15:08 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I'm not sure you actually read what I wrote, that graph shows nothing statistically significant. Look at the graph produced using random numbers (using the =rand() fn in excel), it produced a similar distribution. Also, that preliminary graph did not count the number of cyclones, but the number of reports. A Single cyclone event in the database, could have 5-20 reports associated with it. It was meant to give a general idea of what the moon phase was during the duration of a cyclonic event. In my opinion it shows no relationship. The second graph, outlining the moon age at the beginning of a cyclonic event, was spelt incorrectly on the server, so you can't have actually seen that yet! I've fixed that now, so you can look at it. http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/ncyclones.gif This again shows no relationship. I believe that further limiting the analysis to named cyclones only which last >3 days will reduce the available data to such low numbers that no analysis could possibly produce statistically believable result, which makes me wonder how you could justify your results? Nevertheless, I will do it (it is pretty easy to do) on Monday, when I get back to the office. Cheers James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Friday, 25 October 2002 5:54 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis Just looking at your preliminary graph of number of cyclone reports vs moon age, it strikes me that perhaps the higher number of hits occurred after 23.6 days, i.e. just after the full moon-last quarter time interval, and if your TC criteria was a TC well-formed, then perhaps it fits the theory. > Below is a link to a plot of the > number of cyclone reports in each of 5 moon age "bins" > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/nreports.gif > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:32:03 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 02:52 AM 25/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >I will keeping close track on Kens Predictions, why not start making notes >on how well he predicts, test his model out your own way, you dig up the >facts to proove he is incorrect then we will believe you. This is the way to go. I don't think I'll be able to keep track of Ken's predictions, but for people like yourself, you'll be doing everyone a service by doing so. One of 3 outcomes will happen: 1. Ken's proven right by an independent observer or three 2. Ken's proven wrong. 3. We can't come to any conclusion and more research will be needed to prove or deny his claims. I'm interested to see the outcome of this exercise. >These ideas may be far fetched to you, but what happens if he is correct? Exactly! Ken at least deserves a fair hearing and a scientific approach to study his claims. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "dann weatherhead" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:33:10 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At least there's some life in the ol' aus-wx discussion list. I am enjoying this debate. Keep it up :) dann PS--I love (and have always loved) your brief and inspired musings Clyve. They make me constantly re-examine my weather enriching the whole wonderful world of the atmosphere as i cast my eye over. Thanks for your constant and excellent contributions. dann ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Yole" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:18 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > Okay....enough of the flaming and stuff people, and lets get back to what > everyone on the list enjoys....watching weather...not argueing about it. > There's enough flame wars on Wx-Chase...you might wanna try there if you > want to start one. > > PaulY > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:17 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > Laurier > Sorry you think I'm pulling your leg. I'm not. Facts? I would have thought a > humungus dust storm was kind of enough for one day. Chuck in a drought, > successfully predicted to last until November, based only on repeating moon > orbits and you could begin to get someone's attention. The trouble is, > whatever facts I come up with are never enough for some people. They go..oh > yeah, that, mustve been coincidence. Just COULDN'T be evidence of something > that might require that we change our minds about something or look outside > of the square, just couldn't be. Must be El Nino, or La Nina, or La Nada or > La la dee dah. Yeah, that explains it. Don't want any new age pesky moon > stuff; that's for GIRL'S. > A coincidence is just a high degree of correlation that thus far hasn't been > adequately explained. Well, isn't high correlation solid science? > > I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area > Nah, I'm talking of the date they formed, not the date they reached > Australia. Who gives a hoot where they end up? One always takes a few days > after forming to get down here. That's what I mean - a skeptic will look at > a later date in a different frame of reference and say sorry mate, no deal. > which is why I'm not posting data here. I've done it already and got flamed. > It just wastes my time. > I think the suggestion by Tony that we all note the moon phase when a > cyclone or dust storm forms is a good one. And you could add to that a big > earthquake, an eruption, a tornado or a nice big hailstorm. > Don't get me wrong folks, I thoroughly appreciate the discussion of this > thread. I am as much a scientist, by training, as anyone on this list, but I > know enough to know that concepts like proof, stats, criteria, logic, fact > etc are all up for grabs when a new idea appears. Unfortunately the > scientific method is flawed because it is really best suited to repeating > what has already been tested, and it is always protective of established > parameters. Also, the same scientist must do all the experiments, otherwise > you cannot eliminate operator bias, which is clearly an impossibility, which > means there cannot be a truly fair scientific experiment, only another > expresion of opinion. > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Laurier Williams" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:49 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Ken > > > > Thanks for your swift response. > > > > I'm a bit surprised by some of your statements, from the standpoint of > logic > > rather than science. > > > > "What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > > assumed when a result follows an event." > > "There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be > > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a graph I > could > > be accused of presenting a certain bias." > > "Easy enough to look up yourself." > > "...the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once again, > > do it yourself." > > "I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own record-keeping > > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim." > > "Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been doing > > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to do > > the work..." > > "Disagreement is healthy as long as personalities don't get in the way of > > facts." > > > > Ken, I think you're pulling our legs, and doing it very successfully. I > > simply asked you for some facts to support your arguments. I was not being > > critical; just asking for facts. You provided none, but suggested that it > > was up to others to prove you wrong; however, you dismiss the use of data > > (facts) because they can "prove or disprove anything", and you dismiss the > > whole the concept of proof. It seems to me that, under these > circumstances, > > argument or discussion is futile. That's why I think you're pulling our > > legs. > > > > Getting into the spirit of the game, however, I have done one quick bit of > > "legwork". In your earlier post, you said "Tropical cyclones also only > form > > from full moon-last quarter", and in response to my request for the facts > to > > back that up you wrote "The 14 or so TC's last summer only formed during > > that lunar phase time". I did a quick check of Tom Metcalf's site and came > > up with 7 cyclones in the Australian area between November 2001 and April > > 2002. These, the date they reached TC strength, and the moon phase at that > > time, were: > > > > 03S, 21/11/01, 1st quarter > > Chris, 3/2/02, 3 > > Bonnie, 10/4/02, 4 > > Bernie, 3/1/02, 3 > > Upia, 25/3/02, 2 > > Claudia, 11/2/02, 4 > > Des, 5/3/02, 3 > > > > Taking "full moon-last quarter" to mean the third quarter, four of the > > cyclones developed during other phases of the moon. Of course, it can be > > argued that the genesis of these cyclones was earlier than the dates they > > reached TC status, but it still leads to a spread of lunar cycles. If I'm > > wrong, please point out where. > > > > I love the weather, and trying to understand it. But fundamental to > > understanding is a willingness to apply logical argument and to look for, > > and share, information. I feel Ken's response does neither. > > > > Laurier > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 October, 2002 6:27 PM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > Laurier, James, Jane and all > > > Let's not be afraid of having strong ideas. Disagreement is > > > healthy as long > > > as personalities don't get in the way of facts. What I said in > > > july was what > > > David Jones responded to, in which I said NSW would see drought > conditions > > > right till November, a point he, a professional meteorologist, cast some > > > doubt on when he replied "And, what is so special about the > > > moon's behavior > > > this year that leads you to believe that the August through > > > November period > > > should only get ~110mm of rain in Sydney, an amount that would place it > > > within the driest 10% of historical observations, and not far from the > > > driest such period on record.." Any way I read it that did not > > > sound like an > > > agreement with me that the drought would last till now. Let's not mince > > > words, the drought IS not far from the driest such period on > > > record. I hate > > > to harp on this but I was not incorrect, whereas David's response was, > in > > > hindsight, clearly misplaced. > > > > > > > (Jane)What date did the drought actually start? > > > A drought does not have an official starting date. > > > > > > > What predictors did you use to predict "it"? > > > Just the moon's position. > > > > > > > 2. Where is the proof that > > > > "it" was caused by, or even related to, the predictors you used. > > > What proof is there for anything, for that matter, because causality is > > > assumed when a result follows an event. > > > > > > > > > > Can you show me a statistical analysis, proving that when there is a > > > > full moon that ground temperatures are higher? I'm sure there is tons > of > > > > data to support or disprove such a hypothesis. . . . > > > There are tons of data but as any statistician will know, a graph can be > > > constructed to prove or disprove anything and were I to post a > > > graph I could > > > be accused of presenting a certain bias. It is up to each skeptic > > > to do his > > > own work if he is serious about proving or disproving a lunar role. > > > > > > > Also . . . . can you explain why a full moon matters in your > > > > explanation? Surely a New Moon would have the same effect if it was in > > > > the right position? > > > No, the New Moon is in the sky during the day and prevents solar > > > radiation. > > > > > > >Could you please, again, support your explanation > > > > with some sound scientific data? > > > I dispute those two words. "Sound" is in the eye of the beholder. > > > "Science" > > > is ..what? That proposed by scientists? Are these the same bods > > > who say CO2 > > > is rising up to form a greenhouse cover when anyone who is not a > scientist > > > knows that CO2 is heavier than air? Or the scientists of old - > Copernicus, > > > Galileo, Newton, Franklin, Kepler etc, all of whom were self-confessed > > > astrologers? In my view, science is ONLY empirical and it is what > > > I'm trying > > > to do. > > > > > > > Is it possible, that you are only looking for dust-storms more when > > > > there is a full moon, to justify your arguments? I would simply like > to > > > > see some scientific data to back them up. If you are so confident > about > > > > your theory- and I am not saying it is not possible (just unlikely), > > > > then surely you would not be adverse to examining such data, and > > > > allowing a rigorous examination of your "coincidences" . . . . > > > I'm not looking for anything. You sound like you're are looking > > > for an easy > > > way to get out of doing some hard long correlation work.. > > > > > > > Can you please explain the connection, not > > > > between the lunar phase and question of heat, but between the > > > lunar phase > > > > and this specific duststorm. > > > Heat applied to the ground is part of the cause of the duststorm. > > > > > > > What has been the lunar phase during the half-dozen or so major > > > duststorms > > > > in Australia over the past century? > > > Easy enough to look up yourself. I don't have access to Aussie records. > I > > > have to buy everything and I suggest you can do the same. The > > > professionals > > > have unlimited access to all the old files. Perhaps get one of > > > them onto it. > > > > > > > > > > Also, what evidence is there that the sun generates more heat on the > > > ground > > > > during a full moon than otherwise? A tidal effect on the > > > atmosphere sounds > > > > quite reasonable, but just how much more solar radiation does it allow > > > > through, and how do we know this? > > > About 20% more, I'd say. It would vary with location. It is easily > > > measurable and the work has been done, by me and Harry Alcock. Once > again, > > > do it yourself. Get an old exposure meter, put a sunglass lens over it > and > > > point it to the sky, tracking the sun during the day every day > > > over a month. > > > You will find that when in the daytime the moon is out of the sky, the > sun > > > shines brighter. The moon is only out of the sky during full moon and > last > > > quarter. > > > > > > > > > > Have you a simple table > > > > correlating tropical cyclone formation dates with moon phases, > > > say for the > > > > past decade or so? This would help convince me that TCs only form > during > > > the > > > > one lunar quarter. > > > Sure I have. I don't make this stuff up. The 14 or so TC's last > > > summer only > > > formed during that lunar phase time, something I did post to this forum > at > > > the end of summer. I suggest each skeptic starts his/her own > > > record-keeping > > > of lunar correlation if they seriously want to discount what I claim. > > > > > > > If all (or even > > > > most) major duststorms, and all (or even most) tropical cyclones can > be > > > > shown to have occurred/formed during particular moon phases, it should > > > > certainly kick off a concerted study to explain the coincidence. And > as > > > the > > > > dates of all these events -- duststorms, cyclones and moon phases -- > are > > > > precisely known, only a clerical job is needed to produce a table that > > > > proves the coincidences. > > > > I look forward to seeing it. > > > Nothing stopping you doing the legwork, Laurier. I've done it, been > doing > > > little else for the last 27 years. But it's easier to criticise than to > do > > > the work, which is what we see in meteorological circles. The > > > moon is still > > > ignored by forecasters, because of the heavy focus on barometric > pressure, > > > when weather is much more than simple pressure differential. A barometer > > > ignores changes in atmospheric height, because it is set to read at > > > sealevel. But the constant change in atmospheric height is what happens > in > > > the air tide, just as changes in sea height result in the sea > > > tide. Without > > > the barometer the meteorologists are stuffed - they have no science. The > > > trouble is, the change in atmospheric height is hard to detect, but it > can > > > be seen in cloud height as the moon changes altitude. > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:40:02 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:42 AM 25/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: >Not centrifugal force, because that would operate all around the >circumference, not just at one point. Unfortunately for those who want But it would be more extreme at the point furthest from the centre of mass than at the "sides" of the Earth, so there'd still be an uneven effect across the globe, at its maximum on the side opposite the Moon. >simple explanations, normal physics doesn't explain it. Only astrological >physics, explained initially by Sir Isaac Newton, hacks it, but not many >understand it nowadays. Newton's work was dressed up for the scientific >community by Sir George Darwin, Charles's dad, and being an influential >figure everyone turned to him. But he got it wrong. When planets are at >certain angles to a location on earth they exert a pull because they nullify >earth's gravity. It's kind of like a narrow, sometimes momentary, special >force "corridor". The moon gets itself into these angles and only when it >does do we get tides, earthquakes, eruptions, and ..da da..heavy rain. The >sun only evaporates water and applies heat to the ground. It cannot cause >rain and it cannot cause weather to change at night, as we all know it does. I'd like to see this in more detail. > > To me, it's > > reasonable to expect that the Moon has some effect on the atmosphere > > (through gravity), and therefore the weather.. >Thanks for your openmindness, Tony No probs. That's how we learn. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:44:55 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tony Whilst I appreciate the attention given to this exercise, I agree with you that no one can prove I'm correct or incorrect because the variables are too great. It's like trying to prove an unhappy childhood causes someone to rob a bank. We do not yet have a science that can adequately measure what the atmosphere does, just as we don't have any handle on the moon other than what astrology will tell you. This does not disprove moon theory - only shows up our inadequate science. Both airtide and moon have not been considered worthy of heavy research investment. The kind of analysis some are doing re phases/cyclones is just statistical playing around the edges, but not to say that that it may fruitless. But I won't hold my breath. I think all three outcomes you described below will be relevant. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:32 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > At 02:52 AM 25/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: > > >I will keeping close track on Kens Predictions, why not start making notes > >on how well he predicts, test his model out your own way, you dig up the > >facts to proove he is incorrect then we will believe you. > > This is the way to go. I don't think I'll be able to keep track of Ken's > predictions, but for people like yourself, you'll be doing everyone a > service by doing so. One of 3 outcomes will happen: > > 1. Ken's proven right by an independent observer or three > 2. Ken's proven wrong. > 3. We can't come to any conclusion and more research will be needed to > prove or deny his claims. > > I'm interested to see the outcome of this exercise. > > >These ideas may be far fetched to you, but what happens if he is correct? > > Exactly! Ken at least deserves a fair hearing and a scientific approach to > study his claims. > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.221.127.254] From: "Dave Ellem" To: Subject: aus-wx: Possible rain event in QLD Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:18:05 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2002 22:18:08.0929 (UTC) FILETIME=[66029110:01C27C74] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Jimmy's email's not working, so he asked me to pass this on. Hi all, It looks as though the SE Qld region is heading for a long awaited rain event. AVN models are picking this up for early next week. We'll see what comes out of it. I know the predictions are for drought until March next year but quite frankly, I do believe there will be at least a reprieve of some significant rainfalls before then. Jimmy Dave Ellem, Wollongbar, Northern Rivers, NE NSW http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:49:39 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Possible rain event in QLD Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jimmy, Definately...I was looking at it last night and with such a strong upper trough pushing into a region of fresh E-SE winds it does look like the potential for a much needed rain event. Especially if a lot of storms develop to the west tomorrow...we'll see. AC Dave Ellem wrote: > > Jimmy's email's not working, so he asked me to pass this on. > > Hi all, > > It looks as though the SE Qld region is heading for a long awaited rain > event. AVN models are picking this up for early next week. We'll see what > comes out of it. > > I know the predictions are for drought until March next year but quite > frankly, I do believe there will be at least a reprieve of some significant > rainfalls before then. > > Jimmy > > Dave Ellem, > Wollongbar, > Northern Rivers, > NE NSW > http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:58:22 +1000 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Quote:" I agree with you that no one can prove I'm correct or incorrect because the variables are too great." Of course we can . . . you predict it is going to rain . . . it rains . . . you are correct. . . it does not rain, you are incorrect. Do this 365 times over a year, and a pattern will emerge. Equally, you say a full moon = more heat to the ground? An analysis of ground temperatures by moon phase should show some relationship! Why are you discounting the results of an analysis of your theories before those results have even been achieved? James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:19:08 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in November, as I posted on 24/7/02. My prediction for Sydney: Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, and 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. My prediction for Brisbane: Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly dry again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Ellem" To: Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:18 AM Subject: aus-wx: Possible rain event in QLD > Jimmy's email's not working, so he asked me to pass this on. > > > > Hi all, > > It looks as though the SE Qld region is heading for a long awaited rain > event. AVN models are picking this up for early next week. We'll see what > comes out of it. > > I know the predictions are for drought until March next year but quite > frankly, I do believe there will be at least a reprieve of some significant > rainfalls before then. > > Jimmy > > > > Dave Ellem, > Wollongbar, > Northern Rivers, > NE NSW > http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:07:36 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 12:19 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: >Hi all >I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in >November, as I posted on 24/7/02. >My prediction for Sydney: >Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, and >24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. >My prediction for Brisbane: >Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest >falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly dry >again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm >between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 >Ken >www.predictweather.com OK, what about Melbourne? I'm tipping the drought to break around March 2003. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Glen O'Riley" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:35:28 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I agree with you Tony for all Aus looking at the sea surface temperature anomalies. ------------------------------------ Glen O'Riley Computer Technician 3727 Bucketts Way Krambach, 2429 Australia Mobile: 0439 878 633 Email: goriley at tsn.cc Web: www.mypage.tsn.cc/oriley ABN: 42 674 332 428 ------------------------------------ Storm Chaser Rail Fan Electronics & Radio NSW Rural Fire Service Firefighter NSW State Emergency Services Member ------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Tony Langdon (VK3JED) Sent: Saturday, 26 October 2002 10:08 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming At 12:19 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: >Hi all >I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in >November, as I posted on 24/7/02. My prediction for Sydney: >Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, and >24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. >My prediction for Brisbane: >Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest >falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly dry >again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm >between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 >Ken >www.predictweather.com OK, what about Melbourne? I'm tipping the drought to break around March 2003. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:47:11 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: aus-wx: Mini Tornado Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com A mini-tornado passed over the New Windsor area of Auckland yesterday morning as an active cold front moved over the area. As it was only a mini tornado only localised damage occured. JohnGaul NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Andrew Miskelly" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Mini Tornado Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:10:25 +1000 Organization: The Weather Co. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > A mini-tornado passed over the New Windsor area of Auckland... Now come on John, that's just asking for it here! ;) Exciting news all the same though. Even better when the damage is minimal. Andrew. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:34:21 +1000 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Ken... I am interssted in your November forecast for Sydney. More than 40 mm in November occurs in about 80% of years so that's a fairly safe bet. Given your stated "1 day out"is still accurate philosphy that means that as long as rains between 1st and 4th, 6th to 11th, 15th to 22nd and 23rd to 29th you can claim being correct. That leaves jusat 6 days! if it rains on 5th, 12th,13th, 14th or 30th we will let you know... Top forecast - really sticking your neck out here. You must be pulling our legs !!! Or maybe New Zealanders are just more gullible. Cheers, Don White Ken Ring wrote: > > Hi all > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > My prediction for Sydney: > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, and > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > My prediction for Brisbane: > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly dry > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Ellem" > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:18 AM > Subject: aus-wx: Possible rain event in QLD > > > Jimmy's email's not working, so he asked me to pass this on. > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > It looks as though the SE Qld region is heading for a long awaited rain > > event. AVN models are picking this up for early next week. We'll see what > > comes out of it. > > > > I know the predictions are for drought until March next year but quite > > frankly, I do believe there will be at least a reprieve of some > significant > > rainfalls before then. > > > > Jimmy > > > > > > > > Dave Ellem, > > Wollongbar, > > Northern Rivers, > > NE NSW > > http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Wright" To: Subject: aus-wx: Cyclone formmation Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:13:40 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
THE AREA OF CONVECTION PREVIOUSLY LOCATED NEAR 9.1S0
178.8W4 HAS BEEN RELOCATED NEAR 10.6S7 178.9E5, APPROXIMATELY 340 NM
NORTH OF THE FIJI ISLANDS. ANIMATED ENHANCED INFRARED AND
MULTISPECTRAL SATELLITE IMAGERY INDICATES CYCLIC, BUT ORGANIZED,
DEEP CONVECTION WITH INCREASED POLEWARD OUTFLOW. THE 200 MB ANALYSIS
DEPICTS WEAK VERTICAL WIND SHEAR AND GOOD DIFFLUENCE ALOFT OVER THE
REGION. MAXIMUM SUSTAINED SURFACE WINDS ARE ESTIMATED AT 20 TO 25
KNOTS. MINIMUM SEA LEVEL PRESSURE IS ESTIMATED TO BE 1003 MB. BASED
ON THE INCREASED OUTFLOW AND ORGANIZATION OF THE SYSTEM, WE WILL BE
ISSUING A TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION ALERT (TCFA) FOR THIS SYSTEM
WITHIN THE NEXT FEW HOURS. BASED ON ANTICIPATED ISSUANCE OF A TCFA
ON THIS SYSTEM, THE POTENTIAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SIGNIFICANT
TROPICAL CYCLONE WITHIN THE NEXT 24 HOURS IS UPGRADED TO GOOD.
X-Originating-IP: [210.50.30.21] From: "Rune Peitersen" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:23:40 +1000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2002 04:23:41.0109 (UTC) FILETIME=[769BA650:01C27CA7] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Unless he is saying it will rain almost continuously on those consecutive days. To only end up with 40mm after all that it's going to be a miserable and very drizzly November. Can you clarify your forecasts a little more Ken, do you mean there will be at least a drop of rain in Sydney from the 7-10th etc, or that all of those days will experience a significant fall? Either way I do hope some 'weather' returns to Sydney, every time I've seen the word DRY in a forecast I have an epileptic type fit. >From: Don White >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming >Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:34:21 +1000 > >Hi Ken... >I am interssted in your November forecast for Sydney. >More than 40 mm in November occurs in about 80% of years so that's a >fairly safe bet. >Given your stated "1 day out"is still accurate philosphy that means that >as long as rains between 1st and 4th, 6th to 11th, 15th to 22nd and 23rd >to 29th you can claim being correct. That leaves jusat 6 days! >if it rains on 5th, 12th,13th, 14th or 30th we will let you know... >Top forecast - really sticking your neck out here. You must be pulling >our legs !!! Or maybe New Zealanders are just more gullible. >Cheers, >Don White > >Ken Ring wrote: > > > > Hi all > > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in > > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > > My prediction for Sydney: > > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, >and > > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > > My prediction for Brisbane: > > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest > > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly >dry > > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm > > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dave Ellem" > > To: > > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:18 AM > > Subject: aus-wx: Possible rain event in QLD > > > > > Jimmy's email's not working, so he asked me to pass this on. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > It looks as though the SE Qld region is heading for a long awaited >rain > > > event. AVN models are picking this up for early next week. We'll see >what > > > comes out of it. > > > > > > I know the predictions are for drought until March next year but quite > > > frankly, I do believe there will be at least a reprieve of some > > significant > > > rainfalls before then. > > > > > > Jimmy > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave Ellem, > > > Wollongbar, > > > Northern Rivers, > > > NE NSW > > > http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/ > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month.  Try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Mini Tornado Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:10:05 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com a 'mini tornado' lolololol, i get one of those everytime i pull the plug out of the bathtub. regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Gaul" To: Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:17 AM Subject: aus-wx: Mini Tornado > A mini-tornado passed over the New Windsor area of Auckland yesterday > morning as an active cold front moved over the area. As it was only a mini > tornado only localised damage occured. > > JohnGaul > NZTS > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:44:25 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > (Rune) Unless he is saying it will rain almost continuously on those > consecutive days. To only end up with 40mm after all that it's going to be > a miserable and very drizzly November. I said probably more than 40mm > Can you clarify your forecasts a > little more Ken, do you mean there will be at least a drop of rain in Sydney > from the 7-10th etc, or that all of those days will experience a significant > fall? Either way I do hope some 'weather' returns to Sydney, every time > I've seen the word DRY in a forecast I have an epileptic type fit. Whatever I say will be scoffed at, ridiculed and dismantled word for word to be proved wrong, so no, I have ideas but won't stick my neck out on this forum any more re amounts. > >From: Don White > >Hi Ken... > >I am interssted in your November forecast for Sydney. > >More than 40 mm in November occurs in about 80% of years so that's a > >fairly safe bet. Then I'm going to be 80% correct there, which is okay isn't it? > >Given your stated "1 day out"is still accurate philosphy that means that > >as long as rains between 1st and 4th, 6th to 11th, 15th to 22nd and 23rd > >to 29th you can claim being correct. That leaves just 6 days! > >if it rains on 5th, 12th,13th, 14th or 30th we will let you know... > >Top forecast - really sticking your neck out here. You must be pulling > >our legs !!! Or maybe New Zealanders are just more gullible. The point is, there's rain coming. Even other members on this list reckon so. The metservice puts out statements like today's.."Cloud surges along the NSW coast behind a cold front causing light showers.." I don't see why I should be flamed for being as vague as them. And they're professionals! I'm not claiming to be God or any better than anyone else. All I'm saying is that using the moon it is possible to come up with longrange forecasts that are useful. > (Tony)OK, what about Melbourne? > I'm tipping the drought to break around March 2003. March? I have to disagree. I don't think much rain in Melbourne that month. All I'll try to be more specific for those who say my 24 hour error is unacceptable. For Sydney, I believe the potential for rain will be between these times.. afternoon of 1st-evening of 2nd Afternoon of 7th-early morning of 9th Early morning 15th-early morning 17th, early morning 19th - morning of 21st afternoon of 23rd-afternoon of 25th, morning of 27th-afternoon of 28th One can forecast for any other town in Australia and for any time in the future using the same method. All I need is the longitude of the location. Ken Ring www.predictweather.com > > > Hi all > > > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in > > > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > > > My prediction for Sydney: > > > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, > >and > > > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > > > My prediction for Brisbane: > > > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest > > > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly > >dry > > > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm > > > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Dave Ellem" > > > To: > > > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:18 AM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Possible rain event in QLD > > > > > > > Jimmy's email's not working, so he asked me to pass this on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > It looks as though the SE Qld region is heading for a long awaited > >rain > > > > event. AVN models are picking this up for early next week. We'll see > >what > > > > comes out of it. > > > > > > > > I know the predictions are for drought until March next year but quite > > > > frankly, I do believe there will be at least a reprieve of some > > > significant > > > > rainfalls before then. > > > > > > > > Jimmy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave Ellem, > > > > Wollongbar, > > > > Northern Rivers, > > > > NE NSW > > > > http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/ > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > > message. > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Craig Arthur" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:55:14 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, The Weather Company *is not* metservice. The Weather Company (which runs Weatherzone) has a large number of media and internet clients. The quote you took is used to describe the satellite image - it is used by television presenters during the nightly news, or on various websites. Our scripts are written to be informative to the general public, entertaining and enlightening. They are not designed nor intended to be an exact forecast for rainfall amount or location. The Weather Company also provides four day forecasts for over 180 locations around Australia, including max and min temps, precis, rainfall probability and amount. These are available on several Australian agricultural websites. These would serve the purpose you are trying to liken the scripts to. Please don't mistake a satellite script for a forecast for an individual location. Regards, Craig Arthur -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Saturday, 26 October 2002 16:44 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > (Rune) Unless he is saying it will rain almost continuously on those > consecutive days. To only end up with 40mm after all that it's going to be > a miserable and very drizzly November. I said probably more than 40mm > Can you clarify your forecasts a > little more Ken, do you mean there will be at least a drop of rain in Sydney > from the 7-10th etc, or that all of those days will experience a significant > fall? Either way I do hope some 'weather' returns to Sydney, every time > I've seen the word DRY in a forecast I have an epileptic type fit. Whatever I say will be scoffed at, ridiculed and dismantled word for word to be proved wrong, so no, I have ideas but won't stick my neck out on this forum any more re amounts. > >From: Don White > >Hi Ken... > >I am interssted in your November forecast for Sydney. > >More than 40 mm in November occurs in about 80% of years so that's a > >fairly safe bet. Then I'm going to be 80% correct there, which is okay isn't it? > >Given your stated "1 day out"is still accurate philosphy that means that > >as long as rains between 1st and 4th, 6th to 11th, 15th to 22nd and 23rd > >to 29th you can claim being correct. That leaves just 6 days! > >if it rains on 5th, 12th,13th, 14th or 30th we will let you know... > >Top forecast - really sticking your neck out here. You must be pulling > >our legs !!! Or maybe New Zealanders are just more gullible. The point is, there's rain coming. Even other members on this list reckon so. The metservice puts out statements like today's.."Cloud surges along the NSW coast behind a cold front causing light showers.." I don't see why I should be flamed for being as vague as them. And they're professionals! I'm not claiming to be God or any better than anyone else. All I'm saying is that using the moon it is possible to come up with longrange forecasts that are useful. > (Tony)OK, what about Melbourne? > I'm tipping the drought to break around March 2003. March? I have to disagree. I don't think much rain in Melbourne that month. All I'll try to be more specific for those who say my 24 hour error is unacceptable. For Sydney, I believe the potential for rain will be between these times.. afternoon of 1st-evening of 2nd Afternoon of 7th-early morning of 9th Early morning 15th-early morning 17th, early morning 19th - morning of 21st afternoon of 23rd-afternoon of 25th, morning of 27th-afternoon of 28th One can forecast for any other town in Australia and for any time in the future using the same method. All I need is the longitude of the location. Ken Ring www.predictweather.com > > > Hi all > > > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in > > > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > > > My prediction for Sydney: > > > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, > >and > > > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > > > My prediction for Brisbane: > > > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest > > > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly > >dry > > > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm > > > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Dave Ellem" > > > To: > > > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:18 AM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Possible rain event in QLD > > > > > > > Jimmy's email's not working, so he asked me to pass this on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > It looks as though the SE Qld region is heading for a long awaited > >rain > > > > event. AVN models are picking this up for early next week. We'll see > >what > > > > comes out of it. > > > > > > > > I know the predictions are for drought until March next year but quite > > > > frankly, I do believe there will be at least a reprieve of some > > > significant > > > > rainfalls before then. > > > > > > > > Jimmy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave Ellem, > > > > Wollongbar, > > > > Northern Rivers, > > > > NE NSW > > > > http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/ > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > > message. > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:48:28 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Ken, I'm not going to enter this debate on the Moon vs. weather. What I would like to know is why you keep referring to the term astrology rather then astronomy? I always thought astronomy was the study of the planets/stars & what makes them "tick" & astrology was the "belief" that the stars/moon etc. could predict one's future. Now I can see/accept that you are "predicting a future" as such, but that's based on the moons actual gravitational force on the Earth's atmosphere & not simply "where the Moon is now according to the charts" stuff. I personally don't believe in astrology myself; how a far off star (the next closest star to Earth, apart from the Sun, being 4.3 light years or 9,454,492,800,000 km away) will be able to affect my life & the choices I make, but I do accept that the Sun & Moon (& to some degree the other planets in *our* solar system) can have an affect on a persons being (seeing that a human's body is mostly water) & how we may feel & behave. We can see this affect/influence even more so on the Earth's "body of waters" (oceans) that we call tides & also in the atmosphere to the same effect. So I tend to agree that the Moon can/does have a part to play in the weather. How much so I'll leave that to "you's with more smarts then me" to sort it out. All I'm asking is why the term astrology over astronomy? :) Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer Ps. Oh yeh, by the way... You know there are 13 Zodiac signs & not 12 like most people think? :P lol ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 5:14 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Tony > Whilst I appreciate the attention given to this exercise, I agree with you > that no one can prove I'm correct or incorrect because the variables are too > great. It's like trying to prove an unhappy childhood causes someone to rob > a bank. We do not yet have a science that can adequately measure what the > atmosphere does, just as we don't have any handle on the moon other than > what astrology will tell you. This does not disprove moon theory - only > shows up our inadequate science. Both airtide and moon have not been > considered worthy of heavy research investment. The kind of analysis some > are doing re phases/cyclones is just statistical playing around the edges, > but not to say that that it may fruitless. But I won't hold my breath. I > think all three outcomes you described below will be relevant. > Ken +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: wv images Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 18:26:18 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Many thanks, Kevin. I'm now archiving them (and the irenh images) each 3 hours for both east and west Autralia. I'm still hunting for wv images with an archive. Cheers Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Phyland > Sent: Friday, 25 October, 2002 5:20 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: wv images > > > > > Hi Laurier, > > These are CIMSS but they don't have any overlays that I'm aware of: > > http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/shemi/images/xxwvgms5e.GIF > > Cheers, > Kevin from Wycheproof. > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 04:26:55 EDT Subject: aus-wx: re. min max temp help To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all
I need some help for my daughter Katie who is in year 4 .
She has told me she needs the max and min temps for Melbourne from monday 21/10/02 to friday 25/10/02 inclusive , and a discription of the weather for each of these days. Im sorry to ask for this but I just found out its this weeks home work due monday. Does anyone have this info or know where I can get it tonight ?

cheers Dennis Cottle
From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Mini Tornado Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:59:52 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Oh, isn't that cute... a "mini" tornado doing it's own localised damage. So how big does a "mini" tornado have to be before it can run & play with the other tornadoes? :P Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Gaul" To: Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:17 AM Subject: aus-wx: Mini Tornado > A mini-tornado passed over the New Windsor area of Auckland yesterday > morning as an active cold front moved over the area. As it was only a mini > tornado only localised damage occured. > > JohnGaul > NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:22:18 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Craig I stand corrected Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Arthur" To: Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 7:55 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: rain coming > Ken, > > The Weather Company *is not* metservice. The Weather Company (which runs > Weatherzone) has a large number of media and internet clients. The quote > you took is used to describe the satellite image - it is used by > television presenters during the nightly news, or on various websites. Our > scripts are written to be informative to the general public, entertaining > and enlightening. They are not designed nor intended to be an exact > forecast for rainfall amount or location. > The Weather Company also provides four day forecasts for over 180 locations > around Australia, including max and min temps, precis, rainfall probability > and amount. These are available on several Australian agricultural > websites. These would serve the purpose you are trying to liken the scripts > to. > > Please don't mistake a satellite script for a forecast for an individual > location. > > Regards, > Craig Arthur > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Saturday, 26 October 2002 16:44 > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > > > > > > (Rune) Unless he is saying it will rain almost continuously on those > > consecutive days. To only end up with 40mm after all that it's going to > be > > a miserable and very drizzly November. > I said probably more than 40mm > > > Can you clarify your forecasts a > > little more Ken, do you mean there will be at least a drop of rain in > Sydney > > from the 7-10th etc, or that all of those days will experience a > significant > > fall? Either way I do hope some 'weather' returns to Sydney, every time > > I've seen the word DRY in a forecast I have an epileptic type fit. > Whatever I say will be scoffed at, ridiculed and dismantled word for word > to > be proved wrong, so no, I have ideas but won't stick my neck out on this > forum any more re amounts. > > > >From: Don White > > >Hi Ken... > > >I am interssted in your November forecast for Sydney. > > >More than 40 mm in November occurs in about 80% of years so that's a > > >fairly safe bet. > Then I'm going to be 80% correct there, which is okay isn't it? > > > >Given your stated "1 day out"is still accurate philosphy that means that > > >as long as rains between 1st and 4th, 6th to 11th, 15th to 22nd and 23rd > > >to 29th you can claim being correct. That leaves just 6 days! > > >if it rains on 5th, 12th,13th, 14th or 30th we will let you know... > > >Top forecast - really sticking your neck out here. You must be pulling > > >our legs !!! Or maybe New Zealanders are just more gullible. > The point is, there's rain coming. Even other members on this list reckon > so. The metservice puts out statements like today's.."Cloud surges along > the > NSW coast behind a cold front causing light showers.." I don't see why I > should be flamed for being as vague as them. And they're professionals! I'm > not claiming to be God or any better than anyone else. All I'm saying is > that using the moon it is possible to come up with longrange forecasts that > are useful. > > > (Tony)OK, what about Melbourne? > > I'm tipping the drought to break around March 2003. > March? I have to disagree. I don't think much rain in Melbourne that month. > > All > I'll try to be more specific for those who say my 24 hour error is > unacceptable. > For Sydney, I believe the potential for rain will be between these times.. > afternoon of 1st-evening of 2nd > Afternoon of 7th-early morning of 9th > Early morning 15th-early morning 17th, early morning 19th - morning of 21st > afternoon of 23rd-afternoon of 25th, morning of 27th-afternoon of 28th > One can forecast for any other town in Australia and for any time in the > future using the same method. All I need is the longitude of the location. > Ken Ring > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > Hi all > > > > I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), > in > > > > November, as I posted on 24/7/02. > > > > My prediction for Sydney: > > > > Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, > 16th-21st, > > >and > > > > 24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. > > > > My prediction for Brisbane: > > > > Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, > heaviest > > > > falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, > mostly > > >dry > > > > again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around > 150mm > > > > between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 > > > > Ken > > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Dave Ellem" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:18 AM > > > > Subject: aus-wx: Possible rain event in QLD > > > > > > > > > Jimmy's email's not working, so he asked me to pass this on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > It looks as though the SE Qld region is heading for a long awaited > > >rain > > > > > event. AVN models are picking this up for early next week. We'll > see > > >what > > > > > comes out of it. > > > > > > > > > > I know the predictions are for drought until March next year but > quite > > > > > frankly, I do believe there will be at least a reprieve of some > > > > significant > > > > > rainfalls before then. > > > > > > > > > > Jimmy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave Ellem, > > > > > Wollongbar, > > > > > Northern Rivers, > > > > > NE NSW > > > > > http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/ > > > > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > >your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > >your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Unlimited Internet access for only $21.95/month. Try MSN! > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:49:34 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 07:44 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > (Tony)OK, what about Melbourne? > > I'm tipping the drought to break around March 2003. >March? I have to disagree. I don't think much rain in Melbourne that month. OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to see how we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a "closest to the pin" competition. :) Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will be interesting to see what happens. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:51:38 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 04:48 PM 26/10/2002 +0930, you wrote: >that we call tides & also in the atmosphere to the same effect. So I tend to >agree that the Moon can/does have a part to play in the weather. How much so >I'll leave that to "you's with more smarts then me" to sort it out. Agreed, and this is why Ken's theory deserves some consideration and scientific study. >Ps. Oh yeh, by the way... You know there are 13 Zodiac signs & not 12 like >most people think? :P lol Sign of the Spider? I read something about that once, and I fell just outside the spider's range... 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: re. min max temp help Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:53:59 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Dennis
 
This seems to be a perennial parental problem and highlights a real hole in the weather information available on the web. While extremely detailed data is available for the past 24 hours or so is available in abundance, as is climatic data, it's nearly impossible to find out data for the past week or month. I plan to rectify this on Australian Weather News by having a section, similar to the Auto Weather Stations clickable map, where you can get all the max and min temp and rainfall data for the past few months, but it'll be a while before I complete the programming to make it happen.
 
In the meantime, the information is available for the past couple of weeks at http://www.bom.gov.au/silo/ if you go digging.
 
To save you the trouble, here are the max and mins and a quick summary of the weather from the synoptic reports. These are for the Bureau's Regional Office in central Melbourne.
 
Monday 21: max 18.0 min 10.9  0 rainfall 24 hrs to 9am.  Fine, cloudy, light winds
Tuesday 22: 20.4  9.7  0 rainfall 24 hrs to 9am.  Mostly overcast, light winds
Wed 23: 15.6  10.5  6.4mm rainfall 24 hrs to 9am. Rain or showers most of the day with some hail and a thunderstorm during the afternoon.
Thurs 24: 18.6  8.0  7.4mm rainfall 24 hrs to 9am. Mostly overcast with rain late evening, light winds
Fri 25: 17.0  11.0  2.6mm rainfall 24 hrs to 9am. Rain until around 6am then overcast, light winds
 
Let me know whether we get a gold star or an elephant stamp.
 

Laurier Williams
Australian Weather News
http://www.australianweathernews.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of dencot1 at aol.com
Sent: Saturday, 26 October, 2002 6:27 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: re. min max temp help

Hi all
I need some help for my daughter Katie who is in year 4 .
She has told me she needs the max and min temps for Melbourne from monday 21/10/02 to friday 25/10/02 inclusive , and a discription of the weather for each of these days. Im sorry to ask for this but I just found out its this weeks home work due monday. Does anyone have this info or know where I can get it tonight ?

cheers Dennis Cottle
X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:04:53 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: RE: aus-wx: Mini Tornado Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 12:10 26/10/02 +1000, you wrote: >> A mini-tornado passed over the New Windsor area of Auckland... > >Now come on John, that's just asking for it here! ;) > >Exciting news all the same though. Even better when the damage is >minimal. > >Andrew. > Hi Andrew I worded it that way because I know that you, myself and a lot of others hate that term which the media seem to use with regards to any events of tornados happening here in New Zealand and Australia. With Ken Ring from this side of the ditch getting members of this Aussie list "stirred up" about his moon predictions of the drought, I thought I would throw in an alternative and mention something about the tornado that passed over Auckland yesterday, saying it was mini, just for some reaction on this list!!! JohnGaul NZTS JohnGaul NZ Thunderstorm soc +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:11:39 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Paul Thanks for not entering the debate(grin). To reply to you, you may be unaware that astronomy was once called astrology. The old astronomers like Copernicus through to Kepler called themselves astrologers. So did Galileo, Benjamin Franklin, Laplace and arguably the greatest scientist in history; Sir Isaac Newton. Even Flamstead, the first Astronomer Royale, who founded the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, was an astrologer, and a horoscope wheel in his honour still adorns the building. The astrology you speak of, where stars are used to predict one's future, is only a branch, and the focus these days on that aspect has been used to discredit what was once pure astronomical science, which had the moon playing a starring role. Unfortunately these days, astronomers don't have much interest in the moon. I am not predicting the future, as you say. I am merely pointing out the potential for rain occurring at certain times. This is based on probability and proximity. To look at a train timetable and say the train left the station at 4pm and is very likely to reach Bankstown at 4.30 or whatever, is predicting the future too. Given sound evidence one can easily project forward without getting into airy-fairy belief systems. In fact the whole point of scientific research is to be able to predict. Astrology does still imply astronomy but I would call what I am doing more astronomy. I depart from astro-meteorologists where they place equal emphasis on all planets when predicting weather - I only use the moon, but I respect their right to another perspective. Some useful computer programs that one can use to plot the movements of the moon are astronomical, like Starry Sky and Red Shift. But I also use the astrological Solar Maps and Janus2 because they are brilliant tools. The horoscopes in the newspapers are rubbish and not true astrology, which actually covers many aspects of living. If you go to a nonwestern country you will find that astrology governs gardening, architecture, medicine and most aspects of business. It is a fact of history that without thousands of years of astrology we would not have today's science. Ken Ring www.predictweather.com ---- Original Message ----- From: "Stargazer" To: Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 8:18 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Hi Ken, > > I'm not going to enter this debate on the Moon vs. weather. What I would > like to know is why you keep referring to the term astrology rather then > astronomy? > > I always thought astronomy was the study of the planets/stars & what makes > them "tick" & astrology was the "belief" that the stars/moon etc. could > predict one's future. > > Now I can see/accept that you are "predicting a future" as such, but that's > based on the moons actual gravitational force on the Earth's atmosphere & > not simply "where the Moon is now according to the charts" stuff. > > I personally don't believe in astrology myself; how a far off star (the next > closest star to Earth, apart from the Sun, being 4.3 light years or > 9,454,492,800,000 km away) will be able to affect my life & the choices I > make, but I do accept that the Sun & Moon (& to some degree the other > planets in *our* solar system) can have an affect on a persons being (seeing > that a human's body is mostly water) & how we may feel & behave. We can see > this affect/influence even more so on the Earth's "body of waters" (oceans) > that we call tides & also in the atmosphere to the same effect. So I tend to > agree that the Moon can/does have a part to play in the weather. How much so > I'll leave that to "you's with more smarts then me" to sort it out. > > All I'm asking is why the term astrology over astronomy? :) > > Regs. Paul. > (Stargazer) > http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > Ps. Oh yeh, by the way... You know there are 13 Zodiac signs & not 12 like > most people think? :P lol > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 5:14 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Tony > > Whilst I appreciate the attention given to this exercise, I agree with you > > that no one can prove I'm correct or incorrect because the variables are > too > > great. It's like trying to prove an unhappy childhood causes someone to > rob > > a bank. We do not yet have a science that can adequately measure what the > > atmosphere does, just as we don't have any handle on the moon other than > > what astrology will tell you. This does not disprove moon theory - only > > shows up our inadequate science. Both airtide and moon have not been > > considered worthy of heavy research investment. The kind of analysis some > > are doing re phases/cyclones is just statistical playing around the edges, > > but not to say that that it may fruitless. But I won't hold my breath. I > > think all three outcomes you described below will be relevant. > > Ken > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:28:51 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Of course we can . . . you predict it is going to rain . . . it rains . > . . you are correct. . . it does not rain, you are incorrect. No, James, a place like Sydney is a big area. If I say rain and it doesn't in the place where someone is, they'll say I was wrong, when the rain may very well be falling in some other suburb of the city. > Do this 365 times over a year, and a pattern will emerge. I do and it does. > Equally, you say a full moon = more heat to the ground? An analysis of > ground temperatures by moon phase should show some relationship! Indeed. Noteworthy too is that a force 5 hurricane is just now reaching Mexico - between full moon and last quarter. Obviously another coincidence. > Why are you discounting the results of an analysis of your theories > before those results have even been achieved? Not discounting, just not getting any hopes up. Let's just say that a certain bias has been displayed on this forum which make me doubt that these theories are ever going to get much of a sympathetic hearing. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:40:15 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to see how > we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a "closest to > the pin" competition. :) > Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will be > interesting to see what happens. Fair enough, Tony. You name a month, anywhere, anytime, and I'll give you the goods from my perspective. We can compare it with the same by anyone else, if they have the courage to put it on the table alongside mine. But we would need to set ground rules at the outset. The rules would have to be what a "dry" day versus a "wet" one meant, because would a day with a bit of rain, say overnight whilst mostly dry in the daytime be called a wet day? Also, which part of a city would we be talking about? I get some data from the airport and some from old newspapers columns. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Mini Tornado Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:17:08 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > At 12:10 26/10/02 +1000, John wrote: > >> A mini-tornado passed over the New Windsor area of Auckland... Thanks, John, a fine example of moon theory. Whenever a tornado is reported in the newspaper, and a time is mentioned, it will be observed that the moon has still to rise or has set. This situation applies, even if the tornado is at night, the early morning, midday or afternoon. A tornado at night usually occurs during the new moon, which is a day moon. If the tornado is during the early morning hours and up to about midday, the moon will be more than likely in the first quarter. But most tornados occur while the moon is full and into the last quarter, for this is the period that the sun applies the most heat to the ground, which creates the perfect conditions for tornado activity. The Auckland mini-tornado was timed at early afternoon, fitting the theory nicely. Those doing moon/TC analyses might like to also look at full moon-last q/daytime tornado correlations too. Oh dear, all these coincidences.. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 21:49:07 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 11:40 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to see how > > we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a "closest >to > > the pin" competition. :) > > Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will be > > interesting to see what happens. >Fair enough, Tony. You name a month, anywhere, anytime, and I'll give you >the goods from my perspective. We can compare it with the same by anyone >else, if they have the courage to put it on the table alongside mine. But we >would need to set ground rules at the outset. The rules would have to be >what a "dry" day versus a "wet" one meant, because would a day with a bit of >rain, say overnight whilst mostly dry in the daytime be called a wet day? >Also, which part of a city would we be talking about? I get some data from >the airport and some from old newspapers columns. OK, well, Melbourne (CBD) has an annual average rainfall of around 660mm. This rainfall is also fairly evenly spread throughout the year, though in summer, it tends to be dominated by a small number of heavy rain days, while in winter, it comes in dribs and drabs (showers, drizzle, etc). From memory, the airport is a bit drier than the city (I don't recall the exact figures). Doesn't the Bureau consider a "rain day" one with more than 0.2mm rainfall? Sounds good enough to me. I'm just looking at when the drought might break... 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: re. min max temp help Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:17:58 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
It's nice to see the schools still get the parents to do homework  :)  lol 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 7:23 PM
Subject: RE: aus-wx: re. min max temp help

Hi Dennis
 
This seems to be a perennial parental problem and highlights a real hole in the weather information available on the web. While extremely detailed data is available for the past 24 hours or so is available in abundance, as is climatic data, it's nearly impossible to find out data for the past week or month. I plan to rectify this on Australian Weather News by having a section, similar to the Auto Weather Stations clickable map, where you can get all the max and min temp and rainfall data for the past few months, but it'll be a while before I complete the programming to make it happen.
 
In the meantime, the information is available for the past couple of weeks at http://www.bom.gov.au/silo/ if you go digging.
 
To save you the trouble, here are the max and mins and a quick summary of the weather from the synoptic reports. These are for the Bureau's Regional Office in central Melbourne.
 
Monday 21: max 18.0 min 10.9  0 rainfall 24 hrs to 9am.  Fine, cloudy, light winds
Tuesday 22: 20.4  9.7  0 rainfall 24 hrs to 9am.  Mostly overcast, light winds
Wed 23: 15.6  10.5  6.4mm rainfall 24 hrs to 9am. Rain or showers most of the day with some hail and a thunderstorm during the afternoon.
Thurs 24: 18.6  8.0  7.4mm rainfall 24 hrs to 9am. Mostly overcast with rain late evening, light winds
Fri 25: 17.0  11.0  2.6mm rainfall 24 hrs to 9am. Rain until around 6am then overcast, light winds
 
Let me know whether we get a gold star or an elephant stamp.
 

Laurier Williams
Australian Weather News
http://www.australianweathernews.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of dencot1 at aol.com
Sent: Saturday, 26 October, 2002 6:27 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: re. min max temp help

Hi all
I need some help for my daughter Katie who is in year 4 .
She has told me she needs the max and min temps for Melbourne from monday 21/10/02 to friday 25/10/02 inclusive , and a discription of the weather for each of these days. Im sorry to ask for this but I just found out its this weeks home work due monday. Does anyone have this info or know where I can get it tonight ?

cheers Dennis Cottle
From: "Glen O'Riley" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Phils No Subject Email. Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:43:55 +1000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Was that particular email containing a virus? I didn't get to see the name or extension. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:46:53 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Anthony and Ken for the comments. Hopefully we'll send some rains down. Jimmy Deguara At 12:19 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: >Hi all >I believe the drought is due to be broken (or broken into at least), in >November, as I posted on 24/7/02. >My prediction for Sydney: >Sydney is likely to see rain on Nov. 2nd/3rd, then 7th-10th, 16th-21st, and >24th-28th. I would expect over 40mm to fall in November. >My prediction for Brisbane: >Brisbane will see rain Oct. 30th off and on till November 20th, heaviest >falls around Oct. 30th, Nov 4th and Nov. 11th. After Nov. 20th, mostly dry >again till Dec. 18th. I would expect Brisbane to get about around 150mm >between 30/10/02 and 20/11/02 >Ken >www.predictweather.com > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Dave Ellem" >To: >Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:18 AM >Subject: aus-wx: Possible rain event in QLD > > > > Jimmy's email's not working, so he asked me to pass this on. > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > It looks as though the SE Qld region is heading for a long awaited rain > > event. AVN models are picking this up for early next week. We'll see what > > comes out of it. > > > > I know the predictions are for drought until March next year but quite > > frankly, I do believe there will be at least a reprieve of some >significant > > rainfalls before then. > > > > Jimmy > > > > > > > > Dave Ellem, > > Wollongbar, > > Northern Rivers, > > NE NSW > > http://www.lexicon.net/stormboy2002/ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:44:16 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Melbourne potential for rain in November 14th pm-17th am 23rd am - 25th am 27th pm - 28th pm otherwise mostly dry Ken Ring www.predictweather.com Does anyone have a rundown of monthly average rainfall figures for each month for Melbourne? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:49 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming > At 11:40 PM 26/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > > > > OK, name your month for rain in Melbourne. I'll be interested to see how > > > we go. Maybe all the Melbournites should join in and we have a "closest > >to > > > the pin" competition. :) > > > Seriously, I would like your forecast Ken, this far out, it will be > > > interesting to see what happens. > >Fair enough, Tony. You name a month, anywhere, anytime, and I'll give you > >the goods from my perspective. We can compare it with the same by anyone > >else, if they have the courage to put it on the table alongside mine. But we > >would need to set ground rules at the outset. The rules would have to be > >what a "dry" day versus a "wet" one meant, because would a day with a bit of > >rain, say overnight whilst mostly dry in the daytime be called a wet day? > >Also, which part of a city would we be talking about? I get some data from > >the airport and some from old newspapers columns. > > OK, well, Melbourne (CBD) has an annual average rainfall of around > 660mm. This rainfall is also fairly evenly spread throughout the year, > though in summer, it tends to be dominated by a small number of heavy rain > days, while in winter, it comes in dribs and drabs (showers, drizzle, > etc). From memory, the airport is a bit drier than the city (I don't > recall the exact figures). > > Doesn't the Bureau consider a "rain day" one with more than 0.2mm > rainfall? Sounds good enough to me. > > I'm just looking at when the drought might break... > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: Drought breaker Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:18:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I'll jump in and agree with Tony. Just a heart felt thing though and nothing to back it up with. Just told a friend the other day that I reckoned around March/April. Dunno why.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Originating-IP: [203.29.156.5] From: "T Middleton" Bcc: Subject: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 21:58:02 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2002 21:58:02.0640 (UTC) FILETIME=[C16B3900:01C27D3A] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi all, There was storms in SEQ last night (Sat.26th),Ben Quinn was out chasing and managed to capture this AWESOME CG in the Caboolture/Kilcoy area. Great Stuff Ben. http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/cg_big.jpg Anthony Cornelius may also have captured something from these storms also.... cheers, TM Anvil Industries - http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils _________________________________________________________________ Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 07:01:10 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Phils No Subject Email. X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com If you mean this Phil (Hong Kong), the last I sent to the list was an answer to Tony Middleton on 24th October with the same subject as Tony's posting. I am also pretty religious about never sending without a subject. So any e-mail purporting to come from me with no subject is almost certainly sent by a virus from some other location. I can't ever recall seeing the other Phil (Adelaide) posting without a subject either. Meanwhile, having been inactive for a few days, I have 201 e-mails to either wade through or delete. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Glen O'Riley" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:43:55 +1000 Subject: aus-wx: Phils No Subject Email. > Was that particular email containing a virus? I didn't get to see the > name or > extension. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 07:32:04 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: re. min max temp help X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com As a teacher, when I set this kind of work, it is always set BEFORE the period of time in question begins so that the kids have an exercise of looking up a very small amount of information daily. However, now my own (Grade 7) son frustrates the life out of me by starting work on a lengthy project the night before it is due and then expecting Dad to do all the work. (He doesn't attend the school I teach at). Dennis, you are not alone. BTW, it was just such a homework assignment - "Cut out the weather map from The Sun each morning for one week" when I was in Grade 4 that really got me started on this weather kick that I haven't managed to shake off yet, nearly fifty years later. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: dencot1 at aol.com To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 04:26:55 EDT Subject: aus-wx: re. min max temp help > Hi all > I need some help for my daughter Katie who is in year 4 . > She has told me she needs the max and min temps for Melbourne from > monday > 21/10/02 to friday 25/10/02 inclusive , and a discription of the > weather for > each of these days. Im sorry to ask for this but I just found out its > this > weeks home work due monday. Does anyone have this info or know where I > can > get it tonight ? > > cheers Dennis Cottle > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Drought breaker Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:09:56 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
i reckon around late dec. to early feb.......same reason.
 
richard
naracoorte
----- Original Message -----
From: Bussy
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 8:48 AM
Subject: aus-wx: Drought breaker

I'll jump in and agree with Tony. Just a heart felt thing though and nothing to back it up with. Just told a friend the other day that I reckoned around March/April. Dunno why.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Brisbane rain - how good was Ken... Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:42:19 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, Interesting to note that Ken Ring's prediction for Brisbane in October (on his website) was basically dry, much more so than Sep., with showers around the 16th and again 26th..28th. As it happens that is/was just about 100% spot on. Looking forward to November's predicted events with interest! John. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:37:17 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: rain coming Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:44 AM 27/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: >Melbourne potential for rain in November >14th pm-17th am >23rd am - 25th am >27th pm - 28th pm >otherwise mostly dry I've saved your message, but couldn't get onto the BoM for some accurate rainfall averages. However, I do know that Melbourne's rainfall is very evenly distributed all year round with an average of a little over 50mm each month. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:39:45 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Drought breaker Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:18 AM 27/10/2002 +1100, you wrote: >I'll jump in and agree with Tony. Just a heart felt thing though and >nothing to back it up with. Just told a friend the other day that I >reckoned around March/April. Dunno why. Probably experience thrown in with the "bushman's gut feeling"? :) I remember the 82-83 drought breaking in March, and was born after a drought which broke at the end of April. El Nino events (which are a factor in droughts in Australia) tend to dissipate around March. However, let's see what Ken comes up with. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:42:47 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: RE: aus-wx: Brisbane rain - how good was Ken... Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 11:42 AM 27/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Hi all, > >Interesting to note that Ken Ring's prediction for Brisbane in October (on >his website) was basically dry, much more so than Sep., with showers around >the 16th and again 26th..28th. As it happens that is/was just about 100% >spot on. Interesting point. I'm looking forward to seeing how Ken's predictions compare with the actual conditions we get. Ken's predictions for November in Melbourne are precisely what one would expect under the current weather patterns, so it may have to wait a while, before we can draw any conclusions from Melbourne obs. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:54:50 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: aus-wx: NZ Tornado Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com A tornado touched down SE of Christchurch early this afternoon around the Lincoln area. It didn't look mini to me Details on it later JohnGaul NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Barbara" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:45:57 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions are below. If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large drop in surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a corresponding dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. Where is that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that particular moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and known that by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in the atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical development of this theory...law? Leslie R. Lemon Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 21:05:59 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com More excellent examples today of low atmospheric tide as caused by the moon: An afternoon tornado in Christchurch in the full-last q interval A mighty hailstorm in Christchurch right at IC time of moon(dead low airtide) A downpour in Auckland right at IC time. To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric pressure as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have missed the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from the Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. It is the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour of an enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With atmospheric pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of the sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the cold of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from atmospheric pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking about. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barbara" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions are > below. > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large drop in > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a corresponding > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. Where is > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that particular > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and known that > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in the > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical development of > this theory...law? > > > Leslie R. Lemon > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: s355334 at student.uq.edu.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:26:35 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Leslie Muir Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Just a small thing to clear up , You say, >Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. It is the VOLUME of air that changes Its been a while since i have done gas chemistry and gas physics, but i thought volume and pressure are related. Doing as you say, we should forget atmospheric pressure entirely, but aren't they related Also I'm wondering just how much of a difference this volume change is, especially the height difference. As just how much "closer" is the cold of space. And just how much of a difference it makes Les lcm at maths.uq.edu.au s355334 at student.uq.edu.au At 06:05 PM 27/10/2002, you wrote: >More excellent examples today of low atmospheric tide as caused by the moon: >An afternoon tornado in Christchurch in the full-last q interval >A mighty hailstorm in Christchurch right at IC time of moon(dead low >airtide) >A downpour in Auckland right at IC time. >To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric pressure >as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have missed >the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from the >Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily >barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). >Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. It is >the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour of an >enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With atmospheric >pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of the >sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the cold >of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from atmospheric >pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking about. >Ken >www.predictweather.com > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Barbara" >To: >Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions are > > below. > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large drop >in > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a corresponding > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. Where is > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that >particular > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and known >that > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in the > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical development of > > this theory...law? > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:33:50 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:05 PM 27/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: >Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. It is >the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour of an >enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With atmospheric >pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of the >sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the cold >of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from atmospheric >pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking about. >Ken Well, the idea that pressure doesn't change much with the tidal height isn't a problem to me, as we have to remember what is causing the ait to "collect" in the bulges is (lunar) gravity, which is acting upwards when the moon is directly overhead. While I can't cite any laws of physics or chemistry, your assertion does make sense to me. The gas is merely flowing to state of lowest potential energy on a non uniform gravitational field. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:46:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com (quote directly from the > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). Can you give the quote (in full context, not excerpted) and the page reference, because I can't ever remember seeing it and can't find this "statement" that you 'quote' anywhere. Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- > To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric pressure > as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have missed > the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from the > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. It is > the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour of an > enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With atmospheric > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of the > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the cold > of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from atmospheric > pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking about. > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Barbara" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions are > > below. > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large drop > in > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a corresponding > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. Where is > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > particular > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and known > that > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in the > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical development of > > this theory...law? > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- - > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:55:07 +1100 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Worth a read: From http://www.astro.oma.be/ICET/bim/text/WG6SLR.htm With enhancement the global distributed SLR station tracking network and centimeter or better precision of ranging measurement, the tidal variations in the geopotential and coordinates of stations have been recovered by SLR technique more accurately. These tidal variations contain all of the solid Earth, oceanic and atmospheric tide contributions and provide a unique method to directly to estimate Love number independently from traditionally ones. By adopting the recent ocean tide model and some small corrections of atmospheric tides, SLR data can be used to estimated the second degree Love numbers for the semi-diurnal (M2,S2), diurnal (K1,O1), monthly (Mm, Mf) and 18.6 year waves. The geocenter tidal variations can also be recovered by parameterized estimation from SLR data analyzing. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:02:07 +1100 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Also, from http://www.auf.asn.au/groundschool/umodule3.html Stuff you don't need to know • There is a semi-diurnal atmospheric tide, similar to the oceanic tide, which is most apparent in the lower latitudes. The tide peaks at 1000 and 2200 hours local solar time, with the minima at 0400 and 1600. At Cairns, 17°S latitude, the daily minima and maxima are 2 hPa either side of the mean pressure e.g. 0400 hrs - 1014 hPa; 1000 hrs - 1018 hPa; 1600 hrs - 1014 hPa; 2200 hrs - 1018 hPa. The runway elevation at Cairns is 10 feet amsl, so that if you left a parked aircraft at 1600 with the altimeter reading 10 feet, six hours later it would be reading 110 feet below mean sea level. When making their regular pressure reading reports, weather observation stations adjust the reported QFF according to a 'time of day' table. • There is also a semi-diurnal gravity variation at the Earth's solid surface, also peaking at 1000 and 2200. A movement of 50 cm from the low to high earth tide has been ascertained in central Australia. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:07:59 +1100 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Now this is real interesting. Have a look at this Ken. http://www.kilty.com/pressure.htm +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:18:12 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com This is off the top of the head, but there is a standard pressure adjustment made to remove diurnal tide effect, not a lunar tide effect. If you look at a barograph trace in most parts of the world from the equator to around 40N/S you'll see that it has peaks at around 10am and 10pm local, and corresponding troughs around 4am/pm. In stable pressure situations, the difference between peak and trough is usually around 2hPa. I can't remember the cause (though it is solar rather than lunar related), but its removal is desirable to allow a clearer view of pressure variations to be shown. The resulting pressure variation maps are particularly useful when trying to work out where a developing low is moving -- it tends to move towards the direction of greatest pressure falls. Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill > Sent: Sunday, 27 October, 2002 7:47 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > (quote directly from the > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > Can you give the quote (in full context, not excerpted) and the page > reference, because I can't ever remember seeing it and can't find this > "statement" that you 'quote' anywhere. > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric > pressure > > as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have > missed > > the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from > the > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. > It is > > the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour > of an > > enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With > atmospheric > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > of the > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > cold > > of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from > atmospheric > > pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking > about. > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Barbara" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions > are > > > below. > > > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large > drop > > in > > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a > corresponding > > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. > Where is > > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > > particular > > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and > known > > that > > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in > the > > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical > development of > > > this theory...law? > > > > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > -- > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:20:54 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Australian Aviation Pilots Manual Section 1:4 under chapter headed 'Tide Of The Atmosphere' Full quote: "In the low latitudes a semidiurnal pressure variation is quite noticeable. Atmospheric pressure peaks at about 1000 hours and 2200 hours local solar time with minima at 1600 and 0400. The semidiurnal pressure variation at Cairns is about 2 degrees either side of the mean i.e. the pressure might be 1015mb at 0400, 1019mb at 1000, 1015mb at 1600 and 1019mb at 2200. Meteorologists adjust the daily barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect. The atmospheric tide is associated with lunar and solar gravitation, solar heating and resonance. The lunar factor is 2.5 times that of solar. The tide is not apparent in latitudes greater than 50-60deg. The atmospheric tide is an internal gravity wave with a 12 hour frequency. refer 6.2. The semidiurnal pressure variation is similar to the semidiurnal gravity variations at the EARTH'S solid surface, the solid earth being subject also to tides: the SOLID TIDE. A point on the earth's surface moves up and down by as much as 50cm with maximum gravity occurring at 1000 and 2200 hours." Jane, if the moon moves the water and the land, think how much easier it would be able to move the air! Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:46 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > (quote directly from the > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > Can you give the quote (in full context, not excerpted) and the page > reference, because I can't ever remember seeing it and can't find this > "statement" that you 'quote' anywhere. > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric > pressure > > as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have > missed > > the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from > the > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. > It is > > the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour > of an > > enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With > atmospheric > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > of the > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > cold > > of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from > atmospheric > > pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking > about. > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Barbara" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions > are > > > below. > > > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large > drop > > in > > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a > corresponding > > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. > Where is > > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > > particular > > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and > known > > that > > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in > the > > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical > development of > > > this theory...law? > > > > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > -- > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Mossman" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:03:31 +0930 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com So I take it, you missed that chapter Jane ;) Interesting stuff Ken! Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:50 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual > Section 1:4 under chapter headed 'Tide Of The Atmosphere' > Full quote: > "In the low latitudes a semidiurnal pressure variation is quite noticeable. > Atmospheric pressure peaks at about 1000 hours and 2200 hours local solar > time with minima at 1600 and 0400. The semidiurnal pressure variation at > Cairns is about 2 degrees either side of the mean i.e. the pressure might be > 1015mb at 0400, 1019mb at 1000, 1015mb at 1600 and 1019mb at 2200. > Meteorologists adjust the daily barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide > effect. The atmospheric tide is associated with lunar and solar gravitation, > solar heating and resonance. The lunar factor is 2.5 times that of solar. > The tide is not apparent in latitudes greater than 50-60deg. The atmospheric > tide is an internal gravity wave with a 12 hour frequency. refer 6.2. The > semidiurnal pressure variation is similar to the semidiurnal gravity > variations at the EARTH'S solid surface, the solid earth being subject also > to tides: the SOLID TIDE. A point on the earth's surface moves up and down > by as much as 50cm with maximum gravity occurring at 1000 and 2200 hours." > > Jane, if the moon moves the water and the land, think how much easier it > would be able to move the air! > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jane ONeill" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:46 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > (quote directly from the > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > > > > Can you give the quote (in full context, not excerpted) and the page > > reference, because I can't ever remember seeing it and can't find this > > "statement" that you 'quote' anywhere. > > > > Jane > > > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric > > pressure > > > as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have > > missed > > > the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from > > the > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. > > It is > > > the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour > > of an > > > enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With > > atmospheric > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > > of the > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > > cold > > > of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from > > atmospheric > > > pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking > > about. > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Barbara" > > > To: > > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions > > are > > > > below. > > > > > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large > > drop > > > in > > > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a > > corresponding > > > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. > > Where is > > > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > > > particular > > > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and > > known > > > that > > > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in > > the > > > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical > > development of > > > > this theory...law? > > > > > > > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > > -- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:40:49 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The diurnal tide is lunar to solar by 2.5:1. Whatever the sun does gravitationally upon air, sea or land, the moon does two and a half times as much. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Laurier Williams" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 10:18 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" > This is off the top of the head, but there is a standard pressure adjustment > made to remove diurnal tide effect, not a lunar tide effect. If you look at > a barograph trace in most parts of the world from the equator to around > 40N/S you'll see that it has peaks at around 10am and 10pm local, and > corresponding troughs around 4am/pm. In stable pressure situations, the > difference between peak and trough is usually around 2hPa. I can't remember > the cause (though it is solar rather than lunar related), but its removal is > desirable to allow a clearer view of pressure variations to be shown. The > resulting pressure variation maps are particularly useful when trying to > work out where a developing low is moving -- it tends to move towards the > direction of greatest pressure falls. > > Laurier > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jane ONeill > > Sent: Sunday, 27 October, 2002 7:47 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > (quote directly from the > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > > > > Can you give the quote (in full context, not excerpted) and the page > > reference, because I can't ever remember seeing it and can't find this > > "statement" that you 'quote' anywhere. > > > > Jane > > > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric > > pressure > > > as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have > > missed > > > the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from > > the > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. > > It is > > > the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour > > of an > > > enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With > > atmospheric > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > > of the > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > > cold > > > of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from > > atmospheric > > > pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking > > about. > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Barbara" > > > To: > > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions > > are > > > > below. > > > > > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large > > drop > > > in > > > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a > > corresponding > > > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. > > Where is > > > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > > > particular > > > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and > > known > > > that > > > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in > > the > > > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical > > development of > > > > this theory...law? > > > > > > > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > > -- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:43:24 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. It is > the VOLUME of air that changes > I thought volume and pressure are related. Doing as you say, we should forget > atmospheric pressure entirely, but aren't they related Yes. Pressure and volume and temperature are all dependent on each other. Sometimes the only guide to the volume changing is a drop in temperature. The high pressures of an anticyclone have been explained by stating that cooling air from the tropic becomes heavier when descending over the temperate zones thus giving the higher pressures. But what of low pressures? If descending cold air causes pressures to be high, then the opposite situation should apply with rising warm air giving the low pressures. Meteorological literature is strangely silent on this subject and never mentions the anomaly betyween the stated cause of the high pressures and the not explained low pressures; nor has there been an explanation as to why the air pressure changes in any case, for the atmosphere is there and its thickness should remain constant and with the same barometric pressures day in and day out. This we know is not so. It can be said of meteorology as with other areas of science having problems, that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. In this instance the barometric pressure readings are considered infallible. Yes, the barometer may give atmospheric pressures, but not atmospheric height. These are not the same; pressures can remain constant day and night, but the atmosphere can alter in height twice a day as does a sea tide. This does not happen in unison, because a sea tide is subject to lag, drag and land masses whereas an atmospheric tide is not. These atmospheric tides can vary in height by several miles and, unlike sea tides, cannot be observed - although there are many signs that these tides do exist, and many sayings which, unwittingly, recognise their existence. > Also I'm wondering just how much of a difference this volume change is, > especially the height difference. As just how much "closer" is the cold of > space. And just how much of a difference it makes About 20-25%, varying with phase and increasing when the moon is in perigee. If one considers the useful atmosphere to be 5 miles thick, then the atmospheric tide may alter as much as one and a quarter miles, or if the accepted total depth of the atmosphere at about 60 miles is used, then the tidal difference between a low and a high atmospheric tide could be of the magnitude of 15 miles. It must be said that these figures are maximum and relate to the upper levels of the atmosphere where the air is very thin. Hurricane Kenna, formed between the full moon-last quarter, is now approaching Mexico. > > Les > lcm at maths.uq.edu.au > s355334 at student.uq.edu.au > > At 06:05 PM 27/10/2002, you wrote: > >More excellent examples today of low atmospheric tide as caused by the moon: > >An afternoon tornado in Christchurch in the full-last q interval > >A mighty hailstorm in Christchurch right at IC time of moon(dead low > >airtide) > >A downpour in Auckland right at IC time. > >To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric pressure > >as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have missed > >the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from the > >Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > >barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > >Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. It is > >the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour of an > >enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With atmospheric > >pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of the > >sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the cold > >of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from atmospheric > >pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking about. > >Ken > >www.predictweather.com > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Barbara" > >To: > >Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions are > > > below. > > > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large drop > >in > > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a corresponding > > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. Where is > > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > >particular > > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and known > >that > > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in the > > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical development of > > > this theory...law? > > > > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:58:24 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Absolutely Tony, thanks for pointing that out. The reason that atmospheric tides have not been discovered despite being extensive, was because the natural law of gravitational attraction was not applied to the atmosphere, whereby the moon and sun individually, or together (depending on the phase of the moon)attracted the atmosphere towards either or both of them and, the important point is, they support some of the weight of the atmosphere by gravitational attraction which in turn does not show up on the barometer. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:33 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > At 09:05 PM 27/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > >Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. It is > >the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour of an > >enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With atmospheric > >pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of the > >sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the cold > >of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from atmospheric > >pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking about. > >Ken > > Well, the idea that pressure doesn't change much with the tidal height > isn't a problem to me, as we have to remember what is causing the air to > "collect" in the bulges is (lunar) gravity, which is acting upwards when > the moon is directly overhead. While I can't cite any laws of physics or > chemistry, your assertion does make sense to me. The gas is merely flowing > to state of lowest potential energy on a non uniform gravitational field. > > 73 de Tony, VK3JED > http://vkradio.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:08:30 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 18.6 year waves? Wow! That's the exact Nodal Cycle of the moon. Very interesting.. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Creswick" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:55 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Worth a read: > >From http://www.astro.oma.be/ICET/bim/text/WG6SLR.htm > With enhancement the global distributed SLR station tracking network and > centimeter or better precision of ranging > measurement, the tidal variations in the geopotential and coordinates of > stations have been recovered by SLR technique more > accurately. These tidal variations contain all of the solid Earth, > oceanic and atmospheric tide contributions and provide a unique method > to directly to estimate Love number independently from traditionally > ones. By adopting the recent ocean tide model and some small corrections > of atmospheric tides, SLR data can be used to estimated the second > degree Love numbers for the semi-diurnal (M2,S2), diurnal (K1,O1), > monthly (Mm, Mf) and 18.6 year waves. The geocenter tidal variations > can also be > recovered by parameterized estimation from SLR data analyzing. > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:36:28 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Thanks Peter. Not much doubt there about the moon having a major role in influencing weather. He mentions 356 days. Well, it looks like he is unaware that 355 days is the lunar year. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Creswick" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 10:07 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Now this is real interesting. Have a look at this Ken. > http://www.kilty.com/pressure.htm > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Damien Howes" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 21:22:02 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'day Ken, Jane + All, I wonder if you could let us know who published the '' Australian Aviation Pilots Manual'' and what year it was published. I am curious as I have never heard of it, nor has any Aviation publication I have ever come across has mentioned any lunar effect on atmospheric tide. I am wondering if it may be a very old book that I haven't come across. Thanks. Damien. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 7:20 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual > Section 1:4 under chapter headed 'Tide Of The Atmosphere' > Full quote: > "In the low latitudes a semidiurnal pressure variation is quite noticeable. > Atmospheric pressure peaks at about 1000 hours and 2200 hours local solar > time with minima at 1600 and 0400. The semidiurnal pressure variation at > Cairns is about 2 degrees either side of the mean i.e. the pressure might be > 1015mb at 0400, 1019mb at 1000, 1015mb at 1600 and 1019mb at 2200. > Meteorologists adjust the daily barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide > effect. The atmospheric tide is associated with lunar and solar gravitation, > solar heating and resonance. The lunar factor is 2.5 times that of solar. > The tide is not apparent in latitudes greater than 50-60deg. The atmospheric > tide is an internal gravity wave with a 12 hour frequency. refer 6.2. The > semidiurnal pressure variation is similar to the semidiurnal gravity > variations at the EARTH'S solid surface, the solid earth being subject also > to tides: the SOLID TIDE. A point on the earth's surface moves up and down > by as much as 50cm with maximum gravity occurring at 1000 and 2200 hours." > > Jane, if the moon moves the water and the land, think how much easier it > would be able to move the air! > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jane ONeill" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:46 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > (quote directly from the > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > > > > Can you give the quote (in full context, not excerpted) and the page > > reference, because I can't ever remember seeing it and can't find this > > "statement" that you 'quote' anywhere. > > > > Jane > > > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric > > pressure > > > as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have > > missed > > > the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from > > the > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. > > It is > > > the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour > > of an > > > enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With > > atmospheric > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > > of the > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > > cold > > > of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from > > atmospheric > > > pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking > > about. > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Barbara" > > > To: > > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions > > are > > > > below. > > > > > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large > > drop > > > in > > > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a > > corresponding > > > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. > > Where is > > > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > > > particular > > > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and > > known > > > that > > > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in > > the > > > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical > > development of > > > > this theory...law? > > > > > > > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > > -- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:54:12 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Damien It seems I have a different version to that of Peter. I got mine off the net some time ago, as, I think, did Peter. See http://www.auf.asn.au/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Damien Howes" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:22 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > G'day Ken, Jane + All, I wonder if you could let us know who published the > '' Australian Aviation Pilots Manual'' and what year it was published. I am > curious as I have never heard of it, nor has any Aviation publication I > have ever come across has mentioned any lunar effect on atmospheric tide. I > am wondering if it may be a very old book that I haven't come across. > Thanks. Damien. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 7:20 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual > > Section 1:4 under chapter headed 'Tide Of The Atmosphere' > > Full quote: > > "In the low latitudes a semidiurnal pressure variation is quite > noticeable. > > Atmospheric pressure peaks at about 1000 hours and 2200 hours local solar > > time with minima at 1600 and 0400. The semidiurnal pressure variation at > > Cairns is about 2 degrees either side of the mean i.e. the pressure might > be > > 1015mb at 0400, 1019mb at 1000, 1015mb at 1600 and 1019mb at 2200. > > Meteorologists adjust the daily barometric pressure to remove the lunar > tide > > effect. The atmospheric tide is associated with lunar and solar > gravitation, > > solar heating and resonance. The lunar factor is 2.5 times that of solar. > > The tide is not apparent in latitudes greater than 50-60deg. The > atmospheric > > tide is an internal gravity wave with a 12 hour frequency. refer 6.2. The > > semidiurnal pressure variation is similar to the semidiurnal gravity > > variations at the EARTH'S solid surface, the solid earth being subject > also > > to tides: the SOLID TIDE. A point on the earth's surface moves up and down > > by as much as 50cm with maximum gravity occurring at 1000 and 2200 hours." > > > > Jane, if the moon moves the water and the land, think how much easier it > > would be able to move the air! > > Ken > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jane ONeill" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:46 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > (quote directly from the > > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > > > > > > > Can you give the quote (in full context, not excerpted) and the page > > > reference, because I can't ever remember seeing it and can't find this > > > "statement" that you 'quote' anywhere. > > > > > > Jane > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric > > > pressure > > > > as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have > > > missed > > > > the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from > > > the > > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > > Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. > > > It is > > > > the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour > > > of an > > > > enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With > > > atmospheric > > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > > > of the > > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > > > cold > > > > of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from > > > atmospheric > > > > pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking > > > about. > > > > Ken > > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Barbara" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions > > > are > > > > > below. > > > > > > > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large > > > drop > > > > in > > > > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a > > > corresponding > > > > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. > > > Where is > > > > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > > > > particular > > > > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and > > > known > > > > that > > > > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in > > > the > > > > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical > > > development of > > > > > this theory...law? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > > > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > > > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > > > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > > > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:16:59 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken & Paul, That explains why I couldn't find it - the quote doesn't say LUNAR tide effect, it says tide effect...........why was lunar included in your quote? Doesn't say anything about the 2.5:1 figure either. What is Section 6.2 that you refer to? The Ekman Spiral? Quote: "In the low latitudes a semi-diurnal pressure variation is quite noticeable. Atmospheric pressure peaks at about 1000 hours and 2200 hours local solar time with minima at 1600 and 0400. The semi-diurnal pressure variation at Cairns is about 2 hPa either side of the mean, i.e the pressure might be 1015 hPa at 0400, 1019 hPa at 1000, 1015 hPa at 1600 and 1019 hPa at 2200. Meteorologists adjust the daily pressure observations to remove the tide effect. The atmospheric tide is associated with lunar and solar gravitation, solar heating and resonance. The tide is not apparent in latitudes greater than 50° - 60°. The atmospheric tide is an internal gravity wave with a 12 hour frequency. The semi-diurnal pressure variation is similar to the semi-diurnal gravity variations at the earth's solid surface, the solid earth being subject to tides - the solid tide. A point on the earth's surface moves up and down by as much as 50 cm, with maximum gravity occurring at 1000 and 2200 hours" -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- > "In the low latitudes a semidiurnal pressure variation is quite noticeable. > Atmospheric pressure peaks at about 1000 hours and 2200 hours local solar > time with minima at 1600 and 0400. The semidiurnal pressure variation at > Cairns is about 2 degrees either side of the mean i.e. the pressure might be > 1015mb at 0400, 1019mb at 1000, 1015mb at 1600 and 1019mb at 2200. > Meteorologists adjust the daily barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide > effect. The atmospheric tide is associated with lunar and solar gravitation, > solar heating and resonance. The lunar factor is 2.5 times that of solar. > The tide is not apparent in latitudes greater than 50-60deg. The atmospheric > tide is an internal gravity wave with a 12 hour frequency. refer 6.2. The > semidiurnal pressure variation is similar to the semidiurnal gravity > variations at the EARTH'S solid surface, the solid earth being subject also > to tides: the SOLID TIDE. A point on the earth's surface moves up and down > by as much as 50cm with maximum gravity occurring at 1000 and 2200 hours." > > Jane, if the moon moves the water and the land, think how much easier it > would be able to move the air! > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jane ONeill" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:46 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > (quote directly from the > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > > > > Can you give the quote (in full context, not excerpted) and the page > > reference, because I can't ever remember seeing it and can't find this > > "statement" that you 'quote' anywhere. > > > > Jane > > > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric > > pressure > > > as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have > > missed > > > the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from > > the > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. > > It is > > > the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour > > of an > > > enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With > > atmospheric > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > > of the > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > > cold > > > of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from > > atmospheric > > > pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking > > about. > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Barbara" > > > To: > > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions > > are > > > > below. > > > > > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large > > drop > > > in > > > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a > > corresponding > > > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. > > Where is > > > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > > > particular > > > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and > > known > > > that > > > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in > > the > > > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical > > development of > > > > this theory...law? > > > > > > > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > > -- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- - > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- -- > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:30:43 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Interesting stuff! While the moon clearly does have a tidal effect upon the atmosphere, (it does not surprise me that it does), I think you are forgetting one important fact. . . . The earth revolves around an effectively stationary moon once a day ( or the moon revolves around an effectively stationary earth- which ever way you want to look at it ;) ). However I cannot see how the phase of the moon (i.e. the amount illuminated) would have any bearing on the lunar tidal forces? (except possibly for some interplay between the location of the sun as in the case of king tides etc. . . .) Either way your assertion re. TC's will be cleared up tomorrow. However, I would have thought that if there was a relationship, it would have shown up in the analysis of this data I did previously as well. Also, it would be much quicker to examine your previous rain predictions, rather than looking at future months. It would take at least 6-7 months of data before a reasonable analysis could be undertaken, especially due to the nature of your predictions (i.e. predicting over a period rather than specific dates- not that this is a bad thing, it just makes a statistical analysis more difficult). So could you please post at least your previous years predictions, so we can do a simple statistical analysis? Cheers James p.s. the graphs and excel spreadsheet are still on the web-site. I'm sorry I did not annotate it very well, but if anyone has any questions about how it works, please just ask- I did find one little error, the way I designated different cyclones . . . I added 10 times the year, to the cyclone number and then checked if this number changed between successive reports, well the problem came in 1950 - 1951 where there were 11 individual cyclones in 1950, so the first cyclone in 1951 and the last in 1950 had the same "id" number and excel too them as one 306 day long cyclone!!! I have fixed this by simply multiplying the year by 1000 instead, but have not put this on the web yet :) ) James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 10:54 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Hi Damien It seems I have a different version to that of Peter. I got mine off the net some time ago, as, I think, did Peter. See http://www.auf.asn.au/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Damien Howes" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:22 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > G'day Ken, Jane + All, I wonder if you could let us know who published the > '' Australian Aviation Pilots Manual'' and what year it was published. I am > curious as I have never heard of it, nor has any Aviation publication I > have ever come across has mentioned any lunar effect on atmospheric tide. I > am wondering if it may be a very old book that I haven't come across. > Thanks. Damien. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 7:20 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual > > Section 1:4 under chapter headed 'Tide Of The Atmosphere' > > Full quote: > > "In the low latitudes a semidiurnal pressure variation is quite > noticeable. > > Atmospheric pressure peaks at about 1000 hours and 2200 hours local solar > > time with minima at 1600 and 0400. The semidiurnal pressure variation at > > Cairns is about 2 degrees either side of the mean i.e. the pressure might > be > > 1015mb at 0400, 1019mb at 1000, 1015mb at 1600 and 1019mb at 2200. > > Meteorologists adjust the daily barometric pressure to remove the lunar > tide > > effect. The atmospheric tide is associated with lunar and solar > gravitation, > > solar heating and resonance. The lunar factor is 2.5 times that of solar. > > The tide is not apparent in latitudes greater than 50-60deg. The > atmospheric > > tide is an internal gravity wave with a 12 hour frequency. refer 6.2. The > > semidiurnal pressure variation is similar to the semidiurnal gravity > > variations at the EARTH'S solid surface, the solid earth being subject > also > > to tides: the SOLID TIDE. A point on the earth's surface moves up and down > > by as much as 50cm with maximum gravity occurring at 1000 and 2200 hours." > > > > Jane, if the moon moves the water and the land, think how much easier it > > would be able to move the air! > > Ken > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jane ONeill" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:46 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > (quote directly from the > > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > > > > > > > Can you give the quote (in full context, not excerpted) and the page > > > reference, because I can't ever remember seeing it and can't find this > > > "statement" that you 'quote' anywhere. > > > > > > Jane > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > To answer your question, Leslie, I suggest you forget atmospheric > > > pressure > > > > as it will distract you from the real situation. Meteorologists have > > > missed > > > > the air-tide because their models factor it out (quote directly from > > > the > > > > Australian Aviation Pilots Manual.."meteorologists adjust the daily > > > > barometric pressure to remove the lunar tide effect.." ). > > > > Pressure actually stays the same when the moon goes below the horizon. > > > It is > > > > the VOLUME of air that changes. The mathematical work of the behaviour > > > of an > > > > enclosed gas has been done, decades ago. Think Boyles Law. With > > > atmospheric > > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > > > of the > > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > > > cold > > > > of space come closer to ground level. If you can't get away from > > > atmospheric > > > > pressure then you won't have the faintest idea of what I'm talking > > > about. > > > > Ken > > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Barbara" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 6:45 PM > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > > > > > I forwarded this thread to Les Lemon and he comments and questions > > > are > > > > > below. > > > > > > > > > > If the moon takes the atmosphere with it then there is a very large > > > drop > > > > in > > > > > surface atmospheric pressure where the moon isn't and a > > > corresponding > > > > > dramatic increase in surface atmospheric pressure where it is. > > > Where is > > > > > that drop and rise couplet? If that occurred each time with that > > > > particular > > > > > moon phase, don't you think meteorologists would have noticed and > > > known > > > > that > > > > > by now? I think he needs to demonstrate where the moon shows up in > > > the > > > > > atmospheric equations of motion. Where is the mathematical > > > development of > > > > > this theory...law? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Leslie R. Lemon > > > > > Basic Commerce and Industries, Inc. > > > > > Radar, Severe Storms, & Research Meteorologist > > > > > Tel: 816-373-3533, Cell: 816-213-3237 > > > > > E-Mail: lrlemon at compuserve.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au---------------------------- > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Brisbane rain - how good was Ken... Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:20:03 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well the rain certainly made for a bit of a fiasco at the Indy 300 today with lightning, thunder & bits of race cars everywhere! Lucky no one was seriously hurt. :) Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:12 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Brisbane rain - how good was Ken... > Hi all, > > Interesting to note that Ken Ring's prediction for Brisbane in October (on > his website) was basically dry, much more so than Sep., with showers around > the 16th and again 26th..28th. As it happens that is/was just about 100% > spot on. > > Looking forward to November's predicted events with interest! > > John. > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #3 . . . .finally! Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:07:06 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Well I said I’d do it tomorrow but this daylight saving this has me well and truly awake LOL

 

Ok, Ken, I have done the analysis on ONLY named Cyclones which were longer than 4 days.

Of the 350 cyclones which were named and longer than 4 days, the following is the breakdown of the moon age when they formed.

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/namedcyclones-gt4days.gif

 

Again, this shows no relationship which could not be equally shown by a random event. Will you now admit that there is no evidence of a relationship between moon phase and the formation of cyclones?

 

While I was doing this I also came up with an interesting histogram for the duration of cyclones!

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/cyclone-length-histogram.gif

 

I have put the updated spreadsheet on the net in zipped format here (This is different from the last):

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/cyclonesV2.zip  [4.78Mb]

 

as I said before, this is a large excel spreadsheet (~22Mb) and you will need a fairly good computer to open it.

 

Cheers

 

James

 

 James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

 

From: "Paul Rands" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:14:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id IAA28505 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com What a ripper of a pic! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Paul Rands Email: prands at optusnet.com.au ICQ: 137833127 or MSN: Uncle Paul Web: http://prands.docspages.com/ -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of T Middleton Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 08:58 Subject: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! hi all, There was storms in SEQ last night (Sat.26th),Ben Quinn was out chasing and managed to capture this AWESOME CG in the Caboolture/Kilcoy area. Great Stuff Ben. http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/cg_big.jpg Anthony Cornelius may also have captured something from these storms also.... cheers, TM Anvil Industries - http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils _________________________________________________________________ Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #3 . . . .finally! Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:19:27 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
hi james,
 
can you please do a graph showing if the average length of cyclones has increased, decreased or stayed the same over the years?.  this could be interesting ! ! ! !
 
regards
richard
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 11:37 PM
Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #3 . . . .finally!

Well I said I’d do it tomorrow but this daylight saving this has me well and truly awake LOL

 

Ok, Ken, I have done the analysis on ONLY named Cyclones which were longer than 4 days.

Of the 350 cyclones which were named and longer than 4 days, the following is the breakdown of the moon age when they formed.

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/namedcyclones-gt4days.gif

 

Again, this shows no relationship which could not be equally shown by a random event. Will you now admit that there is no evidence of a relationship between moon phase and the formation of cyclones?

 

While I was doing this I also came up with an interesting histogram for the duration of cyclones!

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/cyclone-length-histogram.gif

 

I have put the updated spreadsheet on the net in zipped format here (This is different from the last):

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/cyclonesV2.zip  [4.78Mb]

 

as I said before, this is a large excel spreadsheet (~22Mb) and you will need a fairly good computer to open it.

 

Cheers

 

James

 

 James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

 

Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:52:02 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and has aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Paul Rands" To: Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:14:18 +1100 Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > What a ripper of a pic! > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > Paul Rands > Email: prands at optusnet.com.au > ICQ: 137833127 or MSN: Uncle Paul > Web: http://prands.docspages.com/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of T Middleton > Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 08:58 > Subject: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > hi all, > There was storms in SEQ last night (Sat.26th),Ben Quinn was out chasing > and > managed to capture this AWESOME CG in the Caboolture/Kilcoy area. Great > Stuff Ben. > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/cg_big.jpg > Anthony Cornelius may also have captured something from these storms > also.... > > cheers, TM > > Anvil Industries - http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Steven Williams" To: Subject: aus-wx: NZ Tornados Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:15:47 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
There is a nice picture on the front cover of the Christchurch press of a tornado just SE of the city.
 
A F1 tornado did minor property damage in Aucklands western suburbs friday. Worst affected house had
about 2/3 of its roof removed.  
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #3 . . . .finally! Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:54:09 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com James No evidence? I'd say that the period 13 days-21 days shows more cyclone activity than at other points in the phase cycle in your breakdown! Looks like a question of interpretation here, notwithstanding the excellent effort you went to in preparing it. Cyclone definition could be a bit too variable. If you have time I'd like to see someone try tornados as they are much more specific to a date and time. > Whenever a tornado is reported in the newspaper, and a time is mentioned, it will be observed that the moon > has still to rise or has set. This situation applies, even if the tornado is at night, the early morning, midday or > afternoon. A tornado at night usually occurs during the new moon, which is a day moon. If the tornado is > during the early morning hours and up to about midday, the moon will be more than likely in the first quarter. > But most tornados occur while the moon is full and into the last quarter, for this is the period that the sun > applies the most heat to the ground, which creates the perfect conditions for tornado activity. The > Auckland mini tornado was timed at early afternoon, fitting the theory nicely. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: James Holbeach To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:07 AM Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #3 . . . .finally! Well I said I'd do it tomorrow but this daylight saving this has me well and truly awake LOL Ok, Ken, I have done the analysis on ONLY named Cyclones which were longer than 4 days. Of the 350 cyclones which were named and longer than 4 days, the following is the breakdown of the moon age when they formed. http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/namedcyclones-gt4days.gif Again, this shows no relationship which could not be equally shown by a random event. Will you now admit that there is no evidence of a relationship between moon phase and the formation of cyclones? While I was doing this I also came up with an interesting histogram for the duration of cyclones! http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/cyclone-length-histogram.gif I have put the updated spreadsheet on the net in zipped format here (This is different from the last): http://www.trapdoor.com.au/cyclonesV2.zip [4.78Mb] as I said before, this is a large excel spreadsheet (~22Mb) and you will need a fairly good computer to open it. Cheers James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia . 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.29.139] From: "James Harris" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: NZ Tornados Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:00:12 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2002 21:00:15.0702 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9603760:01C27DFB] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
That is a great shot of the tornado ! The guy who took it gave out a classic quote

"We were waiting for sheds to go up in the air but we never got to have that enjoyment ... I was thinking `where's that bunker we should be diving into'."
 
Hmm I wonder what movie he's been watching ...
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:15 AM
Subject: aus-wx: NZ Tornados

There is a nice picture on the front cover of the Christchurch press of a tornado just SE of the city.
 
A F1 tornado did minor property damage in Aucklands western suburbs friday. Worst affected house had
about 2/3 of its roof removed.  
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:14:42 +1300 From: Gregg Ward User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: NZ Tornados Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Steven Williams wrote: > There is a nice picture on the front cover of the Christchurch press > of a tornado just SE of the city. > http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/thepress/0,2106,2093162a6009,00.html > > A F1 tornado did minor property damage in Aucklands western suburbs > friday. Worst affected house had > about 2/3 of its roof removed. What an impressive photo. The radar echo from around the time of this storm, can be seen at the following web address (only available till 03:00 UTC): http://www.metservice.co.nz/radar/cny_03.asp Gregg +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:27:22 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Amazing shot. Would look excellent framed. Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:52 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and has aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Paul Rands" To: Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:14:18 +1100 Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > What a ripper of a pic! > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > Paul Rands > Email: prands at optusnet.com.au > ICQ: 137833127 or MSN: Uncle Paul > Web: http://prands.docspages.com/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of T Middleton > Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 08:58 > Subject: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > hi all, > There was storms in SEQ last night (Sat.26th),Ben Quinn was out chasing > and > managed to capture this AWESOME CG in the Caboolture/Kilcoy area. Great > Stuff Ben. > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/cg_big.jpg > Anthony Cornelius may also have captured something from these storms > also.... > > cheers, TM > > Anvil Industries - http://bigmax.yi.org/users/anvils > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free! Try MSN. > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather > your_email_address" in the body of your message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: TC genesis Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:14:54 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >"Tropical cyclones also only form from full moon-last quarter" Ken, To save those like myself who are too busy to compare TC genesis dates with phases of the moon, why don't you email your analysis to Aussie WX which proves this fact? I looked very much forward to seeing the results of your work. Now... perish the thought... but if such a statement is not based on hard fact and analysis, it would only seem appropriate for you to unsubscribe from the list as you have miss-lead all of your fellow list members. Regards, David +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: David Jones To: "old AUSSIE WX (aussie-weather-digest at world.std.com)" Subject: aus-wx: no need for fancy statistics Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:29:05 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter, and for the same reason, only in that case we > are talking about the water heating above 28deg instead of the land. > Or is the Full moon + dust storm AGAIN a coincidence? If so.. when does > coincidence become theory..? > regards > Ken > www.predictweather.com and >I agree with you that no one can prove I'm correct or incorrect because the >variables are too great. >Ken Ken you are very wrong here. To prove you wrong ONLY one cyclone has to form outside of "full moon-last quarter". This has been shown to have happened, and you are proven wrong. There is no need for fancy statistics here. Regards, David +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "W.A. \(Bill\) Webb" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:18:03 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Ken, List. for your info ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 6:20 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > In fact, to > my knowledge, no one else is putting out longrange forecasts for Australia a > month ahead. Not any of the professionals OR amateurs. I am ALSO doing it > for NZ and the UK, on the same page. I know of no one else doing it for any > single ONE of those countries, let alone all three. And I'm not even a > meteorologist. So where's THEIR work? Haydon Walker (son of late Lennox Walker) continues to publish forecasts for some months ahead. I believe he uses sun-spot activity as the basis for his analyses. Ian Morandy also publishes forecasts out over a month. He bases his predictions on tidal sequences (more moon-based perhaps than sunspots). I posted a copy of his disclaimer to the list some time ago. Both of these forecasters forecasts have been eagerly read by Australians, especially those in the bush, for many years. I can remember Lennox Walker's forecasts being discussed by people in SW Qld (yeah, Thargomindah too!) in the fifties. My impression is that their forecasts are more often then not overly optimistic for rain occurring, and hence their popularity - good news is always welcome! Fine and bloody dry here in Proserpine. We had a minimum hourly RH of 14 the other day (dust storm day). How about sending some of the moisture from south to the north?? Regards, Bill +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Fancy Statistics LOL Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:26:17 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Fancy Statistics LOL

Two things Ken,

> "Tropical cyclones also only form

> from full moon-last quarter"

This simple analysis has clearly shown that this comment is simply not true.

Second thing is that in none of the graphs, can you say that the variation was not caused by a purely random effect- so No, you cannot say that cyclones are more likely to form b/w 13-21d.

I'll ask again, could you send me your rainfall predictions for the previous year? Please?

And David, it is not really fancy statistics, pretty simple really, didn't take that long to do either :)

Richard: I'll give that a shot when I get into work today . . . .

James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

ph. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring
Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 6:54 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #3 . . . .finally!

James

No evidence? I'd say that the period 13 days-21 days shows more cyclone

activity than at other points in the phase cycle in your breakdown! Looks

like a question of interpretation here, notwithstanding the excellent effort

you went to in preparing it. Cyclone definition could be a bit too variable.

If you have time I'd like to see someone try tornados as they are much more

specific to a date and time.

> Whenever a tornado is reported in the newspaper, and a time is mentioned,

it will be observed that the moon > has still to rise or has set. This

situation applies, even if the tornado is at night, the early morning,

midday or

> afternoon. A tornado at night usually occurs during the new moon, which is

a day moon. If the tornado is

> during the early morning hours and up to about midday, the moon will be

more than likely in the first quarter. > But most tornados occur while the

moon is full and into the last quarter, for this is the period that the sun

> applies the most heat to the ground, which creates the perfect conditions

for tornado activity. The

> Auckland mini tornado was timed at early afternoon, fitting the theory

nicely.

Ken

----- Original Message -----

From: James Holbeach

To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:07 AM

Subject: aus-wx: TC vs Moon age analysis #3 . . . .finally!


Well I said I'd do it tomorrow but this daylight saving this has me well and

truly awake LOL

Ok, Ken, I have done the analysis on ONLY named Cyclones which were longer

than 4 days.

Of the 350 cyclones which were named and longer than 4 days, the following

is the breakdown of the moon age when they formed.

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/namedcyclones-gt4days.gif

Again, this shows no relationship which could not be equally shown by a

random event. Will you now admit that there is no evidence of a relationship

between moon phase and the formation of cyclones?

While I was doing this I also came up with an interesting histogram for the

duration of cyclones!

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/cyclone-length-histogram.gif

I have put the updated spreadsheet on the net in zipped format here (This is

different from the last):

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/cyclonesV2.zip  [4.78Mb]

as I said before, this is a large excel spreadsheet (~22Mb) and you will

need a fairly good computer to open it.

Cheers

James

 James Holbeach

--------------------------------

Trapdoor Ski Club

Mt. Hotham, Australia

. 0417 553 757

http://www.trapdoor.com.au

--------------------------------


 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

 To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com

 with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your

 message.

 -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------

From: "Keith Barnett" To: "Weather list" Subject: aus-wx: Forecasting models Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:18:21 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I have put up at
 
a single reference point where people can access most forecasting models. Click on anything in the drop down box and the model will appear on the same screen opposite.
If there are any missing that anyone thinks would be worth including, please let me know as these are the only ones I know of myself.
 Thanks!
 
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
From: "arky dave" To: Subject: aus-wx: Tornado Drought Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:16:52 -0600 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Greetings Everybody:
         Tonight(Sunday), the Weather Channel had an interesting report. For all of 2002, to Oct. 26th,(preliminary) there had been 641 tornadoes in the US. The 10-year average through October 26th was 1,128. The 10-year average for a full year is 1,206 twisters. THIS kind of drought is fine with me!
          A while back, I asked for a rain dance, NOW, I'd like ya'll to do a SUN dance--as we've seen very little sunshine the past 8 days.(Very unusual for us to be cloudy for a week straight).
Wishing ALL A Super Week!       Yours       David Powell
From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fancy Statistics LOL Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:40:45 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Fancy Statistics LOL (James) > "Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter" This simple analysis has clearly shown that this comment is simply not true. True. Careless use of language on my part. Of course there are exceptions to every rule. "Mainly" would have been a better word to use. Sorry. >Second thing is that in none of the graphs, can you say that the variation was not caused by a purely random > effect. True, it's up for grabs, but which is still not to say what I claim isn't true. > I'll ask again, could you send me your rainfall predictions for the previous year? Please? Sorry, no time. I suggest you follow my forecasts as put out if you are interested, or do an analysis on tornados as I have suggested. If you are serious about examining me and not just finding reason to fault, then I have put more than enough information on my website for you to get stuck into. (Bill) > Haydon Walker (son of late Lennox Walker) continues to publish forecasts.. Thanks for those names. I am aware of the history of the Cromhurst Observatory. However, I do not find they have websites and what I really meant was I don't think there is anyone putting out FREE forecasts at least a month ahead for the general public to make use of. (Jane) > the quote doesn't say LUNAR tide effect, it says tide effect..why was lunar included in your quote? Doesn't say > anything about the 2.5:1 figure either. I can't find the original. Are we quibbling over one word? Jane, the atmospheric tide IS the lunar tide. I'm surprised that you seem to question this. Most people, and that includes most scientists, accept that the sea tide and land tide are mostly caused by the moon; ratio more than 2:1 as compared to solar influence. .So it is not a difficult jump to recognise the tide (lunar)of the air. (David) > it would only seem appropriate for you to unsubscribe > from the list as you have miss-lead all of your fellow list members . Such a comment just doesn't dignify this list. I hope this bad speller and unhappy individual is in a minority. I have had a most interesting time and many expressions of interest in these different ideas. Goodness me! If anyone feels mislead would they please tell me?? +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Fancy Statistics LOL Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:49:55 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >" If you are serious about examining me and not just finding reason to fault" I am not out on a witch hunt ken, I simply want to open people's eyes to not believe everything they see or read, without some proof. If the cyclone analysis showed a relationship, then I would have happily published it and we'd all be famous!!! However, and this is important, it did not. All you can say is that IF there is a relationship between moon phase and cyclone formation, then it must be a very very small relationship. Your altered assertion that they form "mainly" in the last quarter, is equally invalid. The analysis simply does not support ANY relationship unless it is very very minor. The only data I could find for rainfall on your site was 1 month in advance- you have removed all previous data, you must have this still!- If you are really serious and confident in your predictions, then surely you would not mind, and infact want them to be independently checked? It is in your best interests! :) Cheers James James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 4:41 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fancy Statistics LOL Fancy Statistics LOL (James) > "Tropical cyclones also only form > from full moon-last quarter" This simple analysis has clearly shown that this comment is simply not true. True. Careless use of language on my part. Of course there are exceptions to every rule. "Mainly" would have been a better word to use. Sorry. >Second thing is that in none of the graphs, can you say that the variation was not caused by a purely random > effect. True, it's up for grabs, but which is still not to say what I claim isn't true. > I'll ask again, could you send me your rainfall predictions for the previous year? Please? Sorry, no time. I suggest you follow my forecasts as put out if you are interested, or do an analysis on tornados as I have suggested. If you are serious about examining me and not just finding reason to fault, then I have put more than enough information on my website for you to get stuck into. (Bill) > Haydon Walker (son of late Lennox Walker) continues to publish forecasts.. Thanks for those names. I am aware of the history of the Cromhurst Observatory. However, I do not find they have websites and what I really meant was I don't think there is anyone putting out FREE forecasts at least a month ahead for the general public to make use of. (Jane) > the quote doesn't say LUNAR tide effect, it says tide effect..why was lunar included in your quote? Doesn't say > anything about the 2.5:1 figure either. I can't find the original. Are we quibbling over one word? Jane, the atmospheric tide IS the lunar tide. I'm surprised that you seem to question this. Most people, and that includes most scientists, accept that the sea tide and land tide are mostly caused by the moon; ratio more than 2:1 as compared to solar influence. .So it is not a difficult jump to recognise the tide (lunar)of the air. (David) > it would only seem appropriate for you to unsubscribe > from the list as you have miss-lead all of your fellow list members . Such a comment just doesn't dignify this list. I hope this bad speller and unhappy individual is in a minority. I have had a most interesting time and many expressions of interest in these different ideas. Goodness me! If anyone feels mislead would they please tell me?? +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [210.50.30.21] From: "Rune Peitersen" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fancy Statistics LOL Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:30:35 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2002 07:30:35.0723 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7DD71B0:01C27E53] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I don't feel mislead, I find it interesting, maybe there is merit to what you do Ken, and the moon probably does have a little influence in controlling some aspect of weather systems, I personally just think that there are way too many other factors at work here, as there has been NIL weather in this part of australia for a long time, i suppose the 30 odd emails of yours a day is ok as well :), James thanx for putting that effort in, it finally opened on my piece of crap PC, but it was worth it, love stats!, And Ken, looking forward to Nov 1-2 here in Sydney, your rain predicted dates, we need some, let's see how you go. _________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "peter tristram" To: Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:33:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted in with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within Brisbane's general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot dry winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! Peter --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:46:52 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Peter > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted in > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th and 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? er..hello? Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple of weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for over two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice personnel who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know what will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered MISLEADING to some and not significant to others because a random graph will probably show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be called a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years of past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will see some success here.. I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. Ken www.predictweather.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "peter tristram" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted in > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within Brisbane's > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot dry > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > Peter > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Stargazer" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:26:50 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) Regs. Paul. (Stargazer) http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and has > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > Phil +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:35:56 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told you so' at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your reputation or this forum, in future please spare us. richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > Peter > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted > in > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th and > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? er..hello? > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple of > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for over > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice personnel > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know what > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered MISLEADING > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will probably > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be called > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years of > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will see > some success here.. > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "peter tristram" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted in > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within Brisbane's > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot dry > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > Peter > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fancy Statistics LOL Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:07:28 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Good on you Rune, one un-mislead person cancels out one mislead one. Thanks for allowing that the moon may have influence, but I don't blame anyone for being skeptical. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rune Peitersen" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Fancy Statistics LOL > I don't feel mislead, I find it interesting, maybe there is merit to > what you do Ken, and the moon probably does have a little influence in > controlling some aspect of weather systems, I personally just think that > there are way too many other factors at work here, as there has been NIL > weather in this part of australia for a long time, i suppose the 30 odd > emails of yours a day is ok as well :), James thanx for putting that effort > in, it finally opened on my piece of crap PC, but it was worth it, love > stats!, And Ken, looking forward to Nov 1-2 here in Sydney, your rain > predicted dates, we need some, let's see how you go. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 05:25:05 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now it's just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. PaulY -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard Modistach Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told you so' at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your reputation or this forum, in future please spare us. richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > Peter > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted > in > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th and > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? er..hello? > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple of > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for over > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice personnel > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know what > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered MISLEADING > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will probably > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be called > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years of > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will see > some success here.. > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "peter tristram" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted in > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within Brisbane's > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot dry > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > Peter > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: s355334 at student.uq.edu.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:30:51 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Leslie Muir Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike Les At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > >Regs. Paul. >(Stargazer) >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Phil Smith" >To: >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and has > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > Phil > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ben Quinn" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:24:24 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Evening all Thanks for you comments guys It's a time exposure (15 seconds) but it all came down in one hit, 13 seconds into the exposure. I've uploaded a couple more shots from the night http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_01.jpg http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_02.jpg http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_03.jpg http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_04.jpg (the fourth is a smaller version of the close strike posted by TM) Note the first three shots have been cropped to center or show the lightning better, as opposed to the fourth which is completely untouched apart from being resized for the internet. The camera used was a Cannon G2 (digital), 15 second exposures at between 38 and 110mm zoom and appature of F4.5 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leslie Muir" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike > Les > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > >Regs. Paul. > >(Stargazer) > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Phil Smith" > >To: > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and has > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:01:14 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com here's a quote from bodie in the weatherzone forum, bodie 'quote' Thunder, i have a Cannon G2 (digital) and the shot was taken at 38mm, ISO 50 and F4.5. It was a 15 second exposure but when you look closely at the bolt you can see it all came down at once (about 13 seconds into the exposure too i might add!). regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leslie Muir" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:00 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike > Les > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > >Regs. Paul. > >(Stargazer) > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Phil Smith" > >To: > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and has > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:12:58 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I agree too. I want no slanging. I'm sorry for being sarcastic. But is it at all possible that I post something of interest to me, WITHOUT people jumping down my throat? I mean, give me a break, can I discuss weather from MY point of view or is it totally offensive to some people for me to do so? Not fishing for compliments here, but I can hardly be blamed for people's reactions to my ideas. Tonight in NZ on TV1 they filmed a documentary entitled Wild Weather. It pertains to recent discussion here. Hurricane ANDREW, formed on August 14th, 1992. The Full moon was August 13th, merely a day before. It was also the day of apogee, which, like perigee, its twin, is capable of either extreme calm or severe weather. ANDREW caused devastation across Florida. Hurricane Kenna has JUST reached Mexico, having also formed between full moon and last quarter(last quarter phase begins today, 29th October. The other example on the program was the storm that affected the Fastnet Yacht Race in the Irish Sea. The storm began on August 10th, 1979. The day of full moon(and perigee) had occurred on August 8th, two days before. That means that every weather event mentioned in the hour long program occurred within 2 or 3 days of Full moon. I call that downright uncanny, yet the word "moon" was not even mentioned once! I also claim that tornados also mostly form at this time of the moon's phase cycle. As depicted on the program; at Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, no fewer than 65 tornados in the one day killed 42 and rendered 3,500 homeless on 3rd May 1999 - AGAIN 3 days after the day of full moon(and apogee). Over the last two days, within the SAME full moon-last quarter phase period, there have been two tornados here- a mini-tornado over Auckland which affected Hillsborough, and one over Canterbury. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Yole" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now it's > just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the > weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. > > PaulY > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard > Modistach > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told you so' > at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your reputation > or this forum, in future please spare us. > > richard > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > Peter > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > fitted > > in > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th > and > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > er..hello? > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple of > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for > over > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > personnel > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know what > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > MISLEADING > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will probably > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be > called > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years of > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will > see > > some success here.. > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "peter tristram" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted > in > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > Brisbane's > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot dry > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:25:54 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Ken, Don't worry. I read your posts without bias unlike others here. I take on board what I believe matches the weather scene but I am not into "scientific bagging". I suppose it is like doctors who don't believe in alternative medicines.... Jimmy Deguara At 01:12 AM 29/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: >I agree too. I want no slanging. I'm sorry for being sarcastic. But is it at >all possible that I post something of interest to me, WITHOUT people jumping >down my throat? I mean, give me a break, can I discuss weather from MY point >of view or is it totally offensive to some people for me to do so? Not >fishing for compliments here, but I can hardly be blamed for people's >reactions to my ideas. >Tonight in NZ on TV1 they filmed a documentary entitled Wild Weather. It >pertains to recent discussion here. Hurricane ANDREW, formed on August 14th, >1992. The Full moon was August 13th, merely a day before. >It was also the day of apogee, which, like perigee, its twin, is capable of >either extreme calm or severe weather. ANDREW caused devastation across >Florida. Hurricane Kenna has JUST reached Mexico, having also formed between >full moon and last quarter(last quarter phase begins today, 29th October. >The other example on the program was the storm that affected the Fastnet >Yacht Race in the Irish Sea. The storm began on August 10th, 1979. The day >of full moon(and perigee) had occurred on August 8th, two days >before. That means that every weather event mentioned in the hour long >program occurred within 2 or 3 days of Full moon. I call that downright >uncanny, yet the word "moon" was not even mentioned once! >I also claim that tornados also mostly form at this time of the moon's phase >cycle. As depicted on the program; at Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, no fewer than >65 tornados in the one day killed 42 and rendered 3,500 homeless on 3rd May >1999 - AGAIN 3 days after the day of full moon(and apogee). Over the last >two days, within the SAME full moon-last quarter phase period, there have >been two tornados here- a mini-tornado over Auckland which affected >Hillsborough, and one over Canterbury. >Ken > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Paul Yole" >To: >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 PM >Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now it's > > just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the > > weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard > > Modistach > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told you >so' > > at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your reputation > > or this forum, in future please spare us. > > > > richard > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ken Ring" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > > fitted > > > in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th > > and > > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > > er..hello? > > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple >of > > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for > > over > > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say > > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > > personnel > > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know >what > > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > > MISLEADING > > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will >probably > > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be > > called > > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years >of > > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will > > see > > > some success here.. > > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "peter tristram" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this >fitted > > in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > > Brisbane's > > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot >dry > > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: dencot1 at aol.com Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:28:21 EST Subject: Re: aus-wx: re. min max temp help thanks To: aussie-weather at world.std.com X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows AU sub 10501 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com To all that replied to my email thank you especially Laurier Williams .
Project was completed and result (elephant stamp or gold star )  will be posted when known. Once again thank you .

Dennis Cottle
From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:41:55 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ok, I am not a fan of a slanging match either, but are people getting sick of my analysis? If so I will not bother posting them here any more. Views please, I am relatively new to this list and don't want to tread on toes. That said, I don't believe I am flaming or slanging Ken, rather analysing his claims. . . That is all. . . . Regardless. . . Ken, do you admit that your theory re TC's is not sustainable? The facts (my analysis) seem to show it, and you are yet to respond to my last post, in any way. Thanks James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 11:13 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... I agree too. I want no slanging. I'm sorry for being sarcastic. But is it at all possible that I post something of interest to me, WITHOUT people jumping down my throat? I mean, give me a break, can I discuss weather from MY point of view or is it totally offensive to some people for me to do so? Not fishing for compliments here, but I can hardly be blamed for people's reactions to my ideas. Tonight in NZ on TV1 they filmed a documentary entitled Wild Weather. It pertains to recent discussion here. Hurricane ANDREW, formed on August 14th, 1992. The Full moon was August 13th, merely a day before. It was also the day of apogee, which, like perigee, its twin, is capable of either extreme calm or severe weather. ANDREW caused devastation across Florida. Hurricane Kenna has JUST reached Mexico, having also formed between full moon and last quarter(last quarter phase begins today, 29th October. The other example on the program was the storm that affected the Fastnet Yacht Race in the Irish Sea. The storm began on August 10th, 1979. The day of full moon(and perigee) had occurred on August 8th, two days before. That means that every weather event mentioned in the hour long program occurred within 2 or 3 days of Full moon. I call that downright uncanny, yet the word "moon" was not even mentioned once! I also claim that tornados also mostly form at this time of the moon's phase cycle. As depicted on the program; at Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, no fewer than 65 tornados in the one day killed 42 and rendered 3,500 homeless on 3rd May 1999 - AGAIN 3 days after the day of full moon(and apogee). Over the last two days, within the SAME full moon-last quarter phase period, there have been two tornados here- a mini-tornado over Auckland which affected Hillsborough, and one over Canterbury. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Yole" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now it's > just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the > weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. > > PaulY > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard > Modistach > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told you so' > at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your reputation > or this forum, in future please spare us. > > richard > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > Peter > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > fitted > > in > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th > and > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > er..hello? > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple of > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for > over > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > personnel > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know what > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > MISLEADING > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will probably > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be > called > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years of > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will > see > > some success here.. > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "peter tristram" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted > in > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > Brisbane's > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot dry > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:14:02 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com dont get me wrong ken, i'm enjoying reading your posts, i'm still sitting on the fence watching what everyone's got to say, i see merit in some of your ideas, then some of them crack me up, such is life, your dedicated conviction to your ideas impresses me, regardless of how accurate\inaccurate, relavant\irrelavent your ideas might be you have managed to maintain a high professional standard in your arguments and i'd hate to see you, or anyone else for that matter, throw it all away for 5 mins worth of "shove it up 'em".when perpetuating unconventional theories there's always going to be someone jumping on you, you have shown that you are more than capable of rolling with the punches, deep down i hope you can prove your right, time will tell, good luck. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ring" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:42 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > I agree too. I want no slanging. I'm sorry for being sarcastic. But is it at > all possible that I post something of interest to me, WITHOUT people jumping > down my throat? I mean, give me a break, can I discuss weather from MY point > of view or is it totally offensive to some people for me to do so? Not > fishing for compliments here, but I can hardly be blamed for people's > reactions to my ideas. > Tonight in NZ on TV1 they filmed a documentary entitled Wild Weather. It > pertains to recent discussion here. Hurricane ANDREW, formed on August 14th, > 1992. The Full moon was August 13th, merely a day before. > It was also the day of apogee, which, like perigee, its twin, is capable of > either extreme calm or severe weather. ANDREW caused devastation across > Florida. Hurricane Kenna has JUST reached Mexico, having also formed between > full moon and last quarter(last quarter phase begins today, 29th October. > The other example on the program was the storm that affected the Fastnet > Yacht Race in the Irish Sea. The storm began on August 10th, 1979. The day > of full moon(and perigee) had occurred on August 8th, two days > before. That means that every weather event mentioned in the hour long > program occurred within 2 or 3 days of Full moon. I call that downright > uncanny, yet the word "moon" was not even mentioned once! > I also claim that tornados also mostly form at this time of the moon's phase > cycle. As depicted on the program; at Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, no fewer than > 65 tornados in the one day killed 42 and rendered 3,500 homeless on 3rd May > 1999 - AGAIN 3 days after the day of full moon(and apogee). Over the last > two days, within the SAME full moon-last quarter phase period, there have > been two tornados here- a mini-tornado over Auckland which affected > Hillsborough, and one over Canterbury. > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Yole" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now it's > > just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the > > weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard > > Modistach > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told you > so' > > at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your reputation > > or this forum, in future please spare us. > > > > richard > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ken Ring" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > > fitted > > > in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th > > and > > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > > er..hello? > > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple > of > > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for > > over > > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say > > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > > personnel > > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know > what > > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > > MISLEADING > > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will > probably > > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be > > called > > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years > of > > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will > > see > > > some success here.. > > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "peter tristram" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > fitted > > in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > > Brisbane's > > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot > dry > > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:59:18 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com James, Ya not stepping on toes IMO...just asking valid questions. Keep posting buddy :o) PaulY -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of James Holbeach Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:42 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . Ok, I am not a fan of a slanging match either, but are people getting sick of my analysis? If so I will not bother posting them here any more. Views please, I am relatively new to this list and don't want to tread on toes. That said, I don't believe I am flaming or slanging Ken, rather analysing his claims. . . That is all. . . . Regardless. . . Ken, do you admit that your theory re TC's is not sustainable? The facts (my analysis) seem to show it, and you are yet to respond to my last post, in any way. Thanks James James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 11:13 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... I agree too. I want no slanging. I'm sorry for being sarcastic. But is it at all possible that I post something of interest to me, WITHOUT people jumping down my throat? I mean, give me a break, can I discuss weather from MY point of view or is it totally offensive to some people for me to do so? Not fishing for compliments here, but I can hardly be blamed for people's reactions to my ideas. Tonight in NZ on TV1 they filmed a documentary entitled Wild Weather. It pertains to recent discussion here. Hurricane ANDREW, formed on August 14th, 1992. The Full moon was August 13th, merely a day before. It was also the day of apogee, which, like perigee, its twin, is capable of either extreme calm or severe weather. ANDREW caused devastation across Florida. Hurricane Kenna has JUST reached Mexico, having also formed between full moon and last quarter(last quarter phase begins today, 29th October. The other example on the program was the storm that affected the Fastnet Yacht Race in the Irish Sea. The storm began on August 10th, 1979. The day of full moon(and perigee) had occurred on August 8th, two days before. That means that every weather event mentioned in the hour long program occurred within 2 or 3 days of Full moon. I call that downright uncanny, yet the word "moon" was not even mentioned once! I also claim that tornados also mostly form at this time of the moon's phase cycle. As depicted on the program; at Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, no fewer than 65 tornados in the one day killed 42 and rendered 3,500 homeless on 3rd May 1999 - AGAIN 3 days after the day of full moon(and apogee). Over the last two days, within the SAME full moon-last quarter phase period, there have been two tornados here- a mini-tornado over Auckland which affected Hillsborough, and one over Canterbury. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Yole" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now it's > just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the > weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. > > PaulY > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard > Modistach > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told you so' > at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your reputation > or this forum, in future please spare us. > > richard > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken Ring" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > Peter > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > fitted > > in > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th > and > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > er..hello? > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple of > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for > over > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > personnel > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know what > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > MISLEADING > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will probably > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be > called > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years of > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will > see > > some success here.. > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "peter tristram" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this fitted > in > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > Brisbane's > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot dry > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:50:33 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com james, imo your analasys and thoughts are an integral part of this discussion and i read then with great interest, i personally thank you for your input and analysis and hope you continue to do so. regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:11 PM Subject: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . > Ok, I am not a fan of a slanging match either, but are people getting > sick of my analysis? If so I will not bother posting them here any more. > > Views please, I am relatively new to this list and don't want to tread > on toes. That said, I don't believe I am flaming or slanging Ken, rather > analysing his claims. . . That is all. . . . > > Regardless. . . > > Ken, do you admit that your theory re TC's is not sustainable? The facts > (my analysis) seem to show it, and you are yet to respond to my last > post, in any way. > > Thanks > > James > > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 11:13 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > I agree too. I want no slanging. I'm sorry for being sarcastic. But is > it at > all possible that I post something of interest to me, WITHOUT people > jumping > down my throat? I mean, give me a break, can I discuss weather from MY > point > of view or is it totally offensive to some people for me to do so? Not > fishing for compliments here, but I can hardly be blamed for people's > reactions to my ideas. > Tonight in NZ on TV1 they filmed a documentary entitled Wild Weather. It > pertains to recent discussion here. Hurricane ANDREW, formed on August > 14th, > 1992. The Full moon was August 13th, merely a day before. > It was also the day of apogee, which, like perigee, its twin, is capable > of > either extreme calm or severe weather. ANDREW caused devastation across > Florida. Hurricane Kenna has JUST reached Mexico, having also formed > between > full moon and last quarter(last quarter phase begins today, 29th > October. > The other example on the program was the storm that affected the Fastnet > Yacht Race in the Irish Sea. The storm began on August 10th, 1979. The > day > of full moon(and perigee) had occurred on August 8th, two days > before. That means that every weather event mentioned in the hour long > program occurred within 2 or 3 days of Full moon. I call that downright > uncanny, yet the word "moon" was not even mentioned once! > I also claim that tornados also mostly form at this time of the moon's > phase > cycle. As depicted on the program; at Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, no fewer > than > 65 tornados in the one day killed 42 and rendered 3,500 homeless on 3rd > May > 1999 - AGAIN 3 days after the day of full moon(and apogee). Over the > last > two days, within the SAME full moon-last quarter phase period, there > have > been two tornados here- a mini-tornado over Auckland which affected > Hillsborough, and one over Canterbury. > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Yole" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now > it's > > just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the > > weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard > > Modistach > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told > you > so' > > at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your > reputation > > or this forum, in future please spare us. > > > > richard > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ken Ring" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > > fitted > > > in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around > 16th > > and > > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > > er..hello? > > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a > couple > of > > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine > for > > over > > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to > say > > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > > personnel > > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know > what > > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > > MISLEADING > > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will > probably > > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and > be > > called > > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand > years > of > > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who > will > > see > > > some success here.. > > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "peter tristram" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > fitted > > in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > > Brisbane's > > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for > hot > dry > > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:48:38 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, I posted some stuff to you a while back and you conveniently ignored it. Now, it is not the moon controlling the weather that I have a problem with, I belive it does have an effect, but not to the extent that you portray. However things like... Ken Ring wrote: With atmospheric > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of the > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the cold > of space come closer to ground level. Several people have pointed out to you that your reasoning here is TOTALLY WRONG! Yet you CONTINUE TO IGNORE THEM!!! This frustrates people (including myself!) Are you forgetting the rest of the atmosphere??? How high do you think the atmosphere is? 15km? Have a look at this diagram: http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/space/atmos.gif There are not one, BUT TWO warm layers above the surface! First is the tropopause near the stratosphere, the second is the thermosphere. The thermosphere is so hot it's over a thousand degrees!!! If your theory of the "coldness of space" is correct, then if anything we should be getting warmer because the thermosphere would be coming closer to us. Space doesn't start for over a thousand kilometres...then it gets cold! But we have several protective layers that separates us from them. If you're going to issue forecasts, fine. But for goodness sake don't support them with dribble like that (and continue to support them even when people have TOLD you it is totally WRONG). In fact, I suspect that is what a lot of people have been frustrated with. Not the issuing of your unique forecasts, but the INCORRECT INFORMATION you support your method with! I for one would much rather you say "I believe there is a relationship there, and I believe this will happen but I can't explain why" then to teach bad meteorology. Sure everyone gets the wrong idea every so often...but to continue to teach that idea when you've been told your wrong to me shows that the most closed-minded person here is you Ken. AC +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [211.28.96.69] From: "Karl Lijnders" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:54:37 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2002 13:54:37.0538 (UTC) FILETIME=[8DDB6420:01C27E89] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com There is no good coming out of this, I think Ken is intitled to his points of view and expressing his ideas openly like we all do here. His theories to some may not be right, OK fair enough, but to some others it may be interesting. I have enjoyed the debate, but its when it turns slinging, its really not really enjoyable at all. Karl :) >From: "Richard Modistach" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... >Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:35:56 +1030 > >getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told you >so' >at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your reputation >or this forum, in future please spare us. > >richard > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ken Ring" >To: >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > Peter > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this >fitted > > in > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th >and > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? >er..hello? > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple >of > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for >over > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice >personnel > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know >what > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered >MISLEADING > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will >probably > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be >called > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years >of > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will >see > > some success here.. > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > Ken > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "peter tristram" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this >fitted >in > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within >Brisbane's > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot >dry > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: our "drought" Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:57:03 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, To rejoin the great debate once again... >snip Space doesn't start for over a thousand kilometres...then it gets cold! The 'cold' of space seems to be a recurring theme in posts from various folk. Space is a vacuum, as such there is no matter (or so little that it is completely irrelevant) therefore the concept of temperature does not really apply. It is neither hot nor cold as there is simply nothing there to be hot or cold. Also, as we know from the common household item of a thermos or vacuum flask, that a vacuum is an excellent thermal insulator as there is no material to conduct heat. Therefore think of space as a nice thermal blanket wrapped around the Earth helping to keep the heat energy on the surface and atmosphere in. Actually this is not 100% true because heat energy does escape from Earth into space as infrared electromagnetic radiation, and of course the thickness of the atmosphere and in particular, presence of cloud, helps to catch and retain this radiated form of heat energy from the surface. But thinking of space as a thermal insulator puts a rather different perspective on some arguments put forward here. John. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: simon at fearby.com To: Gregg Ward , Subject: Re: aus-wx: NZ Tornados Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:23:25 Pacific Standard Time X-Originating-Ip: [203.98.50.151] X-Mailer: NOCC v0.9.5 X-AntiSpam: Checked for restricted content by Gordano's AntiSpam Software Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Just landed in NZ from Aussie and missed the Tornado by 1 day. The trees in the main park in Christchurch have had most of their leaves stripped by hail. Simon Fearby Gregg Ward wrote : > Steven Williams wrote: > > > There is a nice picture on the front cover of the Christchurch press > > of a tornado just SE of the city. > > http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/thepress/0,2106,2093162a6009,00.html > > > > A F1 tornado did minor property damage in Aucklands western suburbs > > friday. Worst affected house had > > about 2/3 of its roof removed. > > What an impressive photo. > > The radar echo from around the time of this storm, can be seen at the > following web address (only available till 03:00 UTC): > > http://www.metservice.co.nz/radar/cny_03.asp > > > Gregg > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Last one to the pub is a MCSE professional! -- My 3D FishTank Simulator / Screen Saver ----------------- ( DirectX 8.1 ) ----- Main: http://www.fearby.com/products/3dfishtank/default.shtml Screenshots: http://www.fearby.com/products/3dfishtank/screenshots.shtml Download: http://www.fearby.com/products/3dfishtank/evaluation.shtml ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:17:06 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well this is my first post here - my names Craig (pardon the dodgy e-mail address) and my interest in stuff weather comes from involvement in the SES. Ben they are excellent lightning shots - I know you said where they were taken in an earlier post - could you remind me where ? Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Quinn" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > Evening all > > Thanks for you comments guys > > It's a time exposure (15 seconds) but it all came down in one hit, 13 > seconds into the exposure. I've uploaded a couple more shots from the night > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_01.jpg > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_02.jpg > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_03.jpg > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_04.jpg > (the fourth is a smaller version of the close strike posted by TM) > > Note the first three shots have been cropped to center or show the lightning > better, as opposed to the fourth which is completely untouched apart from > being resized for the internet. The camera used was a Cannon G2 (digital), > 15 second exposures at between 38 and 110mm zoom and appature of F4.5 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Leslie Muir" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike > > Les > > > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > > > >Regs. Paul. > > >(Stargazer) > > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > >To: > > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and has > > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:55:15 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well, some corrections are necessary here. The thermosphere is not strictly the atmosphere, it is beyond it. The atmosphere, by definition, is the name for our region of air. But there aint much air in the old thermosphere. The thermosphere is the highest and the largest of the four layers because it's just about space. But it's not as if there are dividing lines. It's not like those coloured sand-in-bottle things. The few molecules that are present in the thermosphere receive extraordinary amounts of energy from the Sun, causing the layer to warm to such high temperatures. Air temperature, however, is a measure of the kinetic energy of air molecules, not of the total energy stored by the air. Therefore, since the air is so thin within the thermosphere, such temperature values are not comparable to those of the troposphere or stratosphere. (ref http://www.doc.mmu.ac.uk/aric/eae/Atmosphere/Older/Thermosphere.html) "Although the measured temperature is very hot, the thermosphere would actually feel very COLD to us because the total energy of only a few air molecules residing there would not be enough to transfer any appreciable heat to our skin"(quote from the above website). So as far as I'm concerned my model of the cold of space stands intact. Sorry that you're getting angry, Anthony. Clearly up till now you have not had the correct information. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Cornelius" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:48 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > Ken, > > I posted some stuff to you a while back and you conveniently ignored > it. Now, it is not the moon controlling the weather that I have a > problem with, I belive it does have an effect, but not to the extent > that you portray. > > However things like... > > Ken Ring wrote: > With atmospheric > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of the > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the cold > > of space come closer to ground level. > > Several people have pointed out to you that your reasoning here is > TOTALLY WRONG! Yet you CONTINUE TO IGNORE THEM!!! This frustrates > people (including myself!) Are you forgetting the rest of the > atmosphere??? How high do you think the atmosphere is? 15km? Have a > look at this diagram: > > http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/space/atmos.gif > > There are not one, BUT TWO warm layers above the surface! First is the > tropopause near the stratosphere, the second is the thermosphere. The > thermosphere is so hot it's over a thousand degrees!!! If your theory > of the "coldness of space" is correct, then if anything we should be > getting warmer because the thermosphere would be coming closer to us. > Space doesn't start for over a thousand kilometres...then it gets cold! > But we have several protective layers that separates us from them. > > If you're going to issue forecasts, fine. But for goodness sake don't > support them with dribble like that (and continue to support them even > when people have TOLD you it is totally WRONG). In fact, I suspect that > is what a lot of people have been frustrated with. Not the issuing of > your unique forecasts, but the INCORRECT INFORMATION you support your > method with! I for one would much rather you say "I believe there is a > relationship there, and I believe this will happen but I can't explain > why" then to teach bad meteorology. Sure everyone gets the wrong idea > every so often...but to continue to teach that idea when you've been > told your wrong to me shows that the most closed-minded person here is > you Ken. > > AC > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:05:19 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Ken, do you admit that your theory re TC's is not sustainable? The facts > > (my analysis) seem to show it, and you are yet to respond to my last > > post, in any way. I did respond. I don't think TCs vs moon's influence has not been proven by your tables. I've explained my views about the huge potential for error in defining cyclone time of formation and movement. e.g. what is a cyclone, when does one become a tropical cyclone, where and when in its formation time is it actually measured etc. A better test would be for tornados, which are much more fleeting and location-specific. But you seem reluctant to do a test such as that. Why? Because with the vagueness absent it just might prove my ideas correct? Perhaps you are afraid of that. Tell you what - you do the tornado thing and I'll give you 6 months worth of back Aussie predictions to play with that you keep asking for, for the whole of Australia in the form printed currently on my website on the Freemonth page.. what do you reckon..? regards Ken www.predictweather.com > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 11:13 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > I agree too. I want no slanging. I'm sorry for being sarcastic. But is > > it at > > all possible that I post something of interest to me, WITHOUT people > > jumping > > down my throat? I mean, give me a break, can I discuss weather from MY > > point > > of view or is it totally offensive to some people for me to do so? Not > > fishing for compliments here, but I can hardly be blamed for people's > > reactions to my ideas. > > Tonight in NZ on TV1 they filmed a documentary entitled Wild Weather. It > > pertains to recent discussion here. Hurricane ANDREW, formed on August > > 14th, > > 1992. The Full moon was August 13th, merely a day before. > > It was also the day of apogee, which, like perigee, its twin, is capable > > of > > either extreme calm or severe weather. ANDREW caused devastation across > > Florida. Hurricane Kenna has JUST reached Mexico, having also formed > > between > > full moon and last quarter(last quarter phase begins today, 29th > > October. > > The other example on the program was the storm that affected the Fastnet > > Yacht Race in the Irish Sea. The storm began on August 10th, 1979. The > > day > > of full moon(and perigee) had occurred on August 8th, two days > > before. That means that every weather event mentioned in the hour long > > program occurred within 2 or 3 days of Full moon. I call that downright > > uncanny, yet the word "moon" was not even mentioned once! > > I also claim that tornados also mostly form at this time of the moon's > > phase > > cycle. As depicted on the program; at Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, no fewer > > than > > 65 tornados in the one day killed 42 and rendered 3,500 homeless on 3rd > > May > > 1999 - AGAIN 3 days after the day of full moon(and apogee). Over the > > last > > two days, within the SAME full moon-last quarter phase period, there > > have > > been two tornados here- a mini-tornado over Auckland which affected > > Hillsborough, and one over Canterbury. > > Ken > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul Yole" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now > > it's > > > just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the > > > weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. > > > > > > PaulY > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard > > > Modistach > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told > > you > > so' > > > at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your > > reputation > > > or this forum, in future please spare us. > > > > > > richard > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Ken Ring" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > > > fitted > > > > in > > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around > > 16th > > > and > > > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > > > er..hello? > > > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a > > couple > > of > > > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine > > for > > > over > > > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to > > say > > > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > > > personnel > > > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know > > what > > > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > > > MISLEADING > > > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will > > probably > > > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and > > be > > > called > > > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand > > years > > of > > > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who > > will > > > see > > > > some success here.. > > > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > > > Ken > > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "peter tristram" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > > fitted > > > in > > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > > > Brisbane's > > > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for > > hot > > dry > > > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > > of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:08:07 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Third... As is the usual case on this list in order to welcome ALL the new 'posters' to the list (perhaps at an awkward time, could you please tell us a little about yourselves: where you are from, what you do, your age, your favourite weather and how you got interested in weather in the first place. Jimmy Deguara At 06:17 AM 29/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Well this is my first post here - my names Craig (pardon the dodgy e-mail >address) and my interest in stuff weather comes from involvement in the SES. > >Ben they are excellent lightning shots - I know you said where they were >taken in an earlier post - could you remind me where ? > >Craig > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ben Quinn" >To: >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 PM >Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > Evening all > > > > Thanks for you comments guys > > > > It's a time exposure (15 seconds) but it all came down in one hit, 13 > > seconds into the exposure. I've uploaded a couple more shots from the >night > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_01.jpg > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_02.jpg > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_03.jpg > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_04.jpg > > (the fourth is a smaller version of the close strike posted by TM) > > > > Note the first three shots have been cropped to center or show the >lightning > > better, as opposed to the fourth which is completely untouched apart from > > being resized for the internet. The camera used was a Cannon G2 >(digital), > > 15 second exposures at between 38 and 110mm zoom and appature of F4.5 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Leslie Muir" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike > > > Les > > > > > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > > > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > > > > > >Regs. Paul. > > > >(Stargazer) > > > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > >To: > > > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > > > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and >has > > > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of >your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ben Quinn" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 07:19:31 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com G'day Craig Welcome to the list The first 3 were taken from the D'aguilar Highway about 25-30km's (i guess) east of Kilkoy on Saturday night- the mountain the bolts are striking is Mt Archer. The fourth was taken 2-3k's east of Kilkoy on a side road. The bolts would have come down very close to the meatworks on the edge of town. Anyone working there at the time would have known about it that's for sure! Cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: "Third" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:17 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > Well this is my first post here - my names Craig (pardon the dodgy e-mail > address) and my interest in stuff weather comes from involvement in the SES. > > Ben they are excellent lightning shots - I know you said where they were > taken in an earlier post - could you remind me where ? > > Craig > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ben Quinn" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > Evening all > > > > Thanks for you comments guys > > > > It's a time exposure (15 seconds) but it all came down in one hit, 13 > > seconds into the exposure. I've uploaded a couple more shots from the > night > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_01.jpg > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_02.jpg > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_03.jpg > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_04.jpg > > (the fourth is a smaller version of the close strike posted by TM) > > > > Note the first three shots have been cropped to center or show the > lightning > > better, as opposed to the fourth which is completely untouched apart from > > being resized for the internet. The camera used was a Cannon G2 > (digital), > > 15 second exposures at between 38 and 110mm zoom and appature of F4.5 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Leslie Muir" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike > > > Les > > > > > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > > > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > > > > > >Regs. Paul. > > > >(Stargazer) > > > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > >To: > > > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > > > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and > has > > > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:39:59 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Oh for gods sake Ken . . . you've just shot yourself in the foot without me even trying . . . " I've explained my views about the huge potential for error in defining cyclone time of formation and movement. e.g. what is a cyclone, when does one become a tropical cyclone, where and when in its formation time is it actually measured etc." So if that is the case, how can you possibly predict them with any accuracy? Look, if there was some error between the first report of a cyclone and the actual start of the cyclone (which you seem to want to be able to define yourself), then it would be a systematic error, which would propagate through the analysis, BUT a relationship would STILL show up. IT DOES NOT- The average length of a cyclonic even (as defined by the reports) is 3-7 days http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/cyclone-length-histogram.gif so if there was a question about the definition of a start time, it would not make a big difference in my analysis. > "Tropical cyclones also only [mainly] form from full moon-last quarter" I have shown this to be completely incorrect. Now what is the point of me wasting my time doing any further analysis if you are going to be so pig headed, and not accept the facts that are plainly in front of you? Sure attack my method, look for reasonable flaws in my logic, but don't keep changing the rules to suit your argument! Also, WHEN did I ever say I was reluctant to do a tornado analysis? I am not, I don't know where I would get the data, but I'll have a look. But for heavens sake, be a man and admit when you are wrong. James p.s. from a currently hungover and surly james (congrats to my other half who got a great new job yesterday- did we have to celebrate so hard???) LOL James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 8:05 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . > > Ken, do you admit that your theory re TC's is not sustainable? The facts > > (my analysis) seem to show it, and you are yet to respond to my last > > post, in any way. I did respond. I don't think TCs vs moon's influence has not been proven by your tables. I've explained my views about the huge potential for error in defining cyclone time of formation and movement. e.g. what is a cyclone, when does one become a tropical cyclone, where and when in its formation time is it actually measured etc. A better test would be for tornados, which are much more fleeting and location-specific. But you seem reluctant to do a test such as that. Why? Because with the vagueness absent it just might prove my ideas correct? Perhaps you are afraid of that. Tell you what - you do the tornado thing and I'll give you 6 months worth of back Aussie predictions to play with that you keep asking for, for the whole of Australia in the form printed currently on my website on the Freemonth page.. what do you reckon..? regards Ken www.predictweather.com > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > > Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 11:13 PM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > I agree too. I want no slanging. I'm sorry for being sarcastic. But is > > it at > > all possible that I post something of interest to me, WITHOUT people > > jumping > > down my throat? I mean, give me a break, can I discuss weather from MY > > point > > of view or is it totally offensive to some people for me to do so? Not > > fishing for compliments here, but I can hardly be blamed for people's > > reactions to my ideas. > > Tonight in NZ on TV1 they filmed a documentary entitled Wild Weather. It > > pertains to recent discussion here. Hurricane ANDREW, formed on August > > 14th, > > 1992. The Full moon was August 13th, merely a day before. > > It was also the day of apogee, which, like perigee, its twin, is capable > > of > > either extreme calm or severe weather. ANDREW caused devastation across > > Florida. Hurricane Kenna has JUST reached Mexico, having also formed > > between > > full moon and last quarter(last quarter phase begins today, 29th > > October. > > The other example on the program was the storm that affected the Fastnet > > Yacht Race in the Irish Sea. The storm began on August 10th, 1979. The > > day > > of full moon(and perigee) had occurred on August 8th, two days > > before. That means that every weather event mentioned in the hour long > > program occurred within 2 or 3 days of Full moon. I call that downright > > uncanny, yet the word "moon" was not even mentioned once! > > I also claim that tornados also mostly form at this time of the moon's > > phase > > cycle. As depicted on the program; at Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, no fewer > > than > > 65 tornados in the one day killed 42 and rendered 3,500 homeless on 3rd > > May > > 1999 - AGAIN 3 days after the day of full moon(and apogee). Over the > > last > > two days, within the SAME full moon-last quarter phase period, there > > have > > been two tornados here- a mini-tornado over Auckland which affected > > Hillsborough, and one over Canterbury. > > Ken > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul Yole" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 PM > > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now > > it's > > > just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the > > > weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. > > > > > > PaulY > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard > > > Modistach > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM > > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told > > you > > so' > > > at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your > > reputation > > > or this forum, in future please spare us. > > > > > > richard > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Ken Ring" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > > > fitted > > > > in > > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around > > 16th > > > and > > > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > > > er..hello? > > > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a > > couple > > of > > > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine > > for > > > over > > > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to > > say > > > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > > > personnel > > > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know > > what > > > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > > > MISLEADING > > > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will > > probably > > > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and > > be > > > called > > > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand > > years > > of > > > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who > > will > > > see > > > > some success here.. > > > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > > > Ken > > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "peter tristram" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > > fitted > > > in > > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > > > Brisbane's > > > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for > > hot > > dry > > > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > > of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:34:27 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Ken, My dearest and most humble apologies. All of those years at university and thousands of dollars of HECS fees must have gone to waste. I'll be sure to go to uni and inform my lecturers of their mistakes, and I shall also contact some of the well known academic publishers such as Oxford University Press and Camrbdige University Press etc who have printed textbooks and inform them that the definition of the atmosphere has changed in accordance with yout statement. In space there is no air...in the thermosphere there is air. If the atmosphere is the region of air, then because the thermosphere has air in it then it's part of the atmosphere. Just because there is "not much air" does not mean it's not a part of space! And certainly not to suit your opinion. Furthermore, there's not much air in the mesosphere or stratosphere, should I also inform my lecturers and scholars that they're not a part of the atmosphere too? Where would you like the atmosphere to end, Ken? 6km up in the atmosphere and you're already above half of the available air. 15-16km and you're above 90% of the air, shall we call the upper part of the troposphere the end of the atmosphere? I've already said, it's not that I disagree with your forecasting method. I don't mind how people forecast, whether they use the moon, sunspots, tides, ENSO, forecast models, their gut feeling or want to throw a pair of dice. It's their forecast, and that's fine and if they get it right, kudos to them. What I have a problem with is supporting their method with incorrect information!!! There are people on this list who might actually think that things you have said (for instance, you once explained that the poles are colder because the coldness of space is closer there than at the equator) are actually true! This is extremely wrong! It's cold there because the sun shines on it at an angle so the rays aren't as strong as they're spread over a wider angle. Furthermore, when people have told you they're wrong you don't believe them. I tried the nice tactic a while ago, it didn't work. You only seem to respond to emails with anger in them. Don't twist things around to make them suit your opinion...find some other way of describing it, just don't describe something you've already been informed as being wrong! AC Ken Ring wrote: > > Well, some corrections are necessary here. > The thermosphere is not strictly the atmosphere, it is beyond it. The > atmosphere, by definition, is the name for our region of air. But there aint > much air in the old thermosphere. The thermosphere is the highest and the > largest of the four layers because it's just about space. But it's not as if > there are dividing lines. It's not like those coloured sand-in-bottle > things. The few molecules that are present in the thermosphere receive > extraordinary amounts of energy from the Sun, causing the layer to warm to > such high temperatures. Air temperature, however, is a measure of the > kinetic energy of air molecules, not of the total energy stored by the air. > Therefore, since the air is so thin within the thermosphere, such > temperature values are not comparable to those of the troposphere or > stratosphere. (ref > http://www.doc.mmu.ac.uk/aric/eae/Atmosphere/Older/Thermosphere.html) > "Although the measured temperature is very hot, the thermosphere would > actually feel very COLD to us because the total energy of only a few air > molecules residing there would not be enough to transfer any appreciable > heat to our skin"(quote from the above website). > So as far as I'm concerned my model of the cold of space stands intact. > Sorry that you're getting angry, Anthony. Clearly up till now you have not > had the correct information. > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anthony Cornelius" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:48 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > Ken, > > > > I posted some stuff to you a while back and you conveniently ignored > > it. Now, it is not the moon controlling the weather that I have a > > problem with, I belive it does have an effect, but not to the extent > > that you portray. > > > > However things like... > > > > Ken Ring wrote: > > With atmospheric > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of > the > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > cold > > > of space come closer to ground level. > > > > Several people have pointed out to you that your reasoning here is > > TOTALLY WRONG! Yet you CONTINUE TO IGNORE THEM!!! This frustrates > > people (including myself!) Are you forgetting the rest of the > > atmosphere??? How high do you think the atmosphere is? 15km? Have a > > look at this diagram: > > > > http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/space/atmos.gif > > > > There are not one, BUT TWO warm layers above the surface! First is the > > tropopause near the stratosphere, the second is the thermosphere. The > > thermosphere is so hot it's over a thousand degrees!!! If your theory > > of the "coldness of space" is correct, then if anything we should be > > getting warmer because the thermosphere would be coming closer to us. > > Space doesn't start for over a thousand kilometres...then it gets cold! > > But we have several protective layers that separates us from them. > > > > If you're going to issue forecasts, fine. But for goodness sake don't > > support them with dribble like that (and continue to support them even > > when people have TOLD you it is totally WRONG). In fact, I suspect that > > is what a lot of people have been frustrated with. Not the issuing of > > your unique forecasts, but the INCORRECT INFORMATION you support your > > method with! I for one would much rather you say "I believe there is a > > relationship there, and I believe this will happen but I can't explain > > why" then to teach bad meteorology. Sure everyone gets the wrong idea > > every so often...but to continue to teach that idea when you've been > > told your wrong to me shows that the most closed-minded person here is > > you Ken. > > > > AC > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: aus-wx: 6 months of forecast Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:43:34 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Here's my end of the bargain. regards Ken www.predictweather.com Attachment Converted: "c:\program files\eudora\attach\6 months of Australian forecasts.pdf" From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:03:43 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com No James, I never tire of statistical analyses especially as there's a good chance I could learn something from what someone else does. Other people of course (including me!) are not as well versed as you are in these things but that doesn't water down the importance of your work. So please keep putting them up wherever appropriate. Did you try a (non parametric) Wilcoxon rank sum test between the random numbers and the tropical cyclone counts? If the cyclones are as random as the numbers there should be no statistically signifcant difference between the 2 populations. Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free. ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holbeach" To: Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:41 PM Subject: aus-wx: Question Re current discussion. . . . > Ok, I am not a fan of a slanging match either, but are people getting > sick of my analysis? If so I will not bother posting them here any more. > > Views please, I am relatively new to this list and don't want to tread > on toes. That said, I don't believe I am flaming or slanging Ken, rather > analysing his claims. . . That is all. . . . > > Regardless. . . > > Ken, do you admit that your theory re TC's is not sustainable? The facts > (my analysis) seem to show it, and you are yet to respond to my last > post, in any way. > > Thanks > > James > > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 11:13 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > I agree too. I want no slanging. I'm sorry for being sarcastic. But is > it at > all possible that I post something of interest to me, WITHOUT people > jumping > down my throat? I mean, give me a break, can I discuss weather from MY > point > of view or is it totally offensive to some people for me to do so? Not > fishing for compliments here, but I can hardly be blamed for people's > reactions to my ideas. > Tonight in NZ on TV1 they filmed a documentary entitled Wild Weather. It > pertains to recent discussion here. Hurricane ANDREW, formed on August > 14th, > 1992. The Full moon was August 13th, merely a day before. > It was also the day of apogee, which, like perigee, its twin, is capable > of > either extreme calm or severe weather. ANDREW caused devastation across > Florida. Hurricane Kenna has JUST reached Mexico, having also formed > between > full moon and last quarter(last quarter phase begins today, 29th > October. > The other example on the program was the storm that affected the Fastnet > Yacht Race in the Irish Sea. The storm began on August 10th, 1979. The > day > of full moon(and perigee) had occurred on August 8th, two days > before. That means that every weather event mentioned in the hour long > program occurred within 2 or 3 days of Full moon. I call that downright > uncanny, yet the word "moon" was not even mentioned once! > I also claim that tornados also mostly form at this time of the moon's > phase > cycle. As depicted on the program; at Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, no fewer > than > 65 tornados in the one day killed 42 and rendered 3,500 homeless on 3rd > May > 1999 - AGAIN 3 days after the day of full moon(and apogee). Over the > last > two days, within the SAME full moon-last quarter phase period, there > have > been two tornados here- a mini-tornado over Auckland which affected > Hillsborough, and one over Canterbury. > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Yole" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:25 PM > Subject: RE: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > I agree Richard. Sure, all of this is interesting and such, but now > it's > > just getting into a slanging match. Can we get back to discussing the > > weather instead please. This is starting to get worse than Wx-Chase. > > > > PaulY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Richard > > Modistach > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 AM > > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told > you > so' > > at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your > reputation > > or this forum, in future please spare us. > > > > richard > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ken Ring" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > > fitted > > > in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around > 16th > > and > > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > > er..hello? > > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a > couple > of > > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine > for > > over > > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to > say > > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > > personnel > > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know > what > > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > > MISLEADING > > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will > probably > > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and > be > > called > > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand > years > of > > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who > will > > see > > > some success here.. > > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "peter tristram" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > fitted > > in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > > Brisbane's > > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for > hot > dry > > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:22:45 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Hi Ken, > > My dearest and most humble apologies. All of those years at university > and thousands of dollars of HECS fees must have gone to waste. I'll be > sure to go to uni and inform my lecturers of their mistakes, and I shall > also contact some of the well known academic publishers such as Oxford > University Press and Camrbdige University Press etc who have printed > textbooks and inform them that the definition of the atmosphere has > changed in accordance with yout statement. If you say so, but don't get too drastic, Anthony, they were only doing their best.. > In space there is no air... Correct > in the thermosphere there is air. Incorrect. You couldn't breathe there without oxygen. > Furthermore, there's not much air in the mesosphere or > stratosphere, should I also inform my lecturers and scholars that > they're not a part of the atmosphere too? Suit yourself. > Where would you like the > atmosphere to end, Ken? 6km up in the atmosphere and you're already > above half of the available air. 15-16km and you're above 90% of the > air, shall we call the upper part of the troposphere the end of the > atmosphere? Yes, for purposes of this discussion. Where is the end of your finger if viewed under an electron microscope? Impossible to determine. At that level of scrutiny the "fingerness" just gets less and less in density. That's the scale of measurement we're doing here. > What I have a problem with is supporting > their method with incorrect information!!! Me too, same.. > There are people on this > list who might actually think that things you have said (for instance, > you once explained that the poles are colder because the coldness of > space is closer there than at the equator) are actually true! This is > extremely wrong! Do you agree that the useful atmosphere is only a mile high above the poles and about 15 miles high at the equator, or not? If so then you must surely accept that the cold of space comes down to near ground level. If not, then how high do you think the atmosphere IS above the poles? Would you like me to give you refs. to the studies done that I have read about and downloaded from the net accordingly? I didn't make this stuff up - it's well documented by NASA and others. .> It's cold there because the sun shines on it at an > angle so the rays aren't as strong as they're spread over a wider > angle. I agree, sure that adds to it, but it's not the whole story. > Furthermore, when people have told you they're wrong you don't > believe them. I tried the nice tactic a while ago, it didn't work. I see, according to the Anthony Law, just because someone tells me I'm wrong I have to believe them. Doesn't seem like a scientific discussion at that point. Were you a bully in the school playground too? > You > only seem to respond to emails with anger in them. No, I enjoy others too, but the angry ones tell me the writers are probably afraid of changing their mindsets, which is not my problem.. > Don't twist things around to make them suit your opinion...find some > other way of describing it, just don't describe something you've already > been informed as being wrong! I'll try to remember that. Thanks for the advice. In return, may I suggest you try to apply some commonsense to what you say, instead of just repeating off what you have read in obsolete textbooks. And thanks for taking trouble with your replies. I mean that sincerely. We may disagree but I welcome the chance to present an alternative viewpoint. I have been a scientist for 30 years. I am sad to say that in my opinion much of current science has been hijacked by politics and profit and the much of the real research now being done that anyone can trust is by those who get labelled mavericks. > > Well, some corrections are necessary here. > > The thermosphere is not strictly the atmosphere, it is beyond it. The > > atmosphere, by definition, is the name for our region of air. But there aint > > much air in the old thermosphere. The thermosphere is the highest and the > > largest of the four layers because it's just about space. But it's not as if > > there are dividing lines. It's not like those coloured sand-in-bottle > > things. The few molecules that are present in the thermosphere receive > > extraordinary amounts of energy from the Sun, causing the layer to warm to > > such high temperatures. Air temperature, however, is a measure of the > > kinetic energy of air molecules, not of the total energy stored by the air. > > Therefore, since the air is so thin within the thermosphere, such > > temperature values are not comparable to those of the troposphere or > > stratosphere. (ref > > http://www.doc.mmu.ac.uk/aric/eae/Atmosphere/Older/Thermosphere.html) > > "Although the measured temperature is very hot, the thermosphere would > > actually feel very COLD to us because the total energy of only a few air > > molecules residing there would not be enough to transfer any appreciable > > heat to our skin"(quote from the above website). > > So as far as I'm concerned my model of the cold of space stands intact. > > Sorry that you're getting angry, Anthony. Clearly up till now you have not > > had the correct information. > > Ken > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Anthony Cornelius" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:48 AM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > Ken, > > > > > > I posted some stuff to you a while back and you conveniently ignored > > > it. Now, it is not the moon controlling the weather that I have a > > > problem with, I belive it does have an effect, but not to the extent > > > that you portray. > > > > > > However things like... > > > > > > Ken Ring wrote: > > > With atmospheric > > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out of > > the > > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets the > > cold > > > > of space come closer to ground level. > > > > > > Several people have pointed out to you that your reasoning here is > > > TOTALLY WRONG! Yet you CONTINUE TO IGNORE THEM!!! This frustrates > > > people (including myself!) Are you forgetting the rest of the > > > atmosphere??? How high do you think the atmosphere is? 15km? Have a > > > look at this diagram: > > > > > > http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/space/atmos.gif > > > > > > There are not one, BUT TWO warm layers above the surface! First is the > > > tropopause near the stratosphere, the second is the thermosphere. The > > > thermosphere is so hot it's over a thousand degrees!!! If your theory > > > of the "coldness of space" is correct, then if anything we should be > > > getting warmer because the thermosphere would be coming closer to us. > > > Space doesn't start for over a thousand kilometres...then it gets cold! > > > But we have several protective layers that separates us from them. > > > > > > If you're going to issue forecasts, fine. But for goodness sake don't > > > support them with dribble like that (and continue to support them even > > > when people have TOLD you it is totally WRONG). In fact, I suspect that > > > is what a lot of people have been frustrated with. Not the issuing of > > > your unique forecasts, but the INCORRECT INFORMATION you support your > > > method with! I for one would much rather you say "I believe there is a > > > relationship there, and I believe this will happen but I can't explain > > > why" then to teach bad meteorology. Sure everyone gets the wrong idea > > > every so often...but to continue to teach that idea when you've been > > > told your wrong to me shows that the most closed-minded person here is > > > you Ken. > > > > > > AC > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > -- > Anthony Cornelius > Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the > Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) > (07) 3390 4812 > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:30:42 +1100 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather Subject: aus-wx: Raob 5.2 updated Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Interactive mode has been upgraded to allow changing wind speeds and direction at all altitudes. http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~ventus45/Raob52/Moree_1.gif http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~ventus45/Raob52/Moree_2.gif +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:50:39 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Craig, welcome to the list. I know this is off-topic, but I would love to hear the story of how you came to have an e-mail address like that. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Third" To: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:17:06 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > Well this is my first post here - my names Craig (pardon the dodgy > e-mail > address) and my interest in stuff weather comes from involvement in the > SES. > > Ben they are excellent lightning shots - I know you said where they > were > taken in an earlier post - could you remind me where ? > > Craig > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ben Quinn" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 PM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > Evening all > > > > Thanks for you comments guys > > > > It's a time exposure (15 seconds) but it all came down in one hit, 13 > > seconds into the exposure. I've uploaded a couple more shots from > the > night > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_01.jpg > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_02.jpg > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_03.jpg > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_04.jpg > > (the fourth is a smaller version of the close strike posted by TM) > > > > Note the first three shots have been cropped to center or show the > lightning > > better, as opposed to the fourth which is completely untouched apart > from > > being resized for the internet. The camera used was a Cannon G2 > (digital), > > 15 second exposures at between 38 and 110mm zoom and appature of F4.5 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Leslie Muir" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike > > > Les > > > > > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > > > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > > > > > >Regs. Paul. > > > >(Stargazer) > > > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > >To: > > > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > > > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being > and > has > > > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Tornados v Moon Age. Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:56:39 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tornados v Moon Age.

Ok I've kept my end of the bargain I analysed tornado data. . . . it is amazing what you can find on the net if you look hard enough!! LOL

I got the data from here

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/archive/tornadoes/

Annoyingly, it does not have a single file for all states, but I figured Texas gets enough tornadoes to sink a ship, so I just analyzed Texas.

Between 1950 and 1995, Texas had 5934 Tornodic events (made that word up :D), of which 5925 were classified as tornados. Again I simply calculated the moon age at each event, and then produced a plot showing the number of tornados between particular ages.

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist.gif

and the distribution produced by a set of random numbers

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist-rand.gif

While there does seem to be a very slight tendency for tornadoes to form near the end/beginning of the moon age, no solid conclusions could be drawn from this as it could be still due to statistical error.

 

To put these results in another way

There is a 20.2% chance of a tornado between moon age 0-5.9days

There is a 19.5% chance of a tornado between moon age 5.9-11.8days

There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 12-17.7days

There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 17.7-23.6days

There is a 21.7% chance of a tornado between moon age 23.6-29.5days

However there is a statistical 1.3% error in each of those figures (1/root(N))- I think that is the right way to do it- it has been a while since I did this stuff :).

It DEFINITELY shows that there is no significant relationship between tornado formation and the phase of the moon.

Oh and Kieth, I'll give it a shot, but I have deliberately done it this way so that everyone can easily understand it.

The spreadsheet is available. It is MUCH better annotated than the cyclone one. The cyclone one required a few tricks to extract the data, but this one is much simpler.

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/textorn.xls.gz [0.99Mb] Much smaller :) is a 4.9Mb Excel file unzipped

Hope this helps

Cheers

James

James Holbeach

----------------------------------------

Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

University of Melbourne, Australia

ph. +61 3 8344 6652

----------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring
Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 9:44 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: 6 months of forecast

Here's my end of the bargain.

regards

Ken

www.predictweather.com

X-Sender: carls at xenios.qldnet.com.au (Unverified) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:13:29 +1000 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Carl Smith Subject: Re: aus-wx: 6 months of forecast > text version online Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi All. As Ken somehow managed to get the pages out of order in his PDF file (according to my version of Acrobat reader), I have uploaded a plain text version of Ken's 6 month Australian forecast at: http://users.qldnet.com.au/~carls/temp/ken_ring_6_month_forecast.txt I have taken the liberty of adding a Moon Addendum showing Apogee, Perigee, New Moon and Full Moon dates beneath each month (all dates and times UTC). Regards, Carl. >Here's my end of the bargain. >regards >Ken >www.predictweather.com > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Keith Barnett" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Tornados v Moon Age. Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:26:42 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Tornados v Moon Age.
James,
Would it be possible for you to send the excel file in .ZIP format? I would like to run the stats test we were referring to but I only have WinZip and it gives me error messages.
Thanks
Keith Barnett
Weather fanatic and classical musician
Website: http://www.wthrman.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: aus-wx: Tornados v Moon Age.

Ok I've kept my end of the bargain I analysed tornado data. . . . it is amazing what you can find on the net if you look hard enough!! LOL

I got the data from here

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/archive/tornadoes/

Annoyingly, it does not have a single file for all states, but I figured Texas gets enough tornadoes to sink a ship, so I just analyzed Texas.

Between 1950 and 1995, Texas had 5934 Tornodic events (made that word up :D), of which 5925 were classified as tornados. Again I simply calculated the moon age at each event, and then produced a plot showing the number of tornados between particular ages.

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist.gif

and the distribution produced by a set of random numbers

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist-rand.gif

While there does seem to be a very slight tendency for tornadoes to form near the end/beginning of the moon age, no solid conclusions could be drawn from this as it could be still due to statistical error.

 

To put these results in another way

There is a 20.2% chance of a tornado between moon age 0-5.9days

There is a 19.5% chance of a tornado between moon age 5.9-11.8days

There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 12-17.7days

There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 17.7-23.6days

There is a 21.7% chance of a tornado between moon age 23.6-29.5days

However there is a statistical 1.3% error in each of those figures (1/root(N))- I think that is the right way to do it- it has been a while since I did this stuff :).

It DEFINITELY shows that there is no significant relationship between tornado formation and the phase of the moon.

Oh and Kieth, I'll give it a shot, but I have deliberately done it this way so that everyone can easily understand it.

The spreadsheet is available. It is MUCH better annotated than the cyclone one. The cyclone one required a few tricks to extract the data, but this one is much simpler.

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/textorn.xls.gz [0.99Mb] Much smaller :) is a 4.9Mb Excel file unzipped

Hope this helps

Cheers

James

James Holbeach

----------------------------------------

Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

University of Melbourne, Australia

ph. +61 3 8344 6652

----------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring
Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 9:44 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: aus-wx: 6 months of forecast

Here's my end of the bargain.

regards

Ken

www.predictweather.com

X-Sender: nzts.nz at pop3.caverock.net.nz X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:04:40 +1300 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: John Gaul Subject: Re: aus-wx: NZ Tornados Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 08:00 28/10/02 +1100, you wrote: > That is a great shot of the tornado ! The guy who took it gave out a >classic quote >"We were waiting for sheds to go up in the air but we never got to have >that enjoyment ... I was thinking `where's that bunker we should be diving >into'." Hmm I wonder what movie he's been watching ... ----- >Original Message ----- From: Steven Williams To: >aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:15 >AM Subject: aus-wx: NZ Tornados > There is a nice picture on the front cover of the Christchurch press >of a tornado just SE of the city. >http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/thepress/0,2106,2093162a6009,00.html A >F1 tornado did minor property damage in Aucklands western suburbs >friday. Worst affected house had Yes indeed a great shot of the tornado which rated as F1 in my books. I videoed it from the other side, looking south and it did look menacing although it had lifted back up into the cloud before I managed to get to the site where it was. About 20 minutes previous to that I did observe and filmed a smaller funnel roughly about the West Melton area along the same line of cloud. It was hazy though. I'm beginning to wonder, now, if it was in someways a, and excuse me for this quote, I know how you hate this word on this list - a mini-supercell development???????? It was an interesting day weather-wize, especially after the NE kicked in just before noon. Things began to happen in all directions with the first clap of thunder overhead about 30 minutes after. Things were happening relatively quickly. The development of the cloud that produced the tornado was after the first lots of thunder which moved away to the east over the Port Hills. I noticed huge uplifts and massive Cb top. Thunder was rumbling away mostly in the cloud, but it was getting darker and I thought I would move close toward where the storm was developing. What I filmed was the tornado about 5 miles away. A similar tornado passed through the Halswell area on January 19th 1983. A bit more closer to where i filmed. The 1983 tornado did $3 million dollars worth of damage. This one was over farmland so less damage occured. A one in 20 year event for Canterbury, New Zealand !!! JohnGaul NZTS +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:08:06 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 01:22 PM 29/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > > in the thermosphere there is air. >Incorrect. You couldn't breathe there without oxygen. There is "something" in the thermosphere, mostly highly excited ions, but they're there. Either that, or some mysterious phenomenon returns the HF signals I send back to Earth in a different place. Oh, and what slows down the ISS such that it needs a boost every few weeks? (The ISS orbits in the thermosphere). However, I sense a semantic argument as to where "space" starts (afterall, "space" isn't empty, but it contains gas and dust at extremely low densities). The question is at what amount (i.e. molecular density) does the atmosphere approximate a "complete vacuum"? >Yes, for purposes of this discussion. Where is the end of your finger if >viewed under an electron microscope? Impossible to determine. At that level >of scrutiny the "fingerness" just gets less and less in density. That's the >scale of measurement we're doing here. Exactly. There is no "point" where the atmosphere ends and space begins, but the atmosphere just gradually thins out until the molecular density approaches that of the surrounding space. The question is how much of this "atmosphere" is significant then it comes to the question of lunar influence and the weather (I've already proved that the extremely thin thermosphere/ionosphere is significant for HF radio communications and low earth satellites). Note: the "F" layer (which supports HF radio) is at a similar altitude to ISS... >Do you agree that the useful atmosphere is only a mile high above the poles >and about 15 miles high at the equator, or not? If so then you must surely >accept that the cold of space comes down to near ground level. If not, then >how high do you think the atmosphere IS above the poles? Would you like me >to give you refs. to the studies done that I have read about and downloaded >from the net accordingly? I didn't make this stuff up - it's well documented >by NASA and others. Hmm, I wasn't aware of "thinning" at the poles to this extent. If you have references, show them, and NASA is certainly what most people would consider a "credible" source, but we'd like to be able to examine this ourselves. The issue here is you've done the research, so it should be easier to come up with the references (you do include bibliographies when you write papers?). >I'll try to remember that. Thanks for the advice. In return, may I suggest >you try to apply some commonsense to what you say, instead of just repeating >off what you have read in obsolete textbooks. >And thanks for taking trouble with your replies. I mean that sincerely. We >may disagree but I welcome the chance to present an alternative viewpoint. I >have been a scientist for 30 years. I am sad to say that in my opinion much >of current science has been hijacked by politics and profit and the much of >the real research now being done that anyone can trust is by those who get >labelled mavericks. I'm open to new ideas, but I like to see evidence so I can mull them over. The study of your predictions over time will be a part of that process. I'm watching this with interest. 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.221.136.235] From: "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:09:23 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2002 09:09:24.0341 (UTC) FILETIME=[E0028250:01C27F2A] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi every1, OK...not that I care to contribute to the rapidly escalating flamefest...but I'm pretty sure things like solar flares expand the atmosphere (total atmosphere - not just any bit of it - whatever the definition), so shouldn't solar flares produce influences just as great if not greater than those of the Moon? Food for thought anyway. Cheers, Kevin from Wycheproof. P.S. The statistics provided are well and truly within the realm of a random distribution no matter which method I used. I'm forwarding them to a mate in the Stats section of Melbourne Uni. and Dr. Karl's site...not that I expect any great revelations to occur. P.P.S. The tidal influences quoted at around dawn and dusk (+/- 2 hours) can easily be accounted for by solar radiation minima and maxima...i.e it's not only darkest before the dawn, it's also usually coldest... >From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:08:06 +1100 > >At 01:22 PM 29/10/2002 +1300, you wrote: > >> > in the thermosphere there is air. >>Incorrect. You couldn't breathe there without oxygen. > >There is "something" in the thermosphere, mostly highly excited ions, but >they're there. Either that, or some mysterious phenomenon returns the HF >signals I send back to Earth in a different place. Oh, and what slows down >the ISS such that it needs a boost every few weeks? (The ISS orbits in the >thermosphere). > >However, I sense a semantic argument as to where "space" starts (afterall, >"space" isn't empty, but it contains gas and dust at extremely low >densities). The question is at what amount (i.e. molecular density) does >the atmosphere approximate a "complete vacuum"? > >>Yes, for purposes of this discussion. Where is the end of your finger if >>viewed under an electron microscope? Impossible to determine. At that >>level >>of scrutiny the "fingerness" just gets less and less in density. That's >>the >>scale of measurement we're doing here. > >Exactly. There is no "point" where the atmosphere ends and space begins, >but the atmosphere just gradually thins out until the molecular density >approaches that of the surrounding space. > >The question is how much of this "atmosphere" is significant then it comes >to the question of lunar influence and the weather (I've already proved >that the extremely thin thermosphere/ionosphere is significant for HF radio >communications and low earth satellites). Note: the "F" layer (which >supports HF radio) is at a similar altitude to ISS... > >>Do you agree that the useful atmosphere is only a mile high above the >>poles >>and about 15 miles high at the equator, or not? If so then you must surely >>accept that the cold of space comes down to near ground level. If not, >>then >>how high do you think the atmosphere IS above the poles? Would you like me >>to give you refs. to the studies done that I have read about and >>downloaded >>from the net accordingly? I didn't make this stuff up - it's well >>documented >>by NASA and others. > >Hmm, I wasn't aware of "thinning" at the poles to this extent. If you have >references, show them, and NASA is certainly what most people would >consider a "credible" source, but we'd like to be able to examine this >ourselves. The issue here is you've done the research, so it should be >easier to come up with the references (you do include bibliographies when >you write papers?). > >>I'll try to remember that. Thanks for the advice. In return, may I suggest >>you try to apply some commonsense to what you say, instead of just >>repeating >>off what you have read in obsolete textbooks. >>And thanks for taking trouble with your replies. I mean that sincerely. We >>may disagree but I welcome the chance to present an alternative viewpoint. >>I >>have been a scientist for 30 years. I am sad to say that in my opinion >>much >>of current science has been hijacked by politics and profit and the much >>of >>the real research now being done that anyone can trust is by those who get >>labelled mavericks. > >I'm open to new ideas, but I like to see evidence so I can mull them over. >The study of your predictions over time will be a part of that process. >I'm watching this with interest. > >73 de Tony, VK3JED >http://vkradio.com > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:09:44 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com More than agreed Karl. I'm out. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Lijnders" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:54 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > There is no good coming out of this, I think Ken is intitled to his points > of view and expressing his ideas openly like we all do here. His theories > to some may not be right, OK fair enough, but to some others it may be > interesting. > > I have enjoyed the debate, but its when it turns slinging, its really not > really enjoyable at all. > > Karl :) > > > > > > > >From: "Richard Modistach" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > >Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:35:56 +1030 > > > >getting on your high horse and thumbing your nose and saying 'i told you > >so' > >at people and slagging off the bom doesn't do anything for your reputation > >or this forum, in future please spare us. > > > >richard > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Ken Ring" > >To: > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:16 PM > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > >fitted > > > in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast > > > Well now, since you asked, I said "Brisbane can expect falls around 16th > >and > > > 28th-30th.." So was it right or was it right? James? David? Jane? > >er..hello? > > > Check it folks - that's been on my website (Freemonth page)for a couple > >of > > > weeks now at least, and on the editor's desk of Lifetsyle magazine for > >over > > > two months. If I wasn't such a modest and humble chap I'd venture to say > > > that such a result runs rings around poor weary old ex-metservice > >personnel > > > who have trouble predicting their own birthdays. BUT... I bet I know > >what > > > will happen next. Such a forecast so far ahead will be considered > >MISLEADING > > > to some and not significant to others because a random graph will > >probably > > > show the same result. It will not prove anything to yet others and be > >called > > > a coincidence. There will be one or two who will need a thousand years > >of > > > past data to be convinced. BUT..da da..there will be a tiny few who will > >see > > > some success here.. > > > I suggest we don't lose sight of the fun.. > > > Ken > > > www.predictweather.com > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "peter tristram" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:33 PM > > > Subject: aus-wx: Repton rain - how good was Ken... > > > > > > > > > > 76mm at Repton for the 36 hrs until 9am today. I wonder how this > >fitted > >in > > > > with Ken's Brisbane October forecast - is Coffs Harbour within > >Brisbane's > > > > general 'range'? Bugger all for the rest of the month except for hot > >dry > > > > winds, smoke and the odd dust storm! > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.404 / Virus Database: 228 - Release Date: 15/10/2002 > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > > message. > > > > > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now! > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.221.136.235] From: "Kevin Phyland" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: NZ Tornados Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:14:40 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2002 09:14:40.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[9C4E65A0:01C27F2B] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi John, Congrats!!! You've also touched on one of my pet theories...that some storms which produce tornadoes (not necesarily "gustnadoes" (sic) either) may not obey the classical or traditional Great Plains model of supercell development. Good catch anyway, man! Cheers, Kevin from Wycheproof. >From: John Gaul >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: NZ Tornados >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:04:40 +1300 > >At 08:00 28/10/02 +1100, you wrote: > > That is a great shot of the tornado ! The guy who took it gave out a > >classic quote > >"We were waiting for sheds to go up in the air but we never got to have > >that enjoyment ... I was thinking `where's that bunker we should be >diving > >into'." Hmm I wonder what movie he's been watching ... ----- > >Original Message ----- From: Steven Williams To: > >aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:15 > >AM Subject: aus-wx: NZ Tornados > > There is a nice picture on the front cover of the Christchurch >press > >of a tornado just SE of the city. > >http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/thepress/0,2106,2093162a6009,00.html A > >F1 tornado did minor property damage in Aucklands western suburbs > >friday. Worst affected house had > >Yes indeed a great shot of the tornado which rated as F1 in my books. >I videoed it from the other side, looking south and it did look menacing >although it had lifted back up into the cloud before I managed to get to >the site where it was. >About 20 minutes previous to that I did observe and filmed a smaller funnel >roughly about the West Melton area along the same line of cloud. It was >hazy though. >I'm beginning to wonder, now, if it was in someways a, and excuse me for >this quote, I know how you hate this word on this list - a mini-supercell >development???????? >It was an interesting day weather-wize, especially after the NE kicked in >just before noon. >Things began to happen in all directions with the first clap of thunder >overhead about 30 minutes after. Things were happening relatively quickly. >The development of the cloud that produced the tornado was after the first >lots of thunder which moved away to the east over the Port Hills. >I noticed huge uplifts and massive Cb top. Thunder was rumbling away mostly >in the cloud, but it was getting darker and I thought I would move close >toward where the storm was developing. >What I filmed was the tornado about 5 miles away. A similar tornado passed >through the Halswell area on January 19th 1983. A bit more closer to where >i filmed. The 1983 tornado did $3 million dollars worth of damage. This one >was over farmland so less damage occured. >A one in 20 year event for Canterbury, New Zealand !!! > >JohnGaul >NZTS > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:23:33 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com P.S.S.S. Sorry, It's usually the best time to pinch your neighbours paper too! > P.P.S. The tidal influences quoted at around dawn and dusk (+/- 2 hours) can > easily be accounted for by solar radiation minima and maxima...i.e it's not > only darkest before the dawn, it's also usually coldest... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:41:53 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Wx-Chase , Aus-wx Subject: aus-wx: Monster Storms & Gustfront From Wide Bay & Lightning Show! Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi everyone, I've uploaded some new chase reports... http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/26_10_02ac.html Dayboro CC/crawler show http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/27_10_02ac.html Severe storm near Biggenden - massive cell! Gale force inflow into it, produced winds around 100km/h...trees snapped in half etc. http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/27_10_02-01ac.html Later that day...more storms, awesome mammatus, massive gustfront also! Topped off by a squall line that gave a great lightning show Also, I've added 3D radar for the October 9 Border Range Supercell (thanks to the Bureau), great BWER! http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/09_10_02ac.html See: http://www.downunderchase.com/stormchasing/02-03/index.html for the remainder of this season's chase reports! -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:25:43 +1100 From: Peter Creswick X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather Subject: aus-wx: Raob 5.2 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all. Raob 5.2 development continues, and the features continue to grow. For those who may be interested, I have put up a fairly comprehensive set of screen grabs of the analysis of Brisbane's Monday morning trace at http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~ventus45/Raob52/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:29:58 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Bussy, sometimes your short contributions are almost naughty. But keep it up. I love to get a good grin from them! Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Bussy" To: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:23:33 +1100 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere > P.S.S.S. Sorry, It's usually the best time to pinch your neighbours > paper > too! > > > P.P.S. The tidal influences quoted at around dawn and dusk (+/- 2 > hours) > can > > easily be accounted for by solar radiation minima and maxima...i.e > it's > not > > only darkest before the dawn, it's also usually coldest... > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: ASWA Victoria meeting Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:21:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The next Victorian ASWA meeting will be a barbeque to be held at: ** Location: Bellbird Picnic area - off Yarra Boulevard, Kew (see map - http://www.stormchasers.au.com/barbeque.htm look for the red cross south of the freeway near the river) ** Time: Saturday 9th November starting at 11am with cricket / frisbee / football ** Menu: To be followed by a sumptuous barbeque cooked by 'expert barbeque chef' Macca (and helpers) ** Attendees: members, friends and family all most welcome ** Donation: $2 per head ** Please note - there may not be formal presentations at this meeting, but if we can find a powerpoint on a gumtree, well...... Please RSVP cadence at australianskynweather.com by Thursday 7th November -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:33:21 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ok - well as I said my name is Craig and my interest in weather comes primarily from my involvement in the State Emergency Service as a volunteer. I would say I have a fairly limited technical knowledge of weather given the in depth nature of some of the posts here. It will be good to gain some more knowledge. My part of the world is Pine Rivers Shire which is to the immediate North of Brisbane. Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Deguara" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:08 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > Hi Third... > > As is the usual case on this list in order to welcome ALL the new 'posters' > to the list (perhaps at an awkward time, could you please tell us a little > about yourselves: where you are from, what you do, your age, your favourite > weather and how you got interested in weather in the first place. > > Jimmy Deguara > > At 06:17 AM 29/10/2002 +1000, you wrote: > >Well this is my first post here - my names Craig (pardon the dodgy e-mail > >address) and my interest in stuff weather comes from involvement in the SES. > > > >Ben they are excellent lightning shots - I know you said where they were > >taken in an earlier post - could you remind me where ? > > > >Craig > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Ben Quinn" > >To: > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 PM > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > Evening all > > > > > > Thanks for you comments guys > > > > > > It's a time exposure (15 seconds) but it all came down in one hit, 13 > > > seconds into the exposure. I've uploaded a couple more shots from the > >night > > > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_01.jpg > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_02.jpg > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_03.jpg > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_04.jpg > > > (the fourth is a smaller version of the close strike posted by TM) > > > > > > Note the first three shots have been cropped to center or show the > >lightning > > > better, as opposed to the fourth which is completely untouched apart from > > > being resized for the internet. The camera used was a Cannon G2 > >(digital), > > > 15 second exposures at between 38 and 110mm zoom and appature of F4.5 > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Leslie Muir" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike > > > > Les > > > > > > > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > > > > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > > > > > > > >Regs. Paul. > > > > >(Stargazer) > > > > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > > >To: > > > > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > > > > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and > >has > > > > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > >to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > >your > > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:35:39 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com A near BBQ at the meatworks you reckon ! thanks - I know that area well Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Quinn" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:19 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > G'day Craig > > Welcome to the list > > The first 3 were taken from the D'aguilar Highway about 25-30km's (i guess) > east of Kilkoy on Saturday night- the mountain the bolts are striking is Mt > Archer. The fourth was taken 2-3k's east of Kilkoy on a side road. The > bolts would have come down very close to the meatworks on the edge of town. > Anyone working there at the time would have known about it that's for sure! > > Cheers > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Third" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 6:17 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > Well this is my first post here - my names Craig (pardon the dodgy e-mail > > address) and my interest in stuff weather comes from involvement in the > SES. > > > > Ben they are excellent lightning shots - I know you said where they were > > taken in an earlier post - could you remind me where ? > > > > Craig > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ben Quinn" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > Evening all > > > > > > Thanks for you comments guys > > > > > > It's a time exposure (15 seconds) but it all came down in one hit, 13 > > > seconds into the exposure. I've uploaded a couple more shots from the > > night > > > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_01.jpg > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_02.jpg > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_03.jpg > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_04.jpg > > > (the fourth is a smaller version of the close strike posted by TM) > > > > > > Note the first three shots have been cropped to center or show the > > lightning > > > better, as opposed to the fourth which is completely untouched apart > from > > > being resized for the internet. The camera used was a Cannon G2 > > (digital), > > > 15 second exposures at between 38 and 110mm zoom and appature of F4.5 > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Leslie Muir" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike > > > > Les > > > > > > > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > > > > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > > > > > > > >Regs. Paul. > > > > >(Stargazer) > > > > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > > >To: > > > > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > > > > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being and > > has > > > > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Third" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:44:55 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Phil, Nothing very exciting about that really. it's actually my second e-mail address (i use it when I subscribe to all sorts of things - that way if I end up involved in something i don't want to be I can cancel the address and the people I know can contact me on my primary address - typing that makes me think I may be a wee bit paranoid !!) Anyway - basically I grabbed it out of a book of the scripts to Monty Python's flying circus. Just some obscure character. Didn't really want to know all that did you ? Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Smith" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:50 AM Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > Craig, welcome to the list. I know this is off-topic, but I would love > to hear the story of how you came to have an e-mail address like that. > > Phil > <>< > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Third" > To: > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:17:06 +1000 > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > Well this is my first post here - my names Craig (pardon the dodgy > > e-mail > > address) and my interest in stuff weather comes from involvement in the > > SES. > > > > Ben they are excellent lightning shots - I know you said where they > > were > > taken in an earlier post - could you remind me where ? > > > > Craig > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ben Quinn" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 PM > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > Evening all > > > > > > Thanks for you comments guys > > > > > > It's a time exposure (15 seconds) but it all came down in one hit, 13 > > > seconds into the exposure. I've uploaded a couple more shots from > > the > > night > > > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_01.jpg > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_02.jpg > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_03.jpg > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_04.jpg > > > (the fourth is a smaller version of the close strike posted by TM) > > > > > > Note the first three shots have been cropped to center or show the > > lightning > > > better, as opposed to the fourth which is completely untouched apart > > from > > > being resized for the internet. The camera used was a Cannon G2 > > (digital), > > > 15 second exposures at between 38 and 110mm zoom and appature of F4.5 > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Leslie Muir" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one strike > > > > Les > > > > > > > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > > > > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > > > > > > > >Regs. Paul. > > > > >(Stargazer) > > > > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > > >To: > > > > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > > > > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time being > > and > > has > > > > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > > of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > > of > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Third" To: "weather" Subject: aus-wx: wind gust Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:05:57 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I have a question (I think I know the answer but want to test it)
 
For those of you in SE Qld - a few years ago I was camping with friends at Burton's Well - A campsite on the NW side of the Bunya Mountains near Kingaroy.  A thunderstorm developed late in the afternoon and came over the mountain from the SW as they do.  The lower areas of some the appeared to be at maybe double (pure guess) the tree height and rushed overhead at a tremendous rate of knots.
 
As the storm rushed over the escarpment there was an incredible (but quite localised) gust of wind from the NE (the opposite directionfrom where the storm was approaching).  Strong enough that it destroyed 3 tents (including my own).  It was however such a localised gust that other tents (including open tarps on poles) were left unscathed.  We then went on to have a lovely storm with wind and hail.
 
My uneducated assumption was that as the storm crossed over the mountain at low level it compressed the air on the Eastern side creating the 'backdraft' of wind that gave us an excuse to buy a new tent.  Is that a good assumption ?  and any ideas on why it was so localised - the strip of damage couldn't have been more than 15metres wide with very flimsy structures to either side completely untouched.
 
Craig
 
From: "Jason Beer" To: Subject: aus-wx: road wind Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:39:25 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Not related to Thirds wind post but it reminded me of something.
 
When I have been driving in the desert, occassionally, you will hit a very local channel of wind crossing the road that may only be 50 - 200 meters wide.(long? as you drive through it)
 
It is so strong and sudden that it can blow you onto the wrong side of the road. Thank goodness the roads are not busy. But it may explain the occasional head on crash.
 
Do any of you educated on weather people explain this? Is it just a freak gust or is it a local high velocity "river" of wind? If it is a river of wind does anyone know how long they may stream for? kms and time wise.
 
No, I do not know what cycle the moon was in at the time of occurance.  So if the moon cycle is relevant or not I cannot give any indication other than it was daytime. Driving at night is very dangerous - cows, horses, camels, roos, pigs etc etc ;-) 
 
thanks
 
Jas
From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: aus-wx: Victorian ASWA meeting Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:18:47 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The next Victorian ASWA meeting will be a barbeque to be held at: ** Location: Bellbird Picnic area - Yarra Boulevard, KEW not far from the Eastern Freeway (see link for map - http://www.stormchasers.au.com/barbeque.htm look for the red cross south of the freeway near the river) ** Time: Saturday 9th November starting at 11am with cricket / frisbee / football ** Menu: a sumptuous barbeque cooked by 'expert barbeque chef' Macca (and helpers) ** Attendees: ASWA members, friends and family all most welcome ** Donation: $2 per head ** Available on the day: ASWA car stickers, caps, shirts Please RSVP cadence at australianskynweather.com by Thursday 7th November to allow us to cater for the event. NB: there will be no formal presentations at this meeting...unless we find a powerpoint on a tree........ Look forward to seeing all of you there!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] From: "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: road wind Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:37:28 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2002 21:37:29.0008 (UTC) FILETIME=[615B2B00:01C27F93] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

Could have been an invisible dust devil

>From: "Jason Beer"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: aus-wx: road wind
>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:39:25 +0100
>
>Not related to Thirds wind post but it reminded me of something.
>
>When I have been driving in the desert, occassionally, you will hit a very local channel of wind crossing the road that may only be 50 - 200 meters wide.(long? as you drive through it)
>
>It is so strong and sudden that it can blow you onto the wrong side of the road. Thank goodness the roads are not busy. But it may explain the occasional head on crash.
>
>Do any of you educated on weather people explain this? Is it just a freak gust or is it a local high velocity "river" of wind? If it is a river of wind does anyone know how long they may stream for? kms and time wise.
>
>No, I do not know what cycle the moon was in at the time of occurance. So if the moon cycle is relevant or not I cannot give any indication other than it was daytime. Driving at night is very dangerous - cows, horses, camels, roos, pigs etc etc ;-)
>
>thanks
>
>Jas


Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "Jason Beer" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: road wind Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 23:29:29 +0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
No I don´t think so. There was plenty of loose dirt around the road and it was not disturbed. Indicating to me that it was steady blow. This happened on much more than one occasion.
 
cheers
 
Jas
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of michael king
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:37 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: road wind

Could have been an invisible dust devil

>From: "Jason Beer"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: aus-wx: road wind
>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:39:25 +0100
>
>Not related to Thirds wind post but it reminded me of something.
>
>When I have been driving in the desert, occassionally, you will hit a very local channel of wind crossing the road that may only be 50 - 200 meters wide.(long? as you drive through it)
>
>It is so strong and sudden that it can blow you onto the wrong side of the road. Thank goodness the roads are not busy. But it may explain the occasional head on crash.
>
>Do any of you educated on weather people explain this? Is it just a freak gust or is it a local high velocity "river" of wind? If it is a river of wind does anyone know how long they may stream for? kms and time wise.
>
>No, I do not know what cycle the moon was in at the time of occurance. So if the moon cycle is relevant or not I cannot give any indication other than it was daytime. Driving at night is very dangerous - cows, horses, camels, roos, pigs etc etc ;-)
>
>thanks
>
>Jas


Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Keith and Ken :) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:38:43 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id TAA20645 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Kieth: Hmmm very strange- I have winzip and it extracted fine for me??? Either way I have put it in zip rather than gnuzip format http://www.trapdoor.com.au/textorn.zip [1Mb] if you still have problems send me an e-mail and I’ll put the unzipped version up i Ken: could you please clarify exactly what you mean by the following descriptions ( I’ll need a fairly accurate description to be able to analyse the 6months worth of data you have supplied properly ) “Slightly less rainfall” “Queensland will have a changed month” “rain looks possible” “may see some falls” “even less rain than last month” ”could be wet” ”far less rain” ”chances of rain” “driest periods” “possible shower” “good rain” “changeable skies” “mostly dry” “more of Tasmania's rain” “a fraction of the amount received in September” “some [rain - SIC] looks possible for Alice” “brief unsettlement” “Ballarats rain comes MAINLY around . . .” “Melbournes weather will be changeable” “may not see any [rain-SIC] at all” “Some rain look possible . . .“ “no real rain” “a rather dryish month” “could be wettish” “significant falls” Thanks James p.s. what did you think of the tornado analysis? James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith Barnett Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 5:27 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Tornados v Moon Age. James, Would it be possible for you to send the excel file in .ZIP format? I would like to run the stats test we were referring to but I only have WinZip and it gives me error messages. Thanks Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.     ----- Original Message ----- From: James Holbeach To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: aus-wx: Tornados v Moon Age. Ok I've kept my end of the bargain I analysed tornado data. . . . it is amazing what you can find on the net if you look hard enough!! LOL I got the data from here http://www.spc.noaa.gov/archive/tornadoes/ Annoyingly, it does not have a single file for all states, but I figured Texas gets enough tornadoes to sink a ship, so I just analyzed Texas. Between 1950 and 1995, Texas had 5934 Tornodic events (made that word up :D), of which 5925 were classified as tornados. Again I simply calculated the moon age at each event, and then produced a plot showing the number of tornados between particular ages. http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist.gif and the distribution produced by a set of random numbers http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist-rand.gif While there does seem to be a very slight tendency for tornadoes to form near the end/beginning of the moon age, no solid conclusions could be drawn from this as it could be still due to statistical error.   To put these results in another way There is a 20.2% chance of a tornado between moon age 0-5.9days There is a 19.5% chance of a tornado between moon age 5.9-11.8days There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 12-17.7days There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 17.7-23.6days There is a 21.7% chance of a tornado between moon age 23.6-29.5days However there is a statistical 1.3% error in each of those figures (1/root(N))- I think that is the right way to do it- it has been a while since I did this stuff :). It DEFINITELY shows that there is no significant relationship between tornado formation and the phase of the moon. Oh and Kieth, I'll give it a shot, but I have deliberately done it this way so that everyone can easily understand it. The spreadsheet is available. It is MUCH better annotated than the cyclone one. The cyclone one required a few tricks to extract the data, but this one is much simpler. http://www.trapdoor.com.au/textorn.xls.gz [0.99Mb] Much smaller :) is a 4.9Mb Excel file unzipped Hope this helps Cheers James James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 9:44 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: 6 months of forecast Here's my end of the bargain. regards Ken www.predictweather.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: road wind Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:14:03 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Jas,
 
I think the answer to both the desert wind and the tent wind is a vortex action, i.e, a willy willy in  the first and a likely gustnado in the second.
 
The fact is that when a vortex is travelling fast enough, so that it's forward motion is close to the speed of rotating inflow at ground level, it will appear visually as a narrow straight line gust instead of a vortex because the forward motion has the effect of cancelling out one side of the rotation and reinforcing the other with repect to the ground (the same thing happens in tropical cyclones).
 
It is for example quite possible to have a very weak tornado or willy willy with rotating inflow at say 60kph.  It is also quite possible for it to be moving laterally at 60kph, (many storms move faster than this, speeds of up to 80+kph are not unknown in SEQ).  So for such a vortex you would observe a narrow apparently straight line wind zone at 120kph which is quite devastating.
 
The core of both a willy willy and gustnado may be very small and only a few metres in diameter, thus you have the phenomena observed.  (also may be a lot larger, a recent willy willy at Mt. Crosby had a 100m diameter).
 
My own observations of sudden brief strong winds on calm sunny days leads me to suspect that the phenomena is very common, in that many willy willies actually manifest as an apparently narrow mainly straight line gusts.  I also suspect that many a narrow 'straight line' damage path associated with a storm and attributed to a microburst, is actually tornadic in origin.
 
When evaluating damage paths for evidence of a tornado, I believe it is important to know what at what speed the storm was travelling at, usually easily obtained from radar loops.  If you had for example a storm front sweeping throgh at 80kph, then to actually observe typical tornado like damage such as trees felled at all angles, you probably would need a tornado with winds well in excess of 200kph).
 
John.
>snip
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jason Beer
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:29 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: RE: aus-wx: road wind

No I don´t think so. There was plenty of loose dirt around the road and it was not disturbed. Indicating to me that it was steady blow. This happened on much more than one occasion.
 
cheers
 
Jas
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of michael king
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:37 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: road wind

Could have been an invisible dust devil

>From: "Jason Beer"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: aus-wx: road wind
>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:39:25 +0100
>
>Not related to Thirds wind post but it reminded me of something.
>
>When I have been driving in the desert, occassionally, you will hit a very local channel of wind crossing the road that may only be 50 - 200 meters wide.(long? as you drive through it)
>
>It is so strong and sudden that it can blow you onto the wrong side of the road. Thank goodness the roads are not busy. But it may explain the occasional head on crash.
>
>Do any of you educated on weather people explain this? Is it just a freak gust or is it a local high velocity "river" of wind? If it is a river of wind does anyone know how long they may stream for? kms and time wise.
>
>No, I do not know what cycle the moon was in at the time of occurance. So if the moon cycle is relevant or not I cannot give any indication other than it was daytime. Driving at night is very dangerous - cows, horses, camels, roos, pigs etc etc ;-)
>
>thanks
>
>Jas


Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "John Woodbridge" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Keith and Ken :) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:25:42 +1000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hmm James, Perhaps then you would like to define some of the BoM's favourites then, such as: "mainly fine" "a shower or two about" "scattered showers" "unsettled at first then fine" "unsettled" "a few light showers about the coast" etc.. What is good for the goose is surely good for the gander? Why should you expect Ken to offer up more definitive descriptions when no other forecaster in world does. Fair go mate. John. >snip Ken: could you please clarify exactly what you mean by the following descriptions ( I’ll need a fairly accurate description to be able to analyse the 6months worth of data you have supplied properly ) “Slightly less rainfall” “Queensland will have a changed month” “rain looks possible” “may see some falls” “even less rain than last month” ”could be wet” ”far less rain” ”chances of rain” “driest periods” “possible shower” “good rain” “changeable skies” “mostly dry” “more of Tasmania's rain” “a fraction of the amount received in September” “some [rain - SIC] looks possible for Alice” “brief unsettlement” “Ballarats rain comes MAINLY around . . .” “Melbournes weather will be changeable” “may not see any [rain-SIC] at all” “Some rain look possible . . .“ “no real rain” “a rather dryish month” “could be wettish” “significant falls” Thanks James +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:38:46 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: road wind X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Back in the seventies, I was used as one of several drivers in an experiment conducted by Melbourne University to try to understand just this phenomenon. It was believed that otherwise unexplainable head-on collisions in desert areas were being caused not so much by driver error as by sudden, unpredictable, short bursts of very strong wind blowing a car suddenly onto the wrong side of the road. It was also believed that many single vehicle accidents might be caused by the same phenomenon blowing a vehicle off the road altogether. The theory was that better road markings and guideposts would help drivers to respond more rapidly to the effects of these sudden invisible wind gusts. We used a Holden Station Wagon with the rear seats removed and filled to capacity with computers, dozens of car batteries, and special gear to translate the battery power into whatever power the computers needed. It handled dreadfully because of the weight. There was no mechanical connection between the steering wheel and the front wheels - the computers would measure what the driver was trying to do and pass the appropriate messages on to the servo motors that controlled steering, suspension, etc. The sudden gusts of wind were simulated by computer programs which suddenly moved the car sideways across the road - and we were supposed to correct for the sudden movement. The experiment ended prematurely on the second day out when one of the other drivers involved rolled the car and wrecked it. The test track was set out like a Victorian country two-lane road with broken white lines marked down the centre line. About one third of the loop had no guide posts at all. Another third had regular white guideposts. The rest had both guideposts and solid white lines painted at the edges of the road as well as the broken line down the middle. We had not been told about the different markings before the experiment. Even the first two days of work had revealed that all drivers recovered from the artificial wind gusts much more quickly when the solid white lines were painted along the edge of the road, so it was recommended to the various governments of the day that lines be painted along the sides of country roads. Regarding the wind phenomenon, I have encountered this many times in desert areas and it can be quite frightening if it happens right when a road train is coming towards you in the opposite direction as happened to me one day just north of Tennant Creek. Missed the road train but almost pooped myself! What the cause of these sudden winds is, I have never been able to work out, but I imagine that they are similar in some way to the "windshear" that airport controllers have to worry about. Leaving Coober Pedy around 11am one morning in November 1982 in a RFDS aircraft, we had climbed only about 20 feet up from the ground and were still above the dirt runway when a sudden cross-wind caught us and the plane lurched violently sideways to the right as the port wing lifted high into the air. The pilot was half expecting it, as it had happened to him there once before, but it was still a scary few moments as he brought the plane back under control and continued climbing. There was no sign of any dust being blown by it even though the ground was very dusty, so it was not a dust devil. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Jason Beer" To: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:39:25 +0100 Subject: aus-wx: road wind > Not related to Thirds wind post but it reminded me of something. > > When I have been driving in the desert, occassionally, you will hit a > very local channel of wind crossing the road that may only be 50 - 200 > meters wide.(long? as you drive through it) > > It is so strong and sudden that it can blow you onto the wrong side of > the road. Thank goodness the roads are not busy. But it may explain the > occasional head on crash. > > Do any of you educated on weather people explain this? Is it just a > freak gust or is it a local high velocity "river" of wind? If it is a > river of wind does anyone know how long they may stream for? kms and > time wise. > > No, I do not know what cycle the moon was in at the time of occurance. > So if the moon cycle is relevant or not I cannot give any indication > other than it was daytime. Driving at night is very dangerous - cows, > horses, camels, roos, pigs etc etc ;-) > > thanks > > Jas > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Tina Jones" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: road wind - now Snow wind!!! Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:41:27 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
OK earlier this year, I was on a T bar at Perisher Blue.  Mitchell T bar to be precise.
 
I had my daughter, on her snowboard, in between my legs while I was on skis.
 
We saw a "willy willy" coming towards us, but thought nothing of it.
 
WOW!!!!  How wrong were we!!!!!
 
It was terrifying, we could see nothing, I was being dragged towards the T bar tower and my daughter was being dragged out from between my legs!!!!  Luckily it passed before I was dragged into the T bar tower.
 
I was using every ounce of strength I had to hold the T bar and my daughter and try and stay upright!!!  I can assure you, I'm no weakling.
 
If I ever see one coming again, I will bail!!!!!!
 
Cheers,
 
Tina.
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of John Woodbridge
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 12:14 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: RE: aus-wx: road wind

Hi Jas,
 
I think the answer to both the desert wind and the tent wind is a vortex action, i.e, a willy willy in  the first and a likely gustnado in the second.
 
The fact is that when a vortex is travelling fast enough, so that it's forward motion is close to the speed of rotating inflow at ground level, it will appear visually as a narrow straight line gust instead of a vortex because the forward motion has the effect of cancelling out one side of the rotation and reinforcing the other with repect to the ground (the same thing happens in tropical cyclones).
 
It is for example quite possible to have a very weak tornado or willy willy with rotating inflow at say 60kph.  It is also quite possible for it to be moving laterally at 60kph, (many storms move faster than this, speeds of up to 80+kph are not unknown in SEQ).  So for such a vortex you would observe a narrow apparently straight line wind zone at 120kph which is quite devastating.
 
The core of both a willy willy and gustnado may be very small and only a few metres in diameter, thus you have the phenomena observed.  (also may be a lot larger, a recent willy willy at Mt. Crosby had a 100m diameter).
 
My own observations of sudden brief strong winds on calm sunny days leads me to suspect that the phenomena is very common, in that many willy willies actually manifest as an apparently narrow mainly straight line gusts.  I also suspect that many a narrow 'straight line' damage path associated with a storm and attributed to a microburst, is actually tornadic in origin.
 
When evaluating damage paths for evidence of a tornado, I believe it is important to know what at what speed the storm was travelling at, usually easily obtained from radar loops.  If you had for example a storm front sweeping throgh at 80kph, then to actually observe typical tornado like damage such as trees felled at all angles, you probably would need a tornado with winds well in excess of 200kph).
 
John.
>snip
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Jason Beer
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:29 AM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: RE: aus-wx: road wind

No I don´t think so. There was plenty of loose dirt around the road and it was not disturbed. Indicating to me that it was steady blow. This happened on much more than one occasion.
 
cheers
 
Jas
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of michael king
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:37 PM
To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Subject: Re: aus-wx: road wind

Could have been an invisible dust devil

>From: "Jason Beer"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: aus-wx: road wind
>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:39:25 +0100
>
>Not related to Thirds wind post but it reminded me of something.
>
>When I have been driving in the desert, occassionally, you will hit a very local channel of wind crossing the road that may only be 50 - 200 meters wide.(long? as you drive through it)
>
>It is so strong and sudden that it can blow you onto the wrong side of the road. Thank goodness the roads are not busy. But it may explain the occasional head on crash.
>
>Do any of you educated on weather people explain this? Is it just a freak gust or is it a local high velocity "river" of wind? If it is a river of wind does anyone know how long they may stream for? kms and time wise.
>
>No, I do not know what cycle the moon was in at the time of occurance. So if the moon cycle is relevant or not I cannot give any indication other than it was daytime. Driving at night is very dangerous - cows, horses, camels, roos, pigs etc etc ;-)
>
>thanks
>
>Jas


Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN. Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:51:28 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! - but now quite off-topic! X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Craig, That's the exact reason why I also keep an additional e-mail address called junk at drdisk.com.hk - I can always check it after I signed up for something I really want to be in and the rest of the time it saves me from reading through vast loads of junk mail. It's also a bit amusing when some marketing character who is using mail- merge sends you an e-mail that starts off "My dear Junk, I was just thinking of you, Junk, the other day when ..." Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: "Third" To: Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:44:55 +1000 Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > Phil, > > Nothing very exciting about that really. it's actually my second > e-mail > address (i use it when I subscribe to all sorts of things - that way if > I > end up involved in something i don't want to be I can cancel the > address and > the people I know can contact me on my primary address - typing that > makes > me think I may be a wee bit paranoid !!) > > Anyway - basically I grabbed it out of a book of the scripts to Monty > Python's flying circus. Just some obscure character. > > Didn't really want to know all that did you ? > > Craig > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Smith" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:50 AM > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > Craig, welcome to the list. I know this is off-topic, but I would > love > > to hear the story of how you came to have an e-mail address like > that. > > > > Phil > > <>< > > > > International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > > Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > > Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > > Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Third" > > To: > > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:17:06 +1000 > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > Well this is my first post here - my names Craig (pardon the dodgy > > > e-mail > > > address) and my interest in stuff weather comes from involvement in > the > > > SES. > > > > > > Ben they are excellent lightning shots - I know you said where they > > > were > > > taken in an earlier post - could you remind me where ? > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Ben Quinn" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 PM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > Evening all > > > > > > > > Thanks for you comments guys > > > > > > > > It's a time exposure (15 seconds) but it all came down in one > hit, 13 > > > > seconds into the exposure. I've uploaded a couple more shots > from > > > the > > > night > > > > > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_01.jpg > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_02.jpg > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_03.jpg > > > > http://asp1.cwihosting.com/~bschau/261002_04.jpg > > > > (the fourth is a smaller version of the close strike posted by > TM) > > > > > > > > Note the first three shots have been cropped to center or show > the > > > lightning > > > > better, as opposed to the fourth which is completely untouched > apart > > > from > > > > being resized for the internet. The camera used was a Cannon G2 > > > (digital), > > > > 15 second exposures at between 38 and 110mm zoom and appature of > F4.5 > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Leslie Muir" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:30 PM > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can somone clarify if the photo is time exposure or was one > strike > > > > > Les > > > > > > > > > > At 07:56 PM 28/10/2002, you wrote: > > > > > >Found it's way to my desktop too! ;) > > > > > > > > > > > >Regs. Paul. > > > > > >(Stargazer) > > > > > >http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/stargazer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > > > > > >To: > > > > > >Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:22 AM > > > > > >Subject: RE: aus-wx: excellent lightning pic! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It's now on my desktop for the time > being > > > and > > > has > > > > > > > aroused comments from all who have walked past my computer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body > > > of > > > > your > > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the > body > > > of > > > your > > > > > message. > > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > + > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body > of > > > your > > > message. > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > - > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Keith and Ken :) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:34:00 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by europe.std.com id VAA16830 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I did the random thing on the fly, and didn't save it- but I re-did it for you :) http://www.trapdoor.com.au/RandomDistribution.xls [990kb] And John: I agree completely, however I wanted to make sure that I interpret Ken's descriptions in a manner he his happy with. When it comes to comparing with the BoM's forecasts, I'll use their definitions for each term. The BoM Glossary defines each of the terms used in their forecast, I guess I was looking for Ken to do the same. If he does not I'll assume they are the same as the BoM ones. http://www.bom.gov.au/lam/glossary/ But some of his descriptions I just don’t know what to make of? James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of James Holbeach Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 11:39 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: Keith and Ken :) Kieth: Hmmm very strange- I have winzip and it extracted fine for me??? Either way I have put it in zip rather than gnuzip format http://www.trapdoor.com.au/textorn.zip [1Mb] if you still have problems send me an e-mail and I’ll put the unzipped version up i Ken: could you please clarify exactly what you mean by the following descriptions ( I’ll need a fairly accurate description to be able to analyse the 6months worth of data you have supplied properly ) “Slightly less rainfall” “Queensland will have a changed month” “rain looks possible” “may see some falls” “even less rain than last month” ”could be wet” ”far less rain” ”chances of rain” “driest periods” “possible shower” “good rain” “changeable skies” “mostly dry” “more of Tasmania's rain” “a fraction of the amount received in September” “some [rain - SIC] looks possible for Alice” “brief unsettlement” “Ballarats rain comes MAINLY around . . .” “Melbournes weather will be changeable” “may not see any [rain-SIC] at all” “Some rain look possible . . .“ “no real rain” “a rather dryish month” “could be wettish” “significant falls” Thanks James p.s. what did you think of the tornado analysis? James Holbeach -------------------------------- Trapdoor Ski Club Mt. Hotham, Australia ph. 0417 553 757 http://www.trapdoor.com.au -------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith Barnett Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 5:27 PM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Tornados v Moon Age. James, Would it be possible for you to send the excel file in .ZIP format? I would like to run the stats test we were referring to but I only have WinZip and it gives me error messages. Thanks Keith Barnett Weather fanatic and classical musician Website: http://www.wthrman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------- This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified to be virus free.     ----- Original Message ----- From: James Holbeach To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: aus-wx: Tornados v Moon Age. Ok I've kept my end of the bargain I analysed tornado data. . . . it is amazing what you can find on the net if you look hard enough!! LOL I got the data from here http://www.spc.noaa.gov/archive/tornadoes/ Annoyingly, it does not have a single file for all states, but I figured Texas gets enough tornadoes to sink a ship, so I just analyzed Texas. Between 1950 and 1995, Texas had 5934 Tornodic events (made that word up :D), of which 5925 were classified as tornados. Again I simply calculated the moon age at each event, and then produced a plot showing the number of tornados between particular ages. http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist.gif and the distribution produced by a set of random numbers http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist-rand.gif While there does seem to be a very slight tendency for tornadoes to form near the end/beginning of the moon age, no solid conclusions could be drawn from this as it could be still due to statistical error.   To put these results in another way There is a 20.2% chance of a tornado between moon age 0-5.9days There is a 19.5% chance of a tornado between moon age 5.9-11.8days There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 12-17.7days There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 17.7-23.6days There is a 21.7% chance of a tornado between moon age 23.6-29.5days However there is a statistical 1.3% error in each of those figures (1/root(N))- I think that is the right way to do it- it has been a while since I did this stuff :). It DEFINITELY shows that there is no significant relationship between tornado formation and the phase of the moon. Oh and Kieth, I'll give it a shot, but I have deliberately done it this way so that everyone can easily understand it. The spreadsheet is available. It is MUCH better annotated than the cyclone one. The cyclone one required a few tricks to extract the data, but this one is much simpler. http://www.trapdoor.com.au/textorn.xls.gz [0.99Mb] Much smaller :) is a 4.9Mb Excel file unzipped Hope this helps Cheers James James Holbeach ---------------------------------------- Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Melbourne, Australia ph. +61 3 8344 6652 ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 9:44 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: aus-wx: 6 months of forecast Here's my end of the bargain. regards Ken www.predictweather.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:07:25 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: BoM Defintion of Supercell (was) Re: aus-wx: Keith and Ken :) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hmm...I've never seen their online defintion for a supercell before. Not one that I agree with... Supercell A persistent, single, intense updraught and downdraught coexisting in a thunderstorm. No mention of a mesocyclone...but perhaps it is just for those not overly intersted in the weather. AC James Holbeach wrote: > > I did the random thing on the fly, and didn't save it- but I re-did it > for you :) > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/RandomDistribution.xls [990kb] > > And John: I agree completely, however I wanted to make sure that I > interpret Ken's descriptions in a manner he his happy with. When it > comes to comparing with the BoM's forecasts, I'll use their definitions > for each term. > The BoM Glossary defines each of the terms used in their forecast, I > guess I was looking for Ken to do the same. If he does not I'll assume > they are the same as the BoM ones. > http://www.bom.gov.au/lam/glossary/ > > But some of his descriptions I just don’t know what to make of? > > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of James > Holbeach > Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 11:39 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: Keith and Ken :) > > Kieth: Hmmm very strange- I have winzip and it extracted fine for me??? > > Either way I have put it in zip rather than gnuzip format > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/textorn.zip [1Mb] > > if you still have problems send me an e-mail and I’ll put the unzipped > version up i > > Ken: could you please clarify exactly what you mean by the following > descriptions ( I’ll need a fairly accurate description to be able to > analyse the 6months worth of data you have supplied properly ) > > “Slightly less rainfall” > “Queensland will have a changed month” > “rain looks possible” > “may see some falls” > “even less rain than last month” > ”could be wet” > ”far less rain” > ”chances of rain” > “driest periods” > “possible shower” > “good rain” > “changeable skies” > “mostly dry” > “more of Tasmania's rain” > “a fraction of the amount received in September” > “some [rain - SIC] looks possible for Alice” > “brief unsettlement” > “Ballarats rain comes MAINLY around . . .” > “Melbournes weather will be changeable” > “may not see any [rain-SIC] at all” > “Some rain look possible . . .“ > “no real rain” > “a rather dryish month” > “could be wettish” > “significant falls” > > Thanks > James > p.s. what did you think of the tornado analysis? > > James Holbeach > -------------------------------- > Trapdoor Ski Club > Mt. Hotham, Australia > ph. 0417 553 757 > http://www.trapdoor.com.au > -------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Keith > Barnett > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 5:27 PM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: Re: aus-wx: Tornados v Moon Age. > > James, > Would it be possible for you to send the excel file in .ZIP format? I > would like to run the stats test we were referring to but I only have > WinZip and it gives me error messages. > Thanks > Keith Barnett > Weather fanatic and classical musician > Website: http://www.wthrman.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------------------------------------------------------- > This message has been scanned by Norton AntiVirus 2002 and is certified > to be virus free. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: James Holbeach > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:56 PM > Subject: aus-wx: Tornados v Moon Age. > > Ok I've kept my end of the bargain I analysed tornado data. . . . it is > amazing what you can find on the net if you look hard enough!! LOL > I got the data from here > http://www.spc.noaa.gov/archive/tornadoes/ > Annoyingly, it does not have a single file for all states, but I figured > Texas gets enough tornadoes to sink a ship, so I just analyzed Texas. > Between 1950 and 1995, Texas had 5934 Tornodic events (made that word up > :D), of which 5925 were classified as tornados. Again I simply > calculated the moon age at each event, and then produced a plot showing > the number of tornados between particular ages. > > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist.gif > and the distribution produced by a set of random numbers > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/TornadoHist-rand.gif > While there does seem to be a very slight tendency for tornadoes to form > near the end/beginning of the moon age, no solid conclusions could be > drawn from this as it could be still due to statistical error. > > To put these results in another way > There is a 20.2% chance of a tornado between moon age 0-5.9days > There is a 19.5% chance of a tornado between moon age 5.9-11.8days > There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 12-17.7days > There is a 19.3% chance of a tornado between moon age 17.7-23.6days > There is a 21.7% chance of a tornado between moon age 23.6-29.5days > However there is a statistical 1.3% error in each of those figures > (1/root(N))- I think that is the right way to do it- it has been a while > since I did this stuff :). > It DEFINITELY shows that there is no significant relationship between > tornado formation and the phase of the moon. > Oh and Kieth, I'll give it a shot, but I have deliberately done it this > way so that everyone can easily understand it. > The spreadsheet is available. It is MUCH better annotated than the > cyclone one. The cyclone one required a few tricks to extract the data, > but this one is much simpler. > http://www.trapdoor.com.au/textorn.xls.gz [0.99Mb] Much smaller :) is a > 4.9Mb Excel file unzipped > Hope this helps > Cheers > James > James Holbeach > ---------------------------------------- > Dept. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering > University of Melbourne, Australia > ph. +61 3 8344 6652 > ---------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com] On Behalf Of Ken Ring > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 9:44 AM > To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > Subject: aus-wx: 6 months of forecast > Here's my end of the bargain. > regards > Ken > www.predictweather.com > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:16:30 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ken, All you have done is redefined your boundaries of space and changed the accepted definitions in the scientific community. But then again, if something doesn't fit your opinion, you make it fit your opinion so you're always correct, of course that's "Ken's law." But, if for a moment we decided to throw out the 50 years+ research and PROOF of where the atmosphere exists, and call the "thermosphere" "space" - then if "space" came closer towards us, surely it would actually get warmer given it's so hot in the thermosphere? Keeping in mind there is also a warm layer between the troposphere and the stratosphere called the tropopause which again is very warm. The troposophere (not the atmosphere) is more shallow at the poles than it is at the equator. However it is MORE than one mile high - it's in the vicinity of 5-6 miles depending on the region. But it is so cold at the poles, that often there is an inversion where it gets 5-20C warmer about several kilometres higher than the surface! Once again, if this air was brought closer to the ground it would warm the ground! Not to mention that as air descends to the Earth, particularly in the tropopause it actually warms by 9.8C/km. So your theory of bringing colder air from space is again flawed because: a) It's actually warmer when you ascend higher at the poles! b) As air descends and comes closer to Earth, it will be compressed and therefore increases in temperature by 9.8C/km. AC Ken Ring wrote: > > > Hi Ken, > > > > My dearest and most humble apologies. All of those years at university > > and thousands of dollars of HECS fees must have gone to waste. I'll be > > sure to go to uni and inform my lecturers of their mistakes, and I shall > > also contact some of the well known academic publishers such as Oxford > > University Press and Camrbdige University Press etc who have printed > > textbooks and inform them that the definition of the atmosphere has > > changed in accordance with yout statement. > If you say so, but don't get too drastic, Anthony, they were only doing > their best.. > > > In space there is no air... > Correct > > > in the thermosphere there is air. > Incorrect. You couldn't breathe there without oxygen. > > > Furthermore, there's not much air in the mesosphere or > > stratosphere, should I also inform my lecturers and scholars that > > they're not a part of the atmosphere too? > Suit yourself. > > > Where would you like the > > atmosphere to end, Ken? 6km up in the atmosphere and you're already > > above half of the available air. 15-16km and you're above 90% of the > > air, shall we call the upper part of the troposphere the end of the > > atmosphere? > Yes, for purposes of this discussion. Where is the end of your finger if > viewed under an electron microscope? Impossible to determine. At that level > of scrutiny the "fingerness" just gets less and less in density. That's the > scale of measurement we're doing here. > > > What I have a problem with is supporting > > their method with incorrect information!!! > Me too, same.. > > > There are people on this > > list who might actually think that things you have said (for instance, > > you once explained that the poles are colder because the coldness of > > space is closer there than at the equator) are actually true! This is > > extremely wrong! > Do you agree that the useful atmosphere is only a mile high above the poles > and about 15 miles high at the equator, or not? If so then you must surely > accept that the cold of space comes down to near ground level. If not, then > how high do you think the atmosphere IS above the poles? Would you like me > to give you refs. to the studies done that I have read about and downloaded > from the net accordingly? I didn't make this stuff up - it's well documented > by NASA and others. > > .> It's cold there because the sun shines on it at an > > angle so the rays aren't as strong as they're spread over a wider > > angle. > I agree, sure that adds to it, but it's not the whole story. > > > Furthermore, when people have told you they're wrong you don't > > believe them. I tried the nice tactic a while ago, it didn't work. > I see, according to the Anthony Law, just because someone tells me I'm wrong > I have to believe them. Doesn't seem like a scientific discussion at that > point. Were you a bully in the school playground too? > > > You > > only seem to respond to emails with anger in them. > No, I enjoy others too, but the angry ones tell me the writers are probably > afraid of changing their mindsets, which is not my problem.. > > > Don't twist things around to make them suit your opinion...find some > > other way of describing it, just don't describe something you've already > > been informed as being wrong! > I'll try to remember that. Thanks for the advice. In return, may I suggest > you try to apply some commonsense to what you say, instead of just repeating > off what you have read in obsolete textbooks. > And thanks for taking trouble with your replies. I mean that sincerely. We > may disagree but I welcome the chance to present an alternative viewpoint. I > have been a scientist for 30 years. I am sad to say that in my opinion much > of current science has been hijacked by politics and profit and the much of > the real research now being done that anyone can trust is by those who get > labelled mavericks. > > > > Well, some corrections are necessary here. > > > The thermosphere is not strictly the atmosphere, it is beyond it. The > > > atmosphere, by definition, is the name for our region of air. But there > aint > > > much air in the old thermosphere. The thermosphere is the highest and > the > > > largest of the four layers because it's just about space. But it's not > as if > > > there are dividing lines. It's not like those coloured sand-in-bottle > > > things. The few molecules that are present in the thermosphere receive > > > extraordinary amounts of energy from the Sun, causing the layer to warm > to > > > such high temperatures. Air temperature, however, is a measure of the > > > kinetic energy of air molecules, not of the total energy stored by the > air. > > > Therefore, since the air is so thin within the thermosphere, such > > > temperature values are not comparable to those of the troposphere or > > > stratosphere. (ref > > > http://www.doc.mmu.ac.uk/aric/eae/Atmosphere/Older/Thermosphere.html) > > > "Although the measured temperature is very hot, the thermosphere would > > > actually feel very COLD to us because the total energy of only a few air > > > molecules residing there would not be enough to transfer any appreciable > > > heat to our skin"(quote from the above website). > > > So as far as I'm concerned my model of the cold of space stands intact. > > > Sorry that you're getting angry, Anthony. Clearly up till now you have > not > > > had the correct information. > > > Ken > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Anthony Cornelius" > > > To: > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:48 AM > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > Ken, > > > > > > > > I posted some stuff to you a while back and you conveniently ignored > > > > it. Now, it is not the moon controlling the weather that I have a > > > > problem with, I belive it does have an effect, but not to the extent > > > > that you portray. > > > > > > > > However things like... > > > > > > > > Ken Ring wrote: > > > > With atmospheric > > > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > of > > > the > > > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets > the > > > cold > > > > > of space come closer to ground level. > > > > > > > > Several people have pointed out to you that your reasoning here is > > > > TOTALLY WRONG! Yet you CONTINUE TO IGNORE THEM!!! This frustrates > > > > people (including myself!) Are you forgetting the rest of the > > > > atmosphere??? How high do you think the atmosphere is? 15km? Have a > > > > look at this diagram: > > > > > > > > http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/space/atmos.gif > > > > > > > > There are not one, BUT TWO warm layers above the surface! First is > the > > > > tropopause near the stratosphere, the second is the thermosphere. The > > > > thermosphere is so hot it's over a thousand degrees!!! If your theory > > > > of the "coldness of space" is correct, then if anything we should be > > > > getting warmer because the thermosphere would be coming closer to us. > > > > Space doesn't start for over a thousand kilometres...then it gets > cold! > > > > But we have several protective layers that separates us from them. > > > > > > > > If you're going to issue forecasts, fine. But for goodness sake don't > > > > support them with dribble like that (and continue to support them even > > > > when people have TOLD you it is totally WRONG). In fact, I suspect > that > > > > is what a lot of people have been frustrated with. Not the issuing of > > > > your unique forecasts, but the INCORRECT INFORMATION you support your > > > > method with! I for one would much rather you say "I believe there is > a > > > > relationship there, and I believe this will happen but I can't explain > > > > why" then to teach bad meteorology. Sure everyone gets the wrong idea > > > > every so often...but to continue to teach that idea when you've been > > > > told your wrong to me shows that the most closed-minded person here is > > > > you Ken. > > > > > > > > AC > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:18:44 +1000 From: Anthony Cornelius X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Keith and Ken :) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com John - the BoM comes under scrutiny for using these terms also, so it's only fair Ken does also. But the BoM are never so vague as to say "unsettled in Western Australia over the next few days" That's a very broad definition, and of course, if so much of a shower falls in the far SW corner the and the rest of WA bakes under 40C tempratures for the week, then Ken is "correct". AC John Woodbridge wrote: > > Hmm James, > > Perhaps then you would like to define some of the BoM's favourites then, > such as: > > "mainly fine" > "a shower or two about" > "scattered showers" > "unsettled at first then fine" > "unsettled" > "a few light showers about the coast" > etc.. > > What is good for the goose is surely good for the gander? Why should you > expect Ken to offer up more definitive descriptions when no other forecaster > in world does. Fair go mate. > > John. > > >snip > > Ken: could you please clarify exactly what you mean by the following > descriptions ( I’ll need a fairly accurate description to be able to > analyse the 6months worth of data you have supplied properly ) > > “Slightly less rainfall” > “Queensland will have a changed month” > “rain looks possible” > “may see some falls” > “even less rain than last month” > ”could be wet” > ”far less rain” > ”chances of rain” > “driest periods” > “possible shower” > “good rain” > “changeable skies” > “mostly dry” > “more of Tasmania's rain” > “a fraction of the amount received in September” > “some [rain - SIC] looks possible for Alice” > “brief unsettlement” > “Ballarats rain comes MAINLY around . . .” > “Melbournes weather will be changeable” > “may not see any [rain-SIC] at all” > “Some rain look possible . . .“ > “no real rain” > “a rather dryish month” > “could be wettish” > “significant falls” > > Thanks > James > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ -- Anthony Cornelius Vice President & Queensland Coordinator of the Australian Severe Weather Association (ASWA) (07) 3390 4812 http://www.severeweather.asn.au +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:35:02 +1000 (GMT+1000) From: Leslie Muir To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Another thing that i was just discussing with someone else, if the thickness of the atmosphere plays the main role in the temperature at the poles, what about other planets who have very thin atmpspheres, but the temperatures at the poles are still significantly colder. Just an intersting point, also, what about planets without significantly large moons like mars? can the same be done?? Les On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Anthony Cornelius wrote: > Ken, > > All you have done is redefined your boundaries of space and changed the > accepted definitions in the scientific community. But then again, if > something doesn't fit your opinion, you make it fit your opinion so > you're always correct, of course that's "Ken's law." > > But, if for a moment we decided to throw out the 50 years+ research and > PROOF of where the atmosphere exists, and call the "thermosphere" > "space" - then if "space" came closer towards us, surely it would > actually get warmer given it's so hot in the thermosphere? > > Keeping in mind there is also a warm layer between the troposphere and > the stratosphere called the tropopause which again is very warm. > > The troposophere (not the atmosphere) is more shallow at the poles than > it is at the equator. However it is MORE than one mile high - it's in > the vicinity of 5-6 miles depending on the region. But it is so cold at > the poles, that often there is an inversion where it gets 5-20C warmer > about several kilometres higher than the surface! Once again, if this > air was brought closer to the ground it would warm the ground! Not to > mention that as air descends to the Earth, particularly in the > tropopause it actually warms by 9.8C/km. So your theory of bringing > colder air from space is again flawed because: > > a) It's actually warmer when you ascend higher at the poles! > b) As air descends and comes closer to Earth, it will be compressed and > therefore increases in temperature by 9.8C/km. > > AC > > Ken Ring wrote: > > > > > Hi Ken, > > > > > > My dearest and most humble apologies. All of those years at university > > > and thousands of dollars of HECS fees must have gone to waste. I'll be > > > sure to go to uni and inform my lecturers of their mistakes, and I shall > > > also contact some of the well known academic publishers such as Oxford > > > University Press and Camrbdige University Press etc who have printed > > > textbooks and inform them that the definition of the atmosphere has > > > changed in accordance with yout statement. > > If you say so, but don't get too drastic, Anthony, they were only doing > > their best.. > > > > > In space there is no air... > > Correct > > > > > in the thermosphere there is air. > > Incorrect. You couldn't breathe there without oxygen. > > > > > Furthermore, there's not much air in the mesosphere or > > > stratosphere, should I also inform my lecturers and scholars that > > > they're not a part of the atmosphere too? > > Suit yourself. > > > > > Where would you like the > > > atmosphere to end, Ken? 6km up in the atmosphere and you're already > > > above half of the available air. 15-16km and you're above 90% of the > > > air, shall we call the upper part of the troposphere the end of the > > > atmosphere? > > Yes, for purposes of this discussion. Where is the end of your finger if > > viewed under an electron microscope? Impossible to determine. At that level > > of scrutiny the "fingerness" just gets less and less in density. That's the > > scale of measurement we're doing here. > > > > > What I have a problem with is supporting > > > their method with incorrect information!!! > > Me too, same.. > > > > > There are people on this > > > list who might actually think that things you have said (for instance, > > > you once explained that the poles are colder because the coldness of > > > space is closer there than at the equator) are actually true! This is > > > extremely wrong! > > Do you agree that the useful atmosphere is only a mile high above the poles > > and about 15 miles high at the equator, or not? If so then you must surely > > accept that the cold of space comes down to near ground level. If not, then > > how high do you think the atmosphere IS above the poles? Would you like me > > to give you refs. to the studies done that I have read about and downloaded > > from the net accordingly? I didn't make this stuff up - it's well documented > > by NASA and others. > > > > .> It's cold there because the sun shines on it at an > > > angle so the rays aren't as strong as they're spread over a wider > > > angle. > > I agree, sure that adds to it, but it's not the whole story. > > > > > Furthermore, when people have told you they're wrong you don't > > > believe them. I tried the nice tactic a while ago, it didn't work. > > I see, according to the Anthony Law, just because someone tells me I'm wrong > > I have to believe them. Doesn't seem like a scientific discussion at that > > point. Were you a bully in the school playground too? > > > > > You > > > only seem to respond to emails with anger in them. > > No, I enjoy others too, but the angry ones tell me the writers are probably > > afraid of changing their mindsets, which is not my problem.. > > > > > Don't twist things around to make them suit your opinion...find some > > > other way of describing it, just don't describe something you've already > > > been informed as being wrong! > > I'll try to remember that. Thanks for the advice. In return, may I suggest > > you try to apply some commonsense to what you say, instead of just repeating > > off what you have read in obsolete textbooks. > > And thanks for taking trouble with your replies. I mean that sincerely. We > > may disagree but I welcome the chance to present an alternative viewpoint. I > > have been a scientist for 30 years. I am sad to say that in my opinion much > > of current science has been hijacked by politics and profit and the much of > > the real research now being done that anyone can trust is by those who get > > labelled mavericks. > > > > > > Well, some corrections are necessary here. > > > > The thermosphere is not strictly the atmosphere, it is beyond it. The > > > > atmosphere, by definition, is the name for our region of air. But there > > aint > > > > much air in the old thermosphere. The thermosphere is the highest and > > the > > > > largest of the four layers because it's just about space. But it's not > > as if > > > > there are dividing lines. It's not like those coloured sand-in-bottle > > > > things. The few molecules that are present in the thermosphere receive > > > > extraordinary amounts of energy from the Sun, causing the layer to warm > > to > > > > such high temperatures. Air temperature, however, is a measure of the > > > > kinetic energy of air molecules, not of the total energy stored by the > > air. > > > > Therefore, since the air is so thin within the thermosphere, such > > > > temperature values are not comparable to those of the troposphere or > > > > stratosphere. (ref > > > > http://www.doc.mmu.ac.uk/aric/eae/Atmosphere/Older/Thermosphere.html) > > > > "Although the measured temperature is very hot, the thermosphere would > > > > actually feel very COLD to us because the total energy of only a few air > > > > molecules residing there would not be enough to transfer any appreciable > > > > heat to our skin"(quote from the above website). > > > > So as far as I'm concerned my model of the cold of space stands intact. > > > > Sorry that you're getting angry, Anthony. Clearly up till now you have > > not > > > > had the correct information. > > > > Ken > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Anthony Cornelius" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:48 AM > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > Ken, > > > > > > > > > > I posted some stuff to you a while back and you conveniently ignored > > > > > it. Now, it is not the moon controlling the weather that I have a > > > > > problem with, I belive it does have an effect, but not to the extent > > > > > that you portray. > > > > > > > > > > However things like... > > > > > > > > > > Ken Ring wrote: > > > > > With atmospheric > > > > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > > of > > > > the > > > > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets > > the > > > > cold > > > > > > of space come closer to ground level. > > > > > > > > > > Several people have pointed out to you that your reasoning here is > > > > > TOTALLY WRONG! Yet you CONTINUE TO IGNORE THEM!!! This frustrates > > > > > people (including myself!) Are you forgetting the rest of the > > > > > atmosphere??? How high do you think the atmosphere is? 15km? Have a > > > > > look at this diagram: > > > > > > > > > > http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/space/atmos.gif > > > > > > > > > > There are not one, BUT TWO warm layers above the surface! First is > > the > > > > > tropopause near the stratosphere, the second is the thermosphere. The > > > > > thermosphere is so hot it's over a thousand degrees!!! If your theory > > > > > of the "coldness of space" is correct, then if anything we should be > > > > > getting warmer because the thermosphere would be coming closer to us. > > > > > Space doesn't start for over a thousand kilometres...then it gets > > cold! > > > > > But we have several protective layers that separates us from them. > > > > > > > > > > If you're going to issue forecasts, fine. But for goodness sake don't > > > > > support them with dribble like that (and continue to support them even > > > > > when people have TOLD you it is totally WRONG). In fact, I suspect > > that > > > > > is what a lot of people have been frustrated with. Not the issuing of > > > > > your unique forecasts, but the INCORRECT INFORMATION you support your > > > > > method with! I for one would much rather you say "I believe there is > > a > > > > > relationship there, and I believe this will happen but I can't explain > > > > > why" then to teach bad meteorology. Sure everyone gets the wrong idea > > > > > every so often...but to continue to teach that idea when you've been > > > > > told your wrong to me shows that the most closed-minded person here is > > > > > you Ken. > > > > > > > > > > AC > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.208.66.43] From: "Leslie Baxter" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Victorian ASWA meeting Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 04:35:21 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2002 04:35:21.0925 (UTC) FILETIME=[C1FAAF50:01C27FCD] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Jane I'd love to attend but unfortunately it's cricket season, and I have cricket. Hope it goes well Cheers Les Baxter Ballarat Weather >From: "Jane ONeill" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: >Subject: aus-wx: Victorian ASWA meeting >Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:18:47 +1100 > >The next Victorian ASWA meeting will be a barbeque to be held at: > >** Location: Bellbird Picnic area - Yarra Boulevard, KEW not far from the >Eastern Freeway (see link for map - >http://www.stormchasers.au.com/barbeque.htm look for the red cross south of >the freeway near the river) >** Time: Saturday 9th November starting at 11am with cricket / frisbee / >football >** Menu: a sumptuous barbeque cooked by 'expert barbeque chef' Macca (and >helpers) >** Attendees: ASWA members, friends and family all most welcome >** Donation: $2 per head >** Available on the day: ASWA car stickers, caps, shirts > >Please RSVP cadence at australianskynweather.com by Thursday 7th November to >allow us to cater for the event. > >NB: there will be no formal presentations at this meeting...unless we find >a >powerpoint on a tree........ > >Look forward to seeing all of you there!! > >Jane > >-------------------------------- >Jane ONeill - Melbourne >cadence at australianskynweather.com > >Australian Sky & Weather >http://www.stormchasers.au.com > >Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) >http://www.severeweather.asn.au >-------------------------------- > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: aus-wx: Re: accurate description call Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:36:18 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Fair enough to question me on my terms. But I suppose I choose to leave it vague. Longrange forecasting is different to what the BoM does, because they openly admit being unable to do it. Therefore I must be allowed my own complete system, along with terminology. I don't feel I have to justify anything. I merely have to provide something which is considered useful so that the exercise is worthwhile. Farmers only want to know if it's going to be mostly dry for a few days, so grass will dry for haymaking, or the soil to dry out, or wet for a few days so that the watertable comes up. Nothing too specific here. I do not have the type of accuracy that can say 13.23mm will fall between 6.17am and 6.18mm on the 15th of November 2005 in Elizabeth St. I can tell about the POTENTIAL for rain then, based on high/low pressure zone formation, wind direction and wind force. If I had funding or sponsorship help then the situation would be totally different. But I don't get a cracker. On top of that I have to earn a living, so I can't do this fulltime. This is a hobby. I can't just put a team onto it like any government meteorologist can. So I ask you all to put things into perpsective here. $70 million + per annum, which is what the metservice in NZ gets, would go a long way for me to get much more deadly accurate. So given the actual time I can afford to spend on it I am told I do remarkably well. That's good enough for me. Whilst I do enjoy chewing the fat with others who like yakking about weather on this forum, I don't care if I convince anybody or not, and I certainly have no moral obligation to justify what I am doing and provide minutae of data and method. I distill my data down to what I consider will happen and then try to cover myself with a bit of leeway. You'll find doctors do that, so do economists and politicians. It's considered the smarter thing to do. Anyone who works with meteorologists will find that the metservices ALL do the same too. Bob McDavitt, "Weather Ambassador" of NZ Metservice once told me that he always deliberately builds uncertainty into whatever he says. His actual words: "I choose the middle ground of weather. Just enough pattern so we can have ideas about it, but also enough chaos so that no one depends on us to be 100%." So it's over to you. I have given you the type of forecast I arrive at. If you can't do anything with it then more is not going to help you either. As I have suggested before, I think your comparison system is at fault because you are only looking for it to show up as negative. The rain(or not) may be entirely local and therefore give a false reading for the general district. It is much too easy for you to call me wrong whatever I say, due to your personal bias. To overcome that I would need data from a collecting station every few metres along the ground in any direction. Weather is not yet an exact science, so I say stop pretending it can be treated as one. And I'm saying it COULD be much more so, if the moon became involved. This state of affairs may frustrate the more fastidious, but I am open to cheques and donations... ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Woodbridge" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 2:25 PM Subject: RE: aus-wx: Keith and Ken :) > Hmm James, > > Perhaps then you would like to define some of the BoM's favourites then, > such as: > > "mainly fine" > "a shower or two about" > "scattered showers" > "unsettled at first then fine" > "unsettled" > "a few light showers about the coast" > etc.. > > What is good for the goose is surely good for the gander? Why should you > expect Ken to offer up more definitive descriptions when no other forecaster > in world does. Fair go mate. > > John. > > >snip > > Ken: could you please clarify exactly what you mean by the following > descriptions ( I'll need a fairly accurate description to be able to > analyse the 6months worth of data you have supplied properly ) > > "Slightly less rainfall" > "Queensland will have a changed month" > "rain looks possible" > "may see some falls" > "even less rain than last month" > "could be wet" > "far less rain" > "chances of rain" > "driest periods" > "possible shower" > "good rain" > "changeable skies" > "mostly dry" > "more of Tasmania's rain" > "a fraction of the amount received in September" > "some [rain - SIC] looks possible for Alice" > "brief unsettlement" > "Ballarats rain comes MAINLY around . . ." > "Melbournes weather will be changeable" > "may not see any [rain-SIC] at all" > "Some rain look possible . . ." > "no real rain" > "a rather dryish month" > "could be wettish" > "significant falls" > > Thanks > James > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:38:18 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Les You will find that planets with moons like Mars and Jupiter have variable weather, whilst those without, like Venus, have more regular, unchanging weather. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leslie Muir" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:35 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Re: thermosphere > Another thing that i was just discussing with someone else, if the > thickness of the atmosphere plays the main role in the temperature at the > poles, what about other planets who have very thin atmpspheres, but the > temperatures at the poles are still significantly colder. > Just an intersting point, also, what about planets without significantly > large moons like mars? can the same be done?? > > Les > > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Anthony Cornelius wrote: > > > Ken, > > > > All you have done is redefined your boundaries of space and changed the > > accepted definitions in the scientific community. But then again, if > > something doesn't fit your opinion, you make it fit your opinion so > > you're always correct, of course that's "Ken's law." > > > > But, if for a moment we decided to throw out the 50 years+ research and > > PROOF of where the atmosphere exists, and call the "thermosphere" > > "space" - then if "space" came closer towards us, surely it would > > actually get warmer given it's so hot in the thermosphere? > > > > Keeping in mind there is also a warm layer between the troposphere and > > the stratosphere called the tropopause which again is very warm. > > > > The troposophere (not the atmosphere) is more shallow at the poles than > > it is at the equator. However it is MORE than one mile high - it's in > > the vicinity of 5-6 miles depending on the region. But it is so cold at > > the poles, that often there is an inversion where it gets 5-20C warmer > > about several kilometres higher than the surface! Once again, if this > > air was brought closer to the ground it would warm the ground! Not to > > mention that as air descends to the Earth, particularly in the > > tropopause it actually warms by 9.8C/km. So your theory of bringing > > colder air from space is again flawed because: > > > > a) It's actually warmer when you ascend higher at the poles! > > b) As air descends and comes closer to Earth, it will be compressed and > > therefore increases in temperature by 9.8C/km. > > > > AC > > > > Ken Ring wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Ken, > > > > > > > > My dearest and most humble apologies. All of those years at university > > > > and thousands of dollars of HECS fees must have gone to waste. I'll be > > > > sure to go to uni and inform my lecturers of their mistakes, and I shall > > > > also contact some of the well known academic publishers such as Oxford > > > > University Press and Camrbdige University Press etc who have printed > > > > textbooks and inform them that the definition of the atmosphere has > > > > changed in accordance with yout statement. > > > If you say so, but don't get too drastic, Anthony, they were only doing > > > their best.. > > > > > > > In space there is no air... > > > Correct > > > > > > > in the thermosphere there is air. > > > Incorrect. You couldn't breathe there without oxygen. > > > > > > > Furthermore, there's not much air in the mesosphere or > > > > stratosphere, should I also inform my lecturers and scholars that > > > > they're not a part of the atmosphere too? > > > Suit yourself. > > > > > > > Where would you like the > > > > atmosphere to end, Ken? 6km up in the atmosphere and you're already > > > > above half of the available air. 15-16km and you're above 90% of the > > > > air, shall we call the upper part of the troposphere the end of the > > > > atmosphere? > > > Yes, for purposes of this discussion. Where is the end of your finger if > > > viewed under an electron microscope? Impossible to determine. At that level > > > of scrutiny the "fingerness" just gets less and less in density. That's the > > > scale of measurement we're doing here. > > > > > > > What I have a problem with is supporting > > > > their method with incorrect information!!! > > > Me too, same.. > > > > > > > There are people on this > > > > list who might actually think that things you have said (for instance, > > > > you once explained that the poles are colder because the coldness of > > > > space is closer there than at the equator) are actually true! This is > > > > extremely wrong! > > > Do you agree that the useful atmosphere is only a mile high above the poles > > > and about 15 miles high at the equator, or not? If so then you must surely > > > accept that the cold of space comes down to near ground level. If not, then > > > how high do you think the atmosphere IS above the poles? Would you like me > > > to give you refs. to the studies done that I have read about and downloaded > > > from the net accordingly? I didn't make this stuff up - it's well documented > > > by NASA and others. > > > > > > .> It's cold there because the sun shines on it at an > > > > angle so the rays aren't as strong as they're spread over a wider > > > > angle. > > > I agree, sure that adds to it, but it's not the whole story. > > > > > > > Furthermore, when people have told you they're wrong you don't > > > > believe them. I tried the nice tactic a while ago, it didn't work. > > > I see, according to the Anthony Law, just because someone tells me I'm wrong > > > I have to believe them. Doesn't seem like a scientific discussion at that > > > point. Were you a bully in the school playground too? > > > > > > > You > > > > only seem to respond to emails with anger in them. > > > No, I enjoy others too, but the angry ones tell me the writers are probably > > > afraid of changing their mindsets, which is not my problem.. > > > > > > > Don't twist things around to make them suit your opinion...find some > > > > other way of describing it, just don't describe something you've already > > > > been informed as being wrong! > > > I'll try to remember that. Thanks for the advice. In return, may I suggest > > > you try to apply some commonsense to what you say, instead of just repeating > > > off what you have read in obsolete textbooks. > > > And thanks for taking trouble with your replies. I mean that sincerely. We > > > may disagree but I welcome the chance to present an alternative viewpoint. I > > > have been a scientist for 30 years. I am sad to say that in my opinion much > > > of current science has been hijacked by politics and profit and the much of > > > the real research now being done that anyone can trust is by those who get > > > labelled mavericks. > > > > > > > > Well, some corrections are necessary here. > > > > > The thermosphere is not strictly the atmosphere, it is beyond it. The > > > > > atmosphere, by definition, is the name for our region of air. But there > > > aint > > > > > much air in the old thermosphere. The thermosphere is the highest and > > > the > > > > > largest of the four layers because it's just about space. But it's not > > > as if > > > > > there are dividing lines. It's not like those coloured sand-in-bottle > > > > > things. The few molecules that are present in the thermosphere receive > > > > > extraordinary amounts of energy from the Sun, causing the layer to warm > > > to > > > > > such high temperatures. Air temperature, however, is a measure of the > > > > > kinetic energy of air molecules, not of the total energy stored by the > > > air. > > > > > Therefore, since the air is so thin within the thermosphere, such > > > > > temperature values are not comparable to those of the troposphere or > > > > > stratosphere. (ref > > > > > http://www.doc.mmu.ac.uk/aric/eae/Atmosphere/Older/Thermosphere.html) > > > > > "Although the measured temperature is very hot, the thermosphere would > > > > > actually feel very COLD to us because the total energy of only a few air > > > > > molecules residing there would not be enough to transfer any appreciable > > > > > heat to our skin"(quote from the above website). > > > > > So as far as I'm concerned my model of the cold of space stands intact. > > > > > Sorry that you're getting angry, Anthony. Clearly up till now you have > > > not > > > > > had the correct information. > > > > > Ken > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Anthony Cornelius" > > > > > To: > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:48 AM > > > > > Subject: Re: aus-wx: our "drought" > > > > > > > > > > > Ken, > > > > > > > > > > > > I posted some stuff to you a while back and you conveniently ignored > > > > > > it. Now, it is not the moon controlling the weather that I have a > > > > > > problem with, I belive it does have an effect, but not to the extent > > > > > > that you portray. > > > > > > > > > > > > However things like... > > > > > > > > > > > > Ken Ring wrote: > > > > > > With atmospheric > > > > > > > pressure out of your mind try to visualise that when the moon is out > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > sky the height of the atmosphere changes, i.e. it lowers and lets > > > the > > > > > cold > > > > > > > of space come closer to ground level. > > > > > > > > > > > > Several people have pointed out to you that your reasoning here is > > > > > > TOTALLY WRONG! Yet you CONTINUE TO IGNORE THEM!!! This frustrates > > > > > > people (including myself!) Are you forgetting the rest of the > > > > > > atmosphere??? How high do you think the atmosphere is? 15km? Have a > > > > > > look at this diagram: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/space/atmos.gif > > > > > > > > > > > > There are not one, BUT TWO warm layers above the surface! First is > > > the > > > > > > tropopause near the stratosphere, the second is the thermosphere. The > > > > > > thermosphere is so hot it's over a thousand degrees!!! If your theory > > > > > > of the "coldness of space" is correct, then if anything we should be > > > > > > getting warmer because the thermosphere would be coming closer to us. > > > > > > Space doesn't start for over a thousand kilometres...then it gets > > > cold! > > > > > > But we have several protective layers that separates us from them. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you're going to issue forecasts, fine. But for goodness sake don't > > > > > > support them with dribble like that (and continue to support them even > > > > > > when people have TOLD you it is totally WRONG). In fact, I suspect > > > that > > > > > > is what a lot of people have been frustrated with. Not the issuing of > > > > > > your unique forecasts, but the INCORRECT INFORMATION you support your > > > > > > method with! I for one would much rather you say "I believe there is > > > a > > > > > > relationship there, and I believe this will happen but I can't explain > > > > > > why" then to teach bad meteorology. Sure everyone gets the wrong idea > > > > > > every so often...but to continue to teach that idea when you've been > > > > > > told your wrong to me shows that the most closed-minded person here is > > > > > > you Ken. > > > > > > > > > > > > AC > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [203.0.101.6] From: "David Croan" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: NZ Tornados Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:07:53 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2002 06:07:54.0056 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF4EA480:01C27FDA] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com John and Kevin; There are many documented tornadic storms that are labelled as "mini-supercells" which is not so surprising I suppose. A supercell, well one definition anyway, is a storm characterised by the presence of a mesocyclone that meets certain threshold values with respect to depth/diameter, duration, shear and maybe others - I'm not sure. Obviously these cut-off values are subjective. Any storm that can get up to the widely accepted threshold levels is likely to be quite nasty and the emphasis is on severe weather forecasting. Of course, there are many storms that do contain a mesocyclone, depending exactly on how you define that as well, that do not qualify as a supercell by definition. Even though these are obviously the same sort of thing on a smaller scale to varying degrees, I suppose one is forced to come up with terms such as 'mini-supercell' so as not to detract from the definition itself. http://www.wdtb.noaa.gov/resources/PAPERS/MINIMESO/minimeso.htm Anyway, after reading your own observations and the newspaper article report John, the NZ storms dont sound terribly mini-to me. Good stuff! :) >From: "Kevin Phyland" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: NZ Tornados >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:14:40 +1100 > > > >Hi John, > >Congrats!!! You've also touched on one of my pet theories...that some >storms which produce tornadoes (not necesarily "gustnadoes" (sic) either) >may not obey the classical or traditional Great Plains model of supercell >development. > >Good catch anyway, man! > >Cheers, >Kevin from Wycheproof. > > _________________________________________________________________ Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Bussy" To: "aussie-weather" Subject: aus-wx: I'm out Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:11:46 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
See ya later guys. I can't believe that we have delved so low as to (sorry) shitcan everyone else's ideas. This list has always been great reading but not 200 messages a day shit canning each other. Sorry for my language and I have now Un-subbed.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
X-Sender: goriley at mail.tsn.cc X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:36:12 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Glen O'Riley" Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm out Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well said there old chap. I have been gradually getting the shits with the list. There seems to be very few topics/posts of interest.

At 07:11 PM 30/10/2002 +1100, you wrote:
See ya later guys. I can't believe that we have delved so low as to (sorry) shitcan everyone else's ideas. This list has always been great reading but not 200 messages a day shit canning each other. Sorry for my language and I have now Un-subbed.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "Laurier Williams" To: "Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com" Subject: aus-wx: AWN hourly charts updating again Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:40:35 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com The Digital Atmosphere hourly charts of Australia (http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml) are updating automatically again -- and hopefully will continue to do so. I've spent a tedious afternoon converting the processing computer and all scripts over to a UTC base, as DA's script scheduler spat the dummy at working with clock times that are ahead of UTC (like Australia's :)) As a result of the change, the script scheduler will hopefully work through the full 24 hours, then repeat at 00 UTC -- time will tell. I *think* that all the other real-time stuff on the site is updating with the proper local times, but reply to this thread if you notice anything weird happening. Laurier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:38:39 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2002 09:37:04.0929 (UTC) FILETIME=[E835E110:01C27FF7] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real weather did not take the digital. Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of localised dust being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in very sharp edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. Looked quite spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and drought affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison ). This was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a sudden greening just south of Goulburn. Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Brooker, Sean SD" To: "'aussie-weather at world.std.com'" Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm out Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:39:47 +1100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
I have been a silent member of this list for a couple of months. Trying to glean as much info from the well written info that appears here everyday.
I agree with Bussy - some of you need to grow up or the list will die.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Bussy [mailto:bussie at netc.net.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 4:12 PM
To: aussie-weather
Subject: aus-wx: I'm out

See ya later guys. I can't believe that we have delved so low as to (sorry) shitcan everyone else's ideas. This list has always been great reading but not 200 messages a day shit canning each other. Sorry for my language and I have now Un-subbed.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

From: "Peter Matters" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm out Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:31:07 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi all, I have to agree with Michael Thompson. The couple of emails I read, lead me to delete all other related emails. This was not going to stop me from learning from the heaps of other very informative emails to the list:-)) My 2 cents. Peter (Didjman) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Thompson" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:01 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm out Calm down, just hit the delete key a few times like I do, there are too many other important and sensible discussions for me to get radical and unsubscribe, that's akin to cutting off your toe to prove a point Micha +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: Goodbye Ken . . . Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:34:32 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Ok Ken, now you are making me a little angry . . . >"I think your comparison system is at fault because you are only looking for it to show up as negative" >"It is much too easy for you to call me wrong whatever I say, due to your personal bias." There is absolutely NO personal bias in the tornado analysis that I recently undertook- and if it had shown up positive, then I would have happily posted the results here! Both it and the cyclone analysis have shown your theories to be completely unsustainable. Why can you not admit that? If you really think there is personal bias in what I have done, then what you are implying is that I have fudged the data, an accusation which, lets just say, I find exceedingly unpalatable . . . However, I have made all my analysis available and open for criticism. To go further, "I agree with you that no one can prove I'm correct or incorrect because the variables are too great" How convenient . . . You have written a bunch of books which no doubt sell, you have created a web-site which no doubt helps sell those books, and you no doubt sell your predictions to Lifestyle farmer magazine. Interesting how it is all of a sudden impossible to test whether your predictions are based on a reasonable theory or are no more then pure, unadulterated entertainment. I have shown, in plain simple terms that anyone, from a non science background could easily understand, that your predictions regarding TC's and tornados are completely false, and what have you said? NOTHING directly regarding any of those analysis, other than to accuse me of personal bias. Well Ken it is time to go shove it, I put a lot of effort into that analysis and you dismiss it out of hand because you are so deluded by "theory" that you cannot be man enough to admit when you are wrong. . . From: "Jane ONeill" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm out Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:37:56 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Hi Sean,
 
Fear not - the aussie-weather list will never die...it just goes through stages....and as people take their 'indepth discussions' away from the public forum and begin to conduct them in private, the list becomes active once more......it will happen, as we've watched it happen a number of time over the past few years.
 
back to the weather...I've got a number more images now of that amazing duststorm that was over eastern Australia, (with many thanks to those who have found them and sent them through), these images form NASA - I'll create a gallery of them during the next day or so.
 
Cheers,
 
Jane
<I'm not going anywhere>

--------------------------------
Jane ONeill - Melbourne
cadence at australianskynweather.com
 
Australian Sky & Weather
http://www.stormchasers.au.com
 
Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA)
http://www.severeweather.asn.au
--------------------------------
 
 
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:39 PM
Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm out

I have been a silent member of this list for a couple of months. Trying to glean as much info from the well written info that appears here everyday.
I agree with Bussy - some of you need to grow up or the list will die.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Bussy [mailto:bussie at netc.net.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 4:12 PM
To: aussie-weather
Subject: aus-wx: I'm out

See ya later guys. I can't believe that we have delved so low as to (sorry) shitcan everyone else's ideas. This list has always been great reading but not 200 messages a day shit canning each other. Sorry for my language and I have now Un-subbed.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: aus-wx: I'm NOT out (was: I'm out) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:47:49 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
Good grief. Far from dying, the list has been more active in the past week than it has in the past year! I seriously thought during the winter that it would quietly atrophy given the traffic that has transferred to WeatherZone.
 
While strong language and entrenched ideas have been expressed on both sides, we should not shrink away from energetic discussion. Ideas only get honed by intelligent debate, and where issues are highly contentious it is difficult for the debate not to get heated. Those that prefer everyone to be "nice" can always hit the delete key on threads they don't like and wait for the weather to improve. Or begin new threads of their own.
 
Alternative bases for weather forecasting have been around longer than meteorology. The moon, frogs, ants, lumbago, tea leaves... And rarely have I come across an exponent as willing and lucid as Ken. I disagree with just about everything he says, but the argy bargy that has ensued has been hugely instructive and frequently entertaining.
 
Laurier
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Brooker, Sean SD
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October, 2002 09:40
To: 'aussie-weather at world.std.com'
Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm out

I have been a silent member of this list for a couple of months. Trying to glean as much info from the well written info that appears here everyday.
I agree with Bussy - some of you need to grow up or the list will die.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Bussy [mailto:bussie at netc.net.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 4:12 PM
To: aussie-weather
Subject: aus-wx: I'm out

See ya later guys. I can't believe that we have delved so low as to (sorry) shitcan everyone else's ideas. This list has always been great reading but not 200 messages a day shit canning each other. Sorry for my language and I have now Un-subbed.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

X-Sender: jdeguara at australiasevereweather.com at mail.australiasevereweather.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:49:17 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Jimmy Deguara Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm out Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Come on guys, I bet if you were all talking to each other, it would be a different story. Sometimes the protection of the internet allows some unusual talk. Also please understand that to describe feelings are not always easy. I suppose a drought of the weather also attracts a drought in the posts. Let's just get back on topic I suppose and not start another set of posts relating to somebody's departure. Once the storms and other forms of significant weather begin, this won't happen. Let's hope November delivers. Can't wait until the chases begin!!! Jimmy Deguara http://www.thunderbolttours.com/ At 07:36 PM 30/10/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Well said there old chap. I have been gradually getting the shits with the >list. There seems to be very few topics/posts of interest. > >At 07:11 PM 30/10/2002 +1100, you wrote: >>See ya later guys. I can't believe that we have delved so low as to >>(sorry) shitcan everyone else's ideas. This list has always been great >>reading but not 200 messages a day shit canning each other. Sorry for my >>language and I have now Un-subbed. >> >>Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To >unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your >message. >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: vk3jed-1 at 192.168.15.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:19:58 +1100 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: "Tony Langdon (VK3JED)" Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm out Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com At 09:49 PM 30/10/2002 +1100, you wrote: >Come on guys, > >I bet if you were all talking to each other, it would be a different >story. Sometimes the protection of the internet allows some unusual talk. >Also please understand that to describe feelings are not always easy. I >suppose a drought of the weather also attracts a drought in the posts. > >Let's just get back on topic I suppose and not start another set of posts >relating to somebody's departure. > >Once the storms and other forms of significant weather begin, this won't >happen. Let's hope November delivers. Can't wait until the chases begin!!! Well said. In the meantime, there are ASWA functions to attend and other things to do... I dunno how we'll go for storms this year, with the dry upon it, it might be a lean summer. :-( 73 de Tony, VK3JED http://vkradio.com +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:46:59 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm out Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com I agree with Laurie and others. A good debAte requires a bit of "heat"... I too find Ken 's theories interesting but doubtful. I agree that he expresses his idesa effectively - even if frustratingly and illogically at times but I have enjoyed the discussion. Bussy - if you read this, I am surprised and disappointed by your reaction... oyur input to this list has always been on interest and that is the purposes of such an interchange. To react in such a way seems to have gone against everything else you have given over the recent months.... maybe you were caught at a bad time. As for Sean... I haven't come across any of your postings previously... your first I saw was earlier tonight and so negative and useless that I can see why your contributions might have been limited. Back to the weather... my main concern with Ken is that I believe his unwillingness to accept testing of ideas reflects what I have been fighting against for a long time... acceptance of meteorology as a science and as a challenge. I really believe "leg pullers"like Ken contribute to the negative community attitude to meteorology. If it was medicine or law, Ken would be barred. The meteorological community is more tolerant (despite Bussy and Seans petulant responses) and from that stems enjoyable discussion. We are all wrong sometimes.... admitting statements are wrong, such as Ken's obviously silly assertions about formation times of cyclones etc, is harder but necessary if we are to move forward. In recent years, the accuracy of forecasting has been almost impossible to statistically support. Like Ken I provide forecasts to client who require a level of detail and analysis beyond which is available on the public weather products from the Bureau of Meteorology. Like Ken, I rely on client response. (I am assuming Ken has clients who pay). If my forecasts were inferior to the BoM product which is freely available then I would have been out of business 25 years ago. They are not... that is why I am still in business and if Ken has manged to convince people to pay for his assessments - then good luk to him. But that is not sufficient. Let's continue the discussion... let's "stick it up him"or "agree with him".... it's all good fun. And good on James... your analyses have been great to read and the most contructive contribution to thios debate. Cheers, Don White PS Excuse the odd spelling mistake, Ken. I am sure David Jones was tired too. Jimmy Deguara wrote: > > Come on guys, > > I bet if you were all talking to each other, it would be a different story. > Sometimes the protection of the internet allows some unusual talk. Also > please understand that to describe feelings are not always easy. I suppose > a drought of the weather also attracts a drought in the posts. > > Let's just get back on topic I suppose and not start another set of posts > relating to somebody's departure. > > Once the storms and other forms of significant weather begin, this won't > happen. Let's hope November delivers. Can't wait until the chases begin!!! > > Jimmy Deguara > > http://www.thunderbolttours.com/ > > At 07:36 PM 30/10/2002 +1100, you wrote: > >Well said there old chap. I have been gradually getting the shits with the > >list. There seems to be very few topics/posts of interest. > > > >At 07:11 PM 30/10/2002 +1100, you wrote: > >>See ya later guys. I can't believe that we have delved so low as to > >>(sorry) shitcan everyone else's ideas. This list has always been great > >>reading but not 200 messages a day shit canning each other. Sorry for my > >>language and I have now Un-subbed. > >> > >>Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria) > >+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To > >unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > >with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > >message. > >-----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm NOT out (was: I'm out) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:26:15 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
yeah, gets a bit ugly sometimes, 'tis the nature of the beast, lol
i'm with you laurier, i'll just roll with the punches.
much to some peoples horror, i ain't goin' nowhere either.
 
james, i know your a bit jacked off atm, for what it's worth
imo your conclusions are correct,  your efforts are appreciated
and your frustration is understandable, please when things cool a bit
could you do the stats on the lifespan of TCs over the years, it'd be
interesting to see if there's any variation or even better, cycles.
 
jane, you got any thoughts on this weekend? 
 
regards
richard
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:17 PM
Subject: aus-wx: I'm NOT out (was: I'm out)

Good grief. Far from dying, the list has been more active in the past week than it has in the past year! I seriously thought during the winter that it would quietly atrophy given the traffic that has transferred to WeatherZone.
 
While strong language and entrenched ideas have been expressed on both sides, we should not shrink away from energetic discussion. Ideas only get honed by intelligent debate, and where issues are highly contentious it is difficult for the debate not to get heated. Those that prefer everyone to be "nice" can always hit the delete key on threads they don't like and wait for the weather to improve. Or begin new threads of their own.
 
Alternative bases for weather forecasting have been around longer than meteorology. The moon, frogs, ants, lumbago, tea leaves... And rarely have I come across an exponent as willing and lucid as Ken. I disagree with just about everything he says, but the argy bargy that has ensued has been hugely instructive and frequently entertaining.
 
Laurier
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Brooker, Sean SD
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October, 2002 09:40
To: 'aussie-weather at world.std.com'
Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm out

I have been a silent member of this list for a couple of months. Trying to glean as much info from the well written info that appears here everyday.
I agree with Bussy - some of you need to grow up or the list will die.
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: Bussy [mailto:bussie at netc.net.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 4:12 PM
To: aussie-weather
Subject: aus-wx: I'm out

See ya later guys. I can't believe that we have delved so low as to (sorry) shitcan everyone else's ideas. This list has always been great reading but not 200 messages a day shit canning each other. Sorry for my language and I have now Un-subbed.
 
Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)

EOM


NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.

From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Subject: aus-wx: East Australian Dust Storm Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:17:51 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com As promised, a few more images are now in the collection with much thanks to the BoM & NASA & the collector of the images..... still more to come. http://www.stormchasers.au.com/dust1002.htm Enjoy!! Jane -------------------------------- Jane ONeill - Melbourne cadence at australianskynweather.com Australian Sky & Weather http://www.stormchasers.au.com Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) http://www.severeweather.asn.au -------------------------------- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Richard Modistach" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: East Australian Dust Storm Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:14:14 +1030 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com hi jane, exellent pics and theres more to come, will you have pics. of the duststorm from a ground point of view?, there must be some rippers out there. also would it be possible to put up some analysis charts. regards richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jane ONeill" To: "Aussie-wx" Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:47 PM Subject: aus-wx: East Australian Dust Storm > As promised, a few more images are now in the collection with much > thanks to the BoM & NASA & the collector of the images..... still more > to come. > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/dust1002.htm > > Enjoy!! > > Jane > > -------------------------------- > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > Australian Sky & Weather > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "James Holbeach" To: Subject: aus-wx: RE: Goodbye Ken . . . Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:34:24 +1100 Organization: Trapdoor Ski Club X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Unfortunately the rest of my post did not come up . . . so here it is in full (fingers crossed) Ok Ken, now you are making me a little angry . . . >"I think your comparison system is at fault because you are only >looking for it to show up as negative" "It is much too easy for you to >call me wrong whatever I say, due to your personal bias." There is absolutely NO personal bias in the tornado analysis that I recently undertook- and if it had shown up positive, then I would have happily posted the results here! Both it and the cyclone analysis have shown your theories to be completely unsustainable. Why can you not admit that? If you really think there is personal bias in what I have done, then what you are implying is that I have fudged the data, an accusation which, lets just say, I find exceedingly unpalatable . . . However, I have made all my analysis available and open for criticism. To go further, "I agree with you that no one can prove I'm correct or incorrect because the variables are too great" How convenient . . . You have written a bunch of books which no doubt sell, you have created a web-site which no doubt helps sell those books, and you no doubt sell your predictions to Lifestyle farmer magazine. Interesting how it is all of a sudden impossible to test whether your predictions are based on a reasonable theory or are no more then pure, unadulterated entertainment. I have shown, in plain simple terms that anyone, from a non science background could easily understand, that your predictions regarding TC's and tornados are completely false, and what have you said? NOTHING directly regarding any of those analysis, other than to accuse me of personal bias. Well Ken it is time to go shove it, I put a lot of effort into that analysis and you dismiss it out of hand because you are so deluded by "theory" that you cannot be man enough to admit when you are wrong. . . From: "Ken Ring" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: RE: Goodbye Ken . . . Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:56:46 +1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > you cannot be man enough to admit when you are wrong. . . Fair enough, if you say wrong, then I admit it +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [152.91.9.49] From: "michael king" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: I'm NOT out (was: I'm out) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:58:08 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2002 21:58:09.0020 (UTC) FILETIME=[6EDFBBC0:01C2805F] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com

I agree.  We're not a bunch of diplomats who must use language so emasculated and designed not to offend, that it's devoid of content.  At the same time, however, people should be prepared to justify their theories and others must feel able to challenge these ideas.  We must 'play the ball', and not 'play the man', to use an AFL analogy.  Sometimes its a fine line to tread.



 

>From: "Laurier Williams"
>Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com
>To:
>Subject: aus-wx: I'm NOT out (was: I'm out)
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:47:49 -0000
>
>Good grief. Far from dying, the list has been more active in the past week
>than it has in the past year! I seriously thought during the winter that it
>would quietly atrophy given the traffic that has transferred to WeatherZone.
>
>While strong language and entrenched ideas have been expressed on both
>sides, we should not shrink away from energetic discussion. Ideas only get
>honed by intelligent debate, and where issues are highly contentious it is
>difficult for the debate not to get heated. Those that prefer everyone to be
>"nice" can always hit the delete key on threads they don't like and wait for
>the weather to improve. Or begin new threads of their own.
>
>Alternative bases for weather forecasting have been around longer than
>meteorology. The moon, frogs, ants, lumbago, tea leaves... And rarely have I
>come across an exponent as willing and lucid as Ken. I disagree with just
>about everything he says, but the argy bargy that has ensued has been hugely
>instructive and frequently entertaining.
>
>Laurier
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com
>[mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Brooker, Sean SD
>Sent: Wednesday, 30 October, 2002 09:40
>To: 'aussie-weather at world.std.com'
>Subject: RE: aus-wx: I'm out
>
>
> I have been a silent member of this list for a couple of months. Trying to
>glean as much info from the well written info that appears here everyday.
> I agree with Bussy - some of you need to grow up or the list will die.
> Sean
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bussy [mailto:bussie at netc.net.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 4:12 PM
> To: aussie-weather
> Subject: aus-wx: I'm out
>
>
> See ya later guys. I can't believe that we have delved so low as to
>(sorry) shitcan everyone else's ideas. This list has always been great
>reading but not 200 messages a day shit canning each other. Sorry for my
>language and I have now Un-subbed.
>
> Bussy (Rutherglen NE Victoria)
>
>
> EOM
>
>
>
> NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that
>is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by
>the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
>responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised
>that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination,
>copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is
>the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message
>in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.


Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now! Click Here +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------
From: "Laurier Williams" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: AWN hourly charts updating again Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:19:30 -0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Well, everything is working fine at this end but now my host site has gone down. Whenever it comes back up, the charts (and other data) should update. Laurier > -----Original Message----- > From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com > [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Laurier > Williams > Sent: Wednesday, 30 October, 2002 08:41 > To: Aussie-Weather at World. Std. Com > Subject: aus-wx: AWN hourly charts updating again > > > The Digital Atmosphere hourly charts of Australia > (http://www.australianweathernews.com/charts.shtml) are updating > automatically again -- and hopefully will continue to do so. I've spent a > tedious afternoon converting the processing computer and all > scripts over to > a UTC base, as DA's script scheduler spat the dummy at working with clock > times that are ahead of UTC (like Australia's :)) > > As a result of the change, the script scheduler will hopefully > work through > the full 24 hours, then repeat at 00 UTC -- time will tell. > > I *think* that all the other real-time stuff on the site is updating with > the proper local times, but reply to this thread if you notice anything > weird happening. > > Laurier > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Sender: hdewit at mail.sa.bom.gov.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:03:25 +1030 To: aussie-weather at world.std.com From: Hank de Wit Subject: Re: aus-wx: TC duration distribution Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi James,

I'm sorry about all the angst you had with Ken following your statistical analysis of cyclones and tornadoes. However I couldn't see how it would end any other way. Ken's approach is pre-scientific (note his references to Astrology, Kepler, his 'theory' of 'cold', etc) and any scientific critique would be viewed with suspicion by him. The two world views are just so different.

However, the real point of my email, a few gems of interesting information did come out of the discussion.

One that appealed to me was your analysis of Cyclone duration times, which you showed had the wonderful distribution below.

        http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/cyclone-length-histogram.gif

This appears to be the famous Weibull distribution. It is widely used in industry to predict/analyse the failure of parts. It's interesting to think of a cyclone as a failing part, but I suppose that's clearly true.

There are thousands of pages on the web about Weibull, but these a good start:

        http://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue14/relbasics14.htm
        http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda3668.htm

The Weibull distribution has two main parameters, a scale parameter, and a shape parameter. The shape parameter is the more interesting.

Your cyclone distribution looks similar to some wind distributions I was dealing with a few months ago which have a shape parameter near 2 (special case called the Rayleigh distribution). In the web pages on Weibull, a shape parameter>1 is associated with a failure rate increasing with time.

I thought this might be interesting to you and some compensation for all the work you put into your battle with Ken.

Cheers
Hank

At 12:07 AM 28/10/2002 +1100, you wrote:

Well I said I d do it tomorrow but this daylight saving this has me well and truly awake LOL

While I was doing this I also came up with an interesting histogram for the duration of cyclones!

http://www.trapdoor.com.au/weather/cyclone-length-histogram.gif
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:10:37 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: East Australian Dust Storm Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Hi Richard and everyone I put together a little something about the dust storm on sydney storm chasers a few days ago, will add too it next week with some mslp etc when i get the time. http://www.sydneystormchasers.com , link is on the right, under the NZ tornado event :), its not much, but hopefully over time will add to it...although its only dust.. you can only write so much :P Matt Smith Richard Modistach wrote: > hi jane, > > exellent pics and theres more to come, will you have pics. of the duststorm > from a ground point of view?, there must be some rippers out there. also > would it be possible to put up some analysis charts. > > regards > richard > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jane ONeill" > To: "Aussie-wx" > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:47 PM > Subject: aus-wx: East Australian Dust Storm > > > As promised, a few more images are now in the collection with much > > thanks to the BoM & NASA & the collector of the images..... still more > > to come. > > > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com/dust1002.htm > > > > Enjoy!! > > > > Jane > > > > -------------------------------- > > Jane ONeill - Melbourne > > cadence at australianskynweather.com > > > > Australian Sky & Weather > > http://www.stormchasers.au.com > > > > Australian Severe Weather Assocn (ASWA) > > http://www.severeweather.asn.au > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 From: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com wow! Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you would see much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. Matt Smith Michael Thompson wrote: > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real weather did > not take the digital. > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of localised dust > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in very sharp > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. Looked quite > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and drought > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison ). This > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a sudden > greening just south of Goulburn. > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 From: "Phil Smith" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George X-Mailer: WorldClient 6.0.7 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.2 X-Return-Path: SmithP at ics.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com "Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle of water in the far distance. I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. Phil <>< International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Smith To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > wow! > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > would see > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > Matt Smith > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > weather did > > not take the digital. > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > localised dust > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in very > sharp > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > Looked quite > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > drought > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > ). This > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > sudden > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > + > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > - +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ X-Originating-IP: [144.132.18.241] From: "Liam Domanski" To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 19:07:59 +1100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2002 08:07:59.0539 (UTC) FILETIME=[A085D830:01C280B4] Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! Perhaps they drink all the water some years! Liam >From: "Phil Smith" >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle >of water in the far distance. >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > >Phil ><>< > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Matthew Smith >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > wow! > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > would see > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > Matt Smith > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > weather did > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > localised dust > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in very > > sharp > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > Looked quite > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > drought > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > ). This > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > sudden > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > > message. > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > + > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > - > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:36:22 +1100 From: Don White X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com True Liam, but I believe there is evidence that this only happens before a full moon. Comments Ken? Liam Domanski wrote: > > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > Liam > > >From: "Phil Smith" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > >of water in the far distance. > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > >Phil > ><>< > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Matthew Smith > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > wow! > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > > would see > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > weather did > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > localised dust > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in very > > > sharp > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > Looked quite > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > drought > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > > ). This > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > > sudden > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > + > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > message. > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > - > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > _________________________________________________________________ > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Michael Thompson" To: Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:53:40 +1100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.ns4ua.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - world.std.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ozthunder.com Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a young lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and could not see how even then. I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. Like Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and wonder where the water went. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Liam Domanski" To: Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > Liam > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > >of water in the far distance. > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > >Phil > ><>< > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Matthew Smith > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > wow! > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > > would see > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > weather did > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > localised dust > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in very > > > sharp > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > Looked quite > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > drought > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > > ). This > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > > sudden > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > + > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > - > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ From: "Paul Yole" To: Subject: RE: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:10:06 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal Sender: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com It neither goes to Mt Gambier of some secret cave. We got Jeff kennet working for us still, and he stole it like he also stole the Grand Prix off South Australia...LOL (Although with Vic's water supplies as they are...Jeff...where did you exactly put the water???) PaulY -----Original Message----- From: aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com [mailto:aussie-weather-approval at world.std.com]On Behalf Of Michael Thompson Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:54 AM To: aussie-weather at world.std.com Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George It's funny you should say that as my first sight of the Lake was as a young lad in the early 1960's. Similar story except my father said it was connected to the lake at Mt Gambier in Victoria. Even though I was only 7 or 8 years old I was a keen rock collector and could not see how even then. I suppose people cannot pick long term trends as easily as short ones. Like Lake George will slowly dry over a number of just slightly dry years, perhaps not even drought years, so they look at the green pastures and wonder where the water went. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Liam Domanski" To: Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:07 PM Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > When I lived in Canberra years ago, there used to be a story going around > how Lake George was connected by an underground cave system to Lach Ness, > and that there had been monsters spotted cruising the lake!!! > > > Perhaps they drink all the water some years! > > > Liam > > > > > > >From: "Phil Smith" > >Reply-To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:39:48 +0800 > > > >"Lake George" is often a misnomer. Some years, you drive past and the > >water is almost lapping the main road. Other years it's as dry as a > >desert. In between years you might see miles of paddocks with a puddle > >of water in the far distance. > >I haven't been past in the last 15 years, but I assume since the dust is > >being lifted that it is dry or almost dry at present. > > > >Phil > ><>< > > > >International Christian School E-mail: SmithP at ics.edu.hk > >Doctor Disk Limited E-mail: phil at drdisk.com.hk > >Web-site: http://www.drdisk.com.hk > >Weather: http://www.drdisk.com.hk/cyclones.htm > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Matthew Smith > >To: aussie-weather at world.std.com > >Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:18:49 +1100 > >Subject: Re: aus-wx: Lifted Dust over Lake George > > > > > wow! > > > Sounds interesting Michael... I guess raised dust is not something you > > > would see > > > much of on a lake... would have been a sight to see. > > > > > > Matt Smith > > > > > > Michael Thompson wrote: > > > > > > > Was in Canberra yesterday and today and not expecting any real > > > weather did > > > > not take the digital. > > > > > > > > Bad mistake as around 3.30pm this afternoon was the sight of > > > localised dust > > > > being lifted over the SE corner of Lake George, it was lifted in very > > > sharp > > > > edged sheets and extended perhaps 100m into the air at highest. > > > Looked quite > > > > spectacular, largest would have been about 2kms long. > > > > > > > > Also noted that the hills east of Lake George were very brown and > > > drought > > > > affected, whilst the range just west is quite green ( in comparison > > > ). This > > > > was something I noticed two weeks ago on a similar Canberra trip, a > > > sudden > > > > greening just south of Goulburn. > > > > > > > > Some virga around 3.15 near Canberra too. > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > > Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 > > > > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > > message. > > > > > > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > > > + > > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail > > > to:majordomo at world.std.com > > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of > > > your > > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au----------------------------- > > > - > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > > message. > > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com > with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your > message. > -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.406 / Virus Database: 229 - Release Date: 21/10/02 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ To unsubscribe from aussie-weather send e-mail to:majordomo at world.std.com with "unsubscribe aussie-weather your_email_address" in the body of your message. -----------------------jacob at iinet.net.au------------------------------